Daimler Trucks North America, Grant of Petition for Decision of Inconsequential Noncompliance, 14325-14327 [2022-05304]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 49 / Monday, March 14, 2022 / Notices
reviews at this time including measures such
as color coding portions of the mold,
makding software changes to remove manual
data entry, and adding additional visual
quality checks of the molds when
information is changed. Cooper Tire is also
reviewing its inspection processes to ensure
that any errors are identified earlier and/or
prevented before they occur.
Cooper Tire concluded by expressing
the belief that the subject
noncompliances are inconsequential as
they relate to motor vehicle safety, and
that its petition to be exempted from
providing notification of the
noncompliance, as required by 49
U.S.C. 30118, and a remedy for the
noncompliance, as required by 49
U.S.C. 30120, should be granted.
NHTSA notes that the statutory
provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to
file petitions for a determination of
inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to
exempt manufacturers only from the
duties found in sections 30118 and
30120, respectively, to notify owners,
purchasers, and dealers of a defect or
noncompliance and to remedy the
defect or noncompliance. Therefore, any
decision on this petition only applies to
the subject tires that Cooper Tire no
longer controlled at the time it
determined that the noncompliance
existed. However, any decision on this
petition does not relieve vehicle
distributors and dealers of the
prohibitions on the sale, offer for sale,
or introduction or delivery for
introduction into interstate commerce of
the noncompliant buses under their
control after Cooper Tire notified them
that the subject noncompliance existed.
(Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120:
delegations of authority at 49 CFR 1.95 and
501.8)
Otto G. Matheke III,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2022–05305 Filed 3–11–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
[Docket No. NHTSA–2019–0008; Notice 2]
Daimler Trucks North America, Grant
of Petition for Decision of
Inconsequential Noncompliance
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Grant of petition.
AGENCY:
Daimler Trucks North
America (DTNA) has determined that
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:51 Mar 11, 2022
Jkt 256001
certain model year (MY) 2017–2019
Freightliner Cascadia motor vehicles do
not fully comply with Federal Motor
Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No.
108, Lamps, Reflective Devices, and
Associated Equipment. DTNA filed a
noncompliance report dated January 16,
2019. DTNA subsequently petitioned
NHTSA on February 8, 2019, for a
decision that the subject noncompliance
is inconsequential as it relates to motor
vehicle safety. This document
announces the grant of DTNA’s petition.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Leroy Angeles, Office of Vehicle Safety
Compliance, the National Highway
Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
telephone (202) 366–5304, leroy.angles@
dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Overview
DTNA has determined that certain
MY 2017–2019 Freightliner Cascadia
motor vehicles do not fully comply with
paragraph S6.2.1 of FMVSS No. 108,
Lamps, Reflective Devices, and
Associated Equipment (49 CFR
571.108). DTNA filed a noncompliance
report dated January 16, 2019, pursuant
to 49 CFR part 573, Defect and
Noncompliance Responsibility and
Reports. DTNA subsequently petitioned
NHTSA on February 8, 2019, for an
exemption from the notification and
remedy requirements of 49 U.S.C.
Chapter 301 on the basis that this
noncompliance is inconsequential as it
relates to motor vehicle safety pursuant
to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and 30120(h) and
49 CFR part 556, Exemption for
Inconsequential Defect or
Noncompliance.
Notice of receipt of DTNA’s petition
was published with a 30-day public
comment period, on February 27, 2020,
in the Federal Register (85 FR 11450).
No comments were received. To view
the petition and all supporting
documents log onto the Federal Docket
Management System (FDMS) website at
https://www.regulations.gov/. Then
follow the online search instructions to
locate docket number ‘‘NHTSA–2019–
0008.’’
II. Trucks Involved
Approximately 74,675 MY 2017–2019
Freightliner Cascadia motor vehicles,
manufactured between May 3, 2016, and
December 17, 2018, are potentially
involved.
III. Noncompliance
DTNA described the noncompliance
as automatic illumination of the stop
lamps when the low air pressure
warning indicator light illuminates.
Since low air pressure does not
PO 00000
Frm 00089
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
14325
necessarily activate the brakes or result
in braking without driver intervention,
this activation of the stop lamps does
not meet the requirements of S6.2.1 of
FMVSS No. 108.
IV. Rule Requirements
Paragraph S6.2.1 of FMVSS No. 108
includes the requirements relevant to
this petition. No additional lamp,
reflective device, or other motor vehicle
equipment is permitted to be installed
that impairs the effectiveness of lighting
equipment required by FMVSS No. 108.
V. Summary of DTNA’s Petition
The following views and arguments
presented in this section, ‘‘V. Summary
of DTNA’s Petition,’’ are the views and
arguments provided by DTNA.
DTNA described the subject
noncompliance and stated its belief that
the noncompliance is inconsequential
as it relates to motor vehicle safety.
DTNA submitted the following
background information on how their
air brake system affects the stop lamps:
DTNA’s air brake system is comprised
of two brake systems, primary and
secondary. The primary system controls
the service brakes on the drive axles,
and the secondary system controls the
service brakes on the steer axle, in
which the higher pressure of these two
controls the trailer service brakes. These
two systems are isolated from each other
so that if there is an air loss in one
system, the other system will still be
functional to control the vehicle service
brakes. When either one of the systems
drops below 70 psi, the low air warning
indicator light on the dash turns ON and
the stop lamps illuminate. However, if
this occurs, it does not mean that the
drive axle parking brakes being applied,
since the other brake system may still be
functional and keeping the brake from
applying. In such a situation, the air that
holds off the drive axle parking brakes
would be the higher pressure of either
primary or secondary air brake. In other
words, if the primary air brake pressure
falls below 70 psi, the indicator light
and stop lamps illuminate, but the
parking brakes do not start to drag since
the secondary air (presumably
unaffected) remains high and holds off
the parking springs. In the same
manner, the trailer parking brakes are
held off by the higher of either primary
or secondary air brake system. Only
when both air systems drop below about
70 psi will the trailer parking brakes
begin to apply.
DTNA submitted the following views
and arguments in support of the
petition:
1. The normal operating air pressure
of the vehicle is between 110 and 130
E:\FR\FM\14MRN1.SGM
14MRN1
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
14326
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 49 / Monday, March 14, 2022 / Notices
psi. There is a regulator that turns on
the air compressor if the air pressure is
below 110 psi and turns off the air
compressor when the system pressure is
above 130 psi. If the air pressure begins
to drop and reaches approximately 70
psi, the air system pressure is not
adequate to maintain optimum
operation, so a warning indicator light
illuminates on the dash and a buzzer
activates to alert the driver to this
condition. On these vehicles, the stop
lamps illuminate when the warning
indiactor light illuminates on the dash.
The events induced by a low air
condition after initial vehicle startup are
rare and are not expected in normal
operation. If the condition were to occur
during operation, the driver would be
alerted to the circumstances with
audible and visual low air warning
signals and would be expected to apply
the service brakes and pull over in a safe
manner. Additionally, if the pressure in
both air systems drops below 70 psi, the
parking brakes will slowly begin to
apply.
2. The Freightliner Cascadia Driver’s
Manual states ‘‘If the low air pressure
warning is activated, check the air
pressure gauges to determine which
system has low air pressure. Although
the vehicle’s speed can be reduced
using the foot brake control pedal, either
the front or rear service brakes will not
be operating at full capacity, causing a
longer stopping distance. Bring the
vehicle to a safe stop and have the air
system repaired before continuing.’’
3. Brakes are commonly applied
causing the stop lamps to illuminate
when a driver sees a vehicle display
warning or senses that the vehicle is
experiencing a problem. Reducing
vehicle speed in relation to a vehicle
operational problem increases safety,
providing following drivers the
opportunity to increase the following
distance. A low air warning indicator
light would likely cause the vehicle
driver to immediately engage the brake
system and bring the vehicle to a safe
stop. Stop lamp illumination for a brake
system low air event would help
provide early warning to following
drivers to slow down.
4. DTNA stated, in ‘‘Motorcoach
Brake Systems and Safety
Technologies,’’ the Federal Motor
Carrier Safety Administration issued
guidance, while directed toward
motorcoach drivers, that supports the
expectation that a driver, upon receipt
of a low-pressure warning, would apply
brakes and pull off the roadway.
FMCSA stated: ‘‘Low Pressure
Warning—In most cases, you should
notice an air leak or malfunction before
getting a low-pressure warning;
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:51 Mar 11, 2022
Jkt 256001
however, when a low-pressure warning
occurs, immediately bring the
motorcoach to a safe stop, off of the
roadway. Continuing to operate the
motorcoach could result in an automatic
application of the park brakes, possibly
leading to a loss of control or a stop in
an unsafe position.’’
5. DTNA is not aware of any
accidents, injuries, owner complaints,
or field reports related to this condition
on the subject vehicles.
6. DTNA also stated that NHTSA has
previously granted petitions for
decisions of inconsequential
noncompliance for lighting
requirements where technical
noncompliance exists, but does not
create a negative impact on safety:
• In General Motors Corporation;
Grant of Application for Decision of
Inconsequential Noncompliance. 66 FR
32871 (June 18, 2001) a petition for
inconsequentiality by General Motors
Corporation was granted by NHTSA. In
this instance, certain models could have
unintended CHMSL illumination briefly
if the hazard warning lamp switch is
depressed to its limit of travel.
• In General Motors, LLC, Grant of
Petition for Decision of Inconsequential
Noncompliance, a petition for
inconsequentiality by General Motors,
LLC (GM) was granted by NHTSA. See
83 FR 7847 (February 22, 2018). In this
instance, under certain conditions, the
parking lamps on the subject vehicles
fail to meet the requirement that parking
lamps must be activated when
headlamps are activated in a steady
burning state.
• In Grant of Application for
Determination of Inconsequential
Noncompliance with FMVSS No. 108, a
petition for inconsequentiality by
General Motors Corporation was granted
by NHTSA. See 64 FR 48231 (September
2, 1999). In this instance, a certain
model equipped with an electronic turn
signal was affected by random inputs
that cause the internal timing of the
electronic circuit to become
unsynchronized causing the left front
turn signal lamp to flash at a rapid rate
while the left rear turn signal lamp
illuminates but does not flash. These
conditions can continue after the turn
signal lever automatically returns to the
off position.
7. DTNA believes that a technical
noncompliance exists but does not
create a negative impact on safety when
the brake lamps illuminate during a
brake system low air warning event. The
stop lamp illumination serves to
emphasize the message to following
drivers that the vehicle is experiencing
trouble and they should pay close
attention. The Brake Air warning
PO 00000
Frm 00090
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
indicator light, on the driver’s display
panel, shows the driver that there is an
issue with the air brake system. This
would result in the driver bringing the
vehicle to a safe stop and having the air
system repaired before continuing.
DTNA concluded by expressing its
belief that the subject noncompliance is
inconsequential as it relates to motor
vehicle safety, and that its petition to be
exempted from providing notification of
the noncompliance, as required by 49
U.S.C. 30118, and a remedy for the
noncompliance, as required by 49
U.S.C. 30120, should be granted.
VI. NHTSA’s Analysis
The burden of establishing the
inconsequentiality of a failure to comply
with a performance requirement in a
standard—as opposed to a labeling
requirement with no performance
implications—is more substantial and
difficult to meet. Accordingly, the
Agency has not found many such
noncompliances inconsequential.1
Potential performance failures of safetycritical equipment, like seat belts or air
bags, are rarely deemed inconsequential.
An important issue to consider in
determining inconsequentiality is the
safety risk to individuals who
experience the type of event against
which the recall would otherwise
protect.2 In general, NHTSA does not
consider the absence of complaints or
injuries to show that the issue is
inconsequential to safety. ‘‘Most
importantly, the absence of a complaint
does not mean there have not been any
safety issues, nor does it mean that there
will not be safety issues in the future.’’ 3
‘‘[T]he fact that in past reported cases
good luck and swift reaction have
prevented many serious injuries does
not mean that good luck will continue
to work.’’ 4
1 Cf. Gen. Motors Corporation; Ruling on Petition
for Determination of Inconsequential
Noncompliance, 69 FR 19897, 19899 (Apr. 14,
2004) (citing prior cases where noncompliance was
expected to be imperceptible, or nearly so, to
vehicle occupants or approaching drivers).
2 See Gen. Motors, LLC; Grant of Petition for
Decision of Inconsequential Noncompliance, 78 FR
35355 (June 12, 2013) (finding noncompliance had
no effect on occupant safety because it had no effect
on the proper operation of the occupant
classification system and the correct deployment of
an air bag); Osram Sylvania Prods. Inc.; Grant of
Petition for Decision of Inconsequential
Noncompliance, 78 FR 46000 (July 30, 2013)
(finding occupant using noncompliant light source
would not be exposed to significantly greater risk
than occupant using similar compliant light
source).
3 Morgan 3 Wheeler Limited; Denial of Petition for
Decision of Inconsequential Noncompliance, 81 FR
21663, 21666 (Apr. 12, 2016).
4 United States v. Gen. Motors Corp., 565 F.2d
754, 759 (D.C. Cir. 1977) (finding defect poses an
unreasonable risk when it ‘‘results in hazards as
E:\FR\FM\14MRN1.SGM
14MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 49 / Monday, March 14, 2022 / Notices
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
NHTSA has rejected petitions based
on the assertion that only a small
percentage of vehicles or items of
equipment are likely to actually exhibit
a noncompliance. The percentage of
potential occupants that could be
adversely affected by a noncompliance
does not determine the question of
inconsequentiality. Rather, the issue to
consider is the consequence to an
occupant who is exposed to the
consequence of that noncompliance.5
These considerations are also relevant
when considering whether a defect is
inconsequential to motor vehicle safety.
NHTSA notes that DTNA misquoted
the decision language pertaining to a
prior inconsequential noncompliance
petition (83 FR 7847) by adding ‘‘The
Agency agrees with GM that in this
case’’ prior to the original statement.
NHTSA does not consider this addition
accurate.
The noncompliance, in the DTNA
case currently being considered, is that
the stop lamp illuminates when a
braking system low air pressure warning
indicator light is illuminated, regardless
of whether the service brakes are
applied.6 As the subject trucks have two
air brake systems, which split the trailer
brakes from the steer axle brakes, low
air pressure will cause a brake
application only if air pressure is lost in
both systems. Should only one of the
two air brake systems report low air
pressure, the parking brakes would not
engage but the stop lamps would
illuminate in addition to the low air
warning indicator light, which includes
an audible alarm. The Agency believes
that an alert would prompt the operator
to safely pull over and/or attempt to
slow/stop the truck soon after the
warnings appear. In that case, the
noncompliance would only result in a
momentary illumination of the stop
lamps without the brakes being applied.
If the driver of a subject vehicle did
not apply the brakes immediately after
receiving a low air pressure warning,
following drivers would be presented
with a false indication that the subject
truck was braking. Further, should there
be an air leak, application of the service
brakes will cause the air pressure to
potentially dangerous as sudden engine fire, and
where there is no dispute that at least some such
hazards, in this case fires, can definitely be
expected to occur in the future’’).
5 See Gen. Motors Corp.; Ruling on Petition for
Determination of Inconsequential Noncompliance,
69 FR 19897, 19900 (Apr. 14, 2004); Cosco Inc.;
Denial of Application for Decision of
Inconsequential Noncompliance, 64 FR 29408,
29409 (June 1, 1999).
6 Per FMVSS No. 108, stop lamps should only be
activated upon activation of the service brakes, or
a device intended to retard the movement of the
vehicle. See FMVSS No. 108, Table I–a.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:51 Mar 11, 2022
Jkt 256001
further drop, braking performance may
be impacted, and it is also possible that
the system will no longer be able to
achieve proper pressure, which
subsequently may cause the parking
brakes to engage. As the function of a
stop lamp is to notify other road users
that a vehicle is stopping and/or
slowing down, a vehicle equipped with
an air braking system where the low air
pressure warning on the instrument
cluster along with an audible warning
has been activated will likely prompt
the driver to immediately pull over and/
or attempt to slow/stop the vehicle.
A previous NHTSA interpretation
concerning trailer stop lamp
illumination, requested by Wabash
National Corporation, explained that the
stop lamps were permitted to be
illuminated in the event that the
emergency braking system was activated
when significant deceleration could
occur.7 NHTSA does not agree with
DTNA’s argument that the activation of
the stop lamps when the low air
pressure warning occurs would be
helpful for a warning other drivers of
the brake malfunction. Nonetheless,
NHTSA still believes this
noncompliance would be
inconsequential to safety. This is
because when a vehicle with air brakes
experiences a low-air event and notifies
the driver of a brake system
malfunction, NHTSA believes that the
driver would likely respond by pulling
over to the side of the road and taking
the vehicle out of service until the brake
system can be repaired. Because the act
of pulling over to the side of the road
would result in the intentional
activation of the stop lamps and this
sequence of events would likely occur
only once before the vehicle is repaired,
NHTSA believes that the activation of
the brake lamps due to the low air
pressure event would be
inconsequential to safety.
VII. NHTSA’s Decision
In consideration of the foregoing,
NHTSA finds that DTNA has met its
burden of persuasion that the subject
FMVSS No. 108 noncompliance in the
affected trucks is inconsequential to
motor vehicle safety. Accordingly,
DTNA’s petition is hereby granted and
DTNA is consequently exempted from
the obligation of providing notification
of, and a free remedy for, that
noncompliance under 49 U.S.C. 30118
and 30120.
NHTSA notes that the statutory
provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to
file petitions for a determination of
7 https://isearch.nhtsa.gov/files/22036.ztv.html.
PO 00000
Frm 00091
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
14327
inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to
exempt manufacturers only from the
duties found in sections 30118 and
30120, respectively, to notify owners,
purchasers, and dealers of a defect or
noncompliance and to remedy the
defect or noncompliance. Therefore, this
decision only applies to the subject
trucks that DTNA no longer controlled
at the time it determined that the
noncompliance existed. However, the
granting of this petition does not relieve
truck distributors and dealers of the
prohibitions on the sale, offer for sale,
or introduction or delivery for
introduction into interstate commerce of
the noncompliant trucks under their
control after DTNA notified them that
the subject noncompliance existed.
(Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120:
delegations of authority at 49 CFR 1.95 and
501.8)
Otto G. Matheke III,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2022–05304 Filed 3–11–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Office of Foreign Assets Control
Notice of OFAC Sanctions Action
Office of Foreign Assets
Control, Treasury.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Department of the
Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets
Control (‘‘OFAC’’) is updating the
identifying information on its Specially
Designated Nationals and Blocked
Persons List (‘‘SDN List’’) for a person
whose property and interests in
property are blocked pursuant to
Executive Order 13224 of September 23,
2001, ‘‘Blocking Property and
Prohibiting Transactions With Persons
Who Commit, Threaten To Commit, or
Support Terrorism,’’ as amended by
Executive Order 13886 of September 9,
2019, ‘‘Modernizing Sanctions to
Combat Terrorism’’.
DATES: See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section for applicable date(s).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
OFAC: Andrea Gacki, Director, tel.: 202–
622–2490; Associate Director for Global
Targeting, tel.: 202–622–2420; Assistant
Director for Licensing, tel.: 202–622–
2480; Assistant Director for Regulatory
Affairs, tel.: 202–622–4855; or the
Assistant Director for Sanctions
Compliance & Evaluation, tel.: 202–622–
2490.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\14MRN1.SGM
14MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 49 (Monday, March 14, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14325-14327]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-05304]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA-2019-0008; Notice 2]
Daimler Trucks North America, Grant of Petition for Decision of
Inconsequential Noncompliance
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Grant of petition.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Daimler Trucks North America (DTNA) has determined that
certain model year (MY) 2017-2019 Freightliner Cascadia motor vehicles
do not fully comply with Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS)
No. 108, Lamps, Reflective Devices, and Associated Equipment. DTNA
filed a noncompliance report dated January 16, 2019. DTNA subsequently
petitioned NHTSA on February 8, 2019, for a decision that the subject
noncompliance is inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety.
This document announces the grant of DTNA's petition.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Leroy Angeles, Office of Vehicle
Safety Compliance, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
(NHTSA), telephone (202) 366-5304, [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Overview
DTNA has determined that certain MY 2017-2019 Freightliner Cascadia
motor vehicles do not fully comply with paragraph S6.2.1 of FMVSS No.
108, Lamps, Reflective Devices, and Associated Equipment (49 CFR
571.108). DTNA filed a noncompliance report dated January 16, 2019,
pursuant to 49 CFR part 573, Defect and Noncompliance Responsibility
and Reports. DTNA subsequently petitioned NHTSA on February 8, 2019,
for an exemption from the notification and remedy requirements of 49
U.S.C. Chapter 301 on the basis that this noncompliance is
inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety pursuant to 49
U.S.C. 30118(d) and 30120(h) and 49 CFR part 556, Exemption for
Inconsequential Defect or Noncompliance.
Notice of receipt of DTNA's petition was published with a 30-day
public comment period, on February 27, 2020, in the Federal Register
(85 FR 11450). No comments were received. To view the petition and all
supporting documents log onto the Federal Docket Management System
(FDMS) website at https://www.regulations.gov/. Then follow the online
search instructions to locate docket number ``NHTSA-2019-0008.''
II. Trucks Involved
Approximately 74,675 MY 2017-2019 Freightliner Cascadia motor
vehicles, manufactured between May 3, 2016, and December 17, 2018, are
potentially involved.
III. Noncompliance
DTNA described the noncompliance as automatic illumination of the
stop lamps when the low air pressure warning indicator light
illuminates. Since low air pressure does not necessarily activate the
brakes or result in braking without driver intervention, this
activation of the stop lamps does not meet the requirements of S6.2.1
of FMVSS No. 108.
IV. Rule Requirements
Paragraph S6.2.1 of FMVSS No. 108 includes the requirements
relevant to this petition. No additional lamp, reflective device, or
other motor vehicle equipment is permitted to be installed that impairs
the effectiveness of lighting equipment required by FMVSS No. 108.
V. Summary of DTNA's Petition
The following views and arguments presented in this section, ``V.
Summary of DTNA's Petition,'' are the views and arguments provided by
DTNA.
DTNA described the subject noncompliance and stated its belief that
the noncompliance is inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle
safety.
DTNA submitted the following background information on how their
air brake system affects the stop lamps:
DTNA's air brake system is comprised of two brake systems, primary
and secondary. The primary system controls the service brakes on the
drive axles, and the secondary system controls the service brakes on
the steer axle, in which the higher pressure of these two controls the
trailer service brakes. These two systems are isolated from each other
so that if there is an air loss in one system, the other system will
still be functional to control the vehicle service brakes. When either
one of the systems drops below 70 psi, the low air warning indicator
light on the dash turns ON and the stop lamps illuminate. However, if
this occurs, it does not mean that the drive axle parking brakes being
applied, since the other brake system may still be functional and
keeping the brake from applying. In such a situation, the air that
holds off the drive axle parking brakes would be the higher pressure of
either primary or secondary air brake. In other words, if the primary
air brake pressure falls below 70 psi, the indicator light and stop
lamps illuminate, but the parking brakes do not start to drag since the
secondary air (presumably unaffected) remains high and holds off the
parking springs. In the same manner, the trailer parking brakes are
held off by the higher of either primary or secondary air brake system.
Only when both air systems drop below about 70 psi will the trailer
parking brakes begin to apply.
DTNA submitted the following views and arguments in support of the
petition:
1. The normal operating air pressure of the vehicle is between 110
and 130
[[Page 14326]]
psi. There is a regulator that turns on the air compressor if the air
pressure is below 110 psi and turns off the air compressor when the
system pressure is above 130 psi. If the air pressure begins to drop
and reaches approximately 70 psi, the air system pressure is not
adequate to maintain optimum operation, so a warning indicator light
illuminates on the dash and a buzzer activates to alert the driver to
this condition. On these vehicles, the stop lamps illuminate when the
warning indiactor light illuminates on the dash. The events induced by
a low air condition after initial vehicle startup are rare and are not
expected in normal operation. If the condition were to occur during
operation, the driver would be alerted to the circumstances with
audible and visual low air warning signals and would be expected to
apply the service brakes and pull over in a safe manner. Additionally,
if the pressure in both air systems drops below 70 psi, the parking
brakes will slowly begin to apply.
2. The Freightliner Cascadia Driver's Manual states ``If the low
air pressure warning is activated, check the air pressure gauges to
determine which system has low air pressure. Although the vehicle's
speed can be reduced using the foot brake control pedal, either the
front or rear service brakes will not be operating at full capacity,
causing a longer stopping distance. Bring the vehicle to a safe stop
and have the air system repaired before continuing.''
3. Brakes are commonly applied causing the stop lamps to illuminate
when a driver sees a vehicle display warning or senses that the vehicle
is experiencing a problem. Reducing vehicle speed in relation to a
vehicle operational problem increases safety, providing following
drivers the opportunity to increase the following distance. A low air
warning indicator light would likely cause the vehicle driver to
immediately engage the brake system and bring the vehicle to a safe
stop. Stop lamp illumination for a brake system low air event would
help provide early warning to following drivers to slow down.
4. DTNA stated, in ``Motorcoach Brake Systems and Safety
Technologies,'' the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration issued
guidance, while directed toward motorcoach drivers, that supports the
expectation that a driver, upon receipt of a low-pressure warning,
would apply brakes and pull off the roadway. FMCSA stated: ``Low
Pressure Warning--In most cases, you should notice an air leak or
malfunction before getting a low-pressure warning; however, when a low-
pressure warning occurs, immediately bring the motorcoach to a safe
stop, off of the roadway. Continuing to operate the motorcoach could
result in an automatic application of the park brakes, possibly leading
to a loss of control or a stop in an unsafe position.''
5. DTNA is not aware of any accidents, injuries, owner complaints,
or field reports related to this condition on the subject vehicles.
6. DTNA also stated that NHTSA has previously granted petitions for
decisions of inconsequential noncompliance for lighting requirements
where technical noncompliance exists, but does not create a negative
impact on safety:
In General Motors Corporation; Grant of Application for
Decision of Inconsequential Noncompliance. 66 FR 32871 (June 18, 2001)
a petition for inconsequentiality by General Motors Corporation was
granted by NHTSA. In this instance, certain models could have
unintended CHMSL illumination briefly if the hazard warning lamp switch
is depressed to its limit of travel.
In General Motors, LLC, Grant of Petition for Decision of
Inconsequential Noncompliance, a petition for inconsequentiality by
General Motors, LLC (GM) was granted by NHTSA. See 83 FR 7847 (February
22, 2018). In this instance, under certain conditions, the parking
lamps on the subject vehicles fail to meet the requirement that parking
lamps must be activated when headlamps are activated in a steady
burning state.
In Grant of Application for Determination of
Inconsequential Noncompliance with FMVSS No. 108, a petition for
inconsequentiality by General Motors Corporation was granted by NHTSA.
See 64 FR 48231 (September 2, 1999). In this instance, a certain model
equipped with an electronic turn signal was affected by random inputs
that cause the internal timing of the electronic circuit to become
unsynchronized causing the left front turn signal lamp to flash at a
rapid rate while the left rear turn signal lamp illuminates but does
not flash. These conditions can continue after the turn signal lever
automatically returns to the off position.
7. DTNA believes that a technical noncompliance exists but does not
create a negative impact on safety when the brake lamps illuminate
during a brake system low air warning event. The stop lamp illumination
serves to emphasize the message to following drivers that the vehicle
is experiencing trouble and they should pay close attention. The Brake
Air warning indicator light, on the driver's display panel, shows the
driver that there is an issue with the air brake system. This would
result in the driver bringing the vehicle to a safe stop and having the
air system repaired before continuing.
DTNA concluded by expressing its belief that the subject
noncompliance is inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety,
and that its petition to be exempted from providing notification of the
noncompliance, as required by 49 U.S.C. 30118, and a remedy for the
noncompliance, as required by 49 U.S.C. 30120, should be granted.
VI. NHTSA's Analysis
The burden of establishing the inconsequentiality of a failure to
comply with a performance requirement in a standard--as opposed to a
labeling requirement with no performance implications--is more
substantial and difficult to meet. Accordingly, the Agency has not
found many such noncompliances inconsequential.\1\ Potential
performance failures of safety-critical equipment, like seat belts or
air bags, are rarely deemed inconsequential.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Cf. Gen. Motors Corporation; Ruling on Petition for
Determination of Inconsequential Noncompliance, 69 FR 19897, 19899
(Apr. 14, 2004) (citing prior cases where noncompliance was expected
to be imperceptible, or nearly so, to vehicle occupants or
approaching drivers).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
An important issue to consider in determining inconsequentiality is
the safety risk to individuals who experience the type of event against
which the recall would otherwise protect.\2\ In general, NHTSA does not
consider the absence of complaints or injuries to show that the issue
is inconsequential to safety. ``Most importantly, the absence of a
complaint does not mean there have not been any safety issues, nor does
it mean that there will not be safety issues in the future.'' \3\
``[T]he fact that in past reported cases good luck and swift reaction
have prevented many serious injuries does not mean that good luck will
continue to work.'' \4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See Gen. Motors, LLC; Grant of Petition for Decision of
Inconsequential Noncompliance, 78 FR 35355 (June 12, 2013) (finding
noncompliance had no effect on occupant safety because it had no
effect on the proper operation of the occupant classification system
and the correct deployment of an air bag); Osram Sylvania Prods.
Inc.; Grant of Petition for Decision of Inconsequential
Noncompliance, 78 FR 46000 (July 30, 2013) (finding occupant using
noncompliant light source would not be exposed to significantly
greater risk than occupant using similar compliant light source).
\3\ Morgan 3 Wheeler Limited; Denial of Petition for Decision of
Inconsequential Noncompliance, 81 FR 21663, 21666 (Apr. 12, 2016).
\4\ United States v. Gen. Motors Corp., 565 F.2d 754, 759 (D.C.
Cir. 1977) (finding defect poses an unreasonable risk when it
``results in hazards as potentially dangerous as sudden engine fire,
and where there is no dispute that at least some such hazards, in
this case fires, can definitely be expected to occur in the
future'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 14327]]
NHTSA has rejected petitions based on the assertion that only a
small percentage of vehicles or items of equipment are likely to
actually exhibit a noncompliance. The percentage of potential occupants
that could be adversely affected by a noncompliance does not determine
the question of inconsequentiality. Rather, the issue to consider is
the consequence to an occupant who is exposed to the consequence of
that noncompliance.\5\ These considerations are also relevant when
considering whether a defect is inconsequential to motor vehicle
safety.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Gen. Motors Corp.; Ruling on Petition for Determination
of Inconsequential Noncompliance, 69 FR 19897, 19900 (Apr. 14,
2004); Cosco Inc.; Denial of Application for Decision of
Inconsequential Noncompliance, 64 FR 29408, 29409 (June 1, 1999).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
NHTSA notes that DTNA misquoted the decision language pertaining to
a prior inconsequential noncompliance petition (83 FR 7847) by adding
``The Agency agrees with GM that in this case'' prior to the original
statement. NHTSA does not consider this addition accurate.
The noncompliance, in the DTNA case currently being considered, is
that the stop lamp illuminates when a braking system low air pressure
warning indicator light is illuminated, regardless of whether the
service brakes are applied.\6\ As the subject trucks have two air brake
systems, which split the trailer brakes from the steer axle brakes, low
air pressure will cause a brake application only if air pressure is
lost in both systems. Should only one of the two air brake systems
report low air pressure, the parking brakes would not engage but the
stop lamps would illuminate in addition to the low air warning
indicator light, which includes an audible alarm. The Agency believes
that an alert would prompt the operator to safely pull over and/or
attempt to slow/stop the truck soon after the warnings appear. In that
case, the noncompliance would only result in a momentary illumination
of the stop lamps without the brakes being applied.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ Per FMVSS No. 108, stop lamps should only be activated upon
activation of the service brakes, or a device intended to retard the
movement of the vehicle. See FMVSS No. 108, Table I-a.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
If the driver of a subject vehicle did not apply the brakes
immediately after receiving a low air pressure warning, following
drivers would be presented with a false indication that the subject
truck was braking. Further, should there be an air leak, application of
the service brakes will cause the air pressure to further drop, braking
performance may be impacted, and it is also possible that the system
will no longer be able to achieve proper pressure, which subsequently
may cause the parking brakes to engage. As the function of a stop lamp
is to notify other road users that a vehicle is stopping and/or slowing
down, a vehicle equipped with an air braking system where the low air
pressure warning on the instrument cluster along with an audible
warning has been activated will likely prompt the driver to immediately
pull over and/or attempt to slow/stop the vehicle.
A previous NHTSA interpretation concerning trailer stop lamp
illumination, requested by Wabash National Corporation, explained that
the stop lamps were permitted to be illuminated in the event that the
emergency braking system was activated when significant deceleration
could occur.\7\ NHTSA does not agree with DTNA's argument that the
activation of the stop lamps when the low air pressure warning occurs
would be helpful for a warning other drivers of the brake malfunction.
Nonetheless, NHTSA still believes this noncompliance would be
inconsequential to safety. This is because when a vehicle with air
brakes experiences a low-air event and notifies the driver of a brake
system malfunction, NHTSA believes that the driver would likely respond
by pulling over to the side of the road and taking the vehicle out of
service until the brake system can be repaired. Because the act of
pulling over to the side of the road would result in the intentional
activation of the stop lamps and this sequence of events would likely
occur only once before the vehicle is repaired, NHTSA believes that the
activation of the brake lamps due to the low air pressure event would
be inconsequential to safety.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ https://isearch.nhtsa.gov/files/22036.ztv.html.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
VII. NHTSA's Decision
In consideration of the foregoing, NHTSA finds that DTNA has met
its burden of persuasion that the subject FMVSS No. 108 noncompliance
in the affected trucks is inconsequential to motor vehicle safety.
Accordingly, DTNA's petition is hereby granted and DTNA is consequently
exempted from the obligation of providing notification of, and a free
remedy for, that noncompliance under 49 U.S.C. 30118 and 30120.
NHTSA notes that the statutory provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to file petitions for a
determination of inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to exempt manufacturers
only from the duties found in sections 30118 and 30120, respectively,
to notify owners, purchasers, and dealers of a defect or noncompliance
and to remedy the defect or noncompliance. Therefore, this decision
only applies to the subject trucks that DTNA no longer controlled at
the time it determined that the noncompliance existed. However, the
granting of this petition does not relieve truck distributors and
dealers of the prohibitions on the sale, offer for sale, or
introduction or delivery for introduction into interstate commerce of
the noncompliant trucks under their control after DTNA notified them
that the subject noncompliance existed.
(Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120: delegations of authority at 49
CFR 1.95 and 501.8)
Otto G. Matheke III,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2022-05304 Filed 3-11-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P