Certain Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Products From Taiwan: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2020-2021, 13700-13701 [2022-05070]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
13700
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 47 / Thursday, March 10, 2022 / Notices
within FTZ 93, in Durham, North
Carolina.
The notification was processed in
accordance with the regulations of the
FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including
notice in the Federal Register inviting
public comment (86 FR 62985,
November 15, 2021). On March 7, 2022,
the applicant was notified of the FTZ
Board’s decision that no further review
of the activity is warranted at this time.
The production activity described in the
notification was authorized, subject to
the FTZ Act and the FTZ Board’s
regulations, including Section 400.14.
Dated: March 7, 2022.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022–05074 Filed 3–9–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–583–853]
Certain Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic
Products From Taiwan: Final Results
of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review and Final Determination of No
Shipments; 2020–2021
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On November 5, 2021, the
Department of Commerce (Commerce)
published the preliminary results of the
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on certain
crystalline silicon photovoltaic products
(solar products) from Taiwan during the
period of review (POR), February 1,
2020, to January 31, 2021. We received
no comments or requests for a hearing.
We continue to find that 16 of the
companies under review made no
shipments of solar products from
Taiwan during the POR. Moreover, with
respect to the companies that did not
submit no-shipment certifications and
were not selected as mandatory
respondents, we have determined to
apply a rate of 7.89 percent, i.e., the
non-selected rate from the prior (fifth)
administrative review under this
antidumping duty order.
DATES: Applicable March 10, 2022.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Thomas Martin or Zachary Shaykin,
AD/CVD Operations, Office IV,
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3936 or
(202) 482–2638, respectively.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:20 Mar 09, 2022
Jkt 256001
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On November 5, 2021, Commerce
published the Preliminary Results and
invited interested parties to comment.1
We received no comments on the
Preliminary Results from any interested
parties. Commerce conducted this
review in accordance with section 751
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended
(the Act).
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by the
Order is solar products from Taiwan.2
Imports of subject merchandise are
classified under the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS)
subheadings: 8501.71.0000,
8501.72.1000, 8501.72.2000,
8501.72.3000, 8501.72.9000,
8501.80.1000, 8501.80.2000,
8501.80.3000, 8501.80.9000,
8507.20.8010, 8507.20.8031,
8507.20.8041, 8507.20.8061,
8507.20.8091, 8541.42.0010,
8541.43.0010. These HTSUS
subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes; the
written description of the scope of the
Order is dispositive.3
Final Determination of No Shipments
As noted in the Preliminary Results,
we received claims of no shipments
from 16 producers and/or exporters
under review, and we preliminarily
determined that these 16 companies had
no shipments of subject merchandise
during the POR.4 We received no
comments from interested parties with
respect to these claims. Therefore,
because we have not received any
information to contradict our
1 See Certain Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic
Products from Taiwan: Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Partial
Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review and Preliminary Determination of No
Shipments; 2020–2021, 86 FR 61131 (November 5,
2021).
2 See Certain Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic
Products from Taiwan: Antidumping Duty Order,
80 FR 8596 (February 18, 2015) (Order).
3 Id.
4 See Preliminary Results, 86 FR at 61131–32.
These companies are: (1) AU Optronics Corporation
(AU); (2) Canadian Solar Inc.; (3) Canadian Solar
International Limited; (4) Canadian Solar
Manufacturing (Changshu), Inc.; (5) Canadian Solar
Manufacturing (Luoyang), Inc.; (6) Canadian Solar
Solutions Inc.; (7) Vina Solar Technology Co., Ltd.;
(8) Baoding Tianwei Yingli New Energy Resources
Co., Ltd.; (9) Beijing Tianneng Yingli New Energy
Resources Co., Ltd.; (10) Hainan Yingli New Energy
Resources Co., Ltd.; (11) Hengshui Yingli New
Energy Resources Co., Ltd.; (12) Lixian Yingli New
Energy Resources Co., Ltd.; (13) Shenzhen Yingli
New Energy Resources Co., Ltd.; (14) Tianjin Yingli
New Energy Resources Co., Ltd.; (15) Yingli Energy
(China) Co., Ltd.; and (16) Yingli Green Energy
International Trading Company Limited.
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
preliminary no-shipment determination,
nor any comment in opposition to our
preliminary finding or to record
evidence indicating that these 16
companies had no entries of subject
merchandise to the United States during
the POR, we continue to find that these
16 companies had no shipments during
the POR.5 We will issue appropriate
instructions to U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) based on our final
results.
Final Rate for Non-Examined
Companies
The statute and Commerce’s
regulations do not address the
establishment of a rate to be applied to
companies not selected for individual
examination when Commerce limits its
examination in an administrative review
pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the
Act. Generally, Commerce looks to
section 735(c)(5) of the Act, which
provides instructions for calculating the
all-others rate in a less-than-fair-value
(LTFV) investigation, for guidance when
calculating the rate for companies
which were not selected for individual
examination in an administrative
review. Under section 735(c)(5)(A) of
the Act, the all-others rate is normally
‘‘an amount equal to the weightedaverage of the estimated weightedaverage dumping margins established
for exporters and producers
individually investigated, excluding any
zero or de minimis margins, and any
margins determined entirely {on the
basis of facts available}.’’ However, in
this administrative review, there are no
individually investigated companies
receiving calculated dumping margins.
Accordingly, because we have no
companies in the instant review for
which we are calculating a rate that can
be applied to the non-selected
companies,6 for the final results of
review, we have determined to apply a
rate of 7.89 percent to the non-selected
respondents, which is the weightedaverage dumping margin determined
and assigned to the non-selected
respondents in the previous (fifth)
administrative review of the Order.7
5 See
Preliminary Results, 86 FR at 61131–32.
the Preliminary Results, Commerce rescinded
the review with respect to eleven companies that
had reviewable entries of subject merchandise
during the POR, including the mandatory
respondents, in response to timely withdrawn
review requests from all parties that requested a
review of these eleven companies. See Preliminary
Results, 86 FR at 61131.
7 See Certain Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic
Products from Taiwan: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; Partial
Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; Final Determination of No Shipments;
2019–2020, 86 FR 49509, 49510–11 (September 3,
6 In
E:\FR\FM\10MRN1.SGM
10MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 47 / Thursday, March 10, 2022 / Notices
rate if there is no rate for the
intermediate company(-ies) involved in
the transaction.10
Commerce intends to issue
appropriate assessment instructions to
CBP no earlier than 35 days after the
date of publication of the final results of
Weightedthis review in the Federal Register. If a
average
timely summons is filed at the U.S.
dumping
margin
Court of International Trade, the
(percent)
assessment instructions will direct CBP
not to liquidate relevant entries until the
7.89 time for parties to file a request for a
7.89 statutory injunction has expired (i.e.,
7.89 within 90 days of publication).
Final Results of Review
We determine that the following
weighted-average dumping margins
exist for the non-selected respondents
for the POR, February 1, 2020, through
January 31, 2021:
Producer/exporter
Baoding Jiasheng Photovoltaic
Technology Co. Ltd .................
Boviet Solar Technology Co., Ltd
Kyocera Mexicana S.A. de C.V ..
Sunrise Energy Co. Ltd ..............
7.89
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Disclosure
As noted above, no party commented
on the Preliminary Results. As a result,
we have not modified our analysis from
the Preliminary Results and will not
issue a decision memorandum to
accompany this Federal Register notice.
We are adopting the Preliminary Results
as the final results of this review.
Further, because we have not changed
our calculations since the Preliminary
Results, there are no new calculations to
disclose in accordance with 19 CFR
351.224(b) for these final results.
Assessment Rates
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the
Act, and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1),
Commerce has determined, and CBP
shall assess, antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries of subject
merchandise in accordance with the
final results of this review. In
accordance with the Preliminary
Results, we determined that no
companies in this review had
reviewable entries of subject
merchandise upon which to calculate a
dumping margin.8
For the companies which were not
selected for individual review, we will
instruct CBP to assess antidumping
duties at an ad valorem rate equal to the
non-selected rate determined in the
previous administrative review. The
final results of this review shall be the
basis for the assessment of antidumping
duties on entries of merchandise
covered by the final results of this
review and for future deposits of
estimated duties, where applicable.9
For entries of subject merchandise
produced during the POR by the 16
companies that had no shipments
during the POR, we will instruct CBP to
liquidate such entries at the all-others
2021), and accompanying Issues and Decision
Memorandum.
8 See Preliminary Results, 86 FR at 61132.
9 See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:20 Mar 09, 2022
Jkt 256001
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective for all
shipments of subject merchandise
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the
publication date of the final results of
this administrative review, as provided
by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1)
The cash deposit rate for all remaining
companies in this review will be equal
to the weighted-average dumping
margin of 7.89 percent that was
established in the final results of the
previous administrative review; (2) for
previously reviewed or investigated
companies not covered in this review,
including the companies which
Commerce has determined had no
shipments in these final results, the
cash deposit rate will continue to be the
company-specific rate published for the
most recently completed segment of this
proceeding in which the companies
participated; (3) if the exporter is not a
firm covered in this review, a prior
review, or the original LTFV
investigation, but the producer is, then
the cash deposit rate will be the cash
deposit rate established for the most
recently completed segment for the
producer of the subject merchandise;
and (4) if neither the exporter nor the
manufacturer is a firm covered in this or
any previous review or the LTFV
investigation, the cash deposit rate for
all other producers or exporters will
continue to be 19.50 percent, the allothers rate established in the LTFV
investigation.11 The cash deposit
requirements, when imposed, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
10 For a full discussion of this practice, see
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954
(May 6, 2003).
11 See Certain Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic
Products from Taiwan: Final Determination of Sales
at Less Than Fair Value, 79 FR 76966, 76969
(December 23, 2014).
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
13701
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during this review period. Failure to
comply with this requirement could
result in Commerce’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of double antidumping duties.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as the final
reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of
their responsibility concerning the
return or destruction of proprietary
information disclosed under APO in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3),
which continues to govern business
proprietary information in this segment
of the proceeding. Timely written
notification of return/destruction of
APO materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations
and the terms of an APO is a
sanctionable violation.
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice is issued and published in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and
777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR
351.221(b)(5) and 19 CFR 351.213(h).
Dated: March 3, 2022.
Lisa W. Wang,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2022–05070 Filed 3–9–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–533–871]
Finished Carbon Steel Flanges From
India: Final Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review; 2019–
2020
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(Commerce) determines that producers
and/or exporters subject to this
administrative review did not make
sales of finished carbon steel flanges
from India at prices below normal value
during the period of review (POR),
August 1, 2019, through July 31, 2020.
DATES: Applicable March 10, 2022.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\10MRN1.SGM
10MRN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 47 (Thursday, March 10, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13700-13701]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-05070]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-583-853]
Certain Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Products From Taiwan:
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final
Determination of No Shipments; 2020-2021
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On November 5, 2021, the Department of Commerce (Commerce)
published the preliminary results of the administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on certain crystalline silicon photovoltaic
products (solar products) from Taiwan during the period of review
(POR), February 1, 2020, to January 31, 2021. We received no comments
or requests for a hearing. We continue to find that 16 of the companies
under review made no shipments of solar products from Taiwan during the
POR. Moreover, with respect to the companies that did not submit no-
shipment certifications and were not selected as mandatory respondents,
we have determined to apply a rate of 7.89 percent, i.e., the non-
selected rate from the prior (fifth) administrative review under this
antidumping duty order.
DATES: Applicable March 10, 2022.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas Martin or Zachary Shaykin, AD/
CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International
Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3936 or (202)
482-2638, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On November 5, 2021, Commerce published the Preliminary Results and
invited interested parties to comment.\1\ We received no comments on
the Preliminary Results from any interested parties. Commerce conducted
this review in accordance with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 1930,
as amended (the Act).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Certain Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Products from
Taiwan: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review, Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review
and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2020-2021, 86 FR
61131 (November 5, 2021).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by the Order is solar products from
Taiwan.\2\ Imports of subject merchandise are classified under the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) subheadings:
8501.71.0000, 8501.72.1000, 8501.72.2000, 8501.72.3000, 8501.72.9000,
8501.80.1000, 8501.80.2000, 8501.80.3000, 8501.80.9000, 8507.20.8010,
8507.20.8031, 8507.20.8041, 8507.20.8061, 8507.20.8091, 8541.42.0010,
8541.43.0010. These HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and
customs purposes; the written description of the scope of the Order is
dispositive.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See Certain Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Products from
Taiwan: Antidumping Duty Order, 80 FR 8596 (February 18, 2015)
(Order).
\3\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Determination of No Shipments
As noted in the Preliminary Results, we received claims of no
shipments from 16 producers and/or exporters under review, and we
preliminarily determined that these 16 companies had no shipments of
subject merchandise during the POR.\4\ We received no comments from
interested parties with respect to these claims. Therefore, because we
have not received any information to contradict our preliminary no-
shipment determination, nor any comment in opposition to our
preliminary finding or to record evidence indicating that these 16
companies had no entries of subject merchandise to the United States
during the POR, we continue to find that these 16 companies had no
shipments during the POR.\5\ We will issue appropriate instructions to
U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) based on our final results.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Preliminary Results, 86 FR at 61131-32. These companies
are: (1) AU Optronics Corporation (AU); (2) Canadian Solar Inc.; (3)
Canadian Solar International Limited; (4) Canadian Solar
Manufacturing (Changshu), Inc.; (5) Canadian Solar Manufacturing
(Luoyang), Inc.; (6) Canadian Solar Solutions Inc.; (7) Vina Solar
Technology Co., Ltd.; (8) Baoding Tianwei Yingli New Energy
Resources Co., Ltd.; (9) Beijing Tianneng Yingli New Energy
Resources Co., Ltd.; (10) Hainan Yingli New Energy Resources Co.,
Ltd.; (11) Hengshui Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd.; (12)
Lixian Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd.; (13) Shenzhen Yingli
New Energy Resources Co., Ltd.; (14) Tianjin Yingli New Energy
Resources Co., Ltd.; (15) Yingli Energy (China) Co., Ltd.; and (16)
Yingli Green Energy International Trading Company Limited.
\5\ See Preliminary Results, 86 FR at 61131-32.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Rate for Non-Examined Companies
The statute and Commerce's regulations do not address the
establishment of a rate to be applied to companies not selected for
individual examination when Commerce limits its examination in an
administrative review pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the Act.
Generally, Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5) of the Act, which
provides instructions for calculating the all-others rate in a less-
than-fair-value (LTFV) investigation, for guidance when calculating the
rate for companies which were not selected for individual examination
in an administrative review. Under section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, the
all-others rate is normally ``an amount equal to the weighted-average
of the estimated weighted-average dumping margins established for
exporters and producers individually investigated, excluding any zero
or de minimis margins, and any margins determined entirely {on the
basis of facts available{time} .'' However, in this administrative
review, there are no individually investigated companies receiving
calculated dumping margins. Accordingly, because we have no companies
in the instant review for which we are calculating a rate that can be
applied to the non-selected companies,\6\ for the final results of
review, we have determined to apply a rate of 7.89 percent to the non-
selected respondents, which is the weighted-average dumping margin
determined and assigned to the non-selected respondents in the previous
(fifth) administrative review of the Order.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ In the Preliminary Results, Commerce rescinded the review
with respect to eleven companies that had reviewable entries of
subject merchandise during the POR, including the mandatory
respondents, in response to timely withdrawn review requests from
all parties that requested a review of these eleven companies. See
Preliminary Results, 86 FR at 61131.
\7\ See Certain Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Products from
Taiwan: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review;
Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; Final
Determination of No Shipments; 2019-2020, 86 FR 49509, 49510-11
(September 3, 2021), and accompanying Issues and Decision
Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 13701]]
Final Results of Review
We determine that the following weighted-average dumping margins
exist for the non-selected respondents for the POR, February 1, 2020,
through January 31, 2021:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-
average
Producer/exporter dumping
margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Baoding Jiasheng Photovoltaic Technology Co. Ltd............ 7.89
Boviet Solar Technology Co., Ltd............................ 7.89
Kyocera Mexicana S.A. de C.V................................ 7.89
Sunrise Energy Co. Ltd...................................... 7.89
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure
As noted above, no party commented on the Preliminary Results. As a
result, we have not modified our analysis from the Preliminary Results
and will not issue a decision memorandum to accompany this Federal
Register notice. We are adopting the Preliminary Results as the final
results of this review. Further, because we have not changed our
calculations since the Preliminary Results, there are no new
calculations to disclose in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b) for these
final results.
Assessment Rates
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, and 19 CFR
351.212(b)(1), Commerce has determined, and CBP shall assess,
antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise in
accordance with the final results of this review. In accordance with
the Preliminary Results, we determined that no companies in this review
had reviewable entries of subject merchandise upon which to calculate a
dumping margin.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See Preliminary Results, 86 FR at 61132.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the companies which were not selected for individual review, we
will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties at an ad valorem rate
equal to the non-selected rate determined in the previous
administrative review. The final results of this review shall be the
basis for the assessment of antidumping duties on entries of
merchandise covered by the final results of this review and for future
deposits of estimated duties, where applicable.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For entries of subject merchandise produced during the POR by the
16 companies that had no shipments during the POR, we will instruct CBP
to liquidate such entries at the all-others rate if there is no rate
for the intermediate company(-ies) involved in the transaction.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ For a full discussion of this practice, see Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties,
68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commerce intends to issue appropriate assessment instructions to
CBP no earlier than 35 days after the date of publication of the final
results of this review in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is
filed at the U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment
instructions will direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until
the time for parties to file a request for a statutory injunction has
expired (i.e., within 90 days of publication).
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective for all
shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the publication date of the final results
of this administrative review, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of
the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for all remaining companies in this
review will be equal to the weighted-average dumping margin of 7.89
percent that was established in the final results of the previous
administrative review; (2) for previously reviewed or investigated
companies not covered in this review, including the companies which
Commerce has determined had no shipments in these final results, the
cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate
published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding in
which the companies participated; (3) if the exporter is not a firm
covered in this review, a prior review, or the original LTFV
investigation, but the producer is, then the cash deposit rate will be
the cash deposit rate established for the most recently completed
segment for the producer of the subject merchandise; and (4) if neither
the exporter nor the manufacturer is a firm covered in this or any
previous review or the LTFV investigation, the cash deposit rate for
all other producers or exporters will continue to be 19.50 percent, the
all-others rate established in the LTFV investigation.\11\ The cash
deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until
further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See Certain Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Products from
Taiwan: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 79 FR
76966, 76969 (December 23, 2014).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply
with this requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as the final reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of
the proceeding. Timely written notification of return/destruction of
APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5) and 19 CFR
351.213(h).
Dated: March 3, 2022.
Lisa W. Wang,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2022-05070 Filed 3-9-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
