Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod From Mexico: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2019-2020, 13705-13707 [2022-05069]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 47 / Thursday, March 10, 2022 / Notices According to the CBP import data, eight companies subject to this review did not have reviewable entries of subject merchandise during the POR for which liquidation is suspended.8 Further, in response to the Preliminary Results, no party submitted information to contradict the information on the record. Therefore, because there is no evidence on the record of this segment of the proceeding to indicate that these companies had entries, exports, or sales of subject merchandise to the United States during the POR, we are rescinding the administrative review with respect to these companies, consistent with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3). Rate for Non-Selected Companies Under Review There are three companies for which a review was requested and not rescinded, and which were not selected as mandatory respondents. For these companies, we are applying the rate calculated for the sole mandatory respondent, Sumitomo Rubber (Hunan) Co., Ltd. (Sumitomo Rubber), which is above de minimis and not based entirely on facts available. This methodology to establish the non-selected subsidy rate is consistent with our practice and uses section 705(c)(5)(A) of the Act, which governs the calculation of the all-others rate in investigations, as guidance. Final Results of Review We determine the following net countervailable subsidy rates for the POR January 1, 2019, through December 31, 2019: Subsidy rate (percent ad valorem) Producer/exporter Sumitomo Rubber (Hunan) Co., Ltd. and its cross-owned affiliates.9 ........ Triangle Tyre Co., Ltd.10 ..................... 24.79 124.53 Review-Specific Average Rate Applicable to the Following Companies Jiangsu Hankook Tire Co., Ltd ........... Qingdao Landwinner Tyre Co., Ltd ..... Shandong Province Sanli Tire Manufacture Co., Ltd ................................ 24.79 24.79 24.79 Disclosure khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES We intend to disclose to interested parties the calculations and analysis 8 These companies are: Hankook Tire China Co., Ltd.; Prinx Chengshan (Shandong) Tire Company Ltd.; Qingdao Fullrun Tyre Tech Corp., Ltd.; Qingdao Honghuasheng Trade Co., Ltd; Qingdao Kapsen Trade Co.; Shandong Habilead Rubber Co., Ltd.; Shandong Hongsheng Rubber Technology Co., Ltd.; and Shandong Qilun Rubber Co., Ltd. 9 Commerce finds the following companies to be cross owned with Sumitomo Rubber (Hunan) Co., Ltd.: Sumitomo Rubber (China) Co., Ltd. and Sumitomo Rubber (Changshu) Co. Ltd. VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:20 Mar 09, 2022 Jkt 256001 performed for these final results of this review within five days of the date of publication of this notice, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Assessment In accordance with section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(2), Commerce shall determine, and CBP shall assess, countervailing duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review. Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 days after the date of this publication of the final results of this review in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is filed at the U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within 90 days of publication). With respect to the companies for which this administrative review is rescinded, countervailing duties shall be assessed at rates equal to the cash deposit rate required at the time of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption, during the period January 1, 2019, through December 31, 2019, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). Cash Deposit Requirements In accordance with section 751(a)(1) of the Act, Commerce also intends to instruct CBP to collect cash deposits of estimated countervailing duties in the amounts shown above for the abovelisted companies with regard to shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication of these final results of review. For all non-reviewed firms, CBP will continue to collect cash deposits of estimated countervailing duties at the most recent company-specific or allothers rate applicable to the company, as appropriate. These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Administrative Protective Order This notice serves as a final reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of return or 10 This rate is based on the rates for the respondents that were selected for individual review, excluding rates that are zero, de minimis, or based entirely on facts available. See section 705(c)(5)(A) of the Act. PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 13705 destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. Notification to Interested Parties These final results are issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5). Dated: March 3, 2022. Lisa W. Wang, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. Subsidies Valuation V. Use of Facts Otherwise Available and Application of Adverse Inferences VI. Analysis of Programs VII. Analysis of Comments Comment 1: Whether Commerce Should Reverse its Decision to Countervail the Export Buyer’s Credit Program (EBCP) based on Adverse Facts Available (AFA) Comment 2: Whether Commerce Should Reverse its Decision to Apply AFA in Finding that the Domestic Producers that Supplied Inputs are ‘‘Authorities’’ Comment 3: Whether Commerce Should Use World Export Prices as the Tier-Two Benchmark Prices to Calculate the Alleged Input Subsidies Comment 4: Whether Commerce Should Adjust for Ocean Freight if it Continues to Rely on Import Prices as the Tier-One Benchmark for Inputs Comment 5: Whether Commerce Should Apply AFA on Electricity for LTAR Comment 6: Whether Commerce Should Apply AFA to ‘‘Other Subsidies’’ Comment 7: Whether Commerce Should Treat the Assistance for Deployment of Trade as an Export Subsidy for SRH Comment 8: Whether Commerce Should Apply a Separate Adverse Rate for the Enterprise Income Tax Law, R&D Program VIII. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2022–05068 Filed 3–9–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–201–830] Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod From Mexico: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2019–2020 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. AGENCY: E:\FR\FM\10MRN1.SGM 10MRN1 13706 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 47 / Thursday, March 10, 2022 / Notices The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that sales of carbon and certain alloy steel wire rod (wire rod) from Mexico were made at less than normal value (NV) during the period of review (POR), October 1, 2019, through September 30, 2020. DATES: Applicable March 10, 2022. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Benjamin A. Smith, AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–2181. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: SUMMARY: Background On November 4, 2021, Commerce published the Preliminary Results of this review in the Federal Register.1 We invited interested parties to comment on the Preliminary Results. This review covers one mandatory respondent selected for individual examination, Deacero S.A.P.I de C.V. (Deacero). We received case briefs from Deacero and Nucor Corporation (Nucor, or the petitioner).2 Subsequently, we received a rebuttal brief from Deacero.3 A complete summary of the events that occurred since publication of the Preliminary Results is found in the Issues and Decision Memorandum.4 Commerce conducted this review in accordance with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Scope of the Order 5 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES The merchandise subject to the Order is wire rod, in coils, of approximately round cross section, 5.00 mm or more, but less than 19.00 mm, in solid crosssectional diameter. 1 See Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Mexico: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Partial Recission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2019– 2020, 86 FR 60799 (November 4, 2021) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM). 2 See Deacero’s Letter, ‘‘Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Mexico—Case Brief,’’ dated December 6, 2021; see also Nucor’s Letter, ‘‘Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Mexico: Case Brief,’’ dated December 6, 2021. 3 See Deacero’s Letter, ‘‘Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Mexico—Rebuttal Brief,’’ dated December 13, 2021. 4 See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the 2019–2020 Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Mexico,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). 5 See Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Brazil, Indonesia, Mexico, Moldova, Trinidad and Tobago, and Ukraine, 67 FR 65945 (October 29, 2002) (Order). VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:20 Mar 09, 2022 Jkt 256001 A full description of the scope of the Order is contained in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties to this review are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. The issues are identified in the appendix to this notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the internet at https://access. trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout. aspx. Changes Since the Preliminary Results Based on our analysis of the comments received from parties, we have made certain revisions to the margin calculation for Deacero.6 For detailed information, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum. Rate for Respondent Not Selected for Individual Examination Commerce did not select Ternium Mexico S.A. de C.V. (Ternium) for individual examination. Further, Ternium was not the subject of a withdrawal of request for review; did not request to participate as a voluntary respondent; did not submit a claim of no shipments; and was not otherwise collapsed with a mandatory respondent. Therefore, Ternium remains a respondent not selected for individual examination. As explained in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, we have assigned to Ternium the weightedaverage dumping margin calculated for Deacero. Disclosure We intend to disclose the calculations performed to parties in this proceeding within five days after publication of these final results in the Federal Register, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Assessment Rates Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), Commerce will determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise in accordance with the final results of this review. For Deacero, Commerce has calculated importer-specific antidumping duty assessment rates by aggregating the total amount of dumping calculated for the examined sales of each importer and dividing each of these amounts by the total entered value associated with those sales in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2), we will instruct CBP to liquidate without regard to antidumping duties any entries for which the importer-specific assessment rate is zero or de minimis. For entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by Deacero for which it did not know its merchandise was destined for the United States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the all-others rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction. For the companies not selected for individual examination, we will instruct CBP to apply an assessment rate to all entries produced and/or exported by those companies equal to the dumping margin indicated above. Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 41 days after the date of publication of these final results of review.7 Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the notice of final results Final Results of the Review of administrative review for all shipments of subject merchandise Commerce determines that the entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, following weighted-average dumping for consumption on or after the margins exist for the period October 1, publication of the final results of this 2019, through September 30, 2020: administrative review, as provided by Weighted- section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) For average producers or exporters covered in this Producers/exporters dumping administrative review, the cash deposit margins rates will be the rates established in the (percent) final results of this administrative Deacero S.A.P.I de C.V ............. 4.64 review; (2) for producers or exporters Ternium Mexico S.A. de C.V ...... 4.64 not covered in this administrative review but covered in a prior segment 6 See PO 00000 Issues and Decision Memorandum. Frm 00020 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 7 See E:\FR\FM\10MRN1.SGM 19 CFR 351.356.8(a). 10MRN1 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 47 / Thursday, March 10, 2022 / Notices of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the companyspecific rate published for the most recent period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the original investigation, but the producer is, then the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recent period for the producer of the merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other producers or exporters will continue to be 20.11 percent, the all-others rate established in the investigation.8 These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. VI. Discussion of Comments Comment 1: Whether Commerce Made a Ministerial Error Related to Currency Conversion Comment 2: Whether Commerce Should Exclude Insurance Revenue from the Calculation of Deacero’s Home Market Credit Expenses Comment 3: Whether Deacero Failed to Report Inland Freight Expenses for Some U.S. Sales. VII. Recommendation Notification to Importers This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in Commerce’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. International Trade Administration Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of return/ destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. Notification to Interested Parties We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.213(h). Dated: March 3, 2022. Lisa W. Wang, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Final Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. Margin for Company Not Selected for Individual Examination V. Changes Since the Preliminary Results 8 See Order, 67 FR at 65947. VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:20 Mar 09, 2022 Jkt 256001 [FR Doc. 2022–05069 Filed 3–9–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), Article 10.12: Binational Panel Review: Notice of Request for Panel Review United States Section, USMCA Secretariat, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. ACTION: Notice of USMCA Request for Panel Review. AGENCY: A Request for Panel Review was filed on behalf of Evraz, Inc. NA with the United States Section of the USMCA Secretariat on March 4, 2022, pursuant to USMCA Article 10.12. Panel Review was requested of the U.S. Department of Commerce’s Final Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review (2018–2020) in Large Diameter Welded Pipe from Canada, which was published in the Federal Register on February 4, 2022. The USMCA Secretariat has assigned case number USA–CDA–2022–10.12–01 to this request. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vidya Desai, Acting United States Secretary, USMCA Secretariat, Room 2061, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230, 202–482–5438. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Article 10.12 of Chapter 10 of USMCA provides a dispute settlement mechanism involving trade remedy determinations issued by the Government of the United States, the Government of Canada, and the Government of Mexico. Following a Request for Panel Review, a Binational Panel is composed to review the trade remedy determination being challenged and issue a binding Panel Decision. There are established USMCA Rules of Procedure for Article 10.12 (Binational Panel Reviews), which were adopted by the three governments for panels requested pursuant to Article 10.12(2) of USMCA which requires Requests for Panel Review to be published in SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 13707 accordance with Rule 40. For the complete Rules, please see https://canmex-usa-sec.org/secretariat/agreementaccord-acuerdo/usmca-aceum-tmec/ rules-regles-reglas/article-articlearticulo_10_12.aspx?lang=eng. The Rules provide that: (a) A Party or interested person may challenge the final determination in whole or in part by filing a Complaint in accordance with Rule 44 no later than 30 days after the filing of the first Request for Panel Review (the deadline for filing a Complaint is April 4, 2022); (b) A Party, an investigating authority or other interested person who does not file a Complaint but who intends to participate in the panel review shall file a Notice of Appearance in accordance with Rule 45 no later than 45 days after the filing of the first Request for Panel Review (the deadline for filing a Notice of Appearance is April 18, 2022); (c) The panel review will be limited to the allegations of error of fact or law, including challenges to the jurisdiction of the investigating authority, that are set out in the Complaints filed in the panel review and to the procedural and substantive defenses raised in the panel review. Dated: March 4, 2022. Garrett Peterson, International Trade Specialist, USMCA Secretariat. [FR Doc. 2022–05016 Filed 3–9–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–GT–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–570–928] Uncovered Innerspring Units From the People’s Republic of China: Final Determination of No Shipments; 2020– 2021 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that Comfort Coil Technology Sdn. Bhd. (Comfort Coil), the only company subject to review, had no shipments of subject merchandise during the period of review (POR), February 1, 2020, through January 31, 2021. DATES: Applicable March 10, 2022. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher Maciuba, AD/CVD Operations, Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue AGENCY: E:\FR\FM\10MRN1.SGM 10MRN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 47 (Thursday, March 10, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13705-13707]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-05069]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-201-830]


Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod From Mexico: Final 
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2019-2020

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.


[[Page 13706]]


SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that sales of 
carbon and certain alloy steel wire rod (wire rod) from Mexico were 
made at less than normal value (NV) during the period of review (POR), 
October 1, 2019, through September 30, 2020.

DATES: Applicable March 10, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Benjamin A. Smith, AD/CVD Operations, 
Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-2181.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On November 4, 2021, Commerce published the Preliminary Results of 
this review in the Federal Register.\1\ We invited interested parties 
to comment on the Preliminary Results. This review covers one mandatory 
respondent selected for individual examination, Deacero S.A.P.I de C.V. 
(Deacero). We received case briefs from Deacero and Nucor Corporation 
(Nucor, or the petitioner).\2\ Subsequently, we received a rebuttal 
brief from Deacero.\3\ A complete summary of the events that occurred 
since publication of the Preliminary Results is found in the Issues and 
Decision Memorandum.\4\ Commerce conducted this review in accordance 
with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Mexico: 
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and 
Partial Recission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2019-
2020, 86 FR 60799 (November 4, 2021) (Preliminary Results), and 
accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM).
    \2\ See Deacero's Letter, ``Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire 
Rod from Mexico--Case Brief,'' dated December 6, 2021; see also 
Nucor's Letter, ``Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from 
Mexico: Case Brief,'' dated December 6, 2021.
    \3\ See Deacero's Letter, ``Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire 
Rod from Mexico--Rebuttal Brief,'' dated December 13, 2021.
    \4\ See Memorandum, ``Decision Memorandum for the Final Results 
of the 2019-2020 Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order 
on Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Mexico,'' dated 
concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and 
Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order 5
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: Carbon and Certain 
Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Brazil, Indonesia, Mexico, Moldova, 
Trinidad and Tobago, and Ukraine, 67 FR 65945 (October 29, 2002) 
(Order).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The merchandise subject to the Order is wire rod, in coils, of 
approximately round cross section, 5.00 mm or more, but less than 19.00 
mm, in solid cross-sectional diameter.
    A full description of the scope of the Order is contained in the 
Issues and Decision Memorandum.

Analysis of Comments Received

    All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties to 
this review are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. The 
issues are identified in the appendix to this notice. The Issues and 
Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically 
via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 
registered users at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete 
version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly 
on the internet at https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.

Changes Since the Preliminary Results

    Based on our analysis of the comments received from parties, we 
have made certain revisions to the margin calculation for Deacero.\6\ 
For detailed information, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Issues and Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Rate for Respondent Not Selected for Individual Examination

    Commerce did not select Ternium Mexico S.A. de C.V. (Ternium) for 
individual examination. Further, Ternium was not the subject of a 
withdrawal of request for review; did not request to participate as a 
voluntary respondent; did not submit a claim of no shipments; and was 
not otherwise collapsed with a mandatory respondent. Therefore, Ternium 
remains a respondent not selected for individual examination. As 
explained in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, we have assigned to 
Ternium the weighted-average dumping margin calculated for Deacero.

Final Results of the Review

    Commerce determines that the following weighted-average dumping 
margins exist for the period October 1, 2019, through September 30, 
2020:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               Weighted-
                                                                average
                     Producers/exporters                        dumping
                                                                margins
                                                               (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Deacero S.A.P.I de C.V......................................        4.64
Ternium Mexico S.A. de C.V..................................        4.64
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclosure

    We intend to disclose the calculations performed to parties in this 
proceeding within five days after publication of these final results in 
the Federal Register, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).

Assessment Rates

    Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the Act, and 19 CFR 
351.212(b)(1), Commerce will determine, and CBP shall assess, 
antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise in 
accordance with the final results of this review.
    For Deacero, Commerce has calculated importer-specific antidumping 
duty assessment rates by aggregating the total amount of dumping 
calculated for the examined sales of each importer and dividing each of 
these amounts by the total entered value associated with those sales in 
accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2), 
we will instruct CBP to liquidate without regard to antidumping duties 
any entries for which the importer-specific assessment rate is zero or 
de minimis. For entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced 
by Deacero for which it did not know its merchandise was destined for 
the United States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries 
at the all-others rate if there is no rate for the intermediate 
company(ies) involved in the transaction. For the companies not 
selected for individual examination, we will instruct CBP to apply an 
assessment rate to all entries produced and/or exported by those 
companies equal to the dumping margin indicated above. Commerce intends 
to issue assessment instructions to CBP 41 days after the date of 
publication of these final results of review.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See 19 CFR 351.356.8(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon 
publication of the notice of final results of administrative review for 
all shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from 
warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication of the final 
results of this administrative review, as provided by section 751(a)(2) 
of the Act: (1) For producers or exporters covered in this 
administrative review, the cash deposit rates will be the rates 
established in the final results of this administrative review; (2) for 
producers or exporters not covered in this administrative review but 
covered in a prior segment

[[Page 13707]]

of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the 
company-specific rate published for the most recent period; (3) if the 
exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the 
original investigation, but the producer is, then the cash deposit rate 
will be the rate established for the most recent period for the 
producer of the merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all 
other producers or exporters will continue to be 20.11 percent, the 
all-others rate established in the investigation.\8\ These cash deposit 
requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further 
notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Order, 67 FR at 65947.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification to Importers

    This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply 
with this requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of double antidumping duties.

Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order

    This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under 
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written 
notification of return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to 
judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with 
the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.

Notification to Interested Parties

    We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with 
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.213(h).

    Dated: March 3, 2022.
Lisa W. Wang,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix

List of Topics Discussed in the Final Decision Memorandum

I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Margin for Company Not Selected for Individual Examination
V. Changes Since the Preliminary Results
VI. Discussion of Comments
    Comment 1: Whether Commerce Made a Ministerial Error Related to 
Currency Conversion
    Comment 2: Whether Commerce Should Exclude Insurance Revenue 
from the Calculation of Deacero's Home Market Credit Expenses
    Comment 3: Whether Deacero Failed to Report Inland Freight 
Expenses for Some U.S. Sales.
VII. Recommendation

[FR Doc. 2022-05069 Filed 3-9-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P