Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to the Office of Management and Budget for Review and Approval; Uniform Procedures for State Highway Safety Grant Programs, 13360-13365 [2022-04932]
Download as PDF
13360
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 46 / Wednesday, March 9, 2022 / Notices
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
of the key from the ignition switch
when the vehicle is not being used.
As required in section 543.6(a)(3)(v),
Subaru provided information on the
reliability and durability of its proposed
device. To ensure reliability and
durability of the device, Subaru
conducted tests based on its own
specified standards and provided a
detailed list of the tests conducted.
Subaru stated that it believes that its
device is reliable and durable because it
complied with its own specific design
standards and the antitheft device is
installed on other vehicle lines for
which the agency has granted a partsmarking exemption.
Subaru stated that its theft rates have
been low per the National Insurance
Crime Bureau’s 2019 report on
America’s 10 most stolen vehicles.
However, Subaru compared its
proposed device to other Subaru
antitheft devices that NHTSA has
determined to be as effective in
reducing and deterring motor vehicle
theft as would compliance with the
parts-marking requirements.
Specifically, Subaru stated that the theft
rate of the MY 2008 Impreza (not parts
marked, standard engine immobilizer)
decreased by almost 51% as compared
to the MY 2007 Impreza (parts marked
with optional engine immobilizer).
Subaru stated that the antitheft system
included on the BRZ vehicle line is the
same system employed on the Subaru
Ascent car line, for which NHTSA
determined that the system was likely as
effective in reducing and deterring
motor vehicle theft as compliance with
the parts-marking requirements of the
theft prevention standard.7
Subaru also stated that the National
Crime Information Center’s (NCIC) theft
data showed that there was a 70%
reduction in theft experienced when
comparing the MY 1997 Ford Mustang
vehicle thefts (with immobilizers) to MY
1995 Ford Mustang vehicle thefts
(without immobilizers). On the basis of
the above and other cited comparisons,
Subaru has concluded that its proposed
immobilizer system is no less effective
than those devices installed on lines for
which NHTSA has already granted full
exemptions.
III. Decision To Grant the Petition
Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 33106 and 49
CFR 543.8(b), the agency grants a
petition for exemption from the partsmarking requirements of part 541, either
in whole or in part, if it determines that,
based upon substantial evidence, the
standard equipment antitheft device is
likely to be as effective in reducing and
7 82
FR 57650 (Dec. 06, 2017).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:44 Mar 08, 2022
Jkt 256001
deterring motor vehicle theft as
compliance with the parts-marking
requirements of part 541 or if deemed
approved under 49 U.S.C. 33106(d).
NHTSA finds that Subaru has provided
adequate reasons for its belief that the
antitheft device for its vehicle line is
likely to be as effective in reducing and
deterring motor vehicle theft as
compliance with the parts-marking
requirements of the theft prevention
standard. This conclusion is based on
the information Subaru provided about
its antitheft device.
The agency concludes that Subaru’s
antitheft device will provide the five
types of performance features listed in
section 543.6(a)(3): Promoting
activation; attracting attention to the
efforts of unauthorized persons to enter
or operate a vehicle by means other than
a key; preventing defeat or
circumvention of the device by
unauthorized persons; preventing
operation of the vehicle by
unauthorized entrants; and ensuring the
reliability and durability of the device.
The agency notes that 49 CFR part
541, Appendix A–1, identifies those
lines that are exempted from the theft
prevention standard for a given model
year. 49 CFR 543.8(f) contains
publication requirements incident to the
disposition of all part 543 petitions.
Advanced listing, including the release
of future product nameplates, the
beginning model year for which the
petition is granted and a general
description of the antitheft device is
necessary in order to notify law
enforcement agencies of new vehicle
lines exempted from the parts-marking
requirements of the theft prevention
standard.
If Subaru decides not to use the
exemption for its requested vehicle line,
the manufacturer must formally notify
the agency. If such a decision is made,
the line must be fully marked as
required by 49 CFR 541.5 and 541.6
(marking of major component parts and
replacement parts).
NHTSA notes that if a manufacturer
to which an exemption has been granted
wishes in the future to modify the
device on which the exemption is
based, the company may have to submit
a petition to modify the exemption.
Section 543.8(d) states that a part 543
exemption applies only to vehicles that
belong to a line exempted under this
part and equipped with the antitheft
device on which the line’s exemption is
based. Further, section 543.10(c)(2)
provides for the submission of petitions
‘‘to modify an exemption to permit the
use of an antitheft device similar to but
PO 00000
Frm 00110
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
differing from the one specified in the
exemption.’’ 8
For the foregoing reasons, the agency
hereby announces a grant in full of
Subaru’s petition for exemption for the
BRZ vehicle line from the parts-marking
requirements of 49 CFR part 541,
beginning with its MY 2023 vehicles.
Issued under authority delegated in 49 CFR
1.95 and 501.8.
Raymond R. Posten,
Associate Administrator for Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 2022–04928 Filed 3–8–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA–2021–0009]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission to the Office of
Management and Budget for Review
and Approval; Uniform Procedures for
State Highway Safety Grant Programs
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments on a reinstatement of a
previously approved information
collection.
AGENCY:
In compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA), this notice announces that the
Information Collection Request (ICR)
abstracted below will be submitted to
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and approval. The ICR
describes the nature of the information
collection and its expected burden. This
is a request for approval for
reinstatement of a previously-approved
collection of information for NHTSA’s
Highway Grant Program, which
includes State Highway Safety Program
grants, the National Priority Safety
Program grants, and a separate grant on
racial profiling data collection. The
purpose of the information collection is
to collect information necessary for
NHTSA to issue grants to States. To
receive grants, a State must submit a
SUMMARY:
8 The agency wishes to minimize the
administrative burden that section 543.10(c)(2)
could place on exempted vehicle manufacturers
and itself. The agency did not intend in drafting
part 543 to require the submission of a modification
petition for every change to the components or
design of an antitheft device. The significance of
many such changes could be de minimis. Therefore,
NHTSA suggests that if a manufacturer with an
exemption contemplates making any changes, the
effects of which might be characterized as de
minimis, it should consult the agency before
preparing and submitting a petition to modify.
E:\FR\FM\09MRN1.SGM
09MRN1
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 46 / Wednesday, March 9, 2022 / Notices
Highway Safety Plan (HSP) that
supports its qualifications for receiving
grant funds. Specifically, the HSP
consists of information on the highway
safety planning process, performance
report, performance plan, problem
identification, highway safety
countermeasure strategies, planned
activities and funding amounts,
certifications and assurances, and
application materials that cover Section
405 grants and the reauthorized Section
1906 grant. A Federal Register Notice
with a 60-day comment period soliciting
comments on the following information
collection was published on February 9,
2021. NHTSA received three comments.
A summary of the comments and
NHTSA’s response to those comments is
provided below.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on
or before April 8, 2022.
ADDRESSES: Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection, including
suggestions for reducing burden, should
be submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget at
www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain.
To find this particular information
collection, select ‘‘Currently under
Review—Open for Public Comment’’ or
use the search function.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
additional information or access to
background documents, contact Barbara
Sauers, Regional Operations and
Program Delivery, NRO–011, National
Highway Traffic Safety Administration,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington,
DC, 20590; Telephone: 202–366–0144.
Please identify the relevant collection of
information by referring to its OMB
Control Number.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the
PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), a Federal
agency must receive approval from the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) before it collects certain
information from the public and a
person is not required to respond to a
collection of information by a Federal
agency unless the collection displays a
valid OMB control number. In
compliance with these requirements,
this notice announces that the following
information collection request will be
submitted to OMB.
Title: Uniform Procedures for State
Highway Safety Grant Programs.
OMB Control Number: 2127–0730.
Form Number: None.
Type of Request: Reinstatement of a
previously approved information
collection.
Type of Review Requested: Regular.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:44 Mar 08, 2022
Jkt 256001
Length of Approval Requested: Three
years from date of approval.
Summary of the Collection of
Information:
The Fixing America’s Surface
Transportation Act (FAST), Public Law
114–94, authorizes the National
Highway Traffic Safety Administration
(NHTSA) to issue highway safety grants
to States under Chapter 4 of Title 23,
U.S.C. Specifically, these grant
programs include the Highway Safety
Program grants (23 U.S.C. 402 or Section
402), the National Priority Safety
Program grants (23 U.S.C. 405 or Section
405) and a separate grant on racial
profiling data collection contained in a
previous authorization that was revised
and restored under the FAST Act
(Public Law 109–59, Sec. 1906 or
Section 1906, as amended by Sec. 4011,
Public Law 114–94).
For all of these grants, as directed in
statute, NHTSA uses a consolidated
application process that relies on the
Highway Safety Plan (HSP) that States 1
submit under the Section 402 program
as a single application. The information
required to be submitted for these grants
includes the HSP consisting of
information on the highway safety
planning process, performance report,
performance plan, problem
identification, highway safety
countermeasure strategies, projects and
funding amounts, certifications and
assurances, and application materials
that cover Section 405 grants and the
reauthorized Section 1906 grant.2 States
also must submit an annual report
evaluating their progress in achieving
performance targets. In addition, as part
of the statutory criteria for Section 405
grants covering the areas of occupant
protection, traffic safety information
system improvement and impaired
driving countermeasures, States may be
required to receive assessments of their
State programs in order to receive a
grant.3 States must provide information
1 While
the grant programs are available for the
50 States, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico,
U.S. Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, the
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands,
and the Bureau of Indian Affairs on behalf of the
Indian Country, NHTSA will refer to the
respondents to the Uniform Procedures for State
Highway Safety Grant Programs information
collection as ‘‘States.’’
2 Section 405 grants cover the following:
Occupant Protection Grants; State Traffic Safety
Information System Improvements Grants; Impaired
Driving Countermeasures Grants (including
Alcohol-Ignition Interlock Grants and 24–7 Sobriety
Program Grants); Distracted Driving Grants;
Motorcyclist Safety Grants; State Graduated Driver
Licensing Incentive Grants; and Nonmotorized
Safety Grants. Section 1906 is a separate racial
profiling data collection grant.
3 Under occupant protection grants, one criterion
that a State with a lower belt use rate may use to
receive a grant is to complete an assessment of its
PO 00000
Frm 00111
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
13361
and respond to questions as part of the
assessment process.
Consistent with the statute, NHTSA
has implemented a final rule that
creates uniform procedures for States to
apply for grant funds (83 FR 3466,
January 25, 2018). These procedures
specify the information that is required
to be submitted to receive a grant and
the type of information required to
verify performance under the grants.
As indicated above, States may be
required to receive an assessment of
certain covered programs in order to be
eligible for some grants under Section
405. Separate from these requirements,
States also may request assessments in
these areas at their discretion. NHTSA
uses two different assessment
approaches based on the traffic safety
area covered. For occupant protection
and impaired driving, assessments are
based on NHTSA’s Uniform Guidelines
for State Highway Safety Programs,
which are required by Congress and
periodically updated through a process
that seeks public comment.4 State
programs are assessed against these
uniform guidelines by a team of subject
matter experts. The assessment team
produces a final report with
recommendations on how the State can
improve the effectiveness of its program.
As part of the process, States provide
written materials in response to requests
from the assessment team and
participate in a comprehensive
interview process. For traffic safety
information systems, States respond to
questions based on NHTSA’s Traffic
Records Program Assessment Advisory
(DOT HS 812 601), which describes an
ideal traffic records system. The
questions cover nine topical areas and
examine how well a State plans,
collects, manages, and integrates
information from several State traffic
records systems.5 Responses are
occupant protection program once every three years
(23 U.S.C. 405(b)(3)(B)(ii)(VI)(aa)); and another
criterion is a comprehensive occupant protection
program that includes a program assessment
conducted every five years as one of its elements
(23 U.S.C. 405(b)(3)(B)(ii)(V)(aa); 23 CFR
1300.21(e)(5)(i)). Under traffic safety system
information system improvement grants, a State
must have an assessment of its highway safety data
and traffic records system once every 5 years in
order to receive a grant (23 U.S.C. 405(c)(3)(E)).
Under impaired driving countermeasure grants, a
State with high average impaired driving fatality
rates must have an assessment of its impaired
driving program once every 3 years in order to
receive a grant. (23 U.S.C. 405(d)(3)(C)(i)(I)).
4 The Uniform Guidelines for State Highway
Safety Programs are available online at https://
one.nhtsa.gov/nhtsa/whatsup/tea21/
tea21programs/index.htm.
5 The Traffic Records Program Assessment
Advisory is available online at https://
crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov/Api/Public/
ViewPublication/812601.
E:\FR\FM\09MRN1.SGM
09MRN1
13362
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 46 / Wednesday, March 9, 2022 / Notices
evaluated by subject matter experts, and
a final report is provided to the State
with recommendations for
improvement.
Description of the Need for the
Information and Proposed Use of the
Information:
As noted above, the statute provides
that the HSP is the application basis for
grants each fiscal year. The information
is necessary to determine whether a
State satisfies the Federal criteria for
grant awards. The annual report tracks
progress in achieving the aims of the
grant program. The information is
necessary to verify performance under
the grants and to provide a basis for
improvement. As specified in statute,
States may be required to receive an
assessment of certain covered programs.
In other instances, States may opt to
receive an assessment in order to use
that assessment as one of several
options to qualify for a grant under
Section 405. The information provided
by a State allows subject matter experts
to provide recommendations for the
purpose of improving the covered areas.
Public Comments
A Federal Register notice with a 60day comment period soliciting public
comments on the information collection
was published on February 9, 2021 (86
FR 8832). NHTSA received three
comments from the Governors Highway
Safety Association (GHSA), the
Tennessee Highway Safety Office, and
an anonymous commenter. Comments
addressed the timing of the Highway
Safety Program applications and Annual
Report, estimated burden hours, and the
inclusion of other activities in the
burden estimates.
General
In general, commenters indicated
support for the agency’s collection of
information and its use of a single,
unified annual Highway Safety Plan.
Commenters also included other topics
unrelated to this PRA which will be
addressed separately.
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
Timing of Highway Safety Plan
Application and Annual Report
Commenters raised issues with the
timing of the HSP application.
Tennessee commented that the
‘‘deadline is so early in the year’’ and
that ‘‘States need time to look at the
previous year’s uncertified FARS data
(State data) to determine issue areas to
address for the upcoming grant year and
the most current certified FARS data.’’
Furthermore, the comment noted that
the deadline of July 1 necessitates the
use of amendments to supply
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:44 Mar 08, 2022
Jkt 256001
information not available at the time of
the application.
While NHTSA recognizes the
potential difficulty in submitting
applications by the July 1 application
date, NHTSA does not have discretion
to adjust the application deadline. The
July 1 application date is set forth in
statute.6 However, NHTSA would like
to reiterate that while FARS data is to
be used to report progress on the core
performance targets, States can use
other sources of data to help determine
their targets and priority problem areas.
It is correct that States that do not know
which projects will be funded at the
time of application will need to follow
up by providing a list of projects in an
amendment to their application;
however, States can provide this list in
any format they choose as long as the
four required data elements are
included (project agreement number,
subrecipient, amount of federal funds,
and eligible use of funds). While
NHTSA believes that this type of list is
common and exists as a normal business
practice in most States (and the majority
of States (68%) provided a list with
their 2021 application) we agree that
extra time may be needed. Accordingly,
we have adjusted our estimated burden
hours (see below).
Commenters also raised concerns
regarding the timing of the annual
report. GHSA commented that it is
challenging to meet the due date for the
annual report due to it coinciding with
year-end closeout and the winter
holidays. They also noted the new
option in the revised 2 CFR 200 7 that
allows NHTSA to extend the closeout
and reporting deadline from 90 days to
120 days beginning with FY22. The
timing of the annual report is set forth
in NHTSA’s regulation at 23 CFR
1300.35 and was created to align with
the 90-day government-wide timing
requirements that existed at the time our
regulation was published in 2018. As
GHSA notes, the government-wide
regulation has since been updated to
allow a longer, 120-day time frame for
closeout and reporting; NHTSA will
take this into consideration when we
next revise our own implementing
regulation. Another commenter said that
automating the annual report could help
reduce the burden.
Estimated Burden Hours
Both GHSA and the anonymous
commenter stated that they believe
NHTSA under-estimated the burden of
time involved in developing the HSP
6 23
U.S.C. 402(k)(2).
85 FR 49506 (Aug. 13, 2020), effective
November 12, 2020.
7 See
PO 00000
Frm 00112
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and annual report. One State that
supplied comments to GHSA suggested
that preparing the HSP, including both
the Section 402 and 405 grant programs,
likely takes over 400 hours. In support,
GHSA commented that ‘‘HSP
development involves not just planning
within the SHSO but interaction with
other partners as well to select projects
and develop agreements.’’ GHSA
acknowledged, however, the difficulty
of developing an estimate across States
since the number will ‘‘differ
significantly from State to State.’’ They
added that States do not track time
spent meeting these requirements and
‘‘are involved in preparing HSPs and
Annual Reports intermittently over time
in addition to implementing programs
and performing other duties.’’
NHTSA agrees that an average may
not be reflective of the experience of
some States. While our initial burden
hour estimate is not too dissimilar from
GHSA’s (380 vs 400), after meeting to
discuss the details of their comments,
we agree that more time should be
added to account for HSP planning
activities which were not part of our
original estimate. We agree that working
with partners is necessary for planning
and carrying out the program, but these
activities are also normal every-day
program planning and operation
activities that are not solely needed for
the application process. In response to
GHSA’s comment and after further
review of the issues, we have increased
the estimate for the HSP application to
410 hours. We also revised our estimate
for completing the annual report. One
State reported to GHSA that it could
take 100–120 hours. While we believe
this estimate is high, we have increased
our estimate to 80 hours, which is an
increase of 40 hours from our original
estimate.
GHSA also noted that the time burden
required for an assessment is significant.
While no commenters provided any
estimates for how long assessments take,
they expressed that assessments are
similar to conference planning and
include preparing materials, scheduling
participants, making travel
arrangements, arranging for audio
visual, and coordination of facilities.
NHTSA’s estimate only covered the
background material collection,
responding to questions and
participating in interviews during the
assessment week. In response to these
comments, NHTSA has increased the
estimated burden hours for occupant
protection and impaired driving
assessments to 88 hours. For traffic
records assessments, NHTSA continues
to estimate that the burden hours for a
traffic records assessment will be 123
E:\FR\FM\09MRN1.SGM
09MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 46 / Wednesday, March 9, 2022 / Notices
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
hours per respondent because these
assessments are conducted virtually and
involve submission of information
submitted via email as opposed to
through interviews.
Other Comments
While commenting on the 60-day
notice, GHSA took the opportunity to
include comments regarding other
aspects of the grant program, not
necessarily related to the information
collection request. Some of the
comments addressed aspects of the
grant program which cannot be changed
since they are part of the grant program
regulation (23 CFR 1300) or statutes.
NHTSA acknowledges these additional
topics raised that are unrelated to this
information collection request and will
respond to them separately through
other means.
Affected Public:
This collection impacts the fifty-seven
entities that are eligible to apply for
grants under the NHTSA Highway Grant
Program (the fifty States, the District of
Columbia, Puerto Rico, American
Samoa, Guam, the Commonwealth of
the Northern Mariana Islands, the U.S.
Virgin Islands, and the Bureau of Indian
Affairs on behalf of the Indian Country).
This collection also impacts the
subject matter experts and
administrative assistants who are
involved in assessments for the grant
program. These subject matter experts
are recruited by NHTSA based on
recommendations from NHTSA
Regional Offices and the State Highway
Safety Offices. All new occupant
protection and impaired driving
assessors complete an e-learning course,
Conducting Highway Safety Program
Assessments.The course is self-paced
and entirely on-line. Each impaired
driving and occupant protection
assessment team consists of five (5)
assessors and an administrative
assistant. For traffic records
assessments, NHTSA uses a contractor
to recruit and train the assessors for the
online traffic records assessment
conducted using NHTSA’s Traffic
Records Improvement Program
Reporting System (TRIPRS). All subject
matter experts are current or former
members of State Traffic Records
Coordinating Committees. There are
between 10 to 14 assessors for each
traffic records assessment.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
There are 57 potential State
respondents (the fifty States, the District
of Columbia, Puerto Rico, American
Samoa, Guam, the Commonwealth of
the Northern Mariana Islands, the U.S.
Virgin Islands, and the Bureau of Indian
Affairs on behalf of the Indian Country).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:44 Mar 08, 2022
Jkt 256001
NHTSA estimates there will be
approximately 260 assessors per year.
This estimate includes assessors and
administrative assistants. Each occupant
protection or impaired driving
assessment involves five (5) subject
matter experts and one (1)
administrative assistant. NHTSA
estimates that 13 occupant protection
and impaired driving assessments will
be completed each year, for a total of 78
respondents. Each traffic records
assessment involves approximately
thirteen (13) subject matter experts.
NHTSA estimates that 14 traffic records
assessments are completed each year,
for a total of 182 traffic records
assessors.
Frequency:
Applications for grant funding and
annual reporting are submitted once a
year and assessments are conducted
once every three or five years.
Number of Responses:
NHTSA estimates that it will receive
57 Section 402 grant applications, 56
Section 405 grant applications (except
for impaired driving countermeasures,
motorcyclist safety and nonmotorized
grants), and 52 Section 405 impaired
driving countermeasures, motorcyclist
safety and nonmotorized grant
applications. These estimates are based
on the number of eligible respondents
each year for each of the grants.
NHTSA estimates that there will be 9
State responses for assessments for
Section 405 occupation protection
grants, 14 State responses for
assessments for Section 405 traffic
safety information system improvement
grants, and 4 State responses for
assessments for Section 405 impaired
driving countermeasures grants
annually. Further, NHTSA estimates
that there will be 54 subject matter
expert responses for Section 405
occupation protection grants, 182
subject matter expert responses for
assessments for Section 405 traffic
safety information system improvement
grants, and 24 subject matter expert
responses for assessments for Section
405 impaired driving countermeasures
grants.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 39,550.
The estimated burden hours for the
grant application and annual report part
of the collection of information are
based on all eligible respondents each
year for each of the grants:
• Section 402 grants: 57 (fifty States,
the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico,
the U.S. Virgin Islands, Guam,
American Samoa, the Commonwealth of
the Northern Mariana Islands, and the
Bureau of Indian Affairs);
PO 00000
Frm 00113
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
13363
• Section 405 Grants (except
Impaired Driving Countermeasures,
Motorcyclist Safety and Nonmotorized
Grants) and Section 1906 Grant: 56 (fifty
States, the District of Columbia, Puerto
Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, Guam,
American Samoa, and the
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana
Islands); and
• Section 405, Impaired Driving
Countermeasures, Motorcyclist Safety
and Nonmotorized Grants: 52 (fifty
States, the District of Columbia, and
Puerto Rico).
Under the grant application and
annual report requirements for Sections
402 and 405, we estimate that it will
take each respondent approximately 490
hours to collect, review and submit the
required information to NHTSA (220
burden hours for 402 grant applications,
190 for 405 and 1906 grant applications,
and 80 hours for annual reports).8
Therefore, NHTSA estimates the total
annual burden for Section 402 grant
applications to be 12,540 hours (57
respondents × 220 hours), the total
annual burden for Section 405 and 1906
grant applications to be 10,640 hours
(56 respondents × 190 hours), and the
total annual burden for annual reports
to be 4,560 (57 respondents × 80 hours).
The estimated burden hours for the
assessment part of the collection of
information are based on the average
number of State assessments that are
carried out each year in each of the
covered grant areas: 9 NHTSA estimates
that there will be 9 assessments for
Section 405 occupant protection grants,
14 assessments for the Section 405
traffic safety information system
improvement grants, and 4 assessments
for the Section 405 impaired driving
grant each year. Based on this
information and the hours listed below,
the estimated annual burden hours for
all State respondents is 2,866 hours.
As the requirements for the program
assessments vary, the burden for each
type is calculated separately. For traffic
safety information system improvement
grants, we estimate that it takes 123
hours to respond to questions under the
assessment. For occupant protection
and impaired driving countermeasures
grants, we estimate that it takes 88 hours
to provide the required information and
8 Please note that the burden estimates for 405
and 1906 applications are based on every applicant
applying for a grant under all program areas.
Marginally, this may overestimate the total burden
as all applicants will not apply for a grant in each
program area each year.
9 Assessment average is based on the total number
of assessments conducted each year and divided by
the number of years since the inception of
assessment requirements for certain grants under
MAP–21, Public Law 112–141.
E:\FR\FM\09MRN1.SGM
09MRN1
13364
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 46 / Wednesday, March 9, 2022 / Notices
respond to questions under an
assessment.
Commenters did not question
NHTSA’s estimates for labor cost. For
the costs associated with respondents
preparing application materials NHTSA
used the estimated average wage for
‘‘Management Analysts,’’ Occupation
Code 13–1111. The Bureau of Labor
Statistics estimates that the average
hourly wage for management analysts in
State and local government is $31.95.10
The Bureau of Labor Statistics estimates
that wages for State and local
government workers represent 61.8% of
total compensation costs.11 Therefore,
NHTSA estimates the hourly labor costs
to be $51.70 and estimates that hourly
labor cost associated with preparing
materials to be $24,056 per respondent.
If all eligible States applied for and
received grants for all programs (and
including the annual number of
assessment responses required from
States), the total labor costs on all State
respondents would be $1,582,329.
These estimates are based on every
eligible respondent submitting the
required information for every available
grant. However, not all States apply for
and receive a grant each year under each
of these programs. In addition, under
Section 405 grants, some requirements
permit States to submit a single
application covering multiple years
allowing States to simply recertify in
subsequent years.
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
TABLE 1—ESTIMATED BURDEN HOURS AND LABOR COSTS FOR STATE RESPONDENTS
Number of
respondents
Burden hours
per
respondent
Hourly labor
costs
Total labor
costs
Total burden
hours
Information collection
Frequency
Section 402 Grant Application .............
405 and 1906 Grant Applications ........
Annual Report ......................................
405b Assessment ................................
405c Assessment ................................
405d Assessment ................................
Yearly .................
Yearly .................
Yearly .................
Every 3 years ....
Every 5 years ....
Every 3 years ....
57
56
57
9
14
4
220
190
80
88
123
88
$51.70
51.70
51.70
51.70
51.70
51.70
$648,318
550,088
235,752
40,946
89,027
18,198
12,540
10,640
4,560
792
1,722
352
Totals ............................................
............................
........................
........................
........................
$1,582,329
30,606
In addition to the burden hours for
State respondents, this information
collection also involves burden hours
for subject matter experts who assess the
States and burden hours for
administrative assistants. NHTSA
estimates the burden on subject matter
experts based on the number
assessments that will be performed each
year, the number of individuals
involved with each assessment, and the
estimated time for each assessor. As
stated above, NHTSA estimates that
there will be 9 assessments for Section
405 occupant protection grants, 14
assessments for the Section 405 traffic
safety information system improvement
grants, and 4 assessments for the
Section 405 impaired driving grant each
year. Each impaired driving and
occupant protection assessment team
consists of five (5) assessors and an
administrative assistant. For traffic
records assessments, there are between
10 to 14 assessors. For purposes of
estimate the total annual burden hours,
NHTSA estimates that there will be
approximately 13 assessors for each
traffic records assessment.
For occupant protection and impaired
driving assessments NHTSA estimates
that assessors spend approximately 80
hours of work on each assessment,
based on the following assumptions: 46
hours for the interviews and panel
discussions and 34 hours for pre- and
post- assessment activities, to include
reviewing: (1) Briefing book materials;
(2) resources on the State Highway
Safety Office’s website, and (3)
reviewing comments and/or suggestions
submitted from the State after their
review of the assessment final report.In
addition, an administrative assistant is
expected to spend approximately 46
hours preparing for the interviews and
panel discussions and 18 hours for preand post- assessment activities, to
include coordinating logistics, assisting
team members and editing the
document. Therefore, NHTSA estimates
the total annual burden for Section 405b
(occupant protection) assessment
subject matter experts to be 4,176 hours
((5 SME × 80 hours × 9 assessments) +
(1 Admin × 64 hours × 9 assessments))
and the total annual burden for Section
405d (impaired driving) assessment
subject matter experts to be 1,856 hours
((5 SME × 80 hours × 4 assessments) +
(1 Admin × 64 hours × 4 assessments)).
For traffic records assessments
(Section 405c), NHTSA estimates that
each subject matter expert will spend
approximately 16 hours on an
assessment. Therefore, NHTSA
estimates the total annual burden for
traffic records subject matter experts to
be 2,912 hours (13 SME × 16 hours × 14
assessments).
To calculate the cost associated with
the assessors time, NHTSA uses the
costs paid to the assessors. For occupant
protection and impaired driving
assessments, the State pays each subject
matter expert $2,700, which translates
to $33.75 per hour and pays each
administrative assistant $2,100, which
translates to $32.80 per hour. For traffic
records assessments NHTSA pays each
assessor $2,100 for their time, or
$131.25 per hour. Table 2 provides a
summary of the burden hours for subject
matter expert respondents.
10 See May 2019 National Industry-Specific
Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates,
NAICS 336100—Motor Vehicle Manufacturing,
available at https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/
naics4_999200.htm (accessed January 6, 2021).
11 See Table 1. Employer Costs for Employee
Compensation by ownership, available at https://
www.bls.gov/news.release/ecec.t01.htm
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:44 Mar 08, 2022
Jkt 256001
PO 00000
Frm 00114
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\09MRN1.SGM
09MRN1
13365
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 46 / Wednesday, March 9, 2022 / Notices
TABLE 2—ESTIMATED BURDEN HOURS AND LABOR COSTS FOR SUBJECT MATTER EXPERT RESPONDENTS
Information collection
405b Assessment (every 3 years) .........
405c Assessment (every 5 years) .........
405d Assessment (every 3 years) .........
Total ................................................
Number of
respondents
per assessment
Number of
assessments
per year
Burden hours
per
respondent
5 SME ..................
1 Admin ...............
13 SME ................
5 SME ..................
1 Admin ...............
9
......................
14
4
......................
80
64
16
80
64
$33.75
32.80
131.25
33.75
32.80
$121,500
18,893
382,200
54,000
8,397
3,600
576
2,912
1,600
256
..............................
......................
......................
........................
584,990
8,944
Accordingly, NHTSA estimates the
total burden hours for this information
collection request is 39,550 hours and
the associated labor costs is estimated to
be $2,167,319.
Estimated Total Annual Burden Cost:
$422,500.
Apart from the costs incurred by
States for labor associated with the
burden hours, States are expected to
incur other costs in conjunction with
the assessments. There are other costs
involved related to conducting the event
such as subject matter expert stipend,
travel and per diem. These costs are
approximately $32,500 per occupant
protection and impaired driving
assessment. For the thirteen planned
assessments, the cost is estimated to be
$422,500.
Public Comments Invited: You are
asked to comment on any aspects of this
information collection, including (a)
whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate
of the burden of the proposed collection
of information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
(c) ways to enhance the quality, utility
and clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
Application No.
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submission of responses.
Authority: The Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995; 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35, as
amended; 49 CFR 1.49; and DOT Order
1351.29.
Issued on March 3, 2022.
Barbara F. Sauers,
Acting Associate Administrator for Regional
Operations and Program Delivery.
[FR Doc. 2022–04932 Filed 3–8–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
Hazardous Materials: Notice of Actions
on Special Permits
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration
(PHMSA), Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of actions on special
permit applications.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
procedures governing the application
for, and the processing of, special
permits from the Department of
Transportation’s Hazardous Material
Regulations, notice is hereby given that
the Office of Hazardous Materials Safety
has received the application described
herein.
SUMMARY:
Applicant
Regulation(s) affected
Hourly labor
costs
Total labor
costs
Total burden
hours
Comments must be received on
or before April 8, 2022.
ADDRESSES: Record Center, Pipeline and
Hazardous Materials Safety
Administration, U.S. Department of
Transportation Washington, DC 20590.
Comments should refer to the
application number and be submitted in
triplicate. If confirmation of receipt of
comments is desired, include a selfaddressed stamped postcard showing
the special permit number.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Donald Burger, Chief, Office of
Hazardous Materials Safety General
Approvals and Permits Branch, Pipeline
and Hazardous Materials Safety
Administration, U.S. Department of
Transportation, East Building, PHH–13,
1200 New Jersey Avenue Southeast,
Washington, DC 20590–0001, (202) 366–
4535.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Copies of
the applications are available for
inspection in the Records Center, East
Building, PHH–13, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue Southeast, Washington DC.
This notice of receipt of applications
for special permit is published in
accordance with part 107 of the Federal
hazardous materials transportation law
(49 U.S.C. 5117(b); 49 CFR 1.53(b)).
DATES:
Issued in Washington, DC, on March 02,
2022.
Donald P. Burger,
Chief, General Approvals and Permits
Branch.
Nature of the special permits thereof
Special Permits Data—Granted
10511–M ............
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
11650–M ............
13112–M ............
14919–M ............
20907–M ............
20963–M ............
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Schlumberger Technology
Corp.
Autoliv Asp, Inc ......................
173.304a ................................
Cobham Mission Systems Orchard Park Inc.
Joyson Safety Systems Acquisition LLC.
Versum Materials Us, LLC .....
173.302a(a)(1) .......................
Lg Energy Solution Wroclaw
SP ZOO.
172.101(j) ...............................
17:44 Mar 08, 2022
Jkt 256001
PO 00000
173.301(a)(1), 173.302(a) ......
173.301(a)(1), 173.302a,
178.65(f)(2).
171.23(a)(1), 171.23(a)(3) .....
Frm 00115
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
To modify the special permit to authorize an additional
packaging configuration.
To modify the special permit to authorize cylinder weld
studs.
To modify the special permit to update the drawing revision
number of the packaging.
To modify the special permit to authorize a different pressure test and alternative safety control measures.
To modify the special permit to replace paragraph 7.b.(6)
with a 5-year service life restriction.
To modify the special permit to include additional cells in
the authorized battery modules.
E:\FR\FM\09MRN1.SGM
09MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 46 (Wednesday, March 9, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13360-13365]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-04932]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA-2021-0009]
Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to the
Office of Management and Budget for Review and Approval; Uniform
Procedures for State Highway Safety Grant Programs
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice and request for comments on a reinstatement of a
previously approved information collection.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA),
this notice announces that the Information Collection Request (ICR)
abstracted below will be submitted to the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) for review and approval. The ICR describes the nature of
the information collection and its expected burden. This is a request
for approval for reinstatement of a previously-approved collection of
information for NHTSA's Highway Grant Program, which includes State
Highway Safety Program grants, the National Priority Safety Program
grants, and a separate grant on racial profiling data collection. The
purpose of the information collection is to collect information
necessary for NHTSA to issue grants to States. To receive grants, a
State must submit a
[[Page 13361]]
Highway Safety Plan (HSP) that supports its qualifications for
receiving grant funds. Specifically, the HSP consists of information on
the highway safety planning process, performance report, performance
plan, problem identification, highway safety countermeasure strategies,
planned activities and funding amounts, certifications and assurances,
and application materials that cover Section 405 grants and the
reauthorized Section 1906 grant. A Federal Register Notice with a 60-
day comment period soliciting comments on the following information
collection was published on February 9, 2021. NHTSA received three
comments. A summary of the comments and NHTSA's response to those
comments is provided below.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before April 8, 2022.
ADDRESSES: Written comments and recommendations for the proposed
information collection, including suggestions for reducing burden,
should be submitted to the Office of Management and Budget at
www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. To find this particular information
collection, select ``Currently under Review--Open for Public Comment''
or use the search function.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For additional information or access
to background documents, contact Barbara Sauers, Regional Operations
and Program Delivery, NRO-011, National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC, 20590; Telephone: 202-366-0144. Please
identify the relevant collection of information by referring to its OMB
Control Number.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), a
Federal agency must receive approval from the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) before it collects certain information from the public and
a person is not required to respond to a collection of information by a
Federal agency unless the collection displays a valid OMB control
number. In compliance with these requirements, this notice announces
that the following information collection request will be submitted to
OMB.
Title: Uniform Procedures for State Highway Safety Grant Programs.
OMB Control Number: 2127-0730.
Form Number: None.
Type of Request: Reinstatement of a previously approved information
collection.
Type of Review Requested: Regular.
Length of Approval Requested: Three years from date of approval.
Summary of the Collection of Information:
The Fixing America's Surface Transportation Act (FAST), Public Law
114-94, authorizes the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
(NHTSA) to issue highway safety grants to States under Chapter 4 of
Title 23, U.S.C. Specifically, these grant programs include the Highway
Safety Program grants (23 U.S.C. 402 or Section 402), the National
Priority Safety Program grants (23 U.S.C. 405 or Section 405) and a
separate grant on racial profiling data collection contained in a
previous authorization that was revised and restored under the FAST Act
(Public Law 109-59, Sec. 1906 or Section 1906, as amended by Sec. 4011,
Public Law 114-94).
For all of these grants, as directed in statute, NHTSA uses a
consolidated application process that relies on the Highway Safety Plan
(HSP) that States \1\ submit under the Section 402 program as a single
application. The information required to be submitted for these grants
includes the HSP consisting of information on the highway safety
planning process, performance report, performance plan, problem
identification, highway safety countermeasure strategies, projects and
funding amounts, certifications and assurances, and application
materials that cover Section 405 grants and the reauthorized Section
1906 grant.\2\ States also must submit an annual report evaluating
their progress in achieving performance targets. In addition, as part
of the statutory criteria for Section 405 grants covering the areas of
occupant protection, traffic safety information system improvement and
impaired driving countermeasures, States may be required to receive
assessments of their State programs in order to receive a grant.\3\
States must provide information and respond to questions as part of the
assessment process.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ While the grant programs are available for the 50 States,
the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, U.S. Virgin Islands, Guam,
American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands,
and the Bureau of Indian Affairs on behalf of the Indian Country,
NHTSA will refer to the respondents to the Uniform Procedures for
State Highway Safety Grant Programs information collection as
``States.''
\2\ Section 405 grants cover the following: Occupant Protection
Grants; State Traffic Safety Information System Improvements Grants;
Impaired Driving Countermeasures Grants (including Alcohol-Ignition
Interlock Grants and 24-7 Sobriety Program Grants); Distracted
Driving Grants; Motorcyclist Safety Grants; State Graduated Driver
Licensing Incentive Grants; and Nonmotorized Safety Grants. Section
1906 is a separate racial profiling data collection grant.
\3\ Under occupant protection grants, one criterion that a State
with a lower belt use rate may use to receive a grant is to complete
an assessment of its occupant protection program once every three
years (23 U.S.C. 405(b)(3)(B)(ii)(VI)(aa)); and another criterion is
a comprehensive occupant protection program that includes a program
assessment conducted every five years as one of its elements (23
U.S.C. 405(b)(3)(B)(ii)(V)(aa); 23 CFR 1300.21(e)(5)(i)). Under
traffic safety system information system improvement grants, a State
must have an assessment of its highway safety data and traffic
records system once every 5 years in order to receive a grant (23
U.S.C. 405(c)(3)(E)). Under impaired driving countermeasure grants,
a State with high average impaired driving fatality rates must have
an assessment of its impaired driving program once every 3 years in
order to receive a grant. (23 U.S.C. 405(d)(3)(C)(i)(I)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Consistent with the statute, NHTSA has implemented a final rule
that creates uniform procedures for States to apply for grant funds (83
FR 3466, January 25, 2018). These procedures specify the information
that is required to be submitted to receive a grant and the type of
information required to verify performance under the grants.
As indicated above, States may be required to receive an assessment
of certain covered programs in order to be eligible for some grants
under Section 405. Separate from these requirements, States also may
request assessments in these areas at their discretion. NHTSA uses two
different assessment approaches based on the traffic safety area
covered. For occupant protection and impaired driving, assessments are
based on NHTSA's Uniform Guidelines for State Highway Safety Programs,
which are required by Congress and periodically updated through a
process that seeks public comment.\4\ State programs are assessed
against these uniform guidelines by a team of subject matter experts.
The assessment team produces a final report with recommendations on how
the State can improve the effectiveness of its program. As part of the
process, States provide written materials in response to requests from
the assessment team and participate in a comprehensive interview
process. For traffic safety information systems, States respond to
questions based on NHTSA's Traffic Records Program Assessment Advisory
(DOT HS 812 601), which describes an ideal traffic records system. The
questions cover nine topical areas and examine how well a State plans,
collects, manages, and integrates information from several State
traffic records systems.\5\ Responses are
[[Page 13362]]
evaluated by subject matter experts, and a final report is provided to
the State with recommendations for improvement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ The Uniform Guidelines for State Highway Safety Programs are
available online at https://one.nhtsa.gov/nhtsa/whatsup/tea21/tea21programs/index.htm.
\5\ The Traffic Records Program Assessment Advisory is available
online at https://crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov/Api/Public/ViewPublication/812601.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Description of the Need for the Information and Proposed Use of the
Information:
As noted above, the statute provides that the HSP is the
application basis for grants each fiscal year. The information is
necessary to determine whether a State satisfies the Federal criteria
for grant awards. The annual report tracks progress in achieving the
aims of the grant program. The information is necessary to verify
performance under the grants and to provide a basis for improvement. As
specified in statute, States may be required to receive an assessment
of certain covered programs. In other instances, States may opt to
receive an assessment in order to use that assessment as one of several
options to qualify for a grant under Section 405. The information
provided by a State allows subject matter experts to provide
recommendations for the purpose of improving the covered areas.
Public Comments
A Federal Register notice with a 60-day comment period soliciting
public comments on the information collection was published on February
9, 2021 (86 FR 8832). NHTSA received three comments from the Governors
Highway Safety Association (GHSA), the Tennessee Highway Safety Office,
and an anonymous commenter. Comments addressed the timing of the
Highway Safety Program applications and Annual Report, estimated burden
hours, and the inclusion of other activities in the burden estimates.
General
In general, commenters indicated support for the agency's
collection of information and its use of a single, unified annual
Highway Safety Plan. Commenters also included other topics unrelated to
this PRA which will be addressed separately.
Timing of Highway Safety Plan Application and Annual Report
Commenters raised issues with the timing of the HSP application.
Tennessee commented that the ``deadline is so early in the year'' and
that ``States need time to look at the previous year's uncertified FARS
data (State data) to determine issue areas to address for the upcoming
grant year and the most current certified FARS data.'' Furthermore, the
comment noted that the deadline of July 1 necessitates the use of
amendments to supply information not available at the time of the
application.
While NHTSA recognizes the potential difficulty in submitting
applications by the July 1 application date, NHTSA does not have
discretion to adjust the application deadline. The July 1 application
date is set forth in statute.\6\ However, NHTSA would like to reiterate
that while FARS data is to be used to report progress on the core
performance targets, States can use other sources of data to help
determine their targets and priority problem areas. It is correct that
States that do not know which projects will be funded at the time of
application will need to follow up by providing a list of projects in
an amendment to their application; however, States can provide this
list in any format they choose as long as the four required data
elements are included (project agreement number, subrecipient, amount
of federal funds, and eligible use of funds). While NHTSA believes that
this type of list is common and exists as a normal business practice in
most States (and the majority of States (68%) provided a list with
their 2021 application) we agree that extra time may be needed.
Accordingly, we have adjusted our estimated burden hours (see below).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ 23 U.S.C. 402(k)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commenters also raised concerns regarding the timing of the annual
report. GHSA commented that it is challenging to meet the due date for
the annual report due to it coinciding with year-end closeout and the
winter holidays. They also noted the new option in the revised 2 CFR
200 \7\ that allows NHTSA to extend the closeout and reporting deadline
from 90 days to 120 days beginning with FY22. The timing of the annual
report is set forth in NHTSA's regulation at 23 CFR 1300.35 and was
created to align with the 90-day government-wide timing requirements
that existed at the time our regulation was published in 2018. As GHSA
notes, the government-wide regulation has since been updated to allow a
longer, 120-day time frame for closeout and reporting; NHTSA will take
this into consideration when we next revise our own implementing
regulation. Another commenter said that automating the annual report
could help reduce the burden.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See 85 FR 49506 (Aug. 13, 2020), effective November 12,
2020.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated Burden Hours
Both GHSA and the anonymous commenter stated that they believe
NHTSA under-estimated the burden of time involved in developing the HSP
and annual report. One State that supplied comments to GHSA suggested
that preparing the HSP, including both the Section 402 and 405 grant
programs, likely takes over 400 hours. In support, GHSA commented that
``HSP development involves not just planning within the SHSO but
interaction with other partners as well to select projects and develop
agreements.'' GHSA acknowledged, however, the difficulty of developing
an estimate across States since the number will ``differ significantly
from State to State.'' They added that States do not track time spent
meeting these requirements and ``are involved in preparing HSPs and
Annual Reports intermittently over time in addition to implementing
programs and performing other duties.''
NHTSA agrees that an average may not be reflective of the
experience of some States. While our initial burden hour estimate is
not too dissimilar from GHSA's (380 vs 400), after meeting to discuss
the details of their comments, we agree that more time should be added
to account for HSP planning activities which were not part of our
original estimate. We agree that working with partners is necessary for
planning and carrying out the program, but these activities are also
normal every-day program planning and operation activities that are not
solely needed for the application process. In response to GHSA's
comment and after further review of the issues, we have increased the
estimate for the HSP application to 410 hours. We also revised our
estimate for completing the annual report. One State reported to GHSA
that it could take 100-120 hours. While we believe this estimate is
high, we have increased our estimate to 80 hours, which is an increase
of 40 hours from our original estimate.
GHSA also noted that the time burden required for an assessment is
significant. While no commenters provided any estimates for how long
assessments take, they expressed that assessments are similar to
conference planning and include preparing materials, scheduling
participants, making travel arrangements, arranging for audio visual,
and coordination of facilities. NHTSA's estimate only covered the
background material collection, responding to questions and
participating in interviews during the assessment week. In response to
these comments, NHTSA has increased the estimated burden hours for
occupant protection and impaired driving assessments to 88 hours. For
traffic records assessments, NHTSA continues to estimate that the
burden hours for a traffic records assessment will be 123
[[Page 13363]]
hours per respondent because these assessments are conducted virtually
and involve submission of information submitted via email as opposed to
through interviews.
Other Comments
While commenting on the 60-day notice, GHSA took the opportunity to
include comments regarding other aspects of the grant program, not
necessarily related to the information collection request. Some of the
comments addressed aspects of the grant program which cannot be changed
since they are part of the grant program regulation (23 CFR 1300) or
statutes. NHTSA acknowledges these additional topics raised that are
unrelated to this information collection request and will respond to
them separately through other means.
Affected Public:
This collection impacts the fifty-seven entities that are eligible
to apply for grants under the NHTSA Highway Grant Program (the fifty
States, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, American Samoa, Guam,
the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, the U.S. Virgin
Islands, and the Bureau of Indian Affairs on behalf of the Indian
Country).
This collection also impacts the subject matter experts and
administrative assistants who are involved in assessments for the grant
program. These subject matter experts are recruited by NHTSA based on
recommendations from NHTSA Regional Offices and the State Highway
Safety Offices. All new occupant protection and impaired driving
assessors complete an e-learning course, Conducting Highway Safety
Program Assessments.The course is self-paced and entirely on-line. Each
impaired driving and occupant protection assessment team consists of
five (5) assessors and an administrative assistant. For traffic records
assessments, NHTSA uses a contractor to recruit and train the assessors
for the online traffic records assessment conducted using NHTSA's
Traffic Records Improvement Program Reporting System (TRIPRS). All
subject matter experts are current or former members of State Traffic
Records Coordinating Committees. There are between 10 to 14 assessors
for each traffic records assessment.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
There are 57 potential State respondents (the fifty States, the
District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, American Samoa, Guam, the
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, the U.S. Virgin Islands,
and the Bureau of Indian Affairs on behalf of the Indian Country).
NHTSA estimates there will be approximately 260 assessors per year.
This estimate includes assessors and administrative assistants. Each
occupant protection or impaired driving assessment involves five (5)
subject matter experts and one (1) administrative assistant. NHTSA
estimates that 13 occupant protection and impaired driving assessments
will be completed each year, for a total of 78 respondents. Each
traffic records assessment involves approximately thirteen (13) subject
matter experts. NHTSA estimates that 14 traffic records assessments are
completed each year, for a total of 182 traffic records assessors.
Frequency:
Applications for grant funding and annual reporting are submitted
once a year and assessments are conducted once every three or five
years.
Number of Responses:
NHTSA estimates that it will receive 57 Section 402 grant
applications, 56 Section 405 grant applications (except for impaired
driving countermeasures, motorcyclist safety and nonmotorized grants),
and 52 Section 405 impaired driving countermeasures, motorcyclist
safety and nonmotorized grant applications. These estimates are based
on the number of eligible respondents each year for each of the grants.
NHTSA estimates that there will be 9 State responses for
assessments for Section 405 occupation protection grants, 14 State
responses for assessments for Section 405 traffic safety information
system improvement grants, and 4 State responses for assessments for
Section 405 impaired driving countermeasures grants annually. Further,
NHTSA estimates that there will be 54 subject matter expert responses
for Section 405 occupation protection grants, 182 subject matter expert
responses for assessments for Section 405 traffic safety information
system improvement grants, and 24 subject matter expert responses for
assessments for Section 405 impaired driving countermeasures grants.
Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 39,550.
The estimated burden hours for the grant application and annual
report part of the collection of information are based on all eligible
respondents each year for each of the grants:
Section 402 grants: 57 (fifty States, the District of
Columbia, Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa,
the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and the Bureau of
Indian Affairs);
Section 405 Grants (except Impaired Driving
Countermeasures, Motorcyclist Safety and Nonmotorized Grants) and
Section 1906 Grant: 56 (fifty States, the District of Columbia, Puerto
Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, and the
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands); and
Section 405, Impaired Driving Countermeasures,
Motorcyclist Safety and Nonmotorized Grants: 52 (fifty States, the
District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico).
Under the grant application and annual report requirements for
Sections 402 and 405, we estimate that it will take each respondent
approximately 490 hours to collect, review and submit the required
information to NHTSA (220 burden hours for 402 grant applications, 190
for 405 and 1906 grant applications, and 80 hours for annual
reports).\8\ Therefore, NHTSA estimates the total annual burden for
Section 402 grant applications to be 12,540 hours (57 respondents x 220
hours), the total annual burden for Section 405 and 1906 grant
applications to be 10,640 hours (56 respondents x 190 hours), and the
total annual burden for annual reports to be 4,560 (57 respondents x 80
hours).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ Please note that the burden estimates for 405 and 1906
applications are based on every applicant applying for a grant under
all program areas. Marginally, this may overestimate the total
burden as all applicants will not apply for a grant in each program
area each year.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The estimated burden hours for the assessment part of the
collection of information are based on the average number of State
assessments that are carried out each year in each of the covered grant
areas: \9\ NHTSA estimates that there will be 9 assessments for Section
405 occupant protection grants, 14 assessments for the Section 405
traffic safety information system improvement grants, and 4 assessments
for the Section 405 impaired driving grant each year. Based on this
information and the hours listed below, the estimated annual burden
hours for all State respondents is 2,866 hours.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ Assessment average is based on the total number of
assessments conducted each year and divided by the number of years
since the inception of assessment requirements for certain grants
under MAP-21, Public Law 112-141.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As the requirements for the program assessments vary, the burden
for each type is calculated separately. For traffic safety information
system improvement grants, we estimate that it takes 123 hours to
respond to questions under the assessment. For occupant protection and
impaired driving countermeasures grants, we estimate that it takes 88
hours to provide the required information and
[[Page 13364]]
respond to questions under an assessment.
Commenters did not question NHTSA's estimates for labor cost. For
the costs associated with respondents preparing application materials
NHTSA used the estimated average wage for ``Management Analysts,''
Occupation Code 13-1111. The Bureau of Labor Statistics estimates that
the average hourly wage for management analysts in State and local
government is $31.95.\10\ The Bureau of Labor Statistics estimates that
wages for State and local government workers represent 61.8% of total
compensation costs.\11\ Therefore, NHTSA estimates the hourly labor
costs to be $51.70 and estimates that hourly labor cost associated with
preparing materials to be $24,056 per respondent. If all eligible
States applied for and received grants for all programs (and including
the annual number of assessment responses required from States), the
total labor costs on all State respondents would be $1,582,329.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See May 2019 National Industry-Specific Occupational
Employment and Wage Estimates, NAICS 336100--Motor Vehicle
Manufacturing, available at https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/naics4_999200.htm (accessed January 6, 2021).
\11\ See Table 1. Employer Costs for Employee Compensation by
ownership, available at https://www.bls.gov/news.release/ecec.t01.htm
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
These estimates are based on every eligible respondent submitting
the required information for every available grant. However, not all
States apply for and receive a grant each year under each of these
programs. In addition, under Section 405 grants, some requirements
permit States to submit a single application covering multiple years
allowing States to simply recertify in subsequent years.
Table 1--Estimated Burden Hours and Labor Costs for State Respondents
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Burden hours
Information collection Frequency Number of per Hourly labor Total labor Total burden
respondents respondent costs costs hours
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 402 Grant Application.......... Yearly......................... 57 220 $51.70 $648,318 12,540
405 and 1906 Grant Applications........ Yearly......................... 56 190 51.70 550,088 10,640
Annual Report.......................... Yearly......................... 57 80 51.70 235,752 4,560
405b Assessment........................ Every 3 years.................. 9 88 51.70 40,946 792
405c Assessment........................ Every 5 years.................. 14 123 51.70 89,027 1,722
405d Assessment........................ Every 3 years.................. 4 88 51.70 18,198 352
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Totals............................. ............................... .............. .............. .............. $1,582,329 30,606
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition to the burden hours for State respondents, this
information collection also involves burden hours for subject matter
experts who assess the States and burden hours for administrative
assistants. NHTSA estimates the burden on subject matter experts based
on the number assessments that will be performed each year, the number
of individuals involved with each assessment, and the estimated time
for each assessor. As stated above, NHTSA estimates that there will be
9 assessments for Section 405 occupant protection grants, 14
assessments for the Section 405 traffic safety information system
improvement grants, and 4 assessments for the Section 405 impaired
driving grant each year. Each impaired driving and occupant protection
assessment team consists of five (5) assessors and an administrative
assistant. For traffic records assessments, there are between 10 to 14
assessors. For purposes of estimate the total annual burden hours,
NHTSA estimates that there will be approximately 13 assessors for each
traffic records assessment.
For occupant protection and impaired driving assessments NHTSA
estimates that assessors spend approximately 80 hours of work on each
assessment, based on the following assumptions: 46 hours for the
interviews and panel discussions and 34 hours for pre- and post-
assessment activities, to include reviewing: (1) Briefing book
materials; (2) resources on the State Highway Safety Office's website,
and (3) reviewing comments and/or suggestions submitted from the State
after their review of the assessment final report.In addition, an
administrative assistant is expected to spend approximately 46 hours
preparing for the interviews and panel discussions and 18 hours for
pre- and post- assessment activities, to include coordinating
logistics, assisting team members and editing the document. Therefore,
NHTSA estimates the total annual burden for Section 405b (occupant
protection) assessment subject matter experts to be 4,176 hours ((5 SME
x 80 hours x 9 assessments) + (1 Admin x 64 hours x 9 assessments)) and
the total annual burden for Section 405d (impaired driving) assessment
subject matter experts to be 1,856 hours ((5 SME x 80 hours x 4
assessments) + (1 Admin x 64 hours x 4 assessments)).
For traffic records assessments (Section 405c), NHTSA estimates
that each subject matter expert will spend approximately 16 hours on an
assessment. Therefore, NHTSA estimates the total annual burden for
traffic records subject matter experts to be 2,912 hours (13 SME x 16
hours x 14 assessments).
To calculate the cost associated with the assessors time, NHTSA
uses the costs paid to the assessors. For occupant protection and
impaired driving assessments, the State pays each subject matter expert
$2,700, which translates to $33.75 per hour and pays each
administrative assistant $2,100, which translates to $32.80 per hour.
For traffic records assessments NHTSA pays each assessor $2,100 for
their time, or $131.25 per hour. Table 2 provides a summary of the
burden hours for subject matter expert respondents.
[[Page 13365]]
Table 2--Estimated Burden Hours and Labor Costs for Subject Matter Expert Respondents
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Burden hours
Information collection Number of respondents per assessments per Hourly labor Total labor Total burden
assessment per year respondent costs costs hours
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
405b Assessment (every 3 years)......... 5 SME............................. 9 80 $33.75 $121,500 3,600
1 Admin........................... ............ 64 32.80 18,893 576
405c Assessment (every 5 years)......... 13 SME............................ 14 16 131.25 382,200 2,912
405d Assessment (every 3 years)......... 5 SME............................. 4 80 33.75 54,000 1,600
1 Admin........................... ............ 64 32.80 8,397 256
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total............................... .................................. ............ ............ .............. 584,990 8,944
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Accordingly, NHTSA estimates the total burden hours for this
information collection request is 39,550 hours and the associated labor
costs is estimated to be $2,167,319.
Estimated Total Annual Burden Cost: $422,500.
Apart from the costs incurred by States for labor associated with
the burden hours, States are expected to incur other costs in
conjunction with the assessments. There are other costs involved
related to conducting the event such as subject matter expert stipend,
travel and per diem. These costs are approximately $32,500 per occupant
protection and impaired driving assessment. For the thirteen planned
assessments, the cost is estimated to be $422,500.
Public Comments Invited: You are asked to comment on any aspects of
this information collection, including (a) whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including whether the information will
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of
the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (c) ways to enhance
the quality, utility and clarity of the information to be collected;
and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
respondents, including the use of appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms
of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Authority: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995; 44 U.S.C. Chapter
35, as amended; 49 CFR 1.49; and DOT Order 1351.29.
Issued on March 3, 2022.
Barbara F. Sauers,
Acting Associate Administrator for Regional Operations and Program
Delivery.
[FR Doc. 2022-04932 Filed 3-8-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P