Oil Country Tubular Goods From Ukraine: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2019-2020, 7801-7802 [2022-02856]
Download as PDF
7801
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 28 / Thursday, February 10, 2022 / Notices
others cash deposit rate for ‘‘all other
producers or exporters’’ is 6.05 percent.
In the Federal Register of October 6,
2020, in the FR Doc 2020–22053 on
page 63081, in the first column, correct
the all-others cash deposit rate for ‘‘all
other producers or exporters’’ in the first
paragraph under the ‘‘Cash Deposit
Requirements’’ section. The correct allothers cash deposit rate for ‘‘all other
producers or exporters’’ is 6.05 percent.
Dated: February 4, 2022.
Lisa W. Wang,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
Background
On July 9, 2019, August 5, 2019, and
October 6, 2020, Commerce published
in the Federal Register notices of the
final results of the 2016–2017
administrative review, the amended
final results of the 2016–2017
administrative review, and the final
results of the 2017–2018 administrative
review, respectively. We incorrectly
identified the cash deposit rate for all
others (i.e., ‘‘for all other producers or
exporters’’) as 5.55 percent. The correct
all-others cash deposit rate applicable
during the 2016–2017 and 2017–2018
periods of review did not change from
the rate that was established in the lessthan-fair-value (LTFV) investigation and
the antidumping duty order. In the
LTFV investigation, Commerce
established a 6.05 percent cash deposit
rate for all others (i.e., ‘‘for all other
producers or exporters’’) as published in
the antidumping duty order.1 We hereby
notify the public that Commerce should
have identified the all-others cash
deposit rate as 6.05 percent in the
above-referenced determinations. We
intend to notify U.S. Customs and
Border Protection of these corrections.
[A–823–815]
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice is issued and published in
accordance with sections 751(a) and
777(i) of the Act.
[FR Doc. 2022–02852 Filed 2–9–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
discussion of the issues raised by parties
for these final results, see the Issues and
Decision Memorandum.3 Commerce
conducted this review in accordance
with section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (the Act).
Scope of the Order 4
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Oil Country Tubular Goods From
Ukraine: Final Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review; 2019–
2020
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(Commerce) determines that the sole
producer/exporter sold subject
merchandise in the United State at
prices below normal value during the
July 10, 2019, through June 30, 2020,
period of review (POR).
DATES: Applicable February 10, 2022.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Toni
Page, AD/CVD Operations, Office VII,
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1398.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On August 9, 2021, Commerce
published the Preliminary Results of
this administrative review.1 We invited
interested parties, including mandatory
respondent Interpipe,2 to comment on
the Preliminary Results. For a
description of the events since the
Preliminary Results, as well as a full
The products covered by the Order
are certain oil country tubular goods
(OCTG) from Ukraine. For a full
description of the scope, see the Issues
and Decision Memorandum.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the parties’ case
and rebuttal briefs are addressed in the
Issues and Decision Memorandum. A
list of these issues is attached as an
appendix to this notice. The Issues and
Decision Memorandum is a public
document and is on file electronically
via Enforcement and Compliance’s
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System
(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://
access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete
version of the Issues and Decision
Memorandum can be accessed directly
at https://access.trade.gov/public/
FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on our analysis of the
comments received from interested
parties regarding our Preliminary
Results, we made certain changes to the
calculation of the preliminary weightedaverage dumping margin for Interpipe.
Final Results of the Review
As a result of this administrative
review, we determine the following
weighted-average dumping margin for
the period July 10, 2019, through June
30, 2020:
Weightedaverage
dumping margin
(percent)
Exporter or producer
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
Interpipe Europe S.A./Interpipe Ukraine LLC/PJSC Interpipe Niznedneprovsky Tube Rolling Plant (aka Interpipe NTRP)/LLC
Interpipe Niko Tube ......................................................................................................................................................................
1 See Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from
Australia, Brazil, Japan, the Republic of Korea, the
Netherlands, the Republic of Turkey, and the
United Kingdom: Amended Final Affirmative
Antidumping Determinations for Australia, the
Republic of Korea, and the Republic of Turkey and
Antidumping Duty Orders, 81 FR 67962 (October 3,
2016).
1 See Oil Country Tubular Goods from Ukraine:
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2019–2020, 86 FR 43522
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:18 Feb 09, 2022
Jkt 256001
(August 9, 2021) (Preliminary Results), and
accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum
(PDM).
2 Commerce has previously determined that
Interpipe Europe S.A.; Interpipe Ukraine LLC
(Interpipe Ukraine); PJSC Interpipe
Niznedneprovsky Tube Rolling Plant (Interpipe
NTRP); and LLC Interpipe Niko Tube (Niko Tube)
are affiliated and treated as a single entity (i.e.,
Interpipe). See Preliminary Results PDM at
‘‘Affiliation and Collapsing.’’
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
27.80
3 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Final Results of the
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Oil
Country Tubular Goods from Ukraine, 2019–2020,’’
dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by,
this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
4 See Termination of the Suspension Agreement
on Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods from
Ukraine, Rescission of Administrative Review, and
Issuance of Antidumping Duty Order, 84 FR 33918
(July 16, 2019) (Order).
E:\FR\FM\10FEN1.SGM
10FEN1
7802
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 28 / Thursday, February 10, 2022 / Notices
Disclosure
We intend to disclose the calculations
performed for these final results within
five days of the date of publication of
this notice in the Federal Register, in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
Assessment Rates
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the
Act, and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1),
Commerce has determined, and U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
shall assess, antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries of subject
merchandise in accordance with the
final results of this review.5 In
accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1),
Commerce calculated an importerspecific ad valorem antidumping
assessment rate for Interpipe that is not
zero or de minimis and will instruct
CBP to assess antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries covered by this
review.
Consistent with Commerce’s
assessment practice, for entries of
subject merchandise during the POR
produced by Interpipe for which it did
not know that the merchandise was
destined for the United States, we will
instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed
entries at the all-others rate if there is no
rate for the intermediate company(ies)
involved in the transaction.6
Commerce intends to issue
assessment instructions to CBP no
earlier than 35 days after the date of
publication of the final results of this
review in the Federal Register. If a
timely summons is filed at the U.S.
Court of International Trade, the
assessment instructions will direct CBP
not to liquidate relevant entries until the
time for parties to file a request for a
statutory injunction has expired (i.e.,
within 90 days of publication).
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective for all
shipments of the subject merchandise
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the
publication date of the final results of
this administrative review, as provided
by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1)
The cash deposit rate for Interpipe will
be equal to the weighted-average
dumping margin established in the final
results of this administrative review; (2)
for previously reviewed or investigated
5 See Antidumping Proceeding: Calculation of the
Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and
Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty
Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101
(February 14, 2012).
6 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68
FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:18 Feb 09, 2022
Jkt 256001
companies not listed above, the cash
deposit rate will continue to be the
company-specific rate published for the
most recently completed segment of this
proceeding in which the company
participated; (3) if the exporter was not
a firm covered in this review or in the
investigation but the producer was
covered, the cash deposit rate will be
the rate established for the most recently
completed segment of this proceeding
for the producer of the merchandise;
and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other
producers or exporters will continue to
be the all-others rate of 7.47 percent, the
all-others rate established in the original
less-than-fair-value investigation.7
These cash deposit requirements, when
imposed, shall remain in effect until
further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during this review period. Failure to
comply with this requirement could
result in Commerce’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of double antidumping duties.
Dated: February 4, 2022.
Lisa W. Wang,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Changes Since the Preliminary Results
IV. Scope of the Order
V. Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1: Whether Commerce
Incorrectly Added Certain U.S. Direct
Selling Expenses to Normal Value
Comment 2: Whether to Grant Interpipe a
Constructed Export Price (CEP) Offset
Comment 3: Whether to Treat Section 232
Tariffs as U.S. Customs Duties
Comment 4: Whether Commerce Should
Correct the CONNUM Field Used as the
Basis for the Margin Calculation
Comment 5: Whether Commerce Should
Include Sales of Current Assets in the
Calculation of General and
Administrative (G&A) Expenses
Comment 6: Whether Commerce Should
Make an Adjustment to Interpipe’s
Reported Depreciation
Comment 7: Whether Commerce Should
Revise Niko Tube’s G&A Expense Ratio
VI. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2022–02856 Filed 2–9–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Notification Regarding Administrative
Protective Order
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
This notice serves as the only
reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of
their responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
continues to govern business
proprietary information in this segment
of the proceeding. Timely written
notification of return/destruction of
APO materials or conversion to judicial
protective order, is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations
and the terms of an APO is a
sanctionable violation.
[RTID 0648–XB748]
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing these
results of administrative review in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and
777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR
351.221(b)(5).
7 See
PO 00000
Order, 84 FR at 33919.
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Pacific Fishery Management Council;
Public Meeting
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of public meeting.
AGENCY:
Drs. Chris Harvey and Toby
Garfield of NMFS will provide a briefing
on the 2022 California Current
Integrated Ecosystem Assessment
(CCIEA) Ecosystem Status Report to
interested Pacific Fishery Management
Council (Pacific Council) members,
advisory body members, and the public.
DATES: The online briefing will be held
Wednesday, March 2, 2022, from 1 p.m.
to 3 p.m., Pacific Standard Time, or
until discussion is finished.
ADDRESSES: This meeting will be held
online. Specific meeting information,
including directions on how to join the
meeting and system requirements will
be provided in the meeting
announcement on the Pacific Council’s
website (see www.pcouncil.org). You
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\10FEN1.SGM
10FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 28 (Thursday, February 10, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7801-7802]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-02856]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-823-815]
Oil Country Tubular Goods From Ukraine: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2019-2020
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that the sole
producer/exporter sold subject merchandise in the United State at
prices below normal value during the July 10, 2019, through June 30,
2020, period of review (POR).
DATES: Applicable February 10, 2022.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Toni Page, AD/CVD Operations, Office
VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-1398.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On August 9, 2021, Commerce published the Preliminary Results of
this administrative review.\1\ We invited interested parties, including
mandatory respondent Interpipe,\2\ to comment on the Preliminary
Results. For a description of the events since the Preliminary Results,
as well as a full discussion of the issues raised by parties for these
final results, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.\3\ Commerce
conducted this review in accordance with section 751(a) of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Oil Country Tubular Goods from Ukraine: Preliminary
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2019-2020, 86 FR
43522 (August 9, 2021) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying
Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM).
\2\ Commerce has previously determined that Interpipe Europe
S.A.; Interpipe Ukraine LLC (Interpipe Ukraine); PJSC Interpipe
Niznedneprovsky Tube Rolling Plant (Interpipe NTRP); and LLC
Interpipe Niko Tube (Niko Tube) are affiliated and treated as a
single entity (i.e., Interpipe). See Preliminary Results PDM at
``Affiliation and Collapsing.''
\3\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the
Final Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Oil
Country Tubular Goods from Ukraine, 2019-2020,'' dated concurrently
with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision
Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order 4
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Termination of the Suspension Agreement on Certain Oil
Country Tubular Goods from Ukraine, Rescission of Administrative
Review, and Issuance of Antidumping Duty Order, 84 FR 33918 (July
16, 2019) (Order).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The products covered by the Order are certain oil country tubular
goods (OCTG) from Ukraine. For a full description of the scope, see the
Issues and Decision Memorandum.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the parties' case and rebuttal briefs are
addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of these issues
is attached as an appendix to this notice. The Issues and Decision
Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via
Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete
version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly
at https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on our analysis of the comments received from interested
parties regarding our Preliminary Results, we made certain changes to
the calculation of the preliminary weighted-average dumping margin for
Interpipe.
Final Results of the Review
As a result of this administrative review, we determine the
following weighted-average dumping margin for the period July 10, 2019,
through June 30, 2020:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-
average dumping
Exporter or producer margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interpipe Europe S.A./Interpipe Ukraine LLC/PJSC 27.80
Interpipe Niznedneprovsky Tube Rolling Plant (aka
Interpipe NTRP)/LLC Interpipe Niko Tube..............
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 7802]]
Disclosure
We intend to disclose the calculations performed for these final
results within five days of the date of publication of this notice in
the Federal Register, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
Assessment Rates
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, and 19 CFR
351.212(b)(1), Commerce has determined, and U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries of subject merchandise in accordance with the final results of
this review.\5\ In accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), Commerce
calculated an importer-specific ad valorem antidumping assessment rate
for Interpipe that is not zero or de minimis and will instruct CBP to
assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this
review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Antidumping Proceeding: Calculation of the Weighted-
Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping
Duty Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14,
2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Consistent with Commerce's assessment practice, for entries of
subject merchandise during the POR produced by Interpipe for which it
did not know that the merchandise was destined for the United States,
we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the all-others
rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in
the transaction.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP no earlier
than 35 days after the date of publication of the final results of this
review in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is filed at the
U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will
direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties
to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within
90 days of publication).
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective for all
shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the
final results of this administrative review, as provided by section
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for Interpipe will
be equal to the weighted-average dumping margin established in the
final results of this administrative review; (2) for previously
reviewed or investigated companies not listed above, the cash deposit
rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the
most recently completed segment of this proceeding in which the company
participated; (3) if the exporter was not a firm covered in this review
or in the investigation but the producer was covered, the cash deposit
rate will be the rate established for the most recently completed
segment of this proceeding for the producer of the merchandise; and (4)
the cash deposit rate for all other producers or exporters will
continue to be the all-others rate of 7.47 percent, the all-others rate
established in the original less-than-fair-value investigation.\7\
These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect
until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See Order, 84 FR at 33919.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply
with this requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order
This notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern
business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding.
Timely written notification of return/destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure
to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a
sanctionable violation.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing these results of administrative
review in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act, and
19 CFR 351.221(b)(5).
Dated: February 4, 2022.
Lisa W. Wang,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Changes Since the Preliminary Results
IV. Scope of the Order
V. Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1: Whether Commerce Incorrectly Added Certain U.S.
Direct Selling Expenses to Normal Value
Comment 2: Whether to Grant Interpipe a Constructed Export Price
(CEP) Offset
Comment 3: Whether to Treat Section 232 Tariffs as U.S. Customs
Duties
Comment 4: Whether Commerce Should Correct the CONNUM Field Used
as the Basis for the Margin Calculation
Comment 5: Whether Commerce Should Include Sales of Current
Assets in the Calculation of General and Administrative (G&A)
Expenses
Comment 6: Whether Commerce Should Make an Adjustment to
Interpipe's Reported Depreciation
Comment 7: Whether Commerce Should Revise Niko Tube's G&A
Expense Ratio
VI. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2022-02856 Filed 2-9-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P