Large Diameter Welded Pipe From Canada: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2018-2020, 6497-6499 [2022-02353]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 24 / Friday, February 4, 2022 / Notices circumstances under which Commerce will grant untimely-filed requests for the extension of time limits. Please review the Final Rule, available at https:// www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-09-20/ html/2013-22853.htm, prior to submitting factual information in these segments. These initiations and this notice are in accordance with section 751(a) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(a)) and 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i). Dated: January 31, 2022. James Maeder, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. [FR Doc. 2022–02352 Filed 2–3–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–122–863] Large Diameter Welded Pipe From Canada: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2018– 2020 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that the producers or exporters subject to this administrative review made sales of large diameter welded pipe from the Canada in the United States at prices below normal value (NV) during the period of review (POR), August 27, 2018, through April 30, 2020. DATES: Applicable February 4, 2022. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Irene Gorelik, AD/CVD Operations, Office VIII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–6905. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AGENCY: lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 Background On August 4, 2021, Commerce published the preliminary results of this administrative review.1 The review covers 40 producers or exporters of subject merchandise. We invited interested parties to comment on the 1 See Large Diameter Welded Pipe from Canada: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2018–2020, 86 FR 41956 (August 4, 2021) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM). VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:50 Feb 03, 2022 Jkt 256001 Preliminary Results. A summary of the events that occurred since Commerce published the Preliminary Results, as well as a full discussion of the issues raised by parties for these final results, are discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum.2 Commerce conducted this review in accordance with section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Scope of the Order 3 6497 Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at https://access.trade.gov/ public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. Changes Since the Preliminary Results Based on comments received from interested parties regarding our Preliminary Results and our review of the record to address those comments, we made changes to the Preliminary Results, as detailed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum.7 The product covered by this Order is large diameter welded pipe from Canada. For a complete description of the scope of the Order, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum. Rate for Non-Examined Respondents As we stated in the Preliminary Results, the statute and Commerce’s regulations do not address the establishment of a rate to be applied to Final Determination of No Shipments companies not selected for individual In the Preliminary Results, Commerce examination when Commerce limits its examination in an administrative review determined that Canam (St Gedeon) pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the (Canam),4 had no shipments during the Act.8 For the weighted-average dumping 5 POR. As we have received no margin for non-examined respondents information to contradict this in an administrative review, generally, determination, consistent with our Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5) of practice, we will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to liquidate the Act, which provides instructions for calculating the all-others rate in an any existing entries of subject investigation.9 Under section merchandise produced by this company, but exported by other parties, 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, the all-others rate is normally an amount equal to the at the rate for the intermediate reseller, weighted average of the estimated if available, or at the all-others rate. weighted-average dumping margins Analysis of Comments Received established for exporters and producers individually investigated, excluding All issues raised in the parties’ case rates that are zero, de minimis, or based and rebuttal briefs are addressed in the entirely on facts available. For these Issues and Decision Memorandum and final results, we calculated a weightedare listed in Appendix I to this notice.6 average dumping margin for Evraz Inc. The Issues and Decision Memorandum NA (Evraz), the sole mandatory is a public document and is on file respondent, that was not zero, de electronically via Enforcement and minimis, or based entirely on facts Compliance’s Antidumping and available. Accordingly, consistent with Countervailing Duty Centralized our practice, we applied the weightedElectronic Service System (ACCESS). average dumping margin calculated for ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a Evraz as the weighted-average dumping margin for the non-examined complete version of the Issues and companies.10 2 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Large Diameter Welded Pipe from Canada; 2018–2020,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). 3 See Large Diameter Welded Pipe from Canada: Antidumping Duty Order, 84 FR 18775 (May 2, 2019) (Order). 4 In the Initiation Notice, this company was listed as Canam (St Gedeon). However, in its certification of no shipments, it noted that Canam (St Gedeon) is a plant location and not its legal name. It also noted that it had recently undergone a corporate restructuring and is now named Canam Group Inc., which is the successor entity to Canam Group Inc. f/k/a Canam Buildings and Structures Inc. See Canam’s Letter, ‘‘No Shipments Letter for Canam Group Inc. f/k/a Canam Buildings and Structures Inc.,’’ dated August 7, 2020; see also Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 85 FR 41540 (July 10, 2020). 5 See Preliminary Results, 86 FR 41956–57. 6 See Appendix I. PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Final Results of the Review As a result of this review, we determine the following weightedaverage dumping margins exist for the POR: 7 See Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comments 2, 3, 5 and 6. 8 See Preliminary Results, 86 FR 41957; see also PDM at 4. 9 Id. 10 See Preliminary Results, 86 FR 41957; see also Narrow Woven Ribbons with Woven Selvedge from Taiwan; Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013–2014, 80 FR 60627, 60627 (October 7, 2015), unchanged in Narrow Woven Ribbons with Woven Selvedge from Taiwan; Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013–2014, 81 FR 22578 (April 18, 2016); and Boltless Steel Shelving Units Prepackaged for Sale from the People’s Republic of China: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 80 FR 51779, 51780 (August 26, 2015). E:\FR\FM\04FEN1.SGM 04FEN1 6498 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 24 / Friday, February 4, 2022 / Notices company(ies) involved in the transaction.14 Exporter or producer For the companies which were not selected for individual examination, we intend to direct CBP to assess Evraz Inc. NA 11 .......................... 15.29 antidumping duties at a rate equal to the Non-Examined Companies 12 ..... 15.29 weighted-average dumping margin determined for those companies in the final results. Disclosure For the company that certified it had no shipments, we will instruct CBP to Commerce intends to disclose the liquidate any existing entries of subject calculations performed for these final merchandise produced by it, but results within five days of the date of publication of this notice in the Federal exported by other parties, at the rate for the intermediate reseller, if available, or Register, in accordance with 19 CFR at the all-others rate, consistent with 351.224(b). Commerce’s reseller policy.15 Commerce intends to issue Assessment Rates liquidation instructions to CBP no Commerce determined, and CBP shall earlier than 41 days after the date of assess, antidumping duties on all publication of the final results of this appropriate entries of subject review in the Federal Register. If a merchandise in accordance with these timely summons is filed at the U.S. final results of review.13 Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will direct CBP Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), as not to liquidate relevant entries until the Evraz reported that it is the importer of time for parties to file a request for a record for all its U.S. sales and it statutory injunction has expired (i.e., reported the entered value of those within 90 days of publication). sales, we calculated importer-specific ad valorem duty assessment rates based Cash Deposit Requirements on the ratio of the total amount of The following deposit requirements dumping calculated for the examined will be in effect for all shipments of the sales to the total entered value of those subject merchandise entered, or sales. Where the respondent’s weighted- withdrawn from warehouse, for average dumping margin is zero or de consumption on or after the publication minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR date of the final results of this 351.106(c)(1), or an importer-specific administrative review, as provided by assessment rate is zero or de minimis, section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The we will instruct CBP to liquidate the cash deposit rate for the companies appropriate entries without regard to listed above will be equal to the antidumping duties. weighted-average dumping margin that is established in the final results of this Commerce’s ‘‘automatic assessment’’ review, except if the rate is less than practice will apply to entries of subject 0.50 percent and, therefore, de minimis merchandise during the POR produced by Evraz for which the company did not within the meaning of 19 CFR know that the merchandise it sold to the 351.106(c)(1), in which case the cash deposit rate will be zero; (2) for intermediary (e.g., a reseller, trading previously investigated or reviewed company, or exporter) was destined for the United States. In such instances, we companies not subject to this review, the cash deposit rate will continue to be will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the all-others rate the company-specific rate published for the most recently completed segment of if there is no rate for the intermediate this proceeding in which the company participated; (3) if the exporter is not a 11 In the underlying less-than-fair-value (LTFV) investigation, Commerce determined that Evraz Inc. firm covered in this review, a prior NA, Evraz Inc. NA Canada, and the Canadian review, or the original LTFV National Steel Corporation (or Corp.) (collectively, investigation, but the producer is, the Evraz) comprise a single entity. See Order. There is cash deposit rate will be the rate no information on the record of this review that established for the most recently warrants reconsideration of this single entity determination. In the Preliminary Results, completed segment of the proceeding Commerce inadvertently listed the abbreviated for the producer of the merchandise; name form ‘‘Canadian National Steel Corp’’ in and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other Appendix II as this name form was listed in the producers and exporters will continue Initiation Notice separately from the Evraz single lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 Weightedaverage dumping margin (percent) entity. As the two names differ only by the abbreviation of Corporation to Corp., we find them to be the same company, and thus, have not listed the abbreviated form in Appendix II of this notice. 12 See Appendix II. 13 See 19 CFR 351.212(b). VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:50 Feb 03, 2022 Jkt 256001 14 For a full discussion of this practice, see Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). 15 Id. PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 to be 12.32 percent ad valorem, the allothers rate established in the LTFV investigation.16 These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers Regarding the Reimbursement of Duties This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during the POR. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in Commerce’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. Notification to Interested Parties We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5). Dated: January 28, 2022. Lisa W. Wang, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix I List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. Changes to the Preliminary Results V. Discussion of the Issues Comment 1: Whether To Apply Partial Adverse Facts Available to Structural Pipe Cost Comment 2: Whether To Revise Certain Affiliated Supplier Adjustments Comment 3: Whether To Correct a Clerical Error Regarding Home Market and U.S. Sales 16 See E:\FR\FM\04FEN1.SGM Order. 04FEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 24 / Friday, February 4, 2022 / Notices Comment 4: Whether To Recalculate Home Market Credit Expenses Using Invoice Date Comment 5: Whether Antidumping Duty Revenue is an Addition to Gross Unit Price Comment 6: Whether To Cap MovementRelated Revenues by the Corresponding Expenses Comment 7: Whether Section 232 Duties can be Lawfully Deducted From the Export Price VI. Recommendation Appendix II Companies Not Selected for Individual Examination 1. Aciers Lague Steels Inc 2. Acier Profile SBB Inc 3. Amdor Inc 4. BPC Services Group 5. Bri-Steel Manufacturing 6. Canada Culvert 7. Cappco Tubular Products Canada Inc 8. CFI Metal Inc 9. Dominion Pipe & Piling 10. Enduro Canada Pipeline Services 11. Fi Oilfield Services Canada 12. Forterra 13. Gchem Ltd 14. Graham Construction 15. Groupe Fordia Inc 16. Grupo Fordia Inc 17. Hodgson Custom Rolling 18. Hyprescon Inc 19. Interpipe Inc 20. K K Recycling Services 21. Kobelt Manufacturing Co 22. Labrie Environment 23. Les Aciers Sofatec 24. Lorenz Conveying P 25. Lorenz Conveying Products 26. Matrix Manufacturing 27. MBI Produits De Forge 28. Nor Arc 29. Peak Drilling Ltd 30. Pipe & Piling Sply Ltd 31. Pipe & Piling Supplies 32. Prudental 33. Prudential 34. Shaw Pipe Protecction 35. Shaw Pipe Protection 36. Tenaris Algoma Tubes Facility 37. Tenaris Prudential 38. Welded Tube of Can Ltd Background On July 6, 2021, based on a timely request for review, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i), we initiated an administrative review on CTL plate from Germany.1 This review covers one producer/exporter of the subject merchandise, AG der Dillinger Hu¨ttenwerke (Dillinger). For a complete description of the events that followed the initiation of this review, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.2 Scope of the Order 3 The products covered by the Order are certain carbon and alloy steel hotrolled or forged flat plate products not in coils, whether or not painted, varnished, or coated with plastics or other non-metallic substances from Germany. Products subject to the Order are currently classified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) under item numbers: 7208.40.3030, 7208.40.3060, 7208.51.0030, 7208.51.0045, 7208.51.0060, 7208.52.0000, 7211.13.0000, 7211.14.0030, 7211.14.0045, 7225.40.1110, 7225.40.1180, 7225.40.3005, 7225.40.3050, 7226.20.0000, and 7226.91.5000. Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for [FR Doc. 2022–02353 Filed 2–3–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 [A–428–844] Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-toLength Plate From Germany: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2020– 2021 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. AGENCY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:50 Feb 03, 2022 Jkt 256001 The Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that certain carbon and alloy steel cutto-length plate (CTL plate) from Germany is not being, or is not likely to be, sold in the United States at less than normal value (NV) during the period of review (POR) May 1, 2020, through April 30, 2021. DATES: Applicable February 4, 2022. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Goldberger, AD/CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4136. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: SUMMARY: 1 See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 86 FR 35481 (July 6, 2021). 2 See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of the 2020–2021 Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-ToLength Plate from Germany,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). 3 See Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-ToLength Plate from Austria, Belgium, France, the Federal Republic of Germany, Italy, Japan, the Republic of Korea, and Taiwan: Amended Final Affirmative Antidumping Determinations for France, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Republic of Korea, and Taiwan, and Antidumping Duty Orders, 82 FR 24096, 24098 (May 25, 2017) (Order). PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 6499 convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the merchandise subject to this scope is dispositive.4 Methodology Commerce is conducting this review in accordance with sections 751(a)(1)(B) and (2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Export price is calculated in accordance with section 772 of the Act. NV is calculated in accordance with section 773 of the Act. For a full description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at https://access.trade.gov/ public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. A list of the topics discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is attached as an appendix to this notice. Preliminary Results of the Review As a result of this review, we preliminarily determine that the following weighted-average dumping margin exists for the respondent for the period May 1, 2020, through April 30, 2021: Producer/exporter Weightedaverage dumping margin (percent) AG der Dillinger Hu¨ttenwerke ..... 0.00 Disclosure and Public Comment Commerce intends to disclose the calculations performed in connection with these preliminary results to interested parties within five days after the date of publication of this notice.5 Interested parties may submit case briefs to Commerce no later than 30 days after the date of publication of this notice.6 Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case briefs, may be filed no later than seven days after the time limit for filing case briefs.7 Parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are encouraged to submit 4 For a complete description of the scope of the Order, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 5 See 19 CFR 351.224(b). 6 See 19 CFR 351.309(c). 7 Commerce is exercising its discretion, under 19 CFR 351.309(d)(1), to alter the time limit for filing of rebuttal briefs. E:\FR\FM\04FEN1.SGM 04FEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 24 (Friday, February 4, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6497-6499]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-02353]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-122-863]


Large Diameter Welded Pipe From Canada: Final Results of 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No 
Shipments; 2018-2020

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that the 
producers or exporters subject to this administrative review made sales 
of large diameter welded pipe from the Canada in the United States at 
prices below normal value (NV) during the period of review (POR), 
August 27, 2018, through April 30, 2020.

DATES: Applicable February 4, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Irene Gorelik, AD/CVD Operations, 
Office VIII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-6905.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On August 4, 2021, Commerce published the preliminary results of 
this administrative review.\1\ The review covers 40 producers or 
exporters of subject merchandise. We invited interested parties to 
comment on the Preliminary Results. A summary of the events that 
occurred since Commerce published the Preliminary Results, as well as a 
full discussion of the issues raised by parties for these final 
results, are discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Large Diameter Welded Pipe from Canada: Preliminary 
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Preliminary 
Determination of No Shipments; 2018-2020, 86 FR 41956 (August 4, 
2021) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision 
Memorandum (PDM).
    \2\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the 
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Large 
Diameter Welded Pipe from Canada; 2018-2020,'' dated concurrently 
with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision 
Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Commerce conducted this review in accordance with section 751(a) of 
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).

Scope of the Order 3
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Large Diameter Welded Pipe from Canada: Antidumping Duty 
Order, 84 FR 18775 (May 2, 2019) (Order).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The product covered by this Order is large diameter welded pipe 
from Canada. For a complete description of the scope of the Order, see 
the Issues and Decision Memorandum.

Final Determination of No Shipments

    In the Preliminary Results, Commerce determined that Canam (St 
Gedeon) (Canam),\4\ had no shipments during the POR.\5\ As we have 
received no information to contradict this determination, consistent 
with our practice, we will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection 
(CBP) to liquidate any existing entries of subject merchandise produced 
by this company, but exported by other parties, at the rate for the 
intermediate reseller, if available, or at the all-others rate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ In the Initiation Notice, this company was listed as Canam 
(St Gedeon). However, in its certification of no shipments, it noted 
that Canam (St Gedeon) is a plant location and not its legal name. 
It also noted that it had recently undergone a corporate 
restructuring and is now named Canam Group Inc., which is the 
successor entity to Canam Group Inc. f/k/a Canam Buildings and 
Structures Inc. See Canam's Letter, ``No Shipments Letter for Canam 
Group Inc. f/k/a Canam Buildings and Structures Inc.,'' dated August 
7, 2020; see also Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Administrative Reviews, 85 FR 41540 (July 10, 2020).
    \5\ See Preliminary Results, 86 FR 41956-57.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Analysis of Comments Received

    All issues raised in the parties' case and rebuttal briefs are 
addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum and are listed in 
Appendix I to this notice.\6\ The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a 
public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and 
Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic 
Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at 
https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the Issues 
and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Appendix I.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Changes Since the Preliminary Results

    Based on comments received from interested parties regarding our 
Preliminary Results and our review of the record to address those 
comments, we made changes to the Preliminary Results, as detailed in 
the Issues and Decision Memorandum.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comments 2, 3, 5 and 
6.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Rate for Non-Examined Respondents

    As we stated in the Preliminary Results, the statute and Commerce's 
regulations do not address the establishment of a rate to be applied to 
companies not selected for individual examination when Commerce limits 
its examination in an administrative review pursuant to section 
777A(c)(2) of the Act.\8\ For the weighted-average dumping margin for 
non-examined respondents in an administrative review, generally, 
Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5) of the Act, which provides 
instructions for calculating the all-others rate in an 
investigation.\9\ Under section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, the all-others 
rate is normally an amount equal to the weighted average of the 
estimated weighted-average dumping margins established for exporters 
and producers individually investigated, excluding rates that are zero, 
de minimis, or based entirely on facts available. For these final 
results, we calculated a weighted-average dumping margin for Evraz Inc. 
NA (Evraz), the sole mandatory respondent, that was not zero, de 
minimis, or based entirely on facts available. Accordingly, consistent 
with our practice, we applied the weighted-average dumping margin 
calculated for Evraz as the weighted-average dumping margin for the 
non-examined companies.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Preliminary Results, 86 FR 41957; see also PDM at 4.
    \9\ Id.
    \10\ See Preliminary Results, 86 FR 41957; see also Narrow Woven 
Ribbons with Woven Selvedge from Taiwan; Preliminary Results of 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013-2014, 80 FR 60627, 
60627 (October 7, 2015), unchanged in Narrow Woven Ribbons with 
Woven Selvedge from Taiwan; Final Results of Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review; 2013-2014, 81 FR 22578 (April 18, 2016); and 
Boltless Steel Shelving Units Prepackaged for Sale from the People's 
Republic of China: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair 
Value, 80 FR 51779, 51780 (August 26, 2015).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Final Results of the Review

    As a result of this review, we determine the following weighted-
average dumping margins exist for the POR:

[[Page 6498]]



------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               Weighted-
                                                                average
                    Exporter or producer                        dumping
                                                                margin
                                                               (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Evraz Inc. NA \11\..........................................       15.29
Non-Examined Companies \12\.................................       15.29
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclosure
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ In the underlying less-than-fair-value (LTFV) 
investigation, Commerce determined that Evraz Inc. NA, Evraz Inc. NA 
Canada, and the Canadian National Steel Corporation (or Corp.) 
(collectively, Evraz) comprise a single entity. See Order. There is 
no information on the record of this review that warrants 
reconsideration of this single entity determination. In the 
Preliminary Results, Commerce inadvertently listed the abbreviated 
name form ``Canadian National Steel Corp'' in Appendix II as this 
name form was listed in the Initiation Notice separately from the 
Evraz single entity. As the two names differ only by the 
abbreviation of Corporation to Corp., we find them to be the same 
company, and thus, have not listed the abbreviated form in Appendix 
II of this notice.
    \12\ See Appendix II.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Commerce intends to disclose the calculations performed for these 
final results within five days of the date of publication of this 
notice in the Federal Register, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).

Assessment Rates

    Commerce determined, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on 
all appropriate entries of subject merchandise in accordance with these 
final results of review.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), as Evraz reported that it is the 
importer of record for all its U.S. sales and it reported the entered 
value of those sales, we calculated importer-specific ad valorem duty 
assessment rates based on the ratio of the total amount of dumping 
calculated for the examined sales to the total entered value of those 
sales. Where the respondent's weighted-average dumping margin is zero 
or de minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), or an 
importer-specific assessment rate is zero or de minimis, we will 
instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to 
antidumping duties.
    Commerce's ``automatic assessment'' practice will apply to entries 
of subject merchandise during the POR produced by Evraz for which the 
company did not know that the merchandise it sold to the intermediary 
(e.g., a reseller, trading company, or exporter) was destined for the 
United States. In such instances, we will instruct CBP to liquidate 
unreviewed entries at the all-others rate if there is no rate for the 
intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ For a full discussion of this practice, see Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 
68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For the companies which were not selected for individual 
examination, we intend to direct CBP to assess antidumping duties at a 
rate equal to the weighted-average dumping margin determined for those 
companies in the final results.
    For the company that certified it had no shipments, we will 
instruct CBP to liquidate any existing entries of subject merchandise 
produced by it, but exported by other parties, at the rate for the 
intermediate reseller, if available, or at the all-others rate, 
consistent with Commerce's reseller policy.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Commerce intends to issue liquidation instructions to CBP no 
earlier than 41 days after the date of publication of the final results 
of this review in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is filed at 
the U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will 
direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties 
to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within 
90 days of publication).

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following deposit requirements will be in effect for all 
shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from 
warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the 
final results of this administrative review, as provided by section 
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for the companies 
listed above will be equal to the weighted-average dumping margin that 
is established in the final results of this review, except if the rate 
is less than 0.50 percent and, therefore, de minimis within the meaning 
of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), in which case the cash deposit rate will be 
zero; (2) for previously investigated or reviewed companies not subject 
to this review, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-
specific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this 
proceeding in which the company participated; (3) if the exporter is 
not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the original LTFV 
investigation, but the producer is, the cash deposit rate will be the 
rate established for the most recently completed segment of the 
proceeding for the producer of the merchandise; and (4) the cash 
deposit rate for all other producers and exporters will continue to be 
12.32 percent ad valorem, the all-others rate established in the LTFV 
investigation.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ See Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in 
effect until further notice.

Notification to Importers Regarding the Reimbursement of Duties

    This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during the POR. Failure to comply with this 
requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that reimbursement 
of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double 
antidumping duties.

Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order

    This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information 
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 
continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of 
the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or 
destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective 
order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and 
the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.

Notification to Interested Parties

    We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with 
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5).

    Dated: January 28, 2022.
Lisa W. Wang,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix I

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum

I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Changes to the Preliminary Results
V. Discussion of the Issues
    Comment 1: Whether To Apply Partial Adverse Facts Available to 
Structural Pipe Cost
    Comment 2: Whether To Revise Certain Affiliated Supplier 
Adjustments
    Comment 3: Whether To Correct a Clerical Error Regarding Home 
Market and U.S. Sales

[[Page 6499]]

    Comment 4: Whether To Recalculate Home Market Credit Expenses 
Using Invoice Date
    Comment 5: Whether Antidumping Duty Revenue is an Addition to 
Gross Unit Price
    Comment 6: Whether To Cap Movement-Related Revenues by the 
Corresponding Expenses
    Comment 7: Whether Section 232 Duties can be Lawfully Deducted 
From the Export Price
VI. Recommendation

Appendix II

Companies Not Selected for Individual Examination

1. Aciers Lague Steels Inc
2. Acier Profile SBB Inc
3. Amdor Inc
4. BPC Services Group
5. Bri-Steel Manufacturing
6. Canada Culvert
7. Cappco Tubular Products Canada Inc
8. CFI Metal Inc
9. Dominion Pipe & Piling
10. Enduro Canada Pipeline Services
11. Fi Oilfield Services Canada
12. Forterra
13. Gchem Ltd
14. Graham Construction
15. Groupe Fordia Inc
16. Grupo Fordia Inc
17. Hodgson Custom Rolling
18. Hyprescon Inc
19. Interpipe Inc
20. K K Recycling Services
21. Kobelt Manufacturing Co
22. Labrie Environment
23. Les Aciers Sofatec
24. Lorenz Conveying P
25. Lorenz Conveying Products
26. Matrix Manufacturing
27. MBI Produits De Forge
28. Nor Arc
29. Peak Drilling Ltd
30. Pipe & Piling Sply Ltd
31. Pipe & Piling Supplies
32. Prudental
33. Prudential
34. Shaw Pipe Protecction
35. Shaw Pipe Protection
36. Tenaris Algoma Tubes Facility
37. Tenaris Prudential
38. Welded Tube of Can Ltd

[FR Doc. 2022-02353 Filed 2-3-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P