Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet From the People's Republic of China: Amended Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 2018-2020, 6504-6506 [2022-02351]

Download as PDF lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 6504 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 24 / Friday, February 4, 2022 / Notices Mill & Timber Products Ltd. Millar Western Forest Products Ltd. Mirax Lumber Products Ltd. Mobilier Rustique (Beauce) Inc. Monterra Lumber Mills Limited Morwood Forest Products Inc. Multicedre ltee Nakina Lumber Inc. National Forest Products Ltd. Nicholson and Cates Ltd Norsask Forest Products Limited Partnership North American Forest Products Ltd. (located in Abbotsford, British Columbia) North Enderby Timber Ltd. Northland Forest Products Ltd. Olympic Industries, Inc./Olympic Industries Inc-Reman Code/Olympic Industries ULC/ Olympic Industries ULC-Reman/Olympic Industries ULC-Reman Code Oregon Canadian Forest Products Inc. dba Oregon Canadian Forest Products Pacific Coast Cedar Products, Ltd. Pacific Lumber Remanufacturing Inc. Pacific Pallet, Ltd. Pacific Western Wood Works Ltd. PalletSource Inc. Parallel Wood Products Ltd. Pat Power Forest Products Corporation Phoenix Forest Products Inc. Pioneer Pallet & Lumber Ltd. Porcupine Wood Products Ltd. Portbec Forest Products Ltd (aka Les Produits Forestiers Portbec Ltee) Power Wood Corp. Precision Cedar Products Corp. Prendiville Industries Ltd. (aka, Kenora Forest Products) Produits Forestiers Petit Paris Inc. Produits forestiers Temrex, s.e.c. (aka Temrex Forest Products LP) Produits Matra Inc. and Sechoirs de Beauce Inc. Promobois G.D.S. inc. Rayonier A.M. Canada GP Rembos Inc. Rene Bernard Inc. Rick Dubois Rielly Industrial Lumber Inc. River City Remanufacturing Inc. S&R Sawmills Ltd S&W Forest Products Ltd. San Industries Ltd. Sawarne Lumber Co. Ltd. Scierie St-Michel inc. Scierie West Brome Inc. Scott Lumber Sales Shakertown Corp. Sigurdson Forest Products Ltd. Silvaris Corporation Sinclar Group Forest Products Ltd. Skana Forest Products Ltd. Source Forest Products South Beach Trading Inc. South Coast Reman Ltd. South Fraser Container Terminals Spruceland Millworks Inc. Star Lumber Canada Ltd. Sundher Timber Products Inc. Surplus G Rioux Surrey Cedar Ltd. Taan Forest Limited Partnership Taiga Building Products Ltd. Tall Tree Lumber Company Terminal Forest Products Ltd. The Wood Source Inc. Tolko Industries Ltd. and Tolko Marketing and Sales Ltd. VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:50 Feb 03, 2022 Jkt 256001 Trans-Pacific Trading Ltd. Triad Forest Products Ltd. Twin Rivers Paper Co. Inc. Tyee Timber Products Ltd. Usine Sartigan Inc. Vaagen Fibre Canada, ULC Valley Cedar 2 Inc. Vancouver Specialty Cedar Products Ltd. Visscher Lumber Inc W.I. Woodtone Industries Inc. Waldun Forest Product Sales Ltd. Watkins Sawmills Ltd. West Bay Forest Products Ltd. Western Forest Products Inc. Western Lumber Sales Limited Westminster Industries Ltd. Weyerhaeuser Co. White River Forest Products L.P. Winton Homes Ltd. Woodline Forest Products Ltd. Woodstock Forest Products Woodtone Specialties Inc. [FR Doc. 2022–02322 Filed 2–3–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–570–073] Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet From the People’s Republic of China: Amended Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 2018–2020 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) is amending the final results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on common alloy aluminum sheet from the People’s Republic of China to correct ministerial errors. The period of review (POR) is June 22, 2018, through January 31, 2020. DATES: Applicable February 4, 2022. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Frank Schmitt or Fred Baker, AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4880 or (202) 482–2924, respectively. AGENCY: Background On December 27, 2021, Commerce disclosed its calculations for the Final Results 1 to interested parties.2 On 1 See Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet from the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Final Successor-In-Interest Determination, and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2018–2020, 86 FR 74066 (December 29, 2021) (Final Results). 2 See Memorandum, ‘‘Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet from the People’s Republic of China, 2018– PO 00000 Frm 00022 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 January 3, 2022, the domestic industry 3 submitted an allegation of ministerial errors in the Final Results.4 No other party made an allegation of ministerial errors or submitted a reply to the domestic industry’s ministerial error allegation. Legal Framework Section 751(h) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), defines a ‘‘ministerial error’’ as including ‘‘errors in addition, subtraction, or other arithmetic function, clerical errors resulting from inaccurate copying, duplication, or the like, and any other unintentional error which the administering authority considers ministerial.’’ With respect to final results of administrative reviews, 19 CFR 351.224(e) provides that Commerce ‘‘will analyze any comments received and, if appropriate, correct any ministerial error by amending . . . the final results of review . . .’’ Ministerial Error Commerce agrees with the domestic industry that Commerce made inadvertent, unintentional errors in the Final Results within the meaning of section 751(h) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.224(f) with respect to its calculation of financial ratios from the financial statement of Alcomet A.B. used in the calculation of normal value for respondent, Jiangsu Alcha Aluminum Co., Ltd., Baotou Alcha Aluminum Co., Ltd., and Alcha International Holdings Limited (collectively, Alcha). Accordingly, Commerce determines that, in accordance with section 751(h) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.224(f), it made ministerial errors in the Final Results. For a complete discussion of the ministerial error allegation, as well as Commerce’s analysis, see the accompanying Ministerial Error Memorandum.5 The Ministerial Error Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and 2020: Final Results Disclosure,’’ dated December 27, 2021. 3 The domestic industry is the Aluminum Association Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet Trade Enforcement Working Group and its individual members. 4 See Domestic Industry’s Letter, ‘‘1st Administrative Review of the Antidumping Order on Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet from the People’s Republic of China—Domestic Industry’s Comments Identifying a Ministerial Error in Final Results,’’ dated January 3, 2022. 5 See Memorandum, ‘‘Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet from the People’s Republic of China: Ministerial Error Allegation in the Final Results,’’ dated concurrently with this notice (Ministerial Error Memorandum). E:\FR\FM\04FEN1.SGM 04FEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 24 / Friday, February 4, 2022 / Notices statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within 90 days of publication). Where Alcha reported reliable entered values, we calculated importer- (or customer-) specific ad valorem rates by aggregating the dumping margins calculated for all U.S. sales to each importer (or customer) and dividing this amount by the total entered value of the sales to each importer (or customer).8 Where Commerce calculated a weighted-average dumping margin by dividing the total amount of dumping for reviewed sales to that party by the total sales quantity associated with those transactions, Commerce will direct CBP to assess importer- (or customer-) specific assessment rates based on the resulting per-unit rates.9 Where an importer- (or customer-) Amended Final Results specific ad valorem or per-unit rate is As a result of correcting the greater than de minimis (i.e., 0.50 ministerial errors, Commerce percent), Commerce will instruct CBP to determines that the following weighted- collect the appropriate duties at the time average dumping margins exist for the of liquidation.10 Where an importer- (or period June 22, 2018, through January customer-) specific ad valorem or per31, 2020: unit rate is zero or de minimis, Commerce will instruct CBP to liquidate Weightedappropriate entries without regard to average antidumping duties.11 Exporter dumping margin For the non-selected respondent that (percent) received a separate rate, Yinbang Clad, we will instruct CBP to apply an Jiangsu Alcha Aluminum Co., antidumping duty assessment rate of Ltd.7/Baotou Alcha Aluminum 58.61 percent to all entries of subject Co., Ltd./Alcha International Holdings Limited ..................... 58.61 merchandise that entered the United Yinbang Clad Material Co., Ltd. 58.61 States during the POR. For the companies that we determined had no reviewable entries of the subject Disclosure We intend to disclose the calculations merchandise in this review period, any suspended entries that entered under performed to parties in this proceeding those exporters’ case numbers (i.e., at within five days after publication of the exporters’ rates) will be liquidated at these amended final results in the Federal Register, in accordance with 19 the China-wide rate, i.e., 59.72 percent.12 For all other companies, we CFR 351.224(b). will instruct CBP to apply the Assessment Rates antidumping duty assessment rate of the Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the China-wide entity to all entries of subject merchandise exported by these Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b), Commerce companies.13 has determined, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, Cash Deposit Requirements antidumping duties on all appropriate The following cash deposit entries of subject merchandise in requirements will be effective upon accordance with these amended final results of review. We intend to issue 8 See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). assessment instructions to CBP no 9 Id. earlier than 35 days after the date of 10 Id. publication of these final results. If a 11 See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). timely summons is filed at the U.S. 12 For a full discussion of this practice, see NonCourt of International Trade, the Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 assessment instructions will direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the (October 24, 2011). 13 See Initiation of Antidumping and time for parties to file a request for a lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov. Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.224(e), Commerce is amending the Final Results to reflect the correction of a ministerial error in the calculation of the weighted-average dumping margin assigned to Alcha in the Final Results, which changes from 56.93 percent to 58.61 percent. Furthermore, we are revising the dumping margin applicable to the company not selected for individual examination in this administrative review, Yinbang Clad Material Co., Ltd. (Yinbang Clad), which is based entirely on Alcha’s weightedaverage dumping margin.6 6 See Final Results, 86 FR at 74067. the purposes of this review, we have considered the names Jiangsu Alcha Aluminum Co., Ltd. and Jiangsu Alcha Aluminium Co., Ltd., as equivalent. 7 For VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:50 Feb 03, 2022 Jkt 256001 Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 85 FR 19730, 19731 (April 8, 2020) (‘‘All firms listed below that wish to qualify for separate rate status in the administrative reviews involving NME countries must complete, as appropriate, either a separate rate application or certification, as described below.’’). PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 6505 publication of the final results of this review for shipments of the subject merchandise from China entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For subject merchandise exported by the companies listed above that have separate rates, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established in these final results of review for each exporter as listed above; (2) for previously investigated or reviewed Chinese and non-Chinese exporters not listed above that received a separate rate in a prior segment of this proceeding, except for the companies which lost their separate rate eligibility in this review, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the existing exporterspecific rate; (3) for all Chinese exporters of subject merchandise that have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, or lost their separate rate eligibility in this review, the cash deposit rate will be that for the Chinawide entity; and (4) for all non-Chinese exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the Chinese exporter that supplied that non-Chinese exporter. These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in Commerce’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of return/ destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. E:\FR\FM\04FEN1.SGM 04FEN1 6506 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 24 / Friday, February 4, 2022 / Notices Notification to Interested Parties We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with sections 751(h) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.224(e). Dated: January 31, 2022. Lisa W. Wang, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Scope of the Order The product covered by this review is softwood lumber from Canada. For a full description of the scope, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.5 [FR Doc. 2022–02351 Filed 2–3–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–122–857] Certain Softwood Lumber Products From Canada: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) is conducting an administrative review of the antidumping duty (AD) order on certain softwood lumber products (softwood lumber) from Canada. The period of review (POR) is January 1, 2020, through December 31, 2020. Commerce preliminarily determines that the producers/exporters subject to this review made sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value. We invite interested parties to comment on these preliminary results. DATES: Applicable February 4, 2022. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff Pedersen (Canfor) and Maisha Cryor (West Fraser), AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–2769 and (202) 482–5831, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AGENCY: lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 Background On March 4, 2021, based on timely requests for administrative reviews, Commerce initiated an AD administrative review covering 275 companies and has not rescinded the review of any of these companies.1 Thus, the review covers 275 producers/ exporters of the subject merchandise, including mandatory respondents 1 See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 86 FR 12599 (March 4, 2021) (Initiation Notice). VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:50 Feb 03, 2022 Jkt 256001 Canfor 2 and West Fraser.3 The remaining companies were not selected for individual examination and remain subject to this administrative review. On September 8, 2021, we extended the preliminary results until January 28, 2022.4 Exporter/producer Canfor Corporation/Canadian Forest Products Ltd./Canfor Wood Products Marketing Ltd West Fraser Mills Ltd./Blue Ridge Lumber Inc./Manning Forest Products Ltd./and Sundre Forest Products Inc .... Non-Selected Companies ........... Weightedaverage margin (percent) 4.92 4.63 4.76 Rate for Companies Not Individually Examined Methodology Generally, when calculating margins for non-selected respondents, Commerce is conducting this review Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5) of in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B) the Act for guidance, which provides of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended instructions for calculating the all(the Act). For a full description of the others margin in an investigation. methodology underlying our Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act provides conclusions, see the Preliminary that when calculating the all-others Decision Memorandum. A list of the margin, Commerce will exclude any topics is included in the Preliminary zero and de minimis weighted-average Decision Memorandum as Appendix I to dumping margins, as well as any this notice. The Preliminary Decision weighted-average dumping margins Memorandum is a public document and based on total facts available. is made available to the public via Accordingly, Commerce’s usual practice Enforcement and Compliance’s has been to average the margins for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty selected respondents, excluding margins Centralized Electronic Service System that are zero, de minimis, or based (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to entirely on facts available. registered users at https:// In this review, we calculated a access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete weighted-average dumping margin of 4.92 percent for Canfor and 4.63 percent version of the Preliminary Decision for West Fraser. In accordance with Memorandum can be found at https:// section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, access.trade.gov/public/FRNotices Commerce assigned the weighted ListLayout.aspx. average of these two calculated Preliminary Results of the weighted-average dumping margins Administrative Review based on their publicly ranged sales data, 4.76 percent, to the non-selected We preliminarily determine that the companies in these preliminary results.6 following weighted-average dumping Disclosure margins exist for the period January 1, 2020, through December 31, 2020: We intend to disclose the calculations performed for these preliminary results to the interested parties within five days 2 As described in the Preliminary Decision after public announcement of the Memorandum, we have treated Canfor Corporation, preliminary results in accordance with Canadian Forest Products Ltd., and Canfor Wood 19 CFR 351.224(b). Products Marketing Ltd. (collectively, Canfor) as a single entity. See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Certain Softwood Lumber Products from Canada; 2019,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum) at 5. 3 As described in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum, we have treated West Fraser Mills Ltd., Blue Ridge Lumber Inc., Manning Forest Products Ltd., and Sundre Forest Products Inc. (collectively, West Fraser) as a single entity. See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 5. 4 See Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review—2020,’’ dated September 8, 2021. 5 See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 3–4. PO 00000 Frm 00024 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Verification As provided in section 782(i)(1) of the Act, Commerce intends to verify the information relied upon in making its final determination. Normally, Commerce verifies information using standard procedures, including an onsite examination of original accounting, financial, and sales documentation. However, due to current travel restrictions in response to the global 6 See Memorandum, ‘‘Calculation of the Rate for Non-Selected Respondents,’’ dated concurrently with this notice. A list of the non-selected companies under review is included as Attachment II. E:\FR\FM\04FEN1.SGM 04FEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 24 (Friday, February 4, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6504-6506]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-02351]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-073]


Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet From the People's Republic of China: 
Amended Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 2018-
2020

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) is amending the final 
results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on 
common alloy aluminum sheet from the People's Republic of China to 
correct ministerial errors. The period of review (POR) is June 22, 
2018, through January 31, 2020.

DATES: Applicable February 4, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Frank Schmitt or Fred Baker, AD/CVD 
Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4880 or (202) 482-2924, 
respectively.

Background

    On December 27, 2021, Commerce disclosed its calculations for the 
Final Results \1\ to interested parties.\2\ On January 3, 2022, the 
domestic industry \3\ submitted an allegation of ministerial errors in 
the Final Results.\4\ No other party made an allegation of ministerial 
errors or submitted a reply to the domestic industry's ministerial 
error allegation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet from the People's Republic 
of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 
Final Successor-In-Interest Determination, and Final Determination 
of No Shipments; 2018-2020, 86 FR 74066 (December 29, 2021) (Final 
Results).
    \2\ See Memorandum, ``Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet from the 
People's Republic of China, 2018-2020: Final Results Disclosure,'' 
dated December 27, 2021.
    \3\ The domestic industry is the Aluminum Association Common 
Alloy Aluminum Sheet Trade Enforcement Working Group and its 
individual members.
    \4\ See Domestic Industry's Letter, ``1st Administrative Review 
of the Antidumping Order on Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet from the 
People's Republic of China--Domestic Industry's Comments Identifying 
a Ministerial Error in Final Results,'' dated January 3, 2022.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Legal Framework

    Section 751(h) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), 
defines a ``ministerial error'' as including ``errors in addition, 
subtraction, or other arithmetic function, clerical errors resulting 
from inaccurate copying, duplication, or the like, and any other 
unintentional error which the administering authority considers 
ministerial.'' With respect to final results of administrative reviews, 
19 CFR 351.224(e) provides that Commerce ``will analyze any comments 
received and, if appropriate, correct any ministerial error by amending 
. . . the final results of review . . .''

Ministerial Error

    Commerce agrees with the domestic industry that Commerce made 
inadvertent, unintentional errors in the Final Results within the 
meaning of section 751(h) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.224(f) with respect 
to its calculation of financial ratios from the financial statement of 
Alcomet A.B. used in the calculation of normal value for respondent, 
Jiangsu Alcha Aluminum Co., Ltd., Baotou Alcha Aluminum Co., Ltd., and 
Alcha International Holdings Limited (collectively, Alcha). 
Accordingly, Commerce determines that, in accordance with section 
751(h) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.224(f), it made ministerial errors in 
the Final Results.
    For a complete discussion of the ministerial error allegation, as 
well as Commerce's analysis, see the accompanying Ministerial Error 
Memorandum.\5\ The Ministerial Error Memorandum is a public document 
and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's 
Antidumping and

[[Page 6505]]

Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 
ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Memorandum, ``Administrative Review of the Antidumping 
Duty Order on Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet from the People's Republic 
of China: Ministerial Error Allegation in the Final Results,'' dated 
concurrently with this notice (Ministerial Error Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.224(e), Commerce is amending the Final 
Results to reflect the correction of a ministerial error in the 
calculation of the weighted-average dumping margin assigned to Alcha in 
the Final Results, which changes from 56.93 percent to 58.61 percent. 
Furthermore, we are revising the dumping margin applicable to the 
company not selected for individual examination in this administrative 
review, Yinbang Clad Material Co., Ltd. (Yinbang Clad), which is based 
entirely on Alcha's weighted-average dumping margin.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Final Results, 86 FR at 74067.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Amended Final Results

    As a result of correcting the ministerial errors, Commerce 
determines that the following weighted-average dumping margins exist 
for the period June 22, 2018, through January 31, 2020:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               Weighted-
                                                                average
                          Exporter                              dumping
                                                                margin
                                                               (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jiangsu Alcha Aluminum Co., Ltd.\7\/Baotou Alcha Aluminum          58.61
 Co., Ltd./Alcha International Holdings Limited.............
Yinbang Clad Material Co., Ltd..............................       58.61
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclosure
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ For the purposes of this review, we have considered the 
names Jiangsu Alcha Aluminum Co., Ltd. and Jiangsu Alcha Aluminium 
Co., Ltd., as equivalent.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We intend to disclose the calculations performed to parties in this 
proceeding within five days after publication of these amended final 
results in the Federal Register, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).

Assessment Rates

    Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b), 
Commerce has determined, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 
shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of subject 
merchandise in accordance with these amended final results of review. 
We intend to issue assessment instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 
days after the date of publication of these final results. If a timely 
summons is filed at the U.S. Court of International Trade, the 
assessment instructions will direct CBP not to liquidate relevant 
entries until the time for parties to file a request for a statutory 
injunction has expired (i.e., within 90 days of publication).
    Where Alcha reported reliable entered values, we calculated 
importer- (or customer-) specific ad valorem rates by aggregating the 
dumping margins calculated for all U.S. sales to each importer (or 
customer) and dividing this amount by the total entered value of the 
sales to each importer (or customer).\8\ Where Commerce calculated a 
weighted-average dumping margin by dividing the total amount of dumping 
for reviewed sales to that party by the total sales quantity associated 
with those transactions, Commerce will direct CBP to assess importer- 
(or customer-) specific assessment rates based on the resulting per-
unit rates.\9\ Where an importer- (or customer-) specific ad valorem or 
per-unit rate is greater than de minimis (i.e., 0.50 percent), Commerce 
will instruct CBP to collect the appropriate duties at the time of 
liquidation.\10\ Where an importer- (or customer-) specific ad valorem 
or per-unit rate is zero or de minimis, Commerce will instruct CBP to 
liquidate appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
    \9\ Id.
    \10\ Id.
    \11\ See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For the non-selected respondent that received a separate rate, 
Yinbang Clad, we will instruct CBP to apply an antidumping duty 
assessment rate of 58.61 percent to all entries of subject merchandise 
that entered the United States during the POR. For the companies that 
we determined had no reviewable entries of the subject merchandise in 
this review period, any suspended entries that entered under those 
exporters' case numbers (i.e., at the exporters' rates) will be 
liquidated at the China-wide rate, i.e., 59.72 percent.\12\ For all 
other companies, we will instruct CBP to apply the antidumping duty 
assessment rate of the China-wide entity to all entries of subject 
merchandise exported by these companies.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ For a full discussion of this practice, see Non-Market 
Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 
76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011).
    \13\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Administrative Reviews, 85 FR 19730, 19731 (April 8, 2020) (``All 
firms listed below that wish to qualify for separate rate status in 
the administrative reviews involving NME countries must complete, as 
appropriate, either a separate rate application or certification, as 
described below.'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon 
publication of the final results of this review for shipments of the 
subject merchandise from China entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 
for consumption on or after the publication date, as provided by 
section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For subject merchandise exported 
by the companies listed above that have separate rates, the cash 
deposit rate will be the rate established in these final results of 
review for each exporter as listed above; (2) for previously 
investigated or reviewed Chinese and non-Chinese exporters not listed 
above that received a separate rate in a prior segment of this 
proceeding, except for the companies which lost their separate rate 
eligibility in this review, the cash deposit rate will continue to be 
the existing exporter-specific rate; (3) for all Chinese exporters of 
subject merchandise that have not been found to be entitled to a 
separate rate, or lost their separate rate eligibility in this review, 
the cash deposit rate will be that for the China-wide entity; and (4) 
for all non-Chinese exporters of subject merchandise which have not 
received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate 
applicable to the Chinese exporter that supplied that non-Chinese 
exporter. These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in 
effect until further notice.

Notification to Importers

    This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply 
with this requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of double antidumping duties.

Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order

    This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under 
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written 
notification of return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to 
judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with 
the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.

[[Page 6506]]

Notification to Interested Parties

    We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with 
sections 751(h) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.224(e).

    Dated: January 31, 2022.
Lisa W. Wang,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2022-02351 Filed 2-3-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P