Self-Regulatory Organizations; BOX Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing of Amendment Nos. 2 and 3 and Order Granting Accelerated Approval of a Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment Nos. 2 and 3, To Adopt Rules Governing the Trading of Equity Securities on the Exchange Through a Facility of the Exchange Known as BSTX LLC, 5881-5901 [2022-02086]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 22 / Wednesday, February 2, 2022 / Notices
(B) Clearing Agency’s Statement on
Burden on Competition
ICE Clear Europe does not believe the
proposed amendments would have any
impact, or impose any burden, on
competition not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. The proposed
amendments to the Delivery Procedures
are intended to address new settlement
discipline procedures applicable to
certain contracts as provided in the
CSDR and RTS. Although the
procedures could result in certain
additional costs to Clearing Members, if
certain fines were imposed as a result of
a settlement failure, those additional
costs result from the requirements of
relevant EU legislation applicable to
settlements in the affected underlying
securities which would be applicable to
all market participants for the relevant
contracts and it would be inappropriate
for the Clearing House to bear the cost
of late delivery fines, which should
reasonably be passed on to the Clearing
Members responsible for delivery
failures. Furthermore, any such
additional costs would result from a
failure by the relevant Clearing Member
or its customer to comply in a timely
manner with its settlement obligations
as specified under EU legislation.
Accordingly, ICE Clear Europe does not
believe the amendments would
adversely affect competition among
Clearing Members, materially affect the
cost of clearing, adversely affect access
to clearing for Clearing Members or their
customers, or otherwise adversely affect
competition in clearing services.
Accordingly, ICE Clear Europe does not
believe that the amendments would
impose any impact or burden on
competition that is not appropriate in
furtherance of the purpose of the Act.
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
(C) Clearing Agency’s Statement on
Comments on the Proposed Rule
Change Received From Members,
Participants or Others
Written comments relating to the
proposed amendments have not been
solicited or received by ICE Clear
Europe. ICE Clear Europe will notify the
Commission of any comments received
with respect to the proposed rule
change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)
of the Act 18 and paragraph (f) of Rule
19b–4 19 thereunder. At any time within
18 15
19 17
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:31 Feb 01, 2022
Jkt 256001
60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml) or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
ICEEU–2022–002 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–ICEEU–2022–002. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such
filings will also be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of ICE Clear Europe and on ICE
Clear Europe’s website at https://
www.theice.com/notices/Notices.shtml?
regulatoryFilings.
All comments received will be posted
without change. Persons submitting
comments are cautioned that we do not
redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions.
PO 00000
Frm 00103
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
5881
You should submit only information
that you wish to make available
publicly. All submissions should refer
to File Number SR–ICEEU–2022–002
and should be submitted on or before
February 23, 2022.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.20
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022–02078 Filed 2–1–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–94092; File No. SR–BOX–
2021–06]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; BOX
Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing of
Amendment Nos. 2 and 3 and Order
Granting Accelerated Approval of a
Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by
Amendment Nos. 2 and 3, To Adopt
Rules Governing the Trading of Equity
Securities on the Exchange Through a
Facility of the Exchange Known as
BSTX LLC
January 27, 2022.
Introduction
On May 12, 2021, BOX Exchange LLC
(‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘BOX’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’), pursuant to Section
19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (‘‘Exchange Act’’) 1 and Rule
19b–4 thereunder,2 a proposed rule
change to adopt rules governing the
listing and trading of equity securities
on the Exchange through a facility of the
Exchange to be known as BSTX LLC
(‘‘BSTX’’). The proposed rule change
was published for comment in the
Federal Register on June 2, 2021.3 On
July 13, 2021, the Commission extended
the time period within which to
approve the proposed rule change,
disapprove the proposed rule change, or
institute proceedings to determine
whether to approve or disapprove the
proposed rule change, to August 31,
2021.4 On August 18, 2021, the
Exchange filed Amendment No. 1 to the
proposed rule change, which replaced
and superseded the proposed rule
20 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 92017
(May 25, 2021), 86 FR 29634 (‘‘Notice’’). Comments
on the proposed rule change can be found at:
https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-box-2021-06/
srbox202106.htm.
4 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 92387
(July 13, 2021), 86 FR 38140 (July 19, 2021).
1 15
E:\FR\FM\02FEN1.SGM
02FEN1
5882
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 22 / Wednesday, February 2, 2022 / Notices
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
change as originally filed.5 On August
27, 2021, the Commission published
notice of Amendment No. 1 and
instituted proceedings pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2)(B) of the Exchange
Act 6 to determine whether to approve or
disapprove the proposed rule change, as
modified by Amendment No. 1.7 On
November 23, 2021, the Commission
designated a longer period for
Commission action on the proposed rule
change, as modified by Amendment No.
1.8 On December 20, 2021, the Exchange
filed Amendment No. 2, which replaced
and superseded the proposed rule
change, as modified by Amendment No.
1.9 On January 20, 2022, the Exchange
5 In Amendment No. 1, the Exchange revised the
proposal to: (i) Eliminate the proposed suspension
of unlisted trading privileges for thinly traded
securities; (ii) modify proposed rule text regarding
the order parameter that would allow participants
to indicate a preference for same day or next day
settlement to clarify that, based on how the
preferences of the two sides of an executed trade
compare, the Exchange will transmit matched order
information to a registered clearing agency for
settlement as indicated to the extent that such
settlement timing may be permitted under the rules,
policies, and procedures of the registered clearing
agency; (iii) modify aspects of the proposed market
data blockchain to remove the Exchange’s ability to
change the content of the market data blockchain
through a regulatory circular, remove the unique
identification number from the types of memberspecific market data, specify that anonymized,
general market data will pertain to displayed
orders, and add that the Exchange may provide
permission for non-members to view the
anonymized, general market data; (iv) add rule text
regarding the Exchange’s proposed market data
products; (v) eliminate a proposed rule regarding
issuer conversion of a security to listing on BSTX;
(vi) provide additional description of several
aspects of the proposal, including the market data
blockchain and the possibility to settle on a sameday or next-day basis; and (vii) make technical and
conforming changes. Amendment No. 1 is available
on the Commission’s website at: https://
www.sec.gov/comments/sr-box-2021-06/
srbox202106-9159349-247726.pdf.
6 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
7 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 92796,
86 FR 49416 (September 2, 2021) (‘‘OIP’’).
8 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 93649,
86 FR 68023 (November 30, 2021).
9 In Amendment No. 2, the Exchange revised the
proposal to: (i) Provide additional information
regarding the connectivity and co-location services
that will be offered at the Exchange’s primary data
center, including equidistant cabling arrangements;
(ii) state that, pursuant to its authority under
proposed BSTX Rule 26101, the Exchange would
not permit an issuer to list a new class of securities
on BSTX that is not distinct from an existing class
of securities of the issuer; (iii) modify proposed rule
text regarding the proposed market data blockchain
to clarify that non-members will have access to
anonymized, general market data and specify what
fields are included in this data, to specify that the
market data will apply to trading activity for regular
trading hours, and to clarify that users will view the
data through an application programming interface;
(iv) modify proposed rule text related to the
proposed order parameter that would be used to
preference same-day settlement to add a cut-off
time by which an execution must occur to be
eligible for same-day settlement; (v) modify certain
proposed rules to bring them into closer alignment
with the rules of other national securities exchanges
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:31 Feb 01, 2022
Jkt 256001
filed partial Amendment No. 3 to the
proposed rule change.10 The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change, as modified by Amendment
Nos. 2 and 3, from interested persons
and is approving the proposed rule
change, as modified by Amendment
Nos. 2 and 3, on an accelerated basis.
II. Description of the Proposal, as
Modified by Amendment Nos. 2 and 3
As set forth in the OIP and
Amendment Nos. 2 and 3,11 the
on which equity securities are traded, including
rules regarding securities eligible for trading,
prohibitions against trading ahead of customer
orders, round lots, minimum price variants,
auctions used to open or reopen trading, the
dissemination of market data concerning such
auctions, risk controls, market maker registration
process and obligations, business conduct, trading
practices, maintaining books and records, offexchange transactions, scope of the minor rule
violation plan, trade reporting and the
dissemination of quotations, clearly erroneous
executions, and locking and crossing quotations;
(vi) eliminate a proposed rule regarding an audit
trail that has been superseded by rules pertaining
to the Consolidated Audit Trail; (vii) modify certain
proposed listing standards to comply with the
thresholds in Rule 3a51–1, and bring the proposed
listing standards into closer alignment with the
rules of other national securities exchanges on
which equities securities are traded, including with
respect to the listing of secondary classes and
preferred stock, the required number of market
makers, requirements for securities of foreign
issuers that would apply to the listing of Canadian
issuers, the listing of securities that are subject to
an exemption from Exchange Act registration, the
method of computing the payment of cash in lieu
of fractional shares, the settlement timing of
securities transactions, requirements to notify the
Exchange before engaging in activities relating to a
proxy contest, requirements that listed companies
establish and maintain an internal audit function,
the calculation of regulatory transaction fees under
Section 31 of the Exchange Act, and the distribution
of funds in the event of liquidation of the Exchange;
(viii) eliminate a proposed listing requirement that
an applicant provide a legal opinion that its
security qualifies as a security under applicable
United States securities laws; (ix) provide
additional description to clarify operation of the
proposed market data blockchain and proposed
order parameter that would be used to preference
same-day or next-day settlement; and (x) make
technical and conforming changes. Amendment No.
2 is available on the Commission’s website at:
https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-box-2021-06/
srbox202106-20110109-264393.pdf (‘‘Amendment
No. 2’’).
10 In Amendment No. 3, the Exchange revised the
proposal to make certain changes to the proposed
listing rules in proposed BSTX Rule 26000 to
promote consistency with the definition of ‘‘penny
stock’’ under Exchange Act Rule 3a51–1, including
by defining ‘‘public distribution’’ and ‘‘public
shareholder’’ consistently with Rule 3a51–1,
changing references to ‘‘Market Value of Listed
Securities’’ to ‘‘Total Value of Market
Capitalization,’’ and eliminating initial listing
standards for preferred stock that were based on the
rules of NYSE American. Amendment No. 3 is
available on the Commission’s website at: https://
www.sec.gov/comments/sr-box-2021-06/
srbox202106-20112225-265310.pdf (‘‘Amendment
No. 3’’).
11 See OIP, supra note 7; Amendment No. 2,
supra note 9; Amendment No. 3, supra note 10.
PO 00000
Frm 00104
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Exchange proposes to adopt listing
standards for certain equity securities
(‘‘Securities’’) along with rules
governing the trading of Securities
through a facility of the Exchange
known as BSTX.12 BSTX would operate
a fully automated, price/time priority
execution system (‘‘BSTX System’’) for
the trading of Securities.13 Under the
proposed rules, Securities would be
NMS stocks, as defined in Rule
600(b)(54),14 that meet BSTX listing
standards and that trade on the BSTX
System.15 BSTX would serve as the
listing market for eligible companies
and issuers of exchange traded products
(‘‘ETPs’’).16 The Exchange states that it
is not proposing rules that would
support the extension of unlisted
trading privileges (‘‘UTP’’) to NMS
stocks listed on other national securities
exchanges.17
The Exchange proposes rules for
participation on BSTX, business
conduct for BSTX Participants,18
12 See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49416. Pursuant
to a separate proposed rule change, the Exchange
proposes to establish BSTX as a facility of the
Exchange that will operate a market for the trading
of securities (‘‘BSTX Market’’) and adopt the BSTX
Third Amended and Restated LLC Agreement. See
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 93094
(September 21, 2021), 86 FR 53365 (September 27,
2021) (SR–BOX–2021–14) (Notice of Filing of
Amendment No. 1 and Order Instituting
Proceedings to Determine Whether to Approve or
Disapprove a Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by
Amendment No. 1, in Connection with the
Proposed Establishment of BSTX as a Facility of the
Exchange) (‘‘Amended BSTX Governance
Proposal’’); Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 7.
Among other things, the Amended BSTX
Governance Proposal sets forth the proposed
ownership structure for BSTX. The Exchange states
that without Commission approval of the trading
rules, the Exchange would not permit BSTX to
commence operations of the BSTX Market, and that
the Exchange’s regulatory oversight responsibilities
with respect to BSTX would not be triggered unless
SR–BOX–2021–14 is approved by the Commission.
See Amended BSTX Governance Proposal, 86 FR at
53366. The Exchange also states that without
approved rules pertaining to the governance
structure of BSTX as a facility of the Exchange, the
Exchange will not commence operation of BSTX.
See Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 9.
13 See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49416.
14 17 CFR 242.600(b)(54).
15 See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49417. The
Exchange proposes listing standards that, according
to the Exchange, are similar to the listing standards
of NYSE American LLC (‘‘NYSE American’’). See
id. at 49439.
16 See id. at 49417.
17 See id. The Exchange also states that, therefore,
it would only trade Securities listed on BSTX
unless and until it proposes and receives
Commission approval for rules that would support
trading in other types of securities, including
through the extension of UTP to other NMS stocks.
See id.
18 ‘‘BSTX Participant’’ would be defined as a
Participant or Options Participant that is authorized
to trade securities on the Exchange. See proposed
BSTX Rule 17000(a)(12). See also proposed BOX
Rules 100(a)(41) (defining ‘‘Options Participant’’ to
mean a Participant registered with the Exchange for
E:\FR\FM\02FEN1.SGM
02FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 22 / Wednesday, February 2, 2022 / Notices
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
financial and operational provisions for
BSTX Participants, supervision, trading
practices, discipline, trading on the
BSTX System, market making, and
listing Securities on BSTX.19 The
Exchange proposes to offer several
proprietary market data products that
are similar to those offered by other
national securities exchanges, as well as
a historical market data product that
utilizes blockchain technology.20
Specifically, the Exchange proposes to
record and disseminate certain
information regarding orders and
executions on BSTX on a proprietary
market data feed that BSTX would
operate using a proprietary blockchain
system (‘‘BSTX Market Data
Blockchain’’).21 The Exchange states
that the BSTX Market Data Blockchain
would be accessible through an
application program interface (‘‘API’’)
available through the internet, and the
Exchange would control all aspects of
the BSTX Market Data Blockchain and
the associated API.22
The Exchange states that two types of
information would be available on the
BSTX Market Data Blockchain. Each
BSTX Participant would be able to see
its own order and transaction
information related to its own trading
activity on BSTX (‘‘Participant
Proprietary Data’’).23 In addition, all
BSTX Participants and non-BSTX
Participants with permission to view the
BSTX Market Data Blockchain would be
able to see anonymized, general market
data related to all trading activity
occurring on BSTX (‘‘General Market
Data’’).24 The Exchange states that
information would be posted to the
BSTX Market Data Blockchain on a
delayed basis of at least five minutes.25
The Exchange states that the General
Market Data that would be available on
the BSTX Market Data Blockchain
purposes of participating in options trading on the
Exchange); and 100(a)(42) (defining ‘‘Participant’’ to
mean a firm or organization that is registered with
the Exchange pursuant to BOX Rule 2000 Series for
purposes of participating in trading on a facility of
the Exchange, including an Options Participant and
BSTX Participant).
19 See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49417.
20 See proposed BSTX Rule 22060. The Exchange
states that its rule concerning market data products
is substantially similar to that of MEMX LLC
(‘‘MEMX’’). See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49424
& n.154.
21 See proposed BSTX Rules 17000(a)(9) and
17020.
22 See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49420. The
Exchange states that only the Exchange would have
direct access to the underlying data on the private
blockchain. See id.
23 See id.
24 See id.
25 See id. at 49421. See also infra note 156
(describing that by ‘‘five minute delay,’’ the
Exchange means that market data would be
uploaded once every five minutes).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:31 Feb 01, 2022
Jkt 256001
would contain substantively similar
information as would be available
through the Exchange’s proprietary
market data feeds.26 The Exchange
further states that the BSTX Market Data
Blockchain would not impact the ability
of Securities to trade on other national
securities exchanges or over-the-counter
(‘‘OTC’’).27
According to the Exchange, all
transactions in Securities would clear
and settle in accordance with the rules,
policies, and procedures of registered
clearing agencies.28 The Exchange states
that BSTX anticipates that The
Depository Trust Company (‘‘DTC’’)
would serve as the securities depository
for Securities and that confirmed trades
in Securities on BSTX would be
transmitted to National Securities
Clearing Corporation (‘‘NSCC’’) for
clearing.29 The Exchange proposes to
introduce an optional order parameter
that would allow BSTX Participants to
indicate a preference for settlement on
a shorter settlement cycle than the
standard two business day (‘‘T+2’’)
settlement cycle. Specifically, the
Exchange proposes that BSTX
Participants would be able to utilize an
order parameter that would indicate a
preference for settlement on a same day
(‘‘T+0’’) or next day (‘‘T+1’’) basis when
certain conditions are met.30 The
Exchange states that orders in a Security
that include a parameter indicating a
preference for settlement on a T+0 basis
or on a T+1 basis would only result in
executions that would actually settle
more quickly than on a T+2 basis if, and
only if, all of the specified conditions
are met and the execution that is
transmitted by BSTX to NSCC is eligible
for T+0 or T+1 settlement under the
rules, policies, and procedures of a
registered clearing agency.31 The
Exchange states that any such
preference would only become
26 See
OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49421.
id. at 49423. The Exchange states that it is
proposing to use blockchain technology for
purposes of the BSTX Market Data Blockchain and
that, to the extent the Exchange proposes future
applications of blockchain technology to the
Exchange’s business, the Exchange would file such
proposal with the Commission. See Amendment
No. 2, supra note 9, at 29 n.52. The Commission
notes that the Exchange’s current proposal does not
involve the trading of digital tokens and such a
proposal, or any other additional use of blockchain
technology, would require that the Exchange file a
proposed rule change pursuant to Section 19(b) and
Rule 19b–4 of the Exchange Act.
28 See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49418. The
Exchange also states that the operation of the BSTX
Market Data Blockchain would have no impact or
effect on the manner in which a Security clears and
settles. See id.
29 See id.
30 See id. at 49423; proposed BSTX Rule
25060(h).
31 See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49424.
27 See
PO 00000
Frm 00105
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
5883
operative if the order happened to
execute against another order that also
includes a parameter indicating a
preference for settlement on a T+0 or
T+1 basis.32 According to the Exchange,
an order with a preference for faster
settlement would continue to interact
with any other order against which it is
marketable, and a resulting execution
would always settle using the latest
settlement timing associated with the
two matching orders.33 The Exchange
also states that the possibility of a
shortened settlement time would have
no impact on the Exchange’s proposed
price/time priority structure for order
matching.34
III. Discussion and Commission
Findings
After careful review of the proposed
rule change, as modified by Amendment
Nos. 2 and 3, the Commission finds that
the proposal is consistent with the
requirements of the Exchange Act and
the rules and regulations thereunder
applicable to a national securities
exchange.35 Specifically, the
Commission finds that the proposed
rule change, as amended, is consistent
with Section 6(b)(5) of the Exchange
Act,36 which requires, among other
things, that the rules of a national
securities exchange be designed to
prevent fraudulent and manipulative
acts and practices; to promote just and
equitable principles of trade; to foster
cooperation and coordination with
persons engaged in regulating, clearing,
settling, and processing information
with respect to, and facilitating
transactions in securities; to remove
impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system; and, in
general, to protect investors and the
public interest. Section 6(b)(5) also
requires that the rules of a national
securities exchange not be designed to
permit unfair discrimination among
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.
Further, the Commission finds that the
proposed rule change, as amended, is
consistent with Section 6(b)(1) of the
Exchange Act,37 which requires, among
other things, that a national securities
exchange be so organized and have the
capacity to carry out the purposes of the
Exchange Act, and to comply and
enforce compliance by its members and
32 See
id.
id. at 49425.
34 See id. at 49424.
35 In approving this proposed rule change, the
Commission has considered the proposed rule’s
impact on efficiency, competition, and capital
formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
36 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
37 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(1).
33 See
E:\FR\FM\02FEN1.SGM
02FEN1
5884
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 22 / Wednesday, February 2, 2022 / Notices
persons associated with its members,
with the provisions of the Exchange Act,
the rules and regulations thereunder,
and the rules of the exchange, and with
Sections 6(b)(6) and 6(b)(7) of the
Exchange Act,38 which require a
national securities exchange to provide
fair procedures for the disciplining of
members and persons associated with
members. The Commission also finds
that the proposed rule change, as
amended, is consistent with Section
11A of the Exchange Act,39 and,
consistent with Section 6(b)(8) of the
Exchange Act, does not impose any
burden on competition not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Exchange Act.40 The
Commission further finds that the
proposed rule change, as amended, is
consistent with the public interest, the
protection of investors, or otherwise in
furtherance of the purposes of the
Exchange Act, as required by Rule 19d–
1(c)(2) under the Exchange Act,41 which
governs minor rule violation plans.
The Exchange proposes to adopt rules
governing the trading of Securities
under the proposed rules through a
facility of the Exchange known as BSTX,
which will function in a manner similar
to equities trading platforms that the
Commission has approved for other
national securities exchanges.42 With
the exception of the proposed BSTX
Market Data Blockchain and optional
order parameter for preferencing
settlement on a T+0 or T+1 basis, the
Exchange’s proposed rules for BSTX are
substantively similar to the
corresponding rules of other equities
exchanges. As discussed below, the
Commission believes that the proposed
rule change, as modified by Amendment
Nos. 2 and 3, is consistent with the
Exchange Act.
A. BSTX Participants
The Exchange proposes to adopt
BSTX Rule 18000, which will set forth
requirements for participation on BSTX.
A ‘‘BSTX Participant’’ will be a new
category of Exchange participant for
effecting transactions on the BSTX
System. All BOX Participants would be
eligible to participate in BSTX provided
that they become a BSTX Participant
38 15
U.S.C. 78f(b)(6) and (b)(7).
U.S.C. 78k–1.
40 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
41 17 CFR 240.19d–1(c)(2).
42 BSTX’s rules, including its rules relating to
participation on BSTX and business conduct,
financial and operational, supervisory, and trading
practice rules, and certain trading, market making,
and listing rules, are similar to existing national
securities exchanges’ trading and listing rules. See,
e.g., Rules of the Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (‘‘Cboe
BZX’’), Investors Exchange LLC (‘‘IEX’’), and NYSE
American.
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
39 15
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:31 Feb 01, 2022
Jkt 256001
pursuant to the proposed rules.43 A
BSTX Participant must complete the
BSTX Participation Application,
Participation Agreement, and User
Agreement; 44 be an existing Participant
or Options Participant or become a
Participant or Options Participant of the
Exchange pursuant to BOX Rule 2000
Series and continue to abide by all
applicable provisions in BOX Rule 2000
Series; 45 and provide such other
information as required by the
Exchange.46 BSTX Participants would
be required to comply with, among
other things, financial responsibility
requirements established by Rule 15c3–
1 under the Exchange Act and
applicable books and records
requirements, and be a member or
participant of a registered clearing
agency or clear security transactions
through another BSTX Participant that
is a member or participant of a
registered clearing agency.47 In
addition, proposed BSTX Rule 18020
would require associated persons of a
BSTX Participant to be bound by the
rules of the Exchange to the same extent
as each BSTX Participant and allow the
Exchange to discipline, suspend, or
terminate the registration with the
Exchange of any person associated with
a BSTX Participant for violation of the
Exchange rules.48
The Exchange also proposes rules for
business conduct for BSTX Participants,
financial and operational provisions for
BSTX Participants, and rules for
supervision, trading practices,
43 See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49417. The
Exchange proposes defined terms for use in the
BSTX Rules, and states that terms defined
elsewhere in the BOX Rules shall have the same
meaning. See proposed BSTX Rule 17000. The
Exchange also proposes to specify that the proposed
BSTX Rules apply to the trading of securities by
BSTX Participants approved for such trading, the
listing of securities, and related matters pertaining
to the trading of securities, and that unless specific
BSTX Rules related to securities govern or the
context otherwise requires, the provisions of the
existing BOX Rules shall be applicable to BSTX
Participants and the trading of securities on the
BSTX System. See proposed BSTX Rule 17010.
Further, the Exchange proposes to make conforming
changes to certain existing BOX Rules that would
apply to BSTX Participants, but currently only
contemplate trading in options. See Amendment
No. 2, supra note 9, at 123; proposed BOX Rules
100, 2020, 2060, 3180, 7130, 7150, 7230, 7245, IM–
8050–3, 11010, 11030, and 12140.
44 See Exhibits 3A, 3B, and 3C, respectively.
45 The BOX Rule 2000 Series requires, among
other things, that a Participant (including a BSTX
Participant) remain a member of another registered
national securities exchange or national securities
association. See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49448
n.320.
46 See proposed BSTX Rule 18000.
47 See proposed BSTX Rule 18010(b). See also
Exhibits 3F and 3G.
48 See proposed BSTX Rule 18020(b).
PO 00000
Frm 00106
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
discipline, and market making.49
According to the Exchange, the
proposed BSTX Rule 19000 Series
would specify business conduct
requirements that are substantially
similar to those of other national
securities exchanges,50 which pertain
to: Just and equitable principles of trade;
adherence to law; use of fraudulent
devices; false statements; know your
customer; fair dealing with customers;
suitability; prompt receipt and delivery
of securities; charges for services
performed; use of information obtained
in a fiduciary capacity; publication of
transactions and quotations; offers at
stated prices; payments involving
publications that influence the market
price of a security; customer
confirmations; disclosure of a control
relationship with an issuer of securities;
discretionary accounts; improper use of
customers’ securities or funds and a
prohibition against guarantees and
sharing in accounts; the extent to which
sharing in accounts is permissible;
communications with customers and
the public; gratuities; telemarketing;
mandatory systems testing; and short
interest reporting. The Exchange states
that the proposed business conduct
rules are identical to those of other
national securities exchanges, other
than changes to defined terms and
certain other provisions that would not
apply to the trading of Securities on the
BSTX System.51
According to the Exchange, the
proposed BSTX Rule 20000 Series
would specify financial and operational
rules for BSTX Participants associated
with maintenance and furnishing of
books and records, financial reports, net
capital compliance, early warning
notifications pursuant to Rule 17a–11
under the Exchange Act, authority of the
Chief Regulatory Officer to impose
certain restrictions, margin, day-trading
margin, customer account information,
maintaining records of customer
complaints, and disclosure of financial
49 See proposed BSTX Rule Series 19000, 20000,
21000, 23000, 24000, 25000, and 25200.
50 See Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 48
(citing to Cboe BZX Rules Chapter III and IEX Rules
Chapter 3).
51 See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49427. For
example, the Exchange is not proposing to adopt a
rule contained in other national securities
exchanges’ business conduct rules relating to
disclosures that broker-dealers give to their
customers regarding the risks of effecting securities
transactions during times other than Regular
Trading Hours because executions may only occur
during Regular Trading Hours on the BSTX System.
See id. at 49427 n.113 (citing to IEX Rule 3.290 and
Cboe BZX Rule 3.21). ‘‘Regular Trading Hours’’
would mean the time between 9:30 a.m. and 4:00
p.m. Eastern Time (‘‘ET’’). See proposed BSTX Rule
17000(a)(29).
E:\FR\FM\02FEN1.SGM
02FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 22 / Wednesday, February 2, 2022 / Notices
condition.52 The Exchange represents
that the financial and operational
requirements are substantially similar to
those of other national securities
exchanges.53 Further, the Exchange
proposes to adopt supervisory
requirements for BSTX Participants in
the proposed BSTX Rule 21000 Series,
which, according to the Exchange, are
substantially similar to those of other
national securities exchanges.54 The
proposed supervisory requirements
pertain to enforcing written procedures
to appropriately supervise the BSTX
Participant’s conduct and compliance
with applicable regulatory
requirements, designation of an
individual to carry out written
supervisory procedures, maintenance
and keeping of records carrying out the
BSTX Participant’s written supervisory
procedures, review of activities of each
BSTX Participant’s offices, including
periodic examination of customer
accounts to detect and prevent
irregularities or abuses, prevention of
the misuse of material non-public
information, and implementation of an
anti-money laundering compliance
program.55
The proposed BSTX Rule 22000
Series would provide, among other
things, that BSTX Participants must
comply with requirements with respect
to comparison and settlement,
borrowing and deliveries in accordance
with Rule 203 of Regulation SHO,
forwarding of proxy and other issuerrelated materials, commissions,
regulatory services agreements, and
conditions and limitations on
transactions involving Exchange
employees.56 Proposed BSTX Rule
22070 would generally provide that the
rules of the Exchange would not
prohibit, condition, or limit the ability
of any BSTX Participant, including a
BSTX Participant acting as an agent, to
effect any transaction otherwise than on
the Exchange with another person in
any security listed on the Exchange or
to which UTP on the Exchange has been
extended.57 The Exchange represents
52 See
OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49428.
id. at 49428 & n.116 (citing to Cboe BZX
Rules Chapter VI and IEX Rules Chapter 5). The
Exchange states that the proposed BSTX Rule 20000
Series also incorporates existing rules of the
Exchange or another self-regulatory organization
(‘‘SRO’’) by reference. See id. at 49428.
54 See id.
55 See id. at 49428 & n.128 (citing to Cboe BZX
Rules Chapter V and IEX Rule 5.150).
56 See proposed BSTX Rule 22000 Series.
57 See Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 58;
proposed BSTX Rule 22070. The Exchange states
that the proposed rule is consistent with the
requirements of Rules 19c–1 and 19c–3 under the
Exchange Act and substantially similar to rules of
other national securities exchanges. See
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
53 See
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:31 Feb 01, 2022
Jkt 256001
that these miscellaneous requirements
are substantially similar to rules of other
national securities exchanges.58 The
Exchange also proposes to adopt the
BSTX Rule 23000 Series relating to
trading practice requirements for BSTX
Participants, including prohibiting
forms of market manipulation and
specifying certain obligations brokerdealers have to their customers, such as
the duty of best execution.59 The
Exchange represents that the trading
practice rules are substantially similar
to those of other national securities
exchanges.60
With respect to the imposition of
suspension and disciplinary actions, the
Exchange states that it proposes to adopt
the BSTX Rule 24000 Series, which
would provide that the Exchange
rules 61 pertaining to discipline and
suspension of Exchange Participants
that have been approved by the
Commission shall be applicable to
BSTX Participants and trading on the
BSTX System.62
The Exchange proposes to allow firms
to register as Market Makers and
Designated Market Makers (‘‘DMMs’’) 63
with affirmative and negative market
Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 58 (citing to,
for example, Cboe BZX Rule 13.6).
58 See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49429 & n.138
(citing to Cboe BZX Rules Chapter XIII and IEX
Rule 6.180).
59 According to the Exchange, the proposed BSTX
Rule 23000 Series would specify trading practice
requirements related to: (i) Market manipulation;
(ii) fictitious transactions; (iii) excessive sales by a
BSTX Participant; (iv) manipulative transactions;
(v) dissemination of false information; (vi)
prohibition against trading ahead of customer
orders; (vii) joint activity; (viii) influencing data
feeds; (ix) trade shredding; (x) best execution; (xi)
publication of transactions and changes; (xii)
trading ahead of research reports; (xiii) front
running of block transactions; and (xiv) a
prohibition against disruptive quoting and trading
activity. See id. at 49429.
60 See id. at 49429 & n.155 (citing to Cboe BZX
Rules Chapter XII). The Exchange states that the
proposed minimum price improvement standards
in proposed BSTX Rule 23050(h) are consistent
with those of other national securities exchanges
and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority
(‘‘FINRA’’). See Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at
62 (citing to Cboe BZX Rule 12.6.06).
61 See BOX Rule 11000 Series (Summary
Suspension), 12000 Series (Discipline), 13000
Series (Review of Certain Exchange Actions), and
14000 Series (Arbitration).
62 See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49430–31;
proposed BSTX Rule 24000. In addition, the
Exchange proposes to amend its Minor Rule
Violation Plan to add certain rules relating to BSTX
to the list of rules eligible for minor rule violation
plan treatment, by amending BOX Rule 12140 and
adopting proposed BSTX Rule 24010 (Penalty for
Minor Rule Violations). See Amendment No. 2,
supra note 9, at 121.
63 ‘‘Designated Market Maker’’ or ‘‘DMM’’ would
be defined as a BSTX Participant registered as a
DMM pursuant to the BSTX Rule 25200 Series. See
proposed BSTX Rule 17000(a)(20).
PO 00000
Frm 00107
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
5885
making obligations.64 A BSTX
Participant registered as a BSTX Market
Maker, including a DMM, would be
required to engage in a course of dealing
for its own account in the maintenance
of a fair and orderly market.65 Among
other things, each Market Maker must
maintain two-sided quotes during the
regular market session for each Security
in which it is registered as a Market
Maker.66 A non-DMM Market Maker
may temporarily withdraw its Market
Maker status,67 and any BSTX Market
Maker, other than a DMM, may
voluntarily terminate its registration
with the Exchange.68 If the Exchange
finds any substantial or continued
failure by a BSTX Market Maker to
engage in a course of dealings specified
in proposed BSTX Rule 25220(a),69 the
64 See proposed BSTX Rule 25200 Series. The
Exchange states that rules relating to market makers
are similar to the rules of other national securities
exchanges. See Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at
95–102 (citing to IEX Rules 11.150 and 11.151 and
NYSE American Rules 7.20E through 7.26E). The
Exchange states that proposed BSTX Rule 25200
differs from IEX Rule 11.150 in that IEX makes the
registration effective on the trading day after the
request is entered, whereas the Exchange would
have discretion to make registration effective the
day the request is entered with notice provided to
the prospective BSTX Market Maker. See id. at 95
n.277.
65 See proposed BSTX Rule 25220. The Exchange
states that proposed BSTX Rule 25220 is
substantially similar to NYSE American Rule 7.23E,
with certain exceptions, and IEX Rule 11.151.
According to the Exchange, the proposed BSTX rule
differs from NYSE American Rule 7.23E in that,
among other things, the proposed BSTX rule
specifies the minimum quotation increment for
securities priced above $1.00 per share and below
$1.00 per share and requires Market Maker
quotations to be firm for their displayed size and
automatically executable. See Amendment No. 2,
supra note 9, at 97–98. See also infra note 66.
66 See proposed BSTX Rule 25220(a)(1). The
Exchange proposes that the quotes must be entered
within the ‘‘Designated Percentage,’’ which
according to the Exchange would be the same as
that required of market makers on other national
securities exchanges. See Amendment No. 2, supra
note 9, at 96 (citing to IEX Rule 11.151). The
Exchange notes, however, that the Defined
Percentage and ‘‘Defined Limit,’’ which is the
percentage by which price movements cause a
Market Maker or DMM’s quotations to fall outside
of the national best bid and offer (‘‘NBBO’’) or last
sale price, differ from NYSE American Rule 7.23E
in that the Exchange specifies Defined Percentage
and Defined Limit with reference to securities that
are part of the S&P500 Index, Russell 1000 Index,
or a pilot list of exchange traded products. The
Exchange states its belief that the difference does
not pose any novel requirements and is similar to
the market maker requirements of IEX. See id. at 98
(citing to IEX Rules 11.151(a)(6), (7), (11), and
11.151(b)(1)).
67 See proposed BSTX Rule 25220(d). According
to the Exchange, the process by which a DMM may
temporarily withdraw from its DMM status is
similar to the process applicable to a non-DMM
Market Maker. See proposed BSTX Rule
25240(b)(4); OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49438.
68 See proposed BSTX Rule 25210(d).
69 See supra note 66; proposed BSTX Rule
25220(a).
E:\FR\FM\02FEN1.SGM
02FEN1
5886
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 22 / Wednesday, February 2, 2022 / Notices
Exchange would subject the Market
Maker to disciplinary action or
suspension or revocation of the
registration by the Exchange in one or
more of the Securities in which the
Market Maker is registered.70
Proposed BSTX Rule 25230 sets forth
certain requirements for Market Maker
Authorized Traders (‘‘MMATs’’), which
are individuals permitted to enter orders
only for the account of the Market
Maker or DMM for which they are
registered.71 The proposed rule
specifies, among other things, eligibility
for registration as a MMAT, the
Exchange’s ability to suspend an
individual’s registration as a MMAT,
and the process for voluntary
withdrawal of a MMAT via written
request of the BSTX Participant for
which the MMAT is registered.72 The
Exchange represents that the proposed
provisions related to MMATs are
substantially similar to those of other
national securities exchanges.73
Proposed BSTX Rule 25240 sets forth
the registration and obligations of
DMMs.74 Among other things, a DMM
must be registered as a Market Maker
and, in addition to meeting the
obligations of Market Makers set forth in
proposed BSTX Rule 25220,75 the DMM
must maintain a bid or offer at the
NBBO at least 25% of the day as
measured across all Securities that have
been assigned to the DMM.76 Proposed
BSTX Rule 25240 further provides that
all BSTX-listed Securities may be
assigned to a DMM and there would be
no more than one DMM per BSTX-listed
Security.77 A BSTX Participant
registered as a DMM in a Security may
also be registered as a Market Maker in
that Security only if the BSTX
Participant maintains information
barriers between the trading unit
operating as a DMM and the trading unit
operating as a non-DMM Market Maker
70 See
proposed BSTX Rule 25220(c).
proposed BSTX Rule 25230.
72 See id.
73 See Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 98
(citing to NYSE American Rule 7.21E and Cboe BZX
Rule 11.6).
74 See proposed BSTX Rule 25240. The Exchange
represents that proposed BSTX Rule 25240 is
substantially similar to NYSE American Rule 7.24E,
except the Exchange would not be required to
assign a DMM if the Security has an adequate
number of BSTX Market Makers assigned to such
Security. The Exchange states that the purpose of
this requirement is to acknowledge the possibility
that a Security need not necessarily have a DMM,
provided that each Security has been assigned at
least four active Market Makers, consistent with
proposed the Market Maker requirement in BSTX
Rule 26106. See Amendment No. 2, supra note 9,
at 99–100.
75 See supra notes 65–66.
76 See proposed BSTX Rule 25240(c).
77 See proposed BSTX Rule 25240(a).
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
71 See
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:31 Feb 01, 2022
Jkt 256001
in the same Security.78 Proposed BSTX
Rule 25250 would set forth the
allocation and reallocation of Securities
to DMMs.79 Among other things, the
proposed rule would set forth when a
Security is eligible for allocation or
reallocation, as well as the eligibility of
DMMs to participate in the allocation
process.80 The proposed rule further
sets forth the allocation process—
whether the issuer selects the DMM
directly, delegates the selection to the
Exchange, or opts to proceed with
listing without a DMM, in which case a
minimum of four non-DMM Market
Makers must be assigned to its
Security.81
In the event that a listed company
wishes to change its DMM, proposed
BSTX Rule 25250(c) sets forth the
reallocation process.82 Should a DMM
lose its registration or voluntarily
withdraw its registration, the DMM
would be ineligible, under the
Exchange’s ‘‘Allocation Freeze Policy,’’
for future allocations for a six-month
period.83 For companies that list
Securities through an initial public
offering, the allocation decision would
remain effective for 18 months.84 The
proposed rule also sets forth criteria the
Exchange may consider for applicants
that are not currently DMMs to be
allocated a Security as a DMM.85
The Exchange proposes the DMM
combination review policy in BSTX
Rule 25260.86 A DMM combination
would require proponents of the
combination to make a written
submission to the Office of the
Corporate Secretary of the Exchange
addressing certain enumerated factors
78 See
proposed BSTX Rule 25240(b)(3).
proposed BSTX Rule 25250.
80 See proposed BSTX Rule 25250(a). The
Exchange states that the process by which the
Exchange would handle a DMM that fails to meet
its obligations, as proposed in BSTX Rule
25250(a)(4), is substantially similar to NYSE
American Rule 7.25E(a)(4). See OIP, supra note 7,
86 FR at 49438 & n.254.
81 See proposed BSTX Rule 25250(b). See also
Exhibit 3D. The Exchange states that the proposed
rule is similar to NYSE American Rule 7.25E(b). See
Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 101.
82 See proposed BSTX Rule 25250(c). The
Exchange represents that the proposed reallocation
policy is substantially similarly to corresponding
provisions in NYSE American Rule 7.25E(c). See
OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49439.
83 See proposed BSTX Rule 25250(d); OIP, supra
note 7, 86 FR at 49439 (stating that the proposed
rule is substantially similar to NYSE American Rule
7.25E(d)).
84 See proposed BSTX Rule 25250(e); OIP, supra
note 7, 86 FR at 49439 (stating that the proposed
rule is substantially similar to NYSE American Rule
7.25E(e)).
85 See proposed BSTX Rule 25250(f); OIP, supra
note 7, 86 FR at 49439 (stating that the proposed
rule is substantially similar to NYSE American Rule
7.25E(f)).
86 See proposed BSTX Rule 25260.
79 See
PO 00000
Frm 00108
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
for the Exchange to consider in
reviewing the proposed combination,
and as well as the procedures the
Exchange would follow in approving or
disapproving a combination.87 The
proposed rule also sets forth the
timeline for the Exchange to approve or
disapprove a combination, the ability of
the Exchange to grant conditional
approvals, and the ability to have the
Exchange’s board of directors to review
a disapproval decision.88
The Exchange’s rules with respect to
participation on BSTX, including the
proposed affirmative and negative
obligations for Market Makers and
DMMs, and the proposed business
conduct, financial and operational,
supervision, and trading practice rules,
raise no novel regulatory issues. The
Commission finds that these proposed
rules are consistent with the Exchange
Act, and Section 6(b)(5) of the Exchange
Act in particular,89 because by setting
forth these requirements for different
types of participants, they establish a
framework for what entities will
participate in BSTX and how they will
interact with other BSTX Participants
and fulfill their obligations, which
should help to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, perfect the
mechanism of a national market system
and, in general, protect investors and
the public interest. The Commission
also finds that these proposed rules
subject BSTX Participants, including
BSTX Market Makers and DMMs, to
appropriate discipline for improper
conduct, consistent with Sections
6(b)(6) and 6(b)(7) of the Exchange
Act.90
B. BSTX System
The Exchange proposes that BSTX
would operate the BSTX System as a
fully automated, price-time priority
execution system.91 The BSTX System
would operate as an ‘‘automated trading
center’’ under Rule 600(b)(7) of
Regulation NMS and would display
‘‘automated quotations’’ under Rule
600(b)(6) of Regulation NMS at all
times, except in the event that a system
malfunction renders the BSTX System
incapable of displaying automated
quotations.92 BSTX’s best-priced
quotation in an NMS stock would be a
87 See
id.
id. The Exchange represents that the
proposed rule is substantially similar to NYSE
American Rule 7.26E. See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR
at 49439.
89 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
90 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(6) and (7).
91 See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49416.
92 17 CFR 242.600(b)(6) and (b)(7). See
Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 86; proposed
BSTX Rule 25100(c).
88 See
E:\FR\FM\02FEN1.SGM
02FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 22 / Wednesday, February 2, 2022 / Notices
‘‘protected quotation’’ under Rules
600(b)(70) and 600(b)(71) of Regulation
NMS.93 Only a BSTX Participant
approved for trading on the BSTX
System or a person associated with such
a BSTX Participant would be able to
effect any transactions on the BSTX
System.94
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
Order Types and Instructions
Proposed BSTX Rule 25060(c)
provides that BSTX Participants may
enter orders to the BSTX System as limit
orders or Inter-Market Sweep Orders
(‘‘ISOs’’).95 The BSTX System would
only support two time-in-force (‘‘TIF’’)
designations: DAY and IOC.96 Under
proposed BSTX Rule 25060(d), all
orders would be given a default TIF of
DAY.97 DAY orders may queue during
the Pre-Opening Phase 98 or before the
resumption of trading following a
trading halt, may trade only during
Regular Market Hours, and, if
unexecuted at the close of the trading
day (4:00 p.m. ET), would be cancelled
by the BSTX System.99 BSTX
Participants may also designate orders
as IOC, which overrides the default TIF
of DAY.100 IOC orders are not accepted
by the BSTX System during the PreOpening Phase, and during Regular
Trading Hours, IOC orders will execute
in whole or in part immediately upon
receipt by the BSTX System.101 The
BSTX System would not support
modification of resting orders, and to
change the price or quantity of an order
resting on the BSTX Book,102 a BSTX
Participant must cancel the resting order
and submit a new order, which would
result in a new time stamp for purposes
93 17 CFR 242.600(b)(70) and (b)(71). See OIP,
supra note 7, 86 FR at 49435 & n.210.
94 See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49431;
proposed BSTX Rule 25000(a). The Exchange
represents that proposed BSTX Rule 25000 is
substantially similar to IEX Rule 11.140. See
Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 65 n.175.
95 See proposed BSTX Rule 25060(c). The
Exchange states that if a BSTX Participant fails to
specify a limit price with respect to its limit order,
such order shall be rejected. ISOs must be limit
orders, are ineligible for routing, may be submitted
with a limit price during Regular Trading Hours,
and must have a time-in-force of immediate-orcancel (‘‘IOC’’). See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at
49434 & n.202.
96 See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49434;
proposed BSTX Rule 25060(d).
97 See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49434;
proposed BSTX Rule 25060(d)(1).
98 ‘‘Pre-Opening Phase’’ would mean the time
between 8:30 a.m. and 9:30 a.m. ET. See proposed
BSTX Rule 17000(a)(28).
99 See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49434;
proposed BSTX Rule 25060(d)(1).
100 See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49434;
proposed BSTX Rule 25060(d)(2).
101 See id.
102 ‘‘BSTX Book’’ would mean the electronic book
of orders on each Security maintained by the BSTX
System. See proposed BSTX Rule 17000(a)(10).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:31 Feb 01, 2022
Jkt 256001
of BSTX Book priority.103 The Exchange
states that all orders on BSTX would be
displayed.104 With the exception of the
order parameter to preference faster
settlement,105 the order types and
instructions the Exchange has proposed
for the BSTX System are similar to those
approved by the Commission and
currently available on other national
securities exchanges 106 and raise no
new regulatory issues. The Commission
finds these proposed rules are
consistent with the Exchange Act, and
Section 6(b)(5) 107 of the Exchange Act
in particular, because they establish the
types of orders and modifiers that all
BSTX Participants may use and provide
transparency regarding how orders
would operate on the BSTX System,
which should help promote just and
equitable principles of trade, foster
coordination with persons engaged in
facilitating transactions in securities,
and remove impediments to and perfect
the mechanism of a national market
system.
Auctions
The Exchange proposes that order
entry in BSTX-listed Securities 108 may
commence at 8:30 a.m. ET during the
Pre-Opening Phase, in which orders are
placed on the BSTX Book but do not
generate executions until Regular
Trading Hours begin at 9:30 a.m. ET.109
103 See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49434;
proposed BSTX Rule 25060(f).
104 See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49434. The
Exchange states that the BSTX System will not
support hidden orders, undisplayed liquidity, price
sliding, pegged orders, or other order type features
that add complexity upon the initial launch of
BSTX. See id.
105 See infra notes 190–207 and accompanying
text.
106 See, e.g., Cboe BZX Rule 11.9(d).
107 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
108 Although the Exchange initially plans to only
support trading in securities listed on BSTX, the
Exchange states that it may in the future propose
to trade securities listed on other national securities
exchanges, subject to any necessary changes to its
rules to support its trading pursuant to Section
19(b) and Rule 19b–4 of the Exchange Act. The
Exchange also states that for such reason it proposes
to adopt an opening process for non-BSTX-listed
securities as a placeholder for potential trading of
securities listed on other national securities
exchanges in the future. The Exchange states that
the proposed process for opening securities listed
on other national securities exchanges is similar to
the existing rules of another national securities
exchange. See proposed BSTX Rule 25040(e);
Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 74–75 (citing
to Cboe BZX Rule 11.24).
109 See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49431. During
the Pre-Opening Phase, orders may not be cancelled
or modified from 9:28 a.m. to 9:30 a.m. Orders
received during the 10 seconds prior to the Opening
Auction would be rejected. See proposed BSTX
Rule 25040(a)(1). ‘‘Opening Auction’’ would be
defined as the process of crossing orders in BSTXlisted Securities to open the market. See proposed
BSTX Rule 25040(a)(6). The Exchange states that
these provisions are consistent with the rules of
PO 00000
Frm 00109
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
5887
The Exchange states that, similar to how
its opening process works for options
trading, BSTX would calculate and
disseminate a theoretical opening price
(‘‘TOP’’) from the time that the BSTX
System commences accepting orders to
BSTX Participants for the current orders
resting on the BSTX Book during the
Pre-Opening Phase.110 The Exchange
proposes to disseminate the TOP and
other Broadcast Information pursuant to
proposed BSTX Rule 25040(a)(3) during
the Pre-Opening Phase.111 Broadcast
Information would be recalculated and
disseminated via electronic means (i.e.,
market data feeds) every five seconds.112
At the time of the opening match (i.e.,
9:30 a.m. ET), the BSTX System would
establish a single price at which the
BSTX-listed Security would be opened
(‘‘BSTX Official Opening Price’’), which
would be the TOP at the moment of the
Opening Auction, provided that the
resulting price must be within the Collar
Price Range.113 The Exchange states that
the BSTX System would determine a
single price at which a BSTX-listed
Security would be opened by
calculating the optimum number of
shares that could be matched at a price,
taking into consideration all the orders
other equities exchanges. See Amendment No. 2,
supra note 9, at 68 n.185 (citing to IEX Rules
11.350(c)(1)(B) and (C)).
110 See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49431;
proposed BSTX Rule 25040(a)(2). The TOP is the
price at which the Opening Auction would occur
at the current time, if that time were the opening,
according to the Opening Auction procedures in
proposed BSTX Rule 25040(a)(6). See proposed
BSTX Rule 25040(a).
111 See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49431–32.
Specifically, in addition to the TOP, ‘‘Broadcast
Information’’ would include: (i) ‘‘Paired Orders,’’
which is the quantity of shares that would execute
at the TOP; (ii) the ‘‘Imbalance Quantity,’’ which is
the number of shares that may not be matched with
other orders at the TOP at the time of
dissemination; and (iii) the ‘‘Imbalance Side,’’
which is the buy/sell direction of any imbalance at
the time of dissemination. See Amendment No. 2,
supra note 9, at 68–69.
112 See Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 69;
proposed BSTX Rule 25040(a)(4). The Exchange
states that Cboe BZX similarly broadcasts opening
auction information every five seconds. See
Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 69 n.189 (citing
to Cboe BZX Rule 11.23(b)(2)(A)).
113 See Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 69–
70. See proposed BSTX Rule 25040(a)(5) for a
definition of the ‘‘Collar Price Range.’’ As the BSTX
Official Opening Price is determined and the
matched shares are executed in the Opening
Auction, the BSTX System would proceed to move
the Security from the Pre-Opening Phase to the
continuous or regular trading phase and
disseminate the opening trade price, if any. Any
orders that remain unexecuted in the Opening
Auction, including any remaining portion of a
partially executed order, would be moved onto the
BSTX Book for the regular trading phase and would
retain their price/time priority consistent with
proposed BSTX Rule 25080. See proposed BSTX
Rule 25040(a)(7).
E:\FR\FM\02FEN1.SGM
02FEN1
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
5888
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 22 / Wednesday, February 2, 2022 / Notices
on the BSTX Book.114 The Exchange
states that the requirement that the
BSTX Official Opening Price must be
within the Collar Price Range is
designed to ensure that a Security opens
in a fair and orderly manner and under
market conditions where there is
sufficient quotation interest (e.g., a
NBBO), the market is not crossed, and
where the opening price will not
drastically depart from the market at the
time of the auction or the preceding
day’s closing price.115 The Exchange
proposes that when the BSTX System
cannot determine an opening price from
the Opening Auction, BSTX would
nevertheless open the Security for
trading and move all trading interest
received during the Pre-Opening Phase
to the BSTX Book, and that in such case,
the BSTX Official Opening Price would
be the Final Last Sale Eligible Trade.116
The Exchange states that the opening
process for initial public offerings of
Securities (‘‘Initial Security Offerings’’)
would be generally the same as regular
market openings.117 However, in
advance of an Initial Security Offering
auction (‘‘Initial Security Offering
Auction’’), the Exchange would
announce a ‘‘Quote-Only Period’’ of
between 15 and 30 minutes plus a short
random period prior to the Initial
Security Offering Auction.118 Orders
may not be submitted to participate in
an Initial Security Offering Auction
until the beginning of the Quote-Only
Period.119 All orders associated with the
Initial Security Offering Auction must
be received prior to the end of the
Quote-Only Period in order to
participate in the auction.120 Limit
orders with TIF of DAY submitted
during the Quote-Only Period would be
eligible to participate in the Initial
Security Offering Auction.121 According
to the Exchange, it would disseminate
Broadcast Information at the
commencement of the Quote-Only
Period as with regular market openings,
and Broadcast Information would be recalculated and disseminated via
electronic means every five seconds.122
Orders would be matched and executed
at the conclusion of the Quote-Only
Period, rather than at 9:30 a.m. ET.123
Following the initial cross at the end of
the Quote-Only Period wherein orders
will execute based on price/time
priority, consistent with proposed BSTX
Rule 25080, the Exchange would
transition to normal trading pursuant to
proposed BSTX Rule 25040(a)(6).124
The Exchange also proposes a process
for reopening trading following a
‘‘trading halt,’’ a halt or pause in trading
initiated by the Exchange, or a Limit
Up-Limit Down Trading Pause 125 (‘‘Halt
114 See Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 69;
proposed BSTX Rule 25040(a)(6)(ii). The Exchange
states that the determination of the opening match
price is consistent with the manner in which the
Exchange opens options trading. See Amendment
No. 2, supra note 9, at 69. Proposed BSTX Rule
25040(a)(6)(ii) would further provide that the BSTX
Official Opening Price is the price which results in
the matching of the highest number of shares. If two
or more prices would satisfy this maximum
quantity criteria, the price leaving the fewest resting
shares in the BSTX Book would be selected as the
BSTX Official Opening Price. Where two or more
prices would satisfy the maximum quantity criteria
and leave the fewest shares in the BSTX Book, the
price closest to the previous day’s last round lot
trade occurring during Regular Trading Hours on
the Exchange (‘‘BSTX Official Closing Price’’) will
be selected as the BSTX Official Opening Price. See
proposed BSTX Rules 25040(a)(5)(ii) and (6)(ii).
115 See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49432;
proposed BSTX Rule 25040(a)(5).
116 See Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 70;
proposed BSTX Rule 25040(a)(7). See also proposed
BSTX Rule 25040(a)(5)(ii) (defining ‘‘Final Last Sale
Eligible Trade’’).
117 See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49432.
118 See id.; proposed BSTX Rule 25040(b)(1). The
Quote-Only Period may be extended in certain
cases where (i) there is no TOP; (ii) the underwriter
requests an extension; (iii) the TOP moves the
greater of 10% or 50 cents in the 15 seconds prior
to the initial cross; or (iv) in the event of a technical
or systems issue at the Exchange that may impair
the ability of BSTX Participants to participate in the
Initial Security Offering Auction or of the Exchange
to complete the Initial Security Offering Auction.
See proposed BSTX Rule 25040(b)(2). In the event
of any extension to the Quote-Only Period or a
trading pause, the Exchange proposes to notify
market participants regarding the circumstances
and length of the extension. See OIP, supra note 7,
86 FR at 49432; proposed BSTX Rule 25040(b)(4).
119 See proposed BSTX Rule 25040(b)(1).
120 See id.
121 See id. Orders marked IOC submitted during
the Quote-Only Period would be rejected. See id.
122 See Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 71;
proposed BSTX Rule 25040(b)(3).
123 See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49432;
proposed BSTX Rule 25040(b)(5).
124 See Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 71–
72; proposed BSTX Rule 25040(b)(5).
125 See proposed BSTX Rule 25050(g). The
Exchange states that proposed BSTX Rule 25050
regarding trading halts is substantially similar to
other national securities exchange rules adopted in
connection with the NMS Plan to Address
Extraordinary Market Volatility (‘‘LULD Plan’’)—for
example, IEX Rule 11.280—with certain exceptions,
such as excluding rules relating to order types and
other aspects of the LULD Plan that would not be
supported by the Exchange, including market
orders and auction orders. See Amendment No. 2,
supra note 9, at 78–79. The Exchange would cancel
all resting orders in a non-BSTX listed security
subject to a trading halt, reject any incoming orders
in that security, and will only resume accepting
orders following a broadcast message to BSTX
Participants indicating a forthcoming re-opening of
trading. See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49433;
proposed BSTX Rule 25050(d). In addition, the
Exchange proposes to reserve the right to halt or
suspend trading in other circumstances where the
Exchange deems it necessary to do so for the
protection of investors and the public interest, or
pursuant to any other Exchange rule or policy. See
OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49434; proposed BSTX
Rule 25050(f). Proposed BSTX Rule 25010(d) would
allow for the CEO, President, or Chief Regulatory
Officer, or such person’s designee, provided the
designee is a senior officer, to halt or suspend
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:31 Feb 01, 2022
Jkt 256001
PO 00000
Frm 00110
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Auctions’’).126 For Halt Auctions, the
Exchange proposes that in advance of
reopening, the Exchange would
announce a Quote-Only Period that
would be five minutes prior to the Halt
Auction, and that all orders associated
with the Halt Auction must be received
prior to the end of the Quote-Only
Period in order to participate in the
auction.127 According to the Exchange,
it would disseminate the same
Broadcast Information as it does for an
Initial Security Offering Auction, except
it would also disseminate to market
participants the applicable Halt Auction
Reference Price and the Halt Auction
Collars, and would similarly provide
notification of any extension to the
Quote-Only Period as with an Initial
Security Offering Auction.128 The
transition to normal trading would also
occur in the same manner as for Initial
Security Offering Auctions.129
trading in securities. The Exchange states that while
comparable rules of other national securities
exchanges (e.g., IEX Rule 11.110(c) and BOX Rule
7020) may not currently specify that the Chief
Regulatory Officer has the authority, both of these
comparable rules contemplate the CEO or President
delegating the task to a senior officer, which could
be the Chief Regulatory Officer. The Exchange states
that it does not believe that the addition of the Chief
Regulatory Officer would expand the authority of
who can declare a trading halt or suspend trading.
See Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 65 n.176.
126 See Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 72;
proposed BSTX Rule 25040(c).
127 See Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 72–
73; proposed BSTX Rule 25040(c)(1). Limit orders
with TIF of DAY submitted during the Quote-Only
Period would be eligible to participate in the Halt
Auction, whereas orders marked IOC submitted
during the Quote-Only Period would be rejected.
See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49432; proposed
BSTX Rule 25040(c)(1). In addition, Halt Auctions
would be subject to the proposed Halt Auction
Collars, which the Exchange states are substantially
similar to those provided by Cboe BZX, and are
designed to ensure that the Exchange is able to reopen trading in a Security in a fair and orderly
manner. To the extent a Halt Auction is unable to
be performed due to the absence of a TOP or the
TOP is outside the proposed Halt Auction Collars,
the Exchange would extend the period of Halt
Auction for an additional five minutes (‘‘Initial
Extension Period’’). After the Initial Extension
Period, the Exchange proposes that the Quote-Only
Period be extended for additional five-minute
periods, should a Halt Auction be unable to be
performed due to absence of a TOP or because the
TOP is outside the proposed Halt Auction Collars
(‘‘Additional Extension Period’’), until a Halt
Auction occurs. See Amendment No. 2, supra note
9, at 72 n.206 and n.207; proposed BSTX Rule
25040(c)(2).
128 See Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 73;
proposed BSTX Rule 25040(c)(3). In addition, the
Exchange represents that if a trading halt is
triggered by the Exchange or if the Exchange is
unable to reopen trading at the end of the trading
halt due to a systems or technology issue, the
Exchange will immediately notify the single plan
processor responsible for consolidation of
information for the security pursuant to Rule 603
of Regulation NMS under the Exchange Act. See
proposed BSTX Rule 25040(c)(4).
129 See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49432.
E:\FR\FM\02FEN1.SGM
02FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 22 / Wednesday, February 2, 2022 / Notices
In the event a disruption occurs that
prevents the execution of an Initial
Security Offering Auction or Halt
Auction, including any extensions, the
Exchange proposes to apply certain
contingency procedures.130 For a
disruption in an Initial Security Offering
Auction, the Exchange would publicly
announce that the Quote-Only Period
for the Initial Security Offering Auction
will reset for the subject Security, cancel
all orders on the BSTX Book, and
disseminate a new scheduled time for
the Quote-Only Period and opening
match.131 Similarly, for a disruption in
a Halt Auction, the Exchange would
publicly announce that no Halt Auction
will occur and all orders in the halted
Security on the BSTX Book will be
cancelled, after which the Exchange will
open the Security for trading without an
auction.132
The Exchange has not proposed to
operate a closing auction. Instead, the
Exchange proposes that the BSTX
Official Closing Price will be the last
round lot trade occurring during Regular
Trading Hours on BSTX.133 The
Exchange states that it believes this
method is a simple and fair way to
establish the closing price of a Security,
and is consistent with the overall
proposed simplified market structure for
BSTX that does not include order types
such as market-on-close or limit-onclose.134
The Commission believes that the
proposed opening, re-opening, and
closing procedures are reasonably
designed to provide for an orderly
opening or re-opening of trading or
close of trading on BSTX, and thus are
consistent with the Exchange Act, and
in particular the Section 6(b)(5) goals of
removing impediments to the
mechanism of a national market system
and protecting investors and the public
interest.135
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
Order Priority and Execution
The Exchange proposes BSTX Rule
25080 to govern the execution of orders
on the BSTX System.136 The proposed
rule provides that orders of BSTX
Participants shall be ranked and
maintained in the BSTX Book according
to price/time priority, such that within
each price level, all orders shall be
130 See id. at 49432–33; proposed BSTX Rule
25040(d).
131 See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49432–33;
proposed BSTX Rule 25040(d)(1).
132 See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49433;
proposed BSTX Rule 25040(d)(2).
133 See Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 77–
78; proposed BSTX Rule 25040(a)(5)(ii).
134 See Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 78.
135 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
136 See proposed BSTX Rule 25080.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:31 Feb 01, 2022
Jkt 256001
organized by the time of entry.137
Further, the proposed rule provides that
an order would be cancelled back to the
BSTX Participant if, based on market
conditions, BSTX Participant
instructions, applicable Exchange Rules,
and/or the Exchange Act and the rules
and regulations thereunder, such order
is not executable and cannot be posted
to the BSTX Book.138 Specifically,
proposed BSTX Rules 25080(b)(1)
through (3) provide that executions
occurring on BSTX will comply with
Regulation SHO, Regulation NMS,
including Rule 611, and the LULD
Plan.139 In addition, proposed BSTX
Rule 25130 prohibits BSTX Participants
from engaging in a pattern or practice of
displaying quotations that lock or cross
a protected quotation, unless an
exception applies, and provides that the
BSTX System will reject any order or
quotation that would lock or cross a
protected quotation of another national
securities exchange at the time of
entry.140
To meet their regulatory
responsibilities under Rule 611(a) of
Regulation NMS, other trading centers
will be required to have sufficient notice
of new protected quotations, as well as
all necessary information (such as final
technical specifications).141 The
Commission believes that it would be a
reasonable policy and procedure under
Rule 611(a) to require that industry
participants begin treating BSTX’s best
bid and best offer as a protected
quotation as soon as possible but no
later than 90 days after BOX begins
operation of its equities trading
platform. The Commission has taken the
same position with other new equities
exchanges.142
In light of the foregoing, the
Commission finds that the proposed
137 See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49434;
proposed BSTX Rule 25080(a).
138 See proposed BSTX Rule 25080(b). The
Exchange states that sell orders cannot execute at
a price below the best bid in the marketplace and
buy orders cannot execute at a price above the best
offer in the marketplace. See OIP, supra note 7, 86
FR at 49434.
139 See proposed BSTX Rules 25080(b)(1)–(3).
140 See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49437;
proposed BSTX Rule 25130. The Exchange states
that the proposed rule is substantially similar to the
rules of other national securities exchanges. See
Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 93 (citing to IEX
Rule 11.310 and Cboe BZX Rule 11.20).
141 See Securities Exchange Act Release No.
53829 (May 18, 2006), 71 FR 30038, 30041 (May 24,
2006) (File No. S7–10–04) (extending the
compliance dates for Rule 610 and Rule 611 of
Regulation NMS under the Exchange Act).
142 See, e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release Nos.
85828 (May 10, 2019), 84 FR 21841 (May 15, 2019)
(File No. 10–234) (order granting registration of
Long-Term Stock Exchange, Inc.); and 88806 (May
4, 2020), 85 FR 27451 (May 8, 2020) (File No. 10–
237) (order granting registration of MEMX).
PO 00000
Frm 00111
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
5889
BSTX trading rules are consistent with
the Exchange Act and, in particular,
Section 6(b)(5) of the Exchange Act,
because they set forth a fair and
transparent process for establishing
order priority and are reasonably
designed to ensure compliance with
Commission rules concerning quoting
and executions, which should promote
just and equitable principles of trade,
remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanisms of a free and open market
and a national market system, and
protect investors and the public
interest.143
Market Data Products
The Exchange proposes to offer
proprietary market data products,
including BSTX Depth-of-Book, BSTX
Top-of-Book, and BSTX Last Sale.144
The Exchange states that its proposed
rule regarding market data product
offerings is substantially similar to the
rules of another national securities
exchange.145
In addition, the Exchange proposes to
offer a historical market data product,
known as the BSTX Market Data
Blockchain, that would provide
information about trading on the BSTX
System.146 The BSTX Market Data
Blockchain would operate as a private,
permission-based blockchain that will
allow BSTX Participants to see detailed
information on their own trading
activity on BSTX and anonymized
information with respect to the trading
activity of other BSTX Participants.
According to the Exchange, BSTX
Participants would have no obligations
with respect to providing information
to, accessing, maintaining, or using the
BSTX Market Data Blockchain.147 Each
BSTX Participant would be assigned a
BSTX Market Data Blockchain address
that corresponds to the BSTX
Participant’s trading activity on
143 15
U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
proposed BSTX Rule 22060. BSTX Depthof-Book is a data feed that contains all displayed
orders for securities traded on the Exchange, order
executions, order cancellations, order
modifications, order identification numbers,
administrative messages, and auction information
disseminated pursuant to proposed BSTX Rule
25040 (Auctions). See proposed BSTX Rule
22060(a). BSTX Top-of-Book is an uncompressed
data feed that offers top of book quotations and
execution information based on orders entered into
the BSTX System, as well as auction information
disseminated pursuant to proposed BSTX Rule
25040 (Auctions). See proposed BSTX Rule
22060(b). BSTX Last Sale is an uncompressed data
feed that offers only execution information based on
orders entered into the BSTX System. See proposed
BSTX Rule 22060(c).
145 See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49429 (citing
to MEMX Rule 13.8).
146 See proposed BSTX Rule 22060(d); OIP, supra
note 7, 86 FR at 49420.
147 See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49420.
144 See
E:\FR\FM\02FEN1.SGM
02FEN1
5890
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 22 / Wednesday, February 2, 2022 / Notices
BSTX.148 The Exchange would issue
login credentials to each user, including
any non-BSTX Participant that chooses
to subscribe.149 The BSTX Market Data
Blockchain would generally operate by
collecting information from two sources,
which the Exchange would then
translate into information capable of
being recorded to the BSTX Market Data
Blockchain.150 Specifically, the data
provided would be collected from (i) the
BSTX System, with respect to
information such as executed
transactions; and (ii) each BSTX
Participant’s order/message passing
through the financial information
exchange (‘‘FIX’’) gateway through
which all orders and messages pass to
connect to the BSTX System.151 The
Exchange states that the BSTX Market
Data Blockchain does not require any
affirmative action on the part of the
BSTX Participants in order for the
information to be recorded, but rather
captures trading activity that occurs on
BSTX in the normal course of
trading.152
The BSTX Market Data Blockchain
would provide two types of information
for Regular Trading Hours: (i)
Participant Proprietary Data with
respect to the specific BSTX
Participant; 153 and (ii) General Market
Data made available to all BSTX
Participants and non-BSTX Participants
that subscribe.154 The Exchange
148 See
proposed BSTX Rule 17020(b).
Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 19 &
n.36; proposed BSTX Rule 17020(b).
150 See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49420.
151 See id. The Exchange states that BSTX
Participants (and non-BSTX Participants to which
the BSTX Market Data Blockchain is made available
by the Exchange) would only be able to access the
information contained on the BSTX Market Data
Blockchain through the API, and only the Exchange
would have direct access to the underlying data on
the private blockchain. See id. The Exchange
further states that the FIX gateway and the BSTX
System are the same sources of information used to
generate consolidated market data. See id. at 49420
n.39.
152 See id. at 49420.
153 See id. Under proposed BSTX Rule
17020(c)(1), a BSTX Participant would be able to
see the following information with respect to all
orders and messages submitted by the BSTX
Participant and any executions of such orders: (i)
Symbol, side (buy/sell), limit price, quantity, timein-force; (ii) order type (e.g., limit order, ISO); (iii)
order capacity (principal/agent); (iv) short/long sale
order marking; and (v) message type (e.g., order,
modification, cancelation).
154 See id. Under proposed BSTX Rule
17020(c)(2), this would include, in an anonymized
format, all displayed orders, modifications,
cancelations, and executions occurring on BSTX
(i.e., the user may see the symbol, side (buy/sell),
limit price, quantity, and message type), along with
administrative data and other information from the
Exchange (e.g., trading halts or technical messages).
See Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 22–23;
proposed BSTX Rule 17020(c)(2). The Exchange
states that the BSTX Market Data Blockchain would
not include details regarding the T+0 or T+1 order
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
149 See
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:31 Feb 01, 2022
Jkt 256001
represents that no BSTX Participant, or
non-BSTX Participant, would have
access to the Participant Proprietary
Data of another BSTX Participant.155
Both types of data would be available on
a delayed basis of at least five minutes,
with each new block of market data
showing market data for the preceding
five minutes.156 According to the
Exchange, the BSTX Market Data
Blockchain would not function as a
substitute for real-time market data.157
A BSTX Participant, through the API,
would be able to run searches of its
previous orders and trading activity
using the BSTX Market Data
Blockchain. The Participant Proprietary
Data would be visible to the specific
BSTX Participant in sequential order of
when each action occurred 158 and the
General Market Data, available to both
BSTX Participants and non-BSTX
Participants, would allow viewers to
observe the historical orders,
executions, and other events (e.g.,
cancelations) received by and occurring
on BSTX, which is generally the same
information available through
subscribing to proprietary data feeds of
other exchanges.159 The Exchange also
matching preference or matched trades bound for
shorter settlement. See Amendment No. 2, supra
note 9, at 41 n.73.
155 See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49421. The
Exchange states that since no BSTX Participant, or
non-BSTX Participant, would be provided with
access to trading information of another BSTX
Participant, it would not allow for reverse
engineering of trading strategies or otherwise
compromise the confidential nature of each BSTX
Participant’s trading information. See id.
156 See Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 25.
The Exchange specifies that the market data
uploaded as part of each block would contain the
most recent transactions on the Exchange, aged only
a few seconds, as well as market data for the
preceding five minutes, such that the oldest market
data on each new block would be aged at least five
minutes. See id. at 25 n.44.
157 See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49421. The
Exchange states that consolidated market data or
proprietary market data are disseminated on a subsecond, or sub-millisecond, timescale and that even
the consolidated securities information processor’s
99th percentile of quote latency today is below 100
microseconds. See id. at 49421 n.44. The Exchange
also states that, to promote clarity with respect to
how a BSTX Participant may use the BSTX Market
Data Blockchain, proposed BSTX Rule 17020(c)(3)
would provide that information available on the
BSTX Market Data Blockchain does not act as a
substitute for any recordkeeping obligations of a
BSTX Participant. See id. at 49422.
158 The BSTX Participant would be able to filter
the different information fields or run searches for
a particular item (e.g., only showing cancel orders
or only showing activity in a particular symbol).
See id. at 49421.
159 Similar to the Participant Proprietary Data, the
General Market Data would generally be visible in
sequential order of when each action occurred,
although viewers would also have the ability to
filter the different information fields or run searches
for a particular symbol. The Exchange states that
the General Market Data would differ from the
Exchange’s propriety market data feed, which
PO 00000
Frm 00112
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
proposes to append timestamps to the
information made available through the
BSTX Market Data Blockchain, which
would indicate the time to the
microsecond at which an order posted
to the BSTX Book or that the BSTX
System took other actions with respect
to an order.160 A BSTX Participant
would have the ability to download
market data from the BSTX Market Data
Blockchain and could potentially use
the data to back test trading strategies or
evaluate executions received on
BSTX.161
The Exchange also proposes to
periodically audit, at least bi-annually,
the BSTX Market Data Blockchain to
help ensure the proper functioning of
the BSTX Market Data Blockchain and
the accuracy of the information
thereon.162 The Exchange states that it
expects to initially audit the BSTX
Market Data Blockchain more
frequently, likely monthly, during the
first year of operations to ensure the
BSTX Market Data Blockchain operates
as intended.163
The Exchange states that as a system
of the Exchange, the BSTX Market Data
Blockchain will be subject to the
requirements of the Exchange Act,
including Regulation Systems
Compliance and Integrity (‘‘Regulation
SCI’’) and that the Exchange has in
place, among other requirements of
Regulation SCI, robust safeguards to
protect against any possible system
intrusion to the market data
blockchain.164 The Exchange states that
any unauthorized access to the API
through which data on the BSTX Market
Data Blockchain may be accessed would
not allow for any intruder to modify,
delete, or otherwise change any data on
the BSTX Market Data Blockchain.165
The Exchange states that the benefits
of the BSTX Market Data Blockchain are
twofold: (1) BSTX Participants may find
the information useful to them for a
provides real-time snapshots of the order book,
including depth-of-book quotations and quantity of
shares available at each price point. Additionally,
the General Market Data would show viewers, in an
anonymized format, the sequential entry of each
order, modification, or cancelation in the order
book in each symbol as historical orders and
transaction information, rather than real-time
snapshots. See id. at 49421 n.42.
160 See id. at 49421.
161 See id. at 49422.
162 See id.; proposed BSTX Rule 17020(d). See
also proposed BSTX Rule 17020(c)(3) (stating that
information available on the BSTX Market Data
Blockchain does not act as a substitute for any
recordkeeping obligations of a BSTX Participant).
163 See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49422.
164 See Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 27.
The Exchange states that it has classified the BSTX
Market Data Blockchain as an ‘‘SCI system’’ and not
as an ‘‘indirect SCI system.’’ See id.
165 See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49422.
E:\FR\FM\02FEN1.SGM
02FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 22 / Wednesday, February 2, 2022 / Notices
variety of purposes, such as to review
the BSTX Participant’s trading activity
on BSTX, determine what the market
was at a particular point in time on
BSTX for a given Security, evaluate
equation quality, help confirm the
accuracy of their internal trading data,
or download the data to back-test
trading strategies; and (2) help
familiarize BSTX Participants with the
use and capabilities of blockchain
technology in a manner that does not
impose any burden on them or other
market participants.166 The Exchange
also states that BSTX Securities would
be eligible for trading on other national
securities exchanges that extend UTP to
them and that the BSTX Market Data
Blockchain would not impact the ability
of Securities to trade on other national
securities exchanges or OTC.167
One commenter states that the United
States should support blockchain
technologies like BSTX to be
competitive globally, and that
blockchain affords more efficiency and
transparency.168 Another commenter
states that blockchain will bring the
advantages of better security, higher
transparency, more trust, and a fairer
marketplace to the sector.169 This
commenter also states that blockchain
would afford savings in time and
money, make the market safer against
fraud, and help United States markets
keep up with other global systems.170
Another commenter states that the
proposed five minute delay is not
problematic given delays in other
market data products.171
The Commission finds that the
Exchange’s proposed market data
products are consistent with the
Exchange Act. The Commission believes
that the proposed BSTX Depth-of-Book,
BSTX Top-of-Book, and BSTX Last Sale
data products do not raise any novel
166 See
id.
id. at 49423.
168 See Letter from Anonymous (June 15, 2021)
(‘‘Anonymous Letter II’’).
169 See Letter from Anonymous (June 21, 2021)
(‘‘Anonymous Letter III’’).
170 See id. See also Letter from Jonathan Seeley
(September 20, 2021) (‘‘Seeley Letter’’) (stating that
the proposed BSTX facility is designed to promote
just and equitable principles of trade and remove
impediments to a free and open national market
system in a transparent and secure manner through
the proposed use of blockchain technology and
would not inappropriately burden competition);
Letter from Tyler Hess (June 17, 2021) (stating that
the commenter would like to see the development
of financial institutions and securities exchanges
that allow access to financial instruments and
investments without the burdens and controls
placed by traditional exchanges, and that the
proposal represents the first steps in a free and
equitable publicly auditable financial system).
171 See Letter from Anonymous (September 6,
2021) (‘‘Anonymous Letter IV’’).
regulatory issues.172 The Commission
also believes that the BSTX Market Data
Blockchain would not result in the
disclosure of novel information about
trading activity on the BSTX System. A
BSTX Participant viewing the
Participant Proprietary Data would
access the same underlying information
that the BSTX Participant would already
have from FIX messages sent to and
received from the Exchange.173 Further,
the General Market Data would contain
the same substantive information that
could be found in BSTX’s proprietary
market data feeds and this information
would be comparable to the proprietary
market data distributed by other
national securities exchanges. At the
same time, the Commission believes
that the BSTX Market Data Blockchain
is reasonably designed to prevent other
market participants from learning BSTX
Participants’ sensitive trading
information. The BSTX Market Data
Blockchain would not be a real-time
market data product and would contain
historical market data posted in fiveminute increments. In addition, the
Participant Proprietary Data accessible
to each BSTX Participant would be
specific to that BSTX Participant’s
orders and executions, and the General
Market Data would be anonymized by
displaying only the symbol, side (buy/
sell), limit price, quantity, and message
type. As an SCI system operated by an
SCI entity, the BSTX Market Data
Blockchain would also be subject to the
requirements of Regulation SCI.174
National securities exchanges are not
required to offer proprietary market
data, but those that do so must offer
such data in a manner that is not
designed to permit unfair
discrimination between customers,
issuers, brokers, or dealers.175 The
Commission believes that the proposed
dissemination of the Participant
Proprietary Data is not designed to
permit unfair discrimination because
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
167 See
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:31 Feb 01, 2022
Jkt 256001
172 See
supra notes 144–145 and accompanying
text.
173 The Commission has previously approved
proposals by national securities exchanges to offer
a data product to a member of the exchange
consisting of information regarding the member’s
own trading activity on the exchange. See, e.g.,
Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 78886
(September 20, 2016), 81 FR 66113 (September 26,
2016) (approving Nasdaq ‘‘Trading Insights’’
product); 91787 (May 6, 2021), 86 FR 26111 (May
12, 2021) (approving MIAX Emerald ‘‘Liquidity
Taker Event Report’’).
174 See, e.g., 17 CFR 242.1001(a)(1) (requiring
each SCI entity to establish, maintain, and enforce
written policies and procedures reasonably
designed to ensure that its SCI systems have levels
of capacity, integrity, resiliency, availability, and
security adequate to maintain the SCI entity’s
operational capability and promote the
maintenance of fair and orderly markets).
175 See 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
PO 00000
Frm 00113
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
5891
each BSTX Participant will have access
to information specific to its own orders
and executions through the Participant
Proprietary Data. In the OIP, the
Commission states that it was not clear
what conditions, if any, the Exchange
may place on non-BSTX Participants
before granting access to the General
Market Data.176 In Amendment No. 2,
the Exchange states that all BSTX
Participants and non-BSTX Participants
will have access to the same
anonymized market data on the same
terms through the General Market
Data.177 In addition, market participants
would be able to obtain the same
substantive information contained in
the General Market Data through access
to BSTX’s other proprietary market data
feeds. Further, the five-minute delay for
the BSTX Market Data Blockchain
would be a uniform delay for all BSTX
Participants and non-BSTX Participants
that subscribe, and the data on the
BSTX Market Data Blockchain would
not be available on a faster basis than
other BSTX data products (and instead
would be available on a slower basis).
For these reasons, the Commission
finds that the Exchange’s proposed
market data products are consistent
with the Exchange Act, and, in
particular, Section 6(b)(5) of the
Exchange Act 178 because they would
prevent fraudulent and manipulative
acts and practices, promote just and
equitable principles of trade, remove
impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system, and, in
general, protect investors and the public
interest, and would not permit unfair
discrimination among customers,
issuers, brokers, or dealers; and with
Section 6(b)(8) of the Exchange Act 179
because they would not impose any
burden on competition not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the
Exchange Act. The Commission also
finds that the proposed BSTX Market
Data Blockchain is consistent with the
Exchange Act, and Section 6(b)(7) of the
Exchange Act 180 in particular, and its
requirements that the rules of a national
securities exchange provide a fair
procedure for the prohibition or
limitation by the exchange of any access
to services, because the Exchange will
176 See
OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49454.
Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 25
(stating that the Exchange would make the General
Market Data available to BSTX Participants and
non-BSTX Participants for the same fee and on the
same subscription terms, once the Exchange
establishes a fee schedule pursuant to the proposed
rule change process under the Exchange Act prior
to the launch of BSTX).
178 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
179 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
180 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(7).
177 See
E:\FR\FM\02FEN1.SGM
02FEN1
5892
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 22 / Wednesday, February 2, 2022 / Notices
not limit non-BSTX Participants’ access
to the BSTX Market Data Blockchain
beyond applying the same general terms
that apply to BSTX Participants.
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
Access to BSTX
The Commission received a comment
stating that the proposal does not
specifically address how participants
shall access BSTX and that, by
comparison, with respect to the trading
of options, the Exchange does not
currently enforce equidistant cabling
among and between participants and its
matching engine located in the same
data center.181 This commenter states
that concerns regarding unfair
discrimination and inappropriate
burdens on competition could arise in
the absence of confirmation that BOX
will ensure that all co-location
participants will enjoy the same
opportunity for order execution
regardless of their location in the data
center relative to the BSTX matching
engine.182 Absent such confirmation,
the commenter urges the Commission to
disapprove the proposal.183 In response,
the Exchange states that BSTX will
provide for equidistant cabling
arrangements to ensure that all colocated BSTX Participants are on a level
playing field in connecting to the BSTX
matching engine.184 The Exchange also
states that BSTX plans to have
equidistant cabling arrangements within
the area of the data center that it
controls, and that it will make technical
details regarding those arrangements
available to prospective BSTX
Participants in certain specification
documents after approval of BSTX as a
new facility of the Exchange.185
In further response, in Amendment
No. 2, the Exchange states that it will
offer connectivity services at its primary
data center (Equinix NY4 in Secaucus,
NJ) and that connectivity to the
Exchange in the primary data center for
both order entry and market data
dissemination is equalized for all
Participants with equipment co-located
in Equinix NY4.186 Specifically, the
Exchange states that all BSTX
Participants co-located in the same data
181 See Letter from Andrew Stevens, General
Counsel, IMC Chicago, LLC and Richard McDonald,
Compliance Coordinator, Susquehanna
International Group, LLP (June 28, 2021), at 2.
182 See id.
183 See id. at 3.
184 See Letter from Lisa J. Fall, President, BOX
Exchange LLC (July 1, 2021), at 1.
185 See id. The Exchange also states that its
options trading platform is an entirely separate
facility of the Exchange with a separate ownership
structure from BSTX, and BSTX will use separate
data center operations and a different technology
provider. See id. at 2.
186 See Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 6.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:31 Feb 01, 2022
Jkt 256001
center would connect to BSTX through
an equidistant cabling cabinet, which is
a separate cabinet from the cabinet
hosting the BSTX System and market
data distribution system. The cross
connects from the equidistant cabling
cabinet to the cabinet hosting BSTX’s
systems are equidistant.187
Additionally, the Exchange states that
all cross connects from the equidistant
cabling cabinet to each BSTX
Participant’s cabinet, wherever located
in the data center, provide for
equidistant connectivity.188 As a result,
even if BSTX Participant X’s cabinet is
closer in physical proximity to the
equidistant cabling cabinet than BSTX
Participant Y’s cabinet, the arrangement
is such that both BSTX Participant X
and BSTX Participant Y have
equidistant connectivity to the
equidistant cabling cabinet and in turn
to BSTX’s systems.189
The Commission believes that
Amendment No. 2 addresses the
commenter’s concern regarding whether
all co-location participants will enjoy
the same opportunity for order
execution regardless of their location in
the data center relative to the BSTX
matching engine. As described above,
the Exchange states in Amendment No.
2 that all BSTX Participants co-located
in the data center would access BSTX’s
systems through an equidistant cabling
cabinet that connects to each BSTX
Participant’s cabinet through fiber
connections of equal length and that the
cross connects from the equidistant
cabling cabinet to the cabinet hosting
BSTX’s systems are also equidistant.
This arrangement would prevent BSTX
Participants located in closer proximity
to the cabinet hosting the BSTX System
and market data distribution system
from having a shorter path to connect to
BSTX’s systems.
Clearance and Settlement
Under the Exchange’s proposal,
executions occurring as a result of
orders matched against the BSTX Book
will be transmitted by BSTX to a
registered clearing agency to clear and
settle pursuant to the rules, policies,
187 See
id. at 6 n.6.
id. Specifically, the equidistant cabling
cabinet contains equal length spools of fiber that
connect to each external BSTX Participant cabinet
in the data center, and all BSTX Participants must
connect to BSTX through the equidistant cabling
cabinet from their own external cabinets. See id.
189 See id. The Exchange states that it believes
that this structure is designed to prevent unfair
discrimination between market participants,
consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Exchange Act,
by ensuring that all co-located BSTX Participants
have equidistant connections to BSTX irrespective
of where their equipment is located within the data
center. See id.
188 See
PO 00000
Frm 00114
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and procedures of the registered
clearing agency.190 The Exchange states
that Securities would be cleared and
settled by NSCC and DTC in the same
manner as those activities are performed
by NSCC and DTC currently with
respect to a class of NMS stock.191 The
Exchange also states that the operation
of the BSTX Market Data Blockchain
will have no impact or effect on the
manner in which a Security clears and
settles.192
The Exchange proposes to allow
BSTX Participants to indicate a
preference for settling faster than the
standard T+2 settlement cycle.193
Specifically, BSTX Participants would
be able to submit an order with a
preference for settlement on a T+0 basis
(‘‘Order with a T+0 Preference’’) or on
a T+1 basis (‘‘Order with a T+1
Preference’’).194 The Exchange states
that, based on discussions with
representatives from The Depository
Trust & Clearing Corporation (‘‘DTCC’’),
BSTX believes that NSCC already has
the authority under its rules, policies,
and procedures to clear certain trades
on T+1 or T+0 basis.195 Orders with a
T+0 Preference and Orders with a T+1
Preference would result in executions
that settle more quickly than on a T+2
basis if, and only if, all of the conditions
in proposed BSTX Rule 25060(h) are
met and the execution that is
transmitted by BSTX to NSCC is eligible
for T+0 or T+1 settlement under the
rules, policies, and procedures of the
registered clearing agency.196 For an
190 See proposed BSTX Rule 25100(d). See also
proposed BSTX Rule 25140 for additional
provisions regarding clearance and settlement.
191 See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49418.
192 See id.
193 See id. at 49419.
194 See proposed BSTX Rule 25140(h). The
Exchange states that T+1 and T+0 are shorter
settlement cycles than the longest settlement cycle
of T+2 that is generally permitted under SEC Rule
15c6–1, for a security trade that involves a brokerdealer. See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49419 (citing
17 CFR 240.15c6–1). The Exchange states that
under SEC Rule 15c6–1, with certain exceptions, a
broker-dealer is not permitted to enter a contract for
the purchase or sale of a security that provides for
payment of funds and delivery of securities later
than the second business day after the date of the
contract unless otherwise expressly agreed to by the
parties at the time of the transaction. See id. at
49419 n.33.
195 See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49423. The
Exchange states that it understands that NSCC and
DTC are already using this authority for shortened
settlement times, and that DTCC makes data
regarding T+0 and T+1 clearance and settlement
through NSCC and DTC available on the DTCC
website for review by the public. See id. at 49424.
196 See id. at 49423–24; proposed BSTX Rule
25060(h). See also proposed BSTX Rule 25100(d).
The Exchange states that it understands that under
its current rules, policies, and procedures, NSCC
accepts trades for T+0 settlement through its
continuous net settlement system provided that
they are received by NSCC before a cut-off time of
E:\FR\FM\02FEN1.SGM
02FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 22 / Wednesday, February 2, 2022 / Notices
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
Order with a T+0 Preference to be
eligible to be transmitted by BSTX to
NSCC for same-day settlement, the
resulting execution must occur on the
BSTX System prior to the ‘‘T+0 Cut-Off
Time,’’ which would be one minute
before any applicable cut-off time
established by NSCC for inclusion of
T+0 settling trades in its continuous net
settlement process established pursuant
to its rules, policies, and procedures.197
Any preference for T+0 or T+1
settlement included by a BSTX
Participant would only become
operative if the order happens to
execute against another order from a
BSTX Participant that also includes a
parameter indicating a preference for
settlement on a T+0 or T+1 basis.198 The
11:30 a.m. ET. DTCC provides on its website an
overview of the cut-off times for participation in the
continuous net settlement system process and other
procedural considerations under its rules, policies,
and procedures that are associated with processing
trades for accelerated settlement on a T+0 or T+1
basis. See Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 34
n.62.
197 See Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 35;
proposed BSTX Rule 25060(h)(3). The BSTX
System would not accept any new Orders with a
T+0 Preference after the T+0 Cut-Off Time. See
Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 36; proposed
BSTX Rule 25060(h)(3). However, an Order with a
T+0 Preference resting on the BSTX Book after the
T+0 Cut-Off Time would still be able to execute
against orders against which it is marketable, and
would remain eligible for potential T+1 settlement
to the extent it executed against an Order with a
T+1 Preference. See id. According to the Exchange,
it believes that a one minute buffer between its T+0
Cut-Off Time and NSCC’s cut-off time for inclusion
of such same-day settling trades in NSCC’s
continuous net settlement process would be
sufficient time to allow the Exchange to transmit
the relevant execution details to NSCC and for
NSCC to include such same-day settling trades in
its continuous net settlement system. See
Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 35–36. The
Exchange represents that it will monitor the
application of the one minute buffer and whether
it provides the Exchange and NSCC with sufficient
time to prevent executed trades from being
transmitted by the Exchange to NSCC after NSCC’s
cut-off time for inclusion of same-day settling trades
in NSCC’s continuous net settlement system, and
the Exchange will submit additional rule changes
in the future as may be necessary to increase the
buffer if appropriate. See id. at 36. The Exchange
also represents that it will post the then-applicable
T+0 Cut-Off Time on the BSTX website to ensure
BSTX Participants are adequately informed. See id.
at 36 n.64.
198 See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49424. Under
the proposal, an Order with a T+0 Preference will
execute against any order against which it is
marketable and BSTX will transmit the matched
order information to a registered clearing agency for
settlement on a standard settlement cycle (T+2)
pursuant to the rules, policies, and procedures of
the registered clearing agency, except where: (i) the
Order with a T+0 Preference executes against
another Order with a T+0 Preference, in which case
BSTX will transmit the matched order information
to a registered clearing agency for settlement on the
trade date as may be permitted by the rules,
policies, and procedures of the registered clearing
agency, subject to the limitations in proposed BSTX
Rule 25060(h)(3); or (ii) the Order with a T+0
Preference executes against an Order with a T+1
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:31 Feb 01, 2022
Jkt 256001
Exchange states that, at the time of order
entry, any orders that include a
parameter indicating a preference for
faster settlement would be regular way
orders that would be presumed to settle
on a T+2 basis, just like any orders
without such a parameter.199
The Exchange states that, in all cases,
an order not marked with a preference
for either T+0 or T+1 settlement would
be assured under the settlement timing
logic in proposed BSTX Rule 25060(h)
of settlement on a T+2 basis. The
Exchange also states that the possibility
of a shortened settlement time would
have no impact on the Exchange’s
proposed price/time priority structure
for order matching.200 The Exchange
states that, as a result of this structure,
all orders in Securities would be eligible
to match and execute against any order
against which they are marketable, with
settlement to occur at the later
settlement date of any two matching
orders.201 Therefore, according to the
Exchange, only where an Order with a
T+1 Preference or an Order with a T+0
Preference match with another Order
with a T+1 Preference or Order with a
T+0 Preference will those orders (or
matching portions thereof) be eligible to
settle more quickly than the standard
settlement cycle of T+2.202
The Exchange states that it believes
the proposal to allow BSTX Participants
to access the shorter settlement cycles of
T+1 and T+0 that are already being used
by NSCC and DTC today represents a
change that is both consistent with and
in furtherance of broader industry
efforts to move the standard settlement
style to T+1.203 The Exchange also states
that it believes that providing an
optional T+0 or T+1 settlement cycle to
BSTX Participants could also
incrementally and immediately provide
market participants with the benefits of
Preference, in which case BSTX will transmit the
matched order information to a registered clearing
agency for settlement on the next trading day after
the trade date (i.e., T+1) as may be permitted by the
rules, policies, and procedures of the registered
clearing agency. See proposed BSTX Rule
25060(h)(1). An Order with a T+1 Preference will
execute against any order against which it is
marketable and BSTX will transmit the matched
order information to a registered clearing agency for
settlement on a standard settlement cycle (T+2),
except where the Order with a T+1 Preference
executes against another Order with a T+1
Preference or an Order with a T+0 Preference, in
which case BSTX will transmit the matched order
information to a registered clearing agency for
settlement on the next trading day after the trade
date (i.e., T+1) as may be permitted by the rules,
policies, and procedures of the registered clearing
agency. See proposed BSTX Rule 25060(h)(2).
199 See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49423.
200 See id. at 49424.
201 See id.
202 See id.
203 See id. at 49424–25.
PO 00000
Frm 00115
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
5893
shorter settlement cycles.204 The
Exchange further states that it believes
that BSTX Participants have an interest
in being able to assess risk-reducing
market functionality that is presently
available and compatible with market
structure and that this can reduce costs
for market participants settling trading
obligations in that Security and reduce
settlement risk.205
According to the Exchange, because
all orders in Securities submitted to
BSTX would at the time of order entry
be presumed to settle on a regular way
T+2 basis and would interact with any
other order against which the order is
marketable, the Exchange believes that
Orders with a T+0 Preference and
Orders with a T+1 Preference would be
considered ‘‘protected’’ within the
meaning of Rule 611 under the
Exchange Act.206 The Exchange states
that Orders with a T+0 Preference and
Orders with a T+1 Preference would not
fall within the exception for protected
quotation status set forth in Rule
611(b)(2) under the Exchange Act,
because they will only settle more
quickly than T+2 when all of the
conditions in proposed BSTX Rule
25060(h) are met and where faster
settlement is consistent with the rules,
policies, and procedures of a registered
clearing agency.207
The Commission has received several
comments expressing support for the
proposal’s use of a shortened settlement
cycle under certain circumstances.208
One commenter states in support of the
proposal that BSTX would provide
significant advantages over existing
national securities exchanges by
providing fairer conditions to market
participants through reduced settlement
times and more transparency.209 This
commenter states that T+0 settlement
would improve market conditions for
retail investors by reducing risk of
failure to deliver on highly shorted
stocks, and would reduce actual and
opportunity costs by eliminating margin
lending for the period before settlement
and lost opportunities to reinvest.210
204 See
id.
id. at 49425.
206 See id. (citing 17 CFR 242.611(b)(2)).
207 See id.
208 See Letter from Meagan Darata, Utah Salt
Supplements (June 21, 2021) (‘‘Darata Letter’’);
Letter from Mark Nelson (June 10, 2021); Letter
from Robert Shaw (June 11, 2021) (‘‘Shaw Letter’’);
Letter from Neil Skinner (June 11, 2021) (‘‘Skinner
Letter’’).
209 See Skinner Letter, supra note 208.
210 See id. This commenter also states that the
commenter expects the reduced costs of operating
the exchange to be passed on to prospective
companies and issuers, thereby creating more
opportunities for companies and asset holders to
205 See
E:\FR\FM\02FEN1.SGM
Continued
02FEN1
5894
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 22 / Wednesday, February 2, 2022 / Notices
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
Two commenters refer to recent
problems that they characterize as
arising from T+2 settlement and short
selling,211 and state that the proposal for
a shorter settlement cycle would level
the playing field for retail investors.212
Another commenter states that if a
particular trade does not meet the
criteria or conditions on T+0 or T+1, the
fallback option will be the standard
settlement cycle, and that because
shorter settlement will depend on the
NSCC clearing system, addressing any
adverse market effects is NSCC’s
responsibility.213 Another commenter
states that uncertainty regarding
whether an order would receive faster
settlement at the time of order entry
would not affect the ability of a market
participants to reap the potential
benefits of faster settlement.214 This
commenter also states that there has
been much recent public focus on the
inefficiency of the current settlement
system and that there is no evidence
that the proposal would have adverse
market effects.215
The Commission believes that the
optional order parameter that would
allow a BSTX Participant to place an
Order with a T+0 Preference or Order
with a T+1 Preference would permit
BSTX Participants to take advantage of
faster settlement timing provided by
DTC and NSCC in manner that is
consistent with fair and orderly markets.
Use of the order parameter would be
optional and would not have any effect
on price/time execution priority.
Therefore, any order placed by a BSTX
Participant that prefers to settle on a
T+2 basis (or any order routed to BSTX
from another national securities
exchange) would receive T+2 settlement
and that order would not be
disadvantaged in obtaining an execution
due to the absence of a preference for
faster settlement.216 The Commission
offer securities, and resulting in a market boom as
new market participants join the exchange. See id.
211 See Letter from Anonymous (June 15, 2021)
(‘‘Anonymous Letter I’’); Skinner Letter, supra note
208. See also Shaw Letter, supra note 208 (stating
that, with the current issues regarding settlement
time, the proposal to offer speedy settlement is one
answer to improving the system).
212 See Anonymous Letter I, supra note 211;
Skinner Letter, supra note 208. See also Darata
Letter, supra note 208 (stating that there is a wide
power differential between retail and institutional
traders).
213 See Anonymous Letter IV, supra note 171.
214 See Seeley Letter, supra note 170 (stating also
that this uncertainty would not represent any
additional inconsistency with the Exchange Act
compared to current settlement systems and does
not provide an appropriate basis for disapproving
the proposal).
215 Id.
216 In the OIP, the Commission raises whether
introducing the possibility for T+0 or T+1
settlement for on-exchange trades in NMS stocks
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:31 Feb 01, 2022
Jkt 256001
also believes that the proposal that
Orders with a T+0 Preference must be
executed on the BSTX System prior to
the T+0 Cut-Off Time to be eligible for
same-day settlement is reasonably
designed to ensure that when BSTX
transmits an order to the registered
clearing agency for same-day settlement,
the registered clearing agency will be
able to include that trade in its
continuous net settlement process.
For these reasons, the Commission
finds that the proposed order parameter
that BSTX Participants could use to
preference faster settlement is consistent
with the Exchange Act and, in
particular, Section 6(b)(5)’s requirement
to foster cooperation and coordination
with persons engaged in clearing,
settling, and processing information
with respect to transactions in
securities; remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system; and, in general, protect
investors and the public interest.217 The
Commission also finds that the
proposed order parameter for faster
settlement is consistent with Section
6(b)(8)’s requirement that the proposal
not impose any burden on competition
not necessary or appropriate in further
of the purposes of the Exchange Act,
because the operation of this order
parameter will not impact the ability of
a market participant that instead prefers
T+2 settlement to obtain an
execution.218
C. Eligibility for Listing and Trading on
BSTX
Once BSTX begins operations as a
facility of the Exchange, a security
would be considered for listing on
BSTX only if such security is registered
under both Section 12 of the Exchange
Act 219 and Section 6 of the Securities
Act of 1933 (‘‘Securities Act’’),220 or
such security to subject to an exemption
under Regulation A.221 An issuer may
register a security pursuant to Section
12(b) by submitting to the Exchange a
listing application that provides certain
pursuant to the rules of a single national securities
exchange, at a time when the industry standard is
T+2 settlement, might have any adverse market
effects. See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49455. The
Commission notes that no commenters raised any
potential adverse market effects.
217 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
218 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
219 15 U.S.C. 78l; proposed BSTX Rule 26210.
220 15 U.S.C. 78f.
221 See Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 10–
11. See also 17 CFR 230.251. The Exchange states
that IEX similarly allows for securities subject to an
exemption from registration under Section 12(b) of
the Exchange Act to be listed on IEX. See
Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 11 n.20 (citing
to IEX Rule 14.203).
PO 00000
Frm 00116
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
required information.222 The Exchange
will review the listing application and,
if the listing application is approved,
will certify to the Commission that it
has approved the security for listing and
registration.223 Registration of the
security will become effective thirty
days after the receipt of such
certification by the Commission or
within a shorter period of time as the
Commission may determine.224 Once
registration is effective, the Security
would be eligible to be admitted to
dealings on BSTX.225
The Exchange proposes that the only
securities that will be eligible for trading
on BSTX will be BSTX-listed
securities.226 The Exchange states that it
is not proposing rules that would
support its extension of UTP to other
NMS stock.227 However, according to
the Exchange, BSTX-listed Securities
would be eligible for trading on other
national securities exchanges that
extend UTP to them and would be able
to trade on other national securities
exchanges and OTC in the same manner
as other NMS stock.228
Classes of Securities Eligible for Listing
The Exchange states that issuers on
BSTX could include both: (i) New
issuers who do not currently have any
class of securities registered on a
national securities exchange, and (ii)
issuers who currently have securities
registered on a national securities
exchange and who are seeking
registration of a new class of equity
securities for listing on BSTX as
Securities.229 In the original Notice, the
Exchange stated that while BSTX does
not intend for Securities listed on BSTX
to be fungible with any other class of
securities from the same issuer, to the
222 See proposed BSTX Rules 26210–26217; 15
U.S.C. 78l(b). Prior to submitting a listing
application to the Exchange, the issuer would be
required to participate in a confidential preapplication eligibility review, in which the
Exchange will determine whether the issuer meets
its listing criteria and is eligible to submit a listing
application. See proposed BSTX Rule 26201.
223 See proposed BSTX Rule 26210(b); 15 U.S.C.
78l(d). See Exhibits 3G, 3H, 3I, 3J, 3K, and 3L for
agreements and forms related to the listing process.
224 15 U.S.C. 78l(d).
225 See proposed BSTX Rule 26202. See also 15
U.S.C. 78l(d).
226 See proposed BSTX Rule 25020(a) (providing
that any class of securities listed on the Exchange
shall be eligible to become designated for trading
on the Exchange in accordance with the proposed
BSTX Rule 26000 and 28000 Rule Series).
227 See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49417. The
Exchange also states that it would only trade BSTXlisted Securities on BSTX unless and until the
Exchange proposes and receives Commission
approval for rules that would support trading in
other types of securities, including thorough any
extension of UTP to other NMS stock. See id.
228 See id. at 49423.
229 See Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 13.
E:\FR\FM\02FEN1.SGM
02FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 22 / Wednesday, February 2, 2022 / Notices
extent that two classes of an issuer’s
shares had identical voting and
economic rights but were registered
with the Commission as separate
classes, the two classes of shares could
be ‘‘economically fungible’’ with each
other.230 With respect to the Notice, one
commenter states that BSTX appears to
be contemplating that an issuer could
list shares with identical voting and
economic rights on BSTX and another
exchange but designate the shares listed
on BSTX as a separate class of the
issuer’s securities, with the only
distinguishing factor between the two
classes of securities being that the
BSTX-listed securities would have the
additional blockchain functionality.231
The commenter states that, in the
trading context, having two separate
classes of an issuer’s securities with
identical economic and voting rights
trading at the same time on different
exchanges could result in investor and
market confusion.232 In Amendment No.
2, the Exchange states that BSTX does
not intend for a Security listed on BSTX
to be a unique class of security due only
to the fact that certain trading activity in
the Security on BSTX would be
recorded on the BSTX Market Data
Blockchain.233 The Exchange also states
that if an issuer sought to list a new
class of securities on BSTX that is not
distinct from an existing class of
securities of the issuer, the Exchange
would not allow such a class to be listed
pursuant to its authority under
proposed BSTX Rule 26101.234 The
Commission believes that Amendment
No. 2 addresses the commenter’s
concern that an issuer could list one
class of securities on BSTX and a
separate class of securities on another
national securities exchange, with both
classes having identical voting and
economic interests. Proposed BSTX
Rule 26101 provides that the approval
of an application for listing of a security
for trading on BSTX is a matter solely
within the discretion of the
Exchange.235 The Exchange’s use of this
230 See
Notice, supra note 3, 86 FR at 29636 &
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
n.20.
231 See Letter from Ellen Greene, Managing
Director, Equities & Options Market Structure,
Securities Industry and Financial Markets
Association (September 27, 2021) (‘‘SIFMA Letter’’),
at 2 (stating that ‘‘the definition of ‘class’ of
securities in Section 12(g)(5) of the Exchange Act
contemplates that securities of an issuer that have
identical economic and voting rights would be part
of the same class of securities’’).
232 See id. (stating that ‘‘issuers have dually-listed
securities on two exchanges to meet the different
listing standards of each of the exchanges, but the
issuers have done so by listing the same class of
securities on both exchanges’’).
233 See Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 13.
234 See id.
235 See proposed BSTX Rule 26101.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:31 Feb 01, 2022
Jkt 256001
discretionary authority to prevent an
issuer from listing a class of securities
on BSTX that is not distinct from an
existing class of securities would
prevent the listing of a class of securities
that has the same voting and economic
rights as another listed class of
securities of that same issuer.
Initial and Continued Listing Standards
The Commission has consistently
recognized the importance and
significance of national securities
exchange listing standards. Among
other things, such listing standards help
ensure that exchange-listed companies
will have sufficient public float,
investor base, and trading interest to
provide the depth and liquidity
necessary to promote fair and orderly
markets.236 The standards, collectively,
also provide investors and market
participants with some level of
assurance that the listed company has
the resources, policies, and procedures
to comply with the requirements of the
Exchange Act and Exchange rules.237
236 The Commission has stated in approving
national securities exchange listing requirements
that the development and enforcement of adequate
standards governing the listing of securities on an
exchange is an activity of critical importance to the
financial markets and the investing public. In
addition, once a security has been approved for
initial listing, maintenance criteria allow an
exchange to monitor the status and trading
characteristics of that issue to ensure that it
continues to meet the exchange’s standards for
market depth and liquidity so that fair and orderly
markets can be maintained. See, e.g., Securities
Exchange Act Release Nos. 90768 (December 22,
2020), 85 FR 85807, 85811 n.55 (December 29,
2020) (SR–NYSE–2019–67) (‘‘NYSE 2020 Order’’);
82627 (February 2, 2018), 83 FR 5650, 5653 n.53
(February 8, 2018) (SR–NYSE–2017–30) (‘‘NYSE
2018 Order’’); 81856 (October 11, 2017), 82 FR
48296, 48298 (October 17, 2017) (SR–NYSE–2017–
31); 81079 (July 5, 2017), 82 FR 32022, 32023 (July
11, 2017) (SR–NYSE–2017–11). The Commission
has stated that adequate listing standards, by
promoting fair and orderly markets, are consistent
with Section 6(b)(5) of the Exchange Act, in that
they are, among other things, designed to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices,
promote just and equitable principles of trade, and
protect investors and the public interest. See, e.g.,
NYSE 2020 Order, 85 FR at 85811 n.55; NYSE 2018
Order, 83 FR at 5653 n.53; Securities Exchange Act
Release Nos. 87648 (December 3, 2019), 84 FR
67308, 67314 n.42 (December 9, 2019) (SR–
NASDAQ–2019–059); 88716 (April 21, 2020), 85 FR
23393, 23395 n.22 (April 27, 2020) (SR–NASDAQ–
2020–001).
237 ‘‘Meaningful listing standards are also
important given investor expectations regarding the
nature of securities that have achieved a national
securities exchange listing, and the role of a
national securities exchange in overseeing its
market and assuring compliance with its listing
standards.’’ Securities Exchange Act Release No.
65708 (November 8, 2011), 76 FR 70799, 70802
(November 15, 2011) (SR–NASDAQ–2011–073). See
also, e.g., NYSE 2020 Order, supra note 236, 85 FR
at 85811 n.56; Securities Exchange Act Release Nos.
65709 (November 8, 2011), 76 FR 70795 (November
15, 2011) (SR–NYSE–2011–38); 88389 (March 16,
2020), 85 FR 16163 (March 20, 2020) (SR–
NASDAQ–2019–089). The Exchange, in addition to
PO 00000
Frm 00117
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
5895
The Exchange has proposed initial
and continued listing standards for
companies to be listed on BSTX that are
substantially similar to the current rules
for NYSE American.238 These proposed
listing standards relate to the listing and
delisting of companies, including
procedures and prerequisites for initial
and continued listing on BSTX, the
obligations of issuers with Securities
listed on BSTX, as well as rules
describing the application and
qualification process, the suspension
and delisting process, and procedures
for review of the Exchange’s listing
determinations.239 The Commission has
previously determined that the initial
and continued listing standards of
NYSE American are consistent with the
Exchange Act.240 The Exchange states
that it did not integrate certain sections
of NYSE American’s listing standards
that the Exchange deemed were
inapplicable to its operations, such as
with respect to types of securities that
the Exchange does not propose to make
eligible for listing.241 The Exchange also
proposes to include certain listing
standards that are substantially similar
requiring companies seeking to list to meet the
quantitative initial listing standards and once listed
the quantitative continued listing standards, also
requires listed companies to meet other qualitative
requirements. See, e.g., proposed BSTX Rules 26800
Series, Corporate Governance.
238 See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49439 (citing
Parts 1–12 of the NYSE American Company Guide).
The Exchange states that it understands that the
Commission has extended relief to NYSE American
with respect to certain quantitative listing standards
that do not meet the thresholds of Rule 3a51–1, and
that initial listings of securities that do not meet
such thresholds and are not subject to the relief
provided to NYSE American would qualify as
‘‘penny stocks’’ and would be subject to additional
regulation. See Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at
106 (citing 17 CFR 240.3a51–1); Amendment No. 3,
supra note 10, at 4–5. The Exchange states that it
is not seeking relief related to Rule 3a51–1 and
describes certain adjustments made to the proposed
BSTX rules to meet the requirements in Rule 3a51–
1. See Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 106;
Amendment No. 3, supra note 10, at 4–5.
239 See proposed BSTX Rules 26000 Series (BSTX
Listing Rules Other Than for Exchange Traded
Products), 26200 Series (Original Listing
Procedures), 26300 Series (Additional Listings),
27000 Series (Suspension and Delisting), 27100
Series (Guide to Filing Requirements), and 27200
Series (Procedures for Review of Exchange Listing
Determinations).
240 See, e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release Nos.
59050 (December 3, 2008), 73 FR 75144 (December
10, 2008) (SR-Amex-2008–70) (approving revisions
to the listing process and removal of alternative
listing standards for American Stock Exchange LLC
(‘‘Amex’’), a predecessor to NYSE American); 53050
(January 3, 2006), 71 FR 1580 (January 10, 2006)
(SR-Amex-2005–114) (approving change to initial
listing standards for Amex).
241 See Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 103
n.301. For example, the Exchange does not propose
to list bonds, debentures, securities of foreign
companies (other than Canadian companies), or
investment trusts. See id. The Exchange also does
not propose to allow the issuance of fractional
shares of Securities. See id. at 114.
E:\FR\FM\02FEN1.SGM
02FEN1
5896
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 22 / Wednesday, February 2, 2022 / Notices
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
to the rules of other national securities
exchanges.242
In addition, the Exchange has
proposed initial and continued listing
standards for ETP-related securities to
be listed on BSTX that are substantially
similar to the rules of NYSE Arca, Inc.
(‘‘NYSE Arca’’).243 These initial and
continued listing standards relate to the
specific types of ETPs that the Exchange
proposes to make eligible for listing on
BSTX.244 The Exchange states that the
proposed rules do not include certain
products that are supported by NYSE
Arca but that the Exchange does not
plan to offer.245 The Commission has
previously determined that the ETPrelated listing standards of NYSE Arca
are consistent with the Exchange Act.246
Accordingly, the Commission finds
that the Exchange’s proposed initial and
continued listing requirements,
including the procedures for listing and
delisting securities, are consistent with
the Exchange Act, and Section 6(b)(5) of
the Exchange Act 247 in particular, and
its requirements that the rules of a
national securities exchange be
reasonably designed to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable
principals of trade, to remove
impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system, and, in
general, to protect investors and the
public interest; and that the rules not be
designed to permit unfair
242 See, e.g., Amendment No. 3, supra note 10, at
5–6 (stating that the Exchange is including initial
listing standards for preferred securities and
secondary classes based on Nasdaq Rule 5510).
243 See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49442 (citing
to NYSE Arca Rules 5.2–E(j)(3), 5.2–E(j)(6), 5.2–
E(j)(8), 8.200–E, 8.201–E, 8.600–E, 8.601–E, and
8.900–E).
244 See proposed BSTX Rules 28000 (Investment
Company Units), 28001 (Equity Index-Linked
Securities, Commodity-Linked Securities, CurrencyLinked Securities, Fixed Income Index-Linked
Securities, Futures-Listed Securities, and
Multifactor Index-Linked Securities), 28002
(Exchange-Traded Fund Shares), 28003 (Trust
Issued Receipts), 28004 (Commodity-Based Trust
Shares), 28005 (Managed Fund Shares), 28006
(Active Proxy Portfolio Shares), and 28007
(Managed Portfolio Shares).
245 See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49443 (stating
that the Exchange will not support trading in a
Nasdaq-100 Index Product, Currency Trust Shares,
or Commodity Index Trust Shares).
246 See, e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release Nos.
44551 (July 12, 2001), 66 FR 37716 (July 19, 2001)
(PCX–2001–14) (approving generic listing standards
for investment company units and portfolio
depository receipts for Pacific Exchange, Inc.
(‘‘PCX’’), a predecessor to NYSE Arca); 52204
(August 3, 2005), 70 FR 46559 (August 10, 2005)
(PCX–2005–63) (approving PCX’s generic listing
standards for index-linked securities); 78397 (July
22, 2016), 81 FR 49320 (July 27, 2016) (NYSEArca2015–110) (approving NYSE Arca’s generic listing
standards for managed fund shares).
247 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:31 Feb 01, 2022
Jkt 256001
discrimination between customers,
issuers, brokers, or dealers. The
Commission also finds that procedures
for listing and delisting securities,
including the procedures for
challenging the Exchange’s listing
determinations, are consistent with
Section 6(b)(7) of the Exchange Act,248
which requires, among other things, that
the rules of a national securities
exchange provide a fair procedure for
the prohibition or limitation by the
exchange of any person with respect to
access to services offered by the
exchange.
Corporate Governance Standards
The development and enforcement of
meaningful corporate governance listing
standards for a national securities
exchange is of substantial importance to
financial markets and the investing
public, especially given investor
expectations regarding the nature of
companies that have achieved an
exchange listing for their securities.249
The corporate governance standards
embodied in the listing standards of
national securities exchanges, in
particular, play an important role in
assuring that exchange-listed companies
observe good governance practices
including safeguarding the interests of
shareholders.250
The Exchange proposes corporate
governance standards in connection
with Securities to be listed and traded
on BSTX that are substantially similar to
the corporate governance standards for
listed issuers of NYSE American.251
These corporate governance standards
for listed issuers include policies
relating to disclosures, the handling of
stock dividends and splits, accounting,
shareholder meetings and voting, and
required notifications to the Exchange,
as well as standards for the issuer’s
corporate structure and its board of
directors and committees thereof.252
Further, these standards include rules
requiring a majority of directors on a
listed issuer’s board to be independent,
248 15
U.S.C. 78f(b)(7).
e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release Nos.
85374 (March 20, 2019), 84 FR 11354, 11356 (March
26, 2019); 91567 (April 14, 2021), 86 FR 20556,
20559 (April 20, 2021).
250 See, e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release Nos.
85374 (March 20, 2019), 84 FR 11354, 11356 (March
26, 2019); 91567 (April 14, 2021), 86 FR 20556,
20559 (April 20, 2021).
251 See OIP, supra note 7, at 49442 (citing to
NYSE American Sections 401–404, 501–522, 603–
624, 701–726, 801–809, and 920–994).
252 See proposed BSTX Rule 26400 Series
(Disclosure Policies), 26500 Series (Dividends and
Splits), 26600 Series (Accounting; Annual and
Quarterly Reports), 26700 Series (Shareholders’
Meetings, Approval and Voting of Proxies), 26800
Series (Corporate Governance), and 26900 Series
(Additional Matters).
249 See,
PO 00000
Frm 00118
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
rules and independence requirements
relating to audit and compensation
committees and the oversight of
nominations, and rules requiring listed
issuers to adopt codes of conduct
applicable to all their directors, officers,
and employees.253 The Commission has
previously determined that the
corporate governance standards for
listed issuers of NYSE American are
consistent with the Exchange Act.254
The Exchange also proposes to require
listed companies to maintain an internal
audit function pursuant to a rule that is
substantially similar to the requirements
of IEX.255
The Commission finds that BSTX’s
proposed corporate governance
standards for listed issuers contained in
BSTX’s proposed rules are consistent
with the Exchange Act, and in particular
Section 6(b)(5) of the Exchange Act and
its requirements that the rules of a
national securities exchange be
reasonably designed to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to remove
impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system, and, in
general, to protect investors and the
public interest; and are not designed to
permit unfair discrimination between
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.
The Commission further finds that
BSTX’s proposed rules satisfy the
requirements of Section 10A(m) of the
Exchange Act and Rule 10A–3
thereunder and Section 10C of the
Exchange Act and Rule 10C–1
thereunder, relating to audit and
compensation committees,
respectively.256 The Commission
believes that BSTX’s corporate
governance standards for listed issuers
that require a fully independent audit
committee are designed to promote
independent and objective review and
oversight of the accounting and auditing
practices of listed issuers and to
enhance audit committee independence,
authority, and responsibility by
implementing the standards set forth in
253 See proposed BSTX Rules 26802, 26803, and
27807.
254 See, e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release Nos.
48863 (December 1, 2003), 68 FR 68432 (December
8, 2003) (SR–Amex–2003–65) (approving proposal
to enhance the corporate governance requirements
applicable to listed companies for Amex); 54851
(November 30, 2006), 71 FR 71201 (December 8,
2006) (SR–Amex–2006–48) (approving exchange’s
independent director and audit committee
corporate governance standards for Amex).
255 See Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 115
(citing to IEX Rule 14.414). See also proposed BSTX
Rule 26801(i).
256 See 15 U.S.C. 78j–1(m); 15 U.S.C. 78j–3; 17
CFR 240.10A–3; 17 CFR 240.10C–1.
E:\FR\FM\02FEN1.SGM
02FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 22 / Wednesday, February 2, 2022 / Notices
Rule 10A–3.257 In addition, the
Commission believes that BSTX’s
proposed requirements relating to
independent compensation committees
for listed issuers would benefit investors
by implementing the standards set forth
in Rule 10C–1, which requires that the
independent directors of a listed issuer
oversee executive compensation
matters, consider independence criteria
before retaining compensation advisers,
and have responsibility for the
appointment, compensation, and
oversight of these advisers.258 Corporate
governance standards play an important
role in assuring that companies listed
for trading on the national securities
exchanges’ markets have a reasoned,
fair, and impartial approach for
determining the compensation of
corporate executives.259 The
Commission believes that the
Exchange’s rules will foster greater
transparency, accountability, and
objectivity in the oversight of
compensation practices of listed issuers
and in the decision-making processes of
their compensation committees.260
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
Regulation
The Exchange states that in
connection with the operation of BSTX,
it will leverage many of the Exchange’s
existing regulatory structures.261 The
Exchange states that it will extend its
Regulatory Services Agreement with
FINRA to cover BSTX Participants and
trading on the BSTX System, and this
Regulatory Services Agreement will
govern many aspects of the regulation
and discipline of BSTX Participants.262
According to the Exchange, the
Exchange will regulate the listing of
Securities, authorize BSTX Participants
to trade on the BSTX System, and
conduct surveillance of Security trading
257 See Securities Exchange Act Release No.
47654 (April 9, 2003), 68 FR 18788 (April 16, 2003).
258 See Securities Exchange Act Release No.
67220 (June 20, 2012), 77 FR 38422, 38425 (June 27,
2012).
259 See proposed BSTX Rule 26805. See, e.g.,
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 68640 (January
11, 2013), 78 FR 4554, 4563 (January 22, 2013) (SR–
NASDAQ–2012–109) (‘‘Nasdaq 2012 Order’’)
(approving proposal relating to rules for
compensation committees for listed companies).
260 See, e.g., Nasdaq 2012 Order, supra note 259
(finding Nasdaq compensation committee rules
consistent with the Exchange Act). See also, e.g.,
Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 68639
(January 11, 2013), 78 FR 4570 (January 22, 2013)
(order approving NYSE’s compensation committee
rules, which was cited by Nasdaq as precedent for
a subsequent amendment to its own rules that was
filed on an immediately effective basis); 71037
(December 11, 2013), 78 FR 76179 (December 16,
2013) (SR–NASDAQ–2013–147).
261 See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49448.
262 See id. The Exchange states that, as is the case
with the Exchange’s options trading platform, the
Exchange will supervise FINRA and bear ultimate
regulatory responsibility for BSTX. See id.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:31 Feb 01, 2022
Jkt 256001
on the BSTX System.263 The Exchange
states that, consistent with the
Exchange’s existing regulatory structure,
the Exchange’s Chief Regulatory Officer
will have general supervision of the
regulatory operations of BSTX,
including responsibility for overseeing
the surveillance, examination, and
enforcement functions and for
administering all regulatory services
agreements applicable to BSTX.264 The
Exchange states that its existing
Regulatory Oversight Committee will be
responsible for overseeing the adequacy
and effectiveness of the Exchange’s
regulatory and self-regulatory
organization responsibilities, including
those applicable to BSTX.265
The Exchange proposes specific
business conduct and operational rules
for BSTX Participants that include rules
covering similar subject matter as
existing Exchange Rules applicable to
Options Participants.266 The Exchange
also proposes to adopt proposed BSTX
Rule 24000 (Discipline and Summary
Suspension), which provides that the
provisions of the Exchange’s existing
BOX Rule 11000 Series (Summary
Suspension), 12000 Series (Discipline),
13000 Series (Review of Certain
Exchange Actions), and 14000 Series
(Arbitration) shall be applicable to
BSTX Participants and trading on the
BSTX System.267 According to the
Exchange, the Exchange already has
Rules pertaining to discipline and
suspension of Exchange Participants
that it proposes to extend to BSTX
Participants and trading on the BSTX
System.268
In addition to the Exchange’s other
disciplinary rules, the Exchange’s Minor
Rule Violation Plan (‘‘MRVP’’) specifies
those uncontested minor rule violations
with sanctions not exceeding $2,500
that would not be subject to the
provisions of Rule 19d–1(c)(1) under the
Exchange Act 269 requiring that an SRO
promptly file notice with the
Commission of any final disciplinary
action taken with respect to any person
or organization.270 The Exchange’s
263 See
id.
id.
265 See id. at 49448–49.
266 See id. at 49427–30 (discussing proposed
BSTX Rules regarding Business Conduct for BSTX
Participants (Rule 19000 Series), Financial and
Operational Rules for BSTX Participants (Rule
20000 Series), Supervision (Rule 21000 Series) and
Miscellaneous Provisions (Rule 22000 Series)).
267 See id. at 49430–31; proposed BSTX Rule
24000. The Exchange proposes to make conforming
edits to certain existing Exchange Rules to expand
their coverage to all Participants. See proposed BOX
Rules 11010 and 11030.
268 See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49431.
269 17 CFR 240.19d–1(c)(1).
270 See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49443.
264 See
PO 00000
Frm 00119
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
5897
MRVP includes the policies and
procedures set forth in existing BOX
Rule 12140 (Imposition of Fines for
Minor Violations).271 The Exchange
proposes to amend its MRVP to add
certain rules relating to BSTX to the list
of rules eligible for MRVP treatment, by
amending BOX Rule 12140 and
adopting proposed BSTX Rule 24010.272
Specifically, the Exchange proposes to
modify BOX Rule 12140 to specify that
rules and penalties relating to trading on
BSTX are set forth in proposed BSTX
Rule 24010.273 The Exchange also
proposes to set forth a fine schedule for
violations of certain rules related to
activity on BSTX and provide that a
subsequent violation is calculated on
the basis of a rolling 12-month
period.274 The Exchange states that the
rules that it proposes to include in its
MRVP are comparable to the rules
included in the MRVPs of other national
securities exchanges.275
The Exchange represents that it plans
to join the multi-party Rule 17d–2 Plan
for Allocation of Regulatory
Responsibilities Regarding Regulation
NMS and is in the process of joining
certain Rule 17d–2 agreements,
including those applicable to equities
trading and equities market
surveillance.276 The Exchange states
that it is a participant in the NMS plan
related to the Consolidated Audit Trail,
and that it intends to join the Order
Execution Quality Disclosure Plan, the
LULD Plan, and the applicable plans for
the consolidation and dissemination of
271 See
id.
Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 121.
273 See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49443;
proposed BOX Rule 12140(f). The Exchange also
proposes to make conforming changes to replaced
references to ‘‘Options Participant’’ with
‘‘Participant.’’ See proposed BOX Rule 12140.
274 See proposed BSTX Rule 24010. The Exchange
proposes that violations of the following rules
would be appropriate for dispositions under the
MRVP: proposed BSTX Rule 19180
(Communications with the Public), proposed BSTX
Rule 20000 (Maintenance, Retention and
Furnishing of Records), proposed BSTX Rule 25070
(Consolidated Audit Trail), proposed BSTX Rule
25130 (Locking or Crossing Quotations in NMS
Stocks), proposed BSTX Rule 25210(a)(1) (BSTX
Market Maker Two-Sided Quote Obligation), and
proposed BSTX Rule 25120 (Short Sales). See
proposed BSTX Rule 24010(b).
275 See Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 122
(citing to IEX Rule 9.218, Cboe BZX Rule 8.15.01,
and MIAX Pearl Rule 1014(d)(15)).
276 See id. at 143. Rule 17d–2 provides that any
two or more SROs may file with the Commission
a plan for allocating among such SROs the
responsibility to receive regulatory reports from
persons who are members or participants of more
than one of such SROs to examine such persons for
compliance, or to enforce compliance by such
persons, with specified provisions of the Exchange
Act, the rules and regulations thereunder, and the
rules of such SROs, or to carry out other specified
regulatory functions with respect to such persons.
See 17 CFR 240.17d–2.
272 See
E:\FR\FM\02FEN1.SGM
02FEN1
5898
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 22 / Wednesday, February 2, 2022 / Notices
market data.277 The Exchange also states
that it will ensure that its membership
in the Intermarket Surveillance Group
extends to the BSTX facility.278
According to the Exchange, the
Exchange will perform automated
surveillance of trading on BSTX for the
purposes of maintaining a fair and
orderly market at all times and monitor
BSTX to identify unusual trading
patterns and determine whether
particular trading activity requires
further regulatory investigation by
FINRA.279 The Exchange states that it
will oversee the process for determining
and implementing trading halts,
identifying and responding to unusual
market conditions, and administering
the Exchange’s process for identifying
and remediating ‘‘clearly erroneous
trades’’ pursuant to proposed BSTX
Rule 25110.280
The Exchange has also proposed
BSTX Rules 25050 and 25080(b)(3) to
comply with the LULD Plan.281
Proposed BSTX Rule 25080(b)(3)
provides that, for any execution to occur
during Regular Trading Hours, such
executions must comply with the LULD
plan, as set forth in BSTX Rule
25050.282 Proposed BSTX Rule 25050
describes the Exchange’s order handling
procedures to comply with the LULD
Plan.283
The Exchange’s proposed regulatory
structure raises no new regulatory
issues. Accordingly, the Commission
finds that the Exchange’s proposed
regulatory structure, including the
Exchange’s proposed application of its
existing rules to BSTX and BSTX
Participants’ conduct, the Exchange’s
commitment to establish new or expand
existing agreements with third-parties
including FINRA for purposes such as
surveillance, member discipline, and
overseeing and enforcing compliance
with BSTX rules, and proposed BSTX
Rule 25050 requiring compliance with
the LULD Plan are consistent with the
Exchange Act and, in particular, the
Section 6(b)(5) requirement that a
national securities exchange’s rules be
designed to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, remove
277 See
Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 144.
id.
279 See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49449. The
Exchange states that it currently does this for
options. See id.
280 See id.
281 See id. at 49433. The Exchange represents that
it intends to join the LULD Plan prior to the
commencement of trading Securities. See id.
282 See proposed BSTX Rule 25080(b)(3).
283 See proposed BSTX Rule 25050. See also
supra note 125 (discussing how proposed BSTX
Rule 25050 is substantially similar to the rules of
other national securities exchanges adopted in
connection with the LULD Plan).
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
278 See
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:31 Feb 01, 2022
Jkt 256001
impediments to and perfect the
mechanisms of a free and open market
and a national market system, and
protect investors and the public
interest.284 The Commission also finds
that the Exchange’s proposed regulatory
structure is consistent with the
requirements of Section 6(b)(1) of the
Exchange Act, which requires a national
securities exchange to be so organized
and have the capacity to be able to carry
out the purposes of the Exchange Act
and to comply, and to enforce
compliance by its members and persons
associated with its members, with the
Exchange Act and the rules and
regulations thereunder, and the rules of
the Exchange,285 and with Sections
6(b)(6) and 6(b)(7) of the Exchange
Act,286 which require an Exchange to
provide fair procedures for the
disciplining of members and persons
associated with members.
Finally, the Commission finds that the
proposed changes to the Exchange’s
MRVP are consistent with the public
interest, the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purpose
of the Exchange Act, as required by Rule
19d–1(c)(2) under the Exchange Act,287
which governs minor rule violation
plans. The Commission believes that
BOX Rule 12140 is an effective way to
discipline a member for a minor
violation of a rule. The Commission
believes that the Exchange’s proposal to
add rules related to BSTX to the list of
rules that are eligible for minor rule
violation plan treatment is consistent
with the Exchange Act because it may
help the Exchange’s ability to better
carry out its oversight and enforcement
responsibilities.
In approving the proposed changes to
the Exchange’s MRVP, the Commission
in no way minimizes the importance of
complying with the Exchange’s rules
and all other rules subject to fines under
BOX Rule 12140 and proposed BSTX
Rule 24010. The Commission believes
that a violation of any SRO’s rules, as
well as Commission rules, is a serious
matter. However, BOX Rule 12140 and
proposed BSTX Rule 24010 provide a
reasonable means of addressing rule
violations that may not rise to the level
of requiring formal disciplinary
proceedings, while providing greater
flexibility in handling certain violations.
Consistent with its rules and the
requirements of the Exchange Act, the
Commission expects that the Exchange
will continue to conduct surveillance
with due diligence and make a
284 See
15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
U.S.C. 78f(b)(1).
286 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(6) and (b)(7).
287 17 CFR 240.19d–1(c)(2).
285 15
PO 00000
Frm 00120
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
determination based on its findings, on
a case-by-case basis, whether a fine of
more or less than the recommended
amount is appropriate for a violation
under BOX Rule 12140 and proposed
BSTX Rule 24010 or whether a violation
requires formal disciplinary action.
Section 11(a) of the Exchange Act
Section 11(a)(1) of the Exchange
Act 288 prohibits a member of a national
securities exchange from effecting
transactions on that exchange for its
own account, the account of an
associated person, or an account over
which it or its associated person
exercises investment discretion
(collectively, ‘‘covered accounts’’)
unless an exception applies. Rule 11a2–
2(T) under the Exchange Act,289 known
as the ‘‘effect versus execute’’ rule,
provides exchange members with an
exemption from the Section 11(a)(1)
prohibition. Rule 11a2–2(T) permits an
exchange member, subject to certain
conditions, to effect transactions for
covered accounts by arranging for an
unaffiliated member to execute
transactions on the exchange. To
comply with Rule 11a2–2(T)’s
conditions, a member: (i) Must transmit
the order from off the exchange floor;
(ii) may not participate in the execution
of the transaction once it has been
transmitted to the member performing
the execution; 290 (iii) may not be
affiliated with the executing member;
and (iv) with respect to an account over
which the member or an associated
person has investment discretion,
neither the member nor its associated
person may retain any compensation in
connection with effecting the
transaction except as provided in the
Rule.
In a letter to the Commission, the
Exchange requests that the Commission
concur with the Exchange’s conclusion
that Exchange members that enter
orders into the BSTX System satisfy the
conditions of Rule 11a2–2(T).291 For the
reasons set forth below, the Commission
believes that members entering orders
into the BSTX System could satisfy the
requirements of Rule 11a2–2(T).
The Rule’s first condition is that
orders for covered accounts be
transmitted from off the exchange floor.
In the context of automated trading
288 15
U.S.C. 78k(a)(1).
CFR 240.11a2–2(T).
290 This prohibition also applies to associated
persons. The member may, however, participate in
clearing and settling the transaction.
291 See Letter from Lisa Fall, President, BOX,
dated December 23, 2021 (‘‘BSTX 11(a) Letter’’)
available on the Commission’s website at: https://
www.sec.gov/comments/sr-box-2021-06/
srbox202106-20110741-264607.pdf.
289 17
E:\FR\FM\02FEN1.SGM
02FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 22 / Wednesday, February 2, 2022 / Notices
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
systems, the Commission has found that
the off-floor transmission condition is
met if a covered account order is
transmitted from a remote location
directly to an exchange’s floor by
electronic means.292 The Exchange has
represented that BSTX does not have a
physical trading floor, and the BSTX
System will receive orders from
members electronically through remote
terminals or computer-to-computer
interfaces.293 The Commission believes
that the BSTX System satisfies this offfloor transmission condition.
The second condition states that the
member and any associated person not
participate in the execution of its order
after the order has been transmitted. The
Exchange has represented that at no
time following the submission of an
order is a member or an associated
person of the member able to acquire
control or influence over the result or
timing of the order’s execution.294
According to the Exchange, the
execution of a member’s order is
determined solely by what quotes and
orders are present in the BSTX System
at the time the member submits the
order, and the order priority based on
the BSTX rules.295 Accordingly, the
Commission believes that a member and
its associated persons do not participate
292 See, e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release Nos.
78101 (June 17, 2016), 81 FR 41141 (June 23, 2016)
(order approving IEX exchange registration); 75650
(August 7, 2015), 80 FR 48600 (August 13, 2015)
(order approving EDGX Options as an options
trading facility of the EDGX Exchange, Inc.); 61419
(January 26, 2010), 75 FR 5157 (February 1, 2010)
(order approving the BATS Options as an options
trading facility of the BATS Exchange, Inc.); 49068
(January 13, 2004), 69 FR 2775 (January 20, 2004)
(order approving the Boston Options Exchange as
an options trading facility of the Boston Stock
Exchange); 44983 (October 25, 2001), 66 FR 55225
(November 1, 2001) (order approving Archipelago
Exchange as electronic trading facility of the Pacific
Exchange); 29237 (May 24, 1991), 56 FR 24853
(May 31, 1991) (regarding NYSE’s Off-Hours
Trading Facility); 15533 (January 29, 1979), 44 FR
6084 (January 31, 1979) (‘‘1979 Release’’); and
14563 (March 14, 1978), 43 FR 11542 (March 17,
1978) (‘‘1978 Release’’) (regarding NYSE’s
Designated Order Turnaround System).
293 See BSTX 11(a) Letter, supra note 291, at 3.
294 See id. at 4.
295 See id. The Exchange states that a member
may cancel or modify the order, or modify the
instructions for executing the order, provided such
cancellations or modifications are transmitted from
off an exchange floor. See id. at 3 (citing the 1978
Release). The Commission has stated that the nonparticipation requirement is satisfied under such
circumstances, so long as such modifications or
cancellations are also transmitted from off the floor.
See 1978 Release, supra note 292 (stating that the
‘‘non-participation requirement does not prevent
initiating members from canceling or modifying
orders (or the instructions pursuant to which the
initiating member wishes orders to be executed)
after the orders have been transmitted to the
executing member, provided that any such
instructions are also transmitted from off the
floor’’).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:31 Feb 01, 2022
Jkt 256001
in the execution of an order submitted
to the BSTX System.
The third condition states that the
order be executed by an exchange
member who is unaffiliated with the
member initiating the order. The
Commission has stated that this
condition is satisfied when automated
exchange facilities are used, as long as
the design of these systems ensures that
members do not possess any special or
unique trading advantages in handling
their orders after transmitting them to
the exchange.296 The Exchange has
represented that the design of the BSTX
System ensures that no member has any
special or unique trading advantage in
the handling of its orders after
transmitting its orders to the
Exchange.297 Based on the Exchange’s
representation that the design of the
BSTX System ensures that no member
has any special or unique trading
advantage in the handling of its orders
after transmitting its orders to BSTX, the
Commission believes that the BSTX
System satisfies this condition of Rule
11a2–2(T).
Fourth, in the case of a transaction
effected for an account with respect to
which the initiating member or an
associated person thereof exercises
investment discretion, neither the
initiating member nor any associated
person thereof may retain any
compensation in connection with
effecting the transaction, unless the
person authorized to transact business
for the account has expressly provided
otherwise by written contract referring
to Section 11(a) of the Exchange Act and
Rule 11a2–2(T) thereunder.298 Members
296 In considering the operation of automated
execution systems operated by an exchange, the
Commission has stated that while there is not an
independent executing exchange member, the
execution of an order is automatic once it has been
transmitted into the system. Because the design of
these systems ensures that members do not possess
any special or unique trading advantages in
handling their orders after transmitting them to the
exchange, the Commission has stated that
executions obtained through these systems satisfy
the independent execution requirement of Rule
11a2–2(T). See 1979 Release, supra note 292.
297 See BSTX 11(a) Letter, supra note 291, at 4.
The Exchange also states that access to the BSTX
Market Data Blockchain will not allow a member
or an associated person of such member to acquire
control or influence over the result or timing of an
order’s execution. See id.
298 17 CFR 240.11a2–2(T)(a)(2)(iv). In addition,
Rule 11a2–2(T)(d) requires a member or associated
person authorized by written contract to retain
compensation, in connection with effecting
transactions for covered accounts over which such
member or associated persons thereof exercises
investment discretion, to furnish at least annually
to the person authorized to transact business for the
account a statement setting forth the total amount
of compensation retained by the member in
connection with effecting transactions for the
account during the period covered by the statement.
See 17 CFR 240.11a2–2(T)(d). See also 1978
PO 00000
Frm 00121
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
5899
trading for covered accounts over which
they exercise investment discretion
must comply with this condition in
order to rely on the rule’s exemption.299
IV. Solicitation of Comments on
Amendment Nos. 2 and 3 to the
Proposed Rule Change
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning whether
Amendment Nos. 2 and 3 are consistent
with the Exchange Act. Comments may
be submitted by any of the following
methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
BOX–2021–06 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–BOX–2021–06. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change.
Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit
Release, supra note 292 (stating ‘‘[t]he contractual
and disclosure requirements are designed to assure
that accounts electing to permit transaction-related
compensation do so only after deciding that such
arrangements are suitable to their interests’’).
299 See BSTX 11(a) Letter, supra note 291, at 4–
5.
E:\FR\FM\02FEN1.SGM
02FEN1
5900
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 22 / Wednesday, February 2, 2022 / Notices
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
personal identifying information from
comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish
to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–BOX–2021–06, and should
be submitted on or before February 23,
2022.
V. Accelerated Approval of Proposed
Rule Change, as Modified by
Amendment Nos. 2 and 3
The Commission finds good cause to
approve the proposed rule change, as
modified by Amendment Nos. 2 and 3,
prior to the thirtieth day after the date
of publication of notice of the filing of
Amendment Nos. 2 and 3 in the Federal
Register. The Commission notes that the
original proposal and the proposal as
modified by Amendment No. 1 were
published for comment in the Federal
Register.300
In Amendment No. 2, the Exchange
revised the proposal to: (i) Provide
additional information regarding the
connectivity and co-location services
that will be offered at the Exchange’s
primary data center, including
equidistant cabling arrangements; (ii)
state that, pursuant to its authority
under proposed BSTX Rule 26101, the
Exchange would not permit an issuer to
list a new class of securities on BSTX
that is not distinct from an existing class
of securities of the issuer; (iii) modify
proposed rule text regarding the
proposed BSTX Market Data Blockchain
to clarify that non-BSTX Participants
will have access to anonymized, general
market data and specify what fields are
included in this data, to specify that the
market data will apply to trading
activity for regular trading hours, and to
clarify that users will view the data
through an application programming
interface; (iv) modify proposed rule text
related to the proposed order parameter
that would be used to preference T+0
settlement to add the T+0 Cut-Off Time
by which an execution must occur to be
eligible for T+0 settlement; (v) provide
additional description to clarify
operation of the proposed BSTX Market
Data Blockchain and proposed optional
order parameter for T+0 or T+1
settlement; and (vi) make technical and
conforming changes. The Commission
believes that these changes help to
clarify the proposal and address
concerns raised by commenters
regarding the Exchange’s equidistant
cabling arrangements and the potential
for listing a class of securities that has
the same economic and voting rights as
a class of securities listed on another
national securities exchange. The
300 See
Notice, supra note 3; OIP, supra note 7.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:31 Feb 01, 2022
Jkt 256001
Commission also believes that the
changes regarding General Market Data
on the BSTX Market Data Blockchain
help to clarify access for non-BSTX
Participants and how the Exchange will
anonymize the data. The Commission
further believes that the addition of the
T+0 Cut-Off Time will help to ensure
that trades submitted to NSCC for T+0
settlement are received by NSCC before
NSCC’s cut-off time and thus can be
settled using the consolidated net
settlement process, and that the
additional explanation regarding the
order parameter for T+0 and T+1
settlement helps to clarify how this
functionality will operate.
In addition, the Exchange made
several changes in Amendment No. 2 to
bring the proposed rules into closer
alignment with the rules of other
national securities exchanges on which
equities securities are traded, including
by: (i) Modifying certain trading rules
regarding securities eligible for trading,
prohibitions against trading ahead of
customer orders, round lots, minimum
price variants, auctions used to open or
reopen trading, the dissemination of
market data concerning such auctions,
risk controls, market maker registration
process and obligations, business
conduct, trading practices, maintaining
books and records, off-exchange
transactions, scope of the MRVP, trade
reporting and the dissemination of
quotations, clearly erroneous
executions, and locking and crossing
quotations; (ii) eliminating a proposed
rule regarding an audit trail that has
been superseded by rules pertaining to
the Consolidated Audit Trail; (iii)
modifying certain proposed listing
standards regarding the listing of
secondary classes and preferred stock,
the required number of market makers,
requirements for securities of foreign
issuers that would apply to the listing
of Canadian issuers, the listing of
securities subject to an exemption from
Exchange Act registration, the method
of computing the payment of cash in
lieu of fractional shares, the settlement
timing of securities transactions,
requirements to notify the Exchange
before engaging in activities relating to
a proxy contest, requirements that listed
companies establish and maintain an
internal audit function, the calculation
of regulatory transaction fees under
Section 31 of the Exchange Act, and the
distribution of funds in the event of
liquidation of the Exchange; and (iv)
eliminating a proposed listing
requirement that an applicant provide a
legal opinion that its security qualifies
as a security under applicable United
States securities laws. The Exchange
PO 00000
Frm 00122
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
also made changes in Amendment Nos.
2 and 3 to certain quantitative listing
requirements to comply with the
thresholds and other terminology in
Rule 3a51–1. The Commission believes
that these changes help make these
aspects of the proposal substantially
similar to the existing rules of national
securities exchanges.
Accordingly, the Commission finds
good cause, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2)
of the Exchange Act,301 to approve the
proposed rule change, as modified by
Amendment Nos. 2 and 3, on an
accelerated basis.
VI. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Exchange Act 302
and Rule 19d–1(c)(2) thereunder,303 that
the proposed rule change (SR–BOX–
2021–06), as modified by Amendment
Nos. 2 and 3 thereto, be, and it hereby
is, approved on an accelerated basis.
Although the Commission’s approval
of the proposed rule change is final, and
the proposed rules are therefore
effective, it is further ordered that the
operation of BSTX is conditioned on the
satisfaction of the requirements below:
A. Participation in National Market
System Plans Relating to Equities
Trading. BOX must join all relevant
national market system plans related to
BSTX equities trading, including: (1)
The Consolidated Tape Association
Plan, the Consolidated Quotation Plan,
and the Nasdaq UTP Plan (or any
successors thereto); (2) the National
Market System Plan to Address
Extraordinary Market Volatility; and (3)
the National Market System Plan
Establishing Procedures Under Rule 605
of Regulation NMS.
B. Regulatory Services Agreement and
Rule 17d–2 Agreements. BOX must
ensure that all necessary changes are
made to its Regulatory Services
Agreement with FINRA and must be a
party to the multi-party Rule 17d–2
agreements applicable to BSTX equities
trading and equities market
surveillance.
C. Intermarket Surveillance Group.
BOX must ensure that its membership
in the Intermarket Surveillance Group
extends to the BSTX facility.
D. Governance Structure. BOX must
ensure, consistent with the
requirements of Section 19(b) and Rule
19b–4, that it has adopted a rule
establishing BSTX as a facility of the
Exchange.304
301 15
U.S.C. 78f(b)(2).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
303 17 CFR 240.19d–1(c)(2).
304 See also supra note 12 and accompanying text.
305 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
302 15
E:\FR\FM\02FEN1.SGM
02FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 22 / Wednesday, February 2, 2022 / Notices
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.305
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022–02086 Filed 2–1–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–94088; File Nos. SR–MIAX–
2021–59, SR–PEARL–2021–57]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Miami
International Securities Exchange,
LLC, MIAX PEARL, LLC; Suspension of
and Order Instituting Proceedings To
Determine Whether To Approve or
Disapprove Proposed Rule Changes
To Amend the Fee Schedules To Adopt
a Tiered-Pricing Structure for Certain
Connectivity Fees
January 27, 2022.
I. Introduction
On December 1, 2021, Miami
International Securities Exchange LLC,
LLC (‘‘MIAX’’) and MIAX PEARL, LLC
(‘‘MIAX Pearl’’) (collectively, the
‘‘Exchanges’’) each filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’), pursuant to Section
19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (‘‘Exchange Act’’ or ‘‘Act’’),1 and
Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 a proposed rule
change (File Numbers SR–MIAX–2021–
59 and SR–PEARL–2021–57) to amend
the MIAX Fee Schedule and MIAX Pearl
Options Fee Schedule (collectively, the
‘‘Fee Schedules’’) to adopt a tiered
pricing structure for certain connectivity
fees. The proposed rule changes were
immediately effective upon filing with
the Commission pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act.3 The proposed
rule changes were published for
comment in the Federal Register on
December 20, 2021.4 Under Section
19(b)(3)(C) of the Act,5 the Commission
is hereby: (i) Temporarily suspending
File Numbers SR–MIAX–2021–59 and
SR–PEARL–2021–57; and (ii) instituting
proceedings to determine whether to
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). A proposed rule change
may take effect upon filing with the Commission if
it is designated by the exchange as ‘‘establishing or
changing a due, fee, or other charge imposed by the
self-regulatory organization on any person, whether
or not the person is a member of the self-regulatory
organization.’’ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
4 See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 93775
(December 14, 2021), 86 FR 71996 (‘‘MIAX
Notice’’); 93774 (December 14, 2021), 86 FR 71952
(‘‘Pearl Notice’’). For ease of reference, citations to
statements generally applicable to both notices are
to the MIAX Notice.
5 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(C).
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
2 17
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:31 Feb 01, 2022
Jkt 256001
approve or disapprove File Numbers
SR–MIAX–2021–59 and SR–PEARL–
2021–57.
II. Background and Description of the
Proposed Rule Changes
MIAX and the MIAX Pearl options
facility have a shared connectivity
infrastructure that permits Members and
non-Members to connect directly to
either or both of the Exchanges, and
thereby access the associated
Exchanges’ trading platforms, market
data systems, test systems, and disaster
recovery facilities via a single, shared
connection.6 Prior to implementation of
the proposed rule changes, a market
participant connecting to the primary or
secondary facility of either or both of
the Exchanges options platforms via a
10 gigabit ultra-low latency (‘‘10Gb
ULL’’) fiber connection was assessed a
monthly fee of $10,000 per connection.7
The Exchanges proposes to modify their
respective Fee Schedules to adopt a
tiered pricing structure for 10Gb ULL
fiber connections as follows:
• $9,000 each for the 1st and 2nd
10Gb ULL connections;
• $11,000 each for the 3rd and 4th
10Gb ULL connections; and
• $13,000 for each additional
connection 10Gb ULL connection.8
These fees (the ‘‘Proposed Access
Fees’’) are assessed in any month the
Member or non-Member is credentialed
to use any of the Exchanges’ APIs or
market data feeds in the Exchanges’
production environment, pro-rated
when a Member or non-Member adds or
deletes a connection.9
6 See
MIAX Notice, supra note 4 at 71998.
id. 1Gb connections to the primary/
secondary facility, and 1Gb and 10Gb connections
to the disaster recovery facility are subject to
separate monthly charges that are not affected by
the proposed rule changes. As the MIAX Pearl filing
relates only the MIAX Pearl Options Fee Schedule,
fees for the MIAX Pearl Equities facility also are
outside the scope of the proposed rule changes.
8 The Exchanges initially filed the proposed fee
changes on July 30, 2021. See Securities Exchange
Act Release Nos. 92643 (August 11, 2021), 86 FR
46034 (August 17, 2021) (SR–MIAX–2021–35),
92644 (August 11, 2021), 86 FR 46055 (August 17,
2021) (SR–PEARL–2021–36). These filings were
withdrawn by the Exchanges. The Exchanges filed
new proposed fee changes with additional
justification (SR–MIAX–2021–41 and SR–PEARL–
2021–45), which were the subject of a Suspension
of and Order Instituting Proceedings. See Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 93639 (November 22,
2021), 86 FR 67758 (November 29, 2021). The
Exchanges subsequently withdrew those filings and
replaced them with the instant filings to provide
additional information and a revised justification
for the proposal, which is discussed herein. See
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 93733
(December 7, 2021), 86 FR 71108 (December 14,
2021) (Notice of Withdrawal); see also MIAX Notice
and Pearl Notice, supra note 4 at 71997, 71984,
respectively.
9 See MIAX Notice, supra note 4, at 71998. The
Exchanges state that they deem connectivity fees to
7 See
PO 00000
Frm 00123
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
5901
III. Suspension of the Proposed Rule
Changes
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(C) of the
Act,10 at any time within 60 days of the
date of filing of an immediately effective
proposed rule change pursuant to
Section 19(b)(1) of the Act,11 the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend the change in the
rules of a self-regulatory organization
(‘‘SRO’’) if it appears to the Commission
that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for
the protection of investors, or otherwise
in furtherance of the purposes of the
Act. As discussed below, the
Commission believes a temporary
suspension of the proposed rule changes
is necessary and appropriate to allow for
additional analysis of the proposed rule
changes’ consistency with the Act and
the rules thereunder.
In support of the proposals, the
Exchanges argue that the proposed
tiered pricing structure for 10Gb ULL
connections is reasonable, equitable,
and not unfairly discriminatory because
the new tiers result in a majority of
10Gb ULL purchasers either saving
money or paying the same amount.12 As
discussed further below, the Exchanges
state that ‘‘a higher fee to a Member or
non-Member that utilizes numerous
connections is directly related to the
increased costs the Exchange incurs in
providing and maintaining those
additional connections.’’ 13 The
Exchanges also maintain that the tiered
pricing structure will encourage
Members and non-Members to be more
efficient and economical when
determining how to connect to the
Exchanges and should better enable the
Exchanges to monitor and provide
access to the Exchanges’ network to
ensure sufficient capacity and headroom
in the System.14
In further support of the proposals,
the Exchanges argue that the Proposed
Access Fees are reasonable because they
will permit recovery of the Exchange’s
costs in providing the associated
services and will not result in the
Exchange generating a suprabe access fees, and records these fees as part of its
‘‘Access Fees’’ revenue in its financial statements.
Id. at 71999.
10 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(C).
11 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
12 See MIAX Notice, supra note 4, at 72004. The
Exchanges state that approximately 80% of the
firms that purchased at least one 10Gb ULL
connection experienced a decrease in their monthly
connectivity fees, while approximately 20% of
firms experienced an increase in their monthly
connectivity fees. See id.
13 See id.
14 See MIAX Notice, supra note 4, at 72004.
E:\FR\FM\02FEN1.SGM
02FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 22 (Wednesday, February 2, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5881-5901]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-02086]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-94092; File No. SR-BOX-2021-06]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; BOX Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing
of Amendment Nos. 2 and 3 and Order Granting Accelerated Approval of a
Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment Nos. 2 and 3, To Adopt
Rules Governing the Trading of Equity Securities on the Exchange
Through a Facility of the Exchange Known as BSTX LLC
January 27, 2022.
Introduction
On May 12, 2021, BOX Exchange LLC (``Exchange'' or ``BOX'') filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant
to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Exchange
Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to
adopt rules governing the listing and trading of equity securities on
the Exchange through a facility of the Exchange to be known as BSTX LLC
(``BSTX''). The proposed rule change was published for comment in the
Federal Register on June 2, 2021.\3\ On July 13, 2021, the Commission
extended the time period within which to approve the proposed rule
change, disapprove the proposed rule change, or institute proceedings
to determine whether to approve or disapprove the proposed rule change,
to August 31, 2021.\4\ On August 18, 2021, the Exchange filed Amendment
No. 1 to the proposed rule change, which replaced and superseded the
proposed rule
[[Page 5882]]
change as originally filed.\5\ On August 27, 2021, the Commission
published notice of Amendment No. 1 and instituted proceedings pursuant
to Section 19(b)(2)(B) of the Exchange Act \6\ to determine whether to
approve or disapprove the proposed rule change, as modified by
Amendment No. 1.\7\ On November 23, 2021, the Commission designated a
longer period for Commission action on the proposed rule change, as
modified by Amendment No. 1.\8\ On December 20, 2021, the Exchange
filed Amendment No. 2, which replaced and superseded the proposed rule
change, as modified by Amendment No. 1.\9\ On January 20, 2022, the
Exchange filed partial Amendment No. 3 to the proposed rule change.\10\
The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment Nos. 2 and 3, from
interested persons and is approving the proposed rule change, as
modified by Amendment Nos. 2 and 3, on an accelerated basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 92017 (May 25,
2021), 86 FR 29634 (``Notice''). Comments on the proposed rule
change can be found at: https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-box-2021-06/srbox202106.htm.
\4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 92387 (July 13,
2021), 86 FR 38140 (July 19, 2021).
\5\ In Amendment No. 1, the Exchange revised the proposal to:
(i) Eliminate the proposed suspension of unlisted trading privileges
for thinly traded securities; (ii) modify proposed rule text
regarding the order parameter that would allow participants to
indicate a preference for same day or next day settlement to clarify
that, based on how the preferences of the two sides of an executed
trade compare, the Exchange will transmit matched order information
to a registered clearing agency for settlement as indicated to the
extent that such settlement timing may be permitted under the rules,
policies, and procedures of the registered clearing agency; (iii)
modify aspects of the proposed market data blockchain to remove the
Exchange's ability to change the content of the market data
blockchain through a regulatory circular, remove the unique
identification number from the types of member-specific market data,
specify that anonymized, general market data will pertain to
displayed orders, and add that the Exchange may provide permission
for non-members to view the anonymized, general market data; (iv)
add rule text regarding the Exchange's proposed market data
products; (v) eliminate a proposed rule regarding issuer conversion
of a security to listing on BSTX; (vi) provide additional
description of several aspects of the proposal, including the market
data blockchain and the possibility to settle on a same-day or next-
day basis; and (vii) make technical and conforming changes.
Amendment No. 1 is available on the Commission's website at: https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-box-2021-06/srbox202106-9159349-247726.pdf.
\6\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
\7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 92796, 86 FR 49416
(September 2, 2021) (``OIP'').
\8\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 93649, 86 FR 68023
(November 30, 2021).
\9\ In Amendment No. 2, the Exchange revised the proposal to:
(i) Provide additional information regarding the connectivity and
co-location services that will be offered at the Exchange's primary
data center, including equidistant cabling arrangements; (ii) state
that, pursuant to its authority under proposed BSTX Rule 26101, the
Exchange would not permit an issuer to list a new class of
securities on BSTX that is not distinct from an existing class of
securities of the issuer; (iii) modify proposed rule text regarding
the proposed market data blockchain to clarify that non-members will
have access to anonymized, general market data and specify what
fields are included in this data, to specify that the market data
will apply to trading activity for regular trading hours, and to
clarify that users will view the data through an application
programming interface; (iv) modify proposed rule text related to the
proposed order parameter that would be used to preference same-day
settlement to add a cut-off time by which an execution must occur to
be eligible for same-day settlement; (v) modify certain proposed
rules to bring them into closer alignment with the rules of other
national securities exchanges on which equity securities are traded,
including rules regarding securities eligible for trading,
prohibitions against trading ahead of customer orders, round lots,
minimum price variants, auctions used to open or reopen trading, the
dissemination of market data concerning such auctions, risk
controls, market maker registration process and obligations,
business conduct, trading practices, maintaining books and records,
off-exchange transactions, scope of the minor rule violation plan,
trade reporting and the dissemination of quotations, clearly
erroneous executions, and locking and crossing quotations; (vi)
eliminate a proposed rule regarding an audit trail that has been
superseded by rules pertaining to the Consolidated Audit Trail;
(vii) modify certain proposed listing standards to comply with the
thresholds in Rule 3a51-1, and bring the proposed listing standards
into closer alignment with the rules of other national securities
exchanges on which equities securities are traded, including with
respect to the listing of secondary classes and preferred stock, the
required number of market makers, requirements for securities of
foreign issuers that would apply to the listing of Canadian issuers,
the listing of securities that are subject to an exemption from
Exchange Act registration, the method of computing the payment of
cash in lieu of fractional shares, the settlement timing of
securities transactions, requirements to notify the Exchange before
engaging in activities relating to a proxy contest, requirements
that listed companies establish and maintain an internal audit
function, the calculation of regulatory transaction fees under
Section 31 of the Exchange Act, and the distribution of funds in the
event of liquidation of the Exchange; (viii) eliminate a proposed
listing requirement that an applicant provide a legal opinion that
its security qualifies as a security under applicable United States
securities laws; (ix) provide additional description to clarify
operation of the proposed market data blockchain and proposed order
parameter that would be used to preference same-day or next-day
settlement; and (x) make technical and conforming changes. Amendment
No. 2 is available on the Commission's website at: https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-box-2021-06/srbox202106-20110109-264393.pdf
(``Amendment No. 2'').
\10\ In Amendment No. 3, the Exchange revised the proposal to
make certain changes to the proposed listing rules in proposed BSTX
Rule 26000 to promote consistency with the definition of ``penny
stock'' under Exchange Act Rule 3a51-1, including by defining
``public distribution'' and ``public shareholder'' consistently with
Rule 3a51-1, changing references to ``Market Value of Listed
Securities'' to ``Total Value of Market Capitalization,'' and
eliminating initial listing standards for preferred stock that were
based on the rules of NYSE American. Amendment No. 3 is available on
the Commission's website at: https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-box-2021-06/srbox202106-20112225-265310.pdf (``Amendment No. 3'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Description of the Proposal, as Modified by Amendment Nos. 2 and 3
As set forth in the OIP and Amendment Nos. 2 and 3,\11\ the
Exchange proposes to adopt listing standards for certain equity
securities (``Securities'') along with rules governing the trading of
Securities through a facility of the Exchange known as BSTX.\12\ BSTX
would operate a fully automated, price/time priority execution system
(``BSTX System'') for the trading of Securities.\13\ Under the proposed
rules, Securities would be NMS stocks, as defined in Rule
600(b)(54),\14\ that meet BSTX listing standards and that trade on the
BSTX System.\15\ BSTX would serve as the listing market for eligible
companies and issuers of exchange traded products (``ETPs'').\16\ The
Exchange states that it is not proposing rules that would support the
extension of unlisted trading privileges (``UTP'') to NMS stocks listed
on other national securities exchanges.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See OIP, supra note 7; Amendment No. 2, supra note 9;
Amendment No. 3, supra note 10.
\12\ See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49416. Pursuant to a
separate proposed rule change, the Exchange proposes to establish
BSTX as a facility of the Exchange that will operate a market for
the trading of securities (``BSTX Market'') and adopt the BSTX Third
Amended and Restated LLC Agreement. See Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 93094 (September 21, 2021), 86 FR 53365 (September 27,
2021) (SR-BOX-2021-14) (Notice of Filing of Amendment No. 1 and
Order Instituting Proceedings to Determine Whether to Approve or
Disapprove a Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment No. 1,
in Connection with the Proposed Establishment of BSTX as a Facility
of the Exchange) (``Amended BSTX Governance Proposal''); Amendment
No. 2, supra note 9, at 7. Among other things, the Amended BSTX
Governance Proposal sets forth the proposed ownership structure for
BSTX. The Exchange states that without Commission approval of the
trading rules, the Exchange would not permit BSTX to commence
operations of the BSTX Market, and that the Exchange's regulatory
oversight responsibilities with respect to BSTX would not be
triggered unless SR-BOX-2021-14 is approved by the Commission. See
Amended BSTX Governance Proposal, 86 FR at 53366. The Exchange also
states that without approved rules pertaining to the governance
structure of BSTX as a facility of the Exchange, the Exchange will
not commence operation of BSTX. See Amendment No. 2, supra note 9,
at 9.
\13\ See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49416.
\14\ 17 CFR 242.600(b)(54).
\15\ See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49417. The Exchange
proposes listing standards that, according to the Exchange, are
similar to the listing standards of NYSE American LLC (``NYSE
American''). See id. at 49439.
\16\ See id. at 49417.
\17\ See id. The Exchange also states that, therefore, it would
only trade Securities listed on BSTX unless and until it proposes
and receives Commission approval for rules that would support
trading in other types of securities, including through the
extension of UTP to other NMS stocks. See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange proposes rules for participation on BSTX, business
conduct for BSTX Participants,\18\
[[Page 5883]]
financial and operational provisions for BSTX Participants,
supervision, trading practices, discipline, trading on the BSTX System,
market making, and listing Securities on BSTX.\19\ The Exchange
proposes to offer several proprietary market data products that are
similar to those offered by other national securities exchanges, as
well as a historical market data product that utilizes blockchain
technology.\20\ Specifically, the Exchange proposes to record and
disseminate certain information regarding orders and executions on BSTX
on a proprietary market data feed that BSTX would operate using a
proprietary blockchain system (``BSTX Market Data Blockchain'').\21\
The Exchange states that the BSTX Market Data Blockchain would be
accessible through an application program interface (``API'') available
through the internet, and the Exchange would control all aspects of the
BSTX Market Data Blockchain and the associated API.\22\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ ``BSTX Participant'' would be defined as a Participant or
Options Participant that is authorized to trade securities on the
Exchange. See proposed BSTX Rule 17000(a)(12). See also proposed BOX
Rules 100(a)(41) (defining ``Options Participant'' to mean a
Participant registered with the Exchange for purposes of
participating in options trading on the Exchange); and 100(a)(42)
(defining ``Participant'' to mean a firm or organization that is
registered with the Exchange pursuant to BOX Rule 2000 Series for
purposes of participating in trading on a facility of the Exchange,
including an Options Participant and BSTX Participant).
\19\ See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49417.
\20\ See proposed BSTX Rule 22060. The Exchange states that its
rule concerning market data products is substantially similar to
that of MEMX LLC (``MEMX''). See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49424 &
n.154.
\21\ See proposed BSTX Rules 17000(a)(9) and 17020.
\22\ See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49420. The Exchange states
that only the Exchange would have direct access to the underlying
data on the private blockchain. See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange states that two types of information would be
available on the BSTX Market Data Blockchain. Each BSTX Participant
would be able to see its own order and transaction information related
to its own trading activity on BSTX (``Participant Proprietary
Data'').\23\ In addition, all BSTX Participants and non-BSTX
Participants with permission to view the BSTX Market Data Blockchain
would be able to see anonymized, general market data related to all
trading activity occurring on BSTX (``General Market Data'').\24\ The
Exchange states that information would be posted to the BSTX Market
Data Blockchain on a delayed basis of at least five minutes.\25\ The
Exchange states that the General Market Data that would be available on
the BSTX Market Data Blockchain would contain substantively similar
information as would be available through the Exchange's proprietary
market data feeds.\26\ The Exchange further states that the BSTX Market
Data Blockchain would not impact the ability of Securities to trade on
other national securities exchanges or over-the-counter (``OTC'').\27\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ See id.
\24\ See id.
\25\ See id. at 49421. See also infra note 156 (describing that
by ``five minute delay,'' the Exchange means that market data would
be uploaded once every five minutes).
\26\ See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49421.
\27\ See id. at 49423. The Exchange states that it is proposing
to use blockchain technology for purposes of the BSTX Market Data
Blockchain and that, to the extent the Exchange proposes future
applications of blockchain technology to the Exchange's business,
the Exchange would file such proposal with the Commission. See
Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 29 n.52. The Commission notes that
the Exchange's current proposal does not involve the trading of
digital tokens and such a proposal, or any other additional use of
blockchain technology, would require that the Exchange file a
proposed rule change pursuant to Section 19(b) and Rule 19b-4 of the
Exchange Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
According to the Exchange, all transactions in Securities would
clear and settle in accordance with the rules, policies, and procedures
of registered clearing agencies.\28\ The Exchange states that BSTX
anticipates that The Depository Trust Company (``DTC'') would serve as
the securities depository for Securities and that confirmed trades in
Securities on BSTX would be transmitted to National Securities Clearing
Corporation (``NSCC'') for clearing.\29\ The Exchange proposes to
introduce an optional order parameter that would allow BSTX
Participants to indicate a preference for settlement on a shorter
settlement cycle than the standard two business day (``T+2'')
settlement cycle. Specifically, the Exchange proposes that BSTX
Participants would be able to utilize an order parameter that would
indicate a preference for settlement on a same day (``T+0'') or next
day (``T+1'') basis when certain conditions are met.\30\ The Exchange
states that orders in a Security that include a parameter indicating a
preference for settlement on a T+0 basis or on a T+1 basis would only
result in executions that would actually settle more quickly than on a
T+2 basis if, and only if, all of the specified conditions are met and
the execution that is transmitted by BSTX to NSCC is eligible for T+0
or T+1 settlement under the rules, policies, and procedures of a
registered clearing agency.\31\ The Exchange states that any such
preference would only become operative if the order happened to execute
against another order that also includes a parameter indicating a
preference for settlement on a T+0 or T+1 basis.\32\ According to the
Exchange, an order with a preference for faster settlement would
continue to interact with any other order against which it is
marketable, and a resulting execution would always settle using the
latest settlement timing associated with the two matching orders.\33\
The Exchange also states that the possibility of a shortened settlement
time would have no impact on the Exchange's proposed price/time
priority structure for order matching.\34\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\28\ See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49418. The Exchange also
states that the operation of the BSTX Market Data Blockchain would
have no impact or effect on the manner in which a Security clears
and settles. See id.
\29\ See id.
\30\ See id. at 49423; proposed BSTX Rule 25060(h).
\31\ See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49424.
\32\ See id.
\33\ See id. at 49425.
\34\ See id. at 49424.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Discussion and Commission Findings
After careful review of the proposed rule change, as modified by
Amendment Nos. 2 and 3, the Commission finds that the proposal is
consistent with the requirements of the Exchange Act and the rules and
regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities
exchange.\35\ Specifically, the Commission finds that the proposed rule
change, as amended, is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Exchange
Act,\36\ which requires, among other things, that the rules of a
national securities exchange be designed to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices; to promote just and equitable
principles of trade; to foster cooperation and coordination with
persons engaged in regulating, clearing, settling, and processing
information with respect to, and facilitating transactions in
securities; to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a
free and open market and a national market system; and, in general, to
protect investors and the public interest. Section 6(b)(5) also
requires that the rules of a national securities exchange not be
designed to permit unfair discrimination among customers, issuers,
brokers, or dealers. Further, the Commission finds that the proposed
rule change, as amended, is consistent with Section 6(b)(1) of the
Exchange Act,\37\ which requires, among other things, that a national
securities exchange be so organized and have the capacity to carry out
the purposes of the Exchange Act, and to comply and enforce compliance
by its members and
[[Page 5884]]
persons associated with its members, with the provisions of the
Exchange Act, the rules and regulations thereunder, and the rules of
the exchange, and with Sections 6(b)(6) and 6(b)(7) of the Exchange
Act,\38\ which require a national securities exchange to provide fair
procedures for the disciplining of members and persons associated with
members. The Commission also finds that the proposed rule change, as
amended, is consistent with Section 11A of the Exchange Act,\39\ and,
consistent with Section 6(b)(8) of the Exchange Act, does not impose
any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Exchange Act.\40\ The Commission further finds
that the proposed rule change, as amended, is consistent with the
public interest, the protection of investors, or otherwise in
furtherance of the purposes of the Exchange Act, as required by Rule
19d-1(c)(2) under the Exchange Act,\41\ which governs minor rule
violation plans.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\35\ In approving this proposed rule change, the Commission has
considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition,
and capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
\36\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
\37\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(1).
\38\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(6) and (b)(7).
\39\ 15 U.S.C. 78k-1.
\40\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
\41\ 17 CFR 240.19d-1(c)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange proposes to adopt rules governing the trading of
Securities under the proposed rules through a facility of the Exchange
known as BSTX, which will function in a manner similar to equities
trading platforms that the Commission has approved for other national
securities exchanges.\42\ With the exception of the proposed BSTX
Market Data Blockchain and optional order parameter for preferencing
settlement on a T+0 or T+1 basis, the Exchange's proposed rules for
BSTX are substantively similar to the corresponding rules of other
equities exchanges. As discussed below, the Commission believes that
the proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment Nos. 2 and 3, is
consistent with the Exchange Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\42\ BSTX's rules, including its rules relating to participation
on BSTX and business conduct, financial and operational,
supervisory, and trading practice rules, and certain trading, market
making, and listing rules, are similar to existing national
securities exchanges' trading and listing rules. See, e.g., Rules of
the Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (``Cboe BZX''), Investors Exchange LLC
(``IEX''), and NYSE American.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A. BSTX Participants
The Exchange proposes to adopt BSTX Rule 18000, which will set
forth requirements for participation on BSTX. A ``BSTX Participant''
will be a new category of Exchange participant for effecting
transactions on the BSTX System. All BOX Participants would be eligible
to participate in BSTX provided that they become a BSTX Participant
pursuant to the proposed rules.\43\ A BSTX Participant must complete
the BSTX Participation Application, Participation Agreement, and User
Agreement; \44\ be an existing Participant or Options Participant or
become a Participant or Options Participant of the Exchange pursuant to
BOX Rule 2000 Series and continue to abide by all applicable provisions
in BOX Rule 2000 Series; \45\ and provide such other information as
required by the Exchange.\46\ BSTX Participants would be required to
comply with, among other things, financial responsibility requirements
established by Rule 15c3-1 under the Exchange Act and applicable books
and records requirements, and be a member or participant of a
registered clearing agency or clear security transactions through
another BSTX Participant that is a member or participant of a
registered clearing agency.\47\ In addition, proposed BSTX Rule 18020
would require associated persons of a BSTX Participant to be bound by
the rules of the Exchange to the same extent as each BSTX Participant
and allow the Exchange to discipline, suspend, or terminate the
registration with the Exchange of any person associated with a BSTX
Participant for violation of the Exchange rules.\48\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\43\ See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49417. The Exchange
proposes defined terms for use in the BSTX Rules, and states that
terms defined elsewhere in the BOX Rules shall have the same
meaning. See proposed BSTX Rule 17000. The Exchange also proposes to
specify that the proposed BSTX Rules apply to the trading of
securities by BSTX Participants approved for such trading, the
listing of securities, and related matters pertaining to the trading
of securities, and that unless specific BSTX Rules related to
securities govern or the context otherwise requires, the provisions
of the existing BOX Rules shall be applicable to BSTX Participants
and the trading of securities on the BSTX System. See proposed BSTX
Rule 17010. Further, the Exchange proposes to make conforming
changes to certain existing BOX Rules that would apply to BSTX
Participants, but currently only contemplate trading in options. See
Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 123; proposed BOX Rules 100, 2020,
2060, 3180, 7130, 7150, 7230, 7245, IM-8050-3, 11010, 11030, and
12140.
\44\ See Exhibits 3A, 3B, and 3C, respectively.
\45\ The BOX Rule 2000 Series requires, among other things, that
a Participant (including a BSTX Participant) remain a member of
another registered national securities exchange or national
securities association. See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49448 n.320.
\46\ See proposed BSTX Rule 18000.
\47\ See proposed BSTX Rule 18010(b). See also Exhibits 3F and
3G.
\48\ See proposed BSTX Rule 18020(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange also proposes rules for business conduct for BSTX
Participants, financial and operational provisions for BSTX
Participants, and rules for supervision, trading practices, discipline,
and market making.\49\ According to the Exchange, the proposed BSTX
Rule 19000 Series would specify business conduct requirements that are
substantially similar to those of other national securities
exchanges,\50\ which pertain to: Just and equitable principles of
trade; adherence to law; use of fraudulent devices; false statements;
know your customer; fair dealing with customers; suitability; prompt
receipt and delivery of securities; charges for services performed; use
of information obtained in a fiduciary capacity; publication of
transactions and quotations; offers at stated prices; payments
involving publications that influence the market price of a security;
customer confirmations; disclosure of a control relationship with an
issuer of securities; discretionary accounts; improper use of
customers' securities or funds and a prohibition against guarantees and
sharing in accounts; the extent to which sharing in accounts is
permissible; communications with customers and the public; gratuities;
telemarketing; mandatory systems testing; and short interest reporting.
The Exchange states that the proposed business conduct rules are
identical to those of other national securities exchanges, other than
changes to defined terms and certain other provisions that would not
apply to the trading of Securities on the BSTX System.\51\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\49\ See proposed BSTX Rule Series 19000, 20000, 21000, 23000,
24000, 25000, and 25200.
\50\ See Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 48 (citing to Cboe
BZX Rules Chapter III and IEX Rules Chapter 3).
\51\ See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49427. For example, the
Exchange is not proposing to adopt a rule contained in other
national securities exchanges' business conduct rules relating to
disclosures that broker-dealers give to their customers regarding
the risks of effecting securities transactions during times other
than Regular Trading Hours because executions may only occur during
Regular Trading Hours on the BSTX System. See id. at 49427 n.113
(citing to IEX Rule 3.290 and Cboe BZX Rule 3.21). ``Regular Trading
Hours'' would mean the time between 9:30 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Eastern
Time (``ET''). See proposed BSTX Rule 17000(a)(29).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
According to the Exchange, the proposed BSTX Rule 20000 Series
would specify financial and operational rules for BSTX Participants
associated with maintenance and furnishing of books and records,
financial reports, net capital compliance, early warning notifications
pursuant to Rule 17a-11 under the Exchange Act, authority of the Chief
Regulatory Officer to impose certain restrictions, margin, day-trading
margin, customer account information, maintaining records of customer
complaints, and disclosure of financial
[[Page 5885]]
condition.\52\ The Exchange represents that the financial and
operational requirements are substantially similar to those of other
national securities exchanges.\53\ Further, the Exchange proposes to
adopt supervisory requirements for BSTX Participants in the proposed
BSTX Rule 21000 Series, which, according to the Exchange, are
substantially similar to those of other national securities
exchanges.\54\ The proposed supervisory requirements pertain to
enforcing written procedures to appropriately supervise the BSTX
Participant's conduct and compliance with applicable regulatory
requirements, designation of an individual to carry out written
supervisory procedures, maintenance and keeping of records carrying out
the BSTX Participant's written supervisory procedures, review of
activities of each BSTX Participant's offices, including periodic
examination of customer accounts to detect and prevent irregularities
or abuses, prevention of the misuse of material non-public information,
and implementation of an anti-money laundering compliance program.\55\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\52\ See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49428.
\53\ See id. at 49428 & n.116 (citing to Cboe BZX Rules Chapter
VI and IEX Rules Chapter 5). The Exchange states that the proposed
BSTX Rule 20000 Series also incorporates existing rules of the
Exchange or another self-regulatory organization (``SRO'') by
reference. See id. at 49428.
\54\ See id.
\55\ See id. at 49428 & n.128 (citing to Cboe BZX Rules Chapter
V and IEX Rule 5.150).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed BSTX Rule 22000 Series would provide, among other
things, that BSTX Participants must comply with requirements with
respect to comparison and settlement, borrowing and deliveries in
accordance with Rule 203 of Regulation SHO, forwarding of proxy and
other issuer-related materials, commissions, regulatory services
agreements, and conditions and limitations on transactions involving
Exchange employees.\56\ Proposed BSTX Rule 22070 would generally
provide that the rules of the Exchange would not prohibit, condition,
or limit the ability of any BSTX Participant, including a BSTX
Participant acting as an agent, to effect any transaction otherwise
than on the Exchange with another person in any security listed on the
Exchange or to which UTP on the Exchange has been extended.\57\ The
Exchange represents that these miscellaneous requirements are
substantially similar to rules of other national securities
exchanges.\58\ The Exchange also proposes to adopt the BSTX Rule 23000
Series relating to trading practice requirements for BSTX Participants,
including prohibiting forms of market manipulation and specifying
certain obligations broker-dealers have to their customers, such as the
duty of best execution.\59\ The Exchange represents that the trading
practice rules are substantially similar to those of other national
securities exchanges.\60\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\56\ See proposed BSTX Rule 22000 Series.
\57\ See Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 58; proposed BSTX
Rule 22070. The Exchange states that the proposed rule is consistent
with the requirements of Rules 19c-1 and 19c-3 under the Exchange
Act and substantially similar to rules of other national securities
exchanges. See Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 58 (citing to, for
example, Cboe BZX Rule 13.6).
\58\ See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49429 & n.138 (citing to
Cboe BZX Rules Chapter XIII and IEX Rule 6.180).
\59\ According to the Exchange, the proposed BSTX Rule 23000
Series would specify trading practice requirements related to: (i)
Market manipulation; (ii) fictitious transactions; (iii) excessive
sales by a BSTX Participant; (iv) manipulative transactions; (v)
dissemination of false information; (vi) prohibition against trading
ahead of customer orders; (vii) joint activity; (viii) influencing
data feeds; (ix) trade shredding; (x) best execution; (xi)
publication of transactions and changes; (xii) trading ahead of
research reports; (xiii) front running of block transactions; and
(xiv) a prohibition against disruptive quoting and trading activity.
See id. at 49429.
\60\ See id. at 49429 & n.155 (citing to Cboe BZX Rules Chapter
XII). The Exchange states that the proposed minimum price
improvement standards in proposed BSTX Rule 23050(h) are consistent
with those of other national securities exchanges and the Financial
Industry Regulatory Authority (``FINRA''). See Amendment No. 2,
supra note 9, at 62 (citing to Cboe BZX Rule 12.6.06).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
With respect to the imposition of suspension and disciplinary
actions, the Exchange states that it proposes to adopt the BSTX Rule
24000 Series, which would provide that the Exchange rules \61\
pertaining to discipline and suspension of Exchange Participants that
have been approved by the Commission shall be applicable to BSTX
Participants and trading on the BSTX System.\62\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\61\ See BOX Rule 11000 Series (Summary Suspension), 12000
Series (Discipline), 13000 Series (Review of Certain Exchange
Actions), and 14000 Series (Arbitration).
\62\ See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49430-31; proposed BSTX
Rule 24000. In addition, the Exchange proposes to amend its Minor
Rule Violation Plan to add certain rules relating to BSTX to the
list of rules eligible for minor rule violation plan treatment, by
amending BOX Rule 12140 and adopting proposed BSTX Rule 24010
(Penalty for Minor Rule Violations). See Amendment No. 2, supra note
9, at 121.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange proposes to allow firms to register as Market Makers
and Designated Market Makers (``DMMs'') \63\ with affirmative and
negative market making obligations.\64\ A BSTX Participant registered
as a BSTX Market Maker, including a DMM, would be required to engage in
a course of dealing for its own account in the maintenance of a fair
and orderly market.\65\ Among other things, each Market Maker must
maintain two-sided quotes during the regular market session for each
Security in which it is registered as a Market Maker.\66\ A non-DMM
Market Maker may temporarily withdraw its Market Maker status,\67\ and
any BSTX Market Maker, other than a DMM, may voluntarily terminate its
registration with the Exchange.\68\ If the Exchange finds any
substantial or continued failure by a BSTX Market Maker to engage in a
course of dealings specified in proposed BSTX Rule 25220(a),\69\ the
[[Page 5886]]
Exchange would subject the Market Maker to disciplinary action or
suspension or revocation of the registration by the Exchange in one or
more of the Securities in which the Market Maker is registered.\70\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\63\ ``Designated Market Maker'' or ``DMM'' would be defined as
a BSTX Participant registered as a DMM pursuant to the BSTX Rule
25200 Series. See proposed BSTX Rule 17000(a)(20).
\64\ See proposed BSTX Rule 25200 Series. The Exchange states
that rules relating to market makers are similar to the rules of
other national securities exchanges. See Amendment No. 2, supra note
9, at 95-102 (citing to IEX Rules 11.150 and 11.151 and NYSE
American Rules 7.20E through 7.26E). The Exchange states that
proposed BSTX Rule 25200 differs from IEX Rule 11.150 in that IEX
makes the registration effective on the trading day after the
request is entered, whereas the Exchange would have discretion to
make registration effective the day the request is entered with
notice provided to the prospective BSTX Market Maker. See id. at 95
n.277.
\65\ See proposed BSTX Rule 25220. The Exchange states that
proposed BSTX Rule 25220 is substantially similar to NYSE American
Rule 7.23E, with certain exceptions, and IEX Rule 11.151. According
to the Exchange, the proposed BSTX rule differs from NYSE American
Rule 7.23E in that, among other things, the proposed BSTX rule
specifies the minimum quotation increment for securities priced
above $1.00 per share and below $1.00 per share and requires Market
Maker quotations to be firm for their displayed size and
automatically executable. See Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 97-
98. See also infra note 66.
\66\ See proposed BSTX Rule 25220(a)(1). The Exchange proposes
that the quotes must be entered within the ``Designated
Percentage,'' which according to the Exchange would be the same as
that required of market makers on other national securities
exchanges. See Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 96 (citing to IEX
Rule 11.151). The Exchange notes, however, that the Defined
Percentage and ``Defined Limit,'' which is the percentage by which
price movements cause a Market Maker or DMM's quotations to fall
outside of the national best bid and offer (``NBBO'') or last sale
price, differ from NYSE American Rule 7.23E in that the Exchange
specifies Defined Percentage and Defined Limit with reference to
securities that are part of the S&P500 Index, Russell 1000 Index, or
a pilot list of exchange traded products. The Exchange states its
belief that the difference does not pose any novel requirements and
is similar to the market maker requirements of IEX. See id. at 98
(citing to IEX Rules 11.151(a)(6), (7), (11), and 11.151(b)(1)).
\67\ See proposed BSTX Rule 25220(d). According to the Exchange,
the process by which a DMM may temporarily withdraw from its DMM
status is similar to the process applicable to a non-DMM Market
Maker. See proposed BSTX Rule 25240(b)(4); OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR
at 49438.
\68\ See proposed BSTX Rule 25210(d).
\69\ See supra note 66; proposed BSTX Rule 25220(a).
\70\ See proposed BSTX Rule 25220(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed BSTX Rule 25230 sets forth certain requirements for Market
Maker Authorized Traders (``MMATs''), which are individuals permitted
to enter orders only for the account of the Market Maker or DMM for
which they are registered.\71\ The proposed rule specifies, among other
things, eligibility for registration as a MMAT, the Exchange's ability
to suspend an individual's registration as a MMAT, and the process for
voluntary withdrawal of a MMAT via written request of the BSTX
Participant for which the MMAT is registered.\72\ The Exchange
represents that the proposed provisions related to MMATs are
substantially similar to those of other national securities
exchanges.\73\ Proposed BSTX Rule 25240 sets forth the registration and
obligations of DMMs.\74\ Among other things, a DMM must be registered
as a Market Maker and, in addition to meeting the obligations of Market
Makers set forth in proposed BSTX Rule 25220,\75\ the DMM must maintain
a bid or offer at the NBBO at least 25% of the day as measured across
all Securities that have been assigned to the DMM.\76\ Proposed BSTX
Rule 25240 further provides that all BSTX-listed Securities may be
assigned to a DMM and there would be no more than one DMM per BSTX-
listed Security.\77\ A BSTX Participant registered as a DMM in a
Security may also be registered as a Market Maker in that Security only
if the BSTX Participant maintains information barriers between the
trading unit operating as a DMM and the trading unit operating as a
non-DMM Market Maker in the same Security.\78\ Proposed BSTX Rule 25250
would set forth the allocation and reallocation of Securities to
DMMs.\79\ Among other things, the proposed rule would set forth when a
Security is eligible for allocation or reallocation, as well as the
eligibility of DMMs to participate in the allocation process.\80\ The
proposed rule further sets forth the allocation process--whether the
issuer selects the DMM directly, delegates the selection to the
Exchange, or opts to proceed with listing without a DMM, in which case
a minimum of four non-DMM Market Makers must be assigned to its
Security.\81\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\71\ See proposed BSTX Rule 25230.
\72\ See id.
\73\ See Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 98 (citing to NYSE
American Rule 7.21E and Cboe BZX Rule 11.6).
\74\ See proposed BSTX Rule 25240. The Exchange represents that
proposed BSTX Rule 25240 is substantially similar to NYSE American
Rule 7.24E, except the Exchange would not be required to assign a
DMM if the Security has an adequate number of BSTX Market Makers
assigned to such Security. The Exchange states that the purpose of
this requirement is to acknowledge the possibility that a Security
need not necessarily have a DMM, provided that each Security has
been assigned at least four active Market Makers, consistent with
proposed the Market Maker requirement in BSTX Rule 26106. See
Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 99-100.
\75\ See supra notes 65-66.
\76\ See proposed BSTX Rule 25240(c).
\77\ See proposed BSTX Rule 25240(a).
\78\ See proposed BSTX Rule 25240(b)(3).
\79\ See proposed BSTX Rule 25250.
\80\ See proposed BSTX Rule 25250(a). The Exchange states that
the process by which the Exchange would handle a DMM that fails to
meet its obligations, as proposed in BSTX Rule 25250(a)(4), is
substantially similar to NYSE American Rule 7.25E(a)(4). See OIP,
supra note 7, 86 FR at 49438 & n.254.
\81\ See proposed BSTX Rule 25250(b). See also Exhibit 3D. The
Exchange states that the proposed rule is similar to NYSE American
Rule 7.25E(b). See Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 101.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the event that a listed company wishes to change its DMM,
proposed BSTX Rule 25250(c) sets forth the reallocation process.\82\
Should a DMM lose its registration or voluntarily withdraw its
registration, the DMM would be ineligible, under the Exchange's
``Allocation Freeze Policy,'' for future allocations for a six-month
period.\83\ For companies that list Securities through an initial
public offering, the allocation decision would remain effective for 18
months.\84\ The proposed rule also sets forth criteria the Exchange may
consider for applicants that are not currently DMMs to be allocated a
Security as a DMM.\85\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\82\ See proposed BSTX Rule 25250(c). The Exchange represents
that the proposed reallocation policy is substantially similarly to
corresponding provisions in NYSE American Rule 7.25E(c). See OIP,
supra note 7, 86 FR at 49439.
\83\ See proposed BSTX Rule 25250(d); OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR
at 49439 (stating that the proposed rule is substantially similar to
NYSE American Rule 7.25E(d)).
\84\ See proposed BSTX Rule 25250(e); OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR
at 49439 (stating that the proposed rule is substantially similar to
NYSE American Rule 7.25E(e)).
\85\ See proposed BSTX Rule 25250(f); OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR
at 49439 (stating that the proposed rule is substantially similar to
NYSE American Rule 7.25E(f)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange proposes the DMM combination review policy in BSTX
Rule 25260.\86\ A DMM combination would require proponents of the
combination to make a written submission to the Office of the Corporate
Secretary of the Exchange addressing certain enumerated factors for the
Exchange to consider in reviewing the proposed combination, and as well
as the procedures the Exchange would follow in approving or
disapproving a combination.\87\ The proposed rule also sets forth the
timeline for the Exchange to approve or disapprove a combination, the
ability of the Exchange to grant conditional approvals, and the ability
to have the Exchange's board of directors to review a disapproval
decision.\88\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\86\ See proposed BSTX Rule 25260.
\87\ See id.
\88\ See id. The Exchange represents that the proposed rule is
substantially similar to NYSE American Rule 7.26E. See OIP, supra
note 7, 86 FR at 49439.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange's rules with respect to participation on BSTX,
including the proposed affirmative and negative obligations for Market
Makers and DMMs, and the proposed business conduct, financial and
operational, supervision, and trading practice rules, raise no novel
regulatory issues. The Commission finds that these proposed rules are
consistent with the Exchange Act, and Section 6(b)(5) of the Exchange
Act in particular,\89\ because by setting forth these requirements for
different types of participants, they establish a framework for what
entities will participate in BSTX and how they will interact with other
BSTX Participants and fulfill their obligations, which should help to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, perfect the mechanism
of a national market system and, in general, protect investors and the
public interest. The Commission also finds that these proposed rules
subject BSTX Participants, including BSTX Market Makers and DMMs, to
appropriate discipline for improper conduct, consistent with Sections
6(b)(6) and 6(b)(7) of the Exchange Act.\90\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\89\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
\90\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(6) and (7).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. BSTX System
The Exchange proposes that BSTX would operate the BSTX System as a
fully automated, price-time priority execution system.\91\ The BSTX
System would operate as an ``automated trading center'' under Rule
600(b)(7) of Regulation NMS and would display ``automated quotations''
under Rule 600(b)(6) of Regulation NMS at all times, except in the
event that a system malfunction renders the BSTX System incapable of
displaying automated quotations.\92\ BSTX's best-priced quotation in an
NMS stock would be a
[[Page 5887]]
``protected quotation'' under Rules 600(b)(70) and 600(b)(71) of
Regulation NMS.\93\ Only a BSTX Participant approved for trading on the
BSTX System or a person associated with such a BSTX Participant would
be able to effect any transactions on the BSTX System.\94\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\91\ See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49416.
\92\ 17 CFR 242.600(b)(6) and (b)(7). See Amendment No. 2, supra
note 9, at 86; proposed BSTX Rule 25100(c).
\93\ 17 CFR 242.600(b)(70) and (b)(71). See OIP, supra note 7,
86 FR at 49435 & n.210.
\94\ See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49431; proposed BSTX Rule
25000(a). The Exchange represents that proposed BSTX Rule 25000 is
substantially similar to IEX Rule 11.140. See Amendment No. 2, supra
note 9, at 65 n.175.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Order Types and Instructions
Proposed BSTX Rule 25060(c) provides that BSTX Participants may
enter orders to the BSTX System as limit orders or Inter-Market Sweep
Orders (``ISOs'').\95\ The BSTX System would only support two time-in-
force (``TIF'') designations: DAY and IOC.\96\ Under proposed BSTX Rule
25060(d), all orders would be given a default TIF of DAY.\97\ DAY
orders may queue during the Pre-Opening Phase \98\ or before the
resumption of trading following a trading halt, may trade only during
Regular Market Hours, and, if unexecuted at the close of the trading
day (4:00 p.m. ET), would be cancelled by the BSTX System.\99\ BSTX
Participants may also designate orders as IOC, which overrides the
default TIF of DAY.\100\ IOC orders are not accepted by the BSTX System
during the Pre-Opening Phase, and during Regular Trading Hours, IOC
orders will execute in whole or in part immediately upon receipt by the
BSTX System.\101\ The BSTX System would not support modification of
resting orders, and to change the price or quantity of an order resting
on the BSTX Book,\102\ a BSTX Participant must cancel the resting order
and submit a new order, which would result in a new time stamp for
purposes of BSTX Book priority.\103\ The Exchange states that all
orders on BSTX would be displayed.\104\ With the exception of the order
parameter to preference faster settlement,\105\ the order types and
instructions the Exchange has proposed for the BSTX System are similar
to those approved by the Commission and currently available on other
national securities exchanges \106\ and raise no new regulatory issues.
The Commission finds these proposed rules are consistent with the
Exchange Act, and Section 6(b)(5) \107\ of the Exchange Act in
particular, because they establish the types of orders and modifiers
that all BSTX Participants may use and provide transparency regarding
how orders would operate on the BSTX System, which should help promote
just and equitable principles of trade, foster coordination with
persons engaged in facilitating transactions in securities, and remove
impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a national market system.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\95\ See proposed BSTX Rule 25060(c). The Exchange states that
if a BSTX Participant fails to specify a limit price with respect to
its limit order, such order shall be rejected. ISOs must be limit
orders, are ineligible for routing, may be submitted with a limit
price during Regular Trading Hours, and must have a time-in-force of
immediate-or-cancel (``IOC''). See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49434
& n.202.
\96\ See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49434; proposed BSTX Rule
25060(d).
\97\ See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49434; proposed BSTX Rule
25060(d)(1).
\98\ ``Pre-Opening Phase'' would mean the time between 8:30 a.m.
and 9:30 a.m. ET. See proposed BSTX Rule 17000(a)(28).
\99\ See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49434; proposed BSTX Rule
25060(d)(1).
\100\ See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49434; proposed BSTX Rule
25060(d)(2).
\101\ See id.
\102\ ``BSTX Book'' would mean the electronic book of orders on
each Security maintained by the BSTX System. See proposed BSTX Rule
17000(a)(10).
\103\ See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49434; proposed BSTX Rule
25060(f).
\104\ See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49434. The Exchange states
that the BSTX System will not support hidden orders, undisplayed
liquidity, price sliding, pegged orders, or other order type
features that add complexity upon the initial launch of BSTX. See
id.
\105\ See infra notes 190-207 and accompanying text.
\106\ See, e.g., Cboe BZX Rule 11.9(d).
\107\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Auctions
The Exchange proposes that order entry in BSTX-listed Securities
\108\ may commence at 8:30 a.m. ET during the Pre-Opening Phase, in
which orders are placed on the BSTX Book but do not generate executions
until Regular Trading Hours begin at 9:30 a.m. ET.\109\ The Exchange
states that, similar to how its opening process works for options
trading, BSTX would calculate and disseminate a theoretical opening
price (``TOP'') from the time that the BSTX System commences accepting
orders to BSTX Participants for the current orders resting on the BSTX
Book during the Pre-Opening Phase.\110\ The Exchange proposes to
disseminate the TOP and other Broadcast Information pursuant to
proposed BSTX Rule 25040(a)(3) during the Pre-Opening Phase.\111\
Broadcast Information would be recalculated and disseminated via
electronic means (i.e., market data feeds) every five seconds.\112\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\108\ Although the Exchange initially plans to only support
trading in securities listed on BSTX, the Exchange states that it
may in the future propose to trade securities listed on other
national securities exchanges, subject to any necessary changes to
its rules to support its trading pursuant to Section 19(b) and Rule
19b-4 of the Exchange Act. The Exchange also states that for such
reason it proposes to adopt an opening process for non-BSTX-listed
securities as a placeholder for potential trading of securities
listed on other national securities exchanges in the future. The
Exchange states that the proposed process for opening securities
listed on other national securities exchanges is similar to the
existing rules of another national securities exchange. See proposed
BSTX Rule 25040(e); Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 74-75 (citing
to Cboe BZX Rule 11.24).
\109\ See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49431. During the Pre-
Opening Phase, orders may not be cancelled or modified from 9:28
a.m. to 9:30 a.m. Orders received during the 10 seconds prior to the
Opening Auction would be rejected. See proposed BSTX Rule
25040(a)(1). ``Opening Auction'' would be defined as the process of
crossing orders in BSTX-listed Securities to open the market. See
proposed BSTX Rule 25040(a)(6). The Exchange states that these
provisions are consistent with the rules of other equities
exchanges. See Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 68 n.185 (citing to
IEX Rules 11.350(c)(1)(B) and (C)).
\110\ See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49431; proposed BSTX Rule
25040(a)(2). The TOP is the price at which the Opening Auction would
occur at the current time, if that time were the opening, according
to the Opening Auction procedures in proposed BSTX Rule 25040(a)(6).
See proposed BSTX Rule 25040(a).
\111\ See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49431-32. Specifically, in
addition to the TOP, ``Broadcast Information'' would include: (i)
``Paired Orders,'' which is the quantity of shares that would
execute at the TOP; (ii) the ``Imbalance Quantity,'' which is the
number of shares that may not be matched with other orders at the
TOP at the time of dissemination; and (iii) the ``Imbalance Side,''
which is the buy/sell direction of any imbalance at the time of
dissemination. See Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 68-69.
\112\ See Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 69; proposed BSTX
Rule 25040(a)(4). The Exchange states that Cboe BZX similarly
broadcasts opening auction information every five seconds. See
Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 69 n.189 (citing to Cboe BZX Rule
11.23(b)(2)(A)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At the time of the opening match (i.e., 9:30 a.m. ET), the BSTX
System would establish a single price at which the BSTX-listed Security
would be opened (``BSTX Official Opening Price''), which would be the
TOP at the moment of the Opening Auction, provided that the resulting
price must be within the Collar Price Range.\113\ The Exchange states
that the BSTX System would determine a single price at which a BSTX-
listed Security would be opened by calculating the optimum number of
shares that could be matched at a price, taking into consideration all
the orders
[[Page 5888]]
on the BSTX Book.\114\ The Exchange states that the requirement that
the BSTX Official Opening Price must be within the Collar Price Range
is designed to ensure that a Security opens in a fair and orderly
manner and under market conditions where there is sufficient quotation
interest (e.g., a NBBO), the market is not crossed, and where the
opening price will not drastically depart from the market at the time
of the auction or the preceding day's closing price.\115\ The Exchange
proposes that when the BSTX System cannot determine an opening price
from the Opening Auction, BSTX would nevertheless open the Security for
trading and move all trading interest received during the Pre-Opening
Phase to the BSTX Book, and that in such case, the BSTX Official
Opening Price would be the Final Last Sale Eligible Trade.\116\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\113\ See Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 69-70. See proposed
BSTX Rule 25040(a)(5) for a definition of the ``Collar Price
Range.'' As the BSTX Official Opening Price is determined and the
matched shares are executed in the Opening Auction, the BSTX System
would proceed to move the Security from the Pre-Opening Phase to the
continuous or regular trading phase and disseminate the opening
trade price, if any. Any orders that remain unexecuted in the
Opening Auction, including any remaining portion of a partially
executed order, would be moved onto the BSTX Book for the regular
trading phase and would retain their price/time priority consistent
with proposed BSTX Rule 25080. See proposed BSTX Rule 25040(a)(7).
\114\ See Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 69; proposed BSTX
Rule 25040(a)(6)(ii). The Exchange states that the determination of
the opening match price is consistent with the manner in which the
Exchange opens options trading. See Amendment No. 2, supra note 9,
at 69. Proposed BSTX Rule 25040(a)(6)(ii) would further provide that
the BSTX Official Opening Price is the price which results in the
matching of the highest number of shares. If two or more prices
would satisfy this maximum quantity criteria, the price leaving the
fewest resting shares in the BSTX Book would be selected as the BSTX
Official Opening Price. Where two or more prices would satisfy the
maximum quantity criteria and leave the fewest shares in the BSTX
Book, the price closest to the previous day's last round lot trade
occurring during Regular Trading Hours on the Exchange (``BSTX
Official Closing Price'') will be selected as the BSTX Official
Opening Price. See proposed BSTX Rules 25040(a)(5)(ii) and (6)(ii).
\115\ See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49432; proposed BSTX Rule
25040(a)(5).
\116\ See Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 70; proposed BSTX
Rule 25040(a)(7). See also proposed BSTX Rule 25040(a)(5)(ii)
(defining ``Final Last Sale Eligible Trade'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange states that the opening process for initial public
offerings of Securities (``Initial Security Offerings'') would be
generally the same as regular market openings.\117\ However, in advance
of an Initial Security Offering auction (``Initial Security Offering
Auction''), the Exchange would announce a ``Quote-Only Period'' of
between 15 and 30 minutes plus a short random period prior to the
Initial Security Offering Auction.\118\ Orders may not be submitted to
participate in an Initial Security Offering Auction until the beginning
of the Quote-Only Period.\119\ All orders associated with the Initial
Security Offering Auction must be received prior to the end of the
Quote-Only Period in order to participate in the auction.\120\ Limit
orders with TIF of DAY submitted during the Quote-Only Period would be
eligible to participate in the Initial Security Offering Auction.\121\
According to the Exchange, it would disseminate Broadcast Information
at the commencement of the Quote-Only Period as with regular market
openings, and Broadcast Information would be re-calculated and
disseminated via electronic means every five seconds.\122\ Orders would
be matched and executed at the conclusion of the Quote-Only Period,
rather than at 9:30 a.m. ET.\123\ Following the initial cross at the
end of the Quote-Only Period wherein orders will execute based on
price/time priority, consistent with proposed BSTX Rule 25080, the
Exchange would transition to normal trading pursuant to proposed BSTX
Rule 25040(a)(6).\124\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\117\ See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49432.
\118\ See id.; proposed BSTX Rule 25040(b)(1). The Quote-Only
Period may be extended in certain cases where (i) there is no TOP;
(ii) the underwriter requests an extension; (iii) the TOP moves the
greater of 10% or 50 cents in the 15 seconds prior to the initial
cross; or (iv) in the event of a technical or systems issue at the
Exchange that may impair the ability of BSTX Participants to
participate in the Initial Security Offering Auction or of the
Exchange to complete the Initial Security Offering Auction. See
proposed BSTX Rule 25040(b)(2). In the event of any extension to the
Quote-Only Period or a trading pause, the Exchange proposes to
notify market participants regarding the circumstances and length of
the extension. See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49432; proposed BSTX
Rule 25040(b)(4).
\119\ See proposed BSTX Rule 25040(b)(1).
\120\ See id.
\121\ See id. Orders marked IOC submitted during the Quote-Only
Period would be rejected. See id.
\122\ See Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 71; proposed BSTX
Rule 25040(b)(3).
\123\ See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49432; proposed BSTX Rule
25040(b)(5).
\124\ See Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 71-72; proposed BSTX
Rule 25040(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange also proposes a process for reopening trading
following a ``trading halt,'' a halt or pause in trading initiated by
the Exchange, or a Limit Up-Limit Down Trading Pause \125\ (``Halt
Auctions'').\126\ For Halt Auctions, the Exchange proposes that in
advance of reopening, the Exchange would announce a Quote-Only Period
that would be five minutes prior to the Halt Auction, and that all
orders associated with the Halt Auction must be received prior to the
end of the Quote-Only Period in order to participate in the
auction.\127\ According to the Exchange, it would disseminate the same
Broadcast Information as it does for an Initial Security Offering
Auction, except it would also disseminate to market participants the
applicable Halt Auction Reference Price and the Halt Auction Collars,
and would similarly provide notification of any extension to the Quote-
Only Period as with an Initial Security Offering Auction.\128\ The
transition to normal trading would also occur in the same manner as for
Initial Security Offering Auctions.\129\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\125\ See proposed BSTX Rule 25050(g). The Exchange states that
proposed BSTX Rule 25050 regarding trading halts is substantially
similar to other national securities exchange rules adopted in
connection with the NMS Plan to Address Extraordinary Market
Volatility (``LULD Plan'')--for example, IEX Rule 11.280--with
certain exceptions, such as excluding rules relating to order types
and other aspects of the LULD Plan that would not be supported by
the Exchange, including market orders and auction orders. See
Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 78-79. The Exchange would cancel
all resting orders in a non-BSTX listed security subject to a
trading halt, reject any incoming orders in that security, and will
only resume accepting orders following a broadcast message to BSTX
Participants indicating a forthcoming re-opening of trading. See
OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49433; proposed BSTX Rule 25050(d). In
addition, the Exchange proposes to reserve the right to halt or
suspend trading in other circumstances where the Exchange deems it
necessary to do so for the protection of investors and the public
interest, or pursuant to any other Exchange rule or policy. See OIP,
supra note 7, 86 FR at 49434; proposed BSTX Rule 25050(f). Proposed
BSTX Rule 25010(d) would allow for the CEO, President, or Chief
Regulatory Officer, or such person's designee, provided the designee
is a senior officer, to halt or suspend trading in securities. The
Exchange states that while comparable rules of other national
securities exchanges (e.g., IEX Rule 11.110(c) and BOX Rule 7020)
may not currently specify that the Chief Regulatory Officer has the
authority, both of these comparable rules contemplate the CEO or
President delegating the task to a senior officer, which could be
the Chief Regulatory Officer. The Exchange states that it does not
believe that the addition of the Chief Regulatory Officer would
expand the authority of who can declare a trading halt or suspend
trading. See Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 65 n.176.
\126\ See Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 72; proposed BSTX
Rule 25040(c).
\127\ See Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 72-73; proposed BSTX
Rule 25040(c)(1). Limit orders with TIF of DAY submitted during the
Quote-Only Period would be eligible to participate in the Halt
Auction, whereas orders marked IOC submitted during the Quote-Only
Period would be rejected. See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49432;
proposed BSTX Rule 25040(c)(1). In addition, Halt Auctions would be
subject to the proposed Halt Auction Collars, which the Exchange
states are substantially similar to those provided by Cboe BZX, and
are designed to ensure that the Exchange is able to re-open trading
in a Security in a fair and orderly manner. To the extent a Halt
Auction is unable to be performed due to the absence of a TOP or the
TOP is outside the proposed Halt Auction Collars, the Exchange would
extend the period of Halt Auction for an additional five minutes
(``Initial Extension Period''). After the Initial Extension Period,
the Exchange proposes that the Quote-Only Period be extended for
additional five-minute periods, should a Halt Auction be unable to
be performed due to absence of a TOP or because the TOP is outside
the proposed Halt Auction Collars (``Additional Extension Period''),
until a Halt Auction occurs. See Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at
72 n.206 and n.207; proposed BSTX Rule 25040(c)(2).
\128\ See Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 73; proposed BSTX
Rule 25040(c)(3). In addition, the Exchange represents that if a
trading halt is triggered by the Exchange or if the Exchange is
unable to reopen trading at the end of the trading halt due to a
systems or technology issue, the Exchange will immediately notify
the single plan processor responsible for consolidation of
information for the security pursuant to Rule 603 of Regulation NMS
under the Exchange Act. See proposed BSTX Rule 25040(c)(4).
\129\ See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49432.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 5889]]
In the event a disruption occurs that prevents the execution of an
Initial Security Offering Auction or Halt Auction, including any
extensions, the Exchange proposes to apply certain contingency
procedures.\130\ For a disruption in an Initial Security Offering
Auction, the Exchange would publicly announce that the Quote-Only
Period for the Initial Security Offering Auction will reset for the
subject Security, cancel all orders on the BSTX Book, and disseminate a
new scheduled time for the Quote-Only Period and opening match.\131\
Similarly, for a disruption in a Halt Auction, the Exchange would
publicly announce that no Halt Auction will occur and all orders in the
halted Security on the BSTX Book will be cancelled, after which the
Exchange will open the Security for trading without an auction.\132\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\130\ See id. at 49432-33; proposed BSTX Rule 25040(d).
\131\ See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49432-33; proposed BSTX
Rule 25040(d)(1).
\132\ See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49433; proposed BSTX Rule
25040(d)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange has not proposed to operate a closing auction.
Instead, the Exchange proposes that the BSTX Official Closing Price
will be the last round lot trade occurring during Regular Trading Hours
on BSTX.\133\ The Exchange states that it believes this method is a
simple and fair way to establish the closing price of a Security, and
is consistent with the overall proposed simplified market structure for
BSTX that does not include order types such as market-on-close or
limit-on-close.\134\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\133\ See Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 77-78; proposed BSTX
Rule 25040(a)(5)(ii).
\134\ See Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 78.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission believes that the proposed opening, re-opening, and
closing procedures are reasonably designed to provide for an orderly
opening or re-opening of trading or close of trading on BSTX, and thus
are consistent with the Exchange Act, and in particular the Section
6(b)(5) goals of removing impediments to the mechanism of a national
market system and protecting investors and the public interest.\135\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\135\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Order Priority and Execution
The Exchange proposes BSTX Rule 25080 to govern the execution of
orders on the BSTX System.\136\ The proposed rule provides that orders
of BSTX Participants shall be ranked and maintained in the BSTX Book
according to price/time priority, such that within each price level,
all orders shall be organized by the time of entry.\137\ Further, the
proposed rule provides that an order would be cancelled back to the
BSTX Participant if, based on market conditions, BSTX Participant
instructions, applicable Exchange Rules, and/or the Exchange Act and
the rules and regulations thereunder, such order is not executable and
cannot be posted to the BSTX Book.\138\ Specifically, proposed BSTX
Rules 25080(b)(1) through (3) provide that executions occurring on BSTX
will comply with Regulation SHO, Regulation NMS, including Rule 611,
and the LULD Plan.\139\ In addition, proposed BSTX Rule 25130 prohibits
BSTX Participants from engaging in a pattern or practice of displaying
quotations that lock or cross a protected quotation, unless an
exception applies, and provides that the BSTX System will reject any
order or quotation that would lock or cross a protected quotation of
another national securities exchange at the time of entry.\140\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\136\ See proposed BSTX Rule 25080.
\137\ See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49434; proposed BSTX Rule
25080(a).
\138\ See proposed BSTX Rule 25080(b). The Exchange states that
sell orders cannot execute at a price below the best bid in the
marketplace and buy orders cannot execute at a price above the best
offer in the marketplace. See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49434.
\139\ See proposed BSTX Rules 25080(b)(1)-(3).
\140\ See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49437; proposed BSTX Rule
25130. The Exchange states that the proposed rule is substantially
similar to the rules of other national securities exchanges. See
Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 93 (citing to IEX Rule 11.310 and
Cboe BZX Rule 11.20).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To meet their regulatory responsibilities under Rule 611(a) of
Regulation NMS, other trading centers will be required to have
sufficient notice of new protected quotations, as well as all necessary
information (such as final technical specifications).\141\ The
Commission believes that it would be a reasonable policy and procedure
under Rule 611(a) to require that industry participants begin treating
BSTX's best bid and best offer as a protected quotation as soon as
possible but no later than 90 days after BOX begins operation of its
equities trading platform. The Commission has taken the same position
with other new equities exchanges.\142\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\141\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 53829 (May 18,
2006), 71 FR 30038, 30041 (May 24, 2006) (File No. S7-10-04)
(extending the compliance dates for Rule 610 and Rule 611 of
Regulation NMS under the Exchange Act).
\142\ See, e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 85828 (May
10, 2019), 84 FR 21841 (May 15, 2019) (File No. 10-234) (order
granting registration of Long-Term Stock Exchange, Inc.); and 88806
(May 4, 2020), 85 FR 27451 (May 8, 2020) (File No. 10-237) (order
granting registration of MEMX).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In light of the foregoing, the Commission finds that the proposed
BSTX trading rules are consistent with the Exchange Act and, in
particular, Section 6(b)(5) of the Exchange Act, because they set forth
a fair and transparent process for establishing order priority and are
reasonably designed to ensure compliance with Commission rules
concerning quoting and executions, which should promote just and
equitable principles of trade, remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanisms of a free and open market and a national market system, and
protect investors and the public interest.\143\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\143\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Market Data Products
The Exchange proposes to offer proprietary market data products,
including BSTX Depth-of-Book, BSTX Top-of-Book, and BSTX Last
Sale.\144\ The Exchange states that its proposed rule regarding market
data product offerings is substantially similar to the rules of another
national securities exchange.\145\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\144\ See proposed BSTX Rule 22060. BSTX Depth-of-Book is a data
feed that contains all displayed orders for securities traded on the
Exchange, order executions, order cancellations, order
modifications, order identification numbers, administrative
messages, and auction information disseminated pursuant to proposed
BSTX Rule 25040 (Auctions). See proposed BSTX Rule 22060(a). BSTX
Top-of-Book is an uncompressed data feed that offers top of book
quotations and execution information based on orders entered into
the BSTX System, as well as auction information disseminated
pursuant to proposed BSTX Rule 25040 (Auctions). See proposed BSTX
Rule 22060(b). BSTX Last Sale is an uncompressed data feed that
offers only execution information based on orders entered into the
BSTX System. See proposed BSTX Rule 22060(c).
\145\ See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49429 (citing to MEMX Rule
13.8).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, the Exchange proposes to offer a historical market
data product, known as the BSTX Market Data Blockchain, that would
provide information about trading on the BSTX System.\146\ The BSTX
Market Data Blockchain would operate as a private, permission-based
blockchain that will allow BSTX Participants to see detailed
information on their own trading activity on BSTX and anonymized
information with respect to the trading activity of other BSTX
Participants. According to the Exchange, BSTX Participants would have
no obligations with respect to providing information to, accessing,
maintaining, or using the BSTX Market Data Blockchain.\147\ Each BSTX
Participant would be assigned a BSTX Market Data Blockchain address
that corresponds to the BSTX Participant's trading activity on
[[Page 5890]]
BSTX.\148\ The Exchange would issue login credentials to each user,
including any non-BSTX Participant that chooses to subscribe.\149\ The
BSTX Market Data Blockchain would generally operate by collecting
information from two sources, which the Exchange would then translate
into information capable of being recorded to the BSTX Market Data
Blockchain.\150\ Specifically, the data provided would be collected
from (i) the BSTX System, with respect to information such as executed
transactions; and (ii) each BSTX Participant's order/message passing
through the financial information exchange (``FIX'') gateway through
which all orders and messages pass to connect to the BSTX System.\151\
The Exchange states that the BSTX Market Data Blockchain does not
require any affirmative action on the part of the BSTX Participants in
order for the information to be recorded, but rather captures trading
activity that occurs on BSTX in the normal course of trading.\152\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\146\ See proposed BSTX Rule 22060(d); OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR
at 49420.
\147\ See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49420.
\148\ See proposed BSTX Rule 17020(b).
\149\ See Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 19 & n.36; proposed
BSTX Rule 17020(b).
\150\ See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49420.
\151\ See id. The Exchange states that BSTX Participants (and
non-BSTX Participants to which the BSTX Market Data Blockchain is
made available by the Exchange) would only be able to access the
information contained on the BSTX Market Data Blockchain through the
API, and only the Exchange would have direct access to the
underlying data on the private blockchain. See id. The Exchange
further states that the FIX gateway and the BSTX System are the same
sources of information used to generate consolidated market data.
See id. at 49420 n.39.
\152\ See id. at 49420.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The BSTX Market Data Blockchain would provide two types of
information for Regular Trading Hours: (i) Participant Proprietary Data
with respect to the specific BSTX Participant; \153\ and (ii) General
Market Data made available to all BSTX Participants and non-BSTX
Participants that subscribe.\154\ The Exchange represents that no BSTX
Participant, or non-BSTX Participant, would have access to the
Participant Proprietary Data of another BSTX Participant.\155\ Both
types of data would be available on a delayed basis of at least five
minutes, with each new block of market data showing market data for the
preceding five minutes.\156\ According to the Exchange, the BSTX Market
Data Blockchain would not function as a substitute for real-time market
data.\157\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\153\ See id. Under proposed BSTX Rule 17020(c)(1), a BSTX
Participant would be able to see the following information with
respect to all orders and messages submitted by the BSTX Participant
and any executions of such orders: (i) Symbol, side (buy/sell),
limit price, quantity, time-in-force; (ii) order type (e.g., limit
order, ISO); (iii) order capacity (principal/agent); (iv) short/long
sale order marking; and (v) message type (e.g., order, modification,
cancelation).
\154\ See id. Under proposed BSTX Rule 17020(c)(2), this would
include, in an anonymized format, all displayed orders,
modifications, cancelations, and executions occurring on BSTX (i.e.,
the user may see the symbol, side (buy/sell), limit price, quantity,
and message type), along with administrative data and other
information from the Exchange (e.g., trading halts or technical
messages). See Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 22-23; proposed
BSTX Rule 17020(c)(2). The Exchange states that the BSTX Market Data
Blockchain would not include details regarding the T+0 or T+1 order
matching preference or matched trades bound for shorter settlement.
See Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 41 n.73.
\155\ See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49421. The Exchange states
that since no BSTX Participant, or non-BSTX Participant, would be
provided with access to trading information of another BSTX
Participant, it would not allow for reverse engineering of trading
strategies or otherwise compromise the confidential nature of each
BSTX Participant's trading information. See id.
\156\ See Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 25. The Exchange
specifies that the market data uploaded as part of each block would
contain the most recent transactions on the Exchange, aged only a
few seconds, as well as market data for the preceding five minutes,
such that the oldest market data on each new block would be aged at
least five minutes. See id. at 25 n.44.
\157\ See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49421. The Exchange states
that consolidated market data or proprietary market data are
disseminated on a sub-second, or sub-millisecond, timescale and that
even the consolidated securities information processor's 99th
percentile of quote latency today is below 100 microseconds. See id.
at 49421 n.44. The Exchange also states that, to promote clarity
with respect to how a BSTX Participant may use the BSTX Market Data
Blockchain, proposed BSTX Rule 17020(c)(3) would provide that
information available on the BSTX Market Data Blockchain does not
act as a substitute for any recordkeeping obligations of a BSTX
Participant. See id. at 49422.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A BSTX Participant, through the API, would be able to run searches
of its previous orders and trading activity using the BSTX Market Data
Blockchain. The Participant Proprietary Data would be visible to the
specific BSTX Participant in sequential order of when each action
occurred \158\ and the General Market Data, available to both BSTX
Participants and non-BSTX Participants, would allow viewers to observe
the historical orders, executions, and other events (e.g.,
cancelations) received by and occurring on BSTX, which is generally the
same information available through subscribing to proprietary data
feeds of other exchanges.\159\ The Exchange also proposes to append
timestamps to the information made available through the BSTX Market
Data Blockchain, which would indicate the time to the microsecond at
which an order posted to the BSTX Book or that the BSTX System took
other actions with respect to an order.\160\ A BSTX Participant would
have the ability to download market data from the BSTX Market Data
Blockchain and could potentially use the data to back test trading
strategies or evaluate executions received on BSTX.\161\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\158\ The BSTX Participant would be able to filter the different
information fields or run searches for a particular item (e.g., only
showing cancel orders or only showing activity in a particular
symbol). See id. at 49421.
\159\ Similar to the Participant Proprietary Data, the General
Market Data would generally be visible in sequential order of when
each action occurred, although viewers would also have the ability
to filter the different information fields or run searches for a
particular symbol. The Exchange states that the General Market Data
would differ from the Exchange's propriety market data feed, which
provides real-time snapshots of the order book, including depth-of-
book quotations and quantity of shares available at each price
point. Additionally, the General Market Data would show viewers, in
an anonymized format, the sequential entry of each order,
modification, or cancelation in the order book in each symbol as
historical orders and transaction information, rather than real-time
snapshots. See id. at 49421 n.42.
\160\ See id. at 49421.
\161\ See id. at 49422.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange also proposes to periodically audit, at least bi-
annually, the BSTX Market Data Blockchain to help ensure the proper
functioning of the BSTX Market Data Blockchain and the accuracy of the
information thereon.\162\ The Exchange states that it expects to
initially audit the BSTX Market Data Blockchain more frequently, likely
monthly, during the first year of operations to ensure the BSTX Market
Data Blockchain operates as intended.\163\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\162\ See id.; proposed BSTX Rule 17020(d). See also proposed
BSTX Rule 17020(c)(3) (stating that information available on the
BSTX Market Data Blockchain does not act as a substitute for any
recordkeeping obligations of a BSTX Participant).
\163\ See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49422.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange states that as a system of the Exchange, the BSTX
Market Data Blockchain will be subject to the requirements of the
Exchange Act, including Regulation Systems Compliance and Integrity
(``Regulation SCI'') and that the Exchange has in place, among other
requirements of Regulation SCI, robust safeguards to protect against
any possible system intrusion to the market data blockchain.\164\ The
Exchange states that any unauthorized access to the API through which
data on the BSTX Market Data Blockchain may be accessed would not allow
for any intruder to modify, delete, or otherwise change any data on the
BSTX Market Data Blockchain.\165\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\164\ See Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 27. The Exchange
states that it has classified the BSTX Market Data Blockchain as an
``SCI system'' and not as an ``indirect SCI system.'' See id.
\165\ See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49422.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange states that the benefits of the BSTX Market Data
Blockchain are twofold: (1) BSTX Participants may find the information
useful to them for a
[[Page 5891]]
variety of purposes, such as to review the BSTX Participant's trading
activity on BSTX, determine what the market was at a particular point
in time on BSTX for a given Security, evaluate equation quality, help
confirm the accuracy of their internal trading data, or download the
data to back-test trading strategies; and (2) help familiarize BSTX
Participants with the use and capabilities of blockchain technology in
a manner that does not impose any burden on them or other market
participants.\166\ The Exchange also states that BSTX Securities would
be eligible for trading on other national securities exchanges that
extend UTP to them and that the BSTX Market Data Blockchain would not
impact the ability of Securities to trade on other national securities
exchanges or OTC.\167\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\166\ See id.
\167\ See id. at 49423.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
One commenter states that the United States should support
blockchain technologies like BSTX to be competitive globally, and that
blockchain affords more efficiency and transparency.\168\ Another
commenter states that blockchain will bring the advantages of better
security, higher transparency, more trust, and a fairer marketplace to
the sector.\169\ This commenter also states that blockchain would
afford savings in time and money, make the market safer against fraud,
and help United States markets keep up with other global systems.\170\
Another commenter states that the proposed five minute delay is not
problematic given delays in other market data products.\171\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\168\ See Letter from Anonymous (June 15, 2021) (``Anonymous
Letter II'').
\169\ See Letter from Anonymous (June 21, 2021) (``Anonymous
Letter III'').
\170\ See id. See also Letter from Jonathan Seeley (September
20, 2021) (``Seeley Letter'') (stating that the proposed BSTX
facility is designed to promote just and equitable principles of
trade and remove impediments to a free and open national market
system in a transparent and secure manner through the proposed use
of blockchain technology and would not inappropriately burden
competition); Letter from Tyler Hess (June 17, 2021) (stating that
the commenter would like to see the development of financial
institutions and securities exchanges that allow access to financial
instruments and investments without the burdens and controls placed
by traditional exchanges, and that the proposal represents the first
steps in a free and equitable publicly auditable financial system).
\171\ See Letter from Anonymous (September 6, 2021) (``Anonymous
Letter IV'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission finds that the Exchange's proposed market data
products are consistent with the Exchange Act. The Commission believes
that the proposed BSTX Depth-of-Book, BSTX Top-of-Book, and BSTX Last
Sale data products do not raise any novel regulatory issues.\172\ The
Commission also believes that the BSTX Market Data Blockchain would not
result in the disclosure of novel information about trading activity on
the BSTX System. A BSTX Participant viewing the Participant Proprietary
Data would access the same underlying information that the BSTX
Participant would already have from FIX messages sent to and received
from the Exchange.\173\ Further, the General Market Data would contain
the same substantive information that could be found in BSTX's
proprietary market data feeds and this information would be comparable
to the proprietary market data distributed by other national securities
exchanges. At the same time, the Commission believes that the BSTX
Market Data Blockchain is reasonably designed to prevent other market
participants from learning BSTX Participants' sensitive trading
information. The BSTX Market Data Blockchain would not be a real-time
market data product and would contain historical market data posted in
five-minute increments. In addition, the Participant Proprietary Data
accessible to each BSTX Participant would be specific to that BSTX
Participant's orders and executions, and the General Market Data would
be anonymized by displaying only the symbol, side (buy/sell), limit
price, quantity, and message type. As an SCI system operated by an SCI
entity, the BSTX Market Data Blockchain would also be subject to the
requirements of Regulation SCI.\174\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\172\ See supra notes 144-145 and accompanying text.
\173\ The Commission has previously approved proposals by
national securities exchanges to offer a data product to a member of
the exchange consisting of information regarding the member's own
trading activity on the exchange. See, e.g., Securities Exchange Act
Release Nos. 78886 (September 20, 2016), 81 FR 66113 (September 26,
2016) (approving Nasdaq ``Trading Insights'' product); 91787 (May 6,
2021), 86 FR 26111 (May 12, 2021) (approving MIAX Emerald
``Liquidity Taker Event Report'').
\174\ See, e.g., 17 CFR 242.1001(a)(1) (requiring each SCI
entity to establish, maintain, and enforce written policies and
procedures reasonably designed to ensure that its SCI systems have
levels of capacity, integrity, resiliency, availability, and
security adequate to maintain the SCI entity's operational
capability and promote the maintenance of fair and orderly markets).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
National securities exchanges are not required to offer proprietary
market data, but those that do so must offer such data in a manner that
is not designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers,
issuers, brokers, or dealers.\175\ The Commission believes that the
proposed dissemination of the Participant Proprietary Data is not
designed to permit unfair discrimination because each BSTX Participant
will have access to information specific to its own orders and
executions through the Participant Proprietary Data. In the OIP, the
Commission states that it was not clear what conditions, if any, the
Exchange may place on non-BSTX Participants before granting access to
the General Market Data.\176\ In Amendment No. 2, the Exchange states
that all BSTX Participants and non-BSTX Participants will have access
to the same anonymized market data on the same terms through the
General Market Data.\177\ In addition, market participants would be
able to obtain the same substantive information contained in the
General Market Data through access to BSTX's other proprietary market
data feeds. Further, the five-minute delay for the BSTX Market Data
Blockchain would be a uniform delay for all BSTX Participants and non-
BSTX Participants that subscribe, and the data on the BSTX Market Data
Blockchain would not be available on a faster basis than other BSTX
data products (and instead would be available on a slower basis).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\175\ See 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
\176\ See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49454.
\177\ See Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 25 (stating that the
Exchange would make the General Market Data available to BSTX
Participants and non-BSTX Participants for the same fee and on the
same subscription terms, once the Exchange establishes a fee
schedule pursuant to the proposed rule change process under the
Exchange Act prior to the launch of BSTX).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For these reasons, the Commission finds that the Exchange's
proposed market data products are consistent with the Exchange Act,
and, in particular, Section 6(b)(5) of the Exchange Act \178\ because
they would prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices,
promote just and equitable principles of trade, remove impediments to
and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national
market system, and, in general, protect investors and the public
interest, and would not permit unfair discrimination among customers,
issuers, brokers, or dealers; and with Section 6(b)(8) of the Exchange
Act \179\ because they would not impose any burden on competition not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the Exchange Act. The
Commission also finds that the proposed BSTX Market Data Blockchain is
consistent with the Exchange Act, and Section 6(b)(7) of the Exchange
Act \180\ in particular, and its requirements that the rules of a
national securities exchange provide a fair procedure for the
prohibition or limitation by the exchange of any access to services,
because the Exchange will
[[Page 5892]]
not limit non-BSTX Participants' access to the BSTX Market Data
Blockchain beyond applying the same general terms that apply to BSTX
Participants.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\178\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
\179\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
\180\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(7).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Access to BSTX
The Commission received a comment stating that the proposal does
not specifically address how participants shall access BSTX and that,
by comparison, with respect to the trading of options, the Exchange
does not currently enforce equidistant cabling among and between
participants and its matching engine located in the same data
center.\181\ This commenter states that concerns regarding unfair
discrimination and inappropriate burdens on competition could arise in
the absence of confirmation that BOX will ensure that all co-location
participants will enjoy the same opportunity for order execution
regardless of their location in the data center relative to the BSTX
matching engine.\182\ Absent such confirmation, the commenter urges the
Commission to disapprove the proposal.\183\ In response, the Exchange
states that BSTX will provide for equidistant cabling arrangements to
ensure that all co-located BSTX Participants are on a level playing
field in connecting to the BSTX matching engine.\184\ The Exchange also
states that BSTX plans to have equidistant cabling arrangements within
the area of the data center that it controls, and that it will make
technical details regarding those arrangements available to prospective
BSTX Participants in certain specification documents after approval of
BSTX as a new facility of the Exchange.\185\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\181\ See Letter from Andrew Stevens, General Counsel, IMC
Chicago, LLC and Richard McDonald, Compliance Coordinator,
Susquehanna International Group, LLP (June 28, 2021), at 2.
\182\ See id.
\183\ See id. at 3.
\184\ See Letter from Lisa J. Fall, President, BOX Exchange LLC
(July 1, 2021), at 1.
\185\ See id. The Exchange also states that its options trading
platform is an entirely separate facility of the Exchange with a
separate ownership structure from BSTX, and BSTX will use separate
data center operations and a different technology provider. See id.
at 2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In further response, in Amendment No. 2, the Exchange states that
it will offer connectivity services at its primary data center (Equinix
NY4 in Secaucus, NJ) and that connectivity to the Exchange in the
primary data center for both order entry and market data dissemination
is equalized for all Participants with equipment co-located in Equinix
NY4.\186\ Specifically, the Exchange states that all BSTX Participants
co-located in the same data center would connect to BSTX through an
equidistant cabling cabinet, which is a separate cabinet from the
cabinet hosting the BSTX System and market data distribution system.
The cross connects from the equidistant cabling cabinet to the cabinet
hosting BSTX's systems are equidistant.\187\ Additionally, the Exchange
states that all cross connects from the equidistant cabling cabinet to
each BSTX Participant's cabinet, wherever located in the data center,
provide for equidistant connectivity.\188\ As a result, even if BSTX
Participant X's cabinet is closer in physical proximity to the
equidistant cabling cabinet than BSTX Participant Y's cabinet, the
arrangement is such that both BSTX Participant X and BSTX Participant Y
have equidistant connectivity to the equidistant cabling cabinet and in
turn to BSTX's systems.\189\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\186\ See Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 6.
\187\ See id. at 6 n.6.
\188\ See id. Specifically, the equidistant cabling cabinet
contains equal length spools of fiber that connect to each external
BSTX Participant cabinet in the data center, and all BSTX
Participants must connect to BSTX through the equidistant cabling
cabinet from their own external cabinets. See id.
\189\ See id. The Exchange states that it believes that this
structure is designed to prevent unfair discrimination between
market participants, consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Exchange
Act, by ensuring that all co-located BSTX Participants have
equidistant connections to BSTX irrespective of where their
equipment is located within the data center. See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission believes that Amendment No. 2 addresses the
commenter's concern regarding whether all co-location participants will
enjoy the same opportunity for order execution regardless of their
location in the data center relative to the BSTX matching engine. As
described above, the Exchange states in Amendment No. 2 that all BSTX
Participants co-located in the data center would access BSTX's systems
through an equidistant cabling cabinet that connects to each BSTX
Participant's cabinet through fiber connections of equal length and
that the cross connects from the equidistant cabling cabinet to the
cabinet hosting BSTX's systems are also equidistant. This arrangement
would prevent BSTX Participants located in closer proximity to the
cabinet hosting the BSTX System and market data distribution system
from having a shorter path to connect to BSTX's systems.
Clearance and Settlement
Under the Exchange's proposal, executions occurring as a result of
orders matched against the BSTX Book will be transmitted by BSTX to a
registered clearing agency to clear and settle pursuant to the rules,
policies, and procedures of the registered clearing agency.\190\ The
Exchange states that Securities would be cleared and settled by NSCC
and DTC in the same manner as those activities are performed by NSCC
and DTC currently with respect to a class of NMS stock.\191\ The
Exchange also states that the operation of the BSTX Market Data
Blockchain will have no impact or effect on the manner in which a
Security clears and settles.\192\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\190\ See proposed BSTX Rule 25100(d). See also proposed BSTX
Rule 25140 for additional provisions regarding clearance and
settlement.
\191\ See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49418.
\192\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange proposes to allow BSTX Participants to indicate a
preference for settling faster than the standard T+2 settlement
cycle.\193\ Specifically, BSTX Participants would be able to submit an
order with a preference for settlement on a T+0 basis (``Order with a
T+0 Preference'') or on a T+1 basis (``Order with a T+1
Preference'').\194\ The Exchange states that, based on discussions with
representatives from The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation
(``DTCC''), BSTX believes that NSCC already has the authority under its
rules, policies, and procedures to clear certain trades on T+1 or T+0
basis.\195\ Orders with a T+0 Preference and Orders with a T+1
Preference would result in executions that settle more quickly than on
a T+2 basis if, and only if, all of the conditions in proposed BSTX
Rule 25060(h) are met and the execution that is transmitted by BSTX to
NSCC is eligible for T+0 or T+1 settlement under the rules, policies,
and procedures of the registered clearing agency.\196\ For an
[[Page 5893]]
Order with a T+0 Preference to be eligible to be transmitted by BSTX to
NSCC for same-day settlement, the resulting execution must occur on the
BSTX System prior to the ``T+0 Cut-Off Time,'' which would be one
minute before any applicable cut-off time established by NSCC for
inclusion of T+0 settling trades in its continuous net settlement
process established pursuant to its rules, policies, and
procedures.\197\ Any preference for T+0 or T+1 settlement included by a
BSTX Participant would only become operative if the order happens to
execute against another order from a BSTX Participant that also
includes a parameter indicating a preference for settlement on a T+0 or
T+1 basis.\198\ The Exchange states that, at the time of order entry,
any orders that include a parameter indicating a preference for faster
settlement would be regular way orders that would be presumed to settle
on a T+2 basis, just like any orders without such a parameter.\199\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\193\ See id. at 49419.
\194\ See proposed BSTX Rule 25140(h). The Exchange states that
T+1 and T+0 are shorter settlement cycles than the longest
settlement cycle of T+2 that is generally permitted under SEC Rule
15c6-1, for a security trade that involves a broker-dealer. See OIP,
supra note 7, 86 FR at 49419 (citing 17 CFR 240.15c6-1). The
Exchange states that under SEC Rule 15c6-1, with certain exceptions,
a broker-dealer is not permitted to enter a contract for the
purchase or sale of a security that provides for payment of funds
and delivery of securities later than the second business day after
the date of the contract unless otherwise expressly agreed to by the
parties at the time of the transaction. See id. at 49419 n.33.
\195\ See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49423. The Exchange states
that it understands that NSCC and DTC are already using this
authority for shortened settlement times, and that DTCC makes data
regarding T+0 and T+1 clearance and settlement through NSCC and DTC
available on the DTCC website for review by the public. See id. at
49424.
\196\ See id. at 49423-24; proposed BSTX Rule 25060(h). See also
proposed BSTX Rule 25100(d). The Exchange states that it understands
that under its current rules, policies, and procedures, NSCC accepts
trades for T+0 settlement through its continuous net settlement
system provided that they are received by NSCC before a cut-off time
of 11:30 a.m. ET. DTCC provides on its website an overview of the
cut-off times for participation in the continuous net settlement
system process and other procedural considerations under its rules,
policies, and procedures that are associated with processing trades
for accelerated settlement on a T+0 or T+1 basis. See Amendment No.
2, supra note 9, at 34 n.62.
\197\ See Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 35; proposed BSTX
Rule 25060(h)(3). The BSTX System would not accept any new Orders
with a T+0 Preference after the T+0 Cut-Off Time. See Amendment No.
2, supra note 9, at 36; proposed BSTX Rule 25060(h)(3). However, an
Order with a T+0 Preference resting on the BSTX Book after the T+0
Cut-Off Time would still be able to execute against orders against
which it is marketable, and would remain eligible for potential T+1
settlement to the extent it executed against an Order with a T+1
Preference. See id. According to the Exchange, it believes that a
one minute buffer between its T+0 Cut-Off Time and NSCC's cut-off
time for inclusion of such same-day settling trades in NSCC's
continuous net settlement process would be sufficient time to allow
the Exchange to transmit the relevant execution details to NSCC and
for NSCC to include such same-day settling trades in its continuous
net settlement system. See Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 35-36.
The Exchange represents that it will monitor the application of the
one minute buffer and whether it provides the Exchange and NSCC with
sufficient time to prevent executed trades from being transmitted by
the Exchange to NSCC after NSCC's cut-off time for inclusion of
same-day settling trades in NSCC's continuous net settlement system,
and the Exchange will submit additional rule changes in the future
as may be necessary to increase the buffer if appropriate. See id.
at 36. The Exchange also represents that it will post the then-
applicable T+0 Cut-Off Time on the BSTX website to ensure BSTX
Participants are adequately informed. See id. at 36 n.64.
\198\ See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49424. Under the proposal,
an Order with a T+0 Preference will execute against any order
against which it is marketable and BSTX will transmit the matched
order information to a registered clearing agency for settlement on
a standard settlement cycle (T+2) pursuant to the rules, policies,
and procedures of the registered clearing agency, except where: (i)
the Order with a T+0 Preference executes against another Order with
a T+0 Preference, in which case BSTX will transmit the matched order
information to a registered clearing agency for settlement on the
trade date as may be permitted by the rules, policies, and
procedures of the registered clearing agency, subject to the
limitations in proposed BSTX Rule 25060(h)(3); or (ii) the Order
with a T+0 Preference executes against an Order with a T+1
Preference, in which case BSTX will transmit the matched order
information to a registered clearing agency for settlement on the
next trading day after the trade date (i.e., T+1) as may be
permitted by the rules, policies, and procedures of the registered
clearing agency. See proposed BSTX Rule 25060(h)(1). An Order with a
T+1 Preference will execute against any order against which it is
marketable and BSTX will transmit the matched order information to a
registered clearing agency for settlement on a standard settlement
cycle (T+2), except where the Order with a T+1 Preference executes
against another Order with a T+1 Preference or an Order with a T+0
Preference, in which case BSTX will transmit the matched order
information to a registered clearing agency for settlement on the
next trading day after the trade date (i.e., T+1) as may be
permitted by the rules, policies, and procedures of the registered
clearing agency. See proposed BSTX Rule 25060(h)(2).
\199\ See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49423.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange states that, in all cases, an order not marked with a
preference for either T+0 or T+1 settlement would be assured under the
settlement timing logic in proposed BSTX Rule 25060(h) of settlement on
a T+2 basis. The Exchange also states that the possibility of a
shortened settlement time would have no impact on the Exchange's
proposed price/time priority structure for order matching.\200\ The
Exchange states that, as a result of this structure, all orders in
Securities would be eligible to match and execute against any order
against which they are marketable, with settlement to occur at the
later settlement date of any two matching orders.\201\ Therefore,
according to the Exchange, only where an Order with a T+1 Preference or
an Order with a T+0 Preference match with another Order with a T+1
Preference or Order with a T+0 Preference will those orders (or
matching portions thereof) be eligible to settle more quickly than the
standard settlement cycle of T+2.\202\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\200\ See id. at 49424.
\201\ See id.
\202\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange states that it believes the proposal to allow BSTX
Participants to access the shorter settlement cycles of T+1 and T+0
that are already being used by NSCC and DTC today represents a change
that is both consistent with and in furtherance of broader industry
efforts to move the standard settlement style to T+1.\203\ The Exchange
also states that it believes that providing an optional T+0 or T+1
settlement cycle to BSTX Participants could also incrementally and
immediately provide market participants with the benefits of shorter
settlement cycles.\204\ The Exchange further states that it believes
that BSTX Participants have an interest in being able to assess risk-
reducing market functionality that is presently available and
compatible with market structure and that this can reduce costs for
market participants settling trading obligations in that Security and
reduce settlement risk.\205\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\203\ See id. at 49424-25.
\204\ See id.
\205\ See id. at 49425.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
According to the Exchange, because all orders in Securities
submitted to BSTX would at the time of order entry be presumed to
settle on a regular way T+2 basis and would interact with any other
order against which the order is marketable, the Exchange believes that
Orders with a T+0 Preference and Orders with a T+1 Preference would be
considered ``protected'' within the meaning of Rule 611 under the
Exchange Act.\206\ The Exchange states that Orders with a T+0
Preference and Orders with a T+1 Preference would not fall within the
exception for protected quotation status set forth in Rule 611(b)(2)
under the Exchange Act, because they will only settle more quickly than
T+2 when all of the conditions in proposed BSTX Rule 25060(h) are met
and where faster settlement is consistent with the rules, policies, and
procedures of a registered clearing agency.\207\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\206\ See id. (citing 17 CFR 242.611(b)(2)).
\207\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission has received several comments expressing support for
the proposal's use of a shortened settlement cycle under certain
circumstances.\208\ One commenter states in support of the proposal
that BSTX would provide significant advantages over existing national
securities exchanges by providing fairer conditions to market
participants through reduced settlement times and more
transparency.\209\ This commenter states that T+0 settlement would
improve market conditions for retail investors by reducing risk of
failure to deliver on highly shorted stocks, and would reduce actual
and opportunity costs by eliminating margin lending for the period
before settlement and lost opportunities to reinvest.\210\
[[Page 5894]]
Two commenters refer to recent problems that they characterize as
arising from T+2 settlement and short selling,\211\ and state that the
proposal for a shorter settlement cycle would level the playing field
for retail investors.\212\ Another commenter states that if a
particular trade does not meet the criteria or conditions on T+0 or
T+1, the fallback option will be the standard settlement cycle, and
that because shorter settlement will depend on the NSCC clearing
system, addressing any adverse market effects is NSCC's
responsibility.\213\ Another commenter states that uncertainty
regarding whether an order would receive faster settlement at the time
of order entry would not affect the ability of a market participants to
reap the potential benefits of faster settlement.\214\ This commenter
also states that there has been much recent public focus on the
inefficiency of the current settlement system and that there is no
evidence that the proposal would have adverse market effects.\215\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\208\ See Letter from Meagan Darata, Utah Salt Supplements (June
21, 2021) (``Darata Letter''); Letter from Mark Nelson (June 10,
2021); Letter from Robert Shaw (June 11, 2021) (``Shaw Letter'');
Letter from Neil Skinner (June 11, 2021) (``Skinner Letter'').
\209\ See Skinner Letter, supra note 208.
\210\ See id. This commenter also states that the commenter
expects the reduced costs of operating the exchange to be passed on
to prospective companies and issuers, thereby creating more
opportunities for companies and asset holders to offer securities,
and resulting in a market boom as new market participants join the
exchange. See id.
\211\ See Letter from Anonymous (June 15, 2021) (``Anonymous
Letter I''); Skinner Letter, supra note 208. See also Shaw Letter,
supra note 208 (stating that, with the current issues regarding
settlement time, the proposal to offer speedy settlement is one
answer to improving the system).
\212\ See Anonymous Letter I, supra note 211; Skinner Letter,
supra note 208. See also Darata Letter, supra note 208 (stating that
there is a wide power differential between retail and institutional
traders).
\213\ See Anonymous Letter IV, supra note 171.
\214\ See Seeley Letter, supra note 170 (stating also that this
uncertainty would not represent any additional inconsistency with
the Exchange Act compared to current settlement systems and does not
provide an appropriate basis for disapproving the proposal).
\215\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission believes that the optional order parameter that
would allow a BSTX Participant to place an Order with a T+0 Preference
or Order with a T+1 Preference would permit BSTX Participants to take
advantage of faster settlement timing provided by DTC and NSCC in
manner that is consistent with fair and orderly markets. Use of the
order parameter would be optional and would not have any effect on
price/time execution priority. Therefore, any order placed by a BSTX
Participant that prefers to settle on a T+2 basis (or any order routed
to BSTX from another national securities exchange) would receive T+2
settlement and that order would not be disadvantaged in obtaining an
execution due to the absence of a preference for faster
settlement.\216\ The Commission also believes that the proposal that
Orders with a T+0 Preference must be executed on the BSTX System prior
to the T+0 Cut-Off Time to be eligible for same-day settlement is
reasonably designed to ensure that when BSTX transmits an order to the
registered clearing agency for same-day settlement, the registered
clearing agency will be able to include that trade in its continuous
net settlement process.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\216\ In the OIP, the Commission raises whether introducing the
possibility for T+0 or T+1 settlement for on-exchange trades in NMS
stocks pursuant to the rules of a single national securities
exchange, at a time when the industry standard is T+2 settlement,
might have any adverse market effects. See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR
at 49455. The Commission notes that no commenters raised any
potential adverse market effects.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For these reasons, the Commission finds that the proposed order
parameter that BSTX Participants could use to preference faster
settlement is consistent with the Exchange Act and, in particular,
Section 6(b)(5)'s requirement to foster cooperation and coordination
with persons engaged in clearing, settling, and processing information
with respect to transactions in securities; remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market
system; and, in general, protect investors and the public
interest.\217\ The Commission also finds that the proposed order
parameter for faster settlement is consistent with Section 6(b)(8)'s
requirement that the proposal not impose any burden on competition not
necessary or appropriate in further of the purposes of the Exchange
Act, because the operation of this order parameter will not impact the
ability of a market participant that instead prefers T+2 settlement to
obtain an execution.\218\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\217\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
\218\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Eligibility for Listing and Trading on BSTX
Once BSTX begins operations as a facility of the Exchange, a
security would be considered for listing on BSTX only if such security
is registered under both Section 12 of the Exchange Act \219\ and
Section 6 of the Securities Act of 1933 (``Securities Act''),\220\ or
such security to subject to an exemption under Regulation A.\221\ An
issuer may register a security pursuant to Section 12(b) by submitting
to the Exchange a listing application that provides certain required
information.\222\ The Exchange will review the listing application and,
if the listing application is approved, will certify to the Commission
that it has approved the security for listing and registration.\223\
Registration of the security will become effective thirty days after
the receipt of such certification by the Commission or within a shorter
period of time as the Commission may determine.\224\ Once registration
is effective, the Security would be eligible to be admitted to dealings
on BSTX.\225\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\219\ 15 U.S.C. 78l; proposed BSTX Rule 26210.
\220\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
\221\ See Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 10-11. See also 17
CFR 230.251. The Exchange states that IEX similarly allows for
securities subject to an exemption from registration under Section
12(b) of the Exchange Act to be listed on IEX. See Amendment No. 2,
supra note 9, at 11 n.20 (citing to IEX Rule 14.203).
\222\ See proposed BSTX Rules 26210-26217; 15 U.S.C. 78l(b).
Prior to submitting a listing application to the Exchange, the
issuer would be required to participate in a confidential pre-
application eligibility review, in which the Exchange will determine
whether the issuer meets its listing criteria and is eligible to
submit a listing application. See proposed BSTX Rule 26201.
\223\ See proposed BSTX Rule 26210(b); 15 U.S.C. 78l(d). See
Exhibits 3G, 3H, 3I, 3J, 3K, and 3L for agreements and forms related
to the listing process.
\224\ 15 U.S.C. 78l(d).
\225\ See proposed BSTX Rule 26202. See also 15 U.S.C. 78l(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange proposes that the only securities that will be
eligible for trading on BSTX will be BSTX-listed securities.\226\ The
Exchange states that it is not proposing rules that would support its
extension of UTP to other NMS stock.\227\ However, according to the
Exchange, BSTX-listed Securities would be eligible for trading on other
national securities exchanges that extend UTP to them and would be able
to trade on other national securities exchanges and OTC in the same
manner as other NMS stock.\228\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\226\ See proposed BSTX Rule 25020(a) (providing that any class
of securities listed on the Exchange shall be eligible to become
designated for trading on the Exchange in accordance with the
proposed BSTX Rule 26000 and 28000 Rule Series).
\227\ See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49417. The Exchange also
states that it would only trade BSTX-listed Securities on BSTX
unless and until the Exchange proposes and receives Commission
approval for rules that would support trading in other types of
securities, including thorough any extension of UTP to other NMS
stock. See id.
\228\ See id. at 49423.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Classes of Securities Eligible for Listing
The Exchange states that issuers on BSTX could include both: (i)
New issuers who do not currently have any class of securities
registered on a national securities exchange, and (ii) issuers who
currently have securities registered on a national securities exchange
and who are seeking registration of a new class of equity securities
for listing on BSTX as Securities.\229\ In the original Notice, the
Exchange stated that while BSTX does not intend for Securities listed
on BSTX to be fungible with any other class of securities from the same
issuer, to the
[[Page 5895]]
extent that two classes of an issuer's shares had identical voting and
economic rights but were registered with the Commission as separate
classes, the two classes of shares could be ``economically fungible''
with each other.\230\ With respect to the Notice, one commenter states
that BSTX appears to be contemplating that an issuer could list shares
with identical voting and economic rights on BSTX and another exchange
but designate the shares listed on BSTX as a separate class of the
issuer's securities, with the only distinguishing factor between the
two classes of securities being that the BSTX-listed securities would
have the additional blockchain functionality.\231\ The commenter states
that, in the trading context, having two separate classes of an
issuer's securities with identical economic and voting rights trading
at the same time on different exchanges could result in investor and
market confusion.\232\ In Amendment No. 2, the Exchange states that
BSTX does not intend for a Security listed on BSTX to be a unique class
of security due only to the fact that certain trading activity in the
Security on BSTX would be recorded on the BSTX Market Data
Blockchain.\233\ The Exchange also states that if an issuer sought to
list a new class of securities on BSTX that is not distinct from an
existing class of securities of the issuer, the Exchange would not
allow such a class to be listed pursuant to its authority under
proposed BSTX Rule 26101.\234\ The Commission believes that Amendment
No. 2 addresses the commenter's concern that an issuer could list one
class of securities on BSTX and a separate class of securities on
another national securities exchange, with both classes having
identical voting and economic interests. Proposed BSTX Rule 26101
provides that the approval of an application for listing of a security
for trading on BSTX is a matter solely within the discretion of the
Exchange.\235\ The Exchange's use of this discretionary authority to
prevent an issuer from listing a class of securities on BSTX that is
not distinct from an existing class of securities would prevent the
listing of a class of securities that has the same voting and economic
rights as another listed class of securities of that same issuer.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\229\ See Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 13.
\230\ See Notice, supra note 3, 86 FR at 29636 & n.20.
\231\ See Letter from Ellen Greene, Managing Director, Equities
& Options Market Structure, Securities Industry and Financial
Markets Association (September 27, 2021) (``SIFMA Letter''), at 2
(stating that ``the definition of `class' of securities in Section
12(g)(5) of the Exchange Act contemplates that securities of an
issuer that have identical economic and voting rights would be part
of the same class of securities'').
\232\ See id. (stating that ``issuers have dually-listed
securities on two exchanges to meet the different listing standards
of each of the exchanges, but the issuers have done so by listing
the same class of securities on both exchanges'').
\233\ See Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 13.
\234\ See id.
\235\ See proposed BSTX Rule 26101.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Initial and Continued Listing Standards
The Commission has consistently recognized the importance and
significance of national securities exchange listing standards. Among
other things, such listing standards help ensure that exchange-listed
companies will have sufficient public float, investor base, and trading
interest to provide the depth and liquidity necessary to promote fair
and orderly markets.\236\ The standards, collectively, also provide
investors and market participants with some level of assurance that the
listed company has the resources, policies, and procedures to comply
with the requirements of the Exchange Act and Exchange rules.\237\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\236\ The Commission has stated in approving national securities
exchange listing requirements that the development and enforcement
of adequate standards governing the listing of securities on an
exchange is an activity of critical importance to the financial
markets and the investing public. In addition, once a security has
been approved for initial listing, maintenance criteria allow an
exchange to monitor the status and trading characteristics of that
issue to ensure that it continues to meet the exchange's standards
for market depth and liquidity so that fair and orderly markets can
be maintained. See, e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 90768
(December 22, 2020), 85 FR 85807, 85811 n.55 (December 29, 2020)
(SR-NYSE-2019-67) (``NYSE 2020 Order''); 82627 (February 2, 2018),
83 FR 5650, 5653 n.53 (February 8, 2018) (SR-NYSE-2017-30) (``NYSE
2018 Order''); 81856 (October 11, 2017), 82 FR 48296, 48298 (October
17, 2017) (SR-NYSE-2017-31); 81079 (July 5, 2017), 82 FR 32022,
32023 (July 11, 2017) (SR-NYSE-2017-11). The Commission has stated
that adequate listing standards, by promoting fair and orderly
markets, are consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Exchange Act, in
that they are, among other things, designed to prevent fraudulent
and manipulative acts and practices, promote just and equitable
principles of trade, and protect investors and the public interest.
See, e.g., NYSE 2020 Order, 85 FR at 85811 n.55; NYSE 2018 Order, 83
FR at 5653 n.53; Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 87648
(December 3, 2019), 84 FR 67308, 67314 n.42 (December 9, 2019) (SR-
NASDAQ-2019-059); 88716 (April 21, 2020), 85 FR 23393, 23395 n.22
(April 27, 2020) (SR-NASDAQ-2020-001).
\237\ ``Meaningful listing standards are also important given
investor expectations regarding the nature of securities that have
achieved a national securities exchange listing, and the role of a
national securities exchange in overseeing its market and assuring
compliance with its listing standards.'' Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 65708 (November 8, 2011), 76 FR 70799, 70802 (November
15, 2011) (SR-NASDAQ-2011-073). See also, e.g., NYSE 2020 Order,
supra note 236, 85 FR at 85811 n.56; Securities Exchange Act Release
Nos. 65709 (November 8, 2011), 76 FR 70795 (November 15, 2011) (SR-
NYSE-2011-38); 88389 (March 16, 2020), 85 FR 16163 (March 20, 2020)
(SR-NASDAQ-2019-089). The Exchange, in addition to requiring
companies seeking to list to meet the quantitative initial listing
standards and once listed the quantitative continued listing
standards, also requires listed companies to meet other qualitative
requirements. See, e.g., proposed BSTX Rules 26800 Series, Corporate
Governance.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange has proposed initial and continued listing standards
for companies to be listed on BSTX that are substantially similar to
the current rules for NYSE American.\238\ These proposed listing
standards relate to the listing and delisting of companies, including
procedures and prerequisites for initial and continued listing on BSTX,
the obligations of issuers with Securities listed on BSTX, as well as
rules describing the application and qualification process, the
suspension and delisting process, and procedures for review of the
Exchange's listing determinations.\239\ The Commission has previously
determined that the initial and continued listing standards of NYSE
American are consistent with the Exchange Act.\240\ The Exchange states
that it did not integrate certain sections of NYSE American's listing
standards that the Exchange deemed were inapplicable to its operations,
such as with respect to types of securities that the Exchange does not
propose to make eligible for listing.\241\ The Exchange also proposes
to include certain listing standards that are substantially similar
[[Page 5896]]
to the rules of other national securities exchanges.\242\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\238\ See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49439 (citing Parts 1-12
of the NYSE American Company Guide). The Exchange states that it
understands that the Commission has extended relief to NYSE American
with respect to certain quantitative listing standards that do not
meet the thresholds of Rule 3a51-1, and that initial listings of
securities that do not meet such thresholds and are not subject to
the relief provided to NYSE American would qualify as ``penny
stocks'' and would be subject to additional regulation. See
Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 106 (citing 17 CFR 240.3a51-1);
Amendment No. 3, supra note 10, at 4-5. The Exchange states that it
is not seeking relief related to Rule 3a51-1 and describes certain
adjustments made to the proposed BSTX rules to meet the requirements
in Rule 3a51-1. See Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 106; Amendment
No. 3, supra note 10, at 4-5.
\239\ See proposed BSTX Rules 26000 Series (BSTX Listing Rules
Other Than for Exchange Traded Products), 26200 Series (Original
Listing Procedures), 26300 Series (Additional Listings), 27000
Series (Suspension and Delisting), 27100 Series (Guide to Filing
Requirements), and 27200 Series (Procedures for Review of Exchange
Listing Determinations).
\240\ See, e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 59050
(December 3, 2008), 73 FR 75144 (December 10, 2008) (SR-Amex-2008-
70) (approving revisions to the listing process and removal of
alternative listing standards for American Stock Exchange LLC
(``Amex''), a predecessor to NYSE American); 53050 (January 3,
2006), 71 FR 1580 (January 10, 2006) (SR-Amex-2005-114) (approving
change to initial listing standards for Amex).
\241\ See Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 103 n.301. For
example, the Exchange does not propose to list bonds, debentures,
securities of foreign companies (other than Canadian companies), or
investment trusts. See id. The Exchange also does not propose to
allow the issuance of fractional shares of Securities. See id. at
114.
\242\ See, e.g., Amendment No. 3, supra note 10, at 5-6 (stating
that the Exchange is including initial listing standards for
preferred securities and secondary classes based on Nasdaq Rule
5510).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, the Exchange has proposed initial and continued
listing standards for ETP-related securities to be listed on BSTX that
are substantially similar to the rules of NYSE Arca, Inc. (``NYSE
Arca'').\243\ These initial and continued listing standards relate to
the specific types of ETPs that the Exchange proposes to make eligible
for listing on BSTX.\244\ The Exchange states that the proposed rules
do not include certain products that are supported by NYSE Arca but
that the Exchange does not plan to offer.\245\ The Commission has
previously determined that the ETP-related listing standards of NYSE
Arca are consistent with the Exchange Act.\246\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\243\ See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49442 (citing to NYSE Arca
Rules 5.2-E(j)(3), 5.2-E(j)(6), 5.2-E(j)(8), 8.200-E, 8.201-E,
8.600-E, 8.601-E, and 8.900-E).
\244\ See proposed BSTX Rules 28000 (Investment Company Units),
28001 (Equity Index-Linked Securities, Commodity-Linked Securities,
Currency-Linked Securities, Fixed Income Index-Linked Securities,
Futures-Listed Securities, and Multifactor Index-Linked Securities),
28002 (Exchange-Traded Fund Shares), 28003 (Trust Issued Receipts),
28004 (Commodity-Based Trust Shares), 28005 (Managed Fund Shares),
28006 (Active Proxy Portfolio Shares), and 28007 (Managed Portfolio
Shares).
\245\ See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49443 (stating that the
Exchange will not support trading in a Nasdaq-100 Index Product,
Currency Trust Shares, or Commodity Index Trust Shares).
\246\ See, e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 44551
(July 12, 2001), 66 FR 37716 (July 19, 2001) (PCX-2001-14)
(approving generic listing standards for investment company units
and portfolio depository receipts for Pacific Exchange, Inc.
(``PCX''), a predecessor to NYSE Arca); 52204 (August 3, 2005), 70
FR 46559 (August 10, 2005) (PCX-2005-63) (approving PCX's generic
listing standards for index-linked securities); 78397 (July 22,
2016), 81 FR 49320 (July 27, 2016) (NYSEArca-2015-110) (approving
NYSE Arca's generic listing standards for managed fund shares).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Accordingly, the Commission finds that the Exchange's proposed
initial and continued listing requirements, including the procedures
for listing and delisting securities, are consistent with the Exchange
Act, and Section 6(b)(5) of the Exchange Act \247\ in particular, and
its requirements that the rules of a national securities exchange be
reasonably designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable principals of trade, to remove
impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and
a national market system, and, in general, to protect investors and the
public interest; and that the rules not be designed to permit unfair
discrimination between customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers. The
Commission also finds that procedures for listing and delisting
securities, including the procedures for challenging the Exchange's
listing determinations, are consistent with Section 6(b)(7) of the
Exchange Act,\248\ which requires, among other things, that the rules
of a national securities exchange provide a fair procedure for the
prohibition or limitation by the exchange of any person with respect to
access to services offered by the exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\247\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
\248\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(7).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Corporate Governance Standards
The development and enforcement of meaningful corporate governance
listing standards for a national securities exchange is of substantial
importance to financial markets and the investing public, especially
given investor expectations regarding the nature of companies that have
achieved an exchange listing for their securities.\249\ The corporate
governance standards embodied in the listing standards of national
securities exchanges, in particular, play an important role in assuring
that exchange-listed companies observe good governance practices
including safeguarding the interests of shareholders.\250\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\249\ See, e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 85374
(March 20, 2019), 84 FR 11354, 11356 (March 26, 2019); 91567 (April
14, 2021), 86 FR 20556, 20559 (April 20, 2021).
\250\ See, e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 85374
(March 20, 2019), 84 FR 11354, 11356 (March 26, 2019); 91567 (April
14, 2021), 86 FR 20556, 20559 (April 20, 2021).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange proposes corporate governance standards in connection
with Securities to be listed and traded on BSTX that are substantially
similar to the corporate governance standards for listed issuers of
NYSE American.\251\ These corporate governance standards for listed
issuers include policies relating to disclosures, the handling of stock
dividends and splits, accounting, shareholder meetings and voting, and
required notifications to the Exchange, as well as standards for the
issuer's corporate structure and its board of directors and committees
thereof.\252\ Further, these standards include rules requiring a
majority of directors on a listed issuer's board to be independent,
rules and independence requirements relating to audit and compensation
committees and the oversight of nominations, and rules requiring listed
issuers to adopt codes of conduct applicable to all their directors,
officers, and employees.\253\ The Commission has previously determined
that the corporate governance standards for listed issuers of NYSE
American are consistent with the Exchange Act.\254\ The Exchange also
proposes to require listed companies to maintain an internal audit
function pursuant to a rule that is substantially similar to the
requirements of IEX.\255\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\251\ See OIP, supra note 7, at 49442 (citing to NYSE American
Sections 401-404, 501-522, 603-624, 701-726, 801-809, and 920-994).
\252\ See proposed BSTX Rule 26400 Series (Disclosure Policies),
26500 Series (Dividends and Splits), 26600 Series (Accounting;
Annual and Quarterly Reports), 26700 Series (Shareholders' Meetings,
Approval and Voting of Proxies), 26800 Series (Corporate
Governance), and 26900 Series (Additional Matters).
\253\ See proposed BSTX Rules 26802, 26803, and 27807.
\254\ See, e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 48863
(December 1, 2003), 68 FR 68432 (December 8, 2003) (SR-Amex-2003-65)
(approving proposal to enhance the corporate governance requirements
applicable to listed companies for Amex); 54851 (November 30, 2006),
71 FR 71201 (December 8, 2006) (SR-Amex-2006-48) (approving
exchange's independent director and audit committee corporate
governance standards for Amex).
\255\ See Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 115 (citing to IEX
Rule 14.414). See also proposed BSTX Rule 26801(i).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission finds that BSTX's proposed corporate governance
standards for listed issuers contained in BSTX's proposed rules are
consistent with the Exchange Act, and in particular Section 6(b)(5) of
the Exchange Act and its requirements that the rules of a national
securities exchange be reasonably designed to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism
of a free and open market and a national market system, and, in
general, to protect investors and the public interest; and are not
designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers,
brokers, or dealers. The Commission further finds that BSTX's proposed
rules satisfy the requirements of Section 10A(m) of the Exchange Act
and Rule 10A-3 thereunder and Section 10C of the Exchange Act and Rule
10C-1 thereunder, relating to audit and compensation committees,
respectively.\256\ The Commission believes that BSTX's corporate
governance standards for listed issuers that require a fully
independent audit committee are designed to promote independent and
objective review and oversight of the accounting and auditing practices
of listed issuers and to enhance audit committee independence,
authority, and responsibility by implementing the standards set forth
in
[[Page 5897]]
Rule 10A-3.\257\ In addition, the Commission believes that BSTX's
proposed requirements relating to independent compensation committees
for listed issuers would benefit investors by implementing the
standards set forth in Rule 10C-1, which requires that the independent
directors of a listed issuer oversee executive compensation matters,
consider independence criteria before retaining compensation advisers,
and have responsibility for the appointment, compensation, and
oversight of these advisers.\258\ Corporate governance standards play
an important role in assuring that companies listed for trading on the
national securities exchanges' markets have a reasoned, fair, and
impartial approach for determining the compensation of corporate
executives.\259\ The Commission believes that the Exchange's rules will
foster greater transparency, accountability, and objectivity in the
oversight of compensation practices of listed issuers and in the
decision-making processes of their compensation committees.\260\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\256\ See 15 U.S.C. 78j-1(m); 15 U.S.C. 78j-3; 17 CFR 240.10A-3;
17 CFR 240.10C-1.
\257\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 47654 (April 9,
2003), 68 FR 18788 (April 16, 2003).
\258\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67220 (June 20,
2012), 77 FR 38422, 38425 (June 27, 2012).
\259\ See proposed BSTX Rule 26805. See, e.g., Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 68640 (January 11, 2013), 78 FR 4554, 4563
(January 22, 2013) (SR-NASDAQ-2012-109) (``Nasdaq 2012 Order'')
(approving proposal relating to rules for compensation committees
for listed companies).
\260\ See, e.g., Nasdaq 2012 Order, supra note 259 (finding
Nasdaq compensation committee rules consistent with the Exchange
Act). See also, e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 68639
(January 11, 2013), 78 FR 4570 (January 22, 2013) (order approving
NYSE's compensation committee rules, which was cited by Nasdaq as
precedent for a subsequent amendment to its own rules that was filed
on an immediately effective basis); 71037 (December 11, 2013), 78 FR
76179 (December 16, 2013) (SR-NASDAQ-2013-147).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
The Exchange states that in connection with the operation of BSTX,
it will leverage many of the Exchange's existing regulatory
structures.\261\ The Exchange states that it will extend its Regulatory
Services Agreement with FINRA to cover BSTX Participants and trading on
the BSTX System, and this Regulatory Services Agreement will govern
many aspects of the regulation and discipline of BSTX
Participants.\262\ According to the Exchange, the Exchange will
regulate the listing of Securities, authorize BSTX Participants to
trade on the BSTX System, and conduct surveillance of Security trading
on the BSTX System.\263\ The Exchange states that, consistent with the
Exchange's existing regulatory structure, the Exchange's Chief
Regulatory Officer will have general supervision of the regulatory
operations of BSTX, including responsibility for overseeing the
surveillance, examination, and enforcement functions and for
administering all regulatory services agreements applicable to
BSTX.\264\ The Exchange states that its existing Regulatory Oversight
Committee will be responsible for overseeing the adequacy and
effectiveness of the Exchange's regulatory and self-regulatory
organization responsibilities, including those applicable to BSTX.\265\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\261\ See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49448.
\262\ See id. The Exchange states that, as is the case with the
Exchange's options trading platform, the Exchange will supervise
FINRA and bear ultimate regulatory responsibility for BSTX. See id.
\263\ See id.
\264\ See id.
\265\ See id. at 49448-49.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange proposes specific business conduct and operational
rules for BSTX Participants that include rules covering similar subject
matter as existing Exchange Rules applicable to Options
Participants.\266\ The Exchange also proposes to adopt proposed BSTX
Rule 24000 (Discipline and Summary Suspension), which provides that the
provisions of the Exchange's existing BOX Rule 11000 Series (Summary
Suspension), 12000 Series (Discipline), 13000 Series (Review of Certain
Exchange Actions), and 14000 Series (Arbitration) shall be applicable
to BSTX Participants and trading on the BSTX System.\267\ According to
the Exchange, the Exchange already has Rules pertaining to discipline
and suspension of Exchange Participants that it proposes to extend to
BSTX Participants and trading on the BSTX System.\268\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\266\ See id. at 49427-30 (discussing proposed BSTX Rules
regarding Business Conduct for BSTX Participants (Rule 19000
Series), Financial and Operational Rules for BSTX Participants (Rule
20000 Series), Supervision (Rule 21000 Series) and Miscellaneous
Provisions (Rule 22000 Series)).
\267\ See id. at 49430-31; proposed BSTX Rule 24000. The
Exchange proposes to make conforming edits to certain existing
Exchange Rules to expand their coverage to all Participants. See
proposed BOX Rules 11010 and 11030.
\268\ See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49431.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition to the Exchange's other disciplinary rules, the
Exchange's Minor Rule Violation Plan (``MRVP'') specifies those
uncontested minor rule violations with sanctions not exceeding $2,500
that would not be subject to the provisions of Rule 19d-1(c)(1) under
the Exchange Act \269\ requiring that an SRO promptly file notice with
the Commission of any final disciplinary action taken with respect to
any person or organization.\270\ The Exchange's MRVP includes the
policies and procedures set forth in existing BOX Rule 12140
(Imposition of Fines for Minor Violations).\271\ The Exchange proposes
to amend its MRVP to add certain rules relating to BSTX to the list of
rules eligible for MRVP treatment, by amending BOX Rule 12140 and
adopting proposed BSTX Rule 24010.\272\ Specifically, the Exchange
proposes to modify BOX Rule 12140 to specify that rules and penalties
relating to trading on BSTX are set forth in proposed BSTX Rule
24010.\273\ The Exchange also proposes to set forth a fine schedule for
violations of certain rules related to activity on BSTX and provide
that a subsequent violation is calculated on the basis of a rolling 12-
month period.\274\ The Exchange states that the rules that it proposes
to include in its MRVP are comparable to the rules included in the
MRVPs of other national securities exchanges.\275\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\269\ 17 CFR 240.19d-1(c)(1).
\270\ See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49443.
\271\ See id.
\272\ See Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 121.
\273\ See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49443; proposed BOX Rule
12140(f). The Exchange also proposes to make conforming changes to
replaced references to ``Options Participant'' with ``Participant.''
See proposed BOX Rule 12140.
\274\ See proposed BSTX Rule 24010. The Exchange proposes that
violations of the following rules would be appropriate for
dispositions under the MRVP: proposed BSTX Rule 19180
(Communications with the Public), proposed BSTX Rule 20000
(Maintenance, Retention and Furnishing of Records), proposed BSTX
Rule 25070 (Consolidated Audit Trail), proposed BSTX Rule 25130
(Locking or Crossing Quotations in NMS Stocks), proposed BSTX Rule
25210(a)(1) (BSTX Market Maker Two-Sided Quote Obligation), and
proposed BSTX Rule 25120 (Short Sales). See proposed BSTX Rule
24010(b).
\275\ See Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 122 (citing to IEX
Rule 9.218, Cboe BZX Rule 8.15.01, and MIAX Pearl Rule 1014(d)(15)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange represents that it plans to join the multi-party Rule
17d-2 Plan for Allocation of Regulatory Responsibilities Regarding
Regulation NMS and is in the process of joining certain Rule 17d-2
agreements, including those applicable to equities trading and equities
market surveillance.\276\ The Exchange states that it is a participant
in the NMS plan related to the Consolidated Audit Trail, and that it
intends to join the Order Execution Quality Disclosure Plan, the LULD
Plan, and the applicable plans for the consolidation and dissemination
of
[[Page 5898]]
market data.\277\ The Exchange also states that it will ensure that its
membership in the Intermarket Surveillance Group extends to the BSTX
facility.\278\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\276\ See id. at 143. Rule 17d-2 provides that any two or more
SROs may file with the Commission a plan for allocating among such
SROs the responsibility to receive regulatory reports from persons
who are members or participants of more than one of such SROs to
examine such persons for compliance, or to enforce compliance by
such persons, with specified provisions of the Exchange Act, the
rules and regulations thereunder, and the rules of such SROs, or to
carry out other specified regulatory functions with respect to such
persons. See 17 CFR 240.17d-2.
\277\ See Amendment No. 2, supra note 9, at 144.
\278\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
According to the Exchange, the Exchange will perform automated
surveillance of trading on BSTX for the purposes of maintaining a fair
and orderly market at all times and monitor BSTX to identify unusual
trading patterns and determine whether particular trading activity
requires further regulatory investigation by FINRA.\279\ The Exchange
states that it will oversee the process for determining and
implementing trading halts, identifying and responding to unusual
market conditions, and administering the Exchange's process for
identifying and remediating ``clearly erroneous trades'' pursuant to
proposed BSTX Rule 25110.\280\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\279\ See OIP, supra note 7, 86 FR at 49449. The Exchange states
that it currently does this for options. See id.
\280\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange has also proposed BSTX Rules 25050 and 25080(b)(3) to
comply with the LULD Plan.\281\ Proposed BSTX Rule 25080(b)(3) provides
that, for any execution to occur during Regular Trading Hours, such
executions must comply with the LULD plan, as set forth in BSTX Rule
25050.\282\ Proposed BSTX Rule 25050 describes the Exchange's order
handling procedures to comply with the LULD Plan.\283\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\281\ See id. at 49433. The Exchange represents that it intends
to join the LULD Plan prior to the commencement of trading
Securities. See id.
\282\ See proposed BSTX Rule 25080(b)(3).
\283\ See proposed BSTX Rule 25050. See also supra note 125
(discussing how proposed BSTX Rule 25050 is substantially similar to
the rules of other national securities exchanges adopted in
connection with the LULD Plan).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange's proposed regulatory structure raises no new
regulatory issues. Accordingly, the Commission finds that the
Exchange's proposed regulatory structure, including the Exchange's
proposed application of its existing rules to BSTX and BSTX
Participants' conduct, the Exchange's commitment to establish new or
expand existing agreements with third-parties including FINRA for
purposes such as surveillance, member discipline, and overseeing and
enforcing compliance with BSTX rules, and proposed BSTX Rule 25050
requiring compliance with the LULD Plan are consistent with the
Exchange Act and, in particular, the Section 6(b)(5) requirement that a
national securities exchange's rules be designed to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanisms of a free and open market and a national market system, and
protect investors and the public interest.\284\ The Commission also
finds that the Exchange's proposed regulatory structure is consistent
with the requirements of Section 6(b)(1) of the Exchange Act, which
requires a national securities exchange to be so organized and have the
capacity to be able to carry out the purposes of the Exchange Act and
to comply, and to enforce compliance by its members and persons
associated with its members, with the Exchange Act and the rules and
regulations thereunder, and the rules of the Exchange,\285\ and with
Sections 6(b)(6) and 6(b)(7) of the Exchange Act,\286\ which require an
Exchange to provide fair procedures for the disciplining of members and
persons associated with members.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\284\ See 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
\285\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(1).
\286\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(6) and (b)(7).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Finally, the Commission finds that the proposed changes to the
Exchange's MRVP are consistent with the public interest, the protection
of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purpose of the
Exchange Act, as required by Rule 19d-1(c)(2) under the Exchange
Act,\287\ which governs minor rule violation plans. The Commission
believes that BOX Rule 12140 is an effective way to discipline a member
for a minor violation of a rule. The Commission believes that the
Exchange's proposal to add rules related to BSTX to the list of rules
that are eligible for minor rule violation plan treatment is consistent
with the Exchange Act because it may help the Exchange's ability to
better carry out its oversight and enforcement responsibilities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\287\ 17 CFR 240.19d-1(c)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In approving the proposed changes to the Exchange's MRVP, the
Commission in no way minimizes the importance of complying with the
Exchange's rules and all other rules subject to fines under BOX Rule
12140 and proposed BSTX Rule 24010. The Commission believes that a
violation of any SRO's rules, as well as Commission rules, is a serious
matter. However, BOX Rule 12140 and proposed BSTX Rule 24010 provide a
reasonable means of addressing rule violations that may not rise to the
level of requiring formal disciplinary proceedings, while providing
greater flexibility in handling certain violations. Consistent with its
rules and the requirements of the Exchange Act, the Commission expects
that the Exchange will continue to conduct surveillance with due
diligence and make a determination based on its findings, on a case-by-
case basis, whether a fine of more or less than the recommended amount
is appropriate for a violation under BOX Rule 12140 and proposed BSTX
Rule 24010 or whether a violation requires formal disciplinary action.
Section 11(a) of the Exchange Act
Section 11(a)(1) of the Exchange Act \288\ prohibits a member of a
national securities exchange from effecting transactions on that
exchange for its own account, the account of an associated person, or
an account over which it or its associated person exercises investment
discretion (collectively, ``covered accounts'') unless an exception
applies. Rule 11a2-2(T) under the Exchange Act,\289\ known as the
``effect versus execute'' rule, provides exchange members with an
exemption from the Section 11(a)(1) prohibition. Rule 11a2-2(T) permits
an exchange member, subject to certain conditions, to effect
transactions for covered accounts by arranging for an unaffiliated
member to execute transactions on the exchange. To comply with Rule
11a2-2(T)'s conditions, a member: (i) Must transmit the order from off
the exchange floor; (ii) may not participate in the execution of the
transaction once it has been transmitted to the member performing the
execution; \290\ (iii) may not be affiliated with the executing member;
and (iv) with respect to an account over which the member or an
associated person has investment discretion, neither the member nor its
associated person may retain any compensation in connection with
effecting the transaction except as provided in the Rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\288\ 15 U.S.C. 78k(a)(1).
\289\ 17 CFR 240.11a2-2(T).
\290\ This prohibition also applies to associated persons. The
member may, however, participate in clearing and settling the
transaction.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In a letter to the Commission, the Exchange requests that the
Commission concur with the Exchange's conclusion that Exchange members
that enter orders into the BSTX System satisfy the conditions of Rule
11a2-2(T).\291\ For the reasons set forth below, the Commission
believes that members entering orders into the BSTX System could
satisfy the requirements of Rule 11a2-2(T).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\291\ See Letter from Lisa Fall, President, BOX, dated December
23, 2021 (``BSTX 11(a) Letter'') available on the Commission's
website at: https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-box-2021-06/srbox202106-20110741-264607.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Rule's first condition is that orders for covered accounts be
transmitted from off the exchange floor. In the context of automated
trading
[[Page 5899]]
systems, the Commission has found that the off-floor transmission
condition is met if a covered account order is transmitted from a
remote location directly to an exchange's floor by electronic
means.\292\ The Exchange has represented that BSTX does not have a
physical trading floor, and the BSTX System will receive orders from
members electronically through remote terminals or computer-to-computer
interfaces.\293\ The Commission believes that the BSTX System satisfies
this off-floor transmission condition.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\292\ See, e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 78101
(June 17, 2016), 81 FR 41141 (June 23, 2016) (order approving IEX
exchange registration); 75650 (August 7, 2015), 80 FR 48600 (August
13, 2015) (order approving EDGX Options as an options trading
facility of the EDGX Exchange, Inc.); 61419 (January 26, 2010), 75
FR 5157 (February 1, 2010) (order approving the BATS Options as an
options trading facility of the BATS Exchange, Inc.); 49068 (January
13, 2004), 69 FR 2775 (January 20, 2004) (order approving the Boston
Options Exchange as an options trading facility of the Boston Stock
Exchange); 44983 (October 25, 2001), 66 FR 55225 (November 1, 2001)
(order approving Archipelago Exchange as electronic trading facility
of the Pacific Exchange); 29237 (May 24, 1991), 56 FR 24853 (May 31,
1991) (regarding NYSE's Off-Hours Trading Facility); 15533 (January
29, 1979), 44 FR 6084 (January 31, 1979) (``1979 Release''); and
14563 (March 14, 1978), 43 FR 11542 (March 17, 1978) (``1978
Release'') (regarding NYSE's Designated Order Turnaround System).
\293\ See BSTX 11(a) Letter, supra note 291, at 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The second condition states that the member and any associated
person not participate in the execution of its order after the order
has been transmitted. The Exchange has represented that at no time
following the submission of an order is a member or an associated
person of the member able to acquire control or influence over the
result or timing of the order's execution.\294\ According to the
Exchange, the execution of a member's order is determined solely by
what quotes and orders are present in the BSTX System at the time the
member submits the order, and the order priority based on the BSTX
rules.\295\ Accordingly, the Commission believes that a member and its
associated persons do not participate in the execution of an order
submitted to the BSTX System.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\294\ See id. at 4.
\295\ See id. The Exchange states that a member may cancel or
modify the order, or modify the instructions for executing the
order, provided such cancellations or modifications are transmitted
from off an exchange floor. See id. at 3 (citing the 1978 Release).
The Commission has stated that the non-participation requirement is
satisfied under such circumstances, so long as such modifications or
cancellations are also transmitted from off the floor. See 1978
Release, supra note 292 (stating that the ``non-participation
requirement does not prevent initiating members from canceling or
modifying orders (or the instructions pursuant to which the
initiating member wishes orders to be executed) after the orders
have been transmitted to the executing member, provided that any
such instructions are also transmitted from off the floor'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The third condition states that the order be executed by an
exchange member who is unaffiliated with the member initiating the
order. The Commission has stated that this condition is satisfied when
automated exchange facilities are used, as long as the design of these
systems ensures that members do not possess any special or unique
trading advantages in handling their orders after transmitting them to
the exchange.\296\ The Exchange has represented that the design of the
BSTX System ensures that no member has any special or unique trading
advantage in the handling of its orders after transmitting its orders
to the Exchange.\297\ Based on the Exchange's representation that the
design of the BSTX System ensures that no member has any special or
unique trading advantage in the handling of its orders after
transmitting its orders to BSTX, the Commission believes that the BSTX
System satisfies this condition of Rule 11a2-2(T).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\296\ In considering the operation of automated execution
systems operated by an exchange, the Commission has stated that
while there is not an independent executing exchange member, the
execution of an order is automatic once it has been transmitted into
the system. Because the design of these systems ensures that members
do not possess any special or unique trading advantages in handling
their orders after transmitting them to the exchange, the Commission
has stated that executions obtained through these systems satisfy
the independent execution requirement of Rule 11a2-2(T). See 1979
Release, supra note 292.
\297\ See BSTX 11(a) Letter, supra note 291, at 4. The Exchange
also states that access to the BSTX Market Data Blockchain will not
allow a member or an associated person of such member to acquire
control or influence over the result or timing of an order's
execution. See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fourth, in the case of a transaction effected for an account with
respect to which the initiating member or an associated person thereof
exercises investment discretion, neither the initiating member nor any
associated person thereof may retain any compensation in connection
with effecting the transaction, unless the person authorized to
transact business for the account has expressly provided otherwise by
written contract referring to Section 11(a) of the Exchange Act and
Rule 11a2-2(T) thereunder.\298\ Members trading for covered accounts
over which they exercise investment discretion must comply with this
condition in order to rely on the rule's exemption.\299\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\298\ 17 CFR 240.11a2-2(T)(a)(2)(iv). In addition, Rule 11a2-
2(T)(d) requires a member or associated person authorized by written
contract to retain compensation, in connection with effecting
transactions for covered accounts over which such member or
associated persons thereof exercises investment discretion, to
furnish at least annually to the person authorized to transact
business for the account a statement setting forth the total amount
of compensation retained by the member in connection with effecting
transactions for the account during the period covered by the
statement. See 17 CFR 240.11a2-2(T)(d). See also 1978 Release, supra
note 292 (stating ``[t]he contractual and disclosure requirements
are designed to assure that accounts electing to permit transaction-
related compensation do so only after deciding that such
arrangements are suitable to their interests'').
\299\ See BSTX 11(a) Letter, supra note 291, at 4-5.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments on Amendment Nos. 2 and 3 to the Proposed
Rule Change
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning whether Amendment Nos. 2 and 3 are consistent with
the Exchange Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following
methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-BOX-2021-06 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-BOX-2021-06. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit
[[Page 5900]]
personal identifying information from comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-BOX-2021-06, and should be
submitted on or before February 23, 2022.
V. Accelerated Approval of Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by
Amendment Nos. 2 and 3
The Commission finds good cause to approve the proposed rule
change, as modified by Amendment Nos. 2 and 3, prior to the thirtieth
day after the date of publication of notice of the filing of Amendment
Nos. 2 and 3 in the Federal Register. The Commission notes that the
original proposal and the proposal as modified by Amendment No. 1 were
published for comment in the Federal Register.\300\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\300\ See Notice, supra note 3; OIP, supra note 7.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In Amendment No. 2, the Exchange revised the proposal to: (i)
Provide additional information regarding the connectivity and co-
location services that will be offered at the Exchange's primary data
center, including equidistant cabling arrangements; (ii) state that,
pursuant to its authority under proposed BSTX Rule 26101, the Exchange
would not permit an issuer to list a new class of securities on BSTX
that is not distinct from an existing class of securities of the
issuer; (iii) modify proposed rule text regarding the proposed BSTX
Market Data Blockchain to clarify that non-BSTX Participants will have
access to anonymized, general market data and specify what fields are
included in this data, to specify that the market data will apply to
trading activity for regular trading hours, and to clarify that users
will view the data through an application programming interface; (iv)
modify proposed rule text related to the proposed order parameter that
would be used to preference T+0 settlement to add the T+0 Cut-Off Time
by which an execution must occur to be eligible for T+0 settlement; (v)
provide additional description to clarify operation of the proposed
BSTX Market Data Blockchain and proposed optional order parameter for
T+0 or T+1 settlement; and (vi) make technical and conforming changes.
The Commission believes that these changes help to clarify the proposal
and address concerns raised by commenters regarding the Exchange's
equidistant cabling arrangements and the potential for listing a class
of securities that has the same economic and voting rights as a class
of securities listed on another national securities exchange. The
Commission also believes that the changes regarding General Market Data
on the BSTX Market Data Blockchain help to clarify access for non-BSTX
Participants and how the Exchange will anonymize the data. The
Commission further believes that the addition of the T+0 Cut-Off Time
will help to ensure that trades submitted to NSCC for T+0 settlement
are received by NSCC before NSCC's cut-off time and thus can be settled
using the consolidated net settlement process, and that the additional
explanation regarding the order parameter for T+0 and T+1 settlement
helps to clarify how this functionality will operate.
In addition, the Exchange made several changes in Amendment No. 2
to bring the proposed rules into closer alignment with the rules of
other national securities exchanges on which equities securities are
traded, including by: (i) Modifying certain trading rules regarding
securities eligible for trading, prohibitions against trading ahead of
customer orders, round lots, minimum price variants, auctions used to
open or reopen trading, the dissemination of market data concerning
such auctions, risk controls, market maker registration process and
obligations, business conduct, trading practices, maintaining books and
records, off-exchange transactions, scope of the MRVP, trade reporting
and the dissemination of quotations, clearly erroneous executions, and
locking and crossing quotations; (ii) eliminating a proposed rule
regarding an audit trail that has been superseded by rules pertaining
to the Consolidated Audit Trail; (iii) modifying certain proposed
listing standards regarding the listing of secondary classes and
preferred stock, the required number of market makers, requirements for
securities of foreign issuers that would apply to the listing of
Canadian issuers, the listing of securities subject to an exemption
from Exchange Act registration, the method of computing the payment of
cash in lieu of fractional shares, the settlement timing of securities
transactions, requirements to notify the Exchange before engaging in
activities relating to a proxy contest, requirements that listed
companies establish and maintain an internal audit function, the
calculation of regulatory transaction fees under Section 31 of the
Exchange Act, and the distribution of funds in the event of liquidation
of the Exchange; and (iv) eliminating a proposed listing requirement
that an applicant provide a legal opinion that its security qualifies
as a security under applicable United States securities laws. The
Exchange also made changes in Amendment Nos. 2 and 3 to certain
quantitative listing requirements to comply with the thresholds and
other terminology in Rule 3a51-1. The Commission believes that these
changes help make these aspects of the proposal substantially similar
to the existing rules of national securities exchanges.
Accordingly, the Commission finds good cause, pursuant to Section
19(b)(2) of the Exchange Act,\301\ to approve the proposed rule change,
as modified by Amendment Nos. 2 and 3, on an accelerated basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\301\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
VI. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Exchange Act \302\ and Rule 19d-1(c)(2) thereunder,\303\ that the
proposed rule change (SR-BOX-2021-06), as modified by Amendment Nos. 2
and 3 thereto, be, and it hereby is, approved on an accelerated basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\302\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
\303\ 17 CFR 240.19d-1(c)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Although the Commission's approval of the proposed rule change is
final, and the proposed rules are therefore effective, it is further
ordered that the operation of BSTX is conditioned on the satisfaction
of the requirements below:
A. Participation in National Market System Plans Relating to
Equities Trading. BOX must join all relevant national market system
plans related to BSTX equities trading, including: (1) The Consolidated
Tape Association Plan, the Consolidated Quotation Plan, and the Nasdaq
UTP Plan (or any successors thereto); (2) the National Market System
Plan to Address Extraordinary Market Volatility; and (3) the National
Market System Plan Establishing Procedures Under Rule 605 of Regulation
NMS.
B. Regulatory Services Agreement and Rule 17d-2 Agreements. BOX
must ensure that all necessary changes are made to its Regulatory
Services Agreement with FINRA and must be a party to the multi-party
Rule 17d-2 agreements applicable to BSTX equities trading and equities
market surveillance.
C. Intermarket Surveillance Group. BOX must ensure that its
membership in the Intermarket Surveillance Group extends to the BSTX
facility.
D. Governance Structure. BOX must ensure, consistent with the
requirements of Section 19(b) and Rule 19b-4, that it has adopted a
rule establishing BSTX as a facility of the Exchange.\304\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\304\ See also supra note 12 and accompanying text.
\305\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
[[Page 5901]]
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\305\
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-02086 Filed 2-1-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P