Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip from India: Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review and Rescission, in Part; 2019, 5464-5466 [2022-01959]

Download as PDF tkelley on DSK125TN23PROD with NOTICE 5464 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 21 / Tuesday, February 1, 2022 / Notices and Environmental Industries (OEEI), Industry and Analysis, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce at (202) 482–6083; email: Cora.Dickson@trade.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background: The Secretary of Commerce established the REEEAC pursuant to discretionary authority and in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. app.), on July 14, 2010. The REEEAC was re-chartered most recently on June 5, 2020. The REEEAC provides the Secretary of Commerce with advice from the private sector on the development and administration of programs and policies to expand the export competitiveness of U.S. renewable energy and energy efficiency products and services. More information about the Committee, including the list of appointed members for this charter, is published online at https://trade.gov/ reeeac. On February 17, 2022, the REEEAC will hold the sixth meeting of its current charter term. The Committee, with officials from the Department of Commerce and other agencies, will discuss major issues affecting the competitiveness of the U.S. renewable energy and energy efficiency industries, covering four broad themes: Trade promotion and market access, global decarbonization, clean energy supply chains, and technology and innovation. The Committee will also review recommendations developed by subcommittee in these areas. This meeting will also include a briefing from interagency officials on U.S. government efforts to deploy offshore wind energy and develop a domestic supply chain for offshore wind goods and services. To receive an agenda please make a request to REEEAC DFO Cora Dickson per above. The agenda will be made available no later than February 11, 2022. The Committee meeting will be open to the public and will be accessible to people with disabilities. All guests are required to register in advance by the deadline identified under the DATE caption. Requests for auxiliary aids must be submitted by the registration deadline. Last minute requests will be accepted but may not be possible to fill. A limited amount of time before the close of the meeting will be available for oral comments from members of the public attending the meeting. To accommodate as many speakers as possible, the time for public comments will be limited to two to five minutes per person (depending on number of public participants). Individuals VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:19 Jan 31, 2022 Jkt 256001 wishing to reserve speaking time during the meeting must contact REEEAC DFO Cora Dickson using the contact information above and submit a brief statement of the general nature of the comments, as well as the name and address of the proposed participant, by 5:00 p.m. EST on Friday, February 11, 2022. If the number of registrants requesting to make statements is greater than can be reasonably accommodated during the meeting, the International Trade Administration may conduct a lottery to determine the speakers. Speakers are requested to submit a copy of their oral comments by email to Cora Dickson for distribution to the participants in advance of the meeting. Any member of the public may submit written comments concerning the REEEAC’s affairs at any time before or after the meeting. Comments may be submitted via email to the Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Advisory Committee, c/o: Cora Dickson, DFO, Office of Energy and Environmental Industries, U.S. Department of Commerce; Cora.Dickson@trade.gov. To be considered during the meeting, public comments must be transmitted to the REEEAC prior to the meeting. As such, written comments must be received no later than 5:00 p.m. EST on Friday, February 11, 2022. Comments received after that date will be distributed to the members but may not be considered at the meeting. Copies of REEEAC meeting minutes will be available within 30 days following the meeting. Devin Horne, Senior International Trade Specialist, Office of Energy and Environmental Industries. [FR Doc. 2022–02033 Filed 1–31–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DR–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [C–533–825] Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip from India: Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review and Rescission, in Part; 2019 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines certain producers/exporters of polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet, and strip (PET film) from India received countervailable subsidies during the period of review (POR), January 1, 2019, AGENCY: PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 through December 31, 2019. Additionally, we are rescinding the review for one company with no shipments of subject merchandise to the United States during the POR. DATES: Applicable February 1, 2022. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nicholas Czajkowski or Richard Roberts, AD/CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1395 or (202) 482–3464, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background Commerce published the Preliminary Results of this review on August 2, 2021, and invited comments from interested parties.1 On November 1, 2021, Commerce extended the deadline for the final results of this review until January 28, 2022.2 For a complete description of the events that occurred since the Preliminary Results, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.3 Scope of the Order The products covered by this order are all gauges of raw, pretreated, or primed polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet and strip, whether extruded or coextruded from India. For a complete description of the scope of this order, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum. Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised by the interested parties in their case and rebuttal briefs are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of these issues is provided in Appendix I to this notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and CVD Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https:// 1 See Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip from India: Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review, Rescission in Part, and Intent To Rescind in Part; 2019; 86 FR 41450 (August 8, 2021) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM). 2 See Memorandum, ‘‘Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet and Strip from India: Extension of Deadline for Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2019,’’ dated November 1, 2021. 3 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Results of the Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2019: Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip from India,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). E:\FR\FM\01FEN1.SGM 01FEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 21 / Tuesday, February 1, 2022 / Notices access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at https://access.trade.gov/public/ FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. Changes Since the Preliminary Results Based on the comments received from interested parties, we revised the calculation of the net countervailable subsidy rates for all companies. For a discussion of these issues, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum. Methodology Commerce conducted this review in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). For each of the subsidy programs found countervailable, we determine that there is a subsidy, i.e., a government-provided financial contribution that gives rise to a benefit to the recipient, and that the subsidy is specific.4 For a description of the methodology underlying all of Commerce’s conclusions, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum. Rescission of Administrative Review, in Part tkelley on DSK125TN23PROD with NOTICE It is Commerce’s practice to rescind an administrative review of a countervailing duty order, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), when there are no reviewable entries of subject merchandise during the POR for which liquidation is suspended.5 Normally, upon completion of an administrative review, the suspended entries are liquidated at the countervailing duty assessment rate calculated for the review period.6 Therefore, for an administrative review of a company to be conducted, there must be a reviewable, suspended entry that Commerce can instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to liquidate at the calculated countervailing duty assessment rate calculated for the review period.7 According to the CBP import data, one company subject to this review, Vacmet India Limited, did not have reviewable entries of subject merchandise during the POR for which 4 See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act regarding financial contribution; section 771(5)(E) of the Act regarding benefit; and section 771(5A) of the Act regarding specificity. 5 See, e.g., Lightweight Thermal Paper from the People’s Republic of China: Notice of Rescission of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2015, 82 FR 14349 (March 20, 2017); see also Circular Welded Carbon Quality Steel Pipe from the People’s Republic of China: Rescission of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2017, 84 FR 14650 (April 11, 2019). 6 See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(2). 7 See 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3). VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:19 Jan 31, 2022 Jkt 256001 liquidation is suspended. Because there is no evidence on the record of this segment of the proceeding to indicate that this company had entries, exports, or sales of subject merchandise to the United States during the POR, we are rescinding the administrative review with respect to this company consistent with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3). Rate for Non-Selected Companies Under Review There are three companies for which a review was requested and not rescinded, and which were not selected as mandatory respondents. For these companies, because the rates calculated for the sole mandatory respondent, SRF, was above de minimis and not based entirely on facts available, we are applying to the non-selected companies SRF’s rate. This methodology to establish the all-others subsidy rate is consistent with our practice and section 705(c)(5)(A) of the Act, which governs the calculation of the all-others rate in investigations. Final Results of Review We determine the following net countervailable subsidy rate for the POR January 1, 2019, through December 31, 2019: Manufacturer/exporter Subsidy rate (percent ad valorem) SRF Limited 8 ........................ 5.39 Review-Specific Average Rate Applicable to the Following Companies 9 Ester Industries Limited ........ Garware Polyester Ltd .......... Jindal Poly Films Ltd 10 ........ 5.39 5.39 5.39 Disclosure We intend to disclose to interested parties the calculations and analysis performed for these final results of review within five days of the date of publication of this notice, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Assessment In accordance with section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(2), Commerce shall determine, and CBP shall assess, 8 SRF Limited is also known as SRF Limited of India. 9 This rate is based on the rate for the respondent that was selected for individual review, excluding rates that are zero, de minimis, or based entirely on facts available. See section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act. 10 This company is also known as Jindal Poly Films Ltd. (India). This company was incorrectly identified in the Preliminary Results as Jindal Polyester Ltd. The name has been corrected in these final results. PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 5465 countervailing duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review. Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 days after publication of the final results of this review in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is filed at the U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within 90 days of publication). With respect to the company for which this administrative review is rescinded (i.e., Vacmet India Limited), countervailing duties shall be assessed at rates equal to the cash deposit rate required at the time of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption, during the period January 1, 2019, through December 31, 2019, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). Cash Deposit Requirements In accordance with section 751(a)(1) of the Act, Commerce also intends to instruct CBP to collect cash deposits of estimated countervailing duties in the amounts shown above for the abovelisted companies with regard to shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication of these final results of review. For all non-reviewed firms, CBP will continue to collect cash deposits of estimated countervailing duties at the all-others rate or the most recent company-specific rate applicable to the company, as appropriate. These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Administrative Protective Order This notice also serves as a final reminder to parties subject to an administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. Notification to Interested Parties The final results are issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5). E:\FR\FM\01FEN1.SGM 01FEN1 5466 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 21 / Tuesday, February 1, 2022 / Notices Dated: January 26, 2022. Lisa W. Wang, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. VII. Recommendation Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE [FR Doc. 2022–01959 Filed 1–31–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order Information IV. Subsidies Valuation V. Analysis of Programs VI. Analysis of Comments Comment 1: Whether Commerce Correctly Calculated SRF’s Benefits Received for the Special Economic Zones (SEZ) Program Comment 2: Whether Commerce Used the Correct Denominator to Calculate Benefits for the SEZ Program International Trade Administration Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Advance Notification of Sunset Review and the International Trade Commission automatically initiate and conduct reviews to determine whether revocation of a countervailing or antidumping duty order or termination of an investigation suspended under section 704 or 734 of the Act would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping or a countervailable subsidy (as the case may be) and of material injury. AGENCY: Upcoming Sunset Reviews for March 2022 Background Every five years, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), the Department of Commerce (Commerce) Pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act, the following Sunset Reviews are scheduled for initiation in March 2022 and will appear in that month’s Notice of Initiation of Five-Year Sunset Reviews (Sunset Reviews). Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. Department contact Antidumping Duty Proceedings Aluminum Extrusions from China, A–570–967 (2nd Review) ...................................................................... Pure Magnesium from China, A–570–832 (5th Review) .............................................................................. R–134 from China, A–570–044 (1st Review) ............................................................................................... Stainless Sheet and Strip from China, A–570–042 (1st Review) ................................................................ Phosphorous Copper from South Korea, A–580–085 (1st Review) ............................................................ Jacky Arrowsmith, (202) 482–5255. Mary Kolberg, (202) 482–1785. Mary Kolberg, (202) 482–1785. Jacky Arrowsmith, (202) 482–5255. Mary Kolberg, (202) 482–1785. Countervailing Duty Proceedings Aluminum Extrusions from China, C–570–968 (2nd Review) ...................................................................... Stainless Sheet and Strip from China, C–570–043 (1st Review) ................................................................ Jacky Arrowsmith, (202) 482–5255. Jacky Arrowsmith, (202) 482–5255. tkelley on DSK125TN23PROD with NOTICE Suspended Investigations No Sunset Review of suspended investigations is scheduled for initiation in March 2022. Commerce’s procedures for the conduct of Sunset Reviews are set forth in 19 CFR 351.218. The Notice of Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Review provides further information regarding what is required of all parties to participate in Sunset Review. Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.103(c), Commerce will maintain and make available a service list for these proceedings. To facilitate the timely preparation of the service list(s), it is requested that those seeking recognition as interested parties to a proceeding contact Commerce in writing within 10 days of the publication of the Notice of Initiation. Please note that if Commerce receives a Notice of Intent to Participate from a member of the domestic industry within 15 days of the date of initiation, the review will continue. Thereafter, any interested party wishing to participate in the Sunset Review must provide substantive comments in response to the notice of initiation no later than 30 days after the date of initiation. Note that Commerce has modified certain of its requirements VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:19 Jan 31, 2022 Jkt 256001 for serving documents containing business proprietary information, until further notice.1 This notice is not required by statute but is published as a service to the international trading community. Dated: January 18, 2022. James Maeder, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. [FR Doc. 2022–02014 Filed 1–31–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–533–867] revocation of the antidumping duty (AD) order on welded stainless pressure pipe (WSPP) from India would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping at the levels indicated in the ‘‘Final Results of Review’’ section of this notice. DATES: Applicable February 1, 2022. John Conniff, AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1009. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background Welded Stainless Pressure Pipe From India: Final Results of Expedited Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: As a result of this expedited sunset review, the Department of Commerce (Commerce) finds that AGENCY: 1 See Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD Service Requirements Due to COVID–19; Extension of Effective Period, 85 FR 41363 (July 10, 2020). PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 On October 1, 2021, Commerce published the notice of initiation of the sunset review of the AD order 1 on WSPP from India, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).2 On October 15, 2021, Commerce received a notice of intent to participate from the domestic 1 See Welded Stainless Pressure Pipe from India: Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Order, 81 FR 81062 (November 17, 2016) (Order). 2 See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Review, 86 FR 54423 (October 1, 2021). E:\FR\FM\01FEN1.SGM 01FEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 21 (Tuesday, February 1, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5464-5466]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-01959]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[C-533-825]


Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip from India: 
Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review and 
Rescission, in Part; 2019

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
U.S. Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines certain 
producers/exporters of polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet, and 
strip (PET film) from India received countervailable subsidies during 
the period of review (POR), January 1, 2019, through December 31, 2019. 
Additionally, we are rescinding the review for one company with no 
shipments of subject merchandise to the United States during the POR.

DATES: Applicable February 1, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nicholas Czajkowski or Richard 
Roberts, AD/CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, 
International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-1395 
or (202) 482-3464, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    Commerce published the Preliminary Results of this review on August 
2, 2021, and invited comments from interested parties.\1\ On November 
1, 2021, Commerce extended the deadline for the final results of this 
review until January 28, 2022.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip from 
India: Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative 
Review, Rescission in Part, and Intent To Rescind in Part; 2019; 86 
FR 41450 (August 8, 2021) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying 
Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM).
    \2\ See Memorandum, ``Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet and 
Strip from India: Extension of Deadline for Final Results of 
Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2019,'' dated November 1, 
2021.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For a complete description of the events that occurred since the 
Preliminary Results, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the 
Results of the Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2019: 
Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip from India,'' 
dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues 
and Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order

    The products covered by this order are all gauges of raw, 
pretreated, or primed polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet and strip, 
whether extruded or coextruded from India. For a complete description 
of the scope of this order, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.

Analysis of Comments Received

    All issues raised by the interested parties in their case and 
rebuttal briefs are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A 
list of these issues is provided in Appendix I to this notice. The 
Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file 
electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and CVD 
Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 
registered users at https://

[[Page 5465]]

access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and 
Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.

Changes Since the Preliminary Results

    Based on the comments received from interested parties, we revised 
the calculation of the net countervailable subsidy rates for all 
companies. For a discussion of these issues, see the Issues and 
Decision Memorandum.

Methodology

    Commerce conducted this review in accordance with section 
751(a)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). For each 
of the subsidy programs found countervailable, we determine that there 
is a subsidy, i.e., a government-provided financial contribution that 
gives rise to a benefit to the recipient, and that the subsidy is 
specific.\4\ For a description of the methodology underlying all of 
Commerce's conclusions, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act regarding 
financial contribution; section 771(5)(E) of the Act regarding 
benefit; and section 771(5A) of the Act regarding specificity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Rescission of Administrative Review, in Part

    It is Commerce's practice to rescind an administrative review of a 
countervailing duty order, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), when there 
are no reviewable entries of subject merchandise during the POR for 
which liquidation is suspended.\5\ Normally, upon completion of an 
administrative review, the suspended entries are liquidated at the 
countervailing duty assessment rate calculated for the review 
period.\6\ Therefore, for an administrative review of a company to be 
conducted, there must be a reviewable, suspended entry that Commerce 
can instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to liquidate at 
the calculated countervailing duty assessment rate calculated for the 
review period.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See, e.g., Lightweight Thermal Paper from the People's 
Republic of China: Notice of Rescission of Countervailing Duty 
Administrative Review; 2015, 82 FR 14349 (March 20, 2017); see also 
Circular Welded Carbon Quality Steel Pipe from the People's Republic 
of China: Rescission of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 
2017, 84 FR 14650 (April 11, 2019).
    \6\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(2).
    \7\ See 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    According to the CBP import data, one company subject to this 
review, Vacmet India Limited, did not have reviewable entries of 
subject merchandise during the POR for which liquidation is suspended. 
Because there is no evidence on the record of this segment of the 
proceeding to indicate that this company had entries, exports, or sales 
of subject merchandise to the United States during the POR, we are 
rescinding the administrative review with respect to this company 
consistent with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3).

Rate for Non-Selected Companies Under Review

    There are three companies for which a review was requested and not 
rescinded, and which were not selected as mandatory respondents. For 
these companies, because the rates calculated for the sole mandatory 
respondent, SRF, was above de minimis and not based entirely on facts 
available, we are applying to the non-selected companies SRF's rate. 
This methodology to establish the all-others subsidy rate is consistent 
with our practice and section 705(c)(5)(A) of the Act, which governs 
the calculation of the all-others rate in investigations.

Final Results of Review

    We determine the following net countervailable subsidy rate for the 
POR January 1, 2019, through December 31, 2019:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                           Subsidy rate
                  Manufacturer/exporter                     (percent ad
                                                             valorem)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SRF Limited \8\.........................................            5.39
------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Review-Specific Average Rate Applicable to the Following Companies \9\
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ester Industries Limited................................            5.39
Garware Polyester Ltd...................................            5.39
Jindal Poly Films Ltd \10\..............................            5.39
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclosure

    We intend to disclose to interested parties the calculations and 
analysis performed for these final results of review within five days 
of the date of publication of this notice, in accordance with 19 CFR 
351.224(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ SRF Limited is also known as SRF Limited of India.
    \9\ This rate is based on the rate for the respondent that was 
selected for individual review, excluding rates that are zero, de 
minimis, or based entirely on facts available. See section 
735(c)(5)(A) of the Act.
    \10\ This company is also known as Jindal Poly Films Ltd. 
(India). This company was incorrectly identified in the Preliminary 
Results as Jindal Polyester Ltd. The name has been corrected in 
these final results.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Assessment

    In accordance with section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR 
351.212(b)(2), Commerce shall determine, and CBP shall assess, 
countervailing duties on all appropriate entries covered by this 
review. Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP no 
earlier than 35 days after publication of the final results of this 
review in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is filed at the 
U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will 
direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties 
to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within 
90 days of publication).
    With respect to the company for which this administrative review is 
rescinded (i.e., Vacmet India Limited), countervailing duties shall be 
assessed at rates equal to the cash deposit rate required at the time 
of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption, during the 
period January 1, 2019, through December 31, 2019, in accordance with 
19 CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i).

Cash Deposit Requirements

    In accordance with section 751(a)(1) of the Act, Commerce also 
intends to instruct CBP to collect cash deposits of estimated 
countervailing duties in the amounts shown above for the above-listed 
companies with regard to shipments of subject merchandise entered, or 
withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of 
publication of these final results of review. For all non-reviewed 
firms, CBP will continue to collect cash deposits of estimated 
countervailing duties at the all-others rate or the most recent 
company-specific rate applicable to the company, as appropriate. These 
cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until 
further notice.

Administrative Protective Order

    This notice also serves as a final reminder to parties subject to 
an administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under 
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written 
notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or 
conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure 
to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable 
violation.

Notification to Interested Parties

    The final results are issued and published in accordance with 
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5).


[[Page 5466]]


    Dated: January 26, 2022.
Lisa W. Wang,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix--List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision 
Memorandum

I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order Information
IV. Subsidies Valuation
V. Analysis of Programs
VI. Analysis of Comments
    Comment 1: Whether Commerce Correctly Calculated SRF's Benefits 
Received for the Special Economic Zones (SEZ) Program
    Comment 2: Whether Commerce Used the Correct Denominator to 
Calculate Benefits for the SEZ Program
VII. Recommendation

[FR Doc. 2022-01959 Filed 1-31-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P