Certain Video Security Equipment and Systems, Related Software, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same Notice of Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting Complainants' Motion for Leave To Amend the Complaint and Notice of Investigation, 4658-4659 [2022-01811]

Download as PDF jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1 4658 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 19 / Friday, January 28, 2022 / Notices comment on new, proposed, revised, and continuing collections of information. This helps us assess the impact of our information collection requirements and minimize the public’s reporting burden. It also helps the public understand our information collection requirements and provide the requested data in the desired format. A Federal Register notice with a 60day public comment period soliciting comments on this collection of information was published on September 30, 2021 (86 FR 54237). No comments were received. As part of our continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burdens, we are again soliciting comments from the public and other Federal agencies on the proposed ICR that is described below. We are especially interested in public comment addressing the following: (1) Whether or not the collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether or not the information will have practical utility; (2) The accuracy of our estimate of the burden for this collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (3) Ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) How might the agency minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of response. Comments that you submit in response to this notice are a matter of public record. Before including your address, phone number, email address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment—including your personal identifying information—may be made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. Abstract: This Part implements the requirement in Section 701(28) of the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA), which grants an exemption from the requirements of SMCRA to operators extracting not more than 16 2⁄3 percentage tonnage of coal incidental to the extraction of other minerals. This information will be used by the VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:03 Jan 27, 2022 Jkt 256001 regulatory authorities to make that determination. Title of Collection: Exemption for Coal Extraction Incidental to the Extraction of Other Minerals. OMB Control Number: 1029–0089. Form Number: None. Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved collection. Respondents/Affected Public: State and Tribal governments. Total Estimated Number of Annual Respondents: 67. Total Estimated Number of Annual Responses: 206. Estimated Completion Time per Response: Varies 1 hour to 30 hours. Total Estimated Number of Annual Burden Hours: 734. Respondent’s Obligation: Required to obtain or retain a benefit. Frequency of Collection: One time. Total Estimated Annual Nonhour Burden Cost: $800. An agency may not conduct or sponsor and a person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The authority for this action is the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Mark J. Gehlhar, Information Collection Clearance Officer, Division of Regulatory Support. [FR Doc. 2022–01804 Filed 1–27–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–05–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–1281] Certain Video Security Equipment and Systems, Related Software, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same Notice of Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting Complainants’ Motion for Leave To Amend the Complaint and Notice of Investigation U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 7) of the presiding administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) granting the complainants’ motion for leave to amend the complaint and notice of investigation to transfer the asserted patents in this investigation from certain complainants to SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00107 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 complainant Motorola Solutions, Inc. and to add Avigilon USA Corporation as an additional complainant. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lynde Herzbach, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–3228. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help accessing EDIS, please email EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On September 14, 2021, the Commission instituted this investigation under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337 (‘‘section 337’’), based on a complaint filed by Motorola Solutions, Inc. of Chicago, Illinois (‘‘Motorola Solutions’’); Avigilon Corporation of British Columbia, Canada; Avigilon Fortress Corporation of British Columbia, Canada; Avigilon Patent Holding 1 Corporation of British Columbia, Canada (‘‘Avigilon Patent Holding’’); and Avigilon Technologies Corporation of British Columbia, Canada (collectively, ‘‘Complainants’’). See 86 FR 51182–83 (Sept. 14, 2021). The complaint alleges a violation of section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, sale for importation, or sale after importation into the United States of certain video security equipment and systems, related software, components thereof, and products containing same by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,868,912 (‘‘the ’912 patent’’); 10,726,312 (‘‘the ’312 patent’’); and 8,508,607 (‘‘the ’607 patent’’) (collectively, ‘‘the Asserted Patents’’). Id. The complaint further alleges that a domestic industry exists. Id. The notice of investigation names Verkada Inc. of San Mateo, California as the only respondent. Id. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations is also named as a party. Id. On December 27, 2021, Complainants filed an unopposed motion seeking leave to file an amended complaint and notice of investigation to reflect the transfer of all right, title, and interest in: (1) The ’312 patent from Avigilon Corporation to Motorola Solutions; (2) E:\FR\FM\28JAN1.SGM 28JAN1 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 19 / Friday, January 28, 2022 / Notices the ’912 patent from Avigilon Fortress Corporation to Motorola Solutions; and (3) the ’607 patent from Avigilon Patent Holding to Motorola Solutions. The motion also seeks to add a recent new licensee, Avigilon USA Corporation of Dallas, Texas, as an additional complainant. On December 28, 2021, the ALJ issued the subject ID (Order No. 7) granting Complainants’ unopposed motion for leave to amend the complaint and notice of investigation. Order No. 7 (December 28, 2021). The subject ID finds that Complainants’ unopposed motion is supported by good cause pursuant to Commission Rule 210.14(b) (19 CFR 210.14(b)) and that there is no prejudice to any party if the motion is granted. No party petitioned for review of the subject IDs. The Commission has determined not to review the subject ID (Order No. 7). Complainant Avigilon USA Corporation is added as a complainant to this investigation. The Commission vote for this determination took place on January 25, 2022. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in part 210 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 210). By order of the Commission. Issued: January 25, 2022. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2022–01811 Filed 1–27–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE [OMB Number 1125–NEW] Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection Comments Requested; Volunteer Waiver for Gratuitous Services (EOIR– 62) Executive Office for Immigration Review, Department of Justice. ACTION: 30-Day notice. AGENCY: The Department of Justice (DOJ), Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR), will be submitting the following information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. This proposed information collection was previously jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1 SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:03 Jan 27, 2022 Jkt 256001 published in the Federal Register on September 28, 2021, allowing for a 60day comment period. DATES: Comments are encouraged and will be accepted for an additional 30 days until February 28, 2022. ADDRESSES: Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/ PRAMain. Find this particular information collection by selecting ‘‘Currently under 30-day Review—Open for Public Comments’’ or by using the search function. If you need a copy of the proposed information collection or additional information, please contact Lauren Alder Reid, Assistant Director, Office of Policy, Executive Office for Immigration Review, 5107 Leesburg Pike, Suite 2500, Falls Church, VA 22041, telephone: (703) 305–0289. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Written comments and suggestions from the public and affected agencies concerning the proposed collection of information are encouraged. Your comments should address one or more of the following four points: —Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; —Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; —Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and/or —Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. Overview of This Information Collection 1. Type of Information Collection: New collection. 2. The Title of the Form/Collection: Waiver for Volunteer Services. 3. The agency form number, if any, and the applicable component of the Department sponsoring the collection: The form number is EOIR–62; the sponsoring component is Executive Office for Immigration Review, United States Department of Justice. PO 00000 Frm 00108 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 4659 4. Affected public who will be asked or required to respond, as well as a brief abstract: Primary: private individuals. Other: None. Abstract: This information collection is necessary to accept volunteer services pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 1342 and 5 U.S.C. 3111. 5. An estimate of the total number of respondents and the amount of time estimated for an average respondent to respond: It is estimated that 200 respondents will complete the form annually with an average of 5 minutes per response. 6. An estimate of the total public burden (in hours) associated with the collection: The estimated public burden associated with this collection is 16.7 hours. It is estimated that 200 respondents will take 6 minutes to complete the form. If additional information is required contact: Melody Braswell, Department Clearance Officer, United States Department of Justice, Justice Management Division, Policy and Planning Staff, Two Constitution Square, 145 N Street NE, 3E.405B, Washington, DC 20530. Dated: January 24, 2022. Melody D. Braswell, Department Clearance Officer for PRA, U.S. Department of Justice. [FR Doc. 2022–01696 Filed 1–27–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410–30–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Notice of Lodging of Proposed Amendment to a Consent Decree Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act On January 24, 2022, the Department of Justice lodged a proposed amendment to the 1986 consent decree with the United States District Court for the District of Maine in the lawsuit entitled United States, et al. v. Inmont Corporation, et al., Civil Action No. 86– 0029–B. In that action, the United States sought, pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (‘‘CERCLA’’), 42 U.S.C. 9601, et seq., injunctive relief and recovery of response costs regarding the Winthrop Landfill Superfund Site in Winthrop, Maine (the ‘‘Site’’). The matter was originally resolved in 1986 when the United States entered into a Consent Decree with four potentially responsible parties regarding the Site (the ‘‘1986 Consent Decree’’). The 1986 Consent Decree required, among other things, that the settlers implement the remedial E:\FR\FM\28JAN1.SGM 28JAN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 19 (Friday, January 28, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4658-4659]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-01811]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-1281]


Certain Video Security Equipment and Systems, Related Software, 
Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same Notice of Commission 
Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting 
Complainants' Motion for Leave To Amend the Complaint and Notice of 
Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined not to review an initial determination 
(``ID'') (Order No. 7) of the presiding administrative law judge 
(``ALJ'') granting the complainants' motion for leave to amend the 
complaint and notice of investigation to transfer the asserted patents 
in this investigation from certain complainants to complainant Motorola 
Solutions, Inc. and to add Avigilon USA Corporation as an additional 
complainant.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lynde Herzbach, Office of the General 
Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-3228. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation may 
be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help accessing EDIS, please email 
[email protected]. General information concerning the Commission may 
also be obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on 
this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal 
on (202) 205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On September 14, 2021, the Commission 
instituted this investigation under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 
1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337 (``section 337''), based on a 
complaint filed by Motorola Solutions, Inc. of Chicago, Illinois 
(``Motorola Solutions''); Avigilon Corporation of British Columbia, 
Canada; Avigilon Fortress Corporation of British Columbia, Canada; 
Avigilon Patent Holding 1 Corporation of British Columbia, Canada 
(``Avigilon Patent Holding''); and Avigilon Technologies Corporation of 
British Columbia, Canada (collectively, ``Complainants''). See 86 FR 
51182-83 (Sept. 14, 2021). The complaint alleges a violation of section 
337 based upon the importation into the United States, sale for 
importation, or sale after importation into the United States of 
certain video security equipment and systems, related software, 
components thereof, and products containing same by reason of 
infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,868,912 (``the 
'912 patent''); 10,726,312 (``the '312 patent''); and 8,508,607 (``the 
'607 patent'') (collectively, ``the Asserted Patents''). Id. The 
complaint further alleges that a domestic industry exists. Id. The 
notice of investigation names Verkada Inc. of San Mateo, California as 
the only respondent. Id. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations is 
also named as a party. Id.
    On December 27, 2021, Complainants filed an unopposed motion 
seeking leave to file an amended complaint and notice of investigation 
to reflect the transfer of all right, title, and interest in: (1) The 
'312 patent from Avigilon Corporation to Motorola Solutions; (2)

[[Page 4659]]

the '912 patent from Avigilon Fortress Corporation to Motorola 
Solutions; and (3) the '607 patent from Avigilon Patent Holding to 
Motorola Solutions. The motion also seeks to add a recent new licensee, 
Avigilon USA Corporation of Dallas, Texas, as an additional 
complainant.
    On December 28, 2021, the ALJ issued the subject ID (Order No. 7) 
granting Complainants' unopposed motion for leave to amend the 
complaint and notice of investigation. Order No. 7 (December 28, 2021). 
The subject ID finds that Complainants' unopposed motion is supported 
by good cause pursuant to Commission Rule 210.14(b) (19 CFR 210.14(b)) 
and that there is no prejudice to any party if the motion is granted.
    No party petitioned for review of the subject IDs.
    The Commission has determined not to review the subject ID (Order 
No. 7). Complainant Avigilon USA Corporation is added as a complainant 
to this investigation.
    The Commission vote for this determination took place on January 
25, 2022.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and 
in part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 
part 210).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: January 25, 2022.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2022-01811 Filed 1-27-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.