Agency Information Collection Activities; Comment Request; Unemployment Insurance Data Validation (DV) Program, 3588-3589 [2022-01245]
Download as PDF
3588
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 15 / Monday, January 24, 2022 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employee Benefits Security
Administration
Employment and Training
Administration
[Exemption Application No. D–12002]
Withdrawal of Notice of Proposed
Exemption Involving the Retirement
System of the American National Red
Cross Located in Washington, DC
This document provides
withdrawal of a notice of pendency
before the Department of Labor (the
Department) of a proposed individual
exemption from certain of the
prohibited transaction restrictions of the
Employee Retirement Income Security
Act of 1974 (ERISA) and/or the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986 (the Code).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Anna Vaughan of the Department at
(202) 693–8565. (This is not a toll-free
number.)
SUMMARY:
Withdrawal of Proposed Exemption
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
In the Federal Register dated
November 18, 2021 (86 FR 64688), the
Department of Labor (the Department)
published a notice of proposed
exemption (the Notice) from ERISA and
the Code.
The Notice proposed the following
transactions: (a) The in-kind
contribution (the Contribution) by the
American National Red Cross (the Red
Cross) of nine condominium units
located at 2025 E Street NW,
Washington DC to the Retirement
System of The American National Red
Cross (the Plan); and (b) the assignment
of certain rights and obligations from
the Red Cross to the Plan in connection
with the Contribution.
Subsequent to the publication of the
Notice in the Federal Register, the Red
Cross informed the Department that the
Red Cross had decided not to pursue the
requested exemption, due to changed
circumstances.
Therefore, under the authority of
ERISA Section 408(a) and Code Section
4975(c)(2) the Department is hereby
withdrawing the Notice from the
Federal Register.
Signed at Washington, DC.
George Christopher Cosby,
Acting Director, Office of Exemption
Determinations, Employee Benefits Security
Administration, U.S. Department of Labor.
BILLING CODE 4510–29–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:11 Jan 21, 2022
Jkt 256001
ACTION:
Notice.
The Department of Labor’s
(DOL) Employment and Training
Administration (ETA) is soliciting
comments concerning a proposed
extension for the authority to conduct
the information collection request (ICR)
titled, ‘‘Unemployment Insurance Data
Validation (DV) Program.’’ This
comment request is part of continuing
Departmental efforts to reduce
paperwork and respondent burden in
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA).
DATES: Consideration will be given to all
written comments received by March
25, 2022.
ADDRESSES: A copy of this ICR with
applicable supporting documentation,
including a description of the likely
respondents, proposed frequency of
response, and estimated total burden,
may be obtained free by contacting
Rachel Beistel by telephone at 202–693–
2736 (this is not a toll-free number),
TTY 1–877–889–5627 (this is not a tollfree number), or by email at
Beistel.Rachel@dol.gov.
Submit written comments about, or
requests for a copy of, this ICR by mail
or courier to the U.S. Department of
Labor, Employment and Training
Administration, Office of
Unemployment Insurance Room S–
4519, 200 Constitution Avenue NW,
Washington, DC 20210, by email:
Beistel.Rachel@dol.gov, or by Fax 202–
693–3975.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Rachel Beistel by telephone at 202–693–
2746 (this is not a toll-free number) or
by email at beistel.rachel@dol.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: DOL, as
part of continuing efforts to reduce
paperwork and respondent burden,
conducts a pre-clearance consultation
program to provide the general public
and Federal agencies an opportunity to
comment on proposed and/or
continuing collections of information
before submitting them to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for final
approval. This program helps to ensure
requested data can be provided in the
desired format, reporting burden (time
and financial resources) is minimized,
collection instruments are clearly
SUMMARY:
Employee Benefits Security
Administration, Labor.
ACTION: Notice of withdrawal of
proposed exemption.
AGENCY:
[FR Doc. 2022–01236 Filed 1–21–22; 8:45 am]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Comment Request;
Unemployment Insurance Data
Validation (DV) Program
PO 00000
Frm 00094
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
understood, and the impact of collection
requirements can be properly assessed.
Section 303(a)(6) of the Social
Security Act specifies that the Secretary
of Labor will not certify State UI
programs to receive administrative
grants unless the State’s law includes
provisions for ‘‘making of such reports
. . . as the Secretary of Labor may from
time to time require, and compliance
with such provisions as the Secretary
may from time to time find necessary to
assure the correctness and verification
of such reports.’’ DOL considers DV to
be one of those ‘‘provisions . . .
necessary to assure the correctness and
verification’’ of the reports submitted by
states.
The Government Performance and
Results Act of 1993 (GPRA) requires
Federal agencies to develop annual and
strategic performance plans that
establish performance goals, have
concrete indicators of the extent that
goals are achieved, and set performance
targets. Each year, the agency is to issue
a report that ‘‘evaluate[s] the
performance plan for the current fiscal
year relative to the performance
achieved toward the performance goals
in the fiscal year covered by the report.’’
DOL emphasizes the importance of
complete and accurate information for
program monitoring and improving
program performance ‘‘. . . as a
framework for agencies to communicate
progress in achieving their missions.’’
(OMB Circular A–11, Section 15.5).
The UI DV program employs a refined
and automated approach to review 363
elements reported on 15 UI Benefits
reports and 1 UI Tax report. DOL uses
many of these elements for key
performance measures and for workload
analysis.
The validation process assesses the
accuracy of the counts of transactions.
Guided by a detailed handbook, the
state UI agency first constructs extract
files containing all pertinent individual
transactions for the desired report
period to be validated. These
transactions are grouped into 16 UI
Benefits and 5 UI Tax populations. Each
transaction record contains the
necessary characteristics or dimensions
that enable it to be summed into an
independent recount of what the state
has already reported. DOL provides
state agencies with software that edits
the extract file (to identify and remove
duplicate transactions and improperly
built records, for example), then
aggregates the transactions to produce
an independent reconstruction or
‘‘validation count’’ of the reported
figure. The reported count is considered
valid by this ‘‘quantity’’ validation test
if it is within plus or minus two percent
E:\FR\FM\24JAN1.SGM
24JAN1
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 15 / Monday, January 24, 2022 / Notices
of the validation count (plus or minus
one percent for a GPRA-related
element).
The software also draws samples of
most transaction types from the extract
files. Guided by a state-specific
handbook, the validators review these
sample records against documentation
in the state’s management information
system to determine whether the
transactions in the extract file are
supported by system documentation.
This qualitative check determines
whether the state management
information system accurately reflects
data elements of UI transactions. The UI
Benefits extract files are considered to
pass this ‘‘quality’’ review if random
samples indicate that no more than five
percent of the records contain errors.
The UI Tax extract files are subjected to
different ‘‘quality’’ tests. An extract file
of a population is considered valid only
if the reported count differs from the
reconstructed (validation) count by no
more than the appropriate criterion of
plus or minus two percent or plus or
minus one percent and the samples of
transactions have satisfied all quality
tests.
For Federal fiscal years 2011 and
beyond, all states are required to
conduct a complete validation every
three years. In the following three cases,
the three-year rule does not apply and
a re-validation must occur within one
year: (1) Groups of reported counts that
are summed for purposes of making a
Pass/Fail determination and do not pass
validation by being within plus or
minus two percent of the reconstructed
counts or the extract file does not pass
all quality tests; (2) the validation
applies to the two UI Benefits
populations and one UI Tax population
used for GPRA measures; and (3) reports
are produced by new reporting software
following a state’s information
technology modernization effort. Every
year, states must also certify that
Module 3, the state specific validation
manual of the UI Benefits and UI Tax
information systems, are up to date.
Section 303(a)(6) of the Social Security
Act authorizes this information
collection.
This information collection is subject
to the PRA. A Federal agency generally
cannot conduct or sponsor a collection
of information, and the public is
generally not required to respond to an
information collection, unless it is
approved by OMB under the PRA and
displays a currently valid OMB Control
Number. In addition, notwithstanding
any other provisions of law, no person
shall generally be subject to penalty for
failing to comply with a collection of
information that does not display a
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:11 Jan 21, 2022
Jkt 256001
valid Control Number. See 5 CFR
1320.5(a) and 1320.6.
Interested parties are encouraged to
provide comments to the contact shown
in the ADDRESSES section. Comments
must be written to receive
consideration, and they will be
summarized and included in the request
for OMB approval of the final ICR. In
order to help ensure appropriate
consideration, comments should
mention OMB control number 1205–
0431.
Submitted comments will also be a
matter of public record for this ICR and
posted on the internet, without
redaction. DOL encourages commenters
not to include personally identifiable
information, confidential business data,
or other sensitive statements/
information in any comments.
DOL is particularly interested in
comments that:
• Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
• Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
• Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
• Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
(e.g., permitting electronic submission
of responses).
Agency: DOL–ETA.
Type of Review: Extension without
changes.
Title of Collection: Unemployment
Insurance (UI) Data Validation (DV).
Form: ETA Handbooks 361 and 411.
OMB Control Number: 1205–0431.
Affected Public: State Workforce
Agencies.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
53.
Frequency: Varies.
Total Estimated Annual Responses:
53.
Estimated Average Time per
Response: Varies.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 23,644.
Total Estimated Annual Other Cost
Burden: $0.
PO 00000
Frm 00095
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
3589
Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A).
Angela Hanks,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Employment
and Training, Labor.
[FR Doc. 2022–01245 Filed 1–21–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FW–P
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
[Notice: (22–006)]
Notice of Deep Space Food Challenge
Phase 2
National Aeronautics and
Space Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Notice of Deep Space Food
Challenge Phase 2.
AGENCY:
Phase 2 of the Deep Space
Food Challenge is open, and teams that
wish to compete may now register.
NASA seeks to stimulate research and
technology solutions to support future
missions and inspire new national
aerospace capabilities through public
prize competitions called Centennial
Challenges. The Deep Space Food
Challenge is one such competition.
Centennial Challenges are managed at
NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center in
Huntsville, Alabama and are part of the
Prizes, Challenges, and Crowdsourcing
program within NASA’s Space
Technology Mission Directorate at the
agency’s Headquarters in Washington.
Phase 2 of the Deep Space Food
Challenge is a prize competition with a
total prize purse of $1,000,000 USD,
(one million United States dollars) to be
awarded to Competitor Teams that build
and successfully demonstrate
prototypes of novel technologies,
systems and approaches for food
production for long duration space
exploration missions. Teams are not
required to have participated in Phase 1
and must meet eligibility requirements
in order to participate. NASA is
providing the prize purse for U.S.
Teams, and the Methuselah Foundation
will be conducting the Challenge on
behalf of NASA. NASA is considering a
Phase 3 (full system demonstration
phase) of the competition depending on
the outcome of the Phase 2 competition.
DATES: Challenge registration for Phase
2 opened January 20, 2022 and will
remain open until February 28, 2022.
No further requests for registration will
be accepted after the stated deadline.
Other important dates, including
deadlines for key deliverables from the
Teams, are listed on the Challenge
website: deepspacefoodchallenge.org.
ADDRESSES: Phase 2 of the Deep Space
Food Challenge requires competitors to
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\24JAN1.SGM
24JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 15 (Monday, January 24, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3588-3589]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-01245]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
Agency Information Collection Activities; Comment Request;
Unemployment Insurance Data Validation (DV) Program
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Labor's (DOL) Employment and Training
Administration (ETA) is soliciting comments concerning a proposed
extension for the authority to conduct the information collection
request (ICR) titled, ``Unemployment Insurance Data Validation (DV)
Program.'' This comment request is part of continuing Departmental
efforts to reduce paperwork and respondent burden in accordance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA).
DATES: Consideration will be given to all written comments received by
March 25, 2022.
ADDRESSES: A copy of this ICR with applicable supporting documentation,
including a description of the likely respondents, proposed frequency
of response, and estimated total burden, may be obtained free by
contacting Rachel Beistel by telephone at 202-693-2736 (this is not a
toll-free number), TTY 1-877-889-5627 (this is not a toll-free number),
or by email at [email protected].
Submit written comments about, or requests for a copy of, this ICR
by mail or courier to the U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and
Training Administration, Office of Unemployment Insurance Room S-4519,
200 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20210, by email:
[email protected], or by Fax 202-693-3975.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rachel Beistel by telephone at 202-
693-2746 (this is not a toll-free number) or by email at
[email protected]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: DOL, as part of continuing efforts to reduce
paperwork and respondent burden, conducts a pre-clearance consultation
program to provide the general public and Federal agencies an
opportunity to comment on proposed and/or continuing collections of
information before submitting them to the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) for final approval. This program helps to ensure requested
data can be provided in the desired format, reporting burden (time and
financial resources) is minimized, collection instruments are clearly
understood, and the impact of collection requirements can be properly
assessed.
Section 303(a)(6) of the Social Security Act specifies that the
Secretary of Labor will not certify State UI programs to receive
administrative grants unless the State's law includes provisions for
``making of such reports . . . as the Secretary of Labor may from time
to time require, and compliance with such provisions as the Secretary
may from time to time find necessary to assure the correctness and
verification of such reports.'' DOL considers DV to be one of those
``provisions . . . necessary to assure the correctness and
verification'' of the reports submitted by states.
The Government Performance and Results Act of 1993 (GPRA) requires
Federal agencies to develop annual and strategic performance plans that
establish performance goals, have concrete indicators of the extent
that goals are achieved, and set performance targets. Each year, the
agency is to issue a report that ``evaluate[s] the performance plan for
the current fiscal year relative to the performance achieved toward the
performance goals in the fiscal year covered by the report.'' DOL
emphasizes the importance of complete and accurate information for
program monitoring and improving program performance ``. . . as a
framework for agencies to communicate progress in achieving their
missions.'' (OMB Circular A-11, Section 15.5).
The UI DV program employs a refined and automated approach to
review 363 elements reported on 15 UI Benefits reports and 1 UI Tax
report. DOL uses many of these elements for key performance measures
and for workload analysis.
The validation process assesses the accuracy of the counts of
transactions. Guided by a detailed handbook, the state UI agency first
constructs extract files containing all pertinent individual
transactions for the desired report period to be validated. These
transactions are grouped into 16 UI Benefits and 5 UI Tax populations.
Each transaction record contains the necessary characteristics or
dimensions that enable it to be summed into an independent recount of
what the state has already reported. DOL provides state agencies with
software that edits the extract file (to identify and remove duplicate
transactions and improperly built records, for example), then
aggregates the transactions to produce an independent reconstruction or
``validation count'' of the reported figure. The reported count is
considered valid by this ``quantity'' validation test if it is within
plus or minus two percent
[[Page 3589]]
of the validation count (plus or minus one percent for a GPRA-related
element).
The software also draws samples of most transaction types from the
extract files. Guided by a state-specific handbook, the validators
review these sample records against documentation in the state's
management information system to determine whether the transactions in
the extract file are supported by system documentation. This
qualitative check determines whether the state management information
system accurately reflects data elements of UI transactions. The UI
Benefits extract files are considered to pass this ``quality'' review
if random samples indicate that no more than five percent of the
records contain errors. The UI Tax extract files are subjected to
different ``quality'' tests. An extract file of a population is
considered valid only if the reported count differs from the
reconstructed (validation) count by no more than the appropriate
criterion of plus or minus two percent or plus or minus one percent and
the samples of transactions have satisfied all quality tests.
For Federal fiscal years 2011 and beyond, all states are required
to conduct a complete validation every three years. In the following
three cases, the three-year rule does not apply and a re-validation
must occur within one year: (1) Groups of reported counts that are
summed for purposes of making a Pass/Fail determination and do not pass
validation by being within plus or minus two percent of the
reconstructed counts or the extract file does not pass all quality
tests; (2) the validation applies to the two UI Benefits populations
and one UI Tax population used for GPRA measures; and (3) reports are
produced by new reporting software following a state's information
technology modernization effort. Every year, states must also certify
that Module 3, the state specific validation manual of the UI Benefits
and UI Tax information systems, are up to date. Section 303(a)(6) of
the Social Security Act authorizes this information collection.
This information collection is subject to the PRA. A Federal agency
generally cannot conduct or sponsor a collection of information, and
the public is generally not required to respond to an information
collection, unless it is approved by OMB under the PRA and displays a
currently valid OMB Control Number. In addition, notwithstanding any
other provisions of law, no person shall generally be subject to
penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information that
does not display a valid Control Number. See 5 CFR 1320.5(a) and
1320.6.
Interested parties are encouraged to provide comments to the
contact shown in the ADDRESSES section. Comments must be written to
receive consideration, and they will be summarized and included in the
request for OMB approval of the final ICR. In order to help ensure
appropriate consideration, comments should mention OMB control number
1205-0431.
Submitted comments will also be a matter of public record for this
ICR and posted on the internet, without redaction. DOL encourages
commenters not to include personally identifiable information,
confidential business data, or other sensitive statements/information
in any comments.
DOL is particularly interested in comments that:
Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency,
including whether the information will have practical utility;
Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the
burden of the proposed collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and assumptions used;
Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and
Minimize the burden of the collection of information on
those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate
automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information technology, (e.g., permitting
electronic submission of responses).
Agency: DOL-ETA.
Type of Review: Extension without changes.
Title of Collection: Unemployment Insurance (UI) Data Validation
(DV).
Form: ETA Handbooks 361 and 411.
OMB Control Number: 1205-0431.
Affected Public: State Workforce Agencies.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 53.
Frequency: Varies.
Total Estimated Annual Responses: 53.
Estimated Average Time per Response: Varies.
Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 23,644.
Total Estimated Annual Other Cost Burden: $0.
Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A).
Angela Hanks,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Employment and Training, Labor.
[FR Doc. 2022-01245 Filed 1-21-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FW-P