Agency Information Collection Activities; Comment Request; Unemployment Insurance Data Validation (DV) Program, 3588-3589 [2022-01245]

Download as PDF 3588 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 15 / Monday, January 24, 2022 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF LABOR DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employee Benefits Security Administration Employment and Training Administration [Exemption Application No. D–12002] Withdrawal of Notice of Proposed Exemption Involving the Retirement System of the American National Red Cross Located in Washington, DC This document provides withdrawal of a notice of pendency before the Department of Labor (the Department) of a proposed individual exemption from certain of the prohibited transaction restrictions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) and/or the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the Code). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anna Vaughan of the Department at (202) 693–8565. (This is not a toll-free number.) SUMMARY: Withdrawal of Proposed Exemption jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1 In the Federal Register dated November 18, 2021 (86 FR 64688), the Department of Labor (the Department) published a notice of proposed exemption (the Notice) from ERISA and the Code. The Notice proposed the following transactions: (a) The in-kind contribution (the Contribution) by the American National Red Cross (the Red Cross) of nine condominium units located at 2025 E Street NW, Washington DC to the Retirement System of The American National Red Cross (the Plan); and (b) the assignment of certain rights and obligations from the Red Cross to the Plan in connection with the Contribution. Subsequent to the publication of the Notice in the Federal Register, the Red Cross informed the Department that the Red Cross had decided not to pursue the requested exemption, due to changed circumstances. Therefore, under the authority of ERISA Section 408(a) and Code Section 4975(c)(2) the Department is hereby withdrawing the Notice from the Federal Register. Signed at Washington, DC. George Christopher Cosby, Acting Director, Office of Exemption Determinations, Employee Benefits Security Administration, U.S. Department of Labor. BILLING CODE 4510–29–P VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:11 Jan 21, 2022 Jkt 256001 ACTION: Notice. The Department of Labor’s (DOL) Employment and Training Administration (ETA) is soliciting comments concerning a proposed extension for the authority to conduct the information collection request (ICR) titled, ‘‘Unemployment Insurance Data Validation (DV) Program.’’ This comment request is part of continuing Departmental efforts to reduce paperwork and respondent burden in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA). DATES: Consideration will be given to all written comments received by March 25, 2022. ADDRESSES: A copy of this ICR with applicable supporting documentation, including a description of the likely respondents, proposed frequency of response, and estimated total burden, may be obtained free by contacting Rachel Beistel by telephone at 202–693– 2736 (this is not a toll-free number), TTY 1–877–889–5627 (this is not a tollfree number), or by email at Beistel.Rachel@dol.gov. Submit written comments about, or requests for a copy of, this ICR by mail or courier to the U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration, Office of Unemployment Insurance Room S– 4519, 200 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20210, by email: Beistel.Rachel@dol.gov, or by Fax 202– 693–3975. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rachel Beistel by telephone at 202–693– 2746 (this is not a toll-free number) or by email at beistel.rachel@dol.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: DOL, as part of continuing efforts to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, conducts a pre-clearance consultation program to provide the general public and Federal agencies an opportunity to comment on proposed and/or continuing collections of information before submitting them to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for final approval. This program helps to ensure requested data can be provided in the desired format, reporting burden (time and financial resources) is minimized, collection instruments are clearly SUMMARY: Employee Benefits Security Administration, Labor. ACTION: Notice of withdrawal of proposed exemption. AGENCY: [FR Doc. 2022–01236 Filed 1–21–22; 8:45 am] Agency Information Collection Activities; Comment Request; Unemployment Insurance Data Validation (DV) Program PO 00000 Frm 00094 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 understood, and the impact of collection requirements can be properly assessed. Section 303(a)(6) of the Social Security Act specifies that the Secretary of Labor will not certify State UI programs to receive administrative grants unless the State’s law includes provisions for ‘‘making of such reports . . . as the Secretary of Labor may from time to time require, and compliance with such provisions as the Secretary may from time to time find necessary to assure the correctness and verification of such reports.’’ DOL considers DV to be one of those ‘‘provisions . . . necessary to assure the correctness and verification’’ of the reports submitted by states. The Government Performance and Results Act of 1993 (GPRA) requires Federal agencies to develop annual and strategic performance plans that establish performance goals, have concrete indicators of the extent that goals are achieved, and set performance targets. Each year, the agency is to issue a report that ‘‘evaluate[s] the performance plan for the current fiscal year relative to the performance achieved toward the performance goals in the fiscal year covered by the report.’’ DOL emphasizes the importance of complete and accurate information for program monitoring and improving program performance ‘‘. . . as a framework for agencies to communicate progress in achieving their missions.’’ (OMB Circular A–11, Section 15.5). The UI DV program employs a refined and automated approach to review 363 elements reported on 15 UI Benefits reports and 1 UI Tax report. DOL uses many of these elements for key performance measures and for workload analysis. The validation process assesses the accuracy of the counts of transactions. Guided by a detailed handbook, the state UI agency first constructs extract files containing all pertinent individual transactions for the desired report period to be validated. These transactions are grouped into 16 UI Benefits and 5 UI Tax populations. Each transaction record contains the necessary characteristics or dimensions that enable it to be summed into an independent recount of what the state has already reported. DOL provides state agencies with software that edits the extract file (to identify and remove duplicate transactions and improperly built records, for example), then aggregates the transactions to produce an independent reconstruction or ‘‘validation count’’ of the reported figure. The reported count is considered valid by this ‘‘quantity’’ validation test if it is within plus or minus two percent E:\FR\FM\24JAN1.SGM 24JAN1 jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 15 / Monday, January 24, 2022 / Notices of the validation count (plus or minus one percent for a GPRA-related element). The software also draws samples of most transaction types from the extract files. Guided by a state-specific handbook, the validators review these sample records against documentation in the state’s management information system to determine whether the transactions in the extract file are supported by system documentation. This qualitative check determines whether the state management information system accurately reflects data elements of UI transactions. The UI Benefits extract files are considered to pass this ‘‘quality’’ review if random samples indicate that no more than five percent of the records contain errors. The UI Tax extract files are subjected to different ‘‘quality’’ tests. An extract file of a population is considered valid only if the reported count differs from the reconstructed (validation) count by no more than the appropriate criterion of plus or minus two percent or plus or minus one percent and the samples of transactions have satisfied all quality tests. For Federal fiscal years 2011 and beyond, all states are required to conduct a complete validation every three years. In the following three cases, the three-year rule does not apply and a re-validation must occur within one year: (1) Groups of reported counts that are summed for purposes of making a Pass/Fail determination and do not pass validation by being within plus or minus two percent of the reconstructed counts or the extract file does not pass all quality tests; (2) the validation applies to the two UI Benefits populations and one UI Tax population used for GPRA measures; and (3) reports are produced by new reporting software following a state’s information technology modernization effort. Every year, states must also certify that Module 3, the state specific validation manual of the UI Benefits and UI Tax information systems, are up to date. Section 303(a)(6) of the Social Security Act authorizes this information collection. This information collection is subject to the PRA. A Federal agency generally cannot conduct or sponsor a collection of information, and the public is generally not required to respond to an information collection, unless it is approved by OMB under the PRA and displays a currently valid OMB Control Number. In addition, notwithstanding any other provisions of law, no person shall generally be subject to penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information that does not display a VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:11 Jan 21, 2022 Jkt 256001 valid Control Number. See 5 CFR 1320.5(a) and 1320.6. Interested parties are encouraged to provide comments to the contact shown in the ADDRESSES section. Comments must be written to receive consideration, and they will be summarized and included in the request for OMB approval of the final ICR. In order to help ensure appropriate consideration, comments should mention OMB control number 1205– 0431. Submitted comments will also be a matter of public record for this ICR and posted on the internet, without redaction. DOL encourages commenters not to include personally identifiable information, confidential business data, or other sensitive statements/ information in any comments. DOL is particularly interested in comments that: • Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; • Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; • Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and • Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, (e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses). Agency: DOL–ETA. Type of Review: Extension without changes. Title of Collection: Unemployment Insurance (UI) Data Validation (DV). Form: ETA Handbooks 361 and 411. OMB Control Number: 1205–0431. Affected Public: State Workforce Agencies. Estimated Number of Respondents: 53. Frequency: Varies. Total Estimated Annual Responses: 53. Estimated Average Time per Response: Varies. Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 23,644. Total Estimated Annual Other Cost Burden: $0. PO 00000 Frm 00095 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 3589 Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A). Angela Hanks, Acting Assistant Secretary for Employment and Training, Labor. [FR Doc. 2022–01245 Filed 1–21–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–FW–P NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION [Notice: (22–006)] Notice of Deep Space Food Challenge Phase 2 National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). ACTION: Notice of Deep Space Food Challenge Phase 2. AGENCY: Phase 2 of the Deep Space Food Challenge is open, and teams that wish to compete may now register. NASA seeks to stimulate research and technology solutions to support future missions and inspire new national aerospace capabilities through public prize competitions called Centennial Challenges. The Deep Space Food Challenge is one such competition. Centennial Challenges are managed at NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, Alabama and are part of the Prizes, Challenges, and Crowdsourcing program within NASA’s Space Technology Mission Directorate at the agency’s Headquarters in Washington. Phase 2 of the Deep Space Food Challenge is a prize competition with a total prize purse of $1,000,000 USD, (one million United States dollars) to be awarded to Competitor Teams that build and successfully demonstrate prototypes of novel technologies, systems and approaches for food production for long duration space exploration missions. Teams are not required to have participated in Phase 1 and must meet eligibility requirements in order to participate. NASA is providing the prize purse for U.S. Teams, and the Methuselah Foundation will be conducting the Challenge on behalf of NASA. NASA is considering a Phase 3 (full system demonstration phase) of the competition depending on the outcome of the Phase 2 competition. DATES: Challenge registration for Phase 2 opened January 20, 2022 and will remain open until February 28, 2022. No further requests for registration will be accepted after the stated deadline. Other important dates, including deadlines for key deliverables from the Teams, are listed on the Challenge website: deepspacefoodchallenge.org. ADDRESSES: Phase 2 of the Deep Space Food Challenge requires competitors to SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\24JAN1.SGM 24JAN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 15 (Monday, January 24, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3588-3589]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-01245]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration


Agency Information Collection Activities; Comment Request; 
Unemployment Insurance Data Validation (DV) Program

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Labor's (DOL) Employment and Training 
Administration (ETA) is soliciting comments concerning a proposed 
extension for the authority to conduct the information collection 
request (ICR) titled, ``Unemployment Insurance Data Validation (DV) 
Program.'' This comment request is part of continuing Departmental 
efforts to reduce paperwork and respondent burden in accordance with 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA).

DATES: Consideration will be given to all written comments received by 
March 25, 2022.

ADDRESSES: A copy of this ICR with applicable supporting documentation, 
including a description of the likely respondents, proposed frequency 
of response, and estimated total burden, may be obtained free by 
contacting Rachel Beistel by telephone at 202-693-2736 (this is not a 
toll-free number), TTY 1-877-889-5627 (this is not a toll-free number), 
or by email at [email protected].
    Submit written comments about, or requests for a copy of, this ICR 
by mail or courier to the U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and 
Training Administration, Office of Unemployment Insurance Room S-4519, 
200 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20210, by email: 
[email protected], or by Fax 202-693-3975.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rachel Beistel by telephone at 202-
693-2746 (this is not a toll-free number) or by email at 
[email protected]

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: DOL, as part of continuing efforts to reduce 
paperwork and respondent burden, conducts a pre-clearance consultation 
program to provide the general public and Federal agencies an 
opportunity to comment on proposed and/or continuing collections of 
information before submitting them to the Office of Management and 
Budget (OMB) for final approval. This program helps to ensure requested 
data can be provided in the desired format, reporting burden (time and 
financial resources) is minimized, collection instruments are clearly 
understood, and the impact of collection requirements can be properly 
assessed.
    Section 303(a)(6) of the Social Security Act specifies that the 
Secretary of Labor will not certify State UI programs to receive 
administrative grants unless the State's law includes provisions for 
``making of such reports . . . as the Secretary of Labor may from time 
to time require, and compliance with such provisions as the Secretary 
may from time to time find necessary to assure the correctness and 
verification of such reports.'' DOL considers DV to be one of those 
``provisions . . . necessary to assure the correctness and 
verification'' of the reports submitted by states.
    The Government Performance and Results Act of 1993 (GPRA) requires 
Federal agencies to develop annual and strategic performance plans that 
establish performance goals, have concrete indicators of the extent 
that goals are achieved, and set performance targets. Each year, the 
agency is to issue a report that ``evaluate[s] the performance plan for 
the current fiscal year relative to the performance achieved toward the 
performance goals in the fiscal year covered by the report.'' DOL 
emphasizes the importance of complete and accurate information for 
program monitoring and improving program performance ``. . . as a 
framework for agencies to communicate progress in achieving their 
missions.'' (OMB Circular A-11, Section 15.5).
    The UI DV program employs a refined and automated approach to 
review 363 elements reported on 15 UI Benefits reports and 1 UI Tax 
report. DOL uses many of these elements for key performance measures 
and for workload analysis.
    The validation process assesses the accuracy of the counts of 
transactions. Guided by a detailed handbook, the state UI agency first 
constructs extract files containing all pertinent individual 
transactions for the desired report period to be validated. These 
transactions are grouped into 16 UI Benefits and 5 UI Tax populations. 
Each transaction record contains the necessary characteristics or 
dimensions that enable it to be summed into an independent recount of 
what the state has already reported. DOL provides state agencies with 
software that edits the extract file (to identify and remove duplicate 
transactions and improperly built records, for example), then 
aggregates the transactions to produce an independent reconstruction or 
``validation count'' of the reported figure. The reported count is 
considered valid by this ``quantity'' validation test if it is within 
plus or minus two percent

[[Page 3589]]

of the validation count (plus or minus one percent for a GPRA-related 
element).
    The software also draws samples of most transaction types from the 
extract files. Guided by a state-specific handbook, the validators 
review these sample records against documentation in the state's 
management information system to determine whether the transactions in 
the extract file are supported by system documentation. This 
qualitative check determines whether the state management information 
system accurately reflects data elements of UI transactions. The UI 
Benefits extract files are considered to pass this ``quality'' review 
if random samples indicate that no more than five percent of the 
records contain errors. The UI Tax extract files are subjected to 
different ``quality'' tests. An extract file of a population is 
considered valid only if the reported count differs from the 
reconstructed (validation) count by no more than the appropriate 
criterion of plus or minus two percent or plus or minus one percent and 
the samples of transactions have satisfied all quality tests.
    For Federal fiscal years 2011 and beyond, all states are required 
to conduct a complete validation every three years. In the following 
three cases, the three-year rule does not apply and a re-validation 
must occur within one year: (1) Groups of reported counts that are 
summed for purposes of making a Pass/Fail determination and do not pass 
validation by being within plus or minus two percent of the 
reconstructed counts or the extract file does not pass all quality 
tests; (2) the validation applies to the two UI Benefits populations 
and one UI Tax population used for GPRA measures; and (3) reports are 
produced by new reporting software following a state's information 
technology modernization effort. Every year, states must also certify 
that Module 3, the state specific validation manual of the UI Benefits 
and UI Tax information systems, are up to date. Section 303(a)(6) of 
the Social Security Act authorizes this information collection.
    This information collection is subject to the PRA. A Federal agency 
generally cannot conduct or sponsor a collection of information, and 
the public is generally not required to respond to an information 
collection, unless it is approved by OMB under the PRA and displays a 
currently valid OMB Control Number. In addition, notwithstanding any 
other provisions of law, no person shall generally be subject to 
penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information that 
does not display a valid Control Number. See 5 CFR 1320.5(a) and 
1320.6.
    Interested parties are encouraged to provide comments to the 
contact shown in the ADDRESSES section. Comments must be written to 
receive consideration, and they will be summarized and included in the 
request for OMB approval of the final ICR. In order to help ensure 
appropriate consideration, comments should mention OMB control number 
1205-0431.
    Submitted comments will also be a matter of public record for this 
ICR and posted on the internet, without redaction. DOL encourages 
commenters not to include personally identifiable information, 
confidential business data, or other sensitive statements/information 
in any comments.
    DOL is particularly interested in comments that:
     Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is 
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, 
including whether the information will have practical utility;
     Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the 
burden of the proposed collection of information, including the 
validity of the methodology and assumptions used;
     Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the 
information to be collected; and
     Minimize the burden of the collection of information on 
those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate 
automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection 
techniques or other forms of information technology, (e.g., permitting 
electronic submission of responses).
    Agency: DOL-ETA.
    Type of Review: Extension without changes.
    Title of Collection: Unemployment Insurance (UI) Data Validation 
(DV).
    Form: ETA Handbooks 361 and 411.
    OMB Control Number: 1205-0431.
    Affected Public: State Workforce Agencies.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 53.
    Frequency: Varies.
    Total Estimated Annual Responses: 53.
    Estimated Average Time per Response: Varies.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 23,644.
    Total Estimated Annual Other Cost Burden: $0.
    Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A).

Angela Hanks,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Employment and Training, Labor.
[FR Doc. 2022-01245 Filed 1-21-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FW-P


This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.