Certain Steel Nails From the Republic of Korea: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2019-2020, 2763-2764 [2022-00957]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 12 / Wednesday, January 19, 2022 / Notices
V. Changes Since the Preliminary Results
VI. Subsidies Valuation
VII. Analysis of Programs
VIII. Analysis of Comments
Comment 1: Calculation of a Single Rate
for the Period of Review Covering 2018
and 2019
Comment 2: Application of Adverse Facts
Available (AFA) to Kumar
Comment 3: Pre- and Post-Shipment
Finance Program: Interest Rate
Benchmark for Kumar
Comment 4: Interest Equalization Scheme
on Pre- and Post-Shipment RupeeDenominated Export Credit Program:
Sales Denominator for Kumar
Comment 5: Duty Drawback Program:
Benefit Calculation for Avid
Comment 6: Interest Subsidy Under
Scheme for Assistance of Micro, Small,
and Medium-sized Enterprises (MSMEs)
as per Gujarat Industrial Policy 2009:
Benefit Calculation for Avid
Comment 7: Export Promotion Capital
Goods Scheme: Benefit Calculation for
Avid
IX. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2022–00954 Filed 1–18–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–580–874]
Certain Steel Nails From the Republic
of Korea: Final Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review; 2019–
2020
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(Commerce) determines that producers
and/or exporters subject to this
administrative review made sales of
subject merchandise at less than normal
value during the period of review (POR),
July 1, 2019, through June 30, 2020.
DATES: Applicable January 19, 2022.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eva
Kim, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV,
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–8283.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
Background
On July 19, 2021, Commerce
published the preliminary results of the
2019–2020 administrative review of the
antidumping duty (AD) order on certain
steel nails from the Republic of Korea
(Korea).1 We invited interested parties
1 See Certain Steel Nails from the Republic of
Korea: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:58 Jan 18, 2022
Jkt 256001
to comment on the Preliminary Results.
A full description of the events since the
Preliminary Results is contained in the
Issues and Decision Memorandum.2
Commerce conducted this review in
accordance with section 751(a) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).
Scope of the Order 3
The products covered by the AD
Order are steel nails from Korea. A full
description of the scope of the Order is
contained in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and
rebuttal briefs are listed in the appendix
to this notice and addressed in the
Issues and Decision Memorandum. The
Issues and Decision Memorandum is a
public document and is on file
electronically via Enforcement and
Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a
complete version of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum can be accessed
directly at https://access.trade.gov/
public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on our analysis of the
comments received, we have made no
changes to the margin calculation for
the sole mandatory respondent, Daejin
Steel Company (Daejin), since the
Preliminary Results.
Rate for Non-Examined Company
Generally, when calculating margins
for non-selected respondents,
Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5) of
the Act for guidance, which provides
instructions for calculating the allothers margin in an investigation.
Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act provides
that when calculating the all-others
margin, Commerce will exclude any
zero and de minimis weighted average
dumping margins, as well as any
weighted-average dumping margins
based on total facts available.
Administrative Review and Partial Rescission of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2019–
2020, 86 FR 38015 (July 19, 2021) (Preliminary
Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision
Memorandum.
2 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Final Results of the
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Certain
Steel Nails from the Republic of Korea; 2019–2020,’’
dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by,
this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
3 See Certain Steel Nails from the Republic of
Korea, Malaysia, the Sultanate of Oman, Taiwan,
and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam:
Antidumping Duty Orders, 80 FR 39994 (July 13,
2015) (Order).
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2763
Accordingly, Commerce’s usual practice
has been to average the margins for
selected respondents, excluding margins
that are zero, de minimis, or based
entirely on facts available. In this
review, we calculated a weightedaverage dumping margin of 3.22 percent
for Daejin, the sole mandatory
respondent. In accordance with section
735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, Commerce
assigned Daejin’s calculated weightedaverage dumping margin, i.e., 3.22
percent, to the non-selected company in
these final results. Accordingly, we have
applied a rate of 3.22 percent to the nonselected company, i.e., Koram Inc.
Final Results of Administrative Review
Commerce determines that the
following weighted-average dumping
margins exist for the period July 1, 2019,
through June 30, 2020:
Producer/exporter
Daejin Steel Company ................
Koram Inc ...................................
Weightedaverage
dumping
margin
(percent)
3.22
3.22
Disclosure
Commerce intends to disclose the
calculations performed for these final
results within five days of the date of
publication of this notice, in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
Assessment Rates
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) the
Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1),
Commerce shall determine, and U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
shall assess, antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries of subject
merchandise in accordance with the
final results of this review. We intend to
calculate importer- (or customer-)
specific assessment rates on the basis of
the ratio of the total amount of
antidumping duties calculated for each
importer (or customer’s) examined sales
and the total entered value of the sales
in accordance with 19 CFR
351.212(b)(1). Where an importer- (or
customer-) specific rate is zero or de
minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR
351.106(c)(1), we will instruct CBP to
liquidate the appropriate entries
without regard to antidumping duties.
Commerce’s ‘‘reseller policy’’ will
apply to entries of subject merchandise
during the POR produced by companies
included in these final results of review
for which the reviewed companies did
not know that the merchandise they
sold to the intermediary (e.g., a reseller,
trading company, or exporter) was
destined for the United States. In such
E:\FR\FM\19JAN1.SGM
19JAN1
2764
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 12 / Wednesday, January 19, 2022 / Notices
instances, we will instruct CBP to
liquidate unreviewed entries at the allothers rate if there is no rate for the
intermediate company(ies) involved in
the transaction.4
The final results of this administrative
review shall be the basis for the
assessment of antidumping duties on
entries of merchandise under review
and for future cash deposits of estimated
duties, where applicable. Commerce
intends to issue assessment instructions
to CBP no earlier than 35 days after the
date of publication of the final results of
this review in the Federal Register. If a
timely summons is filed at the U.S.
Court of International Trade, the
assessment instructions will direct CBP
not to liquidate relevant entries until the
time for parties to file a request for a
statutory injunction has expired (i.e.,
within 90 days of publication).
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective for all
shipments of subject merchandise
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the
publication date of these final results, as
provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the
Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for the
companies under review will be equal
to the weighted-average dumping
margin listed above in the ‘‘Final
Results of Review’’ section; (2) for
merchandise exported by producers or
exporters not covered in this review but
covered in a previously completed
segment of this proceeding, the cash
deposit rate will continue to be the
company-specific rate published in the
final results for the most recent period
in which that producer or exporter
participated; (3) if the exporter is not a
firm covered in this review or in any
previous segment of this proceeding, but
the producer is, then the cash deposit
rate will be that established for the
producer of the merchandise in these
final results of review or in the final
results for the most recent period in
which that producer participated; and
(4) if neither the exporter nor the
producer is a firm covered in this
review or in any previously completed
segment of this proceeding, then the
cash deposit rate will be 11.80 percent
ad valorem, the all-others rate
established in the less than fair value
investigation.5 These cash deposit
requirements, when imposed, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
4 For
a full discussion of this practice, see
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954
(May 6, 2003).
5 See Order, 80 FR 39996.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:58 Jan 18, 2022
Jkt 256001
Notification to Importers
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during this POR. Failure to comply with
this requirement could result in
Commerce’s presumption that
reimbursement of the antidumping
duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of doubled antidumping
duties.
International Trade Administration
Notification Regarding Administrative
Protective Order
This notice is the only reminder to
parties subject to the administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the return or
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under the APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
continues to govern business
proprietary information in this segment
of the proceeding. Timely written
notification of the return or destruction
of APO materials, or conversion to
judicial protective order, is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the
regulations and the terms of an APO is
a violation subject to sanction.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing these
final results and this notice in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and
777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR
351.213(h).
Dated: January 12, 2022.
Lisa W. Wang,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1: Whether Commerce Should
Reallocate Certain Common Expenses
from General and Administrative (G&A)
Expenses
Comment 2: Whether Daejin Failed to
Report Product-Specific Cost
Comment 3: Whether Commerce Should
Adjust Differential Pricing Method
V. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2022–00957 Filed 1–18–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
[A–351–842, A–570–022, C–570–023, A–560–
828, C–560–829]
Certain Uncoated Paper From Brazil,
the People’s Republic of China, and
Indonesia: Affirmative Final
Determinations of Circumvention of
the Antidumping Duty Orders and
Countervailing Duty Orders for Certain
Uncoated Paper Rolls; Correction
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On December 14, 2021, the
Department of Commerce (Commerce)
published the Federal Register notice of
the final determination in the anticircumvention inquiries of the
antidumping duty (AD) orders on
certain uncoated paper from Brazil, the
People’s Republic of China (China), and
Indonesia and the countervailing duty
(CVD) orders on certain uncoated paper
from China and Indonesia. This notice
inadvertently did not address
Commerce’s intent to instruct U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to
liquidate certain uncoated paper entries
from China.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Rachel Greenberg, AD/CVD Operations,
Office V, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1110.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Correction
In the Federal Register of December
14, 2021, in FR Doc 2021–26996, on
page 71027, in the section titled
‘‘Liquidation of Entries,’’ between the
second and third paragraph, include the
following:
For all entries of merchandise subject
to the AD order on uncoated paper from
China, entered or withdrawn from
warehouse for consumption on or after
October 18, 2019, through February 28,
2021, Commerce intends to instruct CBP
to liquidate those entries at the
applicable AD rates for those entries.1
For all entries of merchandise subject to
the CVD order on uncoated paper from
China, entered or withdrawn from
warehouse for consumption on or after
October 18, 2019, through December 31,
1 Commerce is not conducting an administrative
review of the AD order on uncoated paper from
China for the period ending on February 28, 2021.
Therefore, Commerce will instruct CBP to liquidate
all entries through the end of the last administrative
review period.
E:\FR\FM\19JAN1.SGM
19JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 12 (Wednesday, January 19, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2763-2764]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-00957]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-580-874]
Certain Steel Nails From the Republic of Korea: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2019-2020
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that
producers and/or exporters subject to this administrative review made
sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value during the
period of review (POR), July 1, 2019, through June 30, 2020.
DATES: Applicable January 19, 2022.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eva Kim, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV,
Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S.
Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC
20230; telephone: (202) 482-8283.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On July 19, 2021, Commerce published the preliminary results of the
2019-2020 administrative review of the antidumping duty (AD) order on
certain steel nails from the Republic of Korea (Korea).\1\ We invited
interested parties to comment on the Preliminary Results. A full
description of the events since the Preliminary Results is contained in
the Issues and Decision Memorandum.\2\ Commerce conducted this review
in accordance with section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended
(the Act).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Certain Steel Nails from the Republic of Korea:
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and
Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2019-
2020, 86 FR 38015 (July 19, 2021) (Preliminary Results), and
accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
\2\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the
Final Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Certain
Steel Nails from the Republic of Korea; 2019-2020,'' dated
concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and
Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order 3
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Certain Steel Nails from the Republic of Korea,
Malaysia, the Sultanate of Oman, Taiwan, and the Socialist Republic
of Vietnam: Antidumping Duty Orders, 80 FR 39994 (July 13, 2015)
(Order).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The products covered by the AD Order are steel nails from Korea. A
full description of the scope of the Order is contained in the Issues
and Decision Memorandum.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs are listed in the
appendix to this notice and addressed in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and
is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov. In
addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can
be accessed directly at https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on our analysis of the comments received, we have made no
changes to the margin calculation for the sole mandatory respondent,
Daejin Steel Company (Daejin), since the Preliminary Results.
Rate for Non-Examined Company
Generally, when calculating margins for non-selected respondents,
Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5) of the Act for guidance, which
provides instructions for calculating the all- others margin in an
investigation. Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act provides that when
calculating the all-others margin, Commerce will exclude any zero and
de minimis weighted average dumping margins, as well as any weighted-
average dumping margins based on total facts available. Accordingly,
Commerce's usual practice has been to average the margins for selected
respondents, excluding margins that are zero, de minimis, or based
entirely on facts available. In this review, we calculated a weighted-
average dumping margin of 3.22 percent for Daejin, the sole mandatory
respondent. In accordance with section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act,
Commerce assigned Daejin's calculated weighted-average dumping margin,
i.e., 3.22 percent, to the non-selected company in these final results.
Accordingly, we have applied a rate of 3.22 percent to the non-selected
company, i.e., Koram Inc.
Final Results of Administrative Review
Commerce determines that the following weighted-average dumping
margins exist for the period July 1, 2019, through June 30, 2020:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-
average
Producer/exporter dumping
margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Daejin Steel Company........................................ 3.22
Koram Inc................................................... 3.22
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure
Commerce intends to disclose the calculations performed for these
final results within five days of the date of publication of this
notice, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
Assessment Rates
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1),
Commerce shall determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of subject
merchandise in accordance with the final results of this review. We
intend to calculate importer- (or customer-) specific assessment rates
on the basis of the ratio of the total amount of antidumping duties
calculated for each importer (or customer's) examined sales and the
total entered value of the sales in accordance with 19 CFR
351.212(b)(1). Where an importer- (or customer-) specific rate is zero
or de minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), we will
instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to
antidumping duties.
Commerce's ``reseller policy'' will apply to entries of subject
merchandise during the POR produced by companies included in these
final results of review for which the reviewed companies did not know
that the merchandise they sold to the intermediary (e.g., a reseller,
trading company, or exporter) was destined for the United States. In
such
[[Page 2764]]
instances, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the
all-others rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies)
involved in the transaction.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ For a full discussion of this practice, see Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties,
68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The final results of this administrative review shall be the basis
for the assessment of antidumping duties on entries of merchandise
under review and for future cash deposits of estimated duties, where
applicable. Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP no
earlier than 35 days after the date of publication of the final results
of this review in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is filed at
the U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will
direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties
to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within
90 days of publication).
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective for all
shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the publication date of these final
results, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash
deposit rate for the companies under review will be equal to the
weighted-average dumping margin listed above in the ``Final Results of
Review'' section; (2) for merchandise exported by producers or
exporters not covered in this review but covered in a previously
completed segment of this proceeding, the cash deposit rate will
continue to be the company-specific rate published in the final results
for the most recent period in which that producer or exporter
participated; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review
or in any previous segment of this proceeding, but the producer is,
then the cash deposit rate will be that established for the producer of
the merchandise in these final results of review or in the final
results for the most recent period in which that producer participated;
and (4) if neither the exporter nor the producer is a firm covered in
this review or in any previously completed segment of this proceeding,
then the cash deposit rate will be 11.80 percent ad valorem, the all-
others rate established in the less than fair value investigation.\5\
These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect
until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Order, 80 FR 39996.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure to comply with this
requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that reimbursement
of the antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of
doubled antidumping duties.
Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order
This notice is the only reminder to parties subject to the
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under the APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of
the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or
destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective
order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and
the terms of an APO is a violation subject to sanction.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing these final results and this notice
in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19
CFR 351.213(h).
Dated: January 12, 2022.
Lisa W. Wang,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1: Whether Commerce Should Reallocate Certain Common
Expenses from General and Administrative (G&A) Expenses
Comment 2: Whether Daejin Failed to Report Product-Specific Cost
Comment 3: Whether Commerce Should Adjust Differential Pricing
Method
V. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2022-00957 Filed 1-18-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P