New York Stock Exchange LLC; Order Granting Petition for Review and Scheduling Filing of Statements Regarding an Order Disapproving Proposed Rule Change To Amend Its Rules Establishing Maximum Fee Rates To Be Charged by Member Organizations for Forwarding Proxy and Other Materials to Beneficial Owners, 2189-2190 [2022-00500]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 9 / Thursday, January 13, 2022 / Notices
6. Section 6(c) of the Act provides that
the Commission may exempt any
person, security or transaction, or any
class of persons, securities or
transactions, from any provisions of the
Act, if and to the extent that such
exemption is necessary or appropriate
in the public interest and consistent
with the protection of investors and the
purposes fairly intended by the policy
and provisions of the Act. Section 17(b)
of the Act authorizes the Commission to
exempt a proposed transaction from
section 17(a) of the Act if evidence
establishes that the terms of the
transaction, including the consideration
to be paid or received, are reasonable
and fair and do not involve
overreaching on the part of any person
concerned, and the transaction is
consistent with the policies of the
registered investment company and the
general purposes of the Act. Section
12(d)(1)(J) of the Act provides that the
Commission may exempt any person,
security, or transaction, or any class or
classes of persons, securities or
transactions, from any provision of
section 12(d)(1) if the exemption is
consistent with the public interest and
the protection of investors. Applicants
submit that for the reasons stated in the
Reference Order the requested relief
meets the exemptive standards under
sections 6(c), 17(b) and 12(d)(1)(J) of the
Act.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Investment Management, pursuant to
delegated authority.
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022–00598 Filed 1–12–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–93933; File No. SR–NYSE–
2021–40]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; New
York Stock Exchange LLC; Notice of
Designation of Longer Period for
Commission Action on Proceedings To
Determine Whether To Approve or
Disapprove a Proposed Rule Change
To Adopt on a Permanent Basis the
Pilot Program for Market-Wide Circuit
Breakers in Rule 7.12
January 7, 2022.
I. Introduction
On July 2, 2021, New York Stock
Exchange LLC (‘‘NYSE’’ or the
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) pursuant to Section
19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (the ‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4
thereunder,2 a proposal to make its rules
governing the operation of the MarketWide Circuit Breakers (‘‘MWCB’’)
mechanism permanent. The proposed
rule change was published for comment
in the Federal Register on July 22,
2021.3 On August 27, 2021, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,4 the
Commission designated a longer period
within which to either approve the
proposed rule changes, disapprove the
proposed rule changes, or institute
proceedings to determine whether to
disapprove the proposed change.5 On
September 30, 2021, the Commission
initiated proceedings to determine
whether to approve or disapprove the
proposed rule changes.6 The
Commission has received no comments
on the proposed rule change.
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act 7 provide
that, after instituting proceedings, the
Commission shall issue an order
approving or disapproving a proposed
rule change not later than 180 days after
the date of publication of notice of filing
of the proposed rule change.8 The
Commission may, however, extend the
period for issuing an order approving or
disapproving the proposed rule change
by not more than 60 days if the
Commission determines that a longer
period is appropriate and publishes the
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 92428
(July 16, 2021), 86 FR 38776.
4 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
5 See Securities Exchange Act Release No.
92785A, 86 FR 50202 (September 7, 2021).
6 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 93212,
86 FR 55066 (October 5, 2021).
7 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
8 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B)(ii)(I).
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
2 17
that relies on the Order in the future will comply
with the terms and conditions of the Order and the
terms and conditions of the Reference Order that
are incorporated by reference into the Order.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:18 Jan 12, 2022
Jkt 256001
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2189
reasons for such determination.9 The
180th day for the proposed rule change
is January 18, 2022.
The Commission is extending the 180day time period for Commission action
on the proposed rule change. The
Commission finds it appropriate to
designate a longer period within which
to issue an order approving or
disapproving the proposed rule change
so that it has sufficient time to consider
the proposed rule change, including the
sufficiency of the proposal’s ongoing
assessment provisions.
Accordingly, the Commission,
pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,10 designates March 19, 2022 as the
date by which the Commission shall
either approve or disapprove the
proposed rule change (File No. SR–
NYSE–2021–40).
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.11
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022–00491 Filed 1–12–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–93934; File No. SR–NYSE–
2020–96]
New York Stock Exchange LLC; Order
Granting Petition for Review and
Scheduling Filing of Statements
Regarding an Order Disapproving
Proposed Rule Change To Amend Its
Rules Establishing Maximum Fee
Rates To Be Charged by Member
Organizations for Forwarding Proxy
and Other Materials to Beneficial
Owners
January 7, 2022.
This matter comes before the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) on petition to review
the disapproval, pursuant to delegated
authority, of the New York Stock
Exchange LLC (‘‘NYSE’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’)
proposed rule change (File No. SR–
NYSE–2020–96) to amend its rules
establishing maximum fee rates to be
charged by member organizations for
forwarding proxy and other materials to
beneficial owners.
On December 15, 2020, the
Commission issued a notice of filing of
the proposed rule change with the
Commission pursuant to Section
19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act
9 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B)(ii)(II)(aa).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
11 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(57).
10 15
E:\FR\FM\13JAN1.SGM
13JAN1
2190
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 9 / Thursday, January 13, 2022 / Notices
of 1934 (‘‘Exchange Act’’) 1 and Rule
19b–4 2 thereunder.3 On February 1,
2021, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Exchange Act,4 a longer time period was
designated within which to act on the
proposed rule change.5 On March 18,
2021, proceedings were instituted under
Section 19(b)(2)(B) of the Exchange Act 6
to determine whether to approve or
disapprove the proposed rule change.7
On June 11, 2021, pursuant to Section
19(b)(2) of the Exchange Act,8 a longer
time period was designated for
Commission action on the proceedings
to determine whether to approve or
disapprove the proposed rule change.9
On August 18, 2021, after consideration
of the record for the proposed rule
change, the Division of Trading and
Markets (‘‘Division’’), pursuant to
delegated authority,10 issued an order
disapproving the proposed rule change
(‘‘Disapproval Order’’).11
Pursuant to Rule 430 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice,12 on
August 25, 2021, the Exchange filed a
notice of intention to petition for review
of the Disapproval Order, and on
September 1, 2021, the Exchange filed a
petition for review of the Disapproval
Order. Pursuant to Rule 431(e) of the
Commission Rules of Practice,13 a notice
of intention to petition for review
results in an automatic stay of the action
by delegated authority.
Pursuant to Rule 431 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice,14 the
Exchange’s petition for review of the
Disapproval Order is granted. Further,
the Commission hereby establishes that
any party to the action or other person
may file a written statement in support
of or in opposition to the Disapproval
Order on or before February 3, 2022.
For the reasons stated above, it is
hereby:
Ordered that the Exchange’s petition
for review of the Division’s action to
disapprove the proposed rule change by
delegated authority is granted; and
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 90677
(December 15, 2020), 85 FR 83119 (December 21,
2020).
4 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
5 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 91025
(February 1, 2021), 86 FR 8420 (February 5, 2021).
6 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
7 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 91359
(March 18, 2021), 86 FR 15734 (March 24, 2021).
8 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
9 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 92154
(June 11, 2021), 86 FR 32301 (June 17, 2021).
10 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
11 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 92700
(August 18, 2021), 86 FR 47351 (August 24, 2021).
12 17 CFR 201.430.
13 17 CFR 201.431(e).
14 17 CFR 201.431.
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
2 17
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:18 Jan 12, 2022
Jkt 256001
It is further ordered that any party or
other person may file a statement in
support of or in opposition to the action
made pursuant to delegated authority on
or before February 3, 2022.
It is further ordered that the automatic
stay of delegated action pursuant to
Commission Rule of Practice 431(e) is
hereby discontinued.
The order disapproving the proposed
rule change (File No. SR–NYSE–2020–
96) shall remain in effect.
By the Commission.
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022–00500 Filed 1–12–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[SEC File No. 270–224, OMB Control No.
3235–0217]
Proposed Collection; Comment
Request; Extension: Rule 17e–1
Upon Written Request, Copies Available
From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of FOIA Services,
100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–2736
Notice is hereby given that, pursuant
to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) (‘‘Paperwork
Reduction Act’’), the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the
‘‘Commission’’) is soliciting comments
on the collection of information
summarized below. The Commission
plans to submit this existing collection
of information to the Office of
Management and Budget (‘‘OMB’’) for
extension and approval.
Rule 17e–1 (17 CFR 270.17e–1) under
the Investment Company Act of 1940
(15 U.S.C. 80a–1 et seq.) (the
‘‘Investment Company Act’’) deems a
remuneration as ‘‘not exceeding the
usual and customary broker’s
commission’’ for purposes of Section
17(e)(2)(A) of the Investment Company
Act (15 U.S.C. 80a–17(e)(2)(A)) if,
among other things, a registered
investment company’s (‘‘fund’s’’) board
of directors has adopted procedures
reasonably designed to provide that the
remuneration to an affiliated broker is
reasonable and fair compared to that
received by other brokers in connection
with comparable transactions involving
similar securities being purchased or
sold on a securities exchange during a
comparable period of time and the
board makes and approves such changes
as it deems necessary. In addition, each
quarter, the board must determine that
all transactions effected under the rule
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
during the preceding quarter complied
with the established procedures
(‘‘review requirement’’). Rule 17e–1 also
requires the fund to (i) maintain
permanently a written copy of the
procedures adopted by the board for
complying with the requirements of the
rule; and (ii) maintain for a period of six
years, the first two in an easily
accessible place, a written record of
each transaction subject to the rule,
setting forth the amount and source of
the commission, fee, or other
remuneration received; the identity of
the broker; the terms of the transaction;
and the materials used to determine that
the transactions were effected in
compliance with the procedures
adopted by the board (‘‘recordkeeping
requirement’’). The review and
recordkeeping requirements under rule
17e–1 enable the Commission to ensure
that affiliated brokers receive
compensation that does not exceed the
usual and customary broker’s
commission. Without the recordkeeping
requirement, Commission inspectors
would have difficulty ascertaining
whether funds were complying with
rule 17e–1.
Based upon an analysis of fund filings
on Form N–CEN, approximately 1,640
funds report reliance on rule 17e–1.
Based on staff experience and
conversations with fund representatives,
we estimate that the burden of
compliance with rule 17e–1 is
approximately 50 hours per fund per
year. This time is spent, for example,
reviewing the applicable transactions
and maintaining records. Accordingly,
we calculate the total estimated annual
internal burden of complying with the
review and recordkeeping requirements
of rule 17e–1 to be approximately
82,000 hours.1 We further estimate that,
of these:
• 60 percent (49,200 hours) are spent
by senior accountants, at an estimated
hourly wage of $221,2 for a total of
approximately $10,873,200 per year; 3
• 30 percent (24,600 hours) are spent
by in-house attorneys at an estimated
funds × 50 hours per fund = 82,000 hours.
Commission’s estimates concerning the
allocation of burden hours and the relevant wage
rates are based on consultations with industry
representatives and on salary information for the
securities industry compiled by the Securities
Industry and Financial Markets Association. The
estimated wage figures are also based on published
rates for senior accountants and in-house attorneys,
modified to account for an 1800-hour work-year
and multiplied by 5.35 to account for bonuses, firm
size, employee benefits, and overhead, yielding
effective hourly rates of $221 and $425,
respectively. See Securities Industry and Financial
Markets Association, Report on Management &
Professional Earnings in the Securities Industry
2013.
3 49,200 hours × $221 per hour = $10,873,200.
1 1,604
2 The
E:\FR\FM\13JAN1.SGM
13JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 9 (Thursday, January 13, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2189-2190]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-00500]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-93934; File No. SR-NYSE-2020-96]
New York Stock Exchange LLC; Order Granting Petition for Review
and Scheduling Filing of Statements Regarding an Order Disapproving
Proposed Rule Change To Amend Its Rules Establishing Maximum Fee Rates
To Be Charged by Member Organizations for Forwarding Proxy and Other
Materials to Beneficial Owners
January 7, 2022.
This matter comes before the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') on petition to review the disapproval, pursuant to
delegated authority, of the New York Stock Exchange LLC (``NYSE'' or
``Exchange'') proposed rule change (File No. SR-NYSE-2020-96) to amend
its rules establishing maximum fee rates to be charged by member
organizations for forwarding proxy and other materials to beneficial
owners.
On December 15, 2020, the Commission issued a notice of filing of
the proposed rule change with the Commission pursuant to Section
19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act
[[Page 2190]]
of 1934 (``Exchange Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 \2\ thereunder.\3\ On
February 1, 2021, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Exchange Act,\4\
a longer time period was designated within which to act on the proposed
rule change.\5\ On March 18, 2021, proceedings were instituted under
Section 19(b)(2)(B) of the Exchange Act \6\ to determine whether to
approve or disapprove the proposed rule change.\7\ On June 11, 2021,
pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Exchange Act,\8\ a longer time
period was designated for Commission action on the proceedings to
determine whether to approve or disapprove the proposed rule change.\9\
On August 18, 2021, after consideration of the record for the proposed
rule change, the Division of Trading and Markets (``Division''),
pursuant to delegated authority,\10\ issued an order disapproving the
proposed rule change (``Disapproval Order'').\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 90677 (December 15,
2020), 85 FR 83119 (December 21, 2020).
\4\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
\5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 91025 (February 1,
2021), 86 FR 8420 (February 5, 2021).
\6\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
\7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 91359 (March 18,
2021), 86 FR 15734 (March 24, 2021).
\8\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
\9\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 92154 (June 11,
2021), 86 FR 32301 (June 17, 2021).
\10\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
\11\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 92700 (August 18,
2021), 86 FR 47351 (August 24, 2021).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to Rule 430 of the Commission's Rules of Practice,\12\ on
August 25, 2021, the Exchange filed a notice of intention to petition
for review of the Disapproval Order, and on September 1, 2021, the
Exchange filed a petition for review of the Disapproval Order. Pursuant
to Rule 431(e) of the Commission Rules of Practice,\13\ a notice of
intention to petition for review results in an automatic stay of the
action by delegated authority.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ 17 CFR 201.430.
\13\ 17 CFR 201.431(e).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to Rule 431 of the Commission's Rules of Practice,\14\ the
Exchange's petition for review of the Disapproval Order is granted.
Further, the Commission hereby establishes that any party to the action
or other person may file a written statement in support of or in
opposition to the Disapproval Order on or before February 3, 2022.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ 17 CFR 201.431.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the reasons stated above, it is hereby:
Ordered that the Exchange's petition for review of the Division's
action to disapprove the proposed rule change by delegated authority is
granted; and
It is further ordered that any party or other person may file a
statement in support of or in opposition to the action made pursuant to
delegated authority on or before February 3, 2022.
It is further ordered that the automatic stay of delegated action
pursuant to Commission Rule of Practice 431(e) is hereby discontinued.
The order disapproving the proposed rule change (File No. SR-NYSE-
2020-96) shall remain in effect.
By the Commission.
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-00500 Filed 1-12-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P