Self-Regulatory Organizations; ICE Clear Europe Limited; Order Approving Proposed Rule Change Relating to Amendments to the ICE Clear Europe Liquidity Management Procedures and Investment Management Procedures, 73833-73835 [2021-28111]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 246 / Tuesday, December 28, 2021 / Notices
and to comply, and to enforce
compliance by its members and persons
associated with its members, with the
provisions of the Act, the rules and
regulations thereunder, and the rules of
the exchange. The Commission also
finds that the proposed rule changes are
consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the
Act,32 which requires, among other
things, that the rules of a national
securities exchange be designed to
prevent fraudulent and manipulative
acts and practices, to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, to remove
impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system, and, in
general, to protect investors and the
public interest.
As described above, the proposed rule
changes will allow (i) the transfer of
Nasdaq HoldCo’s ownership interest in
BX Equities to the Exchange, and (ii) the
merger of BX Equities with and into the
Exchange. The proposed transfer will
have no impact on how the Exchange
operates its equities market and, as
described above, the Exchange
anticipates that the merger will occur
immediately after the transfer.
Following the merger, the Exchange will
directly operate its equities market and
perform the functions that were
previously delegated to BX Equities.
Moreover, the Exchange will continue to
have ultimate responsibility over its
equities market, including the
responsibility to ensure the fulfillment
of its statutory and self-regulatory
obligations under the Act.33 Because the
proposed rule changes will allow the
Exchange to directly operate its equities
market (rather than through a
subsidiary) and the Exchange will
continue to have ultimate regulatory
responsibility over its equities market,
the Commission believes that the
proposed rule changes are consistent
with the Act and will not impair the
ability of the Commission or the
Exchange to discharge their respective
responsibilities under the Act. The
Commission also believes that the
Exchange’s proposals to amend the
Operating Agreement in connection
with the transfer, and to subsequently
remove the Delegation Agreement and
the amended Operating Agreement and
make conforming changes to its rules in
connection with the merger, are
consistent with the Act and will allow
the Exchange’s rulebook to reflect the
Transactions.
IV. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,34 that the
proposed rule changes (SR–BX–2021–
050; SR–BX–2021–051) be, and hereby
are, approved.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.35
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021–28108 Filed 12–27–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–93845; File No. SR–ICEEU–
2021–020]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; ICE
Clear Europe Limited; Order Approving
Proposed Rule Change Relating to
Amendments to the ICE Clear Europe
Liquidity Management Procedures and
Investment Management Procedures
December 21, 2021.
I. Introduction
On October 22, 2021, ICE Clear
Europe Limited (‘‘ICE Clear Europe’’)
filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’), pursuant
to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (the ‘‘Act’’),1 and
Rule 19b–4,2 a proposed rule change to
amend its Liquidity Management
Procedures and Investment Management
Procedures. The proposed rule change
was published for comment in the
Federal Register on November 10,
2021.3 The Commission did not receive
comments regarding the proposed rule
change. For the reasons discussed
below, the Commission is approving the
proposed rule change.
II. Description of the Proposed Rule
Change
A. Liquidity Management Procedures
The proposed rule change would
make three changes to the Liquidity
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
34 15
32 15
U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
33 The Exchange states that its independent
regulatory oversight committee (‘‘ROC’’) will
continue to oversee the Exchange’s regulatory and
self-regulatory organization responsibilities with
regard to both its equities and options markets, and
the Exchange’s regulatory department will continue
to carry out its regulatory functions with respect to
both markets under the oversight of the ROC. See
Merger Notice, supra note 6, at 62224.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:45 Dec 27, 2021
Jkt 256001
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 Self-Regulatory Organizations; ICE Clear Europe
Limited; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change
Relating to Amendments to the ICE Clear Europe
Liquidity Management Procedures and Investment
Management Procedures, Exchange Act Release No.
93523 (Nov. 4, 2021); 86 FR 62588 (Nov. 10, 2021)
(SR–ICEEU–2021–020) (‘‘Notice’’).
35 17
PO 00000
Frm 00114
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
73833
Management Procedures, as described
below.4 In addition, the proposed rule
change would correct typographical
errors in Section 2.4.1 and Section 2.7.2.
First, Section 2.1.1 of the Liquidity
Management Procedures provides an
overview of ICE Clear Europe’s payment
obligations and liquidity needs.
Currently, this section describes three
sources of payment obligations relevant
to liquidity management: (i) Paying
variation margin; (ii) paying delivery or
settlement monies when trades deliver
or settle; and (iii) returning surplus
Initial Margin or other margin to
Clearing Members. The proposed rule
change would add to this, as a fourth
payment obligation, cash substitution
requests by Clearing Members. ICE Clear
Europe is making this change to make
the list more comprehensive, by
expressly taking into account cash
substitution, which, as a current
practice, ICE Clear Europe allows
Clearing Members to request.5
Second, the proposed rule change
would add a new section relating to
special considerations for account
opening. This section would provide
that when ICE Clear Europe is adding
new accounts or amending existing
accounts with counterparties, the
Treasury Department would advise the
Legal and Compliance Departments in
accordance with relevant departmental
procedures to ensure that relevant
banking agreements are modified, any
side or acknowledgement letters are
obtained, and any required regulatory
submissions are timely made, as
appropriate. This section would provide
that this process would include, for
example, the opening of new accounts
for futures customer funds in
accordance with CFTC Rule 1.20(g).6
Finally, the proposed rule change
would amend provisions relating to
haircutting (i.e., risk-based discounting)
of non-cash collateral and cash
collateral in currencies other than the
required currency. Section 2.3.1
currently provides that the Clearing Risk
Team monitors the price of non-cash
collateral and cash that is in currencies
other than the required currency during
the day and calls for additional Initial
Margin if there is a shortfall in the value
of the collateral held. The proposed rule
change would amend this provision so
that it is the Credit Risk Team, not the
Clearing Risk Team, which monitors the
price of such assets. This change is
4 Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein
have the meanings assigned to them in the ICE
Clear Europe Rules, Liquidity Management
Procedures, or Investment Management Procedures,
as applicable.
5 Notice, 86 FR at 62588.
6 17 CFR 1.20(g).
E:\FR\FM\28DEN1.SGM
28DEN1
73834
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 246 / Tuesday, December 28, 2021 / Notices
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
intended to correct the reference to the
responsible internal team, as this
monitoring practice is currently
performed by the Credit Risk Team. The
proposed rule change would also add
that the price of such assets would be
monitored during the day against the
applied haircuts, as a clarification that
reflects current practice. Finally, the
proposed rule change would remove the
statement about calling for additional
Initial Margin in the event of a shortfall
in the value of the collateral held. ICE
Clear Europe represents that this
statement would be unnecessary as it is
addressed in the ICE Clear Europe
Collateral and Haircut Procedures.7
B. Investment Management Procedures
The Investment Management
Procedures set out the permitted
investments and related concentration
limits for ICE Clear Europe when
investing or securing cash received from
Clearing Members, ICE Clear Europe’s
contributions to the Guaranty Fund, or
ICE Clear Europe’s own regulatory
capital. As such, the Investment
Management Procedures contain a table
listing investments authorized for cash
from Clearing Members and ICE Clear
Europe’s contributions to the Guaranty
Fund. This table provides, among other
things, the instrument for investment
and maximum issuer/counterparty
concentration limits.
The proposed rule change would
amend this table with respect to the
maximum issuer/counterparty
concentration limits for reverse
repurchase agreements. Currently, the
limits apply per counterparty family.
Under the proposed rule change, the
limits would apply per counterparty
group. The proposed rule change also
would add a footnote to explain that
breaches of those issuer limits for
reverse repurchase agreements solely
due to valuation differences or
operational failure/error will not be
considered as a breach of policy. ICE
Clear Europe represents that these
updates provide additional detail about
existing practices but do not reflect any
change to such practices.8
The proposed rule change would add
another table to the Investment
Management Procedures that would
specify the additional concentration
limits for reverse repurchase agreements
involving funds from customers of
Futures Commission Merchants
(‘‘FCM’’). For those investments, the
Maximum Issuer/Counterparty
Concentration Limits would be 25% of
total FCM customer cash balance per
7 Notice,
8 Notice,
86 FR at 62588.
86 FR at 62588.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:45 Dec 27, 2021
Jkt 256001
counterparty group. ICE Clear Europe
represents this amendment would
document an existing limitation based
on CFTC Rule 1.25.9
III. Discussion and Commission
Findings
Section 19(b)(2)(C) of the Act directs
the Commission to approve a proposed
rule change of a self-regulatory
organization if it finds that such
proposed rule change is consistent with
the requirements of the Act and the
rules and regulations thereunder
applicable to such organization.10 For
the reasons discussed below, the
Commission finds that the proposed
rule change is consistent with Section
17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act,11 and Rules
17Ad–22(e)(2)(v), (e)(7), and (e)(16)
thereunder.12
A. Consistency With Section
17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act
Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act
requires, among other things, that the
rules of ICE Clear Europe be designed to
promote the prompt and accurate
clearance and settlement of securities
transactions and, to the extent
applicable, derivative agreements,
contracts, and transactions, as well as to
assure the safeguarding of securities and
funds which are in the custody or
control of ICE Clear Europe or for which
it is responsible.13 Overall, the
Commission believes that the changes to
the Liquidity Management Procedures
discussed above would help improve
ICE Clear Europe’s management of
liquidity. Specifically, the Commission
believes that listing cash substitution as
a liquidity need, adding procedures for
opening new accounts, and clarifying
how the Credit Risk team monitors the
price of cash denominated in other
currencies and the price of non-cash
assets, would help to ensure that ICE
Clear Europe calculates its liquidity
needs, establishes new accounts, and
values the price of cash in other
currencies and non-cash assets in a
consistent, predictable manner.
Moreover, the Commission believes
correcting typographical errors would
help to ensure that ICE Clear Europe
personnel apply the Liquidity
Management Procedures in an accurate
and consistent manner.
The Commission similarly believes
that the proposed changes to the
Investment Management Procedures
discussed above, taken together, would
9 17
CFR 1.25. Notice, 86 FR at 62588.
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(C).
11 15 U.S.C. 78q–1(b)(3)(F).
12 17 CFR 240.17Ad–22(e)(2)(v), (e)(7), and
(e)(16).
13 15 U.S.C. 78q–1(b)(3)(F).
help improve ICE Clear Europe’s
management of its investments. For
example, the Commission believes that
clarifying that the numerical
concentration limits are based on total
cash balance per counterparty group
would help to ensure that ICE Clear
Europe calculates the limits consistently
on the basis of counterparty groups.
Moreover, adding a specific
concentration limit of 25% of total FCM
customer cash balance per counterparty
group for reverse repurchase agreements
involving funds from customers of
FCMs should help to ensure that ICE
Clear Europe does not concentrate FCM
customer cash in a single reverse
repurchase counterparty.14 Finally,
clarifying that breaches of issuer limits
for reverse repurchase agreements solely
due to valuation differences or
operational failure/error would not be a
breach of the policy would help ICE
Clear Europe accommodate different
valuation methodologies from a variety
of repo market participants by not
considering breaches resulting only
from valuation differences or time
delays in obtaining valuations resulting
from operational errors.
In making these improvements, the
Commission believes the changes
discussed above would help ICE Clear
Europe to better manage its liquidity
and investments and thereby avoid
losses related to its liquidity and
investments. Because such losses, if
realized, could impede ICE Clear
Europe’s operations and therefore its
ability to clear and settle transactions
and safeguard securities and funds, the
Commission believes the proposed rule
change would help to promote the
prompt and accurate clearance and
settlement of securities transactions and
assure the safeguarding of securities and
funds which are in the custody or
control of ICE Clear Europe or for which
it is responsible. Moreover, the
Commission believes that better of
ICEEU’s liquidity and investments, and
avoiding losses related to such
investments, could reduce the
likelihood that ICE Clear Europe would
need to access liquid resources provided
or backed by a surviving clearing
member’s collateral in case of a default,
and therefore would help to assure the
safeguarding of securities and funds
which are in the custody or control of
ICE Clear Europe or for which it is
responsible.
10 15
PO 00000
Frm 00115
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
14 The Commission notes that ICE Clear Europe
represents that this change would document an
existing limitation based on CFTC Rule 1.25. See 17
CFR 1.25; Notice, 86 FR at 62588
E:\FR\FM\28DEN1.SGM
28DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 246 / Tuesday, December 28, 2021 / Notices
Therefore, the Commission finds that
the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act.15
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
B. Consistency With Rule 17Ad–
22(e)(2)(v) Under the Act
Rule 17Ad–22(e)(2)(v) requires that
ICE Clear Europe establish, implement,
maintain, and enforce written policies
and procedures reasonably designed to
provide for governance arrangements
that specify clear and direct lines of
responsibility.16 As discussed above
under Section II.A, the proposed rule
change would describe certain
responsibilities of the ICE Clear Europe
Treasury Department when adding new
accounts or amending existing accounts
with counterparties. The Commission
believes this change would specify a
clear and direct line of responsibility for
the Treasury Department. Similarly, the
proposed rule change would clarify the
direct line of responsibility of the Credit
Risk Team, not the Clearing Risk Team,
to monitor the intraday price of noncash collateral and cash that is in
currencies other than the required
currency. Therefore, the Commission
finds that the proposed rule change is
consistent with Rule 17Ad–22(e)(2)(v).17
C. Consistency With Rule 17Ad–22(e)(7)
Under the Act
Rule 17Ad–22(e)(7) generally requires
that ICE Clear Europe establish,
implement, maintain and enforce
written policies and procedures
reasonably designed to effectively
measure, monitor, and manage the
liquidity risk that arises in or is borne
by ICE Clear Europe, including
measuring, monitoring, and managing
its settlement and funding flows on an
ongoing and timely basis, and its use of
intraday liquidity.18 As discussed
above, the proposed rule change would
add to the Liquidity Management
Procedures a fourth payment obligation,
cash substitution requests by Clearing
Members, which would be another
liquidity need for ICE Clear Europe. The
Commission believes that this
additional description would help to
clarify the potential liquidity needs that
ICE Clear Europe would need to satisfy.
Moreover, as described in the Liquidity
Management Procedures, ICE Clear
Europe treats non-cash collateral and
cash that is in currencies other than the
requirement as two sources of available
liquidity, among other sources.
Accordingly, the Commission believes
that the changes described above, which
15 15
U.S.C. 78q–1(b)(3)(F).
CFR 240.17Ad–22(e)(2)(v).
17 17 CFR 240.17Ad–22(e)(2)(v).
18 17 CFR 240.17Ad–22(e)(7).
16 17
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:45 Dec 27, 2021
Jkt 256001
would clarify that the Credit Risk team
monitors the price of these assets during
the day against the applied haircuts,
would help to clarify the value of these
potential sources of liquidity. Therefore,
the Commission finds that the proposed
rule change is consistent with Rule
17Ad–22(e)(7).19
D. Consistency With Rule 17Ad–
22(e)(16) Under the Act
Rule 17Ad–22(e)(16) requires that ICE
Clear Europe establish, implement,
maintain, and enforce written policies
and procedures reasonably designed to
safeguard its own and its participants’
assets, minimize the risk of loss and
delay in access to these assets, and
invest such assets in instruments with
minimal credit, market, and liquidity
risks.20 The Commission believes that
the changes to the Investment
Management Procedures described
above, in clarifying that the numerical
concentration limits are based on total
cash balance per counterparty group,
rather than per counterparty family,
would help to ensure that ICE Clear
Europe consistently applies its
concentration limits to groups of
counterparties, in line with related ICE
Clear Europe procedures. The
Commission believes that this change
would therefore help to ensure that ICE
Clear Europe considers the risks of
concentrating investments of cash in
one counterparty group, and thereby
would help to safeguard the investment
of ICE Clear Europe’s and its Clearing
Members’ assets. Similarly, the
Commission believes that the additional
concentration limit for reverse
repurchase agreements involving funds
from customers of FCMs would help to
safeguard the assets of those customers
by helping to ensure that ICE Clear
Europe not concentrate FCM customer
cash in a single reverse repurchase
investment counterparty.21 Therefore,
the Commission finds that the proposed
rule change is consistent with Rule
17Ad–22(e)(16).22
IV. Conclusion
On the basis of the foregoing, the
Commission finds that the proposed
rule change is consistent with the
requirements of the Act, and in
particular, with the requirements of
Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act,23 and
19 17
CFR 240.17Ad–22(e)(7).
CFR 240.17Ad–22(e)(16).
21 The Commission notes that ICE Clear Europe
represents that this change would document an
existing limitation based on CFTC Rule 1.25. See 17
CFR 1.25; Notice, 86 FR at 62588.
22 17 CFR 240.17Ad–22(e)(16).
23 15 U.S.C. 78q–1(b)(3)(F).
20 17
PO 00000
Frm 00116
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
73835
Rules 17Ad–22(e)(2)(v), (e)(7), and
(e)(16).24
It is therefore ordered pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act 25 that the
proposed rule change (SR–ICEEU–2021–
020) be, and hereby is, approved.26
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.27
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021–28111 Filed 12–27–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–93839; File No. SR–ICEEU–
2021–024]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; ICE
Clear Europe Limited; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of
Proposed Rule Change Relating to
Amendments to the ICE Clear Europe
Delivery Procedures
December 21, 2021.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on December
9, 2021, ICE Clear Europe Limited (‘‘ICE
Clear Europe’’ or the ‘‘Clearing House’’)
filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule changes described in
Items I, II and III below, which Items
have been prepared primarily by ICE
Clear Europe. ICE Clear Europe filed the
proposed rule change pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act 3 and Rule
19b–4(f)(4)(ii) thereunder,4 such that the
proposed rule change was immediately
effective upon filing with the
Commission. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Clearing Agency’s Statement of the
Terms of Substance of the Proposed
Rule Change
The principal purpose of the
proposed amendments is for ICE Clear
Europe to amend its Delivery
Procedures (‘‘Delivery Procedures’’ or
24 17 CFR 240.17Ad–22(e)(2)(v), (e)(7), and
(e)(16).
25 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
26 In approving the proposed rule change, the
Commission considered the proposal’s impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. 15
U.S.C. 78c(f).
27 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(4)(ii).
E:\FR\FM\28DEN1.SGM
28DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 246 (Tuesday, December 28, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 73833-73835]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-28111]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-93845; File No. SR-ICEEU-2021-020]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; ICE Clear Europe Limited; Order
Approving Proposed Rule Change Relating to Amendments to the ICE Clear
Europe Liquidity Management Procedures and Investment Management
Procedures
December 21, 2021.
I. Introduction
On October 22, 2021, ICE Clear Europe Limited (``ICE Clear
Europe'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4,\2\ a proposed
rule change to amend its Liquidity Management Procedures and Investment
Management Procedures. The proposed rule change was published for
comment in the Federal Register on November 10, 2021.\3\ The Commission
did not receive comments regarding the proposed rule change. For the
reasons discussed below, the Commission is approving the proposed rule
change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ Self-Regulatory Organizations; ICE Clear Europe Limited;
Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change Relating to Amendments to
the ICE Clear Europe Liquidity Management Procedures and Investment
Management Procedures, Exchange Act Release No. 93523 (Nov. 4,
2021); 86 FR 62588 (Nov. 10, 2021) (SR-ICEEU-2021-020) (``Notice'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Description of the Proposed Rule Change
A. Liquidity Management Procedures
The proposed rule change would make three changes to the Liquidity
Management Procedures, as described below.\4\ In addition, the proposed
rule change would correct typographical errors in Section 2.4.1 and
Section 2.7.2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein have the
meanings assigned to them in the ICE Clear Europe Rules, Liquidity
Management Procedures, or Investment Management Procedures, as
applicable.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
First, Section 2.1.1 of the Liquidity Management Procedures
provides an overview of ICE Clear Europe's payment obligations and
liquidity needs. Currently, this section describes three sources of
payment obligations relevant to liquidity management: (i) Paying
variation margin; (ii) paying delivery or settlement monies when trades
deliver or settle; and (iii) returning surplus Initial Margin or other
margin to Clearing Members. The proposed rule change would add to this,
as a fourth payment obligation, cash substitution requests by Clearing
Members. ICE Clear Europe is making this change to make the list more
comprehensive, by expressly taking into account cash substitution,
which, as a current practice, ICE Clear Europe allows Clearing Members
to request.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ Notice, 86 FR at 62588.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Second, the proposed rule change would add a new section relating
to special considerations for account opening. This section would
provide that when ICE Clear Europe is adding new accounts or amending
existing accounts with counterparties, the Treasury Department would
advise the Legal and Compliance Departments in accordance with relevant
departmental procedures to ensure that relevant banking agreements are
modified, any side or acknowledgement letters are obtained, and any
required regulatory submissions are timely made, as appropriate. This
section would provide that this process would include, for example, the
opening of new accounts for futures customer funds in accordance with
CFTC Rule 1.20(g).\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ 17 CFR 1.20(g).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Finally, the proposed rule change would amend provisions relating
to haircutting (i.e., risk-based discounting) of non-cash collateral
and cash collateral in currencies other than the required currency.
Section 2.3.1 currently provides that the Clearing Risk Team monitors
the price of non-cash collateral and cash that is in currencies other
than the required currency during the day and calls for additional
Initial Margin if there is a shortfall in the value of the collateral
held. The proposed rule change would amend this provision so that it is
the Credit Risk Team, not the Clearing Risk Team, which monitors the
price of such assets. This change is
[[Page 73834]]
intended to correct the reference to the responsible internal team, as
this monitoring practice is currently performed by the Credit Risk
Team. The proposed rule change would also add that the price of such
assets would be monitored during the day against the applied haircuts,
as a clarification that reflects current practice. Finally, the
proposed rule change would remove the statement about calling for
additional Initial Margin in the event of a shortfall in the value of
the collateral held. ICE Clear Europe represents that this statement
would be unnecessary as it is addressed in the ICE Clear Europe
Collateral and Haircut Procedures.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ Notice, 86 FR at 62588.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Investment Management Procedures
The Investment Management Procedures set out the permitted
investments and related concentration limits for ICE Clear Europe when
investing or securing cash received from Clearing Members, ICE Clear
Europe's contributions to the Guaranty Fund, or ICE Clear Europe's own
regulatory capital. As such, the Investment Management Procedures
contain a table listing investments authorized for cash from Clearing
Members and ICE Clear Europe's contributions to the Guaranty Fund. This
table provides, among other things, the instrument for investment and
maximum issuer/counterparty concentration limits.
The proposed rule change would amend this table with respect to the
maximum issuer/counterparty concentration limits for reverse repurchase
agreements. Currently, the limits apply per counterparty family. Under
the proposed rule change, the limits would apply per counterparty
group. The proposed rule change also would add a footnote to explain
that breaches of those issuer limits for reverse repurchase agreements
solely due to valuation differences or operational failure/error will
not be considered as a breach of policy. ICE Clear Europe represents
that these updates provide additional detail about existing practices
but do not reflect any change to such practices.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ Notice, 86 FR at 62588.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed rule change would add another table to the Investment
Management Procedures that would specify the additional concentration
limits for reverse repurchase agreements involving funds from customers
of Futures Commission Merchants (``FCM''). For those investments, the
Maximum Issuer/Counterparty Concentration Limits would be 25% of total
FCM customer cash balance per counterparty group. ICE Clear Europe
represents this amendment would document an existing limitation based
on CFTC Rule 1.25.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ 17 CFR 1.25. Notice, 86 FR at 62588.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Discussion and Commission Findings
Section 19(b)(2)(C) of the Act directs the Commission to approve a
proposed rule change of a self-regulatory organization if it finds that
such proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of the
Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to such
organization.\10\ For the reasons discussed below, the Commission finds
that the proposed rule change is consistent with Section 17A(b)(3)(F)
of the Act,\11\ and Rules 17Ad-22(e)(2)(v), (e)(7), and (e)(16)
thereunder.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(C).
\11\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
\12\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(e)(2)(v), (e)(7), and (e)(16).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A. Consistency With Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act
Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act requires, among other things, that
the rules of ICE Clear Europe be designed to promote the prompt and
accurate clearance and settlement of securities transactions and, to
the extent applicable, derivative agreements, contracts, and
transactions, as well as to assure the safeguarding of securities and
funds which are in the custody or control of ICE Clear Europe or for
which it is responsible.\13\ Overall, the Commission believes that the
changes to the Liquidity Management Procedures discussed above would
help improve ICE Clear Europe's management of liquidity. Specifically,
the Commission believes that listing cash substitution as a liquidity
need, adding procedures for opening new accounts, and clarifying how
the Credit Risk team monitors the price of cash denominated in other
currencies and the price of non-cash assets, would help to ensure that
ICE Clear Europe calculates its liquidity needs, establishes new
accounts, and values the price of cash in other currencies and non-cash
assets in a consistent, predictable manner. Moreover, the Commission
believes correcting typographical errors would help to ensure that ICE
Clear Europe personnel apply the Liquidity Management Procedures in an
accurate and consistent manner.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission similarly believes that the proposed changes to the
Investment Management Procedures discussed above, taken together, would
help improve ICE Clear Europe's management of its investments. For
example, the Commission believes that clarifying that the numerical
concentration limits are based on total cash balance per counterparty
group would help to ensure that ICE Clear Europe calculates the limits
consistently on the basis of counterparty groups. Moreover, adding a
specific concentration limit of 25% of total FCM customer cash balance
per counterparty group for reverse repurchase agreements involving
funds from customers of FCMs should help to ensure that ICE Clear
Europe does not concentrate FCM customer cash in a single reverse
repurchase counterparty.\14\ Finally, clarifying that breaches of
issuer limits for reverse repurchase agreements solely due to valuation
differences or operational failure/error would not be a breach of the
policy would help ICE Clear Europe accommodate different valuation
methodologies from a variety of repo market participants by not
considering breaches resulting only from valuation differences or time
delays in obtaining valuations resulting from operational errors.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ The Commission notes that ICE Clear Europe represents that
this change would document an existing limitation based on CFTC Rule
1.25. See 17 CFR 1.25; Notice, 86 FR at 62588
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In making these improvements, the Commission believes the changes
discussed above would help ICE Clear Europe to better manage its
liquidity and investments and thereby avoid losses related to its
liquidity and investments. Because such losses, if realized, could
impede ICE Clear Europe's operations and therefore its ability to clear
and settle transactions and safeguard securities and funds, the
Commission believes the proposed rule change would help to promote the
prompt and accurate clearance and settlement of securities transactions
and assure the safeguarding of securities and funds which are in the
custody or control of ICE Clear Europe or for which it is responsible.
Moreover, the Commission believes that better of ICEEU's liquidity and
investments, and avoiding losses related to such investments, could
reduce the likelihood that ICE Clear Europe would need to access liquid
resources provided or backed by a surviving clearing member's
collateral in case of a default, and therefore would help to assure the
safeguarding of securities and funds which are in the custody or
control of ICE Clear Europe or for which it is responsible.
[[Page 73835]]
Therefore, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change is
consistent with Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Consistency With Rule 17Ad-22(e)(2)(v) Under the Act
Rule 17Ad-22(e)(2)(v) requires that ICE Clear Europe establish,
implement, maintain, and enforce written policies and procedures
reasonably designed to provide for governance arrangements that specify
clear and direct lines of responsibility.\16\ As discussed above under
Section II.A, the proposed rule change would describe certain
responsibilities of the ICE Clear Europe Treasury Department when
adding new accounts or amending existing accounts with counterparties.
The Commission believes this change would specify a clear and direct
line of responsibility for the Treasury Department. Similarly, the
proposed rule change would clarify the direct line of responsibility of
the Credit Risk Team, not the Clearing Risk Team, to monitor the
intraday price of non-cash collateral and cash that is in currencies
other than the required currency. Therefore, the Commission finds that
the proposed rule change is consistent with Rule 17Ad-22(e)(2)(v).\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(e)(2)(v).
\17\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(e)(2)(v).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Consistency With Rule 17Ad-22(e)(7) Under the Act
Rule 17Ad-22(e)(7) generally requires that ICE Clear Europe
establish, implement, maintain and enforce written policies and
procedures reasonably designed to effectively measure, monitor, and
manage the liquidity risk that arises in or is borne by ICE Clear
Europe, including measuring, monitoring, and managing its settlement
and funding flows on an ongoing and timely basis, and its use of
intraday liquidity.\18\ As discussed above, the proposed rule change
would add to the Liquidity Management Procedures a fourth payment
obligation, cash substitution requests by Clearing Members, which would
be another liquidity need for ICE Clear Europe. The Commission believes
that this additional description would help to clarify the potential
liquidity needs that ICE Clear Europe would need to satisfy. Moreover,
as described in the Liquidity Management Procedures, ICE Clear Europe
treats non-cash collateral and cash that is in currencies other than
the requirement as two sources of available liquidity, among other
sources. Accordingly, the Commission believes that the changes
described above, which would clarify that the Credit Risk team monitors
the price of these assets during the day against the applied haircuts,
would help to clarify the value of these potential sources of
liquidity. Therefore, the Commission finds that the proposed rule
change is consistent with Rule 17Ad-22(e)(7).\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(e)(7).
\19\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(e)(7).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
D. Consistency With Rule 17Ad-22(e)(16) Under the Act
Rule 17Ad-22(e)(16) requires that ICE Clear Europe establish,
implement, maintain, and enforce written policies and procedures
reasonably designed to safeguard its own and its participants' assets,
minimize the risk of loss and delay in access to these assets, and
invest such assets in instruments with minimal credit, market, and
liquidity risks.\20\ The Commission believes that the changes to the
Investment Management Procedures described above, in clarifying that
the numerical concentration limits are based on total cash balance per
counterparty group, rather than per counterparty family, would help to
ensure that ICE Clear Europe consistently applies its concentration
limits to groups of counterparties, in line with related ICE Clear
Europe procedures. The Commission believes that this change would
therefore help to ensure that ICE Clear Europe considers the risks of
concentrating investments of cash in one counterparty group, and
thereby would help to safeguard the investment of ICE Clear Europe's
and its Clearing Members' assets. Similarly, the Commission believes
that the additional concentration limit for reverse repurchase
agreements involving funds from customers of FCMs would help to
safeguard the assets of those customers by helping to ensure that ICE
Clear Europe not concentrate FCM customer cash in a single reverse
repurchase investment counterparty.\21\ Therefore, the Commission finds
that the proposed rule change is consistent with Rule 17Ad-
22(e)(16).\22\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(e)(16).
\21\ The Commission notes that ICE Clear Europe represents that
this change would document an existing limitation based on CFTC Rule
1.25. See 17 CFR 1.25; Notice, 86 FR at 62588.
\22\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(e)(16).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Conclusion
On the basis of the foregoing, the Commission finds that the
proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of the Act,
and in particular, with the requirements of Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the
Act,\23\ and Rules 17Ad-22(e)(2)(v), (e)(7), and (e)(16).\24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
\24\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(e)(2)(v), (e)(7), and (e)(16).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
It is therefore ordered pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act
\25\ that the proposed rule change (SR-ICEEU-2021-020) be, and hereby
is, approved.\26\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\25\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
\26\ In approving the proposed rule change, the Commission
considered the proposal's impact on efficiency, competition, and
capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\27\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\27\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-28111 Filed 12-27-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P