Multilayered Wood Flooring From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review, and Intent to Rescind Review, in Part; 2019, 73244-73247 [2021-28074]
Download as PDF
73244
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 245 / Monday, December 27, 2021 / Notices
Timken Notice
as
In its decision in
clarified by Diamond Sawblades,16 the
CAFC held that, pursuant to section
516A(c) and (e) of the Tariff Act of 1930,
as amended (the Act), Commerce must
publish a notice of a court decision that
is not ‘‘in harmony’’ with Commerce’s
determination and must suspend
liquidation of entries pending a
‘‘conclusive’’ court decision. The CIT’s
December 8, 2021, judgment constitutes
a final decision of the CIT that is not in
harmony with Commerce’s Amended
Final Results. Thus, this notice is
published in fulfillment of the
publication requirements of Timken.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Timken,15
results covering these companies have
been published in a subsequent
administrative review of the AD order
on solar cells from China, we will not
issue revised cash deposit instructions
to U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(CBP) in connection with this notice.
Thus, this notice will not affect the
current cash deposit rate of these
companies.
Liquidation of Suspended Entries
At this time, Commerce remains
enjoined, by orders of the CIT, from
liquidating entries of subject
merchandise that was entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption during the period
December 1, 2014, through November
Amended Final Results
30, 2015 and produced and/or exported
Because there is now a final court
by the collapsed entity comprising
judgment, Commerce is amending its
Canadian Solar International Limited;
Final Results and Amended Final
Canadian Solar Manufacturing
Results with respect to Canadian Solar,
(Changshu), Inc.; Canadian Solar
Yingli and Shanghai BYD Co., Ltd. as
Manufacturing (Luoyang), Inc.; CSI Cells
follows:
Co., Ltd.; CSI–GCL Solar Manufacturing
(YanCheng) Co., Ltd.; and CSI Solar
WeightedPower (China) Inc., or exported by any
average
of the following entities: (1) the
Exporter
dumping
collapsed entity comprising Yingli
margin
(percent)
Energy (China) Company Limited;
Baoding Tianwei Yingli New Energy
Canadian Solar International
Resources Co., Ltd.; Tianjin Yingli New
Limited; Canadian Solar
Energy Resources Co., Ltd.; Hengshui
Manufacturing (Changshu),
Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd.;
Inc.; Canadian Solar ManLixian Yingli New Energy Resources
ufacturing (Luoyang), Inc.;
Co., Ltd.; Baoding Jiasheng Photovoltaic
CSI Cells Co., Ltd.; CSI–
Technology Co., Ltd.; Beijing Tianneng
GCL Solar Manufacturing
(YanCheng) Co., Ltd.; CSI
Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd.;
Solar Power (China) Inc ...
0.00 Hainan Yingli New Energy Resources
Yingli Energy (China) ComCo., Ltd.; and Shenzhen Yingli New
pany Limited; Baoding
Energy Resources Co., Ltd.; (2) Shanghai
Tianwei Yingli New Energy
BYD Co., Ltd.; (3) Ningbo Qixin Solar
Resources Co., Ltd.;
Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd.; (4) Chint
Tianjin Yingli New Energy
Solar (Zhejiang) Co., Ltd.; (5) ERA Solar
Resources Co., Ltd.;
Co., Ltd.; (6) ET Solar Energy Limited;
Hengshui Yingli New En(7) Hangzhou Sunny Energy Science &
ergy Resources Co., Ltd.;
Technology Co., Ltd.; (8) Hengdian
Lixian Yingli New Energy
Resources Co., Ltd.;
Group DMEGC Magnetics Co., Ltd.; (9)
Baoding Jiasheng PhotoJA Solar Technology Yangzhou Co.,
voltaic Technology Co.,
Ltd.; (10) Jiawei Solarchina (Shenzhen)
Ltd.; Beijing Tianneng
Co., Ltd.; (11) Jiawei Solarchina Co.,
Yingli New Energy ReLtd.; (12) JingAo Solar Co., Ltd.; (13)
sources Co., Ltd.; Hainan
Lightway Green New Energy Co., Ltd.;
Yingli New Energy Re(14) Ningbo ETDZ Holdings, Ltd.; (15)
sources Co., Ltd.;
Risen Energy Co., Ltd.; (16) Shanghai JA
Shenzhen Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd ...
0.00 Solar Technology Co., Ltd.; (17)
Shanghai BYD Co., Ltd ........
0.00 Shenzhen Sungold Solar Co., Ltd.; (18)
Shenzhen Topray Solar Co., Ltd.; (19)
Star Power International Limited; (20)
Cash Deposit Requirements
Systemes Versilis, Inc.; (21) Taizhou BD
Because Canadian Solar, Yingli, and
Trade Co., Ltd.; (22) tenKsolar
Shanghai BYD Co., Ltd. all have a
(Shanghai) Co., Ltd.; (23) Toenergy
superseding cash deposit rate, i.e., final
Technology Hangzhou Co., Ltd.; (24)
Wuxi Tianran Photovoltaic Co., Ltd.;
15 See Timken Co. v. United States, 893 F.2d 337
(25) Zhejiang Era Solar Technology Co.,
(Fed. Cir. 1990) (Timken).
Ltd.; and (26) Zhejiang Sunflower Light
16 See Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers
Energy Science & Technology Limited
Coalition v. United States, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir.
2010) (Diamond Sawblades).
Liability Company. These entries will
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:11 Dec 23, 2021
Jkt 256001
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
remain enjoined pursuant to the terms
of injunctions during the pendency of
any appeals process.
In the event the CIT’s ruling is not
appealed, or, if appealed, upheld by a
final and conclusive court decision,
Commerce intends to instruct CBP to
assess antidumping duties on any
unliquidated entries described in the
preceding paragraph, in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.212(b). We will
instruct CBP to assess antidumping
duties on all appropriate entries covered
by this review when either the
respondent’s weighted-average dumping
margin is not zero or de minimis or the
importer-specific ad valorem
assessment rate is not zero or de
minimis. Where either the respondent’s
weighted-average dumping margin is
zero or de minimis, or an importerspecific assessment rate is de minimis
(i.e., less than 0.5 percent), we will
instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate
entries without regard to antidumping
duties.17
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice is issued and published in
accordance with sections 516A(c) and
(e) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: December 20, 2021.
Ryan Majerus,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and
Negotiations, Performing the Non-Exclusive
Functions and Duties of the Assistant
Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2021–28071 Filed 12–23–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C–570–971]
Multilayered Wood Flooring From the
People’s Republic of China:
Preliminary Results of Countervailing
Duty Administrative Review, and Intent
to Rescind Review, in Part; 2019
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(Commerce) preliminarily determines
that countervailable subsidies are being
provided to producers and exporters of
multilayered wood flooring (wood
flooring) from the People’s Republic of
China (China). The period of review
(POR) is January 1, 2019, through
December 31, 2019. Interested parties
are invited to comment on these
preliminary results of review.
DATES: Applicable December 27, 2021.
AGENCY:
17 See
E:\FR\FM\27DEN1.SGM
19 CFR 351.106(c)(2).
27DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 245 / Monday, December 27, 2021 / Notices
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dennis McClure, AD/CVD Operations,
Office VIII, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–5973.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On December 8, 2011, Commerce
issued a countervailing duty (CVD)
order on multilayered wood flooring
from China.1 Several interested parties
requested that Commerce conduct an
administrative review of the Order. On
February 4, 2021, Commerce published
in the Federal Register a notice of
initiation of an administrative review of
the Order.2 On March 4 and October 7,
2021, we published in the Federal
Register additional notices of initiation
of an administrative review for two
companies that were inadvertently
excluded from the February 4, 2021
notice. Altogether, we initiated an
administrative review of 171 producers/
exporters for the POR.3 On June 15,
2021, we rescinded this administrative
review, in part, with respect to 88
companies, based on timely withdrawal
of review requests.4 For events that
occurred since the Initiation Notice, see
the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum.5
Scope of the Order
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
The product covered by the Order is
wood flooring from China. For a
complete description of the scope of the
Order, see the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum.
1 See Multilayered Wood Flooring from the
People’s Republic of China: Countervailing Duty
Order, 76 FR 76693 (December 8, 2011) (Order).
2 See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 86 FR
8166 (February 4, 2021) (Initiation Notice).
3 Metropolitan Hardwood Floors, Inc. and Kember
Flooring Inc., a.k.a. Kember Hardwood Flooring Inc.
were inadvertently omitted from the initiation
notice that published on February 4, 2021. See also
Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews, 86 FR 12599 (March 4,
2021); and Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 86 FR
55811 (October 7, 2021).
4 See Multilayered Wood Flooring from the
People’s Republic of China: Partial Rescission of
Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2019,
86 FR 31696 (June 15, 2021) (Partial Rescission).
5 See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for
the Preliminary Results in the Countervailing Duty
Administrative Review of Multilayered Wood
Flooring from the People’s Republic of China;
2019,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby
adopted by, this notice (Preliminary Decision
Memorandum).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:11 Dec 23, 2021
Jkt 256001
Intent To Rescind Administrative
Review, in Part
The following parties submitted no
shipment certifications: Anhui Longhua
Bamboo Product Co., Ltd. (Anhui);
Benxi Flooring Factory (General
Partnership) (Benxi); Dalian Deerfu
Wooden Product Co., Ltd. (Deerfu);
Dalian Shengyu Science and
Technology Development Co., Ltd.
(Shengyu); Dunhua Dexin Wood
Industry Co., Ltd./Dunhua City Dexin
Wood Industry Co., Ltd. (Dexin); Jiangsu
Yuhui International Trade Co., Ltd.
(Yuhui); Jiashan Fengyun Timber Co.,
Ltd. (Fengyun); Jiaxing Hengtong Wood
Co., Ltd. (Hengtong); Kember Flooring,
Inc. (Kember); Kingman Wood Industry
Co., Ltd. (Kingman); Muchsee Wood
(Chuzhou) Co., Ltd. (Muchsee); Power
Dekor Group Co., Ltd. (Power Dekor);
Yingyi-Nature (Kunshan) Wood
Industry Co., Ltd. (Yingyi-Nature);
Zhejiang Dadongwu Greenhome Wood
Co., Ltd. (Dadongwu); Zhejiang Shiyou
Timber Co., Ltd. (Shiyou); and Zhejiang
Shuimojiangnan New Material
Technology Co., Ltd. (New Material).
Based on our analysis of U.S. Customs
and Border Protection (CBP)
information and comments received
from interested parties, we preliminarily
determine that eleven companies,
Anhui; Benxi; Shengyu; Dexin; Yuhui;
Kingman; Muchsee; Power Dekor;
Yingyi-Nature; Shiyou; and New
Material, had no shipments of subject
merchandise during the POR.6 7 Absent
any evidence of shipments placed on
the record, pursuant to 19 CFR
351.213(d)(3), we intend to rescind the
administrative review of these
companies in the final results of review.
Based on our analysis of CBP
information and comments received
from interested parties, we preliminarily
determine that Kember, Hengtong and
Dadongwu made shipments during the
POR. For additional information
regarding this determination, see the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
73245
the recipient, and that the subsidy is
specific.8 For a full description of the
methodology underlying our
preliminary conclusions, including our
reliance, in part, on adverse facts
available pursuant to sections 776(a)
and (b) of the Act, see the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum.
The Preliminary Decision
Memorandum is a public document and
is on file electronically via Enforcement
and Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a
complete version of the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum can be accessed
directly at https://access.trade.gov/
public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. A list
of topics discussed in the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum is included as
Appendix I to this notice.
Preliminary Rate for Non-Selected
Companies Under Review
Methodology
Commerce is conducting this review
in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(A)
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended
(the Act). For each of the subsidy
programs found countervailable, we
preliminarily determine that there is a
subsidy, i.e., a financial contribution by
an ‘‘authority’’ that confers a benefit to
As discussed above, Commerce
initiated this administrative review on
171 producers/exporters; rescinded this
administrative review, in part, with
respect to 88 producers/exporters; and
intends to rescind this review with
respect to eleven companies that have
certified no shipments during the POR.
In addition, Commerce selected two
mandatory respondents, Jiangsu Senmao
Bamboo and Wood Industry Co., Ltd.
(Jiangsu Senmao) and Riverside
Plywood Corp. (Riverside Plywood) for
individual examination.9 For the
remaining 67 companies subject this
review, because the rates calculated for
the mandatory respondents were above
de minimis and not based entirely on
facts available, we applied a subsidy
rate based on a weighted-average of the
subsidy rates calculated for Jiangsu
Senmao and Riverside Plywood using
publicly ranged sales data submitted by
these mandatory respondents. This
methodology to establish the all-others
subsidy rate is consistent with our
practice and section 705(c)(5)(A) of the
Act. For further information on the
calculation of the non-selected
respondent rate, refer to the section in
the Preliminary Decision Memorandum
entitled ‘‘Non-Selected Companies
Under Review.’’ For a list of the non-
6 See Memorandum, ‘‘No Shipment Inquiry for
Certain Companies During the Period 01/01/2019
through 12/31/2019,’’ dated November 17, 2021.
7 We did not consider Deerfu’s no shipment
certification and Fengyun’s no shipment
certification because we rescinded the review for
these companies. See Partial Rescission, 86 FR at
31697.
8 See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act
regarding financial contribution; section 771(5)(E)
of the Act regarding benefit; and section 771(5A) of
the Act regarding specificity.
9 Cross-owned affiliates are Baroque Timber
Industries (Zhongshan) Co., Ltd.; Suzhou Times
Flooring Co., Ltd.; and Zhongshan Lianjia Flooring
Co., Ltd.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\27DEN1.SGM
27DEN1
73246
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 245 / Monday, December 27, 2021 / Notices
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
selected companies, see Appendix II to
this notice.
proprietary information until further
notice.13
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and
Preliminary Results of the Review
(d)(2), parties who submit case briefs or
rebuttal briefs in this review are
In accordance with 19 CFR
encouraged to submit with each
351.221(b)(4)(i), we calculated a
argument: (1) A statement of the issue;
countervailable subsidy rate for each of
(2) a brief summary of the argument;
the mandatory respondents, Jiangsu
and (3) a table of authorities.
Senmao and Riverside Plywood, and
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c),
their cross-owned affiliates, where
interested parties who wish to request a
applicable.
hearing, limited to issues raised in the
We preliminarily find the
case and rebuttal briefs, must submit a
countervailable subsidy rates for the
written request to the Assistant
mandatory and non-selected
Secretary for Enforcement and
respondents under review to be as
Compliance, U.S. Department of
follows:
Commerce, within 30 days after the date
of publication of this notice. Requests
Subsidy rate
Producer/exporter
(percent)
should contain the party’s name,
address, and telephone number, the
Riverside Plywood Corp. and
number of participants, and a list of the
its Cross-Owned Affili22.70 issues to be discussed. If a request for
ates 10 ................................
a hearing is made, Commerce intends to
Jiangsu Senmao Bamboo
hold the hearing at a time and date to
and Wood Industry Co.,
Ltd .....................................
5.50 be determined. Parties should confirm
Non-Selected Companies
by telephone the date and time of the
Under Review 11 ................
15.71 hearing two days before the scheduled
date.
An electronically filed document
Disclosure
must
be received successfully in its
We intend to disclose to interested
entirety by ACCESS by 5:00 p.m.
parties the calculations performed for
Eastern Time on the established
these preliminary results in accordance
deadline.
with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
Final Results
Verification
Unless extended, we intend to issue
As provided in section 782(i)(3) of the
the final results of this administrative
Act, Commerce intends to verify the
review, which will include the results of
information relied upon for its final
our analysis of the issues raised in the
results. Normally, Commerce verifies
case briefs, within 120 days of
information using standard procedures,
publication of these preliminary results
including an on-site examination of
in the Federal Register, pursuant to
original accounting, financial, and sales
section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19
documentation. However, due to current
CFR 351.213(h).
travel restrictions in response to the
global COVID–19 pandemic, Commerce Assessment Rates
is unable to conduct on-site verification
In accordance with 19 CFR
in this review. Accordingly, we intend
351.221(b)(4)(i), we preliminarily
to verify the information relied upon for assigned subsidy rates in the amounts
the final results through alternative
shown above for the producer/exporters
means in lieu of an on-site verification.
shown above. Upon completion of the
administrative review, consistent with
Public Comment
section 751(a)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR
Case briefs or other written comments 351.212(b)(2), Commerce shall
may be submitted to the Assistant
determine, and CBP shall assess,
Secretary for Enforcement and
countervailing duties on all appropriate
Compliance. A timeline for the
entries covered by this review. For the
submission of case and rebuttal briefs
companies for which this review is
and written comments will be provided rescinded, Commerce will instruct CBP
12
to interested parties at a later date.
to assess countervailing duties on all
Note that Commerce has temporarily
appropriate entries at a rate equal to the
modified certain of its requirements for
cash deposit of estimated countervailing
serving documents containing business
duties required at the time of entry, or
10 Cross-owned affiliates are Baroque Timber
Industries (Zhongshan) Co., Ltd.; Suzhou Times
Flooring Co., Ltd.; and Zhongshan Lianjia Flooring
Co., Ltd.
11 See Appendix II.
12 See 19 CFR 351.309(c) and (d).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:11 Dec 23, 2021
Jkt 256001
13 See Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD
Service Requirements Due to COVID–19; Extension
of Effective Period, 85 FR 29615 (May 18, 2020);
and Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD Service
Requirements Due to COVID–19; Extension of
Effective Period, 85 FR 41363 (July 10, 2020).
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
withdrawal from warehouse, for
consumption, during the period January
1, 2019, through December 31, 2019, in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(l)(i).
Commerce intends to issue assessment
instructions to CBP no earlier than 35
days after the date of publication of the
final results of this review in the
Federal Register. If a timely summons is
filed at the U.S. Court of International
Trade, the assessment instructions will
direct CBP not to liquidate relevant
entries until the time for parties to file
a request for a statutory injunction has
expired (i.e., within 90 days of
publication).
Cash Deposit Requirements
In accordance with section 751(a)(1)
of the Act, Commerce intends, upon
publication of the final results, to
instruct CBP to collect cash deposits of
estimated countervailing duties in the
amounts shown for each of the
respective companies listed above and
in Appendix II on shipments of subject
merchandise entered, or withdrawn
from warehouse, for consumption on or
after the date of publication of the final
results of this administrative review. For
all non-reviewed firms, we will instruct
CBP to continue to collect cash deposits
at the most recent company-specific or
all-others rate applicable to the
company. These cash deposit
requirements, when imposed, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
Notification to Interested Parties
These preliminary results are issued
and published pursuant to sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19
CFR 351.221(b)(4).
Dated: December 17, 2021.
Ryan Majerus,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and
Negotiations, Performing the Non-Exclusive
Functions and Duties of the Assistant
Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix I—List of Topics Discussed in
the Preliminary Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Non-Selected Companies Under Review
IV. Scope of the Order
V. Diversification of China’s Economy
VI. Use of Facts Otherwise Available and
Application of Adverse Inferences
VII. Subsidies Valuation
VIII. Interest Rate Benchmarks, Discount
Rates, Inputs, Land-Use and Electricity
Benchmarks
IX. Analysis of Programs
X. Recommendation
Appendix II—Non-Selected Companies
Under Review
1. Anhui Boya Bamboo & Wood Products Co.,
Ltd.
E:\FR\FM\27DEN1.SGM
27DEN1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 245 / Monday, December 27, 2021 / Notices
2. Anhui Yaolong Bamboo & Wood Products
Co. Ltd.
3. Armstrong Wood Products (Kunshan) Co.,
Ltd.
4. Benxi Wood Company
5. Changzhou Hawd Flooring Co., Ltd.
6. Dalian Guhua Wooden Product Co., Ltd.
7. Dalian Huilong Wooden Products Co., Ltd.
8. Dalian Jaenmaken Wood Industry Co., Ltd.
9. Dalian Jiahong Wood Industry Co., Ltd.
10. Dalian Kemian Wood Industry Co., Ltd.
11. Dalian Penghong Floor Products Co., Ltd.
12. Dalian Qianqiu Wooden Product Co., Ltd.
13. Dalian Shumaike Floor Manufacturing
Co., Ltd.
14. Dalian T-Boom Wood Products Co., Ltd.
15. Dongtai Fuan Universal Dynamics, LLC
16. Dun Hua Sen Tai Wood Co., Ltd.
17. Dunhua City Hongyuan Wood Industry
Co., Ltd.
18. Dunhua City Jisen Wood Industry Co.,
Ltd.
19. Dunhua Shengda Wood Industry Co., Ltd.
20. Fine Furniture (Shanghai) Limited
21. Fusong Jinlong Wooden Group Co., Ltd.
22. Fusong Jinqiu Wooden Product Co., Ltd.
23. Fusong Qianqiu Wooden Product Co.,
Ltd.
24. Guangdong Yihua Timber Industry Co.,
Ltd.
25. Guangzhou Homebon Timber
Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
26. HaiLin LinJing Wooden Products Co.,
Ltd.
27. Hangzhou Hanje Tec Company Limited
28. Hangzhou Zhengtian Industrial Co., Ltd.
29. Hunchun Forest Wolf Wooden Industry
Co., Ltd.
30. Hunchun Xingjia Wooden Flooring Inc.
31. Huzhou Chenghang Wood Co., Ltd.
32. Huzhou Fulinmen Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd.
33. Huzhou Jesonwood Co., Ltd.
34. Huzhou Sunergy World Trade Co., Ltd.
35. Jiangsu Guyu International Trading Co.,
Ltd.
36. Jiangsu Keri Wood Co., Ltd.
37. Jiangsu Mingle Flooring Co., Ltd.
38. Jiangsu Simba Flooring Co., Ltd.
39. Jiashan HuiJiaLe Decoration Material Co.,
Ltd.
40. Jiashan On-Line Lumber Co., Ltd.
41. Jiaxing Brilliant Import & Export Co., Ltd.
42. Jiaxing Hengtong Wood Co., Ltd.
43. Jilin Xinyuan Wooden Industry Co., Ltd.
44. Karly Wood Product Limited
45. Kember Flooring, Inc., a.k.a. Kember
Hardwood Flooring, Inc.
46. Kemian Wood Industry (Kunshan) Co.,
Ltd.
47. Kingman Floors Co., Ltd.
48. Lauzon Distinctive Hardwood Flooring
49. Linyi Anying Wood Co., Ltd.
50. Linyi Youyou Wood Co., Ltd. (successorin-interest to Shanghai Lizhong Wood
Products Co., Ltd.) (a/k/a The Lizhong
Wood Industry Limited Company of
Shanghai)
51. Metropolitan Hardwood Floors, Inc.
52. Pinge Timber Manufacturing (Zhejiang)
Co., Ltd.
53. Power Dekor North America Inc.
54. Scholar Home (Shanghai) New Material
Co. Ltd.
55. Shanghaifloor Timber (Shanghai) Co.,
Ltd.
56. Sino-Maple (Jiangsu) Co., Ltd.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:11 Dec 23, 2021
Jkt 256001
73247
57. Suzhou Dongda Wood Co., Ltd.
58. Tongxiang Jisheng Import and Export Co.,
Ltd.
59. Xiamen Yung De Ornament Co., Ltd.
60. Xuzhou Shenghe Wood Co., Ltd.
61. Yekalon Industry, Inc.
62. Yihua Lifestyle Technology Co., Ltd.
63. Zhejiang Dadongwu GreenHome Wood
Co., Ltd. (a.k.a. Zhejiang Dadongwu
Greenhome Wood Co., Ltd. and Zhejiang
Dadongwu Green Home Wood Co., Ltd.)
64. Zhejiang Fuerjia Wooden Co., Ltd.
65. Zhejiang Jiechen Wood Industry Co., Ltd.
66. Zhejiang Longsen Lumbering Co., Ltd.
67. Zhejiang Simite Wooden Co., Ltd.
(4) Canadian Solar Manufacturing
(Luoyang) Inc.; (5) BYD (Shangluo)
Industrial Co., Ltd.; and (6) Shanghai
BYD Co., Ltd.
DATES: Applicable December 18, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff
Pedersen, AD/CVD Operations, Office
IV, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–2769.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[FR Doc. 2021–28074 Filed 12–23–21; 8:45 am]
Background
On June 20, 2016, Commerce
published the final results of the 2013–
2014 AD administrative review of solar
cells from China. In the Final Results,
Commerce selected Thailand as the
primary surrogate country and relied on
Thai import data to value nitrogen that
was used in manufacturing solar cells.1
Respondents, Trina, Canadian Solar
Inc. et al., BYD (Shangluo) Industrial
Co., Ltd., Shanghai BYD Co., Ltd., and
Yingli,2 and domestic interested party,
SolarWorld Americas, Inc. (SolarWorld),
challenged Commerce’s Final Results
(CIT case numbers 16–00132, 16–00134,
and 16–00135). The CIT consolidated
case numbers 16–00132, 16–00134, and
16–00135 into case number 16–00134 in
October 2016. On October 18, 2017, the
CIT sustained Commerce’s Final Results
with respect to: (1) The surrogates that
it selected to value aluminum frames,
semi-finished polysilicon ingots and
blocks, solar backsheets, nitrogen, and
financial ratios; and (2) its application
of adverse facts available with respect to
unreported factors of production.
However, the CIT remanded the Final
Results to Commerce to reconsider, or
further explain: (1) The surrogates that
it selected to value tempered glass and
scrapped solar cells and modules; and
(2) its decision to include import values
with zero import quantities in its
surrogate value calculations.3
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–979]
Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells,
Whether or Not Assembled Into
Modules, From the People’s Republic
of China: Notice of Court Decision Not
in Harmony With the Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; Notice of Amended Final
Results
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On December 8, 2021, the
U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT)
issued its final judgment in SolarWorld
Americas, Inc., et al. v. United States,
Consol. Court No. 16–00134, sustaining
the Department of Commerce
(Commerce)’s fourth remand results
pertaining to the administrative review
of the antidumping duty (AD) order on
crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells,
whether or not assembled into modules
(solar cells), from the People’s Republic
of China (China) covering the period
December 1, 2013, through November
30, 2014. Commerce is notifying the
public that the CIT’s final judgment is
not in harmony with the final results of
the 2013–2014 AD administrative
review of the solar cells from China and
that Commerce is amending those final
results with respect to the dumping
margin assigned to the following
companies: (1) The collapsed entity
comprising Changzhou Trina Solar
Energy Co., Ltd.; Trina Solar
(Changzhou) Science and Technology
Co., Ltd.; Yancheng Trina Solar Energy
Technology Co., Ltd.; Changzhou Trina
Solar Yabang Energy Co., Ltd.; Turpan
Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd.; and Hubei
Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd.
(collectively, Trina); (2) Canadian Solar
International Limited; (3) Canadian
Solar Manufacturing (Changshu) Inc.;
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
1 See Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells,
Whether or Not Assembled Into Modules, from the
People’s Republic of China: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and
Final Determination of No Shipments; 2013–2014,
81 FR 39905 (June 20, 2016) (Final Results), and
accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum at
Comment 21.
2 We used ‘‘Yingli’’ to refer to the following
companies that we treated as a single entity: Yingli
Energy (China) Company Limited; Baoding Tianwei
Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd.; Tianjin
Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd.; Hengshui
Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd.; Lixian
Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd.; Baoding
Jiasheng Photovoltaic Technology Co., Ltd.; Beijing
Tianneng Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd.;
Hainan Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd.; and
Shenzhen Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd.
3 See SolarWorld Americas, Inc.et al. v. United
States, 273 F. Supp. 3d 1254 (CIT 2017).
E:\FR\FM\27DEN1.SGM
27DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 245 (Monday, December 27, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 73244-73247]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-28074]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C-570-971]
Multilayered Wood Flooring From the People's Republic of China:
Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review, and
Intent to Rescind Review, in Part; 2019
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines
that countervailable subsidies are being provided to producers and
exporters of multilayered wood flooring (wood flooring) from the
People's Republic of China (China). The period of review (POR) is
January 1, 2019, through December 31, 2019. Interested parties are
invited to comment on these preliminary results of review.
DATES: Applicable December 27, 2021.
[[Page 73245]]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dennis McClure, AD/CVD Operations,
Office VIII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-5973.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On December 8, 2011, Commerce issued a countervailing duty (CVD)
order on multilayered wood flooring from China.\1\ Several interested
parties requested that Commerce conduct an administrative review of the
Order. On February 4, 2021, Commerce published in the Federal Register
a notice of initiation of an administrative review of the Order.\2\ On
March 4 and October 7, 2021, we published in the Federal Register
additional notices of initiation of an administrative review for two
companies that were inadvertently excluded from the February 4, 2021
notice. Altogether, we initiated an administrative review of 171
producers/exporters for the POR.\3\ On June 15, 2021, we rescinded this
administrative review, in part, with respect to 88 companies, based on
timely withdrawal of review requests.\4\ For events that occurred since
the Initiation Notice, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Multilayered Wood Flooring from the People's Republic of
China: Countervailing Duty Order, 76 FR 76693 (December 8, 2011)
(Order).
\2\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews, 86 FR 8166 (February 4, 2021) (Initiation
Notice).
\3\ Metropolitan Hardwood Floors, Inc. and Kember Flooring Inc.,
a.k.a. Kember Hardwood Flooring Inc. were inadvertently omitted from
the initiation notice that published on February 4, 2021. See also
Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative
Reviews, 86 FR 12599 (March 4, 2021); and Initiation of Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 86 FR 55811 (October
7, 2021).
\4\ See Multilayered Wood Flooring from the People's Republic of
China: Partial Rescission of Countervailing Duty Administrative
Review; 2019, 86 FR 31696 (June 15, 2021) (Partial Rescission).
\5\ See Memorandum, ``Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary
Results in the Countervailing Duty Administrative Review of
Multilayered Wood Flooring from the People's Republic of China;
2019,'' dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice
(Preliminary Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The product covered by the Order is wood flooring from China. For a
complete description of the scope of the Order, see the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum.
Intent To Rescind Administrative Review, in Part
The following parties submitted no shipment certifications: Anhui
Longhua Bamboo Product Co., Ltd. (Anhui); Benxi Flooring Factory
(General Partnership) (Benxi); Dalian Deerfu Wooden Product Co., Ltd.
(Deerfu); Dalian Shengyu Science and Technology Development Co., Ltd.
(Shengyu); Dunhua Dexin Wood Industry Co., Ltd./Dunhua City Dexin Wood
Industry Co., Ltd. (Dexin); Jiangsu Yuhui International Trade Co., Ltd.
(Yuhui); Jiashan Fengyun Timber Co., Ltd. (Fengyun); Jiaxing Hengtong
Wood Co., Ltd. (Hengtong); Kember Flooring, Inc. (Kember); Kingman Wood
Industry Co., Ltd. (Kingman); Muchsee Wood (Chuzhou) Co., Ltd.
(Muchsee); Power Dekor Group Co., Ltd. (Power Dekor); Yingyi-Nature
(Kunshan) Wood Industry Co., Ltd. (Yingyi-Nature); Zhejiang Dadongwu
Greenhome Wood Co., Ltd. (Dadongwu); Zhejiang Shiyou Timber Co., Ltd.
(Shiyou); and Zhejiang Shuimojiangnan New Material Technology Co., Ltd.
(New Material). Based on our analysis of U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) information and comments received from interested
parties, we preliminarily determine that eleven companies, Anhui;
Benxi; Shengyu; Dexin; Yuhui; Kingman; Muchsee; Power Dekor; Yingyi-
Nature; Shiyou; and New Material, had no shipments of subject
merchandise during the POR.6 7 Absent any evidence of
shipments placed on the record, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), we
intend to rescind the administrative review of these companies in the
final results of review. Based on our analysis of CBP information and
comments received from interested parties, we preliminarily determine
that Kember, Hengtong and Dadongwu made shipments during the POR. For
additional information regarding this determination, see the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Memorandum, ``No Shipment Inquiry for Certain Companies
During the Period 01/01/2019 through 12/31/2019,'' dated November
17, 2021.
\7\ We did not consider Deerfu's no shipment certification and
Fengyun's no shipment certification because we rescinded the review
for these companies. See Partial Rescission, 86 FR at 31697.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Methodology
Commerce is conducting this review in accordance with section
751(a)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). For each
of the subsidy programs found countervailable, we preliminarily
determine that there is a subsidy, i.e., a financial contribution by an
``authority'' that confers a benefit to the recipient, and that the
subsidy is specific.\8\ For a full description of the methodology
underlying our preliminary conclusions, including our reliance, in
part, on adverse facts available pursuant to sections 776(a) and (b) of
the Act, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act regarding
financial contribution; section 771(5)(E) of the Act regarding
benefit; and section 771(5A) of the Act regarding specificity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on
file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov. In
addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can
be accessed directly at https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. A list of topics discussed in the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum is included as Appendix I to this notice.
Preliminary Rate for Non-Selected Companies Under Review
As discussed above, Commerce initiated this administrative review
on 171 producers/exporters; rescinded this administrative review, in
part, with respect to 88 producers/exporters; and intends to rescind
this review with respect to eleven companies that have certified no
shipments during the POR. In addition, Commerce selected two mandatory
respondents, Jiangsu Senmao Bamboo and Wood Industry Co., Ltd. (Jiangsu
Senmao) and Riverside Plywood Corp. (Riverside Plywood) for individual
examination.\9\ For the remaining 67 companies subject this review,
because the rates calculated for the mandatory respondents were above
de minimis and not based entirely on facts available, we applied a
subsidy rate based on a weighted-average of the subsidy rates
calculated for Jiangsu Senmao and Riverside Plywood using publicly
ranged sales data submitted by these mandatory respondents. This
methodology to establish the all-others subsidy rate is consistent with
our practice and section 705(c)(5)(A) of the Act. For further
information on the calculation of the non-selected respondent rate,
refer to the section in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum entitled
``Non-Selected Companies Under Review.'' For a list of the non-
[[Page 73246]]
selected companies, see Appendix II to this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ Cross-owned affiliates are Baroque Timber Industries
(Zhongshan) Co., Ltd.; Suzhou Times Flooring Co., Ltd.; and
Zhongshan Lianjia Flooring Co., Ltd.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Preliminary Results of the Review
In accordance with 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4)(i), we calculated a
countervailable subsidy rate for each of the mandatory respondents,
Jiangsu Senmao and Riverside Plywood, and their cross-owned affiliates,
where applicable.
We preliminarily find the countervailable subsidy rates for the
mandatory and non-selected respondents under review to be as follows:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ Cross-owned affiliates are Baroque Timber Industries
(Zhongshan) Co., Ltd.; Suzhou Times Flooring Co., Ltd.; and
Zhongshan Lianjia Flooring Co., Ltd.
\11\ See Appendix II.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subsidy rate
Producer/exporter (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Riverside Plywood Corp. and its Cross-Owned Affiliates 22.70
\10\...................................................
Jiangsu Senmao Bamboo and Wood Industry Co., Ltd........ 5.50
Non-Selected Companies Under Review \11\................ 15.71
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure
We intend to disclose to interested parties the calculations
performed for these preliminary results in accordance with 19 CFR
351.224(b).
Verification
As provided in section 782(i)(3) of the Act, Commerce intends to
verify the information relied upon for its final results. Normally,
Commerce verifies information using standard procedures, including an
on-site examination of original accounting, financial, and sales
documentation. However, due to current travel restrictions in response
to the global COVID-19 pandemic, Commerce is unable to conduct on-site
verification in this review. Accordingly, we intend to verify the
information relied upon for the final results through alternative means
in lieu of an on-site verification.
Public Comment
Case briefs or other written comments may be submitted to the
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. A timeline for the
submission of case and rebuttal briefs and written comments will be
provided to interested parties at a later date.\12\ Note that Commerce
has temporarily modified certain of its requirements for serving
documents containing business proprietary information until further
notice.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c) and (d).
\13\ See Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD Service Requirements
Due to COVID-19; Extension of Effective Period, 85 FR 29615 (May 18,
2020); and Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD Service Requirements Due
to COVID-19; Extension of Effective Period, 85 FR 41363 (July 10,
2020).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2), parties who submit
case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this review are encouraged to submit
with each argument: (1) A statement of the issue; (2) a brief summary
of the argument; and (3) a table of authorities.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to
request a hearing, limited to issues raised in the case and rebuttal
briefs, must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce, within 30 days
after the date of publication of this notice. Requests should contain
the party's name, address, and telephone number, the number of
participants, and a list of the issues to be discussed. If a request
for a hearing is made, Commerce intends to hold the hearing at a time
and date to be determined. Parties should confirm by telephone the date
and time of the hearing two days before the scheduled date.
An electronically filed document must be received successfully in
its entirety by ACCESS by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on the established
deadline.
Final Results
Unless extended, we intend to issue the final results of this
administrative review, which will include the results of our analysis
of the issues raised in the case briefs, within 120 days of publication
of these preliminary results in the Federal Register, pursuant to
section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h).
Assessment Rates
In accordance with 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4)(i), we preliminarily
assigned subsidy rates in the amounts shown above for the producer/
exporters shown above. Upon completion of the administrative review,
consistent with section 751(a)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(2),
Commerce shall determine, and CBP shall assess, countervailing duties
on all appropriate entries covered by this review. For the companies
for which this review is rescinded, Commerce will instruct CBP to
assess countervailing duties on all appropriate entries at a rate equal
to the cash deposit of estimated countervailing duties required at the
time of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption, during
the period January 1, 2019, through December 31, 2019, in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(l)(i). Commerce intends to issue assessment
instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 days after the date of
publication of the final results of this review in the Federal
Register. If a timely summons is filed at the U.S. Court of
International Trade, the assessment instructions will direct CBP not to
liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties to file a request
for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within 90 days of
publication).
Cash Deposit Requirements
In accordance with section 751(a)(1) of the Act, Commerce intends,
upon publication of the final results, to instruct CBP to collect cash
deposits of estimated countervailing duties in the amounts shown for
each of the respective companies listed above and in Appendix II on
shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the date of publication of the final
results of this administrative review. For all non-reviewed firms, we
will instruct CBP to continue to collect cash deposits at the most
recent company-specific or all-others rate applicable to the company.
These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect
until further notice.
Notification to Interested Parties
These preliminary results are issued and published pursuant to
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4).
Dated: December 17, 2021.
Ryan Majerus,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, Performing the
Non-Exclusive Functions and Duties of the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix I--List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Non-Selected Companies Under Review
IV. Scope of the Order
V. Diversification of China's Economy
VI. Use of Facts Otherwise Available and Application of Adverse
Inferences
VII. Subsidies Valuation
VIII. Interest Rate Benchmarks, Discount Rates, Inputs, Land-Use and
Electricity Benchmarks
IX. Analysis of Programs
X. Recommendation
Appendix II--Non-Selected Companies Under Review
1. Anhui Boya Bamboo & Wood Products Co., Ltd.
[[Page 73247]]
2. Anhui Yaolong Bamboo & Wood Products Co. Ltd.
3. Armstrong Wood Products (Kunshan) Co., Ltd.
4. Benxi Wood Company
5. Changzhou Hawd Flooring Co., Ltd.
6. Dalian Guhua Wooden Product Co., Ltd.
7. Dalian Huilong Wooden Products Co., Ltd.
8. Dalian Jaenmaken Wood Industry Co., Ltd.
9. Dalian Jiahong Wood Industry Co., Ltd.
10. Dalian Kemian Wood Industry Co., Ltd.
11. Dalian Penghong Floor Products Co., Ltd.
12. Dalian Qianqiu Wooden Product Co., Ltd.
13. Dalian Shumaike Floor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
14. Dalian T-Boom Wood Products Co., Ltd.
15. Dongtai Fuan Universal Dynamics, LLC
16. Dun Hua Sen Tai Wood Co., Ltd.
17. Dunhua City Hongyuan Wood Industry Co., Ltd.
18. Dunhua City Jisen Wood Industry Co., Ltd.
19. Dunhua Shengda Wood Industry Co., Ltd.
20. Fine Furniture (Shanghai) Limited
21. Fusong Jinlong Wooden Group Co., Ltd.
22. Fusong Jinqiu Wooden Product Co., Ltd.
23. Fusong Qianqiu Wooden Product Co., Ltd.
24. Guangdong Yihua Timber Industry Co., Ltd.
25. Guangzhou Homebon Timber Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
26. HaiLin LinJing Wooden Products Co., Ltd.
27. Hangzhou Hanje Tec Company Limited
28. Hangzhou Zhengtian Industrial Co., Ltd.
29. Hunchun Forest Wolf Wooden Industry Co., Ltd.
30. Hunchun Xingjia Wooden Flooring Inc.
31. Huzhou Chenghang Wood Co., Ltd.
32. Huzhou Fulinmen Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd.
33. Huzhou Jesonwood Co., Ltd.
34. Huzhou Sunergy World Trade Co., Ltd.
35. Jiangsu Guyu International Trading Co., Ltd.
36. Jiangsu Keri Wood Co., Ltd.
37. Jiangsu Mingle Flooring Co., Ltd.
38. Jiangsu Simba Flooring Co., Ltd.
39. Jiashan HuiJiaLe Decoration Material Co., Ltd.
40. Jiashan On-Line Lumber Co., Ltd.
41. Jiaxing Brilliant Import & Export Co., Ltd.
42. Jiaxing Hengtong Wood Co., Ltd.
43. Jilin Xinyuan Wooden Industry Co., Ltd.
44. Karly Wood Product Limited
45. Kember Flooring, Inc., a.k.a. Kember Hardwood Flooring, Inc.
46. Kemian Wood Industry (Kunshan) Co., Ltd.
47. Kingman Floors Co., Ltd.
48. Lauzon Distinctive Hardwood Flooring
49. Linyi Anying Wood Co., Ltd.
50. Linyi Youyou Wood Co., Ltd. (successor-in-interest to Shanghai
Lizhong Wood Products Co., Ltd.) (a/k/a The Lizhong Wood Industry
Limited Company of Shanghai)
51. Metropolitan Hardwood Floors, Inc.
52. Pinge Timber Manufacturing (Zhejiang) Co., Ltd.
53. Power Dekor North America Inc.
54. Scholar Home (Shanghai) New Material Co. Ltd.
55. Shanghaifloor Timber (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
56. Sino-Maple (Jiangsu) Co., Ltd.
57. Suzhou Dongda Wood Co., Ltd.
58. Tongxiang Jisheng Import and Export Co., Ltd.
59. Xiamen Yung De Ornament Co., Ltd.
60. Xuzhou Shenghe Wood Co., Ltd.
61. Yekalon Industry, Inc.
62. Yihua Lifestyle Technology Co., Ltd.
63. Zhejiang Dadongwu GreenHome Wood Co., Ltd. (a.k.a. Zhejiang
Dadongwu Greenhome Wood Co., Ltd. and Zhejiang Dadongwu Green Home
Wood Co., Ltd.)
64. Zhejiang Fuerjia Wooden Co., Ltd.
65. Zhejiang Jiechen Wood Industry Co., Ltd.
66. Zhejiang Longsen Lumbering Co., Ltd.
67. Zhejiang Simite Wooden Co., Ltd.
[FR Doc. 2021-28074 Filed 12-23-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P