Applications for New Awards; Upward Bound Program, 71460-71465 [2021-27235]
Download as PDF
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
71460
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 239 / Thursday, December 16, 2021 / Notices
75.110, the Department has established
the following performance measures:
(a) Percentage of priority languages
defined by the Secretary of Education
taught at NRCs.
(b) Percentage of NRCs teaching
intermediate or advanced courses in
priority languages as defined by the
Secretary of Education.
(c) Percentage of NRCs that increased
the number of intermediate or advanced
level language courses in the priority
area and/or less and least commonly
taught languages (LCTLs) during the
course of the grant period.
(d) Percentage of NRCs that increased
the number of certificate, minor, or
major degree programs in the priority
area and/or LCTLs, area studies, or
international studies during the course
of the four-year grant period.
(e) Percentage of LCTLs taught at
NRCs.
(f) Cost per NRC that increased the
number of intermediate or advanced
level language courses in the priority
area and/or LCTLs during the course of
the grant period.
The information provided by grantees
in their performance reports submitted
via the International Resource
Information System (IRIS) will be the
source of data for these measures.
Reporting screens for institutions can be
viewed at: https://iris.ed.gov/iris/pdfs/
NRC.pdf.
6. Continuation Awards: In making a
continuation award under 34 CFR
75.253, the Secretary considers, among
other things: Whether a grantee has
made substantial progress in achieving
the goals and objectives of the project;
whether the grantee has expended funds
in a manner that is consistent with its
approved application and budget; and,
if the Secretary has established
performance measurement
requirements, whether the grantee has
made substantial progress in achieving
the performance targets in the grantee’s
approved application.
In making a continuation award, the
Secretary also considers whether the
grantee is operating in compliance with
the assurances in its approved
application, including those applicable
to Federal civil rights laws that prohibit
discrimination in programs or activities
receiving Federal financial assistance
from the Department (34 CFR 100.4,
104.5, 106.4, 108.8, and 110.23).
VII. Other Information
Accessible Format: On request to the
program contact person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT,
individuals with disabilities can obtain
this document and a copy of the
application package in an accessible
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:54 Dec 15, 2021
Jkt 256001
format. The Department will provide the
requestor with an accessible format that
may include Rich Text Format (RTF) or
text format (txt), a thumb drive, an MP3
file, braille, large print, audiotape, or
compact disc, or other accessible format.
Electronic Access to This Document:
The official version of this document is
the document published in the Federal
Register. You may access the official
edition of the Federal Register and the
Code of Federal Regulations at
www.govinfo.gov. At this site you can
view this document, as well as all other
documents of this Department
published in the Federal Register, in
text or Portable Document Format
(PDF). To use PDF you must have
Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is
available free at the site.
You may also access documents of the
Department published in the Federal
Register by using the article search
feature at www.federalregister.gov.
Specifically, through the advanced
search feature at this site, you can limit
your search to documents published by
the Department.
Annmarie Weisman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy,
Planning and Innovation, Office of
Postsecondary Education.
[FR Doc. 2021–27228 Filed 12–15–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Applications for New Awards; Upward
Bound Program
Office of Postsecondary
Education, Department of Education.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Department of Education
(Department) is issuing a notice inviting
applications for new awards for fiscal
year (FY) 2022 for the Upward Bound
(UB) Program, Assistance Listing
Number 84.047A. This notice relates to
the approved information collection
under OMB control number 1840–0550.
DATES:
Applications Available: December 16,
2021.
Deadline for Transmittal of
Applications: January 31, 2022.
Deadline for Intergovernmental
Review: March 31, 2022.
ADDRESSES: For the addresses for
obtaining and submitting an
application, please refer to our Common
Instructions for Applicants to
Department of Education Discretionary
Grant Programs, published in the
Federal Register on February 13, 2019
(84 FR 3768) and available at
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-201902-13/pdf/2019-02206.pdf.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ken
Waters, U.S. Department of Education,
400 Maryland Avenue SW, Room
2C229, Washington, DC 20202–4260.
Telephone: (202) 453–6273. Email:
Ken.Waters@ed.gov.
If you use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD) or a text
telephone (TTY), call the Federal Relay
Service (FRS), toll free, at 1–800–877–
8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Full Text of Announcement
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Purpose of Program: The UB Program
is one of the seven programs known as
the Federal TRIO Programs. The UB
Program is a discretionary grant
program that supports projects designed
to provide students with the skills and
motivation necessary to complete a
program of secondary education and
enter into and succeed in a program of
postsecondary education. There are
three types of grants under the UB
Program: UB; Veterans UB; and UB
Math and Science grants. In this notice
we invite applications for UB grants
only. We will invite applications for
Veterans UB grants and UB Math and
Science grants in forthcoming notices.
Required services under the UB Program
are specified in sections 402C(b) and (c)
of the Higher Education Act of 1965, as
amended (HEA) (20 U.S.C. 1070a–13),
and permissible services under the UB
Program are specified in section 402C(d)
of the HEA.
Priorities: This notice contains three
competitive preference priorities.
Competitive Preference Priority 1 is
from the Secretary’s Notice of
Administrative Priorities and
Definitions for Discretionary Grant
Programs, published in the Federal
Register on March 9, 2020 (85 FR
13640) (Administrative Priorities).
Competitive Preference Priorities 2 and
3 are from the Secretary’s Supplemental
Priorities and Definitions for
Discretionary Grant Programs,
published in the Federal Register on
December 10, 2021 (86 FR 70612)
(Supplemental Priorities).
Note: Applicants must include in the
one-page abstract submitted with the
application a statement indicating
which, if any, competitive preference
priorities are addressed. If the applicant
has addressed one or more of the
competitive preference priorities, this
information must also be listed on the
UB Program Profile Form.
Competitive Preference Priorities: For
FY 2022 and any subsequent year in
E:\FR\FM\16DEN1.SGM
16DEN1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 239 / Thursday, December 16, 2021 / Notices
which we make awards from the list of
unfunded applicants from this
competition, these priorities are
competitive preference priorities. Under
34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i), we award up to
an additional nine points to an
application, depending on how well the
application meets the priorities.
The priorities are:
Competitive Preference Priority 1:
Applications that Demonstrate a
Rationale (Up to 3 points).
Under this priority, an applicant
proposes a project that demonstrates a
rationale (as defined in this notice).
Note: A list of evidence-based
practices that are relevant to the UB
Program is available at www2.ed.gov/
programs/trioupbound/. This
list is not exhaustive. Additional
information regarding the What Works
Clearinghouse practice guides and
intervention reports that could also be
relevant is posted on the Department’s
website at www.ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc.
Competitive Preference Priority 2:
Meeting Student Social, Emotional, and
Academic Needs.
Projects that are designed to improve
students’ social, emotional, academic,
and career development, with a focus on
underserved students, through
providing multi-tiered systems of
supports that address learning barriers
both in and out of the classroom, that
enable healthy development and
respond to students’ needs and which
may include evidence-based traumainformed practices and professional
development for educators on avoiding
deficit-based approaches.
Note: Because the UB Program
supports students and not the
professional development of educators,
applicants should address supports for
students only.
Competitive Preference Priority 3:
Strengthening Cross-Agency
Coordination and Community
Engagement to Advance Systemic
Change.
Projects that are designed to take a
systemic evidence-based approach to
improving outcomes for underserved
students by establishing cross-agency
partnerships, or community-based
partnerships with local nonprofit
organizations, businesses, philanthropic
organizations, or others, to meet family
well-being needs.
Definitions: The definitions below are
from 34 CFR 77.1 and the Supplemental
Priorities.
Demonstrates a rationale means a key
project component included in the
project’s logic model is informed by
research or evaluation findings that
suggest the project component is likely
to improve relevant outcomes.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:54 Dec 15, 2021
Jkt 256001
Disconnected youth means an
individual, between the ages 14 and 24,
who may be from a low-income
background, experiences homelessness,
is in foster care, is involved in the
justice system, or is not working or not
enrolled in (or at risk of dropping out of)
an educational institution.
Evidence-based means the proposed
project component is supported by
evidence that demonstrates a rationale.
Logic model (also referred to as a
theory of action) means a framework
that identifies key project components
of the proposed project (i.e., the active
‘‘ingredients’’ that are hypothesized to
be critical to achieving the relevant
outcomes) and describes the theoretical
and operational relationships among the
key project components and relevant
outcomes.
Note: In developing logic models,
applicants may want to use resources
such as the Regional Educational
Laboratory Program’s (REL Pacific)
Education Logic Model Application,
available at https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/
edlabs/regions/pacific/elm.asp. Other
sources include: https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/
edlabs/regions/pacific/pdf/REL_
2014025.pdf, https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/
edlabs/regions/pacific/pdf/REL_
2014007.pdf, and https://ies.ed.gov/
ncee/edlabs/regions/northeast/pdf/REL_
2015057.pdf.
Project component means an activity,
strategy, intervention, process, product,
practice, or policy included in a project.
Evidence may pertain to an individual
project component or to a combination
of project components (e.g., training
teachers on instructional practices for
English learners and follow-on coaching
for these teachers).
Relevant outcome means the student
outcome(s) or other outcome(s) the key
project component is designed to
improve, consistent with the specific
goals of the program.
Underserved student means a student
in one or more of the following
subgroups:
(a) A student who is living in poverty
or is served by schools with high
concentrations of students living in
poverty.
(b) A student experiencing
homelessness or housing insecurity.
(c) A student who is in foster care.
(d) A student who is the first in their
family to attend postsecondary
education.
(e) A student who is enrolled in or is
seeking to enroll in postsecondary
education who is eligible for a Pell
Grant.
(f) A student performing significantly
below grade level.
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
71461
Application Requirements: The
following application requirements for
FY 2022 are from section 402C(e) of the
HEA (20 U.S.C. 1070a–13).
An applicant must submit, as part of
its application—
(1) An assurance that not less than
two-thirds of the youths participating in
the project proposed to be carried out
under any application be low-income
individuals who are first generation
college students;
(2) An assurance that the remaining
youths participating in the project
proposed to be carried out under any
application be low-income individuals,
first generation college students, or
students who have a high risk for
academic failure;
(3) A determination by the institution,
with respect to each participant in such
project, that the participant has a need
for academic support in order to pursue
successfully a program of education
beyond secondary school;
(4) An assurance that such
participants be persons who have
completed 8 years of elementary
education and are at least 13 years of
age but not more than 19 years of age,
unless the imposition of any such
limitation would defeat the purposes of
section 402C(e) of the HEA; and
(5) An assurance that no student will
be denied participation in a project
assisted under section 402C of the HEA
because the student will enter the
project after the 9th grade.
Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1070a–
11 and 1070a–13.
Note: Projects will be awarded and
must be operated in a manner consistent
with the nondiscrimination
requirements contained in Federal civil
rights laws.
Applicable Regulations: (a) The
Education Department General
Administrative Regulations in 34 CFR
parts 75, 77, 79, 82, 84, 86, 97, 98, and
99. (b) The Office of Management and
Budget Guidelines to Agencies on
Governmentwide Debarment and
Suspension (Nonprocurement) in 2 CFR
part 180, as adopted and amended as
regulations of the Department in 2 CFR
part 3485. (c) The Uniform
Administrative Requirements, Cost
Principles, and Audit Requirements for
Federal Awards in 2 CFR part 200, as
adopted and amended as regulations of
the Department in 2 CFR part 3474. (d)
The regulations for this program in 34
CFR part 645. (e) The Administrative
Priorities. (f) Supplemental Priorities.
Note: The regulations in 34 CFR part
86 apply to institutions of higher
education (IHEs) only.
E:\FR\FM\16DEN1.SGM
16DEN1
71462
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 239 / Thursday, December 16, 2021 / Notices
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Discretionary grants.
Estimated Available Funds: The
Administration has requested
$1,297,761,000 for new awards for the
Federal TRIO Programs for FY 2022, of
which we intend to use an estimated
$355,697,826 for the UB Program. The
actual level of funding, if any, depends
on final congressional action. However,
we are inviting applications to allow
enough time to complete the grant
process if Congress appropriates funds
for the Federal TRIO Programs.
Contingent upon the availability of
funds and the quality of applications,
we may make additional awards in
subsequent years from the list of
unfunded applications from this
competition.
Estimated Range of Awards:
$287,537–$981,028.
Estimated Average Size of Awards:
$368,217.
Maximum Award: The maximum
award varies based on whether the
applicant is currently receiving a UB
Program grant, as well as the number of
participants served.
• For an applicant that is not
currently receiving a UB Program grant,
the maximum award amount is
$287,537, based upon a per-participant
cost of no more than $4,792 and a
minimum of 60 participants.
• For an applicant that is currently
receiving a UB Program grant, the
minimum number of participants is the
number of participants in the project’s
FY 2021 grant award notification and
the maximum award amount is equal to
the applicant’s base award amount for
FY 2021.
Estimated Number of Awards: 966.
Note: The Department is not bound by
any estimates in this notice.
Project Period: Up to 60 months.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
III. Eligibility Information
1. Eligible Applicants: IHEs; public
and private agencies and organizations
including community-based
organizations with experience in serving
disadvantaged youth; secondary
schools; and combinations of such
institutions, agencies, and
organizations.
2. Cost Sharing or Matching: This
competition does not require cost
sharing or matching.
3. Indirect Cost Rate Information: This
program uses a training indirect cost
rate. This limits indirect cost
reimbursement to an entity’s actual
indirect costs, as determined in its
negotiated indirect cost rate agreement,
or eight percent of a modified total
direct cost base, whichever amount is
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:54 Dec 15, 2021
Jkt 256001
less. For more information regarding
training indirect cost rates, see 34 CFR
75.562. For more information regarding
indirect costs, or to obtain a negotiated
indirect cost rate, please see
www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocfo/
intro.html.
4. Administrative Cost Limitation:
This program does not include any
program-specific limitation on
administrative expenses. All
administrative expenses must be
reasonable and necessary and conform
to Cost Principles described in 2 CFR
part 200 subpart E of the Uniform
Guidance.
5. Subgrantees: A grantee under this
competition may not award subgrants to
entities to directly carry out project
activities described in its application.
6. Other: An applicant may submit
more than one application for an UB
Program grant so long as each
application describes a project that
serves a different target area or target
school (34 CFR 645.20(a)). The Secretary
is not designating any additional
populations for which an applicant may
submit a separate application under this
competition (34 CFR 645.20(b)). The
term ‘‘target area’’ is defined as a
geographic area served by a project (34
CFR 645.6(b)). The term ‘‘target school’’
is defined as a school designated by the
applicant as a focus of project services
(34 CFR 645.6(b)).
IV. Application Submission
Information
1. Application Submission
Instructions: Applicants are required to
follow the Common Instructions for
Applicants to Department of Education
Discretionary Grant Programs,
published in the Federal Register on
February 13, 2019 (84 FR 3768), and
available at www.govinfo.gov/content/
pkg/FR-2019-02-13/pdf/2019-02206.pdf,
which contain requirements and
information on how to submit an
application.
2. Intergovernmental Review: This
program is subject to Executive Order
12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR
part 79. Information about
Intergovernmental Review of Federal
Programs under Executive Order 12372
is in the application package for this
program.
3. Funding Restrictions: We specify
unallowable costs in 34 CFR 645.41. We
reference additional regulations
outlining funding restrictions in the
Applicable Regulations section of this
notice.
4. Recommended Page Limit: The
application narrative is where you, the
applicant, address the selection criteria
that reviewers use to evaluate your
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
application. We recommend that you (1)
limit the application narrative, which
includes the budget narrative, to no
more than 65 pages and (2) use the
following standards:
• A ‘‘page’’ is 8.5″ x 11″, on one side
only, with 1″ margins at the top, bottom,
and both sides.
• Double space (no more than three
lines per vertical inch) all text in the
application narrative, excluding titles,
headings, footnotes, quotations,
references, and captions as well as all
text in charts, tables, figures, and
graphs, which may be single-spaced.
• Use a font that is either 12 point or
larger, and no smaller than 10 pitch
(characters per inch).
• Use one of the following fonts:
Times New Roman, Courier, Courier
New, or Arial.
The recommended page limit does not
apply to the cover sheet; the budget
section, including the narrative budget
justification; the assurances and
certifications; or the one-page abstract.
However, the recommended page limit
does apply to all of the application
narrative.
We recommend that any application
addressing the competitive preference
priorities include no more than three
additional pages for each priority, for a
total of up to nine additional pages for
the competitive preference priorities if
the three competitive preference
priorities are addressed.
V. Application Review Information
1. Selection Criteria: The selection
criteria for this competition are from 34
CFR 645.31.
We will award up to 100 points to an
application under the selection criteria
and up to 9 additional points to an
application under the competitive
preference priorities, for a total score of
up to 109 points. The maximum number
of points available for each criterion is
indicated in parentheses.
(a) Need for the project. (Up to 24
points) The Secretary evaluates the need
for a Regular Upward Bound project in
the proposed target area on the basis of
information contained in the
application which clearly demonstrates
that—
(i) The income level of families in the
target area is low; (Up to 4 points)
(ii) The education attainment level of
adults in the target area is low; (Up to
4 points)
(iii) Target high school dropout rates
are high; (Up to 4 points)
(iv) College-going rates in target high
schools are low; (Up to 4 points)
(v) Student/counselor ratios in the
target high schools are high; (Up to 4
points) and
E:\FR\FM\16DEN1.SGM
16DEN1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 239 / Thursday, December 16, 2021 / Notices
(vi) Unaddressed academic, social and
economic conditions in the target area
pose serious problems for low-income,
potentially first-generation college
students. (Up to 4 points)
(b) Objectives. (9 points) The
Secretary evaluates the quality of the
applicant’s objectives and proposed
targets (percentages) in the following
areas on the basis of the extent to which
they are both ambitious, as related to the
need data provided under paragraph (a)
of this section, and attainable, given the
project’s plan of operation, budget, and
other resources:
(i) Academic performance (GPA); (Up
to 1 point)
(ii) Academic performance
(standardized test scores); (Up to 1
point)
(iii) Secondary school retention and
graduation (with regular secondary
school diploma); (Up to 2 points)
(iv) Completion of rigorous secondary
school program of study; (Up to 1 point)
(v) Postsecondary enrollment; (Up to
3 points) and
(vi) Postsecondary completion. (Up to
1 point)
(c) Plan of operation. (Up to 30
points) The Secretary determines the
quality of the applicant’s plan of
operation by assessing the quality of—
(1) The plan to inform the faculty and
staff at the applicant institution or
agency and the interested individuals
and organizations throughout the target
area of the goals and objectives of the
project; (Up to 3 points)
(2) The plan for identifying,
recruiting, and selecting participants to
be served by the project; (Up to 3 points)
(3) The plan for assessing individual
participant needs and for monitoring the
academic progress of participants while
they are in Upward Bound; (Up to 3
points)
(4) The plan for locating the project
within the applicant’s organizational
structure; (Up to 3 points)
(5) The curriculum, services and
activities that are planned for
participants in both the academic year
and summer components; (Up to 3
points)
(6) The planned timelines for
accomplishing critical elements of the
project; (Up to 3 points)
(7) The plan to ensure effective and
efficient administration of the project,
including, but not limited to, financial
management, student records
management, and personnel
management; (Up to 3 points)
(8) The applicant’s plan to use its
resources and personnel to achieve
project objectives and to coordinate the
Upward Bound project with other
projects for disadvantaged students; (Up
to 3 points)
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:54 Dec 15, 2021
Jkt 256001
(9) The plan to work cooperatively
with parents and key administrative,
teaching, and counseling personnel at
the target schools to achieve project
objectives; (Up to 3 points) and
(10) A follow-up plan for tracking
graduates of Upward Bound as they
enter and continue in postsecondary
education. (Up to 3 points)
(d) Applicant and community
support. (Up to 16 points) The Secretary
evaluates the applicant and community
support for the proposed project on the
basis of the extent to which—
(1) The applicant is committed to
supplementing the project with
resources that enhance the project such
as: Space, furniture and equipment,
supplies, and the time and effort of
personnel other than those employed in
the project. (Up to 8 points)
(2) Resources secured through written
commitments from community partners.
(Up to 8 points)
(i) An applicant that is an IHE must
include in its application commitments
from the target schools and community
organizations;
(ii) An applicant that is a secondary
school must include in its application
commitments from IHEs, community
organizations, and, as appropriate, other
secondary schools and the school
district; and
(iii) An applicant that is a community
organization must include in its
application commitments from the
target schools and IHEs.
(e) Quality of personnel. (Up to 8
points) To determine the quality of
personnel the applicant plans to use the
Secretary looks for information that
shows—
(1) The qualifications required of the
project director, including formal
training or work experience in fields
related to the objectives of the project
and experience in designing, managing,
or implementing similar projects; (Up to
3 points)
(2) The qualifications required of each
of the other personnel to be used in the
project, including formal training or
work experience in fields related to the
objectives of the project; (Up to 3 points)
(3) The quality of the applicant’s plan
for employing personnel who have
succeeded in overcoming barriers
similar to those confronting the project’s
target population. (Up to 2 points)
(f) Budget and cost effectiveness. (Up
to 5 points) The Secretary reviews each
application to determine the extent to
which—
(1) The budget for the project is
adequate to support planned project
services and activities; (Up to 3 points)
and
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
71463
(2) Costs are reasonable in relation to
the objectives and scope of the project.
(Up to 2 points)
(g) Evaluation plan. (Up to 8 points)
The Secretary evaluates the quality of
the evaluation plan for the project on
the basis of the extent to which the
applicant’s methods of evaluation—
(1) Are appropriate to the project and
include both quantitative and
qualitative evaluation measures; (Up to
4 points) and
(2) Examine in specific and
measurable ways the success of the
project in making progress toward
achieving its process and outcomes
objectives. (Up to 4 points)
2. Review and Selection Process: We
remind potential applicants that in
reviewing applications in any
discretionary grant competition, the
Secretary may consider, under 34 CFR
75.217(d)(3), the past performance of the
applicant in carrying out a previous
award, such as the applicant’s use of
funds, achievement of project
objectives, and compliance with grant
conditions. The Secretary may also
consider whether the applicant failed to
submit a timely performance report or
submitted a report of unacceptable
quality.
In addition, in making a competitive
grant award, the Secretary requires
various assurances including those
applicable to Federal civil rights laws
that prohibit discrimination in programs
or activities receiving Federal financial
assistance from the Department (34 CFR
100.4, 104.5, 106.4, 108.8, and 110.23).
For this competition, a panel of nonFederal reviewers will review each
application in accordance with the
selection criteria in 34 CFR 645.31. The
individual scores of the reviewers will
be added and the sum divided by the
number of reviewers to determine the
peer review score received in the review
process. Additionally, in accordance
with 34 CFR 645.32, the Secretary will
award prior experience points to
applicants that conducted a UB Program
project during budget periods 2017–18,
2018–19, 2019–20, and 2020–21, based
on their documented experience. Prior
experience points, if any, will be added
to the application’s averaged reader
score to determine the total score for
each application.
If there are insufficient funds for all
applications with the same total scores,
the Secretary will choose among the tied
applications so as to serve geographic
areas in which there is significant child
poverty and that have been underserved
by the UB Program in accordance with
the following procedures. The Secretary
will identify and recommend an award
for—
E:\FR\FM\16DEN1.SGM
16DEN1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
71464
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 239 / Thursday, December 16, 2021 / Notices
• First, applicants in the funding
band that applied to serve target schools
within a Congressional District (a) that
has a child poverty level greater than 30
percent and (b) where UB projects had
previously served either 10 or fewer
target schools or fewer than 150
students within that Congressional
District. If this first tie-breaker provision
exhausts available funds, then no
further action is taken.
• Second, applicants in the funding
band that applied to serve target schools
within a Congressional District (a) that
has a child poverty level greater than 25
percent and (b) where UB projects had
previously served either 15 or fewer
target schools or fewer than 200
students within that Congressional
District. If this second tie-breaker
provision exhausts available funds, then
no further action is taken.
• Third, applicants in the funding
band that applied to serve target schools
within a Congressional District where
UB projects had previously served zero
target schools.
Note: Within each of step one, two,
and three of the tie-breaker, if there is
more than one application with the
same score and insufficient funding to
support these applications, the
applicant proposing to serve the target
schools within the more impoverished
Congressional District will be the final
application identified and
recommended to receive an award.
In applying the tie-breaker criteria,
the Department will use the most
current data available. The criteria refer
to Congressional Districts, and reference
child poverty data within Congressional
Districts. The most recent available
Child Poverty data from the United
States Census for Congressional Districts
is for the 117th Congress, and therefore,
the geographical boundaries used for the
tie-breaker are defined for the 115th
Congress. The number of target schools
served within the boundaries of a
Congressional District, and the number
of students served within these target
schools, will be derived from the UB
Annual Performance Report (APR). The
Department will use data from the
2020–2021 APR to count the number of
target schools that receive services
within Congressional District
boundaries.
3. Risk Assessment and Specific
Conditions: Consistent with 2 CFR
200.206, before awarding grants under
this competition the Department
conducts a review of the risks posed by
applicants. Under 2 CFR 200.208, the
Secretary may impose specific
conditions and, under 2 CFR 3474.10, in
appropriate circumstances, high-risk
conditions on a grant if the applicant or
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:54 Dec 15, 2021
Jkt 256001
grantee is not financially stable; has a
history of unsatisfactory performance;
has a financial or other management
system that does not meet the standards
in 2 CFR part 200, subpart D; has not
fulfilled the conditions of a prior grant;
or is otherwise not responsible.
4. Integrity and Performance System:
If you are selected under this
competition to receive an award that
over the course of the project period
may exceed the simplified acquisition
threshold (currently $250,000), under 2
CFR 200.206(a)(2), we must make a
judgment about your integrity, business
ethics, and record of performance under
Federal awards—that is, the risk posed
by you as an applicant—before we make
an award. In doing so, we must consider
any information about you that is in the
integrity and performance system
(currently referred to as the Federal
Awardee Performance and Integrity
Information System (FAPIIS)),
accessible through the System for
Award Management. You may review
and comment on any information about
yourself that a Federal agency
previously entered and that is currently
in FAPIIS.
Please note that, if the total value of
your currently active grants, cooperative
agreements, and procurement contracts
from the Federal Government exceeds
$10,000,000, the reporting requirements
in 2 CFR part 200, Appendix XII,
require you to report certain integrity
information to FAPIIS semiannually.
Please review the requirements in 2 CFR
part 200, Appendix XII, if this grant
plus all the other Federal funds you
receive exceed $10,000,000.
5. In General: In accordance with the
Office of Management and Budget’s
guidance located at 2 CFR part 200, all
applicable Federal laws, and relevant
Executive guidance, the Department
will review and consider applications
for funding pursuant to this notice
inviting applications in accordance
with—
(a) Selecting recipients most likely to
be successful in delivering results based
on the program objectives through an
objective process of evaluating Federal
award applications (2 CFR 200.205);
(b) Prohibiting the purchase of certain
telecommunication and video
surveillance services or equipment in
alignment with section 889 of the
National Defense Authorization Act of
2019 (Pub. L. 115–232) (2 CFR 200.216);
(c) Providing a preference, to the
extent permitted by law, to maximize
use of goods, products, and materials
produced in the United States (2 CFR
200.322); and
(d) Terminating agreements in whole
or in part to the greatest extent
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
authorized by law if an award no longer
effectuates the program goals or agency
priorities (2 CFR 200.340).
VI. Award Administration Information
1. Award Notices: If your application
is successful, we notify your U.S.
Representative and U.S. Senators and
send you a Grant Award Notification
(GAN); or we may send you an email
containing a link to access an electronic
version of your GAN. We may notify
you informally, also.
If your application is not evaluated or
not selected for funding, we notify you.
2. Administrative and National Policy
Requirements: We identify
administrative and national policy
requirements in the application package
and reference these and other
requirements in the Applicable
Regulations section of this notice.
We reference the regulations outlining
the terms and conditions of an award in
the Applicable Regulations section of
this notice and include these and other
specific conditions in the GAN. The
GAN also incorporates your approved
application as part of your binding
commitments under the grant.
3. Open Licensing Requirements:
Unless an exception applies, if you are
awarded a grant under this competition,
you will be required to openly license
to the public grant deliverables created
in whole, or in part, with Department
grant funds. When the deliverable
consists of modifications to pre-existing
works, the license extends only to those
modifications that can be separately
identified and only to the extent that
open licensing is permitted under the
terms of any licenses or other legal
restrictions on the use of pre-existing
works. Additionally, a grantee or
subgrantee that is awarded competitive
grant funds must have a plan to
disseminate these public grant
deliverables. This dissemination plan
can be developed and submitted after
your application has been reviewed and
selected for funding. For additional
information on the open licensing
requirements please refer to 2 CFR
3474.20.
4. Reporting: (a) If you apply for a
grant under this competition, you must
ensure that you have in place the
necessary processes and systems to
comply with the reporting requirements
in 2 CFR part 170 should you receive
funding under the competition. This
does not apply if you have an exception
under 2 CFR 170.110(b).
(b) At the end of your project period,
you must submit a final performance
report, including financial information,
as directed by the Secretary. If you
receive a multiyear award, you must
E:\FR\FM\16DEN1.SGM
16DEN1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 239 / Thursday, December 16, 2021 / Notices
submit an annual performance report
that provides the most current
performance and financial expenditure
information as directed by the Secretary
under 34 CFR 75.118. The Secretary
may also require more frequent
performance reports under 34 CFR
75.720(c). For specific requirements on
reporting, please go to www.ed.gov/
fund/grant/apply/appforms/
appforms.html.
5. Performance Measures: The success
of the UB Program will be measured by
the percentage of UB participants who
enroll in and complete postsecondary
education. The following performance
measures have been developed to track
progress toward achieving program
success under the Government
Performance and Results Act of 1993
and for purposes of Department
reporting under 34 CFR 75.110:
1. The percentage of UB students who
took two years of mathematics beyond
Algebra I by the 12th grade;
2. The percentage of UB students who
graduated from secondary school with a
regular secondary school diploma;
3. The percentage of UB students who
enrolled in postsecondary education;
4. The percentage of UB students who
enrolled in a program of postsecondary
education by the fall term following
graduation from high school and who in
the first year of postsecondary education
placed into college-level math and
English without need for remediation;
5. The percentage of former UB
students who enrolled in a program of
postsecondary education and graduated
on time—within four years for the
bachelor’s degree and within two years
for the associate’s degree;
6. The percentage of UB participants
who enrolled in a program of
postsecondary education and attained
either an associate’s degree within three
years or a bachelor’s degree within six
years of enrollment; and
7. The percentage of UB students
expected to graduate high school in the
reporting year who complete a Free
Application for Federal Student Aid
(FAFSA).
All UB Program grantees will be
required to submit APRs.
6. Continuation Awards: In making a
continuation award under 34 CFR
75.253, the Secretary considers, among
other things: Whether a grantee has
made substantial progress in achieving
the goals and objectives of the project;
whether the grantee has expended funds
in a manner that is consistent with its
approved application and budget; and,
if the Secretary has established
performance measurement
requirements, whether the grantee has
made substantial progress in achieving
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:54 Dec 15, 2021
Jkt 256001
the performance targets in the grantee’s
approved application.
In making a continuation award, the
Secretary also considers whether the
grantee is operating in compliance with
the assurances in its approved
application, including those applicable
to Federal civil rights laws that prohibit
discrimination in programs or activities
receiving Federal financial assistance
from the Department (34 CFR 100.4,
104.5, 106.4, 108.8, and 110.23).
VII. Other Information
Accessible Format: On request to the
program contact person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT,
individuals with disabilities can obtain
this document and a copy of the
application package in an accessible
format. The Department will provide the
requestor with an accessible format that
may include Rich Text Format (RTF) or
text format (txt), a thumb drive, an MP3
file, Braille, large print, audiotape, or
compact disc, or other accessible format.
Electronic Access to This Document:
The official version of this document is
the document published in the Federal
Register. You may access the official
edition of the Federal Register and the
Code of Federal Regulations at
www.govinfo.gov. At this site you can
view this document, as well as all other
documents of this Department
published in the Federal Register, in
text or Portable Document Format
(PDF). To use PDF you must have
Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is
available free at the site.
You may also access documents of the
Department published in the Federal
Register by using the article search
feature at: www.federalregister.gov.
Specifically, through the advanced
search feature at this site, you can limit
your search to documents published by
the Department.
Annmarie Weisman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy,
Planning and Innovation, Office of
Postsecondary Education.
[FR Doc. 2021–27235 Filed 12–15–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
National Advisory Committee on
Institutional Quality and Integrity
U.S. Department of Education,
National Advisory Committee on
Institutional Quality and Integrity
(NACIQI).
ACTION: Notice of membership.
AGENCY:
This notice lists the members
of the National Advisory Committee on
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
71465
Institutional Quality and Integrity
(NACIQI). This notice is required under
Section 114(e)(1) of the Higher
Education Act of 1965, as amended
(HEA).
U.S. Department of
Education, Office of Postsecondary
Education, 400 Maryland Ave. SW,
Room 2C–159, Washington, DC 20202.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
George Alan Smith, Executive Director/
Designated Federal Official, NACIQI,
U.S. Department of Education, 400
Maryland Ave. SW, Room 2C–159,
Washington, DC, telephone: (202) 453–
7757 or email george.alan.smith@ed.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
NACIQI’s Statutory Authority and
Functions
The NACIQI is established under
Section 114 of the HEA, and is
composed of 18 members appointed—
(A) On the basis of the individuals’
experience, integrity, impartiality, and
good judgment;
(B) From among individuals who are
representatives of, or knowledgeable
concerning, education and training
beyond secondary education,
representing all sectors and types of
institutions of higher education; and,
(C) On the basis of the individuals’
technical qualifications, professional
standing, and demonstrated knowledge
in the fields of accreditation and
administration of higher education.
The NACIQI meets at least twice a
year and advises the Secretary of
Education with respect to:
• The establishment and enforcement
of the standards of accrediting agencies
or associations under subpart 2 of part
G of Title IV of the HEA;
• The recognition of specific
accrediting agencies or associations.
• The preparation and publication of
the list of nationally recognized
accrediting agencies and associations;
• The eligibility and certification
process for institutions of higher
education under Title IV of the HEA,
together with recommendations for
improvements in such process;
• The relationship between (1)
accreditation of institutions of higher
education and the certification and
eligibility of such institutions, and (2)
State licensing responsibilities with
respect to such institutions; and
• Any other advisory functions
relating to accreditation and
institutional eligibility that the
Secretary of Education may prescribe by
regulation.
E:\FR\FM\16DEN1.SGM
16DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 239 (Thursday, December 16, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 71460-71465]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-27235]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Applications for New Awards; Upward Bound Program
AGENCY: Office of Postsecondary Education, Department of Education.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Education (Department) is issuing a notice
inviting applications for new awards for fiscal year (FY) 2022 for the
Upward Bound (UB) Program, Assistance Listing Number 84.047A. This
notice relates to the approved information collection under OMB control
number 1840-0550.
DATES:
Applications Available: December 16, 2021.
Deadline for Transmittal of Applications: January 31, 2022.
Deadline for Intergovernmental Review: March 31, 2022.
ADDRESSES: For the addresses for obtaining and submitting an
application, please refer to our Common Instructions for Applicants to
Department of Education Discretionary Grant Programs, published in the
Federal Register on February 13, 2019 (84 FR 3768) and available at
www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2019-02-13/pdf/2019-02206.pdf.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ken Waters, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW, Room 2C229, Washington, DC 20202-
4260. Telephone: (202) 453-6273. Email: [email protected].
If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) or a text
telephone (TTY), call the Federal Relay Service (FRS), toll free, at 1-
800-877-8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Full Text of Announcement
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Purpose of Program: The UB Program is one of the seven programs
known as the Federal TRIO Programs. The UB Program is a discretionary
grant program that supports projects designed to provide students with
the skills and motivation necessary to complete a program of secondary
education and enter into and succeed in a program of postsecondary
education. There are three types of grants under the UB Program: UB;
Veterans UB; and UB Math and Science grants. In this notice we invite
applications for UB grants only. We will invite applications for
Veterans UB grants and UB Math and Science grants in forthcoming
notices. Required services under the UB Program are specified in
sections 402C(b) and (c) of the Higher Education Act of 1965, as
amended (HEA) (20 U.S.C. 1070a-13), and permissible services under the
UB Program are specified in section 402C(d) of the HEA.
Priorities: This notice contains three competitive preference
priorities. Competitive Preference Priority 1 is from the Secretary's
Notice of Administrative Priorities and Definitions for Discretionary
Grant Programs, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2020 (85
FR 13640) (Administrative Priorities). Competitive Preference
Priorities 2 and 3 are from the Secretary's Supplemental Priorities and
Definitions for Discretionary Grant Programs, published in the Federal
Register on December 10, 2021 (86 FR 70612) (Supplemental Priorities).
Note: Applicants must include in the one-page abstract submitted
with the application a statement indicating which, if any, competitive
preference priorities are addressed. If the applicant has addressed one
or more of the competitive preference priorities, this information must
also be listed on the UB Program Profile Form.
Competitive Preference Priorities: For FY 2022 and any subsequent
year in
[[Page 71461]]
which we make awards from the list of unfunded applicants from this
competition, these priorities are competitive preference priorities.
Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i), we award up to an additional nine points
to an application, depending on how well the application meets the
priorities.
The priorities are:
Competitive Preference Priority 1: Applications that Demonstrate a
Rationale (Up to 3 points).
Under this priority, an applicant proposes a project that
demonstrates a rationale (as defined in this notice).
Note: A list of evidence-based practices that are relevant to the
UB Program is available at www2.ed.gov/programs/trioupbound/.
This list is not exhaustive. Additional information regarding the What
Works Clearinghouse practice guides and intervention reports that could
also be relevant is posted on the Department's website at
www.ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc.
Competitive Preference Priority 2: Meeting Student Social,
Emotional, and Academic Needs.
Projects that are designed to improve students' social, emotional,
academic, and career development, with a focus on underserved students,
through providing multi-tiered systems of supports that address
learning barriers both in and out of the classroom, that enable healthy
development and respond to students' needs and which may include
evidence-based trauma-informed practices and professional development
for educators on avoiding deficit-based approaches.
Note: Because the UB Program supports students and not the
professional development of educators, applicants should address
supports for students only.
Competitive Preference Priority 3: Strengthening Cross-Agency
Coordination and Community Engagement to Advance Systemic Change.
Projects that are designed to take a systemic evidence-based
approach to improving outcomes for underserved students by establishing
cross-agency partnerships, or community-based partnerships with local
nonprofit organizations, businesses, philanthropic organizations, or
others, to meet family well-being needs.
Definitions: The definitions below are from 34 CFR 77.1 and the
Supplemental Priorities.
Demonstrates a rationale means a key project component included in
the project's logic model is informed by research or evaluation
findings that suggest the project component is likely to improve
relevant outcomes.
Disconnected youth means an individual, between the ages 14 and 24,
who may be from a low-income background, experiences homelessness, is
in foster care, is involved in the justice system, or is not working or
not enrolled in (or at risk of dropping out of) an educational
institution.
Evidence-based means the proposed project component is supported by
evidence that demonstrates a rationale.
Logic model (also referred to as a theory of action) means a
framework that identifies key project components of the proposed
project (i.e., the active ``ingredients'' that are hypothesized to be
critical to achieving the relevant outcomes) and describes the
theoretical and operational relationships among the key project
components and relevant outcomes.
Note: In developing logic models, applicants may want to use
resources such as the Regional Educational Laboratory Program's (REL
Pacific) Education Logic Model Application, available at https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/regions/pacific/elm.asp. Other sources include:
https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/regions/pacific/pdf/REL_2014025.pdf,
https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/regions/pacific/pdf/REL_2014007.pdf, and
https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/regions/northeast/pdf/REL_2015057.pdf.
Project component means an activity, strategy, intervention,
process, product, practice, or policy included in a project. Evidence
may pertain to an individual project component or to a combination of
project components (e.g., training teachers on instructional practices
for English learners and follow-on coaching for these teachers).
Relevant outcome means the student outcome(s) or other outcome(s)
the key project component is designed to improve, consistent with the
specific goals of the program.
Underserved student means a student in one or more of the following
subgroups:
(a) A student who is living in poverty or is served by schools with
high concentrations of students living in poverty.
(b) A student experiencing homelessness or housing insecurity.
(c) A student who is in foster care.
(d) A student who is the first in their family to attend
postsecondary education.
(e) A student who is enrolled in or is seeking to enroll in
postsecondary education who is eligible for a Pell Grant.
(f) A student performing significantly below grade level.
Application Requirements: The following application requirements
for FY 2022 are from section 402C(e) of the HEA (20 U.S.C. 1070a-13).
An applicant must submit, as part of its application--
(1) An assurance that not less than two-thirds of the youths
participating in the project proposed to be carried out under any
application be low-income individuals who are first generation college
students;
(2) An assurance that the remaining youths participating in the
project proposed to be carried out under any application be low-income
individuals, first generation college students, or students who have a
high risk for academic failure;
(3) A determination by the institution, with respect to each
participant in such project, that the participant has a need for
academic support in order to pursue successfully a program of education
beyond secondary school;
(4) An assurance that such participants be persons who have
completed 8 years of elementary education and are at least 13 years of
age but not more than 19 years of age, unless the imposition of any
such limitation would defeat the purposes of section 402C(e) of the
HEA; and
(5) An assurance that no student will be denied participation in a
project assisted under section 402C of the HEA because the student will
enter the project after the 9th grade.
Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1070a-11 and 1070a-13.
Note: Projects will be awarded and must be operated in a manner
consistent with the nondiscrimination requirements contained in Federal
civil rights laws.
Applicable Regulations: (a) The Education Department General
Administrative Regulations in 34 CFR parts 75, 77, 79, 82, 84, 86, 97,
98, and 99. (b) The Office of Management and Budget Guidelines to
Agencies on Governmentwide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement) in
2 CFR part 180, as adopted and amended as regulations of the Department
in 2 CFR part 3485. (c) The Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost
Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards in 2 CFR part
200, as adopted and amended as regulations of the Department in 2 CFR
part 3474. (d) The regulations for this program in 34 CFR part 645. (e)
The Administrative Priorities. (f) Supplemental Priorities.
Note: The regulations in 34 CFR part 86 apply to institutions of
higher education (IHEs) only.
[[Page 71462]]
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Discretionary grants.
Estimated Available Funds: The Administration has requested
$1,297,761,000 for new awards for the Federal TRIO Programs for FY
2022, of which we intend to use an estimated $355,697,826 for the UB
Program. The actual level of funding, if any, depends on final
congressional action. However, we are inviting applications to allow
enough time to complete the grant process if Congress appropriates
funds for the Federal TRIO Programs.
Contingent upon the availability of funds and the quality of
applications, we may make additional awards in subsequent years from
the list of unfunded applications from this competition.
Estimated Range of Awards: $287,537-$981,028.
Estimated Average Size of Awards: $368,217.
Maximum Award: The maximum award varies based on whether the
applicant is currently receiving a UB Program grant, as well as the
number of participants served.
For an applicant that is not currently receiving a UB
Program grant, the maximum award amount is $287,537, based upon a per-
participant cost of no more than $4,792 and a minimum of 60
participants.
For an applicant that is currently receiving a UB Program
grant, the minimum number of participants is the number of participants
in the project's FY 2021 grant award notification and the maximum award
amount is equal to the applicant's base award amount for FY 2021.
Estimated Number of Awards: 966.
Note: The Department is not bound by any estimates in this notice.
Project Period: Up to 60 months.
III. Eligibility Information
1. Eligible Applicants: IHEs; public and private agencies and
organizations including community-based organizations with experience
in serving disadvantaged youth; secondary schools; and combinations of
such institutions, agencies, and organizations.
2. Cost Sharing or Matching: This competition does not require cost
sharing or matching.
3. Indirect Cost Rate Information: This program uses a training
indirect cost rate. This limits indirect cost reimbursement to an
entity's actual indirect costs, as determined in its negotiated
indirect cost rate agreement, or eight percent of a modified total
direct cost base, whichever amount is less. For more information
regarding training indirect cost rates, see 34 CFR 75.562. For more
information regarding indirect costs, or to obtain a negotiated
indirect cost rate, please see www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocfo/intro.html.
4. Administrative Cost Limitation: This program does not include
any program-specific limitation on administrative expenses. All
administrative expenses must be reasonable and necessary and conform to
Cost Principles described in 2 CFR part 200 subpart E of the Uniform
Guidance.
5. Subgrantees: A grantee under this competition may not award
subgrants to entities to directly carry out project activities
described in its application.
6. Other: An applicant may submit more than one application for an
UB Program grant so long as each application describes a project that
serves a different target area or target school (34 CFR 645.20(a)). The
Secretary is not designating any additional populations for which an
applicant may submit a separate application under this competition (34
CFR 645.20(b)). The term ``target area'' is defined as a geographic
area served by a project (34 CFR 645.6(b)). The term ``target school''
is defined as a school designated by the applicant as a focus of
project services (34 CFR 645.6(b)).
IV. Application Submission Information
1. Application Submission Instructions: Applicants are required to
follow the Common Instructions for Applicants to Department of
Education Discretionary Grant Programs, published in the Federal
Register on February 13, 2019 (84 FR 3768), and available at
www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2019-02-13/pdf/2019-02206.pdf, which
contain requirements and information on how to submit an application.
2. Intergovernmental Review: This program is subject to Executive
Order 12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR part 79. Information about
Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs under Executive Order
12372 is in the application package for this program.
3. Funding Restrictions: We specify unallowable costs in 34 CFR
645.41. We reference additional regulations outlining funding
restrictions in the Applicable Regulations section of this notice.
4. Recommended Page Limit: The application narrative is where you,
the applicant, address the selection criteria that reviewers use to
evaluate your application. We recommend that you (1) limit the
application narrative, which includes the budget narrative, to no more
than 65 pages and (2) use the following standards:
A ``page'' is 8.5'' x 11'', on one side only, with 1''
margins at the top, bottom, and both sides.
Double space (no more than three lines per vertical inch)
all text in the application narrative, excluding titles, headings,
footnotes, quotations, references, and captions as well as all text in
charts, tables, figures, and graphs, which may be single-spaced.
Use a font that is either 12 point or larger, and no
smaller than 10 pitch (characters per inch).
Use one of the following fonts: Times New Roman, Courier,
Courier New, or Arial.
The recommended page limit does not apply to the cover sheet; the
budget section, including the narrative budget justification; the
assurances and certifications; or the one-page abstract. However, the
recommended page limit does apply to all of the application narrative.
We recommend that any application addressing the competitive
preference priorities include no more than three additional pages for
each priority, for a total of up to nine additional pages for the
competitive preference priorities if the three competitive preference
priorities are addressed.
V. Application Review Information
1. Selection Criteria: The selection criteria for this competition
are from 34 CFR 645.31.
We will award up to 100 points to an application under the
selection criteria and up to 9 additional points to an application
under the competitive preference priorities, for a total score of up to
109 points. The maximum number of points available for each criterion
is indicated in parentheses.
(a) Need for the project. (Up to 24 points) The Secretary evaluates
the need for a Regular Upward Bound project in the proposed target area
on the basis of information contained in the application which clearly
demonstrates that--
(i) The income level of families in the target area is low; (Up to
4 points)
(ii) The education attainment level of adults in the target area is
low; (Up to 4 points)
(iii) Target high school dropout rates are high; (Up to 4 points)
(iv) College-going rates in target high schools are low; (Up to 4
points)
(v) Student/counselor ratios in the target high schools are high;
(Up to 4 points) and
[[Page 71463]]
(vi) Unaddressed academic, social and economic conditions in the
target area pose serious problems for low-income, potentially first-
generation college students. (Up to 4 points)
(b) Objectives. (9 points) The Secretary evaluates the quality of
the applicant's objectives and proposed targets (percentages) in the
following areas on the basis of the extent to which they are both
ambitious, as related to the need data provided under paragraph (a) of
this section, and attainable, given the project's plan of operation,
budget, and other resources:
(i) Academic performance (GPA); (Up to 1 point)
(ii) Academic performance (standardized test scores); (Up to 1
point)
(iii) Secondary school retention and graduation (with regular
secondary school diploma); (Up to 2 points)
(iv) Completion of rigorous secondary school program of study; (Up
to 1 point)
(v) Postsecondary enrollment; (Up to 3 points) and
(vi) Postsecondary completion. (Up to 1 point)
(c) Plan of operation. (Up to 30 points) The Secretary determines
the quality of the applicant's plan of operation by assessing the
quality of--
(1) The plan to inform the faculty and staff at the applicant
institution or agency and the interested individuals and organizations
throughout the target area of the goals and objectives of the project;
(Up to 3 points)
(2) The plan for identifying, recruiting, and selecting
participants to be served by the project; (Up to 3 points)
(3) The plan for assessing individual participant needs and for
monitoring the academic progress of participants while they are in
Upward Bound; (Up to 3 points)
(4) The plan for locating the project within the applicant's
organizational structure; (Up to 3 points)
(5) The curriculum, services and activities that are planned for
participants in both the academic year and summer components; (Up to 3
points)
(6) The planned timelines for accomplishing critical elements of
the project; (Up to 3 points)
(7) The plan to ensure effective and efficient administration of
the project, including, but not limited to, financial management,
student records management, and personnel management; (Up to 3 points)
(8) The applicant's plan to use its resources and personnel to
achieve project objectives and to coordinate the Upward Bound project
with other projects for disadvantaged students; (Up to 3 points)
(9) The plan to work cooperatively with parents and key
administrative, teaching, and counseling personnel at the target
schools to achieve project objectives; (Up to 3 points) and
(10) A follow-up plan for tracking graduates of Upward Bound as
they enter and continue in postsecondary education. (Up to 3 points)
(d) Applicant and community support. (Up to 16 points) The
Secretary evaluates the applicant and community support for the
proposed project on the basis of the extent to which--
(1) The applicant is committed to supplementing the project with
resources that enhance the project such as: Space, furniture and
equipment, supplies, and the time and effort of personnel other than
those employed in the project. (Up to 8 points)
(2) Resources secured through written commitments from community
partners. (Up to 8 points)
(i) An applicant that is an IHE must include in its application
commitments from the target schools and community organizations;
(ii) An applicant that is a secondary school must include in its
application commitments from IHEs, community organizations, and, as
appropriate, other secondary schools and the school district; and
(iii) An applicant that is a community organization must include in
its application commitments from the target schools and IHEs.
(e) Quality of personnel. (Up to 8 points) To determine the quality
of personnel the applicant plans to use the Secretary looks for
information that shows--
(1) The qualifications required of the project director, including
formal training or work experience in fields related to the objectives
of the project and experience in designing, managing, or implementing
similar projects; (Up to 3 points)
(2) The qualifications required of each of the other personnel to
be used in the project, including formal training or work experience in
fields related to the objectives of the project; (Up to 3 points)
(3) The quality of the applicant's plan for employing personnel who
have succeeded in overcoming barriers similar to those confronting the
project's target population. (Up to 2 points)
(f) Budget and cost effectiveness. (Up to 5 points) The Secretary
reviews each application to determine the extent to which--
(1) The budget for the project is adequate to support planned
project services and activities; (Up to 3 points) and
(2) Costs are reasonable in relation to the objectives and scope of
the project. (Up to 2 points)
(g) Evaluation plan. (Up to 8 points) The Secretary evaluates the
quality of the evaluation plan for the project on the basis of the
extent to which the applicant's methods of evaluation--
(1) Are appropriate to the project and include both quantitative
and qualitative evaluation measures; (Up to 4 points) and
(2) Examine in specific and measurable ways the success of the
project in making progress toward achieving its process and outcomes
objectives. (Up to 4 points)
2. Review and Selection Process: We remind potential applicants
that in reviewing applications in any discretionary grant competition,
the Secretary may consider, under 34 CFR 75.217(d)(3), the past
performance of the applicant in carrying out a previous award, such as
the applicant's use of funds, achievement of project objectives, and
compliance with grant conditions. The Secretary may also consider
whether the applicant failed to submit a timely performance report or
submitted a report of unacceptable quality.
In addition, in making a competitive grant award, the Secretary
requires various assurances including those applicable to Federal civil
rights laws that prohibit discrimination in programs or activities
receiving Federal financial assistance from the Department (34 CFR
100.4, 104.5, 106.4, 108.8, and 110.23).
For this competition, a panel of non-Federal reviewers will review
each application in accordance with the selection criteria in 34 CFR
645.31. The individual scores of the reviewers will be added and the
sum divided by the number of reviewers to determine the peer review
score received in the review process. Additionally, in accordance with
34 CFR 645.32, the Secretary will award prior experience points to
applicants that conducted a UB Program project during budget periods
2017-18, 2018-19, 2019-20, and 2020-21, based on their documented
experience. Prior experience points, if any, will be added to the
application's averaged reader score to determine the total score for
each application.
If there are insufficient funds for all applications with the same
total scores, the Secretary will choose among the tied applications so
as to serve geographic areas in which there is significant child
poverty and that have been underserved by the UB Program in accordance
with the following procedures. The Secretary will identify and
recommend an award for--
[[Page 71464]]
First, applicants in the funding band that applied to
serve target schools within a Congressional District (a) that has a
child poverty level greater than 30 percent and (b) where UB projects
had previously served either 10 or fewer target schools or fewer than
150 students within that Congressional District. If this first tie-
breaker provision exhausts available funds, then no further action is
taken.
Second, applicants in the funding band that applied to
serve target schools within a Congressional District (a) that has a
child poverty level greater than 25 percent and (b) where UB projects
had previously served either 15 or fewer target schools or fewer than
200 students within that Congressional District. If this second tie-
breaker provision exhausts available funds, then no further action is
taken.
Third, applicants in the funding band that applied to
serve target schools within a Congressional District where UB projects
had previously served zero target schools.
Note: Within each of step one, two, and three of the tie-breaker,
if there is more than one application with the same score and
insufficient funding to support these applications, the applicant
proposing to serve the target schools within the more impoverished
Congressional District will be the final application identified and
recommended to receive an award.
In applying the tie-breaker criteria, the Department will use the
most current data available. The criteria refer to Congressional
Districts, and reference child poverty data within Congressional
Districts. The most recent available Child Poverty data from the United
States Census for Congressional Districts is for the 117th Congress,
and therefore, the geographical boundaries used for the tie-breaker are
defined for the 115th Congress. The number of target schools served
within the boundaries of a Congressional District, and the number of
students served within these target schools, will be derived from the
UB Annual Performance Report (APR). The Department will use data from
the 2020-2021 APR to count the number of target schools that receive
services within Congressional District boundaries.
3. Risk Assessment and Specific Conditions: Consistent with 2 CFR
200.206, before awarding grants under this competition the Department
conducts a review of the risks posed by applicants. Under 2 CFR
200.208, the Secretary may impose specific conditions and, under 2 CFR
3474.10, in appropriate circumstances, high-risk conditions on a grant
if the applicant or grantee is not financially stable; has a history of
unsatisfactory performance; has a financial or other management system
that does not meet the standards in 2 CFR part 200, subpart D; has not
fulfilled the conditions of a prior grant; or is otherwise not
responsible.
4. Integrity and Performance System: If you are selected under this
competition to receive an award that over the course of the project
period may exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (currently
$250,000), under 2 CFR 200.206(a)(2), we must make a judgment about
your integrity, business ethics, and record of performance under
Federal awards--that is, the risk posed by you as an applicant--before
we make an award. In doing so, we must consider any information about
you that is in the integrity and performance system (currently referred
to as the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System
(FAPIIS)), accessible through the System for Award Management. You may
review and comment on any information about yourself that a Federal
agency previously entered and that is currently in FAPIIS.
Please note that, if the total value of your currently active
grants, cooperative agreements, and procurement contracts from the
Federal Government exceeds $10,000,000, the reporting requirements in 2
CFR part 200, Appendix XII, require you to report certain integrity
information to FAPIIS semiannually. Please review the requirements in 2
CFR part 200, Appendix XII, if this grant plus all the other Federal
funds you receive exceed $10,000,000.
5. In General: In accordance with the Office of Management and
Budget's guidance located at 2 CFR part 200, all applicable Federal
laws, and relevant Executive guidance, the Department will review and
consider applications for funding pursuant to this notice inviting
applications in accordance with--
(a) Selecting recipients most likely to be successful in delivering
results based on the program objectives through an objective process of
evaluating Federal award applications (2 CFR 200.205);
(b) Prohibiting the purchase of certain telecommunication and video
surveillance services or equipment in alignment with section 889 of the
National Defense Authorization Act of 2019 (Pub. L. 115-232) (2 CFR
200.216);
(c) Providing a preference, to the extent permitted by law, to
maximize use of goods, products, and materials produced in the United
States (2 CFR 200.322); and
(d) Terminating agreements in whole or in part to the greatest
extent authorized by law if an award no longer effectuates the program
goals or agency priorities (2 CFR 200.340).
VI. Award Administration Information
1. Award Notices: If your application is successful, we notify your
U.S. Representative and U.S. Senators and send you a Grant Award
Notification (GAN); or we may send you an email containing a link to
access an electronic version of your GAN. We may notify you informally,
also.
If your application is not evaluated or not selected for funding,
we notify you.
2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements: We identify
administrative and national policy requirements in the application
package and reference these and other requirements in the Applicable
Regulations section of this notice.
We reference the regulations outlining the terms and conditions of
an award in the Applicable Regulations section of this notice and
include these and other specific conditions in the GAN. The GAN also
incorporates your approved application as part of your binding
commitments under the grant.
3. Open Licensing Requirements: Unless an exception applies, if you
are awarded a grant under this competition, you will be required to
openly license to the public grant deliverables created in whole, or in
part, with Department grant funds. When the deliverable consists of
modifications to pre-existing works, the license extends only to those
modifications that can be separately identified and only to the extent
that open licensing is permitted under the terms of any licenses or
other legal restrictions on the use of pre-existing works.
Additionally, a grantee or subgrantee that is awarded competitive grant
funds must have a plan to disseminate these public grant deliverables.
This dissemination plan can be developed and submitted after your
application has been reviewed and selected for funding. For additional
information on the open licensing requirements please refer to 2 CFR
3474.20.
4. Reporting: (a) If you apply for a grant under this competition,
you must ensure that you have in place the necessary processes and
systems to comply with the reporting requirements in 2 CFR part 170
should you receive funding under the competition. This does not apply
if you have an exception under 2 CFR 170.110(b).
(b) At the end of your project period, you must submit a final
performance report, including financial information, as directed by the
Secretary. If you receive a multiyear award, you must
[[Page 71465]]
submit an annual performance report that provides the most current
performance and financial expenditure information as directed by the
Secretary under 34 CFR 75.118. The Secretary may also require more
frequent performance reports under 34 CFR 75.720(c). For specific
requirements on reporting, please go to www.ed.gov/fund/grant/apply/appforms/appforms.html.
5. Performance Measures: The success of the UB Program will be
measured by the percentage of UB participants who enroll in and
complete postsecondary education. The following performance measures
have been developed to track progress toward achieving program success
under the Government Performance and Results Act of 1993 and for
purposes of Department reporting under 34 CFR 75.110:
1. The percentage of UB students who took two years of mathematics
beyond Algebra I by the 12th grade;
2. The percentage of UB students who graduated from secondary
school with a regular secondary school diploma;
3. The percentage of UB students who enrolled in postsecondary
education;
4. The percentage of UB students who enrolled in a program of
postsecondary education by the fall term following graduation from high
school and who in the first year of postsecondary education placed into
college-level math and English without need for remediation;
5. The percentage of former UB students who enrolled in a program
of postsecondary education and graduated on time--within four years for
the bachelor's degree and within two years for the associate's degree;
6. The percentage of UB participants who enrolled in a program of
postsecondary education and attained either an associate's degree
within three years or a bachelor's degree within six years of
enrollment; and
7. The percentage of UB students expected to graduate high school
in the reporting year who complete a Free Application for Federal
Student Aid (FAFSA).
All UB Program grantees will be required to submit APRs.
6. Continuation Awards: In making a continuation award under 34 CFR
75.253, the Secretary considers, among other things: Whether a grantee
has made substantial progress in achieving the goals and objectives of
the project; whether the grantee has expended funds in a manner that is
consistent with its approved application and budget; and, if the
Secretary has established performance measurement requirements, whether
the grantee has made substantial progress in achieving the performance
targets in the grantee's approved application.
In making a continuation award, the Secretary also considers
whether the grantee is operating in compliance with the assurances in
its approved application, including those applicable to Federal civil
rights laws that prohibit discrimination in programs or activities
receiving Federal financial assistance from the Department (34 CFR
100.4, 104.5, 106.4, 108.8, and 110.23).
VII. Other Information
Accessible Format: On request to the program contact person listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT, individuals with disabilities
can obtain this document and a copy of the application package in an
accessible format. The Department will provide the requestor with an
accessible format that may include Rich Text Format (RTF) or text
format (txt), a thumb drive, an MP3 file, Braille, large print,
audiotape, or compact disc, or other accessible format.
Electronic Access to This Document: The official version of this
document is the document published in the Federal Register. You may
access the official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of
Federal Regulations at www.govinfo.gov. At this site you can view this
document, as well as all other documents of this Department published
in the Federal Register, in text or Portable Document Format (PDF). To
use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available free at
the site.
You may also access documents of the Department published in the
Federal Register by using the article search feature at:
www.federalregister.gov. Specifically, through the advanced search
feature at this site, you can limit your search to documents published
by the Department.
Annmarie Weisman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy, Planning and Innovation, Office
of Postsecondary Education.
[FR Doc. 2021-27235 Filed 12-15-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P