Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, Receipt of Petition for Decision of Inconsequential Noncompliance, 71118-71120 [2021-26981]

Download as PDF jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1 71118 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 237 / Tuesday, December 14, 2021 / Notices passenger-carrying operations of an air carrier operating aircraft configured for at least 31 passenger seats, as determined by the regulations under which the operation is conducted or the aircraft type certificate issued by a competent civil aviation authority. This part does not apply to: Airports serving scheduled air carrier operations only by reason of being designated as an alternate airport; airports operated by the United States; airports located in the State of Alaska that only serve scheduled operations of small air carrier aircraft and do not serve scheduled or unscheduled operations of large air carrier aircraft; airports located in the State of Alaska during periods of time when not serving operations of large air carrier aircraft; or heliports. The collection involves FAA Form 5280–1, Application for Airport Operating Certificate. Every airport that wants to become a certificated Part 139 airport must complete this form, as well as provide a draft Airport Certification Manual (ACM). In addition, currently certificated Part 139 airports must maintain their ACM, as well as keep and maintain records related to training, self-inspection, and other requirements of Part 139. The collection includes an additional automated tool to assist airports in reporting airport status after an incident, or emergency event, has impacted the airport or surrounding area. The Airport Crisis Response Reporting (ACRR) tool simplifies the reporting process by allowing airports to directly input their airport status into the tool. These records allow the FAA to verify compliance with Part 139 safety and operational requirements to ensure that the airports meet the minimum safety requirements of Part 139, which in turn enhances the safety of the flying public. Public Comments Invited: You are asked to comment on any aspect of this information collection, including (a) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for FAA’s performance; (b) the accuracy of the estimated burden; (c) ways for FAA to enhance the quality, utility and clarity of the information collection; and (d) ways that the burden could be minimized without reducing the quality of the collected information. The agency will summarize and/or include your comments in the request for OMB’s clearance of this information collection. OMB Control Number: 2120–0675. Title: Certification of Airports, 14 CFR part 139. Form Numbers: FAA Form 5280–1. Type of Review: Renewal of an information collection. VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:24 Dec 13, 2021 Jkt 256001 Background: The statutory authority to issue airport operating certificates to airports serving certain air carriers and to establish minimum safety standards for the operation of those airports is currently found in Title 49, United States Code (U.S.C.) § 44706, Airport operation certificates. The FAA uses this authority to issue requirements for the certification and operation of certain airports that service commercial air carriers. These requirements are contained in Title 14, Code of Federal Regulation Part 139 (14 CFR part 139), Certification and Operations: Land Airports Serving Certain Air Carriers, as amended. Information collection requirements are used by the FAA to determine an airport operator’s compliance with Part 139 safety and operational requirements, and to assist airport personnel to perform duties required under the regulation. Operators of certificated airports are required to complete FAA Form 5280– 1 and develop, and comply with, a written document, an Airport Certification Manual (ACM) that details how an airport will comply with the requirements of Part 139. The ACM shows the means and procedures whereby the airport will be operated in compliance with Part 139, plus other instructions and procedures to help personnel concerned with operation of the airport to perform their duties and responsibilities. When an airport satisfactorily complies with such requirements, the FAA issues to that facility an airport operating certificate (AOC) that permits an airport to serve air carriers. The FAA periodically inspects these airports to ensure continued compliance with Part 139 safety requirements, including the maintenance of specified records. Both the application for an AOC and annual compliance inspections require operators of certificated airports to collect and report certain operational information. The AOC remains in effect as long as the need exists and the operator complies with the terms of the AOC and the ACM. The likely respondents to new information requests are those civilian U.S. airport certificate holders who operate airports that serve scheduled and unscheduled operations of air carrier aircraft with more than 10 passenger seats (approximately 520 airports). These airport operators already hold an AOC and comply with all current information collection requirements. Operators of certificated airports are permitted to choose the methodology to report information and can design their own recordkeeping system. As airports PO 00000 Frm 00117 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 vary in size, operations and complexities, the FAA has determined this method of information collection allows airport operators greater flexibility and convenience to comply with reporting and recordkeeping requirements. 100% of the information may be submitted electronically. The FAA has an automated system, the Certification and Compliance Management Information System (CCMIS), which allows FAA airport safety and certification inspectors to enter into a national database airport inspection information. This information is monitored to detect trends and developing safety issues, to allocate inspection resources, and generally, to be more responsive to the needs of regulated airports. The FAA has developed an automated reporting tool, the Airport Crisis Response Reporting (ACRR) tool, which allows airport personnel to directly input status of their airports after an incident, or emergency event, impacts their airport or the surrounding area. Respondents: Approximately 520 airports. Frequency: Information collected on occasion. Estimated Average Burden per Response: 178 hours. Estimated Total Annual Burden: 92,584 hours. Issued in Washington, DC on this date, November 23, 2021. Anthony M. Butters, Deputy Manager, Airport Safety and Operations (AAS–300). [FR Doc. 2021–25979 Filed 12–13–21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–13–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION National Highway Traffic Safety Administration [Docket No. NHTSA–2021–0046; Notice 1] Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, Receipt of Petition for Decision of Inconsequential Noncompliance National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), Department of Transportation (DOT). ACTION: Receipt of petition. AGENCY: Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (Goodyear), has determined that certain Goodyear Convenience Spare tires do not fully comply with Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 109, New Pneumatic and Certain Specialty Tires. Goodyear filed an original noncompliance report dated June 8, 2021, and subsequently, Goodyear petitioned NHTSA on June SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\14DEN1.SGM 14DEN1 jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 237 / Tuesday, December 14, 2021 / Notices 21, 2021, for a decision that the subject noncompliance is inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety. This notice announces receipt of Goodyear’s petition. DATES: Send comments on or before January 13, 2022. ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments on this petition. Comments must refer to the docket and notice number cited in the title of this notice and submitted by any of the following methods: • Mail: Send comments by mail addressed to the U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590. • Hand Delivery: Deliver comments by hand to the U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590. The Docket Section is open on weekdays from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. except for Federal holidays. • Electronically: Submit comments electronically by logging onto the Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) website at https:// www.regulations.gov/. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. • Comments may also be faxed to (202) 493–2251. Comments must be written in the English language and be no greater than 15 pages in length, although there is no limit to the length of necessary attachments to the comments. If comments are submitted in hard copy form, please ensure that two copies are provided. If you wish to receive confirmation that comments you have submitted by mail were received, please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard with the comments. Note that all comments received will be posted without change to https:// www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided. All comments and supporting materials received before the close of business on the closing date indicated above will be filed in the docket and will be considered. All comments and supporting materials received after the closing date will also be filed and will be considered to the fullest extent possible. When the petition is granted or denied, notice of the decision will also be published in the Federal Register pursuant to the authority indicated at the end of this notice. All comments, background documentation, and supporting VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:24 Dec 13, 2021 Jkt 256001 materials submitted to the docket may be viewed by anyone at the address and times given above. The documents may also be viewed on the internet at https:// www.regulations.gov by following the online instructions for accessing the docket. The docket ID number for this petition is shown in the heading of this notice. DOT’s complete Privacy Act Statement is available for review in a Federal Register notice published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477–8). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jayton Lindley, General Engineer, NHTSA, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance, (325) 655–0547. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Overview Goodyear has determined that certain Goodyear Convenience Spare tires do not fully comply with the requirements of paragraph S4.2.1(c) and S4.3(c) of FMVSS No. 109, New Pneumatic and Certain Specialty Tires (49 CFR 571.109). Goodyear filed a noncompliance report dated June 8, 2021, pursuant to 49 CFR part 573, Defect and Noncompliance Responsibility and Reports. Goodyear subsequently petitioned NHTSA on June 21, 2021, for an exemption from the notification and remedy requirements of 49 U.S.C. Chapter 301 on the basis that this noncompliance is inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety, pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and 30120(h) and 49 CFR part 556, Exemption for Inconsequential Defect or Noncompliance. This notice of receipt of Goodyear’s petition is published under 49 U.S.C. 30118 and 30120 and does not represent any Agency decision or other exercise of judgment concerning the merits of the petition. II. Tires Involved Approximately 534 Goodyear Convenience Spare tires, size T155/ 70D17 110M SL, manufactured between February 15, 2021, and April 8, 2021, are potentially involved. III. Noncompliance Goodyear explains that the noncompliance is that the subject tires incorrectly state the maximum load in kg on one side of the tire and, therefore, do not comply with the requirements specified in paragraphs S4.2.1(c) and S4.3(c) of FMVSS No. 109. Specifically, the subject tires are marked on one sidewall with a Maximum Load of 1080 kg, when they should have been marked with a Maximum Load of 1060 kg. PO 00000 Frm 00118 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 71119 IV. Rule Requirements Paragraphs S4.2.1(c) and S4.3(c) of FMVSS No. 109 include the requirements relevant to this petition. Each tire shall conform to each of the following: Its load rating shall be that specified in a submission made by an individual manufacturer, pursuant to paragraph S4.2.1(a), or in one of the publications described in paragraph S4.4.1(b) for its size designation, type, and each appropriate inflation pressure. If the maximum load rating for a particular tire size is shown in more than one of the publications described in paragraph S4.4.1(b), each tire of that size designation shall have a maximum load rating that is not less than the published maximum load rating, or if there are differing maximum load ratings for the same tire size designation, not less than the lowest published maximum load rating. Except as provided in paragraphs S4.3.1 and S4.3.2 of this standard, each tire, except for those certified to comply with paragraph S5.5 of § 571.139, shall have permanently molded into or onto both sidewalls, in letters and numerals not less than 0.078 inches high, the information shown in paragraphs S4.3 (a) through (g) of this standard. (c) Maximum load rating. V. Summary of Goodyear’s Petition The following views and arguments presented in this section, ‘‘V. Summary of Goodyear’s Petition,’’ are the views and arguments provided by Goodyear. They have not been evaluated by the Agency and do not reflect the views of the Agency. Goodyear describes the subject noncompliance and contends that the noncompliance is inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety. In support of its petition, Goodyear submitted the following reasoning: 1. The subject tires were manufactured as designed and meet or exceed all applicable FMVSSs. 2. Goodyear states the subject tires are original equipment on several Toyota and Subaru vehicle models and were designed and manufactured to meet or exceed the specified vehicle loading conditions as specified by the vehicle manufacturers. 3. According to Goodyear, the 110 numerical Load Index marked on the tire as part of the Service Description (110M) is correct as marked. 4. Goodyear claims the subject tires that were mismarked Max Load 1080 kg in place of Max Load 1060 kg met the performance requirements of FMVSS No. 109 for endurance and high speed when tested at the 1080 kg load. E:\FR\FM\14DEN1.SGM 14DEN1 71120 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 237 / Tuesday, December 14, 2021 / Notices jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1 5. The subject tires are marked correctly for Max Load in pounds on both sides of the tire. Further, Goodyear says the subject tires are primarily sold in the domestic original equipment market, where the load in pounds would be the predominant consumer unit of measurement. 6. The subject tires are marked in letters 20-mm high ‘‘TEMPORARY USE ONLY’’ as they are convenience spare tires. 7. Goodyear contends that NHTSA has previously granted petitions for similar noncompliances related to tire loading labeling information on tires and previous NHTSA surveys have shown most consumers do not base tire purchases on tire labeling information found on the tire sidewall. Since the subject tires are temporary use only spare tires, any considerations about what information consumers rely on for tire purchases is even less of a concern. Goodyear concludes that the subject noncompliance is inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety and that its petition to be exempted from providing notification of the noncompliance, as required by 49 U.S.C. 30118, and a remedy for the noncompliance, as required by 49 U.S.C. 30120, should be granted. NHTSA notes that the statutory provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and 30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to file petitions for a determination of inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to exempt manufacturers only from the duties found in sections 30118 and VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:24 Dec 13, 2021 Jkt 256001 30120, respectively, to notify owners, purchasers, and dealers of a defect or noncompliance and to remedy the defect or noncompliance. Therefore, any decision on this petition only applies to the subject tires that Goodyear no longer controlled at the time it determined that the noncompliance existed. However, any decision on this petition does not relieve equipment distributors and dealers of the prohibitions on the sale, offer for sale, or introduction or delivery for introduction into interstate commerce of the noncompliant tires under their control after Goodyear notified them that the subject noncompliance existed. (Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120: delegations of authority at 49 CFR 1.95 and 501.8) Otto G. Matheke III, Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance. [FR Doc. 2021–26981 Filed 12–13–21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–59–P of one or more persons that have been placed on OFAC’s Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (SDN List) based on OFAC’s determination that one or more applicable legal criteria were satisfied. All property and interests in property subject to U.S. jurisdiction of these persons are blocked, and U.S. persons are generally prohibited from engaging in transactions with them. DATES: See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for effective date(s). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: OFAC: Andrea Gacki, Director, tel.: 202–622–2490; Associate Director for Global Targeting, tel.: 202–622–2420; Assistant Director for Licensing, tel.: 202–622–2480; Assistant Director for Regulatory Affairs, tel.: 202–622–4855; or the Assistant Director for Sanctions Compliance & Evaluation, tel.: 202–622– 2490. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Electronic Availability DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Office of Foreign Assets Control The SDN List and additional information concerning OFAC sanctions programs are available on OFAC’s website (https://www.treasury.gov/ofac). Notice of OFAC Sanctions Action Notice of OFAC Action Office of Foreign Assets Control, Treasury. ACTION: Notice. On December 7, 2021, OFAC determined that the property and interests in property subject to U.S. jurisdiction of the following persons are blocked under the relevant sanctions authority listed below. AGENCY: The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is publishing the names SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00119 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 BILLING CODE 4810–AL–P E:\FR\FM\14DEN1.SGM 14DEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 237 (Tuesday, December 14, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 71118-71120]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-26981]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

[Docket No. NHTSA-2021-0046; Notice 1]


Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, Receipt of Petition for Decision 
of Inconsequential Noncompliance

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), 
Department of Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Receipt of petition.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (Goodyear), has determined that 
certain Goodyear Convenience Spare tires do not fully comply with 
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 109, New Pneumatic 
and Certain Specialty Tires. Goodyear filed an original noncompliance 
report dated June 8, 2021, and subsequently, Goodyear petitioned NHTSA 
on June

[[Page 71119]]

21, 2021, for a decision that the subject noncompliance is 
inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety. This notice 
announces receipt of Goodyear's petition.

DATES: Send comments on or before January 13, 2022.

ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written data, 
views, and arguments on this petition. Comments must refer to the 
docket and notice number cited in the title of this notice and 
submitted by any of the following methods:
     Mail: Send comments by mail addressed to the U.S. 
Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building 
Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 
20590.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver comments by hand to the U.S. 
Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building 
Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 
20590. The Docket Section is open on weekdays from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. 
except for Federal holidays.
     Electronically: Submit comments electronically by logging 
onto the Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) website at https://www.regulations.gov/. Follow the online instructions for submitting 
comments.
     Comments may also be faxed to (202) 493-2251.
    Comments must be written in the English language and be no greater 
than 15 pages in length, although there is no limit to the length of 
necessary attachments to the comments. If comments are submitted in 
hard copy form, please ensure that two copies are provided. If you wish 
to receive confirmation that comments you have submitted by mail were 
received, please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard with the 
comments. Note that all comments received will be posted without change 
to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information 
provided.
    All comments and supporting materials received before the close of 
business on the closing date indicated above will be filed in the 
docket and will be considered. All comments and supporting materials 
received after the closing date will also be filed and will be 
considered to the fullest extent possible.
    When the petition is granted or denied, notice of the decision will 
also be published in the Federal Register pursuant to the authority 
indicated at the end of this notice.
    All comments, background documentation, and supporting materials 
submitted to the docket may be viewed by anyone at the address and 
times given above. The documents may also be viewed on the internet at 
https://www.regulations.gov by following the online instructions for 
accessing the docket. The docket ID number for this petition is shown 
in the heading of this notice.
    DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement is available for review in a 
Federal Register notice published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-8).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jayton Lindley, General Engineer, 
NHTSA, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance, (325) 655-0547.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Overview

    Goodyear has determined that certain Goodyear Convenience Spare 
tires do not fully comply with the requirements of paragraph S4.2.1(c) 
and S4.3(c) of FMVSS No. 109, New Pneumatic and Certain Specialty Tires 
(49 CFR 571.109). Goodyear filed a noncompliance report dated June 8, 
2021, pursuant to 49 CFR part 573, Defect and Noncompliance 
Responsibility and Reports. Goodyear subsequently petitioned NHTSA on 
June 21, 2021, for an exemption from the notification and remedy 
requirements of 49 U.S.C. Chapter 301 on the basis that this 
noncompliance is inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety, 
pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and 30120(h) and 49 CFR part 556, 
Exemption for Inconsequential Defect or Noncompliance.
    This notice of receipt of Goodyear's petition is published under 49 
U.S.C. 30118 and 30120 and does not represent any Agency decision or 
other exercise of judgment concerning the merits of the petition.

II. Tires Involved

    Approximately 534 Goodyear Convenience Spare tires, size T155/70D17 
110M SL, manufactured between February 15, 2021, and April 8, 2021, are 
potentially involved.

III. Noncompliance

    Goodyear explains that the noncompliance is that the subject tires 
incorrectly state the maximum load in kg on one side of the tire and, 
therefore, do not comply with the requirements specified in paragraphs 
S4.2.1(c) and S4.3(c) of FMVSS No. 109. Specifically, the subject tires 
are marked on one sidewall with a Maximum Load of 1080 kg, when they 
should have been marked with a Maximum Load of 1060 kg.

IV. Rule Requirements

    Paragraphs S4.2.1(c) and S4.3(c) of FMVSS No. 109 include the 
requirements relevant to this petition. Each tire shall conform to each 
of the following: Its load rating shall be that specified in a 
submission made by an individual manufacturer, pursuant to paragraph 
S4.2.1(a), or in one of the publications described in paragraph 
S4.4.1(b) for its size designation, type, and each appropriate 
inflation pressure. If the maximum load rating for a particular tire 
size is shown in more than one of the publications described in 
paragraph S4.4.1(b), each tire of that size designation shall have a 
maximum load rating that is not less than the published maximum load 
rating, or if there are differing maximum load ratings for the same 
tire size designation, not less than the lowest published maximum load 
rating. Except as provided in paragraphs S4.3.1 and S4.3.2 of this 
standard, each tire, except for those certified to comply with 
paragraph S5.5 of Sec.  571.139, shall have permanently molded into or 
onto both sidewalls, in letters and numerals not less than 0.078 inches 
high, the information shown in paragraphs S4.3 (a) through (g) of this 
standard. (c) Maximum load rating.

V. Summary of Goodyear's Petition

    The following views and arguments presented in this section, ``V. 
Summary of Goodyear's Petition,'' are the views and arguments provided 
by Goodyear. They have not been evaluated by the Agency and do not 
reflect the views of the Agency. Goodyear describes the subject 
noncompliance and contends that the noncompliance is inconsequential as 
it relates to motor vehicle safety.
    In support of its petition, Goodyear submitted the following 
reasoning:
    1. The subject tires were manufactured as designed and meet or 
exceed all applicable FMVSSs.
    2. Goodyear states the subject tires are original equipment on 
several Toyota and Subaru vehicle models and were designed and 
manufactured to meet or exceed the specified vehicle loading conditions 
as specified by the vehicle manufacturers.
    3. According to Goodyear, the 110 numerical Load Index marked on 
the tire as part of the Service Description (110M) is correct as 
marked.
    4. Goodyear claims the subject tires that were mismarked Max Load 
1080 kg in place of Max Load 1060 kg met the performance requirements 
of FMVSS No. 109 for endurance and high speed when tested at the 1080 
kg load.

[[Page 71120]]

    5. The subject tires are marked correctly for Max Load in pounds on 
both sides of the tire. Further, Goodyear says the subject tires are 
primarily sold in the domestic original equipment market, where the 
load in pounds would be the predominant consumer unit of measurement.
    6. The subject tires are marked in letters 20-mm high ``TEMPORARY 
USE ONLY'' as they are convenience spare tires.
    7. Goodyear contends that NHTSA has previously granted petitions 
for similar noncompliances related to tire loading labeling information 
on tires and previous NHTSA surveys have shown most consumers do not 
base tire purchases on tire labeling information found on the tire 
sidewall. Since the subject tires are temporary use only spare tires, 
any considerations about what information consumers rely on for tire 
purchases is even less of a concern.
    Goodyear concludes that the subject noncompliance is 
inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety and that its 
petition to be exempted from providing notification of the 
noncompliance, as required by 49 U.S.C. 30118, and a remedy for the 
noncompliance, as required by 49 U.S.C. 30120, should be granted.
    NHTSA notes that the statutory provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and 
30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to file petitions for a 
determination of inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to exempt manufacturers 
only from the duties found in sections 30118 and 30120, respectively, 
to notify owners, purchasers, and dealers of a defect or noncompliance 
and to remedy the defect or noncompliance. Therefore, any decision on 
this petition only applies to the subject tires that Goodyear no longer 
controlled at the time it determined that the noncompliance existed. 
However, any decision on this petition does not relieve equipment 
distributors and dealers of the prohibitions on the sale, offer for 
sale, or introduction or delivery for introduction into interstate 
commerce of the noncompliant tires under their control after Goodyear 
notified them that the subject noncompliance existed.

(Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120: delegations of authority at 49 
CFR 1.95 and 501.8)

Otto G. Matheke III,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2021-26981 Filed 12-13-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P