Large Residential Washers From Mexico: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2019-2020, 67444-67446 [2021-25773]

Download as PDF 67444 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 225 / Friday, November 26, 2021 / Notices jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1 welded OCTG completed in Brunei or the Philippines using inputs manufactured in China, subsequently exported from Brunei or the Philippines to the United States, and entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after November 12, 2020, the date of publication of the notice of initiation of these circumvention inquiries.6 The suspension of liquidation will remain in effect until further notice. As we explained in the Preliminary Determinations,7 Commerce will instruct CBP to require antidumping duty cash deposits equal to the rate established for the China-wide entity, i.e., 99.14 percent,8 and countervailing duty cash deposits equal to the current all-others rate, i.e., 27.08 percent.9 Welded OCTG assembled or completed in Brunei or the Philippines using non-Chinese inputs is not subject to these circumvention inquiries. However, because the mandatory respondents are unable to track welded OCTG to the country of origin of inputs used in the production of welded OCTG,10 Commerce did not implement a certification process at the preliminary stage and required cash deposits on all entries of welded OCTG produced in Brunei or the Philippines.11 We invited parties to comment on this issue in their case briefs and we received comments from the mandatory respondents on this issue. For the final determinations, we will not implement a certification process for welded OCTG already suspended,12 and we will require cash deposits on all entries of welded OCTG produced in either Brunei or the Philippines, with a slight modification from the Preliminary Determinations.13 However, producers and/or exporters in Brunei or the Philippines may request reconsideration of our denial of the 6 See Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment 5; see also Oil Country Tubular Goods from the People’s Republic of China: Self-Initiation of Anti-Circumvention Inquiries on the Antidumping Duty and Countervailing Duty Orders, 85 FR 71877 (November 12, 2020). 7 See Preliminary Determinations, 86 FR 43628. 8 See Oil Country Tubular Goods from the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2017– 2018, 84 FR 32125, 32126 (July 5, 2019). 9 See Oil Country Tubular Goods from the People’s Republic of China: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With the Amended Final Determination of the Countervailing Duty Investigation, 82 FR 25770 (June 5, 2017). 10 See, e.g., HLDS (B) Steel Sdn. Bhd.’s Letter, ‘‘HLDSB Initial Questionnaire Response,’’ dated March 16, 2021 at 25; and HLD Clark Steel Pipe Co., Inc.’s Letter, ‘‘HLD Clark Initial Questionnaire Response,’’ dated March 16, 2021 at 26. 11 See Preliminary Determinations, 86 FR 43628. 12 See Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment 4. 13 Id. at Comment 5. VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:16 Nov 24, 2021 Jkt 256001 certification process in a future segment of the proceeding, i.e., a changed circumstances review or administrative review.14 Administrative Protective Order This notice will serve as the only reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of return/ destruction or APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. Notification to Interested Parties These final affirmative determinations of circumvention are issued and published in accordance with section 781(b) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.225(f). Dated: November 19, 2021. Ryan Majerus, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Orders IV. Scope of the Circumvention Inquiries V. The Period of Inquiries VI. Discussion of the Issues Comment 1: Production of Hot-Rolled Steel vs. Production of OCTG Comment 2: Production Processes Comment 3: Appropriateness of Finding Circumvention Comment 4: Certification Eligibility Comment 5: Effective Date of Suspension of Liquidation VII. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2021–25832 Filed 11–24–21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 14 See, e.g., Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the People’s Republic of China: Final Determination of Anti-Circumvention Inquiry, 85 FR 9737, 9739 (February 20, 2020) (‘‘However, Protech may request reconsideration of our denial of the certification process in a future segment of the proceeding, i.e., a changed circumstances review or administrative review.’’); see also Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review, 85 FR 86905 (December 31, 2020) (‘‘. . . Protech is eligible to participate in a certification process because Protech has demonstrated that it can identify diamond sawblades that it produced in Canada using non-Chinese cores and Chinese segments.’’). PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–201–842] Large Residential Washers From Mexico: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2019– 2020 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) finds that sales of large residential washers from Mexico were made at less than normal value during the period of review (POR) February 1, 2019, through January 31, 2020. DATES: Applicable November 24, 2021 November 26, 2021. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Eastwood, AD/CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3874. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AGENCY: Background This review covers one producer/ exporter of the subject merchandise, Electrolux Home Products Corp. N.V. and Electrolux Home Products de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. (collectively, Electrolux). On June 28, 2021, Commerce published the Preliminary Results.1 On July 28, 2021, we received a case brief on behalf of Electrolux.2 On August 4, 2021, we received a rebuttal brief on behalf of Whirlpool Corporation (the petitioner).3 Scope of the Order The products covered by the order are all large residential washers and certain subassemblies thereof from Mexico. The products are currently classifiable under subheadings 8450.20.0040 and 8450.20.0080 of the Harmonized Tariff System of the United States (HTSUS). Products subject to this order may also enter under HTSUS subheadings 8450.11.0040, 8450.11.0080, 8450.90.2000, and 8450.90.6000. Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the 1 See Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2019–2020, 86 FR 33986 (June 28, 2021) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM). 2 See Electrolux’s Letter, ‘‘Case Brief of Electrolux,’’ dated August 4, 2021. 3 See Petitioner’s Letter, ‘‘Brief of Whirlpool Corporation,’’ dated August 4, 2021. E:\FR\FM\26NON1.SGM 26NON1 67445 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 225 / Friday, November 26, 2021 / Notices merchandise subject to this scope is dispositive.4 Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs are listed in the Appendix to this notice and addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum.5 Interested parties can find a complete discussion of these issues and the corresponding recommendations in this public memorandum, which is on file electronically via Enforcement and Changes Since the Preliminary Results Based on a review of the record and comments received from interested parties regarding our Preliminary Results, we made certain changes to the preliminary weighted-average margin for Electrolux.6 Final Results of the Review As a result of this review, we determine the following weightedaverage dumping margin for the period February 1, 2019, through January 31, 2020. Producers/exporters Weighted-average dumping margin (percent) Electrolux Home Products Corp. N.V. and Electrolux Home Products de Mexico, S.A. de C.V ................................................. 2.06 Disclosure of Calculations We intend to disclose the calculations performed in connection with these final results to interested parties within five days of the date of publication of this notice, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Assessment Rates jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1 Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at https://access.trade.gov/ public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), Commerce has determined, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise in accordance with the final results of this review. Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), Electrolux reported the entered value of its U.S. sales such that we calculated importer-specific ad valorem duty assessment rates based on the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for the examined sales to the total entered value of the sales for which entered value was reported. Where the respondent’s weighted-average dumping margin is zero or de minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), or an importer-specific assessment rate is zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties. Commerce’s ‘‘automatic assessment’’ practice will apply to entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by Electrolux for which the company did not know that the merchandise it sold to the intermediary (e.g., a reseller, trading company, or exporter) was 4 For a full description of the scope of the order, see Preliminary Results PDM at 2–4. 5 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the 2019– 2020 Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Large Residential Washers from VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:16 Nov 24, 2021 Jkt 256001 destined for the United States. In such instances, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the allothers rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction.7 Commerce intends to issue liquidation instructions to CBP no earlier than 41 days after the date of publication of the final results of this review in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is filed at the U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within 90 days of publication). Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective for all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the final results of this administrative review, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for Electrolux will be equal to the weighted-average dumping margin that is established in the final results of this review, except if the rate is less than 0.50 percent and, therefore, de minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), in which case the cash deposit rate will be zero; (2) for previously reviewed or investigated companies not participating in this review, the cash deposit will continue to be the Mexico,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). 6 See Issues and Decision Memorandum at 8. 7 For a full discussion of this practice, see Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 company-specific rate published for the most recent period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the less-than-fair-value (LTFV) investigation, but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be the cash deposit rate established for the most recently completed segment for the manufacturer of the subject merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other producers or exporters will continue to be 36.52 percent, the all-others rate established in the LTFV investigation.8 These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. Administrative Protective Order This notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). 8 See Large Residential Washers from Mexico and the Republic of Korea: Antidumping Duty Orders, 78 FR 11148 (February 15, 2013). E:\FR\FM\26NON1.SGM 26NON1 67446 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 225 / Friday, November 26, 2021 / Notices continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. Notification to Interested Parties This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: November 19, 2021. Ryan Majerus, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, Performing The Non-Exclusive Functions And Duties Of The Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Margin Calculations IV. Discussion of the Issues Comment 1: Differential Pricing— Calculating the Denominator of the Cohen’s d Test Comment 2: Differential Pricing— Application of the Cohen’s d Test Comment 3: Ministerial Error in the Margin Program V. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2021–25773 Filed 11–24–21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–201–842] Large Residential Washers From Mexico: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2019– 2020 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) finds that sales of large residential washers from Mexico were made at less than normal value during the period of review (POR) February 1, 2019, through January 31, 2020. DATES: Applicable November 26, 2021. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Eastwood, AD/CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3874. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1 AGENCY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:16 Nov 24, 2021 Jkt 256001 Background This review covers one producer/ exporter of the subject merchandise, Electrolux Home Products Corp. N.V. and Electrolux Home Products de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. (collectively, Electrolux). On June 28, 2021, Commerce published the Preliminary Results.1 On July 28, 2021, we received a case brief on behalf of Electrolux.2 On August 4, 2021, we received a rebuttal brief on behalf of Whirlpool Corporation (the petitioner).3 Scope of the Order The products covered by the order are all large residential washers and certain subassemblies thereof from Mexico. The products are currently classifiable under subheadings 8450.20.0040 and 8450.20.0080 of the Harmonized Tariff System of the United States (HTSUS). Products subject to this order may also enter under HTSUS subheadings 8450.11.0040, 8450.11.0080, 8450.90.2000, and 8450.90.6000. Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the merchandise subject to this scope is dispositive.4 Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs are listed in the Appendix to this notice and addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum.5 Interested parties can find a complete discussion of these issues and the corresponding recommendations in this public memorandum, which is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at https://access.trade.gov/ public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 1 See Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2019–2020, 86 FR 33986 (June 28, 2021) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM). 2 See Electrolux’s Letter, ‘‘Case Brief of Electrolux,’’ dated August 4, 2021. 3 See Petitioner’s Letter, ‘‘Brief of Whirlpool Corporation,’’ dated August 4, 2021. 4 For a full description of the scope of the order, see Preliminary Results PDM at 2–4. 5 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the 2019– 2020 Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Large Residential Washers from Mexico,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Changes Since the Preliminary Results Based on a review of the record and comments received from interested parties regarding our Preliminary Results, we made certain changes to the preliminary weighted-average margin for Electrolux.6 Final Results of the Review As a result of this review, we determine the following weightedaverage dumping margin for the period February 1, 2019, through January 31, 2020. Producers/exporters Weightedaverage dumping margin (percent) Electrolux Home Products Corp. N.V. and Electrolux Home Products de Mexico, S.A. de C.V .......................................... 2.06 Disclosure of Calculations We intend to disclose the calculations performed in connection with these final results to interested parties within five days of the date of publication of this notice, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Assessment Rates Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), Commerce has determined, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise in accordance with the final results of this review. Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), Electrolux reported the entered value of its U.S. sales such that we calculated importer-specific ad valorem duty assessment rates based on the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for the examined sales to the total entered value of the sales for which entered value was reported. Where the respondent’s weighted-average dumping margin is zero or de minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), or an importer-specific assessment rate is zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties. Commerce’s ‘‘automatic assessment’’ practice will apply to entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by Electrolux for which the company did not know that the merchandise it sold to the intermediary (e.g., a reseller, trading company, or exporter) was destined for the United States. In such instances, we will instruct CBP to 6 See E:\FR\FM\26NON1.SGM Issues and Decision Memorandum at 8. 26NON1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 225 (Friday, November 26, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67444-67446]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-25773]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-201-842]


Large Residential Washers From Mexico: Final Results of 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2019-2020

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) finds that sales of 
large residential washers from Mexico were made at less than normal 
value during the period of review (POR) February 1, 2019, through 
January 31, 2020.

DATES: Applicable November 24, 2021 November 26, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Eastwood, AD/CVD Operations, 
Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3874.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    This review covers one producer/exporter of the subject 
merchandise, Electrolux Home Products Corp. N.V. and Electrolux Home 
Products de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. (collectively, Electrolux). On June 
28, 2021, Commerce published the Preliminary Results.\1\ On July 28, 
2021, we received a case brief on behalf of Electrolux.\2\ On August 4, 
2021, we received a rebuttal brief on behalf of Whirlpool Corporation 
(the petitioner).\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review; 2019-2020, 86 FR 33986 (June 28, 2021) 
(Preliminary Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision 
Memorandum (PDM).
    \2\ See Electrolux's Letter, ``Case Brief of Electrolux,'' dated 
August 4, 2021.
    \3\ See Petitioner's Letter, ``Brief of Whirlpool Corporation,'' 
dated August 4, 2021.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order

    The products covered by the order are all large residential washers 
and certain subassemblies thereof from Mexico. The products are 
currently classifiable under subheadings 8450.20.0040 and 8450.20.0080 
of the Harmonized Tariff System of the United States (HTSUS). Products 
subject to this order may also enter under HTSUS subheadings 
8450.11.0040, 8450.11.0080, 8450.90.2000, and 8450.90.6000. Although 
the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs 
purposes, the written description of the

[[Page 67445]]

merchandise subject to this scope is dispositive.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ For a full description of the scope of the order, see 
Preliminary Results PDM at 2-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Analysis of Comments Received

    All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs are listed in the 
Appendix to this notice and addressed in the Issues and Decision 
Memorandum.\5\ Interested parties can find a complete discussion of 
these issues and the corresponding recommendations in this public 
memorandum, which is on file electronically via Enforcement and 
Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic 
Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at 
https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the Issues 
and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the 
Final Results of the 2019-2020 Administrative Review of the 
Antidumping Duty Order on Large Residential Washers from Mexico,'' 
dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues 
and Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Changes Since the Preliminary Results

    Based on a review of the record and comments received from 
interested parties regarding our Preliminary Results, we made certain 
changes to the preliminary weighted-average margin for Electrolux.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Issues and Decision Memorandum at 8.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Final Results of the Review

    As a result of this review, we determine the following weighted-
average dumping margin for the period February 1, 2019, through January 
31, 2020.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                       Weighted-average
                 Producers/exporters                    dumping margin
                                                           (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Electrolux Home Products Corp. N.V. and Electrolux                 2.06
 Home Products de Mexico, S.A. de C.V...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclosure of Calculations

    We intend to disclose the calculations performed in connection with 
these final results to interested parties within five days of the date 
of publication of this notice, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).

Assessment Rates

    Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, and 19 CFR 
351.212(b)(1), Commerce has determined, and U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate 
entries of subject merchandise in accordance with the final results of 
this review.
    Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), Electrolux reported the entered 
value of its U.S. sales such that we calculated importer-specific ad 
valorem duty assessment rates based on the ratio of the total amount of 
dumping calculated for the examined sales to the total entered value of 
the sales for which entered value was reported. Where the respondent's 
weighted-average dumping margin is zero or de minimis within the 
meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), or an importer-specific assessment 
rate is zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the 
appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties.
    Commerce's ``automatic assessment'' practice will apply to entries 
of subject merchandise during the POR produced by Electrolux for which 
the company did not know that the merchandise it sold to the 
intermediary (e.g., a reseller, trading company, or exporter) was 
destined for the United States. In such instances, we will instruct CBP 
to liquidate unreviewed entries at the all-others rate if there is no 
rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ For a full discussion of this practice, see Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 
68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Commerce intends to issue liquidation instructions to CBP no 
earlier than 41 days after the date of publication of the final results 
of this review in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is filed at 
the U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will 
direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties 
to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within 
90 days of publication).

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective for all 
shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from 
warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the 
final results of this administrative review, as provided by section 
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for Electrolux will 
be equal to the weighted-average dumping margin that is established in 
the final results of this review, except if the rate is less than 0.50 
percent and, therefore, de minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR 
351.106(c)(1), in which case the cash deposit rate will be zero; (2) 
for previously reviewed or investigated companies not participating in 
this review, the cash deposit will continue to be the company-specific 
rate published for the most recent period; (3) if the exporter is not a 
firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the less-than-fair-
value (LTFV) investigation, but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit 
rate will be the cash deposit rate established for the most recently 
completed segment for the manufacturer of the subject merchandise; and 
(4) the cash deposit rate for all other producers or exporters will 
continue to be 36.52 percent, the all-others rate established in the 
LTFV investigation.\8\ These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall 
remain in effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Large Residential Washers from Mexico and the Republic 
of Korea: Antidumping Duty Orders, 78 FR 11148 (February 15, 2013).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification to Importers

    This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply 
with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of double antidumping duties.

Administrative Protective Order

    This notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under 
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which

[[Page 67446]]

continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of 
the proceeding. Timely written notification of return/destruction of 
APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby 
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an 
APO is a sanctionable violation.

Notification to Interested Parties

    This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections 
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.

    Dated: November 19, 2021.
Ryan Majerus,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, Performing The 
Non-Exclusive Functions And Duties Of The Assistant Secretary for 
Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum

I. Summary
II. Background
III. Margin Calculations
IV. Discussion of the Issues
    Comment 1: Differential Pricing--Calculating the Denominator of 
the Cohen's d Test
    Comment 2: Differential Pricing--Application of the Cohen's d 
Test
    Comment 3: Ministerial Error in the Margin Program
V. Recommendation

[FR Doc. 2021-25773 Filed 11-24-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P