Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts From Belgium: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2019-2020, 62993-62995 [2021-24822]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 217 / Monday, November 15, 2021 / Notices
excipient, such as dextrose or starch,
where the excipient constitutes at least
2 percent, by weight, of the product.
Citric acid and sodium citrate are
classifiable under 2918.14.0000 and
2918.15.1000 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS),
respectively. Potassium citrate and
crude calcium citrate are classifiable
under 2918.15.5000 and, if included in
a mixture or blend, 3824.99.9295 of the
HTSUS. Blends that include citric acid,
sodium citrate, and potassium citrate
are classifiable under 3824.99.9295 of
the HTSUS. Although the HTSUS
subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the
written description of the merchandise
is dispositive.
Final Results of the Administrative
Review
Cash Deposit Requirements
As a result of this administrative
review, we determine that the following
weighted-average dumping margin
exists for the POR:
Producer/exporter
Estimated
weightedaverage
dumping
margin
(percent)
Sucroal S.A .................................
2.50
Disclosure
Normally, Commerce will disclose to
the parties in a proceeding the
calculations performed in connection
with a final results of review within five
days of any public announcement or, if
there is no public announcement,
within five days of the date of
publication of the notice of final results
in the Federal Register, in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.224(b). However,
Commerce made no adjustments to the
margin calculation methodology used in
the Preliminary Results; therefore, there
are no calculations to disclose for the
final results.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Assessment Rates
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act),
and 19 CFR 351.212(b), Commerce has
determined, and U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (CBP) shall assess,
antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries of subject merchandise in
accordance with the final results of this
review. For Sucroal, because its
weighted-average dumping margin is
not zero or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5
percent), Commerce has calculated
importer-specific antidumping duty
(AD) assessment rates. We calculated
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:42 Nov 12, 2021
Jkt 256001
importer- (or customer-) specific ad
valorem AD assessment rates by
dividing the total amount of dumping
calculated for the importer’s examined
sales by the total entered value of the
same sales for that importer, in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
Commerce intends to issue
assessment instructions to CBP no
earlier than 35 days after the date of
publication of the final results of this
review in the Federal Register, in
accordance with 19 CFR 356.8(a). If a
timely summons is filed at the U.S.
Court of International Trade, the
assessment instructions will direct CBP
not to liquidate relevant entries until the
time for parties to file a request for a
statutory injunction has expired (i.e.,
within 90 days of publication).
The following deposit requirements
will be effective upon publication of the
notice of these final results for all
shipments of citric acid from Colombia
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the date of
publication provided by section
751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit
rate for Sucroal will be equal to the
dumping margin established in the final
results of this review; (2) for
merchandise exported by producers or
exporters not covered in this review but
covered in a completed prior segment of
the proceeding, the cash deposit rate
will continue to be the companyspecific rate published for the most
recently-completed segment of this
proceeding in which the producer and/
or exporter participated; (3) if the
exporter is not a firm covered in this
review, a prior review, or the original
less-than-fair-value investigation but the
producer is, then the cash deposit rate
will be the rate established for the most
recently completed segment of the
proceeding for the producer of the
merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit
rate for all other producers or exporters
will continue to be 28.48 percent, the
all-others rate established in the lessthan-fair-value investigation.3 These
cash deposit requirements, when
imposed, shall remain in effect until
further notice.
Notification to Importers
3 See
PO 00000
Order.
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
during this review period. Failure to
comply with this requirement could
result in Commerce’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of double antidumping duties.
Notification Regarding Administrative
Protective Orders
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the return or
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
continues to govern business
proprietary information in this segment
of the proceeding. Timely written
notification of the return or destruction
of APO materials, or conversion to
judicial protective order, is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the
regulations and the terms of an APO is
a sanctionable violation.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing these
results in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.221(b)(5).
Dated: November 5, 2021.
Ryan Majerus,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and
Negotiations, performing the non-exclusive
functions and duties of the Assistant
Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2021–24823 Filed 11–12–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–423–813]
Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts
From Belgium: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2019–2020
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
AGENCY:
The Department of Commerce
(Commerce) determines that S.A.
Citrique Belge N.V. (Citrique Belge), a
producer/exporter of citric acid and
certain citrate salts (citric acid) from
Belgium, did not sell subject
merchandise at prices below normal
value during the period of review (POR),
July 1, 2019, through June 30, 2020.
SUMMARY:
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
62993
E:\FR\FM\15NON1.SGM
15NON1
62994
DATES:
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 217 / Monday, November 15, 2021 / Notices
Applicable November 15, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David Lindgren, AD/CVD Operations,
Office III, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1671.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On July 22, 2021, Commerce
published the Preliminary Results of the
administrative review of the
antidumping duty (AD) order on citric
acid from Belgium.1 This review covers
one producer/exporter of the subject
merchandise, Citrique Belge. We invited
parties to comment on the Preliminary
Results. No party submitted comments.
Accordingly, the final results remain
unchanged from the Preliminary
Results.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by this
Order includes all grades and
granulation sizes of citric acid, sodium
citrate, and potassium citrate in their
unblended forms, whether dry or in
solution, and regardless of packaging
type. The scope also includes blends of
citric acid, sodium citrate, and
potassium citrate; as well as blends with
other ingredients, such as sugar, where
the unblended form(s) of citric acid,
sodium citrate, and potassium citrate
constitute 40 percent or more, by
weight, of the blend.
The scope also includes all forms of
crude calcium citrate, including
dicalcium citrate monohydrate, and
tricalcium citrate tetrahydrate, which
are intermediate products in the
production of citric acid, sodium citrate,
and potassium citrate.
The scope includes the hydrous and
anhydrous forms of citric acid, the
dihydrate and anhydrous forms of
sodium citrate, otherwise known as
citric acid sodium salt, and the
monohydrate and monopotassium forms
of potassium citrate. Sodium citrate also
includes both trisodium citrate and
monosodium citrate which are also
known as citric acid trisodium salt and
citric acid monosodium salt,
respectively.
The scope does not include calcium
citrate that satisfies the standards set
forth in the United States Pharmacopeia
and has been mixed with a functional
excipient, such as dextrose or starch,
1 See Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts from
Belgium: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2019–2020, 86 FR 38681
(July 22, 2021) (Preliminary Results).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:42 Nov 12, 2021
Jkt 256001
where the excipient constitutes at least
2 percent, by weight, of the product.
Citric acid and sodium citrate are
classifiable under 2918.14.0000 and
2918.15.1000 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS),
respectively. Potassium citrate and
crude calcium citrate are classifiable
under 2918.15.5000 and, if included in
a mixture or blend, 3824.99.9295 of the
HTSUS. Blends that include citric acid,
sodium citrate, and potassium citrate
are classifiable under 3824.99.9295 of
the HTSUS. Although the HTSUS
subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the
written description of the merchandise
is dispositive.
Final Results of the Administrative
Review
As a result of this administrative
review, Commerce determines that the
following dumping margin exists for the
POR:
Producer/exporter
Weightedaverage
dumping
margin
(percent)
S.A. Citrique Belge N.V ..............
0.00
Disclosure
Normally, Commerce will disclose to
the parties in a proceeding the
calculations performed in connection
with a final results of review within five
days of any public announcement or, if
there is no public announcement,
within five days of the date of
publication of the notice of final results
in the Federal Register, in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.224(b). However,
Commerce made no adjustments to the
margin calculation methodology used in
the Preliminary Results; therefore, there
are no calculations to disclose for the
final results.
Assessment Rates
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act),
and 19 CFR 351.212(b), Commerce has
determined, and U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (CBP) shall assess,
antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries of subject merchandise in
accordance with the final results of this
review. Because the rate assigned to
Citrique Belge is zero, Commerce will
instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate
entries without regard to antidumping
duties.
Commerce intends to issue
assessment instructions to CBP no
earlier than 35 days after the date of
publication of the final results of this
review in the Federal Register, in
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
accordance with 19 CFR 356.8(a). If a
timely summons is filed at the U.S.
Court of International Trade, the
assessment instructions will direct CBP
not to liquidate relevant entries until the
time for parties to file a request for a
statutory injunction has expired (i.e.,
within 90 days of publication).
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following deposit requirements
will be effective upon publication of the
notice of these final results for all
shipments of citric acid from Belgium
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the date of
publication provided by section
751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit
rate for Citrique Belge will be zero; (2)
for merchandise exported by producers
or exporters not covered in this review
but covered in a completed prior
segment of the proceeding, the cash
deposit rate will continue to be the
company-specific rate published for the
most recently completed segment of this
proceeding in which the producer and/
or exporter participated; (3) if the
exporter is not a firm covered in this
review, a prior review, or the original
less-than-fair-value investigation but the
producer is, then the cash deposit rate
will be the rate established for the most
recently completed segment of the
proceeding for the producer of the
merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit
rate for all other producers or exporters
will continue to be 19.30 percent, the
all-others rate established in the lessthan-fair-value investigation.2 These
cash deposit requirements, when
imposed, shall remain in effect until
further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during this review period. Failure to
comply with this requirement could
result in Commerce’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of double antidumping duties.
Notification Regarding Administrative
Protective Order
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to the administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the return or
destruction of proprietary information
2 See Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts from
Belgium, Colombia and Thailand: Antidumping
Duty Orders, 83 FR 35214 (July 25, 2018).
E:\FR\FM\15NON1.SGM
15NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 217 / Monday, November 15, 2021 / Notices
disclosed under the APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
continues to govern business
proprietary information in this segment
of the proceeding. Timely written
notification of the return or destruction
of APO materials or conversion to
judicial protective order is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the
regulations and terms of an APO is a
sanctionable violation.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing this
notice in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19
CFR 351.221(b)(5).
Dated: November 5, 2021.
Ryan Majerus,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and
Negotiations, Performing the Non-Exclusive
Functions and Duties of The Assistant
Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2021–24822 Filed 11–12–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–475–818]
Certain Pasta From Italy: Final Results
of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2019–2020
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(Commerce) determines that certain
pasta (pasta) from Italy was sold in the
United States at less than normal value
during the period of review (POR) July
1, 2019, through June 30, 2020.
DATES: Applicable November 15, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jonathan Hall-Eastman and John
Hoffner, AD/CVD Operations, Office III,
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1468
and (202) 482–3315, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
Background
On August 3, 2021, Commerce
published the Preliminary Results.1 On
September 2, 2021, Commerce received
case briefs on behalf of Liguori Pastificio
dal 1820 S.p.A./Pastificio Della Forma
1 See Certain Pasta from Italy: Preliminary Results
of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2019–
2020, 86 FR 41827 (August 3, 2021) (Preliminary
Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision
Memorandum.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:42 Nov 12, 2021
Jkt 256001
S.r.l. (Liguori/Della Forma) and La
Molisana S.p.A. (La Molisana).2 No
interested party filed a rebuttal brief.
For a complete description of the events
that occurred since the Preliminary
Results, see the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.3
Scope of the Order
The products covered by this order
are certain pasta from Italy. For a full
description of the scope, see the Issues
and Decision Memorandum.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case briefs are
addressed in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum. A list of the issues that
parties raised and to which we
responded in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum is attached to this notice
as an Appendix. The Issues and
Decision Memorandum is a public
document and is on file electronically
via Enforcement and Compliance’s
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System
(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://
access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete
version of the Issues and Decision
Memorandum can be accessed directly
at https://access.trade.gov/public/FR
NoticesListLayout.aspx.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
No changes were made from the
Preliminary Results.
Rates for Companies Not Selected for
Individual Examination
The statute and Commerce’s
regulations do not address the
establishment of a rate to be applied to
individual companies not selected for
examination when Commerce limits its
examination in an administrative review
pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).
Generally, Commerce looks to section
735(c)(5) of the Act, which provides
instructions for calculating the allothers rate in an investigation, for
guidance when calculating the rate for
companies which we did not
individually examine in an
administrative review. Section
735(c)(5)(A) of the Act establishes a
preference to avoid using rates which
2 See Liguori/Della Forma’s Letter, ‘‘Antidumping
Duty Review of Certain Pasta from Italy: Liguori’s
Case Brief,’’ dated September 2, 2021; see also La
Molisana’s Letter, ‘‘Certain Dry Pasta from Italy; A–
475–818; Case Brief,’’ dated September 2, 2021.
3 See Memorandum, ‘‘Certain Pasta from Italy:
Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2019–2020,’’ dated concurrently with, and
hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision
Memorandum).
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
62995
are zero, de minimis, or based entirely
on facts available (FA) in calculating an
all-others rate. Accordingly,
Commerce’s practice in administrative
reviews has been to average the
weighted-average dumping margins for
the companies selected for individual
examination in the administrative
review, excluding rates that are zero, de
minimis, or based entirely on FA.4 For
these final results of review, we
calculated a weighted-average dumping
margin for La Molisana that is not zero,
de minimis, or based entirely on FA.
Therefore, consistent with our practice,
we have assigned the companies not
selected for individual examination the
weighted-average dumping margin
calculated for La Molisana.
Final Results of the Review
Commerce determines that the
following weighted-average dumping
margin exists for the period July 1, 2019,
through June 30, 2020:
Exporter or producer
La Molisana S.p.A ......................
Liguori Pastificio dal 1820 S.p.A.
and Pastificio Della Forma
S.r.l ..........................................
Weightedaverage
dumping
margin
(percent)
1.61
0.00
Review-Specific Average Rate Applicable
to the Following Companies
Agritalia S.r.L ..............................
Armonie D’Italia srl .....................
F. Divella S.p.A ...........................
Pasta Zara, S.p.A./Ghigi 1870
S.p.A .......................................
Pastificio C.A.M.S. Srl ................
Pastificio Fratelli De Luca S.r.l. ..
1.61
1.61
1.61
1.61
1.61
1.61
Assessment Rate
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the
Act, and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1),
Commerce shall determine, and U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
shall assess, antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries covered by this
review.
For the individually examined
companies with a weighted-average
dumping margin that is not zero, de
minimis or based on total FA,
Commerce has calculated importerspecific antidumping duty assessment
rates. For La Molisana, we calculated
importer-specific antidumping duty
4 See, e.g., Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof from
France, Germany, Italy, Japan, and the United
Kingdom: Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Reviews and Rescission of Reviews
in Part, 73 FR 52823, 52824 (September 11, 2008),
and accompanying Issues and Decision
Memorandum at Comment 16.
E:\FR\FM\15NON1.SGM
15NON1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 217 (Monday, November 15, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62993-62995]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-24822]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-423-813]
Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts From Belgium: Final Results
of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2019-2020
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that S.A.
Citrique Belge N.V. (Citrique Belge), a producer/exporter of citric
acid and certain citrate salts (citric acid) from Belgium, did not sell
subject merchandise at prices below normal value during the period of
review (POR), July 1, 2019, through June 30, 2020.
[[Page 62994]]
DATES: Applicable November 15, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Lindgren, AD/CVD Operations,
Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-1671.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On July 22, 2021, Commerce published the Preliminary Results of the
administrative review of the antidumping duty (AD) order on citric acid
from Belgium.\1\ This review covers one producer/exporter of the
subject merchandise, Citrique Belge. We invited parties to comment on
the Preliminary Results. No party submitted comments. Accordingly, the
final results remain unchanged from the Preliminary Results.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts from Belgium:
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2019-
2020, 86 FR 38681 (July 22, 2021) (Preliminary Results).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by this Order includes all grades and
granulation sizes of citric acid, sodium citrate, and potassium citrate
in their unblended forms, whether dry or in solution, and regardless of
packaging type. The scope also includes blends of citric acid, sodium
citrate, and potassium citrate; as well as blends with other
ingredients, such as sugar, where the unblended form(s) of citric acid,
sodium citrate, and potassium citrate constitute 40 percent or more, by
weight, of the blend.
The scope also includes all forms of crude calcium citrate,
including dicalcium citrate monohydrate, and tricalcium citrate
tetrahydrate, which are intermediate products in the production of
citric acid, sodium citrate, and potassium citrate.
The scope includes the hydrous and anhydrous forms of citric acid,
the dihydrate and anhydrous forms of sodium citrate, otherwise known as
citric acid sodium salt, and the monohydrate and monopotassium forms of
potassium citrate. Sodium citrate also includes both trisodium citrate
and monosodium citrate which are also known as citric acid trisodium
salt and citric acid monosodium salt, respectively.
The scope does not include calcium citrate that satisfies the
standards set forth in the United States Pharmacopeia and has been
mixed with a functional excipient, such as dextrose or starch, where
the excipient constitutes at least 2 percent, by weight, of the
product.
Citric acid and sodium citrate are classifiable under 2918.14.0000
and 2918.15.1000 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States
(HTSUS), respectively. Potassium citrate and crude calcium citrate are
classifiable under 2918.15.5000 and, if included in a mixture or blend,
3824.99.9295 of the HTSUS. Blends that include citric acid, sodium
citrate, and potassium citrate are classifiable under 3824.99.9295 of
the HTSUS. Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience
and customs purposes, the written description of the merchandise is
dispositive.
Final Results of the Administrative Review
As a result of this administrative review, Commerce determines that
the following dumping margin exists for the POR:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-
average
Producer/exporter dumping
margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
S.A. Citrique Belge N.V.................................... 0.00
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure
Normally, Commerce will disclose to the parties in a proceeding the
calculations performed in connection with a final results of review
within five days of any public announcement or, if there is no public
announcement, within five days of the date of publication of the notice
of final results in the Federal Register, in accordance with 19 CFR
351.224(b). However, Commerce made no adjustments to the margin
calculation methodology used in the Preliminary Results; therefore,
there are no calculations to disclose for the final results.
Assessment Rates
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act), and 19 CFR 351.212(b), Commerce has determined, and
U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping
duties on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise in accordance
with the final results of this review. Because the rate assigned to
Citrique Belge is zero, Commerce will instruct CBP to liquidate the
appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties.
Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP no earlier
than 35 days after the date of publication of the final results of this
review in the Federal Register, in accordance with 19 CFR 356.8(a). If
a timely summons is filed at the U.S. Court of International Trade, the
assessment instructions will direct CBP not to liquidate relevant
entries until the time for parties to file a request for a statutory
injunction has expired (i.e., within 90 days of publication).
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication of the notice of these final results for all shipments of
citric acid from Belgium entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the date of publication provided by section
751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for Citrique Belge will
be zero; (2) for merchandise exported by producers or exporters not
covered in this review but covered in a completed prior segment of the
proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-
specific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this
proceeding in which the producer and/or exporter participated; (3) if
the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or
the original less-than-fair-value investigation but the producer is,
then the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most
recently completed segment of the proceeding for the producer of the
merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other producers or
exporters will continue to be 19.30 percent, the all-others rate
established in the less-than-fair-value investigation.\2\ These cash
deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until
further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts from Belgium,
Colombia and Thailand: Antidumping Duty Orders, 83 FR 35214 (July
25, 2018).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply
with this requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to the
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
[[Page 62995]]
disclosed under the APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of
the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or
destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order
is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms
of an APO is a sanctionable violation.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5).
Dated: November 5, 2021.
Ryan Majerus,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, Performing the
Non-Exclusive Functions and Duties of The Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2021-24822 Filed 11-12-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
