Petition for Exemption From the Federal Motor Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard; American Honda Motor Co., Inc., 62878-62881 [2021-24633]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
62878
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 216 / Friday, November 12, 2021 / Notices
information validation (40% of the
total), and 0.5 hour for technical content
approval (10% of the total). Therefore,
NHTSA estimates that each submission
will require 47.5 data entry hours, 38
technical information validation hours,
and 9.5 technical content approval
hours, for an annual total of 997.5 data
entry hours, 798 technical information
validation hours, and 199.5 technical
content approval hours.
NHTSA estimates the total labor costs
associated with the data entry burden
hours by looking at estimates from the
Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) for the
average hourly wage for Business
Operations Specialists (BLS Occupation
code 13–1000) in the Motor Vehicle
Manufacturing Industry. BLS estimates
the average hourly wage is $39.46.1 The
Bureau of Labor Statistics estimates that
private industry workers’ wages
represent 70.4% of total labor
compensation costs.2 Therefore, NHTSA
estimates the hourly labor costs to be
$56.05 for data entry. Table 2 provides
a summary of the labor costs associated
with the burden hours.
TABLE 2—LABOR COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH BURDEN HOURS
Average
hourly
labor cost
Job function
Data Entry ........................................................................................................................
Technical Information Validation .....................................................................................
Technical Content Approval ............................................................................................
$55,909.88
69,848.94
18,796.89
Estimated Annual Labor Cost Associated with Burden Hours ................................................................................................
144,555.71
($144,556)
Raymond R. Posten,
Associate Administrator for Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 2021–24634 Filed 11–10–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
1 See May 2020 National Industry-Specific
Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates,
NAICS 336100—Motor Vehicle Manufacturing,
available at https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:42 Nov 10, 2021
Jkt 256001
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
Petition for Exemption From the
Federal Motor Vehicle Theft Prevention
Standard; American Honda Motor Co.,
Inc.
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Grant of petition for exemption.
AGENCY:
This document grants in full
the American Honda Motor Co., Inc.’s
(Honda) petition for exemption from the
Federal Motor Vehicle Theft Prevention
Standard (theft prevention standard) for
its Acura Integra vehicle line beginning
in model year (MY) 2023. The petition
is granted because the agency has
determined that the antitheft device to
be placed on the line as standard
equipment is likely to be as effective in
reducing and deterring motor vehicle
theft as compliance with the partsmarking requirements of the theft
prevention standard.
DATES: The exemption granted by this
notice is effective beginning with the
2023 model year.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Carlita Ballard, Office of International
Policy, Fuel Economy, and Consumer
Programs, NHTSA, West Building,
W43–439, NRM–310, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590. Ms.
Ballard’s phone number is (202) 366–
5222. Her fax number is (202) 493–2990.
SUMMARY:
naics4_336100.htm#15–0000 (accessed May 4,
2020).
2 See Table 1. Employer Costs for Employee
Compensation by ownership (Mar. 2021), available
PO 00000
Frm 00109
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
$56.05
87.53
94.22
Total labor
cost
997.5
798
199.5
Estimated Total Annual Burden Cost:
There are no costs associated with this
collection other than the labor costs
associated with the burden hours.
Public Comments Invited: You are
asked to comment on any aspects of this
information collection, including (a)
whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
Department, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the Department’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
information collection, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used; (c) ways to enhance
the quality, utility and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents, including the use of
automated, electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses.
Authority: The Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35; and
delegation of authority at 49 CFR 1.95
and DOT Order 1351.29.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Total burden
hours
Under 49
U.S.C. Chapter 331, the Secretary of
Transportation (and the National
Highway Traffic Safety Administration
(NHTSA) by delegation) is required to
promulgate a theft prevention standard
to provide for the identification of
certain motor vehicles and their major
replacement parts to impede motor
vehicle theft. NHTSA promulgated
regulations at 49 CFR part 541 (theft
prevention standard) to require partsmarking for specified passenger motor
vehicles and light trucks. Pursuant to 49
U.S.C. 33106, manufacturers that are
subject to the parts-marking
requirements may petition the Secretary
of Transportation for an exemption for
a line of passenger motor vehicles
equipped with an antitheft device as
standard equipment that the Secretary
decides is likely to be as effective in
reducing and deterring motor vehicle
theft as compliance with the partsmarking requirements. In accordance
with this statute, NHTSA promulgated
49 CFR part 543, which establishes the
process through which manufacturers
may seek an exemption from the theft
prevention standard.
49 CFR 543.5 provides general
submission requirements for petitions
and states that each manufacturer may
petition NHTSA for an exemption of
one vehicle line per model year. Among
other requirements, manufacturers must
identify whether the exemption is
sought under section 543.6 or section
543.7. Under section 543.6, a
manufacturer may request an exemption
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
at https://www.bls.gov/news.release/ecec.t01.htm
(accessed August 2, 2021).
E:\FR\FM\12NON1.SGM
12NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 216 / Friday, November 12, 2021 / Notices
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
by providing specific information about
the antitheft device, its capabilities, and
the reasons the petitioner believes the
device to be as effective at reducing and
deterring theft as compliance with the
parts-marking requirements. Section
543.7 permits a manufacturer to request
an exemption under a more streamlined
process if the vehicle line is equipped
with an antitheft device (an
‘‘immobilizer’’) as standard equipment
that complies with one of the standards
specified in that section.1
Section 543.8 establishes
requirements for processing petitions for
exemption from the theft prevention
standard. As stated in section 543.8(a),
NHTSA processes any complete
exemption petition. If NHTSA receives
an incomplete petition, NHTSA will
notify the petitioner of the deficiencies.
Once NHTSA receives a complete
petition the agency will process it and,
in accordance with section 543.8(b),
will grant the petition if it determines
that, based upon substantial evidence,
the standard equipment antitheft device
is likely to be as effective in reducing
and deterring motor vehicle theft as
compliance with the parts-marking
requirements of part 541.
Section 543.8(c) requires NHTSA to
issue its decision either to grant or to
deny an exemption petition not later
than 120 days after the date on which
a complete petition is filed. If NHTSA
does not make a decision within the
120-day period, the petition shall be
deemed to be approved and the
manufacturer shall be exempt from the
standard for the line covered by the
petition for the subsequent model year.2
Exemptions granted under part 543
apply only to the vehicle line or lines
that are subject to the grant and that are
equipped with the antitheft device on
which the line’s exemption was based,
and are effective for the model year
beginning after the model year in which
1 49 CFR 543.7 specifies that the manufacturer
must include a statement that their entire vehicle
line is equipped with an immobilizer that meets
one of the following standards:
(1) The performance criteria (subsections 8
through 21) of C.R.C, c. 1038.114, Theft Protection
and Rollaway Prevention (in effect March 30, 2011),
as excerpted in appendix A of [part 543];
(2) National Standard of Canada CAN/ULC–
S338–98, Automobile Theft Deterrent Equipment
and Systems: Electronic Immobilization (May
1998);
(3) United Nations Economic Commission for
Europe (UN/ECE) Regulation No. 97 (ECE R97),
Uniform Provisions Concerning Approval of
Vehicle Alarm System (VAS) and Motor Vehicles
with Regard to Their Alarm System (AS) in effect
August 8, 2007; or
(4) UN/ECE Regulation No. 116 (ECE R116),
Uniform Technical Prescriptions Concerning the
Protection of Motor Vehicles Against Unauthorized
Use in effect on February 10, 2009.
2 49 U.S.C. 33106(d).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:42 Nov 10, 2021
Jkt 256001
NHTSA issues the notice of exemption,
unless the notice of exemption specifies
a later year.
Sections 543.8(f) and (g) apply to the
manner in which NHTSA’s decisions on
petitions are to be made known. Under
section 543.8(f), if the petition is sought
under section 543.6, NHTSA publishes
a notice of its decision to grant or deny
the exemption petition in the Federal
Register and notifies the petitioner in
writing. Under section 543.8(g), if the
petition is sought under section 543.7,
NHTSA notifies the petitioner in writing
of the agency’s decision to grant or deny
the exemption petition.
This grant of petition for exemption
considers American Honda Motor Co.,
Inc.’s (Honda) petition for its Acura
Integra vehicle line beginning in MY
2023.
I. Specific Petition Content
Requirements Under 49 CFR 543.6
Pursuant to 49 CFR part 543,
Exemption from Vehicle Theft
Prevention, Honda petitioned for an
exemption for its specified vehicle line
from the parts-marking requirements of
the theft prevention standard, beginning
in MY 2023. Honda petitioned under 49
CFR 543.6, Petition: Specific content
requirements, which, as described
above, requires manufacturers to
provide specific information about the
antitheft device installed as standard
equipment on all vehicles in the line for
which an exemption is sought, the
antitheft device’s capabilities, and the
reasons the petitioner believes the
device to be as effective at reducing and
deterring theft as compliance with the
parts-marking requirements.
More specifically, section 543.6(a)(1)
requires petitions to include a statement
that an antitheft device will be installed
as standard equipment on all vehicles in
the line for which the exemption is
sought. Under section 543.6(a)(2), each
petition must list each component in the
antitheft system, and include a diagram
showing the location of each of those
components within the vehicle. As
required by section 543.6(a)(3), each
petition must include an explanation of
the means and process by which the
device is activated and functions,
including any aspect of the device
designed to: (1) Facilitate or encourage
its activation by motorists; (2) attract
attention to the efforts of an
unauthorized person to enter or move a
vehicle by means other than a key; (3)
prevent defeating or circumventing the
device by an unauthorized person
attempting to enter a vehicle by means
other than a key; (4) prevent the
operation of a vehicle which an
unauthorized person has entered using
PO 00000
Frm 00110
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
62879
means other than a key; and (5) ensure
the reliability and durability of the
device.3
In addition to providing information
about the antitheft device and its
functionality, petitioners must also
submit the reasons for their belief that
the antitheft device will be effective in
reducing and deterring motor vehicle
theft, including any theft data and other
data that are available to the petitioner
and form a basis for that belief,4 and the
reasons for their belief that the agency
should determine that the antitheft
device is likely to be as effective as
compliance with the parts-marking
requirements of part 541 in reducing
and deterring motor vehicle theft. In
support of this belief, the petitioners
should include any statistical data that
are available to the petitioner and form
the basis for the petitioner’s belief that
a line of passenger motor vehicles
equipped with the antitheft device is
likely to have a theft rate equal to or less
than that of passenger motor vehicles of
the same, or a similar line which have
parts marked in compliance with part
541.5
The following sections describe
Honda’s petition information provided
pursuant to 49 CFR part 543, Exemption
from Vehicle Theft Prevention. To the
extent that specific information in
Honda’s petition is subject to a properly
filed confidentiality request, that
information was not disclosed as part of
this notice.6
II. Honda’s Petition for Exemption
In a petition dated July 22, 2021,
Honda requested an exemption from the
parts-marking requirements of the theft
prevention standard for the Acura
Integra vehicle line beginning with MY
2023.
In its petition, Honda provided a
detailed description and diagram of the
identity, design, and location of the
components of the antitheft device for
the Acura Integra vehicle line. Honda
stated that its MY 2023 Acura Integra
vehicle line will be installed with an
engine immobilizer device as standard
equipment, as required by 543.6(a)(1).
Honda stated that it will offer a ‘‘smart
entry remote’’ (keyless key) system on
its vehicle line. Honda also stated that
the Acura Integra vehicle line will offer
two types of remotes, one with remote
engine start and one without remote
start. Key components of the antitheft
system will include a passive
immobilizer, ‘‘smart entry’’ remote,
3 49
CFR 543.6(a)(3).
CFR 543.6(a)(4).
5 49 CFR 543.6(a)(5).
6 49 CFR 512.20(a).
4 49
E:\FR\FM\12NON1.SGM
12NON1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
62880
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 216 / Friday, November 12, 2021 / Notices
powertrain control module (PCM), and
body control module (BCM). Honda
further stated that its vehicle line will
be installed with a vehicle security
alarm system as standard equipment
which will activate a visible and audible
alarm whenever unauthorized access is
attempted.
Pursuant to Section 543.6(a)(3),
Honda explained that its ‘‘smart entry
and start’’ system is part of the normal
operation of the ignition key and
activates automatically when the
ignition switch is in the ‘‘OFF’’ position.
Honda further explained that if a smart
entry remote without a matching code is
within operating range and the engine
start/stop button is pressed, the PCM
will prevent fueling of the engine and
the engine will be inoperable. Honda
also stated that the immobilizer system
is deactivated when a valid smart entry
remote and matching codes are verified,
allowing the engine to continue normal
operations. Honda further stated that the
security indicator flashes continuously
when the immobilizer is activated, and
turns off when it is deactivated.
Honda stated that the audible and
visible vehicle security alarm system
installed on its Acura Integra vehicles
will monitor any attempts of
unauthorized entry and attract attention
to an unauthorized person attempting to
enter its vehicles without the use of a
‘‘smart entry’’ remote or its built-in
mechanical door key. Specifically,
Honda stated that whenever an attempt
is made to open one of its vehicle doors,
hood or trunk without using the ‘‘smart
entry’’ remote or turning a key in the
key cylinder to disarm the vehicle, the
vehicle’s horn will sound and its lights
will flash. Honda stated that its vehicle
security system is activated when all of
the doors are locked and the hood and
trunk are closed and locked. Honda
further stated that its vehicle security
system is deactivated by using the key
fob buttons to unlock the vehicle doors
or having the ‘‘smart entry’’ remote
within operating range when the
operator grabs either of the vehicle’s
front door handles.
Honda also stated that in addition to
the standard security system on all 2023
MY Acura Integra models, additional
security features include counterfeit
resistant vehicle identification number
(VIN) plates, secondary VINs, a hood
release located inside the vehicle, and
its smart entry remote will utilize
rolling codes for the lock and unlock
functions of its vehicles.
As required in section 543.6(a)(3)(v),
Honda provided information on the
reliability and durability of its proposed
device. To ensure reliability and
durability of the device, Honda
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:42 Nov 10, 2021
Jkt 256001
provided a list of requirements for the
characteristics and durability testing
along with its results. Honda stated that
its device does not require the presence
of a ‘‘smart entry’’ remote battery to
function nor does it have any moving
parts (i.e., the PCM, BCM, ‘‘smart entry’’
remote and the corresponding electrical
components found within its own
housing units), which it believes
reduces the chance for deterioration and
wear from normal use.
Honda believes that installation of the
antitheft immobilizer device as standard
equipment reduces the vehicle theft rate
by making conventional methods of
theft obsolete, i.e., punching out the
steering column or hot-wiring the
ignition. Additionally, Honda stated
that although its Acura Integra vehicle
line was previously discontinued, its
proposed immobilizer system is
generationally different in design and
function from the immobilizer system
that was installed on the MY 2000
Acura Integra. Honda referenced the
Highway Loss Data Institute’s (HLDI)
information for certain applicable years
for the Acura TLX’s theft rate data, as
theft rate data for the MY 2023 Acura
Integra is not available at this time. In
accordance with 49 CFR 543.6(a)(5),
Honda stated that the Acura TLX and
Acura Integra are similar in such that
they both occupy the entry level luxury
passenger vehicle market and are
equipped in comparable configurations.
In addition, Honda stated that the
immobilizer system in the MY 2023
Acura Integra is similar in design and
function to the immobilizer system
installed in the Acura TLX. Honda
further stated that data for the Acura
TLX shows a low theft rate and has been
consistent over various years. Honda
stated that the immobilizer on its
proposed vehicle will be no less
effective than similar designed
immobilizer systems applied to the MY
2014 Honda Civic, MY 2015 Honda
Accord or the MY 2020 Acura TLX, all
of which have been granted exemptions
by the agency.
III. Decision To Grant the Petition
Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 33106 and 49
CFR 543.8(b), the agency grants a
petition for exemption from the partsmarking requirements of part 541, either
in whole or in part, if it determines that,
based upon substantial evidence, the
standard equipment antitheft device is
likely to be as effective in reducing and
deterring motor vehicle theft as
compliance with the parts-marking
requirements of part 541. The agency
finds that Honda has provided adequate
reasons for its belief that the antitheft
device for its vehicle line is likely to be
PO 00000
Frm 00111
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
as effective in reducing and deterring
motor vehicle theft as compliance with
the parts-marking requirements of the
theft prevention standard. This
conclusion is based on the information
Honda provided about its antitheft
device. NHTSA believes, based on
Honda’s supporting evidence, the
antitheft device described for its vehicle
line is likely to be as effective in
reducing and deterring motor vehicle
theft as compliance with the partsmarking requirements of the theft
prevention standard.
The agency concludes that Honda’s
antitheft device will provide the five
types of performance features listed in
section 543.6(a)(3): Promoting
activation; attracting attention to the
efforts of unauthorized persons to enter
or operate a vehicle by means other than
a key; preventing defeat or
circumvention of the device by
unauthorized persons; preventing
operation of the vehicle by
unauthorized entrants; and ensuring the
reliability and durability of the device.
The agency notes that 49 CFR part
541, Appendix A–1, identifies those
lines that are exempted from the theft
prevention standard for a given model
year. 49 CFR 543.8(f) contains
publication requirements incident to the
disposition of all part 543 petitions.
Advanced listing, including the release
of future product nameplates, the
beginning model year for which the
petition is granted and a general
description of the antitheft device is
necessary in order to notify law
enforcement agencies of new vehicle
lines exempted from the parts-marking
requirements of the theft prevention
standard.
If Honda decides not to use the
exemption for its requested vehicle line,
the manufacturer must formally notify
the agency. If such a decision is made,
the line must be fully marked as
required by 49 CFR 541.5 and 541.6
(marking of major component parts and
replacement parts).
NHTSA notes that if Honda wishes in
the future to modify the device on
which this exemption is based, the
company may have to submit a petition
to modify the exemption. Section
543.8(d) states that a part 543 exemption
applies only to vehicles that belong to
a line exempted under this part and
equipped with the antitheft device on
which the line’s exemption is based.
Further, section 543.10(c)(2) provides
for the submission of petitions ‘‘to
modify an exemption to permit the use
of an antitheft device similar to but
differing from the one specified in the
exemption.’’
E:\FR\FM\12NON1.SGM
12NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 216 / Friday, November 12, 2021 / Notices
The agency wishes to minimize the
administrative burden that section
543.10(c)(2) could place on exempted
vehicle manufacturers and itself. The
agency did not intend in drafting part
543 to require the submission of a
modification petition for every change
to the components or design of an
antitheft device. The significance of
many such changes could be de
minimis. Therefore, NHTSA suggests
that if Honda contemplates making any
changes, the effects of which might be
characterized as de minimis, it should
consult the agency before preparing and
submitting a petition to modify.
For the foregoing reasons, the agency
hereby grants in full Honda’s petition
for exemption for the Acura Integra
vehicle line from the parts-marking
requirements of 49 CFR part 541,
beginning with its MY 2023 vehicles.
Issued under authority delegated in 49 CFR
1.95 and 501.8.
Raymond R. Posten,
Associate Administrator for Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 2021–24633 Filed 11–10–21; 8:45 am]
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:42 Nov 10, 2021
Jkt 256001
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Office of Foreign Assets Control
Notice of OFAC Sanctions Action
Office of Foreign Assets
Control, Treasury.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Department of the
Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets
Control (OFAC) is publishing the names
of one or more persons that have been
placed on OFAC’s Specially Designated
Nationals and Blocked Persons List
based on OFAC’s determination that one
or more applicable legal criteria were
satisfied. All property and interests in
property subject to U.S. jurisdiction of
these persons are blocked, and U.S.
persons are generally prohibited from
engaging in transactions with them.
Additionally, OFAC is publishing
updates to the identifying information
of one or more persons currently
included on the SDN List. All property
and interests in property subject to U.S.
jurisdiction of these persons remain
blocked, and U.S. persons are generally
prohibited from engaging in transactions
with them.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00112
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
62881
See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section for effective date(s).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
OFAC: Bradley T. Smith, Acting
Director, tel.: 202–622–2490; Associate
Director for Global Targeting, tel.: 202–
622–2420; Assistant Director for
Licensing, tel.: 202–622–2480; Assistant
Director for Regulatory Affairs, tel.: 202–
622–4855; or the Assistant Director for
Sanctions Compliance & Evaluation,
tel.: 202–622–2490.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
Electronic Availability
The Specially Designated Nationals
and Blocked Persons List and additional
information concerning OFAC sanctions
programs are available on OFAC’s
website (https://www.treasury.gov/ofac).
Notice of OFAC Action(s)
A. On November 8, 2021, OFAC
determined that the property and
interests in property subject to U.S.
jurisdiction of the following persons are
blocked under the relevant sanctions
authority listed below.
Individuals
BILLING CODE 4810–AL–P
E:\FR\FM\12NON1.SGM
12NON1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 216 (Friday, November 12, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62878-62881]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-24633]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
Petition for Exemption From the Federal Motor Vehicle Theft
Prevention Standard; American Honda Motor Co., Inc.
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Grant of petition for exemption.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document grants in full the American Honda Motor Co.,
Inc.'s (Honda) petition for exemption from the Federal Motor Vehicle
Theft Prevention Standard (theft prevention standard) for its Acura
Integra vehicle line beginning in model year (MY) 2023. The petition is
granted because the agency has determined that the antitheft device to
be placed on the line as standard equipment is likely to be as
effective in reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft as compliance
with the parts-marking requirements of the theft prevention standard.
DATES: The exemption granted by this notice is effective beginning with
the 2023 model year.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carlita Ballard, Office of
International Policy, Fuel Economy, and Consumer Programs, NHTSA, West
Building, W43-439, NRM-310, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC
20590. Ms. Ballard's phone number is (202) 366-5222. Her fax number is
(202) 493-2990.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under 49 U.S.C. Chapter 331, the Secretary
of Transportation (and the National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration (NHTSA) by delegation) is required to promulgate a theft
prevention standard to provide for the identification of certain motor
vehicles and their major replacement parts to impede motor vehicle
theft. NHTSA promulgated regulations at 49 CFR part 541 (theft
prevention standard) to require parts-marking for specified passenger
motor vehicles and light trucks. Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 33106,
manufacturers that are subject to the parts-marking requirements may
petition the Secretary of Transportation for an exemption for a line of
passenger motor vehicles equipped with an antitheft device as standard
equipment that the Secretary decides is likely to be as effective in
reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft as compliance with the
parts-marking requirements. In accordance with this statute, NHTSA
promulgated 49 CFR part 543, which establishes the process through
which manufacturers may seek an exemption from the theft prevention
standard.
49 CFR 543.5 provides general submission requirements for petitions
and states that each manufacturer may petition NHTSA for an exemption
of one vehicle line per model year. Among other requirements,
manufacturers must identify whether the exemption is sought under
section 543.6 or section 543.7. Under section 543.6, a manufacturer may
request an exemption
[[Page 62879]]
by providing specific information about the antitheft device, its
capabilities, and the reasons the petitioner believes the device to be
as effective at reducing and deterring theft as compliance with the
parts-marking requirements. Section 543.7 permits a manufacturer to
request an exemption under a more streamlined process if the vehicle
line is equipped with an antitheft device (an ``immobilizer'') as
standard equipment that complies with one of the standards specified in
that section.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 49 CFR 543.7 specifies that the manufacturer must include a
statement that their entire vehicle line is equipped with an
immobilizer that meets one of the following standards:
(1) The performance criteria (subsections 8 through 21) of
C.R.C, c. 1038.114, Theft Protection and Rollaway Prevention (in
effect March 30, 2011), as excerpted in appendix A of [part 543];
(2) National Standard of Canada CAN/ULC-S338-98, Automobile
Theft Deterrent Equipment and Systems: Electronic Immobilization
(May 1998);
(3) United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UN/ECE)
Regulation No. 97 (ECE R97), Uniform Provisions Concerning Approval
of Vehicle Alarm System (VAS) and Motor Vehicles with Regard to
Their Alarm System (AS) in effect August 8, 2007; or
(4) UN/ECE Regulation No. 116 (ECE R116), Uniform Technical
Prescriptions Concerning the Protection of Motor Vehicles Against
Unauthorized Use in effect on February 10, 2009.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 543.8 establishes requirements for processing petitions for
exemption from the theft prevention standard. As stated in section
543.8(a), NHTSA processes any complete exemption petition. If NHTSA
receives an incomplete petition, NHTSA will notify the petitioner of
the deficiencies. Once NHTSA receives a complete petition the agency
will process it and, in accordance with section 543.8(b), will grant
the petition if it determines that, based upon substantial evidence,
the standard equipment antitheft device is likely to be as effective in
reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft as compliance with the
parts-marking requirements of part 541.
Section 543.8(c) requires NHTSA to issue its decision either to
grant or to deny an exemption petition not later than 120 days after
the date on which a complete petition is filed. If NHTSA does not make
a decision within the 120-day period, the petition shall be deemed to
be approved and the manufacturer shall be exempt from the standard for
the line covered by the petition for the subsequent model year.\2\
Exemptions granted under part 543 apply only to the vehicle line or
lines that are subject to the grant and that are equipped with the
antitheft device on which the line's exemption was based, and are
effective for the model year beginning after the model year in which
NHTSA issues the notice of exemption, unless the notice of exemption
specifies a later year.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ 49 U.S.C. 33106(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sections 543.8(f) and (g) apply to the manner in which NHTSA's
decisions on petitions are to be made known. Under section 543.8(f), if
the petition is sought under section 543.6, NHTSA publishes a notice of
its decision to grant or deny the exemption petition in the Federal
Register and notifies the petitioner in writing. Under section
543.8(g), if the petition is sought under section 543.7, NHTSA notifies
the petitioner in writing of the agency's decision to grant or deny the
exemption petition.
This grant of petition for exemption considers American Honda Motor
Co., Inc.'s (Honda) petition for its Acura Integra vehicle line
beginning in MY 2023.
I. Specific Petition Content Requirements Under 49 CFR 543.6
Pursuant to 49 CFR part 543, Exemption from Vehicle Theft
Prevention, Honda petitioned for an exemption for its specified vehicle
line from the parts-marking requirements of the theft prevention
standard, beginning in MY 2023. Honda petitioned under 49 CFR 543.6,
Petition: Specific content requirements, which, as described above,
requires manufacturers to provide specific information about the
antitheft device installed as standard equipment on all vehicles in the
line for which an exemption is sought, the antitheft device's
capabilities, and the reasons the petitioner believes the device to be
as effective at reducing and deterring theft as compliance with the
parts-marking requirements.
More specifically, section 543.6(a)(1) requires petitions to
include a statement that an antitheft device will be installed as
standard equipment on all vehicles in the line for which the exemption
is sought. Under section 543.6(a)(2), each petition must list each
component in the antitheft system, and include a diagram showing the
location of each of those components within the vehicle. As required by
section 543.6(a)(3), each petition must include an explanation of the
means and process by which the device is activated and functions,
including any aspect of the device designed to: (1) Facilitate or
encourage its activation by motorists; (2) attract attention to the
efforts of an unauthorized person to enter or move a vehicle by means
other than a key; (3) prevent defeating or circumventing the device by
an unauthorized person attempting to enter a vehicle by means other
than a key; (4) prevent the operation of a vehicle which an
unauthorized person has entered using means other than a key; and (5)
ensure the reliability and durability of the device.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ 49 CFR 543.6(a)(3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition to providing information about the antitheft device and
its functionality, petitioners must also submit the reasons for their
belief that the antitheft device will be effective in reducing and
deterring motor vehicle theft, including any theft data and other data
that are available to the petitioner and form a basis for that
belief,\4\ and the reasons for their belief that the agency should
determine that the antitheft device is likely to be as effective as
compliance with the parts-marking requirements of part 541 in reducing
and deterring motor vehicle theft. In support of this belief, the
petitioners should include any statistical data that are available to
the petitioner and form the basis for the petitioner's belief that a
line of passenger motor vehicles equipped with the antitheft device is
likely to have a theft rate equal to or less than that of passenger
motor vehicles of the same, or a similar line which have parts marked
in compliance with part 541.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ 49 CFR 543.6(a)(4).
\5\ 49 CFR 543.6(a)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The following sections describe Honda's petition information
provided pursuant to 49 CFR part 543, Exemption from Vehicle Theft
Prevention. To the extent that specific information in Honda's petition
is subject to a properly filed confidentiality request, that
information was not disclosed as part of this notice.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ 49 CFR 512.20(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Honda's Petition for Exemption
In a petition dated July 22, 2021, Honda requested an exemption
from the parts-marking requirements of the theft prevention standard
for the Acura Integra vehicle line beginning with MY 2023.
In its petition, Honda provided a detailed description and diagram
of the identity, design, and location of the components of the
antitheft device for the Acura Integra vehicle line. Honda stated that
its MY 2023 Acura Integra vehicle line will be installed with an engine
immobilizer device as standard equipment, as required by 543.6(a)(1).
Honda stated that it will offer a ``smart entry remote'' (keyless key)
system on its vehicle line. Honda also stated that the Acura Integra
vehicle line will offer two types of remotes, one with remote engine
start and one without remote start. Key components of the antitheft
system will include a passive immobilizer, ``smart entry'' remote,
[[Page 62880]]
powertrain control module (PCM), and body control module (BCM). Honda
further stated that its vehicle line will be installed with a vehicle
security alarm system as standard equipment which will activate a
visible and audible alarm whenever unauthorized access is attempted.
Pursuant to Section 543.6(a)(3), Honda explained that its ``smart
entry and start'' system is part of the normal operation of the
ignition key and activates automatically when the ignition switch is in
the ``OFF'' position. Honda further explained that if a smart entry
remote without a matching code is within operating range and the engine
start/stop button is pressed, the PCM will prevent fueling of the
engine and the engine will be inoperable. Honda also stated that the
immobilizer system is deactivated when a valid smart entry remote and
matching codes are verified, allowing the engine to continue normal
operations. Honda further stated that the security indicator flashes
continuously when the immobilizer is activated, and turns off when it
is deactivated.
Honda stated that the audible and visible vehicle security alarm
system installed on its Acura Integra vehicles will monitor any
attempts of unauthorized entry and attract attention to an unauthorized
person attempting to enter its vehicles without the use of a ``smart
entry'' remote or its built-in mechanical door key. Specifically, Honda
stated that whenever an attempt is made to open one of its vehicle
doors, hood or trunk without using the ``smart entry'' remote or
turning a key in the key cylinder to disarm the vehicle, the vehicle's
horn will sound and its lights will flash. Honda stated that its
vehicle security system is activated when all of the doors are locked
and the hood and trunk are closed and locked. Honda further stated that
its vehicle security system is deactivated by using the key fob buttons
to unlock the vehicle doors or having the ``smart entry'' remote within
operating range when the operator grabs either of the vehicle's front
door handles.
Honda also stated that in addition to the standard security system
on all 2023 MY Acura Integra models, additional security features
include counterfeit resistant vehicle identification number (VIN)
plates, secondary VINs, a hood release located inside the vehicle, and
its smart entry remote will utilize rolling codes for the lock and
unlock functions of its vehicles.
As required in section 543.6(a)(3)(v), Honda provided information
on the reliability and durability of its proposed device. To ensure
reliability and durability of the device, Honda provided a list of
requirements for the characteristics and durability testing along with
its results. Honda stated that its device does not require the presence
of a ``smart entry'' remote battery to function nor does it have any
moving parts (i.e., the PCM, BCM, ``smart entry'' remote and the
corresponding electrical components found within its own housing
units), which it believes reduces the chance for deterioration and wear
from normal use.
Honda believes that installation of the antitheft immobilizer
device as standard equipment reduces the vehicle theft rate by making
conventional methods of theft obsolete, i.e., punching out the steering
column or hot-wiring the ignition. Additionally, Honda stated that
although its Acura Integra vehicle line was previously discontinued,
its proposed immobilizer system is generationally different in design
and function from the immobilizer system that was installed on the MY
2000 Acura Integra. Honda referenced the Highway Loss Data Institute's
(HLDI) information for certain applicable years for the Acura TLX's
theft rate data, as theft rate data for the MY 2023 Acura Integra is
not available at this time. In accordance with 49 CFR 543.6(a)(5),
Honda stated that the Acura TLX and Acura Integra are similar in such
that they both occupy the entry level luxury passenger vehicle market
and are equipped in comparable configurations. In addition, Honda
stated that the immobilizer system in the MY 2023 Acura Integra is
similar in design and function to the immobilizer system installed in
the Acura TLX. Honda further stated that data for the Acura TLX shows a
low theft rate and has been consistent over various years. Honda stated
that the immobilizer on its proposed vehicle will be no less effective
than similar designed immobilizer systems applied to the MY 2014 Honda
Civic, MY 2015 Honda Accord or the MY 2020 Acura TLX, all of which have
been granted exemptions by the agency.
III. Decision To Grant the Petition
Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 33106 and 49 CFR 543.8(b), the agency grants
a petition for exemption from the parts-marking requirements of part
541, either in whole or in part, if it determines that, based upon
substantial evidence, the standard equipment antitheft device is likely
to be as effective in reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft as
compliance with the parts-marking requirements of part 541. The agency
finds that Honda has provided adequate reasons for its belief that the
antitheft device for its vehicle line is likely to be as effective in
reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft as compliance with the
parts-marking requirements of the theft prevention standard. This
conclusion is based on the information Honda provided about its
antitheft device. NHTSA believes, based on Honda's supporting evidence,
the antitheft device described for its vehicle line is likely to be as
effective in reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft as compliance
with the parts-marking requirements of the theft prevention standard.
The agency concludes that Honda's antitheft device will provide the
five types of performance features listed in section 543.6(a)(3):
Promoting activation; attracting attention to the efforts of
unauthorized persons to enter or operate a vehicle by means other than
a key; preventing defeat or circumvention of the device by unauthorized
persons; preventing operation of the vehicle by unauthorized entrants;
and ensuring the reliability and durability of the device.
The agency notes that 49 CFR part 541, Appendix A-1, identifies
those lines that are exempted from the theft prevention standard for a
given model year. 49 CFR 543.8(f) contains publication requirements
incident to the disposition of all part 543 petitions. Advanced
listing, including the release of future product nameplates, the
beginning model year for which the petition is granted and a general
description of the antitheft device is necessary in order to notify law
enforcement agencies of new vehicle lines exempted from the parts-
marking requirements of the theft prevention standard.
If Honda decides not to use the exemption for its requested vehicle
line, the manufacturer must formally notify the agency. If such a
decision is made, the line must be fully marked as required by 49 CFR
541.5 and 541.6 (marking of major component parts and replacement
parts).
NHTSA notes that if Honda wishes in the future to modify the device
on which this exemption is based, the company may have to submit a
petition to modify the exemption. Section 543.8(d) states that a part
543 exemption applies only to vehicles that belong to a line exempted
under this part and equipped with the antitheft device on which the
line's exemption is based. Further, section 543.10(c)(2) provides for
the submission of petitions ``to modify an exemption to permit the use
of an antitheft device similar to but differing from the one specified
in the exemption.''
[[Page 62881]]
The agency wishes to minimize the administrative burden that
section 543.10(c)(2) could place on exempted vehicle manufacturers and
itself. The agency did not intend in drafting part 543 to require the
submission of a modification petition for every change to the
components or design of an antitheft device. The significance of many
such changes could be de minimis. Therefore, NHTSA suggests that if
Honda contemplates making any changes, the effects of which might be
characterized as de minimis, it should consult the agency before
preparing and submitting a petition to modify.
For the foregoing reasons, the agency hereby grants in full Honda's
petition for exemption for the Acura Integra vehicle line from the
parts-marking requirements of 49 CFR part 541, beginning with its MY
2023 vehicles.
Issued under authority delegated in 49 CFR 1.95 and 501.8.
Raymond R. Posten,
Associate Administrator for Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 2021-24633 Filed 11-10-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P
