Glycine From India: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2018-2020, 62508-62510 [2021-24579]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
62508
Notices
Federal Register
Vol. 86, No. 215
Wednesday, November 10, 2021
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains documents other than rules or
proposed rules that are applicable to the
public. Notices of hearings and investigations,
committee meetings, agency decisions and
rulings, delegations of authority, filing of
petitions and applications and agency
statements of organization and functions are
examples of documents appearing in this
section.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Office of the Under Secretary for
Economic Affairs
Advisory Committee on Data for
Evidence Building; Meeting
Office of the Under Secretary
for Economic Affairs, U.S. Department
of Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of public meetings.
AGENCY:
The Office of the Under
Secretary for Economic Affairs is
providing notice of two upcoming
meetings of the Advisory Committee on
Data for Evidence Building (ACDEB or
Committee). These will constitute the
fourteenth and fifteenth meetings of the
Committee in support of its charge to
review, analyze, and make
recommendations on how to promote
the use of Federal data for evidence
building purposes. At the conclusion of
the Committee’s first and second year, it
will submit to the Director of the Office
of Management and Budget, Executive
Office of the President, an annual report
on the activities and findings of the
Committee. This report will also be
made available to the public.
DATES: November 19, 2021; January 21,
2022. The meetings will begin at
approximately 9:00 a.m. and adjourn at
approximately 12:00 p.m. (ET). Each
meeting will be held virtually.
ADDRESSES: Those interested in
attending the Committee’s public
meetings are requested to RSVP to
Evidence@bea.gov one week prior to
each meeting. Agendas, background
material, and meeting links will be
accessible 24 hours prior to each
meeting at www.bea.gov/evidence.
Members of the public who wish to
submit written input for the
Committee’s consideration are
welcomed to do so via email to
Evidence@bea.gov. Additional
opportunities for public input will be
forthcoming.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:41 Nov 09, 2021
Jkt 256001
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Gianna Marrone, Program Analyst, U.S.
Department of Commerce, 4600 Silver
Hill Road (BE–64), Suitland, MD 20746;
phone (301) 278–9282; email Evidence@
bea.gov.
The
Foundations for Evidence-Based
Policymaking Act (Pub. L. 115–435,
Evidence Act 101(a)(2) (5 U.S.C. 315
(a)), establishes the Committee and its
charge. It specifies that the Chief
Statistician of the United States shall
serve as the Chair and other members
shall be appointed by the Director of the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB). The Act prescribes a
membership balance plan that includes:
One agency Chief Information Officer;
one agency Chief Privacy Officer; one
agency Chief Performance Officer; three
members who are agency Chief Data
Officers; three members who are agency
Evaluation Officers; and three members
who are agency Statistical Officials who
are members of the Interagency Council
for Statistical Policy established under
section 3504(e)(8) of title 44.
Additionally, at least 10 members are to
be representative of state and local
governments and nongovernmental
stakeholders with expertise in
government data policy, privacy,
technology, transparency policy,
evaluation and research methodologies,
and other relevant subjects. Committee
members serve for a term of two years.
Following a public solicitation and
review of nominations, the Director of
OMB appointed members per this
balance plan and information on the
membership can be found at
www.bea.gov/evidence. Any member
appointed to fill a vacancy occurring
before the expiration of the term for
which the member’s predecessor was
appointed shall be appointed only for
the remainder of that term.
The ACDEB is interested in the
public’s input on the issues it will
consider, and requests that interested
parties submit statements to the ACDEB
via email to Evidence@bea.gov. Please
use the subject line ‘‘ACDEB Meeting
Public Comment.’’ All statements will
be provided to the members for their
consideration and will become part of
the Committee’s records. Additional
opportunities for public input will be
forthcoming as the Committee’s work
progresses.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
ACDEB Committee meetings are open,
and the public is invited to attend and
observe. Those planning to attend are
asked to RSVP to Evidence@bea.gov.
The call-in number, access code, and
meeting link will be posted 24 hours
prior to each meeting on www.bea.gov/
evidence. The meetings are accessible to
people with disabilities. Requests for
foreign language interpretation or other
auxiliary aids should be directed to
Gianna Marrone at Evidence@bea.gov
two weeks prior to each meeting.
Dated: October 18, 2021.
Gianna Marrone,
Alternate Designated Federal Official, U.S.
Department of Commerce.
[FR Doc. 2021–24533 Filed 11–9–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–MN–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–533–883]
Glycine From India: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2018–2020
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(Commerce) finds that producers or
exporters subject to this administrative
review made sales of subject
merchandise below normal value during
the period of review October 31, 2018,
through May 31, 2020.
DATES: Applicable November 10, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Preston Cox or Yang Jin Chun, AD/CVD
Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–5041 or (202) 482–5760,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On July 7, 2021, Commerce published
the Preliminary Results of the 2018–
2020 administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on glycine from
India.1 For a complete description of the
1 See Glycine from India: Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2018–
2020, 86 FR 35733 (July 7, 2021) (Preliminary
E:\FR\FM\10NON1.SGM
10NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 215 / Wednesday, November 10, 2021 / Notices
events that followed the Preliminary
Results, see the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.2 Commerce conducted
this administrative review in
accordance with section 751 of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to the order
is glycine. For a complete description of
the scope of this administrative review,
see the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.3
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and
rebuttal briefs filed by interested parties
in this review are discussed in the
Issues and Decision Memorandum. The
Issues and Decision Memorandum is a
public document and is made available
to the public via Enforcement and
Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a
complete version of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum can be found at
https://access.trade.gov/public/
FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. A list of the
topics included in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum is attached as an
appendix to this notice.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on a review of the record and
our analysis of the comments received
from interested parties regarding our
Preliminary Results, and for the reasons
explained in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum, we did not make changes
to the Preliminary Results.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Rates for Non-Selected Respondents
The statute and Commerce’s
regulations do not address the
establishment of a rate to be applied to
companies not selected for examination
when Commerce limits its examination
in an administrative review pursuant to
section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. Generally,
Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5) of
the Act, which provides instructions for
calculating the all-others rate in a
market economy investigation, for
guidance when calculating the rate for
companies which were not selected for
individual examination in an
administrative review. For the
respondents that were not selected for
Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision
Memorandum (PDM).
2 See Memorandum, ‘‘Glycine from India: Issues
and Decision Memorandum for Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2018–
2020,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby
adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision
Memorandum).
3 See Issues and Decision Memorandum at 2–3.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:41 Nov 09, 2021
Jkt 256001
individual examination in this
administrative review, we have assigned
to them the simple average of the
margins for Avid Organics Private
Limited and Kumar Industries/Rudraa
International,4 consistent with the
guidance in section 735(c)(5)(B) of the
Act.5
Final Results of Review
We determine that the following
estimated weighted-average dumping
margins exist for the period October 31,
2018, through May 31, 2020.
Producer/exporter
Avid Organics Private Limited ...............
Kumar Industries/Rudraa International
Mulji Mehta Enterprises ........................
Mulji Mehta Pharma ..............................
Paras Intermediates Private Ltd ...........
Studio Disrupt ........................................
Estimated
weightedaverage
dumping
margin
(percent)
0.00
13.61
6.81
6.81
6.81
6.81
Disclosure
Normally, Commerce discloses the
calculations performed in connection
with the final results of an
administrative review to parties in the
proceeding within five days of any
public announcement or, if there is no
public announcement, within five days
of the date of publication of the notice
of final results in the Federal Register,
in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
However, as noted above, Commerce
has made no changes to its margin
calculations since the Preliminary
Results. Commerce disclosed its
preliminary margin calculations to
parties in this proceeding, and there are
no additional calculations to disclose.6
Assessment Rates
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the
Act, and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1),
Commerce has determined, and U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
shall assess, antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries of subject
merchandise in accordance with the
final results of this review. For any
individually-examined respondent
whose weighted-average dumping
4 We continue to treat Kumar Industries and
Rudraa International as a collapsed single entity for
the final results of this review. See Preliminary
Results, 86 FR at 35734, and accompanying PDM at
3–4.
5 See Issues and Decision Memorandum for more
details.
6 See Memorandums, ‘‘Administrative Review of
the Antidumping Duty Order on Glycine from
India; 2018–2020: Preliminary Analysis
Memorandum for Avid Organics Private Limited,’’
dated June 30, 2021 and ‘‘Glycine from India:
Preliminary Application of Adverse Facts Available
to Kumar Industries,’’ dated June 30, 2021.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
62509
margin is above de minimis (i.e., 0.50
percent), we will calculate importerspecific assessment rates on the basis of
the ratio of the total amount of
antidumping duties calculated for each
importer’s examined sales and the total
entered value of the sales, in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).7 Where
either a respondent’s weighted-average
dumping margin is zero or de minimis,
or an importer-specific assessment rate
is zero or de minimis, we will instruct
CBP to liquidate appropriate entries
without regard to antidumping duties.8
For entries of subject merchandise
during the period of review produced by
any of these companies for which it did
not know its merchandise was destined
for the United States, we will instruct
CBP to liquidate such entries at the allothers rate if there is no rate for the
intermediate company(ies) involved in
the transaction.9
Commerce intends to issue
assessment instructions to CBP no
earlier than 35 days after the date of
publication of the final results of this
review in the Federal Register. If a
timely summons is filed at the U.S.
Court of International Trade, the
assessment instructions will direct CBP
not to liquidate relevant entries until the
time for parties to file a request for a
statutory injunction has expired (i.e.,
within 90 days of publication). The final
results of this administrative review
shall be the basis for the assessment of
antidumping duties on entries of
merchandise under review and for
future cash deposits of estimated
antidumping duties, where applicable.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective upon
publication in the Federal Register of
the notice of these final results of
administrative review for all shipments
of glycine from India entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the date of
publication as provided by section
751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit
rate for companies subject to this review
will be equal to the company-specific
weighted-average dumping margin
established in the final results of the
review; (2) for merchandise exported by
a company not covered in this review
but covered in a prior segment of the
7 See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of
the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and
Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping
Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8103
(February 14, 2012).
8 Id. at 8102–03; see also 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2).
9 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68
FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
E:\FR\FM\10NON1.SGM
10NON1
62510
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 215 / Wednesday, November 10, 2021 / Notices
proceeding, the cash deposit rate will
continue to be the company-specific rate
published in the completed segment for
the most recent period; (3) if the
exporter is not a firm covered in this
review, a prior review, or the original
investigation but the producer is, the
cash deposit rate will be the rate
established in the completed segment
for the most recent period for the
producer of the merchandise; (4) the
cash deposit rate for all other producers
or exporters will continue to be 7.23
percent, the all-others rate established
in the less-than-fair-value investigation,
adjusted for the export-subsidy rate in
the companion countervailing duty
investigation.10 These cash deposit
requirements, when imposed, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during this review period. Failure to
comply with this requirement could
result in Commerce’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of double antidumping duties.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the return or
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
continues to govern business
proprietary information in this segment
of the proceeding. Timely written
notification of the return or destruction
of APO materials, or conversion to
judicial protective order, is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the
regulations and the terms of an APO is
a sanctionable violation.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing these
results in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19
CFR 351.221.
10 See Glycine from India and Japan: Amended
Final Affirmative Antidumping Duty Determination
and Antidumping Duty Orders, 84 FR 29170, 29171
(June 21, 2019).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:41 Nov 09, 2021
Jkt 256001
Dated: November 4, 2021.
Ryan Majerus,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and
Negotiations, performing the non-exclusive
functions and duties of the Assistant
Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in
the Issues and Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1: Application of Total Adverse
Facts Available
Comment 2: Use of Constructed Value To
Calculate Normal Value
Comment 3: Application of Total Adverse
Facts Available
Comment 4: Selection of the Adverse Facts
Available Rate
Comment 5: Voluntary Respondent
Request for Paras
V. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2021–24579 Filed 11–9–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–900]
Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof
From the People’s Republic of China:
Notice of Amended Final Results
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On October 27, 2021, the U.S.
Court of International Trade (CIT)
issued its final judgment in Diamond
Sawblades Manufacturers’ Coalition v.
United States, Court No. 17–00167,
sustaining the Department of Commerce
(Commerce)’s second remand results
pertaining to the administrative review
of the antidumping duty (AD) order on
diamond sawblades and parts thereof
from the People’s Republic of China
(China) covering the period from
November 1, 2014, through October 31,
2015. Commerce is notifying the public
that it is amending the final results of
review with respect to the dumping
margin assigned to Bosun Tools Co.,
Ltd. (Bosun) and the 22 non-selected
respondents that received a separate
rate.
AGENCY:
DATES:
Applicable November 6, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Thomas Schauer, AD/CVD Operations,
Office I, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0410.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Background
On June 12, 2017, Commerce
published its Final Results in the 2014–
2015 AD administrative review of
diamond sawblades and parts thereof
from China. Commerce calculated a rate
of 6.91 for Bosun and assigned that rate
to the non-selected respondents that
received a separate rate.1
The Diamond Sawblades
Manufacturers’ Coalition (the petitioner)
appealed Commerce’s Final Results. On
October 23, 2018, the CIT remanded the
Final Results to Commerce to further
clarify or reconsider Commerce’s
conclusion that Bosun acted to the best
of its ability in responding to
Commerce’s requests for information.2
In its first remand redetermination,
issued in April 2019, Commerce
concluded that Bosun failed to
cooperate to the best of its ability and
applied a rate based entirely on adverse
facts available (AFA) to Bosun;
Commerce also assigned that rate to the
non-selected respondents that received
a separate rate.3 The CIT sustained the
first remand redetermination, but later
remanded for a second time for further
proceedings in conformity with the
opinion of the Court of Appeals for the
Federal Circuit, which ruled that
Commerce needed to determine whether
there was any basis to disregard the
Bosun-supplied origin information for
certain sales to unaffiliated U.S.
customers during the period of review.4
In its second remand redetermination,
issued in July 2021, Commerce found
that AFA was appropriate to apply to
only certain of Bosun’s sales to U.S.
customers. Accordingly, Commerce
recalculated Bosun’s margin and
assigned Bosun’s rate to the nonselected respondents that received a
separate rate.5 The CIT sustained
Commerce’s final redetermination.6
1 See Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from
the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014–
2015, 82 FR 26912 (June 12, 2017) (Final Results).
2 See Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers’
Coalition v. United States, Court No. 17–00167, Slip
Op. 18–146 (CIT October 23, 2018).
3 See Final Remand Redetermination, Diamond
Sawblades Manufacturers’ Coalition v. United
States, Court No. 17–00167, Slip Op. 18–146, dated
April 17, 2019, available at https://access.trade.gov/
resources/remands/18-146.pdf.
4 See Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers’
Coalition v. United States, Court No. 17–00167 (CIT
March. 25, 2021) (referencing Diamond Sawblades
Mfrs. Coal. v. United States, 986 F.3d 1351 (CAFC
2021)).
5 See Final Remand Redetermination, Diamond
Sawblades Manufacturers’ Coalition v. United
States, Court No. 17–00167, Appeal No. 20–1478,
dated July 13, 2021.
6 See Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers’
Coalition v. United States, Court No. 17–00167, Slip
Op. 21–150 (CIT October 27, 2021).
E:\FR\FM\10NON1.SGM
10NON1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 215 (Wednesday, November 10, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62508-62510]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-24579]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-533-883]
Glycine From India: Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2018-2020
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) finds that producers or
exporters subject to this administrative review made sales of subject
merchandise below normal value during the period of review October 31,
2018, through May 31, 2020.
DATES: Applicable November 10, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Preston Cox or Yang Jin Chun, AD/CVD
Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-5041 or (202) 482-5760,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On July 7, 2021, Commerce published the Preliminary Results of the
2018-2020 administrative review of the antidumping duty order on
glycine from India.\1\ For a complete description of the
[[Page 62509]]
events that followed the Preliminary Results, see the Issues and
Decision Memorandum.\2\ Commerce conducted this administrative review
in accordance with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended
(the Act).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Glycine from India: Preliminary Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review; 2018-2020, 86 FR 35733 (July 7, 2021)
(Preliminary Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision
Memorandum (PDM).
\2\ See Memorandum, ``Glycine from India: Issues and Decision
Memorandum for Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2018-2020,'' dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by,
this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to the order is glycine. For a complete
description of the scope of this administrative review, see the Issues
and Decision Memorandum.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Issues and Decision Memorandum at 2-3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs filed by
interested parties in this review are discussed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public
document and is made available to the public via Enforcement and
Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic
Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at
https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the Issues
and Decision Memorandum can be found at https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. A list of the topics included in the
Issues and Decision Memorandum is attached as an appendix to this
notice.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on a review of the record and our analysis of the comments
received from interested parties regarding our Preliminary Results, and
for the reasons explained in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, we did
not make changes to the Preliminary Results.
Rates for Non-Selected Respondents
The statute and Commerce's regulations do not address the
establishment of a rate to be applied to companies not selected for
examination when Commerce limits its examination in an administrative
review pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. Generally, Commerce
looks to section 735(c)(5) of the Act, which provides instructions for
calculating the all-others rate in a market economy investigation, for
guidance when calculating the rate for companies which were not
selected for individual examination in an administrative review. For
the respondents that were not selected for individual examination in
this administrative review, we have assigned to them the simple average
of the margins for Avid Organics Private Limited and Kumar Industries/
Rudraa International,\4\ consistent with the guidance in section
735(c)(5)(B) of the Act.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ We continue to treat Kumar Industries and Rudraa
International as a collapsed single entity for the final results of
this review. See Preliminary Results, 86 FR at 35734, and
accompanying PDM at 3-4.
\5\ See Issues and Decision Memorandum for more details.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Results of Review
We determine that the following estimated weighted-average dumping
margins exist for the period October 31, 2018, through May 31, 2020.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated
weighted-
average
Producer/exporter dumping
margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Avid Organics Private Limited............................... 0.00
Kumar Industries/Rudraa International....................... 13.61
Mulji Mehta Enterprises..................................... 6.81
Mulji Mehta Pharma.......................................... 6.81
Paras Intermediates Private Ltd............................. 6.81
Studio Disrupt.............................................. 6.81
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure
Normally, Commerce discloses the calculations performed in
connection with the final results of an administrative review to
parties in the proceeding within five days of any public announcement
or, if there is no public announcement, within five days of the date of
publication of the notice of final results in the Federal Register, in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). However, as noted above, Commerce
has made no changes to its margin calculations since the Preliminary
Results. Commerce disclosed its preliminary margin calculations to
parties in this proceeding, and there are no additional calculations to
disclose.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Memorandums, ``Administrative Review of the Antidumping
Duty Order on Glycine from India; 2018-2020: Preliminary Analysis
Memorandum for Avid Organics Private Limited,'' dated June 30, 2021
and ``Glycine from India: Preliminary Application of Adverse Facts
Available to Kumar Industries,'' dated June 30, 2021.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assessment Rates
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, and 19 CFR
351.212(b)(1), Commerce has determined, and U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries of subject merchandise in accordance with the final results of
this review. For any individually-examined respondent whose weighted-
average dumping margin is above de minimis (i.e., 0.50 percent), we
will calculate importer-specific assessment rates on the basis of the
ratio of the total amount of antidumping duties calculated for each
importer's examined sales and the total entered value of the sales, in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).\7\ Where either a respondent's
weighted-average dumping margin is zero or de minimis, or an importer-
specific assessment rate is zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to
liquidate appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties.\8\
For entries of subject merchandise during the period of review produced
by any of these companies for which it did not know its merchandise was
destined for the United States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate such
entries at the all-others rate if there is no rate for the intermediate
company(ies) involved in the transaction.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-
Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping
Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8103 (February 14,
2012).
\8\ Id. at 8102-03; see also 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2).
\9\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP no earlier
than 35 days after the date of publication of the final results of this
review in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is filed at the
U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will
direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties
to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within
90 days of publication). The final results of this administrative
review shall be the basis for the assessment of antidumping duties on
entries of merchandise under review and for future cash deposits of
estimated antidumping duties, where applicable.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication in the Federal Register of the notice of these final
results of administrative review for all shipments of glycine from
India entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after
the date of publication as provided by section 751(a)(2) of the Act:
(1) The cash deposit rate for companies subject to this review will be
equal to the company-specific weighted-average dumping margin
established in the final results of the review; (2) for merchandise
exported by a company not covered in this review but covered in a prior
segment of the
[[Page 62510]]
proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-
specific rate published in the completed segment for the most recent
period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a
prior review, or the original investigation but the producer is, the
cash deposit rate will be the rate established in the completed segment
for the most recent period for the producer of the merchandise; (4) the
cash deposit rate for all other producers or exporters will continue to
be 7.23 percent, the all-others rate established in the less-than-fair-
value investigation, adjusted for the export-subsidy rate in the
companion countervailing duty investigation.\10\ These cash deposit
requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further
notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See Glycine from India and Japan: Amended Final Affirmative
Antidumping Duty Determination and Antidumping Duty Orders, 84 FR
29170, 29171 (June 21, 2019).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply
with this requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of
the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or
destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective
order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and
the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.221.
Dated: November 4, 2021.
Ryan Majerus,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, performing the
non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix--List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1: Application of Total Adverse Facts Available
Comment 2: Use of Constructed Value To Calculate Normal Value
Comment 3: Application of Total Adverse Facts Available
Comment 4: Selection of the Adverse Facts Available Rate
Comment 5: Voluntary Respondent Request for Paras
V. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2021-24579 Filed 11-9-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
