Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof From the People's Republic of China: Notice of Amended Final Results, 62510-62511 [2021-24578]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
62510
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 215 / Wednesday, November 10, 2021 / Notices
proceeding, the cash deposit rate will
continue to be the company-specific rate
published in the completed segment for
the most recent period; (3) if the
exporter is not a firm covered in this
review, a prior review, or the original
investigation but the producer is, the
cash deposit rate will be the rate
established in the completed segment
for the most recent period for the
producer of the merchandise; (4) the
cash deposit rate for all other producers
or exporters will continue to be 7.23
percent, the all-others rate established
in the less-than-fair-value investigation,
adjusted for the export-subsidy rate in
the companion countervailing duty
investigation.10 These cash deposit
requirements, when imposed, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during this review period. Failure to
comply with this requirement could
result in Commerce’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of double antidumping duties.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the return or
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
continues to govern business
proprietary information in this segment
of the proceeding. Timely written
notification of the return or destruction
of APO materials, or conversion to
judicial protective order, is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the
regulations and the terms of an APO is
a sanctionable violation.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing these
results in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19
CFR 351.221.
10 See Glycine from India and Japan: Amended
Final Affirmative Antidumping Duty Determination
and Antidumping Duty Orders, 84 FR 29170, 29171
(June 21, 2019).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:41 Nov 09, 2021
Jkt 256001
Dated: November 4, 2021.
Ryan Majerus,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and
Negotiations, performing the non-exclusive
functions and duties of the Assistant
Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in
the Issues and Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1: Application of Total Adverse
Facts Available
Comment 2: Use of Constructed Value To
Calculate Normal Value
Comment 3: Application of Total Adverse
Facts Available
Comment 4: Selection of the Adverse Facts
Available Rate
Comment 5: Voluntary Respondent
Request for Paras
V. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2021–24579 Filed 11–9–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–900]
Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof
From the People’s Republic of China:
Notice of Amended Final Results
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On October 27, 2021, the U.S.
Court of International Trade (CIT)
issued its final judgment in Diamond
Sawblades Manufacturers’ Coalition v.
United States, Court No. 17–00167,
sustaining the Department of Commerce
(Commerce)’s second remand results
pertaining to the administrative review
of the antidumping duty (AD) order on
diamond sawblades and parts thereof
from the People’s Republic of China
(China) covering the period from
November 1, 2014, through October 31,
2015. Commerce is notifying the public
that it is amending the final results of
review with respect to the dumping
margin assigned to Bosun Tools Co.,
Ltd. (Bosun) and the 22 non-selected
respondents that received a separate
rate.
AGENCY:
DATES:
Applicable November 6, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Thomas Schauer, AD/CVD Operations,
Office I, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0410.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Background
On June 12, 2017, Commerce
published its Final Results in the 2014–
2015 AD administrative review of
diamond sawblades and parts thereof
from China. Commerce calculated a rate
of 6.91 for Bosun and assigned that rate
to the non-selected respondents that
received a separate rate.1
The Diamond Sawblades
Manufacturers’ Coalition (the petitioner)
appealed Commerce’s Final Results. On
October 23, 2018, the CIT remanded the
Final Results to Commerce to further
clarify or reconsider Commerce’s
conclusion that Bosun acted to the best
of its ability in responding to
Commerce’s requests for information.2
In its first remand redetermination,
issued in April 2019, Commerce
concluded that Bosun failed to
cooperate to the best of its ability and
applied a rate based entirely on adverse
facts available (AFA) to Bosun;
Commerce also assigned that rate to the
non-selected respondents that received
a separate rate.3 The CIT sustained the
first remand redetermination, but later
remanded for a second time for further
proceedings in conformity with the
opinion of the Court of Appeals for the
Federal Circuit, which ruled that
Commerce needed to determine whether
there was any basis to disregard the
Bosun-supplied origin information for
certain sales to unaffiliated U.S.
customers during the period of review.4
In its second remand redetermination,
issued in July 2021, Commerce found
that AFA was appropriate to apply to
only certain of Bosun’s sales to U.S.
customers. Accordingly, Commerce
recalculated Bosun’s margin and
assigned Bosun’s rate to the nonselected respondents that received a
separate rate.5 The CIT sustained
Commerce’s final redetermination.6
1 See Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from
the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014–
2015, 82 FR 26912 (June 12, 2017) (Final Results).
2 See Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers’
Coalition v. United States, Court No. 17–00167, Slip
Op. 18–146 (CIT October 23, 2018).
3 See Final Remand Redetermination, Diamond
Sawblades Manufacturers’ Coalition v. United
States, Court No. 17–00167, Slip Op. 18–146, dated
April 17, 2019, available at https://access.trade.gov/
resources/remands/18-146.pdf.
4 See Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers’
Coalition v. United States, Court No. 17–00167 (CIT
March. 25, 2021) (referencing Diamond Sawblades
Mfrs. Coal. v. United States, 986 F.3d 1351 (CAFC
2021)).
5 See Final Remand Redetermination, Diamond
Sawblades Manufacturers’ Coalition v. United
States, Court No. 17–00167, Appeal No. 20–1478,
dated July 13, 2021.
6 See Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers’
Coalition v. United States, Court No. 17–00167, Slip
Op. 21–150 (CIT October 27, 2021).
E:\FR\FM\10NON1.SGM
10NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 215 / Wednesday, November 10, 2021 / Notices
Amended Final Results
Final Results with respect to Bosun and
the 22 non-selected respondents that
received a separate rate as follows:
Because there is now a final court
judgment, Commerce is amending its
Amended final margin
(percent)
Company
Bosun Tools Co., Ltd ...........................................................................................................................................................
Chengdu Huifeng Diamond Tools Co., Ltd .........................................................................................................................
Danyang Hantronic Import & Export Co., Ltd .....................................................................................................................
Danyang Huachang Diamond Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd .............................................................................................
Danyang Like Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd .......................................................................................................................
Danyang NYCL Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd ....................................................................................................................
Danyang Weiwang Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd ...............................................................................................................
Guilin Tebon Superhard Material Co., Ltd ..........................................................................................................................
Hangzhou Deer King Industrial and Trading Co., Ltd .........................................................................................................
Hangzhou Kingburg Import & Export Co., Ltd ....................................................................................................................
Huzhou Gu’s Import & Export Co., Ltd ...............................................................................................................................
Jiangsu Inter-China Group Corporation ..............................................................................................................................
Jiangsu Youhe Tool Manufacturer Co., Ltd ........................................................................................................................
Qingyuan Shangtai Diamond Tools Co., Ltd .......................................................................................................................
Quanzhou Zhongzhi Diamond Tool Co., Ltd .......................................................................................................................
Rizhao Hein Saw Co., Ltd ...................................................................................................................................................
Saint-Gobain Abrasives (Shanghai) Co., Ltd ......................................................................................................................
Shanghai Jingquan Industrial Trade Co., Ltd ......................................................................................................................
Sino Tools Co., Ltd ..............................................................................................................................................................
Weihai Xiangguang Mechanical Industrial Co., Ltd ............................................................................................................
Wuhan Wanbang Laser Diamond Tools Co., Ltd ...............................................................................................................
Xiamen ZL Diamond Technology Co., Ltd ..........................................................................................................................
Zhejiang Wanli Tools Group Co., Ltd ..................................................................................................................................
Cash Deposit Requirements
Because all the exporters listed above
have a superseding cash deposit rate,
i.e., there have been final results
published in a subsequent
administrative review, we will not issue
revised cash deposit instructions to U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP).
This notice does not affect the current
cash deposit rate.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Liquidation of Suspended Entries
At this time, Commerce remains
enjoined by CIT order from issuing
instructions to liquidate entries that
were exported by Bosun Tools Co., Ltd.,
and imported by or sold to (as indicated
on the commercial invoice or Customs
documentation) Bosun Tools, Inc. or
Bosun Tools Inc., or exported by the
non-selected respondents that received
a separate rate, and were entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption during the period
November 1, 2014, through October 31,
2015. These entries will remain
enjoined pursuant to the terms of the
injunction during the pendency of any
appeals process.
In the event the CIT’s ruling is not
appealed, or, if appealed, is upheld by
a final and conclusive court decision,
Commerce intends to instruct CBP to
assess antidumping duties on
unliquidated entries of subject
merchandise exported by Bosun Tools
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:41 Nov 09, 2021
Jkt 256001
62511
Co., Ltd., and imported by or sold to (as
indicated on the commercial invoice or
Customs documentation) Bosun Tools,
Inc. or Bosun Tools Inc., or exported by
the non-selected respondents that
received a separate rate in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.212(b). We will
instruct CBP to assess antidumping
duties on all appropriate entries covered
by this review when the importerspecific ad valorem assessment rate is
not zero or de minimis. Where an
import-specific ad valorem assessment
rate is zero or de minimis,7 we will
instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate
entries without regard to antidumping
duties.
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice is issued and published in
accordance with sections 516A(c) and
(e) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: November 4, 2021.
Ryan Majerus,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and
Negotiations, performing the non-exclusive
functions and duties of the Assistant
Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2021–24578 Filed 11–9–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
Review and Approval; Comment
Request; Coastal and Estuarine Land
Conservation Planning, Protection or
Restoration
National Oceanic &
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
AGENCY:
Notice of information collection,
request for comment.
ACTION:
The Department of
Commerce, in accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA), invites the general public and
other Federal agencies to comment on
proposed, and continuing information
collections, which helps us assess the
impact of our information collection
requirements and minimize the public’s
reporting burden. The purpose of this
notice is to allow for 60 days of public
comment preceding submission of the
collection to OMB.
SUMMARY:
To ensure consideration,
comments regarding this proposed
information collection must be received
on or before January 10, 2022.
DATES:
7 See
PO 00000
19 CFR 351.106(c)(2).
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
15.91
15.91
15.91
15.91
15.91
15.91
15.91
15.91
15.91
15.91
15.91
15.91
15.91
15.91
15.91
15.91
15.91
15.91
15.91
15.91
15.91
15.91
15.91
E:\FR\FM\10NON1.SGM
10NON1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 215 (Wednesday, November 10, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62510-62511]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-24578]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-900]
Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof From the People's Republic of
China: Notice of Amended Final Results
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On October 27, 2021, the U.S. Court of International Trade
(CIT) issued its final judgment in Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers'
Coalition v. United States, Court No. 17-00167, sustaining the
Department of Commerce (Commerce)'s second remand results pertaining to
the administrative review of the antidumping duty (AD) order on diamond
sawblades and parts thereof from the People's Republic of China (China)
covering the period from November 1, 2014, through October 31, 2015.
Commerce is notifying the public that it is amending the final results
of review with respect to the dumping margin assigned to Bosun Tools
Co., Ltd. (Bosun) and the 22 non-selected respondents that received a
separate rate.
DATES: Applicable November 6, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas Schauer, AD/CVD Operations,
Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0410.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On June 12, 2017, Commerce published its Final Results in the 2014-
2015 AD administrative review of diamond sawblades and parts thereof
from China. Commerce calculated a rate of 6.91 for Bosun and assigned
that rate to the non-selected respondents that received a separate
rate.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the People's
Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2014-2015, 82 FR 26912 (June 12, 2017) (Final Results).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers' Coalition (the petitioner)
appealed Commerce's Final Results. On October 23, 2018, the CIT
remanded the Final Results to Commerce to further clarify or reconsider
Commerce's conclusion that Bosun acted to the best of its ability in
responding to Commerce's requests for information.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers' Coalition v. United
States, Court No. 17-00167, Slip Op. 18-146 (CIT October 23, 2018).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In its first remand redetermination, issued in April 2019, Commerce
concluded that Bosun failed to cooperate to the best of its ability and
applied a rate based entirely on adverse facts available (AFA) to
Bosun; Commerce also assigned that rate to the non-selected respondents
that received a separate rate.\3\ The CIT sustained the first remand
redetermination, but later remanded for a second time for further
proceedings in conformity with the opinion of the Court of Appeals for
the Federal Circuit, which ruled that Commerce needed to determine
whether there was any basis to disregard the Bosun-supplied origin
information for certain sales to unaffiliated U.S. customers during the
period of review.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Final Remand Redetermination, Diamond Sawblades
Manufacturers' Coalition v. United States, Court No. 17-00167, Slip
Op. 18-146, dated April 17, 2019, available at https://access.trade.gov/resources/remands/18-146.pdf.
\4\ See Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers' Coalition v. United
States, Court No. 17-00167 (CIT March. 25, 2021) (referencing
Diamond Sawblades Mfrs. Coal. v. United States, 986 F.3d 1351 (CAFC
2021)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In its second remand redetermination, issued in July 2021, Commerce
found that AFA was appropriate to apply to only certain of Bosun's
sales to U.S. customers. Accordingly, Commerce recalculated Bosun's
margin and assigned Bosun's rate to the non-selected respondents that
received a separate rate.\5\ The CIT sustained Commerce's final
redetermination.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Final Remand Redetermination, Diamond Sawblades
Manufacturers' Coalition v. United States, Court No. 17-00167,
Appeal No. 20-1478, dated July 13, 2021.
\6\ See Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers' Coalition v. United
States, Court No. 17-00167, Slip Op. 21-150 (CIT October 27, 2021).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 62511]]
Amended Final Results
Because there is now a final court judgment, Commerce is amending
its Final Results with respect to Bosun and the 22 non-selected
respondents that received a separate rate as follows:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Amended final margin
Company (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bosun Tools Co., Ltd........................... 15.91
Chengdu Huifeng Diamond Tools Co., Ltd......... 15.91
Danyang Hantronic Import & Export Co., Ltd..... 15.91
Danyang Huachang Diamond Tools Manufacturing 15.91
Co., Ltd......................................
Danyang Like Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd...... 15.91
Danyang NYCL Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd...... 15.91
Danyang Weiwang Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd... 15.91
Guilin Tebon Superhard Material Co., Ltd....... 15.91
Hangzhou Deer King Industrial and Trading Co., 15.91
Ltd...........................................
Hangzhou Kingburg Import & Export Co., Ltd..... 15.91
Huzhou Gu's Import & Export Co., Ltd........... 15.91
Jiangsu Inter-China Group Corporation.......... 15.91
Jiangsu Youhe Tool Manufacturer Co., Ltd....... 15.91
Qingyuan Shangtai Diamond Tools Co., Ltd....... 15.91
Quanzhou Zhongzhi Diamond Tool Co., Ltd........ 15.91
Rizhao Hein Saw Co., Ltd....................... 15.91
Saint-Gobain Abrasives (Shanghai) Co., Ltd..... 15.91
Shanghai Jingquan Industrial Trade Co., Ltd.... 15.91
Sino Tools Co., Ltd............................ 15.91
Weihai Xiangguang Mechanical Industrial Co., 15.91
Ltd...........................................
Wuhan Wanbang Laser Diamond Tools Co., Ltd..... 15.91
Xiamen ZL Diamond Technology Co., Ltd.......... 15.91
Zhejiang Wanli Tools Group Co., Ltd............ 15.91
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash Deposit Requirements
Because all the exporters listed above have a superseding cash
deposit rate, i.e., there have been final results published in a
subsequent administrative review, we will not issue revised cash
deposit instructions to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP). This
notice does not affect the current cash deposit rate.
Liquidation of Suspended Entries
At this time, Commerce remains enjoined by CIT order from issuing
instructions to liquidate entries that were exported by Bosun Tools
Co., Ltd., and imported by or sold to (as indicated on the commercial
invoice or Customs documentation) Bosun Tools, Inc. or Bosun Tools
Inc., or exported by the non-selected respondents that received a
separate rate, and were entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption during the period November 1, 2014, through October 31,
2015. These entries will remain enjoined pursuant to the terms of the
injunction during the pendency of any appeals process.
In the event the CIT's ruling is not appealed, or, if appealed, is
upheld by a final and conclusive court decision, Commerce intends to
instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on unliquidated entries of
subject merchandise exported by Bosun Tools Co., Ltd., and imported by
or sold to (as indicated on the commercial invoice or Customs
documentation) Bosun Tools, Inc. or Bosun Tools Inc., or exported by
the non-selected respondents that received a separate rate in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b). We will instruct CBP to assess
antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review
when the importer-specific ad valorem assessment rate is not zero or de
minimis. Where an import-specific ad valorem assessment rate is zero or
de minimis,\7\ we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate
entries without regard to antidumping duties.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections
516A(c) and (e) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: November 4, 2021.
Ryan Majerus,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, performing the
non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2021-24578 Filed 11-9-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
