Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof From the People's Republic of China: Notice of Amended Final Results, 62510-62511 [2021-24578]

Download as PDF 62510 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 215 / Wednesday, November 10, 2021 / Notices proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published in the completed segment for the most recent period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the original investigation but the producer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established in the completed segment for the most recent period for the producer of the merchandise; (4) the cash deposit rate for all other producers or exporters will continue to be 7.23 percent, the all-others rate established in the less-than-fair-value investigation, adjusted for the export-subsidy rate in the companion countervailing duty investigation.10 These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in Commerce’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. Administrative Protective Order This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES Notification to Interested Parties We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.221. 10 See Glycine from India and Japan: Amended Final Affirmative Antidumping Duty Determination and Antidumping Duty Orders, 84 FR 29170, 29171 (June 21, 2019). VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:41 Nov 09, 2021 Jkt 256001 Dated: November 4, 2021. Ryan Majerus, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. Discussion of the Issues Comment 1: Application of Total Adverse Facts Available Comment 2: Use of Constructed Value To Calculate Normal Value Comment 3: Application of Total Adverse Facts Available Comment 4: Selection of the Adverse Facts Available Rate Comment 5: Voluntary Respondent Request for Paras V. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2021–24579 Filed 11–9–21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–570–900] Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof From the People’s Republic of China: Notice of Amended Final Results Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On October 27, 2021, the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) issued its final judgment in Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers’ Coalition v. United States, Court No. 17–00167, sustaining the Department of Commerce (Commerce)’s second remand results pertaining to the administrative review of the antidumping duty (AD) order on diamond sawblades and parts thereof from the People’s Republic of China (China) covering the period from November 1, 2014, through October 31, 2015. Commerce is notifying the public that it is amending the final results of review with respect to the dumping margin assigned to Bosun Tools Co., Ltd. (Bosun) and the 22 non-selected respondents that received a separate rate. AGENCY: DATES: Applicable November 6, 2021. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas Schauer, AD/CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0410. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Background On June 12, 2017, Commerce published its Final Results in the 2014– 2015 AD administrative review of diamond sawblades and parts thereof from China. Commerce calculated a rate of 6.91 for Bosun and assigned that rate to the non-selected respondents that received a separate rate.1 The Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers’ Coalition (the petitioner) appealed Commerce’s Final Results. On October 23, 2018, the CIT remanded the Final Results to Commerce to further clarify or reconsider Commerce’s conclusion that Bosun acted to the best of its ability in responding to Commerce’s requests for information.2 In its first remand redetermination, issued in April 2019, Commerce concluded that Bosun failed to cooperate to the best of its ability and applied a rate based entirely on adverse facts available (AFA) to Bosun; Commerce also assigned that rate to the non-selected respondents that received a separate rate.3 The CIT sustained the first remand redetermination, but later remanded for a second time for further proceedings in conformity with the opinion of the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which ruled that Commerce needed to determine whether there was any basis to disregard the Bosun-supplied origin information for certain sales to unaffiliated U.S. customers during the period of review.4 In its second remand redetermination, issued in July 2021, Commerce found that AFA was appropriate to apply to only certain of Bosun’s sales to U.S. customers. Accordingly, Commerce recalculated Bosun’s margin and assigned Bosun’s rate to the nonselected respondents that received a separate rate.5 The CIT sustained Commerce’s final redetermination.6 1 See Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014– 2015, 82 FR 26912 (June 12, 2017) (Final Results). 2 See Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers’ Coalition v. United States, Court No. 17–00167, Slip Op. 18–146 (CIT October 23, 2018). 3 See Final Remand Redetermination, Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers’ Coalition v. United States, Court No. 17–00167, Slip Op. 18–146, dated April 17, 2019, available at https://access.trade.gov/ resources/remands/18-146.pdf. 4 See Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers’ Coalition v. United States, Court No. 17–00167 (CIT March. 25, 2021) (referencing Diamond Sawblades Mfrs. Coal. v. United States, 986 F.3d 1351 (CAFC 2021)). 5 See Final Remand Redetermination, Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers’ Coalition v. United States, Court No. 17–00167, Appeal No. 20–1478, dated July 13, 2021. 6 See Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers’ Coalition v. United States, Court No. 17–00167, Slip Op. 21–150 (CIT October 27, 2021). E:\FR\FM\10NON1.SGM 10NON1 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 215 / Wednesday, November 10, 2021 / Notices Amended Final Results Final Results with respect to Bosun and the 22 non-selected respondents that received a separate rate as follows: Because there is now a final court judgment, Commerce is amending its Amended final margin (percent) Company Bosun Tools Co., Ltd ........................................................................................................................................................... Chengdu Huifeng Diamond Tools Co., Ltd ......................................................................................................................... Danyang Hantronic Import & Export Co., Ltd ..................................................................................................................... Danyang Huachang Diamond Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd ............................................................................................. Danyang Like Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd ....................................................................................................................... Danyang NYCL Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd .................................................................................................................... Danyang Weiwang Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd ............................................................................................................... Guilin Tebon Superhard Material Co., Ltd .......................................................................................................................... Hangzhou Deer King Industrial and Trading Co., Ltd ......................................................................................................... Hangzhou Kingburg Import & Export Co., Ltd .................................................................................................................... Huzhou Gu’s Import & Export Co., Ltd ............................................................................................................................... Jiangsu Inter-China Group Corporation .............................................................................................................................. Jiangsu Youhe Tool Manufacturer Co., Ltd ........................................................................................................................ Qingyuan Shangtai Diamond Tools Co., Ltd ....................................................................................................................... Quanzhou Zhongzhi Diamond Tool Co., Ltd ....................................................................................................................... Rizhao Hein Saw Co., Ltd ................................................................................................................................................... Saint-Gobain Abrasives (Shanghai) Co., Ltd ...................................................................................................................... Shanghai Jingquan Industrial Trade Co., Ltd ...................................................................................................................... Sino Tools Co., Ltd .............................................................................................................................................................. Weihai Xiangguang Mechanical Industrial Co., Ltd ............................................................................................................ Wuhan Wanbang Laser Diamond Tools Co., Ltd ............................................................................................................... Xiamen ZL Diamond Technology Co., Ltd .......................................................................................................................... Zhejiang Wanli Tools Group Co., Ltd .................................................................................................................................. Cash Deposit Requirements Because all the exporters listed above have a superseding cash deposit rate, i.e., there have been final results published in a subsequent administrative review, we will not issue revised cash deposit instructions to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP). This notice does not affect the current cash deposit rate. khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES Liquidation of Suspended Entries At this time, Commerce remains enjoined by CIT order from issuing instructions to liquidate entries that were exported by Bosun Tools Co., Ltd., and imported by or sold to (as indicated on the commercial invoice or Customs documentation) Bosun Tools, Inc. or Bosun Tools Inc., or exported by the non-selected respondents that received a separate rate, and were entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption during the period November 1, 2014, through October 31, 2015. These entries will remain enjoined pursuant to the terms of the injunction during the pendency of any appeals process. In the event the CIT’s ruling is not appealed, or, if appealed, is upheld by a final and conclusive court decision, Commerce intends to instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on unliquidated entries of subject merchandise exported by Bosun Tools VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:41 Nov 09, 2021 Jkt 256001 62511 Co., Ltd., and imported by or sold to (as indicated on the commercial invoice or Customs documentation) Bosun Tools, Inc. or Bosun Tools Inc., or exported by the non-selected respondents that received a separate rate in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b). We will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review when the importerspecific ad valorem assessment rate is not zero or de minimis. Where an import-specific ad valorem assessment rate is zero or de minimis,7 we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties. Notification to Interested Parties This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections 516A(c) and (e) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: November 4, 2021. Ryan Majerus, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2021–24578 Filed 11–9–21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for Review and Approval; Comment Request; Coastal and Estuarine Land Conservation Planning, Protection or Restoration National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce. AGENCY: Notice of information collection, request for comment. ACTION: The Department of Commerce, in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), invites the general public and other Federal agencies to comment on proposed, and continuing information collections, which helps us assess the impact of our information collection requirements and minimize the public’s reporting burden. The purpose of this notice is to allow for 60 days of public comment preceding submission of the collection to OMB. SUMMARY: To ensure consideration, comments regarding this proposed information collection must be received on or before January 10, 2022. DATES: 7 See PO 00000 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). Frm 00004 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 15.91 15.91 15.91 15.91 15.91 15.91 15.91 15.91 15.91 15.91 15.91 15.91 15.91 15.91 15.91 15.91 15.91 15.91 15.91 15.91 15.91 15.91 15.91 E:\FR\FM\10NON1.SGM 10NON1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 215 (Wednesday, November 10, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62510-62511]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-24578]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-900]


Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof From the People's Republic of 
China: Notice of Amended Final Results

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: On October 27, 2021, the U.S. Court of International Trade 
(CIT) issued its final judgment in Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers' 
Coalition v. United States, Court No. 17-00167, sustaining the 
Department of Commerce (Commerce)'s second remand results pertaining to 
the administrative review of the antidumping duty (AD) order on diamond 
sawblades and parts thereof from the People's Republic of China (China) 
covering the period from November 1, 2014, through October 31, 2015. 
Commerce is notifying the public that it is amending the final results 
of review with respect to the dumping margin assigned to Bosun Tools 
Co., Ltd. (Bosun) and the 22 non-selected respondents that received a 
separate rate.

DATES: Applicable November 6, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas Schauer, AD/CVD Operations, 
Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0410.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On June 12, 2017, Commerce published its Final Results in the 2014-
2015 AD administrative review of diamond sawblades and parts thereof 
from China. Commerce calculated a rate of 6.91 for Bosun and assigned 
that rate to the non-selected respondents that received a separate 
rate.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the People's 
Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 
Review; 2014-2015, 82 FR 26912 (June 12, 2017) (Final Results).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers' Coalition (the petitioner) 
appealed Commerce's Final Results. On October 23, 2018, the CIT 
remanded the Final Results to Commerce to further clarify or reconsider 
Commerce's conclusion that Bosun acted to the best of its ability in 
responding to Commerce's requests for information.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ See Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers' Coalition v. United 
States, Court No. 17-00167, Slip Op. 18-146 (CIT October 23, 2018).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In its first remand redetermination, issued in April 2019, Commerce 
concluded that Bosun failed to cooperate to the best of its ability and 
applied a rate based entirely on adverse facts available (AFA) to 
Bosun; Commerce also assigned that rate to the non-selected respondents 
that received a separate rate.\3\ The CIT sustained the first remand 
redetermination, but later remanded for a second time for further 
proceedings in conformity with the opinion of the Court of Appeals for 
the Federal Circuit, which ruled that Commerce needed to determine 
whether there was any basis to disregard the Bosun-supplied origin 
information for certain sales to unaffiliated U.S. customers during the 
period of review.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Final Remand Redetermination, Diamond Sawblades 
Manufacturers' Coalition v. United States, Court No. 17-00167, Slip 
Op. 18-146, dated April 17, 2019, available at https://access.trade.gov/resources/remands/18-146.pdf.
    \4\ See Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers' Coalition v. United 
States, Court No. 17-00167 (CIT March. 25, 2021) (referencing 
Diamond Sawblades Mfrs. Coal. v. United States, 986 F.3d 1351 (CAFC 
2021)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In its second remand redetermination, issued in July 2021, Commerce 
found that AFA was appropriate to apply to only certain of Bosun's 
sales to U.S. customers. Accordingly, Commerce recalculated Bosun's 
margin and assigned Bosun's rate to the non-selected respondents that 
received a separate rate.\5\ The CIT sustained Commerce's final 
redetermination.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Final Remand Redetermination, Diamond Sawblades 
Manufacturers' Coalition v. United States, Court No. 17-00167, 
Appeal No. 20-1478, dated July 13, 2021.
    \6\ See Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers' Coalition v. United 
States, Court No. 17-00167, Slip Op. 21-150 (CIT October 27, 2021).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 62511]]

Amended Final Results

    Because there is now a final court judgment, Commerce is amending 
its Final Results with respect to Bosun and the 22 non-selected 
respondents that received a separate rate as follows:

 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                   Amended final margin
                    Company                             (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bosun Tools Co., Ltd...........................                    15.91
Chengdu Huifeng Diamond Tools Co., Ltd.........                    15.91
Danyang Hantronic Import & Export Co., Ltd.....                    15.91
Danyang Huachang Diamond Tools Manufacturing                       15.91
 Co., Ltd......................................
Danyang Like Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd......                    15.91
Danyang NYCL Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd......                    15.91
Danyang Weiwang Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd...                    15.91
Guilin Tebon Superhard Material Co., Ltd.......                    15.91
Hangzhou Deer King Industrial and Trading Co.,                     15.91
 Ltd...........................................
Hangzhou Kingburg Import & Export Co., Ltd.....                    15.91
Huzhou Gu's Import & Export Co., Ltd...........                    15.91
Jiangsu Inter-China Group Corporation..........                    15.91
Jiangsu Youhe Tool Manufacturer Co., Ltd.......                    15.91
Qingyuan Shangtai Diamond Tools Co., Ltd.......                    15.91
Quanzhou Zhongzhi Diamond Tool Co., Ltd........                    15.91
Rizhao Hein Saw Co., Ltd.......................                    15.91
Saint-Gobain Abrasives (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.....                    15.91
Shanghai Jingquan Industrial Trade Co., Ltd....                    15.91
Sino Tools Co., Ltd............................                    15.91
Weihai Xiangguang Mechanical Industrial Co.,                       15.91
 Ltd...........................................
Wuhan Wanbang Laser Diamond Tools Co., Ltd.....                    15.91
Xiamen ZL Diamond Technology Co., Ltd..........                    15.91
Zhejiang Wanli Tools Group Co., Ltd............                    15.91
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cash Deposit Requirements

    Because all the exporters listed above have a superseding cash 
deposit rate, i.e., there have been final results published in a 
subsequent administrative review, we will not issue revised cash 
deposit instructions to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP). This 
notice does not affect the current cash deposit rate.

Liquidation of Suspended Entries

    At this time, Commerce remains enjoined by CIT order from issuing 
instructions to liquidate entries that were exported by Bosun Tools 
Co., Ltd., and imported by or sold to (as indicated on the commercial 
invoice or Customs documentation) Bosun Tools, Inc. or Bosun Tools 
Inc., or exported by the non-selected respondents that received a 
separate rate, and were entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for 
consumption during the period November 1, 2014, through October 31, 
2015. These entries will remain enjoined pursuant to the terms of the 
injunction during the pendency of any appeals process.
    In the event the CIT's ruling is not appealed, or, if appealed, is 
upheld by a final and conclusive court decision, Commerce intends to 
instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on unliquidated entries of 
subject merchandise exported by Bosun Tools Co., Ltd., and imported by 
or sold to (as indicated on the commercial invoice or Customs 
documentation) Bosun Tools, Inc. or Bosun Tools Inc., or exported by 
the non-selected respondents that received a separate rate in 
accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b). We will instruct CBP to assess 
antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review 
when the importer-specific ad valorem assessment rate is not zero or de 
minimis. Where an import-specific ad valorem assessment rate is zero or 
de minimis,\7\ we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate 
entries without regard to antidumping duties.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification to Interested Parties

    This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections 
516A(c) and (e) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.

    Dated: November 4, 2021.
Ryan Majerus,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, performing the 
non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for 
Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2021-24578 Filed 11-9-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P