Circular Welded Carbon-Quality Steel Pipe From the United Arab Emirates: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2018-2019, 59364-59366 [2021-23372]
Download as PDF
59364
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 205 / Wednesday, October 27, 2021 / Notices
Comment 10: Whether to Use Riverside’s
and Baroque Timber’s Density Estimates
Based on Actual Purchases or Density
Figures from the 2017 Administrative
Review in the Provision of Fiberboard
and Veneers for Less Than Adequate
Remuneration Calculations
Comment 11: Whether Commerce
Incorrectly Calculated Baroque Timber’s
Unit Price for Fiberboard and Veneers
Comment 12: Whether to Include a
Specific Harmonized Tariff Schedule
Subheading in the Veneer Benchmark
Calculation
Comment 13: Whether Commerce Should
Adjust the Value-Added Tax Used to
Calculate Benchmark Prices for the
Provision of Inputs for Less Than
Adequate Remuneration Calculations
Comment 14: Whether Commerce Should
Revise Inland Freight Costs Used To
Calculate Benchmark Prices for the
Provision of Inputs for Less Than
Adequate Remuneration Calculations
A. Domestic Transportation and Border
Fees
B. Jiangsu Senmao’s Inland Freight
Distance
C. Jiangsu Senmao’s Domestic
Transportation Rate
Comment 15: Whether Commerce Should
Include Negative Less Than Adequate
Remuneration Calculations in Benefits
Comment 16: Whether Commerce’s
Decision to Countervail ‘‘Other
Subsidies’’ Is Contrary to Law
Comment 17: Whether Commerce Should
Assign Kember Flooring a
Countervailable Duty Subsidy Rate
Comment 18: Whether Commerce Should
Revise the U.S. Customs and Border
Protection Instructions
XI. Recommendation
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Appendix II
Non-Selected Companies Under Review
1. Anhui Boya Bamboo & Wood Products Co.,
Ltd.
2. Anhui Longhua Bamboo Product Co., Ltd.
3. Anhui Yaolong Bamboo & Wood Products
Co., Ltd.
4. Armstrong Wood Products (Kunshan) Co.,
Ltd.
5. Benxi Flooring Factory (General
Partnership)
6. Benxi Wood Company
7. Changzhou Hawd Flooring Co., Ltd.
8. Dalian Huilong Wooden Products Co., Ltd.
9. Dalian Jaenmaken Wood Industry Co., Ltd.
10. Dalian Jiahong Wood Industry Co., Ltd.
11. Dalian Kemian Wood Industry Co., Ltd.
12. Dalian Penghong Floor Products Co., Ltd.
13. Dalian Qianqiu Wooden Product Co., Ltd.
14. Dalian Shengyu Science and Technology
Development Co.
15. Dalian Shumaike Floor Manufacturing
Co., Ltd.
16. Dalian T-Boom Wood Products Co., Ltd.
17. Dongtai Fuan Universal Dynamics, LLC
18. Dun Hua Sen Tai Wood Co., Ltd.
19. Dunhua City Dexin Wood Industry Co.,
Ltd.
20. Dunhua City Hongyuan Wood Industry
Co., Ltd.
21. Dunhua City Jisen Wood Industry Co.,
Ltd.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:47 Oct 26, 2021
Jkt 256001
22. Dunhua Shengda Wood Industry Co., Ltd.
23. Fine Furniture (Shanghai) Limited
24. Fusong Jinlong Wooden Group Co., Ltd.
25. Fusong Jinqiu Wooden Product Co., Ltd.
26. Fusong Qianqiu Wooden Product Co.,
Ltd.
27. Guangzhou Homebon Timber
Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
28. HaiLin LinJing Wooden Products Co.,
Ltd.
29. Hangzhou Hanje Tec Company Limited
30. Hangzhou Zhengtian Industrial Co., Ltd.
31. Hunchun Forest Wolf Wooden Industry
Co., Ltd.
32. Hunchun Xingjia Wooden Flooring Inc.
33. Huzhou Chenghang Wood Co., Ltd.
34. Huzhou Fulinmen Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd.
35. Huzhou Jesonwood Co., Ltd.
36. Huzhou Sunergy World Trade Co., Ltd.
37. Jiangsu Guyu International Trading Co.,
Ltd.
38. Jiangsu Keri Wood Co., Ltd.
39. Jiangsu Mingle Flooring Co., Ltd.
40. Jiangsu Simba Flooring Co., Ltd.
41. Jiashan HuiJiaLe Decoration Material Co.,
Ltd.
42. Jiaxing Hengtong Wood Co., Ltd.
43. Jilin Xinyuan Wooden Industry Co., Ltd.
44. Karly Wood Product Limited
45. Kember Flooring, Inc. (aka Kember
Hardwood Flooring, Inc.)
46. Kemian Wood Industry (Kunshan) Co.,
Ltd.
47. Kingman Floors Co., Ltd.
48. Linyi Anying Wood Co., Ltd.
49. Linyi Youyou Wood Co., Ltd. (successorin-interest to Shanghai Lizhong Wood
Products Co., Ltd.) (aka, The Lizhong
Wood Industry Limited Company of
Shanghai)
50. Pinge Timber Manufacturing (Zhejiang)
Co., Ltd.
51. Power Dekor Group Co. Ltd.
52. Scholar Home (Shanghai) New Material
Co. Ltd.
53. Shanghaifloor Timber (Shanghai) Co.,
Ltd.
54. Sino-Maple (Jiangsu) Co., Ltd.
55. Suzhou Dongda Wood Co., Ltd.
56. Tongxiang Jisheng Import and Export Co.,
Ltd.
57. Xiamen Yung De Ornament Co., Ltd.
58. Xuzhou Shenghe Wood Co., Ltd.
59. Yekalon Industry, Inc.
60. Yihua Lifestyle Technology Co., Ltd.
61. Yingyi-Nature (Kunshan) Wood Industry
Co., Ltd.
62. Zhejiang Dadongwu Greenhome Wood
Co., Ltd.
63. Zhejiang Fuerjia Wooden Co., Ltd.
64. Zhejiang Jiechen Wood Industry Co., Ltd.
65. Zhejiang Longsen Lumbering Co., Ltd.
66. Zhejiang Shiyou Timber Co., Ltd.
67. Zhejiang Shuimojiangnan New Material
Technology Co., Ltd.
68. Zhejiang Simite Wooden Co., Ltd.
[FR Doc. 2021–23373 Filed 10–26–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–520–807]
Circular Welded Carbon-Quality Steel
Pipe From the United Arab Emirates:
Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2018–2019
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(Commerce) determines that producers
and/or exporters subject to this
administrative review made sales of
subject merchandise at less than fair
value (LTFV) during the period of
review (POR), December 1, 2018,
through November 30, 2019.
DATES: Applicable October 27, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Benjamin A. Luberda or Steven Seifert,
AD/CVD Operations, Office II,
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–2185 or
(202) 482–3350, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
This review covers three producers/
exporters of the subject merchandise.
Commerce selected two mandatory
respondents for individual examination:
Ajmal Steel Tubes & Pipes Ind. L.L.C./
Noble Steel Industries L.L.C.
(collectively, Ajmal) 1 and Universal
Tube and Plastic Industries, Ltd./THL
Tube and Pipe Industries LLC/KHK
Scaffolding and Formwork LLC
(collectively, Universal).2 The producer/
1 We collapsed Ajmal Steel Tubes & Pipes Ind.
L.L.C. and Noble Steel Industries L.L.C. together in
the final results of the 2016–2017 administrative
review. See Circular Welded Carbon-Quality Steel
Pipe from the United Arab Emirates: Final Results
of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2016–
2017, 84 FR 44845 (August 27, 2019) (CWP from the
UAE 2016–2017 Final Results). Because there is no
information on the record of this administrative
review that would lead us to revisit this
determination, we are continuing to treat these
companies as part of a single entity for the purposes
of this administrative review.
2 Commerce previously determined that Universal
is a single entity consisting of the following three
producers/exporters of subject merchandise:
Universal Tube and Plastic Industries, Ltd.; KHK
Scaffolding and Framework LLC; and Universal
Tube and Pipe Industries LLC (UTP). See Circular
Welded Carbon-Quality Steel Pipe from the United
Arab Emirates: Affirmative Preliminary
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and
Postponement of Final Determination, 81 FR 36882
(June 8, 2016), and accompanying Preliminary
Decision Memorandum, unchanged in Circular
Welded Carbon-Quality Steel Pipe from the United
Arab Emirates: Final Determination of Sales at Less
E:\FR\FM\27OCN1.SGM
27OCN1
59365
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 205 / Wednesday, October 27, 2021 / Notices
exporter not selected for individual
examination is Conares Metal Supply
Limited (Conares).
On April 23, 2021, Commerce
published the Preliminary Results.3 On
August 13, 2021, we postponed the final
results until October 20, 2021.4 A
summary of the events that occurred
since Commerce published the
Preliminary Results, as well as a full
discussion of the issues raised by
interested parties for these final results,
may be found in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum, which is hereby adopted
by this notice.5 The Issues and Decision
Memorandum is a public document and
is on file electronically via Enforcement
and Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a
complete version of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum can be accessed
directly at https://access.trade.gov/
public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.
Commerce conducted this
administrative review in accordance
with section 751 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (the Act).
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to the order
is welded carbon-quality steel pipes and
tube, of circular cross-section, with an
outside diameter not more than nominal
16 inches (406.4 mm), regardless of wall
thickness, surface finish, end finish, or
industry specification, and generally
known as standard pipe, fence pipe and
tube, sprinkler pipe, or structural pipe
(although subject product may also be
referred to as mechanical tubing). The
products subject to this order are
currently classifiable in Harmonized
Tariff Schedule of the United States
(HTSUS) statistical reporting numbers
7306.19.1010, 7306.19.1050,
7306.19.5110, 7306.19.5150,
7306.30.1000, 7306.30.5015,
7306.30.5020, 7306.30.5025,
7306.30.5032, 7306.30.5040,
7306.30.5055, 7306.30.5085,
7306.30.5090, 7306.50.1000,
7306.50.5030, 7306.50.5050, and
7306.50.5070. Although the HTSUS
numbers are provided for convenience
and for customs purposes, the written
product description remains
dispositive.6
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in case and rebuttal
briefs by interested parties to this
administrative review are addressed in
the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
For a list of issues raised by parties, see
appendix to this notice.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on a review of the record and
comments received from interested
parties regarding the Preliminary
Results, we made certain changes to the
preliminary weighted-average margin
calculations for Universal and for those
companies not selected for individual
review.7
Final Results of the Review
We are assigning the following
weighted-average dumping margins to
the firms listed below for the period
December 1, 2018, through November
30, 201:
Weightedaverage
dumping
margin
(percent)
Exporter/producer
Ajmal Steel Tubes & Pipes Ind. L.L.C./Noble Steel Industries L.L.C .......................................................................................................
Universal Tube and Plastic Industries, Ltd./THL Tube and Pipe Industries LLC/KHK Scaffolding and Formwork LLC ..........................
Conares Metal Supply Limited ..................................................................................................................................................................
We intend to disclose the calculations
performed within five days of the date
of publication of this notice to parties in
this proceeding, in accordance with 19
CFR 351.224(b).
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Assessment Rates
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the
Act, and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1),
Commerce has determined, and U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
shall assess, antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries of subject
merchandise in accordance with the
final results of this review.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1),
where Universal reported the entered
value of their U.S. sales, we calculated
Than Fair Value, 81 FR 75030 (October 28, 2016),
and accompanying Issues and Decision
Memorandum. Because there is no information on
the record of this administrative review that would
lead us to revisit this determination, we are
continuing to treat these companies as part of a
single entity for the purposes of this administrative
review. Additionally, we previously determined
that THL Tube and Pipe Industries LLC is the
successor-in-interest to UTP. See CWP from the
UAE 2016–2017 Final Results.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:47 Oct 26, 2021
Jkt 256001
54.27
1.62
1.62
importer-specific ad valorem duty
assessment rates based on the ratio of
the total amount of dumping calculated
for the examined sales to the total
entered value of the sales for which
entered value was reported. Where
either the respondent’s weightedaverage dumping margin is zero or de
minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR
351.106(c)(1), or an importer-specific
rate is zero or de minimis, we will
instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate
entries without regard to antidumping
duties.
The assessment rate for antidumping
duties for the company not selected for
individual examination (i.e., Conares)
and for Ajmal, which has been assigned
a rate based entirely on total adverse
facts available, will be equal to the
respective weighted-average dumping
margin identified above in the Final
Results of the Review. The final results
of this review shall be the basis for the
assessment of antidumping duties on
entries of merchandise covered by the
final results of this review and for future
deposits of estimated duties, where
applicable.8
Commerce’s ‘‘automatic assessment’’
will apply to entries of subject
merchandise during the POR produced
by companies included in these final
results of review for which the reviewed
3 See Circular Welded Carbon-Quality Steel Pipe
from the United Arab Emirates: Preliminary Results
of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and
Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2018–2019, 86 FR 21688
(April 23, 2021) (Preliminary Results), and
accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
4 See Memorandum, ‘‘Circular Welded CarbonQuality Steel Pipe from the United Arab Emirates:
Extension of Deadline for Final Results of 2018–
2019 Administrative Review,’’ dated August 13,
2021.
5 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Final Results of the 2018–
2019 Administrative Review of the Antidumping
Duty Order on Circular Welded Carbon-Quality
Steel Pipe from the United Arab Emirates,’’ dated
concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this
notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
6 For a complete description of the scope of the
order, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
7 See accompanying Issues and Decision
Memorandum.
8 See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\27OCN1.SGM
27OCN1
59366
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 205 / Wednesday, October 27, 2021 / Notices
companies did not know that the
merchandise they sold to the
intermediary (e.g., a reseller, trading
company, or exporter) was destined for
the United States. In such instances, we
will instruct CBP to liquidate
unreviewed entries at the all-others rate
if there is no rate for the intermediate
company(ies) involved in the
transaction.9
We intend to issue assessment
instructions to CBP no earlier than 35
days after the date of publication of the
final results of this review in the
Federal Register. If a timely summons is
filed at the U.S. Court of International
Trade, the assessment instructions will
direct CBP not to liquidate relevant
entries until the time for parties to file
a request for a statutory injunction has
expired (i.e., within 90 days of
publication).
Cash Deposit Requirements
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective for all
shipments of the subject merchandise
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the
publication date of the final results of
this administrative review, as provided
by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1)
The cash deposit rate for each specific
company listed above will be that
established in the final results of this
review, except if the rate is less than
0.50 percent and, therefore, de minimis
within the meaning of 19 CFR
351.106(c)(1), in which case the cash
deposit rate will be zero; (2) for
previously investigated companies not
subject to this review, the cash deposit
will continue to be the companyspecific rate published for the most
recently completed segment of this
proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a
firm covered in this review, or a
previous segment, but the manufacturer
is, then the cash deposit rate will be the
rate established for the most recent
segment for the manufacturer of the
merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit
rate for all other manufacturers or
exporters will continue to be 5.95
percent, the all-others rate established
in the LTFV investigation.10 These
deposit requirements, when imposed,
shall remain in effect until further
notice.
9 For a full discussion of this practice, see
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954
(May 6, 2003).
10 See Circular Welded Carbon-Quality Steel Pipe
from the Sultanate of Oman, Pakistan, and the
United Arab Emirates: Amended Final Affirmative
Antidumping Duty Determination and
Antidumping Duty Orders, 81 FR 91906, 91908
(December 19, 2016).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:47 Oct 26, 2021
Jkt 256001
VII. Recommendation
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during this review period. Failure to
comply with this requirement could
result in the Secretary’s presumption
that reimbursement of antidumping
duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping
duties.
Notification Regarding Administrative
Protective Order
This notice serves as the only
reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of
their responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
continues to govern business
proprietary information in this segment
of the proceeding. Timely written
notification of return/destruction of
APO materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations
and the terms of an APO is a
sanctionable violation.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing this
notice in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act.
Dated: October 20, 2021.
Ryan Majerus,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and
Negotiations performing the non-exclusive
functions and duties of theAssistant Secretary
for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Use of Adverse Facts Available
V. Margin Calculations
VI. Discussion of Issues
Ajmal-Specific Issue
Comment 1: Application of Adverse Facts
Available (AFA) Based on Failure to
Cooperate
Universal-Specific Issues
Comment 2: Whether To Cap Universal’s
Cutting Revenue
Comment 3: Whether To Revise Universal’s
Reported Theoretical Weight
Comment 4: Whether To Use Universal’s
Most Recently Submitted Data Sets
Other Issue
Comment 5: Rate for the Non-Selected
Company
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
[FR Doc. 2021–23372 Filed 10–26–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–560–822, A–557–813, A–570–886, A–583–
843, A–549–821, A–552–806, C–552–805]
Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags From
Indonesia, Malaysia, the People’s
Republic of China, Taiwan, Thailand,
and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam:
Continuation of the Antidumping Duty
Orders and Countervailing Duty Order
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: As a result of the
determinations by the Department of
Commerce (Commerce) and the U.S.
International Trade Commission (ITC)
that revocation of the antidumping duty
(AD) orders on polyethylene retail
carrier bags (PRCBs) from Indonesia,
Malaysia, the People’s Republic of
China (China), Taiwan, Thailand, and
the Socialist Republic of Vietnam
(Vietnam) and the countervailing duty
(CVD) order on PRCBs from Vietnam
would likely lead to a continuation or
recurrence of dumping, countervailable
subsidies, and material injury to an
industry in the United States,
Commerce is publishing a notice of
continuation of these AD and CVD
orders.
AGENCY:
DATES:
Applicable October 27, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Claudia Cott or Minoo Hatten, AD/CVD
Operations, Office I, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–4270 or (202) 482–1690,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On August 9, 2004, Commerce
published in the Federal Register the
AD orders on PRCBs from Malaysia,
China, and Thailand, and on May 4,
2010, the AD orders on PRCBs from
Indonesia, Taiwan, and Vietnam and the
CVD order on PRCBs from Vietnam.1 On
1 See Antidumping Duty Order: Polyethylene
Retail Carrier Bags from Malaysia, 69 FR 48203
(August 9, 2004); Antidumping Duty Order:
Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags from the People’s
Republic of China, 69 FR 48201 (August 9, 2004);
Antidumping Duty Order: Polyethylene Retail
Carrier Bags from Thailand, 69 FR 48204 (August
9, 2004); Antidumping Duty Orders: Polyethylene
E:\FR\FM\27OCN1.SGM
27OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 205 (Wednesday, October 27, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59364-59366]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-23372]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-520-807]
Circular Welded Carbon-Quality Steel Pipe From the United Arab
Emirates: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review;
2018-2019
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that
producers and/or exporters subject to this administrative review made
sales of subject merchandise at less than fair value (LTFV) during the
period of review (POR), December 1, 2018, through November 30, 2019.
DATES: Applicable October 27, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Benjamin A. Luberda or Steven Seifert,
AD/CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, International
Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-2185 or (202)
482-3350, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
This review covers three producers/exporters of the subject
merchandise. Commerce selected two mandatory respondents for individual
examination: Ajmal Steel Tubes & Pipes Ind. L.L.C./Noble Steel
Industries L.L.C. (collectively, Ajmal) \1\ and Universal Tube and
Plastic Industries, Ltd./THL Tube and Pipe Industries LLC/KHK
Scaffolding and Formwork LLC (collectively, Universal).\2\ The
producer/
[[Page 59365]]
exporter not selected for individual examination is Conares Metal
Supply Limited (Conares).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ We collapsed Ajmal Steel Tubes & Pipes Ind. L.L.C. and Noble
Steel Industries L.L.C. together in the final results of the 2016-
2017 administrative review. See Circular Welded Carbon-Quality Steel
Pipe from the United Arab Emirates: Final Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review; 2016-2017, 84 FR 44845 (August 27, 2019)
(CWP from the UAE 2016-2017 Final Results). Because there is no
information on the record of this administrative review that would
lead us to revisit this determination, we are continuing to treat
these companies as part of a single entity for the purposes of this
administrative review.
\2\ Commerce previously determined that Universal is a single
entity consisting of the following three producers/exporters of
subject merchandise: Universal Tube and Plastic Industries, Ltd.;
KHK Scaffolding and Framework LLC; and Universal Tube and Pipe
Industries LLC (UTP). See Circular Welded Carbon-Quality Steel Pipe
from the United Arab Emirates: Affirmative Preliminary Determination
of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Postponement of Final
Determination, 81 FR 36882 (June 8, 2016), and accompanying
Preliminary Decision Memorandum, unchanged in Circular Welded
Carbon-Quality Steel Pipe from the United Arab Emirates: Final
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 81 FR 75030 (October
28, 2016), and accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum. Because
there is no information on the record of this administrative review
that would lead us to revisit this determination, we are continuing
to treat these companies as part of a single entity for the purposes
of this administrative review. Additionally, we previously
determined that THL Tube and Pipe Industries LLC is the successor-
in-interest to UTP. See CWP from the UAE 2016-2017 Final Results.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On April 23, 2021, Commerce published the Preliminary Results.\3\
On August 13, 2021, we postponed the final results until October 20,
2021.\4\ A summary of the events that occurred since Commerce published
the Preliminary Results, as well as a full discussion of the issues
raised by interested parties for these final results, may be found in
the Issues and Decision Memorandum, which is hereby adopted by this
notice.\5\ The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and
is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov. In
addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can
be accessed directly at https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Circular Welded Carbon-Quality Steel Pipe from the
United Arab Emirates: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review and Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2018-2019, 86 FR 21688 (April 23, 2021)
(Preliminary Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision
Memorandum.
\4\ See Memorandum, ``Circular Welded Carbon-Quality Steel Pipe
from the United Arab Emirates: Extension of Deadline for Final
Results of 2018-2019 Administrative Review,'' dated August 13, 2021.
\5\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the
Final Results of the 2018-2019 Administrative Review of the
Antidumping Duty Order on Circular Welded Carbon-Quality Steel Pipe
from the United Arab Emirates,'' dated concurrently with, and hereby
adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commerce conducted this administrative review in accordance with
section 751 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to the order is welded carbon-quality steel
pipes and tube, of circular cross-section, with an outside diameter not
more than nominal 16 inches (406.4 mm), regardless of wall thickness,
surface finish, end finish, or industry specification, and generally
known as standard pipe, fence pipe and tube, sprinkler pipe, or
structural pipe (although subject product may also be referred to as
mechanical tubing). The products subject to this order are currently
classifiable in Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS)
statistical reporting numbers 7306.19.1010, 7306.19.1050, 7306.19.5110,
7306.19.5150, 7306.30.1000, 7306.30.5015, 7306.30.5020, 7306.30.5025,
7306.30.5032, 7306.30.5040, 7306.30.5055, 7306.30.5085, 7306.30.5090,
7306.50.1000, 7306.50.5030, 7306.50.5050, and 7306.50.5070. Although
the HTSUS numbers are provided for convenience and for customs
purposes, the written product description remains dispositive.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ For a complete description of the scope of the order, see
the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in case and rebuttal briefs by interested parties
to this administrative review are addressed in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum. For a list of issues raised by parties, see appendix to
this notice.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on a review of the record and comments received from
interested parties regarding the Preliminary Results, we made certain
changes to the preliminary weighted-average margin calculations for
Universal and for those companies not selected for individual
review.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Results of the Review
We are assigning the following weighted-average dumping margins to
the firms listed below for the period December 1, 2018, through
November 30, 201:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-
average
Exporter/producer dumping
margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ajmal Steel Tubes & Pipes Ind. L.L.C./Noble Steel Industries 54.27
L.L.C......................................................
Universal Tube and Plastic Industries, Ltd./THL Tube and 1.62
Pipe Industries LLC/KHK Scaffolding and Formwork LLC.......
Conares Metal Supply Limited................................ 1.62
------------------------------------------------------------------------
We intend to disclose the calculations performed within five days
of the date of publication of this notice to parties in this
proceeding, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
Assessment Rates
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, and 19 CFR
351.212(b)(1), Commerce has determined, and U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries of subject merchandise in accordance with the final results of
this review.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), where Universal reported the
entered value of their U.S. sales, we calculated importer-specific ad
valorem duty assessment rates based on the ratio of the total amount of
dumping calculated for the examined sales to the total entered value of
the sales for which entered value was reported. Where either the
respondent's weighted-average dumping margin is zero or de minimis
within the meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), or an importer-specific
rate is zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the
appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties.
The assessment rate for antidumping duties for the company not
selected for individual examination (i.e., Conares) and for Ajmal,
which has been assigned a rate based entirely on total adverse facts
available, will be equal to the respective weighted-average dumping
margin identified above in the Final Results of the Review. The final
results of this review shall be the basis for the assessment of
antidumping duties on entries of merchandise covered by the final
results of this review and for future deposits of estimated duties,
where applicable.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commerce's ``automatic assessment'' will apply to entries of
subject merchandise during the POR produced by companies included in
these final results of review for which the reviewed
[[Page 59366]]
companies did not know that the merchandise they sold to the
intermediary (e.g., a reseller, trading company, or exporter) was
destined for the United States. In such instances, we will instruct CBP
to liquidate unreviewed entries at the all-others rate if there is no
rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ For a full discussion of this practice, see Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties,
68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We intend to issue assessment instructions to CBP no earlier than
35 days after the date of publication of the final results of this
review in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is filed at the
U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will
direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties
to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within
90 days of publication).
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective for all
shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the
final results of this administrative review, as provided by section
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for each specific
company listed above will be that established in the final results of
this review, except if the rate is less than 0.50 percent and,
therefore, de minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), in
which case the cash deposit rate will be zero; (2) for previously
investigated companies not subject to this review, the cash deposit
will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most
recently completed segment of this proceeding; (3) if the exporter is
not a firm covered in this review, or a previous segment, but the
manufacturer is, then the cash deposit rate will be the rate
established for the most recent segment for the manufacturer of the
merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other manufacturers
or exporters will continue to be 5.95 percent, the all-others rate
established in the LTFV investigation.\10\ These deposit requirements,
when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See Circular Welded Carbon-Quality Steel Pipe from the
Sultanate of Oman, Pakistan, and the United Arab Emirates: Amended
Final Affirmative Antidumping Duty Determination and Antidumping
Duty Orders, 81 FR 91906, 91908 (December 19, 2016).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply
with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order
This notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern
business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding.
Timely written notification of return/destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to
comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable
violation.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act.
Dated: October 20, 2021.
Ryan Majerus,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations performing the
non-exclusive functions and duties of theAssistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Use of Adverse Facts Available
V. Margin Calculations
VI. Discussion of Issues
Ajmal-Specific Issue
Comment 1: Application of Adverse Facts Available (AFA) Based on
Failure to Cooperate
Universal-Specific Issues
Comment 2: Whether To Cap Universal's Cutting Revenue
Comment 3: Whether To Revise Universal's Reported Theoretical
Weight
Comment 4: Whether To Use Universal's Most Recently Submitted
Data Sets
Other Issue
Comment 5: Rate for the Non-Selected Company
VII. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2021-23372 Filed 10-26-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P