Applications for New Awards; National Center for Information and Technical Support for Postsecondary Students With Disabilities Program, 52654-52659 [2021-20496]
Download as PDF
52654
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 181 / Wednesday, September 22, 2021 / Notices
In accordance with the Fiscal
Year 2018 National Defense
Authorization Act, the DON announces
that the NNPP, a joint activity of the
DON and the Department of Energy
(DOE), NNPP will convert from the
General Schedule (GS) Classification
and Pay System and the DON Interim
Performance Management System
(IPMS) to the NNSA pay and
performance System, also known as the
NNSA Demonstration Project. This
conversion will align DON employees of
the NNPP with their counterparts in the
DOE, NNSA, and bring parity to the pay
and performance systems within the
Nuclear Propulsion workforce.
DATES: This conversion will become
effective September 22, 2022.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Edward Rose, 412–476–7204, or
edward.rose@nrp.doe.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: When the
Naval Sea Systems Command
(NAVSEA) Headquarters converted to
the DoD Civilian Acquisition Workforce
Personnel Demonstration Project
(AcqDemo), Naval Reactors chose to opt
out of AcqDemo in anticipation of
aligning with the DOE, NNSA
Demonstration Project. Section
3116(a)(3) of the Fiscal Year 2018
NDAA authorized NNPP to convert its
DON employees to the NNSA System
with the concurrence of the Secretary of
the Navy. The Secretary of the Navy
approved the transition of NNPP’s DON
civilian personnel to the NNSA
Demonstration Project Personnel
Management System on February 5,
2019. NNPP has been working with the
NAVSEA Office of Civilian Human
Resources to promulgate the conversion
and plan the implementation through
relevant DON and DoD offices. After
providing data and supporting
documentation, the DoD Defense
Civilian Personnel Advisory Service has
given approval to commence with the
planning and implementation upon
publishing of this notice. The
implementation will require, among
other actions, coordination with the
DFAS, final notice to employees,
developing NNPP procedures, creating
new position descriptions, and
processing pay plan adjustment
personnel actions.
The NNSA Demonstration Project was
designed by NNSA, with participation
of and review by the DOE and the Office
of Personnel Management. The NNSA
Demonstration Project modifies the GS
Classification and Pay System by
creating broad career paths, establishing
pay bands within each career path
which may cover more than one GS
grade, eliminates longevity-based step
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:44 Sep 21, 2021
Jkt 253001
progression, and provides for annual
pay adjustments based on performance.
The NNPP has experienced higher-thanaverage attrition and has had difficulty
filling positions, with pay/grade
frequently cited as the reason for
declination by candidates.
As a joint DON/DOE organization,
Naval Reactors has historically managed
its civilian workforce under each
respective agency’s personnel
management system. The Fiscal Year
(FY) 2018 National Defense
Authorization Act states that the
Director of the Naval Nuclear
Propulsion Program (NNPP) may, ‘‘with
concurrence of the Secretary of the
Navy,’’ apply NNSA DEMO to all nonexecutive competitive service
employees of the NNPP, thereby
strengthening Naval Reactors’
recruitment and retention of the highestquality technical and professional
workforce. This move aligns with the
goal of shifting away from tenure-based
personnel systems to performance-based
personnel management systems while
streamlining administrative processes
inherent in managing Naval Reactors’
employees under two different systems.
All DON NNPP current GS employees
and vacant GS positions will be
converted, excluding any Schedule C
excepted service positions. There are
approximately 210 affected positions,
with all but about 40 of those positions
located at the Washington Navy Yard.
These positions will remain as DON
positions. The NNPP will adopt the
NNSA Demonstration Project Policies
and Procedures Manual, dated March
2008, which will also be used by the
servicing Human Resources Office and
the Defense Finance Accounting Service
(DFAS) to implement and support the
NNPP. The intent of this notice is to
promulgate this conversion to
stakeholders within the Departments of
Energy, Defense, and Navy. Affected
employees are not represented by a
labor union.
Dated: September 17, 2021.
J.M. Pike,
Commander, Judge Advocate General’s Corps,
U.S. Navy, Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2021–20510 Filed 9–21–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810–FF–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Applications for New Awards; National
Center for Information and Technical
Support for Postsecondary Students
With Disabilities Program
Office of Postsecondary
Education, Department of Education.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
ACTION:
Notice.
The Department of Education
(Department) is issuing a notice inviting
applications (NIA) for a new award for
fiscal year (FY) 2021 for the National
Center for Information and Technical
Support for Postsecondary Students
with Disabilities Program, Assistance
Listing Number 84.116D. This notice
relates to the approved information
collection under OMB control number
1894–0006.
DATES:
Applications Available: September
22, 2021.
Deadline for Transmittal of
Applications: October 22, 2021.
Deadline for Intergovernmental
Review: December 21, 2021.
ADDRESSES: For the addresses for
obtaining and submitting an
application, please refer to our Common
Instructions for Applicants to
Department of Education Discretionary
Grant Programs, published in the
Federal Register on February 13, 2019
(84 FR 3768), and available at
www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-201902-13/pdf/2019-02206.pdf.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Shedita Alston, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW,
Room 2B194, Washington, DC 20202–
4260. Telephone: (202) 453–7090.
Email: Shedita.Alston@ed.gov.
If you use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD) or a text
telephone (TTY), call the Federal Relay
Service (FRS), toll free, at 1–800–877–
8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Full Text of Announcement
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Purpose of Program: The purpose of
this program is to support a National
Center for Information and Technical
Support for Postsecondary Students
with Disabilities (the Center) to provide
technical assistance and information on
best and promising practices for
students with disabilities as they
transition to or attend postsecondary
education. Institutions of higher
education (IHEs), as well as elementary
and secondary schools, have legal
obligations under two civil rights laws
prohibiting disability discrimination,
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of
1973, as amended (Section 504) (29
U.S.C. 794), and the Americans with
Disabilities Act of 1990, as amended
(ADA) (42 U.S.C. 12101–12213). The
technical assistance and information
provided by the Center can help
students, parents, and educational
officials in determining how to meet
E:\FR\FM\22SEN1.SGM
22SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 181 / Wednesday, September 22, 2021 / Notices
these obligations and ensure the rights
of students with disabilities. In
particular, the Center can assist students
with disabilities and their families in
understanding that in IHEs, students
with disabilities have different rights
and protections than they had in
secondary school under Section 504 and
the Individuals with Disabilities
Education Act (IDEA), 20 U.S.C. 1400 et
seq. Students with disabilities and their
parents need to understand the
differences in these rights and
responsibilities as students with
disabilities enter college and pursue
postsecondary education. Specifically,
unlike students in secondary school,
postsecondary students with disabilities
are responsible for requesting the
academic adjustments, auxiliary aids
and services, and other accommodations
they need to have equal educational
opportunity and are expected to comply
with reasonable procedures that an IHE
may have concerning documentation of
disability and the need for
accommodations under Section 504 and
the ADA.
Note: A more detailed explanation of
the different rights and responsibilities
of students with disabilities in
secondary school and postsecondary
institutions can be found in two
pamphlets issued by the Department’s
Office for Civil Rights: ‘‘Transition of
Students With Disabilities To
Postsecondary Education: A Guide for
High School Educators,’’ available at:
https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/
ocr/transitionguide.html, and ‘‘Students
with Disabilities Preparing for
Postsecondary Education: Know Your
Rights and Responsibilities,’’ available
at: https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/
list/ocr/transition.html.
Priority: This notice contains one
absolute priority. In accordance with 34
CFR 75.105(b)(2)(iv), this priority is
from section 777(a) of the Higher
Education Act of 1965, as amended
(HEA) (20 U.S.C. 1140q(a)).
Absolute Priority: For FY 2021 and
any subsequent year in which we make
awards from the list of unfunded
applicants from this competition, this
priority is an absolute priority. Under 34
CFR 75.105(c)(3), we consider only
applications that meet this priority.
This priority is:
Entities that can demonstrate the
experience and capacity to improve
postsecondary recruitment, transition,
retention, and completion rates of
students with disabilities by providing
the following:
1. Assistance to students and families.
The Center must provide information
and technical assistance to students
with disabilities and the families of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:44 Sep 21, 2021
Jkt 253001
students with disabilities to support
students across the broad spectrum of
disabilities, including—
(a) Information to assist individuals
with disabilities who are prospective
students of an IHE in planning for
postsecondary education while the
students are in secondary school;
(b) Information and technical
assistance provided to individualized
education program teams (as defined in
20 U.S.C. 1414(d)(1)) for secondary
school students with disabilities, and to
early outreach and student services
programs, including programs
authorized under subparts 2, 4, and 5 of
title IV of the HEA, to support students
across a broad spectrum of disabilities
with the successful transition to
postsecondary education;
(c) Research-based supports, services,
and accommodations which are
available in postsecondary settings,
including services provided by other
agencies such as vocational
rehabilitation;
(d) Information on student mentoring
and networking opportunities for
students with disabilities; and
(e) Effective recruitment and
transition programs at postsecondary
educational institutions.
2. Assistance to institutions of higher
education. The Center must provide
information and technical assistance to
faculty, staff, and administrators of IHEs
to improve the services provided to, the
accommodations for, the retention rates
of, and the completion rates of, students
with disabilities in higher education
settings, which may include—
(a) Collection and dissemination of
best and promising practices and
materials for accommodating and
supporting students with disabilities,
including practices and materials
supported by the grants, contracts, or
cooperative agreements authorized
under subparts 1, 2, and 3 of title VII,
part D, of the HEA (20 U.S.C. 1140q);
(b) Development and provision of
training modules for higher education
faculty on exemplary practices for
accommodating and supporting
postsecondary students with disabilities
across a range of academic fields, which
may include universal design for
learning and practices supported by the
grants, contracts, or cooperative
agreements authorized under subparts 1,
2, and 3 of title VII, part D, of the HEA
(20 U.S.C. 1140q); and
(c) Development of technology-based
tutorials for higher education faculty
and staff, including new faculty and
graduate students, on best and
promising practices related to support
and retention of students with
disabilities in postsecondary education.
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
52655
3. Information collection and
dissemination. The Center will be
responsible for building, maintaining,
and updating a database of disability
support services information with
respect to IHEs, or for expanding and
updating an existing database of
disabilities support services information
with respect to IHEs. This database must
be made available to the general public
through a website built to high technical
standards of accessibility practicable for
the broad spectrum of individuals with
disabilities. This database and website
must include available information on—
(a) Disability documentation
requirements;
(b) Support services available;
(c) Links to financial aid;
(d) Accommodations policies;
(e) Accessible instructional materials;
(f) Other topics relevant to students
with disabilities; and
(g) The information in the report
described in paragraph (5) below.
4. Disability support services. The
Center must work with organizations
and individuals with proven expertise
related to disability support services for
postsecondary students with disabilities
to evaluate, improve, and disseminate
information related to the delivery of
high quality disability support services
at IHEs.
5. Review and report. Not later than
three years after the establishment of the
National Center, and every two years
thereafter, the National Center must
prepare and disseminate a report to the
Secretary and the authorizing
committees analyzing the condition of
postsecondary success for students with
disabilities. The report must include—
(a) A review of the activities and the
effectiveness of the programs authorized
under title VII, part D of the HEA;
(b) Annual enrollment and graduation
rates of students with disabilities in
IHEs from publicly reported data;
(c) Recommendations for effective
postsecondary supports and services for
students with disabilities, and how such
supports and services may be widely
implemented at IHEs;
(d) Recommendations on reducing
barriers to full participation for students
with disabilities in higher education;
and
(e) A description of the strategies with
a demonstrated record of effectiveness
in improving the success of such
students in postsecondary education.
6. Staffing of the Center. In hiring
employees of the National Center, the
National Center must consider the
expertise and experience of prospective
employees in providing training and
technical assistance to practitioners.
Note: Websites established or
maintained to carry out any project
E:\FR\FM\22SEN1.SGM
22SEN1
52656
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 181 / Wednesday, September 22, 2021 / Notices
funded under this competition must
meet WCAG 2.1 standards (Source:
https://www.w3.org/WAI/standardsguidelines/wcag/glance/). Documents
posted on grantee websites must, at a
minimum, meet the Department’s
accessibility standards set out at:
https://www2.ed.gov/web-guidance/
accessibility/.
Definitions: The following definitions
are from sections 101 and 103 of the
HEA.
Institution of higher education—
(1) Means an educational institution
in any State that—
(i) Admits as regular students only
persons having a certificate of
graduation from a school providing
secondary education, or the recognized
equivalent of such a certificate, or
persons who meet the requirements of
section 484(d) of the HEA;
(ii) Is legally authorized within such
State to provide a program of education
beyond secondary education;
(iii) Provides an educational program
for which the institution awards a
bachelor’s degree or provides not less
than a 2-year program that is acceptable
for full credit toward such a degree, or
awards a degree that is acceptable for
admission to a graduate or professional
degree program, subject to review and
approval by the Secretary;
(iv) Is a public or other nonprofit
institution; and
(v) Is accredited by a nationally
recognized accrediting agency or
association, or if not so accredited, is an
institution that has been granted preaccreditation status by such an agency
or association that has been recognized
by the Secretary for the granting of preaccreditation status, and the Secretary
has determined that there is satisfactory
assurance that the institution will meet
the accreditation standards of such an
agency or association within a
reasonable time; and
(2) Also includes—
(i) Any school that provides not less
than a 1-year program of training to
prepare students for gainful
employment in a recognized occupation
and that meets the provision of
paragraphs (1)(i), (ii), (iv), and (v); and
(ii) A public or nonprofit private
educational institution in any State that,
in lieu of the requirement in paragraph
(1)(i), admits as regular students
individuals—
(A) Who are beyond the age of
compulsory school attendance in the
State in which the institution is located;
or
(B) Who will be dually or
concurrently enrolled in the institution
and a secondary school.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:44 Sep 21, 2021
Jkt 253001
Universal design for learning means a
scientifically valid framework for
guiding educational practice that—
(1) Provides flexibility in the ways
information is presented, in the ways
students respond or demonstrate
knowledge and skills, and in the ways
students are engaged; and
(2) Reduces barriers in instruction,
provides appropriate accommodations,
supports, and challenges, and maintains
high achievement expectations for all
students, including students with
disabilities and students who are
limited English proficient.
Program Authority: 20 U.S.C.
1140q(a).
Note: Projects will be awarded and
must be operated in a manner consistent
with the nondiscrimination
requirements contained in the Federal
civil rights laws.
Applicable Regulations: (a) The
Education Department General
Administrative Regulations in 34 CFR
parts 75, 77, 79, 82, 84, 86, 97, 98, and
99. (b) The Office of Management and
Budget Guidelines to Agencies on
Governmentwide Debarment and
Suspension (Nonprocurement) in 2 CFR
part 180, as adopted and amended as
regulations of the Department in 2 CFR
part 3485. (c) The Uniform
Administrative Requirements, Cost
Principles, and Audit Requirements for
Federal Awards in 2 CFR part 200, as
adopted and amended in 2 CFR part
3474.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Cooperative
agreement.
Estimated Available Funds:
$1,980,000.
Contingent upon the availability of
funds and the quality of applications,
we may make additional awards in
subsequent years from the list of
unfunded applications from this
competition.
Estimated Average Size of Award:
$1,980,000.
Maximum Award: We will not make
an award exceeding $1,980,000 for a
project period of 48 months.
Estimated Number of Awards: 1.
Note: The Department is not bound by
any estimates in this notice.
Project Period: Up to 48 months.
III. Eligibility Information
1. Eligible Applicants: Under section
777(a)(3) of the HEA, an ‘‘eligible
entity’’ is an IHE (as defined in this
notice); a nonprofit organization; or a
partnership of two or more IHEs or
organizations, with demonstrated
expertise in:
(a) Supporting students with
disabilities in postsecondary education;
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
(b) Technical knowledge necessary for
the dissemination of information in
accessible formats;
(c) Working with diverse types of
IHEs, including community colleges;
and
(d) The subjects necessary to support
students across the broad spectrum of
disabilities.
2.a. Cost Sharing or Matching: This
competition does not require cost
sharing or matching.
b. Administrative Cost Limitation:
This program does not include any
program-specific limitation on
administrative expenses. All
administrative expenses must be
reasonable and necessary and conform
to Cost Principles described in 2 CFR
part 200 subpart E of the Uniform
Guidance.
c. Indirect Cost Rate Information: This
program uses a restricted indirect cost
rate of 8 percent. For more information
regarding indirect costs, or to obtain a
negotiated indirect cost rate, please see
www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocfo/
intro.html.
3. Subgrantees: A grantee under this
competition may not award subgrants to
entities to directly carry out project
activities described in its application.
IV. Application and Submission
Information
1. Application Submission
Instructions: Applicants are required to
follow the Common Instructions for
Applicants to Department of Education
Discretionary Grant Programs,
published in the Federal Register on
February 13, 2019 (84 FR 3768), and
available at www.govinfo.gov/content/
pkg/FR-2019-02-13/pdf/2019-02206.pdf,
which contains requirements and
information on how to submit an
application.
2. Intergovernmental Review: This
program is subject to Executive Order
12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR
part 79. Information about
Intergovernmental Review of Federal
Programs under Executive Order 12372
is in the application package for this
program.
3. Funding Restrictions: We reference
regulations outlining funding
restrictions in the Applicable
Regulations section of this notice.
4. Recommended Page Limit: The
application narrative is where you, the
applicant, address the selection criteria
that reviewers use to evaluate your
application. We recommend that you (1)
limit the application narrative to no
more than 50 pages and (2) use the
following standards:
E:\FR\FM\22SEN1.SGM
22SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 181 / Wednesday, September 22, 2021 / Notices
• A ‘‘page’’ is 8.5″ x 11″, on one side
only, with 1″ margins at the top, bottom,
and both sides.
• Double space (no more than three
lines per vertical inch) all text in the
application narrative, including titles,
headings, footnotes, quotations,
references, and captions as well as all
text in charts, tables, figures, and
graphs.
• Use a font that is either 12 point or
larger, and no smaller than 10 pitch
(characters per inch).
• Use one of the following fonts:
Times New Roman, Courier, Courier
New, or Arial.
The recommended page limit does not
apply to the cover sheet; the budget
section, including the narrative budget
justification; the assurances and
certifications; or the one-page abstract.
However, the recommended page limit
does apply to all of the application
narrative.
Note: The Budget Information-NonConstruction Programs Form (ED 524)
Sections A–C are not the same as the
narrative response to the Budget section
of the selection criteria.
V. Application Review Information
1. Selection Criteria: The selection
criteria for this program are from 34 CFR
75.210 and from section 777(a) of the
HEA (20 U.S.C. 1140q(a)). Applicants
should address each of the following
selection criteria separately for each
proposed activity. The selection criteria
are worth a total of 100 points; the
maximum score for each criterion is
noted in parentheses.
(a) Demonstration of Eligibility.
(Maximum 25 Points)
(1) The Secretary considers whether
the applicant has demonstrated
expertise and experience sufficient to
meet the requirements to be an eligible
entity under section 777(a)(3) of the
HEA.
(2) In considering eligibility, the
Secretary considers the following
factors:
(i) Demonstrated expertise in
supporting students with disabilities in
postsecondary education;
(ii) Demonstrated expertise in
technical knowledge necessary for the
dissemination of information in
accessible formats;
(iii) Demonstrated expertise in
working with diverse types of IHEs,
including community colleges; and
(iv) Demonstrated expertise in the
subjects necessary to support students
across the broad spectrum of
disabilities.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:44 Sep 21, 2021
Jkt 253001
(b) Quality of the Project Design.
(Maximum 15 Points)
(1) The Secretary considers the
quality of the design of the proposed
project.
(2) In determining the quality of the
design of the proposed project, the
Secretary considers the following
factors:
(i) The extent to which the design of
the proposed project is appropriate to,
and will successfully address, the needs
of the target population or other
identified needs;
(ii) The extent to which the design for
implementing and evaluating the
proposed project will result in
information to guide possible
replication of project activities or
strategies, including information about
the effectiveness of the approach or
strategies employed by the project;
(iii) The extent to which the proposed
project will establish linkages with
other appropriate agencies and
organizations providing services to the
target population;
(iv) The extent to which the proposed
project is designed to build capacity and
yield results that will extend beyond the
period of Federal financial assistance;
(v) The extent to which performance
feedback and continuous improvement
are integral to the design of the
proposed project.
(vi) The extent to which the design of
the proposed project reflects up-to-date
knowledge from research and effective
practice.
(vii) The extent to which the
applicant demonstrates that it has the
resources to operate the project beyond
the length of the grant, including a
multi-year financial and operating
model and accompanying plan; the
demonstrated commitment of any
partners; evidence of broad support
from stakeholders (e.g., State
educational agencies, teachers’ unions)
critical to the project’s long-term
success; or more than one of these types
of evidence.
(c) Quality of Project Services.
(Maximum 15 Points)
(1) The Secretary considers the
quality of the services to be provided by
the proposed project.
(2) In determining the quality of the
services to be provided by the proposed
project, the Secretary considers the
quality and sufficiency of strategies for
ensuring equal access and treatment for
eligible project participants who are
members of groups that have
traditionally been underrepresented
based on race, color, national origin,
gender, age, or disability.
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
52657
(3) In addition, the Secretary
considers:
(i) The extent to which the services to
be provided by the proposed project are
appropriate to the needs of the intended
recipients or beneficiaries of those
services;
(ii) The likelihood that the services to
be provided by the proposed project
will lead to improvements in the
achievement of students as measured
against rigorous academic standards;
(iii) The extent to which the services
to be provided by the proposed project
involve the collaboration of appropriate
partners for maximizing the
effectiveness of project services; and
(iv) The extent to which the technical
assistance services to be provided by the
proposed project involve the use of
efficient strategies, including the use of
technology, as appropriate, and the
leveraging of non-project resources.
(d) Quality of Project Personnel.
(Maximum 15 Points)
(1) The Secretary considers the
quality of the personnel who will carry
out the proposed project.
(2) In determining the quality of
project personnel, the Secretary
considers the extent to which the
applicant encourages applications for
employment from persons who are
members of groups that have
traditionally been underrepresented
based on race, color, national origin,
gender, age, or disability.
(3) In addition, the Secretary
considers the following factors:
(i) The qualifications, including
relevant training and experience, of the
project director or principal
investigator;
(ii) The qualifications, including
relevant training and experience, of key
project personnel; and
(iii) The qualifications, including
relevant training and experience, of
project consultants or subcontractors.
(e) Quality of the Management Plan.
(Maximum 10 Points)
(1) The Secretary considers the
quality of the management plan for the
proposed project.
(2) In determining the quality of the
management plan, the Secretary
considers the following factors:
(i) The adequacy of the management
plan to achieve the objectives of the
proposed project on time and within
budget, including clearly defined
responsibilities, timelines, and
milestones for accomplishing project
tasks;
(ii) The adequacy of procedures for
ensuring feedback and continuous
improvement in the operation of the
proposed project;
E:\FR\FM\22SEN1.SGM
22SEN1
52658
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 181 / Wednesday, September 22, 2021 / Notices
(iii) The adequacy of mechanisms for
ensuring high-quality products and
services from the proposed project;
(iv) The extent to which the time
commitments of the project director and
principal investigator and other key
project personnel are appropriate and
adequate to meet the objectives of the
proposed project; and
(v) How the applicant will ensure that
a diversity of perspectives are brought to
bear in the operation of the proposed
project, including those of parents,
teachers, the business community, a
variety of disciplinary and professional
fields, recipients or beneficiaries of
services, or others, as appropriate.
(f) Quality of the Project Evaluation.
(Maximum 20 Points)
(1) The Secretary considers the
quality of the evaluation to be
conducted of the proposed project.
(2) In determining the quality of the
evaluation to be conducted for the
proposed project, the Secretary
considers the following factors:
(i) The extent to which the methods
of evaluation are thorough, feasible, and
appropriate to the goals, objectives, and
outcomes of the proposed project;
(ii) The extent to which the methods
of evaluation provide for examining the
effectiveness of project implementation
strategies;
(iii) The extent to which the methods
of evaluation include the use of
objective performance measures that are
clearly related to the intended outcomes
of the project and will produce
quantitative and qualitative data to the
extent possible; and
(iv) The extent to which the methods
of evaluation will provide performance
feedback and permit periodic
assessment of progress toward achieving
intended outcomes.
2. Review and Selection Process: We
remind potential applicants that in
reviewing applications in any
discretionary grant competition, the
Secretary may consider, under 34 CFR
75.217(d)(3), the past performance of the
applicant in carrying out a previous
award, such as the applicant’s use of
funds, achievement of project
objectives, and compliance with grant
conditions. The Secretary may also
consider whether the applicant failed to
submit a timely performance report or
submitted a report of unacceptable
quality.
In addition, in making a competitive
grant award, the Secretary also requires
various assurances including those
applicable to Federal civil rights laws
that prohibit discrimination in programs
or activities receiving Federal financial
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:44 Sep 21, 2021
Jkt 253001
assistance from the Department (34 CFR
100.4, 104.5, 106.4, 108.8, and 110.23).
A panel of three non-Federal
reviewers will review and score each
application in accordance with the
selection criteria. A rank order funding
slate will be made from this review. An
award will be made in rank order
according to the average score received
from the combined peer review points.
In a tie-breaking situation under this
program, preference will be given to the
applicant with the highest score under
the ‘‘Quality of the Project Design’’
criterion. If there is still a tie after
implementing the first tiebreaker,
preference will be given to the applicant
with the highest score under the
‘‘Quality of Project Services’’ criterion.
If there is still a tie after applying the
secondary tiebreaker, preference will be
given to the applicant with the highest
score under the ‘‘Quality of the
Management Plan’’ selection criterion. If
there is still a tie after applying a third
tiebreaker, preference will be given to
the applicant with the highest score
under the ‘‘Quality of the Project
Evaluation’’ selection criterion.
3. Risk Assessment and Specific
Conditions: Consistent with 2 CFR
200.206, before awarding grants under
this competition the Department
conducts a review of the risks posed by
applicants. Under 2 CFR 200.8, the
Secretary may impose specific
conditions and, under 2 CFR 3474.10, in
appropriate circumstances, high-risk
conditions on a grant if the applicant or
grantee is not financially stable; has a
history of unsatisfactory performance;
has a financial or other management
system that does not meet the standards
in 2 CFR part 200, subpart D; has not
fulfilled the conditions of a prior grant;
or is otherwise not responsible.
4. Integrity and Performance System:
If you are selected under this
competition to receive an award that
over the course of the project period
may exceed the simplified acquisition
threshold (currently $250,000), under 2
CFR 200.206(a)(2) we must make a
judgment about your integrity, business
ethics, and record of performance under
Federal awards—that is, the risk posed
by you as an applicant—before we make
an award. In doing so, we must consider
any information about you that is in the
integrity and performance system
(currently referred to as the Federal
Awardee Performance and Integrity
Information System (FAPIIS)),
accessible through the System for
Award Management. You may review
and comment on any information about
yourself that a Federal agency
previously entered and that is currently
in FAPIIS.
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Please note that, if the total value of
your currently active grants, cooperative
agreements, and procurement contracts
from the Federal Government exceeds
$10,000,000, the reporting requirements
in 2 CFR part 200, Appendix XII,
require you to report certain integrity
information to FAPIIS semiannually.
Please review the requirements in 2 CFR
part 200, Appendix XII, if this grant
plus all the other Federal funds you
receive exceed $10,000,000.
5. In General: In accordance with the
Office of Management and Budget’s
guidance located at 2 CFR part 200, all
applicable Federal laws, and relevant
Executive guidance, the Department
will review and consider applications
for funding pursuant to this notice
inviting applications in accordance
with—
(a) Selecting recipients most likely to
be successful in delivering results based
on the program objectives through an
objective process of evaluating Federal
award applications (2 CFR 200.205);
(b) Prohibiting the purchase of certain
telecommunication and video
surveillance services or equipment in
alignment with section 889 of the
National Defense Authorization Act of
2019 (Pub. L. 115–232) (2 CFR 200.216);
(c) Providing a preference, to the
extent permitted by law, to maximize
use of goods, products, and materials
produced in the United States (2 CFR
200.322); and
(d) Terminating agreements in whole
or in part to the greatest extent
authorized by law if an award no longer
effectuates the program goals or agency
priorities (2 CFR 200.340).
VI. Award Administration Information
1. Award Notices: If your application
is successful, we notify your U.S.
Representative and U.S. Senators and
send you a Grant Award Notification
(GAN); or we may send you an email
containing a link to access an electronic
version of your GAN. We may notify
you informally, also.
If your application is not evaluated or
not selected for funding, we notify you.
2. Administrative and National Policy
Requirements: We identify
administrative and national policy
requirements in the application package
and reference these and other
requirements in the Applicable
Regulations section of this notice.
We reference the regulations outlining
the terms and conditions of an award in
the Applicable Regulations section of
this notice and include these and other
specific conditions in the GAN. The
GAN also incorporates your approved
application as part of your binding
commitments under the grant.
E:\FR\FM\22SEN1.SGM
22SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 181 / Wednesday, September 22, 2021 / Notices
3. Open Licensing Requirements:
Unless an exception applies, if you are
awarded a grant under this competition,
you will be required to openly license
to the public grant deliverables created
in whole, or in part, with Department
grant funds. When the deliverable
consists of modifications to pre-existing
works, the license extends only to those
modifications that can be separately
identified and only to the extent that
open licensing is permitted under the
terms of any licenses or other legal
restrictions on the use of pre-existing
works. Additionally, a grantee or
subgrantee that is awarded competitive
grant funds must have a plan to
disseminate these public grant
deliverables. This dissemination plan
can be developed and submitted after
your application has been reviewed and
selected for funding. For additional
information on the open licensing
requirements, please refer to 2 CFR
3474.20.
4. Reporting: (a) If you apply for a
grant under this competition, you must
ensure that you have in place the
necessary processes and systems to
comply with the reporting requirements
in 2 CFR part 170 should you receive
funding under the competition. This
does not apply if you have an exception
under 2 CFR 170.110(b).
(b) At the end of your project period,
you must submit a final performance
report, including financial information,
as directed by the Secretary. If you
receive a multiyear award, you must
submit an annual performance report
that provides the most current
performance and financial expenditure
information as directed by the Secretary
under 34 CFR 75.118. The Secretary
may also require more frequent
performance reports under 34 CFR
75.720(c). For specific requirements on
reporting, please go to www.ed.gov/
fund/grant/apply/appforms/
appforms.html.
5. Performance Measures: Under the
Government Performance and Results
Act of 1993 and 34 CFR 75.110, the
following three performance measures
will be used in assessing the
performance of the National Center for
Information and Technical Support for
Postsecondary Students with
Disabilities Program:
1. The extent to which the project
serves students with disabilities,
families of students with disabilities,
individualized education program
teams, and individualized plan for
employment teams, including growth in
numbers served over time, and
improved user satisfaction ratings with
the services received;
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:44 Sep 21, 2021
Jkt 253001
2. The extent to which the project
provides information and technical
assistance to faculty, staff, and
administrators of IHEs aimed at
improving accommodation, retention,
and completion rates of students with
disabilities, including growth in the
number of persons and institutions
served over time, and improved user
satisfaction ratings with services
received, baseline change over time in
retention, and completion rates of
students with disabilities at the
institutions served; and
3. The extent and growth over time in
utilization of the database of disability
services information by IHEs, including
improved user satisfaction ratings of the
accessibility and utility of the
information provided.
These measures constitute the
Department’s indicators of success for
this program. Consequently, we advise
an applicant for an award under this
program to give careful consideration to
the operationalization of the measures
in conceptualizing the approach and
evaluation for its proposed project.
If funded, you will be required to
collect and report data in your project’s
annual performance report (34 CFR
75.590).
VII. Other Information
Accessible Format: On request to the
program contact person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT,
individuals with disabilities can obtain
this document and a copy of the
application package in an accessible
format. The Department will provide the
requestor with an accessible format that
may include Rich Text Format (RTF) or
text format (txt), a thumb drive, an MP3
file, braille, large print, audiotape, or
compact disc, or another accessible
format.
Electronic Access to This Document:
The official version of this document is
the document published in the Federal
Register. You may access the official
edition of the Federal Register and the
Code of Federal Regulations at
www.govinfo.gov. At this site you can
view this document, as well as all other
documents of this Department
published in the Federal Register, in
text or Portable Document Format
(PDF). To use PDF, you must have
Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is
available free at the site.
You may also access documents of the
Department published in the Federal
Register by using the article search
feature at www.federalregister.gov.
Specifically, through the advanced
search feature at this site, you can limit
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
52659
your search to documents published by
the Department.
Michelle Asha Cooper,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Postsecondary
Education.
[FR Doc. 2021–20496 Filed 9–21–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
[Docket No.: ED–2021–SCC–0137]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Comment Request; Project
To Support America’s Families and
Educators (Project SAFE) Grant
Application
Office of Elementary and
Secondary Education (OESE),
Department of Education (ED).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, ED is
requesting the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) to conduct an
emergency review of a new information
collection.
DATES: The Department requested
emergency processing from OMB for
this information collection request on
September 16, 2021. As a result, the
Department is providing the public with
the opportunity to comment under the
full comment period. Interested persons
are invited to submit comments on or
before November 22, 2021.
ADDRESSES: To access and review all the
documents related to the information
collection listed in this notice, please
use https://www.regulations.gov by
searching the Docket ID number ED–
2021–SCC–0137. Comments submitted
in response to this notice should be
submitted electronically through the
Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov by selecting the
Docket ID number or via postal mail,
commercial delivery, or hand delivery.
If the regulations.gov site is not
available to the public for any reason,
ED will temporarily accept comments at
ICDocketMgr@ed.gov. Please include the
docket ID number and the title of the
information collection request when
requesting documents or submitting
comments. Please note that comments
submitted by fax or email and those
submitted after the comment period will
not be accepted. Written requests for
information or comments submitted by
postal mail or delivery should be
addressed to the Director of the Strategic
Collections and Clearance Governance
and Strategy Division, U.S. Department
of Education, 400 Maryland Ave. SW,
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\22SEN1.SGM
22SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 181 (Wednesday, September 22, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52654-52659]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-20496]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Applications for New Awards; National Center for Information and
Technical Support for Postsecondary Students With Disabilities Program
AGENCY: Office of Postsecondary Education, Department of Education.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Education (Department) is issuing a notice
inviting applications (NIA) for a new award for fiscal year (FY) 2021
for the National Center for Information and Technical Support for
Postsecondary Students with Disabilities Program, Assistance Listing
Number 84.116D. This notice relates to the approved information
collection under OMB control number 1894-0006.
DATES:
Applications Available: September 22, 2021.
Deadline for Transmittal of Applications: October 22, 2021.
Deadline for Intergovernmental Review: December 21, 2021.
ADDRESSES: For the addresses for obtaining and submitting an
application, please refer to our Common Instructions for Applicants to
Department of Education Discretionary Grant Programs, published in the
Federal Register on February 13, 2019 (84 FR 3768), and available at
www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2019-02-13/pdf/2019-02206.pdf.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shedita Alston, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW, Room 2B194, Washington, DC 20202-
4260. Telephone: (202) 453-7090. Email: [email protected].
If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) or a text
telephone (TTY), call the Federal Relay Service (FRS), toll free, at 1-
800-877-8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Full Text of Announcement
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Purpose of Program: The purpose of this program is to support a
National Center for Information and Technical Support for Postsecondary
Students with Disabilities (the Center) to provide technical assistance
and information on best and promising practices for students with
disabilities as they transition to or attend postsecondary education.
Institutions of higher education (IHEs), as well as elementary and
secondary schools, have legal obligations under two civil rights laws
prohibiting disability discrimination, Section 504 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended (Section 504) (29 U.S.C. 794),
and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, as amended (ADA) (42
U.S.C. 12101-12213). The technical assistance and information provided
by the Center can help students, parents, and educational officials in
determining how to meet
[[Page 52655]]
these obligations and ensure the rights of students with disabilities.
In particular, the Center can assist students with disabilities and
their families in understanding that in IHEs, students with
disabilities have different rights and protections than they had in
secondary school under Section 504 and the Individuals with
Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), 20 U.S.C. 1400 et seq. Students with
disabilities and their parents need to understand the differences in
these rights and responsibilities as students with disabilities enter
college and pursue postsecondary education. Specifically, unlike
students in secondary school, postsecondary students with disabilities
are responsible for requesting the academic adjustments, auxiliary aids
and services, and other accommodations they need to have equal
educational opportunity and are expected to comply with reasonable
procedures that an IHE may have concerning documentation of disability
and the need for accommodations under Section 504 and the ADA.
Note: A more detailed explanation of the different rights and
responsibilities of students with disabilities in secondary school and
postsecondary institutions can be found in two pamphlets issued by the
Department's Office for Civil Rights: ``Transition of Students With
Disabilities To Postsecondary Education: A Guide for High School
Educators,'' available at: https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/transitionguide.html, and ``Students with Disabilities Preparing for
Postsecondary Education: Know Your Rights and Responsibilities,''
available at: https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/transition.html.
Priority: This notice contains one absolute priority. In accordance
with 34 CFR 75.105(b)(2)(iv), this priority is from section 777(a) of
the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended (HEA) (20 U.S.C.
1140q(a)).
Absolute Priority: For FY 2021 and any subsequent year in which we
make awards from the list of unfunded applicants from this competition,
this priority is an absolute priority. Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(3), we
consider only applications that meet this priority.
This priority is:
Entities that can demonstrate the experience and capacity to
improve postsecondary recruitment, transition, retention, and
completion rates of students with disabilities by providing the
following:
1. Assistance to students and families. The Center must provide
information and technical assistance to students with disabilities and
the families of students with disabilities to support students across
the broad spectrum of disabilities, including--
(a) Information to assist individuals with disabilities who are
prospective students of an IHE in planning for postsecondary education
while the students are in secondary school;
(b) Information and technical assistance provided to individualized
education program teams (as defined in 20 U.S.C. 1414(d)(1)) for
secondary school students with disabilities, and to early outreach and
student services programs, including programs authorized under subparts
2, 4, and 5 of title IV of the HEA, to support students across a broad
spectrum of disabilities with the successful transition to
postsecondary education;
(c) Research-based supports, services, and accommodations which are
available in postsecondary settings, including services provided by
other agencies such as vocational rehabilitation;
(d) Information on student mentoring and networking opportunities
for students with disabilities; and
(e) Effective recruitment and transition programs at postsecondary
educational institutions.
2. Assistance to institutions of higher education. The Center must
provide information and technical assistance to faculty, staff, and
administrators of IHEs to improve the services provided to, the
accommodations for, the retention rates of, and the completion rates
of, students with disabilities in higher education settings, which may
include--
(a) Collection and dissemination of best and promising practices
and materials for accommodating and supporting students with
disabilities, including practices and materials supported by the
grants, contracts, or cooperative agreements authorized under subparts
1, 2, and 3 of title VII, part D, of the HEA (20 U.S.C. 1140q);
(b) Development and provision of training modules for higher
education faculty on exemplary practices for accommodating and
supporting postsecondary students with disabilities across a range of
academic fields, which may include universal design for learning and
practices supported by the grants, contracts, or cooperative agreements
authorized under subparts 1, 2, and 3 of title VII, part D, of the HEA
(20 U.S.C. 1140q); and
(c) Development of technology-based tutorials for higher education
faculty and staff, including new faculty and graduate students, on best
and promising practices related to support and retention of students
with disabilities in postsecondary education.
3. Information collection and dissemination. The Center will be
responsible for building, maintaining, and updating a database of
disability support services information with respect to IHEs, or for
expanding and updating an existing database of disabilities support
services information with respect to IHEs. This database must be made
available to the general public through a website built to high
technical standards of accessibility practicable for the broad spectrum
of individuals with disabilities. This database and website must
include available information on--
(a) Disability documentation requirements;
(b) Support services available;
(c) Links to financial aid;
(d) Accommodations policies;
(e) Accessible instructional materials;
(f) Other topics relevant to students with disabilities; and
(g) The information in the report described in paragraph (5) below.
4. Disability support services. The Center must work with
organizations and individuals with proven expertise related to
disability support services for postsecondary students with
disabilities to evaluate, improve, and disseminate information related
to the delivery of high quality disability support services at IHEs.
5. Review and report. Not later than three years after the
establishment of the National Center, and every two years thereafter,
the National Center must prepare and disseminate a report to the
Secretary and the authorizing committees analyzing the condition of
postsecondary success for students with disabilities. The report must
include--
(a) A review of the activities and the effectiveness of the
programs authorized under title VII, part D of the HEA;
(b) Annual enrollment and graduation rates of students with
disabilities in IHEs from publicly reported data;
(c) Recommendations for effective postsecondary supports and
services for students with disabilities, and how such supports and
services may be widely implemented at IHEs;
(d) Recommendations on reducing barriers to full participation for
students with disabilities in higher education; and
(e) A description of the strategies with a demonstrated record of
effectiveness in improving the success of such students in
postsecondary education.
6. Staffing of the Center. In hiring employees of the National
Center, the National Center must consider the expertise and experience
of prospective employees in providing training and technical assistance
to practitioners.
Note: Websites established or maintained to carry out any project
[[Page 52656]]
funded under this competition must meet WCAG 2.1 standards (Source:
https://www.w3.org/WAI/standards-guidelines/wcag/glance/). Documents
posted on grantee websites must, at a minimum, meet the Department's
accessibility standards set out at: https://www2.ed.gov/web-guidance/accessibility/.
Definitions: The following definitions are from sections 101 and
103 of the HEA.
Institution of higher education--
(1) Means an educational institution in any State that--
(i) Admits as regular students only persons having a certificate of
graduation from a school providing secondary education, or the
recognized equivalent of such a certificate, or persons who meet the
requirements of section 484(d) of the HEA;
(ii) Is legally authorized within such State to provide a program
of education beyond secondary education;
(iii) Provides an educational program for which the institution
awards a bachelor's degree or provides not less than a 2-year program
that is acceptable for full credit toward such a degree, or awards a
degree that is acceptable for admission to a graduate or professional
degree program, subject to review and approval by the Secretary;
(iv) Is a public or other nonprofit institution; and
(v) Is accredited by a nationally recognized accrediting agency or
association, or if not so accredited, is an institution that has been
granted pre-accreditation status by such an agency or association that
has been recognized by the Secretary for the granting of pre-
accreditation status, and the Secretary has determined that there is
satisfactory assurance that the institution will meet the accreditation
standards of such an agency or association within a reasonable time;
and
(2) Also includes--
(i) Any school that provides not less than a 1-year program of
training to prepare students for gainful employment in a recognized
occupation and that meets the provision of paragraphs (1)(i), (ii),
(iv), and (v); and
(ii) A public or nonprofit private educational institution in any
State that, in lieu of the requirement in paragraph (1)(i), admits as
regular students individuals--
(A) Who are beyond the age of compulsory school attendance in the
State in which the institution is located; or
(B) Who will be dually or concurrently enrolled in the institution
and a secondary school.
Universal design for learning means a scientifically valid
framework for guiding educational practice that--
(1) Provides flexibility in the ways information is presented, in
the ways students respond or demonstrate knowledge and skills, and in
the ways students are engaged; and
(2) Reduces barriers in instruction, provides appropriate
accommodations, supports, and challenges, and maintains high
achievement expectations for all students, including students with
disabilities and students who are limited English proficient.
Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1140q(a).
Note: Projects will be awarded and must be operated in a manner
consistent with the nondiscrimination requirements contained in the
Federal civil rights laws.
Applicable Regulations: (a) The Education Department General
Administrative Regulations in 34 CFR parts 75, 77, 79, 82, 84, 86, 97,
98, and 99. (b) The Office of Management and Budget Guidelines to
Agencies on Governmentwide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement) in
2 CFR part 180, as adopted and amended as regulations of the Department
in 2 CFR part 3485. (c) The Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost
Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards in 2 CFR part
200, as adopted and amended in 2 CFR part 3474.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Cooperative agreement.
Estimated Available Funds: $1,980,000.
Contingent upon the availability of funds and the quality of
applications, we may make additional awards in subsequent years from
the list of unfunded applications from this competition.
Estimated Average Size of Award: $1,980,000.
Maximum Award: We will not make an award exceeding $1,980,000 for a
project period of 48 months.
Estimated Number of Awards: 1.
Note: The Department is not bound by any estimates in this notice.
Project Period: Up to 48 months.
III. Eligibility Information
1. Eligible Applicants: Under section 777(a)(3) of the HEA, an
``eligible entity'' is an IHE (as defined in this notice); a nonprofit
organization; or a partnership of two or more IHEs or organizations,
with demonstrated expertise in:
(a) Supporting students with disabilities in postsecondary
education;
(b) Technical knowledge necessary for the dissemination of
information in accessible formats;
(c) Working with diverse types of IHEs, including community
colleges; and
(d) The subjects necessary to support students across the broad
spectrum of disabilities.
2.a. Cost Sharing or Matching: This competition does not require
cost sharing or matching.
b. Administrative Cost Limitation: This program does not include
any program-specific limitation on administrative expenses. All
administrative expenses must be reasonable and necessary and conform to
Cost Principles described in 2 CFR part 200 subpart E of the Uniform
Guidance.
c. Indirect Cost Rate Information: This program uses a restricted
indirect cost rate of 8 percent. For more information regarding
indirect costs, or to obtain a negotiated indirect cost rate, please
see www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocfo/intro.html.
3. Subgrantees: A grantee under this competition may not award
subgrants to entities to directly carry out project activities
described in its application.
IV. Application and Submission Information
1. Application Submission Instructions: Applicants are required to
follow the Common Instructions for Applicants to Department of
Education Discretionary Grant Programs, published in the Federal
Register on February 13, 2019 (84 FR 3768), and available at
www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2019-02-13/pdf/2019-02206.pdf, which
contains requirements and information on how to submit an application.
2. Intergovernmental Review: This program is subject to Executive
Order 12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR part 79. Information about
Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs under Executive Order
12372 is in the application package for this program.
3. Funding Restrictions: We reference regulations outlining funding
restrictions in the Applicable Regulations section of this notice.
4. Recommended Page Limit: The application narrative is where you,
the applicant, address the selection criteria that reviewers use to
evaluate your application. We recommend that you (1) limit the
application narrative to no more than 50 pages and (2) use the
following standards:
[[Page 52657]]
A ``page'' is 8.5'' x 11'', on one side only, with 1''
margins at the top, bottom, and both sides.
Double space (no more than three lines per vertical inch)
all text in the application narrative, including titles, headings,
footnotes, quotations, references, and captions as well as all text in
charts, tables, figures, and graphs.
Use a font that is either 12 point or larger, and no
smaller than 10 pitch (characters per inch).
Use one of the following fonts: Times New Roman, Courier,
Courier New, or Arial.
The recommended page limit does not apply to the cover sheet; the
budget section, including the narrative budget justification; the
assurances and certifications; or the one-page abstract. However, the
recommended page limit does apply to all of the application narrative.
Note: The Budget Information-Non-Construction Programs Form (ED
524) Sections A-C are not the same as the narrative response to the
Budget section of the selection criteria.
V. Application Review Information
1. Selection Criteria: The selection criteria for this program are
from 34 CFR 75.210 and from section 777(a) of the HEA (20 U.S.C.
1140q(a)). Applicants should address each of the following selection
criteria separately for each proposed activity. The selection criteria
are worth a total of 100 points; the maximum score for each criterion
is noted in parentheses.
(a) Demonstration of Eligibility. (Maximum 25 Points)
(1) The Secretary considers whether the applicant has demonstrated
expertise and experience sufficient to meet the requirements to be an
eligible entity under section 777(a)(3) of the HEA.
(2) In considering eligibility, the Secretary considers the
following factors:
(i) Demonstrated expertise in supporting students with disabilities
in postsecondary education;
(ii) Demonstrated expertise in technical knowledge necessary for
the dissemination of information in accessible formats;
(iii) Demonstrated expertise in working with diverse types of IHEs,
including community colleges; and
(iv) Demonstrated expertise in the subjects necessary to support
students across the broad spectrum of disabilities.
(b) Quality of the Project Design. (Maximum 15 Points)
(1) The Secretary considers the quality of the design of the
proposed project.
(2) In determining the quality of the design of the proposed
project, the Secretary considers the following factors:
(i) The extent to which the design of the proposed project is
appropriate to, and will successfully address, the needs of the target
population or other identified needs;
(ii) The extent to which the design for implementing and evaluating
the proposed project will result in information to guide possible
replication of project activities or strategies, including information
about the effectiveness of the approach or strategies employed by the
project;
(iii) The extent to which the proposed project will establish
linkages with other appropriate agencies and organizations providing
services to the target population;
(iv) The extent to which the proposed project is designed to build
capacity and yield results that will extend beyond the period of
Federal financial assistance;
(v) The extent to which performance feedback and continuous
improvement are integral to the design of the proposed project.
(vi) The extent to which the design of the proposed project
reflects up-to-date knowledge from research and effective practice.
(vii) The extent to which the applicant demonstrates that it has
the resources to operate the project beyond the length of the grant,
including a multi-year financial and operating model and accompanying
plan; the demonstrated commitment of any partners; evidence of broad
support from stakeholders (e.g., State educational agencies, teachers'
unions) critical to the project's long-term success; or more than one
of these types of evidence.
(c) Quality of Project Services. (Maximum 15 Points)
(1) The Secretary considers the quality of the services to be
provided by the proposed project.
(2) In determining the quality of the services to be provided by
the proposed project, the Secretary considers the quality and
sufficiency of strategies for ensuring equal access and treatment for
eligible project participants who are members of groups that have
traditionally been underrepresented based on race, color, national
origin, gender, age, or disability.
(3) In addition, the Secretary considers:
(i) The extent to which the services to be provided by the proposed
project are appropriate to the needs of the intended recipients or
beneficiaries of those services;
(ii) The likelihood that the services to be provided by the
proposed project will lead to improvements in the achievement of
students as measured against rigorous academic standards;
(iii) The extent to which the services to be provided by the
proposed project involve the collaboration of appropriate partners for
maximizing the effectiveness of project services; and
(iv) The extent to which the technical assistance services to be
provided by the proposed project involve the use of efficient
strategies, including the use of technology, as appropriate, and the
leveraging of non-project resources.
(d) Quality of Project Personnel. (Maximum 15 Points)
(1) The Secretary considers the quality of the personnel who will
carry out the proposed project.
(2) In determining the quality of project personnel, the Secretary
considers the extent to which the applicant encourages applications for
employment from persons who are members of groups that have
traditionally been underrepresented based on race, color, national
origin, gender, age, or disability.
(3) In addition, the Secretary considers the following factors:
(i) The qualifications, including relevant training and experience,
of the project director or principal investigator;
(ii) The qualifications, including relevant training and
experience, of key project personnel; and
(iii) The qualifications, including relevant training and
experience, of project consultants or subcontractors.
(e) Quality of the Management Plan. (Maximum 10 Points)
(1) The Secretary considers the quality of the management plan for
the proposed project.
(2) In determining the quality of the management plan, the
Secretary considers the following factors:
(i) The adequacy of the management plan to achieve the objectives
of the proposed project on time and within budget, including clearly
defined responsibilities, timelines, and milestones for accomplishing
project tasks;
(ii) The adequacy of procedures for ensuring feedback and
continuous improvement in the operation of the proposed project;
[[Page 52658]]
(iii) The adequacy of mechanisms for ensuring high-quality products
and services from the proposed project;
(iv) The extent to which the time commitments of the project
director and principal investigator and other key project personnel are
appropriate and adequate to meet the objectives of the proposed
project; and
(v) How the applicant will ensure that a diversity of perspectives
are brought to bear in the operation of the proposed project, including
those of parents, teachers, the business community, a variety of
disciplinary and professional fields, recipients or beneficiaries of
services, or others, as appropriate.
(f) Quality of the Project Evaluation. (Maximum 20 Points)
(1) The Secretary considers the quality of the evaluation to be
conducted of the proposed project.
(2) In determining the quality of the evaluation to be conducted
for the proposed project, the Secretary considers the following
factors:
(i) The extent to which the methods of evaluation are thorough,
feasible, and appropriate to the goals, objectives, and outcomes of the
proposed project;
(ii) The extent to which the methods of evaluation provide for
examining the effectiveness of project implementation strategies;
(iii) The extent to which the methods of evaluation include the use
of objective performance measures that are clearly related to the
intended outcomes of the project and will produce quantitative and
qualitative data to the extent possible; and
(iv) The extent to which the methods of evaluation will provide
performance feedback and permit periodic assessment of progress toward
achieving intended outcomes.
2. Review and Selection Process: We remind potential applicants
that in reviewing applications in any discretionary grant competition,
the Secretary may consider, under 34 CFR 75.217(d)(3), the past
performance of the applicant in carrying out a previous award, such as
the applicant's use of funds, achievement of project objectives, and
compliance with grant conditions. The Secretary may also consider
whether the applicant failed to submit a timely performance report or
submitted a report of unacceptable quality.
In addition, in making a competitive grant award, the Secretary
also requires various assurances including those applicable to Federal
civil rights laws that prohibit discrimination in programs or
activities receiving Federal financial assistance from the Department
(34 CFR 100.4, 104.5, 106.4, 108.8, and 110.23).
A panel of three non-Federal reviewers will review and score each
application in accordance with the selection criteria. A rank order
funding slate will be made from this review. An award will be made in
rank order according to the average score received from the combined
peer review points.
In a tie-breaking situation under this program, preference will be
given to the applicant with the highest score under the ``Quality of
the Project Design'' criterion. If there is still a tie after
implementing the first tiebreaker, preference will be given to the
applicant with the highest score under the ``Quality of Project
Services'' criterion. If there is still a tie after applying the
secondary tiebreaker, preference will be given to the applicant with
the highest score under the ``Quality of the Management Plan''
selection criterion. If there is still a tie after applying a third
tiebreaker, preference will be given to the applicant with the highest
score under the ``Quality of the Project Evaluation'' selection
criterion.
3. Risk Assessment and Specific Conditions: Consistent with 2 CFR
200.206, before awarding grants under this competition the Department
conducts a review of the risks posed by applicants. Under 2 CFR 200.8,
the Secretary may impose specific conditions and, under 2 CFR 3474.10,
in appropriate circumstances, high-risk conditions on a grant if the
applicant or grantee is not financially stable; has a history of
unsatisfactory performance; has a financial or other management system
that does not meet the standards in 2 CFR part 200, subpart D; has not
fulfilled the conditions of a prior grant; or is otherwise not
responsible.
4. Integrity and Performance System: If you are selected under this
competition to receive an award that over the course of the project
period may exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (currently
$250,000), under 2 CFR 200.206(a)(2) we must make a judgment about your
integrity, business ethics, and record of performance under Federal
awards--that is, the risk posed by you as an applicant--before we make
an award. In doing so, we must consider any information about you that
is in the integrity and performance system (currently referred to as
the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System
(FAPIIS)), accessible through the System for Award Management. You may
review and comment on any information about yourself that a Federal
agency previously entered and that is currently in FAPIIS.
Please note that, if the total value of your currently active
grants, cooperative agreements, and procurement contracts from the
Federal Government exceeds $10,000,000, the reporting requirements in 2
CFR part 200, Appendix XII, require you to report certain integrity
information to FAPIIS semiannually. Please review the requirements in 2
CFR part 200, Appendix XII, if this grant plus all the other Federal
funds you receive exceed $10,000,000.
5. In General: In accordance with the Office of Management and
Budget's guidance located at 2 CFR part 200, all applicable Federal
laws, and relevant Executive guidance, the Department will review and
consider applications for funding pursuant to this notice inviting
applications in accordance with--
(a) Selecting recipients most likely to be successful in delivering
results based on the program objectives through an objective process of
evaluating Federal award applications (2 CFR 200.205);
(b) Prohibiting the purchase of certain telecommunication and video
surveillance services or equipment in alignment with section 889 of the
National Defense Authorization Act of 2019 (Pub. L. 115-232) (2 CFR
200.216);
(c) Providing a preference, to the extent permitted by law, to
maximize use of goods, products, and materials produced in the United
States (2 CFR 200.322); and
(d) Terminating agreements in whole or in part to the greatest
extent authorized by law if an award no longer effectuates the program
goals or agency priorities (2 CFR 200.340).
VI. Award Administration Information
1. Award Notices: If your application is successful, we notify your
U.S. Representative and U.S. Senators and send you a Grant Award
Notification (GAN); or we may send you an email containing a link to
access an electronic version of your GAN. We may notify you informally,
also.
If your application is not evaluated or not selected for funding,
we notify you.
2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements: We identify
administrative and national policy requirements in the application
package and reference these and other requirements in the Applicable
Regulations section of this notice.
We reference the regulations outlining the terms and conditions of
an award in the Applicable Regulations section of this notice and
include these and other specific conditions in the GAN. The GAN also
incorporates your approved application as part of your binding
commitments under the grant.
[[Page 52659]]
3. Open Licensing Requirements: Unless an exception applies, if you
are awarded a grant under this competition, you will be required to
openly license to the public grant deliverables created in whole, or in
part, with Department grant funds. When the deliverable consists of
modifications to pre-existing works, the license extends only to those
modifications that can be separately identified and only to the extent
that open licensing is permitted under the terms of any licenses or
other legal restrictions on the use of pre-existing works.
Additionally, a grantee or subgrantee that is awarded competitive grant
funds must have a plan to disseminate these public grant deliverables.
This dissemination plan can be developed and submitted after your
application has been reviewed and selected for funding. For additional
information on the open licensing requirements, please refer to 2 CFR
3474.20.
4. Reporting: (a) If you apply for a grant under this competition,
you must ensure that you have in place the necessary processes and
systems to comply with the reporting requirements in 2 CFR part 170
should you receive funding under the competition. This does not apply
if you have an exception under 2 CFR 170.110(b).
(b) At the end of your project period, you must submit a final
performance report, including financial information, as directed by the
Secretary. If you receive a multiyear award, you must submit an annual
performance report that provides the most current performance and
financial expenditure information as directed by the Secretary under 34
CFR 75.118. The Secretary may also require more frequent performance
reports under 34 CFR 75.720(c). For specific requirements on reporting,
please go to www.ed.gov/fund/grant/apply/appforms/appforms.html.
5. Performance Measures: Under the Government Performance and
Results Act of 1993 and 34 CFR 75.110, the following three performance
measures will be used in assessing the performance of the National
Center for Information and Technical Support for Postsecondary Students
with Disabilities Program:
1. The extent to which the project serves students with
disabilities, families of students with disabilities, individualized
education program teams, and individualized plan for employment teams,
including growth in numbers served over time, and improved user
satisfaction ratings with the services received;
2. The extent to which the project provides information and
technical assistance to faculty, staff, and administrators of IHEs
aimed at improving accommodation, retention, and completion rates of
students with disabilities, including growth in the number of persons
and institutions served over time, and improved user satisfaction
ratings with services received, baseline change over time in retention,
and completion rates of students with disabilities at the institutions
served; and
3. The extent and growth over time in utilization of the database
of disability services information by IHEs, including improved user
satisfaction ratings of the accessibility and utility of the
information provided.
These measures constitute the Department's indicators of success
for this program. Consequently, we advise an applicant for an award
under this program to give careful consideration to the
operationalization of the measures in conceptualizing the approach and
evaluation for its proposed project.
If funded, you will be required to collect and report data in your
project's annual performance report (34 CFR 75.590).
VII. Other Information
Accessible Format: On request to the program contact person listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT, individuals with disabilities
can obtain this document and a copy of the application package in an
accessible format. The Department will provide the requestor with an
accessible format that may include Rich Text Format (RTF) or text
format (txt), a thumb drive, an MP3 file, braille, large print,
audiotape, or compact disc, or another accessible format.
Electronic Access to This Document: The official version of this
document is the document published in the Federal Register. You may
access the official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of
Federal Regulations at www.govinfo.gov. At this site you can view this
document, as well as all other documents of this Department published
in the Federal Register, in text or Portable Document Format (PDF). To
use PDF, you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available free at
the site.
You may also access documents of the Department published in the
Federal Register by using the article search feature at
www.federalregister.gov. Specifically, through the advanced search
feature at this site, you can limit your search to documents published
by the Department.
Michelle Asha Cooper,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Postsecondary Education.
[FR Doc. 2021-20496 Filed 9-21-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P