Large Power Transformers From the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments, 2019-2020, 49304-49306 [2021-19000]

Download as PDF 49304 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 168 / Thursday, September 2, 2021 / Notices date of publication of this notice.16 Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case briefs, may be filed no later than seven days after the time limit for filing case briefs.17 Commerce modified certain of its requirements for serving documents containing business proprietary information until further notice.18 Parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are requested to submit with each brief: (1) A statement of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of authorities.19 Executive summaries should be limited to five pages total, including footnotes.20 All submissions, with limited exceptions, must be filed electronically using ACCESS.21 Electronically filed comments must be received successfully in its entirety by Commerce’s electronic records system, ACCESS, by 5 p.m. Eastern Time on the due date. Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to request a hearing, must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, filed electronically via ACCESS. Requests should contain: (1) The party’s name, address, and telephone number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of issues to be discussed. Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to those raised in the respective case briefs. If a request for a hearing is made, Commerce intends to hold the hearing at a time and date to be determined. An electronically filed hearing request must be received successfully in its entirety by Commerce’s electronic records system, ACCESS, by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time within 14 days after the date of publication of this notice.22 Consistent with 19 CFR 351.216(e), Commerce intends to issue the final results of this CCR no later than 270 days after the date on which this review was initiated, or within 45 days of publication of these preliminary results, if all parties agree to our preliminary finding. lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 Notification to Interested Parties This notice is published in accordance with sections 751(b)(1) and 16 Commerce is exercising its discretion under 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii) to alter the time limit for the filing of case briefs. 17 See 19 CFR 351.309(d)(1); see also Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD Service Requirements Due to COVID–19; Extension of Effective Period, 85 FR 41363 (July 10, 2020) (Temporary Rule). 18 See Temporary Rule. 19 See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). 20 Id. 21 See 19 CFR 351.303. 22 Commerce is exercising its discretion under 19 CFR 351.310(c) to alter the time limit for requesting a hearing. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:33 Sep 01, 2021 Jkt 253001 777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.216(b) and 351.221(c)(3). Dated: August 30, 2021. James Maeder, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. Good Cause V. Successor-In-Interest Determination VI. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2021–18992 Filed 9–1–21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–580–867] Large Power Transformers From the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments, 2019–2020 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. AGENCY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily finds that large power transformers from the Republic of Korea were sold in the United States at less than normal value during the period of review (POR), August 1, 2019, through July 31, 2020. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results. SUMMARY: DATES: Applicable September 2, 2021. John Drury, AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0195. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: dated concurrently with these results and hereby adopted by this notice.2 The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). Access to ACCESS is available to registered users at http:// access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/ index.html. A list of topics discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is attached as an appendix to this notice. Scope of the Order The scope of this order covers large liquid dielectric power transformers having a top power handling capacity greater than or equal to 60,000 kilovolt amperes (60 megavolt amperes), whether assembled or unassembled, complete or incomplete. The merchandise subject to the order is currently classified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States at subheadings 8504.23.0040, 8504.23.0080 and 8504.90.9540. This tariff classification is provided for convenience and Customs purposes; however, the written description of the scope of the order is dispositive.3 Methodology Commerce is conducting this review in accordance with section 751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). For a full description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. Preliminary Determination of No Shipments On October 27, 2020, LS Electric Co., Ltd. (LS Electric), formerly known as LSIS Co., Ltd. (LSIS) 4 timely notified Commerce that it had no exports, sales, or entries of subject merchandise during the POR.5 Commerce issued a no SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background Commerce initiated this review on October 6, 2020.1 We selected one mandatory respondent in this review, Hyosung Heavy Industries Corporation (Hyosung). For a more detailed description of the events that followed the initiation of this review, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum, 1 See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 85 FR 63082 (October 6, 2020). PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 2 See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Large Power Transformers from the Republic of Korea; 2019–2020,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). 3 The full text of the scope of the order is contained in Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 4 Commerce determined that LS Electric is the successor-in-interest to LSIS. See Large Power Transformers from the Republic of Korea: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Final Determination of No Shipments, and Final Successor-in-Interest Determination; 2018– 2019, 86 FR 30915 (June 10, 2021). 5 See LS Electric’s Letter, ‘‘Large Power Transformers from the Republic of Korea: LS E:\FR\FM\02SEN1.SGM 02SEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 168 / Thursday, September 2, 2021 / Notices deadline date for the submission of case briefs.10 Parties who submit case or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are requested to submit with each argument: (1) A statement of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of authorities.11 Case and rebuttal briefs should be filed using ACCESS.12 Case and rebuttal briefs must be served on interested parties.13 Executive summaries should be limited to five pages total, including footnotes. Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), Preliminary Results of Review interested parties who wish to request a hearing must submit a request to the We preliminarily determine that, for Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and the period August 1, 2018, through July Compliance within 30 days of the date 31, 2019, the following weightedof publication of this notice. Requests average dumping margins exist: should contain: (1) The party’s name, address and telephone number; (2) the Weightednumber of participants; (3) whether any average participant is a foreign national; and (4) Producer/exporter dumping margin a list of issues parties intend to discuss. (percent) Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to those raised in the respective Hyosung Heavy Industries Corporation ....................... 8.85 case and rebuttal briefs. If a request for a hearing is made, Commerce intends to Hyundai Electric & Energy Systems Co., Ltd .............. 8.85 hold the hearing at a time and date to Iljin Electric Co., Ltd ............. 8.85 be determined. Parties should confirm ILJIN ..................................... 8.85 by telephone the date and time of the hearing two days before the scheduled date. Disclosure and Public Comment Commerce intends to publish the final Commerce will disclose to parties to results of this administrative review, the proceeding any calculations including the results of its analysis of performed in connection with these issues raised in any case or rebuttal preliminary results of review within five brief, no later than 120 days after days after the date of publication of this publication of these preliminary results, notice.8 Interested parties are invited to unless extended.14 comment on these preliminary results. Interested parties may submit case briefs Assessment Rates Upon issuing the final results, no later than 30 days after the date of Commerce shall determine, and CBP publication of this notice.9 Rebuttal briefs, the content of which is limited to shall assess, antidumping duties on all the issues raised in the case briefs, must appropriate entries. If the weightedaverage dumping margin for Hyosung is be filed within seven days from the not zero or de minimis (i.e., less than Electric Co., Ltd. (formerly known as LSIS Co., Ltd.) 0.50 percent) in the final results of this review, we will calculate importerNo Shipment Letter,’’ dated October 27, 2020. 6 See Memorandum, ‘‘shipment inquiry with specific assessment rates on the basis of respect to the company below during the period 08/ the ratio of the total amount of dumping 01/2019 through 07/31/2020,’’ dated November 20, calculated for each importer’s examined 2020. sales and the total entered value of such 7 See, e.g., Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from Thailand; Preliminary Results of Antidumping sales in accordance with 19 CFR Duty Administrative Review, Partial Rescission of 351.212(b)(1).15 We will instruct CBP to lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 shipment inquiry to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), and CBP found no evidence of shipments from LSIS during the POR.6 Thus, based on record evidence, we preliminary determine that LSIS had no shipments during the POR. Consistent with Commerce’s practice, we find that it is not appropriate to rescind the review with respect to LSIS but, rather, to complete the review and issue appropriate instructions to CBP based on the final results of this review.7 Review, Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2012–2013, 79 FR 15951, 15952 (March 24, 2014), unchanged in Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from Thailand: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Final Determination of No Shipments, and Partial Rescission of Review; 2012–2013, 79 FR 51306 (August 28, 2014); and Magnesium Metal from the Russian Federation: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 26922, 26923 (May 13, 2010), unchanged in Magnesium Metal from the Russian Federation: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 56989 (September 17, 2010). 8 See 19 CFR 351.224(b). 9 See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii). VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:33 Sep 01, 2021 Jkt 253001 assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review when the importer-specific assessment rate calculated in the final results of this review is above de minimis (i.e., 0.50 percent). If Hyosung’s weighted-average dumping margin is zero or de minimis in the final results of review, or if an importer-specific assessment rate is zero or de minimis, Commerce will instruct CBP to liquidate appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties.16 In accordance with Commerce’s ‘‘automatic assessment’’ practice,17 for entries of subject merchandise during the review period produced by each respondent for which it did not know its merchandise was destined for the United States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the allothers rate of 22.00 percent established in the LTFV investigation.18 For the companies which were not selected for individual review (i.e., Hyundai Electric & Energy Systems Co., Ltd., Iljin Electric Co., Ltd., and ILJIN), we will assign an assessment rate based on the cash deposit rate calculated for the company selected for mandatory review (i.e., Hyosung).19 The final results of this review shall be the basis for the assessment of antidumping duties on entries of merchandise covered by the final results of this review and for future deposits of estimated duties, where applicable.20 Consistent with its recent notice,21 Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 days after the date of publication of the final results of this review in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is filed at the U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within 90 days of publication). Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon 16 Id. at 8102–03; see also 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). 18 See Large Power Transformers from the Republic of Korea: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 77 FR 40857 (July 11, 2012). 19 See section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act; see also Preliminary Decision Memorandum at Section VII, ‘‘Rate for Non-Selected Companies. 20 See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act. 21 See Notice of Discontinuation of Policy to Issue Liquidation Instructions After 15 Days in Applicable Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Proceedings, 86 FR 3995 (January 15, 2021). 17 See 10 See 19 CFR 351.309(d)(1); see also Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD Service Requirements Due to COVID–19; Extension of Effective Period, 85 FR 41363 (July 10, 2020). 11 See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2). 12 See generally 19 CFR 351.303. 13 See 19 CFR 351.303(f). 14 See section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act; see also 19 CFR 351.213(h). 15 See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8103 (February 14, 2012). PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 49305 E:\FR\FM\02SEN1.SGM 02SEN1 49306 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 168 / Thursday, September 2, 2021 / Notices publication of the final results of this administrative review for all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the final results of this administrative review, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for Hyosung and other companies listed above will be equal to the weighted-average dumping margin established in the final results of this administrative review; (2) for previously reviewed or investigated companies not listed above, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding in which they were reviewed; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or in the investigation but the producer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding for the producer of the merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other producers or exporters will continue to be the all-others rate of 22.00 percent, the rate established in the investigation of this proceeding.22 These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice also serves as a reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in Commerce’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. Notification to Interested Parties We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: August 27, 2021. Christian Marsh, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Deadline for Submission of Updated Sales and Cost Information IV. Scope of the Order V. Preliminary Determination of No 22 See Large Power Transformers from the Republic of Korea: Antidumping Duty Order, 77 FR 53177 (August 31, 2012). VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:33 Sep 01, 2021 Jkt 253001 Shipments VI. Discussion of the Methodology VII. Rate for Non-Selected Companies VIII. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2021–19000 Filed 9–1–21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–570–095] Aluminum Wire and Cable From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2019– 2020 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) is conducting an administrative review of the antidumping duty (AD) order on aluminum wire and cable from the People’s Republic of China (China) covering the period June 5, 2019, through November 30, 2020. We preliminarily determine that ICF Cable and Jin Tiong Electrical Materials Manufacturer PTE, Limited (Jin Tiong) are not eligible for a separate rate, and, therefore, are part of the China-wide entity. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results. DATES: Applicable September 2, 2021. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Carey, AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3964. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AGENCY: Background On December 23, 2019, Commerce published the AD order on aluminum wire and cable from China.1 On February 4, 2021, Commerce initiated the administrative review of the AD order on aluminum wire and cable from China covering the period June 5, 2019, through November 30, 2020.2 The petitioners in this proceeding are Encore Wire Corporation (Encore) and Southwire Company, LLC (Southwire).3 1 See Aluminum Wire and Cable from the People’s Republic of China: Antidumping Duty and Countervailing Duty Orders, 84 FR 70496 (December 23, 2019) (Order). 2 See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 86 FR 8166 (February 4, 2021) (Initiation Notice). 3 See Aluminum Wire and Cable from the People’s Republic of China: Initiation of Less-ThanFair-Value Investigation, 83 FR 52811 (October 18, 2018). PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 This review covers two producers or exporters of subject merchandise: ICF Cable and Jin Tiong. On February 10, 2021, Commerce released U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) entry data for U.S. imports of aluminum wire and cable from China during the POR that were subject to the Order during the POR.4 Encore, one of the petitioners, submitted comments on the CBP entry data and respondent selection on February 17, 2021.5 On July 28, 2021, Commerce determined that it had erroneously issued its questionnaire to Jin Tiong 6 (see ‘‘Preliminary Results of Administrative Review’’ section, below), and, accordingly, withdrew the questionnaire and removed it from the record.7 Jin Tiong objected to Commerce’s decision to withdraw the questionnaire on July 30, 2021.8 On August 5, 2021, Jin Tiong submitted a section A questionnaire response. Southwire, one of the petitioners, submitted comments on August 9, 2021, requesting Commerce to remove Jin Tiong’s section A questionnaire response from the record.9 On August 16, 2021, Commerce rejected Jin Tiong’s Section A questionnaire and removed it from the record.10 Scope of the Order The products covered by this Order are aluminum wire and cable from China. For a full description of the 4 See Memorandum, ‘‘Release of U.S. Customs and Border Protection Data,’’ dated February 10, 2021. 5 See Encore’s Letter, ‘‘Aluminum Wire and Cable from the People’s Republic of China: Comments on Customs Data and Respondent Selection,’’ dated February 17, 2021. 6 See Memorandum, ‘‘Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order of Aluminum Wire and Cable from the People’s Republic of China; 2019–2020—Rescission of Questionnaire Issued to Jin Tiong Electrical Materials Manufacturer PTE, Limited,’’ dated July 28, 2020. 7 See Memorandum, ‘‘Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order of Aluminum Wire and Cable from the People’s Republic of China; Removal of Questionnaire Issued to Jin Tiong Electrical Materials Manufacturer PTE, Limited,’’ dated July 29, 2021. 8 See Jin Tiong’s letter, ‘‘Aluminum Wire and Cable from the People’s Republic of China, A–570– 095; Objection to Withdrawal of Questionnaire,’’ dated July 30, 2021. 9 See Southwire’s Letter, ‘‘Aluminum Wire and Cable from the People’s Republic of China: Response to Jin Tiong’s Objection to Withdrawal of Questionnaire; Request that the Department Reject Jin Tiong’s Section A Questionnaire Response,’’ dated August 9, 2021. 10 See Memorandum, ‘‘Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order of Aluminum Wire and Cable from the People’s Republic of China; Rejection and Removal of Jin Tiong Electrical Materials Manufacturer PTE, Limited’s Unsolicited Section A Questionnaire Response,’’ dated August 16, 2021. E:\FR\FM\02SEN1.SGM 02SEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 168 (Thursday, September 2, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49304-49306]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-19000]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-580-867]


Large Power Transformers From the Republic of Korea: Preliminary 
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Preliminary 
Determination of No Shipments, 2019-2020

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily finds that 
large power transformers from the Republic of Korea were sold in the 
United States at less than normal value during the period of review 
(POR), August 1, 2019, through July 31, 2020. Interested parties are 
invited to comment on these preliminary results.

DATES: Applicable September 2, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Drury, AD/CVD Operations, Office 
VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0195.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    Commerce initiated this review on October 6, 2020.\1\ We selected 
one mandatory respondent in this review, Hyosung Heavy Industries 
Corporation (Hyosung). For a more detailed description of the events 
that followed the initiation of this review, see the Preliminary 
Decision Memorandum, dated concurrently with these results and hereby 
adopted by this notice.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Administrative Reviews, 85 FR 63082 (October 6, 2020).
    \2\ See Memorandum, ``Decision Memorandum for Preliminary 
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Large Power 
Transformers from the Republic of Korea; 2019-2020,'' dated 
concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Preliminary 
Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on 
file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 
Access to ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary 
Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. A list of topics discussed in the 
Preliminary Decision Memorandum is attached as an appendix to this 
notice.

Scope of the Order

    The scope of this order covers large liquid dielectric power 
transformers having a top power handling capacity greater than or equal 
to 60,000 kilovolt amperes (60 megavolt amperes), whether assembled or 
unassembled, complete or incomplete. The merchandise subject to the 
order is currently classified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 
United States at subheadings 8504.23.0040, 8504.23.0080 and 
8504.90.9540. This tariff classification is provided for convenience 
and Customs purposes; however, the written description of the scope of 
the order is dispositive.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The full text of the scope of the order is contained in 
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Methodology

    Commerce is conducting this review in accordance with section 
751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). For a full 
description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, see the 
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.

Preliminary Determination of No Shipments

    On October 27, 2020, LS Electric Co., Ltd. (LS Electric), formerly 
known as LSIS Co., Ltd. (LSIS) \4\ timely notified Commerce that it had 
no exports, sales, or entries of subject merchandise during the POR.\5\ 
Commerce issued a no

[[Page 49305]]

shipment inquiry to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), and CBP 
found no evidence of shipments from LSIS during the POR.\6\ Thus, based 
on record evidence, we preliminary determine that LSIS had no shipments 
during the POR. Consistent with Commerce's practice, we find that it is 
not appropriate to rescind the review with respect to LSIS but, rather, 
to complete the review and issue appropriate instructions to CBP based 
on the final results of this review.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ Commerce determined that LS Electric is the successor-in-
interest to LSIS. See Large Power Transformers from the Republic of 
Korea: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 
Final Determination of No Shipments, and Final Successor-in-Interest 
Determination; 2018-2019, 86 FR 30915 (June 10, 2021).
    \5\ See LS Electric's Letter, ``Large Power Transformers from 
the Republic of Korea: LS Electric Co., Ltd. (formerly known as LSIS 
Co., Ltd.) No Shipment Letter,'' dated October 27, 2020.
    \6\ See Memorandum, ``shipment inquiry with respect to the 
company below during the period 08/01/2019 through 07/31/2020,'' 
dated November 20, 2020.
    \7\ See, e.g., Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from Thailand; 
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 
Partial Rescission of Review, Preliminary Determination of No 
Shipments; 2012-2013, 79 FR 15951, 15952 (March 24, 2014), unchanged 
in Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from Thailand: Final Results of 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Final Determination of No 
Shipments, and Partial Rescission of Review; 2012-2013, 79 FR 51306 
(August 28, 2014); and Magnesium Metal from the Russian Federation: 
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 
26922, 26923 (May 13, 2010), unchanged in Magnesium Metal from the 
Russian Federation: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 
Review, 75 FR 56989 (September 17, 2010).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Preliminary Results of Review

    We preliminarily determine that, for the period August 1, 2018, 
through July 31, 2019, the following weighted-average dumping margins 
exist:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                             Weighted-
                                                              average
                    Producer/exporter                         dumping
                                                              margin
                                                             (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hyosung Heavy Industries Corporation....................            8.85
Hyundai Electric & Energy Systems Co., Ltd..............            8.85
Iljin Electric Co., Ltd.................................            8.85
ILJIN...................................................            8.85
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclosure and Public Comment

    Commerce will disclose to parties to the proceeding any 
calculations performed in connection with these preliminary results of 
review within five days after the date of publication of this 
notice.\8\ Interested parties are invited to comment on these 
preliminary results. Interested parties may submit case briefs no later 
than 30 days after the date of publication of this notice.\9\ Rebuttal 
briefs, the content of which is limited to the issues raised in the 
case briefs, must be filed within seven days from the deadline date for 
the submission of case briefs.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See 19 CFR 351.224(b).
    \9\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii).
    \10\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d)(1); see also Temporary Rule Modifying 
AD/CVD Service Requirements Due to COVID-19; Extension of Effective 
Period, 85 FR 41363 (July 10, 2020).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Parties who submit case or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are 
requested to submit with each argument: (1) A statement of the issue; 
(2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of 
authorities.\11\ Case and rebuttal briefs should be filed using 
ACCESS.\12\ Case and rebuttal briefs must be served on interested 
parties.\13\ Executive summaries should be limited to five pages total, 
including footnotes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2).
    \12\ See generally 19 CFR 351.303.
    \13\ See 19 CFR 351.303(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to 
request a hearing must submit a request to the Assistant Secretary for 
Enforcement and Compliance within 30 days of the date of publication of 
this notice. Requests should contain: (1) The party's name, address and 
telephone number; (2) the number of participants; (3) whether any 
participant is a foreign national; and (4) a list of issues parties 
intend to discuss. Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to 
those raised in the respective case and rebuttal briefs. If a request 
for a hearing is made, Commerce intends to hold the hearing at a time 
and date to be determined. Parties should confirm by telephone the date 
and time of the hearing two days before the scheduled date.
    Commerce intends to publish the final results of this 
administrative review, including the results of its analysis of issues 
raised in any case or rebuttal brief, no later than 120 days after 
publication of these preliminary results, unless extended.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ See section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act; see also 19 CFR 
351.213(h).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Assessment Rates

    Upon issuing the final results, Commerce shall determine, and CBP 
shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. If the 
weighted-average dumping margin for Hyosung is not zero or de minimis 
(i.e., less than 0.50 percent) in the final results of this review, we 
will calculate importer-specific assessment rates on the basis of the 
ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for each importer's 
examined sales and the total entered value of such sales in accordance 
with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).\15\ We will instruct CBP to assess 
antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review 
when the importer-specific assessment rate calculated in the final 
results of this review is above de minimis (i.e., 0.50 percent). If 
Hyosung's weighted-average dumping margin is zero or de minimis in the 
final results of review, or if an importer-specific assessment rate is 
zero or de minimis, Commerce will instruct CBP to liquidate appropriate 
entries without regard to antidumping duties.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-
Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping 
Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8103 (February 14, 
2012).
    \16\ Id. at 8102-03; see also 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In accordance with Commerce's ``automatic assessment'' 
practice,\17\ for entries of subject merchandise during the review 
period produced by each respondent for which it did not know its 
merchandise was destined for the United States, we will instruct CBP to 
liquidate unreviewed entries at the all-others rate of 22.00 percent 
established in the LTFV investigation.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
    \18\ See Large Power Transformers from the Republic of Korea: 
Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 77 FR 40857 
(July 11, 2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For the companies which were not selected for individual review 
(i.e., Hyundai Electric & Energy Systems Co., Ltd., Iljin Electric Co., 
Ltd., and ILJIN), we will assign an assessment rate based on the cash 
deposit rate calculated for the company selected for mandatory review 
(i.e., Hyosung).\19\ The final results of this review shall be the 
basis for the assessment of antidumping duties on entries of 
merchandise covered by the final results of this review and for future 
deposits of estimated duties, where applicable.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ See section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act; see also Preliminary 
Decision Memorandum at Section VII, ``Rate for Non-Selected 
Companies.
    \20\ See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Consistent with its recent notice,\21\ Commerce intends to issue 
assessment instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 days after the date 
of publication of the final results of this review in the Federal 
Register. If a timely summons is filed at the U.S. Court of 
International Trade, the assessment instructions will direct CBP not to 
liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties to file a request 
for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within 90 days of 
publication).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \21\ See Notice of Discontinuation of Policy to Issue 
Liquidation Instructions After 15 Days in Applicable Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Administrative Proceedings, 86 FR 3995 (January 
15, 2021).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon

[[Page 49306]]

publication of the final results of this administrative review for all 
shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from 
warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the 
final results of this administrative review, as provided by section 
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for Hyosung and 
other companies listed above will be equal to the weighted-average 
dumping margin established in the final results of this administrative 
review; (2) for previously reviewed or investigated companies not 
listed above, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-
specific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this 
proceeding in which they were reviewed; (3) if the exporter is not a 
firm covered in this review, a prior review, or in the investigation 
but the producer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established 
for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding for the 
producer of the merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all 
other producers or exporters will continue to be the all-others rate of 
22.00 percent, the rate established in the investigation of this 
proceeding.\22\ These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall 
remain in effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ See Large Power Transformers from the Republic of Korea: 
Antidumping Duty Order, 77 FR 53177 (August 31, 2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification to Importers

    This notice also serves as a reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply 
with this requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of double antidumping duties.

Notification to Interested Parties

    We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with 
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.

    Dated: August 27, 2021.
Christian Marsh,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix

    List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Deadline for Submission of Updated Sales and Cost Information
IV. Scope of the Order
V. Preliminary Determination of No Shipments
VI. Discussion of the Methodology
VII. Rate for Non-Selected Companies
VIII. Recommendation

[FR Doc. 2021-19000 Filed 9-1-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P