Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for Review and Approval; Renewal of Information Collection; Comment Request; Swiss-U.S. Privacy Shield; Invitation for Applications for Inclusion on the Supplemental List of Arbitrators, 40463-40465 [2021-16019]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 142 / Wednesday, July 28, 2021 / Notices
completion of the administrative
review, Commerce shall determine, and
CBP shall assess, countervailing duties
on all appropriate entries covered by
this review. Commerce intends to issue
assessment instructions to CBP no
earlier than 35 days after the date of
publication of the final results of this
review in the Federal Register. If a
timely summons is filed at the U.S.
Court of International Trade, the
assessment instructions will direct CBP
not to liquidate relevant entries until the
time for parties to file a request for a
statutory injunction has expired (i.e.,
within 90 days of publication).
Cash Deposit Instructions
In accordance with section
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, Commerce also
intends to instruct CBP to collect cash
deposits of estimated countervailing
duties in the amount shown above for
Yama, on shipments of subject
merchandise entered, or withdrawn
from warehouse, for consumption on or
after the date of publication of the final
results of this review. For all nonreviewed firms, Commerce will instruct
CBP to continue to collect cash deposits
at the most recent company-specific or
all-others rate applicable to the
company, as appropriate. Accordingly,
the cash deposit requirements that will
be applied to companies covered by this
order, but not examined in this
administrative review, are those
established in the most recently
completed segment of the proceeding
for each company. These cash deposit
requirements, when imposed, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
Administrative Protective Orders
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of the return or
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing these
results in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19
CFR 351.221(b)(5).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:16 Jul 27, 2021
Jkt 253001
Dated: July 22, 2021.
Christian Marsh,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Use of Adverse Facts Available
IV. Subsidies Valuation Information
V. Programs Determined To Be
Countervailable
VI. Programs Determined Not To Provide
Measurable Benefits During the POR
VII. Programs Determined Not To Be Used
During the POR
VIII. Analysis of Comments
Comment 1: Application of Adverse Facts
Available (AFA) to the Provision of
Synthetic Yarn and Caustic Soda for
Less-than-Adequate-Remuneration
(LTAR) Programs
Comment 2: Application of AFA to the
Provision of Electricity for LTAR
Program
Comment 3: Application of AFA to the
Export Buyer’s Credit Program
Comment 4: Application of AFA to Other
Subsidy Programs
IX. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2021–16080 Filed 7–27–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
Review and Approval; Renewal of
Information Collection; Comment
Request; Swiss–U.S. Privacy Shield;
Invitation for Applications for Inclusion
on the Supplemental List of Arbitrators
International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of information collection,
request for comment.
AGENCY:
The Department of
Commerce, in accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA), invites the general public and
other Federal agencies to comment on
proposed, and continuing information
collections, which helps us assess the
impact of our information collection
requirements and minimize the public’s
reporting burden. The purpose of this
notice is to allow for 60 days of public
comment preceding submission of the
collection to OMB.
DATES: To ensure consideration,
comments regarding this proposed
information collection must be received
on or before September 27, 2021.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
40463
Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments by
email to Towanda Carey, ITA
Paperwork Clearance Officer,
Department of Commerce, International
Trade Administration at
PRAcomments@doc.gov. Please
reference OMB Control Number 0625–
0278 in the subject line of your
comments. Do not submit Confidential
Business Information or otherwise
sensitive or protected information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
specific questions related to collection
activities should be directed to David
Ritchie, Senior Policy Advisor,
Department of Commerce, International
Trade Administration via email at
privacyshield@trade.gov, or tel. 202–
482–1512. More information on the
arbitration mechanism may be found at
https://www.privacyshield.gov/servlet/
servlet.FileDownload
?file=015t000000079Gr.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
I. Abstract
The Swiss-U.S. Privacy Shield
Framework was designed by the U.S.
Department of Commerce (Department)
and the Swiss Administration to
provide companies in both Switzerland
and the United States with a mechanism
to comply with data protection
requirements when transferring
personal data from Switzerland to the
United States in support of transatlantic
commerce. On January 12, 2017, the
Swiss Administration deemed the
Swiss-U.S. Privacy Shield Framework
adequate to enable data transfers under
Swiss law, and on April 12, 2017, the
Department began accepting selfcertifications from U.S. companies to
join the program (82 FR 16375; April 12,
2017).
On September 8, 2020 the Federal
Data Protection and Information
Commissioner (FDPIC) of Switzerland
issued an opinion concluding that the
Swiss-U.S. Privacy Shield Framework
does not provide an adequate level of
protection for data transfers from
Switzerland to the United States
pursuant to Switzerland’s Federal Act
on Data Protection (FADP). As a result
of that opinion, organizations wishing to
rely on the Swiss-U.S. Privacy Shield to
transfer personal data from Switzerland
to the United States should seek
guidance from the FDPIC or legal
counsel. That opinion does not relieve
participants in the Swiss-U.S. Privacy
Shield of their obligations under the
Swiss-U.S. Privacy Shield Framework.
The Department continues to administer
the Privacy Shield program while those
E:\FR\FM\28JYN1.SGM
28JYN1
40464
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 142 / Wednesday, July 28, 2021 / Notices
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
discussions proceed. For more
information on the Privacy Shield, visit
https://www.privacyshield.gov/
welcome.
As described in Annex I of the SwissU.S. Privacy Shield Framework, the
Department and the Swiss
Administration committed to
implement an arbitration mechanism to
provide Swiss individuals with the
ability to invoke binding arbitration to
determine, for residual claims, whether
an organization has violated its
obligations under the Privacy Shield.
Organizations voluntarily self-certify to
the Swiss-U.S. Privacy Shield
Framework and, upon certification, the
commitments the organization has made
to comply with the Swiss-U.S. Privacy
Shield Framework become legally
enforceable under U.S. law.
Organizations that self-certify to the
Swiss-U.S. Privacy Shield Framework
commit to binding arbitration of
residual claims if a Swiss individual
chooses to exercise that option. Under
the arbitration option, a Privacy Shield
Panel (consisting of one or three
arbitrators, as agreed by the parties) has
the authority to impose individualspecific, non-monetary equitable relief
(such as access, correction, deletion, or
return of the Swiss individual’s data in
question) necessary to remedy the
violation of the Swiss-U.S. Privacy
Shield Framework only with respect to
the individual. The parties will select
the arbitrators from the list of arbitrators
described below.
The Department and the Swiss
Administration seek to maintain a list of
up to five arbitrators to supplement the
list of arbitrators developed under the
EU–U.S. Privacy Shield Framework.1 To
be eligible for inclusion on the
supplemental list, applicants must be
admitted to practice law in the United
States and have expertise in both U.S.
privacy law and European or Swiss data
protection law. Applicants shall not be
subject to any instructions from, or be
affiliated with, any Privacy Shield
1 On July 16, 2020, the Court of Justice of the
European Union (CJEU) issued a judgment
declaring as ‘‘invalid’’ the European Commission’s
decision on the adequacy of the protection provided
by the EU–U.S. Privacy Shield and as a result the
EU–U.S. Privacy Shield Framework is no longer a
valid mechanism to comply with EU data
protection requirements when transferring personal
data from the European Union to the United States.
That judgment does not relieve participants in the
EU–U.S. Privacy Shield of their obligations under
the EU–U.S. Privacy Shield Framework. The
Department and the Commission are discussing the
potential for an enhanced EU–U.S. Privacy Shield
Framework to comply with the July 16, 2020
judgment by the CJEU. The Department continues
to administer the Privacy Shield program while
those discussions proceed. For more information on
the Privacy Shield, visit https://
www.privacyshield.gov/welcome.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:16 Jul 27, 2021
Jkt 253001
organization, or the U.S., Switzerland,
EU, or any EU Member State or any
other governmental authority, public
authority or enforcement authority.
The Department previously requested
and obtained approval of this
information collection (OMB Control
No. 0625–0278), which expires on 10/
31/2021, and now seeks renewal of this
information collection. Although the
Department is not currently seeking
additional applications, it may do so in
the future as appropriate.
To be considered for inclusion on the
Swiss-U.S. Privacy Shield Supplemental
List of Arbitrators, eligible individuals
will be evaluated on the basis of
independence, integrity, and expertise:
Independence
—Freedom from bias and prejudice.
Integrity
—Held in the highest regard by peers
for integrity, fairness and good
judgment.
—Demonstrates high ethical standards
and commitment necessary to be an
arbitrator.
Expertise Required:
—Admission to practice law in the
United States.
—Level of demonstrated expertise in
U.S. privacy law and European or
Swiss data protection law.
Other expertise that may be considered
includes any of the following:
—Relevant educational degrees and
professional licenses.
—Relevant professional or academic
experience or legal practice.
—Relevant training or experience in
arbitration or other forms of dispute
resolution.
Evaluation of applications for
inclusion on the list of arbitrators will
be undertaken by the Department and
the Swiss Administration. Selected
applicants will remain on the list for a
period of three years, absent exceptional
circumstances; change in eligibility, or
for cause, renewable for one additional
period of three years.
The Department selected the
International Centre for Dispute
Resolution-American Arbitration
Association (ICDR–AAA) as
administrator for Privacy Shield
arbitrations brought under either the
EU–U.S. Privacy Shield Framework or
the Swiss-U.S. Privacy Shield
Framework. Among other things, the
ICDR–AAA facilitates arbitrator fee
arrangements, including the collection
and timely payment of arbitrator fees
and other expenses.
Arbitrators are expected to commit
their time and effort when included on
the Swiss-U.S. Privacy Shield
Supplemental List of Arbitrators and to
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
take reasonable steps to minimize the
costs or fees of the arbitration.
Arbitrators are subject to a code of
conduct consistent with Annex I of the
Swiss-U.S. Privacy Shield Framework
and generally accepted ethical standards
for arbitrators. The Department and the
Swiss Administration agreed to adopt
an existing, well-established set of U.S.
arbitral procedures to govern the arbitral
proceedings, subject to considerations
identified in Annex I of the Swiss-U.S.
Privacy Shield Framework, including
that materials submitted to arbitrators
will be treated confidentially and will
only be used in connection with the
arbitration. For more information,
please visit https://
www.privacyshield.gov/article?id=GArbitration-Procedures where you can
find information on the arbitration
procedures. (Please note that the
Arbitration procedures apply to both the
EU-U.S. Privacy Shield Framework and
the Swiss-U.S. Privacy Shield
Framework)
Applications
Applications must be typewritten and
should be headed ‘‘Application for
Inclusion on the Swiss-U.S. Privacy
Shield Supplemental List of
Arbitrators.’’ Applications should
include the following information, and
each section of the application should
be numbered as indicated:
—Name of applicant.
—Address, telephone number, and
email address.
1. Independence
—Description of the applicant’s
affiliations with any Privacy Shield
organization, or the U.S.,
Switzerland, any EU Member State
or any other governmental
authority, public authority, or
enforcement authority.
2. Integrity
—On a separate page, the names,
addresses, telephone, and fax
numbers of three individuals
willing to provide information
concerning the applicant’s
qualifications for service, including
the applicant’s character,
reputation, reliability, and
judgment.
—Description of the applicant’s
willingness and ability to make
time commitments necessary to be
an arbitrator.
3. Expertise
—Demonstration of admittance to
practice law in the United States.
—Relevant academic degrees and
professional training and licensing.
—Current employment, including
title, description of responsibility,
name and address of employer, and
E:\FR\FM\28JYN1.SGM
28JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 142 / Wednesday, July 28, 2021 / Notices
name and telephone number of
supervisor or other reference.
—Employment history, including the
dates and addresses of each prior
position and a summary of
responsibilities.
—Description of expertise in U.S.
privacy law and European or Swiss
data protection law.
—Description of training or
experience in arbitration or other
forms of dispute resolution, if
applicable.
—A list of publications, testimony,
and speeches, if any, concerning
U.S. privacy law and European or
Swiss data protection law, with
copies appended.
II. Method of Collection
As stated above, the Department is not
currently seeking additional
applications, but may do so in the future
as appropriate. The Department
previously requested and obtained
approval of this information collection
(OMB Control No. 0625–0278), which
expires on 10/31/2021, and now seeks
renewal of this information collection.
Future applications would be submitted
to the Department by email. More
information on the arbitration
mechanism may be found at https://
www.privacyshield.gov/
article?id=ANNEX-I-introduction.
Sheleen Dumas,
Department PRA Clearance Officer, Office of
the Chief Information Officer, Commerce
Department.
[FR Doc. 2021–16019 Filed 7–27–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
III. Data
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
OMB Control Number: 0625–0278.
Form Number(s): None.
Type of Review: Regular submission,
revision of a current information
collection.
Affected Public: Private individuals.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
20.
Estimated Time per Response: 240
minutes.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 80.
Estimated Total Annual Cost to
Public: $0.
Respondent’s Obligation: Required to
obtain or retain benefits.
Legal Authority: The Department’s
statutory authority to foster, promote,
and develop the foreign and domestic
commerce of the United States (15
U.S.C. 1512).
International Trade Administration
IV. Request for Comments
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (c)
Evaluate ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and (d) Minimize the
reporting burden on those who are to
respond, including the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
Comments that you submit in
response to this notice are a matter of
public record. We will include or
summarize each comment in our request
to OMB to approve this information
collection request (ICR). Before
including your address, phone number,
email address, or other personal
identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you may ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
We are soliciting public comments to
permit the Department/Bureau to: (a)
Evaluate whether the proposed
information collection is necessary for
the proper functions of the Department,
including whether the information will
have practical utility; (b) Evaluate the
accuracy of our estimate of the time and
cost burden for this proposed collection,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:16 Jul 27, 2021
Jkt 253001
[C–580–882]
Certain Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products
From the Republic of Korea: Final
Results of Countervailing Duty
Administrative Review; 2018
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(Commerce) determines that
countervailable subsidies are being
provided to producers and exporters of
certain cold-rolled steel flat products
(cold-rolled steel) from the Republic of
Korea. The period of review (POR) is
January 1, 2018, through December 31,
2018.
DATES: Applicable July 28, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Moses Song or Tyler Weinhold, AD/
CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement
and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–7885 or (202) 482–1121,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
40465
Background
Commerce published the Preliminary
Results of this review on January 26,
2021.1 On April 8, 2021, Commerce
extended the deadline for the final
results of this administrative review
until July 23, 2021.2 On May 25, 2021,
Commerce issued a post-preliminary
analysis on the electricity for less than
adequate remuneration allegation and
the equity infusions that Dongbu Steel
Co., Ltd. (Dongbu Steel) received.3 For
a description of the events that occurred
since the Preliminary Results, see the
Issues and Decision Memorandum.4
Scope of the Order
The product covered by this order is
cold-rolled steel. For a complete
description of the scope of this order,
see the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in interested parties’
case briefs are addressed in the Issues
and Decision Memorandum
accompanying this notice. A list of the
issues raised by parties, and to which
Commerce responded in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum, is provided in
Appendix I to this notice. The Issues
and Decision Memorandum is a public
document and is on file electronically
via Enforcement and Compliance’s
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System
(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://
access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete
version of the Issues and Decision
Memorandum can be accessed directly
at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on the comments received and
record evidence, we made certain
changes to the Preliminary Results with
1 See Certain Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products from
the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of
Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2018,
86 FR 7063 (January 26, 2021) (Preliminary Results),
and accompanying Preliminary Decision
Memorandum.
2 See Memorandum, ‘‘Certain Cold-Rolled Steel
Flat Products from the Republic of Korea;
Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2018:
Extension of Deadline for Final Results,’’ dated
April 8, 2021.
3 See Memorandum, ‘‘Countervailing Duty
Administrative Review of Certain Cold-Rolled Steel
Flat Products from the Republic of Korea: PostPreliminary Analysis Memorandum—Electricity for
Less than Adequate Remuneration and Equity
Infusions,’’ dated May 25, 2021.
4 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Final Results of the 2018
Administrative Review of the Countervailing Duty
Order on Certain Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products
from the Republic of Korea,’’ dated concurrently
with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and
Decision Memorandum).
E:\FR\FM\28JYN1.SGM
28JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 142 (Wednesday, July 28, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40463-40465]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-16019]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for Review and Approval; Renewal
of Information Collection; Comment Request; Swiss-U.S. Privacy Shield;
Invitation for Applications for Inclusion on the Supplemental List of
Arbitrators
AGENCY: International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of information collection, request for comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce, in accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), invites the general public and other
Federal agencies to comment on proposed, and continuing information
collections, which helps us assess the impact of our information
collection requirements and minimize the public's reporting burden. The
purpose of this notice is to allow for 60 days of public comment
preceding submission of the collection to OMB.
DATES: To ensure consideration, comments regarding this proposed
information collection must be received on or before September 27,
2021.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments by
email to Towanda Carey, ITA Paperwork Clearance Officer, Department of
Commerce, International Trade Administration at [email protected].
Please reference OMB Control Number 0625-0278 in the subject line of
your comments. Do not submit Confidential Business Information or
otherwise sensitive or protected information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or
specific questions related to collection activities should be directed
to David Ritchie, Senior Policy Advisor, Department of Commerce,
International Trade Administration via email at
[email protected], or tel. 202-482-1512. More information on the
arbitration mechanism may be found at https://www.privacyshield.gov/servlet/servlet.FileDownload?file=015t000000079Gr.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
The Swiss-U.S. Privacy Shield Framework was designed by the U.S.
Department of Commerce (Department) and the Swiss Administration to
provide companies in both Switzerland and the United States with a
mechanism to comply with data protection requirements when transferring
personal data from Switzerland to the United States in support of
transatlantic commerce. On January 12, 2017, the Swiss Administration
deemed the Swiss-U.S. Privacy Shield Framework adequate to enable data
transfers under Swiss law, and on April 12, 2017, the Department began
accepting self-certifications from U.S. companies to join the program
(82 FR 16375; April 12, 2017).
On September 8, 2020 the Federal Data Protection and Information
Commissioner (FDPIC) of Switzerland issued an opinion concluding that
the Swiss-U.S. Privacy Shield Framework does not provide an adequate
level of protection for data transfers from Switzerland to the United
States pursuant to Switzerland's Federal Act on Data Protection (FADP).
As a result of that opinion, organizations wishing to rely on the
Swiss-U.S. Privacy Shield to transfer personal data from Switzerland to
the United States should seek guidance from the FDPIC or legal counsel.
That opinion does not relieve participants in the Swiss-U.S. Privacy
Shield of their obligations under the Swiss-U.S. Privacy Shield
Framework. The Department continues to administer the Privacy Shield
program while those
[[Page 40464]]
discussions proceed. For more information on the Privacy Shield, visit
https://www.privacyshield.gov/welcome.
As described in Annex I of the Swiss-U.S. Privacy Shield Framework,
the Department and the Swiss Administration committed to implement an
arbitration mechanism to provide Swiss individuals with the ability to
invoke binding arbitration to determine, for residual claims, whether
an organization has violated its obligations under the Privacy Shield.
Organizations voluntarily self-certify to the Swiss-U.S. Privacy Shield
Framework and, upon certification, the commitments the organization has
made to comply with the Swiss-U.S. Privacy Shield Framework become
legally enforceable under U.S. law. Organizations that self-certify to
the Swiss-U.S. Privacy Shield Framework commit to binding arbitration
of residual claims if a Swiss individual chooses to exercise that
option. Under the arbitration option, a Privacy Shield Panel
(consisting of one or three arbitrators, as agreed by the parties) has
the authority to impose individual-specific, non-monetary equitable
relief (such as access, correction, deletion, or return of the Swiss
individual's data in question) necessary to remedy the violation of the
Swiss-U.S. Privacy Shield Framework only with respect to the
individual. The parties will select the arbitrators from the list of
arbitrators described below.
The Department and the Swiss Administration seek to maintain a list
of up to five arbitrators to supplement the list of arbitrators
developed under the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield Framework.\1\ To be eligible
for inclusion on the supplemental list, applicants must be admitted to
practice law in the United States and have expertise in both U.S.
privacy law and European or Swiss data protection law. Applicants shall
not be subject to any instructions from, or be affiliated with, any
Privacy Shield organization, or the U.S., Switzerland, EU, or any EU
Member State or any other governmental authority, public authority or
enforcement authority.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ On July 16, 2020, the Court of Justice of the European Union
(CJEU) issued a judgment declaring as ``invalid'' the European
Commission's decision on the adequacy of the protection provided by
the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield and as a result the EU-U.S. Privacy
Shield Framework is no longer a valid mechanism to comply with EU
data protection requirements when transferring personal data from
the European Union to the United States. That judgment does not
relieve participants in the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield of their
obligations under the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield Framework. The
Department and the Commission are discussing the potential for an
enhanced EU-U.S. Privacy Shield Framework to comply with the July
16, 2020 judgment by the CJEU. The Department continues to
administer the Privacy Shield program while those discussions
proceed. For more information on the Privacy Shield, visit https://www.privacyshield.gov/welcome.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Department previously requested and obtained approval of this
information collection (OMB Control No. 0625-0278), which expires on
10/31/2021, and now seeks renewal of this information collection.
Although the Department is not currently seeking additional
applications, it may do so in the future as appropriate.
To be considered for inclusion on the Swiss-U.S. Privacy Shield
Supplemental List of Arbitrators, eligible individuals will be
evaluated on the basis of independence, integrity, and expertise:
Independence
--Freedom from bias and prejudice.
Integrity
--Held in the highest regard by peers for integrity, fairness and
good judgment.
--Demonstrates high ethical standards and commitment necessary to
be an arbitrator.
Expertise Required:
--Admission to practice law in the United States.
--Level of demonstrated expertise in U.S. privacy law and European
or Swiss data protection law.
Other expertise that may be considered includes any of the following:
--Relevant educational degrees and professional licenses.
--Relevant professional or academic experience or legal practice.
--Relevant training or experience in arbitration or other forms of
dispute resolution.
Evaluation of applications for inclusion on the list of arbitrators
will be undertaken by the Department and the Swiss Administration.
Selected applicants will remain on the list for a period of three
years, absent exceptional circumstances; change in eligibility, or for
cause, renewable for one additional period of three years.
The Department selected the International Centre for Dispute
Resolution-American Arbitration Association (ICDR-AAA) as administrator
for Privacy Shield arbitrations brought under either the EU-U.S.
Privacy Shield Framework or the Swiss-U.S. Privacy Shield Framework.
Among other things, the ICDR-AAA facilitates arbitrator fee
arrangements, including the collection and timely payment of arbitrator
fees and other expenses.
Arbitrators are expected to commit their time and effort when
included on the Swiss-U.S. Privacy Shield Supplemental List of
Arbitrators and to take reasonable steps to minimize the costs or fees
of the arbitration.
Arbitrators are subject to a code of conduct consistent with Annex
I of the Swiss-U.S. Privacy Shield Framework and generally accepted
ethical standards for arbitrators. The Department and the Swiss
Administration agreed to adopt an existing, well-established set of
U.S. arbitral procedures to govern the arbitral proceedings, subject to
considerations identified in Annex I of the Swiss-U.S. Privacy Shield
Framework, including that materials submitted to arbitrators will be
treated confidentially and will only be used in connection with the
arbitration. For more information, please visit https://www.privacyshield.gov/article?id=G-Arbitration-Procedures where you can
find information on the arbitration procedures. (Please note that the
Arbitration procedures apply to both the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield
Framework and the Swiss-U.S. Privacy Shield Framework)
Applications
Applications must be typewritten and should be headed ``Application
for Inclusion on the Swiss-U.S. Privacy Shield Supplemental List of
Arbitrators.'' Applications should include the following information,
and each section of the application should be numbered as indicated:
--Name of applicant.
--Address, telephone number, and email address.
1. Independence
--Description of the applicant's affiliations with any Privacy
Shield organization, or the U.S., Switzerland, any EU Member State or
any other governmental authority, public authority, or enforcement
authority.
2. Integrity
--On a separate page, the names, addresses, telephone, and fax
numbers of three individuals willing to provide information concerning
the applicant's qualifications for service, including the applicant's
character, reputation, reliability, and judgment.
--Description of the applicant's willingness and ability to make
time commitments necessary to be an arbitrator.
3. Expertise
--Demonstration of admittance to practice law in the United States.
--Relevant academic degrees and professional training and
licensing.
--Current employment, including title, description of
responsibility, name and address of employer, and
[[Page 40465]]
name and telephone number of supervisor or other reference.
--Employment history, including the dates and addresses of each
prior position and a summary of responsibilities.
--Description of expertise in U.S. privacy law and European or
Swiss data protection law.
--Description of training or experience in arbitration or other
forms of dispute resolution, if applicable.
--A list of publications, testimony, and speeches, if any,
concerning U.S. privacy law and European or Swiss data protection law,
with copies appended.
II. Method of Collection
As stated above, the Department is not currently seeking additional
applications, but may do so in the future as appropriate. The
Department previously requested and obtained approval of this
information collection (OMB Control No. 0625-0278), which expires on
10/31/2021, and now seeks renewal of this information collection.
Future applications would be submitted to the Department by email. More
information on the arbitration mechanism may be found at https://www.privacyshield.gov/article?id=ANNEX-I-introduction.
III. Data
OMB Control Number: 0625-0278.
Form Number(s): None.
Type of Review: Regular submission, revision of a current
information collection.
Affected Public: Private individuals.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 20.
Estimated Time per Response: 240 minutes.
Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 80.
Estimated Total Annual Cost to Public: $0.
Respondent's Obligation: Required to obtain or retain benefits.
Legal Authority: The Department's statutory authority to foster,
promote, and develop the foreign and domestic commerce of the United
States (15 U.S.C. 1512).
IV. Request for Comments
We are soliciting public comments to permit the Department/Bureau
to: (a) Evaluate whether the proposed information collection is
necessary for the proper functions of the Department, including whether
the information will have practical utility; (b) Evaluate the accuracy
of our estimate of the time and cost burden for this proposed
collection, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions
used; (c) Evaluate ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of
the information to be collected; and (d) Minimize the reporting burden
on those who are to respond, including the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information technology.
Comments that you submit in response to this notice are a matter of
public record. We will include or summarize each comment in our request
to OMB to approve this information collection request (ICR). Before
including your address, phone number, email address, or other personal
identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your
entire comment--including your personal identifying information--may be
made publicly available at any time. While you may ask us in your
comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public
review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so.
Sheleen Dumas,
Department PRA Clearance Officer, Office of the Chief Information
Officer, Commerce Department.
[FR Doc. 2021-16019 Filed 7-27-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P