Fresh Garlic From the People's Republic of China: Final Results and Final Rescission, in Part, of the 25th Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2018-2019, 38272-38273 [2021-15413]

Download as PDF 38272 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 136 / Tuesday, July 20, 2021 / Notices by CBP in the covered merchandise referral referenced above (Accuride, Maxion, and Vanguard) 11 are not required to submit a letter of appearance, and will be added to the public service list for these scope inquires by Commerce. Commerce placed an APO on the existing records of the scope inquiries on May 12, 2021,12 and established the APO service lists for use in these segments. Commerce intends to place the covered merchandise referral letter on the records of these scope inquiries in ACCESS within five days of publication of this notice. Interested parties must submit applications for disclosure under the APO in accordance with the procedures outlined in Commerce’s regulations at 19 CFR 351.305. Those procedures apply to these segments of the AD and CVD proceedings, with one exception: APO applicants representing the parties that have been identified by CBP as an importer in the covered merchandise referral (referenced above) are exempt from the additional filing requirements for importers pursuant to 19 CFR 351.305(d). Dated: July 14, 2021. James Maeder, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. [FR Doc. 2021–15415 Filed 7–19–21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–570–831] Fresh Garlic From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results and Final Rescission, in Part, of the 25th Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2018–2019 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) published the preliminary results of the 25th administrative review of the antidumping duty order on fresh garlic from the People’s Republic of China (China) on March 25, 2021. Commerce determines that mandatory respondent, Shijiazhuang Goodman Trading Co., Ltd. (Goodman) failed to establish its eligibility for a separate rate and is part of the China-wide entity. We also find that the review request made by The Roots Farm Inc. (Roots Farm) khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES AGENCY: 11 See CBP’s EAPA 75009 Letter at 4. 12 See the Administrative Protective Orders, dated May 12, 2021. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:00 Jul 19, 2021 Jkt 253001 was not valid and, accordingly, we have rescinded the review with respect to the other mandatory respondent, Zhengzhou Harmoni Spice Co., Ltd. (Harmoni). DATES: Applicable July 20, 2021. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Leo Ayala, AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3945. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On March 25, 2021, Commerce published the preliminary results of the 25th administrative review of fresh garlic from China.1 We preliminarily found that the mandatory respondent Goodman was part of the China-wide entity. We rescinded the review with respect to five companies for which their sole requests for review had been timely withdrawn.2 Furthermore, we preliminarily determined that the review request submitted by Roots Farm was invalid and preliminarily rescinded the review with respect to Harmoni. Additionally, we found that two companies, Shandong Happy Foods Co., Ltd. and Jining Alpha Food Co., Ltd., qualified for separate rate status. On April 26, 2021, the Fresh Garlic Producers Association (FGPA) and its individual members 3 submitted comments on the Preliminary Results.4 No other party submitted comments. The deadline for the final results is July 23, 2021. Scope of the Order The products subject to the order are all grades of garlic, whole or separated into constituent cloves, whether or not peeled, fresh, chilled, frozen, provisionally preserved, or packed in water or other neutral substance, but not prepared or preserved by the addition of other ingredients or heat processing. 1 See Fresh Garlic from the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results, Preliminary Rescission, and Final Rescission, In Part, of the 25th Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2018– 2019, 86 FR 15903 (March 25, 2021) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM). 2 The companies are: (1) China Jiangsu International Economic Technical Cooperation Corporation; (2) Hebei Holy Flame International; (3) Jinxiang Qingtian Garlic Industries; (4) Qingdao Ritai Food Co., Ltd.; and (5) Yingxin (Wuqiang) International Trade. 3 The individual members of the FGPA are: Christopher Ranch L.L.C.; The Garlic Company; and Valley Garlic. 4 See FGPA’s Letter, ‘‘25th Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Fresh Garlic from the People’s Republic of China—Petitioners’ Letter in Lieu of Case Brief,’’ dated April 26, 2021. PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 The differences between grades are based on color, size, sheathing, and level of decay. The scope of the order does not include the following: (a) Garlic that has been mechanically harvested and that is primarily, but not exclusively, destined for non-fresh use; or (b) garlic that has been specially prepared and cultivated prior to planting and then harvested and otherwise prepared for use as seed. The subject merchandise is used principally as a food product and for seasoning. The subject garlic is currently classifiable under subheadings: 0703.20.0000, 0703.20.0005, 0703.20.0010, 0703.20.0015, 0703.20.0020, 0703.20.0090, 0710.80.7060, 0710.80.9750, 0711.90.6000, 0711.90.6500, 2005.90.9500, 2005.90.9700, and 2005.99.9700, of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, our written description of the scope of the order is dispositive. In order to be excluded from the order, garlic entered under the HTSUS subheadings listed above that is (1) mechanically harvested and primarily, but not exclusively, destined for nonfresh use or (2) specially prepared and cultivated prior to planting and then harvested and otherwise prepared for use as seed must be accompanied by declarations to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to that effect. Partial Rescission of Administrative Review Commerce has determined that the review request from Roots Farm was invalid ab initio, and is rescinding the administrative review with respect to mandatory respondent, Harmoni. Analysis of Comments Received The FGPA was the only party to file comments on the Preliminary Results. The FGPA noted that the preliminary rate applied to Shandong Happy Foods Co., Ltd and Jining Alpha Food Co., Ltd should be $4.37 per kilogram (kg) rather than the rate of $4.34 per kg stated in the Preliminary Results. Commerce stated in the Preliminary Results that the margin assigned to the separate rate recipients would be the ‘‘rate for the separate rate companies in the previous administrative review of this order.’’ 5 The separate rate in the previous administrative review was $4.37 per kg.6 Therefore, we have made the 5 See Preliminary Results PDM at 9. Fresh Garlic from the People’s Republic of China: Final Results and Partial Rescission, of the 24th Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 6 See E:\FR\FM\20JYN1.SGM 20JYN1 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 136 / Tuesday, July 20, 2021 / Notices Determination of Separate Rates for Non-Selected Companies In the Preliminary Results, in accordance with section 777A(c)(2)(B) of Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), Commerce employed a limited examination methodology, as we determined that it would not be practicable to examine individually all companies for which a review request was made.7 There were two exporters of subject merchandise from China that have demonstrated their eligibility for a separate rate but were not selected for individual examination in this review. These two exporters are listed in the Final Results of Administrative Review section of this notice. Neither the Act nor Commerce’s regulations address the establishment of the rate applied to individual companies not selected for examination where Commerce limited its examination in an administrative review pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. Commerce’s practice in cases involving limited selection based on exporters accounting for the largest volume of imports has been to look to section 735(c)(5) of the Act for guidance, which provides instructions for calculating the all-others rate in an investigation. Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act instructs Commerce to use rates established for individually investigated producers and exporters, excluding any rates that are zero, de minimis, or based entirely on facts available in investigations. In this administrative review, Goodman, the only individually reviewed respondent, did not receive a weighted-average dumping margin. Therefore, for these final results, Commerce has determined to assign the separate-rate from the prior review,8 which was Goodman’s calculated rate, to the non-selected separate-rate companies. Final Results of Administrative Review khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES Commerce determines that the following weighted-average dumping 2017–2018, 85 FR 71049, 71050–51 (November 6, 2020) (Garlic from China 2017–2018). 7 See Memorandum, ‘‘2018–19 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Fresh Garlic from the People’s Republic of China: Selection of Respondents for Individual Examination,’’ dated February 20, 2020. 8 See Garlic from China 2017–2018. 17:00 Jul 19, 2021 Jkt 253001 companies listed above, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established in these final results of review; (2) for previously investigated or reviewed WeightedChinese and non-Chinese exporters not average listed above that have separate rates, the Exporter margin cash deposit rate will continue to be the (dollars per kg) exporter-specific rate published for the most recent period; (3) for all Chinese Shandong Happy Foods Co., exporters of subject merchandise which Ltd ..................................... 4.37 have not been found to be entitled to a Jining Alpha Food Co., Ltd ... 4.37 separate rate, the cash deposit rate will China-Wide Rate 9 ................ 4.71 be the China-wide rate of 4.71 U.S. dollars per kg; and (4) for all nonAssessment Rates Chinese exporters of subject Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the merchandise which have not received Act, and 19 CFR 351.212(b), Commerce their own rate, the cash deposit rate will has determined, and CBP shall assess be the rate applicable to the Chinese antidumping duties on all appropriate exporter that supplied that non-Chinese entries of subject merchandise in exporter. These requirements, when accordance with the final results of this imposed, shall remain in effect until review. Commerce intends to direct CBP further notice. to assess rates based on the per-unit (i.e., Notification to Importers per kg) amount on each entry of the subject merchandise during the POR. This notice serves as a reminder to Commerce also intends to issue importers of their responsibility under assessment instructions no earlier than 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 35 days after the publication date of the regarding the reimbursement of final results of this review in the antidumping duties prior to liquidation Federal Register. If a timely summons is of the relevant entries during this period filed at the U.S. Court of International of review. Failure to comply with this Trade, the assessment instructions will requirement could result in Commerce’s direct CBP not to liquidate relevant presumption that reimbursement of entries until the time for parties to file antidumping duties occurred and the a request for a statutory injunction has subsequent assessment of double expired (i.e., within 90 days of antidumping duties. publication). Administrative Protective Order Pursuant to Commerce’s assessment practice in non-market economy cases, This notice serves as the only for merchandise entered under reminder to parties subject to Goodman’s case number (i.e., at its administrative protective order (APO) of individually-examined exporter’s cash their responsibility concerning the deposit rate), Commerce intends to return or destruction of proprietary instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at information disclosed under APO in the China-wide rate.10 accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Cash Deposit Requirements Timely written notification of return or destruction of APO materials, or The following cash deposit conversion to judicial protective order, requirements will be effective upon is hereby requested. Failure to comply publication of the final results of this with the regulations and the terms of an administrative review for shipments of APO is a sanctionable violation. the subject merchandise from China entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, Notification to Interested Parties for consumption on or after the We are issuing and publishing these publication date of this notice in the final results of administrative review in Federal Register, as provided by accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and sections 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) For the 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 9 The companies that are part of the China-wide 351.221(b)(5). margins exist for the administrative review covering the period November 1, 2018, through October 31, 2019: change proposed by FGPA for these final results. See Final Results of Administrative Review section. VerDate Sep<11>2014 38273 entity in this review include Shijiazhuang Goodman Trading Co., Ltd.; Qingdao Maycarrier Import & Export Co., Ltd.; and Weifang Hongqiao International Logistics Co., Ltd. 10 For a full discussion of this practice, see NonMarket Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011). PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Dated: July 13, 2021. Christian Marsh, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2021–15413 Filed 7–19–21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P E:\FR\FM\20JYN1.SGM 20JYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 136 (Tuesday, July 20, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38272-38273]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-15413]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-831]


Fresh Garlic From the People's Republic of China: Final Results 
and Final Rescission, in Part, of the 25th Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review; 2018-2019

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) published the 
preliminary results of the 25th administrative review of the 
antidumping duty order on fresh garlic from the People's Republic of 
China (China) on March 25, 2021. Commerce determines that mandatory 
respondent, Shijiazhuang Goodman Trading Co., Ltd. (Goodman) failed to 
establish its eligibility for a separate rate and is part of the China-
wide entity. We also find that the review request made by The Roots 
Farm Inc. (Roots Farm) was not valid and, accordingly, we have 
rescinded the review with respect to the other mandatory respondent, 
Zhengzhou Harmoni Spice Co., Ltd. (Harmoni).

DATES: Applicable July 20, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Leo Ayala, AD/CVD Operations, Office 
VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3945.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On March 25, 2021, Commerce published the preliminary results of 
the 25th administrative review of fresh garlic from China.\1\ We 
preliminarily found that the mandatory respondent Goodman was part of 
the China-wide entity. We rescinded the review with respect to five 
companies for which their sole requests for review had been timely 
withdrawn.\2\ Furthermore, we preliminarily determined that the review 
request submitted by Roots Farm was invalid and preliminarily rescinded 
the review with respect to Harmoni. Additionally, we found that two 
companies, Shandong Happy Foods Co., Ltd. and Jining Alpha Food Co., 
Ltd., qualified for separate rate status.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Fresh Garlic from the People's Republic of China: 
Preliminary Results, Preliminary Rescission, and Final Rescission, 
In Part, of the 25th Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2018-
2019, 86 FR 15903 (March 25, 2021) (Preliminary Results), and 
accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM).
    \2\ The companies are: (1) China Jiangsu International Economic 
Technical Cooperation Corporation; (2) Hebei Holy Flame 
International; (3) Jinxiang Qingtian Garlic Industries; (4) Qingdao 
Ritai Food Co., Ltd.; and (5) Yingxin (Wuqiang) International Trade.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On April 26, 2021, the Fresh Garlic Producers Association (FGPA) 
and its individual members \3\ submitted comments on the Preliminary 
Results.\4\ No other party submitted comments. The deadline for the 
final results is July 23, 2021.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The individual members of the FGPA are: Christopher Ranch 
L.L.C.; The Garlic Company; and Valley Garlic.
    \4\ See FGPA's Letter, ``25th Administrative Review of the 
Antidumping Duty Order on Fresh Garlic from the People's Republic of 
China--Petitioners' Letter in Lieu of Case Brief,'' dated April 26, 
2021.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order

    The products subject to the order are all grades of garlic, whole 
or separated into constituent cloves, whether or not peeled, fresh, 
chilled, frozen, provisionally preserved, or packed in water or other 
neutral substance, but not prepared or preserved by the addition of 
other ingredients or heat processing. The differences between grades 
are based on color, size, sheathing, and level of decay. The scope of 
the order does not include the following: (a) Garlic that has been 
mechanically harvested and that is primarily, but not exclusively, 
destined for non-fresh use; or (b) garlic that has been specially 
prepared and cultivated prior to planting and then harvested and 
otherwise prepared for use as seed. The subject merchandise is used 
principally as a food product and for seasoning. The subject garlic is 
currently classifiable under subheadings: 0703.20.0000, 0703.20.0005, 
0703.20.0010, 0703.20.0015, 0703.20.0020, 0703.20.0090, 0710.80.7060, 
0710.80.9750, 0711.90.6000, 0711.90.6500, 2005.90.9500, 2005.90.9700, 
and 2005.99.9700, of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United 
States (HTSUS).
    Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and 
customs purposes, our written description of the scope of the order is 
dispositive. In order to be excluded from the order, garlic entered 
under the HTSUS subheadings listed above that is (1) mechanically 
harvested and primarily, but not exclusively, destined for non-fresh 
use or (2) specially prepared and cultivated prior to planting and then 
harvested and otherwise prepared for use as seed must be accompanied by 
declarations to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to that 
effect.

Partial Rescission of Administrative Review

    Commerce has determined that the review request from Roots Farm was 
invalid ab initio, and is rescinding the administrative review with 
respect to mandatory respondent, Harmoni.

Analysis of Comments Received

    The FGPA was the only party to file comments on the Preliminary 
Results. The FGPA noted that the preliminary rate applied to Shandong 
Happy Foods Co., Ltd and Jining Alpha Food Co., Ltd should be $4.37 per 
kilogram (kg) rather than the rate of $4.34 per kg stated in the 
Preliminary Results. Commerce stated in the Preliminary Results that 
the margin assigned to the separate rate recipients would be the ``rate 
for the separate rate companies in the previous administrative review 
of this order.'' \5\ The separate rate in the previous administrative 
review was $4.37 per kg.\6\ Therefore, we have made the

[[Page 38273]]

change proposed by FGPA for these final results. See Final Results of 
Administrative Review section.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Preliminary Results PDM at 9.
    \6\ See Fresh Garlic from the People's Republic of China: Final 
Results and Partial Rescission, of the 24th Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review; 2017-2018, 85 FR 71049, 71050-51 (November 6, 
2020) (Garlic from China 2017-2018).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Determination of Separate Rates for Non-Selected Companies

    In the Preliminary Results, in accordance with section 
777A(c)(2)(B) of Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), Commerce 
employed a limited examination methodology, as we determined that it 
would not be practicable to examine individually all companies for 
which a review request was made.\7\ There were two exporters of subject 
merchandise from China that have demonstrated their eligibility for a 
separate rate but were not selected for individual examination in this 
review. These two exporters are listed in the Final Results of 
Administrative Review section of this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See Memorandum, ``2018-19 Antidumping Duty Administrative 
Review of Fresh Garlic from the People's Republic of China: 
Selection of Respondents for Individual Examination,'' dated 
February 20, 2020.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Neither the Act nor Commerce's regulations address the 
establishment of the rate applied to individual companies not selected 
for examination where Commerce limited its examination in an 
administrative review pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. 
Commerce's practice in cases involving limited selection based on 
exporters accounting for the largest volume of imports has been to look 
to section 735(c)(5) of the Act for guidance, which provides 
instructions for calculating the all-others rate in an investigation. 
Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act instructs Commerce to use rates 
established for individually investigated producers and exporters, 
excluding any rates that are zero, de minimis, or based entirely on 
facts available in investigations.
    In this administrative review, Goodman, the only individually 
reviewed respondent, did not receive a weighted-average dumping margin. 
Therefore, for these final results, Commerce has determined to assign 
the separate-rate from the prior review,\8\ which was Goodman's 
calculated rate, to the non-selected separate-rate companies.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Garlic from China 2017-2018.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Final Results of Administrative Review

    Commerce determines that the following weighted-average dumping 
margins exist for the administrative review covering the period 
November 1, 2018, through October 31, 2019:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                             Weighted-
                                                          average margin
                        Exporter                           (dollars per
                                                                kg)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shandong Happy Foods Co., Ltd...........................            4.37
Jining Alpha Food Co., Ltd..............................            4.37
China-Wide Rate \9\.....................................            4.71
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Assessment Rates
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ The companies that are part of the China-wide entity in this 
review include Shijiazhuang Goodman Trading Co., Ltd.; Qingdao 
Maycarrier Import & Export Co., Ltd.; and Weifang Hongqiao 
International Logistics Co., Ltd.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.212(b), 
Commerce has determined, and CBP shall assess antidumping duties on all 
appropriate entries of subject merchandise in accordance with the final 
results of this review. Commerce intends to direct CBP to assess rates 
based on the per-unit (i.e., per kg) amount on each entry of the 
subject merchandise during the POR. Commerce also intends to issue 
assessment instructions no earlier than 35 days after the publication 
date of the final results of this review in the Federal Register. If a 
timely summons is filed at the U.S. Court of International Trade, the 
assessment instructions will direct CBP not to liquidate relevant 
entries until the time for parties to file a request for a statutory 
injunction has expired (i.e., within 90 days of publication).
    Pursuant to Commerce's assessment practice in non-market economy 
cases, for merchandise entered under Goodman's case number (i.e., at 
its individually-examined exporter's cash deposit rate), Commerce 
intends to instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at the China-wide 
rate.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ For a full discussion of this practice, see Non-Market 
Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 
76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon 
publication of the final results of this administrative review for 
shipments of the subject merchandise from China entered, or withdrawn 
from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of 
this notice in the Federal Register, as provided by sections 751(a)(2) 
of the Act: (1) For the companies listed above, the cash deposit rate 
will be the rate established in these final results of review; (2) for 
previously investigated or reviewed Chinese and non-Chinese exporters 
not listed above that have separate rates, the cash deposit rate will 
continue to be the exporter-specific rate published for the most recent 
period; (3) for all Chinese exporters of subject merchandise which have 
not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate 
will be the China-wide rate of 4.71 U.S. dollars per kg; and (4) for 
all non-Chinese exporters of subject merchandise which have not 
received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate 
applicable to the Chinese exporter that supplied that non-Chinese 
exporter. These requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect 
until further notice.

Notification to Importers

    This notice serves as a reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during this period of review. Failure to comply 
with this requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of double antidumping duties.

Administrative Protective Order

    This notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information 
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely written 
notification of return or destruction of APO materials, or conversion 
to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply 
with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable 
violation.

Notification to Interested Parties

    We are issuing and publishing these final results of administrative 
review in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, 
and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5).

    Dated: July 13, 2021.
Christian Marsh,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2021-15413 Filed 7-19-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P