Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request, 38107-38109 [2021-15294]
Download as PDF
38107
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 135 / Monday, July 19, 2021 / Notices
Dated: July 13, 2021.
David W Freeman,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory
Committee Policy.
agency, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate
of the burden of the proposed collection
of information; (c) ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
[FR Doc. 2021–15201 Filed 7–16–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Substance Abuse and Mental Health
Services Administration
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request
Proposed Project: Division of State
Programs—Management Reporting
Tool (DSP–MRT) (OMB No. 0930–
0354)—Revision
In compliance with Section
3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 concerning
opportunity for public comment on
proposed collections of information, the
Substance Abuse and Mental Health
Services Administration (SAMHSA)
will publish periodic summaries of
proposed projects. To request more
information on the proposed projects or
to obtain a copy of the information
collection plans, call the SAMHSA
Reports Clearance Officer on (240) 276–
0361.
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collections of information
are necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
The Substance Abuse and Mental
Health Services Administration’s
(SAMHSA) Center for Substance Abuse
Prevention (CSAP) aims to monitor
several substance use prevention
programs through the DSP–MRT, which
reports data using the Strategic
Prevention Framework (SPF). Programs
monitored through the DSP–MRT
include: SPF-Partnerships for Success
(PFS), SPF-Prescription Drugs (Rx),
Prescription Drug Overdose (PDO), and
First Responder-Comprehensive
Addiction and Recovery Act (FR–
CARA). SAMHSA also proposed adding
a new program: Sober Truth on
Preventing Underage Drinking Act
Grants (STOP Act). This request for data
collection includes a revision from a
previously approved OMB instrument.
Monitoring data using the SPF model
will allow SAMHSA’s project officers to
systematically collect data to monitor
their grant program. In addition to
assessing activities related to the SPF
steps, the performance monitoring
instruments covered in this statement
collect data to assess the following
grantee required specific performance
measures:
• Number of training and technical
assistance activities per funded
community provided by the grantee to
support communities
• Number of training and technical
assistance activities (numbers served)
provided by the grantee
• Number of subrecipient communities
that improved on one or more targeted
National Outcome Measures
• Number of grantees who integrate
Prescription Drug Monitoring Program
(PDMP) data into their program needs
assessment
• Number of naloxone toolkits
distributed
Changes to this package include the
following:
• Inclusion of six performance targets
• Removal of outdated references
• Adjustments to the language in the
Disparities Impact Section to refine
response.
ANNUALIZED DATA COLLECTION BURDEN
Instrument
DSP–MRT ....................
PFS Supplemental .......
PDO/FR CARA Supplemental .......................
SPF Rx Supplemental
STOP Act Supplemental (new) .............
FY2021–FY2024 Total
Number of
respondents
Responses
per
respondent
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Total burden
hours
Average
hourly wage
Total
respondent
cost a
4
1
2,084
253
3
1
6,252
253
$44.19
44.19
$276,276
11,180
109
26
2
4
218
104
1
1
218
104
44.19
44.19
9,633
4,596
133
1
133
1
133
44.19
5,877
521
........................
........................
........................
6,960
........................
307,562
Carlos Graham,
Social Science Analyst.
[FR Doc. 2021–15293 Filed 7–16–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162–20–P
18:23 Jul 16, 2021
Hours per
response
521
253
Send comments to Carlos Graham,
SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer,
5600 Fishers Lane, Room 15E57A,
Rockville, Maryland 20857, OR email a
copy to carlos.graham@samhsa.hhs.gov.
Written comments should be received
by September 17, 2021.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Total number
of responses
Jkt 253001
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Substance Abuse and Mental Health
Services Administration
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request
In compliance with Section
3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 concerning
opportunity for public comment on
proposed collections of information, the
Substance Abuse and Mental Health
Services Administration (SAMHSA)
PO 00000
Frm 00121
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
will publish periodic summaries of
proposed projects. To request more
information on the proposed projects or
to obtain a copy of the information
collection plans, call the SAMHSA
Reports Clearance Officer at (240) 276–
0361 or carlos.graham@samhsa.hhs.gov.
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collections of information
are necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate
of the burden of the proposed collection
of information; (c) ways to enhance the
E:\FR\FM\19JYN1.SGM
19JYN1
38108
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 135 / Monday, July 19, 2021 / Notices
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Proposed Project: Survey of State
Underage Drinking Prevention Policies,
Programs, and Practices—(OMB No.
0930–0316)—Extension
The Sober Truth on Preventing
Underage Drinking Act (the ‘‘STOP
Act’’) (Pub. L. 109–422, reauthorized in
2016 by Pub. L. 114–255) states that the
‘‘Secretary [of Health and Human
Services] shall . . . annually issue a
report on each state’s performance in
enacting, enforcing, and creating laws,
regulations, and programs to prevent or
reduce underage drinking.’’ The
Secretary has delegated responsibility
for this report to SAMHSA. Therefore,
SAMHSA has developed a Survey of
State Underage Drinking Prevention
Policies, Programs, and Practices (the
‘‘State Survey’’) to provide input for the
state-by-state report on prevention and
enforcement activities related to the
underage drinking component of the
Annual Report to Congress on the
Prevention and Reduction of Underage
Drinking (‘‘Report to Congress’’).
The STOP Act also requires the
Secretary to develop ‘‘a set of measures
to be used in preparing the report on
best practices’’ and to consider
categories including but not limited to
the following:
Category #1: Sixteen specific
underage drinking laws/regulations
enacted at the state level (e.g., laws
prohibiting sales to minors; laws related
to minors in possession of alcohol).
Note that ten additional policies have
been added to the Report to Congress
pursuant to Congressional
appropriations language or the
Secretary’s authority granted by the
STOP Act;
Category #2: Enforcement and
educational programs to promote
compliance with these laws/regulations;
Category #3: Programs targeted to
youths, parents, and caregivers to deter
underage drinking and the number of
individuals served by these programs;
Category #4: The amount that each
state invests, per youth capita, on the
prevention of underage drinking broken
into five categories: (a) Compliance
check programs in retail outlets; (b)
checkpoints and saturation patrols that
include the goal of reducing and
deterring underage drinking; (c)
community-based, school-based, and
higher-education-based programs to
prevent underage drinking; (d) underage
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:23 Jul 16, 2021
Jkt 253001
drinking prevention programs that target
youth within the juvenile justice and
child welfare systems; and (e) any other
state efforts or programs that target
underage drinking.
Congress’ purpose in mandating the
collection of data on state policies,
programs, and practices through the
State Survey is to provide policymakers
and the public with otherwise
unavailable but much needed
information regarding state underage
drinking prevention policies and
programs. SAMHSA and other federal
agencies that have underage drinking
prevention as part of their mandate use
the results of the State Survey to inform
federal programmatic priorities, as do
other stakeholders, including
community organizations. The
information gathered by the State
Survey has established a resource for
state agencies and the general public for
assessing policies and programs in their
own state and for becoming familiar
with the policies, programs, practices,
and funding priorities of other states.
Because of the broad scope of data
required by the STOP Act, SAMHSA
relies on existing data sources where
possible to minimize the survey burden
on the states. SAMHSA uses data on
state underage drinking policies from
the National Institute of Alcohol Abuse
and Alcoholism’s Alcohol Policy
Information System (APIS), an
authoritative compendium of state
alcohol-related laws. The APIS data is
augmented by SAMHSA with original
legal research on state laws and policies
addressing underage drinking to include
all of the STOP Act’s requested laws
and regulations (Category #1 of the four
categories included in the STOP Act, as
described above, page 2).
The STOP Act mandates that the State
Survey assess ‘‘best practices’’ and
emphasize the importance of building
collaborations with federally recognized
tribal governments (‘‘tribal
governments’’). It also emphasizes the
importance at the federal level of
promoting interagency collaboration
and to that end establishes the
Interagency Coordinating Committee on
the Prevention of Underage Drinking
(ICCPUD). SAMHSA has determined
that to fulfill the Congressional intent, it
is critical that the State Survey gather
information from the states regarding
the best practices standards that they
apply to their underage drinking
programs, collaborations between states
and tribal governments, and the
development of state-level interagency
collaborations similar to ICCPUD.
SAMHSA has determined that data on
Categories #2, #3, and #4 mandated in
the STOP Act (as listed on page 2)
PO 00000
Frm 00122
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
(enforcement and educational programs;
programs targeting youth, parents, and
caregivers; and state expenditures) as
well as states’ best practices standards,
collaborations with tribal governments,
use of social marketing or counteradvertising campaigns, and state-level
interagency collaborations are not
available from secondary sources and
therefore must be collected from the
states themselves. The State Survey is
therefore necessary to fulfill the
Congressional mandate found in the
STOP Act. Furthermore, the uniform
collection of these data from the states
over the last ten years has created a
valuable longitudinal dataset, and the
State Survey’s renewal is vital to
maintaining this resource.
The State Survey is a single document
that is divided into four sections, as
follows:
Section 1: Enforcement programs to
promote compliance with underage
drinking laws and regulations (as
described in Category #2 above);
Section 2A: Programs and media
campaigns targeted to youth, parents,
and caregivers to deter underage
drinking (as described in Category #3
above);
Sections 2B and 2C: State interagency
collaboration to implement prevention
programs and media campaigns, state
best-practice standards, and
collaborations with tribal governments
(as described above);
Section 2D: The amount that each
state invests on the prevention of
underage drinking in the categories
specified in the STOP Act (see
description of Category #4 above) and
descriptions of any dedicated fees,
taxes, or fines used to raise these funds.
The number of questions in each
section is as follows:
Section 1: 38 questions
Section 2A: 15 questions
Section 2B: 12 questions
Section 2C: 10 questions
Section 2D: 10 questions
Total: 85 questions
Note that the number of questions in
Section 2A is an estimate. This section
asks states to identify up to ten
programs that are specific to underage
drinking prevention. For each program
identified, there are three follow-up
questions. Based on the average number
of programs per state reported in the
State Survey’s ten-year history, it is
anticipated that states will report an
average of five programs for a total of 15
questions.
It is anticipated that most respondents
will actually respond to only a subset of
this total. The State Survey is designed
with ‘‘skip logic,’’ which means that
E:\FR\FM\19JYN1.SGM
19JYN1
38109
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 135 / Monday, July 19, 2021 / Notices
many questions will only be directed to
a subset of respondents who report the
existence of particular programs or
activities.
No changes in content are proposed
for the current version of the Survey.
Note that the title of the survey has been
modified from ‘‘Survey of State
Underage Drinking Prevention Policies
and Practices’’ to ‘‘Survey of State
Underage Drinking Prevention Policies,
Programs, and Practices’’ to better
reflect the subjects addressed by the
State Survey questions.
To ensure that the State Survey
obtains the necessary data while
minimizing the burden on the states,
SAMHSA has conducted a lengthy and
comprehensive planning process. It
sought advice from key stakeholders (as
mandated by the STOP Act) including
hosting multiple stakeholders’ meetings,
conducting two field tests with state
officials likely to be responsible for
completing the State Survey, and
investigating and testing various State
Survey formats, online delivery systems,
and data collection methodologies.
Based on these investigations,
SAMHSA collects the required data
using an online survey data collection
platform (SurveyMonkey). Links to the
four sections of the survey are
distributed to states via email. The State
Survey is sent to each state governor’s
office and the Office of the Mayor of the
District of Columbia. Based on the
experience from the last ten years of
Instrument
Number of
respondents
Responses/
respondent
Burden/
response
(hrs)
Annual burden
(hrs)
State Survey ....................................................................................................
51
1
17.7
902.7
Send comments to Carlos Graham,
SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer at
carlos.graham@samhsa.hhs.gov. Written
comments should be received by
September 17, 2021.
Carlos Graham,
Social Science Analyst.
[FR Doc. 2021–15294 Filed 7–16–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162–20–P
virtual meeting of the President’s
National Infrastructure Advisory
Council set to be held on July 23, 2021
has been cancelled.
Rachel Liang,
Designated Federal Officer, President’s
National Infrastructure Advisory Council,
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security
Agency, Department of Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 2021–15206 Filed 7–16–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–9P–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
INTER-AMERICAN FOUNDATION
[Docket No. CISA–2021–0011]
60-Day Notice for Assessing PostDisaster Needs Across IAF Grantees
(PRA)
Notice of Cancellation of the
President’s National Infrastructure
Advisory Council Meeting
Cybersecurity and
Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA),
Department of Homeland Security
(DHS).
ACTION: Notice of cancellation of a
Federal Advisory Committee Act
(FACA) meeting.
AGENCY:
CISA announces the
cancellation of the public meeting of the
President’s National Infrastructure
Advisory Council (NIAC) scheduled for
July 23, 2021.
DATES: This meeting was announced in
the Federal Register on June 16, 2021
(86 FR 32053).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Rachel Liang, Rachel.Liang@
cisa.dhs.gov; 202–936–8300.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: CISA
gives notice under the Federal Advisory
Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. app. 2, that the
SUMMARY:
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
administering the State Survey, it is
anticipated that the state governors will
designate staff from state agencies that
have access to the requested data
(typically state Alcohol Beverage
Control [ABC] agencies and state
Substance Abuse Program agencies).
SAMHSA provides both telephone and
electronic technical support to state
agency staff and emphasizes that the
states are expected to provide data from
existing state databases and other data
sources available to them. The burden
estimate below takes into account these
assumptions.
The estimated annual response
burden to collect this information is as
follows:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:23 Jul 16, 2021
Jkt 253001
Inter-American Foundation.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Inter-American
Foundation (IAF), as part of its
continuing efforts to reduce paperwork
and respondent burden, conducts a
preclearance consultation program to
provide the general public and federal
agencies with an opportunity to
comment on proposed and/or
continuing collections of information in
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995. This program
helps ensure that requested data is
provided in the desired format;
reporting burden (time and financial
resources) is minimized; collection
instruments are clearly understood; and
the impact of collection requirements on
respondents is properly assessed.
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted to the office listed in the
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00123
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
address section below within 60 days
from the date of this publication in the
Federal Register.
ADDRESSES: Send comments to Raquel
Gomes, Inter-American Foundation, via
email to rgomes@iaf.gov and Jenna
Glickman, Inter-American Foundation,
via email to jglickman@iaf.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Natural
disasters and shocks, such as
hurricanes, earthquakes, and
pandemics, tend to be especially
harmful for low-income and
marginalized populations. IAF grantees
across Latin America and the Caribbean
often serve as early responders in times
of crises, helping their communities
cope with the impacts of disasters and
shocks. The IAF seeks to have the
ability to survey grantees that may be
impacted by disasters and shocks to
quickly assess how the agency can
better support them during such times.
The IAF is particularly interested in
comments which:
—Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
—Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
—Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
—Can help the agency minimize the
burden of the collection of
information on those who are to
E:\FR\FM\19JYN1.SGM
19JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 135 (Monday, July 19, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38107-38109]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-15294]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request
In compliance with Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 concerning opportunity for public comment on proposed
collections of information, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health
Services Administration (SAMHSA) will publish periodic summaries of
proposed projects. To request more information on the proposed projects
or to obtain a copy of the information collection plans, call the
SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer at (240) 276-0361 or
[email protected].
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collections of
information are necessary for the proper performance of the functions
of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical
utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the
[[Page 38108]]
quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and
(d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Proposed Project: Survey of State Underage Drinking Prevention
Policies, Programs, and Practices--(OMB No. 0930-0316)--Extension
The Sober Truth on Preventing Underage Drinking Act (the ``STOP
Act'') (Pub. L. 109-422, reauthorized in 2016 by Pub. L. 114-255)
states that the ``Secretary [of Health and Human Services] shall . . .
annually issue a report on each state's performance in enacting,
enforcing, and creating laws, regulations, and programs to prevent or
reduce underage drinking.'' The Secretary has delegated responsibility
for this report to SAMHSA. Therefore, SAMHSA has developed a Survey of
State Underage Drinking Prevention Policies, Programs, and Practices
(the ``State Survey'') to provide input for the state-by-state report
on prevention and enforcement activities related to the underage
drinking component of the Annual Report to Congress on the Prevention
and Reduction of Underage Drinking (``Report to Congress'').
The STOP Act also requires the Secretary to develop ``a set of
measures to be used in preparing the report on best practices'' and to
consider categories including but not limited to the following:
Category #1: Sixteen specific underage drinking laws/regulations
enacted at the state level (e.g., laws prohibiting sales to minors;
laws related to minors in possession of alcohol). Note that ten
additional policies have been added to the Report to Congress pursuant
to Congressional appropriations language or the Secretary's authority
granted by the STOP Act;
Category #2: Enforcement and educational programs to promote
compliance with these laws/regulations;
Category #3: Programs targeted to youths, parents, and caregivers
to deter underage drinking and the number of individuals served by
these programs;
Category #4: The amount that each state invests, per youth capita,
on the prevention of underage drinking broken into five categories: (a)
Compliance check programs in retail outlets; (b) checkpoints and
saturation patrols that include the goal of reducing and deterring
underage drinking; (c) community-based, school-based, and higher-
education-based programs to prevent underage drinking; (d) underage
drinking prevention programs that target youth within the juvenile
justice and child welfare systems; and (e) any other state efforts or
programs that target underage drinking.
Congress' purpose in mandating the collection of data on state
policies, programs, and practices through the State Survey is to
provide policymakers and the public with otherwise unavailable but much
needed information regarding state underage drinking prevention
policies and programs. SAMHSA and other federal agencies that have
underage drinking prevention as part of their mandate use the results
of the State Survey to inform federal programmatic priorities, as do
other stakeholders, including community organizations. The information
gathered by the State Survey has established a resource for state
agencies and the general public for assessing policies and programs in
their own state and for becoming familiar with the policies, programs,
practices, and funding priorities of other states.
Because of the broad scope of data required by the STOP Act, SAMHSA
relies on existing data sources where possible to minimize the survey
burden on the states. SAMHSA uses data on state underage drinking
policies from the National Institute of Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism's
Alcohol Policy Information System (APIS), an authoritative compendium
of state alcohol-related laws. The APIS data is augmented by SAMHSA
with original legal research on state laws and policies addressing
underage drinking to include all of the STOP Act's requested laws and
regulations (Category #1 of the four categories included in the STOP
Act, as described above, page 2).
The STOP Act mandates that the State Survey assess ``best
practices'' and emphasize the importance of building collaborations
with federally recognized tribal governments (``tribal governments'').
It also emphasizes the importance at the federal level of promoting
interagency collaboration and to that end establishes the Interagency
Coordinating Committee on the Prevention of Underage Drinking (ICCPUD).
SAMHSA has determined that to fulfill the Congressional intent, it is
critical that the State Survey gather information from the states
regarding the best practices standards that they apply to their
underage drinking programs, collaborations between states and tribal
governments, and the development of state-level interagency
collaborations similar to ICCPUD.
SAMHSA has determined that data on Categories #2, #3, and #4
mandated in the STOP Act (as listed on page 2) (enforcement and
educational programs; programs targeting youth, parents, and
caregivers; and state expenditures) as well as states' best practices
standards, collaborations with tribal governments, use of social
marketing or counter-advertising campaigns, and state-level interagency
collaborations are not available from secondary sources and therefore
must be collected from the states themselves. The State Survey is
therefore necessary to fulfill the Congressional mandate found in the
STOP Act. Furthermore, the uniform collection of these data from the
states over the last ten years has created a valuable longitudinal
dataset, and the State Survey's renewal is vital to maintaining this
resource.
The State Survey is a single document that is divided into four
sections, as follows:
Section 1: Enforcement programs to promote compliance with underage
drinking laws and regulations (as described in Category #2 above);
Section 2A: Programs and media campaigns targeted to youth,
parents, and caregivers to deter underage drinking (as described in
Category #3 above);
Sections 2B and 2C: State interagency collaboration to implement
prevention programs and media campaigns, state best-practice standards,
and collaborations with tribal governments (as described above);
Section 2D: The amount that each state invests on the prevention of
underage drinking in the categories specified in the STOP Act (see
description of Category #4 above) and descriptions of any dedicated
fees, taxes, or fines used to raise these funds.
The number of questions in each section is as follows:
Section 1: 38 questions
Section 2A: 15 questions
Section 2B: 12 questions
Section 2C: 10 questions
Section 2D: 10 questions
Total: 85 questions
Note that the number of questions in Section 2A is an estimate.
This section asks states to identify up to ten programs that are
specific to underage drinking prevention. For each program identified,
there are three follow-up questions. Based on the average number of
programs per state reported in the State Survey's ten-year history, it
is anticipated that states will report an average of five programs for
a total of 15 questions.
It is anticipated that most respondents will actually respond to
only a subset of this total. The State Survey is designed with ``skip
logic,'' which means that
[[Page 38109]]
many questions will only be directed to a subset of respondents who
report the existence of particular programs or activities.
No changes in content are proposed for the current version of the
Survey. Note that the title of the survey has been modified from
``Survey of State Underage Drinking Prevention Policies and Practices''
to ``Survey of State Underage Drinking Prevention Policies, Programs,
and Practices'' to better reflect the subjects addressed by the State
Survey questions.
To ensure that the State Survey obtains the necessary data while
minimizing the burden on the states, SAMHSA has conducted a lengthy and
comprehensive planning process. It sought advice from key stakeholders
(as mandated by the STOP Act) including hosting multiple stakeholders'
meetings, conducting two field tests with state officials likely to be
responsible for completing the State Survey, and investigating and
testing various State Survey formats, online delivery systems, and data
collection methodologies.
Based on these investigations, SAMHSA collects the required data
using an online survey data collection platform (SurveyMonkey). Links
to the four sections of the survey are distributed to states via email.
The State Survey is sent to each state governor's office and the Office
of the Mayor of the District of Columbia. Based on the experience from
the last ten years of administering the State Survey, it is anticipated
that the state governors will designate staff from state agencies that
have access to the requested data (typically state Alcohol Beverage
Control [ABC] agencies and state Substance Abuse Program agencies).
SAMHSA provides both telephone and electronic technical support to
state agency staff and emphasizes that the states are expected to
provide data from existing state databases and other data sources
available to them. The burden estimate below takes into account these
assumptions.
The estimated annual response burden to collect this information is
as follows:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Responses/ Burden/ Annual burden
Instrument respondents respondent response (hrs) (hrs)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State Survey................................ 51 1 17.7 902.7
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Send comments to Carlos Graham, SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer at
[email protected]. Written comments should be received by
September 17, 2021.
Carlos Graham,
Social Science Analyst.
[FR Doc. 2021-15294 Filed 7-16-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162-20-P