Chlorinated Isocyanurates From the People's Republic of China: Final Determination of No Shipments; 2019-2020 Administrative Review, 36253-36255 [2021-14639]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 129 / Friday, July 9, 2021 / Notices jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES China.1 On November 3, 2020, Commerce published the notice of initiation of the first sunset review of the Orders, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).2 On November 10, 2020, Commerce received notices of intent to participate from Cornerstone Chemical Company (Cornerstone, or domestic interested party), within the deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i).3 Cornerstone claimed interested party status under section 771(9)(C) of the Act, as a domestic producer engaged in the production of melamine in the United States. On November 25, 2020, Commerce received substantive responses from the domestic interested party within the 30day deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i).4 We received no substantive responses from any other domestic or interested parties and no hearing was requested. On December 23, 2020, Commerce notified the ITC that it did not receive adequate substantive responses from respondent interested parties.5 As a result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), Commerce conducted expedited (120-day) sunset reviews of these Orders. As a result of its reviews, Commerce determined that revocation of the AD and CVD orders on melamine from China would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping and subsidization. Therefore, Commerce notified the ITC of the magnitude of the margins likely to prevail should the orders be revoked, pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and 752(b) and (c) of the Act.6 1 See Melamine from the People’s Republic of China: Antidumping Duty and Countervailing Duty Orders, 80 FR 80751 (December 28, 2015) (Orders). 2 See Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews, 85 FR 69585 (November 3, 2020). 3 See Cornerstone’s Letter, ‘‘Five-Year (‘Sunset’) Review Of Countervailing Duty Order On Melamine from the People’s Republic Of China: Domestic Interested Party Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ dated November 10, 2020; see also Cornerstone’s Letter, ‘‘Five-Year (‘Sunset’) Review Of Antidumping Duty Order On Melamine from the People’s Republic Of China: Domestic Interested Party Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ dated November 10, 2020. 4 See Cornerstone’s Letter, ‘‘Five-Year (‘Sunset’) Review Of Countervailing Duty Order On Melamine from the People’s Republic Of China: Domestic Interested Party Substantive Response,’’ dated November 25, 2020; see also Cornerstone’s Letter, ‘‘Five-Year (‘Sunset’) Review Of Antidumping Duty Order On Melamine from the People’s Republic Of China: Domestic Interested Party Substantive Response,’’ dated November 25, 2020. 5 See Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘Sunset Reviews for November 2020,’’ dated December 23, 2020. 6 See Melamine from the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of the Expedited Five-Year Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order, 86 FR 11501 (February 25, 2021); see also Melamine VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:01 Jul 08, 2021 Jkt 253001 On July 6, 2021, the ITC published its determinations, pursuant to sections 751(c) and 752(a) of the Act, that revocation of the Orders would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.7 Scope of the Orders The merchandise subject to the Orders is melamine (Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) registry number 108–78– 01, molecular formula C3H6N6).8 Melamine is a crystalline powder or granule typically (but not exclusively) used to manufacture melamine formaldehyde resins. All melamine is covered by the scope of these Orders irrespective of purity, particle size, or physical form. Melamine that has been blended with other products is included within this scope when such blends include constituent parts that have been intermingled, but that have not been chemically reacted with each other to produce a different product. For such blends, only the melamine component of the mixture is covered by the scope of these Orders. Melamine that is otherwise subject to these orders is not excluded when commingled with melamine from sources not subject to these Orders. Only the subject component of such commingled products is covered by the scope of these Orders. The subject merchandise is provided for in subheading 2933.61.0000 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Although the HTSUS subheading and CAS registry number are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope is dispositive. Continuation of the Orders As a result of the determinations by Commerce and the ITC that revocation of the Orders would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping, countervailable subsidies, and material injury to an industry in the United States, pursuant to section 751(d)(2) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(a), Commerce hereby orders the continuation of the AD and CVD orders on melamine from China. U.S. Customs and Border Protection will continue to collect AD and CVD cash deposits at the 36253 rates in effect at the time of entry for all imports of subject merchandise. The effective date of continuation of these Orders will be the date of publication in the Federal Register of this notice of continuation. Pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of the Act, Commerce intends to initiate the next five-year reviews of the Orders not later than 30 days prior to the fifth anniversary of the effective date of continuation. Notification to Interested Parties These five-year (sunset) reviews and this notice are in accordance with sections 751(c) and 751(d)(2) of the Act and published in accordance with section 777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.218(f)(4). Dated: July 6, 2021. James Maeder, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. [FR Doc. 2021–14640 Filed 7–8–21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–570–898] Chlorinated Isocyanurates From the People’s Republic of China: Final Determination of No Shipments; 2019– 2020 Administrative Review Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. AGENCY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) finds that Heze Huayi Chemical Co., Ltd. (Heze Huayi) and Juancheng Kangtai Chemical Co., Ltd. (Kangtai) did not have any shipments of subject merchandise during the period of review (POR) June 1, 2019, through May 31, 2020. SUMMARY: DATES: Applicable July 9, 2021. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Carey, AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3964. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: from the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of the Expedited Five-Year Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order, 86 FR 13528 (March 9, 2021). 7 See Melamine from China, 86 FR 35531 (July 6, 2021). 8 Melamine is also known as 2,4,6-triamino-striazine; 1,3,5-Triazine-2,4,6-triamine; Cyanurotriamide; Cyanurotriamine; Cyanuramide; and by various brand names. PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Background On March 8, 2021, Commerce published its Preliminary Results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on chlorinated isocyanurates (chlorinated isos) from China covering the period June 1, 2019, E:\FR\FM\09JYN1.SGM 09JYN1 36254 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 129 / Friday, July 9, 2021 / Notices through May 31, 2020.1 The petitioners in this investigation are Bio-lab, Inc., Clearon Corp., and Occidental Chemical Corp. (collectively, the petitioners). The mandatory respondents in this administrative review are Heze Huayi and Kangtai. No case or rebuttal briefs for this review were submitted by the parties. On September 8, 2020, Heze Huayi and Kangtai both certified that their respective companies had no entries of subject merchandise during the POR.2 On November 17, 2020, our review of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) data indicated that Heze Huayi and Kangtai had no entries of subject merchandise originating from China, that were subject to antidumping duties during the POR.3 On May 19, 2021, Commerce issued a no shipment inquiry to CBP with respect to Heze Huayi and Kangtai.4 On May 24, 2021, CBP responded that it has no record of any subject entries for this inquiry.5 Scope of the Order The products covered by the order are chlorinated isos, which are derivatives of cyanuric acid, described as chlorinated s-triazine triones. For a full description of the scope of the order, see Preliminary Decision Memorandum.6 Methodology Commerce is conducting this administrative review in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), and 19 CFR 351.213. jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES Final Determination of No Shipments In the Preliminary Results, we found that Heze Huayi and Kangtai had no entries of subject merchandise during the POR.7 No parties commented on, nor did we receive information that contradicts this preliminary 1 See Chlorinated Isocyanurates from the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2019–2020, 86 FR 13291 (March 8, 2021) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM). 2 See Heze Huayi’s Letter, ‘‘Chlorinated Isocyanurates from the People’s Republic of China: No Sales Certification,’’ dated September 8, 2020; see also Kangtai’s Letter, ‘‘Chlorinated Isocyanurates from the People’s Republic of China: No Sales Certification,’’ dated September 8, 2020. 3 See Memorandum, ‘‘U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Data for Heze Huayi Chemical Co., Ltd. and Juancheng Kangtai Chemical Co., Ltd.,’’ dated November 17, 2020. 4 CBP message 1139404, dated May 19, 2021. 5 See Memorandum, ‘‘Chlorinated Isocyanurates from the People’s Republic of China; No Shipment Inquiry for Heze Huayi Chemical Co., Ltd. and Juancheng Kangtai Chemical Co., Ltd. during the period 06/01/2019 through 05/31/2020,’’ dated May 25, 2021. 6 See Preliminary Results PDM at 2. 7 See Preliminary Results, 86 FR 13291–13292. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:01 Jul 08, 2021 Jkt 253001 determination. Therefore, for the final results, we continue to find that Heze Huayi and Kangtai had no reviewable entries during the POR. Consistent with our assessment practice in non-market economy administrative reviews, Commerce did not rescind this review for Heze Huayi and Kangtai but completed the review and will issue appropriate instructions to CBP based on these final results.8 China-Wide Entity Pursuant to Commerce’s policy, the China-wide entity will not be under review unless a party specifically requests, or Commerce self-initiates, a review of the entity.9 Because no party requested a review of the China-wide entity, we did not review the entity in this segment of the proceeding. Thus, the China-wide entity’s rate (i.e., 285.63 percent) did not change. Assessment Rates Pursuant to Commerce’s assessment practice, if Commerce determines that an exporter had no shipments of the subject merchandise, we intend to issue liquidation instructions for any suspended entries that entered under that exporter’s case number (i.e., at that exporter’s rate) and to liquidate at the China-wide entity rate.10 Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b), Commerce has determined, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise in accordance with the final results of this review. Consistent with its recent notice,11 Commerce intends to issue appropriate assessment instructions directly to CBP no earlier than 35 days after the date of publication of the final results of this review in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is filed at the U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will direct 8 See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694, 65694–95 (October 24, 2011); see also the ‘‘Assessment Rates’ ’’ section, below. 9 See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of Change in Department Practice for Respondent Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963 (November 4, 2013). 10 See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011). For an explanation on the derivation of the China-wide rate, see Notice of Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Chlorinated Isocyanurates from the People’s Republic of China, 70 FR 24502, 24505 (May 10, 2005). 11 See Notice of Discontinuation of Policy to Issue Liquidation Instructions After 15 Days in Applicable Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Proceedings, 86 FR 3995 (January 15, 2021). PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within 90 days of publication). Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the final results of this administrative review for shipments of the subject merchandise from China entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For Heze Huayi and Kangtai, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the existing producer/exporter-specific rate published for the most recent period; (2) for previously investigated or reviewed Chinese and non-Chinese exporters not listed above that have separate rates, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the existing producer/exporter-specific rate published for the most recent period; (3) for all Chinese exporters of subject merchandise that have not been found to be eligible for a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be the China-wide rate of 285.63 percent; and (4) for all nonChinese exporters of subject merchandise that have not received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the Chinese exporter(s) that supplied that nonChinese exporter. These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers Regarding the Reimbursement of Duties This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in Commerce’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties has occurred and that subsequent assessment of doubled antidumping duties. Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials, or conversion to E:\FR\FM\09JYN1.SGM 09JYN1 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 129 / Friday, July 9, 2021 / Notices judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction. Notification to Interested Parties We are issuing and publishing these final results of administrative review in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.213(h). Dated: July 2, 2021. Christian Marsh, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2021–14639 Filed 7–8–21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–570–896] Magnesium Metal From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2019–2020 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) continues to find that Tianjin Magnesium International, Co., Ltd. (TMI) and Tianjin Magnesium Metal, Co., Ltd. (TMM) had no shipments of subject merchandise covered by the antidumping duty order on magnesium metal from the People’s Republic of China (China) for the period of review (POR) April 1, 2019, through May 31, 2020. DATES: Applicable July 9, 2021. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kyle Clahane, AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–5449. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES AGENCY: Background On March 4, 2021, Commerce published the Preliminary Results of this administrative review in the Federal Register.1 No interested party submitted comments concerning the Preliminary Results or requested a hearing in this administrative review. Commerce conducted this administrative review in accordance with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 1 See Magnesium Metal from the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Administrative Review; 2019–20, 86 FR 12621 (March 4, 2021) (Preliminary Results). VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:01 Jul 08, 2021 Jkt 253001 1930, as amended (the Act). The current deadline for these final results is July 2, 2021. Scope of the Order 2 The product covered by the Order is magnesium metal from China, which includes primary and secondary alloy magnesium metal, regardless of chemistry, raw material source, form, shape, or size. Magnesium is a metal or alloy containing by weight primarily the element magnesium. Primary magnesium is produced by decomposing raw materials into magnesium metal. Secondary magnesium is produced by recycling magnesium-based scrap into magnesium metal. The magnesium covered by the Order includes blends of primary and secondary magnesium. The subject merchandise includes the following alloy magnesium metal products made from primary and/or secondary magnesium including, without limitation, magnesium cast into ingots, slabs, rounds, billets, and other shapes; magnesium ground, chipped, crushed, or machined into rasping, granules, turnings, chips, powder, briquettes, and other shapes; and products that contain 50 percent or greater, but less than 99.8 percent, magnesium, by weight, and that have been entered into the United States as conforming to an ‘‘ASTM Specification for Magnesium Alloy’’ 3 and are thus outside the scope of the existing antidumping orders on magnesium from China (generally referred to as ‘‘alloy’’ magnesium). The scope of the Order excludes: (1) All forms of pure magnesium, including chemical combinations of magnesium and other material(s) in which the pure magnesium content is 50 percent or greater, but less than 99.8 percent, by weight, that do not conform to an ‘‘ASTM Specification for Magnesium Alloy;’’ 4 (2) magnesium that is in liquid or molten form; and (3) mixtures containing 90 percent or less magnesium in granular or powder form by weight and one or more of certain 2 See Notice of Antidumping Duty Order: Magnesium Metal from the People’s Republic of China, 70 FR 19928 (April 15, 2005) (Order). 3 The meaning of this term is the same as that used by the American Society for Testing and Materials in its Annual Book for ASTM Standards: Volume 01.02 Aluminum and Magnesium Alloys. 4 The material is already covered by existing antidumping orders. See Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: Pure Magnesium from the People’s Republic of China, the Russian Federation and Ukraine; Notice of Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Antidumping Duty Investigation of Pure Magnesium from the Russian Federation, 60 FR 25691 (May 12, 1995); and Antidumping Duty Order: Pure Magnesium in Granular Form from the People’s Republic of China, 66 FR 57936 (November 19, 2001). PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 36255 non-magnesium granular materials to make magnesium-based reagent mixtures, including lime, calcium metal, calcium silicon, calcium carbide, calcium carbonate, carbon, slag coagulants, fluorspar, nephaline syenite, feldspar, alumina (Al203), calcium aluminate, soda ash, hydrocarbons, graphite, coke, silicon, rare earth metals/mischmetal, cryolite, silica/fly ash, magnesium oxide, periclase, ferroalloys, dolomite lime, and colemanite.5 The merchandise subject to this Order is classifiable under items 8104.19.00, and 8104.30.00 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the merchandise is dispositive. Final Determination of No Shipments In the Preliminary Results, Commerce determined TMI and TMM had no shipments of subject merchandise to the United States during the POR.6 As noted in the Preliminary Results, we received no-shipment statements from TMI and TMM, and the statements were consistent with the information we received from U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP).7 Because Commerce did not receive any comments on its preliminary finding, Commerce continues to find that TMI and TMM did not have any shipments of subject merchandise during the POR. Assessment Rates We have not calculated any assessment rates in this administrative review. Based on record evidence, we have determined that TMI and TMM 5 This third exclusion for magnesium-based reagent mixtures is based on the exclusion for reagent mixtures in the 2000–2001 investigations of magnesium from China, Israel, and Russia. See Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Pure Magnesium in Granular Form from the People’s Republic of China, 66 FR 49345 (September 27, 2001); see also Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Pure Magnesium from Israel, 66 FR 49349 (September 27, 2001); and Final Determination of Sales at Not Less Than Fair Value: Pure Magnesium from the Russian Federation, 66 FR 49347 (September 27, 2001). These mixtures are not magnesium alloys, because they are not combined in liquid form and cast into the same ingot. 6 See Preliminary Results, 86 FR at 12622. 7 See Memorandum, ‘‘Correction of February 2, 2021 Memorandum Placing CBP Data on the Record,’’ dated February 3, 2021; see also Memorandum, ‘‘Magnesium Metal from China; No Shipment Inquiry for Tianjin Magnesium International Co., Ltd and Tianjin Magnesium Metal Co., Ltd. during the period 04/01/2019 through 03/ 31/2020,’’ dated February 24, 2021. On February 5, 2021, Commerce issued a no shipment inquiry to CBP with respect to TMI and TMM. On February 18, 2021, CBP responded that it had no evidence of shipments of magnesium metal from China exported by TMI and TMM during the POR. E:\FR\FM\09JYN1.SGM 09JYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 129 (Friday, July 9, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36253-36255]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-14639]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-898]


Chlorinated Isocyanurates From the People's Republic of China: 
Final Determination of No Shipments; 2019-2020 Administrative Review

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) finds that Heze Huayi 
Chemical Co., Ltd. (Heze Huayi) and Juancheng Kangtai Chemical Co., 
Ltd. (Kangtai) did not have any shipments of subject merchandise during 
the period of review (POR) June 1, 2019, through May 31, 2020.

DATES: Applicable July 9, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Carey, AD/CVD Operations, Office 
VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3964.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On March 8, 2021, Commerce published its Preliminary Results of the 
administrative review of the antidumping duty order on chlorinated 
isocyanurates (chlorinated isos) from China covering the period June 1, 
2019,

[[Page 36254]]

through May 31, 2020.\1\ The petitioners in this investigation are Bio-
lab, Inc., Clearon Corp., and Occidental Chemical Corp. (collectively, 
the petitioners). The mandatory respondents in this administrative 
review are Heze Huayi and Kangtai. No case or rebuttal briefs for this 
review were submitted by the parties.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Chlorinated Isocyanurates from the People's Republic of 
China: Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2019-2020, 86 FR 
13291 (March 8, 2021) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying 
Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On September 8, 2020, Heze Huayi and Kangtai both certified that 
their respective companies had no entries of subject merchandise during 
the POR.\2\ On November 17, 2020, our review of U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection (CBP) data indicated that Heze Huayi and Kangtai had no 
entries of subject merchandise originating from China, that were 
subject to antidumping duties during the POR.\3\ On May 19, 2021, 
Commerce issued a no shipment inquiry to CBP with respect to Heze Huayi 
and Kangtai.\4\ On May 24, 2021, CBP responded that it has no record of 
any subject entries for this inquiry.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ See Heze Huayi's Letter, ``Chlorinated Isocyanurates from 
the People's Republic of China: No Sales Certification,'' dated 
September 8, 2020; see also Kangtai's Letter, ``Chlorinated 
Isocyanurates from the People's Republic of China: No Sales 
Certification,'' dated September 8, 2020.
    \3\ See Memorandum, ``U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 
Data for Heze Huayi Chemical Co., Ltd. and Juancheng Kangtai 
Chemical Co., Ltd.,'' dated November 17, 2020.
    \4\ CBP message 1139404, dated May 19, 2021.
    \5\ See Memorandum, ``Chlorinated Isocyanurates from the 
People's Republic of China; No Shipment Inquiry for Heze Huayi 
Chemical Co., Ltd. and Juancheng Kangtai Chemical Co., Ltd. during 
the period 06/01/2019 through 05/31/2020,'' dated May 25, 2021.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order

    The products covered by the order are chlorinated isos, which are 
derivatives of cyanuric acid, described as chlorinated s-triazine 
triones. For a full description of the scope of the order, see 
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Preliminary Results PDM at 2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Methodology

    Commerce is conducting this administrative review in accordance 
with section 751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the 
Act), and 19 CFR 351.213.

Final Determination of No Shipments

    In the Preliminary Results, we found that Heze Huayi and Kangtai 
had no entries of subject merchandise during the POR.\7\ No parties 
commented on, nor did we receive information that contradicts this 
preliminary determination. Therefore, for the final results, we 
continue to find that Heze Huayi and Kangtai had no reviewable entries 
during the POR. Consistent with our assessment practice in non-market 
economy administrative reviews, Commerce did not rescind this review 
for Heze Huayi and Kangtai but completed the review and will issue 
appropriate instructions to CBP based on these final results.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See Preliminary Results, 86 FR 13291-13292.
    \8\ See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment 
of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694, 65694-95 (October 24, 2011); see 
also the ``Assessment Rates' '' section, below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

China-Wide Entity

    Pursuant to Commerce's policy, the China-wide entity will not be 
under review unless a party specifically requests, or Commerce self-
initiates, a review of the entity.\9\ Because no party requested a 
review of the China-wide entity, we did not review the entity in this 
segment of the proceeding. Thus, the China-wide entity's rate (i.e., 
285.63 percent) did not change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of Change in 
Department Practice for Respondent Selection in Antidumping Duty 
Proceedings and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity 
in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963 (November 4, 2013).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Assessment Rates

    Pursuant to Commerce's assessment practice, if Commerce determines 
that an exporter had no shipments of the subject merchandise, we intend 
to issue liquidation instructions for any suspended entries that 
entered under that exporter's case number (i.e., at that exporter's 
rate) and to liquidate at the China-wide entity rate.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment 
of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011). For an 
explanation on the derivation of the China-wide rate, see Notice of 
Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Chlorinated 
Isocyanurates from the People's Republic of China, 70 FR 24502, 
24505 (May 10, 2005).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b), 
Commerce has determined, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on 
all appropriate entries of subject merchandise in accordance with the 
final results of this review. Consistent with its recent notice,\11\ 
Commerce intends to issue appropriate assessment instructions directly 
to CBP no earlier than 35 days after the date of publication of the 
final results of this review in the Federal Register. If a timely 
summons is filed at the U.S. Court of International Trade, the 
assessment instructions will direct CBP not to liquidate relevant 
entries until the time for parties to file a request for a statutory 
injunction has expired (i.e., within 90 days of publication).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ See Notice of Discontinuation of Policy to Issue 
Liquidation Instructions After 15 Days in Applicable Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Administrative Proceedings, 86 FR 3995 (January 
15, 2021).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon 
publication of the final results of this administrative review for 
shipments of the subject merchandise from China entered, or withdrawn 
from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, as 
provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For Heze Huayi and 
Kangtai, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the existing 
producer/exporter-specific rate published for the most recent period; 
(2) for previously investigated or reviewed Chinese and non-Chinese 
exporters not listed above that have separate rates, the cash deposit 
rate will continue to be the existing producer/exporter-specific rate 
published for the most recent period; (3) for all Chinese exporters of 
subject merchandise that have not been found to be eligible for a 
separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be the China-wide rate of 
285.63 percent; and (4) for all non-Chinese exporters of subject 
merchandise that have not received their own rate, the cash deposit 
rate will be the rate applicable to the Chinese exporter(s) that 
supplied that non-Chinese exporter. These deposit requirements, when 
imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice.

Notification to Importers Regarding the Reimbursement of Duties

    This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding 
the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the 
relevant entries during this POR. Failure to comply with this 
requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that reimbursement 
of antidumping duties has occurred and that subsequent assessment of 
doubled antidumping duties.

Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders

    This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information 
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 
continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of 
the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or 
destruction of APO materials, or conversion to

[[Page 36255]]

judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with 
the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to 
sanction.

Notification to Interested Parties

    We are issuing and publishing these final results of administrative 
review in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, 
and 19 CFR 351.213(h).

    Dated: July 2, 2021.
Christian Marsh,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2021-14639 Filed 7-8-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P