Certain Frozen Fish Fillets From the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2018-2019, 36102-36105 [2021-14509]
Download as PDF
36102
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 128 / Thursday, July 8, 2021 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–552–801]
Certain Frozen Fish Fillets From the
Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Final
Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review and Final
Determination of No Shipments; 2018–
2019
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(Commerce) determines that Vinh Hoan
Corporation (Vinh Hoan), an exporter of
certain frozen fish fillets (fish fillets)
from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam
(Vietnam), did not sell subject
merchandise in the United States at
prices below normal value during the
period of review (POR) August 1, 2018,
through July 31, 2019. Further,
Commerce determines that 20
companies had no shipments during the
POR.
DATES: Applicable July 8, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Javier Barrientos, AD/CVD Operations,
Office V, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–2243.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Background
On December 28, 2020, Commerce
published the Preliminary Results and
invited interested parties to comment.1
On February 3 and 12, 2021, the
petitioners,2 Vinh Hoan, the Hung
Vuong Group (HVG), Colorado Boxed
Beef Company (CBBC), QMC Foods, Inc.
(QMC), Nam Viet Corporation
(NAVICO), and Can Tho Import Export
Joint Stock Company (CASEAMEX)
submitted case and/or rebuttal briefs.3
1 See Certain Frozen Fish Fillets from the Socialist
Republic of Vietnam: Preliminary Results of the
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,
Preliminary Determination of No Shipments, and
Partial Rescission of the Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2018–2019, 85 FR 84300
(December 28, 2020) (Preliminary Results), and
accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
2 The petitioners are the Catfish Farmers of
America and individual U.S. catfish processors
America’s Catch, Inc., Alabama Catfish, LLC d/b/a
Harvest Select Catfish, Inc., Consolidated Catfish
Companies, LLC d/b/a Country Select Catfish, Delta
Pride Catfish, Inc., Guidry’s Catfish, Inc., Heartland
Catfish Company, Magnolia Processing, Inc. d/b/a
Pride of the Pond, and Simmons Farm Raised
Catfish, Inc. (collectively, the petitioners).
3 See Petitioners’ Letter, ‘‘CFA Certain Frozen
Fish Fillets from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam:
Case Brief of the Catfish Farmers of America, et al.,’’
dated February 3, 2021; Vinh Hoan’s Letter,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:47 Jul 07, 2021
Jkt 253001
Following briefing, in response to
comments filed by interested parties, on
May 19, 2021, Commerce placed
additional information obtained from
U.S Customs and Border Protection
(CBP) on the record and solicited
comments.4 The petitioners and HVG
filed comments regarding the
information.5
On April 7, 2021, we extended the
deadline for issuance of these final
results to June 25, 2021.6 On June 8,
2021 we conducted a public hearing in
this matter.7
‘‘Certain Frozen Fish Fillets from Vietnam: Case
Brief of Vinh Hoan Corporation,’’ dated February 3,
2021; HVG’s Letter, ‘‘Administrative Review of AD
Order on Certain Frozen Fish Fillets from the
Socialist Republic of Vietnam (08/01/18–07/31/19):
HVG Case Brief,’’ dated February 3, 2021;
Petitioners’ Letter, ‘‘Certain Frozen Fish Fillets from
the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Rebuttal Brief on
Behalf of the Catfish Farmers of America, et al.,’’
dated February 12, 2021; CBBC/QMC’s Letter,
‘‘Administrative Review of AD Order on Certain
Frozen Fish Fillets from the Socialist Republic of
Vietnam (08/01/18–7/31/19): QMC and CBBC
Rebuttal to CFA’s Case Brief,’’ dated February 12,
2021; Vinh Hoan’s Letter, ‘‘Certain Frozen Fish
Fillets from Vietnam: Rebuttal Brief of Vinh Hoan
Corporation,’’ dated February 12, 2021; HVG’s
Letter, ‘‘Administrative Review of AD Order on
Certain Frozen Fish Fillets from the Socialist
Republic of Vietnam (08/01/18–07/31/19): HVG
Rebuttal Brief,’’ dated February 12, 2021; NAVICO’s
Letter, ‘‘Certain Frozen Fish Fillets from Vietnam:
Rebuttal Brief of Nam Viet Corporation,’’ dated
February 12, 2021; and CASEAMEX’s Letter,
‘‘Certain Frozen Fish Fillets from Vietnam: Rebuttal
Brief of CASEAMEX,’’ dated February 12, 2021.
4 See Memorandum, ‘‘U.S. Customs and Border
Protection Entry Query,’’ dated May 19, 2021.
5 See Petitioners’ Letter, ‘‘Certain Frozen Fish
Fillets from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam:
Comments on the May 19th CBP Entry
Information,’’ dated May 24, 2021; Petitioners’
Letter, ‘‘Certain Frozen Fish Fillets from the
Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Errata to Comments
on the May 19th CBP Entry Information,’’ dated
May 25, 2021; HVG’s Letter, ‘‘Certain Frozen Fish
Fillets from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam (08/
01/18–07/31/19): HVG Response to Department
Request for Information on Liquidated Entry,’’
dated May 25, 2021; HVG’s Letter, ‘‘Certain Frozen
Fish Fillets from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam
(08/01/18–07/31/19): ERRATA to HVG May 25
Response to Department Request for Information on
Liquidated Entry,’’ dated June 3, 2021; Petitioners’
Letter, ‘‘Certain Frozen Fish Fillets from the
Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Response to HVG’s
Comments Regarding Commerce’s Request for
Information on Liquidated Entry,’’ dated May 27,
2021; and HVG’s Letter, ‘‘Certain Frozen Fish Fillets
from Vietnam (08/01/18–7/31/19): Hung Vuong
Group Rebuttal to CFA Comments on CBP Entry
Data,’’ dated May 27, 2021.
6 See Memorandum, ‘‘Frozen Fish Fillets from
Vietnam: Extension of Deadline for Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 2018–
2019,’’ dated April 7, 2021.
7 See Hearing, ‘‘Administrative Review of the
Antidumping Order on Certain Frozen Fish Fillets
from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Public
Hearing,’’ dated June 8, 2021.
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Scope of the Order 8
The products covered by the order are
frozen fish fillets, including regular,
shank, and strip fillets and portions
thereof, whether or not breaded or
marinated, of the species Pangasius
Bocourti, Pangasius Hypophthalmus
(also known as Pangasius Pangasius)
and Pangasius Micronemus. For a
complete description of the scope of this
order, see the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.9
Analysis of Comments Received
We addressed all issues raised in the
case and rebuttal briefs filed by
interested parties in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum. Attached to this
notice in Appendix I is a list of the
issues which parties raised. The Issues
and Decision Memorandum is a public
document and is on file electronically
via Enforcement and Compliance’s
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System
(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://
access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete
version of the Issues and Decision
Memorandum can be accessed directly
at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/
index.html.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on a review of the record and
comments received from interested
parties, and for the reasons explained in
the Issues and Decision Memorandum,
we made certain changes to Vinh Hoan’s
weighted-average dumping margin and
revised the list of companies within the
Vinh Hoan collapsed entity. For these
final results, Commerce also updated
the weighted-average dumping margin
assigned to the non-individuallyexamined company receiving a separate
rate, i.e., NAVICO. For a discussion of
the above-referenced changes, see the
‘‘Changes Since the Preliminary
Results’’ section of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum.
Final Determination of No Shipments
In the Preliminary Results, Commerce
preliminarily determined that 21
companies had no shipments of subject
merchandise during the POR.10
Following the publication of the
Preliminary Results, we received no
comments from interested parties
8 See Notice of Antidumpimg Duty Order: Certain
Frozen Fish Fillets from the Socialist Republic of
Vietnam, 68 FR 47909 (August 12, 2003) (Order).
9 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Final Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review; 2018–2019,’’ dated
concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this
notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum) at 3.
10 See Preliminary Results, 85 FR at 84300.
E:\FR\FM\08JYN1.SGM
08JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 128 / Thursday, July 8, 2021 / Notices
regarding 19 of these companies, nor
has any party submitted record evidence
which would call our preliminary no
shipment determination into question
for them. Therefore, for these final
results, we find that these 19 companies
had no shipments during the POR.
With respect to the remaining two
companies, HVG 11 and Thanh Binh
Dong Thap One Member Company
Limited (Thanh Binh),12 we received
comments from interested parties
requesting that Commerce reevaluate
our no shipment determination. With
regard to HVG, Commerce continues to
find that HVG had no shipments during
the POR.13 With regard to Thanh Binh,
Commerce now finds that this company
is part of the Vinh Hoan single entity.14
For a list of the 20 companies for
which we find ‘‘no shipments’’ for these
final results, see Appendix II. Consistent
with our practice, we will issue
appropriate instructions to CBP
consistent with the reseller policy. 15
Separate Rates
We continue to find that the nonindividually-examined exporter
NAVICO and individually-examined
respondent Vinh Hoan have
demonstrated eligibility for separate
rates. As noted below, we have assigned
NAVICO the rate established for Vinh
Hoan, in accordance with section
735(c)(5)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act).
Vietnam-Wide Entity
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
In the Preliminary Results, we denied
Seafood Joint Stock Company No.4
Branch Dongtam Fisheries Processing
Company (DOTASEAFOOD) a separate
rate.16 For the reasons explained in the
Issues and Decision Memorandum, we
continue to find that DOTASEAFOOD is
not eligible for a separate rate.17 Thus,
we find DOTASEAFOOD to be part of
the Vietnam-wide entity.
In the Preliminary Results, Commerce
found that certain additional companies
for which a review was requested did
not establish eligibility for a separate
rate.18 We have received no information
since the issuance of the Preliminary
Results that provides a basis for
reconsidering this preliminary finding.
11 See Issues and Decision Memorandum at
Comment 4.
12 Id. at Comment 8.
13 Id. at Comment 4.
14 Id. at Comment 8.
15 See Non-Market Economy Antidumping
Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76
FR 65694 (October 24, 2011).
16 See Preliminary Results, 85 FR at 84300–84301.
17 See Issues and Decision Memorandum at
Comment 5.
18 See Preliminary Results, 85 FR at 84301.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:47 Jul 07, 2021
Jkt 253001
36103
review, we will instruct CBP to
liquidate the appropriate entries
without regard to antidumping duties.
Pursuant to Commerce’s assessment
Final Results of Administrative Review
practice, for entries of Vinh Hoan’s
The weighted-average dumping
merchandise that were not reported in
margins for the final results of this
the U.S. sales data submitted by Vinh
administrative review are as follows:
Hoan during this review, Commerce
will instruct CBP to liquidate such
Weightedentries at the Vietnam-wide entity rate.
average
Where we determined that an
dumping
Exporter
exporter under review had no
margin
(dollars/
shipments of the subject merchandise to
kilogram) 20
the United States during the POR, any
suspended entries that entered during
Vinh Hoan Corporation * .......
0.00
Nam Viet Corporation ** .......
0.00 the POR under that exporter’s CBP case
number will be liquidated at a rate of
* The Vinh Hoan single entity includes Vinh $2.39 per kilogram, the rate for the
Hoan Corporation, Van Duc Food Export Joint
Stock Company, Van Duc Tien Giang Food Vietnam-wide entity consistent with
Export Company, Thanh Binh Dong Thap One Commerce’s reseller policy.22
Likewise, for companies that were
Member Company Limited, and Vinh Phuoc
Food Company Limited.
found to be ineligible for a separate rate,
** NAVICO is a separate rate respondent
we will instruct CBP to liquidate entries
not individually examined.
of subject merchandise exported by
Disclosure
such companies also at a rate of $2.39
We intend to disclose the calculations per kilogram, the rate for the Vietnamwide entity.
performed regarding these final results
within five days of the date of
Cash Deposit Requirements
publication of this notice to parties in
The following cash deposit
this proceeding in accordance with 19
requirements will be effective upon
CFR 351.224(b).
publication of the final results of this
Assessment Rates
administrative review for all shipments
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the of subject merchandise entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
Act, and 19 CFR 351.212(b), Commerce
consumption on or after the publication
has determined, and CBP shall assess,
date, as provided for by section
antidumping duties on all appropriate
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For the
entries of subject merchandise in
exporters listed above, the cash deposit
accordance with the final results of this
rate will be equal to the weightedreview. Consistent with its recent
averaged dumping margin established in
notice,21 Commerce intends to issue
the final results of review; (2) for
appropriate assessment instructions to
previously investigated or reviewed
CBP no earlier than 35 days after the
date of publication of the final results of Vietnamese and non-Vietnamese
this review in the Federal Register. If a
exporters not listed above that maintain
timely summons is filed at the U.S.
their eligibility for a separate rate, the
Court of International Trade, the
cash deposit rate will continue to be the
assessment instructions will direct CBP
exporter-specific rate published for the
not to liquidate relevant entries until the most recently-completed segment of this
time for parties to file a request for a
proceeding in which they were
statutory injunction has expired (i.e.,
reviewed; (3) for all Vietnamese
within 90 days of publication).
exporters of subject merchandise which
Because we calculated a weightedhave not been found to be entitled to a
average dumping margin of zero for
separate rate, the cash deposit rate will
Vinh Hoan, and applied that rate to
be $2.39 per kilogram, the rate
NAVICO in the final results of this
established for the Vietnam-wide entity;
and (4) for all non-Vietnamese exporters
19 See Appendix III.
of subject merchandise which have not
20 In the third administrative review of this order,
received their own rate, the cash deposit
Commerce determined that it would calculate perrate will be the rate applicable to the
unit assessment and cash deposit rates for all future
Vietnamese exporters that supplied that
reviews. See Certain Frozen Fish Fillets from the
Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Final Results of
non-Vietnamese exporter.
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and
The deposit requirements, when
Partial Rescission, 73 FR 15479, 15481 (March 24,
imposed,
shall remain in effect until
2008).
further notice.
21 See Notice of Discontinuation of Policy to Issue
Therefore, Commerce continues to find
that these companies are part of the
Vietnam-wide entity.19
Liquidation Instructions After 15 Days in
Applicable Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Proceedings, 86 FR 3995 (January
15, 2021).
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
22 See Non-Market Economy Antidumping
Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76
FR 65694 (October 24, 2011).
E:\FR\FM\08JYN1.SGM
08JYN1
36104
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 128 / Thursday, July 8, 2021 / Notices
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a final
reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)
to file a certificate regarding the
reimbursement of antidumping duties
prior to liquidation of the relevant
entries during this POR. Failure to
comply with this requirement could
result in Commerce’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of doubled antidumping duties.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the return or
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
continues to govern business
proprietary information in this segment
of the proceeding. Timely written
notification of the return or destruction
of APO materials, or conversion to
judicial protective order, is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the
regulations and terms of an APO is a
violation which is subject to sanction.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing these
final results of administrative review in
accordance with sections 751(a)(l) and
777(i) of the Act.
Dated: June 25, 2021.
James Maeder,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Appendix I
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Changes Since the Preliminary Results
V. Separate Rates
VI. Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1: Whether Colorado Boxed Beef
Company (CBBC) and QMC Foods, Inc.
(QMC) Have Standing as Wholesalers to
Request a Review
Comment 2: Whether the Vietnam-Wide
Entity Is Under Review
Comment 3: Selection of Surrogate Country
Comment 4: Hung Vuong Group (HVG)
‘‘No Shipments’’ Determination
Comment 5: Applying Adverse Facts
Available (AFA) to Seafood Joint Stock
Company No. 4 Branch Dongtam Fisheries
Processing Company (DOTASEAFOOD)
Comment 6: Whether to Grant Nam Viet
Corporation (NAVICO) a Separate Rate
Comment 7: Treatment of Can Tho Import
Export Joint Stock Company
(CASEAMEX)
Comment 8: Vinh Hoan Corporation (Vinh
Hoan) Collapsing
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:47 Jul 07, 2021
Jkt 253001
Comment 9: Vinh Hoan Calculation Issues
VII. Recommendation
Appendix II
Companies With No Shipments During the
POR
1. Bentre Forestry and Aquaproduct Import
Export Joint Stock Company (aka Bentre
Forestry and Aquaproduct Import and
Export Joint Stock Company, Ben Tre
Forestry and Aquaproduct Import-Export
Joint Stock Company, Ben Tre Forestry and
Aquaproduct Import-Export Company, Ben
Tre Forestry Aquaproduct Import-Export
Company, Ben Tre Frozen Aquaproduct
Export Company, or Faquimex)
2. Cafatex Corporation (aka Cafatex)
3. Cantho Import-Export Seafood Joint Stock
Company (aka CASEAMEX, Cantho Import
Export Seafood Joint Stock Company,
Cantho Import-Export Joint Stock
Company, Can Tho Import Export Seafood
Joint Stock Company, Can Tho ImportExport Seafood Joint Stock Company, or
Can Tho Import-Export Joint Stock
Company)
4. C.P. Vietnam Corporation
5. Dai Thanh Seafoods Company Limited
(aka DATHACO, Dai Thanh Seafoods, or
Dai Thanh Seafoods Co., Ltd.)
6. Fatifish Company Limited (aka FATIFISH
or FATIFISHCO)
7. Golden Quality Seafood Corporation (aka
Golden Quality, GoldenQuality,
GoldenQuality Seafood Corporation, or
GOLDENQUALITY)
8. Green Farms Seafood Joint Stock Company
(aka Green Farms, GreenFarm SeaFoods
Joint Stock Company, Green Farms
Seafoods Joint Stock Company, or Green
Farms Seafood JSC)
9. Hai Huong Seafood Joint Stock Company
(aka HHFish, HH Fish, or Hai Houng
Seafood)
10. Hung Vuong—Mien Tay Aquaculture
Corporation (aka HVMT or Hung Vuong
Mien Tay Aquaculture Joint Stock
Company)
11. Nha Trang Seafoods, Inc. (aka Nha Trang
Seafoods-F89, Nha Trang Seafoods, or Nha
Trang Seaproduct Company)
12. NTSF Seafoods Joint Stock Company (aka
NTSF or NTSF Seafoods)
13. QVD Dong Thap Food Co., Ltd. (aka Dong
Thap or QVD DT)
14. QVD Food Company, Ltd. (aka QVD, QVD
Food Co., Ltd., or QVD Aquaculture)
15. Seavina Joint Stock Company (aka
Seavina)
16. Southern Fishery Industries Company,
Ltd. (aka South Vina, South Vina Co., Ltd.,
Southern Fisheries Industries Co., Ltd., or
Southern Fisheries Industries Company
Limited)
17. Thuan Hung Co., Ltd. (aka THUFICO)
18. Viet Hai Seafood Company Limited (aka
Viet Hai, Vietnam Fish-One Co, Ltd. Viet
Hai Seafood Co., Viet Hai Seafood Co.,
Ltd., Vietnam Fish One Co., Ltd., or Fish
One)
19. Vinh Quang Fisheries Corporation (aka
Vinh Quang, Vinh Quang Fisheries Joint
Stock Company, Vinh Quang Fisheries Co.
Ltd., or Vinh Quang Fisheries Corp.)
20. The Hung Vuong Group, which consists
of:
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
a. Hung Vuong Joint Stock Company (aka
Hung Vuong Corporation or HVC or HV
Corp.);
b. An Giang Fisheries Import and Export
Joint Stock Company (also known as
Agifish, AnGiang Fisheries Import and
Export, or An Giang Fisheries Import &
Export Joint Stock Company);
c. Asia Pangasius Company Limited (aka
ASIA);
d. Europe Joint Stock Company;
e. Hung Vuong Ben Tre Seafood Processing
Company Limited (aka Ben Tre, HVBT,
or HVBT Seafood Processing);
f. Hung Vuong Mascato Company Limited;
g. Hung Vuong—Sa Dec Co. Ltd. (aka Hung
Vuong Sa Dec Company Limited); and
h. Hung Vuong—Vinh Long Co., Ltd (aka
Hung Vuong Vinh Long Company
Limited)
Appendix III
Vietnam-Wide Entity
1. An Phat Import-Export Seafood Co., Ltd.
(also known as An Phat Seafood Co. Ltd.
or An Phat Seafood Co., Ltd.)
2. Anvifish Joint Stock Company (also known
as Anvifish, Anvifish JSC, or Anvifish Co.,
Ltd.)
3. Basa Joint Stock Company (BASACO)
4. Ben Tre Aquaproduct Import and Export
Joint Stock Company (also known as
Bentre Aquaproduct, Bentre Aquaproduct
Import & Export Joint Stock Company, or
Aquatex Bentre)
5. Binh Dinh Import Export Company (also
known as Binh Dinh)
6. Cadovimex II Seafood Import-Export and
Processing Joint Stock Company (also
known as Cadovimex II, Cadovimex II
Seafood Import-Export, Cadovimex II
Seafood Import Export and Processing Joint
Stock Company, or Cadovimex II Seafood
Import-Export & Processing Joint Stock
Company)
7. Can Tho Animal Fishery Products
Processing Export Enterprise (aka Cafatex)
8. Cuu Long Fish Import-Export Corporation
(also known as CL Panga Fish)
9. Cuu Long Fish Joint Stock Company (also
known as CL-Fish, CL–FISH CORP, or Cuu
Long Fish Joint Stock Company)
10. East Sea Seafoods LLC (also known as
ESS LLC, ESS, ESS JVC, East Sea Seafoods
Limited Liability Company, East Sea
Seafoods Joint Venture Co., Ltd.)
11. Go Dang An Hiep One Member Limited
Company
12. Go Dang Ben Tre One Member Limited
Liability Company
13. Hoa Phat Seafood Import-Export and
Processing J.S.C. (also known as
HOPAFISH, Hoa Phat Seafood ImportExport and Processing Joint Stock
Company, or Hoa Phat Seafood ImportExport and Processing JSC)
14. Hoang Long Seafood Processing Company
Limited (also known as HLS, Hoang Long
Seafood, Hoang Long Seafood Processing
Co., Ltd., Hoang Long, or HoangLong
Seafood)
15. Hung Vuong Seafood Joint Stock
Company
16. Lian Heng Investment Co., Ltd. (also
known as Lian Heng Investment or Lian
Heng)
E:\FR\FM\08JYN1.SGM
08JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 128 / Thursday, July 8, 2021 / Notices
17. Lian Heng Trading Co., Ltd. (also known
as Lian Heng or Lian Heng Trading)
18. Nam Phuong Seafood Co., Ltd. (also
known as Nam Phuong, NAFISHCO, Nam
Phuong Seafood, or Nam PhuongSeafood
Company Ltd.)
19. NTACO Corporation (also known as
NTACO or NTACO Corp.)
20. Quang Minh Seafood Company Limited
(also known as Quang Minh, Quang Minh
Seafood Co., Ltd., or Quang Minh Seafood
Co.)
21. Seafood Joint Stock Company No. 4
Branch Dongtam Fisheries Processing
Company (also known as
DOTASEAFOODCO or Seafood Joint Stock
Company No. 4-Branch Dong Tam
Fisheries Processing Company)
22. Thanh Hung Co., Ltd. (also known as
Thanh Hung Frozen Seafood Processing
Import Export Co., Ltd. or Thanh Hung)
23. Thien Ma Seafood Co., Ltd. (also known
as THIMACO, Thien Ma, Thien Ma
Seafood Company, Ltd., or Thien Ma
Seafoods Co., Ltd.)
24. Thuan An Production Trading and
Service Co., Ltd. (also known as
TAFISHCO, Thuan An Production Trading
and Services Co., Ltd., Thuan An
Production & Trading Service Co., Ltd., or
Thuan An Production & Trading Services
Co., Ltd.)
25. Viet Phu Foods and Fish Corporation
(also known as Vietphu, Viet Phu, Viet Phu
Food and Fish Corporation, or Viet Phu
Food & Fish Corporation)
26. Viet Phu Foods & Fish Co., Ltd.
27. Vinh Long Import-Export Company (also
known as Vinh Long, Imex Cuu Long or
Vinh Long Import/Export Company)
[FR Doc. 2021–14509 Filed 7–7–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–588–878]
Glycine From Japan: Preliminary
Results of Antidumping Administrative
Review; 2018–2020
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(Commerce) preliminarily determines
that Yuki Gosei Kogyo Co., Ltd. and
Nagase & Co., Ltd. (Nagase)
(collectively, YGK/Nagase) made sales
of subject merchandise at less than
normal value during the period of
review (POR) October 31, 2018, through
May 31, 2020.
DATES: Applicable July 8, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joshua A. DeMoss, AD/CVD Operations,
Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3362.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:47 Jul 07, 2021
Jkt 253001
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Commerce initiated this review on
August 6, 2020.1 We selected two
mandatory respondents in this review,
Nagase and Showa Denko K.K. (Showa
Denko). On October 8, 2020, Showa
Denko withdrew from participation in
this administrative review.2 For a more
detailed description of the events that
followed the initiation of this review,
see the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum.3
The Preliminary Decision
Memorandum is a public document and
is on file electronically via Enforcement
and Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a
complete version of the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum can be accessed
directly at https://enforcement.trade.gov/
frn/. A list of topics
discussed in the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum is attached as an
appendix to this notice.
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to the order
is glycine. For a complete description of
the scope of this administrative review,
see the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum.3
Methodology
Commerce is conducting this review
in accordance with section 751(a)(2) of
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the
Act). Export price and constructed
export price are calculated in
accordance with section 772 of the Act.
Normal value is calculated in
accordance with section 773 of the Act.
For a full description of the
methodology underlying our
conclusions, see Preliminary Decision
Memorandum.
Facts Available
Pursuant to section 776(a) of the Act,
Commerce is preliminarily relying upon
facts otherwise available to assign an
estimated weighted-average dumping
margin to Showa Denko in this review
because Showa Denko withheld
1 See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 85 FR
47731 (August 6, 2020).
2 See Showa Denko’s Letter, ‘‘Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review of Glycine from Japan:
Withdrawal of Participation as Mandatory
Respondent,’’ dated October 8, 2020.
3 See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review: Glycine from Japan,’’ dated
concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this
notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum).
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
36105
necessary information that was
requested by Commerce, thereby
significantly impeding the conduct of
the review. Further, Commerce
preliminarily determines that Showa
Denko failed to cooperate by not acting
to the best of its ability to comply with
requests for information and, thus,
Commerce is applying adverse facts
available (AFA) in determining a
weighted-average dumping margin for
Showa Denko, in accordance with
section 776(b) of the Act. For a full
description of the methodology
underlying our conclusions regarding
the application of AFA, see the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
Preliminary Results of Review
We preliminarily determine that, for
the period October 31, 2018, through
May 31, 2020, the following weightedaverage dumping margins exist: 4
Producer/exporter
Yuki Gosei Kogyo Co., Ltd./
Nagase & Co., Ltd5 .................
Showa Denko K.K ......................
Weightedaverage
dumping
margin
(percent)
27.71
86.22
Disclosure and Public Comment
We intend to disclose the calculations
performed to parties in this
administrative review within five days
after public announcement of the
preliminary results, in accordance with
19 CFR 351.224(b).
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c),
interested parties may submit case briefs
no later than 30 days after the date of
publication of this notice. Rebuttal
briefs, limited to issues raised in the
case briefs, may be filed not later than
seven days after the date for filing case
briefs.6 Commerce has modified certain
4 As AFA, we preliminarily assign Showa Denko
a dumping margin of 86.22 percent, the highest rate
on the record of the proceeding. See Glycine from
Japan: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than
Fair Value, 84 FR 18484 (May 1, 2019). This rate
achieves the purpose of applying an adverse
inference, i.e., it is sufficiently adverse to ensure
that the uncooperative party does not obtain a more
favorable result by failing to cooperate than if it had
fully cooperated. Because we previously applied
this rate in the investigation, according to 776(c)(2)
of the Act, this rate does not require corroboration.
5 As explained in the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum, based on the record information,
Commerce preliminarily determines that Nagase &
Co., Ltd. and a non-selected respondent, Yuki Gosei
Kogyo Co., Ltd., are affiliated within the meaning
of section 771(33)(E) of the Act and should be
treated as a single entity pursuant to 19 CFR
351.401(f) for these preliminary results of review.
6 See 19 CFR 351.309(d); see also Temporary Rule
Modifying AD/CVD Service Requirements Due to
COVID–19, 85 FR 17006, 17007 (March 26, 2020)
E:\FR\FM\08JYN1.SGM
Continued
08JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 128 (Thursday, July 8, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36102-36105]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-14509]
[[Page 36102]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-552-801]
Certain Frozen Fish Fillets From the Socialist Republic of
Vietnam: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and
Final Determination of No Shipments; 2018-2019
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that Vinh
Hoan Corporation (Vinh Hoan), an exporter of certain frozen fish
fillets (fish fillets) from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam
(Vietnam), did not sell subject merchandise in the United States at
prices below normal value during the period of review (POR) August 1,
2018, through July 31, 2019. Further, Commerce determines that 20
companies had no shipments during the POR.
DATES: Applicable July 8, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Javier Barrientos, AD/CVD Operations,
Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-2243.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On December 28, 2020, Commerce published the Preliminary Results
and invited interested parties to comment.\1\ On February 3 and 12,
2021, the petitioners,\2\ Vinh Hoan, the Hung Vuong Group (HVG),
Colorado Boxed Beef Company (CBBC), QMC Foods, Inc. (QMC), Nam Viet
Corporation (NAVICO), and Can Tho Import Export Joint Stock Company
(CASEAMEX) submitted case and/or rebuttal briefs.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Certain Frozen Fish Fillets from the Socialist Republic
of Vietnam: Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review, Preliminary Determination of No Shipments,
and Partial Rescission of the Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2018-2019, 85 FR 84300 (December 28, 2020) (Preliminary
Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
\2\ The petitioners are the Catfish Farmers of America and
individual U.S. catfish processors America's Catch, Inc., Alabama
Catfish, LLC d/b/a Harvest Select Catfish, Inc., Consolidated
Catfish Companies, LLC d/b/a Country Select Catfish, Delta Pride
Catfish, Inc., Guidry's Catfish, Inc., Heartland Catfish Company,
Magnolia Processing, Inc. d/b/a Pride of the Pond, and Simmons Farm
Raised Catfish, Inc. (collectively, the petitioners).
\3\ See Petitioners' Letter, ``CFA Certain Frozen Fish Fillets
from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Case Brief of the Catfish
Farmers of America, et al.,'' dated February 3, 2021; Vinh Hoan's
Letter, ``Certain Frozen Fish Fillets from Vietnam: Case Brief of
Vinh Hoan Corporation,'' dated February 3, 2021; HVG's Letter,
``Administrative Review of AD Order on Certain Frozen Fish Fillets
from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam (08/01/18-07/31/19): HVG Case
Brief,'' dated February 3, 2021; Petitioners' Letter, ``Certain
Frozen Fish Fillets from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Rebuttal
Brief on Behalf of the Catfish Farmers of America, et al.,'' dated
February 12, 2021; CBBC/QMC's Letter, ``Administrative Review of AD
Order on Certain Frozen Fish Fillets from the Socialist Republic of
Vietnam (08/01/18-7/31/19): QMC and CBBC Rebuttal to CFA's Case
Brief,'' dated February 12, 2021; Vinh Hoan's Letter, ``Certain
Frozen Fish Fillets from Vietnam: Rebuttal Brief of Vinh Hoan
Corporation,'' dated February 12, 2021; HVG's Letter,
``Administrative Review of AD Order on Certain Frozen Fish Fillets
from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam (08/01/18-07/31/19): HVG
Rebuttal Brief,'' dated February 12, 2021; NAVICO's Letter,
``Certain Frozen Fish Fillets from Vietnam: Rebuttal Brief of Nam
Viet Corporation,'' dated February 12, 2021; and CASEAMEX's Letter,
``Certain Frozen Fish Fillets from Vietnam: Rebuttal Brief of
CASEAMEX,'' dated February 12, 2021.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Following briefing, in response to comments filed by interested
parties, on May 19, 2021, Commerce placed additional information
obtained from U.S Customs and Border Protection (CBP) on the record and
solicited comments.\4\ The petitioners and HVG filed comments regarding
the information.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Memorandum, ``U.S. Customs and Border Protection Entry
Query,'' dated May 19, 2021.
\5\ See Petitioners' Letter, ``Certain Frozen Fish Fillets from
the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Comments on the May 19th CBP
Entry Information,'' dated May 24, 2021; Petitioners' Letter,
``Certain Frozen Fish Fillets from the Socialist Republic of
Vietnam: Errata to Comments on the May 19th CBP Entry Information,''
dated May 25, 2021; HVG's Letter, ``Certain Frozen Fish Fillets from
the Socialist Republic of Vietnam (08/01/18-07/31/19): HVG Response
to Department Request for Information on Liquidated Entry,'' dated
May 25, 2021; HVG's Letter, ``Certain Frozen Fish Fillets from the
Socialist Republic of Vietnam (08/01/18-07/31/19): ERRATA to HVG May
25 Response to Department Request for Information on Liquidated
Entry,'' dated June 3, 2021; Petitioners' Letter, ``Certain Frozen
Fish Fillets from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Response to
HVG's Comments Regarding Commerce's Request for Information on
Liquidated Entry,'' dated May 27, 2021; and HVG's Letter, ``Certain
Frozen Fish Fillets from Vietnam (08/01/18-7/31/19): Hung Vuong
Group Rebuttal to CFA Comments on CBP Entry Data,'' dated May 27,
2021.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On April 7, 2021, we extended the deadline for issuance of these
final results to June 25, 2021.\6\ On June 8, 2021 we conducted a
public hearing in this matter.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Memorandum, ``Frozen Fish Fillets from Vietnam:
Extension of Deadline for Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review, 2018-2019,'' dated April 7, 2021.
\7\ See Hearing, ``Administrative Review of the Antidumping
Order on Certain Frozen Fish Fillets from the Socialist Republic of
Vietnam: Public Hearing,'' dated June 8, 2021.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order 8
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See Notice of Antidumpimg Duty Order: Certain Frozen Fish
Fillets from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam, 68 FR 47909 (August
12, 2003) (Order).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The products covered by the order are frozen fish fillets,
including regular, shank, and strip fillets and portions thereof,
whether or not breaded or marinated, of the species Pangasius Bocourti,
Pangasius Hypophthalmus (also known as Pangasius Pangasius) and
Pangasius Micronemus. For a complete description of the scope of this
order, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2018-
2019,'' dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice
(Issues and Decision Memorandum) at 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analysis of Comments Received
We addressed all issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs
filed by interested parties in the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
Attached to this notice in Appendix I is a list of the issues which
parties raised. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document
and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service
System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on a review of the record and comments received from
interested parties, and for the reasons explained in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum, we made certain changes to Vinh Hoan's weighted-
average dumping margin and revised the list of companies within the
Vinh Hoan collapsed entity. For these final results, Commerce also
updated the weighted-average dumping margin assigned to the non-
individually-examined company receiving a separate rate, i.e., NAVICO.
For a discussion of the above-referenced changes, see the ``Changes
Since the Preliminary Results'' section of the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.
Final Determination of No Shipments
In the Preliminary Results, Commerce preliminarily determined that
21 companies had no shipments of subject merchandise during the
POR.\10\ Following the publication of the Preliminary Results, we
received no comments from interested parties
[[Page 36103]]
regarding 19 of these companies, nor has any party submitted record
evidence which would call our preliminary no shipment determination
into question for them. Therefore, for these final results, we find
that these 19 companies had no shipments during the POR.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See Preliminary Results, 85 FR at 84300.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
With respect to the remaining two companies, HVG \11\ and Thanh
Binh Dong Thap One Member Company Limited (Thanh Binh),\12\ we received
comments from interested parties requesting that Commerce reevaluate
our no shipment determination. With regard to HVG, Commerce continues
to find that HVG had no shipments during the POR.\13\ With regard to
Thanh Binh, Commerce now finds that this company is part of the Vinh
Hoan single entity.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment 4.
\12\ Id. at Comment 8.
\13\ Id. at Comment 4.
\14\ Id. at Comment 8.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For a list of the 20 companies for which we find ``no shipments''
for these final results, see Appendix II. Consistent with our practice,
we will issue appropriate instructions to CBP consistent with the
reseller policy. \15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment
of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Separate Rates
We continue to find that the non-individually-examined exporter
NAVICO and individually-examined respondent Vinh Hoan have demonstrated
eligibility for separate rates. As noted below, we have assigned NAVICO
the rate established for Vinh Hoan, in accordance with section
735(c)(5)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).
Vietnam-Wide Entity
In the Preliminary Results, we denied Seafood Joint Stock Company
No.4 Branch Dongtam Fisheries Processing Company (DOTASEAFOOD) a
separate rate.\16\ For the reasons explained in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum, we continue to find that DOTASEAFOOD is not eligible for a
separate rate.\17\ Thus, we find DOTASEAFOOD to be part of the Vietnam-
wide entity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ See Preliminary Results, 85 FR at 84300-84301.
\17\ See Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment 5.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the Preliminary Results, Commerce found that certain additional
companies for which a review was requested did not establish
eligibility for a separate rate.\18\ We have received no information
since the issuance of the Preliminary Results that provides a basis for
reconsidering this preliminary finding. Therefore, Commerce continues
to find that these companies are part of the Vietnam-wide entity.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ See Preliminary Results, 85 FR at 84301.
\19\ See Appendix III.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Results of Administrative Review
The weighted-average dumping margins for the final results of this
administrative review are as follows:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ In the third administrative review of this order, Commerce
determined that it would calculate per-unit assessment and cash
deposit rates for all future reviews. See Certain Frozen Fish
Fillets from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Partial Rescission, 73 FR
15479, 15481 (March 24, 2008).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-
average
dumping
Exporter margin
(dollars/
kilogram) \20\
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Vinh Hoan Corporation *................................. 0.00
Nam Viet Corporation **................................. 0.00
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* The Vinh Hoan single entity includes Vinh Hoan Corporation, Van Duc
Food Export Joint Stock Company, Van Duc Tien Giang Food Export
Company, Thanh Binh Dong Thap One Member Company Limited, and Vinh
Phuoc Food Company Limited.
** NAVICO is a separate rate respondent not individually examined.
Disclosure
We intend to disclose the calculations performed regarding these
final results within five days of the date of publication of this
notice to parties in this proceeding in accordance with 19 CFR
351.224(b).
Assessment Rates
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.212(b),
Commerce has determined, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on
all appropriate entries of subject merchandise in accordance with the
final results of this review. Consistent with its recent notice,\21\
Commerce intends to issue appropriate assessment instructions to CBP no
earlier than 35 days after the date of publication of the final results
of this review in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is filed at
the U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will
direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties
to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within
90 days of publication).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ See Notice of Discontinuation of Policy to Issue
Liquidation Instructions After 15 Days in Applicable Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Proceedings, 86 FR 3995 (January
15, 2021).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Because we calculated a weighted-average dumping margin of zero for
Vinh Hoan, and applied that rate to NAVICO in the final results of this
review, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries
without regard to antidumping duties. Pursuant to Commerce's assessment
practice, for entries of Vinh Hoan's merchandise that were not reported
in the U.S. sales data submitted by Vinh Hoan during this review,
Commerce will instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at the Vietnam-
wide entity rate.
Where we determined that an exporter under review had no shipments
of the subject merchandise to the United States during the POR, any
suspended entries that entered during the POR under that exporter's CBP
case number will be liquidated at a rate of $2.39 per kilogram, the
rate for the Vietnam-wide entity consistent with Commerce's reseller
policy.\22\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment
of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Likewise, for companies that were found to be ineligible for a
separate rate, we will instruct CBP to liquidate entries of subject
merchandise exported by such companies also at a rate of $2.39 per
kilogram, the rate for the Vietnam-wide entity.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of this administrative review for all
shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the publication date, as provided for by
section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For the exporters listed above,
the cash deposit rate will be equal to the weighted-averaged dumping
margin established in the final results of review; (2) for previously
investigated or reviewed Vietnamese and non-Vietnamese exporters not
listed above that maintain their eligibility for a separate rate, the
cash deposit rate will continue to be the exporter-specific rate
published for the most recently-completed segment of this proceeding in
which they were reviewed; (3) for all Vietnamese exporters of subject
merchandise which have not been found to be entitled to a separate
rate, the cash deposit rate will be $2.39 per kilogram, the rate
established for the Vietnam-wide entity; and (4) for all non-Vietnamese
exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their own
rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the
Vietnamese exporters that supplied that non-Vietnamese exporter.
The deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect
until further notice.
[[Page 36104]]
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding
the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the
relevant entries during this POR. Failure to comply with this
requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that reimbursement
of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of doubled
antidumping duties.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of
the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or
destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective
order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and
terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing these final results of administrative
review in accordance with sections 751(a)(l) and 777(i) of the Act.
Dated: June 25, 2021.
James Maeder,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations.
Appendix I
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Changes Since the Preliminary Results
V. Separate Rates
VI. Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1: Whether Colorado Boxed Beef Company (CBBC) and QMC
Foods, Inc. (QMC) Have Standing as Wholesalers to Request a Review
Comment 2: Whether the Vietnam-Wide Entity Is Under Review
Comment 3: Selection of Surrogate Country
Comment 4: Hung Vuong Group (HVG) ``No Shipments'' Determination
Comment 5: Applying Adverse Facts Available (AFA) to Seafood
Joint Stock
Company No. 4 Branch Dongtam Fisheries Processing Company
(DOTASEAFOOD)
Comment 6: Whether to Grant Nam Viet Corporation (NAVICO) a
Separate Rate
Comment 7: Treatment of Can Tho Import Export Joint Stock
Company (CASEAMEX)
Comment 8: Vinh Hoan Corporation (Vinh Hoan) Collapsing
Comment 9: Vinh Hoan Calculation Issues
VII. Recommendation
Appendix II
Companies With No Shipments During the POR
1. Bentre Forestry and Aquaproduct Import Export Joint Stock Company
(aka Bentre Forestry and Aquaproduct Import and Export Joint Stock
Company, Ben Tre Forestry and Aquaproduct Import-Export Joint Stock
Company, Ben Tre Forestry and Aquaproduct Import-Export Company, Ben
Tre Forestry Aquaproduct Import-Export Company, Ben Tre Frozen
Aquaproduct Export Company, or Faquimex)
2. Cafatex Corporation (aka Cafatex)
3. Cantho Import-Export Seafood Joint Stock Company (aka CASEAMEX,
Cantho Import Export Seafood Joint Stock Company, Cantho Import-
Export Joint Stock Company, Can Tho Import Export Seafood Joint
Stock Company, Can Tho Import-Export Seafood Joint Stock Company, or
Can Tho Import-Export Joint Stock Company)
4. C.P. Vietnam Corporation
5. Dai Thanh Seafoods Company Limited (aka DATHACO, Dai Thanh
Seafoods, or Dai Thanh Seafoods Co., Ltd.)
6. Fatifish Company Limited (aka FATIFISH or FATIFISHCO)
7. Golden Quality Seafood Corporation (aka Golden Quality,
GoldenQuality, GoldenQuality Seafood Corporation, or GOLDENQUALITY)
8. Green Farms Seafood Joint Stock Company (aka Green Farms,
GreenFarm SeaFoods Joint Stock Company, Green Farms Seafoods Joint
Stock Company, or Green Farms Seafood JSC)
9. Hai Huong Seafood Joint Stock Company (aka HHFish, HH Fish, or
Hai Houng Seafood)
10. Hung Vuong--Mien Tay Aquaculture Corporation (aka HVMT or Hung
Vuong Mien Tay Aquaculture Joint Stock Company)
11. Nha Trang Seafoods, Inc. (aka Nha Trang Seafoods-F89, Nha Trang
Seafoods, or Nha Trang Seaproduct Company)
12. NTSF Seafoods Joint Stock Company (aka NTSF or NTSF Seafoods)
13. QVD Dong Thap Food Co., Ltd. (aka Dong Thap or QVD DT)
14. QVD Food Company, Ltd. (aka QVD, QVD Food Co., Ltd., or QVD
Aquaculture)
15. Seavina Joint Stock Company (aka Seavina)
16. Southern Fishery Industries Company, Ltd. (aka South Vina, South
Vina Co., Ltd., Southern Fisheries Industries Co., Ltd., or Southern
Fisheries Industries Company Limited)
17. Thuan Hung Co., Ltd. (aka THUFICO)
18. Viet Hai Seafood Company Limited (aka Viet Hai, Vietnam Fish-One
Co, Ltd. Viet Hai Seafood Co., Viet Hai Seafood Co., Ltd., Vietnam
Fish One Co., Ltd., or Fish One)
19. Vinh Quang Fisheries Corporation (aka Vinh Quang, Vinh Quang
Fisheries Joint Stock Company, Vinh Quang Fisheries Co. Ltd., or
Vinh Quang Fisheries Corp.)
20. The Hung Vuong Group, which consists of:
a. Hung Vuong Joint Stock Company (aka Hung Vuong Corporation or
HVC or HV Corp.);
b. An Giang Fisheries Import and Export Joint Stock Company
(also known as Agifish, AnGiang Fisheries Import and Export, or An
Giang Fisheries Import & Export Joint Stock Company);
c. Asia Pangasius Company Limited (aka ASIA);
d. Europe Joint Stock Company;
e. Hung Vuong Ben Tre Seafood Processing Company Limited (aka
Ben Tre, HVBT, or HVBT Seafood Processing);
f. Hung Vuong Mascato Company Limited;
g. Hung Vuong--Sa Dec Co. Ltd. (aka Hung Vuong Sa Dec Company
Limited); and
h. Hung Vuong--Vinh Long Co., Ltd (aka Hung Vuong Vinh Long
Company Limited)
Appendix III
Vietnam-Wide Entity
1. An Phat Import-Export Seafood Co., Ltd. (also known as An Phat
Seafood Co. Ltd. or An Phat Seafood Co., Ltd.)
2. Anvifish Joint Stock Company (also known as Anvifish, Anvifish
JSC, or Anvifish Co., Ltd.)
3. Basa Joint Stock Company (BASACO)
4. Ben Tre Aquaproduct Import and Export Joint Stock Company (also
known as Bentre Aquaproduct, Bentre Aquaproduct Import & Export
Joint Stock Company, or Aquatex Bentre)
5. Binh Dinh Import Export Company (also known as Binh Dinh)
6. Cadovimex II Seafood Import-Export and Processing Joint Stock
Company (also known as Cadovimex II, Cadovimex II Seafood Import-
Export, Cadovimex II Seafood Import Export and Processing Joint
Stock Company, or Cadovimex II Seafood Import-Export & Processing
Joint Stock Company)
7. Can Tho Animal Fishery Products Processing Export Enterprise (aka
Cafatex)
8. Cuu Long Fish Import-Export Corporation (also known as CL Panga
Fish)
9. Cuu Long Fish Joint Stock Company (also known as CL-Fish, CL-FISH
CORP, or Cuu Long Fish Joint Stock Company)
10. East Sea Seafoods LLC (also known as ESS LLC, ESS, ESS JVC, East
Sea Seafoods Limited Liability Company, East Sea Seafoods Joint
Venture Co., Ltd.)
11. Go Dang An Hiep One Member Limited Company
12. Go Dang Ben Tre One Member Limited Liability Company
13. Hoa Phat Seafood Import-Export and Processing J.S.C. (also known
as HOPAFISH, Hoa Phat Seafood Import-Export and Processing Joint
Stock Company, or Hoa Phat Seafood Import-Export and Processing JSC)
14. Hoang Long Seafood Processing Company Limited (also known as
HLS, Hoang Long Seafood, Hoang Long Seafood Processing Co., Ltd.,
Hoang Long, or HoangLong Seafood)
15. Hung Vuong Seafood Joint Stock Company
16. Lian Heng Investment Co., Ltd. (also known as Lian Heng
Investment or Lian Heng)
[[Page 36105]]
17. Lian Heng Trading Co., Ltd. (also known as Lian Heng or Lian
Heng Trading)
18. Nam Phuong Seafood Co., Ltd. (also known as Nam Phuong,
NAFISHCO, Nam Phuong Seafood, or Nam PhuongSeafood Company Ltd.)
19. NTACO Corporation (also known as NTACO or NTACO Corp.)
20. Quang Minh Seafood Company Limited (also known as Quang Minh,
Quang Minh Seafood Co., Ltd., or Quang Minh Seafood Co.)
21. Seafood Joint Stock Company No. 4 Branch Dongtam Fisheries
Processing Company (also known as DOTASEAFOODCO or Seafood Joint
Stock Company No. 4-Branch Dong Tam Fisheries Processing Company)
22. Thanh Hung Co., Ltd. (also known as Thanh Hung Frozen Seafood
Processing Import Export Co., Ltd. or Thanh Hung)
23. Thien Ma Seafood Co., Ltd. (also known as THIMACO, Thien Ma,
Thien Ma Seafood Company, Ltd., or Thien Ma Seafoods Co., Ltd.)
24. Thuan An Production Trading and Service Co., Ltd. (also known as
TAFISHCO, Thuan An Production Trading and Services Co., Ltd., Thuan
An Production & Trading Service Co., Ltd., or Thuan An Production &
Trading Services Co., Ltd.)
25. Viet Phu Foods and Fish Corporation (also known as Vietphu, Viet
Phu, Viet Phu Food and Fish Corporation, or Viet Phu Food & Fish
Corporation)
26. Viet Phu Foods & Fish Co., Ltd.
27. Vinh Long Import-Export Company (also known as Vinh Long, Imex
Cuu Long or Vinh Long Import/Export Company)
[FR Doc. 2021-14509 Filed 7-7-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P