Ripe Olives From Spain: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2018-2019, 35068-35069 [2021-14060]

Download as PDF 35068 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 124 / Thursday, July 1, 2021 / Notices Dated: June 28, 2021. James Maeder, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. [FR Doc. 2021–14112 Filed 6–30–21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–469–817] Ripe Olives From Spain: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2018–2019 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that the producers/exporters subject to this review made sales of subject merchandise in the United States at less than normal value during the period of review (POR) January 26, 2018, through July 31, 2019. DATES: Applicable July 1, 2021. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dmitry Vladimirov, AD/CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0665. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AGENCY: khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES Background On December 28, 2020, Commerce published the Preliminary Results of the 2018–2019 administrative review of the antidumping duty order on ripe olives from Spain.1 The administrative review covers three producers or exporters of the subject merchandise, Agro Sevilla Aceitunas S. Coop. And. (Agro Sevilla), Camacho Alimentacion S.L. (Angel Camacho), and Alimentary Group Dcoop S. Coop. And. (Dcoop). We invited interested parties to comment on the Preliminary Results. On February 1, 2021, we received case briefs from the domestic interested parties, Musco Family Olive Company (Musco) and Bell-Carter Foods, LLC (BCF), both members of the Coalition for Fair Trade in Ripe Olives, and from the mandatory respondents, Agro Sevilla, Angel Camacho, and Dcoop.2 On February 8, 1 See Ripe Olives from Spain: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2018– 2019, 85 FR 84297 (December 28, 2020) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM). 2 See Musco’s Letters, ‘‘Ripe Olives from Spain; 1st Administrative Review Musco Case Brief VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:45 Jun 30, 2021 Jkt 253001 2021, Musco, Agro Sevilla, Angel Camacho, and Dcoop submitted rebuttal briefs.3 On April 5, 2021, Commerce extended the deadline for the final results by 59 days to June 25, 2021.4 Commerce conducted this review in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn. Scope of the Order The merchandise subject to the order are ripe olives. A full description of the scope of the order is contained in the Issues and Decision Memorandum.5 Final Results of the Administrative Review Changes Since the Preliminary Results Based on the comments received we made changes for these final results which are discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. We determine that the following weighted-average dumping margins exist for the period January 26, 2018, through July 31, 2019. Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in the case and Weightedrebuttal briefs that were submitted by average parties in this investigation are Producer/exporter dumping margin addressed in the Issues and Decision (percent) Memorandum. A list of the topics discussed in the Issues and Decision Agro Sevilla Aceitunas Memorandum is attached as an S.COOP Andalusia ........... 15.65 Appendix to this notice. The Issues and Angel Camacho Decision Memorandum is a public Alimentacion S.L ............... 22.41 document and is on file electronically Alimentary Group Dcoop S. via Enforcement and Compliance’s Coop. And ......................... 5.78 Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System Disclosure (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to We intend to disclose the calculations registered users at https:// performed in connection with these access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete final results to parties in this proceeding within five days after the date of Concerning Agro Sevilla,’’ dated February 1, 2021; publication of the final results or, if ‘‘Ripe Olives from Spain; 1st Administrative Review Musco Case Brief Concerning Camacho,’’ there is no public announcement, dated February 1, 2021; and ‘‘Ripe Olives from within five days of the date of Spain; 1st Administrative Review Musco Case Brief publication of the notice of final results Concerning Dcoop,’’ dated February 1, 2021; see in the Federal Register, in accordance also BCF’s Letter, ‘‘Ripe Olives from Spain: Case Brief,’’ dated February 1, 2021; Agro Sevilla’s with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Letter, ‘‘Case Brief of Agro Sevilla Ripe Olives from Spain (A–469–817) POR1,’’ dated February 1, 2021; Angel Camacho’s Letter, ‘‘Case Brief of Camacho Alimentacio´n S.L. Ripe Olives from Spain (A–469– 817) POR1,’’ dated February 1, 2021; and Dcoop’s Letter, ‘‘Ripe Olives from Spain: Case Brief,’’ dated February 1, 2021. 3 See Musco’s Letters, ‘‘Ripe Olives from Spain; 1st Administrative Review Musco Rebuttal Brief Concerning Agro Sevilla,’’ dated February 8, 2021; ‘‘Ripe Olives from Spain; 1st Administrative Review Musco Rebuttal Brief Concerning Camacho,’’ dated February 8, 2021; ‘‘Ripe Olives from Spain; 1st Administrative Review Musco Rebuttal Brief Concerning Dcoop,’’ dated February 8, 2021; and ‘‘Ripe Olives from Spain; 1st Administrative Review Musco Rebuttal Brief Concerning BCF,’’ dated February 8, 2021; see also Agro Sevilla’s Letter, ‘‘Rebuttal Brief of Agro Sevilla Ripe Olives from Spain (A–469–817) POR1,’’ dated February 8, 2021; Angel Camacho’s Letter, ‘‘Rebuttal Brief of Camacho Alimentacio´n S.L. Ripe Olives from Spain (A–469–817) POR1,’’ dated February 8, 2021; and Dcoop’s Letter, ‘‘Ripe Olives from Spain: Rebuttal Brief,’’ dated February 8, 2021. 4 See Memorandum, ‘‘Ripe Olives from Spain: Extension of Deadline for Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,’’ dated April 5, 2021. 5 See Memorandum, ‘‘Ripe Olives from Spain: Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2018–2019,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Assessment Rates Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), Commerce will determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise in accordance with the final results of this review. For Agro Sevilla, Angel Camacho, and Dcoop, we calculated importer-specific assessment rates on the basis of the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for each importer’s examined sales and the total entered value of those sales in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).6 Where an importerspecific assessment rate is de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent), the entries by that importer will be liquidated 6 In these final results, Commerce applied the assessment rate calculation method adopted in Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012). E:\FR\FM\01JYN1.SGM 01JYN1 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 124 / Thursday, July 1, 2021 / Notices without reference to antidumping duties. For entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by each respondent for which it did not know that its merchandise was destined for the United States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the all-others rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction.7 Consistent with its recent notice,8 Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 days after the date of publication of the final results of this review in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is filed at the U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within 90 days of publication). Cash Deposit Requirements khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication in the Federal Register of this notice for all shipments of ripe olives entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication as provided by section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rates for the companies subject to this review will be equal to the weighted-average dumping margin established in the final results of the review; (2) for merchandise exported by producers or exporters not covered in this review but covered in a prior completed segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published in the completed segment for the most recent period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the original investigation but the producer has been covered in a prior completed segment of this proceeding, then the cash deposit rate will be the rate established in the completed segment for the most recent period for the producer of the merchandise; (4) the cash deposit rate for all other producers or exporters will continue to be 19.98 percent, the all-others rate established in the less-than-fair-value investigation for this proceeding.9 These cash deposit 7 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). 8 See Notice of Discontinuation of Policy to Issue Liquidation Instructions After 15 Days in Applicable Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Proceedings, 86 FR 884 (Jan.15, 2021). 9 See Ripe Olives from Spain: Antidumping Duty Order, 83 FR 37465 (August 1, 2018). VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:45 Jun 30, 2021 Jkt 253001 requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation subject to sanction. Notification to Interested Parties We are issuing and publishing these results of administrative review in accordance with sections 751(a) and 777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5). Dated: June 25, 2021. Ryan Majerus, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. Changes Since the Preliminary Results V. Discussion of the Issues Agro Sevilla Comment 1: Home-Market Database Comment 2: Constructed Export Price Offset Comment 3: Major-Input Rule Adjustment Angel Camacho Comment 4: Price Comparisons for a Certain Product Control Number Sold in the U.S. Market Comment 5: Cost Adjustment to Ending Inventory Value Comment 6: General and Administrative Expenses Comment 7: Certain Inland Freight Expenses PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 35069 Comment 8: Beginning Dates in Programs DCoop Comment 9: Whether Commerce Should Apply Adverse Facts Available to Dcoop’s Cost Database Comment 10: Application of Adverse Facts Available to Dcoop’s General and Administrative Expenses Comment 11: Early Payment and Quantity Discounts Comment 12: U.S. Freight and U.S. Indirect Selling Expenses Comment 13: Rescission of the Administrative Review of Dcoop VI. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2021–14060 Filed 6–30–21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–580–880] Heavy Walled Rectangular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes From the Republic of Korea: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With the Final Results in the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; Notice of Amended Final Results Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On June 24, 2021, the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) sustained the Department of Commerce’s (Commerce’s) remand results pertaining to the first administrative review of the antidumping duty order on heavy walled rectangular welded carbon steel pipes and tubes (HWR) from the Republic of Korea (Korea) covering the period of review (POR) of March 1, 2016, through August 31, 2017. Commerce is notifying the public that the CIT’s final judgment in this case is not in harmony with Commerce’s final results in the first administrative review of HWR from Korea. Consistent with the CIT’s final judgment, Commerce is amending the weighted-average dumping margins calculated for Dong A-Steel Company (DOSCO) and Kukje Steel Co., Ltd. (Kukje Steel). DATES: Applicable July 4, 2021. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alice Maldonado, AD/CVD Operations Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4682. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AGENCY: Background On May 28, 2019, Commerce published its Final Results in the first E:\FR\FM\01JYN1.SGM 01JYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 124 (Thursday, July 1, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35068-35069]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-14060]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-469-817]


Ripe Olives From Spain: Final Results of Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review; 2018-2019

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that the 
producers/exporters subject to this review made sales of subject 
merchandise in the United States at less than normal value during the 
period of review (POR) January 26, 2018, through July 31, 2019.

DATES: Applicable July 1, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dmitry Vladimirov, AD/CVD Operations, 
Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0665.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On December 28, 2020, Commerce published the Preliminary Results of 
the 2018-2019 administrative review of the antidumping duty order on 
ripe olives from Spain.\1\ The administrative review covers three 
producers or exporters of the subject merchandise, Agro Sevilla 
Aceitunas S. Coop. And. (Agro Sevilla), Camacho Alimentacion S.L. 
(Angel Camacho), and Alimentary Group Dcoop S. Coop. And. (Dcoop). We 
invited interested parties to comment on the Preliminary Results. On 
February 1, 2021, we received case briefs from the domestic interested 
parties, Musco Family Olive Company (Musco) and Bell-Carter Foods, LLC 
(BCF), both members of the Coalition for Fair Trade in Ripe Olives, and 
from the mandatory respondents, Agro Sevilla, Angel Camacho, and 
Dcoop.\2\ On February 8, 2021, Musco, Agro Sevilla, Angel Camacho, and 
Dcoop submitted rebuttal briefs.\3\ On April 5, 2021, Commerce extended 
the deadline for the final results by 59 days to June 25, 2021.\4\ 
Commerce conducted this review in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B) 
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Ripe Olives from Spain: Preliminary Results of 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2018-2019, 85 FR 84297 
(December 28, 2020) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying 
Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM).
    \2\ See Musco's Letters, ``Ripe Olives from Spain; 1st 
Administrative Review Musco Case Brief Concerning Agro Sevilla,'' 
dated February 1, 2021; ``Ripe Olives from Spain; 1st Administrative 
Review Musco Case Brief Concerning Camacho,'' dated February 1, 
2021; and ``Ripe Olives from Spain; 1st Administrative Review Musco 
Case Brief Concerning Dcoop,'' dated February 1, 2021; see also 
BCF's Letter, ``Ripe Olives from Spain: Case Brief,'' dated February 
1, 2021; Agro Sevilla's Letter, ``Case Brief of Agro Sevilla Ripe 
Olives from Spain (A-469-817) POR1,'' dated February 1, 2021; Angel 
Camacho's Letter, ``Case Brief of Camacho Alimentaci[oacute]n S.L. 
Ripe Olives from Spain (A-469-817) POR1,'' dated February 1, 2021; 
and Dcoop's Letter, ``Ripe Olives from Spain: Case Brief,'' dated 
February 1, 2021.
    \3\ See Musco's Letters, ``Ripe Olives from Spain; 1st 
Administrative Review Musco Rebuttal Brief Concerning Agro 
Sevilla,'' dated February 8, 2021; ``Ripe Olives from Spain; 1st 
Administrative Review Musco Rebuttal Brief Concerning Camacho,'' 
dated February 8, 2021; ``Ripe Olives from Spain; 1st Administrative 
Review Musco Rebuttal Brief Concerning Dcoop,'' dated February 8, 
2021; and ``Ripe Olives from Spain; 1st Administrative Review Musco 
Rebuttal Brief Concerning BCF,'' dated February 8, 2021; see also 
Agro Sevilla's Letter, ``Rebuttal Brief of Agro Sevilla Ripe Olives 
from Spain (A-469-817) POR1,'' dated February 8, 2021; Angel 
Camacho's Letter, ``Rebuttal Brief of Camacho Alimentaci[oacute]n 
S.L. Ripe Olives from Spain (A-469-817) POR1,'' dated February 8, 
2021; and Dcoop's Letter, ``Ripe Olives from Spain: Rebuttal 
Brief,'' dated February 8, 2021.
    \4\ See Memorandum, ``Ripe Olives from Spain: Extension of 
Deadline for Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 
Review,'' dated April 5, 2021.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order

    The merchandise subject to the order are ripe olives. A full 
description of the scope of the order is contained in the Issues and 
Decision Memorandum.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Memorandum, ``Ripe Olives from Spain: Issues and 
Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review; 2018-2019,'' dated concurrently with, and 
hereby adopted by this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Analysis of Comments Received

    All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs that were 
submitted by parties in this investigation are addressed in the Issues 
and Decision Memorandum. A list of the topics discussed in the Issues 
and Decision Memorandum is attached as an Appendix to this notice. The 
Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file 
electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 
ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov. In 
addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can 
be accessed directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn.

Changes Since the Preliminary Results

    Based on the comments received we made changes for these final 
results which are discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum.

Final Results of the Administrative Review

    We determine that the following weighted-average dumping margins 
exist for the period January 26, 2018, through July 31, 2019.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                             Weighted-
                                                              average
                    Producer/exporter                         dumping
                                                              margin
                                                             (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Agro Sevilla Aceitunas S.COOP Andalusia.................           15.65
Angel Camacho Alimentacion S.L..........................           22.41
Alimentary Group Dcoop S. Coop. And.....................            5.78
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclosure

    We intend to disclose the calculations performed in connection with 
these final results to parties in this proceeding within five days 
after the date of publication of the final results or, if there is no 
public announcement, within five days of the date of publication of the 
notice of final results in the Federal Register, in accordance with 19 
CFR 351.224(b).

Assessment Rates

    Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 
351.212(b)(1), Commerce will determine, and U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate 
entries of subject merchandise in accordance with the final results of 
this review.
    For Agro Sevilla, Angel Camacho, and Dcoop, we calculated importer-
specific assessment rates on the basis of the ratio of the total amount 
of dumping calculated for each importer's examined sales and the total 
entered value of those sales in accordance with 19 CFR 
351.212(b)(1).\6\ Where an importer-specific assessment rate is de 
minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent), the entries by that importer 
will be liquidated

[[Page 35069]]

without reference to antidumping duties.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ In these final results, Commerce applied the assessment rate 
calculation method adopted in Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation 
of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in 
Certain Antidumping Duty Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 
(February 14, 2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by each 
respondent for which it did not know that its merchandise was destined 
for the United States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed 
entries at the all-others rate if there is no rate for the intermediate 
company(ies) involved in the transaction.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Consistent with its recent notice,\8\ Commerce intends to issue 
assessment instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 days after the date 
of publication of the final results of this review in the Federal 
Register. If a timely summons is filed at the U.S. Court of 
International Trade, the assessment instructions will direct CBP not to 
liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties to file a request 
for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within 90 days of 
publication).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Notice of Discontinuation of Policy to Issue Liquidation 
Instructions After 15 Days in Applicable Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Administrative Proceedings, 86 FR 884 (Jan.15, 
2021).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon 
publication in the Federal Register of this notice for all shipments of 
ripe olives entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or 
after the date of publication as provided by section 751(a)(2) of the 
Act: (1) The cash deposit rates for the companies subject to this 
review will be equal to the weighted-average dumping margin established 
in the final results of the review; (2) for merchandise exported by 
producers or exporters not covered in this review but covered in a 
prior completed segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will 
continue to be the company-specific rate published in the completed 
segment for the most recent period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm 
covered in this review, a prior review, or the original investigation 
but the producer has been covered in a prior completed segment of this 
proceeding, then the cash deposit rate will be the rate established in 
the completed segment for the most recent period for the producer of 
the merchandise; (4) the cash deposit rate for all other producers or 
exporters will continue to be 19.98 percent, the all-others rate 
established in the less-than-fair-value investigation for this 
proceeding.\9\ These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall 
remain in effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See Ripe Olives from Spain: Antidumping Duty Order, 83 FR 
37465 (August 1, 2018).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification to Importers

    This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure to comply with this 
requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of double antidumping duties.

Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders

    This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information 
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 
continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of 
the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or 
destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective 
order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and 
terms of an APO is a violation subject to sanction.

Notification to Interested Parties

    We are issuing and publishing these results of administrative 
review in accordance with sections 751(a) and 777(i) of the Act and 19 
CFR 351.221(b)(5).

    Dated: June 25, 2021.
Ryan Majerus,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations.

Appendix

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum

I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Changes Since the Preliminary Results
V. Discussion of the Issues
    Agro Sevilla
    Comment 1: Home-Market Database
    Comment 2: Constructed Export Price Offset
    Comment 3: Major-Input Rule Adjustment
    Angel Camacho
    Comment 4: Price Comparisons for a Certain Product Control 
Number Sold in the U.S. Market
    Comment 5: Cost Adjustment to Ending Inventory Value
    Comment 6: General and Administrative Expenses
    Comment 7: Certain Inland Freight Expenses
    Comment 8: Beginning Dates in Programs
    DCoop
    Comment 9: Whether Commerce Should Apply Adverse Facts Available 
to Dcoop's Cost Database
    Comment 10: Application of Adverse Facts Available to Dcoop's 
General and Administrative Expenses
    Comment 11: Early Payment and Quantity Discounts
    Comment 12: U.S. Freight and U.S. Indirect Selling Expenses
    Comment 13: Rescission of the Administrative Review of Dcoop
VI. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2021-14060 Filed 6-30-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P