Ripe Olives From Spain: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2018-2019, 35068-35069 [2021-14060]
Download as PDF
35068
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 124 / Thursday, July 1, 2021 / Notices
Dated: June 28, 2021.
James Maeder,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. 2021–14112 Filed 6–30–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–469–817]
Ripe Olives From Spain: Final Results
of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2018–2019
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(Commerce) determines that the
producers/exporters subject to this
review made sales of subject
merchandise in the United States at less
than normal value during the period of
review (POR) January 26, 2018, through
July 31, 2019.
DATES: Applicable July 1, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dmitry Vladimirov, AD/CVD
Operations, Office I, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–0665.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Background
On December 28, 2020, Commerce
published the Preliminary Results of the
2018–2019 administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on ripe olives
from Spain.1 The administrative review
covers three producers or exporters of
the subject merchandise, Agro Sevilla
Aceitunas S. Coop. And. (Agro Sevilla),
Camacho Alimentacion S.L. (Angel
Camacho), and Alimentary Group
Dcoop S. Coop. And. (Dcoop). We
invited interested parties to comment on
the Preliminary Results. On February 1,
2021, we received case briefs from the
domestic interested parties, Musco
Family Olive Company (Musco) and
Bell-Carter Foods, LLC (BCF), both
members of the Coalition for Fair Trade
in Ripe Olives, and from the mandatory
respondents, Agro Sevilla, Angel
Camacho, and Dcoop.2 On February 8,
1 See Ripe Olives from Spain: Preliminary Results
of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2018–
2019, 85 FR 84297 (December 28, 2020)
(Preliminary Results), and accompanying
Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM).
2 See Musco’s Letters, ‘‘Ripe Olives from Spain;
1st Administrative Review Musco Case Brief
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:45 Jun 30, 2021
Jkt 253001
2021, Musco, Agro Sevilla, Angel
Camacho, and Dcoop submitted rebuttal
briefs.3 On April 5, 2021, Commerce
extended the deadline for the final
results by 59 days to June 25, 2021.4
Commerce conducted this review in
accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B) of
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the
Act).
version of the Issues and Decision
Memorandum can be accessed directly
at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn.
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to the order
are ripe olives. A full description of the
scope of the order is contained in the
Issues and Decision Memorandum.5
Final Results of the Administrative
Review
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on the comments received we
made changes for these final results
which are discussed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum.
We determine that the following
weighted-average dumping margins
exist for the period January 26, 2018,
through July 31, 2019.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and
Weightedrebuttal briefs that were submitted by
average
parties in this investigation are
Producer/exporter
dumping
margin
addressed in the Issues and Decision
(percent)
Memorandum. A list of the topics
discussed in the Issues and Decision
Agro Sevilla Aceitunas
Memorandum is attached as an
S.COOP Andalusia ...........
15.65
Appendix to this notice. The Issues and Angel Camacho
Decision Memorandum is a public
Alimentacion S.L ...............
22.41
document and is on file electronically
Alimentary Group Dcoop S.
via Enforcement and Compliance’s
Coop. And .........................
5.78
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System
Disclosure
(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
We intend to disclose the calculations
registered users at https://
performed
in connection with these
access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete
final results to parties in this proceeding
within five days after the date of
Concerning Agro Sevilla,’’ dated February 1, 2021;
publication of the final results or, if
‘‘Ripe Olives from Spain; 1st Administrative
Review Musco Case Brief Concerning Camacho,’’
there is no public announcement,
dated February 1, 2021; and ‘‘Ripe Olives from
within five days of the date of
Spain; 1st Administrative Review Musco Case Brief
publication of the notice of final results
Concerning Dcoop,’’ dated February 1, 2021; see
in the Federal Register, in accordance
also BCF’s Letter, ‘‘Ripe Olives from Spain: Case
Brief,’’ dated February 1, 2021; Agro Sevilla’s
with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
Letter, ‘‘Case Brief of Agro Sevilla Ripe Olives from
Spain (A–469–817) POR1,’’ dated February 1, 2021;
Angel Camacho’s Letter, ‘‘Case Brief of Camacho
Alimentacio´n S.L. Ripe Olives from Spain (A–469–
817) POR1,’’ dated February 1, 2021; and Dcoop’s
Letter, ‘‘Ripe Olives from Spain: Case Brief,’’ dated
February 1, 2021.
3 See Musco’s Letters, ‘‘Ripe Olives from Spain;
1st Administrative Review Musco Rebuttal Brief
Concerning Agro Sevilla,’’ dated February 8, 2021;
‘‘Ripe Olives from Spain; 1st Administrative
Review Musco Rebuttal Brief Concerning
Camacho,’’ dated February 8, 2021; ‘‘Ripe Olives
from Spain; 1st Administrative Review Musco
Rebuttal Brief Concerning Dcoop,’’ dated February
8, 2021; and ‘‘Ripe Olives from Spain; 1st
Administrative Review Musco Rebuttal Brief
Concerning BCF,’’ dated February 8, 2021; see also
Agro Sevilla’s Letter, ‘‘Rebuttal Brief of Agro Sevilla
Ripe Olives from Spain (A–469–817) POR1,’’ dated
February 8, 2021; Angel Camacho’s Letter,
‘‘Rebuttal Brief of Camacho Alimentacio´n S.L. Ripe
Olives from Spain (A–469–817) POR1,’’ dated
February 8, 2021; and Dcoop’s Letter, ‘‘Ripe Olives
from Spain: Rebuttal Brief,’’ dated February 8, 2021.
4 See Memorandum, ‘‘Ripe Olives from Spain:
Extension of Deadline for Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,’’ dated
April 5, 2021.
5 See Memorandum, ‘‘Ripe Olives from Spain:
Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2018–2019,’’ dated concurrently with, and
hereby adopted by this notice (Issues and Decision
Memorandum).
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Assessment Rates
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1),
Commerce will determine, and U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
shall assess, antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries of subject
merchandise in accordance with the
final results of this review.
For Agro Sevilla, Angel Camacho, and
Dcoop, we calculated importer-specific
assessment rates on the basis of the ratio
of the total amount of dumping
calculated for each importer’s examined
sales and the total entered value of those
sales in accordance with 19 CFR
351.212(b)(1).6 Where an importerspecific assessment rate is de minimis
(i.e., less than 0.5 percent), the entries
by that importer will be liquidated
6 In these final results, Commerce applied the
assessment rate calculation method adopted in
Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the
Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and
Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty
Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101
(February 14, 2012).
E:\FR\FM\01JYN1.SGM
01JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 124 / Thursday, July 1, 2021 / Notices
without reference to antidumping
duties.
For entries of subject merchandise
during the POR produced by each
respondent for which it did not know
that its merchandise was destined for
the United States, we will instruct CBP
to liquidate unreviewed entries at the
all-others rate if there is no rate for the
intermediate company(ies) involved in
the transaction.7
Consistent with its recent notice,8
Commerce intends to issue assessment
instructions to CBP no earlier than 35
days after the date of publication of the
final results of this review in the
Federal Register. If a timely summons is
filed at the U.S. Court of International
Trade, the assessment instructions will
direct CBP not to liquidate relevant
entries until the time for parties to file
a request for a statutory injunction has
expired (i.e., within 90 days of
publication).
Cash Deposit Requirements
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective upon
publication in the Federal Register of
this notice for all shipments of ripe
olives entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after
the date of publication as provided by
section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash
deposit rates for the companies subject
to this review will be equal to the
weighted-average dumping margin
established in the final results of the
review; (2) for merchandise exported by
producers or exporters not covered in
this review but covered in a prior
completed segment of the proceeding,
the cash deposit rate will continue to be
the company-specific rate published in
the completed segment for the most
recent period; (3) if the exporter is not
a firm covered in this review, a prior
review, or the original investigation but
the producer has been covered in a prior
completed segment of this proceeding,
then the cash deposit rate will be the
rate established in the completed
segment for the most recent period for
the producer of the merchandise; (4) the
cash deposit rate for all other producers
or exporters will continue to be 19.98
percent, the all-others rate established
in the less-than-fair-value investigation
for this proceeding.9 These cash deposit
7 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68
FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
8 See Notice of Discontinuation of Policy to Issue
Liquidation Instructions After 15 Days in
Applicable Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Proceedings, 86 FR 884 (Jan.15,
2021).
9 See Ripe Olives from Spain: Antidumping Duty
Order, 83 FR 37465 (August 1, 2018).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:45 Jun 30, 2021
Jkt 253001
requirements, when imposed, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during this POR. Failure to comply with
this requirement could result in the
Secretary’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of double antidumping duties.
Notification Regarding Administrative
Protective Orders
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the return or
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
continues to govern business
proprietary information in this segment
of the proceeding. Timely written
notification of the return or destruction
of APO materials, or conversion to
judicial protective order, is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the
regulations and terms of an APO is a
violation subject to sanction.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing these
results of administrative review in
accordance with sections 751(a) and
777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.221(b)(5).
Dated: June 25, 2021.
Ryan Majerus,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and
Negotiations.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Changes Since the Preliminary Results
V. Discussion of the Issues
Agro Sevilla
Comment 1: Home-Market Database
Comment 2: Constructed Export Price
Offset
Comment 3: Major-Input Rule Adjustment
Angel Camacho
Comment 4: Price Comparisons for a
Certain Product Control Number Sold in
the U.S. Market
Comment 5: Cost Adjustment to Ending
Inventory Value
Comment 6: General and Administrative
Expenses
Comment 7: Certain Inland Freight
Expenses
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
35069
Comment 8: Beginning Dates in Programs
DCoop
Comment 9: Whether Commerce Should
Apply Adverse Facts Available to
Dcoop’s Cost Database
Comment 10: Application of Adverse Facts
Available to Dcoop’s General and
Administrative Expenses
Comment 11: Early Payment and Quantity
Discounts
Comment 12: U.S. Freight and U.S. Indirect
Selling Expenses
Comment 13: Rescission of the
Administrative Review of Dcoop
VI. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2021–14060 Filed 6–30–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–580–880]
Heavy Walled Rectangular Welded
Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes From
the Republic of Korea: Notice of Court
Decision Not in Harmony With the
Final Results in the Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; Notice of
Amended Final Results
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On June 24, 2021, the U.S.
Court of International Trade (CIT)
sustained the Department of
Commerce’s (Commerce’s) remand
results pertaining to the first
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on heavy
walled rectangular welded carbon steel
pipes and tubes (HWR) from the
Republic of Korea (Korea) covering the
period of review (POR) of March 1,
2016, through August 31, 2017.
Commerce is notifying the public that
the CIT’s final judgment in this case is
not in harmony with Commerce’s final
results in the first administrative review
of HWR from Korea. Consistent with the
CIT’s final judgment, Commerce is
amending the weighted-average
dumping margins calculated for Dong
A-Steel Company (DOSCO) and Kukje
Steel Co., Ltd. (Kukje Steel).
DATES: Applicable July 4, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Alice Maldonado, AD/CVD Operations
Office II, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4682.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On May 28, 2019, Commerce
published its Final Results in the first
E:\FR\FM\01JYN1.SGM
01JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 124 (Thursday, July 1, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35068-35069]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-14060]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-469-817]
Ripe Olives From Spain: Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2018-2019
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that the
producers/exporters subject to this review made sales of subject
merchandise in the United States at less than normal value during the
period of review (POR) January 26, 2018, through July 31, 2019.
DATES: Applicable July 1, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dmitry Vladimirov, AD/CVD Operations,
Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0665.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On December 28, 2020, Commerce published the Preliminary Results of
the 2018-2019 administrative review of the antidumping duty order on
ripe olives from Spain.\1\ The administrative review covers three
producers or exporters of the subject merchandise, Agro Sevilla
Aceitunas S. Coop. And. (Agro Sevilla), Camacho Alimentacion S.L.
(Angel Camacho), and Alimentary Group Dcoop S. Coop. And. (Dcoop). We
invited interested parties to comment on the Preliminary Results. On
February 1, 2021, we received case briefs from the domestic interested
parties, Musco Family Olive Company (Musco) and Bell-Carter Foods, LLC
(BCF), both members of the Coalition for Fair Trade in Ripe Olives, and
from the mandatory respondents, Agro Sevilla, Angel Camacho, and
Dcoop.\2\ On February 8, 2021, Musco, Agro Sevilla, Angel Camacho, and
Dcoop submitted rebuttal briefs.\3\ On April 5, 2021, Commerce extended
the deadline for the final results by 59 days to June 25, 2021.\4\
Commerce conducted this review in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B)
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Ripe Olives from Spain: Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2018-2019, 85 FR 84297
(December 28, 2020) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying
Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM).
\2\ See Musco's Letters, ``Ripe Olives from Spain; 1st
Administrative Review Musco Case Brief Concerning Agro Sevilla,''
dated February 1, 2021; ``Ripe Olives from Spain; 1st Administrative
Review Musco Case Brief Concerning Camacho,'' dated February 1,
2021; and ``Ripe Olives from Spain; 1st Administrative Review Musco
Case Brief Concerning Dcoop,'' dated February 1, 2021; see also
BCF's Letter, ``Ripe Olives from Spain: Case Brief,'' dated February
1, 2021; Agro Sevilla's Letter, ``Case Brief of Agro Sevilla Ripe
Olives from Spain (A-469-817) POR1,'' dated February 1, 2021; Angel
Camacho's Letter, ``Case Brief of Camacho Alimentaci[oacute]n S.L.
Ripe Olives from Spain (A-469-817) POR1,'' dated February 1, 2021;
and Dcoop's Letter, ``Ripe Olives from Spain: Case Brief,'' dated
February 1, 2021.
\3\ See Musco's Letters, ``Ripe Olives from Spain; 1st
Administrative Review Musco Rebuttal Brief Concerning Agro
Sevilla,'' dated February 8, 2021; ``Ripe Olives from Spain; 1st
Administrative Review Musco Rebuttal Brief Concerning Camacho,''
dated February 8, 2021; ``Ripe Olives from Spain; 1st Administrative
Review Musco Rebuttal Brief Concerning Dcoop,'' dated February 8,
2021; and ``Ripe Olives from Spain; 1st Administrative Review Musco
Rebuttal Brief Concerning BCF,'' dated February 8, 2021; see also
Agro Sevilla's Letter, ``Rebuttal Brief of Agro Sevilla Ripe Olives
from Spain (A-469-817) POR1,'' dated February 8, 2021; Angel
Camacho's Letter, ``Rebuttal Brief of Camacho Alimentaci[oacute]n
S.L. Ripe Olives from Spain (A-469-817) POR1,'' dated February 8,
2021; and Dcoop's Letter, ``Ripe Olives from Spain: Rebuttal
Brief,'' dated February 8, 2021.
\4\ See Memorandum, ``Ripe Olives from Spain: Extension of
Deadline for Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review,'' dated April 5, 2021.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to the order are ripe olives. A full
description of the scope of the order is contained in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Memorandum, ``Ripe Olives from Spain: Issues and
Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2018-2019,'' dated concurrently with, and
hereby adopted by this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs that were
submitted by parties in this investigation are addressed in the Issues
and Decision Memorandum. A list of the topics discussed in the Issues
and Decision Memorandum is attached as an Appendix to this notice. The
Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file
electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov. In
addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can
be accessed directly at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on the comments received we made changes for these final
results which are discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
Final Results of the Administrative Review
We determine that the following weighted-average dumping margins
exist for the period January 26, 2018, through July 31, 2019.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-
average
Producer/exporter dumping
margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Agro Sevilla Aceitunas S.COOP Andalusia................. 15.65
Angel Camacho Alimentacion S.L.......................... 22.41
Alimentary Group Dcoop S. Coop. And..................... 5.78
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure
We intend to disclose the calculations performed in connection with
these final results to parties in this proceeding within five days
after the date of publication of the final results or, if there is no
public announcement, within five days of the date of publication of the
notice of final results in the Federal Register, in accordance with 19
CFR 351.224(b).
Assessment Rates
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.212(b)(1), Commerce will determine, and U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries of subject merchandise in accordance with the final results of
this review.
For Agro Sevilla, Angel Camacho, and Dcoop, we calculated importer-
specific assessment rates on the basis of the ratio of the total amount
of dumping calculated for each importer's examined sales and the total
entered value of those sales in accordance with 19 CFR
351.212(b)(1).\6\ Where an importer-specific assessment rate is de
minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent), the entries by that importer
will be liquidated
[[Page 35069]]
without reference to antidumping duties.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ In these final results, Commerce applied the assessment rate
calculation method adopted in Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation
of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in
Certain Antidumping Duty Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101
(February 14, 2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by each
respondent for which it did not know that its merchandise was destined
for the United States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed
entries at the all-others rate if there is no rate for the intermediate
company(ies) involved in the transaction.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Consistent with its recent notice,\8\ Commerce intends to issue
assessment instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 days after the date
of publication of the final results of this review in the Federal
Register. If a timely summons is filed at the U.S. Court of
International Trade, the assessment instructions will direct CBP not to
liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties to file a request
for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within 90 days of
publication).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See Notice of Discontinuation of Policy to Issue Liquidation
Instructions After 15 Days in Applicable Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Proceedings, 86 FR 884 (Jan.15,
2021).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication in the Federal Register of this notice for all shipments of
ripe olives entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or
after the date of publication as provided by section 751(a)(2) of the
Act: (1) The cash deposit rates for the companies subject to this
review will be equal to the weighted-average dumping margin established
in the final results of the review; (2) for merchandise exported by
producers or exporters not covered in this review but covered in a
prior completed segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will
continue to be the company-specific rate published in the completed
segment for the most recent period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm
covered in this review, a prior review, or the original investigation
but the producer has been covered in a prior completed segment of this
proceeding, then the cash deposit rate will be the rate established in
the completed segment for the most recent period for the producer of
the merchandise; (4) the cash deposit rate for all other producers or
exporters will continue to be 19.98 percent, the all-others rate
established in the less-than-fair-value investigation for this
proceeding.\9\ These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See Ripe Olives from Spain: Antidumping Duty Order, 83 FR
37465 (August 1, 2018).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure to comply with this
requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of
the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or
destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective
order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and
terms of an APO is a violation subject to sanction.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing these results of administrative
review in accordance with sections 751(a) and 777(i) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.221(b)(5).
Dated: June 25, 2021.
Ryan Majerus,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Changes Since the Preliminary Results
V. Discussion of the Issues
Agro Sevilla
Comment 1: Home-Market Database
Comment 2: Constructed Export Price Offset
Comment 3: Major-Input Rule Adjustment
Angel Camacho
Comment 4: Price Comparisons for a Certain Product Control
Number Sold in the U.S. Market
Comment 5: Cost Adjustment to Ending Inventory Value
Comment 6: General and Administrative Expenses
Comment 7: Certain Inland Freight Expenses
Comment 8: Beginning Dates in Programs
DCoop
Comment 9: Whether Commerce Should Apply Adverse Facts Available
to Dcoop's Cost Database
Comment 10: Application of Adverse Facts Available to Dcoop's
General and Administrative Expenses
Comment 11: Early Payment and Quantity Discounts
Comment 12: U.S. Freight and U.S. Indirect Selling Expenses
Comment 13: Rescission of the Administrative Review of Dcoop
VI. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2021-14060 Filed 6-30-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P