Barium Chloride From the People's Republic of China: Continuation of Antidumping Duty Order, 31280-31281 [2021-12314]
Download as PDF
31280
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 111 / Friday, June 11, 2021 / Notices
Foodstuff Co., Ltd.
90. Shantou Ocean Best Seafood Corporation
91. Shantou Ruiyuan Industry Co., Ltd.
92. Shantou Wanya Foods Fty. Co., Ltd.
93. Shantou Yuexing Enterprise Company
94. Shengyuan Aquatic Food Co., Ltd.
95. Suizhong Tieshan Food Co., Ltd.
96. Thai Royal Frozen Food Zhanjiang Co.,
Ltd.
97. Tongwei Hainan Aquatic Products Co.,
Ltd.
98. Xiamen East Ocean Foods Co., Ltd.
99. Xiamen Granda Import and Export Co.,
Ltd.
100. Yangjiang Dawu Aquatic Products Co.,
Ltd.
101. Yangjiang Guolian Seafood Co., Ltd.
102. Yangjiang Haina Datong Trading Co.
103. Yantai Longda Foodstuffs Co., Ltd.
104. Yantai Tedfoods Co., Ltd.
105. Yantai Wei Cheng Food Co., Ltd.
106. Yantai Wei-Cheng Food Co., Ltd.
107. Yixing Magnolia Garment Co., Ltd.
108. Zhangzhou Donghao Seafoods Co., Ltd.
109. Zhangzhou Xinhui Foods Co., Ltd.
110. Zhangzhou Xinwanya Aquatic Product
Co., Ltd.
111. Zhangzhou Yanfeng Aquatic Product &
Foodstuff Co., Ltd.
112. Zhanjiang Evergreen Aquatic Product
Science and Technology Co., Ltd.
113. Zhanjiang Fuchang Aquatic Products
Co., Ltd.
114. Zhanjiang Fuchang Aquatic Products
Freezing Plant
115. Zhanjiang Longwei Aquatic Products
Industry Co., Ltd.
116. Zhanjiang Newpro Foods Co., Ltd.
117. Zhanjiang Regal Integrated Marine
Resources Co., Ltd.
118. Zhanjiang Universal Seafood Corp.
119. Zhaoan Yangli Aquatic Co., Ltd.
120. Zhejiang Evernew Seafood Co.
121. Zhejiang Xinwang Foodstuffs Co., Ltd.
122. Zhoushan Genho Food Co., Ltd.
123. Zhoushan Green Food Co., Ltd.
124. Zhoushan Haizhou Aquatic Products
125. Zhuanghe Yongchun Marine Products
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Appendix II
Scope of the Order
The scope of the order includes certain
frozen warmwater shrimp and prawns,
whether wild caught (ocean harvested) or
farm raised (produced by aquaculture), head
on or head off, shell on or peeled, tail on or
tail off,8 deveined or not deveined, cooked or
raw, or otherwise processed in frozen form.
The frozen warmwater shrimp and prawn
products included in the scope of the order,
regardless of definitions in the harmonized
tariff schedule (HTS), are products which are
processed from warmwater shrimp and
prawns through freezing and which are sold
in any count size.
The products described above may be
processed from any species of warmwater
shrimp and prawns. Warmwater shrimp and
prawns are generally classified in, but are not
limited to, the Penaeidae family. Some
examples of the farmed and wild caught
warmwater species include, but are not
limited to, white-leg shrimp (Penaeus
8 ‘‘Tails’’ in this context means the tail fan, which
includes the telson and the uropods.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:14 Jun 10, 2021
Jkt 253001
vannemei), banana prawn (Penaeus
merguiensis), fleshy prawn (Penaeus
chinensis), giant river prawn
(Macrobrachium rosenbergii), giant tiger
prawn (Penaeus monodon), redspotted
shrimp (Penaeus brasiliensis), southern
brown shrimp (Penaeus subtilis), southern
pink shrimp (Penaeus notialis), southern
rough shrimp (Trachypenaeus curvirostris),
southern white shrimp (Penaeus schmitti),
blue shrimp (Penaeus stylirostris), western
white shrimp (Penaeus occidentalis), and
Indian white prawn (Penaeus indicus).
Frozen shrimp and prawns that are packed
with marinade, spices or sauce are included
in the scope of the order. In addition, food
preparations, which are not ‘‘prepared
meals,’’ that contain more than 20 percent by
weight of shrimp or prawn are also included
in the scope of the order.
Excluded from the scope are: (1) Breaded
shrimp and prawns (HTS subheading
1605.20.1020); (2) shrimp and prawns
generally classified in the Pandalidae family
and commonly referred to as coldwater
shrimp, in any state of processing; (3) fresh
shrimp and prawns whether shell on or
peeled (HTS subheadings 0306.23.0020 and
0306.23.0040); (4) shrimp and prawns in
prepared meals (HTS subheading
1605.20.0510); (5) dried shrimp and prawns;
(6) Lee Kum Kee’s shrimp sauce; (7) canned
warmwater shrimp and prawns (HTS
subheading 1605.20.1040); and (8) certain
battered shrimp. Battered shrimp is a shrimpbased product: (1) That is produced from
fresh (or thawed-from-frozen) and peeled
shrimp; (2) to which a ‘‘dusting’’ layer of rice
or wheat flour of at least 95 percent purity
has been applied; (3) with the entire surface
of the shrimp flesh thoroughly and evenly
coated with the flour; (4) with the nonshrimp content of the end product
constituting between four and 10 percent of
the product’s total weight after being dusted,
but prior to being frozen; and (5) that is
subjected to individually quick frozen
(‘‘IQF’’) freezing immediately after
application of the dusting layer. When
dusted in accordance with the definition of
dusting above, the battered shrimp product is
also coated with a wet viscous layer
containing egg and/or milk, and par-fried.
The products covered by this order are
currently classified under the following HTS
subheadings: 0306.17.00.03, 0306.17.00.06,
0306.17.00.09, 0306.17.00.12, 0306.17.00.15,
0306.17.00.18, 0306.17.00.21, 0306.17.00.24,
0306.17.00.27, 0306.17.00.40, 1605.21.10.30,
and 1605.29.10.10. These HTS subheadings
are provided for convenience and for
customs purposes only; the written
description of the scope of this order is
dispositive.9
[FR Doc. 2021–12317 Filed 6–10–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
9 On April 26, 2011, Commerce amended the
order to include dusted shrimp, pursuant to the CIT
decision in Ad Hoc Shrimp Trade Action
Committee v. United States, 703 F. Supp. 2d 1330
(CIT 2010) and the U.S. International Trade
Commission (ITC) determination, which found the
domestic like product to include dusted shrimp.
See Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from Brazil,
India, the People’s Republic of China, Thailand,
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–007]
Barium Chloride From the People’s
Republic of China: Continuation of
Antidumping Duty Order
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: As a result of the
determinations by the Department of
Commerce (Commerce) and the
International Trade Commission (ITC)
that revocation of the antidumping duty
(AD) order on barium chloride from the
People’s Republic of China (China)
would likely lead to a continuation or
recurrence of dumping and material
injury to an industry in the United
States, Commerce is publishing a notice
of continuation of the AD order.
DATES: Applicable June 11, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Eliza Siordia, Office V, AD/CVD
Operations, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–3878.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On October 17, 1984, Commerce
issued the AD order on barium chloride
from China.1 On October 1, 2020, the
ITC instituted,2 and Commerce
initiated,3 the fifth sunset review of the
Order, pursuant to section 751(c) of the
Tariff Act of 1930 as amended (the Act).
As a result of its review, Commerce
determined that a revocation of the
Order would likely lead to continuation
or recurrence of dumping and, therefore,
notified the ITC of the magnitude of the
margins likely to prevail should the
Order be revoked.4
On June 7, 2021, the ITC published its
determination, pursuant to sections
and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Amended
Antidumping Duty Orders in Accordance with Final
Court Decision, 76 FR 23277 (April 26, 2011); see
also Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from Brazil, China,
India, Thailand, and Vietnam (Investigation Nos.
731–TA–1063, 1064, 1066–1068 (Review), USITC
Publication 4221, March 2011.
1 See Antidumping Duty Order; Barium Chloride
from the People’s Republic of China, 49 FR 40635
(October 17, 1984) (Order).
2 See Barium Chloride from China; Institution of
a Five-Year Review, 85 FR 61984 (October 1, 2020).
3 See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 85
FR 61928 (October 1, 2020).
4 See Barium Chloride from the People’s Republic
of China: Final Results of the Expedited Fifth
Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order, 86
FR 7257 (January 27, 2021).
E:\FR\FM\11JNN1.SGM
11JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 111 / Friday, June 11, 2021 / Notices
751(c) and 752(a) of the Act, that
revocation of the Order would likely
lead to continuation or recurrence of
material injury to an industry in the
United States within a reasonably
foreseeable time.5
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A 533–810]
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by the
Order is barium chloride, a chemical
compound having the formulas BaCl2 or
BaCl2-2H20, currently classifiable under
subheading 2827.39.4500 of the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS).6 Although the
HTSUS subheading is provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the
written description of the scope of this
Order is dispositive.
Continuation of the Order
As a result of the determinations by
Commerce and the ITC that revocation
of the Order would likely lead to a
continuation or a recurrence of
dumping, as well as material injury to
an industry in the United States,
pursuant to section 751(d)(2) of the Act
and 19 CFR 351.218(a), Commerce
hereby orders the continuation of the
Order.
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
will continue to collect AD cash
deposits at the rates in effect at the time
of entry for all imports of subject
merchandise. The effective date of the
continuation of the Order will be the
date of publication in the Federal
Register of this notice of continuation.
Pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of the Act
and 19 CFR 351.218(c)(2), Commerce
intends to initiate the next five-year
sunset review of the Order not later than
30 days prior to the fifth anniversary of
the effective date of continuation.
Notification to Interested Parties
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On June 2, 2021, the U.S.
Court of International Trade (the CIT)
issued its final judgment in Carpenter
Technology Corporation, et al. v. United
States, Court No. 19–00200, sustaining
the Department of Commerce
(Commerce)’s remand results pertaining
to the administrative review of the
antidumping duty (AD) order on
stainless steel bar (SSB) from India
covering the period February 1, 2017
through January 31, 2018. Commerce is
notifying the public that the CIT’s final
judgment is not in harmony with
Commerce’s final results of the
administrative review, and that
Commerce is amending the final results
with respect to the dumping margins
assigned to Venus Wire Industries Pvt.
Ltd. and its affiliates Precision Metals,
Sieves Manufacturers (India) Pvt. Ltd.,
and Hindustan Inox Ltd. (collectively,
the Venus Group), Jindal Stainless
(Hisar) Limited (Jindal), and Laxcon
Steels Limited (Laxcon).
DATES: Applicable June 12, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Hermes Pinilla, AD/CVD Operations,
Office I, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3477.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
This five-year sunset review and this
notice are in accordance with sections
751(c) and 751(d)(2) of the Act and
published in accordance with section
777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.218(f)(4).
Dated: June 7, 2021.
Christian Marsh,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2021–12314 Filed 6–10–21; 8:45 am]
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Stainless Steel Bar From India: Notice
of Court Decision Not in Harmony With
the Results of the Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; Notice of
Amended Final Results
On October 21, 2019, Commerce
published its Final Results in the 2017–
2018 AD administrative review of SSB
from India.1 In the Final Results, we
determined that the Venus Group is not
the manufacturer of the SSB that it
purchased from unaffiliated suppliers
and processed in India prior to
exportation to the United States.2
Because most of the unaffiliated
suppliers did not provide their costs, we
applied partial adverse facts available
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
5 See
Barium Chloride from China, 86 FR 30332
(June 7, 2021).
6 The scope reflects the HTSUS subheading
currently in effect.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:14 Jun 10, 2021
Jkt 253001
1 See Stainless Steel Bar from India: Final Results
of Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty
Order; 2017–2018, 84 FR 56179 (October 21, 2019)
(Final Results), and accompanying Issues and
Decision Memorandum (IDM).
2 See Final Results IDM at Comment 1.
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
31281
(AFA) with respect to the Venus
Group.3
The petitioners 4 appealed
Commerce’s Final Results.5 On August
4, 2020, Commerce requested a
voluntary remand to reconsider or
further explain the application of its
partial AFA methodology to address
missing cost of production data from the
Venus Group’s unaffiliated suppliers,
the change in the partial AFA
methodology between the Preliminary
Results 6 and the Final Results, and, if
appropriate, to reconsider the
appropriate AD rates assigned to Jindal
and Laxcon.7
On November 4, 2020, the CIT granted
Commerce’s motion for a voluntary
remand finding that there was a
compelling justification for the remand
request, that the need to accurately
calculate margins was not outweighed
by the interest in finality, and that the
scope of the requested remand was
appropriate.8 Specifically, the CIT
remanded the Final Results to
Commerce to further explain or
reconsider its partial AFA methodology
in the Final Results.9
In its Remand Redetermination,
issued in January 2021,10 Commerce
further explained its revised partial
AFA methodology, and made certain
corrections in the Venus Group’s margin
program. Specifically, Commerce
included all of the Venus Group’s U.S.
sales in its margin calculation; matched
sales and costs by manufacturer; and
made AFA adjustments not only to cost
of production, but also other
components of cost, including variable
cost of manufacture and fixed and
variable overhead.11 Accordingly,
Commerce made changes to the margin
3 Id.
4 The petitioners are: Carpenter Technology
Corporation; Crucible Industries LLC; Electralloy, a
Division of G.O. Carlson, Inc.; North American
Stainless; Universal Stainless Alloy Product, Inc.;
and Valbruna Slater Stainless, Inc.
5 See Plaintiff’s Rule 56.2 Motion for Judgment
upon the Agency Record, in Carpenter Technology
Corporation, et al. v. United States, Court No. 19–
00200 (filed May 5, 2020).
6 See Stainless Steel Bar from India: Preliminary
Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2017–2018, 84 FR 15582 (April 16, 2019)
(Preliminary Results), and accompanying
Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM).
7 See Government’s Response to Plaintiffs’ Motion
for Judgment upon the Agency Record, in Carpenter
Technology Corporation, et al. v. United States,
Court No. 19–00200 (filed August 4, 2020).
8 See Carpenter Technology Corporation, et al. v.
United States, 477 F. Supp. 3d 1356 (CIT 2020).
9 Id.
10 See Results of Redetermination Pursuant to
Court Remand, Carpenter Technology Corporation,
et al. v. United States, Court No. 19–00200, Slip Op.
20–158, dated January 27, 2021 (Remand
Redetermination).
11 Id. at 6 through 11.
E:\FR\FM\11JNN1.SGM
11JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 111 (Friday, June 11, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31280-31281]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-12314]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-007]
Barium Chloride From the People's Republic of China: Continuation
of Antidumping Duty Order
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: As a result of the determinations by the Department of
Commerce (Commerce) and the International Trade Commission (ITC) that
revocation of the antidumping duty (AD) order on barium chloride from
the People's Republic of China (China) would likely lead to a
continuation or recurrence of dumping and material injury to an
industry in the United States, Commerce is publishing a notice of
continuation of the AD order.
DATES: Applicable June 11, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eliza Siordia, Office V, AD/CVD
Operations, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3878.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On October 17, 1984, Commerce issued the AD order on barium
chloride from China.\1\ On October 1, 2020, the ITC instituted,\2\ and
Commerce initiated,\3\ the fifth sunset review of the Order, pursuant
to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended (the Act). As a
result of its review, Commerce determined that a revocation of the
Order would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping and,
therefore, notified the ITC of the magnitude of the margins likely to
prevail should the Order be revoked.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Antidumping Duty Order; Barium Chloride from the
People's Republic of China, 49 FR 40635 (October 17, 1984) (Order).
\2\ See Barium Chloride from China; Institution of a Five-Year
Review, 85 FR 61984 (October 1, 2020).
\3\ See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 85 FR 61928
(October 1, 2020).
\4\ See Barium Chloride from the People's Republic of China:
Final Results of the Expedited Fifth Sunset Review of the
Antidumping Duty Order, 86 FR 7257 (January 27, 2021).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On June 7, 2021, the ITC published its determination, pursuant to
sections
[[Page 31281]]
751(c) and 752(a) of the Act, that revocation of the Order would likely
lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in
the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Barium Chloride from China, 86 FR 30332 (June 7, 2021).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by the Order is barium chloride, a chemical
compound having the formulas BaCl2 or BaCl2-2H20, currently
classifiable under subheading 2827.39.4500 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS).\6\ Although the HTSUS subheading
is provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written
description of the scope of this Order is dispositive.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ The scope reflects the HTSUS subheading currently in effect.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Continuation of the Order
As a result of the determinations by Commerce and the ITC that
revocation of the Order would likely lead to a continuation or a
recurrence of dumping, as well as material injury to an industry in the
United States, pursuant to section 751(d)(2) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.218(a), Commerce hereby orders the continuation of the Order.
U.S. Customs and Border Protection will continue to collect AD cash
deposits at the rates in effect at the time of entry for all imports of
subject merchandise. The effective date of the continuation of the
Order will be the date of publication in the Federal Register of this
notice of continuation. Pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.218(c)(2), Commerce intends to initiate the next five-year
sunset review of the Order not later than 30 days prior to the fifth
anniversary of the effective date of continuation.
Notification to Interested Parties
This five-year sunset review and this notice are in accordance with
sections 751(c) and 751(d)(2) of the Act and published in accordance
with section 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(f)(4).
Dated: June 7, 2021.
Christian Marsh,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2021-12314 Filed 6-10-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P