Certain Steel Nails From Taiwan: Preliminary Determination of No Shipments in the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2019-2020, 30590-30593 [2021-12077]
Download as PDF
30590
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 109 / Wednesday, June 9, 2021 / Notices
merchandise covered by the final results
of this review and for future deposits of
estimated duties, where applicable.7
For entries of subject merchandise
during the POR produced by
ARLANXEO Brasil for which it did not
know the merchandise was destined for
the United States, we will instruct CBP
to liquidate unreviewed entries at the
all-others rate if there is no rate for the
intermediate company(ies) involved in
the transaction.8
Consistent with its recent notice,9
Commerce intends to issue assessment
instructions to CBP no earlier than 35
days after the date of publication of the
final results of this review in the
Federal Register. If a timely summons is
filed at the U.S. Court of International
Trade, the assessment instructions will
direct CBP not to liquidate relevant
entries until the time for parties to file
a request for a statutory injunction has
expired (i.e., within 90 days of
publication).
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective for all
shipments of the subject merchandise
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the
publication date of the final results of
this administrative review, as provided
by section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The
cash deposit rate for ARLANXEO Brasil
S.A. will be equal to the weightedaverage dumping margin established in
the final results of this review; (2) for
merchandise exported by producers or
exporters not covered in this review but
covered in a prior segment of this
proceeding, the cash deposit will
continue to be the company-specific rate
published for the most recently
completed segment of this proceeding in
which the company participated; (3) if
the exporter is not a firm covered in this
review or the original less-than-fairvalue (LTFV) investigation, but the
producer is, then the cash deposit rate
will be the rate established for the most
recently completed segment for the
producer of the subject merchandise;
and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other
producers or exporters will continue to
be 19.61 percent, the all-others rate
established in the LTFV investigation.10
7 See
section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act.
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68
FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
9 See Notice of Discontinuation of Policy to Issue
Liquidation Instructions After 15 Days in
Applicable Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Proceedings, 86 FR 3995 (January
15, 2021).
10 See Emulsion Styrene-Butadiene Rubber from
Brazil: Final Affirmative Determination of Sales at
Less Than Fair Value and Final Negative
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
8 See
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:13 Jun 08, 2021
Jkt 253001
These cash deposit requirements, when
imposed, shall remain in effect until
further notice.
Notification to Importers
Notification Regarding Administrative
Protective Orders
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the return or
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
continues to govern business
proprietary information in this segment
of the proceeding. Timely written
notification of the return or destruction
of APO materials, or conversion to
judicial protective order, is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the
regulations and terms of an APO is a
violation subject to sanction.
Notice to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing these
results of administrative review in
accordance with sections 751(a) and
777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.221(b)(5).
Dated: June 3, 2021.
Christian Marsh,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Final Issues
and Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Changes Since the Preliminary Results
V. Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1: Cost Methodology
Comment 2: Level of Trade, Constructed
Export Price Offset
VI. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2021–12078 Filed 6–8–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
Determination of Critical Circumstances, 82 FR
33048 (July 19, 2019).
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
International Trade Administration
[A–583–854]
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during this POR. Failure to comply with
this requirement could result in
Commerce’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of double antidumping duties.
PO 00000
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Certain Steel Nails From Taiwan:
Preliminary Determination of No
Shipments in the Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2019–2020
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(Commerce) preliminarily determines
that Create Trading Co., Ltd. (Create
Trading), the sole company under
review, made no shipments of certain
steel nails from Taiwan during the
period of review (POR), July 1, 2019, to
June 30, 2020. We invite interested
parties to comment on this preliminary
determination of no shipments.
DATES: Applicable June 9, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Suzanne Lam, AD/CVD Operations,
Office VIII, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–0783.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On July 1, 2020, Commerce published
in the Federal Register a notice of
opportunity to request an administrative
review of the antidumping duty order
on certain steel nails from Taiwan.1
Based on timely requests for
administrative review,2 on September 3,
2020, Commerce published the notice of
initiation for an administrative review,
covering 141 companies, in accordance
with section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (the Act) and 19 CFR
351.221(c)(1)(i).3
On September 21, 2020, the petitioner
timely withdrew its request for
administrative review of all companies
it originally requested, except for one
1 See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order,
Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity
To Request Administrative Review, 85 FR 39531
(July 1, 2020).
2 See Petitioner’s Letter, ‘‘Request for
Administrative Review,’’ dated July 31, 2020; see
also Letter, ‘‘Administrative Review Request,’’
dated July 31, 2020, collectively from: Liang
Chyuan Industrial Co., Ltd., Romp Coil Nail
Industries Inc., UJL Industries Co., Ltd., Hor Liang
Industrial Corp., Yu Chi Hardware Co., Ltd., Trim
International Inc., China Staple Enterprise
Corporation, Hoyi Plus Co., Ltd., and Zon Mon Co.,
Ltd.
3 See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 85 FR
54983 (September 3, 2020) (Initiation Notice).
E:\FR\FM\09JNN1.SGM
09JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 109 / Wednesday, June 9, 2021 / Notices
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
company, Create Trading.4
Subsequently, the nine Taiwanese
companies that had self-requested an
administrative review, also withdrew
their requests for review.5 Accordingly,
on October 15, 2020,6 and December 10,
2020,7 pursuant to 19 CFR
351.213(d)(1), Commerce rescinded the
administrative review, in part, of all
companies under review except for
Create Trading. The review remains
active only with respect to Create
Trading, which filed a statement of no
sales.8
On November 23, 2020, the petitioner
submitted comments regarding Create
Trading’s statement of no sales.9 At
Commerce’s request, U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (CBP) provided entry
documents associated with Create
Trading’s claim.10 Subsequently, on
March 5, 2021, Commerce requested
additional information from Create
Trading regarding the CBP entry
documents vis-a-vis its statement of no
sales.11 On March 19, 2021, Create
Trading responded to Commerce’s
request for information,12 and on April
5, 2021, the petitioner submitted
comments regarding Create Trading’s
response.13
4 See Petitioner’s Letter, ‘‘Withdrawal of Request
for Administrative Reviews,’’ dated September 21,
2020.
5 See Letter, ‘‘Withdrawal of Administrative
Review Request,’’ dated November 30, 2020,
collectively from: Liang Chyuan Industrial Co., Ltd.,
Romp Coil Nail Industries Inc., UJL Industries Co.,
Ltd., Hor Liang Industrial Corp., Yu Chi Hardware
Co., Ltd., Trim International Inc., China Staple
Enterprise Corporation, Hoyi Plus Co., Ltd., and
Zon Mon Co., Ltd.
6 See Certain Steel Nails From Taiwan: Partial
Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2019–2020 , 85 FR 65366 (October 15,
2020).
7 See Certain Steel Nails from Taiwan: Partial
Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2019–2020, 85 FR 79470 (December 10,
2020).
8 See Create Trading’s Letter, ‘‘Statement of No
Sales to the United States,’’ dated September 21,
2020 (Statement of No Sales). Specifically, Create
Trading certified that all of its exports of subject
merchandise were produced by unaffiliated
producers that had knowledge of final destination
to the United States at the time of sale to Create
Trading, and thus, Create Trading claims it has no
reviewable sales for this POR.
9 See Petitioner’s Letter, ‘‘Comments on Create
Trading Co., Ltd.’s Statement of No Sales to the
United States,’’ dated November 23, 2020.
10 See Memorandum, ‘‘Create Trading Co., Ltd.—
Placement of Entry Documentation on the Record,’’
dated May 6, 2021.
11 See Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘Request for
Information,’’ dated March 5, 2021.
12 See Create Trading’s Letter, ‘‘Response to
Request for Information,’’ dated March 19, 2021.
13 See Petitioner’s Letter, ‘‘Comments on Create
Trading Co., Ltd.’s Response to Request for
Information,’’ dated April 2, 2021.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:13 Jun 08, 2021
Jkt 253001
Scope of the Order 14
The merchandise covered by this
order is certain steel nails from Taiwan.
The certain steel nails subject to the
order are currently classifiable under
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS) subheadings
7317.00.55.02, 7317.00.55.03,
7317.00.55.05, 7317.00.55.07,
7317.00.55.08, 7317.00.55.11,
7317.00.55.18, 7317.00.55.19,
7317.00.55.20, 7317.00.55.30,
7317.00.55.40, 7317.00.55.50,
7317.00.55.60, 7317.00.55.70,
7317.00.55.80, 7317.00.55.90,
7317.00.65.30, 7317.00.65.60 and
7317.00.75.00. Certain steel nails subject
to this order also may be classified
under HTSUS subheadings
7907.00.60.00, 8206.00.00.00 or other
HTSUS subheadings. Although the
HTSUS numbers are provided for
convenience and for customs purposes,
the written product description,
available in the Appendix to this notice,
remains dispositive.
Preliminary Determination of No
Shipments
Create Trading reported that it had no
reviewable sales during the POR
because its unaffiliated producers had
knowledge of the final destination of the
subject merchandise that they produced
and sold to Create Trading, and which
Create Trading resold to U.S. customers
during the POR. Create Trading
provided sales documentation, such as
invoices and packing lists from its
unaffiliated producers, as well as
accounting records as evidence in
support of its claim.15 Based on the
information provided by Create Trading,
which we find is supported by entry
documents provided by CBP, we
preliminarily determine that Create
Trading was not the first party in the
transaction chain to have knowledge
that the merchandise was destined for
the United States, and, thus, Create
Trading is not considered the exporter
of subject merchandise during the POR
for purposes of this review. Specifically,
the record demonstrates that Create
Trading’s unaffiliated suppliers had
knowledge that the steel nails they
produced and sold to Create Trading
were destined for the United States.
Thus, we preliminarily determine that
Create Trading had no shipments during
the POR.
14 See Certain Steel Nails from the Republic of
Korea, Malaysia, the Sultanate of Oman, Taiwan,
and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam:
Antidumping Duty Orders, 80 FR 39994 (July 13,
2015) (Order).
15 See Create Trading’s Statement of No Sales.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
30591
Commerce finds that, based on the
clarification in the 2003 Assessment of
Antidumping Duties notice regarding
the reseller policy, we will not rescind
the review in these circumstances but,
rather, complete the review with respect
to Create Trading and issue appropriate
instructions to CBP after the completion
of the review.16 Specifically, we find it
appropriate in this case to instruct CBP
at the completion of the review to
liquidate any existing entries of subject
merchandise produced by Create
Trading’s unaffiliated producers and
exported by Create Trading at the rate
applicable to the unaffiliated producers,
which, as discussed below, in this case
is the all-others rate.17
Public Comment
Interested parties may submit case
briefs no later than 30 days after the
date of publication of this notice.18
Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised
in the case briefs, may be filed no later
than seven days after the time limit for
filing case briefs.19 Parties who submit
case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this
proceeding are encouraged to submit
with each argument: (1) A statement of
the issue; (2) a brief summary of the
argument; and (3) a table of
authorities.20 Case and rebuttal briefs
must be filed electronically via
Enforcement and Compliance’s
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System
(ACCESS) and must also be served on
interested parties.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c),
interested parties who wish to request a
hearing must submit a written request to
the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance, filed electronically via
ACCESS. An electronically-filed
document must be received successfully
in its entirety by ACCESS by 5 p.m.
Eastern Time within 30 days after the
date of publication of this notice.21
Hearing requests should contain: (1) The
16 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68
FR 23954, 23954 (May 6, 2003) (Assessment of
Antidumping Duties).
17 See, e.g., Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp
from India: Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review, 73 FR 77610, 77612
(December 19, 2008) (Shrimp from India); Certain
Pasta from Turkey: Notice of Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 76 FR
23974, 23977 (April 29, 2011), unchanged in Pasta
From Turkey: Notice of Final Results of the 14th
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 76 FR
68399 (November 4, 2011).
18 See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii).
19 See 19 CFR 351.309(d)(1).
20 See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2); see also
Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD Service
Requirements Due to COVID19; Extension of
Effective Period, 85 FR 41363 (July 10, 2020).
21 See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
E:\FR\FM\09JNN1.SGM
09JNN1
30592
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 109 / Wednesday, June 9, 2021 / Notices
party’s name, address, and telephone
number; (2) the number of participants;
and (3) a list of issues to be discussed.
Issues raised in the hearing will be
limited to issues raised in the briefs. If
a request for a hearing is made,
Commerce intends to hold the hearing
at a time and date to be determined.22
Commerce intends to issue the final
results of this administrative review,
including the results of its analysis
raised in any written briefs, no later
than 120 days after the publication of
these preliminary results in the Federal
Register, unless otherwise extended.23
Assessment Rates
Upon completion of the
administrative review, Commerce shall
determine, and CBP shall assess,
antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries covered by this review.24
As discussed above, we preliminarily
determine that Create Trading was not
the first party in the transaction chain
to have knowledge that the merchandise
was destined for the United States, and
thus Create Trading is not considered
the exporter of subject merchandise
during the POR for purposes of this
review. Consistent with the 2003
Assessment of Antidumping Duties
notice and reseller policy, we find it
appropriate in this case to instruct CBP
to liquidate any existing entries of
merchandise produced by Create
Trading’s unaffiliated producers and
exported by Create Trading at the rate
applicable to the producer(s).25 Because
none of the producers have their own
rates, we will instruct CBP to liquidate
entries at the all-others rate from the
investigation, as revised, of 2.16
percent,26 in accordance with the
reseller policy.
Commerce intends to issue
assessment instructions to CBP no
earlier than 35 days after the date of
publication of the final results of this
review in the Federal Register. If a
timely summons is filed at the U.S.
Court of International Trade, the
assessment instructions will direct CBP
not to liquidate relevant entries until the
time for parties to file a request for a
statutory injunction has expired (i.e.,
within 90 days of publication).
23 See
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a
preliminary reminder to importers of
their responsibility under 19 CFR
351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding
the reimbursement of antidumping
duties prior to liquidation of the
relevant entries during this review
period. Failure to comply with this
requirement could result in Commerce’s
presumption that reimbursement of
antidumping duties occurred and the
subsequent assessment of double
antidumping duties.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing this
notice in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and
sections 19 CFR 351.213(h)(1) and
351.221(b)(4).
Dated: June 3, 2021.
Christian Marsh,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance.
Appendix
22 Id.
section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.213(h).
24 See 19 CFR 351.212(b).
25 See, e.g., Shrimp from India, 73 FR at 77612;
Pasta From Turkey, 76 FR at 68400.
26 The all-others rate from the underlying
investigation was revised in Certain Steel Nails
from Taiwan: Notice of Court Decision Not in
Harmony with Final Determination in Less than
Fair Value Investigation and Notice of Amended
Final Determination, 82 FR 55090, 55091
(November 20, 2017) (Amended LTFV Final).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be in effect for all
shipments of the subject merchandise
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the
publication date of the final results of
this administrative review, as provided
by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1)
For merchandise exported by
manufacturers or exporters not covered
in this review but covered in a prior
segment of the proceeding, the cash
deposit rate will continue to be the
company-specific rate published for the
most recently-completed segment; (2) if
the exporter is not a firm covered in a
prior review, or the original
investigation, but the manufacturer is,
then the cash deposit rate will be the
rate established for the most recently
completed segment for the manufacturer
of the merchandise; and (3) the cash
deposit rate for all other manufacturers
or exporters will continue to be 2.16
percent, the all-others cash deposit rate
established in the Amended LTFV
Final.27 These cash deposit
requirements, when imposed, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
18:13 Jun 08, 2021
Jkt 253001
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by this order is
certain steel nails having a nominal shaft
length not exceeding 12 inches.28 Certain
27 Id.
28 The shaft length of certain steel nails with flat
heads or parallel shoulders under the head shall be
measured from under the head or shoulder to the
tip of the point. The shaft length of all other certain
steel nails shall be measured overall.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
steel nails include, but are not limited to,
nails made from round wire and nails that
are cut from flat-rolled steel. Certain steel
nails may be of one piece construction or
constructed of two or more pieces. Certain
steel nails may be produced from any type
of steel, and may have any type of surface
finish, head type, shank, point type and shaft
diameter. Finishes include, but are not
limited to, coating in vinyl, zinc (galvanized,
including but not limited to electroplating or
hot dipping one or more times), phosphate,
cement, and paint. Certain steel nails may
have one or more surface finishes. Head
styles include, but are not limited to, flat,
projection, cupped, oval, brad, headless,
double, countersunk, and sinker. Shank
styles include, but are not limited to, smooth,
barbed, screw threaded, ring shank and
fluted.
Screw-threaded nails subject to this
proceeding are driven using direct force and
not by turning the nail using a tool that
engages with the head. Point styles include,
but are not limited to, diamond, needle,
chisel and blunt or no point. Certain steel
nails may be sold in bulk, or they may be
collated in any manner using any material.
Excluded from the scope of this order are
certain steel nails packaged in combination
with one or more non-subject articles, if the
total number of nails of all types, in aggregate
regardless of size, is less than 25. If packaged
in combination with one or more non-subject
articles, certain steel nails remain subject
merchandise if the total number of nails of
all types, in aggregate regardless of size, is
equal to or greater than 25, unless otherwise
excluded based on the other exclusions
below.
Also, excluded from the scope are certain
steel nails with a nominal shaft length of one
inch or less that are (a) a component of an
unassembled article, (b) the total number of
nails is sixty (60) or less, and (c) the imported
unassembled article falls into one of the
following eight groupings: (1) Builders’
joinery and carpentry of wood that are
classifiable as windows, French windows
and their frames; (2) builders’ joinery and
carpentry of wood that are classifiable as
doors and their frames and thresholds; (3)
swivel seats with variable height adjustment;
(4) seats that are convertible into beds (with
the exception of those classifiable as garden
seats or camping equipment); (5) seats of
cane, osier, bamboo or similar materials; (6)
other seats with wooden frames (with the
exception of seats of a kind used for aircraft
or motor vehicles); (7) furniture (other than
seats) of wood (with the exception of (i)
medical, surgical, dental or veterinary
furniture; and (ii) barbers’ chairs and similar
chairs, having rotating as well as both
reclining and elevating movements); or (8)
furniture (other than seats) of materials other
than wood, metal, or plastics (e.g., furniture
of cane, osier, bamboo or similar materials).
The aforementioned imported unassembled
articles are currently classified under the
following Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS) subheadings: 4418.10,
4418.20, 9401.30, 9401.40, 9401.51, 9401.59,
9401.61, 9401.69, 9403.30, 9403.40, 9403.50,
9403.60, 9403.81 or 9403.89.
Also, excluded from the scope of this order
are steel nails that meet the specifications of
E:\FR\FM\09JNN1.SGM
09JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 109 / Wednesday, June 9, 2021 / Notices
Type I, Style 20 nails as identified in Tables
29 through 33 of ASTM Standard FI667 (2013
revision).
Also, excluded from the scope of this order
are nails suitable for use in powder-actuated
hand tools, whether or not threaded, which
are currently classified under HTSUS
subheadings 7317.00.20.00 and
7317.00.30.00.
Also, excluded from the scope of this order
are nails having a case hardness greater than
or equal to 50 on the Rockwell Hardness C
scale (HRC), a carbon content greater than or
equal to percent, a round head, a secondary
reduced-diameter raised head section, a
centered shank, and a smooth symmetrical
point, suitable for use in gas-actuated hand
tools.
Also, excluded from the scope of this order
are corrugated nails. A corrugated nail is
made up of a small strip of corrugated steel
with sharp points on one side.
Also, excluded from the scope of this order
are thumb tacks, which are currently
classified under HTSUS subheading
7317.00.10.00.
Certain steel nails subject to this order are
currently classified under HTSUS
subheadings 7317.00.55.02, 7317.00.55.03,
7317.00.55.05, 7317.00.55.07, 7317.00.55.08,
7317.00.55.11, 7317.00.55.18, 7317.00.55.19,
7317.00.55.20, 7317.00.55.30, 7317.00.55.40,
7317.00.55.50, 7317.00.55.60, 7317.00.55.70,
7317.00.55.80, 7317.00.55.90, 7317.00.65.30,
7317.00.65.60 and 7317.00.75.00. Certain
steel nails subject to this order also may be
classified under HTSUS subheadings
7907.00.60.00, 8206.00.00.00 or other HTSUS
subheadings. While the HTSUS subheadings
are provided for convenience and customs
purposes, the written description of the
scope of this order is dispositive.
[FR Doc. 2021–12077 Filed 6–8–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
International Trade Administration
[C–557–822]
Utility Scale Wind Towers From
Malaysia: Final Affirmative
Countervailing Duty Determination
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(Commerce) determines that
countervailable subsidies are being
provided to producers and exporters of
utility scale wind towers (wind towers)
from Malaysia.
DATES: Applicable June 9, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nathan James, AD/CVD Operations,
Office V, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–5305.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:13 Jun 08, 2021
Jkt 253001
Background
On March 25, 2021, Commerce
published the Preliminary
Determination in this investigation in
the Federal Register.1 The petitioner in
this investigation is the Wind Tower
Trade Coalition. In addition to the
Government of Malaysia, the mandatory
respondent in this investigation is CS
Wind Malaysia Sdn Bhd (CS Wind).
A summary of the events that
occurred since Commerce published the
Preliminary Determination is found in
the Issues and Decision Memorandum,
which is hereby adopted by this notice.2
The Issues and Decision Memorandum
is a public document and is on file
electronically via Enforcement and
Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a
complete version of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum can be accessed
directly at https://enforcement.trade.gov/
frn/.
Period of Investigation
The period of investigation is January
1, 2019, through December 31, 2019.
Scope of the Investigation
The products covered by this
investigation are wind towers from
Malaysia. For a complete description of
the scope of this investigation, see
Appendix I.
Verification
Commerce was unable to conduct onsite verification of the information
relied upon in making its final
determination in this investigation.
However, we took additional steps in
lieu of on-site verification to verify the
information relied upon in making this
final determination, in accordance with
section 782(i) of the Act.3
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
AGENCY:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Analysis of Subsidy Programs and
Comments Received
The subsidy programs under
investigation, and the issues raised in
1 See Utility Scale Wind Towers from Malaysia:
Preliminary Affirmative Countervailing Duty
Determination, 86 FR 15887 (March 25, 2021)
(Preliminary Determination), and accompanying
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
2 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Final Determination in the
Countervailing Duty Investigation of Utility Scale
Wind Towers from Malaysia,’’ dated concurrently
with this notice (Issues and Decision
Memorandum).
3 See Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘Countervailing Duty
Investigation of Utility Scale Wind Towers from
Malaysia: In Lieu of Verification Questionnaire,’’
dated March 25, 2021.
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
30593
the case and rebuttal briefs by parties in
this investigation, are discussed in the
Issues and Decision Memorandum. For
a list of the issues raised by parties, and
to which we responded in the Issues
and Decision Memorandum, see
Appendix II of this notice.
Methodology
Commerce conducted this
investigation in accordance with section
701 of the Act. For each of the subsidy
programs found countervailable,
Commerce determines that there is a
subsidy, i.e., a financial contribution by
an ‘‘authority’’ that gives rise to a
benefit to the recipient, and that the
subsidy is specific.4 For a full
description of the methodology
underlying our final determination, see
the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
In making this final determination,
Commerce is relying, in part, on facts
otherwise available pursuant to section
776(a) of the Act. For a full discussion
of our application of facts available, see
the Preliminary Determination 5 and
Comment 3 of the accompanying Issues
and Decision Memorandum.
Changes Since the Preliminary
Determination
Based on our review and analysis of
the record and the comments received
from parties, we made certain changes
to the countervailable subsidy rate
calculation for CS Wind. For a
discussion of these changes, see the
Issues and Decision Memorandum.
All-Others Rate
Section 705(c)(5)(A) of the Act
provides that in the final determination,
Commerce shall determine an all-others
rate for companies not individually
examined. This rate shall be an amount
equal to the weighted average of the
estimated subsidy rates established for
those companies individually
examined, excluding any rates that are
zero, de minimis, or based entirely
under section 776 of the Act.
In this investigation, Commerce
calculated an individual estimated
countervailable subsidy rate for CS
Wind that is not zero, de minimis, or
based entirely on facts otherwise
available. Accordingly, we have
assigned CS Wind’s subsidy rate to all
4 See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act
regarding financial contribution; section 771(5)(E)
of the Act regarding benefit; and section 771(5A) of
the Act regarding specificity.
5 See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for
the Preliminary Determination in the
Countervailing Duty Investigation of Utility Scale
Wind Towers from Malaysia,’’ dated March 19,
2021 at 7.
E:\FR\FM\09JNN1.SGM
09JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 109 (Wednesday, June 9, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30590-30593]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-12077]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-583-854]
Certain Steel Nails From Taiwan: Preliminary Determination of No
Shipments in the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2019-2020
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines
that Create Trading Co., Ltd. (Create Trading), the sole company under
review, made no shipments of certain steel nails from Taiwan during the
period of review (POR), July 1, 2019, to June 30, 2020. We invite
interested parties to comment on this preliminary determination of no
shipments.
DATES: Applicable June 9, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Suzanne Lam, AD/CVD Operations, Office
VIII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC
20230; telephone: (202) 482-0783.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On July 1, 2020, Commerce published in the Federal Register a
notice of opportunity to request an administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on certain steel nails from Taiwan.\1\ Based on
timely requests for administrative review,\2\ on September 3, 2020,
Commerce published the notice of initiation for an administrative
review, covering 141 companies, in accordance with section 751(a) of
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act) and 19 CFR
351.221(c)(1)(i).\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or
Suspended Investigation; Opportunity To Request Administrative
Review, 85 FR 39531 (July 1, 2020).
\2\ See Petitioner's Letter, ``Request for Administrative
Review,'' dated July 31, 2020; see also Letter, ``Administrative
Review Request,'' dated July 31, 2020, collectively from: Liang
Chyuan Industrial Co., Ltd., Romp Coil Nail Industries Inc., UJL
Industries Co., Ltd., Hor Liang Industrial Corp., Yu Chi Hardware
Co., Ltd., Trim International Inc., China Staple Enterprise
Corporation, Hoyi Plus Co., Ltd., and Zon Mon Co., Ltd.
\3\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews, 85 FR 54983 (September 3, 2020) (Initiation
Notice).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On September 21, 2020, the petitioner timely withdrew its request
for administrative review of all companies it originally requested,
except for one
[[Page 30591]]
company, Create Trading.\4\ Subsequently, the nine Taiwanese companies
that had self-requested an administrative review, also withdrew their
requests for review.\5\ Accordingly, on October 15, 2020,\6\ and
December 10, 2020,\7\ pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), Commerce
rescinded the administrative review, in part, of all companies under
review except for Create Trading. The review remains active only with
respect to Create Trading, which filed a statement of no sales.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Petitioner's Letter, ``Withdrawal of Request for
Administrative Reviews,'' dated September 21, 2020.
\5\ See Letter, ``Withdrawal of Administrative Review Request,''
dated November 30, 2020, collectively from: Liang Chyuan Industrial
Co., Ltd., Romp Coil Nail Industries Inc., UJL Industries Co., Ltd.,
Hor Liang Industrial Corp., Yu Chi Hardware Co., Ltd., Trim
International Inc., China Staple Enterprise Corporation, Hoyi Plus
Co., Ltd., and Zon Mon Co., Ltd.
\6\ See Certain Steel Nails From Taiwan: Partial Rescission of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2019-2020 , 85 FR 65366
(October 15, 2020).
\7\ See Certain Steel Nails from Taiwan: Partial Rescission of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2019-2020, 85 FR 79470
(December 10, 2020).
\8\ See Create Trading's Letter, ``Statement of No Sales to the
United States,'' dated September 21, 2020 (Statement of No Sales).
Specifically, Create Trading certified that all of its exports of
subject merchandise were produced by unaffiliated producers that had
knowledge of final destination to the United States at the time of
sale to Create Trading, and thus, Create Trading claims it has no
reviewable sales for this POR.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On November 23, 2020, the petitioner submitted comments regarding
Create Trading's statement of no sales.\9\ At Commerce's request, U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) provided entry documents associated
with Create Trading's claim.\10\ Subsequently, on March 5, 2021,
Commerce requested additional information from Create Trading regarding
the CBP entry documents vis-a-vis its statement of no sales.\11\ On
March 19, 2021, Create Trading responded to Commerce's request for
information,\12\ and on April 5, 2021, the petitioner submitted
comments regarding Create Trading's response.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See Petitioner's Letter, ``Comments on Create Trading Co.,
Ltd.'s Statement of No Sales to the United States,'' dated November
23, 2020.
\10\ See Memorandum, ``Create Trading Co., Ltd.--Placement of
Entry Documentation on the Record,'' dated May 6, 2021.
\11\ See Commerce's Letter, ``Request for Information,'' dated
March 5, 2021.
\12\ See Create Trading's Letter, ``Response to Request for
Information,'' dated March 19, 2021.
\13\ See Petitioner's Letter, ``Comments on Create Trading Co.,
Ltd.'s Response to Request for Information,'' dated April 2, 2021.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order 14
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ See Certain Steel Nails from the Republic of Korea,
Malaysia, the Sultanate of Oman, Taiwan, and the Socialist Republic
of Vietnam: Antidumping Duty Orders, 80 FR 39994 (July 13, 2015)
(Order).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The merchandise covered by this order is certain steel nails from
Taiwan. The certain steel nails subject to the order are currently
classifiable under Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States
(HTSUS) subheadings 7317.00.55.02, 7317.00.55.03, 7317.00.55.05,
7317.00.55.07, 7317.00.55.08, 7317.00.55.11, 7317.00.55.18,
7317.00.55.19, 7317.00.55.20, 7317.00.55.30, 7317.00.55.40,
7317.00.55.50, 7317.00.55.60, 7317.00.55.70, 7317.00.55.80,
7317.00.55.90, 7317.00.65.30, 7317.00.65.60 and 7317.00.75.00. Certain
steel nails subject to this order also may be classified under HTSUS
subheadings 7907.00.60.00, 8206.00.00.00 or other HTSUS subheadings.
Although the HTSUS numbers are provided for convenience and for customs
purposes, the written product description, available in the Appendix to
this notice, remains dispositive.
Preliminary Determination of No Shipments
Create Trading reported that it had no reviewable sales during the
POR because its unaffiliated producers had knowledge of the final
destination of the subject merchandise that they produced and sold to
Create Trading, and which Create Trading resold to U.S. customers
during the POR. Create Trading provided sales documentation, such as
invoices and packing lists from its unaffiliated producers, as well as
accounting records as evidence in support of its claim.\15\ Based on
the information provided by Create Trading, which we find is supported
by entry documents provided by CBP, we preliminarily determine that
Create Trading was not the first party in the transaction chain to have
knowledge that the merchandise was destined for the United States, and,
thus, Create Trading is not considered the exporter of subject
merchandise during the POR for purposes of this review. Specifically,
the record demonstrates that Create Trading's unaffiliated suppliers
had knowledge that the steel nails they produced and sold to Create
Trading were destined for the United States. Thus, we preliminarily
determine that Create Trading had no shipments during the POR.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ See Create Trading's Statement of No Sales.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commerce finds that, based on the clarification in the 2003
Assessment of Antidumping Duties notice regarding the reseller policy,
we will not rescind the review in these circumstances but, rather,
complete the review with respect to Create Trading and issue
appropriate instructions to CBP after the completion of the review.\16\
Specifically, we find it appropriate in this case to instruct CBP at
the completion of the review to liquidate any existing entries of
subject merchandise produced by Create Trading's unaffiliated producers
and exported by Create Trading at the rate applicable to the
unaffiliated producers, which, as discussed below, in this case is the
all-others rate.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954, 23954 (May 6, 2003)
(Assessment of Antidumping Duties).
\17\ See, e.g., Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from India:
Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 73 FR
77610, 77612 (December 19, 2008) (Shrimp from India); Certain Pasta
from Turkey: Notice of Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review, 76 FR 23974, 23977 (April 29, 2011),
unchanged in Pasta From Turkey: Notice of Final Results of the 14th
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 76 FR 68399 (November 4,
2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Public Comment
Interested parties may submit case briefs no later than 30 days
after the date of publication of this notice.\18\ Rebuttal briefs,
limited to issues raised in the case briefs, may be filed no later than
seven days after the time limit for filing case briefs.\19\ Parties who
submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are encouraged
to submit with each argument: (1) A statement of the issue; (2) a brief
summary of the argument; and (3) a table of authorities.\20\ Case and
rebuttal briefs must be filed electronically via Enforcement and
Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic
Service System (ACCESS) and must also be served on interested parties.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii).
\19\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d)(1).
\20\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2); see also Temporary
Rule Modifying AD/CVD Service Requirements Due to COVID19; Extension
of Effective Period, 85 FR 41363 (July 10, 2020).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to
request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant
Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, filed electronically via
ACCESS. An electronically-filed document must be received successfully
in its entirety by ACCESS by 5 p.m. Eastern Time within 30 days after
the date of publication of this notice.\21\ Hearing requests should
contain: (1) The
[[Page 30592]]
party's name, address, and telephone number; (2) the number of
participants; and (3) a list of issues to be discussed. Issues raised
in the hearing will be limited to issues raised in the briefs. If a
request for a hearing is made, Commerce intends to hold the hearing at
a time and date to be determined.\22\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
\22\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commerce intends to issue the final results of this administrative
review, including the results of its analysis raised in any written
briefs, no later than 120 days after the publication of these
preliminary results in the Federal Register, unless otherwise
extended.\23\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ See section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assessment Rates
Upon completion of the administrative review, Commerce shall
determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries covered by this review.\24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\24\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As discussed above, we preliminarily determine that Create Trading
was not the first party in the transaction chain to have knowledge that
the merchandise was destined for the United States, and thus Create
Trading is not considered the exporter of subject merchandise during
the POR for purposes of this review. Consistent with the 2003
Assessment of Antidumping Duties notice and reseller policy, we find it
appropriate in this case to instruct CBP to liquidate any existing
entries of merchandise produced by Create Trading's unaffiliated
producers and exported by Create Trading at the rate applicable to the
producer(s).\25\ Because none of the producers have their own rates, we
will instruct CBP to liquidate entries at the all-others rate from the
investigation, as revised, of 2.16 percent,\26\ in accordance with the
reseller policy.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\25\ See, e.g., Shrimp from India, 73 FR at 77612; Pasta From
Turkey, 76 FR at 68400.
\26\ The all-others rate from the underlying investigation was
revised in Certain Steel Nails from Taiwan: Notice of Court Decision
Not in Harmony with Final Determination in Less than Fair Value
Investigation and Notice of Amended Final Determination, 82 FR
55090, 55091 (November 20, 2017) (Amended LTFV Final).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP no earlier
than 35 days after the date of publication of the final results of this
review in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is filed at the
U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will
direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties
to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within
90 days of publication).
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be in effect for all
shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the
final results of this administrative review, as provided by section
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For merchandise exported by manufacturers
or exporters not covered in this review but covered in a prior segment
of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the
company-specific rate published for the most recently-completed
segment; (2) if the exporter is not a firm covered in a prior review,
or the original investigation, but the manufacturer is, then the cash
deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recently
completed segment for the manufacturer of the merchandise; and (3) the
cash deposit rate for all other manufacturers or exporters will
continue to be 2.16 percent, the all-others cash deposit rate
established in the Amended LTFV Final.\27\ These cash deposit
requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further
notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\27\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of
their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply
with this requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and sections 19 CFR
351.213(h)(1) and 351.221(b)(4).
Dated: June 3, 2021.
Christian Marsh,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by this order is certain steel nails
having a nominal shaft length not exceeding 12 inches.\28\ Certain
steel nails include, but are not limited to, nails made from round
wire and nails that are cut from flat-rolled steel. Certain steel
nails may be of one piece construction or constructed of two or more
pieces. Certain steel nails may be produced from any type of steel,
and may have any type of surface finish, head type, shank, point
type and shaft diameter. Finishes include, but are not limited to,
coating in vinyl, zinc (galvanized, including but not limited to
electroplating or hot dipping one or more times), phosphate, cement,
and paint. Certain steel nails may have one or more surface
finishes. Head styles include, but are not limited to, flat,
projection, cupped, oval, brad, headless, double, countersunk, and
sinker. Shank styles include, but are not limited to, smooth,
barbed, screw threaded, ring shank and fluted.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\28\ The shaft length of certain steel nails with flat heads or
parallel shoulders under the head shall be measured from under the
head or shoulder to the tip of the point. The shaft length of all
other certain steel nails shall be measured overall.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Screw-threaded nails subject to this proceeding are driven using
direct force and not by turning the nail using a tool that engages
with the head. Point styles include, but are not limited to,
diamond, needle, chisel and blunt or no point. Certain steel nails
may be sold in bulk, or they may be collated in any manner using any
material.
Excluded from the scope of this order are certain steel nails
packaged in combination with one or more non-subject articles, if
the total number of nails of all types, in aggregate regardless of
size, is less than 25. If packaged in combination with one or more
non-subject articles, certain steel nails remain subject merchandise
if the total number of nails of all types, in aggregate regardless
of size, is equal to or greater than 25, unless otherwise excluded
based on the other exclusions below.
Also, excluded from the scope are certain steel nails with a
nominal shaft length of one inch or less that are (a) a component of
an unassembled article, (b) the total number of nails is sixty (60)
or less, and (c) the imported unassembled article falls into one of
the following eight groupings: (1) Builders' joinery and carpentry
of wood that are classifiable as windows, French windows and their
frames; (2) builders' joinery and carpentry of wood that are
classifiable as doors and their frames and thresholds; (3) swivel
seats with variable height adjustment; (4) seats that are
convertible into beds (with the exception of those classifiable as
garden seats or camping equipment); (5) seats of cane, osier, bamboo
or similar materials; (6) other seats with wooden frames (with the
exception of seats of a kind used for aircraft or motor vehicles);
(7) furniture (other than seats) of wood (with the exception of (i)
medical, surgical, dental or veterinary furniture; and (ii) barbers'
chairs and similar chairs, having rotating as well as both reclining
and elevating movements); or (8) furniture (other than seats) of
materials other than wood, metal, or plastics (e.g., furniture of
cane, osier, bamboo or similar materials). The aforementioned
imported unassembled articles are currently classified under the
following Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS)
subheadings: 4418.10, 4418.20, 9401.30, 9401.40, 9401.51, 9401.59,
9401.61, 9401.69, 9403.30, 9403.40, 9403.50, 9403.60, 9403.81 or
9403.89.
Also, excluded from the scope of this order are steel nails that
meet the specifications of
[[Page 30593]]
Type I, Style 20 nails as identified in Tables 29 through 33 of ASTM
Standard FI667 (2013 revision).
Also, excluded from the scope of this order are nails suitable
for use in powder-actuated hand tools, whether or not threaded,
which are currently classified under HTSUS subheadings 7317.00.20.00
and 7317.00.30.00.
Also, excluded from the scope of this order are nails having a
case hardness greater than or equal to 50 on the Rockwell Hardness C
scale (HRC), a carbon content greater than or equal to percent, a
round head, a secondary reduced-diameter raised head section, a
centered shank, and a smooth symmetrical point, suitable for use in
gas-actuated hand tools.
Also, excluded from the scope of this order are corrugated
nails. A corrugated nail is made up of a small strip of corrugated
steel with sharp points on one side.
Also, excluded from the scope of this order are thumb tacks,
which are currently classified under HTSUS subheading 7317.00.10.00.
Certain steel nails subject to this order are currently
classified under HTSUS subheadings 7317.00.55.02, 7317.00.55.03,
7317.00.55.05, 7317.00.55.07, 7317.00.55.08, 7317.00.55.11,
7317.00.55.18, 7317.00.55.19, 7317.00.55.20, 7317.00.55.30,
7317.00.55.40, 7317.00.55.50, 7317.00.55.60, 7317.00.55.70,
7317.00.55.80, 7317.00.55.90, 7317.00.65.30, 7317.00.65.60 and
7317.00.75.00. Certain steel nails subject to this order also may be
classified under HTSUS subheadings 7907.00.60.00, 8206.00.00.00 or
other HTSUS subheadings. While the HTSUS subheadings are provided
for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the
scope of this order is dispositive.
[FR Doc. 2021-12077 Filed 6-8-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P