Certain Toner Supply Containers and Components Thereof (II); Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting Complainants' Unopposed Motion To Amend the Complaint and Notice of Investigation, 29806-29807 [2021-11702]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
29806
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 105 / Thursday, June 3, 2021 / Notices
Issued: May 27, 2021.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–1260]
[FR Doc. 2021–11619 Filed 6–2–21; 8:45 am]
Certain Toner Supply Containers and
Components Thereof (II); Commission
Determination Not To Review an Initial
Determination Granting Complainants’
Unopposed Motion To Amend the
Complaint and Notice of Investigation
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 701–TA–521 and 731–
TA–1252–1255 and 1257 (Review)]
International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Steel Nails From Korea, Malaysia,
Oman, Taiwan, and Vietnam
Determinations
On the basis of the record 1 developed
in the subject five-year reviews, the
United States International Trade
Commission (‘‘Commission’’)
determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of
1930 (‘‘the Act’’), that revocation of the
countervailing duty order on steel nails
from Vietnam and the antidumping duty
orders on steel nails from Korea,
Malaysia, Oman, Taiwan, and Vietnam
would be likely to lead to continuation
or recurrence of material injury to an
industry in the United States within a
reasonably foreseeable time.
Background
The Commission instituted these
reviews on June 1, 2020 (85 FR 33195)
and determined on September 4, 2020
that it would conduct expedited reviews
(86 FR 26545, May 14, 2021).
The Commission made these
determinations pursuant to section
751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It
completed and filed its determinations
in these reviews on May 28, 2021. The
views of the Commission are contained
in USITC Publication 5200 (May 2021),
entitled Steel Nails from Korea,
Malaysia, Oman, Taiwan, and Vietnam:
Investigation Nos. 701–TA–521 and
731–TA–1252–1255 and 1257 (Review).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: May 28, 2021.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2021–11703 Filed 6–2–21; 8:45 am]
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
1 The record is defined in § 207.2(f) of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19
CFR 207.2(f)).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:23 Jun 02, 2021
Jkt 253001
Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined not to
review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’)
(Order No. 6) of the presiding
administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’)
granting complainants’ unopposed
motion to amend the complaint and
notice of investigation in the abovecaptioned investigation to correct the
identification of a respondent.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Richard P. Hadorn, Esq., Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
205–3179. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help
accessing EDIS, please email
EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
Hearing-impaired persons are advised
that information on this matter can be
obtained by contacting the
Commission’s TDD terminal, telephone
(202) 205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On April
13, 2021, the Commission instituted this
investigation based on a complaint filed
by Canon Inc. of Tokyo, Japan; Canon
U.S.A., Inc. of Melville, New York; and
Canon Virginia, Inc. of Newport News,
Virginia (collectively, ‘‘Canon’’). 86 FR
19287–88 (Apr. 13, 2021). The
complaint, as supplemented, alleges
violations of section 337 of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C.
1337), based on the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
and the sale within the United States
after importation of certain toner supply
containers and components thereof by
reason of infringement of certain claims
of thirteen patents: U.S. Patent Nos.
10,209,667; 10,289,060; 10,289,061;
10,295,957; 10,488,814; 10,496,032;
10,496,033; 10,514,654; 10,520,881;
10,520,882; 8,565,649 (‘‘the ’649
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
patent’’); 9,354,551 (‘‘the ’551 patent’’);
and 9,753,402 (‘‘the ’402 patent’’). Id. at
19287. The complaint further alleges
that a domestic industry exists. Id. The
Commission instituted two separate
investigations and defined the scope of
the present investigation as whether
there is a violation of section 337 based
on the allegations of infringement as to
the asserted claims of the ’649, ’551, and
’402 patents as to the accused products
identified in the notice of investigation.
Id. The notice of investigation named
eleven respondents: Sichuan XingDian
Technology Co., Ltd. of Sichuan, China;
Sichuan Wiztoner Technology Co., Ltd.
of Sichuan, China;
Anhuiyatengshangmaoyouxiangongsi of
Ganyuqu, China; ChengDuXiangChang
NanShiYouSheBeiYouXianGongSi of
SiChuanSheng, China; Digital Marketing
Corporation d/b/a Digital Buyer
Marketing Company of Los Angeles,
California; Do It Wiser, LLC d/b/a Image
Toner (‘‘Do It Wiser’’) of Wilmington,
Delaware;
Hefeierlandianzishangwuyouxiangongsi
of Chengdushi, China; Shenzhenshi
Keluodeng Kejiyouxiangognsi of
Guangdong, China; MITOCOLOR INC.
of Rowland Heights, California; Xianshi
yanliangqu canqiubaihuodianshanghang
of Shanxisheng, China; and Zhuhai
Henyun Image Co., Ltd. of Zhuhai,
China. Id. The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations is also named as a party.
Id. at 19287–88. The question of
whether there is a violation of section
337 based on the allegations of
infringement as to the asserted claims of
the remaining patents is the subject of
the severed investigation based on the
same complaint, Inv. No. 337–TA–1259.
See 86 FR 19284–86 (Apr. 13, 2021).
On April 27, 2021, Canon filed a
motion to amend the complaint and
notice of investigation to change the
identification of respondent Do It Wiser
from ‘‘Do It Wiser, LLC d/b/a Image
Toner’’ to ‘‘Do It Wiser, Inc. d/b/a Image
Toner’’ and to make related changes in
paragraph 31 of the complaint. The
motion states that (i) OUII does not
oppose the motion and (ii) Do It Wiser’s
counsel in a parallel district court
lawsuit informed Canon that Do It Wiser
‘‘will not be participating in this
investigation and does not oppose this
motion.’’ Mot. at 1. No responses to the
motion were filed.
On May 17, 2021, the ALJ issued the
subject ID granting the motion. The ID
finds that, in accordance with
Commission Rule 210.14(b) (19 CFR
210.14(b)), ‘‘Canon has shown good
cause to amend the complaint and
notice of investigation to correct the
identification of the respondent
identified in the original complaint as
E:\FR\FM\03JNN1.SGM
03JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 105 / Thursday, June 3, 2021 / Notices
Do It Wiser, LLC d/b/a Image Toner.’’ ID
at 2. No petitions for review of the
subject ID were filed.
The Commission has determined not
to review the subject ID. The complaint
and notice of investigation are amended
to change the identification of
respondent Do It Wiser from ‘‘Do It
Wiser, LLC d/b/a Image Toner’’ to ‘‘Do
It Wiser, Inc. d/b/a Image Toner’’ and to
make related changes in paragraph 31 of
the complaint.
The Commission vote for this
determination took place on May 27,
2021.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part
210 of the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part
210).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: May 28, 2021.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2021–11702 Filed 6–2–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–1246]
Certain Integrated Circuits and
Products Containing the Same;
Commission Determination Not To
Review an Initial Determination
Granting Complainant’s Motion To
Terminate the Investigation Based on
Settlement; Termination of the
Investigation
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) has
determined not to review an initial
determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 18) of
the presiding administrative law judge
(‘‘ALJ’’) terminating the investigation in
its entirety based on settlement.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Benjamin S. Richards, Esq., Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
708–5453. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help
accessing EDIS, please email
EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. General
information concerning the Commission
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:23 Jun 02, 2021
Jkt 253001
may also be obtained by accessing its
internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
Hearing-impaired persons are advised
that information on this matter can be
obtained by contacting the
Commission’s TDD terminal on (202)
205–1810.
The
Commission instituted this investigation
on February 12, 2021 based on an
amended complaint filed by
complainant Tela Innovations, Inc. of
Los Gatos, CA (‘‘Tela’’). 86 FR 9369
(Feb. 12, 2021). The complaint, as
amended, alleged violations of section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in the
importation into the United States, the
sale for importation, or the sale within
the United States after importation of
certain integrated circuits and products
containing the same by reason of
infringement of claims 1–11, 14–20, 25,
and 26 of U.S. Patent No. 10,186,523. Id.
at 9370. The complaint further alleged
that a domestic industry exists. Id. The
Commission’s notice of investigation
named as respondents Acer, Inc. of New
Taipei City, Taiwan; Acer America
Corporation of San Jose, CA; ASUSTek
Computer Inc. of Taipei, Taiwan; ASUS
Computer International of Fremont, CA;
Intel Corporation of Santa Clara, CA;
Lenovo Group Ltd. of Beijing, China;
Lenovo (United States) Inc. of
Morrisville, NC; Micro-Star
International Co., Ltd. of New Taipei
City, Taiwan; and MSI Computer Corp.
of City of Industry, CA. Id. The Office
of Unfair Import Investigations is
participating in the investigation. Id.
On May 11, 2021, Tela moved,
without opposition, to terminate this
investigation in its entirety based on
settlement pursuant to Commission
Rule 210.21(b). 19 CFR 210.21(b). On
May 13, 2021, the ALJ issued Order No.
18, terminating the investigation in its
entirety based on settlement. No
petitions for review of the ID were filed.
The Commission has determined not
to review the subject ID.
The investigation is hereby
terminated in its entirety.
The Commission vote for this
determination took place on May 27,
2021.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part
210 of the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part
210).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
By order of the Commission.
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
29807
Issued: May 27, 2021.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2021–11620 Filed 6–2–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–1181]
Certain Lithium-Ion Battery Cells,
Battery Modules, Battery Packs,
Components Thereof, and Products
Containing the Same; Commission
Determination To Grant a Joint Motion
To Terminate the Investigation on the
Basis of a Settlement Agreement;
Termination of the Investigation
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined to grant a
joint motion to terminate the abovecaptioned investigation based on a
settlement agreement.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ronald A. Traud, Esq., Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
205–3427. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help
accessing EDIS, please email
EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
Hearing-impaired persons are advised
that information on this matter can be
obtained by contacting the
Commission’s TDD terminal on (202)
205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
November 4, 2019, the Commission
instituted this investigation based on a
complaint filed by LG Chem, Ltd. of
Seoul, Republic of Korea; LG Chem
Michigan Inc. of Holland, Michigan; and
Toray Industries, Inc. of Tokyo, Japan.
84 FR 59415 (Nov. 4, 2019). The
complaint, as supplemented, alleged
violations of section 337 of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C.
1337, due to the importation into the
United States, sale for importation, or
sale in the United States after
importation of certain lithium-ion
battery cells, battery modules, battery
packs, components thereof, and
products containing the same that
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\03JNN1.SGM
03JNN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 105 (Thursday, June 3, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29806-29807]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-11702]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-1260]
Certain Toner Supply Containers and Components Thereof (II);
Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination
Granting Complainants' Unopposed Motion To Amend the Complaint and
Notice of Investigation
AGENCY: International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined not to review an initial determination
(``ID'') (Order No. 6) of the presiding administrative law judge
(``ALJ'') granting complainants' unopposed motion to amend the
complaint and notice of investigation in the above-captioned
investigation to correct the identification of a respondent.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard P. Hadorn, Esq., Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-3179. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation may
be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help accessing EDIS, please email
[email protected]. General information concerning the Commission may
also be obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD
terminal, telephone (202) 205-1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On April 13, 2021, the Commission instituted
this investigation based on a complaint filed by Canon Inc. of Tokyo,
Japan; Canon U.S.A., Inc. of Melville, New York; and Canon Virginia,
Inc. of Newport News, Virginia (collectively, ``Canon''). 86 FR 19287-
88 (Apr. 13, 2021). The complaint, as supplemented, alleges violations
of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337),
based on the importation into the United States, the sale for
importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of
certain toner supply containers and components thereof by reason of
infringement of certain claims of thirteen patents: U.S. Patent Nos.
10,209,667; 10,289,060; 10,289,061; 10,295,957; 10,488,814; 10,496,032;
10,496,033; 10,514,654; 10,520,881; 10,520,882; 8,565,649 (``the '649
patent''); 9,354,551 (``the '551 patent''); and 9,753,402 (``the '402
patent''). Id. at 19287. The complaint further alleges that a domestic
industry exists. Id. The Commission instituted two separate
investigations and defined the scope of the present investigation as
whether there is a violation of section 337 based on the allegations of
infringement as to the asserted claims of the '649, '551, and '402
patents as to the accused products identified in the notice of
investigation. Id. The notice of investigation named eleven
respondents: Sichuan XingDian Technology Co., Ltd. of Sichuan, China;
Sichuan Wiztoner Technology Co., Ltd. of Sichuan, China;
Anhuiyatengshangmaoyouxiangongsi of Ganyuqu, China;
ChengDuXiangChangNanShiYouSheBeiYouXianGongSi of SiChuanSheng, China;
Digital Marketing Corporation d/b/a Digital Buyer Marketing Company of
Los Angeles, California; Do It Wiser, LLC d/b/a Image Toner (``Do It
Wiser'') of Wilmington, Delaware; Hefeierlandianzishangwuyouxiangongsi
of Chengdushi, China; Shenzhenshi Keluodeng Kejiyouxiangognsi of
Guangdong, China; MITOCOLOR INC. of Rowland Heights, California;
Xianshi yanliangqu canqiubaihuodianshanghang of Shanxisheng, China; and
Zhuhai Henyun Image Co., Ltd. of Zhuhai, China. Id. The Office of
Unfair Import Investigations is also named as a party. Id. at 19287-88.
The question of whether there is a violation of section 337 based on
the allegations of infringement as to the asserted claims of the
remaining patents is the subject of the severed investigation based on
the same complaint, Inv. No. 337-TA-1259. See 86 FR 19284-86 (Apr. 13,
2021).
On April 27, 2021, Canon filed a motion to amend the complaint and
notice of investigation to change the identification of respondent Do
It Wiser from ``Do It Wiser, LLC d/b/a Image Toner'' to ``Do It Wiser,
Inc. d/b/a Image Toner'' and to make related changes in paragraph 31 of
the complaint. The motion states that (i) OUII does not oppose the
motion and (ii) Do It Wiser's counsel in a parallel district court
lawsuit informed Canon that Do It Wiser ``will not be participating in
this investigation and does not oppose this motion.'' Mot. at 1. No
responses to the motion were filed.
On May 17, 2021, the ALJ issued the subject ID granting the motion.
The ID finds that, in accordance with Commission Rule 210.14(b) (19 CFR
210.14(b)), ``Canon has shown good cause to amend the complaint and
notice of investigation to correct the identification of the respondent
identified in the original complaint as
[[Page 29807]]
Do It Wiser, LLC d/b/a Image Toner.'' ID at 2. No petitions for review
of the subject ID were filed.
The Commission has determined not to review the subject ID. The
complaint and notice of investigation are amended to change the
identification of respondent Do It Wiser from ``Do It Wiser, LLC d/b/a
Image Toner'' to ``Do It Wiser, Inc. d/b/a Image Toner'' and to make
related changes in paragraph 31 of the complaint.
The Commission vote for this determination took place on May 27,
2021.
The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and
in Part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
part 210).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: May 28, 2021.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2021-11702 Filed 6-2-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
