Certain Uncoated Paper From Indonesia: Final Results of the Expedited First Five-Year Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order, 29243-29244 [2021-11461]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 103 / Tuesday, June 1, 2021 / Notices
requests received by the last day of June
2021. If Commerce does not receive, by
the last day of June 2021, a request for
review of entries covered by an order,
finding, or suspended investigation
listed in this notice and for the period
identified above, Commerce will
instruct CBP to assess antidumping or
countervailing duties on those entries at
a rate equal to the cash deposit of
estimated antidumping or
countervailing duties required on those
entries at the time of entry, or
withdrawal from warehouse, for
consumption and to continue to collect
the cash deposit previously ordered.
For the first administrative review of
any order, there will be no assessment
of antidumping or countervailing duties
on entries of subject merchandise
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption during the relevant
provisional-measures ‘‘gap’’ period of
the order, if such a gap period is
applicable to the period of review.
This notice is not required by statute
but is published as a service to the
international trading community.
Dated: May 20, 2021.
James Maeder,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. 2021–11462 Filed 5–28–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C–560–829]
Certain Uncoated Paper From
Indonesia: Final Results of the
Expedited First Five-Year Sunset
Review of the Countervailing Duty
Order
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: As a result of this sunset
review, the Department of Commerce
(Commerce) finds that revocation of the
countervailing duty (CVD) order on
certain uncoated paper from Indonesia
would be likely to lead to continuation
or recurrence of countervailable
subsidies at the levels indicated in the
‘‘Final Results of Sunset Review’’
section of this notice.
DATES: Applicable June 1, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Terre Keaton Stefanova, AD/CVD
Operations, Office II, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:20 May 28, 2021
Jkt 253001
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–1280.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On March 3, 2016, Commerce
published in the Federal Register the
CVD order on certain uncoated paper
from Indonesia.1 On February 1, 2021,
Commerce published the notice of
initiation of the first sunset review of
the Order, pursuant to section 751(c) of
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the
Act).2 On February 12 and 16, 2021,
Commerce received notices of intent to
participate from domestic interested
parties 3 within the deadline specified
in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i).4 The
domestic interested parties claimed
interested party status pursuant to
sections 771(9)(C) and (D) of the Act,
respectively, as either manufacturers in
the United States of the domestic like
product or as a certified union with
workers engaged in the production of
the domestic like product in the United
States.5
On March 1, 2021, Commerce
received an adequate substantive
response from the domestic interested
parties within the 30-day deadline
specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i).6
Commerce received no substantive
response from any other interested
parties with respect to the Order
covered by this sunset review. On
March 23, 2021, Commerce notified the
U.S. International Trade Commission
that it did not receive an adequate
1 See Certain Uncoated Paper from Indonesia and
the People’s Republic of China: Amended Final
Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination and
Countervailing Duty Order (Indonesia) and
Countervailing Duty Order (People’s Republic of
China), 81 FR 11187 (March 3, 2016) (Order).
2 See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Review, 86
FR 7709 (February 1, 2021).
3 The domestic interested parties are: Domtar
Corporation (Domtar); Finch Paper LLC (Finch);
North Pacific Paper Company (NORPAC); Packaging
Corporation of America (PCA); and United Steel,
Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy,
Allied Industrial and Services Workers
International Union (USW) (collectively, domestic
interested parties).
4 See Domtar, Finch, and NORPAC’s Letter, ‘‘First
Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review Of Countervailing
Duty Order On Certain Uncoated Paper from
Indonesia: Domestic Industry’s Notice of Intent To
Participate In Sunset Review,’’ dated February 12,
2021; and PCA and USW’s Letter, ‘‘Notice of Intent
to Participate in the First Five-Year Review of the
Countervailing Duty Order on Certain Uncoated
Paper from Indonesia,’’ dated February 16, 2021.
5 Id.
6 See Domestic Interested Parties’ Letter,
‘‘Domestic Industry’s Substantive Response to
Notice of Initiation,’’ dated March 1, 2021.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
29243
substantive response from respondent
interested parties.7 As a result, pursuant
to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), Commerce
conducted an expedited (120-day)
sunset review of the Order.
Scope of the Order
The scope of the Order includes
uncoated paper in sheet form; weighing
at least 40 grams per square meter but
not more than 150 grams per square
meter; that either is a white paper with
a GE brightness level 8 of 85 or higher
or is a colored paper; whether or not
surface-decorated, printed (except as
described below), embossed, perforated,
or punched; irrespective of the
smoothness of the surface; and
irrespective of dimensions (Certain
Uncoated Paper).
Certain uncoated paper includes (a)
uncoated free sheet paper that meets
this scope definition; (b) uncoated
ground wood paper produced from
bleached chemi-thermo-mechanical
pulp (BCTMP) that meets this scope
definition; and (c) any other uncoated
paper that meets this scope definition
regardless of the type of pulp used to
produce the paper.
Specifically excluded from the scope
of this order are (1) paper printed with
final content of printed text or graphics
and (2) lined paper products, typically
school supplies, composed of paper that
incorporates straight horizontal and/or
vertical lines that would make the paper
unsuitable for copying or printing
purposes. For purposes of this scope
definition, paper shall be considered
‘‘printed with final content’’ where at
least one side of the sheet has printed
text and/or graphics that cover at least
five percent of the surface area of the
entire sheet.
On September 1, 2017, Commerce
determined that imports of uncoated
paper with a GE brightness of
83 +/¥1% (83 Bright paper), otherwise
meeting the description of in-scope
7 See Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘Sunset Reviews
Initiated on February 1, 2021,’’ dated March 23,
2021.
8 One of the key measurements of any grade of
paper is brightness. Generally speaking, the brighter
the paper the better the contrast between the paper
and the ink. Brightness is measured using a GE
Reflectance Scale, which measures the reflection of
light off a grade of paper. One is the lowest
reflection, or what would be given to a totally black
grade, and 100 is the brightest measured grade.
‘‘Colored paper’’ as used in this scope definition
means a paper with a hue other than white that
reflects one of the primary colors of magenta,
yellow, and cyan (red, yellow, and blue) or a
combination of such primary colors.
E:\FR\FM\01JNN1.SGM
01JNN1
29244
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 103 / Tuesday, June 1, 2021 / Notices
merchandise, constitute merchandise
‘‘altered in form or appearance in minor
respects’’ from in-scope merchandise
that are subject to this order.9
Imports of the subject merchandise
are provided for under Harmonized
Tariff Schedule of the United States
(HTSUS) categories 4802.56.1000,
4802.56.2000, 4802.56.3000,
4802.56.4000, 4802.56.6000,
4802.56.7020, 4802.56.7040,
4802.57.1000, 4802.57.2000,
4802.57.3000, and 4802.57.4000. Some
imports of subject merchandise may
also be classified under 4802.62.1000,
4802.62.2000, 4802.62.3000,
4802.62.5000, 4802.62.6020,
4802.62.6040, 4802.69.1000,
4802.69.2000, 4802.69.3000,
4811.90.8050 and 4811.90.9080. While
HTSUS subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the
written description of the scope is
dispositive.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in this sunset review
are addressed in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.10 A list of the topics
discussed in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum is attached as an
appendix to this notice. The Issues and
Decision Memorandum is a public
document and is on file electronically
via Enforcement and Compliance’s
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System
(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://
access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete
version of the Issues and Decision
Memorandum can be accessed directly
at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/.
Final Results of Sunset Review
Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and
752(b) of the Act, we determine that
revocation of the Order would be likely
to lead to continuation or recurrence of
countervailable subsidies at the
following net countervailable subsidy
rates:
Net
countervailable
subsidy
(percent)
Manufacturers/producers/exporters
PT Anugerah Kertas Utama, PT Riau Andalan Kertas, APRIL Fine Paper Macao Offshore Limited, PT Asia Pacific Rayon,
PT Sateri Viscose International, A P Fine Paper Trading (Hong Kong) Limited, and APRIL International Enterprise Pte.
Ltd ..............................................................................................................................................................................................
Indah Kiat Pulp & Paper TBK/Pabrik Kertas Tjiwi Kimia/PT Pindo Deli Pulp and Paper Mills ....................................................
Great Champ Trading Limited .......................................................................................................................................................
All Others .......................................................................................................................................................................................
Administrative Protective Order (APO)
This notice also serves as the only
reminder to parties subject to an APO of
their responsibility concerning the
return or destruction of proprietary
information disclosed under an APO in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.305.
Timely notification of the return or
destruction of APO materials, or
conversion to judicial protective orders,
is hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and terms of an
APO is a violation which is subject to
sanction.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing the
final results and this notice in
accordance with sections 751(c), 752(b),
and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR
351.218(f)(3).
Dated: May 25, 2021.
Christian Marsh,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2021–11461 Filed 5–28–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–523–808]
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. History of the Order
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(Commerce) preliminarily determines
that sales of certain steel nails (steel
nails) from the Sultanate of Oman
(Oman) have been made below normal
value during the period of review (POR),
9 See Certain Uncoated Paper from Australia,
Brazil, the People’s Republic of China, Indonesia,
and Portugal: Affirmative Final Determination of
Circumvention of the Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Orders, 82 FR 41610
(September 1, 2017).
10 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Expedited First Sunset
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:20 May 28, 2021
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00012
July 1, 2019, through June 30, 2020.
Further, Commerce is rescinding the
administrative review, in part, with
respect to Astrotech Steels Private Ltd.
(Astrotech), Geekay Wires Limited
(Geekay), Overseas International Steel
Industry LLC & Overseas Distribution
Services Inc. (Overseas), Trinity Steel
Private Limited (Trinity Steel),
Universal Freight Services LLC
(Universal Freight Services), and WWL
India Private Ltd (WWL India).
Interested parties are invited to
comment on this preliminary
determination.
DATES:
Certain Steel Nails From the Sultanate
of Oman: Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review and Partial Rescission of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2019–2020
AGENCY:
Appendix
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
V. Legal Framework
VI. Discussion of the Issues
1. Likelihood of Continuation or
Recurrence of a Countervailable Subsidy
2. Net Countervailable Subsidy Rates
Likely to Prevail
3. Nature of the Subsidies
VII. Final Results of Sunset Review
VIII. Recommendation
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
21.21
109.14
103.99
21.21
Applicable June 1, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dakota Potts, AD/CVD Operations,
Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0223.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Commerce is conducting an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on steel nails
Review of the Countervailing Duty Order on Certain
Uncoated Paper from Indonesia,’’ dated
concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this
notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
E:\FR\FM\01JNN1.SGM
01JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 103 (Tuesday, June 1, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29243-29244]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-11461]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C-560-829]
Certain Uncoated Paper From Indonesia: Final Results of the
Expedited First Five-Year Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty
Order
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: As a result of this sunset review, the Department of Commerce
(Commerce) finds that revocation of the countervailing duty (CVD) order
on certain uncoated paper from Indonesia would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of countervailable subsidies at the levels
indicated in the ``Final Results of Sunset Review'' section of this
notice.
DATES: Applicable June 1, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Terre Keaton Stefanova, AD/CVD
Operations, Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-1280.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On March 3, 2016, Commerce published in the Federal Register the
CVD order on certain uncoated paper from Indonesia.\1\ On February 1,
2021, Commerce published the notice of initiation of the first sunset
review of the Order, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (the Act).\2\ On February 12 and 16, 2021, Commerce
received notices of intent to participate from domestic interested
parties \3\ within the deadline specified in 19 CFR
351.218(d)(1)(i).\4\ The domestic interested parties claimed interested
party status pursuant to sections 771(9)(C) and (D) of the Act,
respectively, as either manufacturers in the United States of the
domestic like product or as a certified union with workers engaged in
the production of the domestic like product in the United States.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Certain Uncoated Paper from Indonesia and the People's
Republic of China: Amended Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty
Determination and Countervailing Duty Order (Indonesia) and
Countervailing Duty Order (People's Republic of China), 81 FR 11187
(March 3, 2016) (Order).
\2\ See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Review, 86 FR 7709
(February 1, 2021).
\3\ The domestic interested parties are: Domtar Corporation
(Domtar); Finch Paper LLC (Finch); North Pacific Paper Company
(NORPAC); Packaging Corporation of America (PCA); and United Steel,
Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial
and Services Workers International Union (USW) (collectively,
domestic interested parties).
\4\ See Domtar, Finch, and NORPAC's Letter, ``First Five-Year
(``Sunset'') Review Of Countervailing Duty Order On Certain Uncoated
Paper from Indonesia: Domestic Industry's Notice of Intent To
Participate In Sunset Review,'' dated February 12, 2021; and PCA and
USW's Letter, ``Notice of Intent to Participate in the First Five-
Year Review of the Countervailing Duty Order on Certain Uncoated
Paper from Indonesia,'' dated February 16, 2021.
\5\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On March 1, 2021, Commerce received an adequate substantive
response from the domestic interested parties within the 30-day
deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i).\6\ Commerce received no
substantive response from any other interested parties with respect to
the Order covered by this sunset review. On March 23, 2021, Commerce
notified the U.S. International Trade Commission that it did not
receive an adequate substantive response from respondent interested
parties.\7\ As a result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act
and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), Commerce conducted an expedited
(120-day) sunset review of the Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Domestic Interested Parties' Letter, ``Domestic
Industry's Substantive Response to Notice of Initiation,'' dated
March 1, 2021.
\7\ See Commerce's Letter, ``Sunset Reviews Initiated on
February 1, 2021,'' dated March 23, 2021.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The scope of the Order includes uncoated paper in sheet form;
weighing at least 40 grams per square meter but not more than 150 grams
per square meter; that either is a white paper with a GE brightness
level \8\ of 85 or higher or is a colored paper; whether or not
surface-decorated, printed (except as described below), embossed,
perforated, or punched; irrespective of the smoothness of the surface;
and irrespective of dimensions (Certain Uncoated Paper).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ One of the key measurements of any grade of paper is
brightness. Generally speaking, the brighter the paper the better
the contrast between the paper and the ink. Brightness is measured
using a GE Reflectance Scale, which measures the reflection of light
off a grade of paper. One is the lowest reflection, or what would be
given to a totally black grade, and 100 is the brightest measured
grade. ``Colored paper'' as used in this scope definition means a
paper with a hue other than white that reflects one of the primary
colors of magenta, yellow, and cyan (red, yellow, and blue) or a
combination of such primary colors.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Certain uncoated paper includes (a) uncoated free sheet paper that
meets this scope definition; (b) uncoated ground wood paper produced
from bleached chemi-thermo-mechanical pulp (BCTMP) that meets this
scope definition; and (c) any other uncoated paper that meets this
scope definition regardless of the type of pulp used to produce the
paper.
Specifically excluded from the scope of this order are (1) paper
printed with final content of printed text or graphics and (2) lined
paper products, typically school supplies, composed of paper that
incorporates straight horizontal and/or vertical lines that would make
the paper unsuitable for copying or printing purposes. For purposes of
this scope definition, paper shall be considered ``printed with final
content'' where at least one side of the sheet has printed text and/or
graphics that cover at least five percent of the surface area of the
entire sheet.
On September 1, 2017, Commerce determined that imports of uncoated
paper with a GE brightness of 83 +/-1% (83 Bright paper), otherwise
meeting the description of in-scope
[[Page 29244]]
merchandise, constitute merchandise ``altered in form or appearance in
minor respects'' from in-scope merchandise that are subject to this
order.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See Certain Uncoated Paper from Australia, Brazil, the
People's Republic of China, Indonesia, and Portugal: Affirmative
Final Determination of Circumvention of the Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Orders, 82 FR 41610 (September 1, 2017).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Imports of the subject merchandise are provided for under
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) categories
4802.56.1000, 4802.56.2000, 4802.56.3000, 4802.56.4000, 4802.56.6000,
4802.56.7020, 4802.56.7040, 4802.57.1000, 4802.57.2000, 4802.57.3000,
and 4802.57.4000. Some imports of subject merchandise may also be
classified under 4802.62.1000, 4802.62.2000, 4802.62.3000,
4802.62.5000, 4802.62.6020, 4802.62.6040, 4802.69.1000, 4802.69.2000,
4802.69.3000, 4811.90.8050 and 4811.90.9080. While HTSUS subheadings
are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written
description of the scope is dispositive.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in this sunset review are addressed in the Issues
and Decision Memorandum.\10\ A list of the topics discussed in the
Issues and Decision Memorandum is attached as an appendix to this
notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is
on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov. In
addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can
be accessed directly at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the
Expedited First Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order on
Certain Uncoated Paper from Indonesia,'' dated concurrently with,
and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Results of Sunset Review
Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and 752(b) of the Act, we determine
that revocation of the Order would be likely to lead to continuation or
recurrence of countervailable subsidies at the following net
countervailable subsidy rates:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net
Manufacturers/producers/exporters countervailable
subsidy (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
PT Anugerah Kertas Utama, PT Riau Andalan Kertas, 21.21
APRIL Fine Paper Macao Offshore Limited, PT Asia
Pacific Rayon, PT Sateri Viscose International, A P
Fine Paper Trading (Hong Kong) Limited, and APRIL
International Enterprise Pte. Ltd...................
Indah Kiat Pulp & Paper TBK/Pabrik Kertas Tjiwi Kimia/ 109.14
PT Pindo Deli Pulp and Paper Mills..................
Great Champ Trading Limited.......................... 103.99
All Others........................................... 21.21
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Administrative Protective Order (APO)
This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to
an APO of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of
proprietary information disclosed under an APO in accordance with 19
CFR 351.305. Timely notification of the return or destruction of APO
materials, or conversion to judicial protective orders, is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO
is a violation which is subject to sanction.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing the final results and this notice in
accordance with sections 751(c), 752(b), and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and
19 CFR 351.218(f)(3).
Dated: May 25, 2021.
Christian Marsh,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. History of the Order
V. Legal Framework
VI. Discussion of the Issues
1. Likelihood of Continuation or Recurrence of a Countervailable
Subsidy
2. Net Countervailable Subsidy Rates Likely to Prevail
3. Nature of the Subsidies
VII. Final Results of Sunset Review
VIII. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2021-11461 Filed 5-28-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P