Certain Pasta From Italy: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2018-2019, 28336-28338 [2021-11133]

Download as PDF 28336 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 100 / Wednesday, May 26, 2021 / Notices price of the aircraft, the foreign government may require this sort of extra compensation as a condition of awarding the contract to purchase the aircraft. As described in the Offsets Regulations, U.S. firms are required to report information on contracts for the sale of defense articles or defense services to foreign countries or foreign firms that are subject to offsets agreements exceeding $5,000,000 in value. U.S. firms are also required to report annually information on offsets transactions completed in performance of existing offsets commitments for which offsets credit of $250,000 or more has been claimed from the foreign representative. Commerce’s annual report to Congress includes an aggregated summary of the data reported by industry in accordance with the offsets regulation and the DPA (50 U.S.C. 4568 (2021)). As provided by section 723(c) of the DPA, BIS will not publicly disclose individual firm information it receives through offsets reporting unless the firm furnishing the information specifically authorizes public disclosure. The information collected is sorted and organized into an aggregate report of national offsets data, and therefore does not identify company-specific information. To enable BIS to prepare the next annual offset report reflecting calendar year 2020 data, affected U.S. firms must submit required information on offsets agreements and offsets transactions from calendar year 2020 to BIS no later than June 15, 2021. Matthew S. Borman, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Export Administration. [FR Doc. 2021–11068 Filed 5–25–21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–JT–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–570–836] Glycine From the People’s Republic of China: Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2020– 2021 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. DATES: Applicable May 26, 2021. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) is rescinding the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on glycine from the People’s Republic of China (China) covering the period of review March 1, 2020, through February 28, 2021, based AGENCY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:00 May 25, 2021 Jkt 253001 on the timely withdrawal of the request for review. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Yang Jin Chun, AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–5760. Background On March 1, 2021, Commerce published in the Federal Register a notice of opportunity to request an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on glycine from China covering the period of review March 1, 2020, through February 28, 2021.1 On March 31, 2021, GEO Specialty Chemicals, Inc. (GEO), a domestic producer of glycine, filed a timely request for review in accordance with section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act) and 19 CFR 351.213(b).2 Pursuant to this request, and in accordance with 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i), Commerce initiated this administrative review with respect to one company, Baoding Mantong Fine Chemistry Co., Ltd. (Baoding Mantong), on May 5, 2021.3 On May 14, 2021, GEO withdrew its request for this administrative review with respect to Baoding Mantong.4 Rescission of Review Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), Commerce will rescind an administrative review, in whole or in part, if the party that requested the review withdraws the request within 90 days of the publication date of the notice of initiation of the requested review. GEO timely submitted a withdrawal of its review request within the 90-day deadline. No other party requested this administrative review. Therefore, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), we are rescinding this administrative review in its entirety. Assessment Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of glycine from China. Antidumping duties shall be assessed at rates equal to the cash deposit of estimated antidumping duties required 1 See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity To Request Administrative Review, 86 FR 11921, 11923 (March 1, 2021). 2 See GEO’s Letter, ‘‘Request for Administrative Review’’ dated March 31, 2021. 3 See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 86 FR 23925, 23928 (May 5, 2021). 4 See Letter from GEO, ‘‘Withdrawal of Request for Administrative Review,’’ dated May 14, 2021. PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 at the time of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). Commerce intends to issue appropriate assessment instructions to CBP 35 days after the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register. Notification to Importers This notice serves as the only reminder to importers, whose entries will be liquidated as a result of this rescission notice, of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in Commerce’s presumption that reimbursement of the antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order This notice also serves as a reminder to all parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of the return/ destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction. Notification to Interested Parties This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4). Dated: May 20, 2021. James Maeder, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. [FR Doc. 2021–11134 Filed 5–25–21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–475–818] Certain Pasta From Italy: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2018–2019 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. AGENCY: E:\FR\FM\26MYN1.SGM 26MYN1 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 100 / Wednesday, May 26, 2021 / Notices The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that certain pasta (pasta) from Italy was sold in the United States at less than normal value during the period of review (POR) July 1, 2018, through June 30, 2019. Additionally, Commerce determines that Pasta Berruto S.p.A. (Pasta Berruto) had no shipments during the POR. DATES: Applicable May 26, 2021. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jonathan Hall-Eastman, AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1468. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: SUMMARY: Background On November 23, 2020, Commerce published the Preliminary Results.1 On January 26, 2021, Commerce received case briefs on behalf of La Molisana S.p.A. (La Molisana), Valdigrano di Flavio Pagani S.r.L., and Ghigi 1870 S.p.A. and Pasta Zara S.p.A. (collectively Ghigi/Zara). On February 5, 2021, Riviana Foods and Treehouse Foods LLC., collectively domestic producers of pasta, submitted a rebuttal brief for each of the submitted case briefs. Commerce extended the deadline for the final results by 59 days on March 3, 2021.2 The deadline for the final results of this review is now May 21, 2021. For a complete description of the events that occurred since the Preliminary Results, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.3 Scope of the Order The products covered by this order are certain pasta from Italy. For a full description of the scope, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum. Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues that parties raised and 1 See Certain Pasta from Italy: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2018– 2019, 85 FR 74676 (November 23, 2020) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 2 See Memorandum, ‘‘Certain Pasta from Italy: Extension of Time Limit Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2018/ 2019,’’ dated March 3, 2021. 3 See Memorandum, ‘‘Certain Pasta from Italy: Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2018–2019,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:00 May 25, 2021 Jkt 253001 to which we responded in the Issues and Decision Memorandum is attached to this notice as an Appendix. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/ frn/index.html/. these final results of review, we calculated a weighted-average dumping margin for La Molisana that is above de minimis and not based entirely on FA. Therefore, consistent with our practice, we have assigned the companies not selected for individual examination the weighted-average dumping margin calculated for La Molisana. Final Results of the Review Commerce determines that the following weighted-average dumping margin exists for the period July 1, 2018, through June 30, 2019: Determination of No Shipments As noted in the Preliminary Results, we received a no-shipment claim from Pasta Berruto. In the Preliminary Results, we preliminarily determined that Pasta Berruto had no shipments during the POR. We received no comments from interested parties with respect to this claim. Therefore, we continue to find that Pasta Berruto had no shipments during the POR. Changes Since the Preliminary Results Based on a review of the record and comments received from interested parties, we relied on revised cost of production data when calculating the weighted-average dumping margin for La Molisana.4 Rates for Companies Not Selected for Individual Examination The statute and Commerce’s regulations do not address the establishment of a rate to be applied to individual companies not selected for examination when Commerce limits its examination in an administrative review pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Generally, Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5) of the Act, which provides instructions for calculating the allothers rate in an investigation, for guidance when calculating the rate for companies which we did not examine in an administrative review. Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act establishes a preference to avoid using rates which are zero, de minimis, or based entirely on facts available (FA) in calculating an all-others rate. Accordingly, Commerce’s practice in administrative reviews has been to average the weighted-average dumping margins for the companies selected for individual examination in the annual review, excluding rates that are zero, de minimis, or based entirely on FA.5 For 4 Id. at Comment 2. e.g., Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof from France, Germany, Italy, Japan, and the United 5 See, PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 28337 Exporter or producer Ghigi 1870 S.p.A., Pasta Zara S.p.A ....................................... La Molisana S.p.A ...................... Review-Specific Average Rate Applicable to the Following Companies: F. Divella S.p.A ....................... Liguori Pastificio dal 1820 S.p.A .................................... Newlat Food S.p.A .................. Pastificio Di Martino Gaetano e Flli S.p.A ........................... Pastificio Fratelli DeLuca S.r.l Pastificio Rey S.r.L ................. Rummo S.p.A .......................... Tesa S.r.L ............................... Valdigrano di Flavio Pagani S.r.L ..................................... Weightedaverage dumping margin (percent) 91.76 15.72 15.72 15.72 15.72 15.72 15.72 15.72 15.72 15.72 15.72 Assessment Rate Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), Commerce shall determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review. Commerce has calculated importerspecific antidumping duty assessment rates. For La Molisana, we calculated importer-specific antidumping duty assessment rates by aggregating the total amount of dumping calculated for the examined sales of each importer and dividing each of these amounts by the total entered value associated with those sales. Where either the respondent’s weighted-average dumping margin is zero or de minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), or an importerspecific assessment rate is zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties. Kingdom: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Reviews and Rescission of Reviews in Part, 73 FR 52823, 52824 (September 11, 2008), and accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment 16. E:\FR\FM\26MYN1.SGM 26MYN1 28338 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 100 / Wednesday, May 26, 2021 / Notices For entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by La Molisana where the producer did not know its merchandise was destined for the United States, or for entries associated with Pasta Berruto, who had no shipments during the POR, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed suspended entries, consistent with the reseller policy, at the all-others rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction.6 The assessment rate for antidumping duties for Ghigi/Zara, as well as for each of the companies not selected for individual examination, will be equal to the weighted-average dumping margin identified above in the Final Results of Review. Consistent with its recent notice,7 Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 days after the date of publication of the final results of this review in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is filed at the U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within 90 days of publication). Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective for all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the final results of this administrative review, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rates for the companies identified above in the Final Results of Review will be equal to the company-specific weighted-average dumping margin established in the final results of this administrative review; (2) for merchandise exported by a company not covered in this administrative review but covered in a completed prior segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review or completed prior segment of this proceeding but the producer is, the cash 6 For a full discussion of this practice, see Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). 7 See Notice of Discontinuation of Policy to Issue Liquidation Instructions After 15 Days in Applicable Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Proceedings, 86 FR 3995 (January 15, 2021). VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:00 May 25, 2021 Jkt 253001 deposit rate will be the companyspecific rate established for the most recently-completed segment of this proceeding for the producer of the subject merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other producers or exporters will continue to be 15.45 percent, the all-others rate established in the section 129 determination.8 These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties and/or countervailing duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in Commerce’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties has occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. Administrative Protective Order This notice also serves as a final reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. Notification to Interested Parties We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5) and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(1). Dated: May 20, 2021. Christian Marsh, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background 8 See Implementation of the Findings of the WTO Panel in U.S.— Zeroing (EC): Notice of Determinations Under Section 129 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act and Revocations and Partial Revocations of Certain Antidumping Duty Orders, 72 FR 25261 (May 4, 2007). PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 III. Scope of the Order IV. Changes Since the Preliminary Results V. Discussion of the Issues Comment 1: Protein Content Comment 2: Revisions to La Molisana’s Cost Reporting Comment 3: Model Match for La Molisana’s Tri-Color Pasta Comment 4: Alternative Comparison Methodology Comment 5: Price of La Molisana’s Private Label Pasta Comment 6: Application of Total AFA to Ghigi/Zara Comment 7: Collapsing Ghigi/Zara VI. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2021–11133 Filed 5–25–21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration Notice of an Opportunity To Apply for Membership on the United States Investment Advisory Council; Correction SelectUSA, United States Investment Advisory Council, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. ACTION: Notice; correction. AGENCY: The International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce published a document in the Federal Register on May 17, 2021 concerning the notice of an opportunity to apply for membership on the Investment Advisory Council. The document contained an incorrect number of members allowed to serve on the IAC. DATES: Applications for immediate consideration for membership must be received by the Office of SelectUSA by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time (EDT) on Friday, June 30, 2021. The International Trade Administration (ITA) will continue to accept applications under this notice for two years from the deadline to fill any vacancies. SUMMARY: Please submit application information by email to IAC@trade.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rachel David, SelectUSA, U.S. Department of Commerce; telephone: (202) 302–6858; email: IAC@trade.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: ADDRESSES: Correction In the Federal Register of May 17, 2021, in FR Doc. 2021–10358, on page 26697, in the first column, third paragraph under SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION correct the caption to read: The IAC shall consist of no more than E:\FR\FM\26MYN1.SGM 26MYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 100 (Wednesday, May 26, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28336-28338]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-11133]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-475-818]


Certain Pasta From Italy: Final Results of Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2018-
2019

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.


[[Page 28337]]


SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that certain 
pasta (pasta) from Italy was sold in the United States at less than 
normal value during the period of review (POR) July 1, 2018, through 
June 30, 2019. Additionally, Commerce determines that Pasta Berruto 
S.p.A. (Pasta Berruto) had no shipments during the POR.

DATES: Applicable May 26, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jonathan Hall-Eastman, AD/CVD 
Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-1468.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On November 23, 2020, Commerce published the Preliminary 
Results.\1\ On January 26, 2021, Commerce received case briefs on 
behalf of La Molisana S.p.A. (La Molisana), Valdigrano di Flavio Pagani 
S.r.L., and Ghigi 1870 S.p.A. and Pasta Zara S.p.A. (collectively 
Ghigi/Zara). On February 5, 2021, Riviana Foods and Treehouse Foods 
LLC., collectively domestic producers of pasta, submitted a rebuttal 
brief for each of the submitted case briefs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Certain Pasta from Italy: Preliminary Results of 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Preliminary Determination 
of No Shipments; 2018-2019, 85 FR 74676 (November 23, 2020) 
(Preliminary Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision 
Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Commerce extended the deadline for the final results by 59 days on 
March 3, 2021.\2\ The deadline for the final results of this review is 
now May 21, 2021. For a complete description of the events that 
occurred since the Preliminary Results, see the Issues and Decision 
Memorandum.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ See Memorandum, ``Certain Pasta from Italy: Extension of 
Time Limit Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 
2018/2019,'' dated March 3, 2021.
    \3\ See Memorandum, ``Certain Pasta from Italy: Issues and 
Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review; 2018-2019,'' dated concurrently with, and 
hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order

    The products covered by this order are certain pasta from Italy. 
For a full description of the scope, see the Issues and Decision 
Memorandum.

Analysis of Comments Received

    All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs are addressed in 
the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues that parties 
raised and to which we responded in the Issues and Decision Memorandum 
is attached to this notice as an Appendix. The Issues and Decision 
Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via 
Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 
registered users at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete 
version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly 
at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html/.

Determination of No Shipments

    As noted in the Preliminary Results, we received a no-shipment 
claim from Pasta Berruto. In the Preliminary Results, we preliminarily 
determined that Pasta Berruto had no shipments during the POR. We 
received no comments from interested parties with respect to this 
claim. Therefore, we continue to find that Pasta Berruto had no 
shipments during the POR.

Changes Since the Preliminary Results

    Based on a review of the record and comments received from 
interested parties, we relied on revised cost of production data when 
calculating the weighted-average dumping margin for La Molisana.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ Id. at Comment 2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Rates for Companies Not Selected for Individual Examination

    The statute and Commerce's regulations do not address the 
establishment of a rate to be applied to individual companies not 
selected for examination when Commerce limits its examination in an 
administrative review pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the Tariff Act 
of 1930, as amended (the Act). Generally, Commerce looks to section 
735(c)(5) of the Act, which provides instructions for calculating the 
all-others rate in an investigation, for guidance when calculating the 
rate for companies which we did not examine in an administrative 
review. Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act establishes a preference to 
avoid using rates which are zero, de minimis, or based entirely on 
facts available (FA) in calculating an all-others rate. Accordingly, 
Commerce's practice in administrative reviews has been to average the 
weighted-average dumping margins for the companies selected for 
individual examination in the annual review, excluding rates that are 
zero, de minimis, or based entirely on FA.\5\ For these final results 
of review, we calculated a weighted-average dumping margin for La 
Molisana that is above de minimis and not based entirely on FA. 
Therefore, consistent with our practice, we have assigned the companies 
not selected for individual examination the weighted-average dumping 
margin calculated for La Molisana.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See, e.g., Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof from France, 
Germany, Italy, Japan, and the United Kingdom: Final Results of 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Reviews and Rescission of Reviews in 
Part, 73 FR 52823, 52824 (September 11, 2008), and accompanying 
Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment 16.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Final Results of the Review

    Commerce determines that the following weighted-average dumping 
margin exists for the period July 1, 2018, through June 30, 2019:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               Weighted-
                                                                average
                    Exporter or producer                        dumping
                                                                margin
                                                               (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ghigi 1870 S.p.A., Pasta Zara S.p.A.........................       91.76
La Molisana S.p.A...........................................       15.72
Review-Specific Average Rate Applicable to the Following
 Companies:
  F. Divella S.p.A..........................................       15.72
  Liguori Pastificio dal 1820 S.p.A.........................       15.72
  Newlat Food S.p.A.........................................       15.72
  Pastificio Di Martino Gaetano e Flli S.p.A................       15.72
  Pastificio Fratelli DeLuca S.r.l..........................       15.72
  Pastificio Rey S.r.L......................................       15.72
  Rummo S.p.A...............................................       15.72
  Tesa S.r.L................................................       15.72
  Valdigrano di Flavio Pagani S.r.L.........................       15.72
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Assessment Rate

    Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the Act, and 19 CFR 
351.212(b)(1), Commerce shall determine, and U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate 
entries covered by this review.
    Commerce has calculated importer-specific antidumping duty 
assessment rates. For La Molisana, we calculated importer-specific 
antidumping duty assessment rates by aggregating the total amount of 
dumping calculated for the examined sales of each importer and dividing 
each of these amounts by the total entered value associated with those 
sales. Where either the respondent's weighted-average dumping margin is 
zero or de minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), or an 
importer-specific assessment rate is zero or de minimis, we will 
instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to 
antidumping duties.

[[Page 28338]]

    For entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by La 
Molisana where the producer did not know its merchandise was destined 
for the United States, or for entries associated with Pasta Berruto, 
who had no shipments during the POR, we will instruct CBP to liquidate 
unreviewed suspended entries, consistent with the reseller policy, at 
the all-others rate if there is no rate for the intermediate 
company(ies) involved in the transaction.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ For a full discussion of this practice, see Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 
68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The assessment rate for antidumping duties for Ghigi/Zara, as well 
as for each of the companies not selected for individual examination, 
will be equal to the weighted-average dumping margin identified above 
in the Final Results of Review.
    Consistent with its recent notice,\7\ Commerce intends to issue 
assessment instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 days after the date 
of publication of the final results of this review in the Federal 
Register. If a timely summons is filed at the U.S. Court of 
International Trade, the assessment instructions will direct CBP not to 
liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties to file a request 
for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within 90 days of 
publication).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See Notice of Discontinuation of Policy to Issue Liquidation 
Instructions After 15 Days in Applicable Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Administrative Proceedings, 86 FR 3995 (January 
15, 2021).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective for all 
shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from 
warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the 
final results of this administrative review, as provided by section 
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rates for the companies 
identified above in the Final Results of Review will be equal to the 
company-specific weighted-average dumping margin established in the 
final results of this administrative review; (2) for merchandise 
exported by a company not covered in this administrative review but 
covered in a completed prior segment of the proceeding, the cash 
deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published 
for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding; (3) if the 
exporter is not a firm covered in this review or completed prior 
segment of this proceeding but the producer is, the cash deposit rate 
will be the company-specific rate established for the most recently-
completed segment of this proceeding for the producer of the subject 
merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other producers or 
exporters will continue to be 15.45 percent, the all-others rate 
established in the section 129 determination.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Implementation of the Findings of the WTO Panel in 
U.S.-- Zeroing (EC): Notice of Determinations Under Section 129 of 
the Uruguay Round Agreements Act and Revocations and Partial 
Revocations of Certain Antidumping Duty Orders, 72 FR 25261 (May 4, 
2007).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in 
effect until further notice.

Notification to Importers

    This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties and/or countervailing 
duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this POR. 
Failure to comply with this requirement could result in Commerce's 
presumption that reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing 
duties has occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping 
duties.

Administrative Protective Order

    This notice also serves as a final reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information 
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 
continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of 
the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or 
destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective 
order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and 
the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.

Notification to Interested Parties

    We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with 
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5) 
and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(1).

    Dated: May 20, 2021.
Christian Marsh,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum

I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Changes Since the Preliminary Results
V. Discussion of the Issues
    Comment 1: Protein Content
    Comment 2: Revisions to La Molisana's Cost Reporting
    Comment 3: Model Match for La Molisana's Tri-Color Pasta
    Comment 4: Alternative Comparison Methodology
    Comment 5: Price of La Molisana's Private Label Pasta
    Comment 6: Application of Total AFA to Ghigi/Zara
    Comment 7: Collapsing Ghigi/Zara
VI. Recommendation

[FR Doc. 2021-11133 Filed 5-25-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P