Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Modify the NYSE Arca Options Fee Schedule, 28178-28181 [2021-10958]
Download as PDF
28178
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 99 / Tuesday, May 25, 2021 / Notices
Capital Raise is consistent with the
Exchange Act.
IV. Conclusion
For the foregoing reasons, the
Commission finds that the proposed
rule change, as modified by Amendment
No. 2, is consistent with the Exchange
Act and the rules and regulations
thereunder applicable to a national
securities exchange.
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Exchange Act,94
that the proposed rule change (SR–
NASDAQ–2020–057), as modified by
Amendment No. 2 thereto, be, and it
hereby is, approved.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.95
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021–10968 Filed 5–24–21; 8:45 am]
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE
Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change To Modify the NYSE Arca
Options Fee Schedule
May 19, 2021.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3
notice is hereby given that, on May 12,
2021, NYSE Arca, Inc. (‘‘NYSE Arca’’ or
the ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(the ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and
III below, which Items have been
prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of,
and basis for, the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
The Exchange has prepared summaries,
set forth in sections A, B, and C below,
of the most significant parts of such
statements.
1. Purpose
[Release No. 34–91936; No. SR–NYSEArca–
2021–41]
The Exchange proposes to modify the
NYSE Arca Options Fee Schedule (‘‘Fee
Schedule’’) to adopt a new incentive
program for Floor Brokers. The
Exchange proposes to implement the fee
The purpose of this filing is to modify
the Fee Schedule to introduce the Floor
Broker Professional Customer Manual
Program (the ‘‘Program’’), a new
incentive program intended to
encourage Floor Brokers to increase
their Professional Customer billable
volume on the Exchange.5
Specifically, the Exchange proposes
that the Program would offer Floor
Brokers a credit of $0.13 on each
billable Professional Customer contract
that exceeds a baseline average daily
volume (‘‘ADV’’) for the month, as
specified below.
The Exchange proposes to implement
the rule change on May 12, 2021. The
Exchange further proposes that the
Program expire at the close of business
on June 30, 2021.
Proposed Rule Change
As proposed, the Program would
provide that a Floor Broker would earn
a credit of $0.13 per contract (the
‘‘Credit’’) for Professional Customer
volume in each month that the Floor
Broker achieves certain Professional
Customer ADV in billable ADV. The
Exchanges proposes that the calculation
of Professional Customer ADV for
purposes of the Program will include
Manual executions by a Floor Broker on
4 The Exchange originally filed to amend the Fee
Schedule on May 3, 2021 (SR–NYSEArca–2021–35)
and withdrew such filing on May 12, 2021.
5 See proposed Fee Schedule, FB
PROFESSIONAL CUSTOMER MANUAL
PROGRAM.
94 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 15 U.S.C. 78a.
3 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
95 17
18:09 May 24, 2021
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
change effective May 12, 2021.4 The
proposed rule change is available on the
Exchange’s website at www.nyse.com, at
the principal office of the Exchange, and
at the Commission’s Public Reference
Room.
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00126
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
behalf of a Professional Customer, but
exclude any Professional Customer QCC
volume, Firm Facilitation trades, and
any volume calculated to achieve the
Strategy Execution Fee Cap (regardless
of whether the cap is achieved).6 That
is, any volume (or contract side) for
which a Floor Broker is (potentially) not
billed, including because of monthly fee
caps, would not count towards
qualifying for the Program because Floor
Brokers are already eligible for
incentives to execute such transactions.
To qualify for the proposed Program,
a Floor Broker must execute 60% over
the greater of:
(i) 20,000 ADV in contract sides, or
(ii) the Floor Broker’s Professional
Customer Manual Transaction ADV in
contract sides during the second half of
2020 (i.e., July–December 2020).7
The Exchange believes that a
qualifying threshold of 60% over 20,000
contract sides in Professional Customer
Manual Transaction ADV is reasonable
for a Floor Broker, including one that
may be new to the Exchange, to achieve
based on the volume executed by Floor
Brokers in 2020. Similarly, the
Exchange believes that the alternative
threshold of a 60% increase over a Floor
Broker’s Professional Customer Manual
Transaction ADV in contract sides
during the second half of 2020 is
reasonable for those Floor Brokers that
achieve more than 20,000 ADV billable
contract sides, given the increased
options volume executed by Floor
Brokers in the past year.
The Exchange believes the proposed
Credit would encourage Floor Brokers to
seek out, and increase, Professional
Customer order flow for execution on
the Exchange. The Exchange’s fees are
constrained by intermarket competition,
as OTP Holders and OTP Firms
(collectively, ‘‘OTP Holders’’) may
direct their order flow to any of the 16
options exchanges, including those that
may offer similar incentives. Thus, OTP
Holders have a choice of where they
direct their order flow. Fees and credits
for Floor Broker activity are designed to
encourage Floor Brokers to execute a
variety of transaction types on the
Exchange, and the Program is intended
to augment those fees and credits by
offering an incentive to encourage the
execution of Professional Customer
billable volume. The Exchange notes
that all market participants stand to
benefit from any increase in billable
volume by Floor Brokers, which
promotes market depth, facilitates
tighter spreads, and enhances price
discovery, and may lead to a
6 See
7 See
E:\FR\FM\25MYN1.SGM
id.
id.
25MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 99 / Tuesday, May 25, 2021 / Notices
corresponding increase in order flow
from other market participants.
The Exchange proposes that the
Program expire at the close of business
on June 30, 2021 because, among other
reasons, the Exchange cannot predict
with certainty whether the proposed
Program will achieve its intended goal
of incentivizing Floor Brokers to
increase their Professional Customer
billable volume on the Exchange.
However, the Exchange notes that all
Floor Brokers have the opportunity to
qualify for the Credit available through
the Program, and the Exchange believes
that the proposed alternative thresholds
to qualify for the Credit are attainable by
Floor Brokers, as described above.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
Section 6(b) of the Act,8 in general, and
furthers the objectives of Sections
6(b)(4) and (5) of the Act,9 in particular,
because it provides for the equitable
allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and
other charges among its members,
issuers and other persons using its
facilities and does not unfairly
discriminate between customers,
issuers, brokers or dealers.
The Proposed Rule Change Is
Reasonable
The Exchange operates in a highly
competitive market. The Commission
has repeatedly expressed its preference
for competition over regulatory
intervention in determining prices,
products, and services in the securities
markets. In Regulation NMS, the
Commission highlighted the importance
of market forces in determining prices
and SRO revenues and, also, recognized
that current regulation of the market
system ‘‘has been remarkably successful
in promoting market competition in its
broader forms that are most important to
investors and listed companies.’’ 10
There are currently 16 registered
options exchanges competing for order
flow. Based on publicly-available
information, and excluding index-based
options, no single exchange has more
than 16% of the market share of
executed volume of multiply-listed
equity and ETF options trades.11
Therefore, currently no exchange
8 15
U.S.C. 78f(b).
U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
10 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808
(June 9, 2005), 70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005)
(S7–10–04) (‘‘Reg NMS Adopting Release’’).
11 The OCC publishes options and futures volume
in a variety of formats, including daily and monthly
volume by exchange, available here: https://
www.theocc.com/Market-Data/Market-DataReports/Volume-and-Open-Interest/MonthlyWeekly-Volume-Statistics.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
9 15
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:09 May 24, 2021
Jkt 253001
possesses significant pricing power in
the execution of multiply-listed equity &
ETF options order flow. More
specifically, in March 2021, the
Exchange had less than 11% market
share of executed volume of multiplylisted equity & ETF options trades.12
The Exchange believes that the evershifting market share among the
exchanges from month to month
demonstrates that market participants
can shift order flow or discontinue or
reduce use of certain categories of
products, in response to fee changes.
Accordingly, competitive forces
constrain options exchange transaction
fees. Stated otherwise, changes to
exchange transaction fees can have a
direct effect on the ability of an
exchange to compete for order flow.
The Exchange believes that the
proposed Program, which offers two
alternative methods to qualify, is
reasonable because it is designed to
incent Floor Brokers to increase the
amount of Professional Customer
billable order flow directed to the
Exchange. The Exchange notes that all
market participants stand to benefit
from any increase in billable volume by
Floor Brokers, which promotes market
depth, facilitates tighter spreads and
enhances price discovery, and may lead
to a corresponding increase in order
flow from other market participants.
The Exchange’s fees and credits for
Floor Broker activity are designed to
encourage Floor Brokers to execute a
variety of transaction types on the
Exchange, and the Program is intended
to augment those fees and credits with
an incentive to encourage Floor Brokers
to execute Professional Customer
billable volume. The Exchange believes
it is reasonable to only include
Professional Customer transactions for
which a Floor Broker is billed in the
calculation of eligible volume for the
Program because Floor Brokers are
already incented to execute transactions
for which there is no charge (e.g., Firm
Facilitation trades) or those on which
monthly fees are capped (e.g., the
Strategy Execution Fee Cap).
Finally, to the extent the proposed
Program attracts greater volume and
liquidity, the Exchange believes the
proposed change would improve the
Exchange’s overall competitiveness and
strengthen its market quality for all
market participants. In the backdrop of
the competitive environment in which
the Exchange operates, the proposed
12 Based on OCC data for monthly volume of
equity-based options and monthly volume of ETFbased options, see id., the Exchange’s market share
in equity-based options decreased slightly from
11.10% for the month of March 2020 to 10.16% for
the month of March 2021.
PO 00000
Frm 00127
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
28179
rule change is a reasonable attempt by
the Exchange to increase the depth of its
market and improve its market share
relative to its competitors. The proposed
rule change is designed to incent OTP
Holders to direct liquidity to the
Exchange, thereby promoting market
depth, price discovery and
improvement and enhancing order
execution opportunities for market
participants.
The Proposed Rule Change Is an
Equitable Allocation of Credits and Fees
The Exchange believes the proposed
rule change is an equitable allocation of
its fees and credits. The proposal is
based on the amount and type of
business transacted on the Exchange,
and Floor Brokers can opt to attempt to
trade sufficient volume to qualify for the
Credit or not. All Floor Brokers have the
opportunity to qualify for the same
Credit under two alternatives means
offered (i.e., the greater of at least 60%
over 20,000 contract sides in
Professional Customer Manual billable
ADV or a 60% increase over the Floor
Broker’s Professional Customer Manual
billable ADV in contract sides during
the second half of 2020).
Moreover, the proposed Credit is
designed to incent Floor Brokers to
encourage OTP Holders to aggregate
their executions—particularly
Professional Customer billable
volume—at the Exchange as a primary
execution venue. To the extent that the
proposed change attracts more
Professional Customer billable volume
to the Exchange, this increased order
flow would continue to make the
Exchange a more competitive venue for,
among other things, order execution.
Thus, the Exchange believes the
proposed rule change would improve
market quality for all market
participants on the Exchange and, as a
consequence, attract more order flow to
the Exchange thereby improving marketwide quality and price discovery.
The Proposed Rule Change Is Not
Unfairly Discriminatory
The Exchange believes that the
proposed change is not unfairly
discriminatory because the Program and
Credit thereunder would be available to
all Floor Brokers on an equal and nondiscriminatory basis. The proposed
Program is not unfairly discriminatory
to non-Floor Brokers because it is
intended to encourage the important
role performed by Floor Brokers in
facilitating the execution of orders via
open outcry and providing
opportunities to obtain price
improvement, a function which the
E:\FR\FM\25MYN1.SGM
25MYN1
28180
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 99 / Tuesday, May 25, 2021 / Notices
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Exchange wishes to support for the
benefit of all market participants.
The proposed Program is also based
on the amount and type of business
transacted on the Exchange, and Floor
Brokers are not obligated to try to
qualify for the Program. Rather, the
proposed Program is designed to
encourage these participants to utilize
the Exchange as a primary trading venue
(if they have not done so previously) or
increase Professional Customer Manual
billable volume sent to the Exchange. To
the extent that the proposed change
attracts more order flow to the Exchange
(and, specifically, to the Floor), this
increased order flow would continue to
make the Exchange a more competitive
venue for order execution. Thus, the
Exchange believes the proposed rule
change would improve market quality
for all market participants on the
Exchange and, as a consequence, attract
more order flow to the Exchange thereby
improving market-wide quality and
price discovery. The resulting increased
volume and liquidity would provide
more trading opportunities and tighter
spreads to all market participants and
thus would promote just and equitable
principles of trade, remove
impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system and, in
general, protect investors and the public
interest.
Finally, the Exchange believes that it
is subject to significant competitive
forces, as described below in the
Exchange’s statement regarding the
burden on competition.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
In accordance with Section 6(b)(8) of
the Act, the Exchange does not believe
that the proposed rule change would
impose any burden on competition that
is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
Instead, as discussed above, the
Exchange believes that the proposed
changes would be consistent with
charges for similar business at other
markets. As a result, the Exchange
believes that the proposed changes
further the Commission’s goal in
adopting Regulation NMS of fostering
integrated competition among orders,
which promotes ‘‘more efficient pricing
of individual stocks for all types of
orders, large and small.’’ 13
Intramarket Competition. The
proposed Credit is designed to assist
Floor Brokers in (continuing to) attract
additional Professional Customer order
13 See
Reg NMS Adopting Release, supra note 10,
at 37499.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:09 May 24, 2021
Jkt 253001
flow to the Exchange, and, specifically,
to the Floor, which would enhance the
quality of quoting and may increase the
volumes of contracts traded on the
Exchange. To the extent that the
proposed change imposes an additional
competitive burden on non-Floor
Brokers, the Exchange believes that
offering an incentive to Floor Brokers
via the proposed Program does not
constitute an undue burden on
competition in light of Floor Brokers’
role in facilitating the execution of
orders via open outcry and providing
market participants with opportunities
for price improvement.
To the extent that this function is
achieved, all of the Exchange’s market
participants should benefit from the
improved market liquidity. Enhanced
market quality and increased
transaction volume that results from the
anticipated increase in order flow
directed to the Exchange will benefit all
market participants and improve
competition on the Exchange.
Intermarket Competition. The
Exchange operates in a highly
competitive market in which market
participants can readily favor one of the
16 competing option exchanges if they
deem fee levels at a particular venue to
be excessive. In such an environment,
the Exchange must continually adjust its
fees to remain competitive with other
exchanges and to attract order flow to
the Exchange Based on publiclyavailable information, and excluding
index-based options, no single exchange
currently has more than 16% of the
market share of executed volume of
multiply-listed equity and ETF options
trades.14 Therefore, no exchange
currently possesses significant pricing
power in the execution of multiplylisted equity & ETF options order flow.
More specifically, in March 2021, the
Exchange had less than 11% market
share of executed volume of multiplylisted equity & ETF options trades.15
The Exchange believes that the
proposed Credit reflects this
competitive environment because it
modifies the Exchange’s fees in a
manner designed to incent Floor
Brokers to direct trading interest to the
Exchange, to provide liquidity and to
attract order flow. To the extent that this
purpose is achieved, all the Exchange’s
market participants should benefit from
the improved market quality and
14 See
supra note 11.
on OCC data for monthly volume of
equity-based options and monthly volume of ETFbased options, supra note 11, the Exchange’s market
share in equity-based options decreased slightly
from 11.10% for the month of March 2020 to
10.16% for the month of March 2021.
15 Based
PO 00000
Frm 00128
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
increased opportunities for price
improvement.
The Exchange notes that it operates in
a highly competitive market in which
market participants can readily favor
competing venues. In such an
environment, the Exchange must
continually review, and consider
adjusting, its fees and credits to remain
competitive with other exchanges. For
the reasons described above, the
Exchange believes that the proposed
rule change reflects this competitive
environment. The Exchange also
believes that the proposed change could
promote competition between the
Exchange and other execution venues
by encouraging additional orders to be
sent to the Exchange (and, specifically,
to the Floor) for execution.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited
or received with respect to the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change is effective
upon filing pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) 16 of the Act and
subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b–4 17
thereunder, because it establishes a due,
fee, or other charge imposed by the
Exchange.
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of such proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
under Section 19(b)(2)(B) 18 of the Act to
determine whether the proposed rule
change should be approved or
disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
16 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
18 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
17 17
E:\FR\FM\25MYN1.SGM
25MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 99 / Tuesday, May 25, 2021 / Notices
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
NYSEArca–2021–41 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSEArca–2021–41. This
file number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549 on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change.
Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from
comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish
to make available publicly.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSEArca–2021–41, and
should be submitted on or before June
15, 2021.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.19
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021–10958 Filed 5–24–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
19 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:09 May 24, 2021
Jkt 253001
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–91935; File No. SR–OCC–
2021–004]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; The
Options Clearing Corporation; Order
Granting Approval of Proposed Rule
Change Relating to Revisions to OCC’s
Auction Participation Requirements
May 19, 2021.
I. Introduction
On March 19, 2021, the Options
Clearing Corporation (‘‘OCC’’) filed with
the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change SR–OCC–2021–
004 (‘‘Proposed Rule Change’’) pursuant
to Section 19(b) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Exchange
Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 2 thereunder to
amend the auction participation
requirements set forth in Interpretation
and Policy (‘‘I&P’’) .02(c) to OCC Rule
1104 (Creation of Liquidating
Settlement Account).3 The Proposed
Rule Change was published for public
comment in the Federal Register on
April 6, 2021.4 The Commission has
received no comments regarding the
Proposed Rule Change. This order
approves the Proposed Rule Change.
II. Background
The Proposed Rule Change by OCC
would change I&P .02(c) to OCC Rule
1104 in order to clarify and streamline
the process of on-boarding Clearing
Members and non-Clearing Members as
potential bidders in future auctions of a
suspended Clearing Member’s
remaining portfolio.
Under OCC’s current Rules, following
the suspension of any Clearing Member,
OCC may take a number of steps
designed to reasonably ensure that the
Clearing Member’s suspension is
managed in an orderly fashion. Such
steps may include liquidating the
remaining collateral, open positions,
and/or exercised/matured contracts (i.e.,
the remaining portfolio) of the
suspended Clearing Member. I&P .02(a)
to OCC Rule 1104 clarifies that OCC
‘‘may elect to use one or more private
auctions to liquidate all or any part’’ of
a suspended Clearing Member’s
remaining portfolio. In this context, the
term ‘‘private auction’’ means an
auction open to bidders who are invited
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 See Notice of Filing infra note 4, 86 FR 17868.
4 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 91445
(Mar. 31, 2021), 86 FR 17868 (Apr. 6, 2021) (File
No. SR–OCC–2021–004) (‘‘Notice of Filing’’).
2 17
PO 00000
Frm 00129
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
28181
by OCC and in which such bidders
submit bids on a confidential basis.5
I&P .02(c) to Rule 1104 establishes
certain basic requirements for the
prequalification of bidders who may
participate in OCC’s private auction
process. I&P .02(c) states that OCC ‘‘will
invite all Clearing Members to apply to
become pre-qualified auction bidders’’
and that ‘‘[a]ny Clearing Member may be
included in the pool of pre-qualified
auction bidders by completing required
auction documentation in advance.’’
Further, I&P .02(c) states that ‘‘[b]y
posting notices on the [OCC]’s website
from time to time, [OCC] will also invite
non-Clearing Members to apply to
become pre-qualified auction bidders.’’
I&P .02(c) establishes that for a nonClearing Member to be pre-qualified as
an auction bidder, it ‘‘must (i) actively
trade in the asset class in which it
proposes to submit bids, (ii) actively
trade in markets cleared by [OCC], (iii)
be sponsored by, and submit its bids
through, a Clearing Member that has
agreed to guarantee and settle any
accepted bid made by such non-Clearing
Member and (iv) complete required
auction documentation in advance.’’ I&P
.02(c) also states that OCC ‘‘will
endeavor to maintain a pool of prequalified auction bidders by
periodically reviewing such bidders and
their qualifications’’ and that OCC ‘‘will
promptly notify any pre-qualified
auction bidder removed from the pool of
pre-qualified auction bidders.’’
OCC proposes to revise I&P .02(c) to
eliminate the requirement that Clearing
Members must first be invited by OCC
before Clearing Members may apply to
become pre-qualified auction bidders.
Instead, the revised language in I&P
.02(c) would state that all Clearing
Members are invited to participate in
auctions of a suspended Clearing
Member’s remaining portfolio. The
proposed revisions would retain the
current requirement that, in order for a
Clearing Member to be pre-qualified as
an auction bidder, the Clearing Member
would need to complete any required
auction documentation in advance.
OCC also proposes to revise I&P .02(c)
to reflect that non-Clearing Members, in
order to become pre-qualified auction
bidders, would no longer need OCC to
post invitation notices to its website
from time to time. The proposed
revisions to I&P .02(c) would also
remove the existing requirements that a
non-Clearing Member must actively
trade in the asset class in which it
proposes to submit bids and must
actively trade in markets cleared by
5 Interpretation and Policy .02(a) to OCC Rule
1104.
E:\FR\FM\25MYN1.SGM
25MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 99 (Tuesday, May 25, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28178-28181]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-10958]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-91936; No. SR-NYSEArca-2021-41]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Modify the NYSE
Arca Options Fee Schedule
May 19, 2021.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the ``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby
given that, on May 12, 2021, NYSE Arca, Inc. (``NYSE Arca'' or the
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
\3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to modify the NYSE Arca Options Fee Schedule
(``Fee Schedule'') to adopt a new incentive program for Floor Brokers.
The Exchange proposes to implement the fee change effective May 12,
2021.\4\ The proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
website at www.nyse.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and
at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ The Exchange originally filed to amend the Fee Schedule on
May 3, 2021 (SR-NYSEArca-2021-35) and withdrew such filing on May
12, 2021.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The purpose of this filing is to modify the Fee Schedule to
introduce the Floor Broker Professional Customer Manual Program (the
``Program''), a new incentive program intended to encourage Floor
Brokers to increase their Professional Customer billable volume on the
Exchange.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See proposed Fee Schedule, FB PROFESSIONAL CUSTOMER MANUAL
PROGRAM.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Specifically, the Exchange proposes that the Program would offer
Floor Brokers a credit of $0.13 on each billable Professional Customer
contract that exceeds a baseline average daily volume (``ADV'') for the
month, as specified below.
The Exchange proposes to implement the rule change on May 12, 2021.
The Exchange further proposes that the Program expire at the close of
business on June 30, 2021.
Proposed Rule Change
As proposed, the Program would provide that a Floor Broker would
earn a credit of $0.13 per contract (the ``Credit'') for Professional
Customer volume in each month that the Floor Broker achieves certain
Professional Customer ADV in billable ADV. The Exchanges proposes that
the calculation of Professional Customer ADV for purposes of the
Program will include Manual executions by a Floor Broker on behalf of a
Professional Customer, but exclude any Professional Customer QCC
volume, Firm Facilitation trades, and any volume calculated to achieve
the Strategy Execution Fee Cap (regardless of whether the cap is
achieved).\6\ That is, any volume (or contract side) for which a Floor
Broker is (potentially) not billed, including because of monthly fee
caps, would not count towards qualifying for the Program because Floor
Brokers are already eligible for incentives to execute such
transactions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To qualify for the proposed Program, a Floor Broker must execute
60% over the greater of:
(i) 20,000 ADV in contract sides, or
(ii) the Floor Broker's Professional Customer Manual Transaction
ADV in contract sides during the second half of 2020 (i.e., July-
December 2020).\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that a qualifying threshold of 60% over
20,000 contract sides in Professional Customer Manual Transaction ADV
is reasonable for a Floor Broker, including one that may be new to the
Exchange, to achieve based on the volume executed by Floor Brokers in
2020. Similarly, the Exchange believes that the alternative threshold
of a 60% increase over a Floor Broker's Professional Customer Manual
Transaction ADV in contract sides during the second half of 2020 is
reasonable for those Floor Brokers that achieve more than 20,000 ADV
billable contract sides, given the increased options volume executed by
Floor Brokers in the past year.
The Exchange believes the proposed Credit would encourage Floor
Brokers to seek out, and increase, Professional Customer order flow for
execution on the Exchange. The Exchange's fees are constrained by
intermarket competition, as OTP Holders and OTP Firms (collectively,
``OTP Holders'') may direct their order flow to any of the 16 options
exchanges, including those that may offer similar incentives. Thus, OTP
Holders have a choice of where they direct their order flow. Fees and
credits for Floor Broker activity are designed to encourage Floor
Brokers to execute a variety of transaction types on the Exchange, and
the Program is intended to augment those fees and credits by offering
an incentive to encourage the execution of Professional Customer
billable volume. The Exchange notes that all market participants stand
to benefit from any increase in billable volume by Floor Brokers, which
promotes market depth, facilitates tighter spreads, and enhances price
discovery, and may lead to a
[[Page 28179]]
corresponding increase in order flow from other market participants.
The Exchange proposes that the Program expire at the close of
business on June 30, 2021 because, among other reasons, the Exchange
cannot predict with certainty whether the proposed Program will achieve
its intended goal of incentivizing Floor Brokers to increase their
Professional Customer billable volume on the Exchange. However, the
Exchange notes that all Floor Brokers have the opportunity to qualify
for the Credit available through the Program, and the Exchange believes
that the proposed alternative thresholds to qualify for the Credit are
attainable by Floor Brokers, as described above.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b) of the Act,\8\ in general, and furthers the
objectives of Sections 6(b)(4) and (5) of the Act,\9\ in particular,
because it provides for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues,
fees, and other charges among its members, issuers and other persons
using its facilities and does not unfairly discriminate between
customers, issuers, brokers or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Proposed Rule Change Is Reasonable
The Exchange operates in a highly competitive market. The
Commission has repeatedly expressed its preference for competition over
regulatory intervention in determining prices, products, and services
in the securities markets. In Regulation NMS, the Commission
highlighted the importance of market forces in determining prices and
SRO revenues and, also, recognized that current regulation of the
market system ``has been remarkably successful in promoting market
competition in its broader forms that are most important to investors
and listed companies.'' \10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 (June 9,
2005), 70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005) (S7-10-04) (``Reg NMS
Adopting Release'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
There are currently 16 registered options exchanges competing for
order flow. Based on publicly-available information, and excluding
index-based options, no single exchange has more than 16% of the market
share of executed volume of multiply-listed equity and ETF options
trades.\11\ Therefore, currently no exchange possesses significant
pricing power in the execution of multiply-listed equity & ETF options
order flow. More specifically, in March 2021, the Exchange had less
than 11% market share of executed volume of multiply-listed equity &
ETF options trades.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ The OCC publishes options and futures volume in a variety
of formats, including daily and monthly volume by exchange,
available here: https://www.theocc.com/Market-Data/Market-Data-Reports/Volume-and-Open-Interest/Monthly-Weekly-Volume-Statistics.
\12\ Based on OCC data for monthly volume of equity-based
options and monthly volume of ETF-based options, see id., the
Exchange's market share in equity-based options decreased slightly
from 11.10% for the month of March 2020 to 10.16% for the month of
March 2021.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that the ever-shifting market share among the
exchanges from month to month demonstrates that market participants can
shift order flow or discontinue or reduce use of certain categories of
products, in response to fee changes. Accordingly, competitive forces
constrain options exchange transaction fees. Stated otherwise, changes
to exchange transaction fees can have a direct effect on the ability of
an exchange to compete for order flow.
The Exchange believes that the proposed Program, which offers two
alternative methods to qualify, is reasonable because it is designed to
incent Floor Brokers to increase the amount of Professional Customer
billable order flow directed to the Exchange. The Exchange notes that
all market participants stand to benefit from any increase in billable
volume by Floor Brokers, which promotes market depth, facilitates
tighter spreads and enhances price discovery, and may lead to a
corresponding increase in order flow from other market participants.
The Exchange's fees and credits for Floor Broker activity are
designed to encourage Floor Brokers to execute a variety of transaction
types on the Exchange, and the Program is intended to augment those
fees and credits with an incentive to encourage Floor Brokers to
execute Professional Customer billable volume. The Exchange believes it
is reasonable to only include Professional Customer transactions for
which a Floor Broker is billed in the calculation of eligible volume
for the Program because Floor Brokers are already incented to execute
transactions for which there is no charge (e.g., Firm Facilitation
trades) or those on which monthly fees are capped (e.g., the Strategy
Execution Fee Cap).
Finally, to the extent the proposed Program attracts greater volume
and liquidity, the Exchange believes the proposed change would improve
the Exchange's overall competitiveness and strengthen its market
quality for all market participants. In the backdrop of the competitive
environment in which the Exchange operates, the proposed rule change is
a reasonable attempt by the Exchange to increase the depth of its
market and improve its market share relative to its competitors. The
proposed rule change is designed to incent OTP Holders to direct
liquidity to the Exchange, thereby promoting market depth, price
discovery and improvement and enhancing order execution opportunities
for market participants.
The Proposed Rule Change Is an Equitable Allocation of Credits and Fees
The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is an equitable
allocation of its fees and credits. The proposal is based on the amount
and type of business transacted on the Exchange, and Floor Brokers can
opt to attempt to trade sufficient volume to qualify for the Credit or
not. All Floor Brokers have the opportunity to qualify for the same
Credit under two alternatives means offered (i.e., the greater of at
least 60% over 20,000 contract sides in Professional Customer Manual
billable ADV or a 60% increase over the Floor Broker's Professional
Customer Manual billable ADV in contract sides during the second half
of 2020).
Moreover, the proposed Credit is designed to incent Floor Brokers
to encourage OTP Holders to aggregate their executions--particularly
Professional Customer billable volume--at the Exchange as a primary
execution venue. To the extent that the proposed change attracts more
Professional Customer billable volume to the Exchange, this increased
order flow would continue to make the Exchange a more competitive venue
for, among other things, order execution. Thus, the Exchange believes
the proposed rule change would improve market quality for all market
participants on the Exchange and, as a consequence, attract more order
flow to the Exchange thereby improving market-wide quality and price
discovery.
The Proposed Rule Change Is Not Unfairly Discriminatory
The Exchange believes that the proposed change is not unfairly
discriminatory because the Program and Credit thereunder would be
available to all Floor Brokers on an equal and non-discriminatory
basis. The proposed Program is not unfairly discriminatory to non-Floor
Brokers because it is intended to encourage the important role
performed by Floor Brokers in facilitating the execution of orders via
open outcry and providing opportunities to obtain price improvement, a
function which the
[[Page 28180]]
Exchange wishes to support for the benefit of all market participants.
The proposed Program is also based on the amount and type of
business transacted on the Exchange, and Floor Brokers are not
obligated to try to qualify for the Program. Rather, the proposed
Program is designed to encourage these participants to utilize the
Exchange as a primary trading venue (if they have not done so
previously) or increase Professional Customer Manual billable volume
sent to the Exchange. To the extent that the proposed change attracts
more order flow to the Exchange (and, specifically, to the Floor), this
increased order flow would continue to make the Exchange a more
competitive venue for order execution. Thus, the Exchange believes the
proposed rule change would improve market quality for all market
participants on the Exchange and, as a consequence, attract more order
flow to the Exchange thereby improving market-wide quality and price
discovery. The resulting increased volume and liquidity would provide
more trading opportunities and tighter spreads to all market
participants and thus would promote just and equitable principles of
trade, remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market system and, in general, protect
investors and the public interest.
Finally, the Exchange believes that it is subject to significant
competitive forces, as described below in the Exchange's statement
regarding the burden on competition.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
In accordance with Section 6(b)(8) of the Act, the Exchange does
not believe that the proposed rule change would impose any burden on
competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. Instead, as discussed above, the Exchange believes
that the proposed changes would be consistent with charges for similar
business at other markets. As a result, the Exchange believes that the
proposed changes further the Commission's goal in adopting Regulation
NMS of fostering integrated competition among orders, which promotes
``more efficient pricing of individual stocks for all types of orders,
large and small.'' \13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ See Reg NMS Adopting Release, supra note 10, at 37499.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Intramarket Competition. The proposed Credit is designed to assist
Floor Brokers in (continuing to) attract additional Professional
Customer order flow to the Exchange, and, specifically, to the Floor,
which would enhance the quality of quoting and may increase the volumes
of contracts traded on the Exchange. To the extent that the proposed
change imposes an additional competitive burden on non-Floor Brokers,
the Exchange believes that offering an incentive to Floor Brokers via
the proposed Program does not constitute an undue burden on competition
in light of Floor Brokers' role in facilitating the execution of orders
via open outcry and providing market participants with opportunities
for price improvement.
To the extent that this function is achieved, all of the Exchange's
market participants should benefit from the improved market liquidity.
Enhanced market quality and increased transaction volume that results
from the anticipated increase in order flow directed to the Exchange
will benefit all market participants and improve competition on the
Exchange.
Intermarket Competition. The Exchange operates in a highly
competitive market in which market participants can readily favor one
of the 16 competing option exchanges if they deem fee levels at a
particular venue to be excessive. In such an environment, the Exchange
must continually adjust its fees to remain competitive with other
exchanges and to attract order flow to the Exchange Based on publicly-
available information, and excluding index-based options, no single
exchange currently has more than 16% of the market share of executed
volume of multiply-listed equity and ETF options trades.\14\ Therefore,
no exchange currently possesses significant pricing power in the
execution of multiply-listed equity & ETF options order flow. More
specifically, in March 2021, the Exchange had less than 11% market
share of executed volume of multiply-listed equity & ETF options
trades.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ See supra note 11.
\15\ Based on OCC data for monthly volume of equity-based
options and monthly volume of ETF-based options, supra note 11, the
Exchange's market share in equity-based options decreased slightly
from 11.10% for the month of March 2020 to 10.16% for the month of
March 2021.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that the proposed Credit reflects this
competitive environment because it modifies the Exchange's fees in a
manner designed to incent Floor Brokers to direct trading interest to
the Exchange, to provide liquidity and to attract order flow. To the
extent that this purpose is achieved, all the Exchange's market
participants should benefit from the improved market quality and
increased opportunities for price improvement.
The Exchange notes that it operates in a highly competitive market
in which market participants can readily favor competing venues. In
such an environment, the Exchange must continually review, and consider
adjusting, its fees and credits to remain competitive with other
exchanges. For the reasons described above, the Exchange believes that
the proposed rule change reflects this competitive environment. The
Exchange also believes that the proposed change could promote
competition between the Exchange and other execution venues by
encouraging additional orders to be sent to the Exchange (and,
specifically, to the Floor) for execution.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change is effective upon filing pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A) \16\ of the Act and subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule
19b-4 \17\ thereunder, because it establishes a due, fee, or other
charge imposed by the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\17\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings under
Section 19(b)(2)(B) \18\ of the Act to determine whether the proposed
rule change should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
[[Page 28181]]
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-NYSEArca-2021-41 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEArca-2021-41. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEArca-2021-41,
and should be submitted on or before June 15, 2021.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-10958 Filed 5-24-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P