Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Fee Schedule, 27122-27126 [2021-10496]
Download as PDF
27122
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 95 / Wednesday, May 19, 2021 / Notices
The
United States Postal Service® hereby
gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C.
3642 and 3632(b)(3), on May 6, 2021, it
filed with the Postal Regulatory
Commission a USPS Request to Add
Priority Mail Contract 698 to
Competitive Product List. Documents
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket
Nos. MC2021–88, CP2021–91.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2021–10485 Filed 5–18–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710–12–P
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–91886; File No. SR–
CboeEDGX–2021–026]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe
EDGX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of a
Proposed Rule Change To Amend the
Fee Schedule
May 13, 2021.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on May 3,
2021, Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. (the
‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘EDGX’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been prepared
by the Exchange. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. (the
‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘EDGX’’) is filing with
the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) a
proposed rule change to amend the Fee
Schedule. The text of the proposed rule
change is provided in Exhibit 5.
The text of the proposed rule change
is also available on the Exchange’s
website (https://markets.cboe.com/us/
options/regulation/rule_filings/edgx/),
at the Exchange’s Office of the
Secretary, and at the Commission’s
Public Reference Room.
1 15
2 17
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:43 May 18, 2021
Jkt 253001
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend its
Fee Schedule applicable to its equities
trading platform (‘‘EDGX Equities’’) to
(1) modify the criteria of certain NonDisplayed Add Volume Tiers, (2)
modify and eliminate certain Retail
Volume Tiers, and (3) reduce the rate for
internalization for Members meeting a
certain volume threshold. The Exchange
proposes to implement the proposed
change to its Fee Schedule on May 3,
2021.
The Exchange first notes that it
operates in a highly competitive market
in which market participants can
readily direct order flow to competing
venues if they deem fee levels at a
particular venue to be excessive or
incentives to be insufficient. More
specifically, the Exchange is only one of
16 registered equities exchanges, as well
as a number of alternative trading
systems and other off-exchange venues
that do not have similar self-regulatory
responsibilities under the Exchange Act,
to which market participants may direct
their order flow. Based on publicly
available information,3 no single
registered equities exchange has more
than 15% of the market share. Thus, in
such a low-concentrated and highly
competitive market, no single equities
exchange possesses significant pricing
power in the execution of order flow.
The Exchange in particular operates a
‘‘Maker-Taker’’ model whereby it pays
rebates to members that add liquidity
and assesses fees to those that remove
liquidity. The Exchange’s Fee Schedule
sets forth the standard rebates and rates
applied per share for orders that provide
and remove liquidity, respectively.
3 See Cboe Global Markets, U.S. Equities Market
Volume Summary, Month-to-Date (April 26, 2021),
available at https://markets.cboe.com/us/equities/
market_statistics/.
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Additionally, in response to the
competitive environment, the Exchange
also offers tiered pricing which provides
Members opportunities to qualify for
higher rebates or reduced fees where
certain volume criteria and thresholds
are met. Tiered pricing provides an
incremental incentive for Members to
strive for higher tier levels, which
provides increasingly higher benefits or
discounts for satisfying increasingly
more stringent criteria.
Non-Displayed Add Volume Tiers
Pursuant to footnote 1 of the Fee
Schedule, the Exchange offers NonDisplayed Add Volume Tiers that
provide an enhanced rebate on
Members’ orders yielding fee codes
‘‘DM’’,4 ‘‘HA’’,5 ‘‘MM’’,6 and ‘‘RP’’ 7
where a Member reaches certain
required volume-based criteria offered
in each tier. Specifically, the criteria for
Non-Displayed Add Volume Tiers 1
through 3 are as follows:
• Tier 1 provides an enhanced
rebated of $0.0015 per share on
qualifying orders (i.e., orders yielding
fee code DM, HA, MM or RP) where a
Member has an ADAV 8 greater than or
equal to 0.01% of TCV 9 for NonDisplayed orders that yield fee codes
DM, HA, ‘‘HI’’,10 MM or RP.
• Tier 2 provides an enhanced
rebated of $0.0022 per share on
qualifying orders (i.e., orders yielding
fee code DM, HA, MM or RP) where a
Member has an ADAV greater than or
equal to 0.05% of TCV for NonDisplayed orders that yield fee codes
DM, HA, HI, MM or RP.
• Tier 3 provides an enhanced
rebated of $0.0025 per share on
qualifying orders (i.e., orders yielding
fee code DM, HA, MM or RP) where a
Member has an ADAV greater than or
equal to 0.10% of TCV for NonDisplayed orders that yield fee codes
DM, HA, HI, MM or RP.
Now, the Exchange is proposing to
increase the ADAV thresholds for NonDisplayed Add Volume Tiers 1 and 2
4 ‘‘DM’’ is appended to orders that add liquidity
using MidPoint Discretionary order within
discretionary range.
5 ‘‘HA’’ is appended to non-displayed orders that
add liquidity.
6 ‘‘MM’’ is appended to non-displayed orders that
add liquidity using Mid-Point Peg.
7 ‘‘RP’’ is appended to non-displayed orders that
add liquidity using Supplemental Peg.
8 ‘‘ADAV’’ means average daily added volume
calculated as the number of shares added per day.
ADAV is calculated on a monthly basis.
9 ‘‘TCV’’ means total consolidated volume
calculated as the volume reported by all exchanges
and trade reporting facilities to a consolidated
transaction reporting plan for the month for which
the fees apply.
10 ‘‘HI’’ is appended to non-displayed orders that
receive price improvement and add liquidity.
E:\FR\FM\19MYN1.SGM
19MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 95 / Wednesday, May 19, 2021 / Notices
and add alternate criteria for Tiers 1
through 3. Specifically, the proposed
criteria for Non-Displayed Add Volume
Tiers 1 through 3 are as follows:
• Tier 1 would provide an enhanced
rebated of $0.0015 per share on
qualifying orders (i.e., orders yielding
fee code DM, HA, MM or RP) where a
Member has an ADAV greater than or
equal to 0.05% of TCV for NonDisplayed orders that yield fee codes
DM, HA, HI, MM or RP; or a Member
has an ADAV greater than or equal to
4,000,000 for Non-Displayed orders that
yield fee codes DM, HA, HI, MM, or RP.
• Tier 2 would provide an enhanced
rebated of $0.0022 per share on
qualifying orders (i.e., orders yielding
fee code DM, HA, MM or RP) where a
Member has an ADAV greater than or
equal to 0.08% of TCV for NonDisplayed orders that yield fee codes
DM, HA, HI, MM or RP; or a Member
has an ADAV greater than or equal to
7,000,000 for Non-Displayed orders that
yield fee codes DM, HA, HI, MM, or RP.
• Tier 3 would provide an enhanced
rebated of $0.0025 per share on
qualifying orders (i.e., orders yielding
fee code DM, HA, MM or RP) where a
Member has an ADAV greater than or
equal to 0.10% of TCV for NonDisplayed orders that yield fee codes
DM, HA, HI, MM or RP; or a Member
has an ADAV greater than or equal to
9,000,000 for Non-Displayed orders that
yield fee codes DM, HA, HI, MM, or RP.
The Exchange notes the NonDisplayed Add Volume Tiers, as
modified, continue to be available to all
Members and provide Members an
opportunity to receive an enhanced
rebate, albeit using more stringent
criteria. Moreover, the proposed
changes are designed to encourage
Members to increase non-displayed
liquidity on the Exchange, which
further contributes to a deeper, more
liquid market and provides even more
execution opportunities for active
market participants at improved prices.
Retail Volume Tiers
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Pursuant to footnote 3 of the Fee
Schedule, the Exchange currently offers
Retail Volume Tiers which provide
Retail Member Organizations
(‘‘RMOs’’) 11 an opportunity to receive
an enhanced rebate from the standard
rebate for Retail Orders 12 that add
11 A ‘‘Retail Member Organization’’ or ‘‘RMO’’ is
a Member (or a division thereof) that has been
approved by the Exchange under this Rule to
submit Retail Orders. See EDGX Rule 11.21(a)(1).
12 A ‘‘Retail Order’’ is an agency or riskless
principal order that meets the criteria of FINRA
Rule 5320.03 that originates from a natural person
and is submitted to the Exchange by a Retail
Member Organization, provided that no change is
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:43 May 18, 2021
Jkt 253001
liquidity (i.e., yielding fee code
‘‘ZA’’ 13). Currently, the Retail Volume
Tiers offer four levels of criteria
difficulty and incentive opportunities in
which RMOs may qualify for enhanced
rebates for Retail Orders. The tier
structure is designed to encourage
RMOs to increase their order flow in
order to receive an enhanced rebate on
their liquidity adding orders, and the
Exchange now proposes to amend
existing Retail Volume Tier 2. The
current Retail Volume Tier 2 provides
an enhanced rebate of $0.0036 per share
to Members that add a Retail Order
ADV 14 (i.e., yielding fee code ZA) equal
to or greater than 0.60% of the TCV.
Now, the Exchange proposes to increase
the rebate to $0.0037 and lessen the
Retail Order ADV threshold to 0.45%.
Thus, the proposed Retail Volume Tier
2 would provide an enhanced rebate of
$0.0037 per share to Members that add
a Retail Order ADV (i.e., yielding fee
code ZA) equal to or greater than 0.45%
of the TCV.
The Exchange also proposes to
eliminate Retail Volume Tier 4 as the
Exchange no longer wishes to, nor is it
required to, maintain such a tier.
Further, the Exchange would rather
redirect resources to proposed Retail
Volume Tier 2, which is intended to
incentivize increased order flow.
Internalization Rate
The Exchange proposes to amend
footnote 7, which provides a reduced
fee for internalization (i.e., orders
yielding fee codes ‘‘EA’’ 15 or ‘‘ER’’ 16).
An internalized trade is a trade where
the two orders inadvertently match
against each other and share the same
Market Participant Identifier (‘‘MPID’’).
Internalized trades (i.e., orders yielding
fee codes EA or ER) are charged a
standard fee of $0.00050 in securities
priced at or above $1.00 and 0.15% of
the dollar value in securities priced
below $1.00. Currently, footnote 7
provides a reduced fee of $0.0001 per
share per side for orders yielding fee
code EA or ER to Members that add an
ADV of at least 10,000,000 shares. Now,
made to the terms of the order with respect to price
or side of market and the order does not originate
from a trading algorithm or any other computerized
methodology. See EDGX Rule 11.21(a)(2).
13 Orders yielding fee code ‘‘ZA’’ are orders
routed to a non-exchange destination using the
ROUZ routing strategy.
14 ‘‘ADV’’ means average daily volume calculated
as the number of shares added to, removed from,
or routed by, the Exchange, or any combination or
subset thereof, per day. ADV is calculated on a
monthly basis.
15 Orders yielding fee code ‘‘EA’’ are
internalization orders that add displayed liquidity.
16 Orders yielding fee code ‘‘ER’’ are
internalization orders that remove displayed
liquidity.
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
27123
the Exchange proposes to eliminate the
fee for internalized trades meeting the
criteria provided under footnote 7.
Specifically, as proposed, footnote 7
would provide that if a Member adds an
ADV of at least 10,000,000 shares, then
the Member’s rate for internalization
(fee codes EA or ER) decreases to Free
per share per side, for securities priced
at, above, or below $1.00. The Exchange
believes the proposal is reasonable as it
is designed to incentivize Members (and
their customers) to send orders to the
Exchange that may otherwise be
internalized off exchange, which further
contributes to a deeper, more liquid
market and provide even more
execution opportunities for active
market participants at improved prices.
This overall increase in activity deepens
the Exchange’s liquidity pool, offers
additional cost savings, supports the
quality of price discovery, promotes
market transparency and improves
market quality, for all investors.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
the objectives of Section 6 of the Act,17
in general, and furthers the objectives of
Section 6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5),18 in
particular, as it is designed to provide
for the equitable allocation of reasonable
dues, fees and other charges among its
Members, issuers and other persons
using its facilities.
The Exchange operates in a highly
competitive market in which market
participants can readily direct order
flow to competing venues if they deem
fee levels at a particular venue to be
excessive or incentives to be
insufficient. The proposed rule changes
reflect a competitive pricing structure
designed to incentivize market
participants to direct their order flow to
the Exchange, which the Exchange
believes would enhance market quality
to the benefit of all Members. The
Exchange notes that relative volumebased incentives and discounts have
been widely adopted by exchanges,
including the Exchange, and are
reasonable, equitable and nondiscriminatory because they are open to
all members on an equal basis and
provide additional benefits or discounts
that are reasonably related to (i) the
value to an exchange’s market quality
and (ii) associated higher levels of
market activity, such as higher levels of
liquidity provision and/or growth
patterns. Competing equity exchanges
offer similar tiered pricing structures,
including schedules of rebates and fees
17 15
18 15
E:\FR\FM\19MYN1.SGM
U.S.C. 78f.
U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
19MYN1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
27124
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 95 / Wednesday, May 19, 2021 / Notices
that apply based upon members
achieving certain volume and/or growth
thresholds, as well as assess similar fees
or rebates for similar types of orders, to
that of the Exchange.
The Exchange believes the proposed
Non-Displayed Add Volume Tiers are
reasonable because each tier continues
to be available to all Members and
provide Members an opportunity to
receive an enhanced rebate, even as
modified. Additionally, as noted above,
the Exchange operates in a highly
competitive market. The Exchange is
only one of several equity venues to
which market participants may direct
their order flow, and it represents a
small percentage of the overall market.
It is also only one of several maker-taker
exchanges. Competing equity exchanges
offer similar tiered pricing structures to
that of the Exchange, including
schedules of rebates and fees that apply
based upon members achieving certain
volume thresholds. These competing
pricing schedules, moreover, are
presently comparable to those that the
Exchange provides, including the
pricing of comparable tiers.
The Exchange also believes that the
current enhanced rebates under NonDisplayed Add Volume Tiers 1 through
3 continue to be commensurate with the
proposed criteria. That is, the enhanced
rebates reasonably reflect the difficulty
in achieving the corresponding criteria
as amended. Also, the Exchange’s
affiliated equities exchange, Cboe BZX
Exchange, Inc. (‘‘BZX’’), currently has
Non-Displayed Volume Tiers in place,
which offer similar enhanced rebates
and corresponding criteria.19
Overall, the Exchange believes that
the proposed changes to the NonDisplayed Add Volume Tiers, each
based on a Member’s liquidity adding
orders, will benefit all market
participants by incentivizing continuous
liquidity and, thus, deeper more liquid
markets as well as increased execution
opportunities. Particularly, the
proposed changes to the Non-Displayed
Add Volume Tiers are designed to
incentivize non-displayed liquidity,
which further contributes to a deeper,
more liquid market and provide even
more execution opportunities for active
market participants at improved prices.
This overall increase in activity deepens
the Exchange’s liquidity pool, offers
additional cost savings, supports the
quality of price discovery, promotes
market transparency and improves
market quality, for all investors.
19 See
e.g., Cboe BZX Equities Fee Schedule,
Footnote 1, which provides various Non-Displayed
Add Volume Tiers.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:43 May 18, 2021
Jkt 253001
The Exchange also believes that the
proposal represents an equitable
allocation of fees and rebates and is not
unfairly discriminatory because all
Members are eligible for Non-Displayed
Add Volume Tiers and would have the
opportunity to meet the tiers’ criteria
and would receive the applicable rebate
if such criteria is met. Without having
a view of activity on other markets and
off-exchange venues, the Exchange has
no way of knowing whether this
proposed rule change would definitely
result in any Members qualifying for the
proposed tiers. While the Exchange has
no way of predicting with certainty how
the proposed tier will impact Member
activity, the Exchange anticipates that
approximately 2 Members will be able
to satisfy Non-Displayed Tier 1, 2
Members will be able to satisfy NonDisplayed Tier 2, and 1 Member will be
able to satisfy Non-Displayed Tier 3.
The Exchange also notes that proposed
tiers will not adversely impact any
Member’s ability to qualify for other
reduced fee or enhanced rebate tiers.
Should a Member not meet the
proposed criteria under any of the
proposed tiers, the Member will merely
not receive that corresponding
enhanced rebate.
The Exchange believes the proposal to
amend Retail Volume Tier 2 is
reasonable because the tier, as modified
continues to be available to all RMOs
and provide RMOs an opportunity to
receive an enhanced rebate using less
stringent criteria. The Exchange also
believes that the proposed enhanced
rebate under Retail Volume Tier 2 is
reasonable as it’s in line with existing
rebates under the Retail Volume Tiers
and is commensurate with the proposed
amended criteria. That is, the rebate
reasonably reflects the difficulty in
achieving the corresponding criteria as
amended.
The Exchange believes that the
proposal relating to the Retail Volume
Tier 2 also represents an equitable
allocation of rebates and is not unfairly
discriminatory because all RMOs will
continue to be eligible for the Retail
Volume Tier. The proposed changes are
designed as an incentive to any and all
RMOs interested in meeting the tier
criteria, as amended, to submit
additional adding and/or removing, or
Retail, order flow to the Exchange. The
Exchange notes that greater add volume
order flow provides for deeper, more
liquid markets and execution
opportunities, and greater remove
volume order flow increases
transactions on the Exchange, which
incentivizes liquidity providers to
submit additional liquidity and
execution opportunities, thus, providing
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
an overall increase in price discovery
and transparency on the Exchange.
Also, an increase in Retail Order flow,
which orders are generally submitted in
smaller sizes, tends to attract Market
Makers, as smaller size orders are easier
to hedge. Increased Market Maker
activity facilitates tighter spreads,
signaling an additional corresponding
increase in order flow from other market
participants, which contributes towards
a robust, well-balanced market
ecosystem. Increased overall order flow
benefits all investors by deepening the
Exchange’s liquidity pool, potentially
providing even greater execution
incentives and opportunities, offering
additional flexibility for all investors to
enjoy cost savings, supporting the
quality of price discovery, promoting
market transparency and improving
investor protection. The Exchange also
notes all RMOs will continue to have
the opportunity to submit the requisite
order flow and will receive the
applicable enhanced rebate if the tier
criteria is met. The Exchange
additionally notes that while the Retail
Volume Tiers are applicable only to
RMOs, the Exchange does not believe
this application is discriminatory as the
Exchange offers similar rebates to nonRMO order flow.20
Without having a view of activity on
other markets and off-exchange venues,
the Exchange has no way of knowing
whether this proposed rule change
would definitely result in any RMOs
qualifying for the proposed amended
tier. The Exchange notes that most
recently, no Member has satisfied Retail
Volume Tier 2. While the Exchange has
no way of predicting with certainty how
the proposed tier will impact Member
activity, the Exchange anticipates that at
least three Members will be able to
satisfy Retail Volume Tier 2 (as
amended). The Exchange also notes that
the proposed amended tier will not
adversely impact any RMO’s ability to
qualify for other rebate tiers. Rather,
should an RMO not meet the criteria for
Retail Volume Tier 2, as amended, the
RMO will merely not receive the
corresponding proposed enhanced
rebate. Furthermore, the rebates under
each Retail Volume Tiers would
uniformly apply to all RMOs that meet
the required criteria.
The Exchange also believes the
proposed rule change to remove Retail
Volume Tier 4 is reasonable because the
Exchange no longer wishes to, nor is it
required to, maintain such a tier.
20 Such as the other Add/Remove Volume Tiers
under Footnote 1 of the EDGX Fees Schedule which
provide opportunities to all Members to submit the
requisite order flow to receive an enhanced rebate.
E:\FR\FM\19MYN1.SGM
19MYN1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 95 / Wednesday, May 19, 2021 / Notices
Further, the Exchange would rather
redirect resources to proposed Retail
Volume Tier 2, which is intended to
incentivize increased order flow. The
Exchange believes that the proposed
elimination of Retail Volume Tier 4 is
equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory as it applies equally to
all Members. Additionally, as noted
above, the Exchange operates in a highly
competitive market. The Exchange is
only one of several equity venues to
which market participants may direct
their order flow, and it represents a
small percentage of the overall market.
It is also only one of several maker-taker
exchanges. Competing equity exchanges
offer similar tiered pricing structures to
that of the Exchange, including
schedules of rebates and fees that apply
based upon members achieving certain
volume thresholds. These competing
pricing schedules, moreover, are
presently comparable to those that the
Exchange provides, including the
pricing of comparable tiers.
The Exchange believes the proposal to
eliminate the fee for internalized trades
meeting the required volume threshold
is reasonable and equitable because the
incentive would be available to all
Members and Members would not be
subject to any fee for such transactions.
Without having a view of activity on
other markets and off-exchange venues,
the Exchange has no way of knowing
whether this proposed rule change
would definitely result in any Members
qualifying for the eliminated fee. While
the Exchange has no way of predicting
with certainty how the proposed change
will impact Member activity, in the
most recent month 10 Members satisfied
the internalization volume threshold
and the Exchange anticipates that
approximately 10 Members will
continue to be able to satisfy the
internalization volume threshold. The
Exchange also notes that proposal to
eliminate the fee will not adversely
impact any Member’s ability to qualify
for other reduced fees or enhanced
rebate tiers. Should a Member not meet
the proposed criteria, the Member will
merely not receive the reduced fee.
Additionally, as noted above, the
Exchange operates in a highly
competitive market. The Exchange is
only one of several equity venues to
which market participants may direct
their order flow, and it represents a
small percentage of the overall market.
Furthermore, competing pricing
schedules are presently comparable to
those that the Exchange provides,
including the pricing of internalized
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:43 May 18, 2021
Jkt 253001
trades.21 The Exchange believes the
proposal is reasonable as it is designed
to incentivize Members (and their
customers) to send orders to the
Exchange that may otherwise be
internalized off exchange, which further
contributes to a deeper, more liquid
market and provide even more
execution opportunities for active
market participants at improved prices.
This overall increase in activity deepens
the Exchange’s liquidity pool, offers
additional cost savings, supports the
quality of price discovery, promotes
market transparency and improves
market quality, for all investors.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule changes will impose
any burden on competition not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. Rather, as
discussed above, the Exchange believes
that the proposed change would
encourage the submission of additional
order flow to a public exchange, thereby
promoting market depth, execution
incentives and enhanced execution
opportunities, as well as price discovery
and transparency for all Members. As a
result, the Exchange believes that the
proposed change furthers the
Commission’s goal in adopting
Regulation NMS of fostering
competition among orders, which
promotes ‘‘more efficient pricing of
individual stocks for all types of orders,
large and small.’’
The Exchange believes the proposed
rule change does not impose any burden
on intramarket competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. Particularly,
the proposed changes to the NonDisplayed Add Volume Tiers applies to
all Members equally in that all Members
are eligible for these tiers, have a
reasonable opportunity to meet the tiers’
criteria and will receive the enhanced
rebates if such criteria is met. Similarly,
the proposed changes to the Retail
Volume Tiers apply to all RMOs equally
in that all RMOs are eligible for those
tiers, have a reasonable opportunity to
meet the tiers’ criteria and will receive
the enhanced rebates if such criteria are
met. The proposed change to the
internalization rate under footnote 7
also applies to all Members equally in
that all Members are eligible for the
reduced fee, have a reasonable
opportunity to meet the volume
21 See the Investors Exchange LLC (‘‘IEX’’) Fee
Schedule, Fee Code Combinations and Associated
Fees: ‘‘MIS’’, ‘‘MLS’’, and ‘‘TIS’’.
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
27125
thresholds, and will receive the
eliminated fee if such criteria is met.
Additionally, the proposed tiers and
eliminated fees are designed to attract
additional order flow to the Exchange.
The Exchange believes that the updated
criteria would incentivize market
participants to direct liquidity adding
and/or removing order flow to the
Exchange, bringing with it additional
execution opportunities for market
participants and improved price
transparency. Greater overall order flow,
trading opportunities, and pricing
transparency benefits all market
participants on the Exchange by
enhancing market quality and
continuing to encourage Members to
send orders, thereby contributing
towards a robust and well-balanced
market ecosystem.
Next, the Exchange believes the
proposed rule change does not impose
any burden on intermarket competition
that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
As previously discussed, the Exchange
operates in a highly competitive market.
Members have numerous alternative
venues that they may participate on and
direct their order flow, including other
equities exchanges, off-exchange
venues, and alternative trading systems.
Additionally, the Exchange represents a
small percentage of the overall market.
Based on publicly available information,
no single equities exchange has more
than 15% of the market share.22
Therefore, no exchange possesses
significant pricing power in the
execution of order flow. Indeed,
participants can readily choose to send
their orders to other exchange and offexchange venues if they deem fee levels
at those other venues to be more
favorable. Moreover, the Commission
has repeatedly expressed its preference
for competition over regulatory
intervention in determining prices,
products, and services in the securities
markets. Specifically, in Regulation
NMS, the Commission highlighted the
importance of market forces in
determining prices and SRO revenues
and, also, recognized that current
regulation of the market system ‘‘has
been remarkably successful in
promoting market competition in its
broader forms that are most important to
investors and listed companies.’’ 23 The
fact that this market is competitive has
also long been recognized by the courts.
In NetCoalition v. Securities and
Exchange Commission, the D.C. Circuit
stated as follows: ‘‘[n]o one disputes
22 Supra
note 3.
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808
(June 9, 2005), 70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005).
23 See
E:\FR\FM\19MYN1.SGM
19MYN1
27126
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 95 / Wednesday, May 19, 2021 / Notices
that competition for order flow is
‘fierce.’ . . . As the SEC explained, ‘[i]n
the U.S. national market system, buyers
and sellers of securities, and the brokerdealers that act as their order-routing
agents, have a wide range of choices of
where to route orders for execution’;
[and] ‘no exchange can afford to take its
market share percentages for granted’
because ‘no exchange possesses a
monopoly, regulatory or otherwise, in
the execution of order flow from broker
dealers’. . . .’’.24 Accordingly, the
Exchange does not believe its proposed
fee change imposes any burden on
competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor
received comments on the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act.25
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is: (i) Necessary or appropriate in
the public interest; (ii) for the protection
of investors; or (iii) otherwise in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
should be approved or disapproved.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
CboeEDGX–2021–026 on the subject
line.
24 NetCoalition v. SEC, 615 F.3d 525, 539 (D.C.
Cir. 2010) (quoting Securities Exchange Act Release
No. 59039 (December 2, 2008), 73 FR 74770, 74782–
83 (December 9, 2008) (SR–NYSEArca–2006–21)).
25 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:43 May 18, 2021
Jkt 253001
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–CboeEDGX–2021–026. This
file number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549 on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change.
Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from
comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish
to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–CboeEDGX–2021–026, and
should be submitted on or before June
9, 2021.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.26
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021–10496 Filed 5–18–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–91895; File No. SR–
NYSEArca–2021–39]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE
Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change To List and Trade Shares
of the Putnam Focused Large Cap
Growth ETF; Putnam Focused Large
Cap Value ETF; Putnam Sustainable
Future ETF; and Putnam Sustainable
Leaders ETF
May 13, 2021.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3
notice is hereby given that on May 11,
2021, NYSE Arca, Inc. (‘‘NYSE Arca’’ or
the ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been prepared
by the Exchange. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to list and
trade shares of the following under
NYSE Arca Rule 8.601–E: Putnam
Focused Large Cap Growth ETF; Putnam
Focused Large Cap Value ETF; Putnam
Sustainable Future ETF; and Putnam
Sustainable Leaders ETF. The proposed
rule change is available on the
Exchange’s website at www.nyse.com, at
the principal office of the Exchange, and
at the Commission’s Public Reference
Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of,
and basis for, the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
The Exchange has prepared summaries,
set forth in sections A, B, and C below,
of the most significant parts of such
statements.
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
U.S.C. 78a.
3 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
2 15
26 17
PO 00000
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
Frm 00064
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\19MYN1.SGM
19MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 95 (Wednesday, May 19, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27122-27126]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-10496]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-91886; File No. SR-CboeEDGX-2021-026]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc.; Notice
of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To
Amend the Fee Schedule
May 13, 2021.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on May 3, 2021, Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or
``EDGX'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and
II below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or ``EDGX'') is filing
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') a proposed
rule change to amend the Fee Schedule. The text of the proposed rule
change is provided in Exhibit 5.
The text of the proposed rule change is also available on the
Exchange's website (https://markets.cboe.com/us/options/regulation/rule_filings/edgx/), at the Exchange's Office of the Secretary, and at
the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend its Fee Schedule applicable to its
equities trading platform (``EDGX Equities'') to (1) modify the
criteria of certain Non-Displayed Add Volume Tiers, (2) modify and
eliminate certain Retail Volume Tiers, and (3) reduce the rate for
internalization for Members meeting a certain volume threshold. The
Exchange proposes to implement the proposed change to its Fee Schedule
on May 3, 2021.
The Exchange first notes that it operates in a highly competitive
market in which market participants can readily direct order flow to
competing venues if they deem fee levels at a particular venue to be
excessive or incentives to be insufficient. More specifically, the
Exchange is only one of 16 registered equities exchanges, as well as a
number of alternative trading systems and other off-exchange venues
that do not have similar self-regulatory responsibilities under the
Exchange Act, to which market participants may direct their order flow.
Based on publicly available information,\3\ no single registered
equities exchange has more than 15% of the market share. Thus, in such
a low-concentrated and highly competitive market, no single equities
exchange possesses significant pricing power in the execution of order
flow. The Exchange in particular operates a ``Maker-Taker'' model
whereby it pays rebates to members that add liquidity and assesses fees
to those that remove liquidity. The Exchange's Fee Schedule sets forth
the standard rebates and rates applied per share for orders that
provide and remove liquidity, respectively. Additionally, in response
to the competitive environment, the Exchange also offers tiered pricing
which provides Members opportunities to qualify for higher rebates or
reduced fees where certain volume criteria and thresholds are met.
Tiered pricing provides an incremental incentive for Members to strive
for higher tier levels, which provides increasingly higher benefits or
discounts for satisfying increasingly more stringent criteria.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Cboe Global Markets, U.S. Equities Market Volume
Summary, Month-to-Date (April 26, 2021), available at https://markets.cboe.com/us/equities/market_statistics/.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Non-Displayed Add Volume Tiers
Pursuant to footnote 1 of the Fee Schedule, the Exchange offers
Non-Displayed Add Volume Tiers that provide an enhanced rebate on
Members' orders yielding fee codes ``DM'',\4\ ``HA'',\5\ ``MM'',\6\ and
``RP'' \7\ where a Member reaches certain required volume-based
criteria offered in each tier. Specifically, the criteria for Non-
Displayed Add Volume Tiers 1 through 3 are as follows:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ ``DM'' is appended to orders that add liquidity using
MidPoint Discretionary order within discretionary range.
\5\ ``HA'' is appended to non-displayed orders that add
liquidity.
\6\ ``MM'' is appended to non-displayed orders that add
liquidity using Mid-Point Peg.
\7\ ``RP'' is appended to non-displayed orders that add
liquidity using Supplemental Peg.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tier 1 provides an enhanced rebated of $0.0015 per share
on qualifying orders (i.e., orders yielding fee code DM, HA, MM or RP)
where a Member has an ADAV \8\ greater than or equal to 0.01% of TCV
\9\ for Non-Displayed orders that yield fee codes DM, HA, ``HI'',\10\
MM or RP.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ ``ADAV'' means average daily added volume calculated as the
number of shares added per day. ADAV is calculated on a monthly
basis.
\9\ ``TCV'' means total consolidated volume calculated as the
volume reported by all exchanges and trade reporting facilities to a
consolidated transaction reporting plan for the month for which the
fees apply.
\10\ ``HI'' is appended to non-displayed orders that receive
price improvement and add liquidity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tier 2 provides an enhanced rebated of $0.0022 per share
on qualifying orders (i.e., orders yielding fee code DM, HA, MM or RP)
where a Member has an ADAV greater than or equal to 0.05% of TCV for
Non-Displayed orders that yield fee codes DM, HA, HI, MM or RP.
Tier 3 provides an enhanced rebated of $0.0025 per share
on qualifying orders (i.e., orders yielding fee code DM, HA, MM or RP)
where a Member has an ADAV greater than or equal to 0.10% of TCV for
Non-Displayed orders that yield fee codes DM, HA, HI, MM or RP.
Now, the Exchange is proposing to increase the ADAV thresholds for
Non-Displayed Add Volume Tiers 1 and 2
[[Page 27123]]
and add alternate criteria for Tiers 1 through 3. Specifically, the
proposed criteria for Non-Displayed Add Volume Tiers 1 through 3 are as
follows:
Tier 1 would provide an enhanced rebated of $0.0015 per
share on qualifying orders (i.e., orders yielding fee code DM, HA, MM
or RP) where a Member has an ADAV greater than or equal to 0.05% of TCV
for Non-Displayed orders that yield fee codes DM, HA, HI, MM or RP; or
a Member has an ADAV greater than or equal to 4,000,000 for Non-
Displayed orders that yield fee codes DM, HA, HI, MM, or RP.
Tier 2 would provide an enhanced rebated of $0.0022 per
share on qualifying orders (i.e., orders yielding fee code DM, HA, MM
or RP) where a Member has an ADAV greater than or equal to 0.08% of TCV
for Non-Displayed orders that yield fee codes DM, HA, HI, MM or RP; or
a Member has an ADAV greater than or equal to 7,000,000 for Non-
Displayed orders that yield fee codes DM, HA, HI, MM, or RP.
Tier 3 would provide an enhanced rebated of $0.0025 per
share on qualifying orders (i.e., orders yielding fee code DM, HA, MM
or RP) where a Member has an ADAV greater than or equal to 0.10% of TCV
for Non-Displayed orders that yield fee codes DM, HA, HI, MM or RP; or
a Member has an ADAV greater than or equal to 9,000,000 for Non-
Displayed orders that yield fee codes DM, HA, HI, MM, or RP.
The Exchange notes the Non-Displayed Add Volume Tiers, as modified,
continue to be available to all Members and provide Members an
opportunity to receive an enhanced rebate, albeit using more stringent
criteria. Moreover, the proposed changes are designed to encourage
Members to increase non-displayed liquidity on the Exchange, which
further contributes to a deeper, more liquid market and provides even
more execution opportunities for active market participants at improved
prices.
Retail Volume Tiers
Pursuant to footnote 3 of the Fee Schedule, the Exchange currently
offers Retail Volume Tiers which provide Retail Member Organizations
(``RMOs'') \11\ an opportunity to receive an enhanced rebate from the
standard rebate for Retail Orders \12\ that add liquidity (i.e.,
yielding fee code ``ZA'' \13\). Currently, the Retail Volume Tiers
offer four levels of criteria difficulty and incentive opportunities in
which RMOs may qualify for enhanced rebates for Retail Orders. The tier
structure is designed to encourage RMOs to increase their order flow in
order to receive an enhanced rebate on their liquidity adding orders,
and the Exchange now proposes to amend existing Retail Volume Tier 2.
The current Retail Volume Tier 2 provides an enhanced rebate of $0.0036
per share to Members that add a Retail Order ADV \14\ (i.e., yielding
fee code ZA) equal to or greater than 0.60% of the TCV. Now, the
Exchange proposes to increase the rebate to $0.0037 and lessen the
Retail Order ADV threshold to 0.45%. Thus, the proposed Retail Volume
Tier 2 would provide an enhanced rebate of $0.0037 per share to Members
that add a Retail Order ADV (i.e., yielding fee code ZA) equal to or
greater than 0.45% of the TCV.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ A ``Retail Member Organization'' or ``RMO'' is a Member (or
a division thereof) that has been approved by the Exchange under
this Rule to submit Retail Orders. See EDGX Rule 11.21(a)(1).
\12\ A ``Retail Order'' is an agency or riskless principal order
that meets the criteria of FINRA Rule 5320.03 that originates from a
natural person and is submitted to the Exchange by a Retail Member
Organization, provided that no change is made to the terms of the
order with respect to price or side of market and the order does not
originate from a trading algorithm or any other computerized
methodology. See EDGX Rule 11.21(a)(2).
\13\ Orders yielding fee code ``ZA'' are orders routed to a non-
exchange destination using the ROUZ routing strategy.
\14\ ``ADV'' means average daily volume calculated as the number
of shares added to, removed from, or routed by, the Exchange, or any
combination or subset thereof, per day. ADV is calculated on a
monthly basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange also proposes to eliminate Retail Volume Tier 4 as the
Exchange no longer wishes to, nor is it required to, maintain such a
tier. Further, the Exchange would rather redirect resources to proposed
Retail Volume Tier 2, which is intended to incentivize increased order
flow.
Internalization Rate
The Exchange proposes to amend footnote 7, which provides a reduced
fee for internalization (i.e., orders yielding fee codes ``EA'' \15\ or
``ER'' \16\). An internalized trade is a trade where the two orders
inadvertently match against each other and share the same Market
Participant Identifier (``MPID''). Internalized trades (i.e., orders
yielding fee codes EA or ER) are charged a standard fee of $0.00050 in
securities priced at or above $1.00 and 0.15% of the dollar value in
securities priced below $1.00. Currently, footnote 7 provides a reduced
fee of $0.0001 per share per side for orders yielding fee code EA or ER
to Members that add an ADV of at least 10,000,000 shares. Now, the
Exchange proposes to eliminate the fee for internalized trades meeting
the criteria provided under footnote 7. Specifically, as proposed,
footnote 7 would provide that if a Member adds an ADV of at least
10,000,000 shares, then the Member's rate for internalization (fee
codes EA or ER) decreases to Free per share per side, for securities
priced at, above, or below $1.00. The Exchange believes the proposal is
reasonable as it is designed to incentivize Members (and their
customers) to send orders to the Exchange that may otherwise be
internalized off exchange, which further contributes to a deeper, more
liquid market and provide even more execution opportunities for active
market participants at improved prices. This overall increase in
activity deepens the Exchange's liquidity pool, offers additional cost
savings, supports the quality of price discovery, promotes market
transparency and improves market quality, for all investors.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ Orders yielding fee code ``EA'' are internalization orders
that add displayed liquidity.
\16\ Orders yielding fee code ``ER'' are internalization orders
that remove displayed liquidity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the objectives of Section 6 of the Act,\17\ in general, and
furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5),\18\ in
particular, as it is designed to provide for the equitable allocation
of reasonable dues, fees and other charges among its Members, issuers
and other persons using its facilities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
\18\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange operates in a highly competitive market in which
market participants can readily direct order flow to competing venues
if they deem fee levels at a particular venue to be excessive or
incentives to be insufficient. The proposed rule changes reflect a
competitive pricing structure designed to incentivize market
participants to direct their order flow to the Exchange, which the
Exchange believes would enhance market quality to the benefit of all
Members. The Exchange notes that relative volume-based incentives and
discounts have been widely adopted by exchanges, including the
Exchange, and are reasonable, equitable and non-discriminatory because
they are open to all members on an equal basis and provide additional
benefits or discounts that are reasonably related to (i) the value to
an exchange's market quality and (ii) associated higher levels of
market activity, such as higher levels of liquidity provision and/or
growth patterns. Competing equity exchanges offer similar tiered
pricing structures, including schedules of rebates and fees
[[Page 27124]]
that apply based upon members achieving certain volume and/or growth
thresholds, as well as assess similar fees or rebates for similar types
of orders, to that of the Exchange.
The Exchange believes the proposed Non-Displayed Add Volume Tiers
are reasonable because each tier continues to be available to all
Members and provide Members an opportunity to receive an enhanced
rebate, even as modified. Additionally, as noted above, the Exchange
operates in a highly competitive market. The Exchange is only one of
several equity venues to which market participants may direct their
order flow, and it represents a small percentage of the overall market.
It is also only one of several maker-taker exchanges. Competing equity
exchanges offer similar tiered pricing structures to that of the
Exchange, including schedules of rebates and fees that apply based upon
members achieving certain volume thresholds. These competing pricing
schedules, moreover, are presently comparable to those that the
Exchange provides, including the pricing of comparable tiers.
The Exchange also believes that the current enhanced rebates under
Non-Displayed Add Volume Tiers 1 through 3 continue to be commensurate
with the proposed criteria. That is, the enhanced rebates reasonably
reflect the difficulty in achieving the corresponding criteria as
amended. Also, the Exchange's affiliated equities exchange, Cboe BZX
Exchange, Inc. (``BZX''), currently has Non-Displayed Volume Tiers in
place, which offer similar enhanced rebates and corresponding
criteria.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ See e.g., Cboe BZX Equities Fee Schedule, Footnote 1, which
provides various Non-Displayed Add Volume Tiers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Overall, the Exchange believes that the proposed changes to the
Non-Displayed Add Volume Tiers, each based on a Member's liquidity
adding orders, will benefit all market participants by incentivizing
continuous liquidity and, thus, deeper more liquid markets as well as
increased execution opportunities. Particularly, the proposed changes
to the Non-Displayed Add Volume Tiers are designed to incentivize non-
displayed liquidity, which further contributes to a deeper, more liquid
market and provide even more execution opportunities for active market
participants at improved prices. This overall increase in activity
deepens the Exchange's liquidity pool, offers additional cost savings,
supports the quality of price discovery, promotes market transparency
and improves market quality, for all investors.
The Exchange also believes that the proposal represents an
equitable allocation of fees and rebates and is not unfairly
discriminatory because all Members are eligible for Non-Displayed Add
Volume Tiers and would have the opportunity to meet the tiers' criteria
and would receive the applicable rebate if such criteria is met.
Without having a view of activity on other markets and off-exchange
venues, the Exchange has no way of knowing whether this proposed rule
change would definitely result in any Members qualifying for the
proposed tiers. While the Exchange has no way of predicting with
certainty how the proposed tier will impact Member activity, the
Exchange anticipates that approximately 2 Members will be able to
satisfy Non-Displayed Tier 1, 2 Members will be able to satisfy Non-
Displayed Tier 2, and 1 Member will be able to satisfy Non-Displayed
Tier 3. The Exchange also notes that proposed tiers will not adversely
impact any Member's ability to qualify for other reduced fee or
enhanced rebate tiers. Should a Member not meet the proposed criteria
under any of the proposed tiers, the Member will merely not receive
that corresponding enhanced rebate.
The Exchange believes the proposal to amend Retail Volume Tier 2 is
reasonable because the tier, as modified continues to be available to
all RMOs and provide RMOs an opportunity to receive an enhanced rebate
using less stringent criteria. The Exchange also believes that the
proposed enhanced rebate under Retail Volume Tier 2 is reasonable as
it's in line with existing rebates under the Retail Volume Tiers and is
commensurate with the proposed amended criteria. That is, the rebate
reasonably reflects the difficulty in achieving the corresponding
criteria as amended.
The Exchange believes that the proposal relating to the Retail
Volume Tier 2 also represents an equitable allocation of rebates and is
not unfairly discriminatory because all RMOs will continue to be
eligible for the Retail Volume Tier. The proposed changes are designed
as an incentive to any and all RMOs interested in meeting the tier
criteria, as amended, to submit additional adding and/or removing, or
Retail, order flow to the Exchange. The Exchange notes that greater add
volume order flow provides for deeper, more liquid markets and
execution opportunities, and greater remove volume order flow increases
transactions on the Exchange, which incentivizes liquidity providers to
submit additional liquidity and execution opportunities, thus,
providing an overall increase in price discovery and transparency on
the Exchange. Also, an increase in Retail Order flow, which orders are
generally submitted in smaller sizes, tends to attract Market Makers,
as smaller size orders are easier to hedge. Increased Market Maker
activity facilitates tighter spreads, signaling an additional
corresponding increase in order flow from other market participants,
which contributes towards a robust, well-balanced market ecosystem.
Increased overall order flow benefits all investors by deepening the
Exchange's liquidity pool, potentially providing even greater execution
incentives and opportunities, offering additional flexibility for all
investors to enjoy cost savings, supporting the quality of price
discovery, promoting market transparency and improving investor
protection. The Exchange also notes all RMOs will continue to have the
opportunity to submit the requisite order flow and will receive the
applicable enhanced rebate if the tier criteria is met. The Exchange
additionally notes that while the Retail Volume Tiers are applicable
only to RMOs, the Exchange does not believe this application is
discriminatory as the Exchange offers similar rebates to non-RMO order
flow.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ Such as the other Add/Remove Volume Tiers under Footnote 1
of the EDGX Fees Schedule which provide opportunities to all Members
to submit the requisite order flow to receive an enhanced rebate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Without having a view of activity on other markets and off-exchange
venues, the Exchange has no way of knowing whether this proposed rule
change would definitely result in any RMOs qualifying for the proposed
amended tier. The Exchange notes that most recently, no Member has
satisfied Retail Volume Tier 2. While the Exchange has no way of
predicting with certainty how the proposed tier will impact Member
activity, the Exchange anticipates that at least three Members will be
able to satisfy Retail Volume Tier 2 (as amended). The Exchange also
notes that the proposed amended tier will not adversely impact any
RMO's ability to qualify for other rebate tiers. Rather, should an RMO
not meet the criteria for Retail Volume Tier 2, as amended, the RMO
will merely not receive the corresponding proposed enhanced rebate.
Furthermore, the rebates under each Retail Volume Tiers would uniformly
apply to all RMOs that meet the required criteria.
The Exchange also believes the proposed rule change to remove
Retail Volume Tier 4 is reasonable because the Exchange no longer
wishes to, nor is it required to, maintain such a tier.
[[Page 27125]]
Further, the Exchange would rather redirect resources to proposed
Retail Volume Tier 2, which is intended to incentivize increased order
flow. The Exchange believes that the proposed elimination of Retail
Volume Tier 4 is equitable and not unfairly discriminatory as it
applies equally to all Members. Additionally, as noted above, the
Exchange operates in a highly competitive market. The Exchange is only
one of several equity venues to which market participants may direct
their order flow, and it represents a small percentage of the overall
market. It is also only one of several maker-taker exchanges. Competing
equity exchanges offer similar tiered pricing structures to that of the
Exchange, including schedules of rebates and fees that apply based upon
members achieving certain volume thresholds. These competing pricing
schedules, moreover, are presently comparable to those that the
Exchange provides, including the pricing of comparable tiers.
The Exchange believes the proposal to eliminate the fee for
internalized trades meeting the required volume threshold is reasonable
and equitable because the incentive would be available to all Members
and Members would not be subject to any fee for such transactions.
Without having a view of activity on other markets and off-exchange
venues, the Exchange has no way of knowing whether this proposed rule
change would definitely result in any Members qualifying for the
eliminated fee. While the Exchange has no way of predicting with
certainty how the proposed change will impact Member activity, in the
most recent month 10 Members satisfied the internalization volume
threshold and the Exchange anticipates that approximately 10 Members
will continue to be able to satisfy the internalization volume
threshold. The Exchange also notes that proposal to eliminate the fee
will not adversely impact any Member's ability to qualify for other
reduced fees or enhanced rebate tiers. Should a Member not meet the
proposed criteria, the Member will merely not receive the reduced fee.
Additionally, as noted above, the Exchange operates in a highly
competitive market. The Exchange is only one of several equity venues
to which market participants may direct their order flow, and it
represents a small percentage of the overall market. Furthermore,
competing pricing schedules are presently comparable to those that the
Exchange provides, including the pricing of internalized trades.\21\
The Exchange believes the proposal is reasonable as it is designed to
incentivize Members (and their customers) to send orders to the
Exchange that may otherwise be internalized off exchange, which further
contributes to a deeper, more liquid market and provide even more
execution opportunities for active market participants at improved
prices. This overall increase in activity deepens the Exchange's
liquidity pool, offers additional cost savings, supports the quality of
price discovery, promotes market transparency and improves market
quality, for all investors.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ See the Investors Exchange LLC (``IEX'') Fee Schedule, Fee
Code Combinations and Associated Fees: ``MIS'', ``MLS'', and
``TIS''.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule changes will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. Rather, as discussed above, the
Exchange believes that the proposed change would encourage the
submission of additional order flow to a public exchange, thereby
promoting market depth, execution incentives and enhanced execution
opportunities, as well as price discovery and transparency for all
Members. As a result, the Exchange believes that the proposed change
furthers the Commission's goal in adopting Regulation NMS of fostering
competition among orders, which promotes ``more efficient pricing of
individual stocks for all types of orders, large and small.''
The Exchange believes the proposed rule change does not impose any
burden on intramarket competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. Particularly, the proposed
changes to the Non-Displayed Add Volume Tiers applies to all Members
equally in that all Members are eligible for these tiers, have a
reasonable opportunity to meet the tiers' criteria and will receive the
enhanced rebates if such criteria is met. Similarly, the proposed
changes to the Retail Volume Tiers apply to all RMOs equally in that
all RMOs are eligible for those tiers, have a reasonable opportunity to
meet the tiers' criteria and will receive the enhanced rebates if such
criteria are met. The proposed change to the internalization rate under
footnote 7 also applies to all Members equally in that all Members are
eligible for the reduced fee, have a reasonable opportunity to meet the
volume thresholds, and will receive the eliminated fee if such criteria
is met.
Additionally, the proposed tiers and eliminated fees are designed
to attract additional order flow to the Exchange. The Exchange believes
that the updated criteria would incentivize market participants to
direct liquidity adding and/or removing order flow to the Exchange,
bringing with it additional execution opportunities for market
participants and improved price transparency. Greater overall order
flow, trading opportunities, and pricing transparency benefits all
market participants on the Exchange by enhancing market quality and
continuing to encourage Members to send orders, thereby contributing
towards a robust and well-balanced market ecosystem.
Next, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change does not
impose any burden on intermarket competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. As previously
discussed, the Exchange operates in a highly competitive market.
Members have numerous alternative venues that they may participate on
and direct their order flow, including other equities exchanges, off-
exchange venues, and alternative trading systems. Additionally, the
Exchange represents a small percentage of the overall market. Based on
publicly available information, no single equities exchange has more
than 15% of the market share.\22\ Therefore, no exchange possesses
significant pricing power in the execution of order flow. Indeed,
participants can readily choose to send their orders to other exchange
and off-exchange venues if they deem fee levels at those other venues
to be more favorable. Moreover, the Commission has repeatedly expressed
its preference for competition over regulatory intervention in
determining prices, products, and services in the securities markets.
Specifically, in Regulation NMS, the Commission highlighted the
importance of market forces in determining prices and SRO revenues and,
also, recognized that current regulation of the market system ``has
been remarkably successful in promoting market competition in its
broader forms that are most important to investors and listed
companies.'' \23\ The fact that this market is competitive has also
long been recognized by the courts. In NetCoalition v. Securities and
Exchange Commission, the D.C. Circuit stated as follows: ``[n]o one
disputes
[[Page 27126]]
that competition for order flow is `fierce.' . . . As the SEC
explained, `[i]n the U.S. national market system, buyers and sellers of
securities, and the broker-dealers that act as their order-routing
agents, have a wide range of choices of where to route orders for
execution'; [and] `no exchange can afford to take its market share
percentages for granted' because `no exchange possesses a monopoly,
regulatory or otherwise, in the execution of order flow from broker
dealers'. . . .''.\24\ Accordingly, the Exchange does not believe its
proposed fee change imposes any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ Supra note 3.
\23\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 (June 9,
2005), 70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005).
\24\ NetCoalition v. SEC, 615 F.3d 525, 539 (D.C. Cir. 2010)
(quoting Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59039 (December 2,
2008), 73 FR 74770, 74782-83 (December 9, 2008) (SR-NYSEArca-2006-
21)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act.\25\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\25\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is: (i)
Necessary or appropriate in the public interest; (ii) for the
protection of investors; or (iii) otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the
proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-CboeEDGX-2021-026 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CboeEDGX-2021-026. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-CboeEDGX-2021-026, and should be
submitted on or before June 9, 2021.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\26\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\26\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-10496 Filed 5-18-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P