Certain Steel Nails From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2019-2020, 25841-25843 [2021-09941]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 11, 2021 / Notices
merchandise from China entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption, are subject to the
assessment of countervailing duties.
Therefore, in accordance with section
706(a) of the Act, Commerce intends to
direct CBP to assess, upon further
instruction by Commerce,
countervailing duties for all relevant
entries of non-refillable cylinders from
China, which are entered, or withdrawn
from warehouse, for consumption on or
after August 28, 2020, the date of
publication of the CVD Preliminary
Determination, but will not include
entries occurring after the expiration of
the provisional measures period and
before the publication of the ITC’s final
injury determination under section
705(b) of the Act, as further described in
the ‘‘Provisional Measures—CVD’’
section of this notice.10
Suspension of Liquidation and Cash
Deposits—CVD
In accordance with section 706 of the
Act, Commerce intends to instruct CBP
to reinstitute the suspension of
liquidation of non-refillable cylinders
from China, effective on the date of
publication of the ITC’s final affirmative
injury determination in the Federal
Register, and to assess, upon further
instruction by Commerce, pursuant to
section 706(a)(1) of the Act,
countervailing duties for each entry of
subject merchandise in an amount based
on the net countervailable subsidy rates
below. On or after the date of
publication of the ITC’s final injury
determination in the Federal Register,
CBP must require, at the same time as
importers would normally deposit
estimated customs duties on this
merchandise, a cash deposit equal to the
rates listed in the table below. These
instructions suspending liquidation will
remain in effect until further notice. The
all-others rate applies to all producers or
exporters not specifically listed below,
as appropriate:
Company
Ningbo Eagle Machinery &
Technology Co., Ltd ................
Wuyi Xilinde Machinery Manufacture Co., Ltd .......................
All Others ....................................
Jiangsu Kasidi Chemical Machinery Co., Ltd .......................
Subsidy
rate
(percent)
25.91
18.37
21.28
186.18
10 See
Certain Non-Refillable Steel Cylinders from
the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary
Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination and
Alignment of Final Determination with Final
Antidumping Determination, 85 FR 53323 (August
28, 2020) (CVD Preliminary Determination).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:13 May 10, 2021
Jkt 253001
Subsidy
rate
(percent)
Company
Jinhua Sinoblue Machinery Manufacturing Co., Ltd ..................
Ningbo Runkey CGA Cylinders
Co., Ltd ...................................
Ninhua Group Co., Ltd ...............
Shanghai Ronghua High-Pressure Vessel Co., Ltd ...............
Zhejiang Ansheng Mechanical
Manufacture Co., Ltd ..............
Zhejiang Nof Chemical Co., Ltd
186.18
186.18
186.18
186.18
186.18
186.18
Provisional Measures—CVD
Section 703(d) of the Act states that
the suspension of liquidation pursuant
to an affirmative preliminary
determination may not remain in effect
for more than four months. Commerce
published the CVD Preliminary
Determination on August 28, 2020.11 As
such, the four-month period beginning
on the date of the publication of the
CVD Preliminary Determination ended
on December 25, 2020.
Therefore, in accordance with section
703(d) of the Act, we instructed CBP to
terminate the suspension of liquidation
and to liquidate, without regard to
countervailing duties, unliquidated
entries of non-refillable cylinders from
China entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption, on or after
December 26, 2020, the date on which
the provisional measures expired, until
and through the day preceding the date
of publication of the ITC’s final injury
determination in the Federal Register.
Suspension of liquidation will resume
on the date of publication of the ITC’s
final determination in the Federal
Register.
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice constitutes the AD and
CVD orders with respect to nonrefillable cylinders from China pursuant
to sections 706(a) and 736(a) of the Act.
Interested parties can find a list of
orders currently in effect at https://
enforcement.trade.gov/stats/
iastats1.html.
These orders are published in
accordance with sections 706(a) and
736(a) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.211(b).
Dated: May 6, 2021.
James Maeder,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations.
Appendix
Scope of the Orders
The merchandise covered by these orders
is certain seamed (welded or brazed), nonrefillable steel cylinders meeting the
11 See
PO 00000
CVD Preliminary Determination.
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
25841
requirements of, or produced to meet the
requirements of, U.S. Department of
Transportation (USDOT) Specification 39,
TransportCanada Specification 39M, or
United Nations pressure receptacle standard
ISO 11118 and otherwise meeting the
description provided below (non-refillable
steel cylinders). The subject non-refillable
steel cylinders are portable and range from
300-cubic inch (4.9 liter) water capacity to
1,526-cubic inch (25 liter) water capacity.
Subject non-refillable steel cylinders may be
imported with or without a valve and/or
pressure release device and unfilled at the
time of importation. Non-refillable steel
cylinders filled with pressurized air
otherwise meeting the physical description
above are covered by these orders.
Specifically excluded are seamless nonrefillable steel cylinders.
The merchandise subject to these orders is
properly classified under statistical reporting
numbers 7311.00.0060 and 7311.00.0090 of
the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS). The merchandise
may also enter under HTSUS statistical
reporting numbers 7310.29.0025 and
7310.29.0050. Although the HTSUS
statistical reporting numbers are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the
written description of the merchandise is
dispositive.
[FR Doc. 2021–09942 Filed 5–10–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–909]
Certain Steel Nails From the People’s
Republic of China: Preliminary Results
of the Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review and Preliminary
Determination of No Shipments; 2019–
2020
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(Commerce) preliminarily determines
that certain companies made sales of
subject merchandise at less than normal
value. The period of review (POR) is
August 1, 2019, to July 31, 2020.
Interested parties are invited to
comment on these preliminary results.
AGENCY:
DATES:
Applicable May 11, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joshua Simonidis, AD/CVD Operations,
Office VIII, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–0608.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\11MYN1.SGM
11MYN1
25842
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 11, 2021 / Notices
Background
On October 6, 2020, Commerce
initiated an administrative review on
the antidumping duty order on certain
steel nails (nails) from the People’s
Republic of China (China) covering the
period August 1, 2019, to July 31, 2020
with respect to 457 companies.1 Based
on the timely withdrawal of review
requests, we rescinded the
administrative review with respect to
five companies pursuant to 19 CFR
351.213(d)(1) and (4).2 Therefore, the
results of this review cover the
remaining 452 companies.
Scope of the Order
The products covered by the Order
are nails from China. For a complete
description of the scope, see the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.3
Methodology
Commerce is conducting this review
in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B)
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended
(the Act).
For a full description of the
methodology underlying our
conclusions, see the Preliminary
Determination Memorandum. The
Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a
public document and is on file
electronically via Enforcement and
Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a
complete version of the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum can be accessed
directly at https://
enforcement.trade.gov/frn/.
A list of topics included in the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum is
provided as an appendix to this notice.
Preliminary Determination of No
Shipments
Based on our analysis of U.S. Customs
and Border Protection (CBP)
information and information provided
by a number of companies, we
1 See
Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 85 FR
63081 (October 6, 2020) (Initiation Notice).
2 The five companies for which the review was
rescinded are: Oriental Cherry Hardware Group.,
Ltd.; Youngwoo Fasteners Co., Ltd.; China Staple
Enterprise Co., Ltd.; Faithful Engineering Products
Co., Ltd.; and Promising Way (Hong Kong) Ltd. See
Certain Steel Nails from the People’s Republic of
China: Partial Rescission of AntidumpingDuty
Administrative Review; 2019–2020, 86 FR 7065
(January 26, 2021).
3 See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for
the Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review: Certain Steel Nails from the
People’s Republic of China; 2019–2020,’’ issued
concurrently with and hereby adopted by this
notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:13 May 10, 2021
Jkt 253001
preliminarily determine that 21
companies under review did not have
any shipments of subject merchandise
during the POR.4 For additional
information regarding this
determination, see the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum.
Consistent with our practice, we are
not rescinding this review with respect
to these companies but, instead, intend
to complete the review and issue
appropriate instructions to CBP based
on the final results of the review.5
China-Wide Entity
In accordance with Commerce’s
policy, the China-wide entity will not be
under review unless a party specifically
requests, or Commerce self-initiates, a
review of the China-wide entity.6
Because no party requested a review of
the China-wide entity in this review, the
China-wide entity is not under review
and the weighted-average dumping
margin for the China-wide entity is not
subject to change (i.e., 118.04 percent).7
Preliminary Results of Review
Commerce finds that the two
mandatory respondents, Qingdao D&L
Group Ltd. (Qingdao D&L) and Shanghai
Yueda Nails Industry Co., Ltd., a.k.a.
Shanghai Yueda Nails Co. (Shanghai
Yueda), have not established their
eligibility for a separate rate and are to
be considered part of the China-wide
entity for these preliminary results.
Furthermore, because 427 additional
companies did not submit separate rate
applications or certifications, or noshipment certifications, we
preliminarily determine they are
ineligible for a separate rate as well and
are part of the China-wide entity. See
Appendix I of the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum for a full list of
4 These companies are: Astrotech Steels Private
Limited; Dezhou Hualude Hardware Products Co.,
Ltd.; Geekay Wires Limited; Hebei Minmetals Co.,
Ltd.; Mingguang Ruifeng Hardware Products Co.,
Ltd.; Nanjing Caiqing Hardware Co., Ltd.; Nanjing
Yuechang Hardware Co., Ltd.; Region Industries
Co., Ltd.; Region System Sdn. Bhd; Schenker China
Ltd Chengdu Branch; Schenker China Ltd.; SDC
International Aust. Pty. Ltd.; Shandong Qingyun
Hongyi Hardware Products Co., Ltd.; Shanxi Hairui
Trade Co., Ltd.; Shanxi Pioneer Hardware Industrial
Co., Ltd.; Shanxi Yuci Broad Wire Products Co.,
Ltd.; S-Mart (Tianjin) Technology Development Co.,
Ltd.; Suntec Industries Co., Ltd.; Tianjin Jinchi
Metal Products Co., Ltd.; Tianjin Jinghai County
Hongli Industry & Business Co., Ltd.; and Xi’an
Metals & Minerals Import & Export Co., Ltd.
5 See Non-Market Economy Antidumping
Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76
FR 65694, 65694–95 (October 24, 2011) (NME
Assessment of Duties).
6 Id.
7 The China-wide rate determined in the
investigation was 118.04 percent. See Notice of
Antidumping Duty Order: Certain Steel Nails from
the People’s Republic of China, 73 FR 44961
(August 1, 2008) (Order).
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
companies that are part of the Chinawide entity.
The statute and Commerce’s
regulations do not address what rate to
apply to respondents not selected for
individual examination when
Commerce limits its examination in an
administrative review pursuant to
section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. Generally,
Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5) of
the Act, which provides instructions for
calculating the all-others rate in an
investigation, for guidance when
calculating the rate for non-selected
respondents that are not examined
individually in an administrative
review. Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act
states that the all-others rate should be
calculated by averaging the weightedaverage dumping margins for
individually-examined respondents,
excluding rates that are zero, de
minimis, or based entirely on facts
available. Section 735(c)(5)(B) of the Act
provides that, where all rates are zero,
de minimis, or based entirely on facts
available, Commerce may use ‘‘any
reasonable method’’ for assigning a rate
to non-examined respondents.
However, for these preliminary
results, we have not calculated any
individual rates or assigned a rate based
on facts available. Therefore, consistent
with our recent practice, we
preliminarily determine to assign to the
non-individually examined separate rate
respondents the most recently assigned
separate rate in this proceeding, which
is from the previous administrative
review.8 Using this method, we are
preliminarily assigning a separate rate
margin of 41.75 percent to the two nonindividually examined companies,
Shanghai Curvet Hardware Products
Co., Ltd. and Tianjin Zhonglian Metals
Ware Co., Ltd., that demonstrated their
eligibility for a separate rate.
Commerce preliminarily determines
that the following estimated weightedaverage dumping margins exist for the
period August 1, 2019, to July 31, 2020:
8 See, e.g., Shenzhen Xinboda Industrial Co., Ltd.,
v. United States, Court No. 15–00179, Slip Op. (CIT
2016); see also Certain Steel Threaded Rod From
the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results
of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review
and Rescission of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review, in Part; 2015–2016, 82 FR
21189, 21192 (May 5, 2017), unchanged in Certain
Steel Threaded Rod from the People’s Republic of
China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2015–2016, 82 FR 51611
(November 7, 2017); and Certain Frozen Fish Fillets
from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Preliminary
Results and Partial Rescission of the Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review; 2014–2015, 81 FR
64131, 64133 (September 19, 2016), unchanged in
Certain Frozen Fish Fillets From the Socialist
Republic of Vietnam: Final Results and Partial
Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2014–2015, 82 FR 15181 (March 27, 2017).
E:\FR\FM\11MYN1.SGM
11MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 11, 2021 / Notices
Exporter
Shanghai Curvet Hardware
Products Co., Ltd ....................
Tianjin Zhonglian Metals Ware
Co., Ltd ...................................
Estimated
weightedaverage
dumping
margin
(percent)
41.75
41.75
Disclosure and Public Comment
Interested parties may submit case
briefs no later than 30 days after the
date of publication of this notice.9
Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised
in the case briefs, may be filed no later
than seven days after the time limit for
filing case briefs.10 Parties who submit
case brief or rebuttal briefs in this
proceeding are encouraged to submit
with each argument: (1) A statement of
the issue; (2) a brief summary of the
argument; and (3) a table of
authorities.11 Case and rebuttal briefs
should be filed using ACCESS.12
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c),
interested parties who wish to request a
hearing must submit a written request to
the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance, U.S. Department of
Commerce, filed electronically via
ACCESS within 30 days after the date of
publication of this notice.13 Hearing
requests should contain: (1) The party’s
name, address, and telephone number;
(2) the number of participants; and (3)
a list of issues to be discussed. Issues
raised in the hearing will be limited to
issues raised in the briefs. If a request
for a hearing is made, parties will be
notified of the time and date for the
hearing to be held.14 An electronicallyfiled document must be received
successfully in its entirety by ACCESS
by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on the
established deadline. Note that
Commerce has temporarily modified
certain of its requirements for serving
documents containing business
proprietary information, until further
notice.15
Unless otherwise extended,
Commerce intends to issue the final
results of this administrative review,
9 See
19 CFR 351.309(c).
19 CFR 351.309(d); see also Temporary
Rule Modifying AD/CVD Service Requirements Due
to COVID–19, 85 FR 17006 (March 26, 2020), and
Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD Service
Requirements Due to COVID 19; Extension of
Effective Period, 85 FR 41363 (July 10, 2020)
(collectively, Temporary Rule).
11 See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2).
12 See 19 CFR 351.303.
13 See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
14 See 19 CFR 351.310(d).
15 See 19 CFR 351.309; see also 19 CFR 351.303
(for general filing requirements); and Temporary
Rule.
10 See
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:13 May 10, 2021
Jkt 253001
which will include the results of its
analysis of all issues raised in the case
briefs, within 120 days of the
publication of these preliminary results,
pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(1).
Assessment Rates
Upon issuance of the final results of
this review, Commerce will determine,
and CBP shall assess, antidumping
duties on all appropriate entries of
subject merchandise covered by this
review.16 If the preliminary results are
unchanged for the final results, we will
instruct CBP to apply an ad valorem
assessment rate of 118.04 percent to all
entries of subject merchandise during
the POR which were exported by 429
companies, including Qingdao D&L and
Shanghai Yueda, in the China-wide
entity. If Commerce continues to make
a no-shipment finding in the final
results for the 21 companies referenced
in the ‘‘Preliminary Determination of No
Shipments’’ section above, any
suspended entries of subject
merchandise associated with those
companies will also be liquidated at the
China-wide rate. For the two companies
receiving a separate rate, we intend to
assign an assessment rate of 41.75
percent, consistent with the
methodology described above.
Commerce intends to issue
assessment instructions to CBP no
earlier than 35 days after the date of
publication of the final results of this
review in the Federal Register. If a
timely summons is filed at the U.S.
Court of International Trade, the
assessment instructions will direct CBP
not to liquidate relevant entries until the
time for parties to file a request for a
statutory injunction has expired (i.e.,
within 90 days of publication).
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of this
administrative review for shipments of
the subject merchandise from China
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the
publication date of this notice, as
provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the
Act: (1) For the companies listed above
that have a separate rate, the cash
deposit rate will be that rate established
in the final results of this review
(except, if the rate is zero or de minimis,
then a cash deposit rate of zero will be
established for those companies); (2) for
previously investigated or reviewed
Chinese and non-Chinese exporters of
subject merchandise not listed above
16 See
PO 00000
that continue to be eligible for a separate
rate based on a completed prior segment
of this proceeding, the cash deposit rate
will continue to be that existing cash
deposit rate published for the most
recently completed period; (3) for all
Chinese exporters of subject
merchandise that have not been found
to be entitled to a separate rate,
including Qingdao D&L and Shanghai
Yueda, the cash deposit rate will be
118.04 percent, the weighted-average
dumping margin for the China-wide
entity from the less-than-fair-value
investigation; and (4) for all nonChinese exporters of subject
merchandise which have not received
their own separate rate, the cash deposit
rate will be the rate applicable to the
Chinese exporter that supplied that nonChinese exporter. These cash deposit
requirements, when imposed, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a preliminary
reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of any
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this
review period. Failure to comply with
this requirement could result in the
presumption that reimbursement of the
antidumping duties occurred and the
subsequent assessment of double
antidumping duties.
Notification to Interested Parties
These preliminary results are issued
and published in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(l) of the
Act, and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(1).
Dated: May 3, 2021.
Ryan Majerus,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and
Negotiation.
Appendix I
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Preliminary Determination of No
Shipments
V. Discussion of the Methodology
VI. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2021–09941 Filed 5–10–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
25843
E:\FR\FM\11MYN1.SGM
11MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 89 (Tuesday, May 11, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25841-25843]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-09941]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-909]
Certain Steel Nails From the People's Republic of China:
Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and
Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2019-2020
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines
that certain companies made sales of subject merchandise at less than
normal value. The period of review (POR) is August 1, 2019, to July 31,
2020. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary
results.
DATES: Applicable May 11, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joshua Simonidis, AD/CVD Operations,
Office VIII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0608.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[[Page 25842]]
Background
On October 6, 2020, Commerce initiated an administrative review on
the antidumping duty order on certain steel nails (nails) from the
People's Republic of China (China) covering the period August 1, 2019,
to July 31, 2020 with respect to 457 companies.\1\ Based on the timely
withdrawal of review requests, we rescinded the administrative review
with respect to five companies pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1) and
(4).\2\ Therefore, the results of this review cover the remaining 452
companies.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews, 85 FR 63081 (October 6, 2020) (Initiation
Notice).
\2\ The five companies for which the review was rescinded are:
Oriental Cherry Hardware Group., Ltd.; Youngwoo Fasteners Co., Ltd.;
China Staple Enterprise Co., Ltd.; Faithful Engineering Products
Co., Ltd.; and Promising Way (Hong Kong) Ltd. See Certain Steel
Nails from the People's Republic of China: Partial Rescission of
AntidumpingDuty Administrative Review; 2019-2020, 86 FR 7065
(January 26, 2021).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The products covered by the Order are nails from China. For a
complete description of the scope, see the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Memorandum, ``Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary
Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Certain Steel
Nails from the People's Republic of China; 2019-2020,'' issued
concurrently with and hereby adopted by this notice (Preliminary
Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Methodology
Commerce is conducting this review in accordance with section
751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).
For a full description of the methodology underlying our
conclusions, see the Preliminary Determination Memorandum. The
Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file
electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov. In
addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can
be accessed directly at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. A
list of topics included in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is
provided as an appendix to this notice.
Preliminary Determination of No Shipments
Based on our analysis of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
information and information provided by a number of companies, we
preliminarily determine that 21 companies under review did not have any
shipments of subject merchandise during the POR.\4\ For additional
information regarding this determination, see the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ These companies are: Astrotech Steels Private Limited;
Dezhou Hualude Hardware Products Co., Ltd.; Geekay Wires Limited;
Hebei Minmetals Co., Ltd.; Mingguang Ruifeng Hardware Products Co.,
Ltd.; Nanjing Caiqing Hardware Co., Ltd.; Nanjing Yuechang Hardware
Co., Ltd.; Region Industries Co., Ltd.; Region System Sdn. Bhd;
Schenker China Ltd Chengdu Branch; Schenker China Ltd.; SDC
International Aust. Pty. Ltd.; Shandong Qingyun Hongyi Hardware
Products Co., Ltd.; Shanxi Hairui Trade Co., Ltd.; Shanxi Pioneer
Hardware Industrial Co., Ltd.; Shanxi Yuci Broad Wire Products Co.,
Ltd.; S-Mart (Tianjin) Technology Development Co., Ltd.; Suntec
Industries Co., Ltd.; Tianjin Jinchi Metal Products Co., Ltd.;
Tianjin Jinghai County Hongli Industry & Business Co., Ltd.; and
Xi'an Metals & Minerals Import & Export Co., Ltd.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Consistent with our practice, we are not rescinding this review
with respect to these companies but, instead, intend to complete the
review and issue appropriate instructions to CBP based on the final
results of the review.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment
of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694, 65694-95 (October 24, 2011) (NME
Assessment of Duties).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
China-Wide Entity
In accordance with Commerce's policy, the China-wide entity will
not be under review unless a party specifically requests, or Commerce
self-initiates, a review of the China-wide entity.\6\ Because no party
requested a review of the China-wide entity in this review, the China-
wide entity is not under review and the weighted-average dumping margin
for the China-wide entity is not subject to change (i.e., 118.04
percent).\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ Id.
\7\ The China-wide rate determined in the investigation was
118.04 percent. See Notice of Antidumping Duty Order: Certain Steel
Nails from the People's Republic of China, 73 FR 44961 (August 1,
2008) (Order).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Preliminary Results of Review
Commerce finds that the two mandatory respondents, Qingdao D&L
Group Ltd. (Qingdao D&L) and Shanghai Yueda Nails Industry Co., Ltd.,
a.k.a. Shanghai Yueda Nails Co. (Shanghai Yueda), have not established
their eligibility for a separate rate and are to be considered part of
the China-wide entity for these preliminary results. Furthermore,
because 427 additional companies did not submit separate rate
applications or certifications, or no-shipment certifications, we
preliminarily determine they are ineligible for a separate rate as well
and are part of the China-wide entity. See Appendix I of the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum for a full list of companies that are
part of the China-wide entity.
The statute and Commerce's regulations do not address what rate to
apply to respondents not selected for individual examination when
Commerce limits its examination in an administrative review pursuant to
section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. Generally, Commerce looks to section
735(c)(5) of the Act, which provides instructions for calculating the
all-others rate in an investigation, for guidance when calculating the
rate for non-selected respondents that are not examined individually in
an administrative review. Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act states that
the all-others rate should be calculated by averaging the weighted-
average dumping margins for individually-examined respondents,
excluding rates that are zero, de minimis, or based entirely on facts
available. Section 735(c)(5)(B) of the Act provides that, where all
rates are zero, de minimis, or based entirely on facts available,
Commerce may use ``any reasonable method'' for assigning a rate to non-
examined respondents.
However, for these preliminary results, we have not calculated any
individual rates or assigned a rate based on facts available.
Therefore, consistent with our recent practice, we preliminarily
determine to assign to the non-individually examined separate rate
respondents the most recently assigned separate rate in this
proceeding, which is from the previous administrative review.\8\ Using
this method, we are preliminarily assigning a separate rate margin of
41.75 percent to the two non-individually examined companies, Shanghai
Curvet Hardware Products Co., Ltd. and Tianjin Zhonglian Metals Ware
Co., Ltd., that demonstrated their eligibility for a separate rate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See, e.g., Shenzhen Xinboda Industrial Co., Ltd., v. United
States, Court No. 15-00179, Slip Op. (CIT 2016); see also Certain
Steel Threaded Rod From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary
Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Rescission
of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, in Part; 2015-2016, 82 FR
21189, 21192 (May 5, 2017), unchanged in Certain Steel Threaded Rod
from the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review; 2015-2016, 82 FR 51611 (November 7,
2017); and Certain Frozen Fish Fillets from the Socialist Republic
of Vietnam: Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of the
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014-2015, 81 FR 64131,
64133 (September 19, 2016), unchanged in Certain Frozen Fish Fillets
From the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Final Results and Partial
Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014-2015, 82
FR 15181 (March 27, 2017).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commerce preliminarily determines that the following estimated
weighted-average dumping margins exist for the period August 1, 2019,
to July 31, 2020:
[[Page 25843]]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated
weighted-
average
Exporter dumping
margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shanghai Curvet Hardware Products Co., Ltd.................. 41.75
Tianjin Zhonglian Metals Ware Co., Ltd...................... 41.75
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure and Public Comment
Interested parties may submit case briefs no later than 30 days
after the date of publication of this notice.\9\ Rebuttal briefs,
limited to issues raised in the case briefs, may be filed no later than
seven days after the time limit for filing case briefs.\10\ Parties who
submit case brief or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are encouraged
to submit with each argument: (1) A statement of the issue; (2) a brief
summary of the argument; and (3) a table of authorities.\11\ Case and
rebuttal briefs should be filed using ACCESS.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c).
\10\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d); see also Temporary Rule Modifying
AD/CVD Service Requirements Due to COVID-19, 85 FR 17006 (March 26,
2020), and Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD Service Requirements Due
to COVID 19; Extension of Effective Period, 85 FR 41363 (July 10,
2020) (collectively, Temporary Rule).
\11\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2).
\12\ See 19 CFR 351.303.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to
request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant
Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce,
filed electronically via ACCESS within 30 days after the date of
publication of this notice.\13\ Hearing requests should contain: (1)
The party's name, address, and telephone number; (2) the number of
participants; and (3) a list of issues to be discussed. Issues raised
in the hearing will be limited to issues raised in the briefs. If a
request for a hearing is made, parties will be notified of the time and
date for the hearing to be held.\14\ An electronically-filed document
must be received successfully in its entirety by ACCESS by 5:00 p.m.
Eastern Time on the established deadline. Note that Commerce has
temporarily modified certain of its requirements for serving documents
containing business proprietary information, until further notice.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
\14\ See 19 CFR 351.310(d).
\15\ See 19 CFR 351.309; see also 19 CFR 351.303 (for general
filing requirements); and Temporary Rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unless otherwise extended, Commerce intends to issue the final
results of this administrative review, which will include the results
of its analysis of all issues raised in the case briefs, within 120
days of the publication of these preliminary results, pursuant to
section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(1).
Assessment Rates
Upon issuance of the final results of this review, Commerce will
determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries of subject merchandise covered by this review.\16\ If the
preliminary results are unchanged for the final results, we will
instruct CBP to apply an ad valorem assessment rate of 118.04 percent
to all entries of subject merchandise during the POR which were
exported by 429 companies, including Qingdao D&L and Shanghai Yueda, in
the China-wide entity. If Commerce continues to make a no-shipment
finding in the final results for the 21 companies referenced in the
``Preliminary Determination of No Shipments'' section above, any
suspended entries of subject merchandise associated with those
companies will also be liquidated at the China-wide rate. For the two
companies receiving a separate rate, we intend to assign an assessment
rate of 41.75 percent, consistent with the methodology described above.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP no earlier
than 35 days after the date of publication of the final results of this
review in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is filed at the
U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will
direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties
to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within
90 days of publication).
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of this administrative review for
shipments of the subject merchandise from China entered, or withdrawn
from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of
this notice, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For
the companies listed above that have a separate rate, the cash deposit
rate will be that rate established in the final results of this review
(except, if the rate is zero or de minimis, then a cash deposit rate of
zero will be established for those companies); (2) for previously
investigated or reviewed Chinese and non-Chinese exporters of subject
merchandise not listed above that continue to be eligible for a
separate rate based on a completed prior segment of this proceeding,
the cash deposit rate will continue to be that existing cash deposit
rate published for the most recently completed period; (3) for all
Chinese exporters of subject merchandise that have not been found to be
entitled to a separate rate, including Qingdao D&L and Shanghai Yueda,
the cash deposit rate will be 118.04 percent, the weighted-average
dumping margin for the China-wide entity from the less-than-fair-value
investigation; and (4) for all non-Chinese exporters of subject
merchandise which have not received their own separate rate, the cash
deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the Chinese exporter that
supplied that non-Chinese exporter. These cash deposit requirements,
when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of any antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure
to comply with this requirement could result in the presumption that
reimbursement of the antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
Notification to Interested Parties
These preliminary results are issued and published in accordance
with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(l) of the Act, and 19 CFR
351.213(h)(1).
Dated: May 3, 2021.
Ryan Majerus,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiation.
Appendix I
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Preliminary Determination of No Shipments
V. Discussion of the Methodology
VI. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2021-09941 Filed 5-10-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P