Commission Determination To Review an Initial Determination Granting Summary Determination and on Review To Vacate as Moot; Notice of Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Investigation in Its Entirety Based on a Withdrawal of the Complaint; Termination of the Investigation; Certain Pre-Filled Syringes for Intravitreal Injection and Components Thereof, 24413-24414 [2021-09576]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 86 / Thursday, May 6, 2021 / Notices
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its internet server (https://
www.usitc.gov). The public record for
these reviews may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background.—On January 4, 2021, the
Commission determined that the
domestic interested party group
response to its notice of institution (85
FR 61984, October 1, 2020) of the
subject five-year review was adequate
and that the respondent interested party
group response was inadequate. The
Commission did not find any other
circumstances that would warrant
conducting a full review.1 Accordingly,
the Commission determined that it
would conduct an expedited review
pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of the
Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(3)).
For further information concerning
the conduct of this review and rules of
general application, consult the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, part 201, subparts A and B
(19 CFR part 201), and part 207,
subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part
207).
Please note the Secretary’s Office will
accept only electronic filings at this
time. Filings must be made through the
Commission’s Electronic Document
Information System (EDIS, https://
edis.usitc.gov). No in-person paperbased filings or paper copies of any
electronic filings will be accepted until
further notice.
Staff report.—A staff report
containing information concerning the
subject matter of the review will be
placed in the nonpublic record on May
4, 2021, and made available to persons
on the Administrative Protective Order
service list for this review. A public
version will be issued thereafter,
pursuant to section 207.62(d)(4) of the
Commission’s rules.
Written submissions.—As provided in
section 207.62(d) of the Commission’s
rules, interested parties that are parties
to the review and that have provided
individually adequate responses to the
notice of institution,2 and any party
other than an interested party to the
review may file written comments with
the Secretary on what determination the
Commission should reach in the review.
Comments are due on or before May 7,
2021 and may not contain new factual
information. Any person that is neither
a party to the five-year review nor an
interested party may submit a brief
written statement (which shall not
contain any new factual information)
pertinent to the reviews by May 7, 2021.
However, should the Department of
Commerce (‘‘Commerce’’) extend the
time limit for its completion of the final
results of its review, the deadline for
comments (which may not contain new
factual information) on Commerce’s
final results is three business days after
the issuance of Commerce’s results. If
comments contain business proprietary
information (BPI), they must conform
with the requirements of sections 201.6,
207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s
rules. The Commission’s Handbook on
Filing Procedures, available on the
Commission’s website at https://
www.usitc.gov/documents/handbook_
on_filing_procedures.pdf, elaborates
upon the Commission’s procedures with
respect to filings.
In accordance with sections 201.16(c)
and 207.3 of the rules, each document
filed by a party to the reviews must be
served on all other parties to the review
(as identified by either the public or BPI
service list), and a certificate of service
must be timely filed. The Secretary will
not accept a document for filing without
a certificate of service.
Determination.—The Commission has
determined this review is
extraordinarily complicated and
therefore has determined to exercise its
authority to extend the review period by
up to 90 days pursuant to 19 U.S.C.
1675(c)(5)(B).
Authority: This review is being conducted
under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act
of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to
section 207.62 of the Commission’s rules.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: April 30, 2021.
Katherine Hiner,
Supervisory Attorney.
[FR Doc. 2021–09529 Filed 5–5–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
1 A record of the Commissioners’ votes is
available from the Office of the Secretary and at the
Commission’s website.
2 The Commission has found the response to its
notice of institution filed on behalf of Chemical
Products Corporation, the sole domestic producer of
barium chloride, to be individually adequate.
Comments from other interested parties will not be
accepted (see 19 CFR 207.62(d)(2)).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:49 May 05, 2021
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
24413
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–1207]
Commission Determination To Review
an Initial Determination Granting
Summary Determination and on
Review To Vacate as Moot; Notice of
Commission Determination Not To
Review an Initial Determination
Terminating the Investigation in Its
Entirety Based on a Withdrawal of the
Complaint; Termination of the
Investigation; Certain Pre-Filled
Syringes for Intravitreal Injection and
Components Thereof
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) has
determined to review an initial
determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 31)
granting summary determination of
infringement and of domestic industry,
and on review, to vacate that ID as moot,
and not to review a second ID (Order
No. 33) terminating the investigation
based on a withdrawal of the complaint.
The investigation is terminated.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert Needham, Office of the General
Counsel, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
708–5468. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help
accessing EDIS, please email
EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
Hearing-impaired persons are advised
that information on this matter can be
obtained by contacting the
Commission’s TDD terminal on (202)
205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July
27, 2020, the Commission instituted this
investigation based on a complaint filed
by Novartis Pharma AG, Novartis
Pharmaceuticals Corporation, and
Novartis Technology LLC (collectively,
‘‘Novartis’’). 85 FR 45227–28. The
complaint alleges violations of section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, based on the
importation into the United States, sale
for importation, or sale in the United
States after importation of certain prefilled syringes for intravitreal injections
and components thereof that infringe
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\06MYN1.SGM
06MYN1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
24414
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 86 / Thursday, May 6, 2021 / Notices
one or more of claims 1–6 and 11–26 of
U.S. Patent No. 9,220,631 (‘‘the ’631
patent’’). Id. The complaint also alleges
the existence of a domestic industry. Id.
The notice of investigation names
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. of
Tarrytown, New York (‘‘Regeneron’’) as
the sole respondent and the Office of
Unfair Import Investigations (‘‘OUII’’) as
a party. Id. at 45228.
On February 18, 2021, Novartis filed
a motion for summary determination
that Regeneron directly infringes the
’631 patent and that Novartis satisfied
the domestic industry requirement. On
March 1, 2021, OUII filed a response in
support of the motion, and Regeneron
filed a response opposing Novartis’s
argument that it satisfied the economic
prong of the domestic industry
requirement.
On April 2, 2021, the presiding
administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) issued
the first ID (Order No. 31), granting
summary determination of infringement
and domestic industry. No petitions for
review of the ID were received.
On April 8, 2021, Novartis filed an
unopposed motion to terminate the
investigation in its entirety based on its
withdrawal of the complaint. The
motion indicated that Regeneron and
OUII did not oppose the motion, and
Regeneron did not file a response to the
motion. OUII filed a response in support
of the motion. The motion to terminate
the investigation was filed before the
deadline to petition for review of Order
No. 31 had passed. See 19 CFR
210.43(a).
On April 8, 2021, the ALJ issued the
second ID (Order No. 33), granting the
motion and terminating the
investigation. Order No. 33 was issued
before the deadline to petition for
review of Order No. 31 had passed. No
petitions for review of the second ID
were filed.
The Commission has determined to
review the first ID, Order No. 31, in its
entirety, and on review, to vacate that ID
as moot because the summary
determination issues became moot in
light of Novartis’s motion to withdraw
its complaint and terminate the
investigation. Vice Chair Stayin and
Commissioner Johanson do not join the
Commission’s decision to review and
vacate Order No. 31. In the absence of
a request from any party to review or
vacate the Order, or any other grounds
for review set forth in 19 CFR 210.44,
they would not review Order No. 31.
The Commission has further
determined not to review the second ID,
Order No. 33, terminating the
investigation. The investigation is
hereby terminated in its entirety.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:49 May 05, 2021
Jkt 253001
The Commission vote for this
determination took place on May 3,
2021.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in Section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part
210 of the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part
210).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: May 3, 2021.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2021–09576 Filed 5–5–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 701–TA–437 and 731–
TA–1060–1061 (Third Review)]
Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from
China and India; Scheduling of
Expedited Five-Year Reviews
United States International
Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Commission hereby gives
notice of the scheduling of expedited
reviews pursuant to the Tariff Act of
1930 (‘‘the Act’’) to determine whether
revocation of the countervailing and
antidumping duty orders on carbazole
violet pigment 23 from China and India
would be likely to lead to continuation
or recurrence of material injury within
a reasonably foreseeable time.
DATES: January 4, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kristina Lara (202–205–3386), Office of
Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW,
Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain
information on this matter by contacting
the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office
of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its internet server (https://
www.usitc.gov). The public record for
these reviews may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background.—On January 4, 2021, the
Commission determined that the
domestic interested party group
response to its notice of institution (85
FR 61980, October 1, 2020) of the
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
subject five-year reviews was adequate
and that the respondent interested party
group response was inadequate. The
Commission did not find any other
circumstances that would warrant
conducting full reviews.1 Accordingly,
the Commission determined that it
would conduct expedited reviews
pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of the
Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(3)).
For further information concerning
the conduct of these reviews and rules
of general application, consult the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, part 201, subparts A and B
(19 CFR part 201), and part 207,
subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part
207).
Please note the Secretary’s Office will
accept only electronic filings at this
time. Filings must be made through the
Commission’s Electronic Document
Information System (EDIS, https://
edis.usitc.gov). No in-person paperbased filings or paper copies of any
electronic filings will be accepted until
further notice.
Staff report.—A staff report
containing information concerning the
subject matter of the reviews will be
placed in the nonpublic record on May
4, 2021, and made available to persons
on the Administrative Protective Order
service list for these reviews. A public
version will be issued thereafter,
pursuant to § 207.62(d)(4) of the
Commission’s rules.
Written submissions.—As provided in
§ 207.62(d) of the Commission’s rules,
interested parties that are parties to the
reviews and that have provided
individually adequate responses to the
notice of institution,2 and any party
other than an interested party to the
reviews may file written comments with
the Secretary on what determination the
Commission should reach in the
reviews. Comments are due on or before
May 7, 2021 and may not contain new
factual information. Any person that is
neither a party to the five-year reviews
nor an interested party may submit a
brief written statement (which shall not
contain any new factual information)
pertinent to the reviews by May 7, 2021.
However, should the Department of
Commerce (‘‘Commerce’’) extend the
time limit for its completion of the final
results of its reviews, the deadline for
comments (which may not contain new
1 A record of the Commissioners’ votes is
available from the Office of the Secretary and at the
Commission’s website.
2 The Commission has found a response to its
notice of institution filed on behalf of Sun Chemical
Corp., a domestic producer of carbazole violet
pigment 23, to be individually adequate. Comments
from other interested parties will not be accepted
(see 19 CFR 207.62(d)(2)).
E:\FR\FM\06MYN1.SGM
06MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 86 (Thursday, May 6, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24413-24414]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-09576]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-1207]
Commission Determination To Review an Initial Determination
Granting Summary Determination and on Review To Vacate as Moot; Notice
of Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination
Terminating the Investigation in Its Entirety Based on a Withdrawal of
the Complaint; Termination of the Investigation; Certain Pre-Filled
Syringes for Intravitreal Injection and Components Thereof
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade
Commission (``Commission'') has determined to review an initial
determination (``ID'') (Order No. 31) granting summary determination of
infringement and of domestic industry, and on review, to vacate that ID
as moot, and not to review a second ID (Order No. 33) terminating the
investigation based on a withdrawal of the complaint. The investigation
is terminated.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Needham, Office of the General
Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708-5468. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation may
be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help accessing EDIS, please email
[email protected]. General information concerning the Commission may
also be obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal
on (202) 205-1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July 27, 2020, the Commission instituted
this investigation based on a complaint filed by Novartis Pharma AG,
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, and Novartis Technology LLC
(collectively, ``Novartis''). 85 FR 45227-28. The complaint alleges
violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19
U.S.C. 1337, based on the importation into the United States, sale for
importation, or sale in the United States after importation of certain
pre-filled syringes for intravitreal injections and components thereof
that infringe
[[Page 24414]]
one or more of claims 1-6 and 11-26 of U.S. Patent No. 9,220,631 (``the
'631 patent''). Id. The complaint also alleges the existence of a
domestic industry. Id. The notice of investigation names Regeneron
Pharmaceuticals Inc. of Tarrytown, New York (``Regeneron'') as the sole
respondent and the Office of Unfair Import Investigations (``OUII'') as
a party. Id. at 45228.
On February 18, 2021, Novartis filed a motion for summary
determination that Regeneron directly infringes the '631 patent and
that Novartis satisfied the domestic industry requirement. On March 1,
2021, OUII filed a response in support of the motion, and Regeneron
filed a response opposing Novartis's argument that it satisfied the
economic prong of the domestic industry requirement.
On April 2, 2021, the presiding administrative law judge (``ALJ'')
issued the first ID (Order No. 31), granting summary determination of
infringement and domestic industry. No petitions for review of the ID
were received.
On April 8, 2021, Novartis filed an unopposed motion to terminate
the investigation in its entirety based on its withdrawal of the
complaint. The motion indicated that Regeneron and OUII did not oppose
the motion, and Regeneron did not file a response to the motion. OUII
filed a response in support of the motion. The motion to terminate the
investigation was filed before the deadline to petition for review of
Order No. 31 had passed. See 19 CFR 210.43(a).
On April 8, 2021, the ALJ issued the second ID (Order No. 33),
granting the motion and terminating the investigation. Order No. 33 was
issued before the deadline to petition for review of Order No. 31 had
passed. No petitions for review of the second ID were filed.
The Commission has determined to review the first ID, Order No. 31,
in its entirety, and on review, to vacate that ID as moot because the
summary determination issues became moot in light of Novartis's motion
to withdraw its complaint and terminate the investigation. Vice Chair
Stayin and Commissioner Johanson do not join the Commission's decision
to review and vacate Order No. 31. In the absence of a request from any
party to review or vacate the Order, or any other grounds for review
set forth in 19 CFR 210.44, they would not review Order No. 31.
The Commission has further determined not to review the second ID,
Order No. 33, terminating the investigation. The investigation is
hereby terminated in its entirety.
The Commission vote for this determination took place on May 3,
2021.
The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in
Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and
in Part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
part 210).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: May 3, 2021.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2021-09576 Filed 5-5-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P