Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from China and India; Scheduling of Expedited Five-Year Reviews, 24414-24415 [2021-09560]

Download as PDF khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES 24414 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 86 / Thursday, May 6, 2021 / Notices one or more of claims 1–6 and 11–26 of U.S. Patent No. 9,220,631 (‘‘the ’631 patent’’). Id. The complaint also alleges the existence of a domestic industry. Id. The notice of investigation names Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. of Tarrytown, New York (‘‘Regeneron’’) as the sole respondent and the Office of Unfair Import Investigations (‘‘OUII’’) as a party. Id. at 45228. On February 18, 2021, Novartis filed a motion for summary determination that Regeneron directly infringes the ’631 patent and that Novartis satisfied the domestic industry requirement. On March 1, 2021, OUII filed a response in support of the motion, and Regeneron filed a response opposing Novartis’s argument that it satisfied the economic prong of the domestic industry requirement. On April 2, 2021, the presiding administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) issued the first ID (Order No. 31), granting summary determination of infringement and domestic industry. No petitions for review of the ID were received. On April 8, 2021, Novartis filed an unopposed motion to terminate the investigation in its entirety based on its withdrawal of the complaint. The motion indicated that Regeneron and OUII did not oppose the motion, and Regeneron did not file a response to the motion. OUII filed a response in support of the motion. The motion to terminate the investigation was filed before the deadline to petition for review of Order No. 31 had passed. See 19 CFR 210.43(a). On April 8, 2021, the ALJ issued the second ID (Order No. 33), granting the motion and terminating the investigation. Order No. 33 was issued before the deadline to petition for review of Order No. 31 had passed. No petitions for review of the second ID were filed. The Commission has determined to review the first ID, Order No. 31, in its entirety, and on review, to vacate that ID as moot because the summary determination issues became moot in light of Novartis’s motion to withdraw its complaint and terminate the investigation. Vice Chair Stayin and Commissioner Johanson do not join the Commission’s decision to review and vacate Order No. 31. In the absence of a request from any party to review or vacate the Order, or any other grounds for review set forth in 19 CFR 210.44, they would not review Order No. 31. The Commission has further determined not to review the second ID, Order No. 33, terminating the investigation. The investigation is hereby terminated in its entirety. VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:49 May 05, 2021 Jkt 253001 The Commission vote for this determination took place on May 3, 2021. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part 210 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 210). By order of the Commission. Issued: May 3, 2021. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2021–09576 Filed 5–5–21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 701–TA–437 and 731– TA–1060–1061 (Third Review)] Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from China and India; Scheduling of Expedited Five-Year Reviews United States International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: The Commission hereby gives notice of the scheduling of expedited reviews pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the Act’’) to determine whether revocation of the countervailing and antidumping duty orders on carbazole violet pigment 23 from China and India would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. DATES: January 4, 2021. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kristina Lara (202–205–3386), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server (https:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for these reviews may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background.—On January 4, 2021, the Commission determined that the domestic interested party group response to its notice of institution (85 FR 61980, October 1, 2020) of the SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00037 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 subject five-year reviews was adequate and that the respondent interested party group response was inadequate. The Commission did not find any other circumstances that would warrant conducting full reviews.1 Accordingly, the Commission determined that it would conduct expedited reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(3)). For further information concerning the conduct of these reviews and rules of general application, consult the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A and B (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207). Please note the Secretary’s Office will accept only electronic filings at this time. Filings must be made through the Commission’s Electronic Document Information System (EDIS, https:// edis.usitc.gov). No in-person paperbased filings or paper copies of any electronic filings will be accepted until further notice. Staff report.—A staff report containing information concerning the subject matter of the reviews will be placed in the nonpublic record on May 4, 2021, and made available to persons on the Administrative Protective Order service list for these reviews. A public version will be issued thereafter, pursuant to § 207.62(d)(4) of the Commission’s rules. Written submissions.—As provided in § 207.62(d) of the Commission’s rules, interested parties that are parties to the reviews and that have provided individually adequate responses to the notice of institution,2 and any party other than an interested party to the reviews may file written comments with the Secretary on what determination the Commission should reach in the reviews. Comments are due on or before May 7, 2021 and may not contain new factual information. Any person that is neither a party to the five-year reviews nor an interested party may submit a brief written statement (which shall not contain any new factual information) pertinent to the reviews by May 7, 2021. However, should the Department of Commerce (‘‘Commerce’’) extend the time limit for its completion of the final results of its reviews, the deadline for comments (which may not contain new 1 A record of the Commissioners’ votes is available from the Office of the Secretary and at the Commission’s website. 2 The Commission has found a response to its notice of institution filed on behalf of Sun Chemical Corp., a domestic producer of carbazole violet pigment 23, to be individually adequate. Comments from other interested parties will not be accepted (see 19 CFR 207.62(d)(2)). E:\FR\FM\06MYN1.SGM 06MYN1 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 86 / Thursday, May 6, 2021 / Notices factual information) on Commerce’s final results is three business days after the issuance of Commerce’s results. If comments contain business proprietary information (BPI), they must conform with the requirements of §§ 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s rules. The Commission’s Handbook on Filing Procedures, available on the Commission’s website at https:// www.usitc.gov/documents/handbook_ on_filing_procedures.pdf, elaborates upon the Commission’s procedures with respect to filings. In accordance with §§ 201.16(c) and 207.3 of the rules, each document filed by a party to the reviews must be served on all other parties to the reviews (as identified by either the public or BPI service list), and a certificate of service must be timely filed. The Secretary will not accept a document for filing without a certificate of service. Determination.—The Commission has determined these reviews are extraordinarily complicated and therefore has determined to exercise its authority to extend the review period by up to 90 days pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)(B). Authority: These reviews are being conducted under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to § 207.62 of the Commission’s rules. By order of the Commission. Issued: May 3, 2021. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2021–09560 Filed 5–5–21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993—National Fire Protection Association Notice is hereby given that, on April 12, 2021, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), National Fire Protection Association (‘‘NFPA’’) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing additions or changes to its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:49 May 05, 2021 Jkt 253001 Specifically, NFPA has provided an updated and current list of its standards development activities, related technical committee and conformity assessment activities. Information concerning NFPA regulations, technical committees, current standards, standards development and conformity assessment activities are publicly available at nfpa.org. On September 20, 2004, NFPA filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on October 21, 2004 (69 FR 61869). The last notification was filed with the Department on September 17, 2020. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on October 15, 2020 (84 FR 65426). Suzanne Morris, Chief, Premerger and Division Statistics, Antitrust Division. [FR Doc. 2021–09613 Filed 5–5–21; 8:45 am] DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE [FR Doc. 2021–09612 Filed 5–5–21; 8:45 am] Antitrust Division BILLING CODE 4410–11–P Notice Pursuant To the National Cooperative Research And Production Act of 1993—Pistoia Alliance, Inc. Notice is hereby given that, on April 5, 2021, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. Section 4301 et seq. (the ‘‘Act’’), Pistoia Alliance, Inc. filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Syneos Health, Morrisville, NC; Results Works LLC, Plymouth Meeting, PA; Nanome, Inc., San Diego, CA; IOS Press, Amsterdam, THE NETHERLANDS; Joseph Rossetto (individual), Cambridge, UNITED KINGDOM; Ian D. Wilson (individual), London, UNITED KINGDOM; Glenn Barney (individual), Northboro, MA; Illumina, San Diego, CA; Genestack, Cambridge, UNITED KINGDOM; Causaly, London, UNITED KINGDOM; BioSymetrics, Huntington, NY; and ATCC, Manassas, VA have been added as parties to this venture. Also, MarkLogic Corporation, San Carlos, CA; Johnson Matthey Plc, London, UNITED KINGDOM; Quantori Frm 00038 Fmt 4703 LLC, Cambridge, MA; Innoplexus AG, Eschborn, GERMANY; Arctoris Ltd, Oxford, UNITED KINGDOM; and Monocl Software, Gothenberg, SWEDEN have withdrawn as parties to this venture. No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and Pistoia Alliance, Inc. intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership. On May 28, 2009, Pistoia Alliance, Inc. filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on July 15, 2009 (74 FR 34364). The last notification was filed with the Department on January 11, 2021. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on February 12, 2021 (86 FR 9372). Suzanne Morris, Chief, Premerger and Division Statistics, Antitrust Division. BILLING CODE 4410–11–P PO 00000 24415 Sfmt 4703 NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION Office of Governmental Information Services [NARA–2021–025] Office of Government Information Services Annual Meeting Office of Government Information Services (OGIS), National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). ACTION: Notice of annual open meeting. AGENCY: We are announcing OGIS’s annual meeting, open to the public in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). The purpose of the meeting is to discuss OGIS’s reviews and reports and allow interested people to appear and present oral or written statements. SUMMARY: The meeting will be on Wednesday, May 12, 2021, from 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. EDT. You must register by 11:59 p.m. EDT Monday, May 10, 2021, to attend the meeting. Location: This meeting will be a virtual meeting. We will send instructions on how to access it to those who register according to the instructions below. DATES: E:\FR\FM\06MYN1.SGM 06MYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 86 (Thursday, May 6, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24414-24415]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-09560]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation Nos. 701-TA-437 and 731-TA-1060-1061 (Third Review)]


Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from China and India; Scheduling of 
Expedited Five-Year Reviews

AGENCY: United States International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives notice of the scheduling of 
expedited reviews pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (``the Act'') to 
determine whether revocation of the countervailing and antidumping duty 
orders on carbazole violet pigment 23 from China and India would be 
likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within 
a reasonably foreseeable time.

DATES: January 4, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kristina Lara (202-205-3386), Office 
of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street 
SW, Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain 
information on this matter by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal 
on 202-205-1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need 
special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact 
the Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. General information 
concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its 
internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for these 
reviews may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at 
https://edis.usitc.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Background.--On January 4, 2021, the Commission determined that the 
domestic interested party group response to its notice of institution 
(85 FR 61980, October 1, 2020) of the subject five-year reviews was 
adequate and that the respondent interested party group response was 
inadequate. The Commission did not find any other circumstances that 
would warrant conducting full reviews.\1\ Accordingly, the Commission 
determined that it would conduct expedited reviews pursuant to section 
751(c)(3) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(3)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ A record of the Commissioners' votes is available from the 
Office of the Secretary and at the Commission's website.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For further information concerning the conduct of these reviews and 
rules of general application, consult the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A and B (19 CFR part 201), 
and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207).
    Please note the Secretary's Office will accept only electronic 
filings at this time. Filings must be made through the Commission's 
Electronic Document Information System (EDIS, https://edis.usitc.gov). 
No in-person paper-based filings or paper copies of any electronic 
filings will be accepted until further notice.
    Staff report.--A staff report containing information concerning the 
subject matter of the reviews will be placed in the nonpublic record on 
May 4, 2021, and made available to persons on the Administrative 
Protective Order service list for these reviews. A public version will 
be issued thereafter, pursuant to Sec.  207.62(d)(4) of the 
Commission's rules.
    Written submissions.--As provided in Sec.  207.62(d) of the 
Commission's rules, interested parties that are parties to the reviews 
and that have provided individually adequate responses to the notice of 
institution,\2\ and any party other than an interested party to the 
reviews may file written comments with the Secretary on what 
determination the Commission should reach in the reviews. Comments are 
due on or before May 7, 2021 and may not contain new factual 
information. Any person that is neither a party to the five-year 
reviews nor an interested party may submit a brief written statement 
(which shall not contain any new factual information) pertinent to the 
reviews by May 7, 2021. However, should the Department of Commerce 
(``Commerce'') extend the time limit for its completion of the final 
results of its reviews, the deadline for comments (which may not 
contain new

[[Page 24415]]

factual information) on Commerce's final results is three business days 
after the issuance of Commerce's results. If comments contain business 
proprietary information (BPI), they must conform with the requirements 
of Sec. Sec.  201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission's rules. The 
Commission's Handbook on Filing Procedures, available on the 
Commission's website at https://www.usitc.gov/documents/handbook_on_filing_procedures.pdf, elaborates upon the Commission's 
procedures with respect to filings.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ The Commission has found a response to its notice of 
institution filed on behalf of Sun Chemical Corp., a domestic 
producer of carbazole violet pigment 23, to be individually 
adequate. Comments from other interested parties will not be 
accepted (see 19 CFR 207.62(d)(2)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In accordance with Sec. Sec.  201.16(c) and 207.3 of the rules, 
each document filed by a party to the reviews must be served on all 
other parties to the reviews (as identified by either the public or BPI 
service list), and a certificate of service must be timely filed. The 
Secretary will not accept a document for filing without a certificate 
of service.
    Determination.--The Commission has determined these reviews are 
extraordinarily complicated and therefore has determined to exercise 
its authority to extend the review period by up to 90 days pursuant to 
19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)(B).

    Authority:  These reviews are being conducted under authority of 
title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published 
pursuant to Sec.  207.62 of the Commission's rules.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: May 3, 2021.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2021-09560 Filed 5-5-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.