Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing of a Proposed Rule Change To List and Trade Shares of the Kryptoin Bitcoin ETF Trust Under BZX Rule 14.11(e)(4), Commodity-Based Trust Shares, 22485-22498 [2021-08855]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 28, 2021 / Notices A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–91646; File No. SR– CboeBZX–2021–029] Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing of a Proposed Rule Change To List and Trade Shares of the Kryptoin Bitcoin ETF Trust Under BZX Rule 14.11(e)(4), Commodity-Based Trust Shares April 22, 2021. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 notice is hereby given that on April 9, 2021, Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (the ‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘BZX’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The Exchange proposes a rule change to list and trade shares of the Kryptoin Bitcoin ETF Trust (the ‘‘Trust’’),3 under BZX Rule 14.11(e)(4), Commodity-Based Trust Shares. The shares of the Trust are referred to herein as the ‘‘Shares.’’ The text of the proposed rule change is also available on the Exchange’s website (https://markets.cboe.com/us/ equities/regulation/rule_filings/bzx/), at the Exchange’s Office of the Secretary, and at the Commission’s Public Reference Room. jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). CFR 240.19b–4. 3 The Trust was formed as a Delaware statutory trust on October 28, 2019 and is operated as a grantor trust for U.S. federal tax purposes. The Trust has no fixed termination date. 2 17 VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:17 Apr 27, 2021 Jkt 253001 1. Purpose The Exchange proposes to list and trade the Shares under BZX Rule 14.11(e)(4),4 which governs the listing and trading of Commodity-Based Trust Shares on the Exchange.5 Kryptoin Investment Advisors, LLC is the sponsor of the Trust (the ‘‘Sponsor’’). The Shares will be registered with the Commission by means of the Trust’s registration statement on Form S–1 (the ‘‘Registration Statement’’).6 Background Bitcoin is a digital asset based on the decentralized, open source protocol of the peer-to-peer computer network launched in 2009 that governs the creation, movement, and ownership of bitcoin and hosts the public ledger, or ‘‘blockchain,’’ on which all bitcoin transactions are recorded (the ‘‘Bitcoin Network’’ or ‘‘Bitcoin’’). The decentralized nature of the Bitcoin Network allows parties to transact directly with one another based on cryptographic proof instead of relying on a trusted third party. The protocol also lays out the rate of issuance of new bitcoin within the Bitcoin Network, a rate that is reduced by half approximately every four years with an eventual hard cap of 21 million. It’s generally understood that the combination of these two features—a systemic hard cap of 21 million bitcoin and the ability to transact trustlessly with anyone connected to the Bitcoin Network—gives bitcoin its value.7 The first rule filing proposing to list an exchange-traded product to provide exposure to bitcoin in the U.S. was 4 The Commission approved BZX Rule 14.11(e)(4) in Securities Exchange Act Release No. 65225 (August 30, 2011), 76 FR 55148 (September 6, 2011) (SR–BATS–2011–018). 5 All statements and representations made in this filing regarding (a) the description of the portfolio, (b) limitations on portfolio holdings or reference assets, or (c) the applicability of Exchange rules and surveillance procedures shall constitute continued listing requirements for listing the Shares on the Exchange. 6 See Registration Statement on Form S–1, dated April 9, 2021 submitted to the Commission by the Sponsor on behalf of the Trust. The descriptions of the Trust, the Shares, and the Reference Rate (as defined below) contained herein are based, in part, on information in the Registration Statement. The Registration Statement is not yet effective and the Shares will not trade on the Exchange until such time that the Registration Statement is effective. 7 For additional information about bitcoin and the Bitcoin Network, see https://bitcoin.org/en/gettingstarted; https://www.fidelitydigitalassets.com/ articles/addressing-bitcoin-criticisms; and https:// www.vaneck.com/education/investment-ideas/ investing-in-bitcoin-and-digital-assets/. PO 00000 Frm 00102 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 22485 submitted by the Exchange on June 30, 2016.8 At that time, blockchain technology, and digital assets that utilized it, were relatively new to the broader public. The market cap of all bitcoin in existence at that time was approximately $10 billion. No registered offering of digital asset securities or shares in an investment vehicle with exposure to bitcoin or any other cryptocurrency had yet been conducted, and the regulated infrastructure for conducting a digital asset securities offering had not begun to develop.9 Similarly, regulated U.S. bitcoin futures contracts did not exist. The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the ‘‘CFTC’’) had determined that bitcoin is a commodity,10 but had not engaged in significant enforcement actions in the space. The New York Department of Financial Services (‘‘NYDFS’’) adopted its final BitLicense regulatory framework in 2015, but had only approved four entities to engage in activities relating to virtual currencies (whether through granting a BitLicense or a limited-purpose trust charter) as of June 30, 2016.11 While the first over-thecounter bitcoin fund launched in 2013, public trading was limited and the fund had only $60 million in assets.12 There were very few, if any, traditional financial institutions engaged in the space, whether through investment or providing services to digital asset 8 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 83723 (July 26, 2018), 83 FR 37579 (August 1, 2018). This proposal was subsequently disapproved by the Commission. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 83723 (July 26, 2018), 83 FR 37579 (August 1, 2018) (the ‘‘Winklevoss Order’’). 9 Digital assets that are securities under U.S. law are referred to throughout this proposal as ‘‘digital asset securities.’’ All other digital assets, including bitcoin, are referred to interchangeably as ‘‘cryptocurrencies’’ or ‘‘virtual currencies.’’ The term ‘‘digital assets’’ refers to all digital assets, including both digital asset securities and cryptocurrencies, together. 10 See ‘‘In the Matter of Coinflip, Inc.’’ (‘‘Coinflip’’) (CFTC Docket 15–29 (September 17, 2015)) (order instituting proceedings pursuant to Sections 6(c) and 6(d) of the CEA, making findings and imposing remedial sanctions), in which the CFTC stated: ‘‘Section 1a(9) of the CEA defines ‘commodity’ to include, among other things, ‘all services, rights, and interests in which contracts for future delivery are presently or in the future dealt in.’ 7 U.S.C. 1a(9). The definition of a ‘commodity’ is broad. See, e.g., Board of Trade of City of Chicago v. SEC, 677 F. 2d 1137, 1142 (7th Cir. 1982). Bitcoin and other virtual currencies are encompassed in the definition and properly defined as commodities.’’ 11 A list of virtual currency businesses that are entities regulated by the NYDFS is available on the NYDFS website. See https://www.dfs.ny.gov/apps_ and_licensing/virtual_currency_businesses/ regulated_entities. 12 Data as of March 31, 2016 according to publicly available filings. See Bitcoin Investment Trust Form S–1, dated May 27, 2016, available: https:// www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1588489/ 000095012316017801/filename1.htm. E:\FR\FM\28APN1.SGM 28APN1 22486 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 28, 2021 / Notices jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES companies. In January 2018, the Staff of the Commission noted in a letter to the Investment Company Institute and SIFMA that it was not aware, at that time, of a single custodian providing fund custodial services for digital assets.13 Fast forward to the first quarter of 2021 and the digital assets financial ecosystem, including bitcoin, has progressed significantly. The development of a regulated market for digital asset securities has significantly evolved, with market participants having conducted registered public offerings of both digital asset securities 14 and shares in investment vehicles holding bitcoin futures.15 Additionally, licensed and regulated service providers have emerged to provide fund custodial services for digital assets, among other services. For example, in December 2020, the Commission adopted a conditional noaction position permitting certain special purpose broker-dealers to custody digital asset securities under Rule 15c3–3 under the Exchange Act; 16 in September 2020, the Staff of the Commission released a no-action letter permitting certain broker-dealers to operate a non-custodial Alternative Trading System (‘‘ATS’’) for digital asset securities, subject to specified conditions; 17 and in October 2019, the Staff of the Commission granted temporary relief from the clearing agency registration requirement to an entity seeking to establish a securities clearance and settlement system based 13 See letter from Dalia Blass, Director, Division of Investment Management, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to Paul Schott Stevens, President & CEO, Investment Company Institute and Timothy W. Cameron, Asset Management Group—Head, Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (January 18, 2018), available at https://www.sec.gov/divisions/investment/ noaction/2018/cryptocurrency-011818.htm. 14 See Prospectus supplement filed pursuant to Rule 424(b)(1) for INX Tokens (Registration No. 333–233363), available at: https://www.sec.gov/ Archives/edgar/data/1725882/ 000121390020023202/ea125858-424b1_ inxlimited.htm. 15 See Prospectus filed by Stone Ridge Trust VI on behalf of NYDIG Bitcoin Strategy Fund Registration, available at: https://www.sec.gov/ Archives/edgar/data/1764894/ 000119312519309942/d693146d497.htm. 16 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 90788, 86 FR 11627 (February 26, 2021) (File Number S7– 25–20) (Custody of Digital Asset Securities by Special Purpose Broker-Dealers). 17 See letter from Elizabeth Baird, Deputy Director, Division of Trading and Markets, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to Kris Dailey, Vice President, Risk Oversight & Operational Regulation, Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (September 25, 2020), available at: https://www.sec.gov/divisions/ marketreg/mr-noaction/2020/finra-ats-role-insettlement-of-digital-asset-security-trades09252020.pdf. VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:17 Apr 27, 2021 Jkt 253001 on distributed ledger technology,18 and multiple transfer agents who provide services for digital asset securities registered with the Commission.19 Outside the Commission’s purview, the regulatory landscape has changed significantly since 2016, and cryptocurrency markets have grown and evolved as well. The market for bitcoin is approximately 100 times larger, having recently reached a market cap of over $1 trillion. As of February 27, 2021, bitcoin’s market cap is greater than companies such as Facebook, Inc., Berkshire Hathaway Inc., and JP Morgan Chase & Co. CFTC regulated bitcoin futures represented approximately $28 billion in notional trading volume on Chicago Mercantile Exchange (‘‘CME’’) (‘‘Bitcoin Futures’’) in December 2020 compared to $737 million, $1.4 billion, and $3.9 billion in total trading in December 2017, December 2018, and December 2019, respectively. Bitcoin Futures traded over $1.2 billion per day in December 2020 and represented $1.6 billion in open interest compared to $115 million in December 2019, which the Exchange believes represents a regulated market of significant size, as further discussed below.20 The CFTC has exercised its regulatory jurisdiction in bringing a number of enforcement actions related to bitcoin and against trading platforms that offer cryptocurrency trading.21 The U.S. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the ‘‘OCC’’) has made clear that federally-chartered banks are able to provide custody services for cryptocurrencies and other digital 18 See letter from Jeffrey S. Mooney, Associate Director, Division of Trading and Markets, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to Charles G. Cascarilla & Daniel M. Burstein, Paxos Trust Company, LLC (October 28, 2019), available at: https://www.sec.gov/divisions/marketreg/mrnoaction/2019/paxos-trust-company-10281917a.pdf. 19 See, e.g., Form TA–1/A filed by Tokensoft Transfer Agent LLC (CIK: 0001794142) on January 8, 2021, available at: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/ edgar/data/1794142/000179414219000001/ xslFTA1X01/primary_doc.xml. 20 All statistics and charts included in this proposal are sourced from https:// www.cmegroup.com/trading/bitcoin-futures.html. 21 The CFTC’s annual report for Fiscal Year 2020 (which ended on September 30, 2020) noted that the CFTC ‘‘continued to aggressively prosecute misconduct involving digital assets that fit within the CEA’s definition of commodity’’ and ‘‘brought a record setting seven cases involving digital assets.’’ See CFTC FY2020 Division of Enforcement Annual Report, available at: https://www.cftc.gov/ media/5321/DOE_FY2020_AnnualReport_120120/ download. Additionally, the CFTC filed on October 1, 2020, a civil enforcement action against the owner/operators of the BitMEX trading platform, which was one of the largest bitcoin derivative exchanges. See CFTC Release No. 8270–20 (October 1, 2020) available at: https://www.cftc.gov/ PressRoom/PressReleases/8270-20. PO 00000 Frm 00103 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 assets.22 The OCC recently granted conditional approval of two charter conversions by state-chartered trust companies to national banks, both of which provide cryptocurrency custody services.23 NYDFS has granted no fewer than twenty-five BitLicenses, including to established public payment companies like PayPal Holdings, Inc. and Square, Inc., and limited purpose trust charters to entities providing cryptocurrency custody services, including the Trust’s Custodian. The U.S. Treasury Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (‘‘FinCEN’’) has released extensive guidance regarding the applicability of the Bank Secrecy Act (‘‘BSA’’) and implementing regulations to virtual currency businesses,24 and has proposed rules imposing requirements on entities subject to the BSA that are specific to the technological context of virtual currencies.25 In addition, the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (‘‘OFAC’’) has brought enforcement actions over apparent violations of the sanctions laws in connection with the provision of wallet management services for digital assets.26 In addition to the regulatory developments laid out above, more traditional financial market participants appear to be embracing cryptocurrency: Large insurance companies,27 asset 22 See OCC News Release 2021–2 (January 4, 2021) available at: https://www.occ.gov/newsissuances/news-releases/2021/nr-occ-2021-2.html. 23 See OCC News Release 2021–6 (January 13, 2021) available at: https://www.occ.gov/newsissuances/news-releases/2021/nr-occ-2021-6.html and OCC News Release 2021–19 (February 5, 2021) available at: https://www.occ.gov/news-issuances/ news-releases/2021/nr-occ-2021-19.html. 24 See FinCEN Guidance FIN–2019–G001 (May 9, 2019) (Application of FinCEN’s Regulations to Certain Business Models Involving Convertible Virtual Currencies) available at: https:// www.fincen.gov/sites/default/files/2019-05/FinCEN %20Guidance%20CVC%20FINAL%20508.pdf. 25 See U.S. Department of the Treasury Press Release: ‘‘The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network Proposes Rule Aimed at Closing AntiMoney Laundering Regulatory Gaps for Certain Convertible Virtual Currency and Digital Asset Transactions’’ (December 18, 2020), available at: https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/ sm1216. 26 See U.S. Department of the Treasury Enforcement Release: ‘‘OFAC Enters Into $98,830 Settlement with BitGo, Inc. for Apparent Violations of Multiple Sanctions Programs Related to Digital Currency Transactions’’ (December 30, 2020) available at: https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/ 126/20201230_bitgo.pdf. 27 On December 10, 2020, Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company (MassMutual) announced that it had purchased $100 million in bitcoin for its general investment account. See MassMutual Press Release ‘‘Institutional Bitcoin provider NYDIG announces minority stake purchase by MassMutual’’ (December 10, 2020) available at: https://www.massmutual.com/about-us/news-andpress-releases/press-releases/2020/12/institutionalbitcoin-provider-nydig-announces-minority-stakepurchase-by-massmutual. E:\FR\FM\28APN1.SGM 28APN1 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 28, 2021 / Notices jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES managers,28 university endowments,29 pension funds,30 and even historically bitcoin skeptical fund managers 31 are allocating to bitcoin. The largest overthe-counter bitcoin fund previously filed a Form 10 registration statement, which the Staff of the Commission reviewed and which took effect automatically, and is now a reporting company.32 Established companies like Tesla, Inc.,33 MicroStrategy Incorporated,34 and Square, Inc.,35 among others, have recently announced substantial investments in bitcoin in amounts as large as $1.5 billion (Tesla) and $425 million (MicroStrategy). Suffice to say, bitcoin is on its way to gaining mainstream usage. Despite these developments, access for U.S. retail investors to gain exposure to bitcoin via a transparent and regulated exchange-traded vehicle remains limited. As investors and advisors increasingly utilize ETPs to manage diversified portfolios (including equities, fixed income securities, 28 See e.g., ‘‘BlackRock’s Rick Rieder says the world’s largest asset manager has ‘started to dabble’ in bitcoin’’ (February 17, 2021) available at: https:// www.cnbc.com/2021/02/17/blackrock-has-startedto-dabble-in-bitcoin-says-rick-rieder.html and ‘‘Guggenheim’s Scott Minerd Says Bitcoin Should Be Worth $400,000’’ (December 16, 2020) available at: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/202012-16/guggenheim-s-scott-minerd-says-bitcoinshould-be-worth-400-000. 29 See e.g., ‘‘Harvard and Yale Endowments Among Those Reportedly Buying Crypto’’ (January 25, 2021) available at: https://www.bloomberg.com/ news/articles/2021-01-26/harvard-and-yaleendowments-among-those-reportedly-buyingcrypto. 30 See e.g., ‘‘Virginia Police Department Reveals Why its Pension Fund is Betting on Bitcoin’’ (February 14, 2019) available at: https:// finance.yahoo.com/news/virginia-policedepartment-reveals-why-194558505.html. 31 See e.g., ‘‘Bridgewater: Our Thoughts on Bitcoin’’ (January 28, 2021) available at: https:// www.bridgewater.com/research-and-insights/ourthoughts-on-bitcoin and ‘‘Paul Tudor Jones says he likes bitcoin even more now, rally still in the ‘first inning’’’ (October 22, 2020) available at: https:// www.cnbc.com/2020/10/22/-paul-tudor-jones-sayshe-likes-bitcoin-even-more-now-rally-still-in-thefirst-inning.html. 32 See Letter from Division of Corporation Finance, Office of Real Estate & Construction to Barry E. Silbert, Chief Executive Officer, Grayscale Bitcoin Trust (January 31, 2020) https:// www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1588489/000000 000020000953/filename1.pdf. 33 See Form 10–K submitted by Tesla, Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020 at 23: https:// www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/ 1318605/000156459021004599/tsla-10k_ 20201231.htm. 34 See Form 10–Q submitted by MicroStrategy Incorporated for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2020 at 8: https://www.sec.gov/ ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/1050446/000156459 020047995/mstr-10q_20200930.htm. 35 See Form 10–Q submitted by Square, Inc. for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2020 at 51: https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/ data/1512673/000151267320000012/sq-202 00930.htm. VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:17 Apr 27, 2021 Jkt 253001 commodities, and currencies) quickly, easily, relatively inexpensively, and without having to hold directly any of the underlying assets, options for bitcoin exposure for U.S. investors remain limited to: (i) Investing in overthe-counter bitcoin funds (‘‘OTC Bitcoin Funds’’) that are subject to high premium/discount volatility (and high management fees) to the advantage of more sophisticated investors that are able to create and redeem shares at net asset value (‘‘NAV’’) directly with the issuing trust; (ii) facing the technical risk, complexity and generally high fees associated with buying spot bitcoin; or (iii) purchasing shares of operating companies that they believe will provide proxy exposure to bitcoin with limited disclosure about the associated risks. Meanwhile, investors in many other countries, including Canada,36 are able to use more traditional exchange listed and traded products to gain exposure to bitcoin, disadvantaging U.S. investors and leaving them with riskier and more expensive means of getting bitcoin exposure.37 OTC Bitcoin Funds and Investor Protection Over the past year, U.S. investor exposure to bitcoin through OTC Bitcoin Funds has grown into the tens of billions of dollars. With that growth, so too has grown the potential risk to U.S. investors. As described below, premium and discount volatility, high fees, insufficient disclosures, and technical hurdles are putting U.S. investor money at risk on a daily basis that could potentially be eliminated through access to a bitcoin ETP. The Exchange understands the Commission’s previous focus on potential manipulation of a bitcoin ETP 36 The Exchange notes that the Purpose Bitcoin ETF, a retail physical bitcoin ETP recently launched in Canada, reportedly reached $421.8 million in assets under management (‘‘AUM’’) in two days, demonstrating the demand for a North American market listed bitcoin exchange-traded product (‘‘ETP’’). The Purpose Bitcoin ETF also offers a class of units that is U.S. dollar denominated, which could appeal to U.S. investors. Without an approved bitcoin ETP in the U.S. as a viable alternative, U.S. investors could seek to purchase these shares in order to get access to bitcoin exposure. Given the separate regulatory regime and the potential difficulties associated with any international litigation, such an arrangement would create more risk exposure for U.S. investors than they would otherwise have with a U.S. exchange listed ETP. 37 The Exchange notes that securities regulators in a number of other countries have either approved or otherwise allowed the listing and trading of bitcoin ETPs. Specifically, these funds include the Purpose Bitcoin ETF, Bitcoin ETF, VanEck Vectors Bitcoin ETN, WisdomTree Bitcoin ETP, Bitcoin Tracker One, BTCetc bitcoin ETP, Amun Bitcoin ETP, Amun Bitcoin Suisse ETP, 21Shares Short Bitcoin ETP, and CoinShares Physical Bitcoin ETP. PO 00000 Frm 00104 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 22487 in prior disapproval orders, but now believes that such concerns have been sufficiently mitigated and that the growing and quantifiable investor protection concerns should be the central consideration as the Commission reviews this proposal. As such, the Exchange believes that approving this proposal (and comparable proposals submitted hereafter) provides the Commission with the opportunity to allow U.S. investors with access to bitcoin in a regulated and transparent exchange-traded vehicle that would act to limit risk to U.S. investors by: (i) Reducing premium and discount volatility; (ii) reducing management fees through meaningful competition; (iii) reducing risks associated with investing in operating companies that are imperfect proxies for bitcoin exposure; and (iv) providing an alternative to custodying spot bitcoin. (i) OTC Bitcoin Funds and Premium/ Discount Volatility OTC Bitcoin Funds are generally designed to provide exposure to bitcoin in a manner similar to the Shares. However, unlike the Shares, OTC Bitcoin Funds are unable to freely offer creation and redemption in a way that incentivizes market participants to keep their shares trading in line with their NAV 38 and, as such, frequently trade at a price that is out of line with the value of their assets held. Historically, OTC Bitcoin Funds have traded at a significant premium to NAV.39 Trading at a premium or a discount is not unique to OTC Bitcoin Funds and is not in itself problematic, but the size of such premiums/discounts and volatility thereof highlight the key differences in operations and market structure of OTC Bitcoin Funds as compared to ETPs. This, combined with the significant increase in AUM for OTC Bitcoin Funds over the past year, has given rise to significant and quantifiable investor protection issues, as further described below. In fact, the largest OTC Bitcoin Fund has grown to $35.0 billion in 38 Because OTC Bitcoin Funds are not listed on an exchange, they are also not subject to the same transparency and regulatory oversight by a listing exchange as the Shares would be. In the case of the Trust, the existence of a surveillance-sharing agreement between the Exchange and the Bitcoin Futures market results in increased investor protections compared to OTC Bitcoin Funds. 39 The inability to trade in line with NAV may at some point result in OTC Bitcoin Funds trading at a discount to their NAV, which has occurred more recently with respect to one prominent OTC Bitcoin Fund. While that has not historically been the case, and it is not clear whether such discounts will continue, such a prolonged, significant discount scenario would give rise to nearly identical potential issues related to trading at a premium as described below. E:\FR\FM\28APN1.SGM 28APN1 22488 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 28, 2021 / Notices jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES AUM 40 and has historically traded at a premium of between roughly five and 40%, though it has seen premiums at times above 100%.41 Recently, however, it has traded at a discount. As of March 24, 2021, the discount was approximately 14%,42 representing around $4.9 billion in market value less than the bitcoin actually held by the fund. If premium/discount numbers move back to the middle of its historical range to a 20% premium (which historically could occur at any time and overnight), it would represent a swing of approximately $11.9 billion in value unrelated to the value of bitcoin held by the fund and if the premium returns to the upper end of its typical range, that number increases to $18.9 billion. These numbers are only associated with a single OTC Bitcoin Fund—as more and more OTC Bitcoin Funds come to market and more investor assets flood into them to get access to bitcoin exposure, the potential dollars at risk will only increase. This raises significant investor protection issues in several ways. First, the most obvious issue is that investors are buying shares of a fund for a price that is not reflective of the per share value of the fund’s underlying assets. Even operating within the normal premium range, it’s possible for an investor to buy shares of an OTC Bitcoin Fund only to have those shares quickly lose 10% or more in dollar value excluding any movement of the price of bitcoin. That is to say—the price of bitcoin could have stayed exactly the same from market close on one day to market open the next, yet the value of the shares held by the investor decreased only because of the fluctuation of the premium/discount. As more investment vehicles, including mutual funds and ETFs, seek to gain exposure to bitcoin, the easiest option for a buy and hold strategy is often an OTC Bitcoin Fund, meaning that even 40 As of February 19, 2021. Compare to an AUM of approximately $2.6 billion on February 26, 2020, the date on which the Commission issued the most recent disapproval order for a bitcoin ETP. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 88284 (February 26, 2020), 85 FR 12595 (March 3, 2020) (SR–NYSEArca–2019–39) (the ‘‘Wilshire Phoenix Disapproval’’). While the price of one bitcoin has increased approximately 400% in the intervening period, the total AUM has increased by approximately 1240%, indicating that the increase in AUM was created beyond just price appreciation in bitcoin. 41 See ‘‘Traders Piling Into Overvalued Crypto Funds Risk a Painful Exit’’ (February 4, 2021) available at: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/ articles/2021-02-04/bitcoin-one-big-risk-wheninvesting-in-crypto-funds. 42 This is compared to another OTC Bitcoin Product which had a premium of over 60% on the same day, with a premium of over 200% a few days earlier. VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:17 Apr 27, 2021 Jkt 253001 investors that do not directly buy OTC Bitcoin Funds can be disadvantaged by extreme premiums (or discounts) and premium volatility. The second issue is related to the first and explains how the premium in OTC Bitcoin Funds essentially creates a direct payment from retail investors to more sophisticated investors. Generally speaking, only accredited investors are able to create or redeem shares with the issuing trust, which means that they are able to buy or sell shares directly with the trust at NAV (in exchange for either cash or bitcoin) without having to pay the premium or sell into the discount. While there are often minimum holding periods for shares, an investor that is allowed to interact directly with the trust is able to hedge their bitcoin exposure as needed to satisfy the holding requirements and collect on the premium or discount opportunity. As noted above, the existence of a premium or discount and the premium/ discount collection opportunity is not unique to OTC Bitcoin Funds and does not in itself warrant the approval of an ETP.43 What makes this situation unique is that such significant and persistent premiums and discounts can exist in a product with $35 billion in assets under management,44 that billions of retail investor dollars are constantly under threat of premium/ discount volatility,45 and that premium/ discount volatility is generally captured by more sophisticated investors on a riskless basis. The Exchange understands the Commission’s focus on potential manipulation of a bitcoin ETP in prior disapproval orders, but now believes that current circumstances warrant that this direct, quantifiable investor protection issue should be the central consideration as the Commission determines whether to approve this proposal, particularly when the Trust as a bitcoin ETP is designed to reduce the likelihood of significant and prolonged premiums and discounts with its open43 The Exchange notes, for example, that similar premiums/discounts and premium/discount volatility exist for other non-bitcoin cryptocurrency related over-the-counter funds, but that the size and investor interest in those funds does not give rise to the same investor protection concerns that exist for OTC Bitcoin Funds. 44 At $35 billion in AUM, the largest OTC Bitcoin Fund would be the 32nd largest out of roughly 2,400 U.S. listed ETPs. 45 The Exchange notes that in two recent incidents, the premium dropped from 28.28% to 12.29% from the close on 3/19/20 to the close on 3/20/20 and from 38.40% to 21.05% from the close on 5/13/19 to the close on 5/14/19. Similarly, over the period of 12/21/20 to 1/21/20, the premium went from 40.18% to 2.79%. While the price of bitcoin appreciated significantly during this period and NAV per share increased by 41.25%, the price per share increased by only 3.58%. PO 00000 Frm 00105 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 ended nature as well as the ability of market participants (i.e., market makers and authorized participants) to create and redeem on a daily basis. (ii) Spot and Proxy Exposure Exposure to bitcoin through an ETP also presents certain advantages for retail investors compared to buying spot bitcoin directly. The most notable advantage is the use of the Custodian to custody the Trust’s bitcoin assets. The Sponsor has carefully selected the Custodian, a third party custodian that carries insurance covering both hot and cold storage and is chartered as a trust company and will custody the Trust’s bitcoin assets in a manner so that it meets the definition of qualified custodian under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended. This includes, among others, the use of ‘‘cold’’ (offline) storage to hold private keys and the employment by the Custodian of a certain degree of cybersecurity measures and operational best practices. By contrast, an individual retail investor holding bitcoin through a cryptocurrency exchange lacks these protections. Typically, retail exchanges hold most, if not all, retail investors’ bitcoin in ‘‘hot’’ (internet-connected) storage and do not make any commitments to indemnify retail investors or to observe any particular cybersecurity standard. Meanwhile, a retail investor holding spot bitcoin directly in a self-hosted wallet may suffer from inexperience in private key management (e.g., insufficient password protection, lost key, etc.), which could cause them to lose some or all of their bitcoin holdings. In the Custodian, the Trust has engaged a regulated and licensed entity highly experienced in bitcoin custody, with dedicated, trained employees and procedures to manage the private keys to the Trust’s bitcoin, and which is accountable for failures. Thus, with respect to custody of the Trust’s bitcoin assets, the Trust presents advantages from an investment protection standpoint for retail investors compared to owning spot bitcoin directly. Finally, as described in the Background section above, recently a number of operating companies engaged in unrelated businesses—such as Tesla (a car manufacturer) and MicroStrategy (an enterprise software company)—have announced investments as large as $1.5 billion in bitcoin.46 Without access to 46 It’s been announced that MicroStrategy is currently contemplating a $600 million convertible note offering for the purpose of acquiring bitcoin. See: https://www.cnbc.com/2021/02/16/ E:\FR\FM\28APN1.SGM 28APN1 22489 bitcoin exchange-traded products, retail investors seeking investment exposure to bitcoin may end up purchasing shares in these companies in order to gain the exposure to bitcoin that they seek.47 In fact, mainstream financial news networks have written a number of articles providing investors with guidance for obtaining bitcoin exposure through publicly traded companies (such as MicroStrategy, Tesla, and bitcoin mining companies, among others) instead of dealing with the complications associated with buying spot bitcoin in the absence of a bitcoin ETP.48 Such operating companies, however, are imperfect bitcoin proxies and provide investors with partial bitcoin exposure paired with a host of additional risks associated with whichever operating company they decide to purchase. Additionally, the disclosures provided by the aforementioned operating companies with respect to risks relating to their bitcoin holdings are generally substantially smaller than the registration statement of a bitcoin ETP, including the Registration Statement, typically amounting to a few sentences of narrative description and a handful of risk factors.49 In other words, investors seeking bitcoin exposure through publicly traded companies are gaining only partial exposure to bitcoin and are not fully benefitting from the risk disclosures and associated investor protections that come from the securities registration process. CME began offering trading in Bitcoin Futures in 2017. Each contract represents five bitcoin and is based on the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate.50 The contracts trade and settle like other cash-settled commodity futures contracts. Nearly every measurable metric related to Bitcoin Futures has trended consistently up since launch and/or accelerated upward in the past year. For example, there was approximately $28 billion in trading in Bitcoin Futures in December 2020 compared to $737 million, $1.4 billion, and $3.9 billion in total trading in December 2017, December 2018, and December 2019, respectively. Bitcoin Futures traded over $1.2 billion per day on the CME in December 2020 and represented $1.6 billion in open interest compared to $115 million in December 2019. This general upward trend in trading volume and open interest is captured in the following chart. microstrategy-shares-rise-after-revealing-plans-tobuy-more-bitcoin.html. 47 In August 2017, the Commission’s Office of Investor Education and Advocacy warned investors about situations where companies were publicly announcing events relating to digital coins or tokens in an effort to affect the price of the company’s publicly traded common stock. See https://www.sec.gov/oiea/investor-alerts-andbulletins/ia_icorelatedclaims. 48 See e.g., ‘‘7 public companies with exposure to bitcoin’’ (February 8, 2021) available at: https:// finance.yahoo.com/news/7-public-companies-withexposure-to-bitcoin-154201525.html; and ‘‘Want to get in the crypto trade without holding bitcoin yourself? Here are some investing ideas’’ (February 19, 2021) available at: https://www.cnbc.com/2021/ 02/19/ways-to-invest-in-bitcoin-without-holdingthe-cryptocurrency-yourself-.html. 49 See e.g., Tesla 10–K for the year ended December 31, 2020, which mentions bitcoin just nine times: https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/ edgar/data/1318605/000156459021004599/tsla10k_20201231.htm. 50 According to CME, the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate aggregates the trade flow of major bitcoin spot exchanges during a specific calculation window into a once-a-day reference rate of the U.S. dollar price of bitcoin. Calculation rules are geared toward maximum transparency and real-time replicability in underlying spot markets, including Bitstamp, Coinbase, Gemini, itBit, and Kraken. For additional information, refer to https:// www.cmegroup.com/trading/cryptocurrencyindices/cf-bitcoin-reference-rate.html?redirect=/ trading/cf-bitcoin-reference-rate.html. VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:17 Apr 27, 2021 Jkt 253001 Bitcoin Futures PO 00000 Frm 00106 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\28APN1.SGM 28APN1 EN28AP21.010</GPH> jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 28, 2021 / Notices Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 28, 2021 / Notices Similarly, the number of large open interest holders 51 has continued to increase even as the price of bitcoin has risen, as have the number of unique accounts trading Bitcoin Futures. 51 A large open interest holder in Bitcoin Futures is an entity that holds at least 25 contracts, which is the equivalent of 125 bitcoin. At a price of approximately $30,000 per bitcoin on December 31, VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:17 Apr 27, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00107 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4725 2020, more than 80 firms had outstanding positions of greater than $3.8 million in Bitcoin Futures. E:\FR\FM\28APN1.SGM 28APN1 EN28AP21.011</GPH> jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES 22490 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 28, 2021 / Notices The Sponsor further believes that academic research corroborates the overall trend outlined above and supports the thesis that the Bitcoin Futures pricing leads the spot market and, thus, a person attempting to manipulate the Shares would also have to trade on that market to manipulate the ETP. Specifically, the Sponsor believes that such research indicates that bitcoin futures lead the bitcoin spot market in price formation.52 jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES Section 6(b)(5) and the Applicable Standards The Commission has approved numerous series of Trust Issued Receipts,53 including Commodity-Based Trust Shares,54 to be listed on U.S. national securities exchanges. In order for any proposed rule change from an exchange to be approved, the Commission must determine that, among other things, the proposal is consistent with the requirements of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act, specifically including: (i) The requirement that a national securities exchange’s rules are designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices; 55 and 52 See Hu, Y., Hou, Y. and Oxley, L. (2019). ‘‘What role do futures markets play in Bitcoin pricing? Causality, cointegration and price discovery from a time-varying perspective’’ (available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/ articles/PMC7481826/). This academic research paper concludes that ‘‘There exist no episodes where the Bitcoin spot markets dominates the price discovery processes with regard to Bitcoin futures. This points to a conclusion that the price formation originates solely in the Bitcoin futures market. We can, therefore, conclude that the Bitcoin futures markets dominate the dynamic price discovery process based upon time-varying information share measures. Overall, price discovery seems to occur in the Bitcoin futures markets rather than the underlying spot market based upon a time-varying perspective.’’ 53 See Exchange Rule 14.11(f). 54 Commodity-Based Trust Shares, as described in Exchange Rule 14.11(e)(4), are a type of Trust Issued Receipt. 55 As the Exchange has stated in a number of other public documents, it continues to believe that bitcoin is resistant to price manipulation and that ‘‘other means to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices’’ exist to justify dispensing with the requisite surveillance sharing agreement. The geographically diverse and continuous nature of bitcoin trading render it difficult and prohibitively costly to manipulate the price of bitcoin. The fragmentation across bitcoin platforms, the relatively slow speed of transactions, and the capital necessary to maintain a significant presence on each trading platform make manipulation of bitcoin prices through continuous trading activity challenging. To the extent that there are bitcoin exchanges engaged in or allowing wash trading or other activity intended to manipulate the price of bitcoin on other markets, such pricing does not normally impact prices on other exchange because participants will generally ignore markets with quotes that they deem non-executable. Moreover, the linkage between the bitcoin markets and the presence of arbitrageurs in those markets means that the manipulation of the price of bitcoin price on any single venue would require VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:17 Apr 27, 2021 Jkt 253001 (ii) the requirement that an exchange proposal be designed, in general, to protect investors and the public interest. The Exchange believes that this proposal is consistent with the requirements of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act and that it has sufficiently demonstrated that, on the whole, the manipulation concerns previously articulated by the Commission are sufficiently mitigated to the point that they are outweighed by quantifiable investor protection issues that would be resolved by approving this proposal. Specifically, the Exchange lays out below why it believes that the significant increase in trading volume in Bitcoin Futures, the growth of liquidity at the inside in the spot market for bitcoin, and certain features of the Shares and the Reference Rate (as defined below) mitigate potential manipulation concerns to the point that the investor protection issues that have arisen from the rapid growth of overthe-counter bitcoin funds since the Commission last reviewed an exchange proposal to list and trade a bitcoin ETP, including premium/discount volatility and management fees, should be the central consideration as the Commission determines whether to approve this proposal. (i) Designed To Prevent Fraudulent and Manipulative Acts and Practices In order to meet this standard in a proposal to list and trade a series of Commodity-Based Trust Shares, the Commission requires that an exchange demonstrate that there is a comprehensive surveillance-sharing agreement in place 56 with a regulated manipulation of the global bitcoin price in order to be effective. Arbitrageurs must have funds distributed across multiple trading platforms in order to take advantage of temporary price dislocations, thereby making it unlikely that there will be strong concentration of funds on any particular bitcoin exchange or OTC platform. As a result, the potential for manipulation on a trading platform would require overcoming the liquidity supply of such arbitrageurs who are effectively eliminating any cross-market pricing differences. 56 As previously articulated by the Commission, ‘‘The standard requires such surveillance-sharing agreements since ‘‘they provide a necessary deterrent to manipulation because they facilitate the availability of information needed to fully investigate a manipulation if it were to occur.’’ The Commission has emphasized that it is essential for an exchange listing a derivative securities product to enter into a surveillance-sharing agreement with markets trading underlying securities for the listing exchange to have the ability to obtain information necessary to detect, investigate, and deter fraud and market manipulation, as well as violations of exchange rules and applicable federal securities laws and rules. The hallmarks of a surveillancesharing agreement are that the agreement provides for the sharing of information about market trading activity, clearing activity, and customer identity; that the parties to the agreement have reasonable ability to obtain access to and produce requested PO 00000 Frm 00108 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 22491 market of significant size. Both the Exchange and CME are members of the Intermarket Surveillance Group (the ‘‘ISG’’).57 The only remaining issue to be addressed is whether the Bitcoin Futures market constitutes a market of significant size, which the Exchange believes that it does. The terms ‘‘significant market’’ and ‘‘market of significant size’’ include a market (or group of markets) as to which: (a) There is a reasonable likelihood that a person attempting to manipulate the ETP would also have to trade on that market to manipulate the ETP, so that a surveillance-sharing agreement would assist the listing exchange in detecting and deterring misconduct; and (b) it is unlikely that trading in the ETP would be the predominant influence on prices in that market.58 The Commission has also recognized that the ‘‘regulated market of significant size’’ standard is not the only means for satisfying Section 6(b)(5) of the act, specifically providing that a listing exchange could demonstrate that ‘‘other means to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices’’ are sufficient to justify dispensing with the requisite surveillance-sharing agreement.59 (a) Manipulation of the ETP The significant growth in Bitcoin Futures across each of trading volumes, open interest, large open interest holders, and total market participants since the Wilshire Phoenix Disapproval was issued are reflective of that market’s growing influence on the spot price, which according to the academic research cited above, was already leading the spot price in 2018 and 2019. Where Bitcoin Futures lead the price in the spot market such that a potential manipulator of the bitcoin spot market (beyond just the constituents of the Reference Rate 60) would have to information; and that no existing rules, laws, or practices would impede one party to the agreement from obtaining this information from, or producing it to, the other party.’’ The Commission has historically held that joint membership in ISG constitutes such a surveillance sharing agreement. See Wilshire Phoenix Disapproval. 57 For a list of the current members and affiliate members of ISG, see www.isgportal.com. 58 See Wilshire Phoenix Disapproval. 59 See Winklevoss Order at 37580. The Commission has also specifically noted that it ‘‘is not applying a ‘cannot be manipulated’ standard; instead, the Commission is examining whether the proposal meets the requirements of the Exchange Act and, pursuant to its Rules of Practice, places the burden on the listing exchange to demonstrate the validity of its contentions and to establish that the requirements of the Exchange Act have been met.’’ Id. at 37582. 60 As further described below, the Reference Rate for the Fund is based on materially the same E:\FR\FM\28APN1.SGM Continued 28APN1 22492 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 28, 2021 / Notices jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES participate in the Bitcoin Futures market, it follows that a potential manipulator of the Shares would similarly have to transact in the Bitcoin Futures market because the Reference Rate is based on spot prices. Further, the Trust only allows for in-kind creation and redemption, which, as further described below, reduces the potential for manipulation of the Shares through manipulation of the Reference Rate or any of its individual constituents, again emphasizing that a potential manipulator of the Shares would have to manipulate the entirety of the bitcoin spot market, which is led by the Bitcoin Futures market. As such, the Exchange believes that part (a) of the significant market test outlined above is satisfied and that common membership in ISG between the Exchange and CME would assist the listing exchange in detecting and deterring misconduct in the Shares. bitcoin market, and the ability for market participants, including authorized participants creating and redeeming in-kind with the Trust, to buy or sell large amounts of bitcoin without significant market impact will help prevent the Shares from becoming the predominant force on pricing in either the bitcoin spot or Bitcoin Futures markets, satisfying part (b) of the test outlined above. (c) Other Means To Prevent Fraudulent and Manipulative Acts and Practices As noted above, the Commission also permits a listing exchange to demonstrate that ‘‘other means to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices’’ are sufficient to justify dispensing with the requisite surveillance-sharing agreement. The Exchange believes that such conditions are present. Specifically, the significant liquidity in the spot market and the (b) Predominant Influence on Prices in impact of market orders on the overall Spot and Bitcoin Futures price of bitcoin mean that attempting to move the price of bitcoin is costly and The Exchange also believes that has grown more expensive over the past trading in the Shares would not be the year. In January 2020, for example, the predominant force on prices in the cost to buy or sell $5 million worth of Bitcoin Futures market (or spot market) bitcoin averaged roughly 30 basis points for a number of reasons, including the (compared to 10 basis points in 2/2021) significant volume in the Bitcoin with a market impact of 50 basis points Futures market, the size of bitcoin’s (compared to 30 basis points in 2/ market cap (approximately $1 trillion), 62 and the significant liquidity available in 2021). For a $10 million market order, the cost to buy or sell was roughly 50 the spot market. In addition to the basis points (compared to 20 basis Bitcoin Futures market data points cited above, the spot market for bitcoin is also points in 2/2021) with a market impact of 80 basis points (compared to 50 basis very liquid. According to data from points in 2/2021). As the liquidity in the CoinRoutes from February 2021, the bitcoin spot market increases, it follows cost to buy or sell $5 million worth of bitcoin averages roughly 10 basis points that the impact of $5 million and $10 million orders will continue to decrease with a market impact of 30 basis points.61 For a $10 million market order, the overall impact in spot price. Additionally, offering only in-kind the cost to buy or sell is roughly 20 basis creation and redemption will provide points with a market impact of 50 basis unique protections against potential points. Stated another way, a market attempts to manipulate the Shares. participant could enter a market buy or While the Sponsor believes that the sell order for $10 million of bitcoin and Reference Rate which it uses to value only move the market 0.5%. More the Trust’s bitcoin is itself resistant to strategic purchases or sales (such as manipulation based on the methodology using limit orders and executing further described below, the fact that through OTC bitcoin trade desks) would creations and redemptions are only likely have less obvious impact on the available in-kind makes the market—which is consistent with manipulability of the Reference Rate MicroStrategy, Tesla, and Square being significantly less important. able to collectively purchase billions of Specifically, because the Trust will not dollars in bitcoin. As such, the accept cash to buy bitcoin in order to combination of Bitcoin Futures leading create new shares or, barring a forced price discovery, the overall size of the redemption of the Trust or under other extraordinary circumstances, be forced methodology (except calculation time) as the CME to sell bitcoin to pay cash for redeemed CF Bitcoin Reference Rate, which is the rate on shares, the price that the Sponsor uses which Bitcoin Futures contracts are cash-settled in U.S. dollars at the CME. 61 These statistics are based on samples of bitcoin liquidity in USD (excluding stablecoins or Euro liquidity) based on executable quotes on Coinbase Pro, Gemini, Bitstamp, Kraken, LMAX Exchange, BinanceUS, and OKCoin during February 2021. VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:17 Apr 27, 2021 Jkt 253001 62 These statistics are based on samples of bitcoin liquidity in USD (excluding stablecoins or Euro liquidity) based on executable quotes on Coinbase Pro, Gemini, Bitstamp, Kraken, LMAX Exchange, BinanceUS, and OKCoin during February 2021. PO 00000 Frm 00109 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 to value the Trust’s bitcoin is not particularly important.63 When authorized participants are creating with the Trust, they need to deliver a certain number of bitcoin per share (regardless of the valuation used) and when they’re redeeming, they can similarly expect to receive a certain number of bitcoin per share. As such, even if the price used to value the Trust’s bitcoin is manipulated (which the Sponsor believes that its methodology is resistant to), the ratio of bitcoin per Share does not change and the Trust will either accept (for creations) or distribute (for redemptions) the same number of bitcoin regardless of the value. This not only mitigates the risk associated with potential manipulation, but also discourages and disincentivizes manipulation of the Reference Rate because there is little financial incentive to do so. Kryptoin Bitcoin ETF Trust Delaware Trust is the trustee (‘‘Trustee’’). The Bank of New York Mellon will be the administrator (‘‘Administrator’’) and transfer agent (‘‘Transfer Agent’’). Foreside Fund Services, LLC will be the marketing agent (‘‘Marketing Agent’’) in connection with the creation and redemption of ‘‘Baskets’’ of Shares. Kryptoin Investment Advisors, LLC (‘‘Kryptoin’’) will provide assistance in the marketing of the Shares. Gemini Trust Company, LLC, a third-party regulated custodian (the ‘‘Custodian’’), will be responsible for custody of the Trust’s bitcoin. According to the Registration Statement, each Share will represent a fractional undivided beneficial interest in the bitcoin held by the Trust. The Trust’s assets will consist of bitcoin held by the Custodian on behalf of the Trust. The Trust generally does not intend to hold cash or cash equivalents. However, there may be situations where the Trust will unexpectedly hold cash on a temporary basis. According to the Registration Statement, the Trust is neither an investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended,64 nor a commodity pool for purposes of the Commodity Exchange Act (‘‘CEA’’), and neither the Trust nor the Sponsor is subject to regulation as a commodity pool operator or a 63 While the Reference Rate will not be particularly important for the creation and redemption process, it will be used for calculating fees. 64 15 U.S.C. 80a–1. E:\FR\FM\28APN1.SGM 28APN1 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 28, 2021 / Notices commodity trading adviser in connection with the Shares. When the Trust sells or redeems its Shares, it will do so in ‘‘in-kind’’ transactions in blocks of 50,000 Shares (a ‘‘Creation Basket’’) at the Trust’s NAV. Authorized participants will deliver, or facilitate the delivery of, bitcoin to the Trust’s account with the Custodian in exchange for Shares when they purchase Shares, and the Trust, through the Custodian, will deliver bitcoin to such authorized participants when they redeem Shares with the Trust. Authorized participants may then offer Shares to the public at prices that depend on various factors, including the supply and demand for Shares, the value of the Trust’s assets, and market conditions at the time of a transaction. Shareholders who buy or sell Shares during the day from their broker may do so at a premium or discount relative to the NAV of the Shares of the Trust. jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES Investment Objective According to the Registration Statement and as further described below, the investment objective of the Trust is to provide exposure to bitcoin at a price that is reflective of the actual bitcoin market where investors purchase and sell bitcoin, less the expense of the Trust’s operations. In seeking to achieve its investment objective, the Trust will hold bitcoin and will value its Shares daily based on the reported CF Bitcoin US Settlement Price (the ‘‘Reference Rate’’), which is an independently calculated value based on an aggregation of executed trade flow of major bitcoin spot exchanges. The Trust will process all creations and redemptions in-kind in transactions with authorized participants. The Trust is not actively managed. The Reference Rate As described in the Registration Statement, the Fund will use the Reference Rate to calculate the Trust’s NAV. The Reference Rate was created to facilitate financial products based on bitcoin. It serves as a once-a-day benchmark rate of the U.S. dollar price of bitcoin (USD/BTC), calculated as of 4 p.m. Eastern time. The Reference Rate is based on materially the same methodology (except calculation time) 65 as the Administrator’s CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate (‘‘BRR’’), which was first introduced on November 14, 2016 and is the rate on which bitcoin futures contracts are cash-settled in U.S. dollars at the CME. The Reference Rate 65 The Reference Rate is calculated as of 4 p.m. Eastern Time, whereas the BRR is calculated as of 4 p.m. London Time. VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:17 Apr 27, 2021 Jkt 253001 aggregates the trade flow of several bitcoin exchanges, during an observation window between 3:00 p.m. and 4:00 p.m. Eastern time into the U.S. dollar price of one bitcoin at 4:00 p.m. Eastern time. The current constituent bitcoin exchanges of the Reference Rate are Bitstamp, Coinbase, Gemini, itBit and Kraken (the ‘‘Constituent Bitcoin Exchanges’’). The administrator of the Reference Rate is CF Benchmarks Ltd. (the ‘‘Benchmark Administrator’’). The Reference Rate is calculated based on the ‘‘Relevant Transactions’’ 66 of all of its Constituent Bitcoin Exchanges, as follows: • All Relevant Transactions are added to a joint list, recording the time of execution, trade price and size for each transaction. • The list is partitioned by timestamp into 12 equally-sized time intervals of 5 minute length. • For each partition separately, the volume-weighted median trade price is calculated from the trade prices and sizes of all Relevant Transactions, i.e., across all Constituent Bitcoin Exchanges. A volume-weighted median differs from a standard median in that a weighting factor, in this case trade size, is factored into the calculation. • The Reference Rate is then determined by the arithmetic mean of the volume-weighted medians of all partitions. By employing the foregoing steps, the Reference Rate thereby seeks to ensure that transactions in bitcoin conducted at outlying prices do not have an undue effect on the value of a specific partition, large trades or clusters of trades transacted over a short period of time will not have an undue influence on the index level, and the effect of large trades at prices that deviate from the prevailing price are mitigated from having an undue influence on the benchmark level. In addition, the Sponsor notes that an oversight function is implemented by the Benchmark Administrator in seeking to ensure that the Reference Rate is administered through codified policies for Reference Rate integrity. Availability of Information In addition to the price transparency of the Reference Rate, the Trust will provide information regarding the 66 A ‘‘Relevant Transaction’’ is any cryptocurrency versus U.S. dollar spot trade that occurs during the observation window between 3:00 p.m. and 4:00 p.m. Eastern time on a Constituent Bitcoin Exchange in the BTC/USD pair that is reported and disseminated by a Constituent Bitcoin Exchange through its publicly available API and observed by the Benchmark Administrator, CF Benchmarks Ltd. PO 00000 Frm 00110 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 22493 Trust’s bitcoin holdings as well as additional data regarding the Trust. The Trust will provide an Intraday Indicative Value (‘‘IIV’’) per Share updated every 15 seconds, as calculated by the Exchange or a third-party financial data provider during the Exchange’s Regular Trading Hours (9:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. E.T.). The IIV will be calculated by using the prior day’s closing NAV per Share as a base and updating that value during Regular Trading Hours to reflect changes in the value of the Trust’s bitcoin holdings during the trading day. The IIV disseminated during Regular Trading Hours should not be viewed as an actual real-time update of the NAV, which will be calculated only once at the end of each trading day. The IIV will be widely disseminated on a per Share basis every 15 seconds during the Exchange’s Regular Trading Hours by one or more major market data vendors. In addition, the IIV will be available through on-line information services. The website for the Trust, which will be publicly accessible at no charge, will contain the following information: (a) The current NAV per Share daily and the prior business day’s NAV and the reported closing price; (b) the BZX Official Closing Price 67 in relation to the NAV as of the time the NAV is calculated and a calculation of the premium or discount of such price against such NAV; (c) data in chart form displaying the frequency distribution of discounts and premiums of the Official Closing Price against the NAV, within appropriate ranges for each of the four previous calendar quarters (or for the life of the Trust, if shorter); (d) the prospectus; and (e) other applicable quantitative information. The Trust will also post the Trust’s updated holdings on the Trust’s website prior to the commencement of trading. The price of bitcoin will be made available by one or more major market data vendors, updated at least every 15 seconds during Regular Trading Hours. Information about the Reference Rate, including key elements of how the Reference Rate is calculated, will be publicly available at https:// www.cfbenchmarks.com. The NAV for the Trust will be calculated by the Administrator once a day and will be disseminated daily to all market participants at the same time. Quotation and last-sale information regarding the Shares will be disseminated through the facilities of 67 As defined in Rule 11.23(a)(3), the term ‘‘BZX Official Closing Price’’ shall mean the price disseminated to the consolidated tape as the market center closing trade. E:\FR\FM\28APN1.SGM 28APN1 22494 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 28, 2021 / Notices the Consolidated Tape Association (‘‘CTA’’). Quotation and last sale information for bitcoin is widely disseminated through a variety of major market data vendors, including Bloomberg and Reuters, as well as the Reference Rate. Information relating to trading, including price and volume information, in bitcoin is available from major market data vendors and from the exchanges on which bitcoin are traded. Depth of book information is also available from bitcoin exchanges. The normal trading hours for bitcoin exchanges are 24 hours per day, 365 days per year. jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES Net Asset Value The NAV of the Trust is the aggregate value of the Trust’s assets less its liabilities (which include estimated accrued but unpaid fees and expenses). In determining the NAV of the Trust, the Administrator values the bitcoin held by the Trust on the basis of the price of bitcoin as determined by the Reference Rate. The Administrator will determine the NAV of the Trust on each day that the Exchange is open for regular trading, after 4:00 p.m. EST. The Administrator also determines the NAV per Share, which equals the NAV of the Trust, divided by the number of outstanding Shares. Creation and Redemption of Shares According to the Registration Statement, on any business day, an authorized participant may place an order to create one or more baskets. Purchase orders must be placed by 4:00 p.m. Eastern Time, or the close of regular trading on the Exchange, whichever is earlier. The day on which an order is received is considered the purchase order date. The total deposit of bitcoin required is an amount of bitcoin that is in the same proportion to the total assets of the Trust, net of accrued expenses and other liabilities, on the date the order to purchase is properly received, as the number of Shares to be created under the purchase order is in proportion to the total number of Shares outstanding on the date the order is received. Each night, the Sponsor will publish the amount of bitcoin that will be required in exchange for each creation order. The Administrator determines the required deposit for a given day by dividing the number of bitcoin held by the Trust as of the opening of business on that business day, adjusted for the amount of bitcoin constituting estimated accrued but unpaid fees and expenses of the Trust as of the opening of business on that business day, by the quotient of the VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:17 Apr 27, 2021 Jkt 253001 number of Shares outstanding at the opening of business divided by 50,000. The procedures by which an authorized participant can redeem one or more Creation Baskets mirror the procedures for the creation of Creation Baskets. Rule 14.11(e)(4)—Commodity-Based Trust Shares The Shares will be subject to BZX Rule 14.11(e)(4), which sets forth the initial and continued listing criteria applicable to Commodity-Based Trust Shares. The Exchange will obtain a representation that the Trust’s NAV will be calculated daily and that these values and information about the assets of the Trust will be made available to all market participants at the same time. The Exchange notes that, as defined in Rule 14.11(e)(4)(C)(i), the Shares will be: (a) Issued by a trust that holds a specified commodity 68 deposited with the trust; (b) issued by such trust in a specified aggregate minimum number in return for a deposit of a quantity of the underlying commodity; and (c) when aggregated in the same specified minimum number, may be redeemed at a holder’s request by such trust which will deliver to the redeeming holder the quantity of the underlying commodity. Upon termination of the Trust, the Shares will be removed from listing. The Trustee, Delaware Trust Company, is a trust company having substantial capital and surplus and the experience and facilities for handling corporate trust business, as required under Rule 14.11(e)(4)(E)(iv)(a) and that no change will be made to the trustee without prior notice to and approval of the Exchange. The Exchange also notes that, pursuant to Rule 14.11(e)(4)(F), neither the Exchange nor any agent of the Exchange shall have any liability for damages, claims, losses or expenses caused by any errors, omissions or delays in calculating or disseminating any underlying commodity value, the current value of the underlying commodity required to be deposited to the Trust in connection with issuance of Commodity-Based Trust Shares; resulting from any negligent act or omission by the Exchange, or any agent of the Exchange, or any act, condition or cause beyond the reasonable control of the Exchange, its agent, including, but not limited to, an act of God; fire; flood; extraordinary weather conditions; war; insurrection; riot; strike; accident; action of government; communications 68 For purposes of Rule 14.11(e)(4), the term commodity takes on the definition of the term as provided in the Commodity Exchange Act. As noted above, the CFTC has opined that Bitcoin is a commodity as defined in Section 1a(9) of the Commodity Exchange Act. See Coinflip. PO 00000 Frm 00111 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 or power failure; equipment or software malfunction; or any error, omission or delay in the reports of transactions in an underlying commodity. Finally, as required in Rule 14.11(e)(4)(G), the Exchange notes that any registered market maker (‘‘Market Maker’’) in the Shares must file with the Exchange in a manner prescribed by the Exchange and keep current a list identifying all accounts for trading in an underlying commodity, related commodity futures or options on commodity futures, or any other related commodity derivatives, which the registered Market Maker may have or over which it may exercise investment discretion. No registered Market Maker shall trade in an underlying commodity, related commodity futures or options on commodity futures, or any other related commodity derivatives, in an account in which a registered Market Maker, directly or indirectly, controls trading activities, or has a direct interest in the profits or losses thereof, which has not been reported to the Exchange as required by this Rule. In addition to the existing obligations under Exchange rules regarding the production of books and records (see, e.g., Rule 4.2), the registered Market Maker in CommodityBased Trust Shares shall make available to the Exchange such books, records or other information pertaining to transactions by such entity or registered or non-registered employee affiliated with such entity for its or their own accounts for trading the underlying physical commodity, related commodity futures or options on commodity futures, or any other related commodity derivatives, as may be requested by the Exchange. Trading Halts With respect to trading halts, the Exchange may consider all relevant factors in exercising its discretion to halt or suspend trading in the Shares. The Exchange will halt trading in the Shares under the conditions specified in BZX Rule 11.18. Trading may be halted because of market conditions or for reasons that, in the view of the Exchange, make trading in the Shares inadvisable. These may include: (1) The extent to which trading is not occurring in the bitcoin underlying the Shares; or (2) whether other unusual conditions or circumstances detrimental to the maintenance of a fair and orderly market are present. Trading in the Shares also will be subject to Rule 14.11(e)(4)(E)(ii), which sets forth circumstances under which trading in the Shares may be halted. E:\FR\FM\28APN1.SGM 28APN1 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 28, 2021 / Notices Trading Rules The Exchange deems the Shares to be equity securities, thus rendering trading in the Shares subject to the Exchange’s existing rules governing the trading of equity securities. BZX will allow trading in the Shares during all trading sessions on the Exchange. The Exchange has appropriate rules to facilitate transactions in the Shares during all trading sessions. As provided in BZX Rule 11.11(a), the minimum price variation for quoting and entry of orders in securities traded on the Exchange is $0.01 where the price is greater than $1.00 per share or $0.0001 where the price is less than $1.00 per share. jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES Surveillance The Exchange believes that its surveillance procedures are adequate to properly monitor the trading of the Shares on the Exchange during all trading sessions and to deter and detect violations of Exchange rules and the applicable federal securities laws. Trading of the Shares through the Exchange will be subject to the Exchange’s surveillance procedures for derivative products, including Commodity-Based Trust Shares. The issuer has represented to the Exchange that it will advise the Exchange of any failure by the Trust or the Shares to comply with the continued listing requirements, and, pursuant to its obligations under Section 19(g)(1) of the Exchange Act, the Exchange will surveil for compliance with the continued listing requirements. If the Trust or the Shares are not in compliance with the applicable listing requirements, the Exchange will commence delisting procedures under Exchange Rule 14.12. The Exchange may obtain information regarding trading in the Shares and Bitcoin Futures via ISG, from other exchanges who are members or affiliates of the ISG, or with which the Exchange has entered into a comprehensive surveillance sharing agreement.69 Information Circular Prior to the commencement of trading, the Exchange will inform its members in an Information Circular of the special characteristics and risks associated with trading the Shares. Specifically, the Information Circular will discuss the following: (i) The procedures for the creation and redemption of Baskets (and that the Shares are not individually redeemable); (ii) BZX Rule 3.7, which imposes suitability obligations on Exchange members with respect to recommending 69 For a list of the current members and affiliate members of ISG, see www.isgportal.com. VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:17 Apr 27, 2021 Jkt 253001 transactions in the Shares to customers; (iii) how information regarding the IIV and the Trust’s NAV are disseminated; (iv) the risks involved in trading the Shares outside of Regular Trading Hours 70 when an updated IIV will not be calculated or publicly disseminated; (v) the requirement that members deliver a prospectus to investors purchasing newly issued Shares prior to or concurrently with the confirmation of a transaction; and (vi) trading information. In addition, the Information Circular will advise members, prior to the commencement of trading, of the prospectus delivery requirements applicable to the Shares. Members purchasing the Shares for resale to investors will deliver a prospectus to such investors. The Information Circular will also discuss any exemptive, noaction and interpretive relief granted by the Commission from any rules under the Act. 2. Statutory Basis The Exchange believes that the proposal is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act 71 in general and Section 6(b)(5) of the Act 72 in particular in that it is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest. The Commission has approved numerous series of Trust Issued Receipts,73 including Commodity-Based Trust Shares,74 to be listed on U.S. national securities exchanges. In order for any proposed rule change from an exchange to be approved, the Commission must determine that, among other things, the proposal is consistent with the requirements of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act, specifically including: (i) The requirement that a national securities exchange’s rules are designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices; 75 and (ii) the requirement that an exchange 70 Regular Trading Hours is the time between 9:30 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Eastern Time. 71 15 U.S.C. 78f. 72 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). 73 See Exchange Rule 14.11(f). 74 Commodity-Based Trust Shares, as described in Exchange Rule 14.11(e)(4), are a type of Trust Issued Receipt. 75 See note 54. PO 00000 Frm 00112 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 22495 proposal be designed, in general, to protect investors and the public interest. The Exchange believes that the proposal is, in particular, designed to protect investors and the public interest. With the growth of OTC Bitcoin Funds over the past year, so too has grown the potential risk to U.S. investors. Significant and prolonged premiums and discounts, significant premium/ discount volatility, high fees, insufficient disclosures, and technical hurdles are putting U.S. investor money at risk on a daily basis that could potentially be eliminated through access to a bitcoin ETP. As such, the Exchange believes that this proposal acts to limit the risk to U.S. investors that are increasingly seeking exposure to bitcoin through the elimination of significant and prolonged premiums and discounts, significant premium/discount volatility, the reduction of management fees through meaningful competition, the avoidance of risks associated with investing in operating companies that are imperfect proxies for bitcoin exposure, and protection from risk associated with custodying spot bitcoin by providing direct, 1-for-1 exposure to bitcoin in a regulated, transparent, exchange-traded vehicle designed to reduce the likelihood of significant and prolonged premiums and discounts with its open-ended nature as well as the ability of market participants (i.e., market makers and authorized participants) to create and redeem on a daily basis. The Exchange also believes that this proposal is consistent with the requirements of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act and that it has sufficiently demonstrated that, on the whole, the manipulation concerns previously articulated by the Commission are sufficiently mitigated to the point that they are outweighed by quantifiable investor protection issues that would be resolved by approving this proposal. Specifically, the Exchange believes that the significant increase in trading volume in Bitcoin Futures, the growth of liquidity at the inside in the spot market for bitcoin, and certain features of the Shares and the Reference Rate mitigate potential manipulation concerns to the point that the investor protection issues that have arisen from the rapid growth of over-the-counter bitcoin funds since the Commission last reviewed an exchange proposal to list and trade a bitcoin ETP, including premium/discount volatility and management fees, should be the central consideration as the Commission determines whether to approve this proposal. E:\FR\FM\28APN1.SGM 28APN1 22496 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 28, 2021 / Notices (i) Designed To Prevent Fraudulent and Manipulative Acts and Practices jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES In order to meet this standard in a proposal to list and trade a series of Commodity-Based Trust Shares, the Commission requires that an exchange demonstrate that there is a comprehensive surveillance-sharing agreement in place 76 with a regulated market of significant size. Both the Exchange and CME are members of ISG.77 The only remaining issue to be addressed is whether the Bitcoin Futures market constitutes a market of significant size, which the Exchange believes that it does. The terms ‘‘significant market’’ and ‘‘market of significant size’’ include a market (or group of markets) as to which: (a) There is a reasonable likelihood that a person attempting to manipulate the ETP would also have to trade on that market to manipulate the ETP, so that a surveillance-sharing agreement would assist the listing exchange in detecting and deterring misconduct; and (b) it is unlikely that trading in the ETP would be the predominant influence on prices in that market.78 The Commission has also recognized that the ‘‘regulated market of significant size’’ standard is not the only means for satisfying Section 6(b)(5) of the act, specifically providing that a listing exchange could demonstrate that ‘‘other means to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices’’ are sufficient to justify dispensing with the requisite surveillance-sharing agreement.79 76 As previously articulated by the Commission, ‘‘The standard requires such surveillance-sharing agreements since ‘‘they provide a necessary deterrent to manipulation because they facilitate the availability of information needed to fully investigate a manipulation if it were to occur.’’ The Commission has emphasized that it is essential for an exchange listing a derivative securities product to enter into a surveillance-sharing agreement with markets trading underlying securities for the listing exchange to have the ability to obtain information necessary to detect, investigate, and deter fraud and market manipulation, as well as violations of exchange rules and applicable federal securities laws and rules. The hallmarks of a surveillancesharing agreement are that the agreement provides for the sharing of information about market trading activity, clearing activity, and customer identity; that the parties to the agreement have reasonable ability to obtain access to and produce requested information; and that no existing rules, laws, or practices would impede one party to the agreement from obtaining this information from, or producing it to, the other party.’’ The Commission has historically held that joint membership in ISG constitutes such a surveillance sharing agreement. See Wilshire Phoenix Disapproval. 77 For a list of the current members and affiliate members of ISG, see www.isgportal.com. 78 See Wilshire Phoenix Disapproval. 79 See Winklevoss Order at 37580. The Commission has also specifically noted that it ‘‘is not applying a ‘‘cannot be manipulated’’ standard; VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:17 Apr 27, 2021 Jkt 253001 (a) Manipulation of the ETP The significant growth in Bitcoin Futures across each of trading volumes, open interest, large open interest holders, and total market participants since the Wilshire Phoenix Disapproval was issued are reflective of that market’s growing influence on the spot price, which according to the academic research cited above, was already leading the spot price in 2018 and 2019. Where Bitcoin Futures lead the price in the spot market such that a potential manipulator of the bitcoin spot market (beyond just the constituents of the Reference Rate 80) would have to participate in the Bitcoin Futures market, it follows that a potential manipulator of the Shares would similarly have to transact in the Bitcoin Futures market because the Reference Rate is based on spot prices. Further, the Trust only allows for in-kind creation and redemption, which, as further described below, reduces the potential for manipulation of the Shares through manipulation of the Reference Rate or any of its individual constituents, again emphasizing that a potential manipulator of the Shares would have to manipulate the entirety of the bitcoin spot market, which is led by the Bitcoin Futures market. As such, the Exchange believes that part (a) of the significant market test outlined above is satisfied and that common membership in ISG between the Exchange and CME would assist the listing exchange in detecting and deterring misconduct in the Shares. points.81 For a $10 million market order, the cost to buy or sell is roughly 20 basis points with a market impact of 50 basis points. Stated another way, a market participant could enter a market buy or sell order for $10 million of bitcoin and only move the market 0.5%. More strategic purchases or sales (such as using limit orders and executing through OTC bitcoin trade desks) would likely have less obvious impact on the market—which is consistent with MicroStrategy, Tesla, and Square being able to collectively purchase billions of dollars in bitcoin. As such, the combination of Bitcoin Futures leading price discovery, the overall size of the bitcoin market, and the ability for market participants, including authorized participants creating and redeeming in-kind with the Trust, to buy or sell large amounts of bitcoin without significant market impact will help prevent the Shares from becoming the predominant force on pricing in either the bitcoin spot or Bitcoin Futures markets, satisfying part (b) of the test outlined above. (c) Other Means To Prevent Fraudulent and Manipulative Acts and Practices (b) Predominant Influence on Prices in Spot and Bitcoin Futures The Exchange also believes that trading in the Shares would not be the predominant force on prices in the Bitcoin Futures market (or spot market) for a number of reasons, including the significant volume in the Bitcoin Futures market, the size of bitcoin’s market cap (approximately $1 trillion), and the significant liquidity available in the spot market. In addition to the Bitcoin Futures market data points cited above, the spot market for bitcoin is also very liquid. According to data from CoinRoutes from February 2021, the cost to buy or sell $5 million worth of bitcoin averages roughly 10 basis points with a market impact of 30 basis As noted above, the Commission also permits a listing exchange to demonstrate that ‘‘other means to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices’’ are sufficient to justify dispensing with the requisite surveillance-sharing agreement. The Exchange believes that such conditions are present. Specifically, the significant liquidity in the spot market and the impact of market orders on the overall price of bitcoin mean that attempting to move the price of bitcoin is costly and has grown more expensive over the past year. In January 2020, for example, the cost to buy or sell $5 million worth of bitcoin averaged roughly 30 basis points (compared to 10 basis points in 2/2021) with a market impact of 50 basis points (compared to 30 basis points in 2/ 2021).82 For a $10 million market order, the cost to buy or sell was roughly 50 basis points (compared to 20 basis points in 2/2021) with a market impact of 80 basis points (compared to 50 basis points in 2/2021). As the liquidity in the bitcoin spot market increases, it follows that the impact of $5 million and $10 instead, the Commission is examining whether the proposal meets the requirements of the Exchange Act and, pursuant to its Rules of Practice, places the burden on the listing exchange to demonstrate the validity of its contentions and to establish that the requirements of the Exchange Act have been met. Id. at 37582. 80 As described above, the Constitutent Bitcoin Exchanges are Bitstamp, Coinbase, Gemini, itBit, and Kraken. 81 These statistics are based on samples of bitcoin liquidity in USD (excluding stablecoins or Euro liquidity) based on executable quotes on Coinbase Pro, Gemini, Bitstamp, Kraken, LMAX Exchange, BinanceUS, and OKCoin during February 2021. 82 These statistics are based on samples of bitcoin liquidity in USD (excluding stablecoins or Euro liquidity) based on executable quotes on Coinbase Pro, Gemini, Bitstamp, Kraken, LMAX Exchange, BinanceUS, and OKCoin during February 2021. PO 00000 Frm 00113 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\28APN1.SGM 28APN1 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 28, 2021 / Notices million orders will continue to decrease the overall impact in spot price. Additionally, offering only in-kind creation and redemption will provide unique protections against potential attempts to manipulate the Shares. While the Sponsor believes that the Reference Rate which it uses to value the Trust’s bitcoin is itself resistant to manipulation based on the methodology further described below, the fact that creations and redemptions are only available in-kind makes the manipulability of the Reference Rate significantly less important. Specifically, because the Trust will not accept cash to buy bitcoin in order to create new shares or, barring a forced redemption of the Trust or under other extraordinary circumstances, be forced to sell bitcoin to pay cash for redeemed shares, the price that the Sponsor uses to value the Trust’s bitcoin is not particularly important.83 When authorized participants are creating with the Trust, they need to deliver a certain number of bitcoin per share (regardless of the valuation used) and when they’re redeeming, they can similarly expect to receive a certain number of bitcoin per share. As such, even if the price used to value the Trust’s bitcoin is manipulated (which the Sponsor believes that its methodology is resistant to), the ratio of bitcoin per Share does not change and the Trust will either accept (for creations) or distribute (for redemptions) the same number of bitcoin regardless of the value. This not only mitigates the risk associated with potential manipulation, but also discourages and disincentivizes manipulation of the Reference Rate because there is little financial incentive to do so. jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES Commodity-Based Trust Shares The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices in that the Shares will be listed on the Exchange pursuant to the initial and continued listing criteria in Exchange Rule 14.11(e)(4). The Exchange believes that its surveillance procedures are adequate to properly monitor the trading of the Shares on the Exchange during all trading sessions and to deter and detect violations of Exchange rules and the applicable federal securities laws. Trading of the Shares through the Exchange will be subject to the Exchange’s surveillance 83 While the Reference Rate will not be particularly important for the creation and redemption process, it will be used for calculating fees. VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:17 Apr 27, 2021 Jkt 253001 procedures for derivative products, including Commodity-Based Trust Shares. The issuer has represented to the Exchange that it will advise the Exchange of any failure by the Trust or the Shares to comply with the continued listing requirements, and, pursuant to its obligations under Section 19(g)(1) of the Exchange Act, the Exchange will surveil for compliance with the continued listing requirements. If the Trust or the Shares are not in compliance with the applicable listing requirements, the Exchange will commence delisting procedures under Exchange Rule 14.12. The Exchange may obtain information regarding trading in the Shares and listed bitcoin derivatives via the ISG, from other exchanges who are members or affiliates of the ISG, or with which the Exchange has entered into a comprehensive surveillance sharing agreement. Availability of Information The Exchange also believes that the proposal promotes market transparency in that a large amount of information is currently available about bitcoin and will be available regarding the Trust and the Shares. In addition to the price transparency of the Reference Rate, the Trust will provide information regarding the Trust’s bitcoin holdings as well as additional data regarding the Trust. The Trust will provide an IIV per Share updated every 15 seconds, as calculated by the Exchange or a thirdparty financial data provider during the Exchange’s Regular Trading Hours (9:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. E.T.). The IIV will be calculated by using the prior day’s closing NAV per Share as a base and updating that value during Regular Trading Hours to reflect changes in the value of the Trust’s bitcoin holdings during the trading day. The IIV disseminated during Regular Trading Hours should not be viewed as an actual real-time update of the NAV, which will be calculated only once at the end of each trading day. The IIV will be widely disseminated on a per Share basis every 15 seconds during the Exchange’s Regular Trading Hours by one or more major market data vendors. In addition, the IIV will be available through on-line information services. The website for the Trust, which will be publicly accessible at no charge, will contain the following information: (a) The current NAV per Share daily and the prior business day’s NAV and the reported closing price; (b) the BZX Official Closing Price in relation to the NAV as of the time the NAV is calculated and a calculation of the premium or discount of such price against such NAV; (c) data in chart form PO 00000 Frm 00114 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 22497 displaying the frequency distribution of discounts and premiums of the Official Closing Price against the NAV, within appropriate ranges for each of the four previous calendar quarters (or for the life of the Trust, if shorter); (d) the prospectus; and (e) other applicable quantitative information. The Trust will also disseminate the Trust’s holdings on a daily basis on the Trust’s website. The price of bitcoin will be made available by one or more major market data vendors, updated at least every 15 seconds during Regular Trading Hours. Information about the Reference Rate, including key elements of how the Reference Rate is calculated, will be publicly available at https:// www.cfbenchmarks.com. The NAV for the Trust will be calculated by the Administrator once a day and will be disseminated daily to all market participants at the same time. Quotation and last-sale information regarding the Shares will be disseminated through the facilities of the CTA. Quotation and last sale information for bitcoin is widely disseminated through a variety of major market data vendors, including Bloomberg and Reuters, as well as the Reference Rate. Information relating to trading, including price and volume information, in bitcoin is available from major market data vendors and from the exchanges on which bitcoin are traded. Depth of book information is also available from bitcoin exchanges. The normal trading hours for bitcoin exchanges are 24 hours per day, 365 days per year. For the above reasons, the Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act. B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Burden on Competition The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purpose of the Act. The Exchange notes that the proposed rule change, rather will facilitate the listing and trading of an additional exchange-traded product that will enhance competition among both market participants and listing venues, to the benefit of investors and the marketplace. C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others The Exchange has neither solicited nor received written comments on the proposed rule change. E:\FR\FM\28APN1.SGM 28APN1 22498 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 28, 2021 / Notices III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action Within 45 days of the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register or within such longer period up to 90 days (i) as the Commission may designate if it finds such longer period to be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to which the Exchange consents, the Commission will: A. by order approve or disapprove such proposed rule change, or B. institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved. IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic Comments • Use the Commission’s internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml); or • Send an email to rule-comments@ sec.gov. Please include File Number SR– CboeBZX–2021–029 on the subject line. jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES • Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549–1090. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–CboeBZX–2021–029. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission’s internet website (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in the Commission’s Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for 19:17 Apr 27, 2021 For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.84 J. Matthew DeLesDernier, Assistant Secretary. [FR Doc. 2021–08855 Filed 4–27–21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–91637; File No. SR–CBOE– 2021–013] Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe Exchange, Inc.; Order Approving a Proposed Rule Change To Amend Rule 5.52(d) in Connection With a MarketMaker’s Electronic Volume Transacted on the Exchange April 22, 2021. Paper Comments VerDate Sep<11>2014 inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying information from comment submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–CboeBZX–2021–029 and should be submitted on or before May 19, 2021. Jkt 253001 I. Introduction On February 22, 2021, Cboe Exchange, Inc. (the ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 a proposed rule change to amend Rule 5.52(d) in connection with a Market-Maker’s electronic volume transacted on the Exchange. The proposed rule change was published for comment in the Federal Register on March 12, 2021.3 The Commission received no comment letters on the proposed rule change. This order approves the proposed rule change. II. Description of the Proposal The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 5.52(d) in connection with a Market-Maker’s electronic volume transacted on the Exchange. Rule 5.52(d)(1) provides that if a MarketMaker never trades more than 20% of the Market-Maker’s contract volume CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 91275 (March 8, 2021), 86 FR 14166 (‘‘Notice’’). electronically in an appointed class during any calendar quarter (‘‘Electronic Volume Threshold’’),4 a Market-Maker will not be obligated to quote electronically in any designated percentage of series within that class pursuant to subparagraph (d)(2) (which governs the continuous electronic quoting requirements for Market-Makers in their appointed classes). That is, once a Market-Maker surpasses the Electronic Volume Threshold in an appointed class, the Market-Maker is required to provide continuous electronic quotes in that appointed classes going forward. Neither Rule 5.52(d)(1) nor (d)(2) permit a Market-Maker to reduce its electronic volume after surpassing the Electronic Volume Threshold in order to reset the electronic volume trigger or otherwise undo the resulting obligation to stream electronic quotes once the Electronic Volume Threshold is triggered in an appointed class. According to the Exchange, MarketMakers accustomed to executing volume on the trading floor have sophisticated and complicated risk modeling associated with their floor trading activity, including quoting, monitoring, and responding to the trading crowd. However, the Exchange understands that while such Market-Makers do have separate systems or third-party platforms for quoting, monitoring and responding to electronic markets, because these Market-Makers are almost exclusively floor-based, their technology or other platforms enabling them to quote electronically do not achieve the level of sophistication or complexity as the systems used by Market-Makers accustomed to quoting electronically. Indeed, to satisfy the continuous electronic quoting requirements, a Market-Maker must provide continuous bids and offers for 90% of the time the Market-Maker is required to provide electronic quotes in an appointed option class on a given trading day and must provide continuous quotes in 60% of the series of the Market-Maker’s appointed classes. The Exchange determines compliance by a MarketMaker with this quoting obligation on a monthly basis. In addition to this, a Market-Maker must, among other things, compete with other Market-Makers in its appointed classes, update quotations in response to changed market conditions in its appointed classes, maintain active markets in its appointed classes, and, overall, engage in a course of dealings reasonably calculated to 84 17 1 15 PO 00000 Frm 00115 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 4 The proposed rule change provides additional clarity within Rule 5.52(d)(1) by defining this threshold and adding the defined term throughout Rule 5.52(d)(1). E:\FR\FM\28APN1.SGM 28APN1

Agencies

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 80 (Wednesday, April 28, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22485-22498]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-08855]



[[Page 22485]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-91646; File No. SR-CboeBZX-2021-029]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of 
Filing of a Proposed Rule Change To List and Trade Shares of the 
Kryptoin Bitcoin ETF Trust Under BZX Rule 14.11(e)(4), Commodity-Based 
Trust Shares

April 22, 2021.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given 
that on April 9, 2021, Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or 
``BZX'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the 
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, 
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The 
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the 
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes a rule change to list and trade shares of the 
Kryptoin Bitcoin ETF Trust (the ``Trust''),\3\ under BZX Rule 
14.11(e)(4), Commodity-Based Trust Shares. The shares of the Trust are 
referred to herein as the ``Shares.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The Trust was formed as a Delaware statutory trust on 
October 28, 2019 and is operated as a grantor trust for U.S. federal 
tax purposes. The Trust has no fixed termination date.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The text of the proposed rule change is also available on the 
Exchange's website (https://markets.cboe.com/us/equities/regulation/rule_filings/bzx/), at the Exchange's Office of the Secretary, and at 
the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements 
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and 
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The 
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in 
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in 
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such 
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to list and trade the Shares under BZX Rule 
14.11(e)(4),\4\ which governs the listing and trading of Commodity-
Based Trust Shares on the Exchange.\5\ Kryptoin Investment Advisors, 
LLC is the sponsor of the Trust (the ``Sponsor''). The Shares will be 
registered with the Commission by means of the Trust's registration 
statement on Form S-1 (the ``Registration Statement'').\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ The Commission approved BZX Rule 14.11(e)(4) in Securities 
Exchange Act Release No. 65225 (August 30, 2011), 76 FR 55148 
(September 6, 2011) (SR-BATS-2011-018).
    \5\ All statements and representations made in this filing 
regarding (a) the description of the portfolio, (b) limitations on 
portfolio holdings or reference assets, or (c) the applicability of 
Exchange rules and surveillance procedures shall constitute 
continued listing requirements for listing the Shares on the 
Exchange.
    \6\ See Registration Statement on Form S-1, dated April 9, 2021 
submitted to the Commission by the Sponsor on behalf of the Trust. 
The descriptions of the Trust, the Shares, and the Reference Rate 
(as defined below) contained herein are based, in part, on 
information in the Registration Statement. The Registration 
Statement is not yet effective and the Shares will not trade on the 
Exchange until such time that the Registration Statement is 
effective.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background
    Bitcoin is a digital asset based on the decentralized, open source 
protocol of the peer-to-peer computer network launched in 2009 that 
governs the creation, movement, and ownership of bitcoin and hosts the 
public ledger, or ``blockchain,'' on which all bitcoin transactions are 
recorded (the ``Bitcoin Network'' or ``Bitcoin''). The decentralized 
nature of the Bitcoin Network allows parties to transact directly with 
one another based on cryptographic proof instead of relying on a 
trusted third party. The protocol also lays out the rate of issuance of 
new bitcoin within the Bitcoin Network, a rate that is reduced by half 
approximately every four years with an eventual hard cap of 21 million. 
It's generally understood that the combination of these two features--a 
systemic hard cap of 21 million bitcoin and the ability to transact 
trustlessly with anyone connected to the Bitcoin Network--gives bitcoin 
its value.\7\ The first rule filing proposing to list an exchange-
traded product to provide exposure to bitcoin in the U.S. was submitted 
by the Exchange on June 30, 2016.\8\ At that time, blockchain 
technology, and digital assets that utilized it, were relatively new to 
the broader public. The market cap of all bitcoin in existence at that 
time was approximately $10 billion. No registered offering of digital 
asset securities or shares in an investment vehicle with exposure to 
bitcoin or any other cryptocurrency had yet been conducted, and the 
regulated infrastructure for conducting a digital asset securities 
offering had not begun to develop.\9\ Similarly, regulated U.S. bitcoin 
futures contracts did not exist. The Commodity Futures Trading 
Commission (the ``CFTC'') had determined that bitcoin is a 
commodity,\10\ but had not engaged in significant enforcement actions 
in the space. The New York Department of Financial Services (``NYDFS'') 
adopted its final BitLicense regulatory framework in 2015, but had only 
approved four entities to engage in activities relating to virtual 
currencies (whether through granting a BitLicense or a limited-purpose 
trust charter) as of June 30, 2016.\11\ While the first over-the-
counter bitcoin fund launched in 2013, public trading was limited and 
the fund had only $60 million in assets.\12\ There were very few, if 
any, traditional financial institutions engaged in the space, whether 
through investment or providing services to digital asset

[[Page 22486]]

companies. In January 2018, the Staff of the Commission noted in a 
letter to the Investment Company Institute and SIFMA that it was not 
aware, at that time, of a single custodian providing fund custodial 
services for digital assets.\13\ Fast forward to the first quarter of 
2021 and the digital assets financial ecosystem, including bitcoin, has 
progressed significantly. The development of a regulated market for 
digital asset securities has significantly evolved, with market 
participants having conducted registered public offerings of both 
digital asset securities \14\ and shares in investment vehicles holding 
bitcoin futures.\15\ Additionally, licensed and regulated service 
providers have emerged to provide fund custodial services for digital 
assets, among other services. For example, in December 2020, the 
Commission adopted a conditional no-action position permitting certain 
special purpose broker-dealers to custody digital asset securities 
under Rule 15c3-3 under the Exchange Act; \16\ in September 2020, the 
Staff of the Commission released a no-action letter permitting certain 
broker-dealers to operate a non-custodial Alternative Trading System 
(``ATS'') for digital asset securities, subject to specified 
conditions; \17\ and in October 2019, the Staff of the Commission 
granted temporary relief from the clearing agency registration 
requirement to an entity seeking to establish a securities clearance 
and settlement system based on distributed ledger technology,\18\ and 
multiple transfer agents who provide services for digital asset 
securities registered with the Commission.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ For additional information about bitcoin and the Bitcoin 
Network, see https://bitcoin.org/en/getting-started; https://www.fidelitydigitalassets.com/articles/addressing-bitcoin-criticisms; and https://www.vaneck.com/education/investment-ideas/investing-in-bitcoin-and-digital-assets/.
    \8\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 83723 (July 26, 
2018), 83 FR 37579 (August 1, 2018). This proposal was subsequently 
disapproved by the Commission. See Securities Exchange Act Release 
No. 83723 (July 26, 2018), 83 FR 37579 (August 1, 2018) (the 
``Winklevoss Order'').
    \9\ Digital assets that are securities under U.S. law are 
referred to throughout this proposal as ``digital asset 
securities.'' All other digital assets, including bitcoin, are 
referred to interchangeably as ``cryptocurrencies'' or ``virtual 
currencies.'' The term ``digital assets'' refers to all digital 
assets, including both digital asset securities and 
cryptocurrencies, together.
    \10\ See ``In the Matter of Coinflip, Inc.'' (``Coinflip'') 
(CFTC Docket 15-29 (September 17, 2015)) (order instituting 
proceedings pursuant to Sections 6(c) and 6(d) of the CEA, making 
findings and imposing remedial sanctions), in which the CFTC stated:
     ``Section 1a(9) of the CEA defines `commodity' to include, 
among other things, `all services, rights, and interests in which 
contracts for future delivery are presently or in the future dealt 
in.' 7 U.S.C. 1a(9). The definition of a `commodity' is broad. See, 
e.g., Board of Trade of City of Chicago v. SEC, 677 F. 2d 1137, 1142 
(7th Cir. 1982). Bitcoin and other virtual currencies are 
encompassed in the definition and properly defined as commodities.''
    \11\ A list of virtual currency businesses that are entities 
regulated by the NYDFS is available on the NYDFS website. See 
https://www.dfs.ny.gov/apps_and_licensing/virtual_currency_businesses/regulated_entities.
    \12\ Data as of March 31, 2016 according to publicly available 
filings. See Bitcoin Investment Trust Form S-1, dated May 27, 2016, 
available: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1588489/000095012316017801/filename1.htm.
    \13\ See letter from Dalia Blass, Director, Division of 
Investment Management, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to 
Paul Schott Stevens, President & CEO, Investment Company Institute 
and Timothy W. Cameron, Asset Management Group--Head, Securities 
Industry and Financial Markets Association (January 18, 2018), 
available at https://www.sec.gov/divisions/investment/noaction/2018/cryptocurrency-011818.htm.
    \14\ See Prospectus supplement filed pursuant to Rule 424(b)(1) 
for INX Tokens (Registration No. 333-233363), available at: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1725882/000121390020023202/ea125858-424b1_inxlimited.htm.
    \15\ See Prospectus filed by Stone Ridge Trust VI on behalf of 
NYDIG Bitcoin Strategy Fund Registration, available at: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1764894/000119312519309942/d693146d497.htm.
    \16\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 90788, 86 FR 11627 
(February 26, 2021) (File Number S7-25-20) (Custody of Digital Asset 
Securities by Special Purpose Broker-Dealers).
    \17\ See letter from Elizabeth Baird, Deputy Director, Division 
of Trading and Markets, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to 
Kris Dailey, Vice President, Risk Oversight & Operational 
Regulation, Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (September 25, 
2020), available at: https://www.sec.gov/divisions/marketreg/mr-noaction/2020/finra-ats-role-in-settlement-of-digital-asset-security-trades-09252020.pdf.
    \18\ See letter from Jeffrey S. Mooney, Associate Director, 
Division of Trading and Markets, U.S. Securities and Exchange 
Commission to Charles G. Cascarilla & Daniel M. Burstein, Paxos 
Trust Company, LLC (October 28, 2019), available at: https://www.sec.gov/divisions/marketreg/mr-noaction/2019/paxos-trust-company-102819-17a.pdf.
    \19\ See, e.g., Form TA-1/A filed by Tokensoft Transfer Agent 
LLC (CIK: 0001794142) on January 8, 2021, available at: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1794142/000179414219000001/xslFTA1X01/primary_doc.xml.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Outside the Commission's purview, the regulatory landscape has 
changed significantly since 2016, and cryptocurrency markets have grown 
and evolved as well. The market for bitcoin is approximately 100 times 
larger, having recently reached a market cap of over $1 trillion. As of 
February 27, 2021, bitcoin's market cap is greater than companies such 
as Facebook, Inc., Berkshire Hathaway Inc., and JP Morgan Chase & Co. 
CFTC regulated bitcoin futures represented approximately $28 billion in 
notional trading volume on Chicago Mercantile Exchange (``CME'') 
(``Bitcoin Futures'') in December 2020 compared to $737 million, $1.4 
billion, and $3.9 billion in total trading in December 2017, December 
2018, and December 2019, respectively. Bitcoin Futures traded over $1.2 
billion per day in December 2020 and represented $1.6 billion in open 
interest compared to $115 million in December 2019, which the Exchange 
believes represents a regulated market of significant size, as further 
discussed below.\20\ The CFTC has exercised its regulatory jurisdiction 
in bringing a number of enforcement actions related to bitcoin and 
against trading platforms that offer cryptocurrency trading.\21\ The 
U.S. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the ``OCC'') has made 
clear that federally-chartered banks are able to provide custody 
services for cryptocurrencies and other digital assets.\22\ The OCC 
recently granted conditional approval of two charter conversions by 
state-chartered trust companies to national banks, both of which 
provide cryptocurrency custody services.\23\ NYDFS has granted no fewer 
than twenty-five BitLicenses, including to established public payment 
companies like PayPal Holdings, Inc. and Square, Inc., and limited 
purpose trust charters to entities providing cryptocurrency custody 
services, including the Trust's Custodian. The U.S. Treasury Financial 
Crimes Enforcement Network (``FinCEN'') has released extensive guidance 
regarding the applicability of the Bank Secrecy Act (``BSA'') and 
implementing regulations to virtual currency businesses,\24\ and has 
proposed rules imposing requirements on entities subject to the BSA 
that are specific to the technological context of virtual 
currencies.\25\ In addition, the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets 
Control (``OFAC'') has brought enforcement actions over apparent 
violations of the sanctions laws in connection with the provision of 
wallet management services for digital assets.\26\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ All statistics and charts included in this proposal are 
sourced from https://www.cmegroup.com/trading/bitcoin-futures.html.
    \21\ The CFTC's annual report for Fiscal Year 2020 (which ended 
on September 30, 2020) noted that the CFTC ``continued to 
aggressively prosecute misconduct involving digital assets that fit 
within the CEA's definition of commodity'' and ``brought a record 
setting seven cases involving digital assets.'' See CFTC FY2020 
Division of Enforcement Annual Report, available at: https://www.cftc.gov/media/5321/DOE_FY2020_AnnualReport_120120/download. 
Additionally, the CFTC filed on October 1, 2020, a civil enforcement 
action against the owner/operators of the BitMEX trading platform, 
which was one of the largest bitcoin derivative exchanges. See CFTC 
Release No. 8270-20 (October 1, 2020) available at: https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/8270-20.
    \22\ See OCC News Release 2021-2 (January 4, 2021) available at: 
https://www.occ.gov/news-issuances/news-releases/2021/nr-occ-2021-2.html.
    \23\ See OCC News Release 2021-6 (January 13, 2021) available 
at: https://www.occ.gov/news-issuances/news-releases/2021/nr-occ-2021-6.html and OCC News Release 2021-19 (February 5, 2021) 
available at: https://www.occ.gov/news-issuances/news-releases/2021/nr-occ-2021-19.html.
    \24\ See FinCEN Guidance FIN-2019-G001 (May 9, 2019) 
(Application of FinCEN's Regulations to Certain Business Models 
Involving Convertible Virtual Currencies) available at: https://www.fincen.gov/sites/default/files/2019-05/FinCEN%20Guidance%20CVC%20FINAL%20508.pdf.
    \25\ See U.S. Department of the Treasury Press Release: ``The 
Financial Crimes Enforcement Network Proposes Rule Aimed at Closing 
Anti-Money Laundering Regulatory Gaps for Certain Convertible 
Virtual Currency and Digital Asset Transactions'' (December 18, 
2020), available at: https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/sm1216.
    \26\ See U.S. Department of the Treasury Enforcement Release: 
``OFAC Enters Into $98,830 Settlement with BitGo, Inc. for Apparent 
Violations of Multiple Sanctions Programs Related to Digital 
Currency Transactions'' (December 30, 2020) available at: https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/20201230_bitgo.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition to the regulatory developments laid out above, more 
traditional financial market participants appear to be embracing 
cryptocurrency: Large insurance companies,\27\ asset

[[Page 22487]]

managers,\28\ university endowments,\29\ pension funds,\30\ and even 
historically bitcoin skeptical fund managers \31\ are allocating to 
bitcoin. The largest over-the-counter bitcoin fund previously filed a 
Form 10 registration statement, which the Staff of the Commission 
reviewed and which took effect automatically, and is now a reporting 
company.\32\ Established companies like Tesla, Inc.,\33\ MicroStrategy 
Incorporated,\34\ and Square, Inc.,\35\ among others, have recently 
announced substantial investments in bitcoin in amounts as large as 
$1.5 billion (Tesla) and $425 million (MicroStrategy). Suffice to say, 
bitcoin is on its way to gaining mainstream usage.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \27\ On December 10, 2020, Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance 
Company (MassMutual) announced that it had purchased $100 million in 
bitcoin for its general investment account. See MassMutual Press 
Release ``Institutional Bitcoin provider NYDIG announces minority 
stake purchase by MassMutual'' (December 10, 2020) available at: 
https://www.massmutual.com/about-us/news-and-press-releases/press-releases/2020/12/institutional-bitcoin-provider-nydig-announces-minority-stake-purchase-by-massmutual.
    \28\ See e.g., ``BlackRock's Rick Rieder says the world's 
largest asset manager has `started to dabble' in bitcoin'' (February 
17, 2021) available at: https://www.cnbc.com/2021/02/17/blackrock-has-started-to-dabble-in-bitcoin-says-rick-rieder.html and 
``Guggenheim's Scott Minerd Says Bitcoin Should Be Worth $400,000'' 
(December 16, 2020) available at: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-12-16/guggenheim-s-scott-minerd-says-bitcoin-should-be-worth-400-000.
    \29\ See e.g., ``Harvard and Yale Endowments Among Those 
Reportedly Buying Crypto'' (January 25, 2021) available at: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-01-26/harvard-and-yale-endowments-among-those-reportedly-buying-crypto.
    \30\ See e.g., ``Virginia Police Department Reveals Why its 
Pension Fund is Betting on Bitcoin'' (February 14, 2019) available 
at: https://finance.yahoo.com/news/virginia-police-department-reveals-why-194558505.html.
    \31\ See e.g., ``Bridgewater: Our Thoughts on Bitcoin'' (January 
28, 2021) available at: https://www.bridgewater.com/research-and-insights/our-thoughts-on-bitcoin and ``Paul Tudor Jones says he 
likes bitcoin even more now, rally still in the `first inning''' 
(October 22, 2020) available at: https://www.cnbc.com/2020/10/22/-paul-tudor-jones-says-he-likes-bitcoin-even-more-now-rally-still-in-the-first-inning.html.
    \32\ See Letter from Division of Corporation Finance, Office of 
Real Estate & Construction to Barry E. Silbert, Chief Executive 
Officer, Grayscale Bitcoin Trust (January 31, 2020) https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1588489/000000000020000953/filename1.pdf.
    \33\ See Form 10-K submitted by Tesla, Inc. for the fiscal year 
ended December 31, 2020 at 23: https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/1318605/000156459021004599/tsla-10k_20201231.htm.
    \34\ See Form 10-Q submitted by MicroStrategy Incorporated for 
the quarterly period ended September 30, 2020 at 8: https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/1050446/000156459020047995/mstr-10q_20200930.htm.
    \35\ See Form 10-Q submitted by Square, Inc. for the quarterly 
period ended September 30, 2020 at 51: https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/1512673/000151267320000012/sq-20200930.htm.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Despite these developments, access for U.S. retail investors to 
gain exposure to bitcoin via a transparent and regulated exchange-
traded vehicle remains limited. As investors and advisors increasingly 
utilize ETPs to manage diversified portfolios (including equities, 
fixed income securities, commodities, and currencies) quickly, easily, 
relatively inexpensively, and without having to hold directly any of 
the underlying assets, options for bitcoin exposure for U.S. investors 
remain limited to: (i) Investing in over-the-counter bitcoin funds 
(``OTC Bitcoin Funds'') that are subject to high premium/discount 
volatility (and high management fees) to the advantage of more 
sophisticated investors that are able to create and redeem shares at 
net asset value (``NAV'') directly with the issuing trust; (ii) facing 
the technical risk, complexity and generally high fees associated with 
buying spot bitcoin; or (iii) purchasing shares of operating companies 
that they believe will provide proxy exposure to bitcoin with limited 
disclosure about the associated risks. Meanwhile, investors in many 
other countries, including Canada,\36\ are able to use more traditional 
exchange listed and traded products to gain exposure to bitcoin, 
disadvantaging U.S. investors and leaving them with riskier and more 
expensive means of getting bitcoin exposure.\37\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \36\ The Exchange notes that the Purpose Bitcoin ETF, a retail 
physical bitcoin ETP recently launched in Canada, reportedly reached 
$421.8 million in assets under management (``AUM'') in two days, 
demonstrating the demand for a North American market listed bitcoin 
exchange-traded product (``ETP''). The Purpose Bitcoin ETF also 
offers a class of units that is U.S. dollar denominated, which could 
appeal to U.S. investors. Without an approved bitcoin ETP in the 
U.S. as a viable alternative, U.S. investors could seek to purchase 
these shares in order to get access to bitcoin exposure. Given the 
separate regulatory regime and the potential difficulties associated 
with any international litigation, such an arrangement would create 
more risk exposure for U.S. investors than they would otherwise have 
with a U.S. exchange listed ETP.
    \37\ The Exchange notes that securities regulators in a number 
of other countries have either approved or otherwise allowed the 
listing and trading of bitcoin ETPs. Specifically, these funds 
include the Purpose Bitcoin ETF, Bitcoin ETF, VanEck Vectors Bitcoin 
ETN, WisdomTree Bitcoin ETP, Bitcoin Tracker One, BTCetc bitcoin 
ETP, Amun Bitcoin ETP, Amun Bitcoin Suisse ETP, 21Shares Short 
Bitcoin ETP, and CoinShares Physical Bitcoin ETP.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

OTC Bitcoin Funds and Investor Protection
    Over the past year, U.S. investor exposure to bitcoin through OTC 
Bitcoin Funds has grown into the tens of billions of dollars. With that 
growth, so too has grown the potential risk to U.S. investors. As 
described below, premium and discount volatility, high fees, 
insufficient disclosures, and technical hurdles are putting U.S. 
investor money at risk on a daily basis that could potentially be 
eliminated through access to a bitcoin ETP. The Exchange understands 
the Commission's previous focus on potential manipulation of a bitcoin 
ETP in prior disapproval orders, but now believes that such concerns 
have been sufficiently mitigated and that the growing and quantifiable 
investor protection concerns should be the central consideration as the 
Commission reviews this proposal. As such, the Exchange believes that 
approving this proposal (and comparable proposals submitted hereafter) 
provides the Commission with the opportunity to allow U.S. investors 
with access to bitcoin in a regulated and transparent exchange-traded 
vehicle that would act to limit risk to U.S. investors by: (i) Reducing 
premium and discount volatility; (ii) reducing management fees through 
meaningful competition; (iii) reducing risks associated with investing 
in operating companies that are imperfect proxies for bitcoin exposure; 
and (iv) providing an alternative to custodying spot bitcoin.
(i) OTC Bitcoin Funds and Premium/Discount Volatility
    OTC Bitcoin Funds are generally designed to provide exposure to 
bitcoin in a manner similar to the Shares. However, unlike the Shares, 
OTC Bitcoin Funds are unable to freely offer creation and redemption in 
a way that incentivizes market participants to keep their shares 
trading in line with their NAV \38\ and, as such, frequently trade at a 
price that is out of line with the value of their assets held. 
Historically, OTC Bitcoin Funds have traded at a significant premium to 
NAV.\39\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \38\ Because OTC Bitcoin Funds are not listed on an exchange, 
they are also not subject to the same transparency and regulatory 
oversight by a listing exchange as the Shares would be. In the case 
of the Trust, the existence of a surveillance-sharing agreement 
between the Exchange and the Bitcoin Futures market results in 
increased investor protections compared to OTC Bitcoin Funds.
    \39\ The inability to trade in line with NAV may at some point 
result in OTC Bitcoin Funds trading at a discount to their NAV, 
which has occurred more recently with respect to one prominent OTC 
Bitcoin Fund. While that has not historically been the case, and it 
is not clear whether such discounts will continue, such a prolonged, 
significant discount scenario would give rise to nearly identical 
potential issues related to trading at a premium as described below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Trading at a premium or a discount is not unique to OTC Bitcoin 
Funds and is not in itself problematic, but the size of such premiums/
discounts and volatility thereof highlight the key differences in 
operations and market structure of OTC Bitcoin Funds as compared to 
ETPs. This, combined with the significant increase in AUM for OTC 
Bitcoin Funds over the past year, has given rise to significant and 
quantifiable investor protection issues, as further described below. In 
fact, the largest OTC Bitcoin Fund has grown to $35.0 billion in

[[Page 22488]]

AUM \40\ and has historically traded at a premium of between roughly 
five and 40%, though it has seen premiums at times above 100%.\41\ 
Recently, however, it has traded at a discount. As of March 24, 2021, 
the discount was approximately 14%,\42\ representing around $4.9 
billion in market value less than the bitcoin actually held by the 
fund. If premium/discount numbers move back to the middle of its 
historical range to a 20% premium (which historically could occur at 
any time and overnight), it would represent a swing of approximately 
$11.9 billion in value unrelated to the value of bitcoin held by the 
fund and if the premium returns to the upper end of its typical range, 
that number increases to $18.9 billion. These numbers are only 
associated with a single OTC Bitcoin Fund--as more and more OTC Bitcoin 
Funds come to market and more investor assets flood into them to get 
access to bitcoin exposure, the potential dollars at risk will only 
increase.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \40\ As of February 19, 2021. Compare to an AUM of approximately 
$2.6 billion on February 26, 2020, the date on which the Commission 
issued the most recent disapproval order for a bitcoin ETP. See 
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 88284 (February 26, 2020), 85 FR 
12595 (March 3, 2020) (SR-NYSEArca-2019-39) (the ``Wilshire Phoenix 
Disapproval''). While the price of one bitcoin has increased 
approximately 400% in the intervening period, the total AUM has 
increased by approximately 1240%, indicating that the increase in 
AUM was created beyond just price appreciation in bitcoin.
    \41\ See ``Traders Piling Into Overvalued Crypto Funds Risk a 
Painful Exit'' (February 4, 2021) available at: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-02-04/bitcoin-one-big-risk-when-investing-in-crypto-funds.
    \42\ This is compared to another OTC Bitcoin Product which had a 
premium of over 60% on the same day, with a premium of over 200% a 
few days earlier.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This raises significant investor protection issues in several ways. 
First, the most obvious issue is that investors are buying shares of a 
fund for a price that is not reflective of the per share value of the 
fund's underlying assets. Even operating within the normal premium 
range, it's possible for an investor to buy shares of an OTC Bitcoin 
Fund only to have those shares quickly lose 10% or more in dollar value 
excluding any movement of the price of bitcoin. That is to say--the 
price of bitcoin could have stayed exactly the same from market close 
on one day to market open the next, yet the value of the shares held by 
the investor decreased only because of the fluctuation of the premium/
discount. As more investment vehicles, including mutual funds and ETFs, 
seek to gain exposure to bitcoin, the easiest option for a buy and hold 
strategy is often an OTC Bitcoin Fund, meaning that even investors that 
do not directly buy OTC Bitcoin Funds can be disadvantaged by extreme 
premiums (or discounts) and premium volatility.
    The second issue is related to the first and explains how the 
premium in OTC Bitcoin Funds essentially creates a direct payment from 
retail investors to more sophisticated investors. Generally speaking, 
only accredited investors are able to create or redeem shares with the 
issuing trust, which means that they are able to buy or sell shares 
directly with the trust at NAV (in exchange for either cash or bitcoin) 
without having to pay the premium or sell into the discount. While 
there are often minimum holding periods for shares, an investor that is 
allowed to interact directly with the trust is able to hedge their 
bitcoin exposure as needed to satisfy the holding requirements and 
collect on the premium or discount opportunity.
    As noted above, the existence of a premium or discount and the 
premium/discount collection opportunity is not unique to OTC Bitcoin 
Funds and does not in itself warrant the approval of an ETP.\43\ What 
makes this situation unique is that such significant and persistent 
premiums and discounts can exist in a product with $35 billion in 
assets under management,\44\ that billions of retail investor dollars 
are constantly under threat of premium/discount volatility,\45\ and 
that premium/discount volatility is generally captured by more 
sophisticated investors on a riskless basis. The Exchange understands 
the Commission's focus on potential manipulation of a bitcoin ETP in 
prior disapproval orders, but now believes that current circumstances 
warrant that this direct, quantifiable investor protection issue should 
be the central consideration as the Commission determines whether to 
approve this proposal, particularly when the Trust as a bitcoin ETP is 
designed to reduce the likelihood of significant and prolonged premiums 
and discounts with its open-ended nature as well as the ability of 
market participants (i.e., market makers and authorized participants) 
to create and redeem on a daily basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \43\ The Exchange notes, for example, that similar premiums/
discounts and premium/discount volatility exist for other non-
bitcoin cryptocurrency related over-the-counter funds, but that the 
size and investor interest in those funds does not give rise to the 
same investor protection concerns that exist for OTC Bitcoin Funds.
    \44\ At $35 billion in AUM, the largest OTC Bitcoin Fund would 
be the 32nd largest out of roughly 2,400 U.S. listed ETPs.
    \45\ The Exchange notes that in two recent incidents, the 
premium dropped from 28.28% to 12.29% from the close on 3/19/20 to 
the close on 3/20/20 and from 38.40% to 21.05% from the close on 5/
13/19 to the close on 5/14/19. Similarly, over the period of 12/21/
20 to 1/21/20, the premium went from 40.18% to 2.79%. While the 
price of bitcoin appreciated significantly during this period and 
NAV per share increased by 41.25%, the price per share increased by 
only 3.58%.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

(ii) Spot and Proxy Exposure
    Exposure to bitcoin through an ETP also presents certain advantages 
for retail investors compared to buying spot bitcoin directly. The most 
notable advantage is the use of the Custodian to custody the Trust's 
bitcoin assets. The Sponsor has carefully selected the Custodian, a 
third party custodian that carries insurance covering both hot and cold 
storage and is chartered as a trust company and will custody the 
Trust's bitcoin assets in a manner so that it meets the definition of 
qualified custodian under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as 
amended. This includes, among others, the use of ``cold'' (offline) 
storage to hold private keys and the employment by the Custodian of a 
certain degree of cybersecurity measures and operational best 
practices. By contrast, an individual retail investor holding bitcoin 
through a cryptocurrency exchange lacks these protections. Typically, 
retail exchanges hold most, if not all, retail investors' bitcoin in 
``hot'' (internet-connected) storage and do not make any commitments to 
indemnify retail investors or to observe any particular cybersecurity 
standard. Meanwhile, a retail investor holding spot bitcoin directly in 
a self-hosted wallet may suffer from inexperience in private key 
management (e.g., insufficient password protection, lost key, etc.), 
which could cause them to lose some or all of their bitcoin holdings. 
In the Custodian, the Trust has engaged a regulated and licensed entity 
highly experienced in bitcoin custody, with dedicated, trained 
employees and procedures to manage the private keys to the Trust's 
bitcoin, and which is accountable for failures. Thus, with respect to 
custody of the Trust's bitcoin assets, the Trust presents advantages 
from an investment protection standpoint for retail investors compared 
to owning spot bitcoin directly.
    Finally, as described in the Background section above, recently a 
number of operating companies engaged in unrelated businesses--such as 
Tesla (a car manufacturer) and MicroStrategy (an enterprise software 
company)--have announced investments as large as $1.5 billion in 
bitcoin.\46\ Without access to

[[Page 22489]]

bitcoin exchange-traded products, retail investors seeking investment 
exposure to bitcoin may end up purchasing shares in these companies in 
order to gain the exposure to bitcoin that they seek.\47\ In fact, 
mainstream financial news networks have written a number of articles 
providing investors with guidance for obtaining bitcoin exposure 
through publicly traded companies (such as MicroStrategy, Tesla, and 
bitcoin mining companies, among others) instead of dealing with the 
complications associated with buying spot bitcoin in the absence of a 
bitcoin ETP.\48\ Such operating companies, however, are imperfect 
bitcoin proxies and provide investors with partial bitcoin exposure 
paired with a host of additional risks associated with whichever 
operating company they decide to purchase. Additionally, the 
disclosures provided by the aforementioned operating companies with 
respect to risks relating to their bitcoin holdings are generally 
substantially smaller than the registration statement of a bitcoin ETP, 
including the Registration Statement, typically amounting to a few 
sentences of narrative description and a handful of risk factors.\49\ 
In other words, investors seeking bitcoin exposure through publicly 
traded companies are gaining only partial exposure to bitcoin and are 
not fully benefitting from the risk disclosures and associated investor 
protections that come from the securities registration process.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \46\ It's been announced that MicroStrategy is currently 
contemplating a $600 million convertible note offering for the 
purpose of acquiring bitcoin. See: https://www.cnbc.com/2021/02/16/microstrategy-shares-rise-after-revealing-plans-to-buy-more-bitcoin.html.
    \47\ In August 2017, the Commission's Office of Investor 
Education and Advocacy warned investors about situations where 
companies were publicly announcing events relating to digital coins 
or tokens in an effort to affect the price of the company's publicly 
traded common stock. See https://www.sec.gov/oiea/investor-alerts-and-bulletins/ia_icorelatedclaims.
    \48\ See e.g., ``7 public companies with exposure to bitcoin'' 
(February 8, 2021) available at: https://finance.yahoo.com/news/7-public-companies-with-exposure-to-bitcoin-154201525.html; and ``Want 
to get in the crypto trade without holding bitcoin yourself? Here 
are some investing ideas'' (February 19, 2021) available at: https://www.cnbc.com/2021/02/19/ways-to-invest-in-bitcoin-without-holding-the-cryptocurrency-yourself-.html.
    \49\ See e.g., Tesla 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020, 
which mentions bitcoin just nine times: https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/1318605/000156459021004599/tsla-10k_20201231.htm.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Bitcoin Futures
    CME began offering trading in Bitcoin Futures in 2017. Each 
contract represents five bitcoin and is based on the CME CF Bitcoin 
Reference Rate.\50\ The contracts trade and settle like other cash-
settled commodity futures contracts. Nearly every measurable metric 
related to Bitcoin Futures has trended consistently up since launch 
and/or accelerated upward in the past year. For example, there was 
approximately $28 billion in trading in Bitcoin Futures in December 
2020 compared to $737 million, $1.4 billion, and $3.9 billion in total 
trading in December 2017, December 2018, and December 2019, 
respectively. Bitcoin Futures traded over $1.2 billion per day on the 
CME in December 2020 and represented $1.6 billion in open interest 
compared to $115 million in December 2019. This general upward trend in 
trading volume and open interest is captured in the following chart.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \50\ According to CME, the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate 
aggregates the trade flow of major bitcoin spot exchanges during a 
specific calculation window into a once-a-day reference rate of the 
U.S. dollar price of bitcoin. Calculation rules are geared toward 
maximum transparency and real-time replicability in underlying spot 
markets, including Bitstamp, Coinbase, Gemini, itBit, and Kraken. 
For additional information, refer to https://www.cmegroup.com/trading/cryptocurrency-indices/cf-bitcoin-reference-rate.html?redirect=/trading/cf-bitcoin-reference-rate.html.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN28AP21.010


[[Page 22490]]


    Similarly, the number of large open interest holders \51\ has 
continued to increase even as the price of bitcoin has risen, as have 
the number of unique accounts trading Bitcoin Futures.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \51\ A large open interest holder in Bitcoin Futures is an 
entity that holds at least 25 contracts, which is the equivalent of 
125 bitcoin. At a price of approximately $30,000 per bitcoin on 
December 31, 2020, more than 80 firms had outstanding positions of 
greater than $3.8 million in Bitcoin Futures.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN28AP21.011


[[Page 22491]]


    The Sponsor further believes that academic research corroborates 
the overall trend outlined above and supports the thesis that the 
Bitcoin Futures pricing leads the spot market and, thus, a person 
attempting to manipulate the Shares would also have to trade on that 
market to manipulate the ETP. Specifically, the Sponsor believes that 
such research indicates that bitcoin futures lead the bitcoin spot 
market in price formation.\52\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \52\ See Hu, Y., Hou, Y. and Oxley, L. (2019). ``What role do 
futures markets play in Bitcoin pricing? Causality, cointegration 
and price discovery from a time-varying perspective'' (available at: 
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7481826/). This 
academic research paper concludes that ``There exist no episodes 
where the Bitcoin spot markets dominates the price discovery 
processes with regard to Bitcoin futures. This points to a 
conclusion that the price formation originates solely in the Bitcoin 
futures market. We can, therefore, conclude that the Bitcoin futures 
markets dominate the dynamic price discovery process based upon 
time-varying information share measures. Overall, price discovery 
seems to occur in the Bitcoin futures markets rather than the 
underlying spot market based upon a time-varying perspective.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Section 6(b)(5) and the Applicable Standards
    The Commission has approved numerous series of Trust Issued 
Receipts,\53\ including Commodity-Based Trust Shares,\54\ to be listed 
on U.S. national securities exchanges. In order for any proposed rule 
change from an exchange to be approved, the Commission must determine 
that, among other things, the proposal is consistent with the 
requirements of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act, specifically including: (i) 
The requirement that a national securities exchange's rules are 
designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices; 
\55\ and (ii) the requirement that an exchange proposal be designed, in 
general, to protect investors and the public interest. The Exchange 
believes that this proposal is consistent with the requirements of 
Section 6(b)(5) of the Act and that it has sufficiently demonstrated 
that, on the whole, the manipulation concerns previously articulated by 
the Commission are sufficiently mitigated to the point that they are 
outweighed by quantifiable investor protection issues that would be 
resolved by approving this proposal. Specifically, the Exchange lays 
out below why it believes that the significant increase in trading 
volume in Bitcoin Futures, the growth of liquidity at the inside in the 
spot market for bitcoin, and certain features of the Shares and the 
Reference Rate (as defined below) mitigate potential manipulation 
concerns to the point that the investor protection issues that have 
arisen from the rapid growth of over-the-counter bitcoin funds since 
the Commission last reviewed an exchange proposal to list and trade a 
bitcoin ETP, including premium/discount volatility and management fees, 
should be the central consideration as the Commission determines 
whether to approve this proposal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \53\ See Exchange Rule 14.11(f).
    \54\ Commodity-Based Trust Shares, as described in Exchange Rule 
14.11(e)(4), are a type of Trust Issued Receipt.
    \55\ As the Exchange has stated in a number of other public 
documents, it continues to believe that bitcoin is resistant to 
price manipulation and that ``other means to prevent fraudulent and 
manipulative acts and practices'' exist to justify dispensing with 
the requisite surveillance sharing agreement. The geographically 
diverse and continuous nature of bitcoin trading render it difficult 
and prohibitively costly to manipulate the price of bitcoin. The 
fragmentation across bitcoin platforms, the relatively slow speed of 
transactions, and the capital necessary to maintain a significant 
presence on each trading platform make manipulation of bitcoin 
prices through continuous trading activity challenging. To the 
extent that there are bitcoin exchanges engaged in or allowing wash 
trading or other activity intended to manipulate the price of 
bitcoin on other markets, such pricing does not normally impact 
prices on other exchange because participants will generally ignore 
markets with quotes that they deem non-executable. Moreover, the 
linkage between the bitcoin markets and the presence of arbitrageurs 
in those markets means that the manipulation of the price of bitcoin 
price on any single venue would require manipulation of the global 
bitcoin price in order to be effective. Arbitrageurs must have funds 
distributed across multiple trading platforms in order to take 
advantage of temporary price dislocations, thereby making it 
unlikely that there will be strong concentration of funds on any 
particular bitcoin exchange or OTC platform. As a result, the 
potential for manipulation on a trading platform would require 
overcoming the liquidity supply of such arbitrageurs who are 
effectively eliminating any cross-market pricing differences.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

(i) Designed To Prevent Fraudulent and Manipulative Acts and Practices
    In order to meet this standard in a proposal to list and trade a 
series of Commodity-Based Trust Shares, the Commission requires that an 
exchange demonstrate that there is a comprehensive surveillance-sharing 
agreement in place \56\ with a regulated market of significant size. 
Both the Exchange and CME are members of the Intermarket Surveillance 
Group (the ``ISG'').\57\ The only remaining issue to be addressed is 
whether the Bitcoin Futures market constitutes a market of significant 
size, which the Exchange believes that it does. The terms ``significant 
market'' and ``market of significant size'' include a market (or group 
of markets) as to which: (a) There is a reasonable likelihood that a 
person attempting to manipulate the ETP would also have to trade on 
that market to manipulate the ETP, so that a surveillance-sharing 
agreement would assist the listing exchange in detecting and deterring 
misconduct; and (b) it is unlikely that trading in the ETP would be the 
predominant influence on prices in that market.\58\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \56\ As previously articulated by the Commission, ``The standard 
requires such surveillance-sharing agreements since ``they provide a 
necessary deterrent to manipulation because they facilitate the 
availability of information needed to fully investigate a 
manipulation if it were to occur.'' The Commission has emphasized 
that it is essential for an exchange listing a derivative securities 
product to enter into a surveillance-sharing agreement with markets 
trading underlying securities for the listing exchange to have the 
ability to obtain information necessary to detect, investigate, and 
deter fraud and market manipulation, as well as violations of 
exchange rules and applicable federal securities laws and rules. The 
hallmarks of a surveillance-sharing agreement are that the agreement 
provides for the sharing of information about market trading 
activity, clearing activity, and customer identity; that the parties 
to the agreement have reasonable ability to obtain access to and 
produce requested information; and that no existing rules, laws, or 
practices would impede one party to the agreement from obtaining 
this information from, or producing it to, the other party.'' The 
Commission has historically held that joint membership in ISG 
constitutes such a surveillance sharing agreement. See Wilshire 
Phoenix Disapproval.
    \57\ For a list of the current members and affiliate members of 
ISG, see www.isgportal.com.
    \58\ See Wilshire Phoenix Disapproval.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission has also recognized that the ``regulated market of 
significant size'' standard is not the only means for satisfying 
Section 6(b)(5) of the act, specifically providing that a listing 
exchange could demonstrate that ``other means to prevent fraudulent and 
manipulative acts and practices'' are sufficient to justify dispensing 
with the requisite surveillance-sharing agreement.\59\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \59\ See Winklevoss Order at 37580. The Commission has also 
specifically noted that it ``is not applying a `cannot be 
manipulated' standard; instead, the Commission is examining whether 
the proposal meets the requirements of the Exchange Act and, 
pursuant to its Rules of Practice, places the burden on the listing 
exchange to demonstrate the validity of its contentions and to 
establish that the requirements of the Exchange Act have been met.'' 
Id. at 37582.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

(a) Manipulation of the ETP
    The significant growth in Bitcoin Futures across each of trading 
volumes, open interest, large open interest holders, and total market 
participants since the Wilshire Phoenix Disapproval was issued are 
reflective of that market's growing influence on the spot price, which 
according to the academic research cited above, was already leading the 
spot price in 2018 and 2019. Where Bitcoin Futures lead the price in 
the spot market such that a potential manipulator of the bitcoin spot 
market (beyond just the constituents of the Reference Rate \60\) would 
have to

[[Page 22492]]

participate in the Bitcoin Futures market, it follows that a potential 
manipulator of the Shares would similarly have to transact in the 
Bitcoin Futures market because the Reference Rate is based on spot 
prices. Further, the Trust only allows for in-kind creation and 
redemption, which, as further described below, reduces the potential 
for manipulation of the Shares through manipulation of the Reference 
Rate or any of its individual constituents, again emphasizing that a 
potential manipulator of the Shares would have to manipulate the 
entirety of the bitcoin spot market, which is led by the Bitcoin 
Futures market. As such, the Exchange believes that part (a) of the 
significant market test outlined above is satisfied and that common 
membership in ISG between the Exchange and CME would assist the listing 
exchange in detecting and deterring misconduct in the Shares.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \60\ As further described below, the Reference Rate for the Fund 
is based on materially the same methodology (except calculation 
time) as the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate, which is the rate on 
which Bitcoin Futures contracts are cash-settled in U.S. dollars at 
the CME.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

(b) Predominant Influence on Prices in Spot and Bitcoin Futures
    The Exchange also believes that trading in the Shares would not be 
the predominant force on prices in the Bitcoin Futures market (or spot 
market) for a number of reasons, including the significant volume in 
the Bitcoin Futures market, the size of bitcoin's market cap 
(approximately $1 trillion), and the significant liquidity available in 
the spot market. In addition to the Bitcoin Futures market data points 
cited above, the spot market for bitcoin is also very liquid. According 
to data from CoinRoutes from February 2021, the cost to buy or sell $5 
million worth of bitcoin averages roughly 10 basis points with a market 
impact of 30 basis points.\61\ For a $10 million market order, the cost 
to buy or sell is roughly 20 basis points with a market impact of 50 
basis points. Stated another way, a market participant could enter a 
market buy or sell order for $10 million of bitcoin and only move the 
market 0.5%. More strategic purchases or sales (such as using limit 
orders and executing through OTC bitcoin trade desks) would likely have 
less obvious impact on the market--which is consistent with 
MicroStrategy, Tesla, and Square being able to collectively purchase 
billions of dollars in bitcoin. As such, the combination of Bitcoin 
Futures leading price discovery, the overall size of the bitcoin 
market, and the ability for market participants, including authorized 
participants creating and redeeming in-kind with the Trust, to buy or 
sell large amounts of bitcoin without significant market impact will 
help prevent the Shares from becoming the predominant force on pricing 
in either the bitcoin spot or Bitcoin Futures markets, satisfying part 
(b) of the test outlined above.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \61\ These statistics are based on samples of bitcoin liquidity 
in USD (excluding stablecoins or Euro liquidity) based on executable 
quotes on Coinbase Pro, Gemini, Bitstamp, Kraken, LMAX Exchange, 
BinanceUS, and OKCoin during February 2021.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

(c) Other Means To Prevent Fraudulent and Manipulative Acts and 
Practices
    As noted above, the Commission also permits a listing exchange to 
demonstrate that ``other means to prevent fraudulent and manipulative 
acts and practices'' are sufficient to justify dispensing with the 
requisite surveillance-sharing agreement. The Exchange believes that 
such conditions are present. Specifically, the significant liquidity in 
the spot market and the impact of market orders on the overall price of 
bitcoin mean that attempting to move the price of bitcoin is costly and 
has grown more expensive over the past year. In January 2020, for 
example, the cost to buy or sell $5 million worth of bitcoin averaged 
roughly 30 basis points (compared to 10 basis points in 2/2021) with a 
market impact of 50 basis points (compared to 30 basis points in 2/
2021).\62\ For a $10 million market order, the cost to buy or sell was 
roughly 50 basis points (compared to 20 basis points in 2/2021) with a 
market impact of 80 basis points (compared to 50 basis points in 2/
2021). As the liquidity in the bitcoin spot market increases, it 
follows that the impact of $5 million and $10 million orders will 
continue to decrease the overall impact in spot price.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \62\ These statistics are based on samples of bitcoin liquidity 
in USD (excluding stablecoins or Euro liquidity) based on executable 
quotes on Coinbase Pro, Gemini, Bitstamp, Kraken, LMAX Exchange, 
BinanceUS, and OKCoin during February 2021.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Additionally, offering only in-kind creation and redemption will 
provide unique protections against potential attempts to manipulate the 
Shares. While the Sponsor believes that the Reference Rate which it 
uses to value the Trust's bitcoin is itself resistant to manipulation 
based on the methodology further described below, the fact that 
creations and redemptions are only available in-kind makes the 
manipulability of the Reference Rate significantly less important. 
Specifically, because the Trust will not accept cash to buy bitcoin in 
order to create new shares or, barring a forced redemption of the Trust 
or under other extraordinary circumstances, be forced to sell bitcoin 
to pay cash for redeemed shares, the price that the Sponsor uses to 
value the Trust's bitcoin is not particularly important.\63\ When 
authorized participants are creating with the Trust, they need to 
deliver a certain number of bitcoin per share (regardless of the 
valuation used) and when they're redeeming, they can similarly expect 
to receive a certain number of bitcoin per share. As such, even if the 
price used to value the Trust's bitcoin is manipulated (which the 
Sponsor believes that its methodology is resistant to), the ratio of 
bitcoin per Share does not change and the Trust will either accept (for 
creations) or distribute (for redemptions) the same number of bitcoin 
regardless of the value. This not only mitigates the risk associated 
with potential manipulation, but also discourages and disincentivizes 
manipulation of the Reference Rate because there is little financial 
incentive to do so.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \63\ While the Reference Rate will not be particularly important 
for the creation and redemption process, it will be used for 
calculating fees.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kryptoin Bitcoin ETF Trust
    Delaware Trust is the trustee (``Trustee''). The Bank of New York 
Mellon will be the administrator (``Administrator'') and transfer agent 
(``Transfer Agent''). Foreside Fund Services, LLC will be the marketing 
agent (``Marketing Agent'') in connection with the creation and 
redemption of ``Baskets'' of Shares. Kryptoin Investment Advisors, LLC 
(``Kryptoin'') will provide assistance in the marketing of the Shares. 
Gemini Trust Company, LLC, a third-party regulated custodian (the 
``Custodian''), will be responsible for custody of the Trust's bitcoin.
    According to the Registration Statement, each Share will represent 
a fractional undivided beneficial interest in the bitcoin held by the 
Trust. The Trust's assets will consist of bitcoin held by the Custodian 
on behalf of the Trust. The Trust generally does not intend to hold 
cash or cash equivalents. However, there may be situations where the 
Trust will unexpectedly hold cash on a temporary basis.
    According to the Registration Statement, the Trust is neither an 
investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, 
as amended,\64\ nor a commodity pool for purposes of the Commodity 
Exchange Act (``CEA''), and neither the Trust nor the Sponsor is 
subject to regulation as a commodity pool operator or a

[[Page 22493]]

commodity trading adviser in connection with the Shares.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \64\ 15 U.S.C. 80a-1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    When the Trust sells or redeems its Shares, it will do so in ``in-
kind'' transactions in blocks of 50,000 Shares (a ``Creation Basket'') 
at the Trust's NAV. Authorized participants will deliver, or facilitate 
the delivery of, bitcoin to the Trust's account with the Custodian in 
exchange for Shares when they purchase Shares, and the Trust, through 
the Custodian, will deliver bitcoin to such authorized participants 
when they redeem Shares with the Trust. Authorized participants may 
then offer Shares to the public at prices that depend on various 
factors, including the supply and demand for Shares, the value of the 
Trust's assets, and market conditions at the time of a transaction. 
Shareholders who buy or sell Shares during the day from their broker 
may do so at a premium or discount relative to the NAV of the Shares of 
the Trust.
Investment Objective
    According to the Registration Statement and as further described 
below, the investment objective of the Trust is to provide exposure to 
bitcoin at a price that is reflective of the actual bitcoin market 
where investors purchase and sell bitcoin, less the expense of the 
Trust's operations. In seeking to achieve its investment objective, the 
Trust will hold bitcoin and will value its Shares daily based on the 
reported CF Bitcoin US Settlement Price (the ``Reference Rate''), which 
is an independently calculated value based on an aggregation of 
executed trade flow of major bitcoin spot exchanges. The Trust will 
process all creations and redemptions in-kind in transactions with 
authorized participants. The Trust is not actively managed.
The Reference Rate
    As described in the Registration Statement, the Fund will use the 
Reference Rate to calculate the Trust's NAV. The Reference Rate was 
created to facilitate financial products based on bitcoin. It serves as 
a once-a-day benchmark rate of the U.S. dollar price of bitcoin (USD/
BTC), calculated as of 4 p.m. Eastern time. The Reference Rate is based 
on materially the same methodology (except calculation time) \65\ as 
the Administrator's CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate (``BRR''), which was 
first introduced on November 14, 2016 and is the rate on which bitcoin 
futures contracts are cash-settled in U.S. dollars at the CME. The 
Reference Rate aggregates the trade flow of several bitcoin exchanges, 
during an observation window between 3:00 p.m. and 4:00 p.m. Eastern 
time into the U.S. dollar price of one bitcoin at 4:00 p.m. Eastern 
time. The current constituent bitcoin exchanges of the Reference Rate 
are Bitstamp, Coinbase, Gemini, itBit and Kraken (the ``Constituent 
Bitcoin Exchanges''). The administrator of the Reference Rate is CF 
Benchmarks Ltd. (the ``Benchmark Administrator'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \65\ The Reference Rate is calculated as of 4 p.m. Eastern Time, 
whereas the BRR is calculated as of 4 p.m. London Time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Reference Rate is calculated based on the ``Relevant 
Transactions'' \66\ of all of its Constituent Bitcoin Exchanges, as 
follows:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \66\ A ``Relevant Transaction'' is any cryptocurrency versus 
U.S. dollar spot trade that occurs during the observation window 
between 3:00 p.m. and 4:00 p.m. Eastern time on a Constituent 
Bitcoin Exchange in the BTC/USD pair that is reported and 
disseminated by a Constituent Bitcoin Exchange through its publicly 
available API and observed by the Benchmark Administrator, CF 
Benchmarks Ltd.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     All Relevant Transactions are added to a joint list, 
recording the time of execution, trade price and size for each 
transaction.
     The list is partitioned by timestamp into 12 equally-sized 
time intervals of 5 minute length.
     For each partition separately, the volume-weighted median 
trade price is calculated from the trade prices and sizes of all 
Relevant Transactions, i.e., across all Constituent Bitcoin Exchanges. 
A volume-weighted median differs from a standard median in that a 
weighting factor, in this case trade size, is factored into the 
calculation.
     The Reference Rate is then determined by the arithmetic 
mean of the volume-weighted medians of all partitions.
    By employing the foregoing steps, the Reference Rate thereby seeks 
to ensure that transactions in bitcoin conducted at outlying prices do 
not have an undue effect on the value of a specific partition, large 
trades or clusters of trades transacted over a short period of time 
will not have an undue influence on the index level, and the effect of 
large trades at prices that deviate from the prevailing price are 
mitigated from having an undue influence on the benchmark level. In 
addition, the Sponsor notes that an oversight function is implemented 
by the Benchmark Administrator in seeking to ensure that the Reference 
Rate is administered through codified policies for Reference Rate 
integrity.
Availability of Information
    In addition to the price transparency of the Reference Rate, the 
Trust will provide information regarding the Trust's bitcoin holdings 
as well as additional data regarding the Trust. The Trust will provide 
an Intraday Indicative Value (``IIV'') per Share updated every 15 
seconds, as calculated by the Exchange or a third-party financial data 
provider during the Exchange's Regular Trading Hours (9:30 a.m. to 4:00 
p.m. E.T.). The IIV will be calculated by using the prior day's closing 
NAV per Share as a base and updating that value during Regular Trading 
Hours to reflect changes in the value of the Trust's bitcoin holdings 
during the trading day.
    The IIV disseminated during Regular Trading Hours should not be 
viewed as an actual real-time update of the NAV, which will be 
calculated only once at the end of each trading day. The IIV will be 
widely disseminated on a per Share basis every 15 seconds during the 
Exchange's Regular Trading Hours by one or more major market data 
vendors. In addition, the IIV will be available through on-line 
information services.
    The website for the Trust, which will be publicly accessible at no 
charge, will contain the following information: (a) The current NAV per 
Share daily and the prior business day's NAV and the reported closing 
price; (b) the BZX Official Closing Price \67\ in relation to the NAV 
as of the time the NAV is calculated and a calculation of the premium 
or discount of such price against such NAV; (c) data in chart form 
displaying the frequency distribution of discounts and premiums of the 
Official Closing Price against the NAV, within appropriate ranges for 
each of the four previous calendar quarters (or for the life of the 
Trust, if shorter); (d) the prospectus; and (e) other applicable 
quantitative information. The Trust will also post the Trust's updated 
holdings on the Trust's website prior to the commencement of trading. 
The price of bitcoin will be made available by one or more major market 
data vendors, updated at least every 15 seconds during Regular Trading 
Hours. Information about the Reference Rate, including key elements of 
how the Reference Rate is calculated, will be publicly available at 
https://www.cfbenchmarks.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \67\ As defined in Rule 11.23(a)(3), the term ``BZX Official 
Closing Price'' shall mean the price disseminated to the 
consolidated tape as the market center closing trade.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The NAV for the Trust will be calculated by the Administrator once 
a day and will be disseminated daily to all market participants at the 
same time. Quotation and last-sale information regarding the Shares 
will be disseminated through the facilities of

[[Page 22494]]

the Consolidated Tape Association (``CTA'').
    Quotation and last sale information for bitcoin is widely 
disseminated through a variety of major market data vendors, including 
Bloomberg and Reuters, as well as the Reference Rate. Information 
relating to trading, including price and volume information, in bitcoin 
is available from major market data vendors and from the exchanges on 
which bitcoin are traded. Depth of book information is also available 
from bitcoin exchanges. The normal trading hours for bitcoin exchanges 
are 24 hours per day, 365 days per year.
Net Asset Value
    The NAV of the Trust is the aggregate value of the Trust's assets 
less its liabilities (which include estimated accrued but unpaid fees 
and expenses). In determining the NAV of the Trust, the Administrator 
values the bitcoin held by the Trust on the basis of the price of 
bitcoin as determined by the Reference Rate. The Administrator will 
determine the NAV of the Trust on each day that the Exchange is open 
for regular trading, after 4:00 p.m. EST. The Administrator also 
determines the NAV per Share, which equals the NAV of the Trust, 
divided by the number of outstanding Shares.
Creation and Redemption of Shares
    According to the Registration Statement, on any business day, an 
authorized participant may place an order to create one or more 
baskets. Purchase orders must be placed by 4:00 p.m. Eastern Time, or 
the close of regular trading on the Exchange, whichever is earlier. The 
day on which an order is received is considered the purchase order 
date. The total deposit of bitcoin required is an amount of bitcoin 
that is in the same proportion to the total assets of the Trust, net of 
accrued expenses and other liabilities, on the date the order to 
purchase is properly received, as the number of Shares to be created 
under the purchase order is in proportion to the total number of Shares 
outstanding on the date the order is received. Each night, the Sponsor 
will publish the amount of bitcoin that will be required in exchange 
for each creation order. The Administrator determines the required 
deposit for a given day by dividing the number of bitcoin held by the 
Trust as of the opening of business on that business day, adjusted for 
the amount of bitcoin constituting estimated accrued but unpaid fees 
and expenses of the Trust as of the opening of business on that 
business day, by the quotient of the number of Shares outstanding at 
the opening of business divided by 50,000. The procedures by which an 
authorized participant can redeem one or more Creation Baskets mirror 
the procedures for the creation of Creation Baskets.
Rule 14.11(e)(4)--Commodity-Based Trust Shares
    The Shares will be subject to BZX Rule 14.11(e)(4), which sets 
forth the initial and continued listing criteria applicable to 
Commodity-Based Trust Shares. The Exchange will obtain a representation 
that the Trust's NAV will be calculated daily and that these values and 
information about the assets of the Trust will be made available to all 
market participants at the same time. The Exchange notes that, as 
defined in Rule 14.11(e)(4)(C)(i), the Shares will be: (a) Issued by a 
trust that holds a specified commodity \68\ deposited with the trust; 
(b) issued by such trust in a specified aggregate minimum number in 
return for a deposit of a quantity of the underlying commodity; and (c) 
when aggregated in the same specified minimum number, may be redeemed 
at a holder's request by such trust which will deliver to the redeeming 
holder the quantity of the underlying commodity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \68\ For purposes of Rule 14.11(e)(4), the term commodity takes 
on the definition of the term as provided in the Commodity Exchange 
Act. As noted above, the CFTC has opined that Bitcoin is a commodity 
as defined in Section 1a(9) of the Commodity Exchange Act. See 
Coinflip.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Upon termination of the Trust, the Shares will be removed from 
listing. The Trustee, Delaware Trust Company, is a trust company having 
substantial capital and surplus and the experience and facilities for 
handling corporate trust business, as required under Rule 
14.11(e)(4)(E)(iv)(a) and that no change will be made to the trustee 
without prior notice to and approval of the Exchange. The Exchange also 
notes that, pursuant to Rule 14.11(e)(4)(F), neither the Exchange nor 
any agent of the Exchange shall have any liability for damages, claims, 
losses or expenses caused by any errors, omissions or delays in 
calculating or disseminating any underlying commodity value, the 
current value of the underlying commodity required to be deposited to 
the Trust in connection with issuance of Commodity-Based Trust Shares; 
resulting from any negligent act or omission by the Exchange, or any 
agent of the Exchange, or any act, condition or cause beyond the 
reasonable control of the Exchange, its agent, including, but not 
limited to, an act of God; fire; flood; extraordinary weather 
conditions; war; insurrection; riot; strike; accident; action of 
government; communications or power failure; equipment or software 
malfunction; or any error, omission or delay in the reports of 
transactions in an underlying commodity. Finally, as required in Rule 
14.11(e)(4)(G), the Exchange notes that any registered market maker 
(``Market Maker'') in the Shares must file with the Exchange in a 
manner prescribed by the Exchange and keep current a list identifying 
all accounts for trading in an underlying commodity, related commodity 
futures or options on commodity futures, or any other related commodity 
derivatives, which the registered Market Maker may have or over which 
it may exercise investment discretion. No registered Market Maker shall 
trade in an underlying commodity, related commodity futures or options 
on commodity futures, or any other related commodity derivatives, in an 
account in which a registered Market Maker, directly or indirectly, 
controls trading activities, or has a direct interest in the profits or 
losses thereof, which has not been reported to the Exchange as required 
by this Rule. In addition to the existing obligations under Exchange 
rules regarding the production of books and records (see, e.g., Rule 
4.2), the registered Market Maker in Commodity-Based Trust Shares shall 
make available to the Exchange such books, records or other information 
pertaining to transactions by such entity or registered or non-
registered employee affiliated with such entity for its or their own 
accounts for trading the underlying physical commodity, related 
commodity futures or options on commodity futures, or any other related 
commodity derivatives, as may be requested by the Exchange.
Trading Halts
    With respect to trading halts, the Exchange may consider all 
relevant factors in exercising its discretion to halt or suspend 
trading in the Shares. The Exchange will halt trading in the Shares 
under the conditions specified in BZX Rule 11.18. Trading may be halted 
because of market conditions or for reasons that, in the view of the 
Exchange, make trading in the Shares inadvisable. These may include: 
(1) The extent to which trading is not occurring in the bitcoin 
underlying the Shares; or (2) whether other unusual conditions or 
circumstances detrimental to the maintenance of a fair and orderly 
market are present. Trading in the Shares also will be subject to Rule 
14.11(e)(4)(E)(ii), which sets forth circumstances under which trading 
in the Shares may be halted.

[[Page 22495]]

Trading Rules
    The Exchange deems the Shares to be equity securities, thus 
rendering trading in the Shares subject to the Exchange's existing 
rules governing the trading of equity securities. BZX will allow 
trading in the Shares during all trading sessions on the Exchange. The 
Exchange has appropriate rules to facilitate transactions in the Shares 
during all trading sessions. As provided in BZX Rule 11.11(a), the 
minimum price variation for quoting and entry of orders in securities 
traded on the Exchange is $0.01 where the price is greater than $1.00 
per share or $0.0001 where the price is less than $1.00 per share.
Surveillance
    The Exchange believes that its surveillance procedures are adequate 
to properly monitor the trading of the Shares on the Exchange during 
all trading sessions and to deter and detect violations of Exchange 
rules and the applicable federal securities laws. Trading of the Shares 
through the Exchange will be subject to the Exchange's surveillance 
procedures for derivative products, including Commodity-Based Trust 
Shares. The issuer has represented to the Exchange that it will advise 
the Exchange of any failure by the Trust or the Shares to comply with 
the continued listing requirements, and, pursuant to its obligations 
under Section 19(g)(1) of the Exchange Act, the Exchange will surveil 
for compliance with the continued listing requirements. If the Trust or 
the Shares are not in compliance with the applicable listing 
requirements, the Exchange will commence delisting procedures under 
Exchange Rule 14.12. The Exchange may obtain information regarding 
trading in the Shares and Bitcoin Futures via ISG, from other exchanges 
who are members or affiliates of the ISG, or with which the Exchange 
has entered into a comprehensive surveillance sharing agreement.\69\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \69\ For a list of the current members and affiliate members of 
ISG, see www.isgportal.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Information Circular
    Prior to the commencement of trading, the Exchange will inform its 
members in an Information Circular of the special characteristics and 
risks associated with trading the Shares. Specifically, the Information 
Circular will discuss the following: (i) The procedures for the 
creation and redemption of Baskets (and that the Shares are not 
individually redeemable); (ii) BZX Rule 3.7, which imposes suitability 
obligations on Exchange members with respect to recommending 
transactions in the Shares to customers; (iii) how information 
regarding the IIV and the Trust's NAV are disseminated; (iv) the risks 
involved in trading the Shares outside of Regular Trading Hours \70\ 
when an updated IIV will not be calculated or publicly disseminated; 
(v) the requirement that members deliver a prospectus to investors 
purchasing newly issued Shares prior to or concurrently with the 
confirmation of a transaction; and (vi) trading information.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \70\ Regular Trading Hours is the time between 9:30 a.m. and 
4:00 p.m. Eastern Time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition, the Information Circular will advise members, prior to 
the commencement of trading, of the prospectus delivery requirements 
applicable to the Shares. Members purchasing the Shares for resale to 
investors will deliver a prospectus to such investors. The Information 
Circular will also discuss any exemptive, no-action and interpretive 
relief granted by the Commission from any rules under the Act.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposal is consistent with Section 
6(b) of the Act \71\ in general and Section 6(b)(5) of the Act \72\ in 
particular in that it is designed to prevent fraudulent and 
manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable 
principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with 
persons engaged in facilitating transactions in securities, to remove 
impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and 
a national market system and, in general, to protect investors and the 
public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \71\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
    \72\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission has approved numerous series of Trust Issued 
Receipts,\73\ including Commodity-Based Trust Shares,\74\ to be listed 
on U.S. national securities exchanges. In order for any proposed rule 
change from an exchange to be approved, the Commission must determine 
that, among other things, the proposal is consistent with the 
requirements of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act, specifically including: (i) 
The requirement that a national securities exchange's rules are 
designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices; 
\75\ and (ii) the requirement that an exchange proposal be designed, in 
general, to protect investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \73\ See Exchange Rule 14.11(f).
    \74\ Commodity-Based Trust Shares, as described in Exchange Rule 
14.11(e)(4), are a type of Trust Issued Receipt.
    \75\ See note 54.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that the proposal is, in particular, designed 
to protect investors and the public interest. With the growth of OTC 
Bitcoin Funds over the past year, so too has grown the potential risk 
to U.S. investors. Significant and prolonged premiums and discounts, 
significant premium/discount volatility, high fees, insufficient 
disclosures, and technical hurdles are putting U.S. investor money at 
risk on a daily basis that could potentially be eliminated through 
access to a bitcoin ETP. As such, the Exchange believes that this 
proposal acts to limit the risk to U.S. investors that are increasingly 
seeking exposure to bitcoin through the elimination of significant and 
prolonged premiums and discounts, significant premium/discount 
volatility, the reduction of management fees through meaningful 
competition, the avoidance of risks associated with investing in 
operating companies that are imperfect proxies for bitcoin exposure, 
and protection from risk associated with custodying spot bitcoin by 
providing direct, 1-for-1 exposure to bitcoin in a regulated, 
transparent, exchange-traded vehicle designed to reduce the likelihood 
of significant and prolonged premiums and discounts with its open-ended 
nature as well as the ability of market participants (i.e., market 
makers and authorized participants) to create and redeem on a daily 
basis.
    The Exchange also believes that this proposal is consistent with 
the requirements of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act and that it has 
sufficiently demonstrated that, on the whole, the manipulation concerns 
previously articulated by the Commission are sufficiently mitigated to 
the point that they are outweighed by quantifiable investor protection 
issues that would be resolved by approving this proposal. Specifically, 
the Exchange believes that the significant increase in trading volume 
in Bitcoin Futures, the growth of liquidity at the inside in the spot 
market for bitcoin, and certain features of the Shares and the 
Reference Rate mitigate potential manipulation concerns to the point 
that the investor protection issues that have arisen from the rapid 
growth of over-the-counter bitcoin funds since the Commission last 
reviewed an exchange proposal to list and trade a bitcoin ETP, 
including premium/discount volatility and management fees, should be 
the central consideration as the Commission determines whether to 
approve this proposal.

[[Page 22496]]

(i) Designed To Prevent Fraudulent and Manipulative Acts and Practices
    In order to meet this standard in a proposal to list and trade a 
series of Commodity-Based Trust Shares, the Commission requires that an 
exchange demonstrate that there is a comprehensive surveillance-sharing 
agreement in place \76\ with a regulated market of significant size. 
Both the Exchange and CME are members of ISG.\77\ The only remaining 
issue to be addressed is whether the Bitcoin Futures market constitutes 
a market of significant size, which the Exchange believes that it does. 
The terms ``significant market'' and ``market of significant size'' 
include a market (or group of markets) as to which: (a) There is a 
reasonable likelihood that a person attempting to manipulate the ETP 
would also have to trade on that market to manipulate the ETP, so that 
a surveillance-sharing agreement would assist the listing exchange in 
detecting and deterring misconduct; and (b) it is unlikely that trading 
in the ETP would be the predominant influence on prices in that 
market.\78\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \76\ As previously articulated by the Commission, ``The standard 
requires such surveillance-sharing agreements since ``they provide a 
necessary deterrent to manipulation because they facilitate the 
availability of information needed to fully investigate a 
manipulation if it were to occur.'' The Commission has emphasized 
that it is essential for an exchange listing a derivative securities 
product to enter into a surveillance-sharing agreement with markets 
trading underlying securities for the listing exchange to have the 
ability to obtain information necessary to detect, investigate, and 
deter fraud and market manipulation, as well as violations of 
exchange rules and applicable federal securities laws and rules. The 
hallmarks of a surveillance-sharing agreement are that the agreement 
provides for the sharing of information about market trading 
activity, clearing activity, and customer identity; that the parties 
to the agreement have reasonable ability to obtain access to and 
produce requested information; and that no existing rules, laws, or 
practices would impede one party to the agreement from obtaining 
this information from, or producing it to, the other party.'' The 
Commission has historically held that joint membership in ISG 
constitutes such a surveillance sharing agreement. See Wilshire 
Phoenix Disapproval.
    \77\ For a list of the current members and affiliate members of 
ISG, see www.isgportal.com.
    \78\ See Wilshire Phoenix Disapproval.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission has also recognized that the ``regulated market of 
significant size'' standard is not the only means for satisfying 
Section 6(b)(5) of the act, specifically providing that a listing 
exchange could demonstrate that ``other means to prevent fraudulent and 
manipulative acts and practices'' are sufficient to justify dispensing 
with the requisite surveillance-sharing agreement.\79\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \79\ See Winklevoss Order at 37580. The Commission has also 
specifically noted that it ``is not applying a ``cannot be 
manipulated'' standard; instead, the Commission is examining whether 
the proposal meets the requirements of the Exchange Act and, 
pursuant to its Rules of Practice, places the burden on the listing 
exchange to demonstrate the validity of its contentions and to 
establish that the requirements of the Exchange Act have been met. 
Id. at 37582.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

(a) Manipulation of the ETP
    The significant growth in Bitcoin Futures across each of trading 
volumes, open interest, large open interest holders, and total market 
participants since the Wilshire Phoenix Disapproval was issued are 
reflective of that market's growing influence on the spot price, which 
according to the academic research cited above, was already leading the 
spot price in 2018 and 2019. Where Bitcoin Futures lead the price in 
the spot market such that a potential manipulator of the bitcoin spot 
market (beyond just the constituents of the Reference Rate \80\) would 
have to participate in the Bitcoin Futures market, it follows that a 
potential manipulator of the Shares would similarly have to transact in 
the Bitcoin Futures market because the Reference Rate is based on spot 
prices. Further, the Trust only allows for in-kind creation and 
redemption, which, as further described below, reduces the potential 
for manipulation of the Shares through manipulation of the Reference 
Rate or any of its individual constituents, again emphasizing that a 
potential manipulator of the Shares would have to manipulate the 
entirety of the bitcoin spot market, which is led by the Bitcoin 
Futures market. As such, the Exchange believes that part (a) of the 
significant market test outlined above is satisfied and that common 
membership in ISG between the Exchange and CME would assist the listing 
exchange in detecting and deterring misconduct in the Shares.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \80\ As described above, the Constitutent Bitcoin Exchanges are 
Bitstamp, Coinbase, Gemini, itBit, and Kraken.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

(b) Predominant Influence on Prices in Spot and Bitcoin Futures
    The Exchange also believes that trading in the Shares would not be 
the predominant force on prices in the Bitcoin Futures market (or spot 
market) for a number of reasons, including the significant volume in 
the Bitcoin Futures market, the size of bitcoin's market cap 
(approximately $1 trillion), and the significant liquidity available in 
the spot market. In addition to the Bitcoin Futures market data points 
cited above, the spot market for bitcoin is also very liquid. According 
to data from CoinRoutes from February 2021, the cost to buy or sell $5 
million worth of bitcoin averages roughly 10 basis points with a market 
impact of 30 basis points.\81\ For a $10 million market order, the cost 
to buy or sell is roughly 20 basis points with a market impact of 50 
basis points. Stated another way, a market participant could enter a 
market buy or sell order for $10 million of bitcoin and only move the 
market 0.5%. More strategic purchases or sales (such as using limit 
orders and executing through OTC bitcoin trade desks) would likely have 
less obvious impact on the market--which is consistent with 
MicroStrategy, Tesla, and Square being able to collectively purchase 
billions of dollars in bitcoin. As such, the combination of Bitcoin 
Futures leading price discovery, the overall size of the bitcoin 
market, and the ability for market participants, including authorized 
participants creating and redeeming in-kind with the Trust, to buy or 
sell large amounts of bitcoin without significant market impact will 
help prevent the Shares from becoming the predominant force on pricing 
in either the bitcoin spot or Bitcoin Futures markets, satisfying part 
(b) of the test outlined above.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \81\ These statistics are based on samples of bitcoin liquidity 
in USD (excluding stablecoins or Euro liquidity) based on executable 
quotes on Coinbase Pro, Gemini, Bitstamp, Kraken, LMAX Exchange, 
BinanceUS, and OKCoin during February 2021.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

(c) Other Means To Prevent Fraudulent and Manipulative Acts and 
Practices
    As noted above, the Commission also permits a listing exchange to 
demonstrate that ``other means to prevent fraudulent and manipulative 
acts and practices'' are sufficient to justify dispensing with the 
requisite surveillance-sharing agreement. The Exchange believes that 
such conditions are present. Specifically, the significant liquidity in 
the spot market and the impact of market orders on the overall price of 
bitcoin mean that attempting to move the price of bitcoin is costly and 
has grown more expensive over the past year. In January 2020, for 
example, the cost to buy or sell $5 million worth of bitcoin averaged 
roughly 30 basis points (compared to 10 basis points in 2/2021) with a 
market impact of 50 basis points (compared to 30 basis points in 2/
2021).\82\ For a $10 million market order, the cost to buy or sell was 
roughly 50 basis points (compared to 20 basis points in 2/2021) with a 
market impact of 80 basis points (compared to 50 basis points in 2/
2021). As the liquidity in the bitcoin spot market increases, it 
follows that the impact of $5 million and $10

[[Page 22497]]

million orders will continue to decrease the overall impact in spot 
price.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \82\ These statistics are based on samples of bitcoin liquidity 
in USD (excluding stablecoins or Euro liquidity) based on executable 
quotes on Coinbase Pro, Gemini, Bitstamp, Kraken, LMAX Exchange, 
BinanceUS, and OKCoin during February 2021.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Additionally, offering only in-kind creation and redemption will 
provide unique protections against potential attempts to manipulate the 
Shares. While the Sponsor believes that the Reference Rate which it 
uses to value the Trust's bitcoin is itself resistant to manipulation 
based on the methodology further described below, the fact that 
creations and redemptions are only available in-kind makes the 
manipulability of the Reference Rate significantly less important. 
Specifically, because the Trust will not accept cash to buy bitcoin in 
order to create new shares or, barring a forced redemption of the Trust 
or under other extraordinary circumstances, be forced to sell bitcoin 
to pay cash for redeemed shares, the price that the Sponsor uses to 
value the Trust's bitcoin is not particularly important.\83\ When 
authorized participants are creating with the Trust, they need to 
deliver a certain number of bitcoin per share (regardless of the 
valuation used) and when they're redeeming, they can similarly expect 
to receive a certain number of bitcoin per share. As such, even if the 
price used to value the Trust's bitcoin is manipulated (which the 
Sponsor believes that its methodology is resistant to), the ratio of 
bitcoin per Share does not change and the Trust will either accept (for 
creations) or distribute (for redemptions) the same number of bitcoin 
regardless of the value. This not only mitigates the risk associated 
with potential manipulation, but also discourages and disincentivizes 
manipulation of the Reference Rate because there is little financial 
incentive to do so.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \83\ While the Reference Rate will not be particularly important 
for the creation and redemption process, it will be used for 
calculating fees.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commodity-Based Trust Shares
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is designed to 
prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices in that the 
Shares will be listed on the Exchange pursuant to the initial and 
continued listing criteria in Exchange Rule 14.11(e)(4). The Exchange 
believes that its surveillance procedures are adequate to properly 
monitor the trading of the Shares on the Exchange during all trading 
sessions and to deter and detect violations of Exchange rules and the 
applicable federal securities laws. Trading of the Shares through the 
Exchange will be subject to the Exchange's surveillance procedures for 
derivative products, including Commodity-Based Trust Shares. The issuer 
has represented to the Exchange that it will advise the Exchange of any 
failure by the Trust or the Shares to comply with the continued listing 
requirements, and, pursuant to its obligations under Section 19(g)(1) 
of the Exchange Act, the Exchange will surveil for compliance with the 
continued listing requirements. If the Trust or the Shares are not in 
compliance with the applicable listing requirements, the Exchange will 
commence delisting procedures under Exchange Rule 14.12. The Exchange 
may obtain information regarding trading in the Shares and listed 
bitcoin derivatives via the ISG, from other exchanges who are members 
or affiliates of the ISG, or with which the Exchange has entered into a 
comprehensive surveillance sharing agreement.
Availability of Information
    The Exchange also believes that the proposal promotes market 
transparency in that a large amount of information is currently 
available about bitcoin and will be available regarding the Trust and 
the Shares. In addition to the price transparency of the Reference 
Rate, the Trust will provide information regarding the Trust's bitcoin 
holdings as well as additional data regarding the Trust. The Trust will 
provide an IIV per Share updated every 15 seconds, as calculated by the 
Exchange or a third-party financial data provider during the Exchange's 
Regular Trading Hours (9:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. E.T.). The IIV will be 
calculated by using the prior day's closing NAV per Share as a base and 
updating that value during Regular Trading Hours to reflect changes in 
the value of the Trust's bitcoin holdings during the trading day.
    The IIV disseminated during Regular Trading Hours should not be 
viewed as an actual real-time update of the NAV, which will be 
calculated only once at the end of each trading day. The IIV will be 
widely disseminated on a per Share basis every 15 seconds during the 
Exchange's Regular Trading Hours by one or more major market data 
vendors. In addition, the IIV will be available through on-line 
information services.
    The website for the Trust, which will be publicly accessible at no 
charge, will contain the following information: (a) The current NAV per 
Share daily and the prior business day's NAV and the reported closing 
price; (b) the BZX Official Closing Price in relation to the NAV as of 
the time the NAV is calculated and a calculation of the premium or 
discount of such price against such NAV; (c) data in chart form 
displaying the frequency distribution of discounts and premiums of the 
Official Closing Price against the NAV, within appropriate ranges for 
each of the four previous calendar quarters (or for the life of the 
Trust, if shorter); (d) the prospectus; and (e) other applicable 
quantitative information. The Trust will also disseminate the Trust's 
holdings on a daily basis on the Trust's website. The price of bitcoin 
will be made available by one or more major market data vendors, 
updated at least every 15 seconds during Regular Trading Hours. 
Information about the Reference Rate, including key elements of how the 
Reference Rate is calculated, will be publicly available at https://www.cfbenchmarks.com.
    The NAV for the Trust will be calculated by the Administrator once 
a day and will be disseminated daily to all market participants at the 
same time. Quotation and last-sale information regarding the Shares 
will be disseminated through the facilities of the CTA.
    Quotation and last sale information for bitcoin is widely 
disseminated through a variety of major market data vendors, including 
Bloomberg and Reuters, as well as the Reference Rate. Information 
relating to trading, including price and volume information, in bitcoin 
is available from major market data vendors and from the exchanges on 
which bitcoin are traded. Depth of book information is also available 
from bitcoin exchanges. The normal trading hours for bitcoin exchanges 
are 24 hours per day, 365 days per year.
    For the above reasons, the Exchange believes that the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the requirements of Section 6(b)(5) of the 
Act.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will 
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate 
in furtherance of the purpose of the Act. The Exchange notes that the 
proposed rule change, rather will facilitate the listing and trading of 
an additional exchange-traded product that will enhance competition 
among both market participants and listing venues, to the benefit of 
investors and the marketplace.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange has neither solicited nor received written comments on 
the proposed rule change.

[[Page 22498]]

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    Within 45 days of the date of publication of this notice in the 
Federal Register or within such longer period up to 90 days (i) as the 
Commission may designate if it finds such longer period to be 
appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to 
which the Exchange consents, the Commission will:
    A. by order approve or disapprove such proposed rule change, or
    B. institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule 
change should be disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to [email protected]. Please include 
File Number SR-CboeBZX-2021-029 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities 
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CboeBZX-2021-029. This 
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To 
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). 
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written 
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with 
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed 
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those 
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions 
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in 
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 
20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection 
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments 
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are 
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying 
information from comment submissions. You should submit only 
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions 
should refer to File Number SR-CboeBZX-2021-029 and should be submitted 
on or before May 19, 2021.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \84\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\84\
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-08855 Filed 4-27-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.