Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend Its Fees Schedule, 21380-21384 [2021-08313]
Download as PDF
21380
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 76 / Thursday, April 22, 2021 / Notices
The Exchange notes that IDS
competes with the Telecoms to provide
circuits for Mahwah Customers, as well
as other Telecoms, and that none of the
Telecoms have been compelled to file
their services or fees with the
Commission. Requiring IDS to do so
puts IDS at a competitive disadvantage
vis-a`-vis its competitors. Requiring the
Exchange to file IDS services and fees is
therefore a burden on competition.
The Exchange believes competition
would be best served by allowing IDS to
freely compete with the other providers
of connectivity services into and out of
the Mahwah Data Center, without the
additional burden on IDS alone to file
any proposed changes to services and
fees with the Commission.
With respect to the proposed MMR
Notes 1 and 2, the Exchange believes
that, if triggered, the imposition of the
purchase limits or waitlist provisions
would not impose a burden on a
Telecom’s ability to compete that is not
necessary or appropriate. The Exchange
believes that it would be reasonable for
it to put in place the Proposed
Procedures to establish a method for
allocating not just cabinets but also
power on an equitable basis.
The Exchange would only follow the
Proposed Procedures and place limits
on Telecoms’ ability to purchase new
power and cabinets if either or both the
proposed Power Threshold and Cabinet
Threshold were met. Similarly, a
waitlist would only be created if
unallocated cabinet inventory or power
capacity fell to zero, or if a Telecom
requests, in writing, a number of
cabinets or amount of power that, if
provided, would cause the available
inventory of cabinets and/or unallocated
power capacity to be below zero.
Based on its experience with the
MMR and purchasing trends over the
last few years, the Exchange believes
that in most cases one cabinet would be
sufficient for a Telecom’s needs while
leaving a margin for potential growth.
For the same reason, the Exchange
believes that the amount of power that
a Telecom would be allowed to buy
under the proposed limitations, whether
in the form of a cabinet or Additional
Power, would be sufficient for a
Telecom’s needs while leaving a margin
for potential growth.
The Exchange believes that the
proposed MMR Notes would articulate
rational, objective procedures, and
would serve to reduce any potential for
confusion on how cabinets and power
would be allocated if a shortage in one
or the other were to arise in the future,
and would thereby make the Price List
more transparent and reduce any
potential ambiguity.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:20 Apr 21, 2021
Jkt 253001
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited
or received with respect to the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 45 days of the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register, or such longer period up to 90
days (i) as the Commission may
designate if it finds such longer period
to be appropriate and publishes its
reasons for so finding or (ii) as to which
the self-regulatory organization
consents, the Commission will:
(A) By order approve or disapprove
the proposed rule change, or
(B) institute proceedings to determine
whether the proposed rule change
should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
NYSE–2021–25 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSE–2021–25. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
Frm 00113
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.28
J. Lynn Taylor,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021–08307 Filed 4–21–21; 8:45 am]
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
PO 00000
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change.
Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from
comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish
to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSE–2021–25, and
should be submitted on or before May
13, 2021.
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–91594; File No. SR–
CboeBZX–2021–030]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe
BZX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of a
Proposed Rule Change To Amend Its
Fees Schedule
April 16, 2021.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3
notice is hereby given that, on April 12,
2021, Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (the
‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘BZX’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(the ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been prepared
by the Exchange. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (the
‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘BZX’’ or ‘‘BZX
Equities’’) is filing with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 15 U.S.C. 78a.
3 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
28
1 15
E:\FR\FM\22APN1.SGM
22APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 76 / Thursday, April 22, 2021 / Notices
(‘‘Commission’’) a proposed rule change
to amend its fee schedule. The text of
the proposed rule change is provided in
Exhibit 5.
The text of the proposed rule change
is also available on the Exchange’s
website (https://markets.cboe.com/us/
equities/regulation/rule_filings/bzx/), at
the Exchange’s Office of the Secretary,
and at the Commission’s Public
Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend its
fee schedule as follows: (1) Decrease the
standard liquidity adding rebate and
non-displayed liquidity adding rebate,
(2) modify the Add/Remove Volume
Tiers, (3) modify Tier 2 of the Step-Up
Tiers, and (4) eliminate the Cross-Asset
Tape B Tier. The Exchange proposes to
implement the proposed change to its
fee schedule on April 1, 2021.4
The Exchange first notes that it
operates in a highly competitive market
in which market participants can
readily direct order flow to competing
venues if they deem fee levels at a
particular venue to be excessive or
incentives to be insufficient. More
specifically, the Exchange is only one of
16 registered equities exchanges, as well
as a number of alternative trading
systems and other off-exchange venues
that do not have similar self-regulatory
responsibilities under the Exchange Act,
to which market participants may direct
their order flow. Based on publicly
available information,5 no single
registered equities exchange has more
4 The Exchange initially filed the proposed fee
changes April 1, 2021 (SR–CboeBZX–2021–026).
On April 12, 2021, the Exchange withdrew that
filing and submitted this proposal.
5 See Cboe Global Markets, U.S. Equities Market
Volume Summary, Month-to-Date (March 29, 2021),
available at https://markets.cboe.com/us/equities/
market_statistics/.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:20 Apr 21, 2021
Jkt 253001
than 16% of the market share. Thus, in
such a low-concentrated and highly
competitive market, no single equities
exchange possesses significant pricing
power in the execution of order flow.
The Exchange in particular operates a
‘‘Maker-Taker’’ model whereby it pays
credits to members that add liquidity
and assesses fees to those that remove
liquidity. The Exchange’s fee schedule
sets forth the standard rebates and rates
applied per share for orders that provide
and remove liquidity, respectively.
Particularly, for securities at or above
$1.00, the Exchange provides a standard
rebate of $0.0020 per share for orders
that add liquidity and assesses a fee of
$0.0030 per share for orders that remove
liquidity. Additionally, in response to
the competitive environment, the
Exchange also offers tiered pricing
which provides Members opportunities
to qualify for higher rebates or reduced
fees where certain volume criteria and
thresholds are met. Tiered pricing
provides an incremental incentive for
Members to strive for higher tier levels,
which provides increasingly higher
benefits or discounts for satisfying
increasingly more stringent criteria.
Standard Liquidity Rebate and NonDisplayed Liquidity Adding Rebate
As stated above, the Exchange
currently provides a standard rebate of
$0.0020 per share for liquidity adding
orders (i.e., those yielding fee codes B,6
V,7 and Y 8) in securities priced at or
above $1.00. Orders in securities priced
below $1.00 that add liquidity are
provided a rebate of $0.00009. The
Exchange now proposes to decrease the
current standard rebate of $0.0020 per
share to $0.0018 per share for orders
that add liquidity for securities priced at
or above $1.00. Orders that add liquidity
in securities priced below $1.00 would
continue to be provided a rebate of
$0.00009. Although this proposed
standard rebate for liquidity adding
orders is lower than the current base
rate for such orders, the proposed rebate
is in line with similar rebates for
liquidity adding orders in place on other
exchanges.9
The Exchange also proposes to
decrease the rebate applied to nondisplayed, liquidity adding orders (i.e.,
6 Orders yielding Fee Code ‘‘B’’ are displayed
orders adding liquidity to BZX (Tape B).
7 Orders yielding Fee Code ‘‘V’’ are displayed
orders adding liquidity to BZX (Tape A).
8 Orders yielding Fee Code ‘‘Y’’ are displayed
orders adding liquidity to BZX (Tape C).
9 E.g., the Nasdaq base rebate ranges from $0.0015
to $0.0020 for liquidity adding orders in securities
priced at or above $1.00. See https://
nasdaqtrader.com/Trader.aspx?id=PriceList
Trading2.
PO 00000
Frm 00114
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
21381
orders yielding Fee Code HB,10 HV,11 or
HY 12). The current rebate applied to
non-displayed liquidity adding orders is
$0.00150 per share. Now, the Exchange
proposes to decrease the rebate to
$0.00100 per share. Although this
proposed rebate for non-displayed
liquidity adding orders is lower than the
current rate for such orders, the
proposed rebate is in line with similar
rebates for non-displayed liquidity
adding orders in place on other
exchanges.13
Add/Remove Volume Tiers
Pursuant to footnote 1 of the Fee
Schedule, the Exchange currently offers
Add Volume Tiers (tiers 1 through 5)
that provide Members an opportunity to
receive an enhanced rebate from the
standard rebate for liquidity adding
orders that yield fee codes B, V, and Y
and meet certain required volume-based
criteria. Specifically, the Add Volume
Tiers are as follows:
• Tier 1 provides an enhanced rebate
of $0.0025 per share to a Member that
has an ADAV 14 of greater than or equal
to 3,000,000.
• Tier 2 provides an enhanced rebate
of $0.0027 per share to a Member that
has an ADAV as a percentage of TCV 15
greater than or equal to 0.10%.
• Tier 3 provides an enhanced rebate
of $0.0029 per share to a Member that
has an ADAV as a percentage of TCV
greater than or equal to 0.25%.
• Tier 4 provides an enhanced rebate
of $0.0030 per share to a Member that
has an ADAV as a percentage of TCV
greater than or equal to 0.40%.
• Tier 5 provides an enhanced rebate
of $0.0031 per share to a Member that
has an ADAV as a percentage of TCV
greater than or equal to 0.85%.
Now, the Exchange proposes to
modify the five Add Volume Tiers to
provide the enhanced rebate if a
Member meets certain ADAV as a
percentage of TCV percentage
thresholds or meets certain ADAV share
volume. Specifically, the Exchange
10 Orders yielding Fee Code ‘‘HB’’ are nondisplayed orders adding liquidity to BZX (Tape B).
11 Orders yielding Fee Code ‘‘HV’’ are nondisplayed orders adding liquidity to BZX (Tape A).
12 Orders yielding Fee Code ‘‘HY’’ are nondisplayed orders adding liquidity to BZX (Tape C).
13 E.g., the Nasdaq rebate for non-displayed orders
ranges from $0.0000 to $0.00220 for non-displayed
liquidity adding orders. See https://
nasdaqtrader.com/Trader.aspx?id=PriceList
Trading2.
14 ‘‘ADAV’’ means average daily added volume
calculated as the number of shares added per day.
ADAV is calculated on a monthly basis.
15 ‘‘TCV’’ means total consolidated volume
calculated as the volume reported by all exchanges
and trade reporting facilities to a consolidated
transaction reporting plan for the month for which
the fees apply.
E:\FR\FM\22APN1.SGM
22APN1
21382
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 76 / Thursday, April 22, 2021 / Notices
proposes to modify Tier 1 to require a
certain ADAV as a percentage of TCV or
an ADAV over a certain volume
threshold. Although the proposed
changes to Tier 1 result in more
stringent criteria, Members still have an
opportunity to receive the additional
rebate if they meet the tier threshold.
The Exchange also proposes to modify
the Add Volume Tiers 2 through 5 to
increase the existing ADAV as a
percentage of TCV criteria and offer an
alternative criteria which requires an
ADAV over a certain volume threshold.
The proposed changes to Tiers 2
through 5 are less stringent than the
existing criteria and are designed to
encourage Members to increase their
liquidity adding volume on the
Exchange. Specifically, the proposed
Add Volume Tiers are as follows:
• To meet the proposed criteria in
Tier 1, a Member must have an ADAV
as a percentage of TCV equal to or
greater than 0.08% or an ADAV of
greater than or equal to 8,000,000.
• To meet the proposed criteria in
Tier 2, a Member must have an ADAV
as a percentage of TCV equal to or
greater than 0.15% or an ADAV of
greater than or equal to 15,000,000.
• To meet the proposed criteria in
Tier 3, a Member must have an ADAV
as a percentage of TCV equal to or
greater than 0.35% or an ADAV of
greater than or equal to 35,000,000.
• To meet the proposed criteria in
Tier 4, a Member must have an ADAV
as a percentage of TCV equal to or
greater than 0.60% or an ADAV of
greater than or equal to 60,000,000.
• To meet the proposed criteria in
Tier 5, a Member must have an ADAV
as a percentage of TCV equal to or
greater than 1.00% or an ADAV of
greater than or equal to 100,000,000.
The Exchange notes the Add Volume
Tiers, as modified, continue to be
available to all Members and provide
Members an opportunity to receive an
enhanced rebate. Moreover, the
proposed changes are designed to
encourage Members to increase
displayed liquidity on the Exchange,
which further contributes to a deeper,
more liquid market and provides even
more execution opportunities for active
market participants.
Tier 2 of the Step-Up Tiers
The tiered pricing models set forth in
footnote 2 of the fee schedule (Step-Up
Tiers) provides Members an opportunity
to qualify for an enhanced rebate on
their orders that add liquidity where
they increase their relative liquidity
each month over a predetermined
baseline. Tier 2 of the Step-Up Tiers
provides an enhanced rebate of $0.0033
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:20 Apr 21, 2021
Jkt 253001
per share to a Member that has a StepUp Add TCV 16 from April 2020 equal
to or greater than 0.30%. The Exchange
notes that step-up tiers are designed to
encourage Members that provide
displayed liquidity on the Exchange to
increase their order flow, which would
benefit all Members by providing greater
execution opportunities on the
Exchange.
Now, the Exchange proposes to
reduce the rebate provided under Tier 2
of the Step-Up Tiers to $0.0032 per
share. While the Exchange is proposing
no change to the criteria of Tier 2 of the
Step-Up Tiers, the Exchange believes
that the tier will continue to incentivize
increased order flow to the Exchange,
which may contribute to a deeper, more
liquid market to the benefit of all market
participants by creating a more robust
and well-balanced market ecosystem.
Step-Up Tier 2, as modified, continues
to be available to all Members and
provide Members an opportunity to
receive an enhanced rebate, albeit a
reduced rebate. The proposed rebate is
in line with similar rebates for growth
programs in place on other exchanges.17
Cross-Asset Tape B Tier
The Cross-Asset Tape B Tier is
provided under footnote 12 of the Fee
Schedule and provides an enhanced
rebate to orders yielding fee code B.
Specifically, the Cross-Asset Tape B
Tier provides an enhanced rebate of
$0.0031 per share to a Member that has
a Tape B Step-Up Add TCV 18 from
February 2015 equal to or greater than
0.06% and has an Options Market
Maker Add OCV 19 greater than or equal
to 1.00%. The Cross-Asset Tape B Tier
is designed to encourage members that
provide displayed liquidity on the BZX
Equities and BZX Options to increase
their order flow, which would benefit
all Members by providing greater
execution opportunities on the
Exchange.
16 ‘‘Step-Up Add TCV’’ means ADAV as a
percentage of TCV in the relevant baseline month
subtracted from current ADAV as a percentage of
TCV.
17 E.g., the Nasdaq Growth Program which offers
members a rebate of $0.0025 to members that meet
certain execution volume and increase their add
volume as a percentage of TCV by 20% versus the
member’s growth baseline. See https://
nasdaqtrader.com/Trader.aspx?id=PriceList
Trading2.
18 ‘‘Step-Up Add TCV’’ means ADAV as a
percentage of TCV in the relevant baseline month
subtracted from current ADAV as a percentage of
TCV.
19 ‘‘Options Market Maker Add OCV’’ for
purposes of equities pricing means ADAV resulting
from Market Maker orders as a percentage of OCV,
using the definitions of ADAV, Market Maker and
OCV as provided under the Exchange’s fee schedule
for BZX Options.
PO 00000
Frm 00115
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The Exchange now proposes to
eliminate the Cross-Asset Tape B Tier as
no Member has reached this tier in
several months and the Exchange the
Exchange no longer wishes to, nor is it
required to, maintain such a tier.20
Further, the Exchange would rather
redirect future resources and funding
into other programs and tiers intended
to incentivize increased order flow.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
the objectives of Section 6 of the Act,21
in general, and furthers the objectives of
Section 6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5),22 in
particular, as it is designed to provide
for the equitable allocation of reasonable
dues, fees and other charges among its
Members, issuers and other persons
using its facilities. The Exchange
operates in a highly competitive market
in which market participants can
readily direct order flow to competing
venues if they deem fee levels at a
particular venue to be excessive or
incentives to be insufficient. The
proposed rule changes reflect a
competitive pricing structure designed
to incentivize market participants to
direct their order flow to the Exchange,
which the Exchange believes would
enhance market quality to the benefit of
all Members.
In particular, the Exchange believes
that the proposed amendment to reduce
the standard liquidity adding rebate and
non-displayed liquidity adding rebate is
reasonable, equitable and nondiscriminatory because the proposed
change represents a rebate decrease and
such rebates are equally applicable to all
Members of the Exchange. Additionally,
the proposed rebates for liquidity
adding orders are in-line with rebates
offered at other exchanges for similar
transactions.23
The Exchange also believes the
proposed changes to the Add Volume
Tiers and Tier 2 of the Step-Up Tiers are
reasonable because each tier, as
modified, continues to be available to
all Members and provide Members an
opportunity to receive an enhanced
rebate. The Exchange next notes that
relative volume-based incentives and
discounts have been widely adopted by
exchanges, including the Exchange, and
are reasonable, equitable, and nondiscriminatory because they are open to
all Members on an equal basis and
provide additional discounts that are
reasonably related to (i) the value to an
20 The
Exchange proposes to reserve Footnote 12.
U.S.C. 78f.
22 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
23 Supra notes 7 and 11[sic].
21 15
E:\FR\FM\22APN1.SGM
22APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 76 / Thursday, April 22, 2021 / Notices
exchange’s market quality and (ii)
associated with higher levels of market
activity, such as higher levels of
liquidity provision and/or growth
patterns. The Exchange also believes
that the current enhanced rebates under
the Add Volume Tiers and proposed
rebate under Tier 2 of the Step-Up Tiers
continue to be commensurate with the
proposed and existing criteria,
respectively. That is, the rebates
reasonably reflect the difficulty in
achieving the corresponding criteria as
amended.
The Exchange believes that the
changes to the Add Volume Tiers, will
benefit all market participants by
incentivizing continuous liquidity and,
thus, deeper more liquid markets as
well as increased execution
opportunities. Particularly, the
proposed changes to the Add Volume
Tiers are designed to incentivize
displayed liquidity, which further
contributes to a deeper, more liquid
market and provide even more
execution opportunities for active
market participants at improved prices.
This overall increase in activity deepens
the Exchange’s liquidity pool, offers
additional cost savings, supports the
quality of price discovery, promotes
market transparency and improves
market quality, for all investors.
The Exchange also believes that the
proposed amendments to the Add
Volume Tiers and Tier 2 of the Step-Up
Tiers represent an equitable allocation
of rebates and are not unfairly
discriminatory because all Members are
eligible for the Add Volume Tiers and
Tier 2 of the Step-Up Tiers and would
have the opportunity to meet the tiers’
criteria and would receive the proposed
rebate if such criteria is met. The
Exchange also notes that proposed tiers/
rebate will not adversely impact any
Member’s ability to qualify for other
reduced fee or enhanced rebate tiers.
Should a Member not meet the
proposed criteria under any of the
proposed tiers, the Member will merely
not receive that corresponding
enhanced rebate.
The Exchange also believes the
proposed amendment to remove the
Cross-Asset Tape B Tier is reasonable
because no Member has achieved this
tier in several months. Furthermore, the
Exchange is not required to maintain
this tier and Members still have a
number of other opportunities and a
variety of ways to receive enhanced
rebates, including the proposed
enhanced standard rebates for displayed
orders adding liquidity. The Exchange
believes the proposal to eliminate the
Cross-Asset Tape B Tier is also equitable
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:20 Apr 21, 2021
Jkt 253001
and not unfairly discriminatory because
it applies to all Members.
As noted above, the Exchange
operates in a highly competitive market.
The Exchange is only one of 16 equity
venues to which market participants
may direct their order flow, and it
represents a small percentage of the
overall market. It is also only one of
several maker-taker exchanges.
Competing equity exchanges offer
similar rates and tiered pricing
structures to that of the Exchange,
including schedules of rebates and fees
that apply based upon members
achieving certain volume thresholds.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on intramarket or
intermarket competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. Particularly,
the proposed change applies to all
liquidity adding orders equally, and
thus applies to all Members equally.
Additionally, the Exchange believes the
proposed rule change does not impose
any burden on intermarket competition
that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purpose of the Act.
As previously discussed, the
Exchange operates in a highly
competitive market. Members have
numerous alternative venues that they
may participate on and direct their
order flow, including other equities
exchanges, off-exchange venues, and
alternative trading systems.
Additionally, the Exchange represents a
small percentage of the overall market.
Based on publicly available information,
no single equities exchange has more
than 16% of the market share.24
Therefore, no exchange possesses
significant pricing power in the
execution of order flow. Indeed,
participants can readily choose to send
their orders to other exchange and offexchange venues if they deem fee levels
at those other venues to be more
favorable. Moreover, the Commission
has repeatedly expressed its preference
for competition over regulatory
intervention in determining prices,
products, and services in the securities
markets. Specifically, in Regulation
NMS, the Commission highlighted the
importance of market forces in
determining prices and SRO revenues
and, also, recognized that current
regulation of the market system ‘‘has
been remarkably successful in
promoting market competition in its
broader forms that are most important to
24 Supra
PO 00000
note 3[sic].
Frm 00116
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
21383
investors and listed companies.’’ 25 The
fact that this market is competitive has
also long been recognized by the courts.
In NetCoalition v. Securities and
Exchange Commission, the D.C. Circuit
stated as follows: ‘‘[n]o one disputes
that competition for order flow is
‘fierce.’ . . . As the SEC explained, ‘[i]n
the U.S. national market system, buyers
and sellers of securities, and the brokerdealers that act as their order-routing
agents, have a wide range of choices of
where to route orders for execution’;
[and] ‘no exchange can afford to take its
market share percentages for granted’
because ‘no exchange possesses a
monopoly, regulatory or otherwise, in
the execution of order flow from broker
dealers’. . . .’’.26 Accordingly, the
Exchange does not believe its proposed
fee changes imposes any burden on
competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor
received comments on the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) 27 of the Act and paragraph
(f) of Rule 19b–4 28 thereunder. At any
time within 60 days of the filing of the
proposed rule change, the Commission
summarily may temporarily suspend
such rule change if it appears to the
Commission that such action is
necessary or appropriate in the public
interest, for the protection of investors,
or otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission will
institute proceedings to determine
whether the proposed rule change
should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
25 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808
(June 9, 2005), 70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005).
26 NetCoalition v. SEC, 615 F.3d 525, 539 (D.C.
Cir. 2010) (quoting Securities Exchange Act Release
No. 59039 (December 2, 2008), 73 FR 74770, 74782–
83 (December 9, 2008) (SR–NYSEArca–2006–21)).
27 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
28 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
E:\FR\FM\22APN1.SGM
22APN1
21384
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 76 / Thursday, April 22, 2021 / Notices
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
CboeBZX–2021–030 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–CboeBZX–2021–030. This
file number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549 on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change.
Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from
comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish
to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–CboeBZX–2021–030, and
should be submitted on or before May
13, 2021.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.29
J. Lynn Taylor,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021–08313 Filed 4–21–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
[Release No. 34–91600; File No. SR–
NYSEArca–2021–24]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE
Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing of Proposed
Rule Change To Amend the Schedule
of Wireless, Circuits, and NonColocation Connectivity Services
Available at the Mahwah Data Center
April 16, 2021.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3
notice is hereby given that on April 9,
2021, NYSE Arca, Inc. (‘‘NYSE Arca’’ or
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been prepared
by the Exchange. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend the
schedule of wireless, circuits, and noncolocation connectivity services
available at the Mahwah data center (the
‘‘Fee Schedule’’) to add services
available to customers in the meet me
rooms in the Mahwah data center and
procedures for the allocation of cabinets
and power to such customers. The
proposed change is available on the
Exchange’s website at www.nyse.com, at
the principal office of the Exchange, and
at the Commission’s Public Reference
Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of,
and basis for, the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
The Exchange has prepared summaries,
set forth in sections A, B, and C below,
of the most significant parts of such
statements.
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
U.S.C. 78a.
3 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
2 15
29 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:20 Apr 21, 2021
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00117
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend the
Fee Schedule to add services available
to customers in the two meet me rooms
on the north and south sides of the
Mahwah data center (‘‘MMRs’’) and
procedures for the allocation of cabinets
and power to MMR customers.
The Exchange makes the current
proposal solely as a result of its
determination that the Commission’s
recent interpretations of the Act’s
definitions of the terms ‘‘exchange’’ and
‘‘facility,’’ as expressed in the Wireless
Approval Order,4 apply to the
connectivity services described herein
that are offered by entities other than
the Exchange. The Exchange disagrees
with the Commission’s interpretations,
denies the services covered herein (and
in the Wireless Approval Order) are
offerings of an ‘‘exchange’’ or a
‘‘facility’’ thereof, and has sought review
of the Commission’s interpretations, as
expressed in the Wireless Approval
Order, in the Court of Appeals for the
District of Columbia Circuit.5 Pending
resolution of such appeal, however, the
Exchange is making this proposed rule
change in recognition that the
Commission’s current interpretation
brings certain offerings of the
Exchange’s affiliates into the scope of
the terms ‘‘exchange’’ or ‘‘facility.’’
Background
Through its ICE Data Services (‘‘IDS’’)
business, Intercontinental Exchange,
Inc. (‘‘ICE’’) 6 operates a data center in
Mahwah, New Jersey (the ‘‘Mahwah
Data Center’’), from which the Exchange
provides co-location services to any
market participant that requests to
receive co-location services directly
from the Exchange (‘‘Users’’).7 Services
4 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 90209
(October 15, 2020), 85 FR 67044 (October 21, 2020)
(SR–NYSE–2020–05, SR–NYSEAMER–2020–05,
SR–NYSEArca–2020–08, SR–NYSECHX–2020–02,
SR–NYSENAT–2020–03, SR–NYSE–2020–11, SR–
NYSEAMER–2020–10, SR–NYSEArca–2020–15,
SR–NYSECHX–2020–05, SR–NYSENAT–2020–08)
(‘‘Wireless Approval Order’’).
5 Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. v. SEC, No. 20–
1470 (D.C. Cir. 2020).
6 The Exchange is an indirect subsidiary of ICE
and is an affiliate of New York Stock Exchange LLC,
NYSE American LLC, NYSE Chicago, Inc., and
NYSE National, Inc. (together, the ‘‘Affiliate
SROs’’). Each Affiliate SRO has submitted
substantially the same proposed rule change to
propose the changes described herein. See SR–
NYSE–2021–25, SR–NYSEAMER–2021–21, SR–
NYSECHX–2021–07, and SR–NYSENAT–2021–09.
7 The Exchange initially filed rule changes
relating to its co-location services with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
E:\FR\FM\22APN1.SGM
22APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 76 (Thursday, April 22, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21380-21384]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-08313]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-91594; File No. SR-CboeBZX-2021-030]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend
Its Fees Schedule
April 16, 2021.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the ``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby
given that, on April 12, 2021, Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (the
``Exchange'' or ``BZX'') filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described
in Items I and II below, which Items have been prepared by the
Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments
on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
\3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or ``BZX'' or ``BZX
Equities'') is filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission
[[Page 21381]]
(``Commission'') a proposed rule change to amend its fee schedule. The
text of the proposed rule change is provided in Exhibit 5.
The text of the proposed rule change is also available on the
Exchange's website (https://markets.cboe.com/us/equities/regulation/rule_filings/bzx/), at the Exchange's Office of the Secretary, and at
the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend its fee schedule as follows: (1)
Decrease the standard liquidity adding rebate and non-displayed
liquidity adding rebate, (2) modify the Add/Remove Volume Tiers, (3)
modify Tier 2 of the Step-Up Tiers, and (4) eliminate the Cross-Asset
Tape B Tier. The Exchange proposes to implement the proposed change to
its fee schedule on April 1, 2021.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ The Exchange initially filed the proposed fee changes April
1, 2021 (SR-CboeBZX-2021-026). On April 12, 2021, the Exchange
withdrew that filing and submitted this proposal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange first notes that it operates in a highly competitive
market in which market participants can readily direct order flow to
competing venues if they deem fee levels at a particular venue to be
excessive or incentives to be insufficient. More specifically, the
Exchange is only one of 16 registered equities exchanges, as well as a
number of alternative trading systems and other off-exchange venues
that do not have similar self-regulatory responsibilities under the
Exchange Act, to which market participants may direct their order flow.
Based on publicly available information,\5\ no single registered
equities exchange has more than 16% of the market share. Thus, in such
a low-concentrated and highly competitive market, no single equities
exchange possesses significant pricing power in the execution of order
flow. The Exchange in particular operates a ``Maker-Taker'' model
whereby it pays credits to members that add liquidity and assesses fees
to those that remove liquidity. The Exchange's fee schedule sets forth
the standard rebates and rates applied per share for orders that
provide and remove liquidity, respectively. Particularly, for
securities at or above $1.00, the Exchange provides a standard rebate
of $0.0020 per share for orders that add liquidity and assesses a fee
of $0.0030 per share for orders that remove liquidity. Additionally, in
response to the competitive environment, the Exchange also offers
tiered pricing which provides Members opportunities to qualify for
higher rebates or reduced fees where certain volume criteria and
thresholds are met. Tiered pricing provides an incremental incentive
for Members to strive for higher tier levels, which provides
increasingly higher benefits or discounts for satisfying increasingly
more stringent criteria.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Cboe Global Markets, U.S. Equities Market Volume
Summary, Month-to-Date (March 29, 2021), available at https://markets.cboe.com/us/equities/market_statistics/.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Standard Liquidity Rebate and Non-Displayed Liquidity Adding Rebate
As stated above, the Exchange currently provides a standard rebate
of $0.0020 per share for liquidity adding orders (i.e., those yielding
fee codes B,\6\ V,\7\ and Y \8\) in securities priced at or above
$1.00. Orders in securities priced below $1.00 that add liquidity are
provided a rebate of $0.00009. The Exchange now proposes to decrease
the current standard rebate of $0.0020 per share to $0.0018 per share
for orders that add liquidity for securities priced at or above $1.00.
Orders that add liquidity in securities priced below $1.00 would
continue to be provided a rebate of $0.00009. Although this proposed
standard rebate for liquidity adding orders is lower than the current
base rate for such orders, the proposed rebate is in line with similar
rebates for liquidity adding orders in place on other exchanges.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ Orders yielding Fee Code ``B'' are displayed orders adding
liquidity to BZX (Tape B).
\7\ Orders yielding Fee Code ``V'' are displayed orders adding
liquidity to BZX (Tape A).
\8\ Orders yielding Fee Code ``Y'' are displayed orders adding
liquidity to BZX (Tape C).
\9\ E.g., the Nasdaq base rebate ranges from $0.0015 to $0.0020
for liquidity adding orders in securities priced at or above $1.00.
See https://nasdaqtrader.com/Trader.aspx?id=PriceListTrading2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange also proposes to decrease the rebate applied to non-
displayed, liquidity adding orders (i.e., orders yielding Fee Code
HB,\10\ HV,\11\ or HY \12\). The current rebate applied to non-
displayed liquidity adding orders is $0.00150 per share. Now, the
Exchange proposes to decrease the rebate to $0.00100 per share.
Although this proposed rebate for non-displayed liquidity adding orders
is lower than the current rate for such orders, the proposed rebate is
in line with similar rebates for non-displayed liquidity adding orders
in place on other exchanges.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ Orders yielding Fee Code ``HB'' are non-displayed orders
adding liquidity to BZX (Tape B).
\11\ Orders yielding Fee Code ``HV'' are non-displayed orders
adding liquidity to BZX (Tape A).
\12\ Orders yielding Fee Code ``HY'' are non-displayed orders
adding liquidity to BZX (Tape C).
\13\ E.g., the Nasdaq rebate for non-displayed orders ranges
from $0.0000 to $0.00220 for non-displayed liquidity adding orders.
See https://nasdaqtrader.com/Trader.aspx?id=PriceListTrading2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Add/Remove Volume Tiers
Pursuant to footnote 1 of the Fee Schedule, the Exchange currently
offers Add Volume Tiers (tiers 1 through 5) that provide Members an
opportunity to receive an enhanced rebate from the standard rebate for
liquidity adding orders that yield fee codes B, V, and Y and meet
certain required volume-based criteria. Specifically, the Add Volume
Tiers are as follows:
Tier 1 provides an enhanced rebate of $0.0025 per share to
a Member that has an ADAV \14\ of greater than or equal to 3,000,000.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ ``ADAV'' means average daily added volume calculated as the
number of shares added per day. ADAV is calculated on a monthly
basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tier 2 provides an enhanced rebate of $0.0027 per share to
a Member that has an ADAV as a percentage of TCV \15\ greater than or
equal to 0.10%.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ ``TCV'' means total consolidated volume calculated as the
volume reported by all exchanges and trade reporting facilities to a
consolidated transaction reporting plan for the month for which the
fees apply.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tier 3 provides an enhanced rebate of $0.0029 per share to
a Member that has an ADAV as a percentage of TCV greater than or equal
to 0.25%.
Tier 4 provides an enhanced rebate of $0.0030 per share to
a Member that has an ADAV as a percentage of TCV greater than or equal
to 0.40%.
Tier 5 provides an enhanced rebate of $0.0031 per share to
a Member that has an ADAV as a percentage of TCV greater than or equal
to 0.85%.
Now, the Exchange proposes to modify the five Add Volume Tiers to
provide the enhanced rebate if a Member meets certain ADAV as a
percentage of TCV percentage thresholds or meets certain ADAV share
volume. Specifically, the Exchange
[[Page 21382]]
proposes to modify Tier 1 to require a certain ADAV as a percentage of
TCV or an ADAV over a certain volume threshold. Although the proposed
changes to Tier 1 result in more stringent criteria, Members still have
an opportunity to receive the additional rebate if they meet the tier
threshold. The Exchange also proposes to modify the Add Volume Tiers 2
through 5 to increase the existing ADAV as a percentage of TCV criteria
and offer an alternative criteria which requires an ADAV over a certain
volume threshold. The proposed changes to Tiers 2 through 5 are less
stringent than the existing criteria and are designed to encourage
Members to increase their liquidity adding volume on the Exchange.
Specifically, the proposed Add Volume Tiers are as follows:
To meet the proposed criteria in Tier 1, a Member must
have an ADAV as a percentage of TCV equal to or greater than 0.08% or
an ADAV of greater than or equal to 8,000,000.
To meet the proposed criteria in Tier 2, a Member must
have an ADAV as a percentage of TCV equal to or greater than 0.15% or
an ADAV of greater than or equal to 15,000,000.
To meet the proposed criteria in Tier 3, a Member must
have an ADAV as a percentage of TCV equal to or greater than 0.35% or
an ADAV of greater than or equal to 35,000,000.
To meet the proposed criteria in Tier 4, a Member must
have an ADAV as a percentage of TCV equal to or greater than 0.60% or
an ADAV of greater than or equal to 60,000,000.
To meet the proposed criteria in Tier 5, a Member must
have an ADAV as a percentage of TCV equal to or greater than 1.00% or
an ADAV of greater than or equal to 100,000,000.
The Exchange notes the Add Volume Tiers, as modified, continue to
be available to all Members and provide Members an opportunity to
receive an enhanced rebate. Moreover, the proposed changes are designed
to encourage Members to increase displayed liquidity on the Exchange,
which further contributes to a deeper, more liquid market and provides
even more execution opportunities for active market participants.
Tier 2 of the Step-Up Tiers
The tiered pricing models set forth in footnote 2 of the fee
schedule (Step-Up Tiers) provides Members an opportunity to qualify for
an enhanced rebate on their orders that add liquidity where they
increase their relative liquidity each month over a predetermined
baseline. Tier 2 of the Step-Up Tiers provides an enhanced rebate of
$0.0033 per share to a Member that has a Step-Up Add TCV \16\ from
April 2020 equal to or greater than 0.30%. The Exchange notes that
step-up tiers are designed to encourage Members that provide displayed
liquidity on the Exchange to increase their order flow, which would
benefit all Members by providing greater execution opportunities on the
Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ ``Step-Up Add TCV'' means ADAV as a percentage of TCV in
the relevant baseline month subtracted from current ADAV as a
percentage of TCV.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Now, the Exchange proposes to reduce the rebate provided under Tier
2 of the Step-Up Tiers to $0.0032 per share. While the Exchange is
proposing no change to the criteria of Tier 2 of the Step-Up Tiers, the
Exchange believes that the tier will continue to incentivize increased
order flow to the Exchange, which may contribute to a deeper, more
liquid market to the benefit of all market participants by creating a
more robust and well-balanced market ecosystem. Step-Up Tier 2, as
modified, continues to be available to all Members and provide Members
an opportunity to receive an enhanced rebate, albeit a reduced rebate.
The proposed rebate is in line with similar rebates for growth programs
in place on other exchanges.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ E.g., the Nasdaq Growth Program which offers members a
rebate of $0.0025 to members that meet certain execution volume and
increase their add volume as a percentage of TCV by 20% versus the
member's growth baseline. See https://nasdaqtrader.com/Trader.aspx?id=PriceListTrading2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cross-Asset Tape B Tier
The Cross-Asset Tape B Tier is provided under footnote 12 of the
Fee Schedule and provides an enhanced rebate to orders yielding fee
code B. Specifically, the Cross-Asset Tape B Tier provides an enhanced
rebate of $0.0031 per share to a Member that has a Tape B Step-Up Add
TCV \18\ from February 2015 equal to or greater than 0.06% and has an
Options Market Maker Add OCV \19\ greater than or equal to 1.00%. The
Cross-Asset Tape B Tier is designed to encourage members that provide
displayed liquidity on the BZX Equities and BZX Options to increase
their order flow, which would benefit all Members by providing greater
execution opportunities on the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ ``Step-Up Add TCV'' means ADAV as a percentage of TCV in
the relevant baseline month subtracted from current ADAV as a
percentage of TCV.
\19\ ``Options Market Maker Add OCV'' for purposes of equities
pricing means ADAV resulting from Market Maker orders as a
percentage of OCV, using the definitions of ADAV, Market Maker and
OCV as provided under the Exchange's fee schedule for BZX Options.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange now proposes to eliminate the Cross-Asset Tape B Tier
as no Member has reached this tier in several months and the Exchange
the Exchange no longer wishes to, nor is it required to, maintain such
a tier.\20\ Further, the Exchange would rather redirect future
resources and funding into other programs and tiers intended to
incentivize increased order flow.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ The Exchange proposes to reserve Footnote 12.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the objectives of Section 6 of the Act,\21\ in general, and
furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5),\22\ in
particular, as it is designed to provide for the equitable allocation
of reasonable dues, fees and other charges among its Members, issuers
and other persons using its facilities. The Exchange operates in a
highly competitive market in which market participants can readily
direct order flow to competing venues if they deem fee levels at a
particular venue to be excessive or incentives to be insufficient. The
proposed rule changes reflect a competitive pricing structure designed
to incentivize market participants to direct their order flow to the
Exchange, which the Exchange believes would enhance market quality to
the benefit of all Members.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
\22\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In particular, the Exchange believes that the proposed amendment to
reduce the standard liquidity adding rebate and non-displayed liquidity
adding rebate is reasonable, equitable and non-discriminatory because
the proposed change represents a rebate decrease and such rebates are
equally applicable to all Members of the Exchange. Additionally, the
proposed rebates for liquidity adding orders are in-line with rebates
offered at other exchanges for similar transactions.\23\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ Supra notes 7 and 11[sic].
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange also believes the proposed changes to the Add Volume
Tiers and Tier 2 of the Step-Up Tiers are reasonable because each tier,
as modified, continues to be available to all Members and provide
Members an opportunity to receive an enhanced rebate. The Exchange next
notes that relative volume-based incentives and discounts have been
widely adopted by exchanges, including the Exchange, and are
reasonable, equitable, and non-discriminatory because they are open to
all Members on an equal basis and provide additional discounts that are
reasonably related to (i) the value to an
[[Page 21383]]
exchange's market quality and (ii) associated with higher levels of
market activity, such as higher levels of liquidity provision and/or
growth patterns. The Exchange also believes that the current enhanced
rebates under the Add Volume Tiers and proposed rebate under Tier 2 of
the Step-Up Tiers continue to be commensurate with the proposed and
existing criteria, respectively. That is, the rebates reasonably
reflect the difficulty in achieving the corresponding criteria as
amended.
The Exchange believes that the changes to the Add Volume Tiers,
will benefit all market participants by incentivizing continuous
liquidity and, thus, deeper more liquid markets as well as increased
execution opportunities. Particularly, the proposed changes to the Add
Volume Tiers are designed to incentivize displayed liquidity, which
further contributes to a deeper, more liquid market and provide even
more execution opportunities for active market participants at improved
prices. This overall increase in activity deepens the Exchange's
liquidity pool, offers additional cost savings, supports the quality of
price discovery, promotes market transparency and improves market
quality, for all investors.
The Exchange also believes that the proposed amendments to the Add
Volume Tiers and Tier 2 of the Step-Up Tiers represent an equitable
allocation of rebates and are not unfairly discriminatory because all
Members are eligible for the Add Volume Tiers and Tier 2 of the Step-Up
Tiers and would have the opportunity to meet the tiers' criteria and
would receive the proposed rebate if such criteria is met. The Exchange
also notes that proposed tiers/rebate will not adversely impact any
Member's ability to qualify for other reduced fee or enhanced rebate
tiers. Should a Member not meet the proposed criteria under any of the
proposed tiers, the Member will merely not receive that corresponding
enhanced rebate.
The Exchange also believes the proposed amendment to remove the
Cross-Asset Tape B Tier is reasonable because no Member has achieved
this tier in several months. Furthermore, the Exchange is not required
to maintain this tier and Members still have a number of other
opportunities and a variety of ways to receive enhanced rebates,
including the proposed enhanced standard rebates for displayed orders
adding liquidity. The Exchange believes the proposal to eliminate the
Cross-Asset Tape B Tier is also equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory because it applies to all Members.
As noted above, the Exchange operates in a highly competitive
market. The Exchange is only one of 16 equity venues to which market
participants may direct their order flow, and it represents a small
percentage of the overall market. It is also only one of several maker-
taker exchanges. Competing equity exchanges offer similar rates and
tiered pricing structures to that of the Exchange, including schedules
of rebates and fees that apply based upon members achieving certain
volume thresholds.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on intramarket or intermarket competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
Particularly, the proposed change applies to all liquidity adding
orders equally, and thus applies to all Members equally. Additionally,
the Exchange believes the proposed rule change does not impose any
burden on intermarket competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purpose of the Act.
As previously discussed, the Exchange operates in a highly
competitive market. Members have numerous alternative venues that they
may participate on and direct their order flow, including other
equities exchanges, off-exchange venues, and alternative trading
systems. Additionally, the Exchange represents a small percentage of
the overall market. Based on publicly available information, no single
equities exchange has more than 16% of the market share.\24\ Therefore,
no exchange possesses significant pricing power in the execution of
order flow. Indeed, participants can readily choose to send their
orders to other exchange and off-exchange venues if they deem fee
levels at those other venues to be more favorable. Moreover, the
Commission has repeatedly expressed its preference for competition over
regulatory intervention in determining prices, products, and services
in the securities markets. Specifically, in Regulation NMS, the
Commission highlighted the importance of market forces in determining
prices and SRO revenues and, also, recognized that current regulation
of the market system ``has been remarkably successful in promoting
market competition in its broader forms that are most important to
investors and listed companies.'' \25\ The fact that this market is
competitive has also long been recognized by the courts. In
NetCoalition v. Securities and Exchange Commission, the D.C. Circuit
stated as follows: ``[n]o one disputes that competition for order flow
is `fierce.' . . . As the SEC explained, `[i]n the U.S. national market
system, buyers and sellers of securities, and the broker-dealers that
act as their order-routing agents, have a wide range of choices of
where to route orders for execution'; [and] `no exchange can afford to
take its market share percentages for granted' because `no exchange
possesses a monopoly, regulatory or otherwise, in the execution of
order flow from broker dealers'. . . .''.\26\ Accordingly, the Exchange
does not believe its proposed fee changes imposes any burden on
competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\24\ Supra note 3[sic].
\25\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 (June 9,
2005), 70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005).
\26\ NetCoalition v. SEC, 615 F.3d 525, 539 (D.C. Cir. 2010)
(quoting Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59039 (December 2,
2008), 73 FR 74770, 74782-83 (December 9, 2008) (SR-NYSEArca-2006-
21)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) \27\ of the Act and paragraph (f) of Rule 19b-4 \28\
thereunder. At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed
rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission will institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or
disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\27\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\28\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
[[Page 21384]]
Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-CboeBZX-2021-030 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CboeBZX-2021-030. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-CboeBZX-2021-030, and should be
submitted on or before May 13, 2021.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\29\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\29\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
J. Lynn Taylor,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-08313 Filed 4-21-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P