Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend Its Rules Relating to Categories of Registration and Respective Qualification Examinations Required for Trading Permit Holders and Associated Persons That Engage in Trading Activities on the Exchange, 20760-20772 [2021-08147]
Download as PDF
20760
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 75 / Wednesday, April 21, 2021 / Notices
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–91576; File No. SR–CBOE–
2021–022]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe
Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed
Rule Change To Amend Its Rules
Relating to Categories of Registration
and Respective Qualification
Examinations Required for Trading
Permit Holders and Associated
Persons That Engage in Trading
Activities on the Exchange
April 15, 2021.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’ or ‘‘Exchange Act’’),1 and Rule
19b–4 thereunder,2 notice is hereby
given that on April 5, 2021, Cboe
Exchange, Inc. (the ‘‘Exchange’’ or
‘‘Cboe Options’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(the ‘‘Commission’’ or ‘‘SEC’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which Items
have been substantially prepared by the
Exchange. The Exchange filed the
proposal as a ‘‘non-controversial’’
proposed rule change pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act 3 and
Rule 19b–4(f)(6) thereunder.4 The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend its
rules relating to categories of
registration and respective qualification
examinations required for Trading
Permit Holders (‘‘TPHs’’) and associated
persons that engage in trading activities
on the Exchange. The text of the
proposed rule change is provided in
Exhibit 5.
The text of the proposed rule change
is also available on the Exchange’s
website (https://www.cboe.com/
AboutCBOE/CBOELegal
RegulatoryHome.aspx), at the
Exchange’s Office of the Secretary, and
at the Commission’s Public Reference
Room.
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange has adopted
registration requirements to ensure that
associated persons of TPH organizations
attain and maintain specified levels of
competence and knowledge pertinent to
their function. In general, the current
rules require that persons engaged in a
TPH organization’s securities business
who are to function as representatives or
principals register with the Exchange in
the category of registration appropriate
to their functions by passing one or
more qualification examinations 5 and
exempt specified associated persons
from the registration requirements.6
They also prescribe ongoing continuing
education requirements for registered
persons.7 The Exchange now proposes
to amend, reorganize and enhance its
rules regarding registration,
qualification examinations and
continuing education, as described
below.
In 2017, the Commission approved a
Financial Industry Regulatory
Authority, Inc. (‘‘FINRA’’) proposed rule
change adopting rules relating to
qualification and registration
requirements in the consolidated FINRA
Rulebook, restructuring the FINRA
representative-level qualification
examinations, creating a general
knowledge examination and specialized
knowledge examinations, allowing
permissive registration, establishing an
exam waiver process for persons
working for a financial services affiliate
of a member, and amending certain
Continuing Education (‘‘CE’’)
requirements (the ‘‘FINRA Rule
1 15
2 17
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:12 Apr 20, 2021
5 See
Cboe Options Rule 3.30(a)(1).
Cboe Options Rule 3.30(a)(2).
7 See Cboe Options Rule 3.33.
6 See
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00109
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Changes’’).8 The FINRA Rule Changes
became effective on October 1, 2018.
Other exchanges, such as Nasdaq Stock
Market LLC (‘‘Nasdaq’’), New York
Stock Exchange LLC (‘‘NYSE’’) and
Miami International Securities
Exchange, LLC (‘‘MIAX’’) subsequently
adopted rule changes based on FINRA’s
Rule Changes (collectively with the
FINRA Rule Changes, the ‘‘Registration
Rule Changes’’).9
The Exchange now proposes to
amend, reorganize and enhance its own
membership, registration and
qualification rules in part in response to
the Registration Rule Changes, and also
in order to conform the Exchange’s rules
more closely to those of its affiliated
exchanges and non-affiliated exchanges
in the interest of uniformity and to
facilitate compliance with membership,
registration and qualification regulatory
requirements by members of multiple
exchanges. The proposed rule change
also includes the proposal to enhance
its registration rules by adding a new
registration requirement applicable to
developers of algorithmic trading
systems similar to a requirement
adopted by FINRA pursuant to a 2016
FINRA proposed rule change.10 In
8 See Exchange Act Release No. 81098 (July 7,
2017), 82 FR 32419 (July 13, 2017) (Order
Approving File No. SR–FINRA–2017–007). See also
FINRA Regulatory Notice 17–30 (SEC Approves
Consolidated FINRA Registration Rules,
Restructured Representative-Level Qualification
Examinations and Changes to Continuing Education
Requirements) (October 2017). FINRA articulated
its belief that the proposed rule change would
streamline, and bring consistency and uniformity
to, its registration rules, which would, in turn,
assist FINRA members and their associated persons
in complying with the rules and improve regulatory
efficiency. FINRA also determined to enhance the
overall efficiency of its representative-level
examinations program by eliminating redundancy
of subject matter content across examinations,
retiring several outdated representative-level
registrations, and introducing a general knowledge
examination that could be taken by all potential
representative-level registrants and the general
public. FINRA amended certain aspects of its
continuing education rule, including by codifying
existing guidance regarding the effect of failing to
complete the Regulatory Element on a registered
person’s activities and compensation.
9 See, e.g., Exchange Act Release No. 84638
(November 20, 2018), 83 FR 60909 (November 27,
2018) (SR–NASDAQ–2018–093). See also Exchange
Act Release No. 84336 (October 2, 2018), 83 FR
50727 (October 9, 2018) (SR–NYSE–2018–44) and
Exchange Act Release No. 87830 (December 20,
2019), 84 FR 72025 (December 30, 2019) (SR–
MIAX–2019–50). The Exchange notes the affiliates
of these Exchanges have filed similar rule changes.
10 See Exchange Act Release No. 77551 (April 7,
2016), 81 FR 21914 (April 13, 2016) (Order
Approving File No. SR–FINRA–2016–007). In its
proposed rule change FINRA addressed the
increasing significance of algorithmic trading
strategies by amending its rules to require
registration, as Securities Traders, of associated
persons primarily responsible for the design,
development or significant modification of
algorithmic trading strategies, or who are
E:\FR\FM\21APN1.SGM
21APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 75 / Wednesday, April 21, 2021 / Notices
connection with these changes, the
Exchange proposes to amend Cboe
Options Rules 3.30, 3.33, 3.36 and 3.37
and adopt Cboe Options Rules 3.31, 3.32
and 3.34.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Registration Requirements (Proposed
Rule 3.30)
Cboe Options Rule 3.30 currently
requires that persons engaged, or to be
engaged, in the securities business of a
TPH who are to function as
representatives or principals register
with the Exchange in the category of
registration appropriate to their
functions as specified in Cboe Options
Rule 3.30.11 The Exchange proposes to
amend Rules 3.30 and 3.33 and adopt
Rules 3.31 and 3.32 to address various
elements of registration.
Proposed Rule 3.30 provides that each
person engaged in the securities
business of a TPH must register with the
Exchange as a representative or
principal in each category of registration
appropriate to his or her functions and
responsibilities as specified in proposed
Rule 3.31, unless exempt from
registration pursuant to proposed Rule
3.32. Proposed Rule 3.30 also provides
that such person is not qualified to
function in any registered capacity other
than that for which the person is
registered, unless otherwise stated in
the rules.
Minimum Number of Registered
Principals (Proposed Rule 3.30.01)
Rule 3.30.07 currently requires that
every TPH must register with the
Exchange in a heightened capacity each
individual acting in any of the following
roles: (i) officer; (ii) partner; (iii)
director; (iv) supervisor of proprietary
trading, market-making or brokerage
activities; and/or (v) supervisor of those
engaged in proprietary trading, marketmaking or brokerage activities with
respect to those activities. Each TPH
must register with the Exchange at least
two individuals acting in one or more of
the capacities described in (i)–(v) above.
The Exchange is able to waive this
requirement if a TPH demonstrates
conclusively that only one individual
acting in one or more of the capacities
described in (i) through (v) above
should be required to register. In
addition, a TPH that conducts
proprietary trading only and has 25 or
fewer registered persons shall instead be
required to have a minimum of one
officer or partner who is registered in
this capacity. The Exchange is
proposing to eliminate Rule 3.30.07 and,
responsible for the day-to-day supervision or
direction of such activities.
11 See Cboe Options Rule 3.30.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:12 Apr 20, 2021
Jkt 253001
in its place, adopt a similar, but new,
Rule 3.30.01. The new rule would
provide TPHs that limit the scope of
their business flexibility in satisfying
the two-principal requirement. In
particular, proposed Rule 3.30.01
requires that a TPH have a minimum of
two General Securities Principals,
provided that a TPH that is limited in
the scope of its activities may instead
have two officers or partners who are
registered in a principal category that
corresponds to the scope of the TPH’s
activities. For instance, if a TPH’s
business is limited to securities trading,
the TPH may have two Securities Trader
Principals, instead of two General
Securities Principals. Additionally,
proposed Rule 3.30.01 provides that any
TPH with only one associated person is
excluded from the two-principal
requirement. Proposed Rule 3.30.01
would provide that existing TPHs as
well as new applicants may request a
waiver of the two-principal
requirement, consistent with current
Rule 3.30.07. Finally, the Exchange is
proposing to retain the existing rule’s
provision permitting a proprietary
trading firm with 25 or fewer registered
representatives to have just one
registered principal. The Exchange
notes that proposed Rule 3.30.01 is
substantively the same as FINRA’s and
other exchanges’ corresponding Rules.12
Permissive Registrations (Proposed Rule
3.30.02)
Current Rule 3.30(a)(1) prohibits
TPHs from maintaining a registration
with the Exchange for any person (A)
who is no longer active in the TPH’s
securities business, (B) who is no longer
functioning in the registered capacity, or
(C) where the sole purpose is to avoid
the examination requirement of the rule.
A TPH may not make application for the
registration of any person where there is
no intent to employ such person in the
TPH’s securities business. However, a
TPH may maintain or make application
for the registration of a person who
performs legal, compliance, internal
audit, back-office operations, or similar
duties for the TPH or a person engaged
in the securities business of a foreign
securities affiliate or subsidiary of the
TPH. The Exchange is proposing to
replace this provision with new Rule
3.30.02. The Exchange is also proposing
to expand the scope of permissive
registrations and to clarify a TPH’s
obligations regarding individuals who
are maintaining such registrations.
12 See, e.g., FINRA Rule 1210.01 (Minimum
Number of Registered Principals and Nasdaq Rule
1210.01 (Minimum Number of Registered
Principals)).
PO 00000
Frm 00110
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
20761
Specifically, proposed Rule 3.30.02
allows any associated person to obtain
and maintain any registration permitted
by the TPH. For instance, an associated
person of a TPH working solely in a
clerical or ministerial capacity, such as
in an administrative capacity, would be
able to obtain and maintain a General
Securities Representative registration
with the TPH. As another example, an
associated person of a TPH who is
registered, and functioning solely, as a
General Securities Representative would
be able to obtain and maintain a General
Securities Principal registration with the
TPH. Further, proposed Rule 3.30.02
allows an individual engaged in the
securities business of a foreign
securities affiliate or subsidiary of a
TPH to obtain and maintain any
registration permitted by the TPH.
The Exchange is proposing to permit
the registration of such individuals for
several reasons. First, a TPH may
foresee a need to move a former
representative or principal who has not
been registered for two or more years
back into a position that would require
such person to be registered. Currently,
such persons are required to requalify
(or obtain a waiver of the applicable
qualification examinations) and reapply
for registration. Second, the proposed
rule change would allow TPHs to
develop a depth of associated persons
with registrations in the event of
unanticipated personnel changes. Third,
allowing registration in additional
categories encourages greater regulatory
understanding.
Individuals maintaining a permissive
registration under the proposed rule
change would be considered registered
persons and subject to all Exchange
rules, to the extent relevant to their
activities. For instance, an individual
working solely in an administrative
capacity would be able to maintain a
General Securities Representative
registration and would be considered a
registered person for purposes of rules
relating to borrowing from or lending to
customers, but the rule would have no
practical application to his or her
conduct because he or she would not
have any customers.
Consistent with the Exchange’s
supervision rules, TPHs would be
required to have adequate supervisory
systems and procedures reasonably
designed to ensure that individuals with
permissive registrations do not act
outside the scope of their assigned
functions. With respect to an individual
who solely maintains a permissive
registration, such as an individual
working exclusively in an
administrative capacity, the individual’s
day-to-day supervisor may be a
E:\FR\FM\21APN1.SGM
21APN1
20762
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 75 / Wednesday, April 21, 2021 / Notices
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
nonregistered person. TPHs would be
required to assign a registered
supervisor to this person who would be
responsible for periodically contacting
such individual’s day-to-day supervisor
to verify that the individual is not acting
outside the scope of his or her assigned
functions. If such individual is
permissively registered as a
representative, the registered supervisor
must be registered as a representative or
principal. If the individual is
permissively registered as a principal,
the registered supervisor must be
registered as a principal. The Exchange
notes that proposed Rule 3.30.02 is
substantively similar to FINRA and
other exchanges’ corresponding rules.13
Qualification Examinations and Waivers
of Examinations (Proposed Rule 3.30.03)
Current Rule 3.30(a)(1) provides that
before a registration can become
effective, TPHs must submit the
appropriate application for registration,
pass a qualification examination
appropriate to the category of
registration and submit any required
registration and examination fees. The
Exchange is proposing to incorporate
similar language in new Rule 3.30.03.
In addition, as part of the FINRA Rule
Changes, FINRA adopted a restructured
representative-level qualification
examination program whereby
representative-level registrants would be
required to take a general knowledge
examination (the Securities Industry
Essentials Exam or ‘‘SIE’’) and a
specialized knowledge examination
appropriate to their job functions at the
firm with which they are associating.
The Exchange similarly adopted this
requirement, which is reflected in
current Cboe Options Rules 3.30.08 and
3.37(d).14 The Exchange therefore also
proposes to provide in proposed Rule
3.30.03 that before the registration of a
person as a representative can become
effective under proposed Rule 3.30,
such person must pass the SIE and an
appropriate representative-level
qualification examination as specified
in proposed Rule 3.31. Proposed Rule
3.30.03 also provides that before the
registration of a person as a principal
can become effective under proposed
Rule 3.30, such person must pass an
appropriate principal-level qualification
examination as specified in proposed
Rule 3.31.
Further, proposed Rule 3.30.03
provides that if a registered person’s job
functions change and he or she needs to
13 See, e.g., FINRA Rule 1210.02, NYSE Arca Rule
2.1210.01 and Nasdaq Rule 1210.02.
14 See Exchange Act Release No. 84142
(September 14, 2018), 83 FR 47665 (September 20,
2018) (SR–CBOE–2018–064).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:12 Apr 20, 2021
Jkt 253001
become registered in another
representative-level category, he or she
would not need to pass the SIE again.
Rather, the registered person would
need to pass only the appropriate
representative-level qualification
examination. Moreover, proposed Rule
3.30.03 provides that all associated
persons, such as associated persons
whose functions are solely and
exclusively clerical or ministerial, are
eligible to take the SIE. Proposed Rule
3.30.03 also provides that individuals
who are not associated persons of firms,
such as members of the general public,
are eligible to take the SIE. The
Exchange believes that expanding the
pool of individuals who are eligible to
take the SIE would enable prospective
securities industry professionals to
demonstrate to prospective employers a
basic level of knowledge prior to
submitting a job application. Further,
this approach would allow for more
flexibility and career mobility within
the securities industry. While all
associated persons of firms as well as
individuals who are not associated
persons would be eligible to take the SIE
pursuant to the proposed rule, passing
the SIE alone would not qualify them
for registration with the Exchange.
Rather, to be eligible for registration
with the Exchange, an individual must
pass an applicable representative or
principal qualification examination and
complete the other requirements of the
registration process.
Proposed Rule 3.30.03 also provides
that the Exchange may, in exceptional
cases and where good cause is shown,
waive the applicable qualification
examination(s) and accept other
standards as evidence of an applicant’s
qualifications for registration. The rule
will also state that advanced age or
physical infirmity will not individually
of themselves constitute sufficient
grounds to waive a qualification
examination and that experience in
fields ancillary to the securities business
may constitute sufficient grounds to
waive a qualification examination. The
Exchange notes that proposed language
relating to waivers is already contained
in current Rule 3.30.05.15 Proposed Rule
3.30.03 will further provide that the
Exchange shall only consider waiver
requests submitted by a TPH for
individuals associated with the TPH
who are seeking registration in a
representative or principal registration
category. Moreover, the Exchange shall
consider waivers of the SIE alone or the
15 Pursuant to a Regulatory Services Agreement
between FINRA and the Exchange, FINRA provides
the Exchange certain exam waiver services in
responding to exam waiver requests from TPHs.
PO 00000
Frm 00111
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
SIE and the applicable representative
and principal examination(s) for such
individuals. The Exchange shall not
consider a waiver of the SIE for
individuals who are not associated
persons or for associated persons who
are not registering as representatives or
principals. The Exchange notes that
proposed Rule 3.30.03 is substantively
similar to FINRA and other exchanges’
rules.16
Requirements for Registered Persons
Functioning as Principals for a Limited
Period (Proposed Rule 3.30.04)
The Exchange next proposes to adopt
Rule 3.30.04, which governs the
requirements for registered persons who
wish to function as a principal for a
limited period. Particularly, proposed
Rule 3.30.04 provides that a TPH may
designate any person currently
registered, or who becomes registered,
with the TPH as a representative to
function as a principal for a limited
period, provided that such person has at
least 18 months of experience
functioning as a registered
representative with the five-year period
immediately preceding the designation.
The proposed rule is intended to ensure
that representatives designated to
function as principals for the limited
period under the proposal have an
appropriate level of registered
representative experience. The proposed
rule clarifies that the requirements of
the rule apply to designations to any
principal category, including those
categories that are not subject to a
prerequisite representative-level
registration requirement, such as the
Financial and Operations Principal
registration category.17
The proposed rule also clarifies that
the individual must fulfill all applicable
prerequisite registration, fee and
examination requirements before his or
her designation as a principal. Further,
the proposed rule provides that in no
event may such person function as a
principal beyond the initial 120
calendar days without having
successfully passed an appropriate
principal qualification examination. The
proposed rule also provides an
exception to the experience requirement
for principals who are designated by a
TPH to function in other principal
categories for a limited period.
Specifically, the proposed rule states
16 See, e.g., FINRA Rule 1210.03, NYSE Arca Rule
2.1210.02 and Nasdaq Rule 1210.03.
17 The Exchange notes that qualifying as a
registered representative is a prerequisite to
qualifying as a principal except with respect to the
following principal-level registrations: (1)
Compliance Officer and (2) Financial and
Operations Principal.
E:\FR\FM\21APN1.SGM
21APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 75 / Wednesday, April 21, 2021 / Notices
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
that a TPH may designate any person
currently registered, or who becomes
registered, with the TPH as a principal
to function in another principal category
for 120 calendar days before passing any
applicable examinations. The Exchange
notes that proposed Rule 3.30.04 is
substantively similar to similar FINRA
and other exchanges’ rules.18
Rules of Conduct for Taking
Examinations and Confidentiality of
Examinations (Proposed Rule 3.30.05)
Proposed Rule 3.30.05 provides that
associated persons taking the SIE would
be subject to the SIE Rules of Conduct,
and associated persons taking a
representative or principal examination
would be subject to the Rules of
Conduct for representative and
principal examinations. Pursuant to
proposed Rule 3.30.05, a violation of the
SIE Rules of Conduct or the Rules of
Conduct for representative and
principal examinations by an associated
person would be deemed to be a
violation of Exchange rules requiring
just and equitable principles of trade.19
Moreover, if an associated person is
deemed to have violated the SIE Rules
of Conduct or the Rules of Conduct for
representative and principal
examinations, the associated person
may forfeit the results of the
examination and may be subject to
disciplinary action by the Exchange.
Further, the proposed rule states that
individuals taking the SIE who are not
associated persons must agree to be
subject to the SIE Rules of Conduct.
Among other things, the SIE Rules of
Conduct would require individuals to
attest that they are not qualified to
engage in the investment banking or
securities business based on passing the
SIE and would prohibit individuals
from cheating on the examination or
misrepresenting their qualifications to
the public subsequent to passing the
SIE. Moreover, non-associated persons
may forfeit their SIE results and may be
prohibited from retaking the SIE if the
Exchange determines that they cheated
on the SIE or that they misrepresented
their qualifications to the public
subsequent to passing the SIE.
The proposed rule further notes that
the Exchange considers all qualification
examinations content to be highly
confidential and that the removal of
examination content from an
examination center, reproduction,
disclosure, receipt from or passing to
any person, or use for study purposes of
any portion of such qualification
18 See, e.g., FINRA Rule 1210.04, NYSE Arca Rule
2.1210.03 and Nasdaq Rule 1210.04.
19 See, e.g., Cboe Options Rule 8.1.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:12 Apr 20, 2021
Jkt 253001
examination or any other use that would
compromise the effectiveness of the
examinations and the use in any manner
and at any time of the questions or
answers to the examinations is
prohibited and would be deemed a
violation of Exchange rules requiring
just and equitable principles of trade.20
The Exchange notes that proposed Rule
3.30.05 is substantively similar to
similar FINRA and other exchanges’
rules.21
Waiting Periods for Retaking a Failed
Examination (Proposed Rule 3.30.06)
Proposed Rule 3.30.06 provides that
any person who fails a qualification
examination may retake that
examination after 30 calendar days from
the date of the person’s last attempt to
pass that examination. The proposed
rule further provides that if a person
fails an examination three or more times
in succession within a two-year period,
he or she would be prohibited from
retaking the examination until a period
of 180 calendar days from the date of
the person’s last attempt to pass it.
These waiting periods would apply to
the SIE and the representative- and
principal-level examinations. The
Exchange notes that proposed Rule
3.30.06 is substantively similar to
FINRA and other exchanges’ rules.22
All Registered Persons Must Satisfy the
Regulatory Element of Continuing
Education (Proposed Rule 3.30.07)
Pursuant to current Rule 3.33, the CE
requirements applicable to registered
persons consist of a Regulatory Element
and a Firm Element. The Regulatory
Element applies to registered persons
and must be completed within
prescribed time frames. The Firm
Element consists of annual, TPHdeveloped and administered training
programs designed to keep covered
registered persons current regarding
securities products, services and
strategies offered by the TPH. For
purposes of the Firm Element, the term
‘‘covered registered persons’’ means any
registered Securities Trader and any
registered person who has direct contact
with customers in the conduct of the
TPH’s securities sales, trading and
20 See,
e.g., Cboe Options Rule 8.1.
e.g., FINRA Rule 1210.05, NYSE Arca Rule
2.1210.04 and Nasdaq Rule 1210.05.
22 See, e.g., FINRA Rule 1210.06, NYSE Arca Rule
2.1210.05 and Nasdaq Rule 1210.06. FINRA Rule
1210.06 requires individuals taking the SIE who are
not associated persons to agree to be subject to the
same waiting periods for retaking the SIE. The
Exchange is not including this language in
proposed Rule 3.30.06, as the Exchange will not
apply its registration rules in any event to
individuals who are not associated persons of
TPHs.
21 See,
PO 00000
Frm 00112
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
20763
investment banking activities and to the
immediate supervisors of such persons.
The CE requirements are set forth in
current Rule 3.33. The Exchange
believes that all registered persons,
regardless of their activities, should be
subject to the Regulatory Element of the
CE requirements so that they can keep
their knowledge of the securities
industry current. Therefore, the
Exchange proposes to adopt Rule
3.30.07, to clarify that all registered
persons, including those who solely
maintain a permissive registration, are
required to satisfy the Regulatory
Element, as specified in current Rule
3.33. Individuals who have passed the
SIE but not a representative- or
principal-level examination and do not
hold a registered position would not be
subject to any CE requirements.
Proposed Rule 3.30.07 also provides
that a registered person of a TPH who
becomes CE inactive would not be
permitted to be registered in another
registration category with the TPH or be
registered in any registration category
with another TPH, until the person has
satisfied the Regulatory Element. The
Exchange notes that proposed Rule
3.30.07 is substantively similar to
FINRA and other exchanges’ rules.23
Lapse of Registration and Expiration of
SIE (Proposed Rule 3.30.08)
Proposed Rule 3.30.08 provides that
any person who was last registered as a
representative two or more years
immediately preceding the date of
receipt by the Exchange of a new
application for registration as a
representative is required to pass a
qualification examination for
representatives appropriate to the
category of registration as specified in
proposed Rule 3.31(b). Proposed Rule
3.30.08 also sets forth that a passing
result on the SIE would be valid for up
to four years. Therefore, under the
proposed rule change, an individual
who passes the SIE and is an associated
person of a TPH at the time would have
up to four years from the date he or she
passes the SIE to pass a representativelevel examination to register as a
representative with that TPH, or a
subsequent TPH, without having to
retake the SIE. In addition, an
individual who passes the SIE and is
not an associated person at the time
would have up to four years from the
date he or she passes the SIE to become
an associated person of TPH and pass a
representative-level examination and
register as a representative without
having to retake the SIE.
23 See, e.g., FINRA Rule 1210.07, NYSE Arca Rule
2.1210.06 and Nasdaq Rule 1210.07.
E:\FR\FM\21APN1.SGM
21APN1
20764
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 75 / Wednesday, April 21, 2021 / Notices
Moreover, an individual holding a
representative-level registration who
leaves the industry after the effective
date of this proposed rule change would
have up to four years to re-associate
with a TPH and register as a
representative without having to retake
the SIE. However, the four-year
expiration period in the proposed rule
change extends only to the SIE, and not
the representative- and principal-level
registrations. The representative- and
principal-level registrations would
continue to be subject to a two-year
expiration period as is the case today.
Finally, proposed Rule 3.30.08
clarifies that, for purposes of the
proposed rule, an application would not
be considered to have been received by
the Exchange if that application does
not result in a registration. The
Exchange notes that proposed Rule
3.30.08 is substantively similar to
similar FINRA and other exchanges’
rules.24
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Waiver of Examinations for Individuals
Working for a Financial Services
Industry Affiliate of a TPH (Proposed
Rule 3.30.09)
The Exchange is proposing Rule
3.30.09 to provide a new process
whereby individuals who would be
working for a ‘‘financial services
industry affiliate of a TPH’’ 25 would
terminate their registrations with the
TPH and would be granted a waiver of
their requalification requirements upon
re-registering with an TPH, provided the
firm that is requesting the waiver and
the individual satisfy the criteria for a
Financial Services Affiliate (‘‘FSA’’)
waiver.26
Under the proposed waiver process,
the first time a registered person is
designated as eligible for a waiver based
on the FSA criteria, the TPH with which
the individual is registered would notify
the Exchange of the FSA designation.
The TPH would concurrently file a full
Form U5 terminating the individual’s
registration with the firm, which would
also terminate the individual’s other
self-regulatory organization and state
24 See, e.g., FINRA Rule 1210.08, NYSE Arca Rule
2.1210.07 and Nasdaq Rule 1210.08.
25 Proposed Rule 3.30.09 defines a ‘‘financial
services industry affiliate of a TPH’’ as a legal entity
that controls, is controlled by or is under common
control with TPH and is regulated by the SEC,
CFTC, state securities authorities, federal or state
banking authorities, state insurance authorities, or
substantially equivalent foreign regulatory
authorities.
26 There is no counterpart to proposed Rule
3.30.09 in the Exchange’s existing rules. FINRA
Rule 1210.09 was previously adopted as a new
waiver process for FINRA registrants, as part of the
FINRA Rule Changes. Other Exchanges have since
adopted substantively similar Rules. See, e.g., NYSE
Arca Rule 2.1210.08 and Nasdaq Rule 1210.09.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:12 Apr 20, 2021
Jkt 253001
registrations. To be eligible for initial
designation as an FSA-eligible person
by a TPH, an individual must have been
registered for a total of five years within
the most recent 10-year period prior to
the designation, including for the most
recent year with that TPH. An
individual would have to satisfy these
preconditions only for purposes of his
or her initial designation as an FSAeligible person, and not for any
subsequent FSA designation(s).
Thereafter, the individual would be
eligible for a waiver for up to seven
years from the date of initial
designation,27 provided that the other
conditions of the waiver, as described
below, have been satisfied.
Consequently, a TPH other than the
TPH that initially designated an
individual as an FSA-eligible person
may request a waiver for the individual
and more than one TPH may request a
waiver for the individual during the
seven-year period.28
An individual designated as an FSAeligible person would be subject to the
Regulatory Element of CE while working
for a financial services industry affiliate
of a TPH. The individual would be
subject to a Regulatory Element program
that correlates to his or her most recent
registration category, and CE would be
based on the same cycle had the
individual remained registered. If the
individual fails to complete the
27 Individuals would be eligible for a single, fixed
seven-year period from the date of initial
designation, and the period would not be tolled or
renewed.
28 The following examples illustrate this point:
Example 1. TPH A designates an individual as an
FSA-eligible person by notifying the Exchange and
files a Form U5. The individual joins Firm A’s
financial services affiliate. TPH A does not submit
a waiver request for the individual. After working
for TPH A’s financial services affiliate for three
years, the individual directly joins TPH B’s
financial services affiliate for three years. TPH B
then submits a waiver request to register the
individual.
Example 2. Same as Example 1, but the
individual directly joins TPH B after working for
TPH A’s financial services affiliate, and TPH B
submits a waiver request to register the individual
at that point in time.
Example 3. TPH A designates an individual as an
FSA-eligible person by notifying the Exchange and
files a Form U5. The individual joins TPH A’s
financial services affiliate for three years. TPH A
then submits a waiver request to re-register the
individual. After working for TPH A in a registered
capacity for six months, TPH A re-designates the
individual as an FSA-eligible person by notifying
the Exchange and files a Form U5. The individual
rejoins TPH A’s financial services affiliate for two
years, after which the individual directly joins TPH
B’s financial services affiliate for one year. TPH B
then submits a waiver request to register the
individual.
Example 4. Same as Example 3, but the
individual directly joins TPH B after the second
period of working for TPH A’s financial services
affiliate, and TPH B submits a waiver request to
register the individual at that point in time.
PO 00000
Frm 00113
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
prescribed Regulatory Element during
the 120-day window for taking the
session, he or she would lose FSA
eligibility (i.e., the individual would
have the standard two-year period after
termination to re-register without
having to retake an examination). The
Exchange is making corresponding
changes to Rule 3.33, Continuing
Education.
Upon registering an FSA-eligible
person, a TPH would file a Form U4 and
request the appropriate registration(s)
for the individual. The TPH would also
submit an examination waiver request
to the Exchange,29 similar to the process
used today for waiver requests, and it
would represent that the individual is
eligible for an FSA waiver based on the
conditions set forth below. The
Exchange would review the waiver
request and make a determination of
whether to grant the request within 30
calendar days of receiving the request.
The Exchange would summarily grant
the request if the following conditions
are met:
(a) Prior to the individual’s initial
designation as an FSA-eligible person,
the individual was registered for a total
of five years within the most recent 10year period, including for the most
recent year with the TPH that initially
designated the individual as an FSAeligible person;
(b) The waiver request is made within
seven years of the individual’s initial
designation as an FSA-eligible person
by a TPH;
(c) The initial designation and any
subsequent designation(s) were made
concurrently with the filing of the
individual’s related Form U5;
(d) The individual continuously
worked for the financial services
affiliate(s) of a TPH since the last Form
U5 filing;
(e) The individual has complied with
the Regulatory Element of CE; and
(f) The individual does not have any
pending or adverse regulatory matters,
or terminations, that are reportable on
the Form U4, and has not otherwise
been subject to a statutory
disqualification while the individual
was designated as an FSA-eligible
person with a TPH.
Following the Form U5 filing, an
individual could move between the
financial services affiliates of a TPH so
long as the individual is continuously
working for an affiliate. Further, a TPH
could submit multiple waiver requests
for the individual, provided that the
29 The Exchange would consider a waiver of the
representative-level qualification examination(s),
the principal-level qualification examination(s) and
the SIE, as applicable.
E:\FR\FM\21APN1.SGM
21APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 75 / Wednesday, April 21, 2021 / Notices
waiver requests are made during the
course of the seven-year period.30 An
individual who has been designated as
an FSA-eligible person by a TPH would
not be able to take additional
examinations to gain additional
registrations while working for a
financial services affiliate of a TPH.
Status of Persons Serving in the Armed
Forces of the United States (Proposed
Rule 3.30.10)
Proposed Rule 3.30.10 provides
specific relief to registered persons
serving in the Armed Forces of the
United States. Among other things, the
proposed rule permits a registered
person of a TPH who volunteers for or
is called into active duty in the Armed
Forces of the United States to be
registered in an inactive status and
remain eligible to receive ongoing
transaction-related compensation. The
proposed rule also includes specific
provisions regarding the deferment of
the lapse of registration requirements for
formerly registered persons serving in
the Armed Forces of the United States.
The proposed rule further requires that
the TPH with which such person is
registered promptly notify the Exchange
of such person’s return to employment
with the TPH. The proposed rule would
require a TPH that is a sole proprietor
to also similarly notify the Exchange of
his or her return to participation in the
investment banking or securities
business. The proposed rule also
provides that the Exchange would defer
the lapse of the SIE for formerly
registered persons serving in the Armed
Forces of the United States.
Impermissible Registrations (Proposed
Rule 3.30.11)
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Existing Rule 3.30 prohibits a TPH
from maintaining a registration with the
Exchange for any person who is no
longer active in the TPH’s investment
banking or securities business, who is
no longer functioning in the registered
capacity, or where the sole purpose is to
avoid an examination requirement. The
Rule also prohibits a TPH from applying
for the registration of a person where the
TPH does not intend to employ the
person in its investment banking or
securities business. These prohibitions
do not apply to the current permissive
30 For example, if a TPH submits a waiver request
for an FSA-eligible person who has been working
for a financial services affiliate of the TPH for three
years and re-registers the individual, the TPH could
subsequently file a Form U5 and re-designate the
individual as an FSA-eligible person. Moreover, if
the individual works with a financial services
affiliate of the TPH for another three years, the TPH
could submit a second waiver request and reregister the individual upon returning to the TPH.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:12 Apr 20, 2021
Jkt 253001
registration categories identified in Rule
3.30.31
In light of proposed 3.30.02,
Permissive Registrations, discussed
above the Exchange is proposing to not
carry over this language to new rule 3.30
and instead adopt Rule 3.30.11, which
prohibits a TPH from registering or
maintaining the registration of a person
unless the registration is consistent with
the requirements of proposed Rule 3.30.
The Exchange notes that proposed Rule
3.30.11 is substantively similar FINRA
and other exchanges’ rules.32
Registration Categories (Proposed Rule
3.31)
The Exchange is proposing to adopt
new and revised registration category
rules and related definitions in
proposed Rule 3.31, Registration
Categories.33
Definition of Principal (Proposed Rule
3.31(a)(1))
As set forth in proposed Rule
3.31(a)(1), for purposes of these
registration rules, the term ‘‘principal’’
means any person associated with a
TPH, including, but not limited to, sole
proprietor, officer, partner, director or
other person occupying a similar status
or performing similar functions, actively
engaged in the management of the
TPH’s securities business, including
supervision, solicitation, conduct of the
TPH’s business, or the training of
persons associated with a TPH for any
of these functions. Proposed Rule
3.31(a)(1) also clarifies that a TPH’s
chief executive officer (‘‘CEO’’) and
chief financial officer (‘‘CFO’’) (or
equivalent officers) are considered
principals based solely on their status.
The proposed rule further clarifies that
the term ‘‘principal’’ includes any other
associated person who is performing
functions or carrying out
responsibilities that are required to be
performed or carried out by a principal
under Exchange Rules.
In addition, the proposed Rule
provides that the phrase ‘‘actively
engaged in the management of the
TPH’s securities business’’ includes the
management of, and the implementation
31 Current Rule 3.30 allows for permissive
principal registration of individuals who perform
legal, compliance, internal audit, back-office
operations, or similar duties for the TPH or a person
engaged in the investment banking or securities
business of a foreign securities affiliate or
subsidiary of the TPH.
32 See, e.g., FINRA Rule 1210.11 and Nasdaq Rule
1210.11.
33 For ease of reference, the Exchange proposes to
adopt as Rule 3.31, Interpretation and Policy .05, a
Summary of Qualification Requirements in chart
form for each of the Exchange’s permitted
registration categories discussed below.
PO 00000
Frm 00114
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
20765
of corporate policies related to, such
business as well as managerial decisionmaking authority with respect to the
TPH’s securities business and
management-level responsibilities for
supervising any aspect of such business,
such as serving as a voting member of
the TPH’s executive, management or
operations committees. The Exchange
notes that proposed definition in Rule
3.31(a)(1) is substantively similar to the
definition of principal in FINRA and
other exchanges’ rules.34
General Securities Principal (Proposed
Rule 3.31(a)(2))
Proposed Rule 3.31(a)(2)(A) states that
each principal as defined in paragraph
(a)(1) (of Rule 3.31) is required to
register with the Exchange as a General
Securities Principal, subject to the
following exceptions.35 The proposed
rule provides that if a principal’s
activities include the functions of a
Compliance Officer, a Financial and
Operations Principal, a Securities
Trader Principal, a Securities Trader
Compliance Officer, or a Registered
Options Principal, then the principal
must appropriately register in one or
more of these categories.
Proposed Rule 3.31(a)(2)(A) further
provides that if a principal’s activities
are limited solely to the functions of a
General Securities Sales Supervisor,
then the principal may appropriately
register in that category in lieu of
registering as a General Securities
Principal, provided that if the principal
is engaged in options sales activities he
or she would be required to register as
a General Securities Sales Supervisor or
as a Registered Options Principal.
Proposed Rule 3.31(a)(2)(B) requires
that an individual registering as a
General Securities Principal satisfy the
General Securities Representative
prerequisite registration and pass the
General Securities Principal
qualification examination. Proposed
Rule 3.31(a)(2)(B) also clarifies that an
individual may register as a General
Securities Sales Supervisor and pass the
General Securities Sales Supervisor
Module qualification examination in
lieu of passing the General Securities
Principal examination.
The Exchange notes that proposed
General Securities Principal
requirements and qualifications set forth
in Rule 3.31(a)(2) are similar to the
34 See, e.g., FINRA Rule 1220.(a)(1), NYSE Arca
Rule 2.1220(a)(1) and Nasdaq Rule 1220(a)(1).The
Exchange notes that its definition of Principal does
not include ‘‘manager of office of supervisory
jurisdiction’’ as FINRA, NYSE, and Nasdaq rules do
because it is not applicable on the Exchange.
35 Under the current Rules, the Exchange does not
recognize the General Securities Principal.
E:\FR\FM\21APN1.SGM
21APN1
20766
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 75 / Wednesday, April 21, 2021 / Notices
requirements and qualifications
required by FINRA and other exchanges’
rules.36
Compliance Officer (Proposed Rule
3.31(a)(3))
Current Rule 3.30(c) provides that
each TPH that registered as a brokerdealer shall designated a CCO on
Schedule A of Form BD and that such
individuals are required to register with
the Exchange and pass the appropriate
heightened qualification examination(s).
Current Rule 3.30.08 further provides
that any individual that is a CCO (or
performs similar functions) for a TPH
that engages in in proprietary trading,
market-making or effecting transactions
on behalf of a broker-dealer is required
to register and qualify as a Securities
Trader Compliance Officer (CT) and
pass the Series 14 examination or pass
the General Securities Principal or
Securities Trader Principal qualification
examination.
Under the new registration rules, the
Exchange proposes to adopt Rule
3.31(a)(3) providing that each person
designated as a Chief Compliance
Officer on Schedule A of Form BD shall
be required to register with the
Exchange as a General Securities
Principal, provided that such person
may instead register as a Compliance
Officer if his or her duties do not
include supervision of trading. All
individuals registering as Compliance
Officers would be required, prior to or
concurrent with such registration, to
pass the Compliance Official
qualification examination. An
individual designated as a Chief
Compliance Officer on Schedule A of
Form BD of a TPH that is engaged in
limited securities business could also be
registered in a principal category under
Rule 3.31(a) that corresponds to the
limited scope of the TPH’s business.
The Exchange notes that the proposed
Compliance Officer requirements and
qualifications set forth in Rule 3.31(a)(3)
are similar to the requirements and
qualifications required by FINRA’s and
other exchange’s rules.37
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Securities Trader Compliance Officer
(Proposed Rule 3.31(a)(4))
Rule 3.31(a)(4) would provide that an
individual designated as a Chief
Compliance Officer on Schedule A of
Form BD may register and qualify as a
Securities Trader Compliance Officer if,
with respect to transactions in equity,
preferred or convertible debt securities,
36 See, e.g., FINRA Rule 1220(a)(2), NYSE Arca
Rule 2.1220(a)(2) and Nasdaq Rule 1220(a)(2).
37 See, e.g., FINRA Rule 1220(a)(3) and NYSE
Arca Rule 2.1220(a)(3).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:12 Apr 20, 2021
Jkt 253001
or options, such person is engaged in
proprietary trading or Market Making,
the execution of transactions on an
agency basis, or the direct supervision
of such activities other than a person
associated with a TPH whose trading
activities are conducted principally on
behalf of an investment company that is
registered with the SEC pursuant to the
Investment Company Act and that
controls, is controlled by, or is under
common control with a TPH. Each
individual registering as a Securities
Trader Compliance Officer would be
required to first become registered
pursuant to paragraph (b)(4) as a
Securities Trader, and to pass either (i)
the Compliance Official qualification
exam or (ii) the General Securities
Principal qualification exam. The
Exchange notes that the proposed
Securities Trader Compliance Officer
requirements and qualifications set forth
in Rule 3.31(a)(4) are similar to the
requirements and qualifications
required by other exchanges’ rules.38
Financial and Operations Principal
(Proposed Rule 3.31(a)(5))
Existing Rule 3.30(b) provides that
every TPH that is subject to Exchange
Act Rule 15c3–1 shall designate a
Financial/Operations Principal. It
requires each person associated with a
TPH who performs such duties to be
registered as a Financial/Operations
Principal with the Exchange and to pass
the Series 27 examination.39
It further provides that each
Financial/Operations Principal
38 See, e.g., Nasdaq Rule 1220(a)(3)(D) and MIAX
Options Rule 1220(b)(2)(iv). FINRA does not
recognize the Securities Trader Compliance Officer
registration categories that the Exchange proposes
to recognize. However, FINRA Rule 1220(a)(3), like
proposed Rule 3.31(a)(3), offers an exception
pursuant to which a Chief Compliance Officer
designated on Schedule A of Form BD may register
in a principal category that corresponds to the
limited scope of the member’s business. Unlike
Nasdaq and MIAX, the Exchange proposes to accept
the General Securities Principal exam in lieu of the
Compliance Official exam. The Exchange notes this
is in line with the qualification requirements for the
Compliance Officer, as well as the Exchange’s
current Securities Trader Compliance Officer
qualification requirements. See Rule 3.30.08(b).
39 FINRA Rule 1220(a)(4) differs from proposed
Rule 3.31(a)(5) in that it includes an Introducing
Broker-Dealer, Financial and Operations Principal,
and Market-Maker registration requirement.
Additionally, proposed Rule 3.31(a)(5) contains a
requirement, which the FINRA rule does not, that
each person associated with a member who
performs the duties of a Financial and Operations
Principal must register as such with the Exchange.
Additionally, the Exchange is not adopting a
Principal Financial Officer or Principal Operations
Officer requirement like FINRA Rule 1220(a)(4)(B),
as it believes the Financial and Operations
Principal requirement is sufficient. Finally,
proposed Rule 3.31(a)(5)(B)(v) and (vi) contain
minor wording variations from the FINRA rule.
Proposed Rule 3.31(a) is substantively similar as
Nasdaq Rule 1220(a)(7).
PO 00000
Frm 00115
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
designated by a TPH shall be registered
in that capacity with the Exchange as
prescribed by the Exchange, and that a
Financial/Operations Principal of a TPH
may be a full-time employee, a part-time
employee or independent contractor of
the TPH. The Exchange proposes to
delete Exchange 3.30(b) and adopt in its
place Exchange Rule 3.31(a)(5). Under
the new rule, every TPH of the
Exchange that is operating pursuant to
the provisions of Rules 15c3–1(a)(1)(ii),
(a)(2)(i) or (a)(8) of the Exchange Act,
shall designate at least one Financial
and Operations Principal who shall be
responsible for performing the duties
described in proposed Rule
3.31(a)(5)(A)(i)–(vii). In addition, each
person associated with a TPH who
performs such duties shall be required
to register as a Financial and Operations
Principal with the Exchange. Proposed
Exchange Rule 3.31(a)(5)(C) would
require all individuals registering as a
Financial and Operations Principal to
pass the Financial and Operations
Principal qualification examination
before such registration may become
effective. The Exchange notes that
proposed Financial and Operations
Principal requirements and
qualifications set forth in Rule 3.31(a)(5)
are similar to the requirements and
qualifications required by other
exchanges’ rules.40
Securities Trader Principal (Proposed
Rule 3.31(a)(6))
Existing Rule 3.30.08 provides that an
individual associated with a TPH that:
(i) Supervises or monitors proprietary
trading, market-making and/or
brokerage activities for broker-dealers;
(ii) supervises or trains those engaged in
proprietary trading, market-making and/
or effecting transactions on behalf of a
broker-dealer, with respect to those
activities; and/or (iii) is an officer,
partner or director of a TPH or TPH
organization is required to register and
qualify as a Securities Trader Principal
(TP) and satisfy the prerequisite
registration and qualification
requirements. The Rule further provides
that to qualify for registration as a
Securities Trader Principal, such person
must pass the Series 24 (General
Securities Principal) qualification
examination or the General Securities
40 See, e.g., Nasdaq Rule 1220(a)(3)(D) and MIAX
Options Rule 1220(b)(2)(iv). FINRA Rule 1220(a)(4)
differs from proposed Exchange Rule 3.31(a)(5) in
that it includes an Introducing Broker-Dealer
Financial and Operations Principal registration
requirement. Further, as discussed above, the
Exchange does not propose to adopt a Principal
Financial Officer or Principal Operations Officer
requirement similar to FINRA Rule 1220(a)(4)(B), as
it believes the Financial and Operations Principal
requirement is sufficient.
E:\FR\FM\21APN1.SGM
21APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 75 / Wednesday, April 21, 2021 / Notices
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Sales Supervisor Registration and
General Securities Principal—Sales
Supervisor Module Registration (Series
9/10 and Series 23). A Securities Trader
Principal must also pass the Securities
Trader (Series 57) qualification
examination.41
In place of Rule 3.30.08, the Exchange
proposes to adopt Rule 3.31(a)(6),
Securities Trader Principal. Proposed
Rule 3.31(a)(6) requires that a principal
responsible for supervising the
securities trading activities specified in
proposed Rule 3.31(b)(3), which
provides for registration in the
representative-level ‘‘Securities Trader’’
category, register as a Securities Trader
Principal. The proposed rule requires
individuals registering as Securities
Trader Principals to be registered as
Securities Traders and to pass the
General Securities Principal
qualification examination. The
Exchange notes that proposed Rule
3.31(a)(6) is substantively similar to
FINRA and other exchanges’ rules
governing Securities Trader
Principals.42
Registered Options Principal (Proposed
Rules 3.31(a)(7))
Existing Rule 3.30(d) provides that
associated persons of a TPH that
conducts a public customer business
must also comply with the registration
requirements set forth in Chapter 3,
which include the Registered Options
Principal. Rule 3.36 provides no TPH
shall be approved to transact options
business with the public until those
persons associated with it who are
designated as Options Principals have
been approved by and registered with
the Exchange.43 Rule 3.36 also provides
that persons engaged in the supervision
of options sales practices or a person to
whom the designated general partner or
executive officer (pursuant to Rule 9.2)
or another Registered Options Principal
delegates the authority to supervise
options sales practices shall be
designated as Options Principals. Rule
3.36 provides that individuals engaged
in the supervision of options sales
practices and designated as Options
Principals are required to qualify as an
Options Principal by passing the
Registered Options Principals
Examination (Series 4) or the Sales
Supervision Examination (Series 9/10).
Rule 3.36(c) further provides that
41 See
Cboe Options Regulatory Circular RG15–
180.
42 See
e.g., FINRA Rule 1220(a)(7), NYSE Arca
Rule 2.1220(a)(5) and Nasdaq Rule 1220(a)(7).
43 The Exchange proposes to clarify in Rule 3.36
that the designated Options Principal(s) must also
meet the applicable registration requirements in
Chapter III.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:12 Apr 20, 2021
Jkt 253001
individuals who are delegated
responsibility pursuant to Rule 9.2 for
reviewing the acceptance of
discretionary accounts, for approving
exceptions to a TPH organization’s
criteria or standards for uncovered
options accounts, and for approval of
communications, shall be designated as
Options Principals and are required to
qualify as an Options Principal by
passing the Registered Options Principal
Examination (Series 4).
The Exchange is proposing to delete
Rule 3.30 and in its place adopt Rule
3.31(a)(7), Registered Options Principal,
which would require under its Section
(a)(7)(A) that each TPH that is engaged
in transactions in options with the
public to have at least one Registered
Options Principal.44 In addition, each
principal as defined in paragraph (a)(1)
of the Rule who is responsible for
supervising a TPH’s options sales
practices with the public would be
required to register with the Exchange
as a Registered Options Principal,
subject to the following exception. If a
principal’s options activities are limited
solely to those activities that may be
supervised by a General Securities Sales
Supervisor, then such person may
register as a General Securities Sales
Supervisor pursuant to paragraph (a)(8)
of the Rule in lieu of registering as a
Registered Options Principal. The
proposed rule requires individuals
registering as Registered Options
Principals to be registered as General
Securities Representatives and to pass
the Registered Options Principals
qualification examination.45 The
Exchange notes that proposed Rule
3.31(a)(7) is substantively similar to
FINRA and other exchanges’ rules
regarding Registered Options
Principals.46
General Securities Sales Supervisor
(Proposed Rule 3.31(a)(8))
Proposed Rule 3.31(a)(8) provides that
a principal may register with the
Exchange as a General Securities Sales
Supervisor if his or her supervisory
responsibilities in the investment
banking or securities business of a TPH
are limited to the securities sales
44 The
Exchange proposes to amend Rule 3.36 to
conform all references to ‘‘Options Principal’’ with
‘‘Registered Options Principal’’.
45 Current Rule 3.36(b) provides that individuals
engaged in the supervision of options sales
practices and designated as Options Principals are
required to qualify as an Options Principal by
passing the Registered Options Principals
Qualification Examination (Series 4) or the Sales
Supervisor Qualification Examination (Series 9/10),
and is proposed to be deleted in view of proposed
Rule 3.31(a)(7).
46 See, e.g., FINRA Rule 1220(a)(8), NYSE Arca
Rule 2.1220(a)(7) and Nasdaq Rule 1220(a)(8).
PO 00000
Frm 00116
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
20767
activities of the TPH, including the
approval of customer accounts, training
of sales and sales supervisory personnel
and the maintenance of records of
original entry or ledger accounts of the
TPH required to be maintained in
branch offices by Exchange Act recordkeeping rules.
A person registering as a General
Securities Sales Supervisor must satisfy
the General Securities Representative
prerequisite registration and pass the
General Securities Sales Supervisor
examinations. Moreover, a General
Securities Sales Supervisor is precluded
from performing any of the following
activities: (1) Supervision of marketmaking commitments; (2) supervision of
the custody of firm or customer funds or
securities for purposes of Exchange Act
Rule 15c3–3; or (3) supervision of
overall compliance with financial
responsibility rules. The Exchange notes
that proposed Rule 3.31(a)(8) is
substantively similar to FINRA and
other exchanges’ rules governing
General Securities Sales Supervisors.47
Definition of Representative (Proposed
Rule 3.31(b)(1))
The Exchange proposes to adopt a
definition for the term ‘‘representative’’
in proposed Exchange Rule 3.31(b)(1).
Currently, the Exchange’s rules do not
define the term ‘‘representative,’’
although Rule 3.37(a) states that persons
who perform duties for the TPH that are
customarily performed by sales
representatives’ solicitors, or branch
office managers shall be designated as
Representatives.48 Proposed Rule
3.31(b)(1) will define a representative as
any person associated with an TPH,
including assistant officers other than
principals, who is engaged in TPH’s
investment banking or securities
business, such as supervision,
solicitation, conduct of business in
securities or the training of persons
associated with a TPH for any of these
functions. The Exchange notes that
proposed ‘‘representative’’ definition is
substantively similar to the definition
used by FINRA and other exchange
rules.49
General Securities Representative
(Proposed Rule 3.31(b)(2))
Under current Rule 3.37(d), a person
accepting orders from non-TPH
customers (unless such customer is a
broker-dealer registered with the
47 See, e.g., FINRA Rule 1220(a)(10), NYSE Arca
Rule 2.1220(a)(6) and Nasdaq Rule 1220(a)(10).
48 The Exchange proposes to eliminate this
language under Rule 3.37(a) in view of the proposed
definition under Rule 3.31(b)(1).
49 See, e.g., FINRA Rule 1220(b)(1), NYSE Arca
Rule 2.1220(b)(1) and Nasdaq Rule 1220(b)(1).
E:\FR\FM\21APN1.SGM
21APN1
20768
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 75 / Wednesday, April 21, 2021 / Notices
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Commission) is required to register with
the Exchange and to be qualified by
passing the General Securities
Representatives Examination (Series 7).
Proposed Rule 3.31(b)(2)(A) states that
each representative as defined in
proposed Rule 3.31(b)(1) is required to
register with the Exchange as a General
Securities Representative, subject to the
following exceptions. The proposed rule
provides that if a representative’s
activities include the function of a
Securities Trader, then the
representative must appropriately
register in that category.
The proposed rule further provides
that each person seeking to register as a
General Securities Representative shall,
prior to or concurrent with such
registration, pass the SIE and the
General Securities Representative
qualification examinations. The
Exchange notes that proposed Rule
3.31(b)(2) is substantively similar to
FINRA and other exchanges’ rules
governing General Securities
Representatives.50
Securities Trader (Proposed Rule
3.31(b)(3))
Pursuant to current Rule 3.30.08,
associated persons must pass the
qualification examination for Securities
Trader (the Series 57 examination) and
SIE and register with the Exchange as a
Securities Trader if that person is
engaged in proprietary trading, marketmaking and/or effecting transactions on
behalf of a broker-dealer.
The Exchange proposes to delete Rule
3.30 and with respect to the Securities
Trader requirement, replace it with
proposed Rule 3.31(b)(3). Rule 3.31(b)(3)
would require each representative as
defined in Rule 3.31(b)(1) to register
with the Exchange as a Securities Trader
if, with respect to transactions in equity,
preferred or convertible debt securities,
or options, such person is engaged in
proprietary trading or Market Making,
the execution of transactions on an
agency basis, or the direct supervision
of such activities other than a person
associated with a TPH whose trading
activities are conducted principally on
behalf of an investment company that is
registered with the SEC pursuant to the
Investment Company Act and that
controls, is controlled by, or is under
common control with a TPH. Rule
3.31(b)(3) would continue to require
individuals registering as Securities
Traders to pass the SIE as well as the
Securities Trader qualification exam.
Additionally, proposed Rule
3.31(b)(3)(A) would require each person
50 See, e.g., FINRA Rule 1220(b)(2), NYSE Arca
Rule 2.1220(b)(2) and Nasdaq Rule 1220(b)(2).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:12 Apr 20, 2021
Jkt 253001
associated with a TPH who is: (i)
Primarily responsible for the design,
development or significant modification
of an algorithmic trading strategy
relating to equity, preferred or
convertible debt securities or options; or
(ii) responsible for the day-to-day
supervision or direction of such
activities to register with the Exchange
as a Securities Trader.51
For purposes of this proposed new
registration requirement an ‘‘algorithmic
trading strategy’’ is an automated system
that generates or routes orders (or orderrelated messages) but does not include
an automated system that solely routes
orders received in their entirety to a
market center. The proposed registration
requirement applies to orders and order
related messages whether ultimately
routed or sent to be routed to an
exchange or over the counter. An order
router alone would not constitute an
algorithmic trading strategy. However,
an order router that performs any
additional functions would be
considered an algorithmic trading
strategy. An algorithm that solely
generates trading ideas or investment
allocations—including an automated
investment service that constructs
portfolio recommendations—but that is
not equipped to automatically generate
orders and order-related messages to
effectuate such trading ideas into the
market— whether independently or via
a linked router—would not constitute
an algorithmic trading strategy.52
The associated persons covered by the
expanded registration requirement
would be required to pass the requisite
qualification examination and be subject
to the same continuing education
requirements that are applicable to
individual Securities Traders. The
Exchange believes that potentially
problematic conduct stemming from
algorithmic trading strategies—such as
failure to check for order accuracy,
inappropriate levels of messaging traffic,
and inadequate risk management
controls—could be reduced or
prevented, in part, through improved
education regarding securities
regulations for the specified individuals
involved in the algorithm design and
development process.
The proposal is intended to ensure
the registration of one or more
51 This new registration requirement was recently
added to the FINRA Rulebook. The Exchange, like
other Exchanges such as Nasdaq (see Nasdaq Rule
1220(b)(4)(A)) has determined to add a parallel
requirement to its own rules, but also to add
options and market making to the scope of products
and activities, respectively, within the proposed
rule’s coverage. See SR–FINRA–2016–007, 81 FR
21914.
52 See id.
PO 00000
Frm 00117
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
associated persons that possesses
knowledge of, and responsibility for,
both the design of the intended trading
strategy and the technological
implementation of the strategy,
sufficient to evaluate whether the
resulting product is designed to achieve
regulatory compliance in addition to
business objectives. For example, a lead
developer who liaises with a head trader
regarding the head trader’s desired
algorithmic trading strategy and is
primarily responsible for the
supervision of the development of the
algorithm to meet such objectives must
be registered under the proposal as the
associated person primarily responsible
for the development of the algorithmic
trading strategy and supervising or
directing the team of developers.
Individuals under the lead developer’s
supervision would not be required to
register under the proposal if they are
not primarily responsible for the
development of the algorithmic trading
strategy or are not responsible for the
day-to-day supervision or direction of
others on the team. Under this scenario,
the person on the business side that is
primarily responsible for the design of
the algorithmic trading strategy, as
communicated to the lead developer,
also would be required to register. In the
event of a significant modification to the
algorithm, TPHs, likewise, would be
required to ensure that the associated
person primarily responsible for the
significant modification (or the
associated person supervising or
directing such activity), is registered as
a Securities Trader.
A TPH employing an algorithm is
responsible for the algorithm’s activities
whether the algorithm is designed or
developed in house or by a third-party.
Thus, in all cases, robust supervisory
procedures, both before and after
deployment of an algorithmic trading
strategy, are a key component in
protecting against problematic behavior
stemming from algorithmic trading. In
addition, associated persons responsible
for monitoring or reviewing the
performance of an algorithmic trading
strategy must be registered, and a TPH’s
trading activity must always be
supervised by an appropriately
registered person. Therefore, even
where a firm purchases an algorithm offthe-shelf and does not significantly
modify the algorithm, the associated
person responsible for monitoring or
reviewing the performance of the
algorithm would be required to be
registered.
The Exchange notes that proposed
Rule 3.31(b)(3) is substantively similar
E:\FR\FM\21APN1.SGM
21APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 75 / Wednesday, April 21, 2021 / Notices
to FINRA and other exchanges’ rules
governing Securities Traders.53
Foreign Registrations (Proposed Rule
3.31.01)
Current Rule 3.30.09 and Rule 3.37(e)
provide that any person who is in good
standing as a representative with the
Financial Conduct Authority in the
United Kingdom or with a Canadian
stock exchange or securities regulator
shall be exempt from the requirement to
pass the SIE. The Exchange proposes to
relocate the language contained in Rule
3.30.09 (which rule is being deleted)
and Rule 3.37(e) to new Rule 3.31
Interpretation and Policy .01 as Rule
3.31 governs the SIE requirements and
as the relocation is consistent with the
location of the provision in the rules of
other exchanges.54
Additional Qualification Requirements
for Persons Engaged in Security Futures
Activities (Proposed Rule 3.31.02)
The Exchange is also proposing to
adopt Rule 3.31.02, which provides that
each person who is registered with the
Exchange as a Registered Options
Principal, General Securities
Representative, Options Representative,
or General Securities Sales Supervisor
shall be eligible to engage in security
futures activities as a principal provided
that such individual completes a Firm
Element program as set forth in
proposed Rule 3.33 that addresses
security futures products before such
person engages in security futures
activities.55
TPHs With One Registered Options
Principal (Proposed Rule 3.31.03)
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
The Exchange proposes to adopt new
Rule 3.31 Interpretation and Policy .03
which requires notification to the
Exchange by a TPH that has one
Registered Options Principal in the
event such person is terminated,
resigns, becomes incapacitated or is
otherwise unable to perform the duties
of a Registered Options Principal, and
imposes certain restrictions on the
TPH’s options business in that event.56
53 See, e.g., FINRA Rule 1220(b)(4), NYSE Arca
Rule 2.1220(b)(3) and Nasdaq Rule 1220(b)(4).
54 See, e.g., FINRA Rule 1220.01, NYSE Arca Rule
2.1220.01 and Nasdaq Rule 1220.01.
55 Unlike FINRA Rule 1220.02, proposed
Exchange Rule 3.31.02 omits references to United
Kingdom Securities Representatives and Canada
Securities Representatives, which are registration
categories the Exchange does not recognize. In any
event, the Exchange does not currently offer
security futures products for trading.
56 See Proposed Rule 3.31.03. Proposed Rule
3.31.03 is similar to corresponding FINRA Rule
1220.03, NYSE Arca Rule 2.1220.04 and Nasdaq
Rule 1220.03.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:12 Apr 20, 2021
Jkt 253001
Scope of General Securities Sales
Supervisor Registration Category
(Proposed Rule 3.31.04)
Proposed Rule 3.31.04 explains the
purpose of the General Securities Sales
Supervisor registration category. The
General Securities Sales Supervisor
category is an alternate category of
registration designed to lessen the
qualification burdens on principals of
general securities firms who supervise
sales. Without this category of limited
registration, such principals would be
required to separately qualify pursuant
to the rules of FINRA, the MSRB, and
the Cboe options exchanges. While
persons may continue to separately
qualify with all relevant self-regulatory
organizations, the General Securities
Sales Supervisor examination permits
qualification as a supervisor of sales of
all securities through one registration
category. Persons registered as General
Securities Sales Supervisors may also
qualify in any other category of
principal registration. Persons who are
already qualified in one or more
categories of principal General
Securities Sales Supervisors may
supervise sales activities of all securities
by also qualifying as General Securities
Sales Supervisors. The proposed rule
further provides that any person
required to be registered as a principal
who supervises sales activities in
corporate, municipal and option
securities, investment company
products, variable contracts, and
security futures (subject to the
requirements of Rule 3.31.02) may be
registered solely as a General Securities
Sales Supervisor. In addition to branch
office managers, other persons such as
regional and national sales managers
may also be registered solely as General
Securities Sales Supervisors as long as
they supervise only sales activities.
Proposed Rule 3.31.04 is similar to
corresponding FINRA and other
exchanges’ rules.57
Summary of Qualification Requirements
(Proposed Rule 3.31.05)
Proposed Rule 3.31.05 provides a
table summary of the categories of
registration and applicable
qualifications and alternative
qualifications set forth throughout Rule
3.31.
Associated Persons Exempt From
Registration (Proposed Rule 3.32)
Existing Rule 3.30(2) currently
provides that the following persons
associated with a TPH are not required
to register: (a) Individual associated
57 See, e.g., FINRA Rule 1220.04, NYSE Arca Rule
2.1220.03 and Nasdaq Rule 1220.04.
PO 00000
Frm 00118
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
20769
persons whose functions are solely and
exclusively clerical or ministerial; (b)
individual TPHs and individual
associated persons who are not actively
engaged in the securities business; (c)
individual TPHs and individual
associated persons whose functions are
related solely and exclusively to the
TPH’s or TPH organization’s need for
nominal corporate officers or for capital
participation; (d) individual associated
persons that are restricted from
accessing the Exchange (physically and
electronically) and that do not engage in
the securities business of the TPH or
TPH organization relating to activity
that occurs on the Exchange; and (e)
individual associated persons whose
functions are related solely and
exclusively to: (i) Transactions in
commodities; (ii) transactions in
security futures; and/or (iii) effecting
transactions on the floor of another
national securities exchange and who
are registered as floor members with
such exchange.
The Exchange is proposing to adopt
Rule 3.30(2) as Rule 3.32 subject to
certain changes. Rule 3.30 exempts from
registration those associated persons
who are not actively engaged in the
securities business. It also exempts from
registration those associated persons
whose functions are related solely and
exclusively to a member’s need for
nominal corporate officers or for capital
participation.58 The Exchange believes
that the determination of whether an
associated person is required to register
must be based on an analysis of the
person’s activities and functions in the
context of the various registration
categories. Proposed Rule 3.32 provides
an exemption from registration with the
Exchange for certain associated persons.
Specifically, the proposed rule provides
that persons associated with a TPH
whose functions are solely and
exclusively clerical or ministerial would
be exempt from registration.
FINRA Rule 1230 provides an
exemption from registration with FINRA
to persons associated with a FINRA
member whose functions are solely and
exclusively clerical or ministerial and
persons associated with a FINRA
member whose functions are related
solely and exclusively to (i) effecting
transactions on the floor of a national
securities exchange and who are
appropriately registered with such
exchange; (ii) effecting transactions in
municipal securities; (iii) effecting
transactions in commodities; or (iv)
58 These exemptions generally apply to associated
persons who are corporate officers of a TPH in
name only to meet specific corporate legal
obligations or who only provide capital for a
member but have no other role in a TPH’s business.
E:\FR\FM\21APN1.SGM
21APN1
20770
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 75 / Wednesday, April 21, 2021 / Notices
effecting transactions in security
futures, provided that any such person
is registered with a registered futures
association. TPHs do not solely and
exclusively engage in any of the
foregoing transactions and therefore the
Exchange is not adopting that portion of
FINRA Rule 1230. Proposed Rule 3.32 is
similar to other exchanges’
corresponding rules.59
The Exchange proposes to adopt Rule
3.32.01 to clarify that the function of
accepting customer orders is not
considered a clerical or ministerial
function and that associated persons
who accept customer orders under any
circumstances are required to be
appropriately registered. However, the
proposed rule provides that an
associated person is not accepting a
customer order where occasionally,
when an appropriately registered person
is unavailable, the associated person
transcribes the order details and the
registered person contacts the customer
to confirm the order details before
entering the order.
Changes to Continuing Education
Requirements (Proposed Rule 3.33)
Existing Rule 3.33 (Continuing
Education for Registered Persons),
includes a Regulatory Element and a
Firm Element. The Regulatory Element
applies to registered persons and
consists of periodic computer-based
training on regulatory, compliance,
ethical, supervisory subjects and sales
practice standards. The Firm Element
consists of at least annual, TPHdeveloped and administered training
programs designed to keep covered
registered persons current regarding
securities products, services and
strategies offered by the TPH.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Regulatory Element
The Exchange proposes to amend
Rule 3.33(a) to provide, consistent with
proposed Rule 3.30.09, that a waivereligible person would be subject to a
Regulatory Element program that
correlates to his or her most recent
registration category, and that the
content of the Regulatory Element
would be based on the same cycle had
the individual remain registered. The
proposed rule change is similar to
FINRA’s and other exchanges’ rules.60
Further, the Exchange proposes to
amend Rule 3.33(a)(1) to provide that
any person whose registration has been
deemed inactive under the rule may not
accept or solicit business or receive any
59 See,
e.g., NYSE Arca Rule 2.1230.
60 See, e.g., FINRA Rule 1240(a)(1), NYSE ARCA
Rules 2.23(d)(1) and 2.24(d)(1), and Nasdaq Rule
1240(a)(1).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:12 Apr 20, 2021
Jkt 253001
compensation for the purchase or sale of
securities. The proposed amendment
provides, however, that such person
may receive trail or residual
commissions resulting from transactions
completed before the inactive status,
unless the TPH with which the person
is associated has a policy prohibiting
such trail or residual commissions. The
proposed amendment to Rule 3.33(a)(1)
also provides that if a waiver-eligible
person fails to complete the Regulatory
Element during the prescribed time
frames, he or she would lose waiver
eligibility.61
The Exchange proposes to amend
Rule 3.33(a)(2) to provide that unless
otherwise determined by the Exchange,
a registered person other than a person
designated as eligible for a waiver
pursuant to Rule 3.30.09 will be
required to re-take the Regulatory
Element and satisfy all of its
requirements under certain
circumstances.62
Lastly, the Exchange proposes to
amend Rule 3.33(a)(3) to provide that
the Exchange offers Regulatory Elements
for Exchange registered persons: the
S201 for registered principals and
supervisors, the S106 for persons
registered only as Investment Company
and Variable Contracts Representatives,
and the S101 for all other registered
persons.63
Firm Element
The Exchange proposes to amend
Rule 3.33(c)(1) to provide that any
registered person or any or any
associated person who has direct
contact with customers in the conduct
of the TPH’s or TPH organization’s
securities sales, trading or investment
banking activities, and to the immediate
supervisors of such persons, is subject
to the Firm Element.64
The Exchange believes that training in
ethics and professional responsibility
should apply to all registered persons.
Therefore, proposed Rule 3.33(c)(2)(ii),
which provides that the Firm Element
training programs must cover applicable
regulatory requirements, would also
require that a firm’s training program
cover training in ethics and professional
responsibility. The proposed change to
the Firm Element section of proposed
61 See FINRA Rule 1240(a)(2), NYSE ARCA Rules
2.23(d)(1) and 2.24(d)(1), and Nasdaq Rule
1240(a)(2).
62 Id.
63 See NYSE Arca Rule 2.23(d)(1)(A).
64 See FINRA Rule 1240(b)(1), NYSE Arca Rule
2.23(d)(2)(A) and Nasdaq Rule 1240(b)(1).
PO 00000
Frm 00119
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Rule 3.33 is similar to changes made by
other exchanges. 65
Electronic Filing Rules (Proposed Rule
3.34)
The Exchange is proposing to adopt
new Rule 3.34, Electronic Filing
Requirements for Uniform Forms,
which, among other things, will
consolidate various Web CRD Form U4
and U5 electronic filing requirements in
a single location and also would impose
certain new requirements. More
specifically, current Rule 3.30,
Interpretations and Polices .01—.03,
state that each individual required to
register shall electronically file a
Uniform Application for Securities
Industry Registration (‘‘Form U4’’)
through the Central Registration
Depository system (‘‘Web CRD’’)
operated by FINRA and to electronically
submit to Web CRD any required
amendments to Form U4. Further, any
TPH or TPH organization that
discharges or terminates the
employment or retention of an
individual required to register must
comply with certain termination filing
requirements, which include the filing
of a Form U5. Form U4 and Form U5
electronic filing requirements applicable
to options principals and
representatives, as well a Form U5
requirement applicable to members
upon termination of employment of any
of their registered persons, are found in
Exchange Rules 3.36 and 3.37. The
Exchange proposes to delete current
Exchange Rule 3.30, Interpretations and
Polices .01–.03, and the electronic filing
requirements of Exchange Rules 3.36 66
and 3.37 67, and to replace them with
proposed Rule 3.34, Electronic Filing
Requirements for Uniform Forms, which
will consolidate Form U4 and Form U5
electronic filing requirements into a
single rule.
First, proposed Rule 3.34(a) would
provide that all forms required to be
filed under the Exchange’s registration
rules shall be filed through an electronic
process or such other process as the
Exchange may prescribe to Web CRD.
Under Rule 3.34(b), TPHs would be
required to designate registered
principal(s) or corporate officer(s) who
are responsible for supervising a firm’s
electronic filings. The registered
principal(s) or corporate officer(s) who
has or have the responsibility to review
and approve the forms filed pursuant to
the rule would be required to
65 See FINRA Rule 1240(b)(2)(B), NYSE Arca
Rules 2.23(d)(2)(B)(ii) and 2.24(d)(2)(B) and Nasdaq
Rule 1240(b)(2)(B).
66 See current Rule 3.36(a).
67 See current Rule 3.37(a), (b) and (c).
E:\FR\FM\21APN1.SGM
21APN1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 75 / Wednesday, April 21, 2021 / Notices
acknowledge, electronically, that he or
she is filing this information on behalf
of the member and the member’s
associated persons. Under Rule 3.34.01,
the registered principal(s) or corporate
officer(s) could delegate filing
responsibilities to an associated person
(who need not be registered) but could
not delegate any of the supervision,
review, and approval responsibilities
mandated in Rule 3.34(b). The
registered principal(s) or corporate
officer(s) would be required to take
reasonable and appropriate action to
ensure that all delegated electronic
filing functions were properly executed
and supervised.
Under Rule 3.34(c)(1), initial and
transfer electronic Form U4 filings and
any amendments to the disclosure
information on Form U4 must be based
on a manually signed Form U4 provided
to the TPH or applicant for membership
by the person on whose behalf the Form
U4 is being filed. As part of the TPH’s
recordkeeping requirements, it would be
required to retain the person’s manually
signed Form U4 or amendments to the
disclosure information on Form U4 in
accordance with Rule 17a4(e)(1) under
the Act and make them available
promptly upon regulatory request. An
applicant for membership must also
retain every manually signed Form U4
it receives during the application
process and make them available
promptly upon regulatory request. Rule
3.34(c)(2) and Interpretation and Policy
.03 and 04 provide for the electronic
filing of Form U4 amendments without
the individual’s manual signature,
subject to certain safeguards and
procedures.
Rule 3.34(d) provides that upon filing
an electronic Form U4 on behalf of a
person applying for registration, a TPH
must promptly submit fingerprint
information for that person and that the
Exchange may make a registration
effective pending receipt of the
fingerprint information. It further
provides that if a TPH fails to submit the
fingerprint information within 30 days
after filing of an electronic Form U4, the
person’s registration will be deemed
inactive, requiring the person to
immediately cease all activities
requiring registration or performing any
duties and functioning in any capacity
requiring registration. Under the rule
the Exchange must administratively
terminate a registration that is inactive
for a period of two years. A person
whose registration is administratively
terminated could reactivate the
registration only by reapplying for
registration and meeting the
qualification requirements of the
applicable provisions of proposed
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:12 Apr 20, 2021
Jkt 253001
Exchange Rule 3.31. Upon application
and a showing of good cause, the
Exchange could extend the 30-day
period.
Rule 3.34(e) would require initial
filings and amendments of Form U5 to
be submitted electronically. As part of
the TPH’s recordkeeping requirements,
it would be required to retain such
records for a period of not less than
three years, the first two years in an
easily accessible place, in accordance
with Rule 17a–4 under the Act, and to
make such records available promptly
upon regulatory request.
Finally, proposed Rule 3.34.02 would
provide a TPH could enter into an
agreement with a third party pursuant to
which the third party agrees to file the
required forms electronically on behalf
of the TPH and the TPH’s associated
persons. Notwithstanding the existence
of such an agreement, the TPH would
remain responsible for complying with
the requirements of the Rule.
Implementation Date
The Exchange proposes to announce
the implementation date of the
proposed rule change in an Exchange
Notice, to be published no later than
thirty (30) days following the operative
date. The implementation date will be
no later than sixty (60) days following
the operative date, with the exception of
the new registration requirement for
developers of algorithmic trading
strategies which would become effective
180 days following the implementation
date.68
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed
rule change is consistent with the Act
and the rules and regulations
thereunder applicable to the Exchange
and, in particular, the requirements of
Section 6(b) of the Act.69 Specifically,
the Exchange believes the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Section
6(b)(5) 70 requirements that the rules of
an exchange be designed to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged
68 The Exchange believes it is appropriate to
provide TPHs more lead time for implementation of
the requirement for developers of algorithmic
trading to become Securities Trader, as such
requirement may trigger new testing requirements
for individuals who otherwise weren’t required to
register prior to this rule change. The proposed
implementation period is also consistent with the
amount of time provided for compliance by other
exchanges that have adopted the proposed
requirement. See, e.g., Exchange Act Release No.
84386 (October 9, 2018), 83 FR 51988 (October 15,
2018) (SR–NASDAQ–2018–078).
69 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
70 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
PO 00000
Frm 00120
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
20771
in regulating, clearing, settling,
processing information with respect to,
and facilitating transactions in
securities, to remove impediments to
and perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system, and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest.
Additionally, the Exchange believes the
proposed rule change is consistent with
the Section 6(b)(5) 71 requirement that
the rules of an exchange not be designed
to permit unfair discrimination between
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change will streamline,
and bring consistency and uniformity
to, the registration rules, which will, in
turn, assist TPHs and their associated
persons in complying with these rules
and improve regulatory efficiency. The
proposed rule change will also improve
the efficiency of the examination
program, without compromising the
qualification standards, by eliminating
duplicative testing of general securities
knowledge on examinations and by
removing examinations that currently
have limited utility. In addition, the
proposed rule change will expand the
scope of permissive registrations,
which, among other things, will allow
TPHs to develop a depth of associated
persons with registrations to respond to
unanticipated personnel changes and
will encourage greater regulatory
understanding. Further, the proposed
rule change will provide a more
streamlined and effective waiver
process for individuals working for a
financial services industry affiliate of a
TPH, and it will require such
individuals to maintain specified levels
of competence and knowledge while
working in areas ancillary to the
securities business. The proposed rule
change will improve the supervisory
structure of firms by imposing an
experience requirement for
representatives that are designated by
firms to function as principals for a 120day period before having to pass an
appropriate principal qualification
examination. The proposed rule change
will also prohibit unregistered persons
from accepting customer orders under
any circumstances, which will enhance
investor protection.
The extension of the Securities Trader
registration requirement to developers
of algorithmic trading strategies requires
associated persons primarily
responsible for the design, development
or significant modification of an
algorithmic trading strategy or
responsible for the day-to-day
supervision or direction of such
71 Id.
E:\FR\FM\21APN1.SGM
21APN1
20772
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 75 / Wednesday, April 21, 2021 / Notices
activities to register and meet a
minimum standard of knowledge
regarding the securities rules and
regulations applicable to the TPH
employing the algorithmic trading
strategy. This minimum standard of
knowledge is identical to the standard
of knowledge currently applicable to
traditional securities traders. The
Exchange believes that improved
education of firm personnel may reduce
the potential for problematic market
conduct and manipulative trading
activity.
Finally, the proposed rule change
makes organizational changes to the
Exchange’s registration and
qualification rules to align them with
registration and qualification rules of
other exchanges as discussed above, in
order to prevent unnecessary regulatory
burdens and to promote efficient
administration of the rules. The change
also makes minor updates and
corrections to the Exchange’s rules
which improve readability.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. The
Exchange believes that the proposed
rule changes which are, in all material
respects, based upon and substantially
similar to, recent rule changes adopted
by FINRA and/or other national
securities exchanges, will reduce the
regulatory burden placed on market
participants engaged in trading
activities across different markets. The
Exchange believes that the
harmonization of these registration
requirements across the various markets
will reduce burdens on competition by
removing impediments to participation
in the national market system and
promoting competition among
participants across the multiple national
securities exchanges.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
The Exchange neither solicited nor
received written comments on the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule
change does not:
A. Significantly affect the protection
of investors or the public interest;
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:12 Apr 20, 2021
Jkt 253001
B. impose any significant burden on
competition; and
C. become operative for 30 days from
the date on which it was filed, or such
shorter time as the Commission may
designate, it has become effective
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the
Act 72 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6) 73
thereunder. At any time within 60 days
of the filing of the proposed rule change,
the Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission will institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be approved or
disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
CBOE–2021–022 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–CBOE–2021–022. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change.
Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from
comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish
to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–CBOE–2021–022 and
should be submitted on or before May
12, 2021.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.74
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021–08147 Filed 4–20–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–91582; File No. SR–FINRA–
2021–007]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Financial Industry Regulatory
Authority, Inc.; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed
Rule Change to Extend the Time to
Announce the Implementation
Schedule for FINRA’s Corporate Bond
New Issue Reference Data Service
April 15, 2021.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on April 13,
2021, the Financial Industry Regulatory
Authority, Inc. (‘‘FINRA’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed
rule change as described in Items I and
II below, which Items have been
prepared by FINRA. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
FINRA is proposing to extend its time
to announce the implementation
schedule for FINRA’s corporate bond
74 17
72 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
73 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
PO 00000
Frm 00121
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
E:\FR\FM\21APN1.SGM
21APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 75 (Wednesday, April 21, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20760-20772]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-08147]
[[Page 20760]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-91576; File No. SR-CBOE-2021-022]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend
Its Rules Relating to Categories of Registration and Respective
Qualification Examinations Required for Trading Permit Holders and
Associated Persons That Engage in Trading Activities on the Exchange
April 15, 2021.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act'' or ``Exchange Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\
notice is hereby given that on April 5, 2021, Cboe Exchange, Inc. (the
``Exchange'' or ``Cboe Options'') filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the ``Commission'' or ``SEC'') the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have
been substantially prepared by the Exchange. The Exchange filed the
proposal as a ``non-controversial'' proposed rule change pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \3\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
thereunder.\4\ The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
\4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend its rules relating to categories of
registration and respective qualification examinations required for
Trading Permit Holders (``TPHs'') and associated persons that engage in
trading activities on the Exchange. The text of the proposed rule
change is provided in Exhibit 5.
The text of the proposed rule change is also available on the
Exchange's website (https://www.cboe.com/AboutCBOE/CBOELegalRegulatoryHome.aspx), at the Exchange's Office of the
Secretary, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange has adopted registration requirements to ensure that
associated persons of TPH organizations attain and maintain specified
levels of competence and knowledge pertinent to their function. In
general, the current rules require that persons engaged in a TPH
organization's securities business who are to function as
representatives or principals register with the Exchange in the
category of registration appropriate to their functions by passing one
or more qualification examinations \5\ and exempt specified associated
persons from the registration requirements.\6\ They also prescribe
ongoing continuing education requirements for registered persons.\7\
The Exchange now proposes to amend, reorganize and enhance its rules
regarding registration, qualification examinations and continuing
education, as described below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Cboe Options Rule 3.30(a)(1).
\6\ See Cboe Options Rule 3.30(a)(2).
\7\ See Cboe Options Rule 3.33.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In 2017, the Commission approved a Financial Industry Regulatory
Authority, Inc. (``FINRA'') proposed rule change adopting rules
relating to qualification and registration requirements in the
consolidated FINRA Rulebook, restructuring the FINRA representative-
level qualification examinations, creating a general knowledge
examination and specialized knowledge examinations, allowing permissive
registration, establishing an exam waiver process for persons working
for a financial services affiliate of a member, and amending certain
Continuing Education (``CE'') requirements (the ``FINRA Rule
Changes'').\8\ The FINRA Rule Changes became effective on October 1,
2018. Other exchanges, such as Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (``Nasdaq''),
New York Stock Exchange LLC (``NYSE'') and Miami International
Securities Exchange, LLC (``MIAX'') subsequently adopted rule changes
based on FINRA's Rule Changes (collectively with the FINRA Rule
Changes, the ``Registration Rule Changes'').\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See Exchange Act Release No. 81098 (July 7, 2017), 82 FR
32419 (July 13, 2017) (Order Approving File No. SR-FINRA-2017-007).
See also FINRA Regulatory Notice 17-30 (SEC Approves Consolidated
FINRA Registration Rules, Restructured Representative-Level
Qualification Examinations and Changes to Continuing Education
Requirements) (October 2017). FINRA articulated its belief that the
proposed rule change would streamline, and bring consistency and
uniformity to, its registration rules, which would, in turn, assist
FINRA members and their associated persons in complying with the
rules and improve regulatory efficiency. FINRA also determined to
enhance the overall efficiency of its representative-level
examinations program by eliminating redundancy of subject matter
content across examinations, retiring several outdated
representative-level registrations, and introducing a general
knowledge examination that could be taken by all potential
representative-level registrants and the general public. FINRA
amended certain aspects of its continuing education rule, including
by codifying existing guidance regarding the effect of failing to
complete the Regulatory Element on a registered person's activities
and compensation.
\9\ See, e.g., Exchange Act Release No. 84638 (November 20,
2018), 83 FR 60909 (November 27, 2018) (SR-NASDAQ-2018-093). See
also Exchange Act Release No. 84336 (October 2, 2018), 83 FR 50727
(October 9, 2018) (SR-NYSE-2018-44) and Exchange Act Release No.
87830 (December 20, 2019), 84 FR 72025 (December 30, 2019) (SR-MIAX-
2019-50). The Exchange notes the affiliates of these Exchanges have
filed similar rule changes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange now proposes to amend, reorganize and enhance its own
membership, registration and qualification rules in part in response to
the Registration Rule Changes, and also in order to conform the
Exchange's rules more closely to those of its affiliated exchanges and
non-affiliated exchanges in the interest of uniformity and to
facilitate compliance with membership, registration and qualification
regulatory requirements by members of multiple exchanges. The proposed
rule change also includes the proposal to enhance its registration
rules by adding a new registration requirement applicable to developers
of algorithmic trading systems similar to a requirement adopted by
FINRA pursuant to a 2016 FINRA proposed rule change.\10\ In
[[Page 20761]]
connection with these changes, the Exchange proposes to amend Cboe
Options Rules 3.30, 3.33, 3.36 and 3.37 and adopt Cboe Options Rules
3.31, 3.32 and 3.34.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See Exchange Act Release No. 77551 (April 7, 2016), 81 FR
21914 (April 13, 2016) (Order Approving File No. SR-FINRA-2016-007).
In its proposed rule change FINRA addressed the increasing
significance of algorithmic trading strategies by amending its rules
to require registration, as Securities Traders, of associated
persons primarily responsible for the design, development or
significant modification of algorithmic trading strategies, or who
are responsible for the day-to-day supervision or direction of such
activities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Registration Requirements (Proposed Rule 3.30)
Cboe Options Rule 3.30 currently requires that persons engaged, or
to be engaged, in the securities business of a TPH who are to function
as representatives or principals register with the Exchange in the
category of registration appropriate to their functions as specified in
Cboe Options Rule 3.30.\11\ The Exchange proposes to amend Rules 3.30
and 3.33 and adopt Rules 3.31 and 3.32 to address various elements of
registration.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See Cboe Options Rule 3.30.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed Rule 3.30 provides that each person engaged in the
securities business of a TPH must register with the Exchange as a
representative or principal in each category of registration
appropriate to his or her functions and responsibilities as specified
in proposed Rule 3.31, unless exempt from registration pursuant to
proposed Rule 3.32. Proposed Rule 3.30 also provides that such person
is not qualified to function in any registered capacity other than that
for which the person is registered, unless otherwise stated in the
rules.
Minimum Number of Registered Principals (Proposed Rule 3.30.01)
Rule 3.30.07 currently requires that every TPH must register with
the Exchange in a heightened capacity each individual acting in any of
the following roles: (i) officer; (ii) partner; (iii) director; (iv)
supervisor of proprietary trading, market-making or brokerage
activities; and/or (v) supervisor of those engaged in proprietary
trading, market-making or brokerage activities with respect to those
activities. Each TPH must register with the Exchange at least two
individuals acting in one or more of the capacities described in (i)-
(v) above. The Exchange is able to waive this requirement if a TPH
demonstrates conclusively that only one individual acting in one or
more of the capacities described in (i) through (v) above should be
required to register. In addition, a TPH that conducts proprietary
trading only and has 25 or fewer registered persons shall instead be
required to have a minimum of one officer or partner who is registered
in this capacity. The Exchange is proposing to eliminate Rule 3.30.07
and, in its place, adopt a similar, but new, Rule 3.30.01. The new rule
would provide TPHs that limit the scope of their business flexibility
in satisfying the two-principal requirement. In particular, proposed
Rule 3.30.01 requires that a TPH have a minimum of two General
Securities Principals, provided that a TPH that is limited in the scope
of its activities may instead have two officers or partners who are
registered in a principal category that corresponds to the scope of the
TPH's activities. For instance, if a TPH's business is limited to
securities trading, the TPH may have two Securities Trader Principals,
instead of two General Securities Principals. Additionally, proposed
Rule 3.30.01 provides that any TPH with only one associated person is
excluded from the two-principal requirement. Proposed Rule 3.30.01
would provide that existing TPHs as well as new applicants may request
a waiver of the two-principal requirement, consistent with current Rule
3.30.07. Finally, the Exchange is proposing to retain the existing
rule's provision permitting a proprietary trading firm with 25 or fewer
registered representatives to have just one registered principal. The
Exchange notes that proposed Rule 3.30.01 is substantively the same as
FINRA's and other exchanges' corresponding Rules.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ See, e.g., FINRA Rule 1210.01 (Minimum Number of Registered
Principals and Nasdaq Rule 1210.01 (Minimum Number of Registered
Principals)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Permissive Registrations (Proposed Rule 3.30.02)
Current Rule 3.30(a)(1) prohibits TPHs from maintaining a
registration with the Exchange for any person (A) who is no longer
active in the TPH's securities business, (B) who is no longer
functioning in the registered capacity, or (C) where the sole purpose
is to avoid the examination requirement of the rule. A TPH may not make
application for the registration of any person where there is no intent
to employ such person in the TPH's securities business. However, a TPH
may maintain or make application for the registration of a person who
performs legal, compliance, internal audit, back-office operations, or
similar duties for the TPH or a person engaged in the securities
business of a foreign securities affiliate or subsidiary of the TPH.
The Exchange is proposing to replace this provision with new Rule
3.30.02. The Exchange is also proposing to expand the scope of
permissive registrations and to clarify a TPH's obligations regarding
individuals who are maintaining such registrations.
Specifically, proposed Rule 3.30.02 allows any associated person to
obtain and maintain any registration permitted by the TPH. For
instance, an associated person of a TPH working solely in a clerical or
ministerial capacity, such as in an administrative capacity, would be
able to obtain and maintain a General Securities Representative
registration with the TPH. As another example, an associated person of
a TPH who is registered, and functioning solely, as a General
Securities Representative would be able to obtain and maintain a
General Securities Principal registration with the TPH. Further,
proposed Rule 3.30.02 allows an individual engaged in the securities
business of a foreign securities affiliate or subsidiary of a TPH to
obtain and maintain any registration permitted by the TPH.
The Exchange is proposing to permit the registration of such
individuals for several reasons. First, a TPH may foresee a need to
move a former representative or principal who has not been registered
for two or more years back into a position that would require such
person to be registered. Currently, such persons are required to
requalify (or obtain a waiver of the applicable qualification
examinations) and reapply for registration. Second, the proposed rule
change would allow TPHs to develop a depth of associated persons with
registrations in the event of unanticipated personnel changes. Third,
allowing registration in additional categories encourages greater
regulatory understanding.
Individuals maintaining a permissive registration under the
proposed rule change would be considered registered persons and subject
to all Exchange rules, to the extent relevant to their activities. For
instance, an individual working solely in an administrative capacity
would be able to maintain a General Securities Representative
registration and would be considered a registered person for purposes
of rules relating to borrowing from or lending to customers, but the
rule would have no practical application to his or her conduct because
he or she would not have any customers.
Consistent with the Exchange's supervision rules, TPHs would be
required to have adequate supervisory systems and procedures reasonably
designed to ensure that individuals with permissive registrations do
not act outside the scope of their assigned functions. With respect to
an individual who solely maintains a permissive registration, such as
an individual working exclusively in an administrative capacity, the
individual's day-to-day supervisor may be a
[[Page 20762]]
nonregistered person. TPHs would be required to assign a registered
supervisor to this person who would be responsible for periodically
contacting such individual's day-to-day supervisor to verify that the
individual is not acting outside the scope of his or her assigned
functions. If such individual is permissively registered as a
representative, the registered supervisor must be registered as a
representative or principal. If the individual is permissively
registered as a principal, the registered supervisor must be registered
as a principal. The Exchange notes that proposed Rule 3.30.02 is
substantively similar to FINRA and other exchanges' corresponding
rules.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ See, e.g., FINRA Rule 1210.02, NYSE Arca Rule 2.1210.01 and
Nasdaq Rule 1210.02.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Qualification Examinations and Waivers of Examinations (Proposed Rule
3.30.03)
Current Rule 3.30(a)(1) provides that before a registration can
become effective, TPHs must submit the appropriate application for
registration, pass a qualification examination appropriate to the
category of registration and submit any required registration and
examination fees. The Exchange is proposing to incorporate similar
language in new Rule 3.30.03.
In addition, as part of the FINRA Rule Changes, FINRA adopted a
restructured representative-level qualification examination program
whereby representative-level registrants would be required to take a
general knowledge examination (the Securities Industry Essentials Exam
or ``SIE'') and a specialized knowledge examination appropriate to
their job functions at the firm with which they are associating. The
Exchange similarly adopted this requirement, which is reflected in
current Cboe Options Rules 3.30.08 and 3.37(d).\14\ The Exchange
therefore also proposes to provide in proposed Rule 3.30.03 that before
the registration of a person as a representative can become effective
under proposed Rule 3.30, such person must pass the SIE and an
appropriate representative-level qualification examination as specified
in proposed Rule 3.31. Proposed Rule 3.30.03 also provides that before
the registration of a person as a principal can become effective under
proposed Rule 3.30, such person must pass an appropriate principal-
level qualification examination as specified in proposed Rule 3.31.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ See Exchange Act Release No. 84142 (September 14, 2018), 83
FR 47665 (September 20, 2018) (SR-CBOE-2018-064).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Further, proposed Rule 3.30.03 provides that if a registered
person's job functions change and he or she needs to become registered
in another representative-level category, he or she would not need to
pass the SIE again. Rather, the registered person would need to pass
only the appropriate representative-level qualification examination.
Moreover, proposed Rule 3.30.03 provides that all associated persons,
such as associated persons whose functions are solely and exclusively
clerical or ministerial, are eligible to take the SIE. Proposed Rule
3.30.03 also provides that individuals who are not associated persons
of firms, such as members of the general public, are eligible to take
the SIE. The Exchange believes that expanding the pool of individuals
who are eligible to take the SIE would enable prospective securities
industry professionals to demonstrate to prospective employers a basic
level of knowledge prior to submitting a job application. Further, this
approach would allow for more flexibility and career mobility within
the securities industry. While all associated persons of firms as well
as individuals who are not associated persons would be eligible to take
the SIE pursuant to the proposed rule, passing the SIE alone would not
qualify them for registration with the Exchange. Rather, to be eligible
for registration with the Exchange, an individual must pass an
applicable representative or principal qualification examination and
complete the other requirements of the registration process.
Proposed Rule 3.30.03 also provides that the Exchange may, in
exceptional cases and where good cause is shown, waive the applicable
qualification examination(s) and accept other standards as evidence of
an applicant's qualifications for registration. The rule will also
state that advanced age or physical infirmity will not individually of
themselves constitute sufficient grounds to waive a qualification
examination and that experience in fields ancillary to the securities
business may constitute sufficient grounds to waive a qualification
examination. The Exchange notes that proposed language relating to
waivers is already contained in current Rule 3.30.05.\15\ Proposed Rule
3.30.03 will further provide that the Exchange shall only consider
waiver requests submitted by a TPH for individuals associated with the
TPH who are seeking registration in a representative or principal
registration category. Moreover, the Exchange shall consider waivers of
the SIE alone or the SIE and the applicable representative and
principal examination(s) for such individuals. The Exchange shall not
consider a waiver of the SIE for individuals who are not associated
persons or for associated persons who are not registering as
representatives or principals. The Exchange notes that proposed Rule
3.30.03 is substantively similar to FINRA and other exchanges'
rules.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ Pursuant to a Regulatory Services Agreement between FINRA
and the Exchange, FINRA provides the Exchange certain exam waiver
services in responding to exam waiver requests from TPHs.
\16\ See, e.g., FINRA Rule 1210.03, NYSE Arca Rule 2.1210.02 and
Nasdaq Rule 1210.03.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Requirements for Registered Persons Functioning as Principals for a
Limited Period (Proposed Rule 3.30.04)
The Exchange next proposes to adopt Rule 3.30.04, which governs the
requirements for registered persons who wish to function as a principal
for a limited period. Particularly, proposed Rule 3.30.04 provides that
a TPH may designate any person currently registered, or who becomes
registered, with the TPH as a representative to function as a principal
for a limited period, provided that such person has at least 18 months
of experience functioning as a registered representative with the five-
year period immediately preceding the designation. The proposed rule is
intended to ensure that representatives designated to function as
principals for the limited period under the proposal have an
appropriate level of registered representative experience. The proposed
rule clarifies that the requirements of the rule apply to designations
to any principal category, including those categories that are not
subject to a prerequisite representative-level registration
requirement, such as the Financial and Operations Principal
registration category.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ The Exchange notes that qualifying as a registered
representative is a prerequisite to qualifying as a principal except
with respect to the following principal-level registrations: (1)
Compliance Officer and (2) Financial and Operations Principal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed rule also clarifies that the individual must fulfill
all applicable prerequisite registration, fee and examination
requirements before his or her designation as a principal. Further, the
proposed rule provides that in no event may such person function as a
principal beyond the initial 120 calendar days without having
successfully passed an appropriate principal qualification examination.
The proposed rule also provides an exception to the experience
requirement for principals who are designated by a TPH to function in
other principal categories for a limited period. Specifically, the
proposed rule states
[[Page 20763]]
that a TPH may designate any person currently registered, or who
becomes registered, with the TPH as a principal to function in another
principal category for 120 calendar days before passing any applicable
examinations. The Exchange notes that proposed Rule 3.30.04 is
substantively similar to similar FINRA and other exchanges' rules.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ See, e.g., FINRA Rule 1210.04, NYSE Arca Rule 2.1210.03 and
Nasdaq Rule 1210.04.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rules of Conduct for Taking Examinations and Confidentiality of
Examinations (Proposed Rule 3.30.05)
Proposed Rule 3.30.05 provides that associated persons taking the
SIE would be subject to the SIE Rules of Conduct, and associated
persons taking a representative or principal examination would be
subject to the Rules of Conduct for representative and principal
examinations. Pursuant to proposed Rule 3.30.05, a violation of the SIE
Rules of Conduct or the Rules of Conduct for representative and
principal examinations by an associated person would be deemed to be a
violation of Exchange rules requiring just and equitable principles of
trade.\19\ Moreover, if an associated person is deemed to have violated
the SIE Rules of Conduct or the Rules of Conduct for representative and
principal examinations, the associated person may forfeit the results
of the examination and may be subject to disciplinary action by the
Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ See, e.g., Cboe Options Rule 8.1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Further, the proposed rule states that individuals taking the SIE
who are not associated persons must agree to be subject to the SIE
Rules of Conduct. Among other things, the SIE Rules of Conduct would
require individuals to attest that they are not qualified to engage in
the investment banking or securities business based on passing the SIE
and would prohibit individuals from cheating on the examination or
misrepresenting their qualifications to the public subsequent to
passing the SIE. Moreover, non-associated persons may forfeit their SIE
results and may be prohibited from retaking the SIE if the Exchange
determines that they cheated on the SIE or that they misrepresented
their qualifications to the public subsequent to passing the SIE.
The proposed rule further notes that the Exchange considers all
qualification examinations content to be highly confidential and that
the removal of examination content from an examination center,
reproduction, disclosure, receipt from or passing to any person, or use
for study purposes of any portion of such qualification examination or
any other use that would compromise the effectiveness of the
examinations and the use in any manner and at any time of the questions
or answers to the examinations is prohibited and would be deemed a
violation of Exchange rules requiring just and equitable principles of
trade.\20\ The Exchange notes that proposed Rule 3.30.05 is
substantively similar to similar FINRA and other exchanges' rules.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ See, e.g., Cboe Options Rule 8.1.
\21\ See, e.g., FINRA Rule 1210.05, NYSE Arca Rule 2.1210.04 and
Nasdaq Rule 1210.05.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Waiting Periods for Retaking a Failed Examination (Proposed Rule
3.30.06)
Proposed Rule 3.30.06 provides that any person who fails a
qualification examination may retake that examination after 30 calendar
days from the date of the person's last attempt to pass that
examination. The proposed rule further provides that if a person fails
an examination three or more times in succession within a two-year
period, he or she would be prohibited from retaking the examination
until a period of 180 calendar days from the date of the person's last
attempt to pass it. These waiting periods would apply to the SIE and
the representative- and principal-level examinations. The Exchange
notes that proposed Rule 3.30.06 is substantively similar to FINRA and
other exchanges' rules.\22\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ See, e.g., FINRA Rule 1210.06, NYSE Arca Rule 2.1210.05 and
Nasdaq Rule 1210.06. FINRA Rule 1210.06 requires individuals taking
the SIE who are not associated persons to agree to be subject to the
same waiting periods for retaking the SIE. The Exchange is not
including this language in proposed Rule 3.30.06, as the Exchange
will not apply its registration rules in any event to individuals
who are not associated persons of TPHs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
All Registered Persons Must Satisfy the Regulatory Element of
Continuing Education (Proposed Rule 3.30.07)
Pursuant to current Rule 3.33, the CE requirements applicable to
registered persons consist of a Regulatory Element and a Firm Element.
The Regulatory Element applies to registered persons and must be
completed within prescribed time frames. The Firm Element consists of
annual, TPH-developed and administered training programs designed to
keep covered registered persons current regarding securities products,
services and strategies offered by the TPH. For purposes of the Firm
Element, the term ``covered registered persons'' means any registered
Securities Trader and any registered person who has direct contact with
customers in the conduct of the TPH's securities sales, trading and
investment banking activities and to the immediate supervisors of such
persons.
The CE requirements are set forth in current Rule 3.33. The
Exchange believes that all registered persons, regardless of their
activities, should be subject to the Regulatory Element of the CE
requirements so that they can keep their knowledge of the securities
industry current. Therefore, the Exchange proposes to adopt Rule
3.30.07, to clarify that all registered persons, including those who
solely maintain a permissive registration, are required to satisfy the
Regulatory Element, as specified in current Rule 3.33. Individuals who
have passed the SIE but not a representative- or principal-level
examination and do not hold a registered position would not be subject
to any CE requirements.
Proposed Rule 3.30.07 also provides that a registered person of a
TPH who becomes CE inactive would not be permitted to be registered in
another registration category with the TPH or be registered in any
registration category with another TPH, until the person has satisfied
the Regulatory Element. The Exchange notes that proposed Rule 3.30.07
is substantively similar to FINRA and other exchanges' rules.\23\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ See, e.g., FINRA Rule 1210.07, NYSE Arca Rule 2.1210.06 and
Nasdaq Rule 1210.07.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lapse of Registration and Expiration of SIE (Proposed Rule 3.30.08)
Proposed Rule 3.30.08 provides that any person who was last
registered as a representative two or more years immediately preceding
the date of receipt by the Exchange of a new application for
registration as a representative is required to pass a qualification
examination for representatives appropriate to the category of
registration as specified in proposed Rule 3.31(b). Proposed Rule
3.30.08 also sets forth that a passing result on the SIE would be valid
for up to four years. Therefore, under the proposed rule change, an
individual who passes the SIE and is an associated person of a TPH at
the time would have up to four years from the date he or she passes the
SIE to pass a representative-level examination to register as a
representative with that TPH, or a subsequent TPH, without having to
retake the SIE. In addition, an individual who passes the SIE and is
not an associated person at the time would have up to four years from
the date he or she passes the SIE to become an associated person of TPH
and pass a representative-level examination and register as a
representative without having to retake the SIE.
[[Page 20764]]
Moreover, an individual holding a representative-level registration
who leaves the industry after the effective date of this proposed rule
change would have up to four years to re-associate with a TPH and
register as a representative without having to retake the SIE. However,
the four-year expiration period in the proposed rule change extends
only to the SIE, and not the representative- and principal-level
registrations. The representative- and principal-level registrations
would continue to be subject to a two-year expiration period as is the
case today.
Finally, proposed Rule 3.30.08 clarifies that, for purposes of the
proposed rule, an application would not be considered to have been
received by the Exchange if that application does not result in a
registration. The Exchange notes that proposed Rule 3.30.08 is
substantively similar to similar FINRA and other exchanges' rules.\24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\24\ See, e.g., FINRA Rule 1210.08, NYSE Arca Rule 2.1210.07 and
Nasdaq Rule 1210.08.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Waiver of Examinations for Individuals Working for a Financial Services
Industry Affiliate of a TPH (Proposed Rule 3.30.09)
The Exchange is proposing Rule 3.30.09 to provide a new process
whereby individuals who would be working for a ``financial services
industry affiliate of a TPH'' \25\ would terminate their registrations
with the TPH and would be granted a waiver of their requalification
requirements upon re-registering with an TPH, provided the firm that is
requesting the waiver and the individual satisfy the criteria for a
Financial Services Affiliate (``FSA'') waiver.\26\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\25\ Proposed Rule 3.30.09 defines a ``financial services
industry affiliate of a TPH'' as a legal entity that controls, is
controlled by or is under common control with TPH and is regulated
by the SEC, CFTC, state securities authorities, federal or state
banking authorities, state insurance authorities, or substantially
equivalent foreign regulatory authorities.
\26\ There is no counterpart to proposed Rule 3.30.09 in the
Exchange's existing rules. FINRA Rule 1210.09 was previously adopted
as a new waiver process for FINRA registrants, as part of the FINRA
Rule Changes. Other Exchanges have since adopted substantively
similar Rules. See, e.g., NYSE Arca Rule 2.1210.08 and Nasdaq Rule
1210.09.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under the proposed waiver process, the first time a registered
person is designated as eligible for a waiver based on the FSA
criteria, the TPH with which the individual is registered would notify
the Exchange of the FSA designation. The TPH would concurrently file a
full Form U5 terminating the individual's registration with the firm,
which would also terminate the individual's other self-regulatory
organization and state registrations. To be eligible for initial
designation as an FSA-eligible person by a TPH, an individual must have
been registered for a total of five years within the most recent 10-
year period prior to the designation, including for the most recent
year with that TPH. An individual would have to satisfy these
preconditions only for purposes of his or her initial designation as an
FSA-eligible person, and not for any subsequent FSA designation(s).
Thereafter, the individual would be eligible for a waiver for up to
seven years from the date of initial designation,\27\ provided that the
other conditions of the waiver, as described below, have been
satisfied. Consequently, a TPH other than the TPH that initially
designated an individual as an FSA-eligible person may request a waiver
for the individual and more than one TPH may request a waiver for the
individual during the seven-year period.\28\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\27\ Individuals would be eligible for a single, fixed seven-
year period from the date of initial designation, and the period
would not be tolled or renewed.
\28\ The following examples illustrate this point:
Example 1. TPH A designates an individual as an FSA-eligible
person by notifying the Exchange and files a Form U5. The individual
joins Firm A's financial services affiliate. TPH A does not submit a
waiver request for the individual. After working for TPH A's
financial services affiliate for three years, the individual
directly joins TPH B's financial services affiliate for three years.
TPH B then submits a waiver request to register the individual.
Example 2. Same as Example 1, but the individual directly joins
TPH B after working for TPH A's financial services affiliate, and
TPH B submits a waiver request to register the individual at that
point in time.
Example 3. TPH A designates an individual as an FSA-eligible
person by notifying the Exchange and files a Form U5. The individual
joins TPH A's financial services affiliate for three years. TPH A
then submits a waiver request to re-register the individual. After
working for TPH A in a registered capacity for six months, TPH A re-
designates the individual as an FSA-eligible person by notifying the
Exchange and files a Form U5. The individual rejoins TPH A's
financial services affiliate for two years, after which the
individual directly joins TPH B's financial services affiliate for
one year. TPH B then submits a waiver request to register the
individual.
Example 4. Same as Example 3, but the individual directly joins
TPH B after the second period of working for TPH A's financial
services affiliate, and TPH B submits a waiver request to register
the individual at that point in time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
An individual designated as an FSA-eligible person would be subject
to the Regulatory Element of CE while working for a financial services
industry affiliate of a TPH. The individual would be subject to a
Regulatory Element program that correlates to his or her most recent
registration category, and CE would be based on the same cycle had the
individual remained registered. If the individual fails to complete the
prescribed Regulatory Element during the 120-day window for taking the
session, he or she would lose FSA eligibility (i.e., the individual
would have the standard two-year period after termination to re-
register without having to retake an examination). The Exchange is
making corresponding changes to Rule 3.33, Continuing Education.
Upon registering an FSA-eligible person, a TPH would file a Form U4
and request the appropriate registration(s) for the individual. The TPH
would also submit an examination waiver request to the Exchange,\29\
similar to the process used today for waiver requests, and it would
represent that the individual is eligible for an FSA waiver based on
the conditions set forth below. The Exchange would review the waiver
request and make a determination of whether to grant the request within
30 calendar days of receiving the request. The Exchange would summarily
grant the request if the following conditions are met:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\29\ The Exchange would consider a waiver of the representative-
level qualification examination(s), the principal-level
qualification examination(s) and the SIE, as applicable.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(a) Prior to the individual's initial designation as an FSA-
eligible person, the individual was registered for a total of five
years within the most recent 10-year period, including for the most
recent year with the TPH that initially designated the individual as an
FSA-eligible person;
(b) The waiver request is made within seven years of the
individual's initial designation as an FSA-eligible person by a TPH;
(c) The initial designation and any subsequent designation(s) were
made concurrently with the filing of the individual's related Form U5;
(d) The individual continuously worked for the financial services
affiliate(s) of a TPH since the last Form U5 filing;
(e) The individual has complied with the Regulatory Element of CE;
and
(f) The individual does not have any pending or adverse regulatory
matters, or terminations, that are reportable on the Form U4, and has
not otherwise been subject to a statutory disqualification while the
individual was designated as an FSA-eligible person with a TPH.
Following the Form U5 filing, an individual could move between the
financial services affiliates of a TPH so long as the individual is
continuously working for an affiliate. Further, a TPH could submit
multiple waiver requests for the individual, provided that the
[[Page 20765]]
waiver requests are made during the course of the seven-year
period.\30\ An individual who has been designated as an FSA-eligible
person by a TPH would not be able to take additional examinations to
gain additional registrations while working for a financial services
affiliate of a TPH.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\30\ For example, if a TPH submits a waiver request for an FSA-
eligible person who has been working for a financial services
affiliate of the TPH for three years and re-registers the
individual, the TPH could subsequently file a Form U5 and re-
designate the individual as an FSA-eligible person. Moreover, if the
individual works with a financial services affiliate of the TPH for
another three years, the TPH could submit a second waiver request
and re-register the individual upon returning to the TPH.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status of Persons Serving in the Armed Forces of the United States
(Proposed Rule 3.30.10)
Proposed Rule 3.30.10 provides specific relief to registered
persons serving in the Armed Forces of the United States. Among other
things, the proposed rule permits a registered person of a TPH who
volunteers for or is called into active duty in the Armed Forces of the
United States to be registered in an inactive status and remain
eligible to receive ongoing transaction-related compensation. The
proposed rule also includes specific provisions regarding the deferment
of the lapse of registration requirements for formerly registered
persons serving in the Armed Forces of the United States. The proposed
rule further requires that the TPH with which such person is registered
promptly notify the Exchange of such person's return to employment with
the TPH. The proposed rule would require a TPH that is a sole
proprietor to also similarly notify the Exchange of his or her return
to participation in the investment banking or securities business. The
proposed rule also provides that the Exchange would defer the lapse of
the SIE for formerly registered persons serving in the Armed Forces of
the United States.
Impermissible Registrations (Proposed Rule 3.30.11)
Existing Rule 3.30 prohibits a TPH from maintaining a registration
with the Exchange for any person who is no longer active in the TPH's
investment banking or securities business, who is no longer functioning
in the registered capacity, or where the sole purpose is to avoid an
examination requirement. The Rule also prohibits a TPH from applying
for the registration of a person where the TPH does not intend to
employ the person in its investment banking or securities business.
These prohibitions do not apply to the current permissive registration
categories identified in Rule 3.30.\31\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\31\ Current Rule 3.30 allows for permissive principal
registration of individuals who perform legal, compliance, internal
audit, back-office operations, or similar duties for the TPH or a
person engaged in the investment banking or securities business of a
foreign securities affiliate or subsidiary of the TPH.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In light of proposed 3.30.02, Permissive Registrations, discussed
above the Exchange is proposing to not carry over this language to new
rule 3.30 and instead adopt Rule 3.30.11, which prohibits a TPH from
registering or maintaining the registration of a person unless the
registration is consistent with the requirements of proposed Rule 3.30.
The Exchange notes that proposed Rule 3.30.11 is substantively similar
FINRA and other exchanges' rules.\32\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\32\ See, e.g., FINRA Rule 1210.11 and Nasdaq Rule 1210.11.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Registration Categories (Proposed Rule 3.31)
The Exchange is proposing to adopt new and revised registration
category rules and related definitions in proposed Rule 3.31,
Registration Categories.\33\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\33\ For ease of reference, the Exchange proposes to adopt as
Rule 3.31, Interpretation and Policy .05, a Summary of Qualification
Requirements in chart form for each of the Exchange's permitted
registration categories discussed below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Definition of Principal (Proposed Rule 3.31(a)(1))
As set forth in proposed Rule 3.31(a)(1), for purposes of these
registration rules, the term ``principal'' means any person associated
with a TPH, including, but not limited to, sole proprietor, officer,
partner, director or other person occupying a similar status or
performing similar functions, actively engaged in the management of the
TPH's securities business, including supervision, solicitation, conduct
of the TPH's business, or the training of persons associated with a TPH
for any of these functions. Proposed Rule 3.31(a)(1) also clarifies
that a TPH's chief executive officer (``CEO'') and chief financial
officer (``CFO'') (or equivalent officers) are considered principals
based solely on their status. The proposed rule further clarifies that
the term ``principal'' includes any other associated person who is
performing functions or carrying out responsibilities that are required
to be performed or carried out by a principal under Exchange Rules.
In addition, the proposed Rule provides that the phrase ``actively
engaged in the management of the TPH's securities business'' includes
the management of, and the implementation of corporate policies related
to, such business as well as managerial decision-making authority with
respect to the TPH's securities business and management-level
responsibilities for supervising any aspect of such business, such as
serving as a voting member of the TPH's executive, management or
operations committees. The Exchange notes that proposed definition in
Rule 3.31(a)(1) is substantively similar to the definition of principal
in FINRA and other exchanges' rules.\34\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\34\ See, e.g., FINRA Rule 1220.(a)(1), NYSE Arca Rule
2.1220(a)(1) and Nasdaq Rule 1220(a)(1).The Exchange notes that its
definition of Principal does not include ``manager of office of
supervisory jurisdiction'' as FINRA, NYSE, and Nasdaq rules do
because it is not applicable on the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
General Securities Principal (Proposed Rule 3.31(a)(2))
Proposed Rule 3.31(a)(2)(A) states that each principal as defined
in paragraph (a)(1) (of Rule 3.31) is required to register with the
Exchange as a General Securities Principal, subject to the following
exceptions.\35\ The proposed rule provides that if a principal's
activities include the functions of a Compliance Officer, a Financial
and Operations Principal, a Securities Trader Principal, a Securities
Trader Compliance Officer, or a Registered Options Principal, then the
principal must appropriately register in one or more of these
categories.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\35\ Under the current Rules, the Exchange does not recognize
the General Securities Principal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed Rule 3.31(a)(2)(A) further provides that if a principal's
activities are limited solely to the functions of a General Securities
Sales Supervisor, then the principal may appropriately register in that
category in lieu of registering as a General Securities Principal,
provided that if the principal is engaged in options sales activities
he or she would be required to register as a General Securities Sales
Supervisor or as a Registered Options Principal.
Proposed Rule 3.31(a)(2)(B) requires that an individual registering
as a General Securities Principal satisfy the General Securities
Representative prerequisite registration and pass the General
Securities Principal qualification examination. Proposed Rule
3.31(a)(2)(B) also clarifies that an individual may register as a
General Securities Sales Supervisor and pass the General Securities
Sales Supervisor Module qualification examination in lieu of passing
the General Securities Principal examination.
The Exchange notes that proposed General Securities Principal
requirements and qualifications set forth in Rule 3.31(a)(2) are
similar to the
[[Page 20766]]
requirements and qualifications required by FINRA and other exchanges'
rules.\36\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\36\ See, e.g., FINRA Rule 1220(a)(2), NYSE Arca Rule
2.1220(a)(2) and Nasdaq Rule 1220(a)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Compliance Officer (Proposed Rule 3.31(a)(3))
Current Rule 3.30(c) provides that each TPH that registered as a
broker-dealer shall designated a CCO on Schedule A of Form BD and that
such individuals are required to register with the Exchange and pass
the appropriate heightened qualification examination(s). Current Rule
3.30.08 further provides that any individual that is a CCO (or performs
similar functions) for a TPH that engages in in proprietary trading,
market-making or effecting transactions on behalf of a broker-dealer is
required to register and qualify as a Securities Trader Compliance
Officer (CT) and pass the Series 14 examination or pass the General
Securities Principal or Securities Trader Principal qualification
examination.
Under the new registration rules, the Exchange proposes to adopt
Rule 3.31(a)(3) providing that each person designated as a Chief
Compliance Officer on Schedule A of Form BD shall be required to
register with the Exchange as a General Securities Principal, provided
that such person may instead register as a Compliance Officer if his or
her duties do not include supervision of trading. All individuals
registering as Compliance Officers would be required, prior to or
concurrent with such registration, to pass the Compliance Official
qualification examination. An individual designated as a Chief
Compliance Officer on Schedule A of Form BD of a TPH that is engaged in
limited securities business could also be registered in a principal
category under Rule 3.31(a) that corresponds to the limited scope of
the TPH's business.
The Exchange notes that the proposed Compliance Officer
requirements and qualifications set forth in Rule 3.31(a)(3) are
similar to the requirements and qualifications required by FINRA's and
other exchange's rules.\37\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\37\ See, e.g., FINRA Rule 1220(a)(3) and NYSE Arca Rule
2.1220(a)(3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Securities Trader Compliance Officer (Proposed Rule 3.31(a)(4))
Rule 3.31(a)(4) would provide that an individual designated as a
Chief Compliance Officer on Schedule A of Form BD may register and
qualify as a Securities Trader Compliance Officer if, with respect to
transactions in equity, preferred or convertible debt securities, or
options, such person is engaged in proprietary trading or Market
Making, the execution of transactions on an agency basis, or the direct
supervision of such activities other than a person associated with a
TPH whose trading activities are conducted principally on behalf of an
investment company that is registered with the SEC pursuant to the
Investment Company Act and that controls, is controlled by, or is under
common control with a TPH. Each individual registering as a Securities
Trader Compliance Officer would be required to first become registered
pursuant to paragraph (b)(4) as a Securities Trader, and to pass either
(i) the Compliance Official qualification exam or (ii) the General
Securities Principal qualification exam. The Exchange notes that the
proposed Securities Trader Compliance Officer requirements and
qualifications set forth in Rule 3.31(a)(4) are similar to the
requirements and qualifications required by other exchanges' rules.\38\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\38\ See, e.g., Nasdaq Rule 1220(a)(3)(D) and MIAX Options Rule
1220(b)(2)(iv). FINRA does not recognize the Securities Trader
Compliance Officer registration categories that the Exchange
proposes to recognize. However, FINRA Rule 1220(a)(3), like proposed
Rule 3.31(a)(3), offers an exception pursuant to which a Chief
Compliance Officer designated on Schedule A of Form BD may register
in a principal category that corresponds to the limited scope of the
member's business. Unlike Nasdaq and MIAX, the Exchange proposes to
accept the General Securities Principal exam in lieu of the
Compliance Official exam. The Exchange notes this is in line with
the qualification requirements for the Compliance Officer, as well
as the Exchange's current Securities Trader Compliance Officer
qualification requirements. See Rule 3.30.08(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Financial and Operations Principal (Proposed Rule 3.31(a)(5))
Existing Rule 3.30(b) provides that every TPH that is subject to
Exchange Act Rule 15c3-1 shall designate a Financial/Operations
Principal. It requires each person associated with a TPH who performs
such duties to be registered as a Financial/Operations Principal with
the Exchange and to pass the Series 27 examination.\39\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\39\ FINRA Rule 1220(a)(4) differs from proposed Rule 3.31(a)(5)
in that it includes an Introducing Broker-Dealer, Financial and
Operations Principal, and Market-Maker registration requirement.
Additionally, proposed Rule 3.31(a)(5) contains a requirement, which
the FINRA rule does not, that each person associated with a member
who performs the duties of a Financial and Operations Principal must
register as such with the Exchange. Additionally, the Exchange is
not adopting a Principal Financial Officer or Principal Operations
Officer requirement like FINRA Rule 1220(a)(4)(B), as it believes
the Financial and Operations Principal requirement is sufficient.
Finally, proposed Rule 3.31(a)(5)(B)(v) and (vi) contain minor
wording variations from the FINRA rule. Proposed Rule 3.31(a) is
substantively similar as Nasdaq Rule 1220(a)(7).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
It further provides that each Financial/Operations Principal
designated by a TPH shall be registered in that capacity with the
Exchange as prescribed by the Exchange, and that a Financial/Operations
Principal of a TPH may be a full-time employee, a part-time employee or
independent contractor of the TPH. The Exchange proposes to delete
Exchange 3.30(b) and adopt in its place Exchange Rule 3.31(a)(5). Under
the new rule, every TPH of the Exchange that is operating pursuant to
the provisions of Rules 15c3-1(a)(1)(ii), (a)(2)(i) or (a)(8) of the
Exchange Act, shall designate at least one Financial and Operations
Principal who shall be responsible for performing the duties described
in proposed Rule 3.31(a)(5)(A)(i)-(vii). In addition, each person
associated with a TPH who performs such duties shall be required to
register as a Financial and Operations Principal with the Exchange.
Proposed Exchange Rule 3.31(a)(5)(C) would require all individuals
registering as a Financial and Operations Principal to pass the
Financial and Operations Principal qualification examination before
such registration may become effective. The Exchange notes that
proposed Financial and Operations Principal requirements and
qualifications set forth in Rule 3.31(a)(5) are similar to the
requirements and qualifications required by other exchanges' rules.\40\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\40\ See, e.g., Nasdaq Rule 1220(a)(3)(D) and MIAX Options Rule
1220(b)(2)(iv). FINRA Rule 1220(a)(4) differs from proposed Exchange
Rule 3.31(a)(5) in that it includes an Introducing Broker-Dealer
Financial and Operations Principal registration requirement.
Further, as discussed above, the Exchange does not propose to adopt
a Principal Financial Officer or Principal Operations Officer
requirement similar to FINRA Rule 1220(a)(4)(B), as it believes the
Financial and Operations Principal requirement is sufficient.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Securities Trader Principal (Proposed Rule 3.31(a)(6))
Existing Rule 3.30.08 provides that an individual associated with a
TPH that: (i) Supervises or monitors proprietary trading, market-making
and/or brokerage activities for broker-dealers; (ii) supervises or
trains those engaged in proprietary trading, market-making and/or
effecting transactions on behalf of a broker-dealer, with respect to
those activities; and/or (iii) is an officer, partner or director of a
TPH or TPH organization is required to register and qualify as a
Securities Trader Principal (TP) and satisfy the prerequisite
registration and qualification requirements. The Rule further provides
that to qualify for registration as a Securities Trader Principal, such
person must pass the Series 24 (General Securities Principal)
qualification examination or the General Securities
[[Page 20767]]
Sales Supervisor Registration and General Securities Principal--Sales
Supervisor Module Registration (Series 9/10 and Series 23). A
Securities Trader Principal must also pass the Securities Trader
(Series 57) qualification examination.\41\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\41\ See Cboe Options Regulatory Circular RG15-180.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In place of Rule 3.30.08, the Exchange proposes to adopt Rule
3.31(a)(6), Securities Trader Principal. Proposed Rule 3.31(a)(6)
requires that a principal responsible for supervising the securities
trading activities specified in proposed Rule 3.31(b)(3), which
provides for registration in the representative-level ``Securities
Trader'' category, register as a Securities Trader Principal. The
proposed rule requires individuals registering as Securities Trader
Principals to be registered as Securities Traders and to pass the
General Securities Principal qualification examination. The Exchange
notes that proposed Rule 3.31(a)(6) is substantively similar to FINRA
and other exchanges' rules governing Securities Trader Principals.\42\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\42\ See e.g., FINRA Rule 1220(a)(7), NYSE Arca Rule
2.1220(a)(5) and Nasdaq Rule 1220(a)(7).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Registered Options Principal (Proposed Rules 3.31(a)(7))
Existing Rule 3.30(d) provides that associated persons of a TPH
that conducts a public customer business must also comply with the
registration requirements set forth in Chapter 3, which include the
Registered Options Principal. Rule 3.36 provides no TPH shall be
approved to transact options business with the public until those
persons associated with it who are designated as Options Principals
have been approved by and registered with the Exchange.\43\ Rule 3.36
also provides that persons engaged in the supervision of options sales
practices or a person to whom the designated general partner or
executive officer (pursuant to Rule 9.2) or another Registered Options
Principal delegates the authority to supervise options sales practices
shall be designated as Options Principals. Rule 3.36 provides that
individuals engaged in the supervision of options sales practices and
designated as Options Principals are required to qualify as an Options
Principal by passing the Registered Options Principals Examination
(Series 4) or the Sales Supervision Examination (Series 9/10). Rule
3.36(c) further provides that individuals who are delegated
responsibility pursuant to Rule 9.2 for reviewing the acceptance of
discretionary accounts, for approving exceptions to a TPH
organization's criteria or standards for uncovered options accounts,
and for approval of communications, shall be designated as Options
Principals and are required to qualify as an Options Principal by
passing the Registered Options Principal Examination (Series 4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\43\ The Exchange proposes to clarify in Rule 3.36 that the
designated Options Principal(s) must also meet the applicable
registration requirements in Chapter III.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange is proposing to delete Rule 3.30 and in its place
adopt Rule 3.31(a)(7), Registered Options Principal, which would
require under its Section (a)(7)(A) that each TPH that is engaged in
transactions in options with the public to have at least one Registered
Options Principal.\44\ In addition, each principal as defined in
paragraph (a)(1) of the Rule who is responsible for supervising a TPH's
options sales practices with the public would be required to register
with the Exchange as a Registered Options Principal, subject to the
following exception. If a principal's options activities are limited
solely to those activities that may be supervised by a General
Securities Sales Supervisor, then such person may register as a General
Securities Sales Supervisor pursuant to paragraph (a)(8) of the Rule in
lieu of registering as a Registered Options Principal. The proposed
rule requires individuals registering as Registered Options Principals
to be registered as General Securities Representatives and to pass the
Registered Options Principals qualification examination.\45\ The
Exchange notes that proposed Rule 3.31(a)(7) is substantively similar
to FINRA and other exchanges' rules regarding Registered Options
Principals.\46\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\44\ The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 3.36 to conform all
references to ``Options Principal'' with ``Registered Options
Principal''.
\45\ Current Rule 3.36(b) provides that individuals engaged in
the supervision of options sales practices and designated as Options
Principals are required to qualify as an Options Principal by
passing the Registered Options Principals Qualification Examination
(Series 4) or the Sales Supervisor Qualification Examination (Series
9/10), and is proposed to be deleted in view of proposed Rule
3.31(a)(7).
\46\ See, e.g., FINRA Rule 1220(a)(8), NYSE Arca Rule
2.1220(a)(7) and Nasdaq Rule 1220(a)(8).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
General Securities Sales Supervisor (Proposed Rule 3.31(a)(8))
Proposed Rule 3.31(a)(8) provides that a principal may register
with the Exchange as a General Securities Sales Supervisor if his or
her supervisory responsibilities in the investment banking or
securities business of a TPH are limited to the securities sales
activities of the TPH, including the approval of customer accounts,
training of sales and sales supervisory personnel and the maintenance
of records of original entry or ledger accounts of the TPH required to
be maintained in branch offices by Exchange Act record-keeping rules.
A person registering as a General Securities Sales Supervisor must
satisfy the General Securities Representative prerequisite registration
and pass the General Securities Sales Supervisor examinations.
Moreover, a General Securities Sales Supervisor is precluded from
performing any of the following activities: (1) Supervision of market-
making commitments; (2) supervision of the custody of firm or customer
funds or securities for purposes of Exchange Act Rule 15c3-3; or (3)
supervision of overall compliance with financial responsibility rules.
The Exchange notes that proposed Rule 3.31(a)(8) is substantively
similar to FINRA and other exchanges' rules governing General
Securities Sales Supervisors.\47\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\47\ See, e.g., FINRA Rule 1220(a)(10), NYSE Arca Rule
2.1220(a)(6) and Nasdaq Rule 1220(a)(10).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Definition of Representative (Proposed Rule 3.31(b)(1))
The Exchange proposes to adopt a definition for the term
``representative'' in proposed Exchange Rule 3.31(b)(1). Currently, the
Exchange's rules do not define the term ``representative,'' although
Rule 3.37(a) states that persons who perform duties for the TPH that
are customarily performed by sales representatives' solicitors, or
branch office managers shall be designated as Representatives.\48\
Proposed Rule 3.31(b)(1) will define a representative as any person
associated with an TPH, including assistant officers other than
principals, who is engaged in TPH's investment banking or securities
business, such as supervision, solicitation, conduct of business in
securities or the training of persons associated with a TPH for any of
these functions. The Exchange notes that proposed ``representative''
definition is substantively similar to the definition used by FINRA and
other exchange rules.\49\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\48\ The Exchange proposes to eliminate this language under Rule
3.37(a) in view of the proposed definition under Rule 3.31(b)(1).
\49\ See, e.g., FINRA Rule 1220(b)(1), NYSE Arca Rule
2.1220(b)(1) and Nasdaq Rule 1220(b)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
General Securities Representative (Proposed Rule 3.31(b)(2))
Under current Rule 3.37(d), a person accepting orders from non-TPH
customers (unless such customer is a broker-dealer registered with the
[[Page 20768]]
Commission) is required to register with the Exchange and to be
qualified by passing the General Securities Representatives Examination
(Series 7).
Proposed Rule 3.31(b)(2)(A) states that each representative as
defined in proposed Rule 3.31(b)(1) is required to register with the
Exchange as a General Securities Representative, subject to the
following exceptions. The proposed rule provides that if a
representative's activities include the function of a Securities
Trader, then the representative must appropriately register in that
category.
The proposed rule further provides that each person seeking to
register as a General Securities Representative shall, prior to or
concurrent with such registration, pass the SIE and the General
Securities Representative qualification examinations. The Exchange
notes that proposed Rule 3.31(b)(2) is substantively similar to FINRA
and other exchanges' rules governing General Securities
Representatives.\50\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\50\ See, e.g., FINRA Rule 1220(b)(2), NYSE Arca Rule
2.1220(b)(2) and Nasdaq Rule 1220(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Securities Trader (Proposed Rule 3.31(b)(3))
Pursuant to current Rule 3.30.08, associated persons must pass the
qualification examination for Securities Trader (the Series 57
examination) and SIE and register with the Exchange as a Securities
Trader if that person is engaged in proprietary trading, market-making
and/or effecting transactions on behalf of a broker-dealer.
The Exchange proposes to delete Rule 3.30 and with respect to the
Securities Trader requirement, replace it with proposed Rule
3.31(b)(3). Rule 3.31(b)(3) would require each representative as
defined in Rule 3.31(b)(1) to register with the Exchange as a
Securities Trader if, with respect to transactions in equity, preferred
or convertible debt securities, or options, such person is engaged in
proprietary trading or Market Making, the execution of transactions on
an agency basis, or the direct supervision of such activities other
than a person associated with a TPH whose trading activities are
conducted principally on behalf of an investment company that is
registered with the SEC pursuant to the Investment Company Act and that
controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with a TPH. Rule
3.31(b)(3) would continue to require individuals registering as
Securities Traders to pass the SIE as well as the Securities Trader
qualification exam.
Additionally, proposed Rule 3.31(b)(3)(A) would require each person
associated with a TPH who is: (i) Primarily responsible for the design,
development or significant modification of an algorithmic trading
strategy relating to equity, preferred or convertible debt securities
or options; or (ii) responsible for the day-to-day supervision or
direction of such activities to register with the Exchange as a
Securities Trader.\51\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\51\ This new registration requirement was recently added to the
FINRA Rulebook. The Exchange, like other Exchanges such as Nasdaq
(see Nasdaq Rule 1220(b)(4)(A)) has determined to add a parallel
requirement to its own rules, but also to add options and market
making to the scope of products and activities, respectively, within
the proposed rule's coverage. See SR-FINRA-2016-007, 81 FR 21914.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For purposes of this proposed new registration requirement an
``algorithmic trading strategy'' is an automated system that generates
or routes orders (or order-related messages) but does not include an
automated system that solely routes orders received in their entirety
to a market center. The proposed registration requirement applies to
orders and order related messages whether ultimately routed or sent to
be routed to an exchange or over the counter. An order router alone
would not constitute an algorithmic trading strategy. However, an order
router that performs any additional functions would be considered an
algorithmic trading strategy. An algorithm that solely generates
trading ideas or investment allocations--including an automated
investment service that constructs portfolio recommendations--but that
is not equipped to automatically generate orders and order-related
messages to effectuate such trading ideas into the market-- whether
independently or via a linked router--would not constitute an
algorithmic trading strategy.\52\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\52\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The associated persons covered by the expanded registration
requirement would be required to pass the requisite qualification
examination and be subject to the same continuing education
requirements that are applicable to individual Securities Traders. The
Exchange believes that potentially problematic conduct stemming from
algorithmic trading strategies--such as failure to check for order
accuracy, inappropriate levels of messaging traffic, and inadequate
risk management controls--could be reduced or prevented, in part,
through improved education regarding securities regulations for the
specified individuals involved in the algorithm design and development
process.
The proposal is intended to ensure the registration of one or more
associated persons that possesses knowledge of, and responsibility for,
both the design of the intended trading strategy and the technological
implementation of the strategy, sufficient to evaluate whether the
resulting product is designed to achieve regulatory compliance in
addition to business objectives. For example, a lead developer who
liaises with a head trader regarding the head trader's desired
algorithmic trading strategy and is primarily responsible for the
supervision of the development of the algorithm to meet such objectives
must be registered under the proposal as the associated person
primarily responsible for the development of the algorithmic trading
strategy and supervising or directing the team of developers.
Individuals under the lead developer's supervision would not be
required to register under the proposal if they are not primarily
responsible for the development of the algorithmic trading strategy or
are not responsible for the day-to-day supervision or direction of
others on the team. Under this scenario, the person on the business
side that is primarily responsible for the design of the algorithmic
trading strategy, as communicated to the lead developer, also would be
required to register. In the event of a significant modification to the
algorithm, TPHs, likewise, would be required to ensure that the
associated person primarily responsible for the significant
modification (or the associated person supervising or directing such
activity), is registered as a Securities Trader.
A TPH employing an algorithm is responsible for the algorithm's
activities whether the algorithm is designed or developed in house or
by a third-party. Thus, in all cases, robust supervisory procedures,
both before and after deployment of an algorithmic trading strategy,
are a key component in protecting against problematic behavior stemming
from algorithmic trading. In addition, associated persons responsible
for monitoring or reviewing the performance of an algorithmic trading
strategy must be registered, and a TPH's trading activity must always
be supervised by an appropriately registered person. Therefore, even
where a firm purchases an algorithm off-the-shelf and does not
significantly modify the algorithm, the associated person responsible
for monitoring or reviewing the performance of the algorithm would be
required to be registered.
The Exchange notes that proposed Rule 3.31(b)(3) is substantively
similar
[[Page 20769]]
to FINRA and other exchanges' rules governing Securities Traders.\53\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\53\ See, e.g., FINRA Rule 1220(b)(4), NYSE Arca Rule
2.1220(b)(3) and Nasdaq Rule 1220(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Foreign Registrations (Proposed Rule 3.31.01)
Current Rule 3.30.09 and Rule 3.37(e) provide that any person who
is in good standing as a representative with the Financial Conduct
Authority in the United Kingdom or with a Canadian stock exchange or
securities regulator shall be exempt from the requirement to pass the
SIE. The Exchange proposes to relocate the language contained in Rule
3.30.09 (which rule is being deleted) and Rule 3.37(e) to new Rule 3.31
Interpretation and Policy .01 as Rule 3.31 governs the SIE requirements
and as the relocation is consistent with the location of the provision
in the rules of other exchanges.\54\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\54\ See, e.g., FINRA Rule 1220.01, NYSE Arca Rule 2.1220.01 and
Nasdaq Rule 1220.01.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additional Qualification Requirements for Persons Engaged in Security
Futures Activities (Proposed Rule 3.31.02)
The Exchange is also proposing to adopt Rule 3.31.02, which
provides that each person who is registered with the Exchange as a
Registered Options Principal, General Securities Representative,
Options Representative, or General Securities Sales Supervisor shall be
eligible to engage in security futures activities as a principal
provided that such individual completes a Firm Element program as set
forth in proposed Rule 3.33 that addresses security futures products
before such person engages in security futures activities.\55\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\55\ Unlike FINRA Rule 1220.02, proposed Exchange Rule 3.31.02
omits references to United Kingdom Securities Representatives and
Canada Securities Representatives, which are registration categories
the Exchange does not recognize. In any event, the Exchange does not
currently offer security futures products for trading.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
TPHs With One Registered Options Principal (Proposed Rule 3.31.03)
The Exchange proposes to adopt new Rule 3.31 Interpretation and
Policy .03 which requires notification to the Exchange by a TPH that
has one Registered Options Principal in the event such person is
terminated, resigns, becomes incapacitated or is otherwise unable to
perform the duties of a Registered Options Principal, and imposes
certain restrictions on the TPH's options business in that event.\56\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\56\ See Proposed Rule 3.31.03. Proposed Rule 3.31.03 is similar
to corresponding FINRA Rule 1220.03, NYSE Arca Rule 2.1220.04 and
Nasdaq Rule 1220.03.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of General Securities Sales Supervisor Registration Category
(Proposed Rule 3.31.04)
Proposed Rule 3.31.04 explains the purpose of the General
Securities Sales Supervisor registration category. The General
Securities Sales Supervisor category is an alternate category of
registration designed to lessen the qualification burdens on principals
of general securities firms who supervise sales. Without this category
of limited registration, such principals would be required to
separately qualify pursuant to the rules of FINRA, the MSRB, and the
Cboe options exchanges. While persons may continue to separately
qualify with all relevant self-regulatory organizations, the General
Securities Sales Supervisor examination permits qualification as a
supervisor of sales of all securities through one registration
category. Persons registered as General Securities Sales Supervisors
may also qualify in any other category of principal registration.
Persons who are already qualified in one or more categories of
principal General Securities Sales Supervisors may supervise sales
activities of all securities by also qualifying as General Securities
Sales Supervisors. The proposed rule further provides that any person
required to be registered as a principal who supervises sales
activities in corporate, municipal and option securities, investment
company products, variable contracts, and security futures (subject to
the requirements of Rule 3.31.02) may be registered solely as a General
Securities Sales Supervisor. In addition to branch office managers,
other persons such as regional and national sales managers may also be
registered solely as General Securities Sales Supervisors as long as
they supervise only sales activities. Proposed Rule 3.31.04 is similar
to corresponding FINRA and other exchanges' rules.\57\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\57\ See, e.g., FINRA Rule 1220.04, NYSE Arca Rule 2.1220.03 and
Nasdaq Rule 1220.04.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary of Qualification Requirements (Proposed Rule 3.31.05)
Proposed Rule 3.31.05 provides a table summary of the categories of
registration and applicable qualifications and alternative
qualifications set forth throughout Rule 3.31.
Associated Persons Exempt From Registration (Proposed Rule 3.32)
Existing Rule 3.30(2) currently provides that the following persons
associated with a TPH are not required to register: (a) Individual
associated persons whose functions are solely and exclusively clerical
or ministerial; (b) individual TPHs and individual associated persons
who are not actively engaged in the securities business; (c) individual
TPHs and individual associated persons whose functions are related
solely and exclusively to the TPH's or TPH organization's need for
nominal corporate officers or for capital participation; (d) individual
associated persons that are restricted from accessing the Exchange
(physically and electronically) and that do not engage in the
securities business of the TPH or TPH organization relating to activity
that occurs on the Exchange; and (e) individual associated persons
whose functions are related solely and exclusively to: (i) Transactions
in commodities; (ii) transactions in security futures; and/or (iii)
effecting transactions on the floor of another national securities
exchange and who are registered as floor members with such exchange.
The Exchange is proposing to adopt Rule 3.30(2) as Rule 3.32
subject to certain changes. Rule 3.30 exempts from registration those
associated persons who are not actively engaged in the securities
business. It also exempts from registration those associated persons
whose functions are related solely and exclusively to a member's need
for nominal corporate officers or for capital participation.\58\ The
Exchange believes that the determination of whether an associated
person is required to register must be based on an analysis of the
person's activities and functions in the context of the various
registration categories. Proposed Rule 3.32 provides an exemption from
registration with the Exchange for certain associated persons.
Specifically, the proposed rule provides that persons associated with a
TPH whose functions are solely and exclusively clerical or ministerial
would be exempt from registration.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\58\ These exemptions generally apply to associated persons who
are corporate officers of a TPH in name only to meet specific
corporate legal obligations or who only provide capital for a member
but have no other role in a TPH's business.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
FINRA Rule 1230 provides an exemption from registration with FINRA
to persons associated with a FINRA member whose functions are solely
and exclusively clerical or ministerial and persons associated with a
FINRA member whose functions are related solely and exclusively to (i)
effecting transactions on the floor of a national securities exchange
and who are appropriately registered with such exchange; (ii) effecting
transactions in municipal securities; (iii) effecting transactions in
commodities; or (iv)
[[Page 20770]]
effecting transactions in security futures, provided that any such
person is registered with a registered futures association. TPHs do not
solely and exclusively engage in any of the foregoing transactions and
therefore the Exchange is not adopting that portion of FINRA Rule 1230.
Proposed Rule 3.32 is similar to other exchanges' corresponding
rules.\59\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\59\ See, e.g., NYSE Arca Rule 2.1230.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange proposes to adopt Rule 3.32.01 to clarify that the
function of accepting customer orders is not considered a clerical or
ministerial function and that associated persons who accept customer
orders under any circumstances are required to be appropriately
registered. However, the proposed rule provides that an associated
person is not accepting a customer order where occasionally, when an
appropriately registered person is unavailable, the associated person
transcribes the order details and the registered person contacts the
customer to confirm the order details before entering the order.
Changes to Continuing Education Requirements (Proposed Rule 3.33)
Existing Rule 3.33 (Continuing Education for Registered Persons),
includes a Regulatory Element and a Firm Element. The Regulatory
Element applies to registered persons and consists of periodic
computer-based training on regulatory, compliance, ethical, supervisory
subjects and sales practice standards. The Firm Element consists of at
least annual, TPH-developed and administered training programs designed
to keep covered registered persons current regarding securities
products, services and strategies offered by the TPH.
Regulatory Element
The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 3.33(a) to provide, consistent
with proposed Rule 3.30.09, that a waiver-eligible person would be
subject to a Regulatory Element program that correlates to his or her
most recent registration category, and that the content of the
Regulatory Element would be based on the same cycle had the individual
remain registered. The proposed rule change is similar to FINRA's and
other exchanges' rules.\60\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\60\ See, e.g., FINRA Rule 1240(a)(1), NYSE ARCA Rules
2.23(d)(1) and 2.24(d)(1), and Nasdaq Rule 1240(a)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Further, the Exchange proposes to amend Rule 3.33(a)(1) to provide
that any person whose registration has been deemed inactive under the
rule may not accept or solicit business or receive any compensation for
the purchase or sale of securities. The proposed amendment provides,
however, that such person may receive trail or residual commissions
resulting from transactions completed before the inactive status,
unless the TPH with which the person is associated has a policy
prohibiting such trail or residual commissions. The proposed amendment
to Rule 3.33(a)(1) also provides that if a waiver-eligible person fails
to complete the Regulatory Element during the prescribed time frames,
he or she would lose waiver eligibility.\61\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\61\ See FINRA Rule 1240(a)(2), NYSE ARCA Rules 2.23(d)(1) and
2.24(d)(1), and Nasdaq Rule 1240(a)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 3.33(a)(2) to provide that
unless otherwise determined by the Exchange, a registered person other
than a person designated as eligible for a waiver pursuant to Rule
3.30.09 will be required to re-take the Regulatory Element and satisfy
all of its requirements under certain circumstances.\62\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\62\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lastly, the Exchange proposes to amend Rule 3.33(a)(3) to provide
that the Exchange offers Regulatory Elements for Exchange registered
persons: the S201 for registered principals and supervisors, the S106
for persons registered only as Investment Company and Variable
Contracts Representatives, and the S101 for all other registered
persons.\63\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\63\ See NYSE Arca Rule 2.23(d)(1)(A).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Firm Element
The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 3.33(c)(1) to provide that any
registered person or any or any associated person who has direct
contact with customers in the conduct of the TPH's or TPH
organization's securities sales, trading or investment banking
activities, and to the immediate supervisors of such persons, is
subject to the Firm Element.\64\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\64\ See FINRA Rule 1240(b)(1), NYSE Arca Rule 2.23(d)(2)(A) and
Nasdaq Rule 1240(b)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that training in ethics and professional
responsibility should apply to all registered persons. Therefore,
proposed Rule 3.33(c)(2)(ii), which provides that the Firm Element
training programs must cover applicable regulatory requirements, would
also require that a firm's training program cover training in ethics
and professional responsibility. The proposed change to the Firm
Element section of proposed Rule 3.33 is similar to changes made by
other exchanges. \65\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\65\ See FINRA Rule 1240(b)(2)(B), NYSE Arca Rules
2.23(d)(2)(B)(ii) and 2.24(d)(2)(B) and Nasdaq Rule 1240(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Electronic Filing Rules (Proposed Rule 3.34)
The Exchange is proposing to adopt new Rule 3.34, Electronic Filing
Requirements for Uniform Forms, which, among other things, will
consolidate various Web CRD Form U4 and U5 electronic filing
requirements in a single location and also would impose certain new
requirements. More specifically, current Rule 3.30, Interpretations and
Polices .01--.03, state that each individual required to register shall
electronically file a Uniform Application for Securities Industry
Registration (``Form U4'') through the Central Registration Depository
system (``Web CRD'') operated by FINRA and to electronically submit to
Web CRD any required amendments to Form U4. Further, any TPH or TPH
organization that discharges or terminates the employment or retention
of an individual required to register must comply with certain
termination filing requirements, which include the filing of a Form U5.
Form U4 and Form U5 electronic filing requirements applicable to
options principals and representatives, as well a Form U5 requirement
applicable to members upon termination of employment of any of their
registered persons, are found in Exchange Rules 3.36 and 3.37. The
Exchange proposes to delete current Exchange Rule 3.30, Interpretations
and Polices .01-.03, and the electronic filing requirements of Exchange
Rules 3.36 \66\ and 3.37 \67\, and to replace them with proposed Rule
3.34, Electronic Filing Requirements for Uniform Forms, which will
consolidate Form U4 and Form U5 electronic filing requirements into a
single rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\66\ See current Rule 3.36(a).
\67\ See current Rule 3.37(a), (b) and (c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
First, proposed Rule 3.34(a) would provide that all forms required
to be filed under the Exchange's registration rules shall be filed
through an electronic process or such other process as the Exchange may
prescribe to Web CRD.
Under Rule 3.34(b), TPHs would be required to designate registered
principal(s) or corporate officer(s) who are responsible for
supervising a firm's electronic filings. The registered principal(s) or
corporate officer(s) who has or have the responsibility to review and
approve the forms filed pursuant to the rule would be required to
[[Page 20771]]
acknowledge, electronically, that he or she is filing this information
on behalf of the member and the member's associated persons. Under Rule
3.34.01, the registered principal(s) or corporate officer(s) could
delegate filing responsibilities to an associated person (who need not
be registered) but could not delegate any of the supervision, review,
and approval responsibilities mandated in Rule 3.34(b). The registered
principal(s) or corporate officer(s) would be required to take
reasonable and appropriate action to ensure that all delegated
electronic filing functions were properly executed and supervised.
Under Rule 3.34(c)(1), initial and transfer electronic Form U4
filings and any amendments to the disclosure information on Form U4
must be based on a manually signed Form U4 provided to the TPH or
applicant for membership by the person on whose behalf the Form U4 is
being filed. As part of the TPH's recordkeeping requirements, it would
be required to retain the person's manually signed Form U4 or
amendments to the disclosure information on Form U4 in accordance with
Rule 17a4(e)(1) under the Act and make them available promptly upon
regulatory request. An applicant for membership must also retain every
manually signed Form U4 it receives during the application process and
make them available promptly upon regulatory request. Rule 3.34(c)(2)
and Interpretation and Policy .03 and 04 provide for the electronic
filing of Form U4 amendments without the individual's manual signature,
subject to certain safeguards and procedures.
Rule 3.34(d) provides that upon filing an electronic Form U4 on
behalf of a person applying for registration, a TPH must promptly
submit fingerprint information for that person and that the Exchange
may make a registration effective pending receipt of the fingerprint
information. It further provides that if a TPH fails to submit the
fingerprint information within 30 days after filing of an electronic
Form U4, the person's registration will be deemed inactive, requiring
the person to immediately cease all activities requiring registration
or performing any duties and functioning in any capacity requiring
registration. Under the rule the Exchange must administratively
terminate a registration that is inactive for a period of two years. A
person whose registration is administratively terminated could
reactivate the registration only by reapplying for registration and
meeting the qualification requirements of the applicable provisions of
proposed Exchange Rule 3.31. Upon application and a showing of good
cause, the Exchange could extend the 30-day period.
Rule 3.34(e) would require initial filings and amendments of Form
U5 to be submitted electronically. As part of the TPH's recordkeeping
requirements, it would be required to retain such records for a period
of not less than three years, the first two years in an easily
accessible place, in accordance with Rule 17a-4 under the Act, and to
make such records available promptly upon regulatory request.
Finally, proposed Rule 3.34.02 would provide a TPH could enter into
an agreement with a third party pursuant to which the third party
agrees to file the required forms electronically on behalf of the TPH
and the TPH's associated persons. Notwithstanding the existence of such
an agreement, the TPH would remain responsible for complying with the
requirements of the Rule.
Implementation Date
The Exchange proposes to announce the implementation date of the
proposed rule change in an Exchange Notice, to be published no later
than thirty (30) days following the operative date. The implementation
date will be no later than sixty (60) days following the operative
date, with the exception of the new registration requirement for
developers of algorithmic trading strategies which would become
effective 180 days following the implementation date.\68\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\68\ The Exchange believes it is appropriate to provide TPHs
more lead time for implementation of the requirement for developers
of algorithmic trading to become Securities Trader, as such
requirement may trigger new testing requirements for individuals who
otherwise weren't required to register prior to this rule change.
The proposed implementation period is also consistent with the
amount of time provided for compliance by other exchanges that have
adopted the proposed requirement. See, e.g., Exchange Act Release
No. 84386 (October 9, 2018), 83 FR 51988 (October 15, 2018) (SR-
NASDAQ-2018-078).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to the
Exchange and, in particular, the requirements of Section 6(b) of the
Act.\69\ Specifically, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change
is consistent with the Section 6(b)(5) \70\ requirements that the rules
of an exchange be designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts
and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to
foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating,
clearing, settling, processing information with respect to, and
facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market
system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
Additionally, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is
consistent with the Section 6(b)(5) \71\ requirement that the rules of
an exchange not be designed to permit unfair discrimination between
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\69\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\70\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
\71\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change will
streamline, and bring consistency and uniformity to, the registration
rules, which will, in turn, assist TPHs and their associated persons in
complying with these rules and improve regulatory efficiency. The
proposed rule change will also improve the efficiency of the
examination program, without compromising the qualification standards,
by eliminating duplicative testing of general securities knowledge on
examinations and by removing examinations that currently have limited
utility. In addition, the proposed rule change will expand the scope of
permissive registrations, which, among other things, will allow TPHs to
develop a depth of associated persons with registrations to respond to
unanticipated personnel changes and will encourage greater regulatory
understanding. Further, the proposed rule change will provide a more
streamlined and effective waiver process for individuals working for a
financial services industry affiliate of a TPH, and it will require
such individuals to maintain specified levels of competence and
knowledge while working in areas ancillary to the securities business.
The proposed rule change will improve the supervisory structure of
firms by imposing an experience requirement for representatives that
are designated by firms to function as principals for a 120-day period
before having to pass an appropriate principal qualification
examination. The proposed rule change will also prohibit unregistered
persons from accepting customer orders under any circumstances, which
will enhance investor protection.
The extension of the Securities Trader registration requirement to
developers of algorithmic trading strategies requires associated
persons primarily responsible for the design, development or
significant modification of an algorithmic trading strategy or
responsible for the day-to-day supervision or direction of such
[[Page 20772]]
activities to register and meet a minimum standard of knowledge
regarding the securities rules and regulations applicable to the TPH
employing the algorithmic trading strategy. This minimum standard of
knowledge is identical to the standard of knowledge currently
applicable to traditional securities traders. The Exchange believes
that improved education of firm personnel may reduce the potential for
problematic market conduct and manipulative trading activity.
Finally, the proposed rule change makes organizational changes to
the Exchange's registration and qualification rules to align them with
registration and qualification rules of other exchanges as discussed
above, in order to prevent unnecessary regulatory burdens and to
promote efficient administration of the rules. The change also makes
minor updates and corrections to the Exchange's rules which improve
readability.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The Exchange believes that
the proposed rule changes which are, in all material respects, based
upon and substantially similar to, recent rule changes adopted by FINRA
and/or other national securities exchanges, will reduce the regulatory
burden placed on market participants engaged in trading activities
across different markets. The Exchange believes that the harmonization
of these registration requirements across the various markets will
reduce burdens on competition by removing impediments to participation
in the national market system and promoting competition among
participants across the multiple national securities exchanges.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor received written comments on the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not:
A. Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest;
B. impose any significant burden on competition; and
C. become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was
filed, or such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has
become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \72\ and
Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \73\ thereunder. At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission
that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest,
for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission will institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed
rule change should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\72\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\73\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-CBOE-2021-022 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2021-022. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2021-022 and should be submitted on
or before May 12, 2021.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\74\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\74\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-08147 Filed 4-20-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P