Implementing Rules for the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement Implementation Act, 18183-18185 [2021-07181]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 66 / Thursday, April 8, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with
14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your
principal inspector or responsible Flight
Standards Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the Large Aircraft
Section, International Validation Branch,
send it to the attention of the person
identified in paragraph (j) of this AD.
Information may be emailed to: 9-AVS-AIR730-AMOC@faa.gov. Before using any
approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal
inspector, the manager of the responsible
Flight Standards Office.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any
requirement in this AD to obtain instructions
from a manufacturer, the instructions must
be accomplished using a method approved
by the Manager, Large Aircraft Section,
International Validation Branch, FAA; or
EASA; or Airbus SAS’s EASA Design
Organization Approval (DOA). If approved by
the DOA, the approval must include the
DOA-authorized signature.
(3) Required for Compliance (RC): Except
as required by paragraph (i)(2) of this AD, if
any service information contains procedures
or tests that are identified as RC, those
procedures and tests must be done to comply
with this AD; any procedures or tests that are
not identified as RC are recommended. Those
procedures and tests that are not identified
as RC may be deviated from using accepted
methods in accordance with the operator’s
maintenance or inspection program without
obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided
the procedures and tests identified as RC can
be done and the airplane can be put back in
an airworthy condition. Any substitutions or
changes to procedures or tests identified as
RC require approval of an AMOC.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
(j) Related Information
For more information about this AD,
contact Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace
Engineer, Large Aircraft Section,
International Validation Branch, FAA, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198;
telephone and fax 206–231–3229; email
Vladimir.Ulyanov@faa.gov.
(k) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
(IBR) of the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51.
(2) You must use this service information
as applicable to do the actions required by
this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
(i) European Union Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA) AD 2021–0071, dated March 12,
2021.
(ii) [Reserved]
(3) For EASA AD 2021–0071, contact
EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668
Cologne, Germany; telephone +49 221 8999
000; email ADs@easa.europa.eu; internet
www.easa.europa.eu. You may find this
EASA AD on the EASA website at https://
ad.easa.europa.eu.
(4) You may view this material at the FAA,
Airworthiness Products Section, Operational
Safety Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des
Moines, WA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:14 Apr 07, 2021
Jkt 253001
206–231–3195. This material may be found
in the AD docket at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for and
locating Docket No. FAA–2021–0266.
(5) You may view this material that is
incorporated by reference at the National
Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability
of this material at NARA, email fedreg.legal@
nara.gov, or go to https://www.archives.gov/
federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
Issued on April 1, 2021.
Lance T. Gant,
Director, Compliance & Airworthiness
Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2021–07288 Filed 4–6–21; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
19 CFR Part 208
Implementing Rules for the United
States-Mexico-Canada Agreement
Implementation Act
United States International
Trade Commission.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The United States
International Trade Commission
(Commission) is adopting as a final rule
the interim rule published on July 10,
2020, with one amendment. The rule
concerns the practices and procedures
for investigations of United StatesMexico cross-border long-haul trucking
services (cross-border long-haul
trucking services) provided for in the
United States-Mexico-Canada
Agreement (USMCA) Implementation
Act (the Act).
DATES: Effective May 10, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa
R. Barton, Secretary to the Commission,
United States International Trade
Commission, telephone (202) 205–2000,
or William Gearhart, Office of the
General Counsel, United States
International Trade Commission,
telephone (202) 205–3091. Hearingimpaired individuals may obtain
information on this matter by contacting
the Commission’s TDD terminal at 202–
205–1810. General information
concerning the Commission may also be
obtained by accessing its website at
https://www.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
preamble below is designed to assist
readers in understanding the final rule.
This preamble provides background
information and a regulatory analysis of
the rule.
The final rule and amendment are
being promulgated in accordance with
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
18183
the Administrative Procedure Act (5
U.S.C. 553) (APA), and will be codified
in 19 CFR part 208.
Background
Section 335 of the Tariff Act of 1930
(19 U.S.C. 1335) (Tariff Act) authorizes
the Commission to adopt such
reasonable procedures, rules, and
regulations as it deems necessary to
carry out its functions and duties. In
addition, sections 103(b), 322(f), and
324(e) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 4513(b),
4572(f), and 4574(e), respectively)
authorize the Commission to prescribe
implementing regulations necessary or
appropriate to carry out actions required
or authorized by the Act.
The Commission is adopting as a final
rule, with one clarifying change, the
interim rule published in the Federal
Register on July 10, 2020 (85 FR 41355),
that governs rules of procedure for
investigations of cross-border long-haul
trucking services provided for in
Subtitle C of Title III of the Act. Section
322 of the Act requires that the
Commission undertake an investigation,
upon filing of a petition or request, and
make a determination as to whether a
grant of authority has caused material
harm or threatens material harm to U.S.
suppliers of cross-border long-haul
trucking services, and if affirmative, to
recommend a remedy to the President.
Additionally, Section 324 of the Act
requires that the Commission, at the
request of the President or an interested
party, undertake an investigation and
make a determination as to whether an
extension of relief granted by the
President is necessary to prevent or
remedy material harm. The Act specifies
certain procedures for such
investigations, including who may file a
petition or request such investigations,
the holding of hearings and publication
of notices regarding investigations, the
timelines for such investigations and
determinations, and the issuance of
reports that include the determination,
an explanation thereof, and any
recommendation for relief.
The one minor change to the interim
rule is to § 208.5(e)(1)(vi), which
describes additional information and
data to be provided in a petition for an
investigation of long-haul cross-border
trucking services. Paragraph (e)(1)(vi) of
this section in the interim rule required
that such petitions include ‘‘pricing
information,’’ and the Commission now
amends this to ‘‘freight rates’’ to clarify
the type of pricing information
necessary in petitions. The Commission
makes no other amendments to the
interim rule that it now adopts as final.
In its document announcing the
interim rule at part 208 of the
E:\FR\FM\08APR1.SGM
08APR1
18184
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 66 / Thursday, April 8, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Commission’s regulations, the
Commission invited members of the
public to file written comments on the
rule no later than 30 days after the day
of publication; in this case, by August
10, 2020. The Commission received two
sets of written comments from
interested parties: One filed jointly by
the Owner-Operator Independent
Drivers Association and the
International Brotherhood of Teamsters
(OOIDA/Teamsters), and one filed by
the Government of Mexico (Mexico).
The Commission has carefully
considered all comments that it
received, and it provides responses to
these comments in an analysis provided
below. The Commission appreciates the
time and effort of the commentators in
preparing their submissions.
Procedure for Adopting the
Amendment
The Commission ordinarily
promulgates amendments to the Code of
Federal Regulations in accordance with
the notice-and-comment rulemaking
procedure in section 553 of the APA (5
U.S.C. 553). That procedure entails
publication of proposed rulemaking in
the Federal Register that solicits public
comments on the proposed
amendments, consideration by the
Commission of public comments on the
contents of the amendments, and
publication of the final amendments at
least 30 days prior to their effective
date.
In this instance, however, the
Commission is amending its interim
rule at 19 CFR part 208 on a final basis,
effective 30 days after publication of
this document. The Commission’s
authority to adopt final amendments
without following all steps listed in
section 553 of the APA is derived from
section 335 of the Tariff Act (19 U.S.C.
1335), sections 103(b) and 322(f) of the
Act (19 U.S.C. 4513(b) and 4572(f)), and
section 553 of the APA (5 U.S.C. 553).
Section 553(b) of the APA allows an
agency to dispense with publication of
a notice of proposed rulemaking when
the following circumstances exist: (1)
The rules in question are interpretive
rules, general statements of policy, or
rules of agency organization, procedure
or practice; or (2) the agency for good
cause finds that notice and public
comment on the rules are impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest, and the agency incorporates
that finding and the reasons therefor
into the rules adopted by the agency.
In this instance, the Commission has
determined that the requisite
circumstances exist for dispensing with
the notice and comment procedure that
ordinarily precedes the amendment of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:14 Apr 07, 2021
Jkt 253001
Commission rules. For purposes of
invoking the section 553(b)(3)(A)
exemption from publishing a notice of
proposed rulemaking that solicits public
comment, the Commission finds that the
amendment to part 208 is a technical
clarification of an agency rule of
procedure and practice. Moreover, the
Commission finds under section
553(b)(3)(B) that prior notice and
opportunity for comment are
unnecessary. The amendment clarifies
an aspect of the interim rule, the type
of pricing data to be provided in
petitions on long-haul cross-border
trucking services, but it does not
substantively alter those procedures
already provided for in the interim rule.
Given the lack of any substantive
change and that parties have already
been provided an opportunity to
comment on the interim rule, we find
that public comment on the amendment
is unnecessary.
Regulatory Analysis of Proposed
Amendments to the Commission’s Rules
The Commission has determined that
this final rule and amendment do not
meet the criteria described in section
3(f) of Executive Order 12866 (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993) and thus do not
constitute a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ for purposes of the Executive
order.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.) is inapplicable to this
rulemaking because it is not one for
which a notice of proposed rulemaking
is required under 5 U.S.C. 553(b) or any
other statute.
The final rule and amendment do not
contain federalism implications
warranting the preparation of a
federalism summary impact statement
pursuant to Executive Order 13132 (64
FR 43255, Aug. 4, 1999).
No actions are necessary under title II
of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995, Public Law 104–4 (2 U.S.C.
1531–1538) because the final rule and
amendment will not result in the
expenditure by state, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100,000,000 or more
in any one year (adjusted annually for
inflation), and will not significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as
defined in 5 U.S.C. 601(5).
This final rule and amendment are
not ‘‘major rules’’ as defined by section
251 of the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (5
U.S.C. 801 et seq.). Moreover, they are
exempt from the reporting requirements
of that Act because they contain rules of
agency organization, procedure, or
practice that do not substantially affect
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
the rights or obligations of non-agency
parties.
Overview of the Amendment to the
Regulations
The final regulation contains one
change from the interim rule. The
Commission has determined to amend
§ 208.5(e)(1)(vi), which describes
additional information to be provided in
a petition for long-haul cross-border
trucking services. The interim rule
required that a petition include ‘‘pricing
information’’ on long-haul cross-border
trucking services. After further
consideration, the Commission has
determined to change this language to
‘‘freight rates’’ so as to specify the
precise pricing information relevant to
long-haul cross-border trucking services.
Section-by-Section Explanation of the
Amendment, Comments Received, and
Commission Response
Part 208—Investigations of United
States-Mexico Cross-Border Long-Haul
Trucking Services
Subpart B—Investigations Relating to
Material Harm or Threat of Material
Harm
Section 208.5
Section 208.5 lists the information
required in a petition for cross-border
long-haul trucking services. The
Commission amends § 208.5(e)(1)(vi) to
clarify that freight rates are the type of
pricing information to be included in
petitions.
Comments
In their comments, OOIDA/Teamsters
encouraged the Commission to adopt its
interim rule as a final rule. They noted
that their constituent members are
concerned by the potential economic
and safety impact of Mexican-domiciled
carriers operating in the United States,
and they expressed the view that
investigations by the Commission will
provide useful information as well as
possible remedies for such harmful
effects. OOIDA/Teamsters further noted
that allowing a sub-market to be defined
in a variety of ways is necessary given
the large and diverse nature of the U.S.
trucking industry and the difficulty for
its members in obtaining all relevant
information for the entirety of the
industry. OOIDA/Teamsters also agreed
with the Commission’s decision to
dispense with notice-and-comment
procedures in adopting the interim rules
given the expediency necessary to
implement procedures for investigations
of cross-border long-haul trucking
services.
In its comments, Mexico expressed its
belief that certain provisions of the
E:\FR\FM\08APR1.SGM
08APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 66 / Thursday, April 8, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
interim rule are inconsistent with the
United States’ obligations under the
USMCA. Specifically, Mexico argued
that the definition of ‘‘material harm’’ at
§ 208.2(j) of the interim rule is
inconsistent with the USMCA in two
respects. First, Mexico expressed its
view that this definition differs from
that provided in USMCA, Annex II,
footnote 1 by adding a provision for a
significant loss of market share for a
‘‘relevant sub-market.’’ Second, Mexico
objected to the interim rule’s definition
of injury to the relevant U.S. industry as
being to ‘‘cross-border long-haul
trucking services’’ rather than merely
‘‘long-haul trucking services.’’ In both
instances, Mexico believes that these
differences lower the threshold for
material injury in a manner inconsistent
with the USMCA.
Commission Response
The Commission has considered the
comments of OOIDA/Teamsters that
support the interim rules as published,
and that OOIDA/Teamsters do not seek
or request amendments to the interim
rules.
Addressing Mexico’s comments, the
Commission notes that Mexico’s
objections are directed at language that
mirrors the USMCA’s implementing
statute. While Mexico alleges that the
interim rule’s definition for material
harm is inconsistent with the USMCA,
the interim rule implements provisions
of the Act rather than the USMCA, and
the Commission adopts its definition of
material harm directly from the Act.
Section 321(9) of the Act defines
material harm as ‘‘a significant loss in
the share of the United States market or
relevant sub-market for cross-border
long-haul trucking services held by
persons of the United States,’’ which is
identical to the definition at § 208.2(j) of
the interim rule. Similarly, section
321(5) of the Act also defines the
relevant U.S. industry as ‘‘cross-border
long-haul trucking services.’’ Because
these definitions track and are
consistent with the Act, we adopt the
definition of material harm from the
interim rule as a final rule without
change.
List of Subjects in 19 CFR Part 208
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Administrative practice and
procedure, Trade agreements.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the United States
International Trade Commission adopts
as final rule the interim rule adding 19
CFR part 208 that was published at 85
FR 41355, on July 10, 2020, with the
following change:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:14 Apr 07, 2021
Jkt 253001
PART 208—INVESTIGATIONS OF
UNITED STATES-MEXICO CROSSBORDER LONG-HAUL TRUCKING
SERVICES
1. The authority citation for part 208
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 19 U.S.C. 4574(e).
2. Amend § 208.5 by revising
paragraph (e)(i)(vi) to read as follows:
■
§ 208.5
Contents of petition.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) * * *
(1) * * *
(vi) Any other relevant information,
including freight rates and any evidence
of cross-border long-haul trucking
services lost to persons of Mexico in the
market as a whole or claimed specific
sub-market.
*
*
*
*
*
By order of the Commission.
Issued: April 2, 2021.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2021–07181 Filed 4–7–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 258
[EPA–RCRA–2021–0127; FRL–10021–26–
Region 9]
Research, Development and
Demonstration (RD&D) Rule for the
Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian
Community Landfill RD&D Project
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
(EPA) is taking direct final action to
approve revisions to the site-specific
Research, Development and
Demonstration rule for the Salt River
Pima-Maricopa Indian Community
(SRPMIC), Salt River Landfill Research,
Development, and Demonstration
Project in order to increase the
maximum term for the site-specific rule
from 12 to 21 years. EPA is also revising
the site-specific rule to reflect a change
in the division title for U.S. EPA Region
9, from the Waste Management Division
to the Land, Chemicals and
Redevelopment Division.
DATES: This rule is effective on June 7,
2021 without further notice, unless EPA
receives adverse comment by May 10,
2021. If EPA receives adverse comment,
we will publish a timely withdrawal in
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
18185
the Federal Register informing the
public that the rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R9–
2021–0127 at https://
www.regulations.gov, or via email to
R9LandSubmit@epa.gov. Due to
COVID–19, we are not providing
facsimile or regular mail options, which
are not viable at this time. For
comments submitted at Regulations.gov,
follow the online instructions for
submitting comments. Once submitted,
comments cannot be removed or edited
from Regulations.gov. For either manner
of submission, the EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket.
Do not submit electronically any
information considered confidential
business information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. The EPA will generally not
consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, please
contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
For EPA’s full public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Steve Wall, EPA Region IX, (415) 972–
3381, wall.steve@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’
or ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA.
I. Why is EPA using a direct final rule?
EPA is publishing this rule without a
prior proposed rule because we view
this as a noncontroversial action and
anticipate no adverse comment because
the revisions to the site-specific rule
merely conform the rule to the national
rule regarding the total length of time
that Research, Development and
Demonstration (RD&D) projects may be
permitted. Moreover, the 2016 RD&D
rule was subjected to public notice and
comment prior to promulgation. Also,
the existing 12-year maximum term for
the Salt River Landfill’s operation as a
bioreactor ends in March 2021, and
further delay in extending the total term
of the RD&D project would potentially
result in economic and environmental
harm, contrary to the mission of the
E:\FR\FM\08APR1.SGM
08APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 66 (Thursday, April 8, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 18183-18185]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-07181]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
19 CFR Part 208
Implementing Rules for the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement
Implementation Act
AGENCY: United States International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The United States International Trade Commission (Commission)
is adopting as a final rule the interim rule published on July 10,
2020, with one amendment. The rule concerns the practices and
procedures for investigations of United States-Mexico cross-border
long-haul trucking services (cross-border long-haul trucking services)
provided for in the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA)
Implementation Act (the Act).
DATES: Effective May 10, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa R. Barton, Secretary to the
Commission, United States International Trade Commission, telephone
(202) 205-2000, or William Gearhart, Office of the General Counsel,
United States International Trade Commission, telephone (202) 205-3091.
Hearing-impaired individuals may obtain information on this matter by
contacting the Commission's TDD terminal at 202-205-1810. General
information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing
its website at https://www.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The preamble below is designed to assist
readers in understanding the final rule. This preamble provides
background information and a regulatory analysis of the rule.
The final rule and amendment are being promulgated in accordance
with the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 553) (APA), and will be
codified in 19 CFR part 208.
Background
Section 335 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1335) (Tariff Act)
authorizes the Commission to adopt such reasonable procedures, rules,
and regulations as it deems necessary to carry out its functions and
duties. In addition, sections 103(b), 322(f), and 324(e) of the Act (19
U.S.C. 4513(b), 4572(f), and 4574(e), respectively) authorize the
Commission to prescribe implementing regulations necessary or
appropriate to carry out actions required or authorized by the Act.
The Commission is adopting as a final rule, with one clarifying
change, the interim rule published in the Federal Register on July 10,
2020 (85 FR 41355), that governs rules of procedure for investigations
of cross-border long-haul trucking services provided for in Subtitle C
of Title III of the Act. Section 322 of the Act requires that the
Commission undertake an investigation, upon filing of a petition or
request, and make a determination as to whether a grant of authority
has caused material harm or threatens material harm to U.S. suppliers
of cross-border long-haul trucking services, and if affirmative, to
recommend a remedy to the President. Additionally, Section 324 of the
Act requires that the Commission, at the request of the President or an
interested party, undertake an investigation and make a determination
as to whether an extension of relief granted by the President is
necessary to prevent or remedy material harm. The Act specifies certain
procedures for such investigations, including who may file a petition
or request such investigations, the holding of hearings and publication
of notices regarding investigations, the timelines for such
investigations and determinations, and the issuance of reports that
include the determination, an explanation thereof, and any
recommendation for relief.
The one minor change to the interim rule is to Sec.
208.5(e)(1)(vi), which describes additional information and data to be
provided in a petition for an investigation of long-haul cross-border
trucking services. Paragraph (e)(1)(vi) of this section in the interim
rule required that such petitions include ``pricing information,'' and
the Commission now amends this to ``freight rates'' to clarify the type
of pricing information necessary in petitions. The Commission makes no
other amendments to the interim rule that it now adopts as final.
In its document announcing the interim rule at part 208 of the
[[Page 18184]]
Commission's regulations, the Commission invited members of the public
to file written comments on the rule no later than 30 days after the
day of publication; in this case, by August 10, 2020. The Commission
received two sets of written comments from interested parties: One
filed jointly by the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association and
the International Brotherhood of Teamsters (OOIDA/Teamsters), and one
filed by the Government of Mexico (Mexico). The Commission has
carefully considered all comments that it received, and it provides
responses to these comments in an analysis provided below. The
Commission appreciates the time and effort of the commentators in
preparing their submissions.
Procedure for Adopting the Amendment
The Commission ordinarily promulgates amendments to the Code of
Federal Regulations in accordance with the notice-and-comment
rulemaking procedure in section 553 of the APA (5 U.S.C. 553). That
procedure entails publication of proposed rulemaking in the Federal
Register that solicits public comments on the proposed amendments,
consideration by the Commission of public comments on the contents of
the amendments, and publication of the final amendments at least 30
days prior to their effective date.
In this instance, however, the Commission is amending its interim
rule at 19 CFR part 208 on a final basis, effective 30 days after
publication of this document. The Commission's authority to adopt final
amendments without following all steps listed in section 553 of the APA
is derived from section 335 of the Tariff Act (19 U.S.C. 1335),
sections 103(b) and 322(f) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 4513(b) and 4572(f)),
and section 553 of the APA (5 U.S.C. 553).
Section 553(b) of the APA allows an agency to dispense with
publication of a notice of proposed rulemaking when the following
circumstances exist: (1) The rules in question are interpretive rules,
general statements of policy, or rules of agency organization,
procedure or practice; or (2) the agency for good cause finds that
notice and public comment on the rules are impracticable, unnecessary,
or contrary to the public interest, and the agency incorporates that
finding and the reasons therefor into the rules adopted by the agency.
In this instance, the Commission has determined that the requisite
circumstances exist for dispensing with the notice and comment
procedure that ordinarily precedes the amendment of Commission rules.
For purposes of invoking the section 553(b)(3)(A) exemption from
publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking that solicits public
comment, the Commission finds that the amendment to part 208 is a
technical clarification of an agency rule of procedure and practice.
Moreover, the Commission finds under section 553(b)(3)(B) that prior
notice and opportunity for comment are unnecessary. The amendment
clarifies an aspect of the interim rule, the type of pricing data to be
provided in petitions on long-haul cross-border trucking services, but
it does not substantively alter those procedures already provided for
in the interim rule. Given the lack of any substantive change and that
parties have already been provided an opportunity to comment on the
interim rule, we find that public comment on the amendment is
unnecessary.
Regulatory Analysis of Proposed Amendments to the Commission's Rules
The Commission has determined that this final rule and amendment do
not meet the criteria described in section 3(f) of Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and thus do not constitute a
``significant regulatory action'' for purposes of the Executive order.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) is
inapplicable to this rulemaking because it is not one for which a
notice of proposed rulemaking is required under 5 U.S.C. 553(b) or any
other statute.
The final rule and amendment do not contain federalism implications
warranting the preparation of a federalism summary impact statement
pursuant to Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, Aug. 4, 1999).
No actions are necessary under title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995, Public Law 104-4 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) because the
final rule and amendment will not result in the expenditure by state,
local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private
sector, of $100,000,000 or more in any one year (adjusted annually for
inflation), and will not significantly or uniquely affect small
governments, as defined in 5 U.S.C. 601(5).
This final rule and amendment are not ``major rules'' as defined by
section 251 of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
of 1996 (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.). Moreover, they are exempt from the
reporting requirements of that Act because they contain rules of agency
organization, procedure, or practice that do not substantially affect
the rights or obligations of non-agency parties.
Overview of the Amendment to the Regulations
The final regulation contains one change from the interim rule. The
Commission has determined to amend Sec. 208.5(e)(1)(vi), which
describes additional information to be provided in a petition for long-
haul cross-border trucking services. The interim rule required that a
petition include ``pricing information'' on long-haul cross-border
trucking services. After further consideration, the Commission has
determined to change this language to ``freight rates'' so as to
specify the precise pricing information relevant to long-haul cross-
border trucking services.
Section-by-Section Explanation of the Amendment, Comments Received, and
Commission Response
Part 208--Investigations of United States-Mexico Cross-Border Long-Haul
Trucking Services
Subpart B--Investigations Relating to Material Harm or Threat of
Material Harm
Section 208.5
Section 208.5 lists the information required in a petition for
cross-border long-haul trucking services. The Commission amends Sec.
208.5(e)(1)(vi) to clarify that freight rates are the type of pricing
information to be included in petitions.
Comments
In their comments, OOIDA/Teamsters encouraged the Commission to
adopt its interim rule as a final rule. They noted that their
constituent members are concerned by the potential economic and safety
impact of Mexican-domiciled carriers operating in the United States,
and they expressed the view that investigations by the Commission will
provide useful information as well as possible remedies for such
harmful effects. OOIDA/Teamsters further noted that allowing a sub-
market to be defined in a variety of ways is necessary given the large
and diverse nature of the U.S. trucking industry and the difficulty for
its members in obtaining all relevant information for the entirety of
the industry. OOIDA/Teamsters also agreed with the Commission's
decision to dispense with notice-and-comment procedures in adopting the
interim rules given the expediency necessary to implement procedures
for investigations of cross-border long-haul trucking services.
In its comments, Mexico expressed its belief that certain
provisions of the
[[Page 18185]]
interim rule are inconsistent with the United States' obligations under
the USMCA. Specifically, Mexico argued that the definition of
``material harm'' at Sec. 208.2(j) of the interim rule is inconsistent
with the USMCA in two respects. First, Mexico expressed its view that
this definition differs from that provided in USMCA, Annex II, footnote
1 by adding a provision for a significant loss of market share for a
``relevant sub-market.'' Second, Mexico objected to the interim rule's
definition of injury to the relevant U.S. industry as being to ``cross-
border long-haul trucking services'' rather than merely ``long-haul
trucking services.'' In both instances, Mexico believes that these
differences lower the threshold for material injury in a manner
inconsistent with the USMCA.
Commission Response
The Commission has considered the comments of OOIDA/Teamsters that
support the interim rules as published, and that OOIDA/Teamsters do not
seek or request amendments to the interim rules.
Addressing Mexico's comments, the Commission notes that Mexico's
objections are directed at language that mirrors the USMCA's
implementing statute. While Mexico alleges that the interim rule's
definition for material harm is inconsistent with the USMCA, the
interim rule implements provisions of the Act rather than the USMCA,
and the Commission adopts its definition of material harm directly from
the Act. Section 321(9) of the Act defines material harm as ``a
significant loss in the share of the United States market or relevant
sub-market for cross-border long-haul trucking services held by persons
of the United States,'' which is identical to the definition at Sec.
208.2(j) of the interim rule. Similarly, section 321(5) of the Act also
defines the relevant U.S. industry as ``cross-border long-haul trucking
services.'' Because these definitions track and are consistent with the
Act, we adopt the definition of material harm from the interim rule as
a final rule without change.
List of Subjects in 19 CFR Part 208
Administrative practice and procedure, Trade agreements.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the United States
International Trade Commission adopts as final rule the interim rule
adding 19 CFR part 208 that was published at 85 FR 41355, on July 10,
2020, with the following change:
PART 208--INVESTIGATIONS OF UNITED STATES-MEXICO CROSS-BORDER LONG-
HAUL TRUCKING SERVICES
0
1. The authority citation for part 208 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 19 U.S.C. 4574(e).
0
2. Amend Sec. 208.5 by revising paragraph (e)(i)(vi) to read as
follows:
Sec. 208.5 Contents of petition.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
(1) * * *
(vi) Any other relevant information, including freight rates and
any evidence of cross-border long-haul trucking services lost to
persons of Mexico in the market as a whole or claimed specific sub-
market.
* * * * *
By order of the Commission.
Issued: April 2, 2021.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2021-07181 Filed 4-7-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P