Certain Steel Nails From Malaysia: Final Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2018-2019, 16322-16324 [2021-06383]

Download as PDF 16322 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 58 / Monday, March 29, 2021 / Notices LIST OF PETITIONS RECEIVED BY EDA FOR CERTIFICATION OF ELIGIBILITY TO APPLY FOR TRADE ADJUSTMENT ASSISTANCE—Continued [3/13/2021 through 3/19/2021] Date accepted for investigation Firm name Firm address Sand Dune Ventures, Inc. d/b/a TabletKiosk. 2832 Columbia Street, Torrance, CA 90503. Any party having a substantial interest in these proceedings may request a public hearing on the matter. A written request for a hearing must be submitted to the Trade Adjustment Assistance Division, Room 71030, Economic Development Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC 20230, no later than ten (10) calendar days following publication of this notice. These petitions are received pursuant to section 251 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended. Please follow the requirements set forth in EDA’s regulations at 13 CFR 315.9 for procedures to request a public hearing. The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance official number and title for the program under which these petitions are submitted is 11.313, Trade Adjustment Assistance for Firms. Bryan Borlik, Director. [FR Doc. 2021–06376 Filed 3–26–21; 8:45 am] DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–557–816] Certain Steel Nails From Malaysia: Final Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2018– 2019 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that certain steel nails from Malaysia were not sold at less than normal value during the period of review (POR), July 1, 2018, through June 30, 2019. DATES: Applicable March 29, 2021. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Preston Cox or John Drury, AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:20 Mar 26, 2021 Jkt 253001 The firm manufactures tablet computers. (202) 482–5041 or (202) 482–0195, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On November 23, 2020, Commerce published the Preliminary Results of the 2018–2019 administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain steel nails from Malaysia.1 We invited interested parties to comment on the Preliminary Results. This review covers two mandatory respondents: Inmax and Region.2 The producers/exporters not selected for individual examination are listed in the ‘‘Final Results of the Administrative Review’’ section of this notice. For a complete description of the events that followed the Preliminary Results, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.3 Commerce conducted this administrative review in accordance with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Scope of the Order The products covered by the scope of the order are certain steel nails from Malaysia. For a complete description of the scope of the order, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.4 BILLING CODE 3510–WH–P AGENCY: 3/17/2021 Product(s) Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties in this review are discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of topics included in the Issues and Decision 1 See Certain Steel Nails from Malaysia: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2018–2019, 85 FR 74674 (November 23, 2020) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM). 2 Commerce has determined to collapse, and treat as a single entity, affiliates Inmax Sdn. Bhd. and Inmax Industries Sdn. Bhd. (collectively, Inmax), and Region International Co. Ltd. and Region System Sdn. Bhd. (collectively, Region) for these final results of review. For a discussion of this analysis, see Preliminary Results PDM at 5–7. 3 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Steel Nails from Malaysia; 2018– 2019,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). 4 See Issues and Decision Memorandum at 2–4. PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Memorandum is included in the appendix to this notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https:// access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. Final Determination of No Shipments In the Preliminary Results, Commerce determined that Astrotech Steels Private Limited (Astrotech), Trinity Steel Private Limited (Trinity), and Jinhai Hardware Co. Ltd. (Jinhai) made no shipments of the subject merchandise to the United States during the POR. No parties commented on this determination. Therefore, for the final results of review, we continue to find that these companies made no shipments of subject merchandise to the United States during the POR. Consistent with our practice, we will issue appropriate instructions to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) based on our final results. Changes Since the Preliminary Results Based on a review of the record and our analysis of the comments received from interested parties regarding our Preliminary Results, we made certain changes to the preliminary margin calculations for Inmax. For a complete discussion of these changes, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.5 Rate for Non-Examined Companies The statute and Commerce’s regulations do not address the establishment of a rate to be applied to companies not selected for individual examination when Commerce limits its examination in an administrative review 5 See Issues and Decision Memorandum at 4; see also Memorandum, ‘‘Analysis Memorandum for Inmax Sdn. Bhd. and Inmax Industries Sdn. Bhd. in the Final Results of the 2018/2019 Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Steel Nails from Malaysia,’’ dated concurrently with this notice. E:\FR\FM\29MRN1.SGM 29MRN1 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 58 / Monday, March 29, 2021 / Notices pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. Generally, Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5) of the Act, which provides instructions for calculating the all-others rate in a market economy investigation, for guidance when calculating the rate for companies which were not selected for individual examination in an administrative review. Under section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, the all-others rate is normally ‘‘an amount equal to the weighted average of the estimated weightedaverage dumping margins established for exporters and producers individually examined, excluding any margins that are zero or de minimis margins, and any margins determined entirely {on the basis of facts available}.’’ For these final results, we have calculated weighted-average dumping margins for Inmax and Region that are zero or de minimis, and we have not calculated any margins which are not zero, de minimis, or determined entirely on the basis of facts available. Accordingly, we have assigned to the companies not individually examined a margin of zero percent. Final Results of the Administrative Review Commerce determines that the following estimated weighted-average dumping margins exist during the POR: Weightedaverage dumping margin (percent) Producer/exporter Inmax Sdn. Bhd. and Inmax Industries Sdn. Bhd ................... Region International Co. Ltd. and Region System Sdn. Bhd Chia Pao Metal Co., Ltd ............. Come Best (Thailand) Co., Ltd .. Kerry-Apex (Thailand) Co., Ltd .. Tag Fasteners Sdn. Bhd ............ Vien Group SDN. BHD ............... WWL India Private Ltd ............... calculated margins for Inmax and Region which are zero or de minimis in the final results of this review, we intend to instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties. Further, because we find in these final results that Astrotech, Trinity, and Jinhai had no shipments of subject merchandise during the POR, we will instruct CBP to liquidate such unreviewed entries at the all-others rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the transactions.6 Commerce’s ‘‘reseller policy’’ will apply to entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by companies included in these final results for which the reviewed companies did not know that the merchandise they sold to the intermediary (e.g., a reseller, trading company, or exporter) was destined for the United States. In such instances, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the all-others rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction.7 Consistent with its recent notice,8 Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 days after the date of publication of the final results of this review in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is filed at the U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within 90 days of publication). 0.00 Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit 0.00 requirements will be effective upon 0.00 0.00 publication of the notice of these final 0.00 results for all shipments of the subject 0.00 merchandise entered, or withdrawn 0.00 from warehouse, for consumption on or 0.00 after the publication date of the final results of this administrative review, as Disclosure of Calculations provided by section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for the Commerce intends to disclose the respondents (or non-selected calculations performed for these final companies) noted above will be equal to results within five days of the date of publication of this notice in the Federal the weighted-average dumping margin Register to parties in this proceeding, in established in the final results of this review; (2) for merchandise exported by accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Assessment Rates 6 For Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), Commerce has determined, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise in accordance with the final results of this review. Because we VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:20 Mar 26, 2021 Jkt 253001 a full discussion of this practice, see Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). 7 Id. 8 See Notice of Discontinuation of Policy to Issue Liquidation Instructions After 15 Days in Applicable Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Proceedings, 86 FR 3995 (January 15, 2021). PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 16323 producers or exporters not covered in this review but covered in a prior segment of this proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding in which the company participated; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the original less-than-fairvalue investigation, but the producer is, then the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding for the producer of the subject merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other producers or exporters will continue to be 2.66 percent, the allothers rate established in the less-thanfair-value investigation.9 These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in Commerce’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. Administrative Protective Order This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of return/destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. Notification to Interested Parties This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.221. 9 See Certain Steel Nails From Malaysia: Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 80 FR 34370 (June 16, 2015). E:\FR\FM\29MRN1.SGM 29MRN1 16324 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 58 / Monday, March 29, 2021 / Notices Dated: March 22, 2021. Christian Marsh, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. Changes Since the Preliminary Results V. Discussion of the Issues Comment 1: Interest Income Offset Comment 2: Programming Errors Comment 3: Scrap Offset Comment 4: Labor Costs VI. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2021–06383 Filed 3–26–21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration United States Travel and Tourism Advisory Board; Meeting of the United States Travel and Tourism Advisory Board International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce. ACTION: Notice of an open meeting. AGENCY: The United States Travel and Tourism Advisory Board (Board or TTAB) will hold a meeting on Wednesday, March 31, 2021. The Board advises the Secretary of Commerce (Secretary) on matters relating to the U.S. travel and tourism industry. The purpose of the meeting is for Board members to discuss recommendations for the Secretary on how to distribute the funding appropriated in section 6001 of the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 for ‘‘assistance to States and communities that have suffered economic injury as a result of job and gross domestic product losses in the travel, tourism, or outdoor recreation sectors.’’ The final agenda will be posted on the Department of Commerce website for the Board at https:// www.trade.gov/ttab-meetings at least two days prior to the meeting. DATES: Wednesday, March 31, 2021, 4:00 p.m.–5:00 p.m. EDT. The deadline for members of the public to register, including requests to make comments during the meeting and for auxiliary aids, or to submit written comments for dissemination prior to the meeting, is 5:00 p.m. EDT on Monday, March 29, 2021. ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held virtually. The access information will be provided by email to registrants. SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:20 Mar 26, 2021 Jkt 253001 Requests to register (including to speak or for auxiliary aids) and any written comments should be submitted by email to TTAB@trade.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jennifer Aguinaga, the United States Travel and Tourism Advisory Board, National Travel and Tourism Office, U.S. Department of Commerce; telephone: 202–482–2404; email: TTAB@trade.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background: The Board advises the Secretary of Commerce on matters relating to the U.S. travel and tourism industry. Exceptional Circumstances: Pursuant to 41 CFR 102–3.150(b), the notice for this meeting is given less than 15 calendar days prior to the meeting because of the exceptional circumstances of the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, which contains $3 billion in funding for the Department of Commerce for economic adjustment assistance and requires that 25 percent of those funds be for ‘‘assistance to States and communities that have suffered economic injury as a result of job and gross domestic product losses in the travel, tourism, or outdoor recreation sectors.’’ To allocate the funds expeditiously and in a manner that would best achieve the goals of the Act, the Secretary of Commerce needs prompt advice from the Board on how these funds should be distributed. Public Participation: The meeting will be open to the public and will be accessible to people with disabilities. Any member of the public requesting to join the meeting is asked to register in advance by the deadline identified under the DATES caption. Requests for auxiliary aids must be submitted by the registration deadline. Last minute requests will be accepted but may not be possible to fill. There will be fifteen (15) minutes allotted for oral comments from members of the public joining the meeting. To accommodate as many speakers as possible, the time for public comments may be limited to three (3) minutes per person. Members of the public wishing to reserve speaking time during the meeting must submit a request at the time of registration, as well as the name and address of the proposed speaker. If the number of registrants requesting to make statements is greater than can be reasonably accommodated during the meeting, the International Trade Administration may conduct a lottery to determine the speakers. Speakers are requested to submit a written copy of their prepared remarks by 5:00 p.m. EDT on Monday, March 29, 2021, for PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 inclusion in the meeting records and for circulation to the members of the Board. In addition, any member of the public may submit pertinent written comments concerning the Board’s affairs at any time before or after the meeting. Comments may be submitted to Jennifer Aguinaga at the contact information indicated above. To be considered during the meeting, comments must be received no later than 5:00 p.m. EDT on Monday, March 29, 2021, to ensure transmission to the Board prior to the meeting. Comments received after that date and time will be transmitted to the Board but may not be considered during the meeting. Copies of Board meeting minutes will be available within 90 days of the meeting. Jennifer Aguinaga, Designated Federal Officer, United States Travel and Tourism Advisory Board. [FR Doc. 2021–06412 Filed 3–26–21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DR–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Institute of Standards and Technology Information Collection Activities; Submission to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for Review and Approval; Comment Request; Organization of Scientific Area Committees for Forensic Science (OSAC) Membership Application The Department of Commerce will submit the following information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and clearance in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, on or after the date of publication of this notice. We invite the general public and other Federal agencies to comment on proposed, and continuing information collections, which helps us assess the impact of our information collection requirements and minimize the public’s reporting burden. Public comments were previously requested via the Federal Register on January 14, 2021 during a 60-day comment period. This notice allows for an additional 30 days for public comments. Agency: National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Title: Organization of Scientific Area Committees for Forensic Science (OSAC) Membership Application. OMB Control Number: 0693–0070. Form Number(s): Type of Request: Revision and extension of a current information collection. E:\FR\FM\29MRN1.SGM 29MRN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 58 (Monday, March 29, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16322-16324]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-06383]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-557-816]


Certain Steel Nails From Malaysia: Final Results of the 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No 
Shipments; 2018-2019

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that certain 
steel nails from Malaysia were not sold at less than normal value 
during the period of review (POR), July 1, 2018, through June 30, 2019.

DATES: Applicable March 29, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Preston Cox or John Drury, AD/CVD 
Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-5041 or (202) 482-0195, 
respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On November 23, 2020, Commerce published the Preliminary Results of 
the 2018-2019 administrative review of the antidumping duty order on 
certain steel nails from Malaysia.\1\ We invited interested parties to 
comment on the Preliminary Results. This review covers two mandatory 
respondents: Inmax and Region.\2\ The producers/exporters not selected 
for individual examination are listed in the ``Final Results of the 
Administrative Review'' section of this notice. For a complete 
description of the events that followed the Preliminary Results, see 
the Issues and Decision Memorandum.\3\ Commerce conducted this 
administrative review in accordance with section 751 of the Tariff Act 
of 1930, as amended (the Act).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Certain Steel Nails from Malaysia: Preliminary Results 
of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Preliminary 
Determination of No Shipments; 2018-2019, 85 FR 74674 (November 23, 
2020) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision 
Memorandum (PDM).
    \2\ Commerce has determined to collapse, and treat as a single 
entity, affiliates Inmax Sdn. Bhd. and Inmax Industries Sdn. Bhd. 
(collectively, Inmax), and Region International Co. Ltd. and Region 
System Sdn. Bhd. (collectively, Region) for these final results of 
review. For a discussion of this analysis, see Preliminary Results 
PDM at 5-7.
    \3\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the 
Final Results of the Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty 
Order on Certain Steel Nails from Malaysia; 2018-2019,'' dated 
concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and 
Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order

    The products covered by the scope of the order are certain steel 
nails from Malaysia. For a complete description of the scope of the 
order, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Issues and Decision Memorandum at 2-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Analysis of Comments Received

    All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties in 
this review are discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list 
of topics included in the Issues and Decision Memorandum is included in 
the appendix to this notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a 
public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and 
Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic 
Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at 
https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the Issues 
and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/.

Final Determination of No Shipments

    In the Preliminary Results, Commerce determined that Astrotech 
Steels Private Limited (Astrotech), Trinity Steel Private Limited 
(Trinity), and Jinhai Hardware Co. Ltd. (Jinhai) made no shipments of 
the subject merchandise to the United States during the POR. No parties 
commented on this determination. Therefore, for the final results of 
review, we continue to find that these companies made no shipments of 
subject merchandise to the United States during the POR. Consistent 
with our practice, we will issue appropriate instructions to U.S. 
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) based on our final results.

Changes Since the Preliminary Results

    Based on a review of the record and our analysis of the comments 
received from interested parties regarding our Preliminary Results, we 
made certain changes to the preliminary margin calculations for Inmax. 
For a complete discussion of these changes, see the Issues and Decision 
Memorandum.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Issues and Decision Memorandum at 4; see also 
Memorandum, ``Analysis Memorandum for Inmax Sdn. Bhd. and Inmax 
Industries Sdn. Bhd. in the Final Results of the 2018/2019 
Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Steel 
Nails from Malaysia,'' dated concurrently with this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Rate for Non-Examined Companies

    The statute and Commerce's regulations do not address the 
establishment of a rate to be applied to companies not selected for 
individual examination when Commerce limits its examination in an 
administrative review

[[Page 16323]]

pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. Generally, Commerce looks to 
section 735(c)(5) of the Act, which provides instructions for 
calculating the all-others rate in a market economy investigation, for 
guidance when calculating the rate for companies which were not 
selected for individual examination in an administrative review. Under 
section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, the all-others rate is normally ``an 
amount equal to the weighted average of the estimated weighted-average 
dumping margins established for exporters and producers individually 
examined, excluding any margins that are zero or de minimis margins, 
and any margins determined entirely {on the basis of facts 
available{time} .''
    For these final results, we have calculated weighted-average 
dumping margins for Inmax and Region that are zero or de minimis, and 
we have not calculated any margins which are not zero, de minimis, or 
determined entirely on the basis of facts available. Accordingly, we 
have assigned to the companies not individually examined a margin of 
zero percent.

Final Results of the Administrative Review

    Commerce determines that the following estimated weighted-average 
dumping margins exist during the POR:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               Weighted-
                                                                average
                      Producer/exporter                         dumping
                                                                margin
                                                               (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inmax Sdn. Bhd. and Inmax Industries Sdn. Bhd...............        0.00
Region International Co. Ltd. and Region System Sdn. Bhd....        0.00
Chia Pao Metal Co., Ltd.....................................        0.00
Come Best (Thailand) Co., Ltd...............................        0.00
Kerry-Apex (Thailand) Co., Ltd..............................        0.00
Tag Fasteners Sdn. Bhd......................................        0.00
Vien Group SDN. BHD.........................................        0.00
WWL India Private Ltd.......................................        0.00
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclosure of Calculations

    Commerce intends to disclose the calculations performed for these 
final results within five days of the date of publication of this 
notice in the Federal Register to parties in this proceeding, in 
accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).

Assessment Rates

    Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, and 19 CFR 
351.212(b)(1), Commerce has determined, and CBP shall assess, 
antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise in 
accordance with the final results of this review. Because we calculated 
margins for Inmax and Region which are zero or de minimis in the final 
results of this review, we intend to instruct CBP to liquidate the 
appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties.
    Further, because we find in these final results that Astrotech, 
Trinity, and Jinhai had no shipments of subject merchandise during the 
POR, we will instruct CBP to liquidate such unreviewed entries at the 
all-others rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) 
involved in the transactions.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ For a full discussion of this practice, see Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 
68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Commerce's ``reseller policy'' will apply to entries of subject 
merchandise during the POR produced by companies included in these 
final results for which the reviewed companies did not know that the 
merchandise they sold to the intermediary (e.g., a reseller, trading 
company, or exporter) was destined for the United States. In such 
instances, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the 
all-others rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) 
involved in the transaction.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Consistent with its recent notice,\8\ Commerce intends to issue 
assessment instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 days after the date 
of publication of the final results of this review in the Federal 
Register. If a timely summons is filed at the U.S. Court of 
International Trade, the assessment instructions will direct CBP not to 
liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties to file a request 
for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within 90 days of 
publication).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Notice of Discontinuation of Policy to Issue Liquidation 
Instructions After 15 Days in Applicable Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Administrative Proceedings, 86 FR 3995 (January 
15, 2021).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon 
publication of the notice of these final results for all shipments of 
the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for 
consumption on or after the publication date of the final results of 
this administrative review, as provided by section 751(a)(2) of the 
Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for the respondents (or non-selected 
companies) noted above will be equal to the weighted-average dumping 
margin established in the final results of this review; (2) for 
merchandise exported by producers or exporters not covered in this 
review but covered in a prior segment of this proceeding, the cash 
deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published 
for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding in which the 
company participated; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this 
review, a prior review, or the original less-than-fair-value 
investigation, but the producer is, then the cash deposit rate will be 
the rate established for the most recently completed segment of this 
proceeding for the producer of the subject merchandise; and (4) the 
cash deposit rate for all other producers or exporters will continue to 
be 2.66 percent, the all-others rate established in the less-than-fair-
value investigation.\9\ These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, 
shall remain in effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See Certain Steel Nails From Malaysia: Amended Final 
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 80 FR 34370 (June 
16, 2015).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification to Importers

    This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply 
with this requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of double antidumping duties.

Administrative Protective Order

    This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information 
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 
continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of 
the proceeding. Timely written notification of return/destruction of 
APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby 
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an 
APO is a sanctionable violation.

Notification to Interested Parties

    This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections 
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.221.


[[Page 16324]]


    Dated: March 22, 2021.
Christian Marsh,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum

I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Changes Since the Preliminary Results
V. Discussion of the Issues
    Comment 1: Interest Income Offset
    Comment 2: Programming Errors
    Comment 3: Scrap Offset
    Comment 4: Labor Costs
VI. Recommendation

[FR Doc. 2021-06383 Filed 3-26-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P