Self-Regulatory Organizations; BOX Exchange LLC; Order Approving a Proposed Rule Change To Amend BOX Rule 7620 (Accommodation Transactions), 15992-15993 [2021-06126]
Download as PDF
15992
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 56 / Thursday, March 25, 2021 / Notices
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–91368; File No. SR–BOX–
2020–38]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; BOX
Exchange LLC; Order Approving a
Proposed Rule Change To Amend BOX
Rule 7620 (Accommodation
Transactions)
March 19, 2021.
I. Introduction
On December 10, 2020, BOX
Exchange LLC (‘‘BOX’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’)
filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’), pursuant
to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule
19b–4 thereunder,2 a proposed rule
change to amend BOX Rule 7620
(Accommodation Transactions) to allow
Floor Brokers 3 to enter opening cabinet
orders at a price of $1 per option
contract on behalf of customers and
Floor Market Makers,4 and require all
cabinet trades to follow the Exchange’s
existing open outcry rules pursuant to
BOX Rule 7600 series. The proposed
rule change was published for comment
in the Federal Register on December 30,
2020.5 On February 8, 2021, the
Commission extended the time period
within which to approve, disapprove, or
institute proceedings to determine
whether to approve or disapprove the
proposed rule change.6 The Commission
received no comments on the proposed
rule change. The Commission is
approving the proposed rule change.
II. Description of the Proposed Rule
Change
Currently, BOX Rule 7620 defines a
‘‘cabinet order’’ as ‘‘a closing limit order
at a price of $1 per option contract for
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 See BOX Rule 7540 (defining ‘‘Floor Broker’’ as
‘‘an individual who is registered with the Exchange
for the purpose, while on the Trading Floor, of
accepting and handling options orders. A Floor
Broker must be registered as an Options Participant
prior to registering as a Floor Broker. A Floor Broker
may take into his own account, and subsequently
liquidate, any position that results from an error
made while attempting to execute, as Floor Broker,
an order.’’).
4 See BOX Rule 8510(b) (defining ‘‘Floor Market
Maker’’ as an Options Participant of the Exchange
located on the Trading Floor who has received
permission from the Exchange to trade in options
for his own account.’’).
5 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 90792
(December 23, 2020), 85 FR 86610 (‘‘Notice’’).
6 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 91077,
86 FR 9403 (February 12, 2021), in which the
Commission designated March 30, 2021 as the date
by which it should approve, disapprove, or institute
proceedings to determine whether to disapprove the
proposed rule change.
the account of a customer or Floor
Market Maker.’’ 7 Only closing limit
orders may be submitted as orders to the
cabinet. Although BOX Rule 7620
specifies that ‘‘opening orders’’ are not
cabinet orders, the rule currently allows
opening orders to be matched with
cabinet orders in certain specified
circumstances.8
BOX proposes to amend BOX Rule
7620 to allow all cabinet trades (both
opening and closing) to occur via open
outcry pursuant to BOX’s existing Rule
7600 series. To effectuate this change,
BOX proposes to expand the definition
of ‘‘cabinet orders’’ to include opening
orders as well as closing orders.9
Further, as proposed, the Exchange
would preserve the primacy of existing
closing cabinet orders by requiring
cabinet orders, whether opening or
closing, to yield priority to all existing
closing cabinet orders represented by
the trading crowd.10 Cabinet trading
would not be available in options
classes participating in the Penny
Interval Program.11
Further, under the proposal, as is the
case today, only Floor Brokers would be
permitted to represent cabinet orders
and such orders would only be
permitted to execute on the Exchange’s
Trading Floor.12 The Exchange proposes
to codify that cabinet orders would be
subject to the existing BOX Rule 7600
series 13 and therefore would execute in
open outcry in the same manner as all
other orders execute on the Trading
Floor (i.e., in accordance with the order
allocation, priority, and execution rules
applicable to all Qualified Open Outcry
(‘‘QOO’’) Orders).14 In addition, under
the proposal, cabinet orders would no
longer be subject to separate manual
recordation requirements and would
instead be subject to the same
systematization and order recordation
requirements that currently apply to all
other QOO Orders.15
2 17
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:52 Mar 24, 2021
Jkt 253001
7 See
BOX Rule 7620.
BOX Rule 7620(c)–(e) (specifying limited
circumstances in which an opening order may be
matched with a cabinet order). See also Notice,
supra note 5, at 86611–13.
9 See proposed BOX Rule 7620. As proposed,
‘‘cabinet orders’’ would be defined as ‘‘bids and
offers (whether opening or closing) at a price of $1
per option contract for the account of a customer
of Floor Market Maker.’’
10 See proposed BOX Rule 7620(c). See also
Notice, supra note 5, at 86612–13.
11 See proposed BOX Rule 7620(b).
12 See BOX Rule 7620. See also Notice, supra note
5, at 86611.
13 See Proposed BOX Rule 7620.
14 See Notice, supra note 5, at 86611.
15 See Notice, supra note 5, at 86612. Specifically,
BOX Rule 7580(e)(1) would require Floor Brokers
to contemporaneously upon receipt of a cabinet
order to record specific information about the order
onto the Floor Broker’s order entry mechanism. See
id. at 86612 n.17.
8 See
PO 00000
Frm 00116
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
III. Discussion and Commission
Findings
The Commission finds that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
the requirements of the Act and the
rules and regulations thereunder
applicable to a national securities
exchange.16 In particular, the
Commission finds that the proposed
rule change is consistent with Section
6(b)(5) of the Act,17 which requires that
the rules of an exchange be designed,
among other things, to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged
in regulating and facilitating
transactions in securities, to remove
impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system and, in
general, to protect investors and the
public interest, and not be designed to
permit unfair discrimination between
customers, issuers, brokers or dealers.
The Commission also finds that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
Section 6(b)(8) of the Act,18 which
requires that the rules of a national
securities exchange not impose any
burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
The Commission believes that the
proposed rule change to allow bids and
offers (whether opening or closing) at a
price of $1 per option contract to be
executed by Floor Brokers in open
outcry on the Exchange’s Trading Floor
subject to the existing BOX Rule 7600
series appears reasonably designed to
provide market participants with an
additional means by which they can
close out worthless positions in series of
options that are not actively traded and
thereby avoid unwanted risk. According
to the Exchange, opening cabinet trades
are not profitable for participants, but
participants can use them to change
their risk profile. The Exchange asserts
that the proposed change is in line with
the primary purpose of cabinet trading
in that it would allow participants to
submit opening cabinet orders in series
that are not actively traded to effectively
close out (‘‘synthetically’’) the risk
associated with current positions.19 The
16 In approving this proposed rule change, the
Commission has considered the proposed rule’s
impact on efficiency, competition, and capital
formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
17 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
18 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
19 See Notice, supra note 5, at 86613. See also
Notice, supra note 5, at 86611 n.9–10 and
accompanying text (providing an example of the
use of an opening cabinet order to synthetically
E:\FR\FM\25MRN1.SGM
25MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 56 / Thursday, March 25, 2021 / Notices
Commission believes that the proposed
rule change will permit market
participants to effectively close out
worthless positions prior to their
expiration using closing or opening
cabinet orders in a manner that is
consistent with the original purpose of
the cabinet and in so doing will allow
market participants to better manage
their capital and risk exposures. In this
regard, the Commission notes that all
orders traded pursuant to BOX Rule
7620 must meet the proposed definition
of ‘‘cabinet order’’ and be bona fide
trades. Further, cabinet orders (whether
opening or closing) may not be
conducted for any improper purpose or
be executed in a manner that would be
inconsistent with the Exchange’s other
rules. For example, the Commission
believes that it would be inconsistent
with the just and equitable principles of
trade for a participant to utilize the
cabinet trading rules for the purpose of
avoiding the exchange’s minimum
trading increment rules. The
Commission believes subjecting cabinet
orders to the same order entry,
recordation, and processing
requirements as currently apply to all
QOO Orders will create an electronic
audit trail for cabinet orders and should
promote consistency and facilitate
regulatory oversight of trading on the
Trading Floor.
For the reasons set forth above, the
Commission believes that the proposed
rule change is consistent with the
requirements of the Act.
IV. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,20 that the
proposed rule change (SR–BOX–2020–
38) hereby is approved.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.21
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021–06126 Filed 3–24–21; 8:45 am]
close a Market Maker’s position in a worthless
option and thereby hedge unwanted portfolio risk).
20 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
21 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:52 Mar 24, 2021
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
of the most significant parts of such
statements.
[Release No. 34–91367; File No. SR–
NYSEAMER–2021–15]
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE
American LLC; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change To Amend the NYSE
American Equities Proprietary Market
Data Fee Schedule and the NYSE
American Options Proprietary Market
Data Fee Schedule
March 19, 2021.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3
notice is hereby given that on March 10,
2021, NYSE American LLC (‘‘NYSE
American’’ or the ‘‘Exchange’’) filed
with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which Items
have been prepared by the selfregulatory organization. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend the
NYSE American Equities Proprietary
Market Data Fee Schedule and the
NYSE American Options Proprietary
Market Data Fee Schedule (together,
‘‘Market Data Fee Schedules’’) to adopt
a billing dispute practice substantially
similar to the practice adopted by
another group of exchanges for their
transaction and market data fees. The
proposed rule change is available on the
Exchange’s website at www.nyse.com, at
the principal office of the Exchange, and
at the Commission’s Public Reference
Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of,
and basis for, the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
The Exchange has prepared summaries,
set forth in sections A, B, and C below,
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
Jkt 253001
15993
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
U.S.C. 78a.
3 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
2 15
PO 00000
Frm 00117
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend the
Market Data Fee Schedules to adopt a
billing dispute practice similar to the
practice adopted by another group of
exchanges for their transaction and
market data fees. As discussed below,
the proposed provision would be
substantially similar to provision in the
fee schedules of the Cboe U.S. Equities
markets—Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc.
(‘‘BZX Equities’’),4 Cboe BYX Exchange,
Inc. (‘‘BYX Equities’’),5 Cboe EDGA
Exchange, Inc. (‘‘EDGA Equities’’),6
Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. (‘‘EDGX
Equities’’) 7—and the Cboe U.S Options
markets—Cboe Exchange, Inc. (‘‘Cboe
Options’’),8 Cboe C2 Exchange, Inc. (‘‘C2
Options’’),9 the options platform of Cboe
BZX Exchange, Inc. (‘‘BZX Options’’),10
the options platform of Cboe EDGX
Exchange, Inc. (‘‘EDGX Options’’)
(collectively, the ‘‘Cboe Exchanges’’).11
In addition, the Exchange and the
Exchange’s affiliates, New York Stock
Exchange LLC (‘‘NYSE’’), NYSE Arca,
Inc. (‘‘NYSE Arca’’), NYSE Chicago, Inc.
4 See BZX Equities Fee Schedule, available at,
https://markets.cboe.com/us/equities/membership/
fee_schedule/bzx/. See also Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 90897 (January 11, 2021), 86 FR 4161
(January 15, 2021) (SR–CboeBZX–2020–094).
5 See BYX Equities Fee Schedule, available at,
https://markets.cboe.com/us/equities/membership/
fee_schedule/byx/. See also Securities Exchange
Act Release No. 90899 (January 11, 2021), 86 FR
4156 (January 15, 2021) (SR–CboeBYX–2020–034).
6 See EDGA Equities Fee Schedule, available at,
https://markets.cboe.com/us/equities/membership/
fee_schedule/edga/. See also Securities Exchange
Act Release No. 90900 (January 11, 2021), 86 FR
4149 (January 15, 2021) (SR–CboeEDGA–2020–032).
7 See EDGX Equities Fee Schedule, available at,
https://markets.cboe.com/us/equities/membership/
fee_schedule/edgx/. See also Securities Exchange
Act Release No. 90901 (January 11, 2021), 86 FR
4137 (January 15, 2021) (SR–CboeEDGX–2020–064).
8 See Cboe Options Fee Schedule, footnote 7,
available at, https://cdn.cboe.com/resources/
membership/Cboe_FeeSchedule.pdf. See also
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 91053
(February 3, 2021), 86 FR 8814 (February 9, 2021)
(SR–Cboe–2021–010).
9 See C2 Options Fee Schedule, available at,
https://markets.cboe.com/us/options/membership/
fee_schedule/ctwo/. See also Securities Exchange
Act Release No. 91049 (February 3, 2021), 86 FR
8824 (February 9, 2021) (SR–C2–2021–002).
10 See BZX Options Fee Schedule, available at,
https://markets.cboe.com/us/options/membership/
fee_schedule/bzx/. See also Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 90897 (January 11, 2021), 86 FR 4161
(January 15, 2021) (SR–CboeBZX–2020–094).
11 See EDGX Options Fee Schedule, available at,
https://markets.cboe.com/us/options/membership/
fee_schedule/edgx/. See also Securities Exchange
Act Release No. 90901 (January 11, 2021), 86 FR
4137 (January 15, 2021) (SR–CboeEDGX–2020–064).
E:\FR\FM\25MRN1.SGM
25MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 56 (Thursday, March 25, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15992-15993]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-06126]
[[Page 15992]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-91368; File No. SR-BOX-2020-38]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; BOX Exchange LLC; Order Approving
a Proposed Rule Change To Amend BOX Rule 7620 (Accommodation
Transactions)
March 19, 2021.
I. Introduction
On December 10, 2020, BOX Exchange LLC (``BOX'' or ``Exchange'')
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''),
pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to
amend BOX Rule 7620 (Accommodation Transactions) to allow Floor Brokers
\3\ to enter opening cabinet orders at a price of $1 per option
contract on behalf of customers and Floor Market Makers,\4\ and require
all cabinet trades to follow the Exchange's existing open outcry rules
pursuant to BOX Rule 7600 series. The proposed rule change was
published for comment in the Federal Register on December 30, 2020.\5\
On February 8, 2021, the Commission extended the time period within
which to approve, disapprove, or institute proceedings to determine
whether to approve or disapprove the proposed rule change.\6\ The
Commission received no comments on the proposed rule change. The
Commission is approving the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ See BOX Rule 7540 (defining ``Floor Broker'' as ``an
individual who is registered with the Exchange for the purpose,
while on the Trading Floor, of accepting and handling options
orders. A Floor Broker must be registered as an Options Participant
prior to registering as a Floor Broker. A Floor Broker may take into
his own account, and subsequently liquidate, any position that
results from an error made while attempting to execute, as Floor
Broker, an order.'').
\4\ See BOX Rule 8510(b) (defining ``Floor Market Maker'' as an
Options Participant of the Exchange located on the Trading Floor who
has received permission from the Exchange to trade in options for
his own account.'').
\5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 90792 (December 23,
2020), 85 FR 86610 (``Notice'').
\6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 91077, 86 FR 9403
(February 12, 2021), in which the Commission designated March 30,
2021 as the date by which it should approve, disapprove, or
institute proceedings to determine whether to disapprove the
proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Description of the Proposed Rule Change
Currently, BOX Rule 7620 defines a ``cabinet order'' as ``a closing
limit order at a price of $1 per option contract for the account of a
customer or Floor Market Maker.'' \7\ Only closing limit orders may be
submitted as orders to the cabinet. Although BOX Rule 7620 specifies
that ``opening orders'' are not cabinet orders, the rule currently
allows opening orders to be matched with cabinet orders in certain
specified circumstances.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See BOX Rule 7620.
\8\ See BOX Rule 7620(c)-(e) (specifying limited circumstances
in which an opening order may be matched with a cabinet order). See
also Notice, supra note 5, at 86611-13.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
BOX proposes to amend BOX Rule 7620 to allow all cabinet trades
(both opening and closing) to occur via open outcry pursuant to BOX's
existing Rule 7600 series. To effectuate this change, BOX proposes to
expand the definition of ``cabinet orders'' to include opening orders
as well as closing orders.\9\ Further, as proposed, the Exchange would
preserve the primacy of existing closing cabinet orders by requiring
cabinet orders, whether opening or closing, to yield priority to all
existing closing cabinet orders represented by the trading crowd.\10\
Cabinet trading would not be available in options classes participating
in the Penny Interval Program.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See proposed BOX Rule 7620. As proposed, ``cabinet orders''
would be defined as ``bids and offers (whether opening or closing)
at a price of $1 per option contract for the account of a customer
of Floor Market Maker.''
\10\ See proposed BOX Rule 7620(c). See also Notice, supra note
5, at 86612-13.
\11\ See proposed BOX Rule 7620(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Further, under the proposal, as is the case today, only Floor
Brokers would be permitted to represent cabinet orders and such orders
would only be permitted to execute on the Exchange's Trading Floor.\12\
The Exchange proposes to codify that cabinet orders would be subject to
the existing BOX Rule 7600 series \13\ and therefore would execute in
open outcry in the same manner as all other orders execute on the
Trading Floor (i.e., in accordance with the order allocation, priority,
and execution rules applicable to all Qualified Open Outcry (``QOO'')
Orders).\14\ In addition, under the proposal, cabinet orders would no
longer be subject to separate manual recordation requirements and would
instead be subject to the same systematization and order recordation
requirements that currently apply to all other QOO Orders.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ See BOX Rule 7620. See also Notice, supra note 5, at 86611.
\13\ See Proposed BOX Rule 7620.
\14\ See Notice, supra note 5, at 86611.
\15\ See Notice, supra note 5, at 86612. Specifically, BOX Rule
7580(e)(1) would require Floor Brokers to contemporaneously upon
receipt of a cabinet order to record specific information about the
order onto the Floor Broker's order entry mechanism. See id. at
86612 n.17.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Discussion and Commission Findings
The Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations
thereunder applicable to a national securities exchange.\16\ In
particular, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change is
consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\17\ which requires that the
rules of an exchange be designed, among other things, to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination
with persons engaged in regulating and facilitating transactions in
securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a
free and open market and a national market system and, in general, to
protect investors and the public interest, and not be designed to
permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers, brokers or
dealers. The Commission also finds that the proposed rule change is
consistent with Section 6(b)(8) of the Act,\18\ which requires that the
rules of a national securities exchange not impose any burden on
competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ In approving this proposed rule change, the Commission has
considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition,
and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
\17\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
\18\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission believes that the proposed rule change to allow bids
and offers (whether opening or closing) at a price of $1 per option
contract to be executed by Floor Brokers in open outcry on the
Exchange's Trading Floor subject to the existing BOX Rule 7600 series
appears reasonably designed to provide market participants with an
additional means by which they can close out worthless positions in
series of options that are not actively traded and thereby avoid
unwanted risk. According to the Exchange, opening cabinet trades are
not profitable for participants, but participants can use them to
change their risk profile. The Exchange asserts that the proposed
change is in line with the primary purpose of cabinet trading in that
it would allow participants to submit opening cabinet orders in series
that are not actively traded to effectively close out
(``synthetically'') the risk associated with current positions.\19\ The
[[Page 15993]]
Commission believes that the proposed rule change will permit market
participants to effectively close out worthless positions prior to
their expiration using closing or opening cabinet orders in a manner
that is consistent with the original purpose of the cabinet and in so
doing will allow market participants to better manage their capital and
risk exposures. In this regard, the Commission notes that all orders
traded pursuant to BOX Rule 7620 must meet the proposed definition of
``cabinet order'' and be bona fide trades. Further, cabinet orders
(whether opening or closing) may not be conducted for any improper
purpose or be executed in a manner that would be inconsistent with the
Exchange's other rules. For example, the Commission believes that it
would be inconsistent with the just and equitable principles of trade
for a participant to utilize the cabinet trading rules for the purpose
of avoiding the exchange's minimum trading increment rules. The
Commission believes subjecting cabinet orders to the same order entry,
recordation, and processing requirements as currently apply to all QOO
Orders will create an electronic audit trail for cabinet orders and
should promote consistency and facilitate regulatory oversight of
trading on the Trading Floor.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ See Notice, supra note 5, at 86613. See also Notice, supra
note 5, at 86611 n.9-10 and accompanying text (providing an example
of the use of an opening cabinet order to synthetically close a
Market Maker's position in a worthless option and thereby hedge
unwanted portfolio risk).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the reasons set forth above, the Commission believes that the
proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of the Act.
IV. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\20\ that the proposed rule change (SR-BOX-2020-38) hereby is
approved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
\21\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\21\
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-06126 Filed 3-24-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P