Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Modify the NYSE Arca Options Fee Schedule, 15980-15983 [2021-06122]
Download as PDF
15980
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 56 / Thursday, March 25, 2021 / Notices
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
In accordance with Section 6(b)(8) of
the Act,23 the Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change would not impose
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. The
proposed rule change, which would
apply equally to all market data
subscribers, would establish a clear
process for billing disputes, and is
substantially similar to rules adopted by
the Cboe Exchanges and rules adopted
by other equities and options markets as
well as by the Exchange’s affiliates for
transaction fees. The Exchange does not
believe the proposed rule change would
impair the ability of market data
subscribers or competing venues that
also sell market data products to
maintain their competitive standing in
the financial markets. Moreover,
because the Exchange does not propose
to alter or modify specific fees or credits
applicable to market data subscribers,
the proposal does not impose any
burden on competition.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited
or received with respect to the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The Exchange has filed the proposed
rule change pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act 24 and Rule
19b–4(f)(6) thereunder.25 Because the
proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of
investors or the public interest; (ii)
impose any significant burden on
competition; and (iii) become operative
prior to 30 days from the date on which
it was filed, or such shorter time as the
Commission may designate, if
consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest, the
proposed rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)
of the Act and Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii)
thereunder.
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of such proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
23 15
U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
24 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
25 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:52 Mar 24, 2021
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
under Section 19(b)(2)(B) 26 of the Act to
determine whether the proposed rule
change should be approved or
disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
NYSEArca–2021–19 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSEArca–2021–19. This
file number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549 on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change.
Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from
comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish
26 15
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
Frm 00104
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSEArca–2021–19 and
should be submitted on or before April
15, 2021.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.27
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021–06116 Filed 3–24–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–91372; No. SR–NYSEArca–
2021–18]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE
Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change To Modify the NYSE Arca
Options Fee Schedule
March 19, 2021.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3
notice is hereby given that, on March
10, 2021, NYSE Arca, Inc. (‘‘NYSE
Arca’’ or the ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(the ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and
III below, which Items have been
prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to modify the
NYSE Arca Options Fee Schedule (‘‘Fee
Schedule’’) to extend the waiver of
certain Floor-based fixed fees. The
Exchange proposes to implement the fee
change effective April 1, 2021. The
proposed rule change is available on the
Exchange’s website at www.nyse.com, at
the principal office of the Exchange, and
at the Commission’s Public Reference
Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of,
27 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 15 U.S.C. 78a.
3 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
E:\FR\FM\25MRN1.SGM
25MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 56 / Thursday, March 25, 2021 / Notices
and basis for, the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
The Exchange has prepared summaries,
set forth in sections A, B, and C below,
of the most significant parts of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The purpose of this filing is to modify
the Fee Schedule to extend the waiver
of certain Floor-based fixed fees for
market participants that have been
unable to resume their Floor operations
to a certain capacity level, as discussed
below. The Exchange proposes to
implement the fee change effective
April 1, 2021.
On March 18, 2020, the Exchange
announced that it would temporarily
close the Trading Floor, effective
Monday, March 23, 2020, as a
precautionary measure to prevent the
potential spread of COVID–19.
Following the temporary closure of the
Trading Floor, the Exchange waived
certain Floor-based fixed fees for April
and May 2020.4 Although the Trading
Floor partially reopened on May 4, 2020
and Floor-based open outcry activity is
supported, certain participants have
been unable to resume pre-Floor closure
levels of operations. As a result, the
Exchange extended the fee waiver
through March 2021, but only for Floor
Broker firms that were unable to operate
at more than 50% of their March 2020
on-Floor staffing levels and for Market
Maker firms that have vacant or
‘‘unmanned’’ Podia for the entire month
due to COVID–19 related considerations
(the ‘‘Qualifying Firms’’).5 Because the
Trading Floor will continue to operate
with reduced capacity, the Exchange
proposes to extend the fee waiver for
Qualifying Firms through the earlier of
the first full month of a full reopening
4 See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 88596
(April 8, 2020), 85 FR 20796 (April 14, 2020) (SR–
NYSEArca–2020–29); 88812 (May 5, 2020), 85 FR
27787 (May 11, 2020) (SR–NYSEArca–2020–38).
5 See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 89038
(June 10, 2020), 85 FR 36447 (June 16, 2020) (SR–
NYSEArca–2020–52); 89242 (June 7, 2020), 85 FR
42037 (July 13, 2020) (SR–NYSEArca–2020–60);
89480 (August 5, 2020), 85 FR 48591 (August 11,
2020) (SR–NYSEArca–2020–69); 89694 (August 27,
2020), 85 FR 54608 (September 2, 2020) (SR–
NYSEArca–2020–76); 90191 (October 15, 2020), 85
FR 67032 (October 21, 2020) (SR–NYSEArca–2020–
90); 90838 (December 31, 2020), 86 FR 657 (January
6, 2021) (SR–NYSEArca–2020–115). See also Fee
Schedule, NYSE Arca OPTIONS: FLOOR and
EQUIPMENT and CO-LOCATION FEES.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:52 Mar 24, 2021
Jkt 253001
of the Trading Floor facilities to Floor
personnel or June 2021.6
Specifically, as with the prior fee
waivers, the proposed fee waiver covers
the following fixed fees for Qualifying
Firms, which relate directly to Floor
operations, are charged only to Floor
participants and do not apply to
participants that conduct business offFloor:
• Floor Booths;
• Market Maker Podia;
• Options Floor Access;
• Wire Services; and
• ISP Connection.7
The proposed fee change is designed
to reduce monthly costs for all
Qualifying Firms whose operations
continue to be disrupted even though
the Trading Floor has partially
reopened. In reducing this monthly
financial burden, the proposed change
would allow Qualifying Firms that had
Floor operations in March 2020 to
reallocate funds to assist with the cost
of shifting and maintaining their prior
fully-staffed on-Floor operations to offFloor and recoup losses as a result of the
partial reopening. The Exchange
believes that all Qualifying Firms would
benefit from this proposed fee change.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
Section 6(b) of the Act,8 in general, and
furthers the objectives of Sections
6(b)(4) and (5) of the Act,9 in particular,
because it provides for the equitable
allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and
other charges among its members,
issuers and other persons using its
facilities and does not unfairly
discriminate between customers,
issuers, brokers or dealers.
The Exchange operates in a highly
competitive market. The Commission
has repeatedly expressed its preference
for competition over regulatory
intervention in determining prices,
products, and services in the securities
markets. In Regulation NMS, the
Commission highlighted the importance
of market forces in determining prices
and SRO revenues and, also, recognized
that current regulation of the market
system ‘‘has been remarkably successful
in promoting market competition in its
broader forms that are most important to
investors and listed companies.’’ 10
6 See proposed Fee Schedule, NYSE Arca
OPTIONS: FLOOR and EQUIPMENT and COLOCATION FEES.
7 See id.
8 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
9 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
10 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808
(June 9, 2005), 70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005)
(S7–10–04) (‘‘Reg NMS Adopting Release’’).
PO 00000
Frm 00105
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
15981
There are currently 16 registered
options exchanges competing for order
flow. Based on publicly-available
information, and excluding index-based
options, no single exchange has more
than 16% of the market share of
executed volume of multiply-listed
equity and ETF options trades.11
Therefore, currently no exchange
possesses significant pricing power in
the execution of multiply-listed equity
and ETF options order flow. More
specifically, in February 2021, the
Exchange had less than 11% market
share of executed volume of multiplylisted equity and ETF options trades.12
This proposed fee change is
reasonable, equitable, and not unfairly
discriminatory because it would reduce
monthly costs for all Qualifying Firms
whose operations have been disrupted
despite the fact that the Trading Floor
has partially reopened because of the
social distancing requirements and/or
other health concerns related to
resuming operation on the Floor. In
reducing this monthly financial burden,
the proposed change would allow
Qualifying Firms that had Floor
operations in March 2020 to reallocate
funds to assist with the cost of shifting
and maintaining their prior fully-staffed
on-Floor operations to off-Floor and
recoup losses as a result of the partial
reopening of the Floor. The Exchange
believes that all Qualifying Firms would
benefit from this proposed fee change.
The Exchange believes the proposed
rule change is an equitable allocation of
its fees and credits as it merely
continues the previous fee waiver for
Qualifying Firms, which affects fees
charged only to Floor participants and
does not apply to participants that
conduct business off-Floor. The
Exchange believes it is an equitable
allocation of fees and credits to extend
the fee waiver for Qualifying Firms
because such firms have either no more
than half of their Floor staff (as
measured by either the March 2020 or
Exchange-approved) levels or have
vacant podia—and this reduction in
staffing levels on the Floor impacts the
speed, volume and efficiency with
which these firms can operate, which is
to their financial detriment.
11 The OCC publishes options and futures volume
in a variety of formats, including daily and monthly
volume by exchange, available here: https://
www.theocc.com/Market-Data/Market-DataReports/Volume-and-Open-Interest/MonthlyWeekly-Volume-Statistics.
12 Based on a compilation of OCC data for
monthly volume of equity-based options and
monthly volume of ETF-based options, see id., the
Exchange’s market share in multiply-listed equity
and ETF options increased from 10.23% for the
month of February 2020 to 10.74% for the month
of February 2021.
E:\FR\FM\25MRN1.SGM
25MRN1
15982
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 56 / Thursday, March 25, 2021 / Notices
The Exchange believes that the
proposal is not unfairly discriminatory
because the proposed continuation of
the fee waiver would affect all similarlysituated market participants on an equal
and non-discriminatory basis.
Finally, the Exchange believes that it
is subject to significant competitive
forces, as described below in the
Exchange’s statement regarding the
burden on competition.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
In accordance with Section 6(b)(8) of
the Act, the Exchange does not believe
that the proposed rule change would
impose any burden on competition that
is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
The Exchange believes that the
proposed changes would encourage the
continued participation of Qualifying
Firms, thereby promoting market depth,
price discovery and transparency and
would enhance order execution
opportunities for all market
participants. As a result, the Exchange
believes that the proposed change
furthers the Commission’s goal in
adopting Regulation NMS of fostering
integrated competition among orders,
which promotes ‘‘more efficient pricing
of individual stocks for all types of
orders, large and small.’’ 13
Intramarket Competition. The
proposed change, which continues the
fee waiver for all Qualifying Firms, is
designed to reduce monthly costs for
those Floor participants whose
operations continue to be impacted even
though the Trading Floor has partially
reopened. In reducing this monthly
financial burden, the proposed change
would allow Qualifying Firms that had
Floor operations in March 2020 to
reallocate funds to assist with the cost
of shifting and maintaining their
previously on-Floor operations to offFloor. The Exchange believes that the
proposed waiver of fees for Qualifying
Firms would not impose a disparate
burden on competition among market
participants on the Exchange because
off-Floor market participants are not
subject to these Floor-based fixed fees.
In addition, Floor-based firms that are
not subject to the extent of staffing
shortfalls as are Qualifying Firms, i.e.,
such firms have more than 50% of their
March 2020—or Exchange-approved—
staffing levels on the Floor and/or have
no vacant Podia during the month, do
not face the same operational disruption
and potential financial impact during
the partial reopening of the Floor.
13 See Reg NMS Adopting Release, supra note 10,
at 37499.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:52 Mar 24, 2021
Jkt 253001
Intermarket Competition. The
Exchange operates in a highly
competitive market in which market
participants can readily favor one of the
16 competing option exchanges if they
deem fee levels at a venue to be
excessive. In such an environment, the
Exchange must continually adjust its
fees to remain competitive with other
exchanges and to attract order flow to
the Exchange. Based on publiclyavailable information, and excluding
index-based options, no single exchange
currently has more than 16% of the
market share of executed volume of
multiply-listed equity and ETF options
trades.14 Therefore, currently no
exchange possesses significant pricing
power in the execution of multiplylisted equity and ETF options order
flow. More specifically, in February
2021, the Exchange had slightly over
10% market share of executed volume
of multiply-listed equity and ETF
options trades.15
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change reflects this
competitive environment because it
waives fees for Qualifying Firms and is
designed to reduce monthly costs for
Floor participants whose operations
continue to be disrupted even though
the Trading Floor has partially
reopened. In reducing this monthly
financial burden, the proposed change
would allow affected participants to
reallocate funds to assist with the cost
of shifting and maintaining their prior
fully staffed on-Floor operations to offFloor.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited
or received with respect to the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change is effective
upon filing pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) 16 of the Act and
subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b–4 17
thereunder, because it establishes a due,
fee, or other charge imposed by the
Exchange.
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of such proposed rule change, the
14 See
supra note 11.
on OCC data, supra note 12, the
Exchange’s market share in multiply-listed equity
and ETF options increased from 10.23% for the
month of February 2020 to 10.74% for the month
of February 2021.
16 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
17 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
15 Based
PO 00000
Frm 00106
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
under Section 19(b)(2)(B) 18 of the Act to
determine whether the proposed rule
change should be approved or
disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
NYSEArca–2021–18 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSEArca–2021–18. This
file number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549 on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change.
18 15
E:\FR\FM\25MRN1.SGM
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
25MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 56 / Thursday, March 25, 2021 / Notices
Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from
comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish
to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSEArca–2021–18, and
should be submitted on or before April
15, 2021.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.19
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021–06122 Filed 3–24–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–91376; File No. SR–ICEEU–
2021–002]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; ICE
Clear Europe Limited; Order Approving
Proposed Rule Change Relating to
Amendments to the ICE Clear Europe
Price Submission Disciplinary
Framework
March 19, 2021.
I. Introduction
On February 2, 2021, ICE Clear
Europe Limited (‘‘ICE Clear Europe’’)
filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’), pursuant
to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (the ‘‘Act’’) 1 and
Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 a proposed rule
change to modify certain provisions of
its Price Submission Disciplinary
Framework and to rename it as the
‘‘Price Submission Disciplinary
Procedure’’ (hereinafter referred to as
the ‘‘Procedure’’).3 The proposed rule
change was published for comment in
the Federal Register on February 18,
2021.4 The Commission did not receive
comments regarding the proposed rule
change. For the reasons discussed
below, the Commission is approving the
proposed rule change.
II. Description of the Proposed Rule
Change
ICE Clear Europe proposes to make
specific amendments to the current
19 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 Self-Regulatory Organizations; ICE Clear Europe
Limited; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change
Relating to Amendments to the ICE Clear Europe
Price Submission Disciplinary Framework,
Exchange Act Release No. 91114 (February 11,
2021), 86 FR 10152 (February 18, 2021) (SR–
ICEEU–2021–002) (‘‘Notice’’).
4 See Notice, supra note 3, 86 FR 10152.
1 15
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:52 Mar 24, 2021
Jkt 253001
Procedure for investigating and
disciplining Clearing Members for
missed price submissions when a
Clearing Member holds cleared open
interest in a single-name or index credit
default swap (‘‘CDS’’) product.5 The
proposed amendments are summarized
below.6
Cash Assessments for Missed
Submissions and Waivers
The proposed amendments in
renumbered Section 2.2.3 (Fixed Cash
Assessments for Missed Submissions)
would state that a Clearing Member in
receipt of a Notice of Investigation
issued in respect of an alleged Missed
Submission will have five days to
submit written comments. The proposed
amendments would also provide an
additional five days for ICE Clear
Europe to review the relevant Clearing
Member’s comments before sending a
Letter of Mindedness to the Clearing
Member under Rule 1002(f) at the
conclusion of the investigation. ICE
Clear Europe represents that these
proposed amendments would improve
the current process by affording the
Clearing Member an opportunity to
respond to the initial notice and giving
ICE Clear Europe time to assess the
Clearing Member’s response before
determining whether to take further
action under the Rules.7
The proposed rule change would also
clarify when ICE Clear Europe would
issue a cash assessment notice to a
Clearing Member, regardless of whether
ICE Clear Europe receives written
comments from the Clearing Member
during the ten-day period from the date
of a Letter of Mindedness. Specifically,
the proposed rule change would provide
that ICE Clear Europe will issue a cash
assessment notice following the expiry
of such ten-day period where it
determines that an assessment amount
is required to be collected. The
proposed rule change would make a
drafting clarification to specify that the
cash assessment notice would be
calculated according to the cash
assessment calculation details outlined
in the Procedure.
In addition, the proposed rule change
would remove the current investigation
procedures for one or more Missed
Submissions in a month for the type of
instrument (index or single-name)
involved. Instead, the proposed
amendments would update and clarify
5 Capitalized terms used not defined herein have
the meanings specified in the Procedure or the ICE
Clear Europe Clearing Rules (the ‘‘Rules’’), as
applicable.
6 The following description is substantially
excerpted from the Notice.
7 See Notice, 86 FR at 10152.
PO 00000
Frm 00107
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
15983
the procedures by which a Clearing
Member may assert that one or more
Missed Submissions were due to
extraordinary circumstances outside of
its control. In such circumstances, the
proposed rule change would designate
the Head of Regulation and Compliance
to determine whether such
circumstances apply, rather than the
currently designated Head of Clearing
Compliance.
ICE Clear Europe also proposes
changes in renumbered Section 2.2.3
(Fixed Cash Assessments for Missed
Submissions) to the process for granting
waivers of the applicable cash
assessment amount for Missed
Submissions based on the CDS product
type. The proposed rule change would
clarify that if a waiver is granted, no
cash assessment amount would be due
for the Missed Submission. Further, the
proposed rule change would change the
current eligibility provisions for such
waivers. ICE Clear Europe represents
that, under the current waiver process,
a Clearing Member receives only one
waiver over the course of its clearing
membership for a Missed Submission.8
The proposed rule change would change
that process by providing that a Clearing
Member is eligible for one waiver per
calendar year for Missed Submissions
for single-name products and one
waiver per calendar year for Missed
Submissions for index products.
The proposed rule change would also
expressly limit such waivers to Missed
Submissions caused by technical
failures. In addition, the proposed rule
change would require that Clearing
Members must provide an adequate
written explanation of the technical
failure and a summary of planned
remedial actions. The proposed rule
change would also specify that only the
first instance of a Missed Submission in
any calendar year for both single-name
and index products will be eligible for
a waiver. ICE Clear Europe represents
that it believes the proposed approach
to waivers strikes a better balance than
the current approach between the need
for robust submissions under the Policy
and the goal of not unnecessarily
penalizing Clearing Members for
technical failures.9
Changes Regarding Missed Submissions
In the definition of the term ‘‘Missed
Submissions’’ in Section 2.1.2, ICE Clear
Europe would change the type of
submissions that count as Missed
Submissions. Specifically, ICE Clear
Europe would remove the statement that
spread submissions will be counted as
8 Id.
9 See
E:\FR\FM\25MRN1.SGM
Notice, 86 FR at 10153.
25MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 56 (Thursday, March 25, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15980-15983]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-06122]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-91372; No. SR-NYSEArca-2021-18]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Modify the NYSE
Arca Options Fee Schedule
March 19, 2021.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the ``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby
given that, on March 10, 2021, NYSE Arca, Inc. (``NYSE Arca'' or the
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
\3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to modify the NYSE Arca Options Fee Schedule
(``Fee Schedule'') to extend the waiver of certain Floor-based fixed
fees. The Exchange proposes to implement the fee change effective April
1, 2021. The proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
website at www.nyse.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and
at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of,
[[Page 15981]]
and basis for, the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it
received on the proposed rule change. The text of those statements may
be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has
prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the
most significant parts of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The purpose of this filing is to modify the Fee Schedule to extend
the waiver of certain Floor-based fixed fees for market participants
that have been unable to resume their Floor operations to a certain
capacity level, as discussed below. The Exchange proposes to implement
the fee change effective April 1, 2021.
On March 18, 2020, the Exchange announced that it would temporarily
close the Trading Floor, effective Monday, March 23, 2020, as a
precautionary measure to prevent the potential spread of COVID-19.
Following the temporary closure of the Trading Floor, the Exchange
waived certain Floor-based fixed fees for April and May 2020.\4\
Although the Trading Floor partially reopened on May 4, 2020 and Floor-
based open outcry activity is supported, certain participants have been
unable to resume pre-Floor closure levels of operations. As a result,
the Exchange extended the fee waiver through March 2021, but only for
Floor Broker firms that were unable to operate at more than 50% of
their March 2020 on-Floor staffing levels and for Market Maker firms
that have vacant or ``unmanned'' Podia for the entire month due to
COVID-19 related considerations (the ``Qualifying Firms'').\5\ Because
the Trading Floor will continue to operate with reduced capacity, the
Exchange proposes to extend the fee waiver for Qualifying Firms through
the earlier of the first full month of a full reopening of the Trading
Floor facilities to Floor personnel or June 2021.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 88596 (April 8,
2020), 85 FR 20796 (April 14, 2020) (SR-NYSEArca-2020-29); 88812
(May 5, 2020), 85 FR 27787 (May 11, 2020) (SR-NYSEArca-2020-38).
\5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 89038 (June 10,
2020), 85 FR 36447 (June 16, 2020) (SR-NYSEArca-2020-52); 89242
(June 7, 2020), 85 FR 42037 (July 13, 2020) (SR-NYSEArca-2020-60);
89480 (August 5, 2020), 85 FR 48591 (August 11, 2020) (SR-NYSEArca-
2020-69); 89694 (August 27, 2020), 85 FR 54608 (September 2, 2020)
(SR-NYSEArca-2020-76); 90191 (October 15, 2020), 85 FR 67032
(October 21, 2020) (SR-NYSEArca-2020-90); 90838 (December 31, 2020),
86 FR 657 (January 6, 2021) (SR-NYSEArca-2020-115). See also Fee
Schedule, NYSE Arca OPTIONS: FLOOR and EQUIPMENT and CO-LOCATION
FEES.
\6\ See proposed Fee Schedule, NYSE Arca OPTIONS: FLOOR and
EQUIPMENT and CO-LOCATION FEES.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Specifically, as with the prior fee waivers, the proposed fee
waiver covers the following fixed fees for Qualifying Firms, which
relate directly to Floor operations, are charged only to Floor
participants and do not apply to participants that conduct business
off-Floor:
Floor Booths;
Market Maker Podia;
Options Floor Access;
Wire Services; and
ISP Connection.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed fee change is designed to reduce monthly costs for all
Qualifying Firms whose operations continue to be disrupted even though
the Trading Floor has partially reopened. In reducing this monthly
financial burden, the proposed change would allow Qualifying Firms that
had Floor operations in March 2020 to reallocate funds to assist with
the cost of shifting and maintaining their prior fully-staffed on-Floor
operations to off-Floor and recoup losses as a result of the partial
reopening. The Exchange believes that all Qualifying Firms would
benefit from this proposed fee change.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b) of the Act,\8\ in general, and furthers the
objectives of Sections 6(b)(4) and (5) of the Act,\9\ in particular,
because it provides for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues,
fees, and other charges among its members, issuers and other persons
using its facilities and does not unfairly discriminate between
customers, issuers, brokers or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange operates in a highly competitive market. The
Commission has repeatedly expressed its preference for competition over
regulatory intervention in determining prices, products, and services
in the securities markets. In Regulation NMS, the Commission
highlighted the importance of market forces in determining prices and
SRO revenues and, also, recognized that current regulation of the
market system ``has been remarkably successful in promoting market
competition in its broader forms that are most important to investors
and listed companies.'' \10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 (June 9,
2005), 70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005) (S7-10-04) (``Reg NMS
Adopting Release'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
There are currently 16 registered options exchanges competing for
order flow. Based on publicly-available information, and excluding
index-based options, no single exchange has more than 16% of the market
share of executed volume of multiply-listed equity and ETF options
trades.\11\ Therefore, currently no exchange possesses significant
pricing power in the execution of multiply-listed equity and ETF
options order flow. More specifically, in February 2021, the Exchange
had less than 11% market share of executed volume of multiply-listed
equity and ETF options trades.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ The OCC publishes options and futures volume in a variety
of formats, including daily and monthly volume by exchange,
available here: https://www.theocc.com/Market-Data/Market-Data-Reports/Volume-and-Open-Interest/Monthly-Weekly-Volume-Statistics.
\12\ Based on a compilation of OCC data for monthly volume of
equity-based options and monthly volume of ETF-based options, see
id., the Exchange's market share in multiply-listed equity and ETF
options increased from 10.23% for the month of February 2020 to
10.74% for the month of February 2021.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This proposed fee change is reasonable, equitable, and not unfairly
discriminatory because it would reduce monthly costs for all Qualifying
Firms whose operations have been disrupted despite the fact that the
Trading Floor has partially reopened because of the social distancing
requirements and/or other health concerns related to resuming operation
on the Floor. In reducing this monthly financial burden, the proposed
change would allow Qualifying Firms that had Floor operations in March
2020 to reallocate funds to assist with the cost of shifting and
maintaining their prior fully-staffed on-Floor operations to off-Floor
and recoup losses as a result of the partial reopening of the Floor.
The Exchange believes that all Qualifying Firms would benefit from this
proposed fee change.
The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is an equitable
allocation of its fees and credits as it merely continues the previous
fee waiver for Qualifying Firms, which affects fees charged only to
Floor participants and does not apply to participants that conduct
business off-Floor. The Exchange believes it is an equitable allocation
of fees and credits to extend the fee waiver for Qualifying Firms
because such firms have either no more than half of their Floor staff
(as measured by either the March 2020 or Exchange-approved) levels or
have vacant podia--and this reduction in staffing levels on the Floor
impacts the speed, volume and efficiency with which these firms can
operate, which is to their financial detriment.
[[Page 15982]]
The Exchange believes that the proposal is not unfairly
discriminatory because the proposed continuation of the fee waiver
would affect all similarly-situated market participants on an equal and
non-discriminatory basis.
Finally, the Exchange believes that it is subject to significant
competitive forces, as described below in the Exchange's statement
regarding the burden on competition.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
In accordance with Section 6(b)(8) of the Act, the Exchange does
not believe that the proposed rule change would impose any burden on
competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. The Exchange believes that the proposed changes
would encourage the continued participation of Qualifying Firms,
thereby promoting market depth, price discovery and transparency and
would enhance order execution opportunities for all market
participants. As a result, the Exchange believes that the proposed
change furthers the Commission's goal in adopting Regulation NMS of
fostering integrated competition among orders, which promotes ``more
efficient pricing of individual stocks for all types of orders, large
and small.'' \13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ See Reg NMS Adopting Release, supra note 10, at 37499.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Intramarket Competition. The proposed change, which continues the
fee waiver for all Qualifying Firms, is designed to reduce monthly
costs for those Floor participants whose operations continue to be
impacted even though the Trading Floor has partially reopened. In
reducing this monthly financial burden, the proposed change would allow
Qualifying Firms that had Floor operations in March 2020 to reallocate
funds to assist with the cost of shifting and maintaining their
previously on-Floor operations to off-Floor. The Exchange believes that
the proposed waiver of fees for Qualifying Firms would not impose a
disparate burden on competition among market participants on the
Exchange because off-Floor market participants are not subject to these
Floor-based fixed fees. In addition, Floor-based firms that are not
subject to the extent of staffing shortfalls as are Qualifying Firms,
i.e., such firms have more than 50% of their March 2020--or Exchange-
approved--staffing levels on the Floor and/or have no vacant Podia
during the month, do not face the same operational disruption and
potential financial impact during the partial reopening of the Floor.
Intermarket Competition. The Exchange operates in a highly
competitive market in which market participants can readily favor one
of the 16 competing option exchanges if they deem fee levels at a venue
to be excessive. In such an environment, the Exchange must continually
adjust its fees to remain competitive with other exchanges and to
attract order flow to the Exchange. Based on publicly-available
information, and excluding index-based options, no single exchange
currently has more than 16% of the market share of executed volume of
multiply-listed equity and ETF options trades.\14\ Therefore, currently
no exchange possesses significant pricing power in the execution of
multiply-listed equity and ETF options order flow. More specifically,
in February 2021, the Exchange had slightly over 10% market share of
executed volume of multiply-listed equity and ETF options trades.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ See supra note 11.
\15\ Based on OCC data, supra note 12, the Exchange's market
share in multiply-listed equity and ETF options increased from
10.23% for the month of February 2020 to 10.74% for the month of
February 2021.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change reflects this
competitive environment because it waives fees for Qualifying Firms and
is designed to reduce monthly costs for Floor participants whose
operations continue to be disrupted even though the Trading Floor has
partially reopened. In reducing this monthly financial burden, the
proposed change would allow affected participants to reallocate funds
to assist with the cost of shifting and maintaining their prior fully
staffed on-Floor operations to off-Floor.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change is effective upon filing pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A) \16\ of the Act and subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule
19b-4 \17\ thereunder, because it establishes a due, fee, or other
charge imposed by the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\17\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings under
Section 19(b)(2)(B) \18\ of the Act to determine whether the proposed
rule change should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-NYSEArca-2021-18 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEArca-2021-18. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change.
[[Page 15983]]
Persons submitting comments are cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEArca-2021-18, and should
be submitted on or before April 15, 2021.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-06122 Filed 3-24-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P