Self-Regulatory Organizations; ICE Clear Credit LLC; Order Approving Proposed Rule Change Relating to the ICC Governance Playbook, 15747-15750 [2021-06002]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 55 / Wednesday, March 24, 2021 / Notices
Washington, DC 20549 on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of NSCC and on DTCC’s website
(https://dtcc.com/legal/sec-rulefilings.aspx). All comments received
will be posted without change. Persons
submitting comments are cautioned that
we do not redact or edit personal
identifying information from comment
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–NSCC–
2021–002 and should be submitted on
or before April 14, 2021.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.61
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021–05995 Filed 3–23–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–91348; File No. SR–
NASDAQ–2020–062]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; The
Nasdaq Stock Market LLC; Notice of
Designation of a Longer Period for
Commission Action on Proceedings To
Determine Whether To Approve or
Disapprove a Proposed Rule Change,
as Modified by Amendment, No. 1, To
Amend Listing Rules Applicable to
Special Purpose Acquisition
Companies Whose Business Plan Is To
Complete One or More Business
Combinations
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
March 18, 2021.
On September 3, 2020, The Nasdaq
Stock Market LLC (‘‘Nasdaq’’ or
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’), pursuant to Section
19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4
thereunder,2 a proposed rule change to
amend its listing rules to permit
companies whose business plan is to
complete one or more business
combinations (‘‘SPACs’’ or ‘‘Acquisition
Companies’’) 15 calendar days following
the closing of a business combination to
demonstrate that the SPAC has satisfied
the applicable round lot shareholder
requirement. The proposed rule change
was published for comment in the
61 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:37 Mar 23, 2021
Jkt 253001
Federal Register on September 22,
2020.3
On November 4, 2020, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Exchange Act,4
the Commission designated a longer
period within which to approve the
proposed rule change, disapprove the
proposed rule change, or institute
proceedings to determine whether to
disapprove the proposed rule change.5
On December 16, 2020, the Commission
instituted proceedings under Section
19(b)(2)(B) of the Act 6 to determine
whether to approve or disapprove the
proposed rule change.7 On February 25,
2021, the Exchange filed Amendment
No. 1 to the proposed rule change,
which superseded the proposed rule
change as originally filed. Amendment
No. 1 to the proposed rule change was
published for comment in the Federal
Register on March 16, 2021.8
Section 19(b)(2) of the Exchange Act 9
provides that, after initiating
disapproval proceedings, the
Commission shall issue an order
approving or disapproving the proposed
rule change not later than 180 days after
the date of publication of notice of filing
of the proposed rule change. The
Commission may extend the period for
issuing an order approving or
disapproving the proposed rule change,
however, by not more than 60 days if
the Commission determines that a
longer period is appropriate and
publishes the reasons for such
determination. The proposed rule
change was published for comment in
the Federal Register on September 22,
2020. The 180th day after publication of
the Notice is March 21, 2021. The
Commission is extending the time
period for approving or disapproving
the proposal for an additional 60 days.
The Commission finds it appropriate
to designate a longer period within
which to issue an order approving or
disapproving the proposed rule change
so that it has sufficient time to consider
the proposed rule change as modified by
Amendment No. 1, along with the
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 89897
(September 16, 2020), 85 FR 59574 (‘‘Notice’’).
Comments received on the proposal are available on
the Commission’s website at: https://www.sec.gov/
comments/sr-nasdaq-2020-062/
srnasdaq2020062.htm.
4 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
5 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 90340,
85 FR 71704 (November 10, 2020). The Commission
designated December 21, 2020, as the date by which
it should approve, disapprove, or institute
proceedings to determine whether to disapprove the
proposed rule change.
6 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
7 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 90682,
85 FR 83113 (December 16, 2020).
8 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 91294
(March 10, 2021), 86 FR 14508 (March 16, 2021).
9 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
PO 00000
Frm 00108
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
15747
comments received on the proposal and
the Exchange’s response. Accordingly,
the Commission, pursuant to Section
19(b)(2) of the Exchange Act,10
designates May 20, 2021 as the date by
which the Commission shall either
approve or disapprove the proposed
rule change (File No. SR–NASDAQ–
2020–062) as modified by Amendment
No. 1.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.11
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021–05994 Filed 3–23–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–91361; File No. SR–ICC–
2021–004]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; ICE
Clear Credit LLC; Order Approving
Proposed Rule Change Relating to the
ICC Governance Playbook
March 18, 2021.
I. Introduction
On January 29, 2021, ICE Clear Credit
LLC (‘‘ICC’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’), pursuant to Section
19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (the ‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4
thereunder,2 a proposed rule change to
update and formalize the ICC
Governance Playbook. The proposed
rule change was published for comment
in the Federal Register on February 16,
2021.3 The Commission did not receive
comments regarding the proposed rule
change. For the reasons discussed
below, the Commission is approving the
proposed rule change.
II. Description of the Proposed Rule
Change
The principal purpose of the
proposed rule change is to update and
formalize the ICC Governance
Playbook.4 Specifically, the proposed
rule change would consolidate and
summarize governance arrangements set
forth in the ICC Clearing Rules
10 Id.
11 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(57).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 Self-Regulatory Organizations; ICE Clear Credit
LLC; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change
Relating to the ICC Governance Playbook; Exchange
Act Release No. 91090 (Feb. 9, 2021); 86 FR 9557
(Feb. 16, 2021) (‘‘Notice’’).
4 The description that follows is substantially
excerpted from the Notice, 86 FR at 9557.
1 15
E:\FR\FM\24MRN1.SGM
24MRN1
15748
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 55 / Wednesday, March 24, 2021 / Notices
(‘‘Rules’’), operating agreement, and
other ICC policies and procedures
within the Governance Playbook
document. The Governance Playbook
contains information regarding the
governance structure at ICC, which
includes the Board, committees, and
management. The document is divided
in six parts and sets out (i) the purpose
of the document, (ii) an introduction to
the ICC governance structure, (iii)
information on the ICC Board of
Managers (the ‘‘Board,’’ with each
member a ‘‘Manager’’), (iv) descriptions
of the committees at ICC, (v)
descriptions of the special purpose
committees at ICC, and (vi) a revision
history of the Governance Playbook and
an appendix that outlines the roles,
responsibilities, and required skills of
key senior management positions and
provides an email template relating to
the annual reconstitution of ICC’s Risk
Committee.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
1. Purpose
ICC proposes to formalize and update
the purpose section of the Governance
Playbook. Specifically, the purpose
section includes a statement that the
governance guidelines set forth in the
Governance Playbook are intended to
comply with applicable Commission
and Commodity Futures Trading
Commission (‘‘CFTC’’) regulations. This
statement would include an updated
citation to a relevant CFTC Regulation.
2. Introduction to ICC Governance
Structure
In the introduction section of the
Governance Playbook, ICC proposes to
formalize its general mission and
describe its overall governance
structure, comprised of its Board,
committees and management. The
introduction section reflects the Boarddetermined mission statement that ICC
is to provide safe and sound central
counterparty services to reduce systemic
risk in an efficient and compliant
manner while generating positive
returns for shareholders. The
introduction section also states that
ICC’s governance arrangements are clear
and transparent, promote its safety and
efficiency and support the stability of
the broader financial system, other
relevant public interest considerations
and the objectives of relevant
stakeholders.
3. Board of Managers
In this section of the Governance
Playbook, ICC proposes to formalize the
Board’s sole responsibility for the
control and management of ICC’s
operations, subject only to prior
consultation rights of the ICC Risk
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:30 Mar 23, 2021
Jkt 253001
Committee and the ICC Risk
Management Subcommittee as
described in Chapter 5 of its Rules. This
section would clarify that ICC’s officers,
including the Chief Operating Officer,
Chief Compliance Officer, Chief Risk
Officer and General Counsel, are
designated by the Board following a
determination that they possess the
requisite experience and skills to
discharge their responsibilities and
report to the ICC President. The section
also formalizes additional reporting
lines of certain ICC officers to ensure
that relevant personnel have sufficient
access to the Board, consistent with
relevant regulation. Specifically, the
Chief Compliance Officer has an
additional reporting line directly to the
Board, and the Chief Risk Officer has an
additional reporting line directly to the
Chairperson of the Risk Committee, who
also is a Manager on the Board. This
section of the Governance Playbook
details how the Board guides
management with respect to strategic
planning and priority setting.
Additionally, this section of the
Governance Playbook describes the
composition of the Board, and specifies
the fitness standards required of each
Manager, as well as the fitness standards
and qualifications of the Board as a
whole. ICC represents that it includes
such procedures in the Governance
Playbook to ensure that the Board
consists of suitable individuals having
appropriate skills and incentives and
that Managers have the appropriate
experience, skills, and integrity
necessary to discharge their Board
responsibilities.5 The Governance
Playbook describes the election
procedures for new Managers and
specifies who is responsible for electing
new Managers and for ensuring such
Managers meet the fitness standards.
The Governance Playbook also contains
information regarding scheduling of
meetings and meeting frequency, and
lists all documents relevant to Board
operations. The Governance Playbook
sets forth the process for determining
the independence of those Managers
who are required to be independent.
Additionally, the document lists the
independence qualifications considered
as part of such independence
determinations and describes the annual
questionnaire process each independent
Manager is required to complete. The
Governance Playbook also describes the
self-evaluation survey process by which
ICC reviews the performance of the
Board and its individual Managers on
5 See
PO 00000
Notice, 86 FR at 9557.
Frm 00109
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
an annual basis in accordance with
applicable regulation.
The Governance Playbook also
contains information on required
disclosures of the Board’s major
decisions under relevant regulations.
The Governance Playbook formalizes
arrangements by which all major
decisions of the Board are clearly
disclosed to clearing members, other
relevant stakeholders, and ICC’s
regulators. In addition, the Governance
Playbook provides governance
procedures for clearly disclosing to the
public the Board’s major decisions that
have a broad market impact. With
respect to information made available to
the public, ICC posts on its website
relevant rules and material procedures
and documents. ICC maintains a
comprehensive public Disclosure
Framework that describes its material
rules, policies, and procedures
regarding its legal, governance, risk
management, and operating framework.
ICC updates the Disclosure Framework
every two years or more frequently
following material changes to ICC’s
systems or environment in which it
operates.
Further, the Governance Playbook
describes the Board’s role in reviewing
the performance and compensation of
senior managers who are responsible for
executing the Board’s decisions
throughout the year. As part of this
process, the Board will consider, in
accordance with relevant regulation,
whether senior management continues
to have the appropriate experience,
skills, and integrity necessary to
discharge their responsibilities.
4. Committees
In this section of the Governance
Playbook, ICC would formalize
information regarding the roles and
responsibilities of the various
committees at ICC, including the Audit
Committee, Risk Committee, Risk
Management Subcommittee, Advisory
Committee, Futures Commission
Merchant (FCM) Executive Council,
Participant Review Committee, Credit
Review Subcommittee, New Initiatives
Approval Committee, Operations
Working Group, Trading Advisory
Group, Business Continuity Planning
(BCP) and Disaster Recovery (DR)
Oversight Committee of the Compliance
Committee, Risk Working Group,
Compliance Committee, and Steering
Committee. The Governance Playbook
further details and updates the
membership composition and meeting
frequency for each committee and
contains a listing of all relevant
committee documents (including, as
applicable, a charter, meeting minutes,
E:\FR\FM\24MRN1.SGM
24MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 55 / Wednesday, March 24, 2021 / Notices
and agendas). As applicable, the
Governance Playbook details procedures
for electing new members to a
committee. The Governance Playbook
also includes procedures for the annual
Audit Committee performance review
and the annual reconstitution of the
Risk Committee.
5. Special Purpose Committees
This section of the Governance
Playbook would formalize information
regarding ICC’s special purpose
committees, including the Business
Conduct Committee, Regional CDS
Committees, and the CDS Default
Committee. The Governance Playbook
contains a brief description of each
special purpose committee, details
membership composition and meeting
frequency, and lists relevant committee
documents. As applicable, the
Governance Playbook contains
information regarding the appointment
of new members.
6. Revision History and Appendix
Finally, the Governance Playbook
includes a revision history to document
the date, versions, and revisions to the
Governance Playbook document. An
appendix follows the revision history
with relevant detailed information,
including a record of the roles,
responsibilities, and required skills of
key senior management in Appendix 1,
and an email template relating to the
annual reconstitution of the ICC Risk
Committee composition in Appendix 2.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
III. Discussion and Commission
Findings
Section 19(b)(2)(C) of the Act directs
the Commission to approve a proposed
rule change of a self-regulatory
organization if it finds that such
proposed rule change is consistent with
the requirements of the Act and the
rules and regulations thereunder
applicable to such organization.6 For the
reasons given below, the Commission
finds that the proposed rule change is
consistent with Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of
the Act 7 and Rules 17Ad–22(e)(2) and
(e)(23)(i), (iv), and (v) thereunder.8
A. Consistency With Section
17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act
Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act
requires, in part, that the rules of a
clearing agency, such as ICC, be
designed to promote the prompt and
accurate clearance and settlement of
securities transactions and, to the extent
applicable, derivative agreements,
contracts, and transactions, to assure the
safeguarding of securities and funds
which are in the custody or control of
ICC or for which it is responsible, and
to protect the public interest.9
As noted above, the principal purpose
of the proposed rule change is to
formalize and update the Governance
Playbook as a single reference document
of governance guidelines that
consolidates and summarizes the ICC
governance arrangements set forth in the
Rules, operating agreement, and a
number of written ICC policies and
procedures. The introduction section of
the Governance Playbook states its
intended purposes to ensure that ICC’s
governance arrangements are clear and
transparent, promote ICC’s safety and
efficiency and support the stability of
the broader financial system, other
relevant public interest considerations
and the objectives of relevant
stakeholders.
The Governance Playbook also
reflects the Board’s sole responsibility
for the control and management of ICC’s
operations, subject only to prior
consultation rights of the ICC Risk
Committee and the ICC Risk
Management Subcommittee as
described in Chapter 5 of ICC’s Rules.
The Governance Playbook describes the
composition of the Board and the
election procedures for new Managers,
provides information regarding
scheduling of meetings and meeting
frequency, and updates required
disclosures under relevant regulations
of the Board’s major decisions. The
Governance Playbook describes the role
of the Board in reviewing the
performance and compensation of
senior managers responsible for
executing the Board’s decisions,
information regarding the roles and
responsibilities of the various
committees at ICC, information
regarding ICC’s special purpose
committees, and a revision history and
an appendix with relevant information
that outlines the roles, responsibilities,
and required skills of key senior
management positions and provides an
email template relating to the annual
reconstitution of ICC’s Risk Committee.
Governance arrangements are critical
to the sound operation of clearing
agencies.10 Specifically, clear and
transparent governance documents
promote accountability and reliability in
the decisions, rules, and procedures of
9 15
6 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(C).
7 15 U.S.C. 78q–1(b)(3)(F).
8 17 CFR 240.17Ad–22(e)(2) and (e)(23)(i), (iv),
and (v).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:30 Mar 23, 2021
Jkt 253001
U.S.C. 78q–1(b)(3)(F).
Exchange Act Release No. 71699
(May 21, 2014), 79 FR 29508, 29521 (May 22, 2014)
(‘‘Covered Clearing Agency Standards Proposing
Release’’).
10 Securities
PO 00000
Frm 00110
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
15749
a clearing agency.11 Clear and
transparent governance documents also
provide interested parties, including
owners, members, and general members
of the public, with information about
how a clearing agency’s decisions are
made and what the rules and
procedures are designed to
accomplish.12 Further, the decisions,
rules, and procedures of a clearing
agency are important, as they can have
widespread impact, affecting multiple
market members, financial institutions,
markets, and jurisdictions.13
The Commission believes that the
proposed rule change would provide
ICC stakeholders with a better
understanding of how ICC makes
decisions that could ultimately affect
them and, potentially, the broader
financial system. The proposed rule
change would also help the Board, as
well as ICC’s management, employees,
and members, understand the roles and
responsibilities of ICC officers,
committees and subcommittees. The
Commission further believes that the
Governance Playbook should enhance
the clarity and transparency of ICC’s
governance structure and facilitate the
efficiency and effectiveness of ICC’s
governance procedures by providing a
single, consolidated summary document
of governance guidelines for ease of
reference. For these reasons, the
proposed rule change should facilitate
ICC’s ability to provide clearing services
that are supported by, and consistent
with, clear and transparent governance
arrangements that comply with relevant
regulations and internal policies and
procedures, thereby helping ICC
maintain prudent risk management
processes to promote the prompt and
accurate clearance of settlement and
securities transactions and derivative
agreements, contracts and transactions
cleared by ICC, to assure the
safeguarding of securities and funds in
the custody or control of ICC, and to
protect the public interest.14
For these reasons, the Commission
finds that the proposed rule change is
consistent with Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of
the Act.15
B. Consistency With Rule 17Ad–22(e)(2)
Under the Act
Rule 17Ad–22(e)(2) under the Act
requires each covered clearing agency to
establish, implement, maintain and
11 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 64017
(March 3, 2011), 76 FR 14472 (March 16, 2011) at
14488.
12 Id.
13 Covered Clearing Agency Standards Proposing
Release, 79 FR at 29521.
14 15 U.S.C. 78q–1(b)(3)(F).
15 15 U.S.C. 78q–1(b)(3)(F).
E:\FR\FM\24MRN1.SGM
24MRN1
15750
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 55 / Wednesday, March 24, 2021 / Notices
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
enforce written policies and procedures
reasonably designed to provide for
governance arrangements that, among
other things, are clear and transparent,
establish that the board of directors and
senior management have appropriate
experience and skills to discharge their
duties and responsibilities, and specify
clear and direct lines of responsibility.16
As stated above, the proposed rule
change would update and formalize the
Governance Playbook to reflect the
governance arrangements in place at
ICC, including those that specify: the
Board’s responsibility for the control
and management of ICC’s operations,
the composition of the Board, the
election procedures for new Managers,
the fitness standards and qualifications
required of each Manager and the Board
as a whole, and the process to review
the performance of ICC’s senior
managers. The Commission believes
that these aspects of the proposed rule
change should help ICC ensure that the
Board and individual Managers, as well
as ICC’s senior managers, including the
Chief Operating Officer, Chief
Compliance Officer, Chief Risk Officer
and General Counsel, have the
appropriate experience and skills to
discharge their duties and
responsibilities. Further, the
Commission believes the Governance
Playbook specifies clear and direct lines
of responsibility by identifying
reporting lines of certain ICC officers to
ensure they have sufficient access to the
Board, consistent with relevant
regulation. For these reasons, the
Commission believes that the proposed
rule change is consistent with Rule
17Ad–22(e)(2) 17 under the Act.
C. Consistency With Rule 17Ad–
22(e)(23)(i), (iv), and (v) Under the Act
Rule 17Ad–22(e)(23)(i), (iv), and (v)
under the Act requires each covered
clearing agency to establish, implement,
maintain and enforce written policies
and procedures reasonably designed to
provide for, among other things, (1)
publicly disclosing all relevant rules
and material procedures, including key
aspects of its default rules and
procedures, (2) a comprehensive public
disclosure that describes its material
rules, policies, and procedures
regarding its legal, governance, risk
management, and operating framework,
accurate in all material respects at the
time of publication, and (3) updating the
public disclosure every two years, or
more frequently following changes to its
system or the environment in which it
operates to the extent necessary to
16 17
17 17
CFR 240.17Ad–22(e)(2).
CFR 240.17Ad–22(e)(2).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:30 Mar 23, 2021
Jkt 253001
ensure statements previously provided
remain accurate in all material
respects.18 As noted above, the
Governance Playbook reflects updated
arrangements by which all major
decisions of the Board are clearly
disclosed to clearing members, other
relevant stakeholders, and ICC’s
regulators. In addition, the Governance
Playbook provides governance
procedures for clearly disclosing to the
public the Board’s major decisions that
have a broad market impact. With
respect to information made available to
the public, the Governance Playbook
specifies that ICC posts on its website
all relevant rules and material
procedures and documents, as required
by applicable regulations. The
Commission believes that these aspects
of the Governance Playbook should help
ensure that ICC publicly discloses all
relevant rules and material procedures,
including key aspects of its default rules
and procedures.
In addition, the Governance Playbook
specifies that ICC maintains a
comprehensive public Disclosure
Framework that describes its material
rules, policies, and procedures
regarding its legal, governance, risk
management, and operating framework.
The Governance Playbook formalizes
the process by which ICC Legal will
update the public Disclosure
Framework every two years or more
frequently following material changes to
ICC’s systems or environment in which
it operates, including updates for major
decisions of the Board with a broad
market impact. The Commission
believes that these aspects of the
Governance Playbook should help
ensure ICC’s compliance with its
regulatory obligation to provide a
comprehensive public disclosure that is
updated every two years or more
frequently following material changes.
For these reasons, the Commission
believes that the proposed rule change
is consistent with Rule 17Ad–
22(e)(23)(i), (iv), and (v) 19 under the
Act.
D. Conclusion
On the basis of the foregoing, the
Commission finds that the proposed
rule change is consistent with the
requirements of the Act, and in
particular, with the requirements of
Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act 20 and
Rules 17Ad–22(e)(2) and (e)(23)(i), (iv),
and (v) thereunder.21
18 17
CFR 240.17Ad–22(e)(23)(i), (iv), and (v).
CFR 240.17Ad–22(e)(23)(i), (iv) and (v).
20 15 U.S.C. 78q–1(b)(3)(F).
21 17 CFR 240.17Ad–22(e)(2) and (e)(23)(i), (iv),
and (v).
19 17
PO 00000
Frm 00111
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
It is therefore ordered pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act 22 that the
proposed rule change (SR–ICC–2021–
004), be, and hereby is, approved.23
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.24
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021–06002 Filed 3–23–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–91347; File No. SR–NSCC–
2021–801]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
National Securities Clearing
Corporation; Notice of Filing of
Advance Notice To Amend the
Supplemental Liquidity Deposit
Requirements
March 18, 2021.
Pursuant to Section 806(e)(1) of Title
VIII of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street
Reform and Consumer Protection Act
entitled the Payment, Clearing, and
Settlement Supervision Act of 2010
(‘‘Clearing Supervision Act’’) 1 and Rule
19b–4(n)(1)(i) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’),2 notice is
hereby given that on March 5, 2021,
National Securities Clearing Corporation
(‘‘NSCC’’) filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’)
the advance notice as described in Items
I, II and III below, which Items have
been prepared by the clearing agency.3
The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments on the
advance notice from interested persons.
I. Clearing Agency’s Statement of the
Terms of Substance of the Advance
Notice
This advance notice consists of
modifications to Rule 4(A)
(Supplemental Liquidity Deposits) of
the NSCC’s Rules & Procedures
(‘‘Rules’’) to (1) calculate and collect,
when applicable, supplemental
22 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
approving the proposed rule change, the
Commission considered the proposal’s impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. 15
U.S.C. 78c(f).
24 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
1 12 U.S.C. 5465(e)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4(n)(1)(i).
3 NSCC filed this advance notice as a proposed
rule change (File No. SR–NSCC–2021–002) with the
Commission pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Act,
15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1), and Rule 19b-4 thereunder, 17
CFR 240.19b–4. A copy of the proposed rule change
is available at https://www.dtcc.com/legal/sec-rulefilings.aspx.
23 In
E:\FR\FM\24MRN1.SGM
24MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 55 (Wednesday, March 24, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15747-15750]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-06002]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-91361; File No. SR-ICC-2021-004]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; ICE Clear Credit LLC; Order
Approving Proposed Rule Change Relating to the ICC Governance Playbook
March 18, 2021.
I. Introduction
On January 29, 2021, ICE Clear Credit LLC (``ICC'') filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant to
Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act'')
\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to update and
formalize the ICC Governance Playbook. The proposed rule change was
published for comment in the Federal Register on February 16, 2021.\3\
The Commission did not receive comments regarding the proposed rule
change. For the reasons discussed below, the Commission is approving
the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ Self-Regulatory Organizations; ICE Clear Credit LLC; Notice
of Filing of Proposed Rule Change Relating to the ICC Governance
Playbook; Exchange Act Release No. 91090 (Feb. 9, 2021); 86 FR 9557
(Feb. 16, 2021) (``Notice'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Description of the Proposed Rule Change
The principal purpose of the proposed rule change is to update and
formalize the ICC Governance Playbook.\4\ Specifically, the proposed
rule change would consolidate and summarize governance arrangements set
forth in the ICC Clearing Rules
[[Page 15748]]
(``Rules''), operating agreement, and other ICC policies and procedures
within the Governance Playbook document. The Governance Playbook
contains information regarding the governance structure at ICC, which
includes the Board, committees, and management. The document is divided
in six parts and sets out (i) the purpose of the document, (ii) an
introduction to the ICC governance structure, (iii) information on the
ICC Board of Managers (the ``Board,'' with each member a ``Manager''),
(iv) descriptions of the committees at ICC, (v) descriptions of the
special purpose committees at ICC, and (vi) a revision history of the
Governance Playbook and an appendix that outlines the roles,
responsibilities, and required skills of key senior management
positions and provides an email template relating to the annual
reconstitution of ICC's Risk Committee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ The description that follows is substantially excerpted from
the Notice, 86 FR at 9557.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Purpose
ICC proposes to formalize and update the purpose section of the
Governance Playbook. Specifically, the purpose section includes a
statement that the governance guidelines set forth in the Governance
Playbook are intended to comply with applicable Commission and
Commodity Futures Trading Commission (``CFTC'') regulations. This
statement would include an updated citation to a relevant CFTC
Regulation.
2. Introduction to ICC Governance Structure
In the introduction section of the Governance Playbook, ICC
proposes to formalize its general mission and describe its overall
governance structure, comprised of its Board, committees and
management. The introduction section reflects the Board-determined
mission statement that ICC is to provide safe and sound central
counterparty services to reduce systemic risk in an efficient and
compliant manner while generating positive returns for shareholders.
The introduction section also states that ICC's governance arrangements
are clear and transparent, promote its safety and efficiency and
support the stability of the broader financial system, other relevant
public interest considerations and the objectives of relevant
stakeholders.
3. Board of Managers
In this section of the Governance Playbook, ICC proposes to
formalize the Board's sole responsibility for the control and
management of ICC's operations, subject only to prior consultation
rights of the ICC Risk Committee and the ICC Risk Management
Subcommittee as described in Chapter 5 of its Rules. This section would
clarify that ICC's officers, including the Chief Operating Officer,
Chief Compliance Officer, Chief Risk Officer and General Counsel, are
designated by the Board following a determination that they possess the
requisite experience and skills to discharge their responsibilities and
report to the ICC President. The section also formalizes additional
reporting lines of certain ICC officers to ensure that relevant
personnel have sufficient access to the Board, consistent with relevant
regulation. Specifically, the Chief Compliance Officer has an
additional reporting line directly to the Board, and the Chief Risk
Officer has an additional reporting line directly to the Chairperson of
the Risk Committee, who also is a Manager on the Board. This section of
the Governance Playbook details how the Board guides management with
respect to strategic planning and priority setting.
Additionally, this section of the Governance Playbook describes the
composition of the Board, and specifies the fitness standards required
of each Manager, as well as the fitness standards and qualifications of
the Board as a whole. ICC represents that it includes such procedures
in the Governance Playbook to ensure that the Board consists of
suitable individuals having appropriate skills and incentives and that
Managers have the appropriate experience, skills, and integrity
necessary to discharge their Board responsibilities.\5\ The Governance
Playbook describes the election procedures for new Managers and
specifies who is responsible for electing new Managers and for ensuring
such Managers meet the fitness standards. The Governance Playbook also
contains information regarding scheduling of meetings and meeting
frequency, and lists all documents relevant to Board operations. The
Governance Playbook sets forth the process for determining the
independence of those Managers who are required to be independent.
Additionally, the document lists the independence qualifications
considered as part of such independence determinations and describes
the annual questionnaire process each independent Manager is required
to complete. The Governance Playbook also describes the self-evaluation
survey process by which ICC reviews the performance of the Board and
its individual Managers on an annual basis in accordance with
applicable regulation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Notice, 86 FR at 9557.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Governance Playbook also contains information on required
disclosures of the Board's major decisions under relevant regulations.
The Governance Playbook formalizes arrangements by which all major
decisions of the Board are clearly disclosed to clearing members, other
relevant stakeholders, and ICC's regulators. In addition, the
Governance Playbook provides governance procedures for clearly
disclosing to the public the Board's major decisions that have a broad
market impact. With respect to information made available to the
public, ICC posts on its website relevant rules and material procedures
and documents. ICC maintains a comprehensive public Disclosure
Framework that describes its material rules, policies, and procedures
regarding its legal, governance, risk management, and operating
framework. ICC updates the Disclosure Framework every two years or more
frequently following material changes to ICC's systems or environment
in which it operates.
Further, the Governance Playbook describes the Board's role in
reviewing the performance and compensation of senior managers who are
responsible for executing the Board's decisions throughout the year. As
part of this process, the Board will consider, in accordance with
relevant regulation, whether senior management continues to have the
appropriate experience, skills, and integrity necessary to discharge
their responsibilities.
4. Committees
In this section of the Governance Playbook, ICC would formalize
information regarding the roles and responsibilities of the various
committees at ICC, including the Audit Committee, Risk Committee, Risk
Management Subcommittee, Advisory Committee, Futures Commission
Merchant (FCM) Executive Council, Participant Review Committee, Credit
Review Subcommittee, New Initiatives Approval Committee, Operations
Working Group, Trading Advisory Group, Business Continuity Planning
(BCP) and Disaster Recovery (DR) Oversight Committee of the Compliance
Committee, Risk Working Group, Compliance Committee, and Steering
Committee. The Governance Playbook further details and updates the
membership composition and meeting frequency for each committee and
contains a listing of all relevant committee documents (including, as
applicable, a charter, meeting minutes,
[[Page 15749]]
and agendas). As applicable, the Governance Playbook details procedures
for electing new members to a committee. The Governance Playbook also
includes procedures for the annual Audit Committee performance review
and the annual reconstitution of the Risk Committee.
5. Special Purpose Committees
This section of the Governance Playbook would formalize information
regarding ICC's special purpose committees, including the Business
Conduct Committee, Regional CDS Committees, and the CDS Default
Committee. The Governance Playbook contains a brief description of each
special purpose committee, details membership composition and meeting
frequency, and lists relevant committee documents. As applicable, the
Governance Playbook contains information regarding the appointment of
new members.
6. Revision History and Appendix
Finally, the Governance Playbook includes a revision history to
document the date, versions, and revisions to the Governance Playbook
document. An appendix follows the revision history with relevant
detailed information, including a record of the roles,
responsibilities, and required skills of key senior management in
Appendix 1, and an email template relating to the annual reconstitution
of the ICC Risk Committee composition in Appendix 2.
III. Discussion and Commission Findings
Section 19(b)(2)(C) of the Act directs the Commission to approve a
proposed rule change of a self-regulatory organization if it finds that
such proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of the
Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to such
organization.\6\ For the reasons given below, the Commission finds that
the proposed rule change is consistent with Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the
Act \7\ and Rules 17Ad-22(e)(2) and (e)(23)(i), (iv), and (v)
thereunder.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(C).
\7\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
\8\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(e)(2) and (e)(23)(i), (iv), and (v).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A. Consistency With Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act
Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act requires, in part, that the rules
of a clearing agency, such as ICC, be designed to promote the prompt
and accurate clearance and settlement of securities transactions and,
to the extent applicable, derivative agreements, contracts, and
transactions, to assure the safeguarding of securities and funds which
are in the custody or control of ICC or for which it is responsible,
and to protect the public interest.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As noted above, the principal purpose of the proposed rule change
is to formalize and update the Governance Playbook as a single
reference document of governance guidelines that consolidates and
summarizes the ICC governance arrangements set forth in the Rules,
operating agreement, and a number of written ICC policies and
procedures. The introduction section of the Governance Playbook states
its intended purposes to ensure that ICC's governance arrangements are
clear and transparent, promote ICC's safety and efficiency and support
the stability of the broader financial system, other relevant public
interest considerations and the objectives of relevant stakeholders.
The Governance Playbook also reflects the Board's sole
responsibility for the control and management of ICC's operations,
subject only to prior consultation rights of the ICC Risk Committee and
the ICC Risk Management Subcommittee as described in Chapter 5 of ICC's
Rules. The Governance Playbook describes the composition of the Board
and the election procedures for new Managers, provides information
regarding scheduling of meetings and meeting frequency, and updates
required disclosures under relevant regulations of the Board's major
decisions. The Governance Playbook describes the role of the Board in
reviewing the performance and compensation of senior managers
responsible for executing the Board's decisions, information regarding
the roles and responsibilities of the various committees at ICC,
information regarding ICC's special purpose committees, and a revision
history and an appendix with relevant information that outlines the
roles, responsibilities, and required skills of key senior management
positions and provides an email template relating to the annual
reconstitution of ICC's Risk Committee.
Governance arrangements are critical to the sound operation of
clearing agencies.\10\ Specifically, clear and transparent governance
documents promote accountability and reliability in the decisions,
rules, and procedures of a clearing agency.\11\ Clear and transparent
governance documents also provide interested parties, including owners,
members, and general members of the public, with information about how
a clearing agency's decisions are made and what the rules and
procedures are designed to accomplish.\12\ Further, the decisions,
rules, and procedures of a clearing agency are important, as they can
have widespread impact, affecting multiple market members, financial
institutions, markets, and jurisdictions.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 71699 (May 21, 2014),
79 FR 29508, 29521 (May 22, 2014) (``Covered Clearing Agency
Standards Proposing Release'').
\11\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 64017 (March 3, 2011),
76 FR 14472 (March 16, 2011) at 14488.
\12\ Id.
\13\ Covered Clearing Agency Standards Proposing Release, 79 FR
at 29521.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission believes that the proposed rule change would provide
ICC stakeholders with a better understanding of how ICC makes decisions
that could ultimately affect them and, potentially, the broader
financial system. The proposed rule change would also help the Board,
as well as ICC's management, employees, and members, understand the
roles and responsibilities of ICC officers, committees and
subcommittees. The Commission further believes that the Governance
Playbook should enhance the clarity and transparency of ICC's
governance structure and facilitate the efficiency and effectiveness of
ICC's governance procedures by providing a single, consolidated summary
document of governance guidelines for ease of reference. For these
reasons, the proposed rule change should facilitate ICC's ability to
provide clearing services that are supported by, and consistent with,
clear and transparent governance arrangements that comply with relevant
regulations and internal policies and procedures, thereby helping ICC
maintain prudent risk management processes to promote the prompt and
accurate clearance of settlement and securities transactions and
derivative agreements, contracts and transactions cleared by ICC, to
assure the safeguarding of securities and funds in the custody or
control of ICC, and to protect the public interest.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For these reasons, the Commission finds that the proposed rule
change is consistent with Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Consistency With Rule 17Ad-22(e)(2) Under the Act
Rule 17Ad-22(e)(2) under the Act requires each covered clearing
agency to establish, implement, maintain and
[[Page 15750]]
enforce written policies and procedures reasonably designed to provide
for governance arrangements that, among other things, are clear and
transparent, establish that the board of directors and senior
management have appropriate experience and skills to discharge their
duties and responsibilities, and specify clear and direct lines of
responsibility.\16\ As stated above, the proposed rule change would
update and formalize the Governance Playbook to reflect the governance
arrangements in place at ICC, including those that specify: the Board's
responsibility for the control and management of ICC's operations, the
composition of the Board, the election procedures for new Managers, the
fitness standards and qualifications required of each Manager and the
Board as a whole, and the process to review the performance of ICC's
senior managers. The Commission believes that these aspects of the
proposed rule change should help ICC ensure that the Board and
individual Managers, as well as ICC's senior managers, including the
Chief Operating Officer, Chief Compliance Officer, Chief Risk Officer
and General Counsel, have the appropriate experience and skills to
discharge their duties and responsibilities. Further, the Commission
believes the Governance Playbook specifies clear and direct lines of
responsibility by identifying reporting lines of certain ICC officers
to ensure they have sufficient access to the Board, consistent with
relevant regulation. For these reasons, the Commission believes that
the proposed rule change is consistent with Rule 17Ad-22(e)(2) \17\
under the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(e)(2).
\17\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(e)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Consistency With Rule 17Ad-22(e)(23)(i), (iv), and (v) Under the Act
Rule 17Ad-22(e)(23)(i), (iv), and (v) under the Act requires each
covered clearing agency to establish, implement, maintain and enforce
written policies and procedures reasonably designed to provide for,
among other things, (1) publicly disclosing all relevant rules and
material procedures, including key aspects of its default rules and
procedures, (2) a comprehensive public disclosure that describes its
material rules, policies, and procedures regarding its legal,
governance, risk management, and operating framework, accurate in all
material respects at the time of publication, and (3) updating the
public disclosure every two years, or more frequently following changes
to its system or the environment in which it operates to the extent
necessary to ensure statements previously provided remain accurate in
all material respects.\18\ As noted above, the Governance Playbook
reflects updated arrangements by which all major decisions of the Board
are clearly disclosed to clearing members, other relevant stakeholders,
and ICC's regulators. In addition, the Governance Playbook provides
governance procedures for clearly disclosing to the public the Board's
major decisions that have a broad market impact. With respect to
information made available to the public, the Governance Playbook
specifies that ICC posts on its website all relevant rules and material
procedures and documents, as required by applicable regulations. The
Commission believes that these aspects of the Governance Playbook
should help ensure that ICC publicly discloses all relevant rules and
material procedures, including key aspects of its default rules and
procedures.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(e)(23)(i), (iv), and (v).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, the Governance Playbook specifies that ICC maintains a
comprehensive public Disclosure Framework that describes its material
rules, policies, and procedures regarding its legal, governance, risk
management, and operating framework. The Governance Playbook formalizes
the process by which ICC Legal will update the public Disclosure
Framework every two years or more frequently following material changes
to ICC's systems or environment in which it operates, including updates
for major decisions of the Board with a broad market impact. The
Commission believes that these aspects of the Governance Playbook
should help ensure ICC's compliance with its regulatory obligation to
provide a comprehensive public disclosure that is updated every two
years or more frequently following material changes.
For these reasons, the Commission believes that the proposed rule
change is consistent with Rule 17Ad-22(e)(23)(i), (iv), and (v) \19\
under the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(e)(23)(i), (iv) and (v).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
D. Conclusion
On the basis of the foregoing, the Commission finds that the
proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of the Act,
and in particular, with the requirements of Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the
Act \20\ and Rules 17Ad-22(e)(2) and (e)(23)(i), (iv), and (v)
thereunder.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
\21\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(e)(2) and (e)(23)(i), (iv), and (v).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
It is therefore ordered pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act
\22\ that the proposed rule change (SR-ICC-2021-004), be, and hereby
is, approved.\23\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
\23\ In approving the proposed rule change, the Commission
considered the proposal's impact on efficiency, competition, and
capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\24\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-06002 Filed 3-23-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P