Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Preliminary Determination of No Shipments, and Rescission of Review in Part; 2018-2019, 14873-14876 [2021-05741]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 52 / Friday, March 19, 2021 / Notices
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on the comments received, we
made changes for these final results
which are explained in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum.
Final Results of the Administrative
Review
We determine that the following
weighted-average dumping margin
exists for the period May 1, 2018,
through April 30, 2019.
Weightedaverage
dumping
margin
(percent)
Producer or exporter
Garg Tube Export LLP and Garg
Tube Limited ...........................
13.90
Disclosure
We intend to disclose the calculations
performed in connection with these
final results to parties in this proceeding
within five days after public
announcement of the final results, in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
Assessment Rates
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1),
Commerce will determine, and U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
shall assess, antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries of subject
merchandise in accordance with the
final results of this review. For Garg
Tube, we calculated importer-specific
assessment rates on the basis of the ratio
of the total amount of dumping
calculated for each importer’s examined
sales and the total entered value of those
sales in accordance with 19 CFR
351.212(b)(1).6 Where an importerspecific assessment rate is de minimis
(i.e., less than 0.5 percent), the entries
by that importer will be liquidated
without reference to antidumping
duties. For entries of subject
merchandise during the POR produced
by Garg Tube for which it did not know
the merchandise was destined for the
United States, we will instruct CBP to
liquidate unreviewed entries at the allothers rate if there is no rate for the
intermediate company(ies) involved in
the transaction.7
6 In these final results, Commerce applied the
assessment rate calculation method adopted in
Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the
Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and
Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty
Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101
(February 14, 2012).
7 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68
FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:13 Mar 18, 2021
Jkt 253001
Consistent with its recent notice,8
Commerce intends to issue assessment
instructions to CBP no earlier than 35
days after the date of publication of the
final results of this review in the
Federal Register. If a timely summons is
filed at the U.S. Court of International
Trade, the assessment instructions will
direct CBP not to liquidate relevant
entries until the time for parties to file
a request for a statutory injunction has
expired (i.e., within 90 days of
publication).
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective upon
publication in the Federal Register of
this notice for all shipments of pipe and
tube from India entered, or withdrawn
from warehouse, for consumption on or
after the date of publication as provided
by section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The
cash deposit rate for Garg Tube will be
equal to the weighted-average dumping
margin established in the final results of
the review; (2) for merchandise exported
by producers or exporters not covered in
this review but covered in a prior
completed segment of the proceeding,
the cash deposit rate will continue to be
the company-specific rate published in
the completed segment for the most
recent period; (3) if the exporter is not
a firm covered in this review, a prior
review, or the original investigation but
the producer has been covered in a
priorcompleted segment of this
proceeding, then the cash deposit rate
will be the rate established in the
completed segment for the most recent
period for the producer of the
merchandise; (4) the cash deposit rate
for all other producers or exporters will
continue to be 7.08 percent, the allothers rate established in the less-thanfair-value investigation for this
proceeding.9 These cash deposit
requirements, when imposed, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during this POR. Failure to comply with
this requirement could result in the
Secretary’s presumption that
8 See Notice of Discontinuation of Policy to Issue
Liquidation Instructions After 15 Days in
Applicable Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Proceedings, 86 FR 3995 (January
15, 2021).
9 See Antidumping Duty Order; Certain Welded
Carbon Steel Standard Pipes and Tubes from India,
51 FR 17384 (May 12, 1986).
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
14873
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of double antidumping duties.
Notification Regarding Administrative
Protective Orders
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the return or
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
continues to govern business
proprietary information in this segment
of the proceeding. Timely written
notification of the return or destruction
of APO materials, or conversion to
judicial protective order, is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the
regulations and terms of an APO is a
violation subject to sanction.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing these
results of administrative review in
accordance with sections 751(a) and
777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.221(b)(5).
Dated: March 15, 2020.
Christian Marsh,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Changes Since the Preliminary Results
V. Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1: Particular Market Situation
and Quantifying an Adjustment
Comment 2: Partial Adverse Facts
Available for Non-Cooperative
Unaffiliated Suppliers’ Costs
VI. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2021–05740 Filed 3–18–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–900]
Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof
From the People’s Republic of China:
Preliminary Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review,
Preliminary Determination of No
Shipments, and Rescission of Review
in Part; 2018–2019
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(Commerce) preliminarily determines
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\19MRN1.SGM
19MRN1
14874
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 52 / Friday, March 19, 2021 / Notices
that diamond sawblades and parts
thereof from the People’s Republic of
China (China) were sold at less than
normal value during the period of
review (POR) November 1, 2018,
through October 31, 2019. Interested
parties are invited to comment on these
preliminary results of review.
DATES: Applicable March 19, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Bryan Hansen or Thomas Schauer, AD/
CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement
and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–3683 and (202) 482–0410,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On January 17, 2020, Commerce
initiated the administrative review of
the antidumping duty order on diamond
sawblades and parts thereof from
China.1 The administrative review
covers two mandatory respondents,
Chengdu Huifeng New Material
Technology Co., Ltd. (Chengdu Huifeng)
and Wuhan Wanbang Laser Diamond
Tools Co., Ltd. (Wuhan Wanbang).
On April 24, 2020, Commerce tolled
all deadlines in administrative reviews
by 50 days, thereby tolling the deadline
for the preliminary results of review.2
On July 21, 2020, Commerce tolled all
deadlines in administrative reviews by
an additional 60 days, thereby tolling
the deadline for the preliminary results
of review until November 19, 2020.3 On
October 19, 2020, Commerce extended
the time limit for issuing the
preliminary results of this review by 120
days, to no later than March 19, 2021.4
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to the
antidumping duty order is diamond
sawblades and parts thereof, which is
typically imported under heading
8202.39.00.00 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS).
When packaged together as a set for
retail sale with an item that is separately
1 See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 85 FR
3014 (January 17, 2020).
2 See Memorandum, ‘‘Tolling of Deadlines for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews in Response to Operational
Adjustments Due to COVID–19,’’ dated April 24,
2020.
3 See Memorandum, ‘‘Tolling of Deadlines for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews,’’ dated July 21, 2020.
4 See Memorandum, ‘‘Diamond Sawblades and
Parts Thereof from the People’s Republic of China:
Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 2018–
2019,’’ dated October 19, 2020.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:13 Mar 18, 2021
Jkt 253001
classified under headings 8202 to 8205
of the HTSUS, diamond sawblades or
parts thereof may be imported under
heading 8206.00.00.00 of the HTSUS.
On October 11, 2011, Commerce
included the 6804.21.00.00 HTSUS
classification number to the customs
case reference file, pursuant to a request
by U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(CBP). Pursuant to requests by CBP,
Commerce included to the customs case
reference file the following HTSUS
classification numbers: 8202.39.0040
and 8202.39.0070 on January 22, 2015,
and 6804.21.0010 and 6804.21.0080 on
January 26, 2015.
While the HTSUS numbers are
provided for convenience and customs
purposes, the written description is
dispositive. A full description of the
scope of the order is contained in the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.5
Preliminary Determination of No
Shipments
Three companies that received a
separate rate in previous segments of the
proceeding and are subject to this
review reported that they did not have
any shipments of subject merchandise
during the POR.6 We requested that CBP
report any contrary information.7 To
date, we have not received any contrary
information from either CBP in response
to our inquiry or any other sources that
these companies had any shipments of
the subject merchandise to the United
States during the POR.8 Further,
consistent with our practice, we find
that it is not appropriate to rescind the
review with respect to these companies,
but rather to complete the review and
issue appropriate instructions to CBP
based on the final results of review.9
5 See Memorandum, ‘‘Diamond Sawblades and
Parts Thereof from the People’s Republic of China:
Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Results
of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review;
2018–2019,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby
adopted by, this notice (Preliminary Decision
Memorandum).
6 See Bosun Tools Co., Ltd.’s Letter, ‘‘Diamond
Sawblades from the People’s Republic of China
Separate Rate Certification,’’ dated February 14,
2020; see also Danyang Weiwang Tools
Manufacturing Co., Ltd.’s Letter, ‘‘Diamond
Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the People’s
Republic of China: Submission of Statement of No
Shipments,’’ dated February 14, 2020; and Weihai
Xiangguang Mechanical Industrial Co., Ltd.’s Letter,
‘‘No Shipment Letter for Weihai Xiangguang
Mechanical Industrial Co., Ltd.: Diamond
Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the People’s
Republic of China (Review Period: 11/1/18–10/31/
19),’’ dated February 14, 2020.
7 See CBP message numbers 0094406, 0094409,
and 0094410, dated April 3, 2020 (ACCESS
barcodes 3962143–01, 3962145–01, and 3962146–
01).
8 See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 3–4.
9 See, e.g., Certain Steel Threaded Rod from the
People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of
the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Rescission of Review in Part
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1),
Commerce will rescind an
administrative review, in whole or in
part, if the party that requested a review
withdraws its request within 90 days of
the date of publication of the notice of
initiation. The request for an
administrative review of Husqvarna
(Hebei) Co., Ltd. was withdrawn within
90 days of the date of publication of the
Initiation Notice.10 As a result,
Commerce is rescinding this review
with respect to this company in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1).
Separate Rates
Commerce preliminarily determines
that four respondents are eligible to
receive separate rates in this review.11
Separate Rate for Eligible Non-Selected
Respondents
Commerce preliminarily determines
that the respondents not selected for
individual examination, the Jiangsu
Fengtai Single Entity,12 and Zhejiang
Wanli Tools Group Co., Ltd. (Zhejiang
Wanli), are eligible to receive a separate
rate in the administrative review.13
Consistent with our practice, we
assigned to the Jiangsu Fengtai Single
Entity, and Zhejiang Wanli, as the
separate rate for the preliminary results
of this review, a simple average of the
rate calculated for Chengdu Huifeng and
the rate assigned to Wuhan Wanbang
based entirely on facts otherwise
available with an adverse inference.14
China-Wide Entity
Under Commerce’s policy regarding
the conditional review of the Chinawide entity,15 the China-wide entity
Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2018–
2019, 84 FR 71900 (December 30, 2019).
10 See Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers’
Coalition’s Letter, ‘‘Diamond Sawblades and Parts
Thereof from the People’s Republic of China:
Request to Withdraw Review of Certain
Companies,’’ dated February 12, 2020; see also
Husqvarna (Hebei) Co., Ltd.’s Letter, ‘‘Diamond
Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the People’s
Republic Of China: Withdrawal of Request for
Administrative Review,’’ dated February 13, 2020.
11 See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at
‘‘Separate Rates’’ section.
12 Jiangsu Fengtai Diamond Tool Manufacture
Co., Ltd., Jiangsu Fengtai Tools Co., Ltd., and
Jiangsu Fengtai Sawing Industry Co., Ltd., comprise
the Jiangsu Fengtai Single Entity. See Diamond
Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the People’s
Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review; 2014–2015, 82 FR
26912, 26913 (June 12, 2017). We received review
requests for Jiangsu Fengtai Diamond Tool
Manufacture Co., Ltd., Jiangsu Fengtai Diamond
Tools Co., Ltd., and Jiangsu Fengtai Tools Co., Ltd.
13 For more details, see Preliminary Decision
Memorandum at 10–11.
14 Id.
15 See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement
of Change in Department Practice for Respondent
E:\FR\FM\19MRN1.SGM
19MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 52 / Friday, March 19, 2021 / Notices
will not be under review unless a party
specifically requests, or Commerce selfinitiates, a review of the entity. Because
no party requested a review of the
China-wide entity in this review, the
entity is not under review, and the
entity’s rate (i.e., 82.05 percent) is not
subject to change.16 Aside from the noshipment and separate rate companies
discussed above, Commerce considers
all other companies for which a review
was requested (which did not file a
separate rate application) to be part of
the China-wide entity.17
Methodology
Commerce is conducting this review
in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B)
and (a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act), and 19 CFR 351.213.
Export price is calculated in accordance
with section 772(c) of the Act. Because
China is a non-market economy within
the meaning of section 771(18) of the
Act, normal value has been calculated
in accordance with section 773(c) of the
Act.
For a full description of the
methodology underlying our
conclusions, see the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum. The
Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a
public document and is made available
to the public via Enforcement and
Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
14875
Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a
complete version of the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum can be found at
https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. A list
of the topics discussed in the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum is
attached as Appendix I to this notice.
Preliminary Results of Administrative
Review
We are assigning the following
weighted-average dumping margins to
the firms listed below for the period
November 1, 2018, through October 31,
2019:
Weighted-average
dumping\margin
(percent)
Exporters
Chengdu Huifeng New Material Technology Co., Ltd ...................................................................................................................
Wuhan Wanbang Laser Diamond Tools Co., Ltd .........................................................................................................................
0.00
82.05
Review-Specific Average Rate Applicable to the Following Companies: 18
Jiangsu Fengtai Single Entity ........................................................................................................................................................
Zhejiang Wanli Tools Group Co., Ltd ............................................................................................................................................
Disclosure
We intend to disclose calculations
performed in these preliminary results
to parties within five days after public
announcement of the preliminary
results.19
Public Comment
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c)(ii),
interested parties may submit case briefs
no later than 30 days after the date of
publication of this notice.20 Rebuttal
briefs, limited to issues raised in the
case briefs, may be filed no later than
seven days after the date for filing case
briefs.21 Commerce modified certain of
its requirements for serving documents
containing business proprietary
information until further notice.22
Parties who submit case briefs or
rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are
encouraged to submit with each
argument: (1) A statement of the issue;
Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and
Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy
Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78
FR 65963 (November 4, 2013).
16 See, e.g., Diamond Sawblades and Parts
Thereof from the People’s Republic of China; Final
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2012–2013, 80 FR 32344, 32345 (June 8,
2015).
17 See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 85 FR
3014, 3019–20 (January 17, 2020) (‘‘All firms listed
below that wish to qualify for separate rate status
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:13 Mar 18, 2021
Jkt 253001
41.03
41.03
(2) a brief summary of the argument;
and (3) a table of authorities.23
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c),
interested parties who wish to request a
hearing must submit a written request to
the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance, U.S. Department of
Commerce, filed electronically using
ACCESS. Hearing requests should
contain: (1) The party’s name, address,
and telephone number; (2) the number
of participants; and (3) a list of issues to
be discussed. Issues raised in the
hearing will be limited to those raised
in the respective case briefs. An
electronically filed document must be
received successfully in its entirety by
ACCESS by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time
within 30 days after the date of
publication of this notice.24
Unless the deadline is extended,
Commerce intends to issue the final
results of these reviews, including the
results of its analysis of issues raised by
parties in their comments, within 120
days after the publication of these
preliminary results, pursuant to section
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.213(h).
in the administrative reviews involving NME
countries must complete, as appropriate, either a
separate rate application or certification, as
described below’’); see also Appendix II of this
notice for a list of companies that are subject to this
administrative review that are considered to be part
of the China-wide entity.
18 This rate is based on the simple average of the
rates for the respondents that were selected for
individual review as described in ‘‘Separate Rate for
Eligible Non-Selected Respondents,’’ above.
19 See 19 CFR 351.224(b).
20 See 19 CFR 351.309(c).
21 See 19 CFR 351.309(d).
22 See Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD
Service Requirements Due to COVID–19; Extension
of Effective Period, 85 FR 41363 (July 10, 2020).
23 See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2) and 19 CFR
351.303 (for general filing requirements).
24 See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
25 See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
26 See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of
the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and
Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping
Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8103
(February 14, 2012).
27 See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2).
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Assessment Rates
Upon issuing the final results,
Commerce will determine, and CBP
shall assess, antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries covered by this
review.25 If a respondent’s weightedaverage dumping margin is above de
minimis (i.e., 0.50 percent) in the final
results of this review, we will calculate
an importer-specific assessment rate on
the basis of the ratio of the total amount
of dumping calculated for each
importer’s examined sales and, where
possible, the total entered value of those
same sales in accordance with 19 CFR
351.212(b)(1).26 Where an importer- (or
customer-) specific ad valorem rate is
zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP
to liquidate appropriate entries without
regard to antidumping duties.27
E:\FR\FM\19MRN1.SGM
19MRN1
14876
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 52 / Friday, March 19, 2021 / Notices
For entries that were not reported in
the U.S. sales databases submitted by
exporters individually examined during
this review, Commerce will instruct
CBP to liquidate such entries at the
China-wide rate. If Commerce
determines that an exporter under
review had no shipments of the subject
merchandise, any suspended entries
that entered under that exporter’s case
number (i.e., at that exporter’s rate) will
be liquidated at the China-wide rate.28
Commerce intends to issue
assessment instructions to CBP no
earlier than 35 days after the date of
publication of the final results of this
review in the Federal Register. If a
timely summons is filed at the U.S.
Court of International Trade, the
assessment instructions will direct CBP
not to liquidate relevant entries until the
time for parties to file a request for a
statutory injunction has expired (i.e.,
within 90 days of publication).
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of these
reviews for shipments of the subject
merchandise from China entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the publication
date, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C)
of the Act: (1) For the subject
merchandise exported by the companies
listed above that have separate rates, the
cash deposit rate will be that established
in the final results of review (except, if
the rates are zero, de minimis, or based
entirely on AFA, then the cash deposit
to be required will be the simple average
of the rates we determine for the final
results); (2) for previously investigated
or reviewed Chinese and non-Chinese
exporters not listed above that received
a separate rate in a prior segment of this
proceeding, the cash deposit rate will
continue to be the existing exporterspecific rate; (3) for all Chinese
exporters of subject merchandise that
have not been found to be entitled to a
separate rate, the cash deposit rate will
be that for the China-wide entity; and
(4) for all non-Chinese exporters of
subject merchandise which have not
received their own rate, the cash deposit
rate will be the rate applicable to the
Chinese exporter that supplied that nonChinese exporter. These deposit
requirements, when imposed, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
28 See Non-Market Economy Antidumping
Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76
FR 65694, 65695 (October 24, 2011).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:13 Mar 18, 2021
Jkt 253001
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a preliminary
reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during these
PORs. Failure to comply with this
requirement could result in Commerce’s
presumption that reimbursement of
antidumping duties occurred and the
subsequent assessment of double
antidumping duties.
Notification Regarding Administrative
Protective Orders
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of the return or
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and the terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
Notification to Interested Parties
Commerce is issuing and publishing
the preliminary results of this review in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1)(B),
751(a)(3) and 777(i) of the Act, and 19
CFR 351.213 and 351.221(b)(4).
Dated: March 15, 2021.
Christian Marsh,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance.
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Preliminary Determination of No
Shipments
V. Discussion of the Methodology
VI. Currency Conversion
VII. Recommendation
Appendix II
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Institute of Standards and
Technology
National Voluntary Laboratory
Accreditation Program—Proposed
Revisions to the Personal Body Armor
Laboratory Accreditation Program
National Institute of Standards
and Technology, Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; request for comment.
AGENCY:
Companies Preliminarily Not Eligible for a
Separate Rate and Treated as Part of the
China-Wide Entity
1. ASHINE Diamond Tools Co., Ltd.
2. Danyang City Ou Di Ma Tools Co., Ltd.
3. Danyang Hantronic Import & Export Co.,
Ltd.
4. Danyang Huachang Diamond Tools
Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
5. Danyang Like Tools Manufacturing Co.,
Ltd.
6. Danyang NYCL Tools Manufacturing Co.,
Ltd.
7. Danyang Tsunda Diamond Tools Co., Ltd.
8. Guilin Tebon Superhard Material Co., Ltd.
Frm 00012
[FR Doc. 2021–05741 Filed 3–18–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
Appendix I
PO 00000
9. Hangzhou Deer King Industrial and
Trading Co., Ltd.
10. Hangzhou Kingburg Import & Export Co.,
Ltd.
11. Hebei XMF Tools Group Co., Ltd.
12. Henan Huanghe Whirlwind Co., Ltd.
13. Henan Huanghe Whirlwind International
Co., Ltd.
14. Hong Kong Hao Xin International Group
Limited
15. Hubei Changjiang Precision Engineering
Materials Technology Co., Ltd.
16. Hubei Sheng Bai Rui Diamond Tools Co.,
Ltd.
17. Huzhou Gu’s Import & Export Co., Ltd.
18. Jiangsu Huachang Diamond Tools
Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
19. Jiangsu Inter-China Group Corporation
20. Jiangsu Youhe Tool Manufacturer Co.,
Ltd.
21. Orient Gain International Limited
22. Pantos Logistics (HK) Company Limited
23. Pujiang Talent Diamond Tools Co., Ltd.
24. Qingdao Hyosung Diamond Tools Co.,
Ltd.
25. Qingyuan Shangtai Diamond Tools Co.,
Ltd.
26. Qingdao Shinhan Diamond Industrial
Co., Ltd.
27. Quanzhou Zhongzhi Diamond Tool Co.,
Ltd.
28. Rizhao Hein Saw Co., Ltd.
29. Saint-Gobain Abrasives (Shanghai) Co.,
Ltd.
30. Shanghai Jingquan Industrial Trade Co.,
Ltd.
31. Shanghai Starcraft Tools Co., Ltd.
32. Sino Tools Co., Ltd.
33. Wuhan Baiyi Diamond Tools Co., Ltd.
34. Wuhan Sadia Trading Co., Ltd.
35. Wuhan ZhaoHua Technology Co., Ltd.
36. Xiamen ZL Diamond Technology Co.,
Ltd.
37. ZL Diamond Technology Co., Ltd.
38. ZL Diamond Tools Co., Ltd.
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The Chief of the National
Institute of Standards and Technology’s
(NIST) National Voluntary Laboratory
Accreditation Program (NVLAP) may
approve modifications to a specific
Laboratory Accreditation Program (LAP)
when a request to modify the LAP is
received. Modifications may include
addition of tests, types of tests or
standards that are directly relevant to
the LAP. NVLAP has received a request
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\19MRN1.SGM
19MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 52 (Friday, March 19, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14873-14876]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-05741]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-900]
Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof From the People's Republic of
China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,
Preliminary Determination of No Shipments, and Rescission of Review in
Part; 2018-2019
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines
[[Page 14874]]
that diamond sawblades and parts thereof from the People's Republic of
China (China) were sold at less than normal value during the period of
review (POR) November 1, 2018, through October 31, 2019. Interested
parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results of review.
DATES: Applicable March 19, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bryan Hansen or Thomas Schauer, AD/CVD
Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3683 and (202) 482-0410,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On January 17, 2020, Commerce initiated the administrative review
of the antidumping duty order on diamond sawblades and parts thereof
from China.\1\ The administrative review covers two mandatory
respondents, Chengdu Huifeng New Material Technology Co., Ltd. (Chengdu
Huifeng) and Wuhan Wanbang Laser Diamond Tools Co., Ltd. (Wuhan
Wanbang).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews, 85 FR 3014 (January 17, 2020).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On April 24, 2020, Commerce tolled all deadlines in administrative
reviews by 50 days, thereby tolling the deadline for the preliminary
results of review.\2\ On July 21, 2020, Commerce tolled all deadlines
in administrative reviews by an additional 60 days, thereby tolling the
deadline for the preliminary results of review until November 19,
2020.\3\ On October 19, 2020, Commerce extended the time limit for
issuing the preliminary results of this review by 120 days, to no later
than March 19, 2021.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See Memorandum, ``Tolling of Deadlines for Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews in Response to
Operational Adjustments Due to COVID-19,'' dated April 24, 2020.
\3\ See Memorandum, ``Tolling of Deadlines for Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews,'' dated July 21, 2020.
\4\ See Memorandum, ``Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from
the People's Republic of China: Extension of Time Limit for
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 2018-
2019,'' dated October 19, 2020.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to the antidumping duty order is diamond
sawblades and parts thereof, which is typically imported under heading
8202.39.00.00 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States
(HTSUS). When packaged together as a set for retail sale with an item
that is separately classified under headings 8202 to 8205 of the HTSUS,
diamond sawblades or parts thereof may be imported under heading
8206.00.00.00 of the HTSUS. On October 11, 2011, Commerce included the
6804.21.00.00 HTSUS classification number to the customs case reference
file, pursuant to a request by U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(CBP). Pursuant to requests by CBP, Commerce included to the customs
case reference file the following HTSUS classification numbers:
8202.39.0040 and 8202.39.0070 on January 22, 2015, and 6804.21.0010 and
6804.21.0080 on January 26, 2015.
While the HTSUS numbers are provided for convenience and customs
purposes, the written description is dispositive. A full description of
the scope of the order is contained in the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Memorandum, ``Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from
the People's Republic of China: Decision Memorandum for the
Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review;
2018-2019,'' dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this
notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Preliminary Determination of No Shipments
Three companies that received a separate rate in previous segments
of the proceeding and are subject to this review reported that they did
not have any shipments of subject merchandise during the POR.\6\ We
requested that CBP report any contrary information.\7\ To date, we have
not received any contrary information from either CBP in response to
our inquiry or any other sources that these companies had any shipments
of the subject merchandise to the United States during the POR.\8\
Further, consistent with our practice, we find that it is not
appropriate to rescind the review with respect to these companies, but
rather to complete the review and issue appropriate instructions to CBP
based on the final results of review.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Bosun Tools Co., Ltd.'s Letter, ``Diamond Sawblades from
the People's Republic of China Separate Rate Certification,'' dated
February 14, 2020; see also Danyang Weiwang Tools Manufacturing Co.,
Ltd.'s Letter, ``Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the
People's Republic of China: Submission of Statement of No
Shipments,'' dated February 14, 2020; and Weihai Xiangguang
Mechanical Industrial Co., Ltd.'s Letter, ``No Shipment Letter for
Weihai Xiangguang Mechanical Industrial Co., Ltd.: Diamond Sawblades
and Parts Thereof from the People's Republic of China (Review
Period: 11/1/18-10/31/19),'' dated February 14, 2020.
\7\ See CBP message numbers 0094406, 0094409, and 0094410, dated
April 3, 2020 (ACCESS barcodes 3962143-01, 3962145-01, and 3962146-
01).
\8\ See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 3-4.
\9\ See, e.g., Certain Steel Threaded Rod from the People's
Republic of China: Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments;
2018-2019, 84 FR 71900 (December 30, 2019).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rescission of Review in Part
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), Commerce will rescind an
administrative review, in whole or in part, if the party that requested
a review withdraws its request within 90 days of the date of
publication of the notice of initiation. The request for an
administrative review of Husqvarna (Hebei) Co., Ltd. was withdrawn
within 90 days of the date of publication of the Initiation Notice.\10\
As a result, Commerce is rescinding this review with respect to this
company in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers' Coalition's Letter,
``Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the People's Republic of
China: Request to Withdraw Review of Certain Companies,'' dated
February 12, 2020; see also Husqvarna (Hebei) Co., Ltd.'s Letter,
``Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the People's Republic Of
China: Withdrawal of Request for Administrative Review,'' dated
February 13, 2020.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Separate Rates
Commerce preliminarily determines that four respondents are
eligible to receive separate rates in this review.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at ``Separate Rates''
section.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Separate Rate for Eligible Non-Selected Respondents
Commerce preliminarily determines that the respondents not selected
for individual examination, the Jiangsu Fengtai Single Entity,\12\ and
Zhejiang Wanli Tools Group Co., Ltd. (Zhejiang Wanli), are eligible to
receive a separate rate in the administrative review.\13\ Consistent
with our practice, we assigned to the Jiangsu Fengtai Single Entity,
and Zhejiang Wanli, as the separate rate for the preliminary results of
this review, a simple average of the rate calculated for Chengdu
Huifeng and the rate assigned to Wuhan Wanbang based entirely on facts
otherwise available with an adverse inference.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ Jiangsu Fengtai Diamond Tool Manufacture Co., Ltd., Jiangsu
Fengtai Tools Co., Ltd., and Jiangsu Fengtai Sawing Industry Co.,
Ltd., comprise the Jiangsu Fengtai Single Entity. See Diamond
Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the People's Republic of China:
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014-2015,
82 FR 26912, 26913 (June 12, 2017). We received review requests for
Jiangsu Fengtai Diamond Tool Manufacture Co., Ltd., Jiangsu Fengtai
Diamond Tools Co., Ltd., and Jiangsu Fengtai Tools Co., Ltd.
\13\ For more details, see Preliminary Decision Memorandum at
10-11.
\14\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
China-Wide Entity
Under Commerce's policy regarding the conditional review of the
China-wide entity,\15\ the China-wide entity
[[Page 14875]]
will not be under review unless a party specifically requests, or
Commerce self-initiates, a review of the entity. Because no party
requested a review of the China-wide entity in this review, the entity
is not under review, and the entity's rate (i.e., 82.05 percent) is not
subject to change.\16\ Aside from the no-shipment and separate rate
companies discussed above, Commerce considers all other companies for
which a review was requested (which did not file a separate rate
application) to be part of the China-wide entity.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of Change in
Department Practice for Respondent Selection in Antidumping Duty
Proceedings and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity
in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963 (November 4, 2013).
\16\ See, e.g., Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the
People's Republic of China; Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2012-2013, 80 FR 32344, 32345 (June 8, 2015).
\17\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews, 85 FR 3014, 3019-20 (January 17, 2020)
(``All firms listed below that wish to qualify for separate rate
status in the administrative reviews involving NME countries must
complete, as appropriate, either a separate rate application or
certification, as described below''); see also Appendix II of this
notice for a list of companies that are subject to this
administrative review that are considered to be part of the China-
wide entity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Methodology
Commerce is conducting this review in accordance with section
751(a)(1)(B) and (a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the
Act), and 19 CFR 351.213. Export price is calculated in accordance with
section 772(c) of the Act. Because China is a non-market economy within
the meaning of section 771(18) of the Act, normal value has been
calculated in accordance with section 773(c) of the Act.
For a full description of the methodology underlying our
conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. The Preliminary
Decision Memorandum is a public document and is made available to the
public via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing
Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is
available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov. In addition,
a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be found
at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. A list of the topics discussed in
the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is attached as Appendix I to this
notice.
Preliminary Results of Administrative Review
We are assigning the following weighted-average dumping margins to
the firms listed below for the period November 1, 2018, through October
31, 2019:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ This rate is based on the simple average of the rates for
the respondents that were selected for individual review as
described in ``Separate Rate for Eligible Non-Selected
Respondents,'' above.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-average
Exporters dumping\margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chengdu Huifeng New Material Technology Co., Ltd..... 0.00
Wuhan Wanbang Laser Diamond Tools Co., Ltd........... 82.05
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Review-Specific Average Rate Applicable to the Following Companies: \18\
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jiangsu Fengtai Single Entity........................ 41.03
Zhejiang Wanli Tools Group Co., Ltd.................. 41.03
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure
We intend to disclose calculations performed in these preliminary
results to parties within five days after public announcement of the
preliminary results.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ See 19 CFR 351.224(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Public Comment
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c)(ii), interested parties may submit
case briefs no later than 30 days after the date of publication of this
notice.\20\ Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case
briefs, may be filed no later than seven days after the date for filing
case briefs.\21\ Commerce modified certain of its requirements for
serving documents containing business proprietary information until
further notice.\22\ Parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs
in this proceeding are encouraged to submit with each argument: (1) A
statement of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a
table of authorities.\23\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c).
\21\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d).
\22\ See Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD Service Requirements
Due to COVID-19; Extension of Effective Period, 85 FR 41363 (July
10, 2020).
\23\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2) and 19 CFR 351.303 (for
general filing requirements).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to
request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant
Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce,
filed electronically using ACCESS. Hearing requests should contain: (1)
The party's name, address, and telephone number; (2) the number of
participants; and (3) a list of issues to be discussed. Issues raised
in the hearing will be limited to those raised in the respective case
briefs. An electronically filed document must be received successfully
in its entirety by ACCESS by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time within 30 days
after the date of publication of this notice.\24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\24\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unless the deadline is extended, Commerce intends to issue the
final results of these reviews, including the results of its analysis
of issues raised by parties in their comments, within 120 days after
the publication of these preliminary results, pursuant to section
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h).
Assessment Rates
Upon issuing the final results, Commerce will determine, and CBP
shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by
this review.\25\ If a respondent's weighted-average dumping margin is
above de minimis (i.e., 0.50 percent) in the final results of this
review, we will calculate an importer-specific assessment rate on the
basis of the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for each
importer's examined sales and, where possible, the total entered value
of those same sales in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).\26\ Where
an importer- (or customer-) specific ad valorem rate is zero or de
minimis, we will instruct CBP to liquidate appropriate entries without
regard to antidumping duties.\27\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\25\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
\26\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-
Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping
Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8103 (February 14,
2012).
\27\ See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 14876]]
For entries that were not reported in the U.S. sales databases
submitted by exporters individually examined during this review,
Commerce will instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at the China-wide
rate. If Commerce determines that an exporter under review had no
shipments of the subject merchandise, any suspended entries that
entered under that exporter's case number (i.e., at that exporter's
rate) will be liquidated at the China-wide rate.\28\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\28\ See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment
of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694, 65695 (October 24, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP no earlier
than 35 days after the date of publication of the final results of this
review in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is filed at the
U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will
direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties
to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within
90 days of publication).
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of these reviews for shipments of the
subject merchandise from China entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the publication date, as provided by
section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For the subject merchandise
exported by the companies listed above that have separate rates, the
cash deposit rate will be that established in the final results of
review (except, if the rates are zero, de minimis, or based entirely on
AFA, then the cash deposit to be required will be the simple average of
the rates we determine for the final results); (2) for previously
investigated or reviewed Chinese and non-Chinese exporters not listed
above that received a separate rate in a prior segment of this
proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the existing
exporter-specific rate; (3) for all Chinese exporters of subject
merchandise that have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate,
the cash deposit rate will be that for the China-wide entity; and (4)
for all non-Chinese exporters of subject merchandise which have not
received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate
applicable to the Chinese exporter that supplied that non-Chinese
exporter. These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in
effect until further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during these PORs. Failure to comply with this
requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that reimbursement
of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double
antidumping duties.
Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written
notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to
comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable
violation.
Notification to Interested Parties
Commerce is issuing and publishing the preliminary results of this
review in accordance with sections 751(a)(1)(B), 751(a)(3) and 777(i)
of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.213 and 351.221(b)(4).
Dated: March 15, 2021.
Christian Marsh,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix I
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Preliminary Determination of No Shipments
V. Discussion of the Methodology
VI. Currency Conversion
VII. Recommendation
Appendix II
Companies Preliminarily Not Eligible for a Separate Rate and Treated as
Part of the China-Wide Entity
1. ASHINE Diamond Tools Co., Ltd.
2. Danyang City Ou Di Ma Tools Co., Ltd.
3. Danyang Hantronic Import & Export Co., Ltd.
4. Danyang Huachang Diamond Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
5. Danyang Like Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
6. Danyang NYCL Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
7. Danyang Tsunda Diamond Tools Co., Ltd.
8. Guilin Tebon Superhard Material Co., Ltd.
9. Hangzhou Deer King Industrial and Trading Co., Ltd.
10. Hangzhou Kingburg Import & Export Co., Ltd.
11. Hebei XMF Tools Group Co., Ltd.
12. Henan Huanghe Whirlwind Co., Ltd.
13. Henan Huanghe Whirlwind International Co., Ltd.
14. Hong Kong Hao Xin International Group Limited
15. Hubei Changjiang Precision Engineering Materials Technology Co.,
Ltd.
16. Hubei Sheng Bai Rui Diamond Tools Co., Ltd.
17. Huzhou Gu's Import & Export Co., Ltd.
18. Jiangsu Huachang Diamond Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
19. Jiangsu Inter-China Group Corporation
20. Jiangsu Youhe Tool Manufacturer Co., Ltd.
21. Orient Gain International Limited
22. Pantos Logistics (HK) Company Limited
23. Pujiang Talent Diamond Tools Co., Ltd.
24. Qingdao Hyosung Diamond Tools Co., Ltd.
25. Qingyuan Shangtai Diamond Tools Co., Ltd.
26. Qingdao Shinhan Diamond Industrial Co., Ltd.
27. Quanzhou Zhongzhi Diamond Tool Co., Ltd.
28. Rizhao Hein Saw Co., Ltd.
29. Saint-Gobain Abrasives (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
30. Shanghai Jingquan Industrial Trade Co., Ltd.
31. Shanghai Starcraft Tools Co., Ltd.
32. Sino Tools Co., Ltd.
33. Wuhan Baiyi Diamond Tools Co., Ltd.
34. Wuhan Sadia Trading Co., Ltd.
35. Wuhan ZhaoHua Technology Co., Ltd.
36. Xiamen ZL Diamond Technology Co., Ltd.
37. ZL Diamond Technology Co., Ltd.
38. ZL Diamond Tools Co., Ltd.
[FR Doc. 2021-05741 Filed 3-18-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P